HomeMy WebLinkAbout(0003) IR 21-10542 - Proposed 2021 Comprehensive Plan Incl. 20 Year Plan Serv. AreasINFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
No. 21-10542
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
February 16, 2021
Page 1 of 2
SUBJECT: PROPOSED 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, INCLUDING 20-YEAR
PLANNED SERVICE AREAS — APPENDIX E
The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with a summary of proposed amendments to be
incorporated into the 2021 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed plan contains numerous updates and
graphic enhancements to over half of the Comprehensive Plan chapters and appendices.
Proposed Amendments for the 2021 Comprehensive Plan
1. The Population Trends, Economic Trends, and Financial Trends chapters have been updated to
reflect the latest statistical information available for these chapters.
2. The following chapters have been redesigned and updated for the first time since 2012 to include
updated data, new project and program information, new policy direction from recently adopted
plans, and graphic enhancements intended to improve the user experience:
a. Chapter 6: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
b. Chapter 7: Libraries
c. Chapter 13: Historic Preservation
d. Chapter 14: Urban Design
e. Chapter 16: Police Services
f. Chapter 17: Fire and Emergency Services
g. Chapter 18: Water Supply and Environmental Quality
h. Chapter 23: Financial Incentives
i. Chapter 24: Annexations
3. Additional updates and new information have been added to recently updated Chapter 5: Housing.
4. Appendix A: Existing Plans and Studies has been updated to reflect the City Council's adoption of
a) Library Strategic Services Plan, b) Library Facilities Master Plan, and c) Parks, Recreation, and
Open Space Master Plan, 2020 Update.
5. Appendix C: Future Land Use by Sector has been updated to reflect approved zoning changes,
previously adopted City plans, new development plans and opportunities, and existing
development patterns unlikely to change.
6. Appendix D: Proposed Capital Improvements has been updated to include the adopted FY2021-
2025 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan, along with a graphic summary of major expenditures
described in the plan.
7. A new appendix has been added, Appendix E. 20-Year Planned Service Areas, which includes
maps of ETJ areas where the City anticipates being able to provide City water and other services
within the next 20 years.
8. Appendix F: Annexation Plan, Policy, and Program has been updated to reflect changes to the
annexation program.
9. Appendix G: Special Districts has been reduced to one page with description and map. A link is
included to the full policy.
10. Appendix H: Reserved. The full Tax Abatement Policy has been removed from the appendices
and a description and link to the full policy has been included in Chapter 23: Financial Incentives.
Exhibit A provides more information on the proposed amendments, Comprehensive Plan update process,
and the adoption schedule.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
No. 21-10542
February 16, 2021
PRTEA To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
e- fCWP d5
Page 2of2
rrA SUBJECT: PROPOSED 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, INCLUDING 20-YEAR
PLANNED SERVICE AREAS — APPENDIX E
On December 18, 2020, the City Plan Commission received a briefing on the draft 2021 Comprehensive
Plan and expressed support for the proposed amendments to the plan. On January 27, 2021, the City
Plan Commission conducted a public hearing on the draft 2021 Comprehensive Plan and voted
unanimously to recommend adoption of the plan. The City Council is currently scheduled to conduct a
public hearing and vote on adoption of the plan on March 2, 2021.
Should you have any questions, please contact Eric Fladager, Planning Manager, at 817-392-8011.
David Cooke
City Manager
Attachment: Exhibit A — 2021 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Draft Presentation
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
I Exhibit A
Proposed
2021 Comprehens10
ive Plan
Presented to the
City Council
by the
Planning and Data Analytics Department
February 16, 2021
What is the Comprehensive Plan?
• A general guide for making
decisions about the City's
growth and development.
• Presents a broad vision for
Fort Worth's future and
describes major policies,
programs, and projects to
realize that vision.
FoRH
L�� —.. — 0. N.M.
e. J4
-~ = City of Fort Worth
2021 PROPOSED
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
4MH
Plan Implementation by
City and Other Agencies
through CI P, Budget,
Programs, and Projects
City Council
Adopts Plan
City Staff Prepares
Draft Plan
Annual
Planning
Process
City Plan Commission
and City Council Hold
Public Hearings
Planning & Data
Analytics Department
Conducts Community
Meetings
Planning & Data
Analytics
Department
Revises Draft Plan
City of Fort Worth
202*1 PROPOSED
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Vision and Values
PART I: FOCUSING ON THE FUTURE
I. Population Trends
2. Economic Trends
3. Financial Trends
PART II: BUILDING STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS
4. Land Use (New in 2019)
5. Housing (New in 2020)
o. human services
9. Neighborhood Capacity Building
PART III: DEVELOPING A SOUND ECONOMY
10. Economic Development (New in 2019)
11. Transportation (New in 2020)
t4Urban
ion
istoric Preservation
Desi n
r s and Culture
PART IV: PROVIDING A SAFE COMMUNITY
le. roiice services
17. Fire and Emergency Services
19. Public Health
20. Municipal Facilities
PART V: TOOLS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
21. Capital Improvements
23. Financiallncentives
24. Annexation Policy
APPENDICES
A. Existing Plans and Studies
B. Population Projection Methodology
C. Sector Land Use Policies
IE. Planned Service Areas
r. Annexation man, roiicy ana rrogram
G. Conservation and Reclamation District Policy
H. Tax Abatement Policy Statement
GLOSSARY
Trends Chapters:
Updated Data in Infographic Layout
• Population Trends
• Economic Trends
• Financial Trends
FORT WORTH BUILDING PERMITS 2010 - 2019
2019 ®
11,543 451
2018
11,687 W 421
2017
10,561 . .487
2016
9,525 - 803
2015 ®
8,792
' 349
2011
8,471
- 376
2013 ®
8,115
, 349
2012
6,927
.409
2011 • r •
7,101
i .450
2010 7,136
JML____, 486
- 2,000 4,000
6,000
8,000 10,000 12.000 14,000
.Commercial .Residential
■Multifamily
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Source, City of Fort Worth, 2020.
FORT WORTH HOUSEHOLD SIZE
St Person
Hou:eM1o1e, 12.9%
1 Person Household,
25.5%
4 Person Household,
14.6%
3 Person Household,
70%
ff2Ph.1d,
30.1%
...........................................................................................................................................................................
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2019Amerimn Community5umy5-Ymr Estimates.
HOUSEHOLD SIZE COMPARISON
00%
90%
80% 14.6% 14.8% AM 12.6%
Ja%
6a%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Fort Worth DFW Texas USA
.1 Person H.0 Wd .2 Person Hou old . 3 Person Householtl
4 Perwn Householtl .5. Perwn Householtl
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2019 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.
One -person households and two -person households constitute more than half
of the total population in Fort Worth.
2.88 Persons 32%
Average Household Size Nonfamily Households
...................................................... _.............. _.. _..........._................................................... _.. _........... _............
Source: US C.—AC55-year(2015-2019).
HOUSEHOLD STATUS COMPARISON
Non -Family Household 31%
35%
Family.Marcied
Family: Male-Unmarcied '�%
Family: Female - Unmarciee -13
O.M 10.0% 20.0% 30A% 4.0% Mm 60.0%
.Fort Worth .DFW .Texas .United Staten
Bu..
So.-..u...........US............Cens.us .........rea.....2..0...1...9...Am......rlca...n...C........uni.....................Y..r...................
rce:u,..eomm..ty5urve..y ...l-Est..lmates.
1-7
2012 Chapter
CHAPTER 6: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
Parks, open space, and recreational opportunities are important, not only to enhance
quality of life and neighborhood vitality, but also to preserve natural resources and
provide alternative transportation links between our neighborhoods and growth
centers. Over the years, the City of Fort Worth has recognized these benefits and has
strived to increase these opportunities, earning the State Gold Medal in 1992, 1994,
2001, and 2005 from the Texas Recreation and Park Society for having the best
managed large park system in the state, as well as eaming the National Gold Medal in
1996 for having the hest managed large park system in the United States.
The City of Fort Worth provides park and recreational opportunities through the
Parks and Community Services Department (PALS), whose mission is "to enrich the
lives of our citizens through the stewardship of our resources and the responsive
provision of quality recreational opportunities and community services." In June
2004, the City Council adopted a Park, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan, and
in February 2010 approved a resolution updating the Master Plan.
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS
Fort Worth has 260 parks, which make up 5.3% percent of the total land area within
the city limits. Thep ark sites totaling 11,648 acres include 178 playgrounds, 105
practice fields, 46 competition baseball/softball fields, 33 competition soccer fields,
109 basketball courts, 98 tennis courts, 7 pools (currently closed), 5 golf courses (99
holes), approximately 70 miles of trails, and 111 picnic shelters.
Park Classifications
Fort Worth's park and recreational sites are grouped into four classifications, based
on the National Recreation and Park Association QNRPA) standards that use size,
service area, and uses as distinguishing characteristics. The four park classifications
are Neighborhood, Community, Large Recreation, and Special Use Park. These
classifications and standards assist the City in evaluating the current park system and
in planning for future sites and facilities. In 2011, there were 191 neighborhood
parks, 31 community parks, 7 large recreation parks, and 29 special use parks. The
four park classifications are grouped into two types of parkland. Large recreation and
the larger special use parks, including golf courses and the Nature Center, are
considered Regional parkland. Smaller special use parks such as urban parks/plazas,
neighborhood parks and community parks are considered close -to -home parkland.
The City standard for all parkland including regional as adopted in the Park,
Recreation and Open Space Master Plan is 21.25 acres per 1,000 persons, which is
based on NRPA standards for parkland. The greatest deficiency is in Regional
parkland, though there is also a need for additional Close -to -Home parkland.
4,210.20 acres of parkland will need to be acquired by 2025 to meet the 21.25 acres
of dark land standard. In order to provide adequate close -to -home parkland the City
Council adopted the Neighborhood and Community Park Dedication policy in April
2000, and revised it in 2009. The purpose of the policy is to ensure adequate
neighborhood and community park acreage.
Existing Park Sites
w
41,
d�
ray
�LJp� Park Boundary
10 5 ❑ 10 Miles
Fort Worth has 260 parks with 11,648 acres of parkland. (Source: Parks and
Community Services Department, 2011.)
53 Chapter 6: Parks and Commun►ty Services
EXISTING PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES
291 129337 600
PARKS ACRES OF SQ. FT. PARKLAND
PARKLAND PER PERSON
The Fort Worth Park & Recreation Department (PARD) manages special park
attractions including three golf complexes, the Fort Worth Nature Center and
Refuge, Log Cabin village, and the Botanic Garden. The City also offers an
athletics program, sports facilities and league events; community centers with
fitness equipment, activities and classes; pools and aquatics programs; and a
full forestry program.
EXISTING PARK FACILITIES & PROGRAMS
OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PROGRAM
Land stewardship, nature education, and outdoor exploration can be found
within the City of Fort Worth's public open space lands. Open spaces
are woodlands, native prairies, shorelines, and waterways set aside for
environmental, recreational, and aesthetic purposes in urban environments.
Open spaces benefit the community through opportunities for active
lifestyles, access to nature, improved air and water quality, and increased
property values. More information on open space ecosystems as natural
habitat for endangered and threatened species can be found in Chapter 18,
Environmental Quality.
20 50 39621
HIGH -PRIORITY ACRES OF NATURAL ACRES OF PARKLAND
NATURALAREAS OPEN SPACE PRESERVED WITHIN THE
IDENTIFIED ACQUIRED IN 2020 FORT WORTH NATURE
CENTER & REFUGE
k� r
zoo
re=Li LW
11 11 110 7 124 62 105
SPECIAL USE ATHLETIC FIELD BASEBALL & GREENBELTS SOCCER FIELDS TENNIS COURTS BASKETBALL
PARKS COMPLEXES SOFTBALL FIELDS COURTS
208 3 3 4 210 21 8
PLAYGROUNDS POOLS GOLFCOURSE DOG PARKS MILESOFHIKE& COMMUNITY CONSERVANCY
COMPLEXES BIKETRAILS CENTERS (In Total) PARKS
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Source. City of Fort Worth, Planning & Data Anolytics Department, 2021.
6-2
PARK PLANNING UNITS
Fort Worth is divided into five Park Planning Districts (PPDs) with each PPD
containing smaller planning units.
A Neighborhood Park Unit (NPU) has a service radius of approximately 1/4
to 1/2 mile and is designed to serve approximately 3,000 people, up to a
maximum of 6,000 people. As the population changes, the NPU geographywill
morph to keep the population served under 6,000 people. Neighborhood park
units (NPUs) are used for tracking funding, fees, and vacant land, so that park
development can occur in the NPU geographywhere fees were collected.
A Community Park Unit (CPU) has a service radius of approximately 1 to 11/2
miles to serve approximately 18,000 - 36,000 people.
Special Use & Nature Based Parks are unique and are not regulated by a service
radius, or a population within a geography. The park size varies according to
the specific site and use.
CPUUnit fCPUIY Park
• bans \
•Sports Fields
• Community Centers
• Destination Activity
or Facility
SU&NBP
Special Use & Nature
• Fort Worth Botanic Garden
• Fort Worth Nature Center & Refuge
• Fort Worth Zoo
• Log Cabin Village
• Conservancy Parks
• Greenbelts
NUMBER OF PARKS
N PU Neighborhood Park Unit
(NPU)
• A 'Close -to -Home -Park'
• Playgrounds
• Picnic Areas
• Non -Structured Open Space
• Informal Field and Court Games:
Softball, Basketball or Soccer.
PEOPLE
SERVED
PARK PLANNING DISTRICTS
.........................................................................................................
Source: City of Fort Worth, Park& Recreation Department, 2021.
6-4
Source: City of Fort Worth, Park & Recreation Department, 2021.
CHAPTER 16: POLICE SERVICES
Safety is vital to the development of a vibrant and growing city. Effective delivery of
police services affects economic development, population growth, and ultimately, the
fiscal well being of a city. Nationwide, the fear of crime is cited as a primary factor in
the quality of life within communities, as well as a contributing factor in business and
family relocation decisions.
The City of Fort Worth provides police protection to residents within the city limits
through five patrol divisions, and works collaboratively with multiple agencies to reduce
crime and increase the overall safety of residents and visitors to Fort Worth. The Police
Department's mission is to provide quality service in partnership with the community to
create a safe environment for all.
On July 31, 2010, the Police Department implemented a patrol realignment, which
created four zones within each of the five patrol divisions. The zones have
approximately 3-5 beats each. The realignment provides supervision and accountability
in patrol by using a team approach. Consequently, the Department's availability to
address questions and concerns about service has more than doubled by providing
command level personnel to cover the city 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Persons living in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) or Limited Purpose Annexation
Areas are served primarily by county sheriff departments. All of the statistical material
found in this chapter relates to law enforcement and crimes occurring within the city
limits.
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS
According to the City Crime Rankings 2010-2011: Crime in Aft opolitanAmerica, Fort
Worth is ranked the loth safest city of 500,000 or more in population.
Historical Perspective
In the 1980s, Fort Worth experienced double-digit increases in criminal activity and had
the highest crime rate in the United States for two years. The negative impact of crime
and the adverse publicity it generated had a significant impact on Fort Worth overall,
including the local economy. In response to the high crime rates, community
stakeholders and the City worked together to address the situation in several ways.
Communitv-Oriented Policine
Former Chief Thomas Windham implemented Community -Oriented Policing —
establishing one of the most successful models of Code Blue programs in the nation that
emphasizes community involvement and proactive crime prevention to reduce crime.
The Citizens on Patrol Program is a partnership between the Police Department and the
citizens under the umbrella of the CODE BLUE funding from the Crime Control and
Prevention District (CCPD). The Citizens on Patrol volunteers work in tandem under the
direction of the Neighborhood Police Officers and serve as the eyes and ears of the
neighborhood.
2012 Chapter
Fort Worth Police Department Divisions and Zones Map, 2011
sro ti
h� r1dP
n1,
i
�`. N2 2$
'rs3' n"I
ez
N4 E1
21
Ci
�- E2
1N1 C2 E3
! � C3 si
sc4 E4 Zones
Divisions
--
Q u Central
s3 East
s;a
7 - North
S F—] South
West
10 5 0 10 Miles
� a
b
The Fort Worth Police Department includes five patrol divisions, each of which
is further subdivided into four zones containing 3-5 police beats. (source: Paine
Department, 2011 )
163
Chapter 16: Police Services
The Fort Worth Police Department is guided by four strategic directions: OVERALL CRIME RATE AND POPULATION 2010 - 2020
1. Professionalism and Organizational Excellence
2. Community Engagement and Partnerships
3. Operational Improvements
4. Technology Development and Infrastructure Expansion
791349691 349 10
Total calls received
Recruits graduated
Code Blue Volunteer
since 2015
since 2015
Programs
11729
129462
$267M+_
Sworn officers
Hours of officer
FY2021 General
in-service training in
Fund Budget
2020
90
168
Police beats
Standards met to be accredited by the Texas
Police Chief Association
North Patrol Headquarters
...........................................................................................................................................................................
Source: City of Fort Worth, Police Department, 2021.
10,000 1,000,000
9,000 900,000
8,000 , 800,000
7,000 700,000
u 6,000 600,000
5.000 500,000
4,000 400,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
— Population Crime Rate
Population Overall Crime Rate
UP 23% DOWN 43%
SINCE 2010 ISINCE 2010
2010
CRIME TYPE (per 100,000
population)
OVERALL CRIME 9,308.7
CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS
1,702.6
CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY
6,986.7
CRIMES AGAINST SOCIETY
...................................................................................................
619.4
2020
(per 100,000
population)
CHANGE
................................
5,023.7
i 43%
i 301
1,197.1
i 49%
3,544.7
281.9
1 i 54%
16-2
The Fort Worth Police Department FY17-FY21 Strategic Plan was developed
in 2016 to guide departmental decision -making over a five-year period. The
plan identified departmental and community priorities, established S.M.A.R.T.
(specific, manageable, achievable, realistic, and time bound) goals, action items
to achieve the goals, and assigned persons in the organization responsible for
implementation. As the plan has been implemented, key accomplishments,
organizational changes, and new opportunities necessitate a review of the plan
to ensure the Police Department focuses resources to maximize opportunities
and continue implementation for the remaining year, FY21. The Strategic
Plan includes over 500 goals and action items divided between four strategic
directions and each department bureau.
A new Strategic Plan is expected to be developed in 2021 for FY 2022 through
2026.
STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS
OProfessionalism
and Organization
Excellence
Professionalism and Organization
Excellence refers to maintaining
the standards of behavior
that align FWPD's actions and
attitude with the department's
mission, vision, and core values.
The purpose of specifying these
standards of behavior is to give
FWPD employees guidance in
understanding their role in the
department's success.
19 Community
Engagement and
Partnerships
Community Engagement and
Partnerships refers to working
with stakeholders to collaborate
and build trusting relationships,
to reduce crime and improve the
health of the community. This
strategic direction is about forming
trust with fellow members of the
community, which is a vital step
towards creating sustained crime
reductions.
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
The goals and action items are reviewed and progress is tracked monthly
using the web -based ClearPoint software. Implementation updates are posted
monthly on the department's dashboard.
Source: City of Fort Worth, Police Department, 2021.
0 Operational
Improvements
Operational Improvements refers
to advancing the delivery of quality
police services and enabling the
department to meet short and
long-term goals. This strategic
direction addresses the emergent
challengers that confront law
enforcement agencies.
Complete -91
On Target -318
Insufficient Progress-0
Lagging - 24
•
Monitoring -118
Numbers indicate the amount of goals in each
category. Symbols are based on Strategic Plan
Implementation Dashboard.
O'
Technology
Development and
Infrastructure
Expansion
Technology Development and
Infrastructure Expansion refers to
expanding reliance on technology
advancements. New and emergent
technologies have increasingly
critical roles in the daily work of
officers and largely dictate the
probabi I ity that a department
meets the expectations of citizens.
The strategic direction addresses
enhancements in technology,
facility updates, and police vehicle
up -dates.
16-16
Appendix A: Existing Plans and Studies
• Library Strategic Services Plan
• Library Facilities Master Plan
• Parks, Recreation, and Open
Space Master Plan, 2020 Update
13
Appendix Co. Future Land Use
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS SECTOR FUTURE LAND USE
Sector Land Use Policies
1. Promote transit -oriented development (TOD) along West 7th Street
where it could be served by a future western bypass alignment of the TEX
Rail commuter rail corridor and/or future modern streetcar service on
West 7th Street.
2. Promote commercial and urban residential development within the
Cultural District and Clear Fork Mixed -Use Growth Centers.
3. Promote a desirable combination of compatible residential, office, retail,
commercial, and selected light industrial uses in the mixed -use and urban
residential zoning districts ofthe West Seventh Urban Village.
4. Protect land needed for Green Infrastructure projects such as natural
stormwater conveyance and detention, riparian buffer protection, and
linear greenways with hike & bike trail alignments.
5. Maintain the neighborhood commercial scale and character of the historic
section of Camp Bowie Boulevard bounded by Montgomery Street and
Interstate 30. Promote the preservation of historic buildings, head -in
parking, storefronts, awnings, brick pavers, and compatible development
between residential and commercial uses. Discourage mixed use zoning or
higher density developments which may be out of scale for the historical
development pattern.
6. Maintain the neighborhood residential scale and character of the
White Settlement Road boundaries of the Monticello and Crestwood
neighborhoods. Discourage commercial or mixed use zoning or higher
density developments out of scale and character with the existing
residential development.
7. Stimulate the redevelopment of the Camp Bowie Boulevard, West 7th
Street, White Settlement Road, and Vickery Boulevard/Lovell Avenue
commercial, mixed -use, and urban residential districts.
8. Encourage urban residential development in appropriate locations to
create more walkable, pedestrian -oriented neighborhoods.
9. Seek to attract at least one convention hotel to the Cultural District.
10. Encourage compatible land use and infill development in the Como
neighborhood consistent with its neighborhood empowerment zone plan.
11. Promote the revitalization of the Horne Street commercial district.
12. Encourage compatible development between residential and commercial
properties along the west side of the Montgomery Street corridor.
13. Honor agreements between the University of North Texas Health Science
Center and the adjacent residential communities to meet expansion needs,
while protecting the residential communities.
Master Thoroughfare Plan —Commercial Mixed Use Street Q Existing Tranzi�5tati°ns IT-1 Commuter Rail
=A'1,AW5[reet P Future Transl151at1°ns °
�C°mmercml Connector �A'System Link--Rec°mmendetl Pas g ad
Future Land Use Designation °od Commercial �Inlrastrunure
Vacan[.UMevelopV.Agricul[ural M°'��^sty Resident al �cereraI C^mm al ®1Wyear—Plain
_M(d um Density Residential ® Ligbf ndurtdaeK MPUbi<Park. Recreafi°n.OpenSWce
�Hlgh Dw, ty Residential �Heavylnd,rsrial Pri—Park,Rtt u°n.0p 5p
a y esidential Urban Residential Mi d-Ux t F__J sand Pondsr
U-ituional kWusrlal G—h Center
d
A comprehensive plan shall not constitute zoning regulations or establish zoning district boundaries."
Texas Local Government Code, Section 219.005.
14
C-3
District 2: Northside TEXRail
Station Area
Northside and Northeast
Planning Sectors
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties along Decatur Ave. FROM
Light Industrial TO Mixed -Use and
Public Park, Recreation, Open Space.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Light Industrial
9i
Street View of Property
Proposed Future Land Use:
Mixed -Use and Public Park, Recreation,
Open Space
. t W
ER
2
I R I ON
CKYARQ��- OH IO
N,
8RE N
�� •, c N
HA_NN GCE _ 410* 1
y Ii F .HEAL
Districts 3 & 7:
Loop 820 & Silver Creek Road
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties located west of Loop 820
along Silver Creek Road FROM Mixed
Use, General Commercial, and Open
Space TO Light Industrial.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Mixed Use, General Commercial, and Open Space
Bull I �' a:
'*1111
.
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Light Industrial
Council
District
Location
Current Land Use
Proposed Land Use
Northside
2
TEXRail Station
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI)
MIXED -USE (MU)
Area
PRIVATE PARK,
2
Swains Lake,
RECREATION, OPEN SPACE
SFR &PRIPK
Watts Bar
(PRIPK) &SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (SFR)
3
5201 & 5404
NONE
VACANT, UNDEVELOPED,
Benbrook Blvd
AGRICULTURAL (AG)
3
8251 Benbrook
NONE
INFRASTRUCTURE
Blvd
(INFRA)
MU, GENERAL
3 & 7
Loop 820 &
COMMERCIAL (GC),
LI
Silver Creek Rd
INSTITUTIONAL (INST), &
PRIPK
Vista Ridge
MEDIUM DENSITY
4
Middle School
RESIDENTIAL (MDR) & SFR
INST
(Thompson Rd)
5029-5033
PUBLIC PARK,
4
Glenscape Trail
RECREATION, OPEN SPACE
SFR & PUBPK
(PUBPK) & SFR
Council
Location
Current Land Use
Proposed Land Use
District
Summerfields Blvd &
PRIVATE PARK,
SINGLE-FAMILY
4
Button Dr
RECREATION, OPEN
RESIDENTIAL (SFR)
SPACE (PRI PK)
2408-2412 & 2409-
NEIGHBORHOOD
5
2413 Willspoint
COMMERCIAL (NC)
SFR
Court
PUBLIC PARK, RECREATION,
6
Southwest Christian
OPEN SPACE (PUBPK),
INSTITUTIONAL (INST)
& Adjacent Property
VACANT, UNDEVELOPED,
& AG
AGRICULTURAL (AG), & SFR
6
6908 Woodway
PUBPK
SFR
Drive
LOW DENSITY
NC, MIXED -USE (MU),
7
Melbourne Drive
RESIDENTIAL (LDR) &
URBAN RESIDENTIAL (UR),
PRI PK
& LDR
Oak Acres BBQ
7
(North Las Vegas
SFR
NC
Trail)
7
1317 Bomber Road
PRI PK
SFR
Council
District
Location
Current Land Use
Proposed Land Use
Harmon Road &
SINGLE-FAMILY
NEIGHBORHOOD
7
Heritage Trace
RESIDENTIAL (SFR)
COMMERCIAL (NC)
Parkway
7
709-817 Cropout
PRI PK
SFR
Way
7
8516 Waterfront
SFR
PRI PK
Court
8
Belknap Street
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
PRIPK & GC
(GC)
8
Bell Avenue &
NONE
INDUSTRIAL GROWTH
Wichita Street
CENTER (IGC)
Oncor Properties at
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) &
9
1-35W & Oak Grove
LOW DENSITY
INFRASTRUCTURE
Road
RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
(INFRA)
Appendix Do.
Funded Capital Improvements
The consolidated
FY2021-2025
Five -Year Capital
Improvement Plan
and Summary
incorporated into
Appendix D.
Caotai lmpravement Projects -continued
FY2021
FY 2022
FY 2023
F=: 2
F='2J25
Athletic Fueld Improvements
$2.40 M
Community Park Improvements
E 1.03 M
$0. 17 M
$0.01 M
$0.16 M
;::: I / ,
Community Partnershi ps
$0.01 M
E1.04 A I
$1.00M
5L00M
:�..i3 M
Dries& Parking Lots
50.13 M
SO.SOM
Facihty Improvements
$4.10M
New Fanli t.es
$0.81M
P"rnund Improvement,
$0.75 ht
n Redevelopmenli!R aaticns
$0.10 M
50.43 M
$0.26 M
$L38T+1
$0.31 M
Studies
$0.20 M
50.05 M
$0.05 M
$0.20 M
Equipment
50 !0 M
$0 e3 M
$0.27 N1
$0.10 M
$0.14 M
Veh;- e_
b4.07 M
59.05 M
$4.36M I
$951M
54.66 M
;M
Equipment
$0.06 M
50.07 M
$1.03 M
$0.22 M
$0.04 M
RederelopmenvRenaaaticn=
$3.92 M
$3.95 M
53.79 M
$3.62 M
$3.92 M
Veh:: e=
$3.22 M
53.00 M
53.00 M
$3.00 M
$3.92 M
U_S
Appendix E:
20-Year
Planned Service
Areas
Planned Service Areas
Maps will be
incorporated into a new
Appendix E.
• Development Advisory Committee
• Real Estate Council
41 REAL [STATE
rim
UC1IL
ar G ec _er Fort Worth
kl6er�arefortommercialrealesta[e
• Builders Association
GREATER FORT WORM
BUILDERS ASSOCIATION
The maps in this appendix depict the Planned Service Areas (PSAs), which are
locations in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) that the City of Fort Worth
expects to be able to serve within the next 20-25 years with appropriate
municipal services and infrastructure. The City delineates Planned Service
Areas in the ETJ to help guide planning and decision -making on capital
improvement projects, future land use allocations, municipal services
forecasting, and annexation requests. Inclusion of property in a Planned
Service Area does not obligate the City to provide services to the property,
nor does it prohibit the City from considering areas outside of PSAs for service
provision.
Key factors used to determine Planned Service Areas include proximity to:
• City limits
• Waterlines
• Highways, arterial thoroughfares, and railroads
Other factors considered in determining PSAs include the City's future land
use plan, the location and extent of buildable land, fire station response times,
and Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCNs,which define existing
water and sewer service areas).
FORT WORTH
SELECTION FACTORS
a
c
J
a�
w
0
0
o.
c
L
a�
c
0
0.
a)
rr
a�
L
LL
E
J
U
c
J
N
LL
LL
One million gallon elevated water v
storage tank in Parker County, c�
constructed north of 1-20 to serve
development in far west Fort Worth.
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Source: City of Fort Worth Departments: Development Services, Fire & Emergency Services, IT Solutions, Planning & Data Analytics, Water, and the City Manager's Office, 2021.
23
E-2
Fort Worth has 17 Planned Service Areas, as shown on the map to the right.
Planned Service Area maps are provided on the following pages in counter-
clockwise order, starting with the Far North Area - East.
1) Far North Area - East
2) Far North Area - West
3) Eagle Mountain/ Business 287 Area
.......................................................................................................................
4) Boat Club & Bailey Boswell Intersection
.......................................................................................................................
5) Ten Mile Bridge & Cromwell Marine Creek
.......................................................................................................................
6) Jacksboro Highway/Nine Mile Bridge Area
.......................................................................................................................
7) Live Oak/Silver Creek Area
10) US 377 & FM 1187 Intersection
......................................................................................................................
11) Oakmont/Chisholm Trail Parkwav Area
14) Chisholm Trail Parkway East/South CR 920Area
..................................................................................................................................................................
15) Chisholm Trail Parkway/ East FM 1187/Cleburne Rd Area
..................................................................................................................................................................
16) Rosemary/Southfork/The Bridges Area
..................................................................................................................................................................
17) Everman Southeast Area
20-YEAR PLANNED SERVICE AREAS
I� 20-Year Planned Service Areas
ETJ
City Limit
Adjacent Cities/Places
24
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Source: City of Fort Worth Departments: Development Services, Fire & Emergency Services, IT Solutions, Planning & Data Ana lytics, Water, and the City Manager's Office, 2021.
E-3
7) LIVE OAK/SILVER CREEK AREA
r
I;
Commercial Connector
Adjacent PSA
Neighborhood Connector
F--] City Limit
System Link
ED
20-Year Planned Service Areas
Adjacent Cities/Places
t
�M10. Lake^
Pm Worth
f,
rrrt►'
8) WALSH RANCH NORTH/FM 3325 AREA
r
Commercial Connector Adjacent PSA
Neighborhood Connector City Limit
System Link
ED
20-Year Planned Service Areas
0 Adjacent Cities/Places
Source. City of Fort Worth Departments: Development Services, Fire & Emergency Services, IT Solutions, Planning & Data Analytics, Water, and the City Manager's Office, 2021.
AN
0 1 2 fvllles
I �
25
E-7
Appendix F:
Annexation Policy
and Program
Annexation Plan, Policy,
and Program updates
incorporated into
Appendix F.
1 & A
Denton
LL 13 14 4&Cf B
■F
15
... G H s 11
'£ . l
6
10
21
223
M;
Parker 24 d+` Tarrant '
s
V'26
°'<oy, y •°,,." .,,. ° ❑ Owner -Initiated Annex
� Potential Annexation
City of Fort Worth
ze ?< s Designation
3o r i a E� Full Purpose
u 26 " Limited Purpose
■ """"`" EMratenitonal Jurisdictio
31 33
w Lake
o r County Boundary
•/ N Freeways
Major Streets
FORTNORTH. - Map 1 - Draft 10121/2020
Potential Annexation, Short -Range Program Development Services Department
COPYRIGHT 2020 CITY OF FORT WORTH UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION IS A VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAWS. THIS
R A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION ONLY. THE
ACCURACY IS NOT TOBETAKEN/USEDAS DATA PRODUCED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES OR BYA REGISTEREDRROFESsONAL LAND SURVEYOR. THECITYOFFORTWORTH ASSUMES NO
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF SAID DATA
Proposed Schedule
December 18, 2020 City Plan Commission receives a work session briefing on the
draft 2021 Comprehensive Plan.
January 27, 2021 City Plan Commission conducts public hearing and votes to
recommend adoption of plan.
February 16, 2021 City Council receives an Informal Report on proposed plan.
March 2, 2021 City Council conducts public hearing on proposed plan and votes
on ordinance to adopt 2021 Comprehensive Plan.
March 2021 Adopted plan posted on City website.
Contact Info
Eric Fladager
817-392-8011
Eric.r iadager@FortWorthTexas.gov
Korrie Becht
817-392-7944
Korrie.Becht@FortWorthTexas.gov
29
District 2: Swains Lake Drive,
Watts Bar Court, Marine
Creek Ranch Addition
Far Northwest Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties along Huffines Blvd. to
correctly assign existing designations.
Current Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential and Private Park,
Recreation, Open Space
Aerial View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential and Private Park,
Recreation, Open Space
District 3: Benbrook Blvd.
Western Hills/Ridglea Planning
Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties at 5201 & 5401 Benbrook
Blvd. FROM No Designation TO
Vacant, Undeveloped, Agricultural.
Current Future Land Use:
No Designation
Aerial View
1.
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Vacant, Undeveloped, Agricultural
District 3: Benbrook Blvd.
Western Hills/Ridglea Planning
Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties at 8251 Benbrook Blvd.
FROM No Designation TO
Infrastructure.
Current Future Land Use:
No Designation
Aerial View
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Infrastructure
All-
,
K
District 4: Thompson Road
Middle School
Northeast Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties along Thompson Rd. FROM
Medium Density Residential and
Single -Family Residential TO
Institutional.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Medium Density Residential and Single -Family
Residential
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Institutional
District4: Glenscape Trail
Far North Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties at 5029, 5033 & 5037
Glenscape Trail FROM Public Park,
Recreation, Open Space and Single -
Family Residential TO Single -Family
Residential and Public Park,
Recreation, Open Space.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Public Park, Recreation, Open Space and
Single -Family Residential
9
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential and Public Park,
Recreation, Open Space
r�r �
c,EN�aPE
District4: Summerfields Blvd.
& Buttonwood Dr.
Far North Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties located at 7924-7932
Buttonwood Dr. FROM Private Park,
Recreation, Open Space TO Single -
Family Residential.
Current Future Land Use:
Private Park, Recreation, Open Space
'
1 SU MMERFILLU "
— - o SUMMERFIELN S-�� MMERF
a
`
' -
ThT
W%
Aerial View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential
MERFIE
R
AAI a NANNINA �A �R
District 6: Southwest
Christian & Adjacent Property
Far Southwest Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
6901 Altamesa Blvd. and adjacent
properties FROM Public Park,
Recreation, Open Space TO
Institutional and Vacant,
Undeveloped, Agricultural.
Current Future Land Use:
Aerial View
Public Park, Recreation, Open Space; Vacant,
Undeveloped, Agricultural, and Single -Family
Residential
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Institutional and Vacant, Undeveloped,
Agricultural
i
District 6: Woodway Drive
Wedgwood Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
property at 6908 Woodway Drive v
FROM P bl' P k R O
1 R'
u is ar ecreation, pen
Space TO Single -Family Residential.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Public Park, Recreation, Open Space
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential
It . 0"_�Vl '�_*
District 7: Melbourne Drive
Northside Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties along Melbourne Dr. FROM
Low Density Residential and Private
Park, Recreation, Open Space TO
Neighborhood Commercial, Mixed -
Use, Urban Residential, and Low
Density Residential.
x
;s
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Low Density Residential and Private Park,
Recreation, Open Space
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Neighborhood Commercial, Mixed -Use, Urban
Residential, and Low Density Residential
District 7: North Las Vegas TH
Far West Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
Oak Acres BBQ property along North
Las Vegas Trail FROM Single -Family
Residential TO Neighborhood
Commercial.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Neighborhood Commercial
District 7: Bomber Road -
Far West Planning Sector.
t i . -
Proposed Future Land Use change for',
1317 Bomber Road FROM Private` T,
Park, Recreation, Open SpaceTO '_.L b `.
Single -Family Residential. 7� a.
Current Future Land Use:
Private Park, Recreation, Open Space
Lake Worth
Aerial View
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential
District 7: Harmon Road &
Heritage Trace Parkway
Far North Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
9701 Harmon Road and 1933 Heritage
Trace Parkway FROM Single -Family
Residential TO Neighborhood
Commercial.
Current Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential
P
.Ilk'
am
Jam\\\
Ss ♦
ql
NNP�
\S
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Neighborhood Commercial
Aerial View
V` c WUCHLI'IJ -U1 �G1 L
�f II
II Yi Ibl�
II<I
II � II
u I; IIa
III Iho
Mva, l II r FR�A�Ka
III II
fll lix
4 Ila�l
1
-.lLi LEPFdiFGE` �VASEFFdiiGi
J � WITGHLINRr. 1'LA�GIiLIN-
UN�,
U
Ib
I
II<
I' I
JJ
Ilo'
U I;
N t
IIa
Il
ii
i
No
III
��d
�C
II
IVx
II°
1,
Q
l
�'sL"LEPF�d irG'�"
�OALLEVFdriGF
District 7: Cropout Way
Far North Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
709-817 Cropout Way FROM Private
Park, Recreation, Open Space TO
Single -Family Residential.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
Private Park, Recreation, Open Space
x . �\A
OPO��/1
.,.� CROPWT
a
o•
s4i4�_ /
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential
Q'Wr � `•� 1 �� f
CROPWT Or
a
o•
District 7: WaterfrontCt
Far West Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
8516 Waterfront Court FROM Single -
Family Residential TO Private Park,
Recreation, Open Space.
Current Future Land Use:
Single -Family Residential
Eagle Mountain;
/j
so
Aerial View
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Private Park, Recreation, Open Space
�e#
I
District 8: Belknap Street �
Northeast Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change fora.,
properties along Belknap St. FROM
General Commercial TO Private Park
Recreation, Open Space and General
Commercial.
Aerial View
Current Future Land Use:
General Commercial
k
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Private Park, Recreation, Open Space and
General Commercial
C C 4 Y
N �vi
2
n
Wg%
PSEH�
e w
:SATE-14Y.141
District8: Bell Avenue&
Wichita Street
Sycamore Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
property along Bell Ave. & Wichita St.
FROM No Designation TO Industrial
Growth Center.
Current Future Land Use:
No Designation
yam.
...k
Aerial View
Street View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Industrial Growth Center
District 9: Oncor Properties at
1-35W & Oak Grove Road
Sycamore Planning Sector
Proposed Future Land Use change for
properties located between 1-35W and
Oak Grove Rd./E. Felix St. FROM Light
Industrial and Low Density Residential
TO Infrastructure.
Current Future Land Use:
Light Industrial and Low Density Residential
rYR��y
t�
q4
1
Aerial View
Proposed Future Land Use:
Infrastructure
Appendix D : Capital Improvements
Sample Capital Projects
Completed in 2020
• Hemphill/Lamar Connector
Tunnel ($30.6 M)
• Clover Lane Street
Reconstruction ($4 M)
Appendix D : Capital Improvements
Sample Capital Projects
Completed in 2020
• Westside V Elevated
Storage Tank ($2.7 M)
• Village Creek Water
Reclamation Facility Liquid
Bio-solids Storage Tank
($6.4 M)
RT WORTH
Appendix D : Capital Improvements
Sample Capital Projects Completed in 2020
• Keller Haslet Hazardous
Road Overtopping
Mitigation Project ($1.9 M)
r . 1--
7 FIS(",1L
IKELL'ERMAS1
� ti'cii;D RIGH��'OMI
4WEL'LSBL
49