HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/03/02-Attachments-Certified Local Government Grant Manual and Application 2020.pdfI%
_LL
09!
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT MANUAL
CONTENTS
Introduction....................................................................................................................................................... 3
Administrative Information............................................................................................................................. 3
WhoMay Apply................................................................................................................................................. 4
EligibleProjects................................................................................................................................................. 4
Professional Qualifications Standards............................................................................................................ 5
Section106 Review.......................................................................................................................................... 5
MatchingFunds Requirement........................................................................................................................ 5
Grant Timeline and Responsibilities of the Grantee.................................................................................. 6
CLGGrant Application Form........................................................................................................................ 8
Submittal Deadline A complete grant application package (hard copy and electronic) must be received no
later than 5 p.m. Monday, November 4, 2019.
One electronic copy of the application must be submitted via e-mail and one printed copy must be delivered to:
HAND DELIVER OR COURIER SERVICE U.S. MAIL
Texas Historical Commission Texas Historical Commission
Community Heritage Development Division Community Heritage Development Division
ATTN: Maria Mougridis, CLG Program Specialist ATTN: Maria Mougridis, CLG Program Specialist
1304 Colorado Street PO Box 12276
Austin, Texas 78701 Austin, Texas 78711-2276
WHO MAY APPLY
Only city or county governments, and state recognized Native American Tribes that have been individually
"certified" by the National Park Service before November 4, 2019 are eligible to apply for CLG grants. The THC
reserves the right to disqualify applications from CLG communities that are not in compliance with the
CLG Certification Agreement.
In an attempt to distribute CLG grant funds to as many CLGs as possible, preference will be given to
applicants that have not received or directly benefited from CLG grant funds in the past five years.
A CLG may submit more than one grant application; however, a separate application package must be submitted
for each project request.
The following entities may also be eligible:
An organization such as a non-CLG city or another unit of local government, a commercial firm, a non-
profit entity or educational institution that has administrative capabilities that comply with applicable federal
standards and has been delegated as a third -party to administer the grant on behalf of the CLG. The
contributed services of the third party to the CLG may be counted toward the matching share requirements
of the grant. The third party may apply for the CLG grant directly, in which case, the Historic Preservation
Officer or CLG Representative and the Chief Elected Official must sign the application.
ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
Activities eligible for CLG grant funding must be tied to the statewide comprehensive preservation planning
process. A copy of the THC's Statewide Preservation Plan can be found at:
htW://www.thc.texas.gov/preserve/projects-and-programs/texas-statewide-preservation-plan as well as in the
grant application. In an effort to encourage local governments to develop and sustain an effective local preservation
program critical to preserving local historic resources, priority for funding shall be given to those projects that
directly relate to the following work categories:
• Architectural, historical, archeological surveys/inventories
• Preparation of nominations to the National Register of Historic Places
• Preparation of a local preservation plan
• Writing or amending a preservation ordinance
• Development of local design guidelines
• Research and development of a local preservation incentive program
M
If two or more applicant's scores are tied, the THC will select the applicant that has not received or directly
benefitted from CLG grant funds in the past five years. If the scores are still tied, the THC will give preference to a
project it can fully fund rather than partially fund.
GRANT TIMELINE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE GRANTEE
September 2019 Applications for the FY2020 CLG grant period are made available.
November 4, 2019 A signed and complete application package, including all supporting materials, must be
received by the THC no later than 5 p.m. on Monday, November 4, 2019.
November 2019 Review of applications by an interdisciplinary committee of THC staff.
January 2020 Final award decisions made by the Texas Historical Commission at its Quarterly Meeting.
All applicants are contacted by mail, and phone or email regarding the THC's decision.
Feb 2020 - April 2020 THC sends preliminary notification to giant recipients that will include a request for a
revised/amended project scope of work and budget. Once the scope of work and budget
are agreed upon by the Grantee and THC, the grant contract will be sent to the Grantee
for signatures. The contract must be signed by all parties before the commencement of
project work. Failure to submit any or all of this documentation by the required deadlines
may cause the requested grant monies to revert back to the THC.
The project manager, fiscal manager, and anyone else who will be significantly involved
with the giant -funded project shall participate in a CLG Grant Orientation coordinated
by the THC. The purpose of the orientation is to review project -specific requirements,
expectations for project deliverables, important deadlines and milestones, and
reimbursement procedures. The orientation requirement may be waived at the sole
discretion of the THC.
The recordation of a Preservation Easement will be required for all construction and
certain other projects prior to the commencement of any work. Duration of Preservation
Easement will be based on award amount, see table below.
Award Amount: Duration of Easement:
Less than $10,000
10 years
$10,000 — $30,000
15 years
$30,001 — $50,000
20 years
Greater than $50,000
30 years
If the Grantee is not doing the actual work, it must execute a contract with a
subcontractor. All subcontracted services and products must be procured according to
Federal procurement standards set forth in Chapter 17 of the Historic Preservation Fund
(HPF) Grants Manual and 2 CFR Part 200.317- 200.326. THC will review and approve all
RFPs and contracts between the Grantee and subcontractor.
Work conducted, or costs incurred, prior to the execution of the contract is not eligible for
reimbursement.
April 2020 - Sept 2021 THC staff routinely review projects to monitor progress and provide assistance. Each
0
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUBGRANT
FISCAL YEAR 2020 GRANT APPLICATION FORM
Deadline for submission is November 4, 2019
Please fill out this section completely and use only the space provided below.
Handwritten applications will not be accepted.
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT: City of Fort Worth Historic Resource Survey Update (Phases 3b/c and
4b)
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT NAME: city of Fort worth
THIRD PARTY NAME (IF APPLICABLE):
X91 kill fT"P►17071 iylr_%0 us] i• - . - ►� .... -
Fiscal Manaaer
Or anization Name
H H M & Associates
Contact Person
Emily Payne
Address
3500 Jefferson St., Suite 330
City State I Zip
Austin 178731
Telephone I Fax
(512) 478-8014
Email
info@hhminc.com
Historic Preservation Officer, or
POLITICAL CONTACTS: CLG Representative City Mavor or Countv Judae
Contact Person
Murray Miller
Betsy Price (Mayor)
Address
200 Texas St.
200 Texas St.
City State I Zip
Fort Worth 176102
Fort Worth JTX 176102
Telephone I Fax
(817) 392-8574
817) 392-2409
Email
Murray. Miller@fortworthtexas.gov
Betsy. Price@fortworthtexas.gov
FUNDING REQUEST:
Grant Funds
$42,500
Matching
$42,50o
Total Project
$85,000
Requested:
JFunds:
Cost:
PROPOSED PROJECT TYPE (check one that applies):
❑ Archeological Project ❑ Research & Development
❑ Preservation Planning Project ❑ Education & Outreach
❑ National Register Nomination(s)' ❑ Design Guidelines
® Survey/Inventory Project
❑ Historic Preservation Plan or Element/Chapter of Comprehensive Plan
❑ Construction/Development Project2
❑ Preservation Training
I Applications submitted without THC Determination of Eligibility will not be reviewed
2 Property must be listed or deemed eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places
printed format is less conducive to periodic updating than is desired given that surveys are organic and should be
updated every five years or so.
Upon adoption of the Fort Worth Citywide Historic Preservation Plan in July 2003, recommendations were made that
all previously conducted historic resource surveys needed to be updated and expanded. The format and practicality of
updating the existing surveys has generated a heightened interest in utilizing new survey and data collection technology
that incorporated the type of data recommended by the Texas Historical Commission's Historic Resources Survey
Manual. It is a key objective of the City that any survey update be more widely accessible to the public and be easier to
update regularly in the future.
In August 2017, the Texas Historical Commission undertook its Four -Year Evaluation of the City of Fort Worth's Certified
Local Government Program under Section 101(a)(7)(C) of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
That evaluation highlighted an item in the Certification Agreement between the City of Fort Worth and the Texas
Historical Commission, where it states that the CLG will maintain a system for the survey and inventory of local historic
properties that is coordinated with the statewide cultural resources survey process, with technical assistance provided
by the National Register Program office of the Texas Historical Commission's History Programs Division.
In relation to developing a plan that outlined the City's short and long-term survey goals, a proposal to undertake a
multi -year survey update in phases, administered by staff and undertaken by a preservation consultant was deemed
acceptable by the THC. The relevant portions of that strategy are provided in the chart below.
In 2018, a Letter of Intent was submitted for the cost -sharing of the first element in the multi -year strategy to update the
city's historic resources survey, however, the follow-up application was delayed by several weeks pending the
confirmation of the city's contribution, which extended beyond the THC's grant application deadline. In 2019, the city
forged ahead with the first part of the update once funding had been confirmed with the aim of applying to the THC in
the fall of 2019 for the next funded portion of the update.
HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY
TASK
DESCRIPTION
YEAR
Budget Appropriation
Planning & Development Department to request
2018
Request
annual budget item in next budget cycle to be used in
a funding partnership with the Texas Historical
Commission and the Tarrant County Historical
Commission, to update the City's historic resource
survey.
Partnership Funding
Seek fmancial partners to assist with consultant costs
2018
to undertake specific phases of the survey.
THC Survey Grant
Apply for CLG grant to assist with each phase of the
2018
survey.
Completed
Completed
Completed
10
2. Project Need (15 Points):
How did the CLG identify the need for this project? Has the need been documented? If so, how?
The need for this project has been acknowledged for many years, including in the city's 2003 Preservation Plan. Here,
it was identified as a priority. The need for this project was highlighted again during the 4-year CLG review in 2017.
How was the project initiated? (City Council, the public, preservation commission, etc.)
The 2019 project was initiated by staff as a result of the 2017 CLG review.
How does the project address a goal of the local government's preservation program or a specific preservation need?
This phase of the historic resources survey update has been a goal of the city since (at least) the 2003 Preservation
Plan. This phase begins to address the need for an accurate and up-to-date survey, which is essential to the
regulation of change. In addition, a specific need has arisen whereby an expedited project involves multiple properties
potentially linked by a common theme. The need to complete the historic context to inform future nominations of
thematic groups represents a specific time -sensitive need.
3. Project Objective (15 Points):
Define the objective for the proposed project.
The objectives of this Phase of the overall update to the city's historic resource survey update are:
a. to develop a City of Fort Worth historic context that informs the multi -year survey update and future thematic
nominations;
b. to begin to address a key area identified in the 2017 four-year CLG review, which is an essential component of
the city's Certification Agreement with the THC;
c. to work towards the establishment of an accurate survey that is used regularly in virtually all land -use decisions
involving historic resources; and
d. to utilize the products from each phase as part of an ongoing education and awareness initiative
Identify the steps the applicant and/or the consultant must take to accomplish the project objective.
The consultant will essentially "resume" the work that was undertaken to the end of the FY 2019, by filling -in the two
main periods in the history and development of the City of Fort Worth, from its establishment in 1849 to 1899 and then
closing -out the more recent period from 1946-1970 or thereabouts. Depending on the budget remaining for FY 2020,
the consultant is aware that the completion of the historic context will enable the commencement of the actual survey
update, which will consist of a combination of desktop research and review of existing surveys and field work to verify
integrity. The City has discussed the longer -term survey objectives with the consultant so that they understand how
their individual projects fit into the full scope. The steps are therefore as follows:
Step 1 - Based on the work already completed for Phase 3a: Historic Context that focused on the period 1900 —
1945, undertake Phase 3b: Historic Context that focuses on the period 1849-1899;
Step 2 - Phase 3c: Historic Context that focuses on the period 1946-1970; and
Step 3 - Phase 4a: Survey Update (Part 1)
What is the estimated timeframe to accomplish each of these steps?
If the contract is let for the consultant to commence early in 2020, the project will need to be completed by August
2020 so that the administrative aspects can be conducted before the end of the 2020 fiscal year.
Who will be leading the project? What qualifies this person to lead such a project? Resumes must be provided.
On behalf of the City, the City's Historic Preservation Officer and CLG representative will lead the project for
continuity. The HPO participated in the 2017 four-year review with the THC, prepared the multi -year strategy for
updating the city's historic resources survey, developed the RFP for consultants, reviewed the work of the successful
12
Yes, the emphasis of the survey update that begins to crystalize with the commencement of Phase 4a, is organized to
address those communities that are experiencing the greatest degree of change or are areas where updated
information is in greatest need as has been evidenced by issues arising from requests for Certificates of
Appropriateness and demolition requests. These conditions also align with the predominance of African American and
Hispanic populations.
Additionally, there is an enhanced need for increased awareness of African American and Hispanic historic resources
and utilizing appropriate avenues to promote, incentivize and celebrate underrepresented aspects of the city's cultural
heritage. This project will also contribute to a known desire to make information regarding historic resources readily
available to current and new residents. Understanding the significance, integrity and location of historic resources is
an important community benefit.
How will this project enhance public and private support for local preservation?
This project will act as a catalyst that can serve to facilitate greater interaction with the public on an important part of
the City's historic preservation program. The identification and documentation of a community's historic resources is
essential to public awareness and community support for preservation efforts. Updating the survey will confirm
aspects of the City's previous survey efforts, but it is anticipated that it will also identify new conditions that can
contribute to education and awareness opportunities. These opportunities ultimately carry a key objective of
enhancing public and private support for historic preservation in Fort Worth.
Will this project result in educational publications or activities?
Yes. This project will enable the development of educational material that highlights the "context" of the history and
development of the city in relation to thematic frameworks. In addition, a pending multiple property nomination that is
thematic based is anticipated over the coming months that would also lend itself to the development of educational
material, which can be tied directly to this project. This project establishes and confirms the thematic historic context
of the city, as a precursor to a multi -year historic resource survey update, which will provide opportunities for the
development of educational material and activities that can be highlighted during Preservation Month.
6. Budget and Cost Effectiveness (15 Points):
How necessary are CLG funds in order to accomplish the proposed project?
During the 2017 CLG four-year review, a lack of funding was cited as the key reason that the obligation to satisfy the
Certification Agreement in relation to maintaining an up-to-date historic resources survey was highlighted. Staff
continue to explore creative solutions that might enable a multi -year survey update to take place. At present, the multi-
year strategy relies on CLG funds and while it would be preferable to update the survey with one CLG grant
application that would span over a three -or -four year period, the matching funds for such a large undertaking are not
readily available and we acknowledge that the CLG grants are limited and need to be spread statewide. It is for those
two reasons that an incremental approach appears more manageable for both parties, noting that the city is not
positioned at this time to undertake the entire survey update with its limited resources.
While the survey update is the largest project that has been identified, there are many other preservation projects and
initiatives that are also in need of being undertaken. The CLG funds are therefore necessary in order to accomplish
the next phase of this important project.
How did the applicant develop the project's budget? (research, past experience, etc.)
The project budget for the next phases was developed with the consultant, having regard to the recently completed
Phase 3: Historic Context Study 1900-1945, with an awareness of the type of documentation that presently exists and
having regard to the need for the updated survey to be made easily accessible to the public as well as being in a
format that can be practically updated in the future. The budget was also informed by the goals for Phase 4a, which
begins the actual survey update and will involve desktop research, archival research, fieldwork and integrity analysis
as well as the maximum available funds that are now available to be used as matching funds.
What is the applicant's source and commitment of matching funds?
The source of matching funds for Phases 3b/c and Phase 4a (see Project Objectives in item 3 above) is twofold:
a. Funds within a city department that resulted from a previous mitigation resolution involving a historic property;
14
® BUILD CAPACITY OF PRESERVATION COMMUNITY: The existing preservation community
develops its capacity to function more effectively and efficiently.
Please summarize how your project addresses the goals selected above. -
This project directly addresses four key objectives of the Statewide Preservation Plan in the following ways:
1. Survey and Online Inventory — the proposed project is part of a multi -year historic resources survey update that
seeks a product informed in part by existing hard copy surveys, additional research/coordination/synthesis and
actual fieldwork. This survey update will be the city's first online inventory of its historic resources, which will
address a key local as well as statewide objective.
2. Implement Policies and Incentives — the proposed project represents a preservation policy that was identified in
the 2003 Preservation Plan. In addition, maintaining a current and accurate historic resources survey is a key
obligation of the City's Certification Agreement with the THC. An updated survey will serve to confirm the status of
individually designated properties as well as those within existing historic districts, in relation to their integrity.
Given the length of time that has passed since the last survey, an update will clarify which properties may or may
not trigger certain regulatory provisions or be eligible for local incentives.
3. Cultivate Political Commitment — the proposed project offers opportunities to raise awareness of those places
that are important to the history and development of Fort Worth. Developing information for wide dissemination
that involves each council district can be integrated with data taken from successful/important projects to promote
and celebrate the relationship between this project and the benefits that it offers to the community and applicants
seeking to make changes. It is anticipated that the utilization of the historic context study and the various phases
of survey update in promoting and celebrating the culture of the city will cultivate political commitment. Build
4. Capacity of Preservation Community — the historic context study will serve an immediate need for the
community to develop capacity as it considers submitting the city's first thematic based multiple property
nomination. In addition, an accurate and current survey will greatly assist applicants and Neighborhood
Associations who do not have easy access to the existing surveys and perhaps even less access to those
properties that are considered to be contributing versus non-contributing. Having an updated survey with this
important information will afford opportunities for the community to enhance its capacity to function more
effectively and efficiently.
16
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUBGRANT
FY 2020 Grant Budget Worksheet
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Fort Worth Historic Resource Survey Update (Phases 3b/c and 4a)
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT NAME: CITY OF FORT WORTH
THIRD PARTY NAME (IF APPLICABLE):
BUDGET
GRANT
LOCAL
LOCAL
TOTAL
ITEM
FUNDS
CASH (source)
IN -KIND
COSTS
(source)
Phases 3b/c and
42,500
40,000
2,500
85,000
4a of the Resource
Survey Update
TOTALS
42,500
40,000
2,500
85,000
Please complete the attached budget form and provide any supplemental information
necessary to confirm or support the issues described above.
Proposed projects can use a local cash match for grant monies budgeted on a one-to-one (dollar for dollar) match equal
to a 50-50 ratio for the total cost of the project. Proposed projects utilizing all or partial match of verifiable in -kind services
and/or goods may also qualify as long as the local match equals a 50-50 ratio for the total cost of the project. The Texas
Historical Commission (THC) reserves the right to fund grant requests in part or in full based on the review criteria
outlined in the application form, and the amount of federal funding available. Final decisions will also take into
consideration the annual performance of each CLG applying for assistance. Only non-federal monies may be used as a
match, with the exception of Community Development Block Grants (CDBG).
V.
EMILY THOMPSON PAYNE
3500 Jefferson Street, Suite 330, Austin, Texas 78731
EDUCATION
2003 Master of Science — Historic Preservation, Columbia University
2001 Bachelor of Arts with Distinction —Art History and English, University of Virginia
PROFESSIONAL/TECHN[CAL SOCIETIES
Society of Architectural Historians
Heritage Society of Austin — Preservation Advocacy Committee
AWARDS AND CERTIFICATES
2001— Phi Beta Kappa Society
2005 National Preservation Institute, "Section 106: An Introduction" Austin, Texas
2001-2003 Questers Foundation Scholarship, Columbia University, New York, New York
1997-2001 Echols Scholar, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
2015— President— HHM, Austin, Texas
Present
2006-2015 Architectural Historian — HHM, Austin, Texas
2005-2006 Project Reviewer — Division of Architecture, Texas Historical Commission, Austin, Texas
2004-2005 Architectural Historian — Preservation Central Inc., Austin, Texas
2003-2004 Architectural Historian/Project Manager— E.H.T. Traceries Inc., Washington, D.C.
Since 2003, Ms. Payne has gained in-depth experience as a professional Architectural Historian and preservation
consultant. Her education and experience fully satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification
Standards. In addition, Ms. Payne has managed numerous contracts and projects, managing teams of professional
staff to complete projects on time and on budget. Her expertise lies in efficient management of complicated and
large-scale projects with multi -layered cultural resource management implications. These types of projects include
preparation of nominations for the National Register of Historic Places and local landmark registries, as well as
historic resource surveys that entail photographic documentation, architectural descriptions, archival research,
estimation of construction dates, and evaluation of NRHP eligibility. Ms. Payne is thoroughly familiar with the
terms and conditions of Certified Local Government (CLG) grants and other federal and state grants for historic
preservation. Prior to joining HHM, Ms. Payne served as a Project Reviewer in the Division of Architecture at the
Texas Historical Commission, where she applied her thorough understanding of preservation law and the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to consultation under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act, the federal Historic Preservation Tax Credit program, and federal and state
grant programs.
The following is a sampling of Ms. Payne's recent projects.
HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEYS
Preservation Planning Surveys
2018 Downtown El Paso Survey and National Register Multiple Property Submission, El Paso County, Texas.
Architectural Historian/Project Manager (in progress).
2018 Brownsville Historic Resources Survey, Brownsville, Cameron County, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project
Manager.
EMILY PAYNE
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
2018 Design Guidelines for the City of Port Arthur, Port Arthur, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager
(in progress).
Design Guidelines for the Robertson Hill Local Historic District, Austin, Texas. Architectural
Historian/Project Manager (in progress).
Design Guidelines for the Smoot/Terrace Park Local Historic District, Austin, Texas. Architectural
Historian/Project Manager.
2012 Historic District Design Guidelines, San Antonio, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
Design Guidelines for the Greater Leesville Heritage District, Leesville, Louisiana; the Charlestown Cultural
District, Lake Charles, Louisiana; the Margaret Place Historic District, Lake Charles, Louisiana; and the
Crowley Commercial Downtown Historic District, Crowley, Louisiana. Architectural Historian.
2011 Design Guidelines for Wichita Falls, Wichita County, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
2009 McAllen Citywide Historic Preservation Plan, McAllen, Hidalgo County, Texas. Architectural
Historian/Project Manager,
2005 Hays County Preservation Plan, Hays County, Texas. Architectural Historian.
HISTORIC STRUCTURES REPORTS AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSES
2018 Condition Assessment Report and Interpretive Materials for Limestone Features in the Camp Mabry
National Register Historic District, Austin, Texas. Architectural Historian.
2016 Historic Furnishings Report for Five Rooms in Hampton Mansion, Hampton National Historic Site, Towson,
Maryland. Architectural Historian.
2016 Skywarrior Theater Building Assessment, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Oak Harbor, Washington.
Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
2012 Historic Furnishings Report and Implementation Plan, Thomas Edison Laboratory National Historical Park,
West Orange, New Jersey. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
2010 Historic Furnishings Report and Implementation Plan, Bunker Hill Monument, Boston, Massachusetts.
Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
Historic Furnishings Implementation Plan, the Olmsted House "Fairsted" and Office, Frederick Law Olmsted
National Historic Site, Brookline, Massachusetts. Architectural Historian.
2008 Historic Structures Report for Tule Springs Ranch, Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada. Architectural Historian.
2003 Feasibility Study for Infill Construction at Tregaron Estate, Washington, D.C. Architectural Historian/Project
Manager.
CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND CONSULTATION
2018 Historic Preservation Plan Update, Plano, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
Historic Preservation Tax Credit Application, Uptown Sports Club, Austin, Texas. Architectural
Historian/Project Manager.
2016 Story Map Template for Mitigation, Texas Department of Transportation Environmental Affairs Division,
Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
Historic Preservation Tax Credit Consulting and Application, Stagecoach Inn, Salado, Texas. Architectural
Historian/Project Manager.
2015 Preservation Services for San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center's Long Range Development Plan
Programmatic Agreement Mitigation Measures, San Francisco, California. Architectural Historian/Project
Manager.
Tomah VA Medical Center Section 106 Consultation and Management Plan, Tomah, Wisconsin.
Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
EMILY PAYNE
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATIONS
Pearl Harbor NHL Update, Honolulu, Hawaii. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATIONS
Historic Districts
2018 Chinatown Historic District National Register Update, Honolulu, Hawai'i. Architectural Historian/Project
Manager (in progress).
Oakwood National Register Historic District Update, Raleigh, North Carolina. Architectural
Historian/Project Manager (in progress).
Brownsville Downtown National Register Historic District, Brownsville, Texas. Architectural Historian.
2017 Walzem Family Farmstead National Register Historic District, Comal County, Texas. Architectural Historian.
Stagecoach Inn National Register Historic District Update and Boundary Increase, Salado, Bell County,
Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
2016 Boston African American National Historic Site, Boston, Massachusetts. Architectural Historian.
Lost Bayou Historic District, Galveston, Texas. Architectural Historian.
Fischer Store Historic District, Fischer, Texas. Architectural Historian.
2010 National Register Historic District, Togus VA Hospital, Togus, Maine. Architectural Historian.
2005 West Line Historic District, National Register Nomination, Austin, Travis County, Texas. Architectural
Historian (Preservation Central).
2004 Oblate Park Historic District, National Register Nomination, Mission, Hidalgo County, Texas. Architectural
Historian.
Rio Grande City Downtown Historic District, National Register Nomination under the Multiple Property
Nomination for Rio Grande City, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. Architectural Historian.
Individual Properties
2017 Riley's Tavern, Comal County, Texas, National Register Nomination. Architectural Historian.
2016 Arnold -Rauch -Brandt Homestead, Comal County, Texas, National Register Nomination. Architectural
Historian.
Anhalt Hall, Coma[ County, Texas, National Register Nomination. Architectural Historian. .
2011 Hardscramble, 1806 Tschoepe Road, Seguin vicinity, Guadalupe County, Texas, National Register
Nomination. Architectural Historian.
2005 Fred and Nell Kain Guerra House, National Register Nomination under the Multiple Property Nomination
for Rio Grande City, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. Architectural Historian.
2004 Yzaguirre-Longoria House, National Register Nomination under the Multiple Property Nomination for Rio
Grande City, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. Architectural Historian.
Mifflin-Kenedy Warehouse, National Register Nomination under the Multiple Property Nomination for Rio
Grande City, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. Architectural Historian.
LOCAL LANDMARK AND HISTORIC DISTRICT NOMINATIONS
2018 Robertson Hill Local Historic District, Austin, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager (in progress).
Smoot/Terrace Park Local Historic District, Austin, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
Haggard Park Local Heritage District, Plano, Texas. Architectural Historian/Project Manager.
2016 Shelby House Local Landmark Nomination, 503 W. 33rd Street, Austin, Texas. Architectural
Historian/Project Manager.
2006 S.A. and Florence Street House, 508 Bellevue Place, City of Austin Historic Landmark Nomination, Austin,
Travis County, Texas. Architectural Historian.
EDUCATION
2008 Certificate in UK Planning Law & Practice — Leeds Metropolitan University, School of
the Built Environment, Leeds, UK
1990 Master of Environmental Design Studies (Conservation of the Built Environment)
— Technical University of Nova Scotia
1987 Master of Architecture — Technical University of Nova Scotia
1985 Bachelor of Environmental Design Studies (Architecture) — Technical University of NS
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
2019 NOMA - National Organization of Minority Architects
2014 CAHP - Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals
2008 IHBC - Institute of Historic Building Conservation, UK
2008 INTBAU - International Network of Traditional Building, Architecture & Urbanism, UK
2008 RTPI - Royal Town Planning Institute, UK
2006 PIBC - Planning Institute of British Columbia
2006 CIP - Canadian Institute of Planners
2003 RAIC - Royal Architectural Institute of Canada
2003 NZPI - New Zealand Planning Institute
RECENT AWARDS
2014 Canadian Institute of Planners Award of Merit — Maple Creek Heritage District Plan
2012 City of Regina Municipal Heritage Award — Education
EXPERIENCE
2016 — present
City of Fort Worth — Historic Preservation Officer
2017 — present
University of Texas at Arlington — Adjunct Assistant Professor (Historic Preservation)
2013
- 2016
City of Victoria, BC — Senior Heritage Planner
2011 —
2013
PCR Services Corporation, California — Principal Historic Preservation Planner
2009
— 2011
Ministry of Tourism, Parks, Culture and Sport, SK — A/Provincial Heritage Architect
2010
— 2012
Saskatchewan Heritage Foundation, SK — Heritage Advisor (part-time)
2006
— 2010
Stephen Levrant Heritage Architecture Ltd., UK — Senior Associate
2003
—2006
Christchurch City Council, NZ — Senior Heritage Conservation Planner
2002
—2003
City of Toronto, ON — Preservation Officer
2000
City of Phoenix — Historic Preservation Officer
1998
— 2000
City of Edmonton, AB — Principal Heritage Planner
1995 -1996
City of Victoria, BC — A/Heritage Planner
1993
—1994
Eric J Barker Architect, BC — Project Architect
1991 —1992
Public Works Canada, Architecture & Engineering Services, MB — Period Architect
1988
—1991
Jost Architects Ltd., NS — Graduate Architect
Mr. Miller has thirty-two (32) years' experience in the conservation of the historic environment
throughout Canada, in the USA, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Drawing on a unique
balance of public and private sector experience, Mr. Miller has a special interest and extensive
experience in the interpretation and practical application of historic preservation charters, standards
and principles such as the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties
and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. Mr. Miller's
breadth and depth of international experience within the historic environment is the foundation that
has enabled him to provide preservation advice to architects, developers, property owners, Historic
Preservation Commissions and all levels of government in four countries. Mr. Miller is currently the
Historic Preservation Officer for the City of Fort Worth, Adjunct Assistant Professor in Historic Preservation
at the University of Texas at Arlington and a Historic Preservation Consultant.
bll) dog
B50-BOB
LEUDA
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUBGRANT
FISCAL YEAR 2020 GRANT APPLICATION FORM
Anticipated Area Applicable to Phase 4a
Terrell Heights Local Historic District
W
z
1500 -1599 d EL PASO 1600 - 1799
914.999
1'1ufyju /LI
DASHWOOD
OLEANDER
IRMA 930 999
® Terrell Heights
0 287.5 575 1,160
1120 = 1199 1200 -1299
V� o
- 1150. 1199 -- 7_W0 -
T
1050 -1149 OLEANDER
BROADWAY
- 150D • 1999 STELLA
499 two - 1599 1600 • 1599
et
1 TUCKER
corrtEGm2w7crf arrcmwaRm
UAUfeIO =rS uvtmxnCH6AIIDLAT fOr�CJ uW.
DfS OM TO MC MR AGRAAYC/L RFRKL@RATION&LY.
nw ALUJULYIS ROT TOOC TAAIN I WAMAS OVA FROOUCEDrOR
vllsr Rlr C OR BY ARIfiMMM FROii' CN LLA+D
1,725 2,300 s+M+OR TIC urrmFORT %VM1A=M=NOPXLPOW�Lm
FOR TIC AMNIALY Or fAD DATA
Feet r,�.ln k a D-4 w wt-arm-1wimmo