HomeMy WebLinkAbout(0115) ATTACHMENT PH - Water.Exhibit F (2)f
WATER
IMPAC
ASTEWATER
FX1411RTT F-- CAPITAL iMPRnvF.MFNT PLAN - WA.STF.WATF.R f2O22-20411
PREPARED BY:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
801 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 2800
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
817-735-7300
irmill NICHOLS
WATER & WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE UPDATE
EXHIBIT F; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- WASTEWATER (2022 - 2041)
Prepared for:
Fort Worth Water
FORTWORTH.
m�
%""600"'o
July 22, 2021
Prepared by:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
817-735-7300
WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE
UPDATE
Prepared for:
�E O\T111 Fort Worth Water
F
7/22/2021
_moo cos
joo°000000000000000000000 0
JESSICA L. BROWN
o0 0000000000000000000000 00 /
90098
_
E
##44 S' DENS ' \ —
S � �000000o G
1%/ A
FRE E AND MCHOLS, INC.
XAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
E OF T 11
��P�,.•• •••. F+ys�i /22/2021
ANDREW S.FRANKO
.....................
0�'• 115651
1�,� •.,. ENS G��_
S
i411�� \A040
L
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
'0 F
..... TF�1s�7/22/2021
...............
....... .............:I
MAZEN H. KAWASMI
� 0•. �
o: _
FS •. ENS..• 04
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
Prepared by:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
817-735-7300
FTW 20118
OF • TF-�y��/ 7/22/2021
;/
NICHOLAS JAMES McCORMICK o
00/ '••••135767•••,•��,
.�
/�,�•../C ENS
G
S
11 S/ONAl-
E��
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
V
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater ,11 <NICHQLS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................1-1
2.0 Existing Wastewater Collection System........................................................................................2-1
2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants...............................................................................................2-1
2.2 Lift Stations and Force Mains.................................................................................................2-1
3.0 Projected Wastewater Flows........................................................................................................3-1
4.0 Wastewater Capital Improvements..............................................................................................4-1
5.0 Impact Fee Analysis.......................................................................................................................5-1
5.1 Service Units...........................................................................................................................5-1
5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation.........................................................................5-4
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1
Projected Wastewater Flows...........................................................................................3-1
Table 4-1
Proposed Wastewater CIP Projects.................................................................................4-2
Table 5-1
2022-2031 Impact Fee Eligible Costs...............................................................................5-1
Table 5-2
AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors..................................................................................5-2
Table 5-3
Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter ....5-2
Table 5-4
Wastewater Impact Fee with Credit Analysis(100%)......................................................5-4
Table 5-5
Wastewater Impact Fees by Meter Size..........................................................................5-4
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure F-1 Existing Wastewater Facilities.........................................................................................4-3
Figure F-2 Proposed Wastewater Improvements.............................................................................4-4
APPENDICES
Appendix A—
Existing Wastewater Lift Station Capacities
Appendix B —Wastewater
CIP Projects
Appendix C —
Impact Fee Credit Analysis
Appendix D
—Water Meter Summary
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater W7MICHOLS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth
commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc., to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. This report
establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous study completed in 2017.
Impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost associated with expanding
the municipal wastewater system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of Fort Worth
owns and operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, lift stations, and pipelines that are
continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the wastewater system is
known as the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP was updated as a part of this study with capital
project scope and cost provided by previously commissioned master planning documents and input from
Fort Worth Water staff.
The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth wastewater facilities are eligible
to be included in the impact fee analysis. The additional facilities required to accommodate growth during
the study period are summarized.
1-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS
2.0 EXISTING WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
2.1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
The City of Fort Worth provides wastewater service to retail customers within the city and to 23 wholesale
customers in the surrounding counties. The Fort Worth wastewater collection system is primarily a gravity
flow system that follows the major drainage features of the service area. The City's collection system
consists of 12 sewer basins. There are currently three major wastewater treatment facilities serving the
study area: the Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility (WRF), which is owned and operated by the City
of Fort Worth, and the Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and the Central Regional
WWTP, which are both owned and operated by the Trinity River Authority (TRA). The Village Creek WRF
serves the majority of the population within the study area. The TRA Basin is served by the TRA Central
WWTP, and the Denton Creek Basin is served by the TRA Denton Creek WWTP.
2.2 LIFT STATIONS AND FORCE MAINS
The City of Fort Worth currently operates 35 lift stations, which pump wastewater into gravity sewers.
The City has made a conscious effort to limit the number of lift stations in the collection system. These lift
stations are required because of local topographical constraints or to pump flows across sewer basins.
Appendix A summarizes the existing lift station capacities.
2-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS
3.0 PROJECTED WASTEWATER FLOWS
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) recommends a minimum of 100 gallons per
capita per day (gpcd) for municipal base flow. The 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan recommends
using 110 gpcd and an additional 10 gpcd to account for groundwater infiltration (GWI), resulting in a total
per capita for future growth of 120 gpcd. Additionally, the 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan
recommends using 40 gped for future commercial growth.
In order to calculate the annual average day wastewater flows, the population and employment growth
projections were taken from Exhibit 8: Land Use Assumptions- Wastewater Facilities.
The 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan did not use a straight average flow to peak flow peaking factor
because the City utilized an extended period simulation model to determine the projected peak flows.
The model used the RTK method, which calculates a different peaking factor for each scenario dependent
on amount of rainfall, peaking time, and recession time. From the 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan,
the historical annual average flow to peak hour flow ratio is 3.03 and was used to calculate the peak flows.
The wholesale customer flow was provided by the wholesale customers as part of the wholesale customer
surveys. Table 3-1 summarizes the projected wastewater flows for the City of Fort Worth and its wholesale
customers.
Table 3-1 Projected
Wastewater
Flows
2022
134.04 406.14
City of Fort Worth
2031
164.20 497.53
Wholesale Customers
2022
38.79 117.18
(Portion Served by Fort Worth)
2031
51.33 144.54
Total Flow
2031
215.53 642.07
3-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS
4.0 WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
This section establishes the wastewater facilities and engineering studies that are eligible for inclusion in
the calculation of the impact fee. Projects included in the CIP are designated to increase system capacity
as a result of projected growth. Only those projects warranted by capacity needs derived from growth
occurring during the study period (2022-2031) can be included in the impact fee calculation. Additionally,
projects are excluded from the impact fee calculation if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in
place. Facilities included in the impact fee study are TRA projects, City of Fort Worth wastewater
treatment facilities, lift stations, interceptors and engineering studies.
Table 4-1 provides a summary of each wastewater CIP project cost and allocation for the 2022-2031 study
period. Project costs do not include costs associated with purchasing land, unless specified in the "Project
Phase" field. The 2022 percent utilization is the portion of a project's capacity required to serve existing
development. It is not included in the impact fee cost calculations. The 2022-2031 percent utilization is
the portion of the project's capacity that will be required to serve development projected to occur from
2022 to 2031. The portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur
from 2022 through 2031 is calculated as the total cost multiplied by the 2022-2031 percent utilization.
Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. The percent utilization beyond 2031 is the
portion of a project's capacity allocated to development projected to occur after 2031.
Figures F-1 and F-2 show existing and proposed facilities, respectively, for the impact fee study period.
Appendix B describes each wastewater CIP project for the 2022-2031 planning period. A project
description, the purpose of each project, and the portion of each project that is allocated to associated
growth are included.
4-1
FREESE
WM AICHOLS
FORT WORTH
Table 4-1 Wastewater Capital Improvement Projects 2022 - 2031
Added %Allocatedto CostAllocated % Allocated to 2022-2031 Impact Inflation Adjusted %Allocatedto CostAllocated
T Fort Worth Project Cost in 020 Start Completion Capacity Existing 2022r2022-2031 Fees Impact Fee Costs' Impact Fees to Impact Fees
Project ID Project Title ��M=11?rqjectCost Participation Cost Initial Project Cost Dollars'Date ..te (MGr r r .. .. .. after 2031i
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS
3828.211
Denton Creek WRF Expansion to 11.5 MGD
Const
$47,595,000
$26,177,250
-
$26,177,250
2008
2010
6.5 MGD
54%
$14,135,715
24%
$6,282,540
$6,282,540
22.0%
$5,758,995
3828.651
CB-1 36-inch Parallel Relief Interceptor
Const
$5,317,548
$2,924,651
-
$2,924,651
2013
2015
-
12%
$350,958
30%
$877,395
$877,395
58.0%
$1,696,298
3828.641
HC-1 Relief Int. (460H-DCRWS)
Eng
$2,407,149
$1,323,932
-
$1,323,932
2015
2020
-
0%
$0
20%
$264,786
$264,786
80.0%
$1,059,146
3828.641
HC-1 Relief Int. (460H-DCRWS)
Const
$17,650,502
$9,707,776
-
$9,707,776
2015
2020
-
0%
$0
20%
$1,941,555
$1,941,555
80.0%
$7,766,221
3828.20172
One Alternate Discharge Pump
Eng
$161,330
$88,732
-
$88,732
2016
2018
-
54%
$47,915
24%
$21,296
$21,296
22.0%
$19,521
3828.20172
One Alternate Discharge Pump
Const
$449,555
$247,255
-
$247,255
2019
2021
-
54%
$133,518
24%
$59,341
$59,341
22.0%
$54,396
3828.642
10-25HC-1 Relief Int. (740H - 460H) 12,500 LF
Land
$1,241,000
$682,550
-
$682,550
2015
2019
-
0%
$0
46%
$313,973
$313,973
54.0%
$368,577
3828.642
10-25HC-1 Relief Int. (740H -460H)12,500 LF
Const
$12,970,707
$7,133,889
-
$7,133,889
2019
2021
-
0%
$0
46%
$3,281,589
$3,281,589
54.0%
$3,852,300
3828.644
15-25HC-3 Relief lnt.(1320H to 740H) 13,100 LF (Relieving 24-inch Interceptor)
Land
$800,000
$440,000
-
$440,000
2019
2021
-
0%
$0
49%
$215,600
$215,600
51.0%
$224,400
3828.644
15-25HC-3 Relief Int. (1320H to 740H) 13,100 LF (Relieving 24-inch Interceptor)
Const
$15,015,891
$8,258,740
-
$8,258,740
2021
2022
44.12 MGD
0%
$0
49%
$4,046,783
$4,168,186
51.0%
$4,211,957
3828.645
15-25HC-4/15-25HC-5 Relief Interceptor & MS 10_OHC(1320H-1780H)
Land
$894,000
$491,700
-
$491,700
2020
2021
-
0%
$0
52%
$255,684
$255,684
48.0%
$518,989
3828.645
15-25HC-4/15-25HC-5 Relief Interceptor & MS 10_OHC(1320H-1780H)
Const
$15,829,000
$8,705,950
-
$8,705,950
2021
2023
16.1 MGD
0%
$0
52%
$4,527,094
$4,662,907
48.0%
$4,178,856
3828.2012
Peak Flow Storage
Eng
$5,213,000
$2,867,150
-
$2,867,150
2021
2022
30.6 MG
0%
$0
50%
$1,433,575
$1,476,582
50.0%
$1,433,575
3828.2012
Peak Flow Storage
Const
$32,640,000
$17,952,000
•01,575
-
$17,952,000
$87,001,575
2023
2023
-
TRINITY
0%
RIVER AUTHORITY
$0
1 50%
1 $8,976,000
$9,808,318
50.0%
$8,976,000
TREATMENT FACILITIES
WWTP-003
Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications
Design
-
-
$1,032,750
$1,032,750
2011
2016
-
75%
$774,563
25%
$258,188
$258,188
0.0%
$0
WWTP-003
Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications
CM\Insp
-
-
$995,000
$995,000
2011
2016
-
75%
$746,250
25%
$248,750
$248,750
0.0%
$0
WWTP-003
Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications
Const
-
-
$16,889,298
$16,889,298
2011
2016
80 MGD
75%
$12,666,974
25%
$4,222,325
$4,222,325
0.0%
$0
WWTP-009
VCWRF Peak Flow Diversion Structure (Equalization Basin for Peak Flows)
CM\Const
-
-
$30,921,046
$30,921,046
2012
2018
100 MG
25%
$7,730,262
75%
$23,190,785
$23,190,785
0.0%
$0
WWTP-0133
VCWRF South Influent Lift Station (V-3)
Eng
-
-
$452,147
$452,147
2017
2021
-
0%
$0
93%
$420,497
$420,497
7.0%
$31,650
WWTP-0133
VCWRF South Influent Lift Station (V-3)
Const
-
-
$21,081,975
$21,081,975
2021
2022
-
0%
$0
93%
$19,606,237
$20,194,424
7.0%
$1,475,738
WWMP #53
Mary's Creek WRF Site Selection and Land Purchase
Land
-
-
$4,950,000
$4,950,000
2011
2011
-
0%
$0
52%
$2,574,000
$2,574,000
48.0%
$2,376,000
WWMP #53
Mary's Creek Satellite Plant (MP-053)
Permitting\Eng
-
-
$13,500,000
$13,500,000
2017
2023
-
0%
$0
52%
$7,020,000
$7,020,000
48.0%
$6,480,000
WWMP#533
Mary's Creek Satellite Plant (MP-053)
Const
-
-
$135,000,000
$135,000,000
2024
2026
10 MGD
0%
$0
52%
$70,200,000
$79,010,718
48.0%
$64,800,000
WWTP-012-1
VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12 (Phase 2B of 191 MGD expansion)
Study\Eng
-
-
$3,785,000
$3,785,000
2017
2020
-
0%
$0
93%
$3,520,050
$3,520,050
7.0%
$264,950
WWTP-012-2
VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12 (Phase 2B of 191 MGD expansion)
CM\Const
-
-
$10,574,070
$10,574,070
2024
2025
25 MGD
0%
$0
93%
$9,833,885
$11,068,124
7.0%
$740,185
WWTP-012-3
VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12 (Phase 2B of 191 MGD expansion)
CM\Const
-
-
$10,574,070
$249,755,356
$10,574,070
$249,755,356
2024
2025
-
0%
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
$0
PLANTS
93%
ELIGIBLE COST
$9,833,885
$150,928,602
$11,068,124
7.0%
$740,185
REGIONAL LIFT STATIONS & INTERCEPTORS
WWMP #1074
4.4 MGD Rock Creek Lift Station Expansion (outside of PID boundary) to 6.0 MGD (Including 16-inch Parallel Force Main)
Eng
-
-
$1,096,000
$1,096,000
2017
2023
-
0%
$0
99%
$1,085,040
$1,085,040
1.0%
$10,960
WWMP #107°
4.4 MGD Rock Creek Lift Station Expansion (outside of PID boundary) to 6.0 MGD (Including 16-inch Parallel Force Main)
Const
-
-
$7,306,600
$7,306,600
2017
2024
4.4 MGD
0%
$0
99%
$7,233,534
$7,233,534
1.0%
$73,066
WWMP #283
Dosier Creek 24-inch Force Main (Marine Creek to Big Fossil Basin WW Diversion)
Eng
-
-
$400,000
$400,000
2015
2019
-
31%
$124,000
69%
$276,000
$276,000
0.0%
$0
WWMP #283
Dosier Creek 24-inch Force Main (Marine Creek to Big Fossil Basin WW Diversion)
Const
-
-
$3,877,861
$3,877,861
2019
2020
14 MGD
31%
$1,202,137
69%
$2,675,724
$2,675,724
0.0%
$0
WWMP #134
Proposed 44.0 MGD Lake Arlington - VC Basin Lift Station & 42-inch Force Main
Eng
-
-
$4,299,132
$4,299,132
2018
2020
-
0%
$0
100%
$4,299,132
$4,299,132
0.0%
$0
WWMP #134
Proposed 44.0 MGD Lake Arlington - VC Basin Lift Station & 42-inch Force Main
Const
-
-
$49,018,693
$49,018,693
2020
2023
44 MGD
0%
$0
100%
$49,018,693
$49,018,693
0.0%
$0
2022 IF #14
Proposed 5.25 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "A" & Force Main
Eng
-
-
$800,900
$800,900
2020
2023
-
0%
$0
55%
$440,495
$440,495
45.0%
$360,405
2022 IF #14
Proposed 5.25 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "A" & Force Main
Const
-
-
$5,338,800
$5,338,800
2020
2023
5.25 MGD
0%
$0
55%
$2,936,340
$2,936,340
45.0%
$2,402,460
2022 IF #23
Proposed 22.0 MGD Clear Fork Lift Station & 30-inch Force Main
Eng
-
-
$3,720,000
$3,720,000
2020
2021
-
0%
$0
59%
$2,194,800
$2,194,800
41.0%
$1,525,200
2022 IF #23
Proposed 22.0 MGD Clear Fork Lift Station & 30-inch Force Main
Const
-
-
$24,800,000
$24,800,000
2021
2025
22 MGD
0%
$0
59%
$14,632,000
$15,070,960
41.0%
$10,168,000
2022 IF #34
Proposed 4.5 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "B" & Force Main
Eng
-
-
$806,000
$806,000
2022
2023
-
0%
$0
55%
$443,300
$470,297
45.0%
$362,700
2022 IF #34
Proposed 4.5 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "B" & Force Main
Const
-
-
$5,372,700
$5,372,700
2023
2024
4.5 MGD
0%
$0
55%
$2,954,985
$3,228,992
45.0%
$2,417,715
WWMP #614
5.5 MGD Richardson Slough Lift Station Expansion to 10.0 MGD & 20-inch Force Main in the Clear Fork Basin
Eng
-
-
$607,200
$607,200
2024
2025
-
0%
$0
100%
$607,200
$683,409
0.0%
$0
WWMP #614
5.5 MGD Richardson Slough Lift Station Expansion to 10.0 MGD & 20-inch Force Main in the Clear Fork Basin
Const
-
-
$4,047,600
$4,047,600
2025
2025
5.5 MGD
0%
$0
100%
$4,047,600
$4,692,278
0.0%
$0
WWMP #544
Proposed 10.0 MGD Walnut Creek Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main
Eng
-
-
$2,924,700
$2,924,700
2026
2028
-
0%
$0
48%
$1,403,856
$1,676,277
52.0%
$1,520,844
WWMP #544
Proposed 10.0 MGD Walnut Creek Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main
Const
-
-
$19,497,600
$19,497,600
2026
2028
10 MGD
0%
$0
48%
$9,358,848
$11,174,954
52.0%
$10,138,752
WWMP #644
14.0 MGD Dosier Creek Lift Station Expansion to 24.0 MGD & 24-inch Force Main
Eng
-
-
$1,953,100
$1,953,100
2026
2028
-
0%
$0
50%
$976,550
$1,166,052
50.0%
$976,550
WWMP #64°
14.0 MGD Dosier Creek Lift Station Expansion to 24.0 MGD & 24-inch Force Main
Const
-
-
$13,020,500
$13,020,500
2026
2028
14 MGD
0%
$0
50%
$6,510,250
$7,773,579
50.0%
$6,510,250
2022 IF #43
Proposed 13.0 MGD La Frontera Lift Station
Eng
-
-
$540,000
$540,000
2026
2028
1 -
0%
$0
40%
$216,000
$257,915
60.0%
1 $324,000
2022 IF #44
Proposed 13.0 MGD La Frontera Lift Station
Const
-
-
$8,594,900
$8,594,900
2026
2028
13 MGD
0%
$0
40%
$3,437,960
$4,105,104
60.0%
$5,156,940
WWMP #964
Proposed 10.0 MGD Regional Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main
Eng
-
-
$2,251,100
$2,251,100
2026
2028
-
0%
$0
30%
$675,330
$806,379
70.0%
$1,575,770
WWMP #964
Proposed 10.0 MGD Regional Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main
Const
-
-
$15,006,800
$15,006,800
2026
2028
10 MGD
0%
$0
30%
$4,502,040
$5,375,671
70.0%
$10,504,760
WWMP #18°
108-inch Third Barrel Interceptor Parallel to M-280 & M-338 MP-018
Eng
-
-
$14,467,800
$14,467,800
2025
2032
-
0%
$0
51%
$7,378,578
$8,553,794
49.0%
$7,089,222
WWMP #18°
108-inch Third Barrel Interceptor Parallel to M-280 & M-338 MP-018
Const
-
-
$96,432,000
$96,432,000
2026
2032
173 MGD
0%
$0
51%
$49,180,320
$58,723,874
49.0%
$47,251,680
ENGINEERING STUDIES
- 2012 Wastewater Master Plan 2010-2030 Study - - $4,156,850 $4,156,850 2008 2012 - 60%
$2,494,110 40%
$1,662,740 $1,662,740 0.0% $0
-I Impact Fee Study 2022-2031 Study - - $450,000 $450,000 2019 1 2021 - 0%
$0 100%
$450,000 $450,000 0.0% $0
WWTP-0433 Village Creek Facilities Plan Study $1,000,000 $1,000,000 2023 2023 - 0%
$5,606,850 $5,606,850 ENGINEERING
$0 100%
STUDIES•
$1,000,000 $1,092,727 0.0% $0
,0 $3,205,467
$628,543,76 WASTEWATER CIP ELIGIBLE COST
$363,023,128 $393,550,497
uvrc raaor or i.7i uses co innate proieccea cost rrom zuii wivir co tutu aouars ana an inriauon race or 3i year was assumes on proposes proleccs only.
2One alternate discharge pump was included in Plant Rehab Phase 1 Project.
311evised project costs for 2020 provided by City Staff/Consultant.
°Revised project costs due to deviations from 2012 WWMP CIP.
*New lift station unit pricing was provided by Fort Worth Water staff based on recent bid tabs (Ventana Lift Station)
**Expansion lift station unit pricing was provided by Fort Worth Water staff.
mrormanon sources:
• 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan, Freese & Nichols • City of Fort Worth staff
• 5-year CIP Budget 2021- 2025, City of Fort Worth • Trinity River Authority staff
• Semiannual CIP Progress Report, City of Fort Worth
Sse and Nichols, Inc.
0118
WW_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL _REPORPExhibit F Wastewater CIM(Figure_F7}Existing_Wastewater_ Facilities(11x17).mxd
User Name � 02499
FIGURE F-I
L \7- CITY OF FORT WORTH
Lake Country LS #11 _j P•nder
Lake Country LS #13 J \\\\\ 0 FM 2449 F EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM
LS Ls Ls - \ Dosser Creek LS
LS\�\i 1 rn
LakeCountry12 J' L3 4`iJ- til \ 'I\ Denton LL FACILITIES
f P`j Ls \ \e.CountryLS#4\I — — CoUnty� LEGEND
+ - Lake Country LS #3
j — LakeCoury #2 RF Water Reclamation Fort Worth City Limit
lity
\ 'C >�--- Fort Worth
\`Sunset Cove LS Dish \�\ Lift Station L___J ETJ Boundary
Lake Country LS#5 LL Road Sewer Wholesale
\\ Eagle Ranch LS FM407 FM40T.` Lake Customer
0 7,000 �\ 407 Justin Non -Wholesale
I\ FM40� 1ST FM407 Impact Fee Wastewater L— Customer
Service Area
SCALE IN FEET I--_—_—__ Northlake S_ r —
�I ! I County Boundary
Zia
FORTWORTH.
F ® AuroraFREESE
o Z 4
_ 01111". K.OLS
FM2048 ry ' �i
ryMy114 L_ Flo
FM 2048 �r� I
�� a 114A Trophy Mound
¢ice$ CJ 156 F + /Yor,
1 � �� r4 Denton Creek WRC
9Ill\ L Intel LS #1 \ L
L� I: - � - s Y
Newark ,�� � J Roanoke— � H174 �KESIpE F�
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ �78 �� 81 ''� l _�A_ IW.estlake �rapevr Lak
Ec_;5H17.0 — — —
Briar r I:F:7[IJ---� s 00 e
HILt
o KNOB L
z 287 Haslet Heights LS�
170 I —Shield LS e v a
Pe°can r LS L's Ij-� \' ' J i U > y
r ACr_gs r ,t L ` Sen` era Ranch LS Intel LS #2 a a I
UntHunter Crossroads LS S rin Ranch LS' 1.14 t joppell
y p 9. Southlake
O RF�O I PEDEN PEDEN I-�_ �s89� 1 Haslet26
L N- J Keller 121
,Us _ I ® Grapevine
n 287E
\r--- s l-- Z
Reno Pelin ---^I CN I• 2B�I--- r, j 114
San
_r� 'I _ OP DFW
��� 287 377 Airport
Azle )un i L LS `—, Colle"I'll Glen Mills LS GLADE �LL7 Irvli g
fI i
199 voir LLSLs �r ---- _ 121 360 WALNUT HI`L
— — WATAUGA\ NORTH 26 - `
IL l SAGINAW I; . RICil --AND
BLUE HILLS
MOUND Euless
11 = I vy9 + )-- - Bedford_
I _
Jenkins Heights LSD " I 121 183
1 Meadow Lakes LS ; e HURST T
\,%18
_ 86 FM 1886 �\ 1
f1 Casino Beach LS LAKE HALTOM 183 RICHLAND 10
WORTH .�. HILL"S---- h." f a
Lake Worth LS CITY sLs 0 360 I�
Mosier Valley LS JI °
SANr m� Ls SOM 183 -ram — _ r o
Castle Circle LS PARKS, 121 \\ N o
RIVER- 199 RF 1
Live Oak LS �OAKS� Village Creek WRF
,- Greenway.LS
z--�-WESTWORTH
m WHITE
SETTLEMENTS �' I ANCASTER m N
WESTOVER
rZ i�1, Western Hills LS \1 " HILLS . m r
180 DIVISION 180 360
l s ��' 377580
\L ' z Q�� 287 PANTEGO
\\ ak
SPUR
183 r r Arlington Da ortMi `gton HAYFIELD
fir\ l } Garde s
Alecto - I }
i WLS aterside
J �\ Enchanted Bay,LS
Winn Dixie 6q.
LS. � � � rn RorN
- SI ENBROOK
nnetta \I ~ 377 '�'FORESiT
/south �� EDGECU. FF I HILLS ` o
Hulen Bend LS IVILLAGE
KENNEDALE o =
EDEN _1 Grand
I_v• y
Richardson Slough LS IEVERMANL_J m0 HARRIS Prairie
}` 1 287 Z Jo Poo La
4 I B k Lcdc' _ 1 I o
rook y d '� 4 RISINGER ti
,I o
7360
'ems Summer Creek Ranch LS _ � Iq 287r
r — j J IJJ Rosemary Ridge LS I o Ce' a
Ls\\\ I f � till
.I---J I -CROW `L `�' 1 Rendon Mansfield oI
Rock Creek Ranch LS iLEY g J oo' al�
F.M1187 + v
377
G �— Alsson M 'w
BURLESON � {
Bethesda F�2,
SC 3a
171 2 Johnson
County Briaroaks
9jF 'o er ossi `'aa 9�cy �' 174 M Timber �M9��
1
FM 917
� FM 917 FM 917 yOR �G �d
FM 917 FM 917 1
jGodley 1 Joshua
ry 0,
0 18,000 ;s'
171 o FM 3048 SCALE IN FEET Keene ti US HIGHWAY 67
Cleburne A'Ivarado
N
s
GS m
0� 3
T m
3
287
� I GsyrG
y�qy�
8,
6�
Ellis
s' ounty
fi7 Ue Midlothian
I
Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Job No.: FTW20118
Location: HAW _W W_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL_REPORTExhibit F Wastewater CIP\(Figure_F2}Wastewater_ Proposed _Facilities _CIP(11x17).mxd
Updated: Thursday, June 10, 2021
User: 02499
Decatur FIGURE F-2
ENGINEERING STUDIES CITY OF FORT WORTH
AM2012 Wastewater Master Plan
h^ Gsti ��64 FM I Impact Fee Study 2022-2031 2022 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
FM2264 Village Creek Facilities Plan PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
9` + 9 LEGEND
Ponder
M N Proposed Lift Station Existing
Denton ® Water Reclamation Facility
County! Proposed Wastewater Line
iImprovement Existing Force Main
Wise Proposed Force Main �� Road
LL �' County New Dish Improvement� Lake
Fairview I ® Mary's Creek WRF
Fort Worth CityLimit
g'�ao 81 titi�� TRA Sewer Line-
Improvement ---, Fort Worth
Boyd 287 FM 407 FM 407 f LL ^ FM 407 ETJ Boundary
i� ao �� Impact Fee Wastewater
,FM 407 PM Q� Service Area Sewer Wholesale
Rhome g 4�> FM 407 0 Customer
Northlake
-- J stin 3 0 Non -Wholesale Customer
114 , FORT WORTH
® County Boundary
Aurora ` 0111FNKHOLS
FM --G
'�� Mb� y� � HwY114 ewlsv! e
11
FM2048
114 a Denton Creek WRF
(3828.68.6 41) 61 - 11.5 MGD (3828.211)
_r_ _ One Alternate Discharge Pump (3828.2017* )
c _ EAGLE Roanoke Peak Flow Storage (3828.2012)�
L Trc h y
Newark c r- CB-1 ,p Y lq
•-----
— — — — — -- — a 81 15-25HC-3 10-25HC-1 (3828.651) ClurapevineLake KESlpE
(3828.644)---"-
Briar - — - - - — 00 I
KNOB HILL 287 ,, / , fi r 1 Westlake vE Coppel
1, e r
15-25HC-5 0
Fecal sI- `'-1*i `� (3828.645) L1r� a a
Reno Acres f j 11 1 114 <
Bonds Ranch LS B 15-25HC-4 f
RF \4.5 MGD-i (3828.645) Keller Southlake ❑ 121
�Qa No REND Pelica 2022 13 I_7\—__ Hasl'e't"� Tarrant 26
Q �=o ea� \ , ri ®- -� Grape ine L
Y Proposed LS �e s- r _z County
Bonds Ranch L_ S A La IF tera I- ] ' i 114
5.25 MGD k-13.O MGD �_
Parker san fua 2022 IF #1 1. 2022 IF #4
4rgj �,,� Dosier Creek 24'; FM 287 as 377 a DF�W
COUntJ/ Eagle Mountain �— WWMP #28 , Airport
199 — -�\\ a� Colleyville GLADE 97
zle `� LakeW !_J. G 121
1 O ) L S (------.�' ?
I F�13 Dosier Creek LSD 1 1� j "� 360
I' 24.0 MGD (14 MGD Expansion) r`�� j WATAUGA\ NORTH 26 - o
+ and 24" FM (Parallel)— _ SAGIN AW I RICBLAND a
I W WM P. #64 � "" I 1 �, Z
r —' \� BLUE HILLS Ir
��o �+ ��i����-JJ,1Ij ---`MOUND Bedford �u/es's' J1
F* 183 I.
`tr FM 1886 �Sy7,-'��
�` Lakeside �.� \ r - ---J
I i-----
�/ Pro osed- _ i� LAKE 9y '"4 �'s,
p I WORTH ®_ �lF HALT�OM 183 RI CAN lip:
a Regional LS & 24" FM �r~Y SANSOM ® CITE' HILLS—`—~—~ 108_-inch Third Barrel 36.0
10.0 MGD \
WWMP#96 ` Ls �I\-I .PARK zsTH r \j Interceptor R�
� ;'-" � rJ — � WWMP #18 +I
J 1 ti 377 _ — \I Village Creek WRF
1 L_—_----r Proposed Improvements
1_ S 199 .. WWTP-003, 009; 012, 013!
r\� 1
WESTWORT;H RIVER) � 1ST 1sT
-'rKS
OAI
Propose\i j �,1 - VI �'
WHITE
Mary's Creek 10.0 MGD,WRF ri �
WWMP#53tii��`� {SETTLEMENTtiWESTOV,ER �j m 180 ® a 180
") I -\ `
il/0w '� ---� \HILLS 303
LAN�Asa%ER 360
I
I
nPark c� tr ; ..... f,J 580 T c
An_ e I r _ J ,1� m 287 J PANTIE 0 SPUR
Proposed
+a 1 r-� t z 0 303 lArfingtoin-
North377 \ �TPJL Clearfork L&30'FM (Lke
�•22.0 MGD _ Arlingto Dalwa� hington MAYFIELD
183 2022 IF #2
Alecto ` r-J� ii_`,1 Ls r 1 � Gardens
Annetta 3 I� ALEDO IF ',qv ��— Proposed ` -
FMe �`- �ALEDO 4�). l �' Walnut Creek LS & 24" FM 1
�e I _ `vi_�. f , 10.0 MGD. N
fM �i J 11 �BENBRO, ��r] WWMP�#54 _��,
Annett 1-- L�v ®j (FOREST o
South n ,1 - ' EDGECLIFF HILL Proposed
\EVIL=CAGE \ I\ Lake Arlington LS & 42" FM
--- �\ ESA L:��=="� �I �_ "`iil... 8� 1 377 1 l_�_— +� �r 44.0 MGD >
----� Richardson Slough LS \ �l �1 I L WWMP#13 ° = Grand
.0 MGD (5.5 MGD Expansion) 1 :1- ! y Prairje.
8& 20" FM (Parallel) KENNEDALE HARRIS
; EVERMAN``
WWMP #61 �`l 287 Ioe Pool
r , o
Benbrooh - RISINGER +� LClke'
1 i ® - i--- i 87 R W
' J-�t-v-, I 360 W�
� ---1 1 1 r- J ��\County
Rock Creek Ranch LS t 1 I S-CRL"EY I r�1 j _ Rendon, Mansfield
OWy, I
6.0 MGD (4.4 MGD Expansion)
----- 377 & 16" FM (Parallel) ��_ i ti J ,— ° l
' BURLESON t G
Cresson a ` \ �3o Bethesda
V T
L SC 4
287
171 Johnson
s
County naroaks Ellis
° Pross�
174 ^ Timber e tP Coun
FM 917 1 ��
FM 917 FM1917
FM 917 FM 917
Godley Joshua
0 ' 18,000 Midlothian
�. z 67
SCALE,IN FEET F171 leburne.n� a enus
1 ra FM 3048o eene Alv'arad
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS
5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
Table 5-1 summarizes the impact fee eligible costs for projects from Table 4-1. The calculated cumulative
interest includes the following assumptions:
• Existing impact fee eligible CIP
o Based on the actual interest for the already outstanding debt for the full term of the bond
issuance.
• Future impact fee eligible CIP
o Based on the projects start date.
o Utilizing a bond issuance cost of 2.0%.
o Utilizing an interest rate of 4.0%.
o Utilizing a Fort Worth bond term of 30 years.
o Utilizing a TRA bond term of 20 years.
A more detailed explanation of the cumulative interest is included in the impact fee credit analysis, which
can be found in Appendix C.
Table 5-1 2022-2031 Impact Fee Elieible Costs
mr -MRIM4
CIP Category
..
TRA Projects
$87,001,575
39%
$33,629,752
Treatment Facilities
$249,755,356
65%
$162,795,985
Lift Stations/Interceptors
$286,179,986
68%
$193,919,293
Engineering Studies
$5,606,850
57%
$3,205,467
ELIGIBLE IMPACT FEE
CIP SUBTOTAL (2020
DOLLARS)
$393,550,497
Cumulative Interest - Fort Worth
$159,736,337
Cumulative Interest - TRA
$16,155,341
IMPACTTOTAL
5.1 SERVICE UNITS
Costs between various customer types and sizes are allocated through the application of equivalent
meters. Since the 5/8" x 3/4" water meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential customer,
a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8" x 3/4" meter capacity.
Table 5-2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the American Water Works
Association (AWWA) Standard C700-02, Cold -Water Meters — Displacement Type, Bronze Main Case and
AWWA Standard C701-07, Cold -Water Meters — Turbine Type, for Customer Service.
5-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 011101CHQLS
Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalencv Factors
5/8" x 3/4"
1.00
3/4"
1.50
1"
2.50
1-1/2"
5.00
2"
8.00
3"
21.75
4"
37.50
6"
80.00
8"
140.00
10"
210.00
Appendix D contains the current number of water meters for residential and non-residential customers
by meter size for the City of Fort Worth, as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this
information to FNI. The number of equivalent meters was also calculated for the City and wholesale
customers.
The next calculation step determines factors for population per residential meter and employment per
non-residential meter. Table 5-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and its wholesale
customers using 2020 information.
Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter
m7.M=1lllllllle hL
City of Fort Worth
Number of Equivalent Meters
327,199
97,081
Population / Employment
873,130
589,052
Population per Equivalent Meter
2.67
--
Employment per Equivalent Meter
--
6.07
Wholesale Customers
Number of Equivalent Meters
134,510
32,729
Population / Employment
351,673
160,231
Population per Equivalent Meter
2.61
--
Employment per Equivalent Meter
--
4.90
FNI did not receive meter count information from four of Fort Worth's wholesale wastewater customers;
5-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS
however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The
number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per
equivalent meter in Table 5-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all its
wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent
meter, FNI divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or employment served by
Fort Worth.
The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2022 and 2031 uses the ratios in Table 5-3 and the
population and employment projections for 2022 and 2031 in Exhibit 8- Wastewater Land Use
Assumptions Report. The calculation is shown below:
City of Fort Worth Increase in Equivalent Meters
Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter
= (1,133,678 — 911,970) / 2.67
= 83,037 Service Units
Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter
= (704,041— 615,009) / 6.07
= 14,668 Service Units
Fort Worth Total = Residential + Non -Residential
= 83,037 + 14,668
= 97,705 Service Units
Wholesale Customers Increase in Equivalent Meters
Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter
= (429,667 — 364,844) / 2.61
= 24,836 Service Units
Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter
= (185,300—164,635) / 4.90
= 4,217 Service Units
Wholesale Total = Residential + Non -Residential
= 24,836 + 4,217
= 29,053 Service Units
Grand Total = Fort Worth Total + Wholesale Total
= 97,705 + 29,053
= 126,758 Service Units
5-3
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS
5.2 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of eligible CIP for the study period from Table 5-1 divided
by the increase in equivalent meters from Section 5.1. This fee equals the wastewater impact fee per
service unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size.
Wastewater Impact Fee per Service Unit = Max Infrastructure Cost / Increase in Equivalent Meters
= $569,442,175 / 126,758
= $4,492 per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter
The maximum allowable impact fee that can be collected is calculated by subtracting a credit from the
impact fee eligible cost. A detailed impact fee credit analysis is included in Appendix C. A summary of the
maximum allowable water impact fee including the credit analysis is shown in Table 5-4.
Table 5-4 Wastewater Impact Fee with Credit Analysis
.�..•
Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure Cost
$569,442,175
Minus the CREDIT
($5,443,068)
Max Allowable Calculated Infrastructure Cost
$563,999,107
Service Units
126,758
ImpactMax Allowable
,,•
The wastewater impact fees for meters other than 5/8" x 3/4" are the product of the fee per 5/8" x 3/4"
equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 5-2. The maximum
allowable wastewater impact fees are provided in Table 5-5.
Table 5-5 Wastewater Impact Fees by Meter Size
Meter Sizemm
5/8" x 3/4"
Equivalency
Factor
Calculated Impact Fee per
Service Unit
(Before Subtracting Credit)
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
(After Subtracting Credit)
5-4
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 9187MICHOLS
Appendix A
Existing Wastewater Lift Station
Capacities
APPENDIX A
Existing Fort Worth Wastewater Lift Stations
No. Name Address Firm Total # of
Capacity Pumps
1 Casino Beach 7551 Surfside Dr. 0.6 mRd 2 pumps
2
Castle Circle
9101 Heron Drive
1.0
mgd
2
pumps
3
Dosier Creek
9241 Boat Club Rd.
10.1 mgd
3
pumps
4
Eagle Ranch
6692 Robertson Rd.
0.5
mgd
2
pumps
5
Enchanted Bay
5788 Vesta Farley Rd.
0.7
mgd
2
pumps
6
Glen Mills
9091 Saginaw Blvd.
0.5
mgd
2
pumps
7
Greenway
1000 Nixon Rd.
2.0
mgd
2
pumps
8
Haslet Heights
2484 Avondale Haslet Rd
0.7
mgd
2
pumps
9
Hulen Bend
6401 Oakmont Blvd.
0.8
mgd
2
pumps
10
Hunter Crossroads
13050 Avondale Farms Dr.
0.3
mgd
2
pumps
11
Intel # 1
3001 Eagle Pkwy
3.9
mgd
2
pumps
12
Intel # 2
3200 Keller -Haslet Rd.
8.0
mgd
3
pumps
13
Jenkins Heights
4525 Norris Valley Dr
1.8
mgd
2
pumps
14
Lake Country # 2
7903 Skylake Dr
0.1
mgd
2
pumps
15
Lake Country # 3
8831 Random Rd
0.8
mgd
2
pumps
16
Lake Country # 4
9033 Crosswind Dr
0.9
mgd
2
pumps
17
Lake Country # 5
8420 Crosswind Dr
0.2
mgd
2
pumps
18
Lake Country # 11
9401 Boat Club Rd
0.9
mgd
2
pumps
19
Lake Country # 12
9341 Mountain Lake
0.9
mgd
2
pumps
20
Lake Country # 13
9331 Dosier Cove W
0.5
mgd
2
pumps
21 Lake Worth 6201 Cahoba Dr 2.2 mgd 2 pum
22 Live Oak 731 Verna Trail N 2.9 mgd 2 pumps
A-1
23
Meadow Lakes
4691 St. Thomas Place
0.5
mgd
2 pumps
24
Mosier Valley
3120 House Anderson Rd.
0.14 mgd
2
pumps
25
Richardson Slough
7990 Old Granbury Rd.
4.6
mgd
3
pumps
26
Rock Creek Ranch
10716 Tarleton Way Rd.
1.6
mgd
2
pumps
27
Rosemary Ridge
10499 Old Crowley Cleburne
1.6
mgd
2
pumps
28
Sendera Ranch
1092 Avondale Haslet Rd.
1.5
mgd
2
pumps
29
Shield
14050 Park Vista Boulevard
1.1
mgd
2
pumps
30
Spring Ranch
1100 Travis Court
0.4
mgd
2
pumps
31
Summer Creek Ranch
9898 West Cleburne Road
1.5
mgd
2
pumps
32
Sunset Cove
8505 Lake Country Drive
4.0
mgd
3
pumps
33
Waterside
3912 Watercourse Drive
0.7
mgd
2
pumps
34
Western Hills
2717 Glenrock
0.6
mgd
2
pumps
35
Winn Dixie
200 SW Loop 820
0.5
mgd
2
pumps
A-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 9187MICHOLS
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS
Project Title: Denton Creek WRF Expansion to 11.5 MGD (3828.211)
Description: Construction of a 6.5 MGD expansion of TRAs Denton Creek Water Reclamation
Facility (WRF).
Purpose: Provide treatment capacity to address potential growth needs by expanding the
existing treatment plant.
Allocation: This project is allocated 24% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) for Fort
Worth and its wholesale customers, divided by the added capacity due to the
expansion (11.5 MGD).
Project Title: CB-136-Inch Parallel Relief Interceptor (3828.651)
Description: Land purchase and construction of a 36-inch relief interceptor conveying water to
the Denton Creek WRF.
Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs by paralleling
the existing interceptor.
Allocation: This project is allocated 30% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2023) to the
Interceptor, divided by the capacity shown in the Denton Creek wastewater
model's interceptors which was provided by TRA.
Project Title: HC-1 Relief Int. (460H-DCRWS) (3828.641)
Description: Design and construction of approximately 15,000 ft of 72- to 84-inch diameter relief
pipeline conveying water to the Denton Creek WRF.
Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs.
Allocation: This project is allocated 20% during the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the Relief Interceptor,
divided by the percentage of capacity of the interceptors that belong to Fort
Worth in the Denton Creek wastewater model provided by TRA.
Project Title: One Alternate Discharge Pump (3828.2017)
Description: Design and construction of one alternate discharge pump at the Denton Creek WRF.
Purpose: Provide additional discharge capacity at the Denton Creek WRF to address
potential growth needs.
Allocation: This project is allocated 24% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the
discharge pump, divided by the capacity added from the discharge pump
(6.5MGD).
B-1
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
Project Title: 10-25HC-1 Relief Int. (740H - 460H) 12,500 LF (3828.642)
Description: Land purchase and construction of 12,500 feet of a relief interceptor conveying
water to the Denton Creek WRF.
Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs.
Allocation: This project is allocated 46% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the relief interceptor,
divided by the percentage of capacity of the interceptors that belong to Fort
Worth in the Denton Creek wastewater model provided by TRA.
Project Title: 15-25HC-3 Relief Int. (1320H to 740H) 13,100 LF (Relieving 24-inch Interceptor)
(3828.644)
Description: Land purchase and construction of 13,100 feet of a relief interceptor conveying
water to the Denton Creek WRF.
Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs.
Allocation: This project is allocated 49% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the relief interceptor,
divided by the added capacity from the relief interceptor (44.12 MGD).
Project Title: 15-25HC-4/15-25HC-5 Relief Interceptor & MS 10_OHC (1320H-1780H) (3828.645)
Description: Land purchase and construction of 13,100 feet of a relief interceptor conveying
water to the Denton Creek WRF.
Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs.
Allocation: This project is allocated 52% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the relief interceptor,
divided by the added capacity from the relief interceptor (16.1 MGD).
Project Title: Peak Flow Storage (3828.2012)
Description: Design and construction of a peak flow storage structure at the Denton Creek WRF.
Purpose: Provide additional peak flow storage capacity at the Denton Creek WRF to
address potential growth needs.
Allocation: This project is allocated 50% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031). A peak flow
storage basin with a capacity of 30.6 MG is needed for the plant buildout flow.
The initial peak flow stage capacity would be 27.4 MG with an additional 3.2 MG
of storage capacity constructed at a later date.
B-2
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Project Title: Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications (WWTP-003)
Description: Modification of the deep bed media filters 1-20.
Purpose: Provides added treatment capacity at the Village Creek Reclamation Facility
(VCWRF).
Allocation: This project is allocated 25% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the
VCWRF, which shows that the remaining capacity will be fully utilized during the
planning period. 75% of the capacity will be utilized by 2022, based on the
existing flow to the VCWRF, divided by the existing capacity.
Project Title: VCWRF Peak Flow Diversion Structure (Equalization Basin for Peak Flows) (WWTP-
009)
Description: Design and construction of a wastewater diversion and peak flow storage basin
adjacent to the VCWRF.
Purpose: Detention facility will equalize the peak influent flows to the VCWRF. This
project will divert and store the peak flows for later treatment under normal
conditions.
Allocation: This project is allocated 75% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2023) to the
VCWRF, which shows that the remaining capacity will be fully utilized during the
planning period. 25% of the capacity will be utilized by 2022, based on the
existing flow to VCWRF, divided by the existing capacity.
Project Title: VCWRF South Influent Lift Station (V-3) (WWTP-013)
Description: Design and construction of an influent lift station at the VCWRF.
Purpose: The influent lift station is needed to address growth by providing added influent
capacity at the VCWRF.
Allocation: This project is allocated 93% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected VCWRF average day flow in 2031, divided by the total
capacity of the VCWRF (191 MGD).
Project Title: Mary's Creek WRF Site Selection and Land Purchase (WWMP #53)
Description: Land purchase for Mary's Creek WRF to address growth related needs in the
Clear Fork sewer basin.
Purpose: Provide treatment capacity to address growth needs by constructing a new
treatment facility to serve portions of the Clear Fork Basin.
Allocation: This project is allocated 52% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the existing flow to Mary's Creek plus the flow from the Walnut Creek LS,
all divided by the additional capacity the Mary's Creek satellite plant (10 MGD).
B-3
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
Project Title: Mary's Creek Satellite Plant (MP-053) (WWMP #53)
Description: Design and construction of Mary's Creek WRF to address growth related needs
in the Clear Fork Basin.
Purpose: Provide treatment capacity to address growth needs by constructing a new
treatment facility to serve portions of the Clear Fork Basin.
Allocation: This project is allocated 52% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected average day flow to Mary's Creek plus the flow from the
Walnut Creek LS, all divided by the additional capacity the Mary's Creek satellite
plant (10 MGD).
Project Title: VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1 - 12 & Grit System (Phase 2B of 191 MGD
expansion) (WWTP-012)
Description: Design and construction for the replacement of primary clarifiers 1-12 and
addition of a new grit removal system sized to meet the 191 MGD expansion
requirements.
Purpose: The addition of new primary clarifiers to replace the existing primary clarifiers 1-
12 would greatly increase the functional capacity of the primary clarifiers and
increase hydraulic capacity of the internal 96-inch pipeline. Primary clarifiers 1-
12 at VCWRF are a hydraulic bottleneck which needs to be addressed to realize
the planned expansion to 191 MGD. In addition to being a hydraulic bottleneck,
the reliability of the clarifiers is impacted by large amounts of grit (particularly at
higher flows). These clarifiers need to be replaced before the 191 MGD capacity
can be realized and a new grit removal system needs to be added to increase
reliability in capacity and treatment.
Allocation: This project is allocated 93% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected VCWRF average day flow for 2031, divided by the proposed
total capacity of the VCWRF (191 MGD).
B-4
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
REGIONAL LIFT STATIONS AND INTERCEPTORS
Project Title: 4.4 MGD Rock Creek Lift Station Expansion (outside of PID boundary) to 6.0 MGD
(Including 16-inch Parallel Force Main) (WWMP #107)
Description: 4.4 MGD expansion of the Rock Creek Lift Station to the Southeast of Benbrook
La ke.
Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to growth -related service areas.
Allocation: This project is allocated 99% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected 2031 peak wet weather flow to the Rock Creek Lift Station
less the existing lift station capacity, divided by the added capacity from the
expansion (4.4 MGD).
Project Title: Dosier Creek 24-inch Force Main (Marine Creek to Big Fossil Basin WW Diversion)
(WWMP #28)
Description: Design and construction of 24-inch force main in the Marine Creek and Big Fossil
Basins.
Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to the Marine Creek Basin. Due to tight
corridors and easements in the downtown area the future flow will be pumped
from the Marine Creek Basin to the Big Fossil Basin through the Dosier Creek Lift
Station. The transfer of flow will reduce the amount of flow through the
downtown corridor and delay the need for paralleling larger interceptors in that
area.
Allocation: This project is allocated 69% in the study period. Allocation was determined
assuming the projected increase in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031),
including the additional flow from the La Frontera Lift Station to the Dosier
Creek Force Main is greater than the remaining capacity of the force main. The
existing utilization of 31% was determined using the projected 2022 peak wet
weather flow, divided by the added capacity of the 24-inch force main (14
MGD).
Project Title: Proposed 44.0 MGD Lake Arlington - VC Basin Lift Station & 42-inch Force Main
(WWMP #13)
Description: Design and construction of a 44.0 MGD firm capacity lift station and 42-inch
force main in the Village Creek Basin.
Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to the Village Creek Basin west of Lake
Arlington.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% in the study period. Allocation was determined
based on the projected peak wet weather flow of 44 MGD to the VC Basin Lift
Station, divided by the added capacity from the lift station and force main (44
MGD).
B-5
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
Project Title: Proposed 5.25 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "A" & Force Main (2022 IF #1)
Description: Design and construction of a 5.25 MGD firm capacity lift station to serve future
growth.
Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to the northwest portions of the City.
Allocation: This project is allocated 55% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow to the Bonds Ranch Lift
Station "A", divided by the added capacity from the lift station and force main
(5.25 MGD).
Project Title: Proposed 22.0 MGD Clear Fork Lift Station & 30-inch Force Main (2022 IF #2)
Description: Design and construction of a 22.0 MGD lift station and 30-inch force main in the
Clear Fork Basin.
Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide expanded wastewater capacity to
growth -related service areas.
Allocation: This project is allocated 59% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the
Clear Fork Lift Station, divided by the added capacity from the lift station and
force main (22 MGD).
Project Title: Proposed 4.5 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "B" & Force Main (2022 IF #1)
Description: Design and construction of a 4.5 MGD firm capacity lift station to serve future
growth.
Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to the northwest portions of the City.
Allocation: This project is allocated 55% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow to the Bonds Ranch Lift
Station "B", divided by the added capacity from the lift station and force main
(4.5 MGD).
Project Title: 5.5 MGD Richardson Slough Lift Station Expansion and 20-inch Force Main in the Clear
Fork Basin (WWMP #61)
Description: 5.5 MGD expansion of the Richardson Slough Lift Station just east of Benbrook
Lake in the Clear Fork Basin.
Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to growth -related service areas.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the
Richardson Slough Lift Station, which will fully utilize the added capacity due to
the expansion (5.5 MGD).
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
Project Title: Proposed 10.0 MGD Walnut Creek Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main (WWMP #54)
Description: Design and construction of a 10.0 MGD lift station and 24-inch force main in the
Clear Fork Basin.
Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to growth -related service areas.
Allocation: This project is allocated 48% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in flow (2022-2031) to the Walnut Creek Lift
Station, divided by the added capacity due to the lift station and force main (10
MGD).
Project Title: 14.0 MGD Dosier Creek Lift Station Expansion to 24.0 MGD & 24-inch Force Main
(WWMP #64)
Description: 14 MGD expansion of the Dosier Creek Lift Station and 24-inch
force main in the Marine Creek Basin.
Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to growth -related service areas.
Allocation: This project is allocated 50% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031), including
the additional flow from the La Frontera Lift Station, to the Dosier Creek Lift
Station less the capacity of WWMP #28, divided by the added capacity from the
expansion and force main (14 MGD).
Project Title: Proposed 13.0 MGD La Frontera Lift Station (2022 IF #4)
Description: Design and construction of a 13.0 MGD lift station in the Marine Creek Basin.
Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to growth -related service areas.
Allocation: This project is allocated 40% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) in the
Marine Creek Basin that is not expected to be captured by other projects,
divided by the added capacity due to the lift station (13 MGD).
Project Title: Proposed 10.0 MGD Regional Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main (WWMP #96)
Description: Design and construction of a 10.0 MGD lift station and 24-inch force main in the
West Fork Basin.
Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to
growth -related service areas.
Allocation: This project is allocated 30% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the Regional
Lift Station less the capacity of the existing Live Oak Lift Station capacity, divided
by the added capacity from the Regional Lift Station and force main (10 MGD).
B-7
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
Project Title: 108-inch Third Barrel Interceptor Parallel to M-280 & M-338 MP-018 (WWMP #18)
Description: Design and construction of a 108-inch wastewater interceptor west of the VCWRF.
Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to accommodate projected growth.
Allocation: This project is allocated 51% in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the
interceptor less the capacity of the existing "Twins" interceptors, divided by the
added capacity from the 108-inch third barrel interceptor (173 MGD).
Appendix B
Wastewater CIP Projects
WASTEWATER ENGINEERING STUDIES
Project Title: 2012 Wastewater Master Plan (2010 — 2030)
Description: Engineering Study.
Purpose: The 2012 master plan was an update of the 1999 study and includes the
planning period 2010 through 2030.
Allocation: This project is allocated 40% to the study period. Allocation was determined
using the percentage of the planning period within the master plan that falls
within the 10-year impact fee study period.
Project Title: 2022 Wastewater Impact Fee Study
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute, the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 100% of the cost for the 2022 impact fee study can be allocated to the study
period as all ten years are within the study period. The impact fee covers water
and wastewater, with 50% of costs allocated to each. This study replaces the
2017 Impact Fee study, therefore the costs associated with the 2017 Impact fee
study are not eligible for the 2022 impact fee update.
Project Title: Village Creek Facilities Plan (WWTP-043)
Description: Engineering Study.
Purpose: The engineering study provides a facilities plan for the Village Creek Water
Reclamation Facility.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to the study period.
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 9187MICHOLS
Appendix C
Impact Fee Credit Analysis
801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 • Fort Worth, Texas 76102 • 817-735-7300 • fax 817-735-7492
TO: Wendy Chi-Babulal, P.E., Fort Worth Water
Matt Kusnir, P.E., Fort Worth Water
FROM: Jessica Brown, P.E, Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Mazen Kawasmi, P.E., CFM, GISP, Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Richard Campbell, Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Angie Flores, Senior Manager, Raftelis, Inc.
SUBJECT: 2022 Fort Worth Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Update:
Credit Methodology Memorandum
DATE: July 22, 2021
1.0 INTRODUCTION
www.freese.com
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned
Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI), to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. FNI contracted with Raftelis
Financial Consultants, Inc. to perform a rate credit analysis in compliance with Chapter 395. For this study, Raftelis
completed the maximum allowable impact fee calculation, including the rate credit analysis. The calculated impact
fee includes the outstanding debt service (principal and interest) of existing facilities with excess capacity and the
projected debt service (principal and interest) of the future facilities identified in the 10-year Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP). This memorandum establishes the methodology utilized for the rate credit analysis and summarizes
the results.
2.0 DEBT SERVICE INTEREST CALCULATION
The impact fee eligible interest is based on existing and future debt service. The existing debt service is debt
service associated with existing facilities with excess capacity, while the future debt service is based on future
facilities.
For the existing impact fee eligible facilities, the interest considered in the impact fee is based on the actual
interest for the already outstanding debt. Specifically, the existing debt service is based upon impact fee eligible
outstanding debt for Fort Worth, Trinity River Authority (TRA), and Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD). The
interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the term of the existing debt, per
discussions with City staff.
1
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH
July 22, 2021
The interest for the future facilities is calculated using the assumptions in Table 1. The proposed debt is based
upon the 10-year water and wastewater impact fee eligible CIP. In the CIP, if a project's start date is in 2022 or
later and is greater than $5 million, it is assumed that it will be debt -funded. Any amounts under $5 million are
assumed to be cash -funded. The interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the
term of the future debt, per discussions with City staff.
Table 1 Future Debt Service Assumptions
Debt Service Details
Bond Issuance Cost
Assumption
2.0%
Interest Rate
4.0%
Fort Worth Term
30 years
TRA Term
20 years
3.0 RATE CREDIT CALCULATION
The rate credit methodology was developed by FNI and was applied to the impact fee calculation. Chapter 395
prescribes that a utility must provide a credit to account for any portion of ad valorem tax and utility service
revenues that would also be reflected in the developed impact fees and paid by new service units in the program
period. The utility may choose to do a detailed rate credit analysis, or automatically cap the maximum allowable
impact fee at 50% of the impact fee eligible infrastructure costs. In this case, a rate credit analysis was performed
to determine the applicable credit for the program period.
The purpose of this credit is to ensure that new growth is not charged twice for the portion of capital
improvements attributed to them, once through the impact fee and then again through rates. The code does not
specifically address the way in which this credit is to be calculated. Each utility should calculate the credit in a way
that is consistent with the operation of their fund, the way they finance their capital improvements, and the way
these capital improvements costs are represented in their utility rates. The next section describes how Fort
Worth's credit was calculated.
FNI utilized the projected Service Unit Equivalents (SUE), developed as part of the Land Use Assumptions, to
determine the pro rata share of the existing debt (interest and principal) attributable to each SUE on the system
for each year of the impact fee period (2022 — 2031). The resulting cost per SUE was multiplied by the cumulative
growth in SUE's for each year of the impact fee period, resulting in the portion of the existing debt (interest and
principal) that future customers will pay for in water/wastewater rates. This represents the credit to the impact
fees required to avoid "double counting" and this credit was subtracted from the total impact fee eligible
2
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH
July 22, 2021
infrastructure costs. Table 2 summarizes the results of the water credit calculation. Table 3 summarizes the
results of the wastewater credit calculation.
3
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum
July 22, 2021
Table 2 Water Credit Analysis Summary
r011 NICHOLS
R RAFTELIS
FORT WORTH.
Year 2022
2025
20
202
02
2029
2030
2031
Water Impact Fee
Eligible Interest +
Principle for 10-
Year Period
Total Service Unit
Equivalents (SUE)
Each Year
• • '
• �'
:.
Cost per SUE
.:
Cumulative SUE's
in 10-Year Period
Portion Paid by
Growth in 10-Year $260,293
Period
Total Credit
$528,834
$774,096
$962,093
$1,172,138
$1,382,327
$1,471,490
$1,654,279
$1,626,156
$2,786,360
Table 3 Wastewater Credit Analysis Summary
2�
1
2029
2030 '
Wastewater Impa
Fee Eligible Interes l
$5,742,152
$5,749,275
$5,748,254
$5,755,437
$5,908,684
$5,137,534
$5,130,701
$5,132,433
E
+ Principle for 10-
0 Year Period —M
■ Total Service U
Equivalents (SU • • •
Each Ye
• '
• •
• :
so I
•
Cost per
• •
• •
Cumulative SUEn®
,
10-Year PerlO
Portion Paid by
Growth in 10-Year $117,966
$231,456
$340,747
$445,449
$546,912
$661,203
$658,446
$737,996
$815,857
$887,036
Period
Total Credill
$5,443,068
4
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum
July 22, 2021
r� N;CHOLS
FORT WORTH
R RAFTELIS
4.0 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
The maximum allowable impact fees are the result of taking the total cost of expansion for the study period, minus
the calculated credit, and dividing by the increase in SUE's. This fee equals the maximum allowable impact fee per
service unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size. A summary of the maximum allowable impact fee calculation for
both water and wastewater is shown in Table 4.
Table 4 Credit Analysis Summary
Preliminary Maximum Calculated
$677,264,404
$569,442,175
Infrastructure Cost
Minus the CREDIT
($12,618,067)
($5,443,068)
Max Allowable Calculated
$664,646,337
$563,999,107
Infrastructure Cost
Service Units
136,734
126,758
ImpactMax Allowable
Service Unit
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
City of Fort Worth % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
220,645
220,645
220,645
3/4"
1.50
2,689
2,689
4,034
1"
2.50
21,698
21,698
54,245
1-1/2"
5.00
1,903
1,903
9,515
2"
8.00
1,755
1,755
14,040
3"
21.75
43
43
935
4"
37.50
98
98
3,675
6"
80.00
163
163
13,040
8"1
140.00
1 46
1 46
6,440
10"
210.00
1 3
1 3
630
TOTALI
Non
249,043
Meters
1 249,043
327,199
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
6,841
6,841
6,841
3/4"
1.50
18
18
27
1"
2.50
2,459
2,459
6,148
1-1/2"
5.00
1,560
1,560
7,800
2"
8.00
3,642
3,642
29,136
3"
21.75
392
392
8,526
4"
37.50
327
327
12,263
6"
80.00
156
156
12,480
8"
140.00
1 63
1 63
81820
10"
210.00
1 24
24
5,040
TOTALI
15,482
15,482
97,081
Wholesale Customer: Benbrook Water Authority % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
5,145
5,145
5,145
3/4"
1.50
43
43
65
1"
2.50
3,075
3,075
7,688
1-1/2"
5.00
17
17
85
2"
8.00
87
87
696
3"
21.75
25
25
544
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
1W
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
8,392
Meters
1 8,392
14,223
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
138
138
138
3/4"
1.50
4
4
6
1"
2.50
221
221
553
1-1/2"
5.00
54
54
270
2"
8.00
107
107
856
3"
21.75
11
11
239
4"
37.50
3
3
113
6"
80.00
2
2
160
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
1W
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
540
1 540
2,335
D-1
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Bethesda Water Supply Corportation % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 4%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
10,239
410
410
3/4"
1.50
8
0
0
1"
2.50
42
2
5
1-1/2"
5.00
4
0
0
2"
8.00
2
0
0
3"
21.75
1
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
10,296
Meters
1 412
415
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
142
6
6
3/4"
1.50
8
0
0
1"
2.50
44
2
5
1-1/2"
5.00
13
1
5
2"
8.00
55
2
16
3"
21.75
1
0
0
4"
37.50
8
0
0
6"
80.00
1
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
272
11
32
Wholesale Customer: City of Blue Mound % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
807
807
807
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
807
Meters
1 807
807
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
24
24
24
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
1
1
3
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
1
1
8
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
26
1 26
35
D-2
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Burleson % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
13,746
13,746
13,746
3/4"
1.50
2
2
3
1"
2.50
3
3
8
1-1/2"
5.00
3
3
15
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
13,754
Meters
1 13,754
13,772
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
385
385
385
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
139
139
348
1-1/2"
5.00
101
101
505
2"
8.00
210
210
1,680
3"
21.75
20
20
435
4"
37.50
3
3
113
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
859
859
3,546
Wholesale Customer: City of Crowley % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
6,467
6,467
6,467
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
35
35
88
1-1/2"
5.00
16
16
80
2"
8.00
30
30
240
3"
21.75
2
2
44
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
10
TOTALI
Non
6,550
Meters
1 6,550
6,919
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
59
59
148
1-1/2"
5.00
14
14
70
2"
8.00
48
48
384
3"
21.75
15
15
326
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
136
1 136
928
D-3
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Edgecliff Village % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
78
78
78
3/4"
1.50
1,257
1,257
1,886
1"
2.50
33
33
83
1-1/2"
5.00
5
5
25
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,373
Meters
1 1,373
2,072
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
3
3
5
1"
2.50
4
4
10
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
7
7
56
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
15
15
151
Wholesale Customer: City of Everman % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
1,817
1,817
2,726
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,817
Meters
1 1,817
2,726
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
156
156
234
1"
2.50
14
14
35
1-1/2"
5.00
5
5
25
2"
8.00
11
11
88
3"
21.75
3
3
65
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
190
190
485
D-4
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Forest Hill % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 4%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
4,559
182
273
1"
2.50
10
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
38
2
10
2"
8.00
55
2
16
3"
21.75
1
0
0
4"
37.50
1
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
TOTALI
Non
4,664
Meters
1 186
1 299
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
10
0
0
1"
2.50
7
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
2
0
0
2"
8.00
6
0
0
3"
21.75
1
0
0
4"
37.50
1
0
0
6"
80.00
1
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
28
0
0
Wholesale Customer: Haltom City % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
11,369
11,369
11,369
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
4
4
10
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
37
37
296
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
11,411
Meters
1 11,411
11,697
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
1584
1,584
1,584
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
5
5
13
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
18
18
144
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
2
2
160
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
1,611
1,611
1,961
D-5
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Hurst % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 92%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
9,454
8,698
8,698
3/4"
1.50
1
1
2
1"
2.50
1,517
1,396
3,490
1-1/2"
5.00
33
30
150
2"
8.00
4
4
32
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
11,010
Meters
1 10,130
12,410
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
465
428
428
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
367
338
845
1-1/2"
5.00
251
231
1,155
2"
8.00
239
220
1,760
3"
21.75
32
29
631
4"
37.50
18
17
638
6"
80.00
4
4
320
8"
140.00
1 1
1 1
140
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
1,377
1,268
5,917
Wholesale Customer: City of Kennedale % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 4%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
2,543
102
153
1"
2.50
313
13
33
1-1/2"
5.00
5
0
0
2"
8.00
4
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
2,865
Meters
1 115
186
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
229
9
14
1"
2.50
57
2
5
1-1/2"
5.00
13
1
5
2"
8.00
38
2
16
3"
21.75
44
2
44
4"
37.50
3
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
384
1 16
84
D-6
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Lake Worth %of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
1,663
1,663
2,495
1"
2.50
171
171
428
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
1
1
8
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,835
Meters
1 1,835
2,931
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
123
123
185
1"
2.50
129
129
323
1-1/2"
5.00
46
46
230
2"
8.00
108
108
864
3"
21.75
15
15
326
4"
37.50
7
7
263
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
428
428
2,191
Wholesale Customer: City of North Richland Hills % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 80%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
19,429
15,543
23,315
1"
2.50
960
768
1,920
1-1/2"
5.00
8
6
30
2"
8.00
17
14
112
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
20,414
Meters
1 16,331
25,377
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
683
546
819
1"
2.50
404
323
808
1-1/2"
5.00
64
51
255
2"
8.00
827
662
5,296
3"
21.75
29
23
500
4"
37.50
18
14
525
6"
80.00
4
3
240
8"
140.00
1 2
1 2
280
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
2,031
1 1,624
8,723
D-7
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Pantego % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 75%
*Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study.
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
655
491
737
1"
2.50
58
44
110
1-1/2"
5.00
5
4
20
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
718
Meters
1 539
1 867
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
439
329
494
1"
2.50
15
11
28
1-1/2"
5.00
13
10
50
2"
8.00
19
14
112
3"
21.75
3
2
44
4"
37.50
3
2
75
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
492
368
803
Wholesale Customer: City of Richland Hills % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
2
2
2
3/4"
1.50
2,778
2,778
4,167
1"
2.50
79
79
198
1-1/2"
5.00
17
17
85
2"
8.00
11
11
88
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
2,887
Meters
1 2,887
4,540
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
165
165
248
1"
2.50
85
85
213
1-1/2"
5.00
31
31
155
2"
8.00
42
42
336
3"
21.75
3
3
65
4"
37.50
2
2
75
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
328
1 328
1,092
D-8
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of River Oaks % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
*Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study.
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
2,529
2,529
2,529
3/4"
1.50
15
15
23
1"
2.50
49
49
123
1-1/2"
5.00
9
9
45
2"
8.00
2
2
16
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
2,604
Meters
1 2,604
2,736
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
274
274
274
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
66
66
165
1-1/2"
5.00
41
41
205
2"
8.00
36
36
288
3"
21.75
2
2
44
4"
37.50
2
2
75
6"
80.00
5
5
400
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
426
426
1,451
Wholesale Customer: City of Saginaw % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
7,950
7,950
7,950
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
7,950
Meters
1 7,950
7,950
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
333
333
333
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
333
1 333
333
D-9
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Sansom Park %of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
1,413
1,413
1,413
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,413
Meters
1 1,413
1,413
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
110
110
110
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
1
1
3
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
1
1
8
3"
21.75
4
4
87
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
116
116
208
Wholesale Customer: Trinity River Authority % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
0
Meters
1 0
0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
0
1 0
0
D-10
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Watauga % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
6,377
6,377
9,566
1"
2.50
1,925
1,925
4,813
1-1/2"
5.00
5
5
25
2"
8.00
120
120
960
3"
21.75
3
3
65
4"
37.50
4
4
150
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 1
1 1
1 140
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
8,435
Meters
1 8,435
15,719
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
0
0
0
Wholesale Customer: Westover Hills % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
7
7
11
1"
2.50
110
110
275
1-1/2"
5.00
149
149
745
2"
8.00
41
41
328
3"
21.75
2
2
44
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
310
Meters
1 310
1,441
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
2
2
2
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
1
1
5
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
3
1 3
7
D-11
Appendix D
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Westworth Village % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
*Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study.
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
543
543
815
1"
2.50
6
6
15
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
3
3
24
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
0
1W
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
552
Meters
1 552
854
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
3
3
5
1"
2.50
15
15
38
1-1/2"
5.00
6
6
30
2"
8.00
18
18
144
3"
21.75
2
2
44
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
46
1 46
379
Wholesale Customer: City of White Settlement % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
*Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study.
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
5,156
5,156
5,156
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
0
1W
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
5,156
Meters
1 5,156
5,156
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by Ft.
Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
236
236
236
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
74
74
185
1-1/2"
5.00
46
46
230
2"
8.00
113
113
904
3"
21.75
13
13
283
4"
37.50
4
4
150
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
0
1W
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
487
1 487
2,068
D-12
lent Plan - Wastewater