The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About(0142) exhibit-f-wastewater-cip.pdff WATER IMPAC ASTEWATER FX1411RTT F-- CAPITAL iMPRnvF.MFNT PLAN - WA.STF.WATF.R f2O22-20411 PREPARED BY: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 801 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 2800 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 817-735-7300 irmill NICHOLS WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE EXHIBIT F; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WASTEWATER (2022 - 2041) Prepared for: Fort Worth Water FORTWORTH. m� %""600"'o July 22, 2021 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817-735-7300 WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE Prepared for: �E O\T111 Fort Worth Water F 7/22/2021 _moo cos joo°000000000000000000000 0 JESSICA L. BROWN o0 0000000000000000000000 00 / 90098 _ E ##44 S' DENS ' \ — S � �000000o G 1%/ A FRE E AND MCHOLS, INC. XAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 E OF T 11 ��P�,.•• •••. F+ys�i /22/2021 ANDREW S.FRANKO ..................... 0�'• 115651 1�,� •.,. ENS G��_ S i411�� \A040 L FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 '0 F ..... TF�1s�7/22/2021 ............... ....... .............:I MAZEN H. KAWASMI � 0•. � o: _ FS •. ENS..• 04 FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817-735-7300 FTW 20118 OF • TF-�y��/ 7/22/2021 ;/ NICHOLAS JAMES McCORMICK o 00/ '••••135767•••,•��, .� /�,�•../C ENS G S 11 S/ONAl- E�� FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® V Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater ,11 <NICHQLS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 Existing Wastewater Collection System........................................................................................2-1 2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants...............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Lift Stations and Force Mains.................................................................................................2-1 3.0 Projected Wastewater Flows........................................................................................................3-1 4.0 Wastewater Capital Improvements..............................................................................................4-1 5.0 Impact Fee Analysis.......................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Service Units...........................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation.........................................................................5-4 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 Projected Wastewater Flows...........................................................................................3-1 Table 4-1 Proposed Wastewater CIP Projects.................................................................................4-2 Table 5-1 2022-2031 Impact Fee Eligible Costs...............................................................................5-1 Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors..................................................................................5-2 Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter ....5-2 Table 5-4 Wastewater Impact Fee with Credit Analysis(100%)......................................................5-4 Table 5-5 Wastewater Impact Fees by Meter Size..........................................................................5-4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure F-1 Existing Wastewater Facilities.........................................................................................4-3 Figure F-2 Proposed Wastewater Improvements.............................................................................4-4 APPENDICES Appendix A— Existing Wastewater Lift Station Capacities Appendix B —Wastewater CIP Projects Appendix C — Impact Fee Credit Analysis Appendix D —Water Meter Summary Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater W7MICHOLS 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc., to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. This report establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous study completed in 2017. Impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost associated with expanding the municipal wastewater system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of Fort Worth owns and operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, lift stations, and pipelines that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the wastewater system is known as the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP was updated as a part of this study with capital project scope and cost provided by previously commissioned master planning documents and input from Fort Worth Water staff. The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth wastewater facilities are eligible to be included in the impact fee analysis. The additional facilities required to accommodate growth during the study period are summarized. 1-1 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS 2.0 EXISTING WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 2.1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS The City of Fort Worth provides wastewater service to retail customers within the city and to 23 wholesale customers in the surrounding counties. The Fort Worth wastewater collection system is primarily a gravity flow system that follows the major drainage features of the service area. The City's collection system consists of 12 sewer basins. There are currently three major wastewater treatment facilities serving the study area: the Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility (WRF), which is owned and operated by the City of Fort Worth, and the Denton Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and the Central Regional WWTP, which are both owned and operated by the Trinity River Authority (TRA). The Village Creek WRF serves the majority of the population within the study area. The TRA Basin is served by the TRA Central WWTP, and the Denton Creek Basin is served by the TRA Denton Creek WWTP. 2.2 LIFT STATIONS AND FORCE MAINS The City of Fort Worth currently operates 35 lift stations, which pump wastewater into gravity sewers. The City has made a conscious effort to limit the number of lift stations in the collection system. These lift stations are required because of local topographical constraints or to pump flows across sewer basins. Appendix A summarizes the existing lift station capacities. 2-1 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS 3.0 PROJECTED WASTEWATER FLOWS The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) recommends a minimum of 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) for municipal base flow. The 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan recommends using 110 gpcd and an additional 10 gpcd to account for groundwater infiltration (GWI), resulting in a total per capita for future growth of 120 gpcd. Additionally, the 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan recommends using 40 gped for future commercial growth. In order to calculate the annual average day wastewater flows, the population and employment growth projections were taken from Exhibit 8: Land Use Assumptions- Wastewater Facilities. The 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan did not use a straight average flow to peak flow peaking factor because the City utilized an extended period simulation model to determine the projected peak flows. The model used the RTK method, which calculates a different peaking factor for each scenario dependent on amount of rainfall, peaking time, and recession time. From the 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan, the historical annual average flow to peak hour flow ratio is 3.03 and was used to calculate the peak flows. The wholesale customer flow was provided by the wholesale customers as part of the wholesale customer surveys. Table 3-1 summarizes the projected wastewater flows for the City of Fort Worth and its wholesale customers. Table 3-1 Projected Wastewater Flows 2022 134.04 406.14 City of Fort Worth 2031 164.20 497.53 Wholesale Customers 2022 38.79 117.18 (Portion Served by Fort Worth) 2031 51.33 144.54 Total Flow 2031 215.53 642.07 3-1 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS 4.0 WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS This section establishes the wastewater facilities and engineering studies that are eligible for inclusion in the calculation of the impact fee. Projects included in the CIP are designated to increase system capacity as a result of projected growth. Only those projects warranted by capacity needs derived from growth occurring during the study period (2022-2031) can be included in the impact fee calculation. Additionally, projects are excluded from the impact fee calculation if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in place. Facilities included in the impact fee study are TRA projects, City of Fort Worth wastewater treatment facilities, lift stations, interceptors and engineering studies. Table 4-1 provides a summary of each wastewater CIP project cost and allocation for the 2022-2031 study period. Project costs do not include costs associated with purchasing land, unless specified in the "Project Phase" field. The 2022 percent utilization is the portion of a project's capacity required to serve existing development. It is not included in the impact fee cost calculations. The 2022-2031 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity that will be required to serve development projected to occur from 2022 to 2031. The portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2022 through 2031 is calculated as the total cost multiplied by the 2022-2031 percent utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. The percent utilization beyond 2031 is the portion of a project's capacity allocated to development projected to occur after 2031. Figures F-1 and F-2 show existing and proposed facilities, respectively, for the impact fee study period. Appendix B describes each wastewater CIP project for the 2022-2031 planning period. A project description, the purpose of each project, and the portion of each project that is allocated to associated growth are included. 4-1 FREESE WM AICHOLS FORT WORTH Table 4-1 Wastewater Capital Improvement Projects 2022 - 2031 Added %Allocatedto CostAllocated % Allocated to 2022-2031 Impact Inflation Adjusted %Allocatedto CostAllocated T Fort Worth Project Cost in 020 Start Completion Capacity Existing 2022r2022-2031 Fees Impact Fee Costs' Impact Fees to Impact Fees Project ID Project Title ��M=11?rqjectCost Participation Cost Initial Project Cost Dollars'Date ..te (MGr r r .. .. .. after 2031i TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS 3828.211 Denton Creek WRF Expansion to 11.5 MGD Const $47,595,000 $26,177,250 - $26,177,250 2008 2010 6.5 MGD 54% $14,135,715 24% $6,282,540 $6,282,540 22.0% $5,758,995 3828.651 CB-1 36-inch Parallel Relief Interceptor Const $5,317,548 $2,924,651 - $2,924,651 2013 2015 - 12% $350,958 30% $877,395 $877,395 58.0% $1,696,298 3828.641 HC-1 Relief Int. (460H-DCRWS) Eng $2,407,149 $1,323,932 - $1,323,932 2015 2020 - 0% $0 20% $264,786 $264,786 80.0% $1,059,146 3828.641 HC-1 Relief Int. (460H-DCRWS) Const $17,650,502 $9,707,776 - $9,707,776 2015 2020 - 0% $0 20% $1,941,555 $1,941,555 80.0% $7,766,221 3828.20172 One Alternate Discharge Pump Eng $161,330 $88,732 - $88,732 2016 2018 - 54% $47,915 24% $21,296 $21,296 22.0% $19,521 3828.20172 One Alternate Discharge Pump Const $449,555 $247,255 - $247,255 2019 2021 - 54% $133,518 24% $59,341 $59,341 22.0% $54,396 3828.642 10-25HC-1 Relief Int. (740H - 460H) 12,500 LF Land $1,241,000 $682,550 - $682,550 2015 2019 - 0% $0 46% $313,973 $313,973 54.0% $368,577 3828.642 10-25HC-1 Relief Int. (740H -460H)12,500 LF Const $12,970,707 $7,133,889 - $7,133,889 2019 2021 - 0% $0 46% $3,281,589 $3,281,589 54.0% $3,852,300 3828.644 15-25HC-3 Relief lnt.(1320H to 740H) 13,100 LF (Relieving 24-inch Interceptor) Land $800,000 $440,000 - $440,000 2019 2021 - 0% $0 49% $215,600 $215,600 51.0% $224,400 3828.644 15-25HC-3 Relief Int. (1320H to 740H) 13,100 LF (Relieving 24-inch Interceptor) Const $15,015,891 $8,258,740 - $8,258,740 2021 2022 44.12 MGD 0% $0 49% $4,046,783 $4,168,186 51.0% $4,211,957 3828.645 15-25HC-4/15-25HC-5 Relief Interceptor & MS 10_OHC(1320H-1780H) Land $894,000 $491,700 - $491,700 2020 2021 - 0% $0 52% $255,684 $255,684 48.0% $518,989 3828.645 15-25HC-4/15-25HC-5 Relief Interceptor & MS 10_OHC(1320H-1780H) Const $15,829,000 $8,705,950 - $8,705,950 2021 2023 16.1 MGD 0% $0 52% $4,527,094 $4,662,907 48.0% $4,178,856 3828.2012 Peak Flow Storage Eng $5,213,000 $2,867,150 - $2,867,150 2021 2022 30.6 MG 0% $0 50% $1,433,575 $1,476,582 50.0% $1,433,575 3828.2012 Peak Flow Storage Const $32,640,000 $17,952,000 •01,575 - $17,952,000 $87,001,575 2023 2023 - TRINITY 0% RIVER AUTHORITY $0 1 50% 1 $8,976,000 $9,808,318 50.0% $8,976,000 TREATMENT FACILITIES WWTP-003 Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications Design - - $1,032,750 $1,032,750 2011 2016 - 75% $774,563 25% $258,188 $258,188 0.0% $0 WWTP-003 Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications CM\Insp - - $995,000 $995,000 2011 2016 - 75% $746,250 25% $248,750 $248,750 0.0% $0 WWTP-003 Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications Const - - $16,889,298 $16,889,298 2011 2016 80 MGD 75% $12,666,974 25% $4,222,325 $4,222,325 0.0% $0 WWTP-009 VCWRF Peak Flow Diversion Structure (Equalization Basin for Peak Flows) CM\Const - - $30,921,046 $30,921,046 2012 2018 100 MG 25% $7,730,262 75% $23,190,785 $23,190,785 0.0% $0 WWTP-0133 VCWRF South Influent Lift Station (V-3) Eng - - $452,147 $452,147 2017 2021 - 0% $0 93% $420,497 $420,497 7.0% $31,650 WWTP-0133 VCWRF South Influent Lift Station (V-3) Const - - $21,081,975 $21,081,975 2021 2022 - 0% $0 93% $19,606,237 $20,194,424 7.0% $1,475,738 WWMP #53 Mary's Creek WRF Site Selection and Land Purchase Land - - $4,950,000 $4,950,000 2011 2011 - 0% $0 52% $2,574,000 $2,574,000 48.0% $2,376,000 WWMP #53 Mary's Creek Satellite Plant (MP-053) Permitting\Eng - - $13,500,000 $13,500,000 2017 2023 - 0% $0 52% $7,020,000 $7,020,000 48.0% $6,480,000 WWMP#533 Mary's Creek Satellite Plant (MP-053) Const - - $135,000,000 $135,000,000 2024 2026 10 MGD 0% $0 52% $70,200,000 $79,010,718 48.0% $64,800,000 WWTP-012-1 VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12 (Phase 2B of 191 MGD expansion) Study\Eng - - $3,785,000 $3,785,000 2017 2020 - 0% $0 93% $3,520,050 $3,520,050 7.0% $264,950 WWTP-012-2 VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12 (Phase 2B of 191 MGD expansion) CM\Const - - $10,574,070 $10,574,070 2024 2025 25 MGD 0% $0 93% $9,833,885 $11,068,124 7.0% $740,185 WWTP-012-3 VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12 (Phase 2B of 191 MGD expansion) CM\Const - - $10,574,070 $249,755,356 $10,574,070 $249,755,356 2024 2025 - 0% WASTEWATER TREATMENT $0 PLANTS 93% ELIGIBLE COST $9,833,885 $150,928,602 $11,068,124 7.0% $740,185 REGIONAL LIFT STATIONS & INTERCEPTORS WWMP #1074 4.4 MGD Rock Creek Lift Station Expansion (outside of PID boundary) to 6.0 MGD (Including 16-inch Parallel Force Main) Eng - - $1,096,000 $1,096,000 2017 2023 - 0% $0 99% $1,085,040 $1,085,040 1.0% $10,960 WWMP #107° 4.4 MGD Rock Creek Lift Station Expansion (outside of PID boundary) to 6.0 MGD (Including 16-inch Parallel Force Main) Const - - $7,306,600 $7,306,600 2017 2024 4.4 MGD 0% $0 99% $7,233,534 $7,233,534 1.0% $73,066 WWMP #283 Dosier Creek 24-inch Force Main (Marine Creek to Big Fossil Basin WW Diversion) Eng - - $400,000 $400,000 2015 2019 - 31% $124,000 69% $276,000 $276,000 0.0% $0 WWMP #283 Dosier Creek 24-inch Force Main (Marine Creek to Big Fossil Basin WW Diversion) Const - - $3,877,861 $3,877,861 2019 2020 14 MGD 31% $1,202,137 69% $2,675,724 $2,675,724 0.0% $0 WWMP #134 Proposed 44.0 MGD Lake Arlington - VC Basin Lift Station & 42-inch Force Main Eng - - $4,299,132 $4,299,132 2018 2020 - 0% $0 100% $4,299,132 $4,299,132 0.0% $0 WWMP #134 Proposed 44.0 MGD Lake Arlington - VC Basin Lift Station & 42-inch Force Main Const - - $49,018,693 $49,018,693 2020 2023 44 MGD 0% $0 100% $49,018,693 $49,018,693 0.0% $0 2022 IF #14 Proposed 5.25 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "A" & Force Main Eng - - $800,900 $800,900 2020 2023 - 0% $0 55% $440,495 $440,495 45.0% $360,405 2022 IF #14 Proposed 5.25 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "A" & Force Main Const - - $5,338,800 $5,338,800 2020 2023 5.25 MGD 0% $0 55% $2,936,340 $2,936,340 45.0% $2,402,460 2022 IF #23 Proposed 22.0 MGD Clear Fork Lift Station & 30-inch Force Main Eng - - $3,720,000 $3,720,000 2020 2021 - 0% $0 59% $2,194,800 $2,194,800 41.0% $1,525,200 2022 IF #23 Proposed 22.0 MGD Clear Fork Lift Station & 30-inch Force Main Const - - $24,800,000 $24,800,000 2021 2025 22 MGD 0% $0 59% $14,632,000 $15,070,960 41.0% $10,168,000 2022 IF #34 Proposed 4.5 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "B" & Force Main Eng - - $806,000 $806,000 2022 2023 - 0% $0 55% $443,300 $470,297 45.0% $362,700 2022 IF #34 Proposed 4.5 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "B" & Force Main Const - - $5,372,700 $5,372,700 2023 2024 4.5 MGD 0% $0 55% $2,954,985 $3,228,992 45.0% $2,417,715 WWMP #614 5.5 MGD Richardson Slough Lift Station Expansion to 10.0 MGD & 20-inch Force Main in the Clear Fork Basin Eng - - $607,200 $607,200 2024 2025 - 0% $0 100% $607,200 $683,409 0.0% $0 WWMP #614 5.5 MGD Richardson Slough Lift Station Expansion to 10.0 MGD & 20-inch Force Main in the Clear Fork Basin Const - - $4,047,600 $4,047,600 2025 2025 5.5 MGD 0% $0 100% $4,047,600 $4,692,278 0.0% $0 WWMP #544 Proposed 10.0 MGD Walnut Creek Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main Eng - - $2,924,700 $2,924,700 2026 2028 - 0% $0 48% $1,403,856 $1,676,277 52.0% $1,520,844 WWMP #544 Proposed 10.0 MGD Walnut Creek Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main Const - - $19,497,600 $19,497,600 2026 2028 10 MGD 0% $0 48% $9,358,848 $11,174,954 52.0% $10,138,752 WWMP #644 14.0 MGD Dosier Creek Lift Station Expansion to 24.0 MGD & 24-inch Force Main Eng - - $1,953,100 $1,953,100 2026 2028 - 0% $0 50% $976,550 $1,166,052 50.0% $976,550 WWMP #64° 14.0 MGD Dosier Creek Lift Station Expansion to 24.0 MGD & 24-inch Force Main Const - - $13,020,500 $13,020,500 2026 2028 14 MGD 0% $0 50% $6,510,250 $7,773,579 50.0% $6,510,250 2022 IF #43 Proposed 13.0 MGD La Frontera Lift Station Eng - - $540,000 $540,000 2026 2028 1 - 0% $0 40% $216,000 $257,915 60.0% 1 $324,000 2022 IF #44 Proposed 13.0 MGD La Frontera Lift Station Const - - $8,594,900 $8,594,900 2026 2028 13 MGD 0% $0 40% $3,437,960 $4,105,104 60.0% $5,156,940 WWMP #964 Proposed 10.0 MGD Regional Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main Eng - - $2,251,100 $2,251,100 2026 2028 - 0% $0 30% $675,330 $806,379 70.0% $1,575,770 WWMP #964 Proposed 10.0 MGD Regional Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main Const - - $15,006,800 $15,006,800 2026 2028 10 MGD 0% $0 30% $4,502,040 $5,375,671 70.0% $10,504,760 WWMP #18° 108-inch Third Barrel Interceptor Parallel to M-280 & M-338 MP-018 Eng - - $14,467,800 $14,467,800 2025 2032 - 0% $0 51% $7,378,578 $8,553,794 49.0% $7,089,222 WWMP #18° 108-inch Third Barrel Interceptor Parallel to M-280 & M-338 MP-018 Const - - $96,432,000 $96,432,000 2026 2032 173 MGD 0% $0 51% $49,180,320 $58,723,874 49.0% $47,251,680 ENGINEERING STUDIES - 2012 Wastewater Master Plan 2010-2030 Study - - $4,156,850 $4,156,850 2008 2012 - 60% $2,494,110 40% $1,662,740 $1,662,740 0.0% $0 -I Impact Fee Study 2022-2031 Study - - $450,000 $450,000 2019 1 2021 - 0% $0 100% $450,000 $450,000 0.0% $0 WWTP-0433 Village Creek Facilities Plan Study $1,000,000 $1,000,000 2023 2023 - 0% $5,606,850 $5,606,850 ENGINEERING $0 100% STUDIES• $1,000,000 $1,092,727 0.0% $0 ,0 $3,205,467 $628,543,76 WASTEWATER CIP ELIGIBLE COST $363,023,128 $393,550,497 uvrc raaor or i.7i uses co innate proieccea cost rrom zuii wivir co tutu aouars ana an inriauon race or 3i year was assumes on proposes proleccs only. 2One alternate discharge pump was included in Plant Rehab Phase 1 Project. 311evised project costs for 2020 provided by City Staff/Consultant. °Revised project costs due to deviations from 2012 WWMP CIP. *New lift station unit pricing was provided by Fort Worth Water staff based on recent bid tabs (Ventana Lift Station) **Expansion lift station unit pricing was provided by Fort Worth Water staff. mrormanon sources: • 2012 Wastewater System Master Plan, Freese & Nichols • City of Fort Worth staff • 5-year CIP Budget 2021- 2025, City of Fort Worth • Trinity River Authority staff • Semiannual CIP Progress Report, City of Fort Worth Sse and Nichols, Inc. 0118 WW_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL _REPORPExhibit F Wastewater CIM(Figure_F7}Existing_Wastewater_ Facilities(11x17).mxd User Name � 02499 FIGURE F-I L \7- CITY OF FORT WORTH Lake Country LS #11 _j P•nder Lake Country LS #13 J \\\\\ 0 FM 2449 F EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM LS Ls Ls - \ Dosser Creek LS LS\�\i 1 rn LakeCountry12 J' L3 4`iJ- til \ 'I\ Denton LL FACILITIES f P`j Ls \ \e.CountryLS#4\I — — CoUnty� LEGEND + - Lake Country LS #3 j — LakeCoury #2 RF Water Reclamation Fort Worth City Limit lity \ 'C >�--- Fort Worth \`Sunset Cove LS Dish \�\ Lift Station L___J ETJ Boundary Lake Country LS#5 LL Road Sewer Wholesale \\ Eagle Ranch LS FM407 FM40T.` Lake Customer 0 7,000 �\ 407 Justin Non -Wholesale I\ FM40� 1ST FM407 Impact Fee Wastewater L— Customer Service Area SCALE IN FEET I--_—_—__ Northlake S_ r — �I ! I County Boundary Zia FORTWORTH. F ® AuroraFREESE o Z 4 _ 01111". K.OLS FM2048 ry ' �i ryMy114 L_ Flo FM 2048 �r� I �� a 114A Trophy Mound ¢ice$ CJ 156 F + /Yor, 1 � �� r4 Denton Creek WRC 9Ill\ L Intel LS #1 \ L L� I: - � - s Y Newark ,�� J Roanoke— � H174 �KESIpE F� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �78 �� 81 ''� l _�A_ IW.estlake �rapevr Lak Ec_;5H17.0 — — — Briar r I:F:7[IJ---� s 00 e HILt o KNOB L z 287 Haslet Heights LS� 170 I —Shield LS e v a Pe°can r LS L's Ij-� \' ' J i U > y r ACr_gs r ,t L ` Sen` era Ranch LS Intel LS #2 a a I UntHunter Crossroads LS S rin Ranch LS' 1.14 t joppell y p 9. Southlake O RF�O I PEDEN PEDEN I-�_ �s89� 1 Haslet26 L N- J Keller 121 ,Us _ I ® Grapevine n 287E \r--- s l-- Z Reno Pelin ---^I CN I• 2B�I--- r, j 114 San _r� 'I _ OP DFW �� 287 377 Airport Azle )un i L LS `—, Colle"I'll Glen Mills LS GLADE �LL7 Irvli g fI i 199 voir LLSLs �r ---- _ 121 360 WALNUT HI`L — — WATAUGA\ NORTH 26 - ` IL l SAGINAW I; . RICil --AND BLUE HILLS MOUND Euless 11 = I vy9 + )-- - Bedford_ I _ Jenkins Heights LSD " I 121 183 1 Meadow Lakes LS ; e HURST T \,%18 _ 86 FM 1886 �\ 1 f1 Casino Beach LS LAKE HALTOM 183 RICHLAND 10 WORTH .�. HILL"S---- h." f a Lake Worth LS CITY sLs 0 360 I� Mosier Valley LS JI ° SANr m� Ls SOM 183 -ram — _ r o Castle Circle LS PARKS, 121 \\ N o RIVER- 199 RF 1 Live Oak LS �OAKS� Village Creek WRF ,- Greenway.LS z--�-WESTWORTH m WHITE SETTLEMENTS �' I ANCASTER m N WESTOVER rZ i�1, Western Hills LS \1 " HILLS . m r 180 DIVISION 180 360 l s ��' 377580 \L ' z Q�� 287 PANTEGO \\ ak SPUR 183 r r Arlington Da ortMi `gton HAYFIELD fir\ l } Garde s Alecto - I } i WLS aterside J �\ Enchanted Bay,LS Winn Dixie 6q. LS. � � � rn RorN - SI ENBROOK nnetta \I ~ 377 '�'FORESiT /south �� EDGECU. FF I HILLS ` o Hulen Bend LS IVILLAGE KENNEDALE o = EDEN _1 Grand I_v• y Richardson Slough LS IEVERMANL_J m0 HARRIS Prairie }` 1 287 Z Jo Poo La 4 I B k Lcdc' _ 1 I o rook y d '� 4 RISINGER ti ,I o 7360 'ems Summer Creek Ranch LS _ � Iq 287r r — j J IJJ Rosemary Ridge LS I o Ce' a Ls\\\ I f � till .I---J I -CROW `L `�' 1 Rendon Mansfield oI Rock Creek Ranch LS iLEY g J oo' al� F.M1187 + v 377 G �— Alsson M 'w BURLESON � { Bethesda F�2, SC 3a 171 2 Johnson County Briaroaks 9jF 'o er ossi `'aa 9�cy �' 174 M Timber �M9�� 1 FM 917 � FM 917 FM 917 yOR �G �d FM 917 FM 917 1 jGodley 1 Joshua ry 0, 0 18,000 ;s' 171 o FM 3048 SCALE IN FEET Keene ti US HIGHWAY 67 Cleburne A'Ivarado N s GS m 0� 3 T m 3 287 � I GsyrG y�qy� 8, 6� Ellis s' ounty fi7 Ue Midlothian I Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc. Job No.: FTW20118 Location: HAW _W W_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL_REPORTExhibit F Wastewater CIP\(Figure_F2}Wastewater_ Proposed _Facilities _CIP(11x17).mxd Updated: Thursday, June 10, 2021 User: 02499 Decatur FIGURE F-2 ENGINEERING STUDIES CITY OF FORT WORTH AM2012 Wastewater Master Plan h^ Gsti ��64 FM I Impact Fee Study 2022-2031 2022 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY FM2264 Village Creek Facilities Plan PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 9` + 9 LEGEND Ponder M N Proposed Lift Station Existing Denton ® Water Reclamation Facility County! Proposed Wastewater Line iImprovement Existing Force Main Wise Proposed Force Main �� Road LL �' County New Dish Improvement� Lake Fairview I ® Mary's Creek WRF Fort Worth CityLimit g'�ao 81 titi�� TRA Sewer Line- Improvement ---, Fort Worth Boyd 287 FM 407 FM 407 f LL ^ FM 407 ETJ Boundary i� ao �� Impact Fee Wastewater ,FM 407 PM Q� Service Area Sewer Wholesale Rhome g 4�> FM 407 0 Customer Northlake -- J stin 3 0 Non -Wholesale Customer 114 , FORT WORTH ® County Boundary Aurora ` 0111FNKHOLS FM --G '�� Mb� y� � HwY114 ewlsv! e 11 FM2048 114 a Denton Creek WRF (3828.68.6 41) 61 - 11.5 MGD (3828.211) _r_ _ One Alternate Discharge Pump (3828.2017* ) c _ EAGLE Roanoke Peak Flow Storage (3828.2012)� L Trc h y Newark c r- CB-1 ,p Y lq •----- — — — — — -- — a 81 15-25HC-3 10-25HC-1 (3828.651) ClurapevineLake KESlpE (3828.644)---"- Briar - — - - - — 00 I KNOB HILL 287 ,, / , fi r 1 Westlake vE Coppel 1, e r 15-25HC-5 0 Fecal sI- `'-1*i `� (3828.645) L1r� a a Reno Acres f j 11 1 114 < Bonds Ranch LS B 15-25HC-4 f RF \4.5 MGD-i (3828.645) Keller Southlake ❑ 121 �Qa No REND Pelica 2022 13 I_7\—__ Hasl'e't"� Tarrant 26 Q �=o ea� \ , ri ®- -� Grape ine L Y Proposed LS �e s- r _z County Bonds Ranch L_ S A La IF tera I- ] ' i 114 5.25 MGD k-13.O MGD �_ Parker san fua 2022 IF #1 1. 2022 IF #4 4rgj �,,� Dosier Creek 24'; FM 287 as 377 a DF�W COUntJ/ Eagle Mountain �— WWMP #28 , Airport 199 — -�\\ a� Colleyville GLADE 97 zle `� LakeW !_J. G 121 1 O ) L S (------.�' ? I F�13 Dosier Creek LSD 1 1� j "� 360 I' 24.0 MGD (14 MGD Expansion) r`�� j WATAUGA\ NORTH 26 - o + and 24" FM (Parallel)— _ SAGIN AW I RICBLAND a I W WM P. #64 � "" I 1 �, Z r —' \� BLUE HILLS Ir ��o �+ ��i��-JJ,1Ij ---`MOUND Bedford �u/es's' J1 F* 183 I. `tr FM 1886 �Sy7,-'�� ` Lakeside �.� \ r - ---J I i----- �/ Pro osed- _ i� LAKE 9y '"4 �'s, p I WORTH ®_ �lF HALT�OM 183 RI CAN lip: a Regional LS & 24" FM �r~Y SANSOM ® CITE' HILLS—`—~—~ 108_-inch Third Barrel 36.0 10.0 MGD \ WWMP#96 ` Ls �I\-I .PARK zsTH r \j Interceptor R� � ;'-" � rJ — � WWMP #18 +I J 1 ti 377 _ — \I Village Creek WRF 1 L_—_----r Proposed Improvements 1_ S 199 .. WWTP-003, 009; 012, 013! r\� 1 WESTWORT;H RIVER) � 1ST 1sT -'rKS OAI Propose\i j �,1 - VI �' WHITE Mary's Creek 10.0 MGD,WRF ri � WWMP#53tii��`� {SETTLEMENTtiWESTOV,ER �j m 180 ® a 180 ") I -\ ` il/0w '� ---� \HILLS 303 LAN�Asa%ER 360 I I nPark c� tr ; ..... f,J 580 T c An_ e I r _ J ,1� m 287 J PANTIE 0 SPUR Proposed +a 1 r-� t z 0 303 lArfingtoin- North377 \ �TPJL Clearfork L&30'FM (Lke �•22.0 MGD _ Arlingto Dalwa� hington MAYFIELD 183 2022 IF #2 Alecto ` r-J� ii_`,1 Ls r 1 � Gardens Annetta 3 I� ALEDO IF ',qv ��— Proposed ` - FMe �`- �ALEDO 4�). l �' Walnut Creek LS & 24" FM 1 �e I _ `vi_�. f , 10.0 MGD. N fM �i J 11 �BENBRO, ��r] WWMP�#54 _��, Annett 1-- L�v ®j (FOREST o South n ,1 - ' EDGECLIFF HILL Proposed \EVIL=CAGE \ I\ Lake Arlington LS & 42" FM --- �\ ESA L:��=="� �I �_ "`iil... 8� 1 377 1 l_�_— +� �r 44.0 MGD > ----� Richardson Slough LS \ �l �1 I L WWMP#13 ° = Grand .0 MGD (5.5 MGD Expansion) 1 :1- ! y Prairje. 8& 20" FM (Parallel) KENNEDALE HARRIS ; EVERMAN`` WWMP #61 �`l 287 Ioe Pool r , o Benbrooh - RISINGER +� LClke' 1 i ® - i--- i 87 R W ' J-�t-v-, I 360 W� � ---1 1 1 r- J ��\County Rock Creek Ranch LS t 1 I S-CRL"EY I r�1 j _ Rendon, Mansfield OWy, I 6.0 MGD (4.4 MGD Expansion) ----- 377 & 16" FM (Parallel) ��_ i ti J ,— ° l ' BURLESON t G Cresson a ` \ �3o Bethesda V T L SC 4 287 171 Johnson s County naroaks Ellis ° Pross� 174 ^ Timber e tP Coun FM 917 1 �� FM 917 FM1917 FM 917 FM 917 Godley Joshua 0 ' 18,000 Midlothian �. z 67 SCALE,IN FEET F171 leburne.n� a enus 1 ra FM 3048o eene Alv'arad Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS 5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS Table 5-1 summarizes the impact fee eligible costs for projects from Table 4-1. The calculated cumulative interest includes the following assumptions: • Existing impact fee eligible CIP o Based on the actual interest for the already outstanding debt for the full term of the bond issuance. • Future impact fee eligible CIP o Based on the projects start date. o Utilizing a bond issuance cost of 2.0%. o Utilizing an interest rate of 4.0%. o Utilizing a Fort Worth bond term of 30 years. o Utilizing a TRA bond term of 20 years. A more detailed explanation of the cumulative interest is included in the impact fee credit analysis, which can be found in Appendix C. Table 5-1 2022-2031 Impact Fee Elieible Costs mr -MRIM4 CIP Category .. TRA Projects $87,001,575 39% $33,629,752 Treatment Facilities $249,755,356 65% $162,795,985 Lift Stations/Interceptors $286,179,986 68% $193,919,293 Engineering Studies $5,606,850 57% $3,205,467 ELIGIBLE IMPACT FEE CIP SUBTOTAL (2020 DOLLARS) $393,550,497 Cumulative Interest - Fort Worth $159,736,337 Cumulative Interest - TRA $16,155,341 IMPACTTOTAL 5.1 SERVICE UNITS Costs between various customer types and sizes are allocated through the application of equivalent meters. Since the 5/8" x 3/4" water meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential customer, a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8" x 3/4" meter capacity. Table 5-2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standard C700-02, Cold -Water Meters — Displacement Type, Bronze Main Case and AWWA Standard C701-07, Cold -Water Meters — Turbine Type, for Customer Service. 5-1 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 011101CHQLS Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalencv Factors 5/8" x 3/4" 1.00 3/4" 1.50 1" 2.50 1-1/2" 5.00 2" 8.00 3" 21.75 4" 37.50 6" 80.00 8" 140.00 10" 210.00 Appendix D contains the current number of water meters for residential and non-residential customers by meter size for the City of Fort Worth, as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this information to FNI. The number of equivalent meters was also calculated for the City and wholesale customers. The next calculation step determines factors for population per residential meter and employment per non-residential meter. Table 5-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and its wholesale customers using 2020 information. Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter m7.M=1lllllllle hL City of Fort Worth Number of Equivalent Meters 327,199 97,081 Population / Employment 873,130 589,052 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.67 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 6.07 Wholesale Customers Number of Equivalent Meters 134,510 32,729 Population / Employment 351,673 160,231 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.61 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 4.90 FNI did not receive meter count information from four of Fort Worth's wholesale wastewater customers; 5-2 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per equivalent meter in Table 5-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all its wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent meter, FNI divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or employment served by Fort Worth. The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2022 and 2031 uses the ratios in Table 5-3 and the population and employment projections for 2022 and 2031 in Exhibit 8- Wastewater Land Use Assumptions Report. The calculation is shown below: City of Fort Worth Increase in Equivalent Meters Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter = (1,133,678 — 911,970) / 2.67 = 83,037 Service Units Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter = (704,041— 615,009) / 6.07 = 14,668 Service Units Fort Worth Total = Residential + Non -Residential = 83,037 + 14,668 = 97,705 Service Units Wholesale Customers Increase in Equivalent Meters Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter = (429,667 — 364,844) / 2.61 = 24,836 Service Units Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter = (185,300—164,635) / 4.90 = 4,217 Service Units Wholesale Total = Residential + Non -Residential = 24,836 + 4,217 = 29,053 Service Units Grand Total = Fort Worth Total + Wholesale Total = 97,705 + 29,053 = 126,758 Service Units 5-3 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS 5.2 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of eligible CIP for the study period from Table 5-1 divided by the increase in equivalent meters from Section 5.1. This fee equals the wastewater impact fee per service unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size. Wastewater Impact Fee per Service Unit = Max Infrastructure Cost / Increase in Equivalent Meters = $569,442,175 / 126,758 = $4,492 per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter The maximum allowable impact fee that can be collected is calculated by subtracting a credit from the impact fee eligible cost. A detailed impact fee credit analysis is included in Appendix C. A summary of the maximum allowable water impact fee including the credit analysis is shown in Table 5-4. Table 5-4 Wastewater Impact Fee with Credit Analysis .�..• Preliminary Maximum Calculated Infrastructure Cost $569,442,175 Minus the CREDIT ($5,443,068) Max Allowable Calculated Infrastructure Cost $563,999,107 Service Units 126,758 ImpactMax Allowable ,,• The wastewater impact fees for meters other than 5/8" x 3/4" are the product of the fee per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 5-2. The maximum allowable wastewater impact fees are provided in Table 5-5. Table 5-5 Wastewater Impact Fees by Meter Size Meter Sizemm 5/8" x 3/4" Equivalency Factor Calculated Impact Fee per Service Unit (Before Subtracting Credit) Maximum Allowable Impact Fee (After Subtracting Credit) 5-4 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 9187MICHOLS Appendix A Existing Wastewater Lift Station Capacities APPENDIX A Existing Fort Worth Wastewater Lift Stations No. Name Address Firm Total # of Capacity Pumps 1 Casino Beach 7551 Surfside Dr. 0.6 mRd 2 pumps 2 Castle Circle 9101 Heron Drive 1.0 mgd 2 pumps 3 Dosier Creek 9241 Boat Club Rd. 10.1 mgd 3 pumps 4 Eagle Ranch 6692 Robertson Rd. 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 5 Enchanted Bay 5788 Vesta Farley Rd. 0.7 mgd 2 pumps 6 Glen Mills 9091 Saginaw Blvd. 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 7 Greenway 1000 Nixon Rd. 2.0 mgd 2 pumps 8 Haslet Heights 2484 Avondale Haslet Rd 0.7 mgd 2 pumps 9 Hulen Bend 6401 Oakmont Blvd. 0.8 mgd 2 pumps 10 Hunter Crossroads 13050 Avondale Farms Dr. 0.3 mgd 2 pumps 11 Intel # 1 3001 Eagle Pkwy 3.9 mgd 2 pumps 12 Intel # 2 3200 Keller -Haslet Rd. 8.0 mgd 3 pumps 13 Jenkins Heights 4525 Norris Valley Dr 1.8 mgd 2 pumps 14 Lake Country # 2 7903 Skylake Dr 0.1 mgd 2 pumps 15 Lake Country # 3 8831 Random Rd 0.8 mgd 2 pumps 16 Lake Country # 4 9033 Crosswind Dr 0.9 mgd 2 pumps 17 Lake Country # 5 8420 Crosswind Dr 0.2 mgd 2 pumps 18 Lake Country # 11 9401 Boat Club Rd 0.9 mgd 2 pumps 19 Lake Country # 12 9341 Mountain Lake 0.9 mgd 2 pumps 20 Lake Country # 13 9331 Dosier Cove W 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 21 Lake Worth 6201 Cahoba Dr 2.2 mgd 2 pum 22 Live Oak 731 Verna Trail N 2.9 mgd 2 pumps A-1 23 Meadow Lakes 4691 St. Thomas Place 0.5 mgd 2 pumps 24 Mosier Valley 3120 House Anderson Rd. 0.14 mgd 2 pumps 25 Richardson Slough 7990 Old Granbury Rd. 4.6 mgd 3 pumps 26 Rock Creek Ranch 10716 Tarleton Way Rd. 1.6 mgd 2 pumps 27 Rosemary Ridge 10499 Old Crowley Cleburne 1.6 mgd 2 pumps 28 Sendera Ranch 1092 Avondale Haslet Rd. 1.5 mgd 2 pumps 29 Shield 14050 Park Vista Boulevard 1.1 mgd 2 pumps 30 Spring Ranch 1100 Travis Court 0.4 mgd 2 pumps 31 Summer Creek Ranch 9898 West Cleburne Road 1.5 mgd 2 pumps 32 Sunset Cove 8505 Lake Country Drive 4.0 mgd 3 pumps 33 Waterside 3912 Watercourse Drive 0.7 mgd 2 pumps 34 Western Hills 2717 Glenrock 0.6 mgd 2 pumps 35 Winn Dixie 200 SW Loop 820 0.5 mgd 2 pumps A-2 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 9187MICHOLS Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY PROJECTS Project Title: Denton Creek WRF Expansion to 11.5 MGD (3828.211) Description: Construction of a 6.5 MGD expansion of TRAs Denton Creek Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). Purpose: Provide treatment capacity to address potential growth needs by expanding the existing treatment plant. Allocation: This project is allocated 24% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers, divided by the added capacity due to the expansion (11.5 MGD). Project Title: CB-136-Inch Parallel Relief Interceptor (3828.651) Description: Land purchase and construction of a 36-inch relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WRF. Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs by paralleling the existing interceptor. Allocation: This project is allocated 30% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2023) to the Interceptor, divided by the capacity shown in the Denton Creek wastewater model's interceptors which was provided by TRA. Project Title: HC-1 Relief Int. (460H-DCRWS) (3828.641) Description: Design and construction of approximately 15,000 ft of 72- to 84-inch diameter relief pipeline conveying water to the Denton Creek WRF. Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 20% during the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the Relief Interceptor, divided by the percentage of capacity of the interceptors that belong to Fort Worth in the Denton Creek wastewater model provided by TRA. Project Title: One Alternate Discharge Pump (3828.2017) Description: Design and construction of one alternate discharge pump at the Denton Creek WRF. Purpose: Provide additional discharge capacity at the Denton Creek WRF to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 24% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the discharge pump, divided by the capacity added from the discharge pump (6.5MGD). B-1 Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects Project Title: 10-25HC-1 Relief Int. (740H - 460H) 12,500 LF (3828.642) Description: Land purchase and construction of 12,500 feet of a relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WRF. Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 46% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the relief interceptor, divided by the percentage of capacity of the interceptors that belong to Fort Worth in the Denton Creek wastewater model provided by TRA. Project Title: 15-25HC-3 Relief Int. (1320H to 740H) 13,100 LF (Relieving 24-inch Interceptor) (3828.644) Description: Land purchase and construction of 13,100 feet of a relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WRF. Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 49% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the relief interceptor, divided by the added capacity from the relief interceptor (44.12 MGD). Project Title: 15-25HC-4/15-25HC-5 Relief Interceptor & MS 10_OHC (1320H-1780H) (3828.645) Description: Land purchase and construction of 13,100 feet of a relief interceptor conveying water to the Denton Creek WRF. Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 52% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected peak wet weather flow in 2031 to the relief interceptor, divided by the added capacity from the relief interceptor (16.1 MGD). Project Title: Peak Flow Storage (3828.2012) Description: Design and construction of a peak flow storage structure at the Denton Creek WRF. Purpose: Provide additional peak flow storage capacity at the Denton Creek WRF to address potential growth needs. Allocation: This project is allocated 50% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031). A peak flow storage basin with a capacity of 30.6 MG is needed for the plant buildout flow. The initial peak flow stage capacity would be 27.4 MG with an additional 3.2 MG of storage capacity constructed at a later date. B-2 Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects WASTEWATER TREATMENT Project Title: Deep Bed Media Filters 1-20 Modifications (WWTP-003) Description: Modification of the deep bed media filters 1-20. Purpose: Provides added treatment capacity at the Village Creek Reclamation Facility (VCWRF). Allocation: This project is allocated 25% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the VCWRF, which shows that the remaining capacity will be fully utilized during the planning period. 75% of the capacity will be utilized by 2022, based on the existing flow to the VCWRF, divided by the existing capacity. Project Title: VCWRF Peak Flow Diversion Structure (Equalization Basin for Peak Flows) (WWTP- 009) Description: Design and construction of a wastewater diversion and peak flow storage basin adjacent to the VCWRF. Purpose: Detention facility will equalize the peak influent flows to the VCWRF. This project will divert and store the peak flows for later treatment under normal conditions. Allocation: This project is allocated 75% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2023) to the VCWRF, which shows that the remaining capacity will be fully utilized during the planning period. 25% of the capacity will be utilized by 2022, based on the existing flow to VCWRF, divided by the existing capacity. Project Title: VCWRF South Influent Lift Station (V-3) (WWTP-013) Description: Design and construction of an influent lift station at the VCWRF. Purpose: The influent lift station is needed to address growth by providing added influent capacity at the VCWRF. Allocation: This project is allocated 93% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected VCWRF average day flow in 2031, divided by the total capacity of the VCWRF (191 MGD). Project Title: Mary's Creek WRF Site Selection and Land Purchase (WWMP #53) Description: Land purchase for Mary's Creek WRF to address growth related needs in the Clear Fork sewer basin. Purpose: Provide treatment capacity to address growth needs by constructing a new treatment facility to serve portions of the Clear Fork Basin. Allocation: This project is allocated 52% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the existing flow to Mary's Creek plus the flow from the Walnut Creek LS, all divided by the additional capacity the Mary's Creek satellite plant (10 MGD). B-3 Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects Project Title: Mary's Creek Satellite Plant (MP-053) (WWMP #53) Description: Design and construction of Mary's Creek WRF to address growth related needs in the Clear Fork Basin. Purpose: Provide treatment capacity to address growth needs by constructing a new treatment facility to serve portions of the Clear Fork Basin. Allocation: This project is allocated 52% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected average day flow to Mary's Creek plus the flow from the Walnut Creek LS, all divided by the additional capacity the Mary's Creek satellite plant (10 MGD). Project Title: VCWRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1 - 12 & Grit System (Phase 2B of 191 MGD expansion) (WWTP-012) Description: Design and construction for the replacement of primary clarifiers 1-12 and addition of a new grit removal system sized to meet the 191 MGD expansion requirements. Purpose: The addition of new primary clarifiers to replace the existing primary clarifiers 1- 12 would greatly increase the functional capacity of the primary clarifiers and increase hydraulic capacity of the internal 96-inch pipeline. Primary clarifiers 1- 12 at VCWRF are a hydraulic bottleneck which needs to be addressed to realize the planned expansion to 191 MGD. In addition to being a hydraulic bottleneck, the reliability of the clarifiers is impacted by large amounts of grit (particularly at higher flows). These clarifiers need to be replaced before the 191 MGD capacity can be realized and a new grit removal system needs to be added to increase reliability in capacity and treatment. Allocation: This project is allocated 93% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected VCWRF average day flow for 2031, divided by the proposed total capacity of the VCWRF (191 MGD). B-4 Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects REGIONAL LIFT STATIONS AND INTERCEPTORS Project Title: 4.4 MGD Rock Creek Lift Station Expansion (outside of PID boundary) to 6.0 MGD (Including 16-inch Parallel Force Main) (WWMP #107) Description: 4.4 MGD expansion of the Rock Creek Lift Station to the Southeast of Benbrook La ke. Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to growth -related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 99% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected 2031 peak wet weather flow to the Rock Creek Lift Station less the existing lift station capacity, divided by the added capacity from the expansion (4.4 MGD). Project Title: Dosier Creek 24-inch Force Main (Marine Creek to Big Fossil Basin WW Diversion) (WWMP #28) Description: Design and construction of 24-inch force main in the Marine Creek and Big Fossil Basins. Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to the Marine Creek Basin. Due to tight corridors and easements in the downtown area the future flow will be pumped from the Marine Creek Basin to the Big Fossil Basin through the Dosier Creek Lift Station. The transfer of flow will reduce the amount of flow through the downtown corridor and delay the need for paralleling larger interceptors in that area. Allocation: This project is allocated 69% in the study period. Allocation was determined assuming the projected increase in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031), including the additional flow from the La Frontera Lift Station to the Dosier Creek Force Main is greater than the remaining capacity of the force main. The existing utilization of 31% was determined using the projected 2022 peak wet weather flow, divided by the added capacity of the 24-inch force main (14 MGD). Project Title: Proposed 44.0 MGD Lake Arlington - VC Basin Lift Station & 42-inch Force Main (WWMP #13) Description: Design and construction of a 44.0 MGD firm capacity lift station and 42-inch force main in the Village Creek Basin. Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to the Village Creek Basin west of Lake Arlington. Allocation: This project is allocated 100% in the study period. Allocation was determined based on the projected peak wet weather flow of 44 MGD to the VC Basin Lift Station, divided by the added capacity from the lift station and force main (44 MGD). B-5 Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects Project Title: Proposed 5.25 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "A" & Force Main (2022 IF #1) Description: Design and construction of a 5.25 MGD firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to the northwest portions of the City. Allocation: This project is allocated 55% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow to the Bonds Ranch Lift Station "A", divided by the added capacity from the lift station and force main (5.25 MGD). Project Title: Proposed 22.0 MGD Clear Fork Lift Station & 30-inch Force Main (2022 IF #2) Description: Design and construction of a 22.0 MGD lift station and 30-inch force main in the Clear Fork Basin. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide expanded wastewater capacity to growth -related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 59% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the Clear Fork Lift Station, divided by the added capacity from the lift station and force main (22 MGD). Project Title: Proposed 4.5 MGD Bonds Ranch Lift Station "B" & Force Main (2022 IF #1) Description: Design and construction of a 4.5 MGD firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to the northwest portions of the City. Allocation: This project is allocated 55% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow to the Bonds Ranch Lift Station "B", divided by the added capacity from the lift station and force main (4.5 MGD). Project Title: 5.5 MGD Richardson Slough Lift Station Expansion and 20-inch Force Main in the Clear Fork Basin (WWMP #61) Description: 5.5 MGD expansion of the Richardson Slough Lift Station just east of Benbrook Lake in the Clear Fork Basin. Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to growth -related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 100% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the Richardson Slough Lift Station, which will fully utilize the added capacity due to the expansion (5.5 MGD). Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects Project Title: Proposed 10.0 MGD Walnut Creek Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main (WWMP #54) Description: Design and construction of a 10.0 MGD lift station and 24-inch force main in the Clear Fork Basin. Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to growth -related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 48% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in flow (2022-2031) to the Walnut Creek Lift Station, divided by the added capacity due to the lift station and force main (10 MGD). Project Title: 14.0 MGD Dosier Creek Lift Station Expansion to 24.0 MGD & 24-inch Force Main (WWMP #64) Description: 14 MGD expansion of the Dosier Creek Lift Station and 24-inch force main in the Marine Creek Basin. Purpose: Provide expanded wastewater capacity to growth -related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 50% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031), including the additional flow from the La Frontera Lift Station, to the Dosier Creek Lift Station less the capacity of WWMP #28, divided by the added capacity from the expansion and force main (14 MGD). Project Title: Proposed 13.0 MGD La Frontera Lift Station (2022 IF #4) Description: Design and construction of a 13.0 MGD lift station in the Marine Creek Basin. Purpose: Provide future wastewater service to growth -related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 40% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) in the Marine Creek Basin that is not expected to be captured by other projects, divided by the added capacity due to the lift station (13 MGD). Project Title: Proposed 10.0 MGD Regional Lift Station & 24-inch Force Main (WWMP #96) Description: Design and construction of a 10.0 MGD lift station and 24-inch force main in the West Fork Basin. Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to growth -related service areas. Allocation: This project is allocated 30% in the study period. Allocation was determined using projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the Regional Lift Station less the capacity of the existing Live Oak Lift Station capacity, divided by the added capacity from the Regional Lift Station and force main (10 MGD). B-7 Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects Project Title: 108-inch Third Barrel Interceptor Parallel to M-280 & M-338 MP-018 (WWMP #18) Description: Design and construction of a 108-inch wastewater interceptor west of the VCWRF. Purpose: Provide conveyance capacity to accommodate projected growth. Allocation: This project is allocated 51% in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in peak wet weather flow (2022-2031) to the interceptor less the capacity of the existing "Twins" interceptors, divided by the added capacity from the 108-inch third barrel interceptor (173 MGD). Appendix B Wastewater CIP Projects WASTEWATER ENGINEERING STUDIES Project Title: 2012 Wastewater Master Plan (2010 — 2030) Description: Engineering Study. Purpose: The 2012 master plan was an update of the 1999 study and includes the planning period 2010 through 2030. Allocation: This project is allocated 40% to the study period. Allocation was determined using the percentage of the planning period within the master plan that falls within the 10-year impact fee study period. Project Title: 2022 Wastewater Impact Fee Study Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the maximum allowable fee which can be assessed. Purpose: By statute, the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five years. Allocation: 100% of the cost for the 2022 impact fee study can be allocated to the study period as all ten years are within the study period. The impact fee covers water and wastewater, with 50% of costs allocated to each. This study replaces the 2017 Impact Fee study, therefore the costs associated with the 2017 Impact fee study are not eligible for the 2022 impact fee update. Project Title: Village Creek Facilities Plan (WWTP-043) Description: Engineering Study. Purpose: The engineering study provides a facilities plan for the Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility. Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to the study period. Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 9187MICHOLS Appendix C Impact Fee Credit Analysis 801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 • Fort Worth, Texas 76102 • 817-735-7300 • fax 817-735-7492 TO: Wendy Chi-Babulal, P.E., Fort Worth Water Matt Kusnir, P.E., Fort Worth Water FROM: Jessica Brown, P.E, Freese and Nichols, Inc. Mazen Kawasmi, P.E., CFM, GISP, Freese and Nichols, Inc. Richard Campbell, Freese and Nichols, Inc. Angie Flores, Senior Manager, Raftelis, Inc. SUBJECT: 2022 Fort Worth Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Update: Credit Methodology Memorandum DATE: July 22, 2021 1.0 INTRODUCTION www.freese.com In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI), to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. FNI contracted with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. to perform a rate credit analysis in compliance with Chapter 395. For this study, Raftelis completed the maximum allowable impact fee calculation, including the rate credit analysis. The calculated impact fee includes the outstanding debt service (principal and interest) of existing facilities with excess capacity and the projected debt service (principal and interest) of the future facilities identified in the 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This memorandum establishes the methodology utilized for the rate credit analysis and summarizes the results. 2.0 DEBT SERVICE INTEREST CALCULATION The impact fee eligible interest is based on existing and future debt service. The existing debt service is debt service associated with existing facilities with excess capacity, while the future debt service is based on future facilities. For the existing impact fee eligible facilities, the interest considered in the impact fee is based on the actual interest for the already outstanding debt. Specifically, the existing debt service is based upon impact fee eligible outstanding debt for Fort Worth, Trinity River Authority (TRA), and Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD). The interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the term of the existing debt, per discussions with City staff. 1 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH July 22, 2021 The interest for the future facilities is calculated using the assumptions in Table 1. The proposed debt is based upon the 10-year water and wastewater impact fee eligible CIP. In the CIP, if a project's start date is in 2022 or later and is greater than $5 million, it is assumed that it will be debt -funded. Any amounts under $5 million are assumed to be cash -funded. The interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the term of the future debt, per discussions with City staff. Table 1 Future Debt Service Assumptions Debt Service Details Bond Issuance Cost Assumption 2.0% Interest Rate 4.0% Fort Worth Term 30 years TRA Term 20 years 3.0 RATE CREDIT CALCULATION The rate credit methodology was developed by FNI and was applied to the impact fee calculation. Chapter 395 prescribes that a utility must provide a credit to account for any portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues that would also be reflected in the developed impact fees and paid by new service units in the program period. The utility may choose to do a detailed rate credit analysis, or automatically cap the maximum allowable impact fee at 50% of the impact fee eligible infrastructure costs. In this case, a rate credit analysis was performed to determine the applicable credit for the program period. The purpose of this credit is to ensure that new growth is not charged twice for the portion of capital improvements attributed to them, once through the impact fee and then again through rates. The code does not specifically address the way in which this credit is to be calculated. Each utility should calculate the credit in a way that is consistent with the operation of their fund, the way they finance their capital improvements, and the way these capital improvements costs are represented in their utility rates. The next section describes how Fort Worth's credit was calculated. FNI utilized the projected Service Unit Equivalents (SUE), developed as part of the Land Use Assumptions, to determine the pro rata share of the existing debt (interest and principal) attributable to each SUE on the system for each year of the impact fee period (2022 — 2031). The resulting cost per SUE was multiplied by the cumulative growth in SUE's for each year of the impact fee period, resulting in the portion of the existing debt (interest and principal) that future customers will pay for in water/wastewater rates. This represents the credit to the impact fees required to avoid "double counting" and this credit was subtracted from the total impact fee eligible 2 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH July 22, 2021 infrastructure costs. Table 2 summarizes the results of the water credit calculation. Table 3 summarizes the results of the wastewater credit calculation. 3 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum July 22, 2021 Table 2 Water Credit Analysis Summary r011 NICHOLS R RAFTELIS FORT WORTH. Year 2022 2025 20 202 02 2029 2030 2031 Water Impact Fee Eligible Interest + Principle for 10- Year Period Total Service Unit Equivalents (SUE) Each Year • • ' • �' :. Cost per SUE .: Cumulative SUE's in 10-Year Period Portion Paid by Growth in 10-Year $260,293 Period Total Credit $528,834 $774,096 $962,093 $1,172,138 $1,382,327 $1,471,490 $1,654,279 $1,626,156 $2,786,360 Table 3 Wastewater Credit Analysis Summary 2� 1 2029 2030 ' Wastewater Impa Fee Eligible Interes l $5,742,152 $5,749,275 $5,748,254 $5,755,437 $5,908,684 $5,137,534 $5,130,701 $5,132,433 E + Principle for 10- 0 Year Period —M ■ Total Service U Equivalents (SU • • • Each Ye • ' • • • : so I • Cost per • • • • Cumulative SUEn® , 10-Year PerlO Portion Paid by Growth in 10-Year $117,966 $231,456 $340,747 $445,449 $546,912 $661,203 $658,446 $737,996 $815,857 $887,036 Period Total Credill $5,443,068 4 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum July 22, 2021 r� N;CHOLS FORT WORTH R RAFTELIS 4.0 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION The maximum allowable impact fees are the result of taking the total cost of expansion for the study period, minus the calculated credit, and dividing by the increase in SUE's. This fee equals the maximum allowable impact fee per service unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size. A summary of the maximum allowable impact fee calculation for both water and wastewater is shown in Table 4. Table 4 Credit Analysis Summary Preliminary Maximum Calculated $677,264,404 $569,442,175 Infrastructure Cost Minus the CREDIT ($12,618,067) ($5,443,068) Max Allowable Calculated $664,646,337 $563,999,107 Infrastructure Cost Service Units 136,734 126,758 ImpactMax Allowable Service Unit Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® Exhibit F: Capital Improvement Plan - Wastewater 91870ICHOLS Appendix D Water Meter Summary Appendix D Water Meter Summary City of Fort Worth % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 220,645 220,645 220,645 3/4" 1.50 2,689 2,689 4,034 1" 2.50 21,698 21,698 54,245 1-1/2" 5.00 1,903 1,903 9,515 2" 8.00 1,755 1,755 14,040 3" 21.75 43 43 935 4" 37.50 98 98 3,675 6" 80.00 163 163 13,040 8"1 140.00 1 46 1 46 6,440 10" 210.00 1 3 1 3 630 TOTALI Non 249,043 Meters 1 249,043 327,199 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 6,841 6,841 6,841 3/4" 1.50 18 18 27 1" 2.50 2,459 2,459 6,148 1-1/2" 5.00 1,560 1,560 7,800 2" 8.00 3,642 3,642 29,136 3" 21.75 392 392 8,526 4" 37.50 327 327 12,263 6" 80.00 156 156 12,480 8" 140.00 1 63 1 63 81820 10" 210.00 1 24 24 5,040 TOTALI 15,482 15,482 97,081 Wholesale Customer: Benbrook Water Authority % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 5,145 5,145 5,145 3/4" 1.50 43 43 65 1" 2.50 3,075 3,075 7,688 1-1/2" 5.00 17 17 85 2" 8.00 87 87 696 3" 21.75 25 25 544 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 1W 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 8,392 Meters 1 8,392 14,223 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 138 138 138 3/4" 1.50 4 4 6 1" 2.50 221 221 553 1-1/2" 5.00 54 54 270 2" 8.00 107 107 856 3" 21.75 11 11 239 4" 37.50 3 3 113 6" 80.00 2 2 160 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 1W 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 540 1 540 2,335 D-1 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Bethesda Water Supply Corportation % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 4% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 10,239 410 410 3/4" 1.50 8 0 0 1" 2.50 42 2 5 1-1/2" 5.00 4 0 0 2" 8.00 2 0 0 3" 21.75 1 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 10,296 Meters 1 412 415 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 142 6 6 3/4" 1.50 8 0 0 1" 2.50 44 2 5 1-1/2" 5.00 13 1 5 2" 8.00 55 2 16 3" 21.75 1 0 0 4" 37.50 8 0 0 6" 80.00 1 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 272 11 32 Wholesale Customer: City of Blue Mound % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 807 807 807 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 807 Meters 1 807 807 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 24 24 24 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 1 1 3 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 1 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 26 1 26 35 D-2 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Burleson % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 13,746 13,746 13,746 3/4" 1.50 2 2 3 1" 2.50 3 3 8 1-1/2" 5.00 3 3 15 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 13,754 Meters 1 13,754 13,772 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 385 385 385 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 139 139 348 1-1/2" 5.00 101 101 505 2" 8.00 210 210 1,680 3" 21.75 20 20 435 4" 37.50 3 3 113 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 859 859 3,546 Wholesale Customer: City of Crowley % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 6,467 6,467 6,467 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 35 35 88 1-1/2" 5.00 16 16 80 2" 8.00 30 30 240 3" 21.75 2 2 44 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 10 TOTALI Non 6,550 Meters 1 6,550 6,919 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 59 59 148 1-1/2" 5.00 14 14 70 2" 8.00 48 48 384 3" 21.75 15 15 326 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 136 1 136 928 D-3 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Edgecliff Village % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 78 78 78 3/4" 1.50 1,257 1,257 1,886 1" 2.50 33 33 83 1-1/2" 5.00 5 5 25 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,373 Meters 1 1,373 2,072 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 3 3 5 1" 2.50 4 4 10 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 7 7 56 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 15 15 151 Wholesale Customer: City of Everman % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,817 1,817 2,726 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,817 Meters 1 1,817 2,726 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 156 156 234 1" 2.50 14 14 35 1-1/2" 5.00 5 5 25 2" 8.00 11 11 88 3" 21.75 3 3 65 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 190 190 485 D-4 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Forest Hill % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 4% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 4,559 182 273 1" 2.50 10 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 38 2 10 2" 8.00 55 2 16 3" 21.75 1 0 0 4" 37.50 1 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 TOTALI Non 4,664 Meters 1 186 1 299 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 10 0 0 1" 2.50 7 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 2 0 0 2" 8.00 6 0 0 3" 21.75 1 0 0 4" 37.50 1 0 0 6" 80.00 1 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 28 0 0 Wholesale Customer: Haltom City % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 11,369 11,369 11,369 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 4 4 10 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 37 37 296 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 11,411 Meters 1 11,411 11,697 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 1584 1,584 1,584 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 5 5 13 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 18 18 144 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 2 2 160 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 1,611 1,611 1,961 D-5 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Hurst % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 92% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 9,454 8,698 8,698 3/4" 1.50 1 1 2 1" 2.50 1,517 1,396 3,490 1-1/2" 5.00 33 30 150 2" 8.00 4 4 32 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 11,010 Meters 1 10,130 12,410 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 465 428 428 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 367 338 845 1-1/2" 5.00 251 231 1,155 2" 8.00 239 220 1,760 3" 21.75 32 29 631 4" 37.50 18 17 638 6" 80.00 4 4 320 8" 140.00 1 1 1 1 140 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 1,377 1,268 5,917 Wholesale Customer: City of Kennedale % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 4% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,543 102 153 1" 2.50 313 13 33 1-1/2" 5.00 5 0 0 2" 8.00 4 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 2,865 Meters 1 115 186 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 229 9 14 1" 2.50 57 2 5 1-1/2" 5.00 13 1 5 2" 8.00 38 2 16 3" 21.75 44 2 44 4" 37.50 3 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 384 1 16 84 D-6 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Lake Worth %of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,663 1,663 2,495 1" 2.50 171 171 428 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 1 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,835 Meters 1 1,835 2,931 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 123 123 185 1" 2.50 129 129 323 1-1/2" 5.00 46 46 230 2" 8.00 108 108 864 3" 21.75 15 15 326 4" 37.50 7 7 263 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 428 428 2,191 Wholesale Customer: City of North Richland Hills % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 80% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 19,429 15,543 23,315 1" 2.50 960 768 1,920 1-1/2" 5.00 8 6 30 2" 8.00 17 14 112 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 20,414 Meters 1 16,331 25,377 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 683 546 819 1" 2.50 404 323 808 1-1/2" 5.00 64 51 255 2" 8.00 827 662 5,296 3" 21.75 29 23 500 4" 37.50 18 14 525 6" 80.00 4 3 240 8" 140.00 1 2 1 2 280 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 2,031 1 1,624 8,723 D-7 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Pantego % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 75% *Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study. Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 655 491 737 1" 2.50 58 44 110 1-1/2" 5.00 5 4 20 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 718 Meters 1 539 1 867 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 439 329 494 1" 2.50 15 11 28 1-1/2" 5.00 13 10 50 2" 8.00 19 14 112 3" 21.75 3 2 44 4" 37.50 3 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 492 368 803 Wholesale Customer: City of Richland Hills % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 2 2 2 3/4" 1.50 2,778 2,778 4,167 1" 2.50 79 79 198 1-1/2" 5.00 17 17 85 2" 8.00 11 11 88 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 2,887 Meters 1 2,887 4,540 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 165 165 248 1" 2.50 85 85 213 1-1/2" 5.00 31 31 155 2" 8.00 42 42 336 3" 21.75 3 3 65 4" 37.50 2 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 328 1 328 1,092 D-8 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of River Oaks % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% *Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study. Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 2,529 2,529 2,529 3/4" 1.50 15 15 23 1" 2.50 49 49 123 1-1/2" 5.00 9 9 45 2" 8.00 2 2 16 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 2,604 Meters 1 2,604 2,736 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 274 274 274 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 66 66 165 1-1/2" 5.00 41 41 205 2" 8.00 36 36 288 3" 21.75 2 2 44 4" 37.50 2 2 75 6" 80.00 5 5 400 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 426 426 1,451 Wholesale Customer: City of Saginaw % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 7,950 7,950 7,950 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 7,950 Meters 1 7,950 7,950 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 333 333 333 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 333 1 333 333 D-9 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Sansom Park %of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 1,413 1,413 1,413 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,413 Meters 1 1,413 1,413 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 110 110 110 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 1 1 3 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 1 1 8 3" 21.75 4 4 87 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 116 116 208 Wholesale Customer: Trinity River Authority % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 0 Meters 1 0 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 0 1 0 0 D-10 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Watauga % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 6,377 6,377 9,566 1" 2.50 1,925 1,925 4,813 1-1/2" 5.00 5 5 25 2" 8.00 120 120 960 3" 21.75 3 3 65 4" 37.50 4 4 150 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 1 1 1 1 140 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 8,435 Meters 1 8,435 15,719 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 0 0 0 Wholesale Customer: Westover Hills % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 7 7 11 1" 2.50 110 110 275 1-1/2" 5.00 149 149 745 2" 8.00 41 41 328 3" 21.75 2 2 44 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 310 Meters 1 310 1,441 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 2 2 2 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 1 1 5 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 3 1 3 7 D-11 Appendix D Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Westworth Village % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% *Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study. Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 543 543 815 1" 2.50 6 6 15 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 3 3 24 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 1W 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 552 Meters 1 552 854 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 3 3 5 1" 2.50 15 15 38 1-1/2" 5.00 6 6 30 2" 8.00 18 18 144 3" 21.75 2 2 44 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 46 1 46 379 Wholesale Customer: City of White Settlement % of Wastewater Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% *Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study. Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 5,156 5,156 5,156 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 1W 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 5,156 Meters 1 5,156 5,156 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 236 236 236 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 74 74 185 1-1/2" 5.00 46 46 230 2" 8.00 113 113 904 3" 21.75 13 13 283 4" 37.50 4 4 150 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 1W 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 487 1 487 2,068 D-12 lent Plan - Wastewater