Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout(0090) ZC-20-039.pdfCase Number ZC-20-039 FORTWORTH ZONING MAP CHANGE STAFF REPORT City Council Meeting Date: June 2, 2020 Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval by a vote of 7-0 Opposition: none submitted Support: none submitted Owner/Applicant: 3 Strand DV LLC Site Location: 8950 — 8979 block Creek Run Road Proposed Use: Multifamily Request: From: "C" Medium Density Multifamily Council District 5 Continued Case Manager Surplus Council Initiated Acreage Yes No X Lynn Jordan Yes No X Yes No X 1.27 To: PD/C Planned Development for all uses in "C" Medium Density Multifamily with development regulation standard to MFD Multifamily Development submission, parking and location, height, fagade, enhanced landscaping and screening fence; site plan included Land Use Compatibility: Requested change is compatible. Comprehensive Plan Consistency: Requested change is not consistent (Technical Inconsistency). Staff Recommendation: Approval with compliance to facade design standards Background: The site is located just north of Cottonwood Village and east of Creek Run Road. The applicant is requesting a zoning change from "C" Medium Density Multifamily to PD/C Planned Development for all uses in "C" Medium Density Multifamily with design standard regulations to MFD submittal, parking, orientation, facade, and screening fence; site plan included. The property is surrounded by the golf course and other uses related to the golf course. Because site is located adjacent to the golf course and associated uses, conformance with the Multifamily Design Standards, will have a positive impact on the development and its residents. Below is a table illustrating the differences between "C" zoning and the proposed PD/C request. Regulation C PD/C Conformance MFD submittal must be The site plan indicates MFD Submittal approved for every that this submittal Does not comply multifamily project in replaces the MFD (development CR, C, and D zoning requirement regulation standard) Page 1 of 5 A minimum 6 foot A 6 ft. wood fence is Fencing screening fence shall be shown on the site plan Does not comply placed on the property and extends beyond the (development line when adjacent to a building. regulation standard) one- or two- family residential district. Height Maximum 36' The site plan indicates a Complies maximum height of 2 story 1 space per bedroom 2 spaces per unit plus Does not comply Parking count plus 1 space per 250 sf common area, 26 (development of common area, offices spaces provided, a regulation standard) and recreation (less minimum of 39 spaces laundry rooms and are required storage) Parking location No parking or driveways Parking is shown Does not comply shall be provided between the public (development between a building and street and buildings regulation standard) a public or private street. Enhanced 20 points required for Site plan does not Landscaping public features with 10 indicate enhanced Does not comply points coming from landscaping for public or (development street trees private features regulation standard) Building Orientation Buildings located on Building #3 already Does not comply public streets must face exists and has no (development the street with the architectural feature on regulation standard) longest length of the the side fronting the building placed public street. parallel/adjacent to the street. Where site constraints require, the building end (shortest length of the building) may face a public street only when the same exterior quality to the building facade is provided including architecture, masonry and fenestration proportion on the side of the other buildings facing the public street. Facade Variation Each new building All proposed buildings Does not comply oriented to a publicly may meet one of the (development accessible street or three requirements regulation standard) open space shall incorporate each of the following scaling elements: Floors (banding, belt courses, etc., not less than one inch deep and four inches wide) Columns (pilasters, Page 2 of 5 piers, quoins, etc. not less than one inch deep and six inches wide) Foundation (water tables, rustication) Minimum 45% The site plan indicates a minimum open space of Open Space No space or area less 45% Complies than 20 feet in either dimension shall be counted as open space. Front — 20' minimum Front — 5 building 3' Setback for building #3 doesn't comply with 20 Side — 5' (interior); 10' Side — 5' ft. front yard setback Setbacks (corner lot) (development Rear-5' regulation standard) Rear — 5' minimum Three feet for every one foot (3:1) as measured from slab to top of sill plate, or two feet NA for every one foot (2:1) in overall height when measured from lowest finished grade to the peak of the roof, whichever is greater; 30' minimum Not Applicable Setbacks adjacent to A or B zoning 1:1setback with a 10' minimum setback for NA one-story garages and carports 20' minimum setback for dumpster enclosures NA and one-story accessory structures Maximum 24 units per The site plan indicates a Density acre maximum density of Complies 10.2 units per acre Site Information: Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: North PD 353 Planned Development / club house East PD 334 Planned Development / golf course South PD 623 Planned Development / commercial West PD 623 Planned Development / parking lot Zoning History: PD 623 Planned Development for "E" uses with exclusions, PD 353 Planned Development for "CF" for a privately owned golf course with club house, PD 334 Planned Development for "E" uses excluding certain uses Page 3 of 5 Site Plan Comments: The site plan as submitted is not in general compliance with the Zoning Ordinance regulations. 1. The applicant is requesting not to submit an MFD site plan submittal (development regulation standard, recommended approval) 2. The proposed site plan does not indicated compliance with the MFD fagade variation standards (development regulation standard, will comply) 3. Building #3 on the site plan does not comply with the 20 ft. front yard setback along Creek Run (development regulation standard, recommended approval) 4. Proposed 6 ft. wood fence extends beyond the building front. (development regulation standard, recommended approval) 5. Parking is not allowed between a building and a public or private street (development regulation standard, recommended approval) 6. The parking ratio is 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space per 250 sf of common space, which would requires a minimum of 39 parking spaces. The site plan indicates 26 spaces. (development regulation standard, recommended approval) (Comments made by Platting (Subdivision Ordinance), Transportation/Public Works, Fire, Park & Recreation, and Water Department staff cannot be waived through the Zoning Commission and City Council. Approval of the zoning site plan does not constitute the acceptance of conditions) Public Notification: 300 foot Legal Notifications were mailed on April 22, 2020. The following organizations were notified: (emailed April 21, 2020) Organizations Notified Historic Randol Mill Valley Alliance, Inc.* East Fort Worth, Inc. Neighborhoods of East Fort Worth Bentley Villa e-Waterchase NA Trinity Habitat for Humanity Streams and Valleys, Inc. Arlington ISD Fort Worth ISD *Located within this Neighborhood Alliance Development Impact Analysis: 1. Land Use Compatibility The applicant is proposing to change the zoning to PD/C for multifamily development. Surrounding uses consist of a clubhouse to the north, golf course to the east, commercial to the south with associated parking lot to the west. The proposed multifamily is compatible with surrounding land uses. Comprehensive Plan Consistency — Eastside The 2019 Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Low Density Residential. While the proposed use does not meet the future land use designation, it does meet the below policies within the following Comprehensive Plan: Locate multifamily units within walking distance of public transportation, employment, recreation, and/or shopping to increase accessibility and decrease vehicular traffic. Locate public neighborhood parks within easy access of residents (less than one-half mile). Promote appropriate infill development of vacant lots within developed areas, which will efficiently utilize existing infrastructure, particularly in the central city. Based on lack of conformance with the policies stated above, the proposed zoning is not consistent (Technical Inconsistency) with the Comprehensive Plan. Page 4 of 5 Attachments: • Area Zoning Map with 300 ft. Notification Area • Site Plan • Area Map • Future Land Use Map • Aerial Photograph Page 5 of 5 FORT WORTH. Zc-20-039 Area Zoning Map Applicant: 3Strand DV, LLC Address: 8950 - 8979 Creek Run Road Zoning From: C Zoning To: PD/C with dev. regulations to MFD sub, parking, height, fagade, landscape, fencing Acres: 1.27503435 Mapsco: 67V Sector/District: Eastside N Commission Date: 5/13/2020 Contact: 817-392-2495 IN 51 CHEEK RUN a;,% F890o 8900 8940 AR a9 51 e79}] - Subject Area ® 300 Foot Notification J351 PD353 9M 9% 2295 C 2a31 2851 PD334 �❑i 1337 9140 2M1 7 ]]7 9100 9� PD 551 9J2] b' i974 5N3 mr2l, —43 0 112.5 225 450 Feet Created: 4/17/2020 12:50:55 PM N 11 l � v 0 0 QQ I rn I n I cn I 0 v- z 00 m D to p v n m vm �X ND W N 0 Z I N� O� ZD z � W D vz Nom w� m X D I ONcOR D20810 ESMT � E STORAGE E GARAGE E E GARAGE E E E E\E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E \ E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E\ E E E E cw v O v, ao w r -0 m - n f� z X � m 0 0 rnv v z v v v D 0 0 m o N 0 D m m m D v m v m m ccprn Dmm zz> m m D �oI 11 D 0 r rn(n CA � N c D n v M W- v �ON0 O-N -0 p n O 0�OD p Op N Z � DU r K(f) Imm ON m m m 0 N Dzp�� Dp � v � D X m II \ vm�=N N7N 0 z z mo c rn zNzZ N O Z ncn ;0 O r CA D� mK-�m OmDDm m 0 D� cn�om(A zmD DmDX� z m ccnnmq -n-n tntn0 � �Z 9 3 � 3 rn m _ Z. C 9 -' o� � � � o � 0 rn ' PREPARED BY: #m �ZSa.-R 2Zzo3 WIER & ASSOCIATES, INC. c� � N M. c a z TOWNHOME wATERc;HASE CONDOS /� ro �cocn W�o;d ENGINEERS SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS C�J � p 0mc OX v O IT = a - c < O m -U -4 o FORT WORTH, TEXAS 2201 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200E ARLINGTON TEXAS 76006 METRO 817 467-7700 Wo ���o�N�o�rn� SITE PLAN c s 3 z < D Texas Firm Reglstratan No. F-2776 www.WierAs�cates.com ' M0 mN MF NO. DATE DESCRIPTION d �r Council Districts 2 - Carlos E. Flores 3-Brian Byrd 1 4 -Cary Moon 5 -Gyna Bivens 6 - J ungus Jordan 7 - Dennis Shingleton 8 -Kelly Allen Gray 9 -Ann Zadeh Overlay Districts f ® Airport Overlay District 1-35W TU PERIPHERAL DESIGN DISTRICT CONSERVATION DISTRICT Noise Contours DECIBEL 65 70 75 80 85 FORT WORTH Area Map 0 Z Lit 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet f C Arlington ZC-20-039 LU J LU LL Created: 3/23/2020 2:59:28 PM FORT WORTH. "M Future Land Use CREEK RUN ha A -Activity Street Institutional tttttttttttttttttt- CMCO - Commercial Connector Neighborhood Commercial tttttttttttttttttt- CMU - Commercial Mixed Use Street General Commercial tttttttttttttttttt- NC - Neighborhood Connector Light Industrial SL -System Link ! Heavy Industrial Vacant, Undeveloped, Agricultural Mixed -Use Rural Residential Industrial Growth Center Suburban Residential Infrastructure Single Family Residential 100 Year Flood Plan Manufactured Housing Public Park, Recreation, Open Space Low Density Residential Private Park, Recreation, Open Space Medium Density Residential Lakes and Ponds - High Density Residential 160 80 0 160 Feet ZC-20-039 N A Comprehensive Plan shal not constitute zoning regulations or as tab is hzoning district bow dad as. (Texas Local Government Code, Section 213.005.) Land use designationswere approved by City Council on March 5, 2019. Created: 3/23/2020 3:00:47 PM F0111R4T WORTH.: Aerial Photo Map 14 COTTpN*D VILL 0 100 200 400 Feet ZC-20-039 i