HomeMy WebLinkAbout(0140) exhibit-d-water-cip.pdfL
-
WAT E R
CITY C
WORT
ASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE UPDATE I I
EXHIBIT D: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WATER (2022 - 2041)
REESE
PREPARED BY:
rmill NICHOLS
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
801 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 2800
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
817-735-7300
WATER & WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE UPDATE
EXHIBIT D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
-WATER (2022 - 2041)
Prepared for:
Fort Worth Water
FORTWORTH.
m�
%""600"'o
July 22, 2021
Prepared by:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
817-735-7300
WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE
UPDATE
Prepared for:
�E O\T111 Fort Worth Water
F
7/22/2021
_moo cos
joo°000000000000000000000 0
JESSICA L. BROWN
o0 0000000000000000000000 00 /
90098
_
E
##44 S' DENS ' \ —
S � �000000o G
1%/ A
FRE E AND MCHOLS, INC.
XAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
E OF T 11
��P�,.•• •••. F+ys�i /22/2021
ANDREW S.FRANKO
.....................
0�'• 115651
1�,� •.,. ENS G��_
S
i411�� \A040
L
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
'0 F
..... TF�1s�7/22/2021
...............
....... .............:I
MAZEN H. KAWASMI
� 0•. �
o: _
FS •. ENS..• 04
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
Prepared by:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
817-735-7300
FTW 20118
OF • TF-�y��/ 7/22/2021
;/
NICHOLAS JAMES McCORMICK o
00/ '••••135767•••,•��,
.�
/�,�•../C ENS
G
S
11 S/ONAl-
E��
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH.
Ord III <NICHQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water '*40JW*"
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................1-1
2.0 Existing Water Distribution System..............................................................................................2-1
2.1 Raw Water Sources and Transmission...................................................................................2-1
2.2 Water Treatment Plants, Pump Stations and Storage...........................................................2-2
3.0 Projected Water Demands............................................................................................................3-1
4.0 Water Capital Improvements.......................................................................................................4-1
5.0 Impact Fee Analysis.......................................................................................................................5-1
5.1 Service Units...........................................................................................................................5-1
5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation.........................................................................5-4
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1
Water Supply Allocated to Fort Worth............................................................................2-1
Table 2-2
Raw Water Supply Facilities.............................................................................................2-2
Table 2-3
Water Treatment Plant Facilities.....................................................................................2-2
Table 3-1
Projected Water Demands...............................................................................................3-1
Table 4-1
Proposed Water CIP Projects...........................................................................................4-2
Table 5-1
2022-2031 Impact Fee Eligible Costs...............................................................................5-1
Table 5-2
AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors..................................................................................5-2
Table 5-3
Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter ....5-2
Table 5-4
Water Impact Fee with Credit Analysis (100%)...............................................................5-4
Table 5-5
Water Impact Fees by Meter Size....................................................................................5-4
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure D-1 Existing Water Facilities...................................................................................................4-3
Figure D-2 Proposed Water Improvements......................................................................................4-4
APPENDICES
Appendix A—
Existing Water Pumping Capacities
Appendix B —
Existing Distribution System Storage
Appendix C —Water
CIP Projects
Appendix D
— Impact Fee Credit Analysis
Appendix E —
Water Meter Summary
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth
commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc., to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. This report
establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous study completed in 2017.
Impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost associated with expanding
the municipal water system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of Fort Worth owns and
operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, pumping stations, storage facilities, and pipelines
that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the water system is
known as the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP was updated as a part of this study with capital
projects and costs provided by previously commissioned master planning documents and input from Fort
Worth Water staff.
The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth water facilities are eligible to be
included in the impact fee analysis. The additional facilities required to accommodate growth during the
study period are summarized.
1-1
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
2.0 EXISTING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
2.1 RAW WATER SOURCES AND TRANSMISSION
The City obtains the majority of its raw water supply from the Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD),
with the balance supplied by the City's permitted capacity at Lake Worth, the Corps of Engineers (COE)
permitted capacity at Lake Benbrook, and several small reuse projects. The City's supply from TRWD is
per a long term contract, with no contractual limits on the water withdrawn from the Richland -Chambers
and Cedar Creek Reservoirs, subject to the TRWD permit limits. The current water supplies for the City are
as follows in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Water Supply Allocated to Fort Worth
Source
West Fork
HolderWater Right
TRWD
Permitted
Contracted Amount
142.37
Lake Worth (Fort Worth Permit)
Fort Worth
11.85*
Lake Benbrook (COE Contract)
Fort Worth
0.65
Richland -Chambers Reservoir
TRWD
182.87
Cedar Creek Reservoir
TRWD
153.88
*Fort Worth has allowed this water right to be used as part ofTRWD's
West Fork System.
Through a series of pump stations, the TRWD has implemented improvements to allow water from the
Richland -Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs to flow to Lake Benbrook. The blended water can then be
pumped to the Rolling Hills Water Treatment Plant (RHWTP), North Holly Water Treatment Plant
(NHWTP)/South Holly Water Treatment Plant (SHWTP), or Westside Water Treatment Plant (WSWTP).
TRWD implemented improvements to tie Lake Benbrook to Eagle Mountain Lake, where Fort Worth
operates the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant (EMWTP). The existing raw water supply facilities
are shown in Table 2-2.
2-1
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
Table 2-2 Raw Water Supply Facilities
Eagle Mountain Lake
OperatedFacility
TRWD
Capacity
66
Eagle Mountain Pump Station and Pipeline
TRWD
105*
Lake Worth Intake and Pipeline
Fort Worth
127
Clear Fork Pump Station
Fort Worth
90*
Cedar Creek System
TRWD
136*
Richland -Chambers System
TRWD
118*
*Indicates firm capacity with the largest pump out of service
2.2 WATER TREATMENT PLANTS, PUMP STATIONS AND STORAGE
The City's distribution system consists of eleven pressure planes. The pressure planes include the Holly,
Eastside II (ES II), Northside II (NS II), Northside III (NS III), Northside IV (NS IV), Southside II (SS II), Southside
III (SS III), Southside IV (SS IV), Westside II (WS II), Westside III (WS III), Westside IV (WS IV) and Westside
V (WS V) Pressure Planes. Some pressure planes, such as Holly and ES II, are supplied principally by pump
stations at the water treatment plants.
The City currently operates five water treatment plants, summarized in Table 2-3. These plants take raw
water from the TRWD reservoirs and treat it, which is then pumped into the distribution system through
the high service pump stations at each treatment plant.
Table 2-3 Water Treatment Plant Facilities
Water Treatment Plant
North Holly Plant
Treatment
Capacity
,
80
South Holly Plant
80
Rolling Hills Plant
200
Eagle Mountain Plant
108
Westside Plant
15
In order to provide adequate pressure to each of the City's eleven pressure planes, the City operates a
series of 7 high service pump stations (at the Water Treatment Plants) and twenty-two distribution system
pump stations for a total of twenty-nine pumping facilities. A summary of the existing system pumping
capacities of each high service pump station as well as the in -system pump stations can be found in
Appendix A. These pump stations are used to fill the twenty-nine ground and elevated storage tanks
located throughout the City. A summary of the existing system storage capacities of the ground and
elevated storage tanks can be found in Appendix B.
2-2
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
3.0 PROJECTED WATER DEMANDS
Water demand design criteria were developed for the City of Fort Worth in the 2017 Water Master Plan
Update. Based on historical usage, specific residential and non-residential per capita were developed for
each pressure plane. FNI applied the water demand design criteria to Fort Worth population and
employment projections to develop projected water demands, excluding wholesale customers, resulting
in a City 2022 average day demand of 185.97 MGD, and a City 2031 average day demand of 231.80 MGD.
An average day to maximum day peaking factor was also developed for each pressure plane, resulting in
a City 2022 maximum day demand of 354.31 MGD and a City 2031 maximum day demand of 444.06 MGD.
The wholesale customer demand was provided by the wholesale customers as part of the wholesale
customer surveys. The 2022 average day demand for wholesale customers is 73.64 MGD, and the 2031
average day demand for the wholesale customers is 84.41 MGD. The 2022 maximum day demand for
wholesale customers is 163.36 MGD, and the 2031 maximum day demand for the wholesale customers is
183.08 MGD.
The total 2022 average day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 259.61 MGD (2022
maximum day demand of 517.67). The total 2031 average day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale
customers is 316.21 MGD (2031 maximum day demand of 627.14). The 2017 Water Master Plan Update
recommended a maximum day to peak hour peaking factor of 1.5, resulting in a total 2022 peak hour
demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers of 776.51 MGD, and a total 2031 peak hour demand
for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers of 940.71 MGD. Table 3-1 summarizes the projected water
demands for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers.
Table 3-1 Proiected Water Demands
City of Fort Worth 2022 185.97 354.31 531.47
2031 231.80 444.06 666.09
Wholesale Customers 2022 73.64 163.36 245.04
(Portion Served by Fort Worth) 1 2031 1 84.41 1 183.08 1 274.62
3-1
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
4.0 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
This section establishes the water facilities and engineering studies that are eligible for inclusion in the
calculation of the impact fee. Projects included in the CIP are designated to increase system capacity as a
result of projected growth. Only those projects warranted by capacity needs derived from growth
occurring during the study period (2022-2031) can be included in the impact fee calculation. Additionally,
projects are excluded from the impact fee calculation if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in
place.
Projects included in the impact fee study are TRWD supply projects, City of Fort Worth raw water supply
and transmission facilities, water treatment facilities, regional transmission lines, pump stations, storage
facilities, and engineering studies.
Table 4-1 provides a summary of each water CIP project cost and allocation for the 2022-2031 study
period. The 2022 percent utilization is the portion of a project's capacity required to serve existing
development. It is not included in the impact fee cost calculations. The 2022-2031 percent utilization is
the portion of the project's capacity that will be required to serve development projected to occur from
2022 to 2031. The portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur
from 2022 through 2031 is calculated as the total cost multiplied by the 2022-2031 percent utilization.
Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. The percent utilization beyond 2031 is the
portion of a project's capacity allocated to development projected to occur after 2031.
Figures D-1 and D-2 show existing and proposed facilities, respectively, for the impact fee study period.
Appendix C describes each water CIP project for the 2022-2031 planning period. A project description,
the purpose of each project, and the portion of each project that is allocated to associated growth are
included.
4-1
FREESE
r-7 NICHOLS
FORT WORTH
Table 4-1 Water Capital Improvement Projects 2022 - 2031
Start Completion Added xisting 2022 Existing 2022 2022-2031 2031 Impact Fees Fee Costs' Impact Fees after Impact Fees after
ifAllocatedto CostAllocatedto %Allocatedto Cost Allocated to 2022F Inflation Adjusted Impact % Allocated to Cost Allocated to
Project ID Project Title Project Phase Initial Project Cost Project Cost in 2020 Dollars' Date Date Capacity Capacity Capacity Impact Fees (2020 ('Start Date' Dollars) 2031 2031
TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT (TRWD) PROJECTS
Richland -Chambers Wetlands Const $61,000,000 $61,000,000 1999 2013 89.6 MGD 68% $41,480,000
32% $19,520,000 $19,520,000 0% $0
Eagle Mountain Connection Raw Water Line & Pump Station Const $138,867,058 $138,867,058 2006 2008 47 MGD 46% $63,878,847
11% $15,275,376 $15,275,376 43% $59,712,835
Integrated Pipeline & Pump Stations Const $1,076,947,000 $1,076,947,000 2009 2022 160 MGD 0% $0
• PROJECTS
37% 1 $398,470,390 $398,470,390 63% $678,476,610
ELIGIBLE COST
RAW WATER SUPPLY AND TREATMENT PLANTS
W3-58 (2005 MP)
Westside WTP - Phase 1 (0-12 MGD)
Eng
$4,992,954
$4,992,954
2009
2009
-
34%
$1,711,870
26%
$1,283,902
$1,283,902
40%
$1,997,182
W3-5B (2005 MP)
Westside WTP - Phase 1 (0-12 MGD)
Const
$46,847,759
$46,847,759
2009
2012
12 MGD
34%
$16,062,089
26%
$12,046,567
$12,046,567
40%
$18,739,104
N2-5A (2005 MP)
Eagle Mountain Clearwell #3
Eng & Const
$2,968,644
$2,968,644
2011
2014
2.5 MG
53%
$1,582,287
47%
$1,386,357
$1,386,357
0%
$0
W3-8 (2017 MP)2
Westside WTP Expansion 12 MGD to 15 MGD - Membrane Rack
Const
$500,000
$500,000
2016
2017
3 MGD
74%
$371,500
26%
$128,500
$128,500
0%
$0
W3-8 (2017 MP)2
Westside WTP Expansion 15 MGD to 18 MGD - Membrane Rack
Const
$1,200,000
$1,200,000
2020
2021
3 MGD
22%
$267,600
78%
$932,400
$932,400
0%
$0
W3-8 (2017 MP)2
Westside WTP Expansion 18 MGD to 21 MGD - Membrane Rack
Eng & Const
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
2023
2024
3 MGD
0%
$0
94%
$1,880,000
$2,054,327
6%
$120,000
N2-7 (2017 MP)2
Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD
Eng
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
2024
2025
0%
$0
42%
$2,546,000
$2,865,545
58%
$3,454,000
N2-7 (2017 MP)2
Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD
CM
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
2026
2027
0%
$0
420
$1,485,167
$1,773,367
58%
$2,014,833
N2-7 (2017 MP)2
Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD
Const
$50,000,000
$50,000,000
2026
2027
30 MGD
0%
$0
42%
$21,216,667
$25,333,810
58%
$28,783,333
N2-206 (2005 MP)
Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water PS from 35 MGD to 70 MGD
Eng
$480,000
$529,336
2026
2027
0%
$0
42%
$223,909
$267,359
58%
$305,427
N2-201 (2005 MP)
Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water PS from 35 MGD to 70 MGD
Const
$4,800,000
$5,293,360
$123,832,053
2027
2029
35 MGD
RAW WATER SUPPLY
0%
• WATER
$0
TREATMENT PLANT
42%
ELIGIBLE COST,
$2,239,091
$2,753,800
$50,825,934
58%
$3,054,269
PUMP STATIONS AND REGIONAL TRANSMISSION LINES
52-3 (2005 MP)
McCart Pump Station Expansion to 35 MGD Total Capacity
Eng & Const
$563,375
$563,375
2013
2013
10 MGD
85%
$480,417
15%
$82,958
$82,958
0%
$0
W5-1(2005 MP)
3.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station at Walsh Ranch Tank
Eng
$173,000
$173,000
2015
2016
56%
$96,303
44%
$76,697
$76,697
0%
$0
W5-1 (2005 MP)
3.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station at Walsh Ranch Tank
Const
$1,729,685
$1,729,685
2016
2017
3 MGD
56%
$962,858
44%
$766,827
$766,827
0%
$0
N2-1 (2005 MP)
Northside 1148-Inch Transmission Line
Eng & Const
$38,334,816
$38,334,816
2016
2020
48 MGD
10%
$3,680,142
39%
$15,103,918
$15,103,918
51%
$19,550,756
N2-1 (2017 MP)
Expansion of the Northside Pump Station to 70 MGD Total Capacity
Eng & Const
$1,294,391
$1,396,051
2022
2024
12 MGD
0%
$0
100%
$1,396,051
$1,481,071
0%
$0
W4-5 (2005 MP)3
8.0 MGD Southside IV Pump Station
Eng
$120,000
$416,508
2021
2021
0%
$0
55%
$226,997
$233,807
46%
$189,511
W4-5 (2005 MP)3
8.0 MGD Southside IV Pump Station
Const
$1,200,000
$3,832,000
2023
2024
8 MGD
0%
$0
55%
$2,088,440
$2,282,095
46%
$1,743,560
W4-4 (2017 MP)
5.0 MGD Westside IV Pump Station
Eng
$252,000
$271,792
2021
2023
0%
$0
1 26%
$70,188
$72,294
74%
$201,604
W4-4 (2017 MP)
5.0 MGD Westside IV Pump Station
Const
$2,100,000
$2,264,931
2023
2025
5 MGD
0%
$0
26%
$584,900
$639,136
74%
$1,680,031
W5-8 (2017 MP)
5.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station
Eng
$252,000
$271,792
2021
2023
0%
$0
47%
$128,761
$132,624
53%
$143,030
W5-8 (2017 MP)
5.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station
Const
$2,100,000
$2,264,931
2023
2025
5 MGD
0%
$0
47%
$1,073,011
$1,172,508
53%
$1,191,920
53-7 (2017 MP)
McCart Pump Station Expansion to 45 MGD Total Capacity
Eng
$432,000
$465,929
2027
2029
0%
$0
33%
$152,359
$187,382
67%
$313,570
53-7 (2017 MP)
McCart Pump Station Expansion to 45 MGD Total Capacity
Const
$3,600,000
$3,882,739
2027
2029
10 MGD
0%
$0
33%
$1,269,656
$1,561,517
67%
$2,613,083
53-11(2017 MP)
Alta Mesa Pump Station Expansion to 49.4 MGD Total Capacity
Eng
1 $432,000
1 $465,929
1 2027
1 2029
1 -
0%
$0
33%
1 $152,359
1 $187,382
67%
1 $313,570
53-11 (2017 MP)
JAIta Mesa Pump Station Expansion to 49.4 MGD Total Capacity
Const
$3,600,000
$3,882,739
2027
2029
10 MGD
0%
$0
33%
IV:
$1,269,656
$1,561,517
67%
$2,613,083
STORAGE TANKS
N2-7/N3-5 (2005 MP)*
Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Tank & Pump Station
Eng & Const
$4,284,791
$4,284,791
2006
2008
5 MG
78%
$3,342,137
22%
$942,654
$942,654
0%
$0
N4-2 (2005 MP)
1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank on Hwy. 287
Eng
$672,115
$672,115
2014
2015
19%
$127,702
81%
$544,413
$544,413
0%
$0
N4-2 (2005 MP)
1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank on Hwy. 287 & Land Purchase
Const & Land
$4,068,060
$4,068,060
2014
2015
1 MG
19%
$772,931
81%
$3,295,129
$3,295,129
0%
$0
N2-10 (2005 MP)
5.0 MG Northside 11 Ground Storage Tank at the Caylor Tank Site
Eng
$601,729
$601,729
2014
2015
40%
$239,122
50%
$300,865
$300,865
10%
$61,743
N2-10 (2005 MP)
5.0 MG Northside 11 Ground Storage Tank at the Caylor Tank Site
Const
$4,879,440
$4,879,440
2015
2016
5 MG
40%
$1,939,047
50%
$2,439,720
$2,439,720
10%
$500,673
W5-2 (2017 MP)2
1.0 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank on Beggs Ranch
Eng
$575,000
$575,000
2016
2019
5%
$28,750
14%
$80,500
$80,500
81%
$465,750
W5-2 (2017 MP)2
1.0 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank on Beggs Ranch
Const
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
2019
2020
1 MG
5%
$150,000
1 14%
$420,000
$420,000
81%
$2,430,000
W4-5 (2005 MP)'
0.03 MG Southside IV Hydropneumatic Tank
Eng
$103,910
$103,910
2021
2022
-
0%
$0
100%
$103,910
$107,027
0%
$0
W4-5 (2005 MP)'
0.03 MG Southside IV Hydropneumatic Tank
Const
$956,000
$956,000
2021
2022
0.03 MG
0%
$0
100%
$956,000
$984,680
0%
$0
W3-3 (2017 MP)'
2.5 MG Westside III Ground Storage Tank South of IH-20
Eng
$180,000
$450,000
2021
2023
-
0%
$0
59%
$264,600
$272,538
41%
$185,400
W3-3 (2017 MP)3
2.5 MG Westside III Ground Storage Tank South of IH-20
Const
$1,680,000
$3,000,000
2023
2025
2.5 MG
0%
$0
59%
$1,764,000
$1,927,570
41%
$1,236,000
W4-10 (2005 MP)'
1.0 MG Westside IV Elevated Storage Tank
Eng
$234,000
$540,000
2022
2023
1 -
0%
$0
43%
$232,200
$246,341
57%
$307,800
W4-10 (2005 MP)'
1.0 MG Westside IV Elevated Storage Tank
Const
$2,340,000
$3,600,000
2023
2024
1 MG
0%
$0
43%
$1,548,000
$1,691,541
57%
$2,052,000
N3-7 (2017 MP)'
2.0 MG Northside III Elevated Storage Tank
Eng
$432,000
$1,080,000
2024
2024
0%
$0
100%
$1,080,000
$1,215,550
0%
$0
N3-7 (2017 MP)'
2.0 MG Northside III Elevated Storage Tank
Const
$4,032,000
$7,200,000
2025
2026
2 MG
0%
$0
100%
$7,200,000
$8,346,773
0%
$0
53-10 (2017 MP)'
1.0 MG Southside III Elevated Storage Tank off Crowley Plover Road
Eng
$315,700
$540,000
2025
2027
0%
$0
70%
$378,000
$438,206
30%
$162,000
53-10 (2017 MP)3
1.0 MG Southside III Elevated Storage Tank off Crowley Plover Road
Const
$2,630,400
$3,600,000
2025
2027
1 MG
0%
$0
70%
$2,520,000
$2,921,371
30%
$1,080,000
53-7 (2017 MP)'
5.0 MG Southside 11 Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station
Eng
$900,000
$900,000
2027
2029
1 -
0%
$0
23%
$209,700
$257,905
77%
$690,300
53-7 (2017 MP)3
5.0 MG Southside II Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station
Const
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
2027
2029
5 MG
0%
$0
23%
$1,398,000
$1,719,364
77%
$4,602,000
N4-5 (2017 MP)3
1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank
Eng
$288,000
$540,000
2027
2029
0%
$0
8%
$43,200
$53,131
92%
$496,800
N4-5 (2017 MP)'
1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank
Const
$2,688,000
$3,600,000
2027
2029
1 MG
0%
$0
8%
$288,000
$354,204
92%
$3,312,000
W5-5 (2017 MP)'
0.5 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank
Eng
$216,000
$270,000
2027
2029
0%
$0
14%
$37,800
$46,489
86%
$232,200
W5-5 (2017 MP)'
10.5 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank
Const
$1,800,000
$1,800,000
2027
2029
0.5 MG
0%
$0
STORAGE
14%
$252,000
$309,928
1 86%
$1,548,000
ENGINEERING STUDIES
- 2005 Water Master Plan (2005-2025)
Study
$1,360,386 $1,360,386 2003 2005 - 85%
$1,156,328
15% $204,058 $204,058 0% $0
2017 Water Master Plan (2013-2033)
Study
$768,168 $768,168 1 2013 2016 45%
$345,676
50% $384,084 $384,084 1 5% 1 $38,408
Impact Fee Study (2022-2031) Study $150,000 $150,000 1 2019 2021 0% $0 100% $150,000 $150,000 1 0% 1 $0
$2,278,554 ENGINEERING STUDIES ELIGIBLE COST $738,142 $738,142
m�15,401,926m 111=474
1ENR factor of 7.9% used to inflate projected cost from 2017 WMP to 2020 dollars and an inflation rate of 3%/year was assumed on proposed projects only.
2Revised project costs for 2020 provided by City Staff.
3Revised project costs due to deviations from 2017 WMP CIP.
*City of Fort Worth cost participation.
Information Sources:
• 2005 Water System Master Plan, Freese & Nichols • Semiannual CIP Progress Report, City of Fort Worth
• 2017 Water System Master Plan, Freese & Nichols • City of Fort Worth staff
• 5-year CIP Budget 2021- 2025, City of Fort Worth • Tarrant Regional Water District staff
Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Job No.: FTW20118
Location: HAW _W W_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL_REPOR7\Exhibit D Water CIP\(Figure_D1)-Existing_ Water_ Facilities(11x17).mxd
Wise
County
_ k� a \
Lago Vista PS
II \
r I 199
1 I
I
I
411 Parkes I \� Eagle Mountain WTP\
l
I
County]
Jenkins Heights PS -
I- Westsi�de,V\EST
c\ X�
Westland GST and PS
Westside WTP �'� WTP = J
�,s Stagecoach GST and PS
PS e�S 580
Walsh Ranch GST, r
Standpipe, and PS _
1
I
� I
i
\
r i
FIGURE D- I
CITY OF FORT WORTH
EXISTING WATER SYSTEM FACILITIES
LEGEND
M Pump Station Impact Fee Water
®
Ground Storage Service Area
Denton
0 Tank r J Fort Worth City Limit
County
-`
Elevated Storage Fort Worth
Tank CJ
ETJ Boundary
'r
®Water Treatment Water Wholesale
Plant Customer
�- Road Non -Wholesale
1F-I
Lake Customer
®
`---
County Boundary
FORT WORTH®
114 r ~
FREESE
CM11101NICHOLS
—i i\
`Bradley EST
Lake
Holly WTP
-N,
Holly WTP
Calmont EST
\ F 377 Eastside IF\r
Como GSTs and �PS
e 0LL dwl a d Ranch
183
Southside GST and PS
Seminary Hill EST
Russom Ranch PS
Sun Country
I
I
377
t �-
171
Johnson
County
6
1
0 18,000 171
SCALE IN FEET
0
Mesa GST and
® 4
GST and PS.'_ j 1"
Na ,
North Beach GST and PS
Meadowbrook ES'
Eastwood EST
Rolling Hills WTP
r_7�VT
4.1
and PS
Fleetwood GST
Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Job No.: FTW20118
Location: HAW _W W_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL_REPORTExhibit D Water CIP\(Figure_D2)-Water_ Proposed _ Facilities_CIP(11x17).mxd
Updated: Tuesday, July 20, 2021
User: 02499
Integrated Pipeline
& Pump Stations
Richland -Chambers
F Wetlands
h
LL
0
Wise
County
FM
FM 2048A,"
FM 2048
3
------- ---------
Briar y
KNOB HILL
m
'a
n
�pri gtown 2�
o
Parker L^ , ��LL
Sijn ua
County, Mg7Hl
Azle 199
1 I
I
l � I
i
eJ
i f
�, =M 1886 FM I'
I I
T
3 I
Z m
WS-V -1.0 MG EST
W5-2 (2017 MP)
rI 1
+ r
I
I_
'WILLOW \ �I
PARK Walsh Ranch
LL WS-V PSG{
\ .... F W5-1'(2005111
"111711! I
FM 2264
FM 2264
New
FM
I Proposed
NS-III - 2.0 MG EST
,�,N3-7 (2017,111
_..so Proposed
NS-IV =,1.0 MG EST
N4-5 (2017 MP)
New- R ah (!
Pecan
rAcres C
a
NS-IV -1.0 MG ESTj
N4-2 (2005 1il
Ile Mo)
Lake
ENGINEERING STUDIES
2005 Water Master Plan 2005-202
2017 Water Master Plan 2013-203
Impact Fee Study 2022-2031
Denton
County
f�
FM 407
I�FM 407
iendera Ranch
�GST_8r PS
05 111 (2005 MP)1�
J
J_
ncti iTransmission Line
N2A (2005 MP) ",� `'T
os 4 .Eagle Mountain,WTP
Proposed Improvements-
s N2--5 (2005 MP), N2-7 (2017 MF
y�s9f Eagle Mountain RWPS
elide Proposed Improvements
5 N2-20B (2005 MP)
Northside PS \ .
Proposed Improvements
N2-1 (2017 MP) 183 199
1 —
- RIVER
�•O+AKS
Westside WTP WESTWORTH
\Proposed Improvements VILLAGE
W3S13 (2005 MP), W3-8 (2017 MP)\,A,CcTn�iao
L�O}�
NorFWS!'IVIWS-V
roposed
r
F PS I
Proposed
� M:4 (2017 MP), W5-8 (2017 MP)`.
al u qLE
WS-III 2.5 MG GST
W3-3 (2017 MP)�
.0
I
FM5 Proposed
WS-V 0.5 MG EST
BENBROOK
W5-5 (2017 MP)
Proposed 2r�
WS-IVt1.0 MG EST
4
1 BenbrOG
j
Proposed
"SS -IV PS
W4-5 (2005 MP)
1
I
d
Propo es
SS -IV 0.03 MG HP Tank
\ W4-5 (2005 MP)
377
r TO
1
M
LL
Cress,
ti
M t
LL
1 s,
Johnson
9�.
Fy�c
M County
FM 917
FM 917 FM 917
God/e,
0 18,000
L.y9
CT
SCAL-E_'IN FEET
171
1
5
3
FIGURE D-2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
2022 WATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Proposed Pump Station
■ Existing
Proposed
Water Treatment Plant
Ground StorageTank
Existing Water Line
Proposed
TRWD Pump Station
Elevated StorageTank
Proposed
TRWD Raw Water Line
Hydropneumatic Tank
�— Road
\\
Impact Fee Water
® Service Area
Lake
_
Dr
® Existing Pump Station
--J Fort Worth City Limit
Existing Ground
Fort Worth
4KE
C� Storage Tank
ETJ Boundary
Existing Elevated
Storage Tank
Water Wholesale
Customer
Non -Wholesale Customer
FORT WORTH
-
o
�---� County Boundary
�7FREESE
ti
<NICHOLS
I«
_5.0 MG-GST
N
180
1 Eagle, Mountain Connection
Raw Water. Line`& Pump Station FOREST' arran
1 HILL County
r � _ �
Alta Mesa Pb,, _ KENNEDALE EDEN
EVEo
Proposed Improvements I _RM_AN-
'S3-11'(2017 III 287F HARRIS
� \� 287
``'
917
\' McCart GST. and PS
N Proposed Improvements
S2-3 (2005 MP); S3-7,(2017 MF
WI
PropII I:0-MG
-10 (2017
I
114
F�2 EDFv1 3
e IF
287
T Ellis
Count
1
c1
�o
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
Table 5-1 summarizes the impact fee eligible costs for projects from Table 4-1. The calculated cumulative
interest includes the following assumptions:
• Existing impact fee eligible CIP
o Based on the actual interest for the already outstanding debt for the full term of the bond
issuance.
• Future impact fee eligible CIP
o Based on the projects start date.
o Utilizing a bond issuance cost of 2.0%.
o Utilizing an interest rate of 4.0%.
o Utilizing a Fort Worth bond term of 30 years.
A more detailed explanation of the cumulative interest is included in the impact fee credit analysis, which
can be found in Appendix D.
Table 5-1 2022-2031 Impact Fee Eligible Costs
CIP Category
TRWD Projects
ImpactTotal Growth to 2022-2031
Related Cost
$1,276,814,058 34%
Growth
$433,265,766
Raw Water Supply/Treatment Plants
$123,832,053
41%
$50,825,934
Transmission Lines/Pump Stations
$60,216,216
42%
$25,541,733
Storage Tanks
$52,261,045
55%
$28,915,899
Engineering Studies
$2,278,554
32%
$738,142
ELIGIBLE IMPACT FEE CIP SUBTOTAL
(INFLATION ADJUSTED)
$539,287,474
Cumulative Interest - Fort Worth
$34,790,933
Cumulative Interest - TRWD
$103,185,997
TOTAL•
., , 0,
5.1 SERVICE UNITS
Costs between various customer types and sizes are allocated through the application of equivalent
meters. Since the 5/8" x 3/4" water meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential customer,
a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8" x 3/4" meter capacity.
Table 5-2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the American Water Works
Association (AWWA) M6 Manual Standard C700, Cold -Water Meters — Displacement Type and AWWA
Standard C701, Cold -Water Meters — Turbine Types I and II for Customer Service.
5-1
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors
Meter Size
5/8" x 3/4"
Equivalency
Factor
Appendix E contains the current number of water meters for residential and non-residential customers
by meter size for the City of Fort Worth, as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this
information to FNI. The number of equivalent meters was also calculated for the City and wholesale
customers.
The next calculation step determines factors for population per residential meter and employment per
non-residential meter. Table 5-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and wholesale
customers using 2020 information.
Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Emolovment by Eauivalent Meter
Non -
Description Residential Residential
City of Fort Worth
Number of Equivalent Meters
332,846
127,592
Population / Employment
873,130
589,052
Population per Equivalent Meter
2.62
--
Employment per Equivalent Meter
--
4.62
Wholesale Customers
Number of Equivalent Meters
170,512
61,725
Population / Employment
406,953
230,335
Population per Equivalent Meter
2.39
--
Employment per Equivalent Meter
--
3.73
FNI did not receive meter count information from two of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers;
however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The
5-2
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per
equivalent meter in Table 5-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all its
wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent
meter, FNI divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or employment served by
Fort Worth.
The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2022 and 2031 uses the ratios in Table 5-3 and the
population and employment projections for 2022 and 2031 in Exhibit A- Water Land Use Assumptions
Report. The calculation is shown below:
City of Fort Worth Increase in Equivalent Meters
Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter
_ (1,133,678 — 911,970) / 2.62
= 84,621 Service Units
Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter
_ (704,041— 615,009) / 4.62
= 19,271 Service Units
Fort Worth Total = Residential + Non -Residential
= 84,621 + 19,271
= 103,892 Service Units
Wholesale Customers Increase in Equivalent Meters
Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter
_ (489,325 — 423,632) / 2.39
= 27,487 Service Units
Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter
_ (255,528 — 235,555) / 3.73
= 5,355 Service Units
Wholesale Total = Residential + Non -Residential
= 27,487 + 5,355
= 32,842 Service Units
Grand Total = Fort Worth Total + Wholesale Total
= 103,892 + 32,842
= 136,734 Service Units
5-3
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
5.2 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of eligible CIP for the study period from Table 5-1 divided
by the increase in equivalent meters from Section 5.1. This fee equals the water impact fee per service
unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size.
Water Impact Fee per Service Unit = Max Infrastructure Cost / Increase in Equivalent Meters
= $677,264,404 / 136,734
= $4,953 per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter
The maximum allowable impact fee that can be collected is calculated by subtracting a credit from the
impact fee eligible cost. A detailed impact fee credit analysis is included in Appendix D. A summary of the
maximum allowable water impact fee including the credit analysis is shown in Table 5-4.
Table 5-4 Water Impact Fee with Credit Analysis
The water impact fees for meters other than 5/8" x 3/4" are the product of the fee per 5/8" x 3/4"
equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 5-2. The maximum
allowable water impact fees are provided in Table 5-5.
Table 5-5 Water Impact Fees by Meter Size
Meter Size
5/8" x 3/4"
Equivalency
Factor
Calculated Impact Fee per
Service Unit
(Before Subtracting Credit)
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
(After Subtracting Credit)
$1,040,130.00
5-4
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
Appendix A
Existing Water Pumping
Facilities
APPENDIX A
Existing Water Pumping Capacities
North Holly Plant:
Four 27.0 MGD and two 15.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 138.0
MGD. The total measured capacity of the pump station is 90.0 MGD due to piping restrictions.
South Holly Plant:
Four 30.0 MGD and one 15.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 135.0
MGD.
Rolling Hills Plant:
HSPS #1:
Seven 30.0 MGD, one 22.0 MGD, one 17.0 MGD, and one 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units.
Total pumping capacity of 259.0 MGD.
HSPS #2:
Two vertical turbines 30.0 MGD and two 20.0 MGD vertical turbines. Total pumping capacity of 100.0
MGD.
Eagle Mountain Plant:
HSPS #1:
Four 21.7 MGD, two 15.0 MGD, three 3.6 MGD, and two 8.6 MGD. Total pumping capacity of 144.8
HSPS #2:
Three 22.0 MGD and two 3.0 MGD. Total pumping capacity of 72.0 MGD.
Westside Plant:
Two 9.8 MGD and two 6.3 MGD vertical turbines. Total Pumping Capacity of 32.2 MGD.
Southside I1 Pressure Plane:
Edwards Ranch Station:
Two 16.0 MGD and one 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 5.0 MGD emergency
generator pump. Total pumping capacity of 47.0 MGD.
South Side Reservoir Station:
Two 5.7 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 11.4 MGD.
Southside III Pressure Plane:
Russom Ranch Station:
One 6.0 MGD and one 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 10.0 MGD electric and
gas unit. Total pumping capacity of 21.0 MGD.
Alta Mesa Station:
Two 10.0 MGD, one 9.4 MGD, and one 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 5.0
MGD emergency generator pump. Total pumping capacity of 39.4 MGD.
McCort Station:
Two 10.5 MGD, one 10.0 MGD, and one 4.6 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping
capacity of 35.6 MGD.
A-1
Northside I1 Pressure Plane:
Old Northside Station:
Two 5.7 MGD and one 3.4 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, and one 4.5 MGD gas driven unit.
Total pumping capacity of 19.3 MGD.
Cantrell-Sansom Station:
One 5.0 MGD, one 3.0 MGD, and one 2.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units.
Total pumping capacity of 10.0 MGD.
North Beach Station:
One 2.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal unit. Total pumping capacity of 2.0 MGD.
New Northside Station:
Two 18.3 MGD, two 12.9 MGD, and one 11.9 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping
capacity of 74.3 MGD.
Northside III Pressure Plane:
Jenkins Heiahts Station:
One 2.0 MGD, one 3.9 MGD and one 3.4 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity
of 9.3 MGD.
North Beach Station:
Two 4.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 8.0 MGD.
Sendera Ranch Station:
One 5.8 MGD and three 10.1 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 36.1 MGD.
Northside IV Pressure Plane:
Logo Vista Station:
Two 0.25 MGD and two 0.5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 1.5 MGD.
Sendera Ranch Station:
Three 10.1 MGD and one 5.8 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Totally pumping capacity of 36.1
MGD.
Westside II Pressure Plane:
Westside Station:
One 12.0 MGD, one 6.3 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, and one 7.0 MGD gas
driven standby unit. Total pumping capacity of 35.3 MGD.
Como Station:
Three 15.0 MGD, one 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, and one 5.8 MGD emergency
generator. Total pumping capacity of 60.8 MGD.
Westside III Pressure Plane:
Stagecoach Road Station:
Two 8.0 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 5.0 MGD emergency
generator. Total pumping capacity of 31.0 MGD.
A-2
Westside IV Pressure Plane:
Westland Pump Station:
Two 3.0 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 16.0 MGD.
Westside V Pressure Plane:
Walsh Ranch Pump Station:
Two 1.5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 3.0 MGD.
Eastside II Pressure Plane:
Eastside Station:
One 22.0 MGD, one 17.0 MGD and three 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units and one 7 MGD
Gas -driven standby unit. Total pumping capacity of 76.0 MGD.
Randol Mill Station:
One 10.0 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 20.0
MGD.
Fleetwood Station:
One 3.0 MGD and three 2.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 9.0 MGD.
A-3
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
Appendix B
Existing Distribution System
Storage
APPENDIX B
Existing Distribution System Storage
Eastside Pressure Plane II (805')
CAPACITY (MG)
Eastwood Elevated Tank
1.5
Timberline Elevated Tank
2.0
Meadowbrook Elevated Tank
2.0
Randol Mill Ground Reservoir
6.0
North Beach Street Ground Reservoir
5.5
Fleetwood Ground Reservoir
5.5
Eastside Pressure Plane Total
22.5
Hollv Pressure Plane f706'
Northside Ground Reservoir 4.0
Como Ground Storage Reservoir 6.0
Como Ground Storage Reservoir 2.0
Southside Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0
Holly Pressure Plane Total 17.0
Northside Pressure Planes:
Elevation 853' Plane II
Northwest Elevated Tank 1.0
Caylor Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0
Caylor Ground Storage Reservoir #2 5.0
Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0
Elevation 936' Plane III
Lake Country Elevated Tank 0.5
Elevation 950' Plane III
Bradley Elevated Tank 2.0
Willow Springs Elevated Tank 2.0
Elevation 1040' Plane IV
Crumb Elevated Tank 1.0
Northside Pressure Plane Total 21.5
L0I
Southside Pressure Planes: CAPACITY [MG)
Elevation 850' Plane II
Seminary Hill Elevated Tank 2.0
Alta Mesa Ground Storage Reservoir 9.2
McCart Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0
Elevation 990' Plane III
Armstrong Ranch Elevated Tank 2.0
Sun Country Elevated Tank 2.0
Southside Pressure Plane Total 20.2
Westside Pressure Planes:
Elevation 857' Plane II
Calmont Elevated Tank 1.0
Stagecoach Ground Storage Reservoir 5.5
Elevation 974' Plane III
Westland Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0
Elevation 1065' Plane IV
Walsh Ranch Ground Storage Reservoir 2.5
Walsh Ranch Standpipe (used for pressure) 0.06
Elevation 1190' Plane V
Westside V Elevated Tank on Beggs Ranch 1.0
Westside Pressure Plane Total 15.06
TOTAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STORAGE CAPACITY: 96.26 MG
Water Treatment Plants: CAPACITY [MG)
Eagle Mountain WTP 10.5
Holly WTP 20.0
Rolling Hills WTP 17.2
Westside WTP 2.5
TOTAL CLEARWELL CAPACITY: 50.2 MG
LN
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTS
Project Title: Richland -Chambers Wetlands
Description: Construction of wetlands near Richland -Chambers Reservoir.
Purpose: Provide an additional raw water supply to the Integrated Pipeline Project.
Allocation: This project is allocated 32% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the
projected growth in demand (2022-2031), divided by the added capacity from the
Richland -Chambers Wetlands project (89.6 MGD).
Project Title: Eagle Mountain Connection Raw Water Line and Pump Station
Description: Construction of raw water line and pump station from Benbrook Lake to Eagle
Mountain Lake.
Purpose: Provide additional raw water supplies to the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment
Plant (WTP) and the Westside WTP.
Allocation: This project is allocated 11% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the
proportion need of the raw water supply from Lake Benbrook to provide supply for
the Westside WTP and the Eagle Mountain WTP to serve 10-year projected growth.
Project Title: Integrated Pipeline and Pump Stations
Description: Construction of raw water line and pump stations from Richland -Chambers
Reservoir to Benbrook Lake.
Purpose: Provide an additional raw water line to provide additional raw water supplies.
Allocation: This project is allocated 37% to growth in the study period, as it is required to
provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031), approximately 62% of
which will be supplied through this project (as indicated by TRWD), divided by the
capacity added by the Integrated Pipeline and Pump Stations (160 MGD).
C-1
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
RAW WATER SUPPLY
Project Title: Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water PS from 35 MGD to 70 MGD (N2-20B - 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of additional pumping capacity in the Second Eagle
Mountain Raw Water Pump Station.
Purpose: Provide additional raw water supplies to the Eagle Mountain WTP
to a capacity of 70 MGD. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master
Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 42% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand for the Northside Pressure Plane
(2029-2031), divided by the added capacity of the Second Eagle Mountain Raw
Water Pump Station expansion (35 MGD).
C-2
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
WTPS
Project Title: Westside WTP — Phase 1 (0 — 12 MGD) (W3-5B — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of new 12 MGD WTP. This project
includes improvements at the Westside WTP to account for
an ultimate capacity of 35 MGD.
Purpose: A new WTP is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest
part of the City. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan
Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 26% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands in the Westside Pressure Plane. Allocation
was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031), divided by the
ultimate capacity of the treatment plant (35 MGD).
Project Title: Eagle Mountain Clearwell #3 (N2-5A — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of the third clearwell at the Eagle Mountain WTP.
Purpose: The completion of the third clearwell adds 2.5 MG of capacity as well as allows for the
full 105 MGD capacity to be utilized at the WTP. This project was
recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 47% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the
projected growth in demand, divided by the capacity of the clearwell (2.5 MG).
Project Title: Westside WTP Expansion 12 MGD to 15 MGD — Membrane Rack (W3-8 — 2017 MP)
Description: Construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP.
Purpose: An expansion of the WTP capacity from 12 MGD to 15 MGD is
recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project
was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 26% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the
projected 2031 demand in the Westside III/IV/V Pressure Planes, divided by the
added capacity of the treatment plant expansion, less the allocation to existing 2022
capacity, since the capacity will be fully utilized during the planning period.
C-3
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
Project Title: Westside WTP Expansion 15 MGD to 18 MGD — Membrane Rack (W3-8 — 2017 MP)
Description: Construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP.
Purpose: An expansion of the WTP capacity from 15 MGD to 18 MGD is
recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project
was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 78% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the
projected 2031 demand in the Westside III/IV/V Pressure Planes, divided by the
added capacity of the treatment plant expansion, less the allocation to existing 2022
capacity, since the capacity will be fully utilized during the planning period.
Project Title: Westside WTP Expansion 18 MGD to 21 MGD — Membrane Rack (W3-8 — 2017 MP)
Description: Construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP.
Purpose: An expansion of the WTP capacity from 18 MGD to 21 MGD is
recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project
was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 94% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the
projected 2031 demand in the Westside III/IV/V Pressure Planes, divided by the
total capacity of the treatment plant expansion (21 MGD).
Project Title: Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD (N2-7 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of Eagle Mountain WTP expansion to treat
140 MGD.
Purpose: An expansion of Eagle Mountain WTP to be increased further to 140 MGD because of
the growth of the City's north side and Alliance Airport, and because of the
projected water demand increase. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water
Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 42% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide
capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the
projected growth in coincidental demand (2027-2031) in the Northside Pressure
Plane less the Northside II projected coincidental demand met by N2-1, divided by
the capacity added from the Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion (30 MGD).
C-4
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
PUMP STATIONS AND REGIONAL TRANSMISSION LINES
Project Title: McCart Pump Station Expansion to 35 MGD Total Capacity (52-3 — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the McCart Pump Station with an
expanded capacity from 25 to 35 MGD.
Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the
Southside II Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended in
the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. The additional 10 MGD pump station capacity
increases the total pump station capacity by 40% to meet future water system
demands.
Allocation: This project is allocated 15% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
assuming the remaining capacity is projected to be fully utilized in the planning
period.
Project Title: 3.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station at Walsh Ranch Tank (W5-1— 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a new Westside V Pump Station with a capacity of 3
MGD.
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in
the Westside V Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water
Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 44% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
because the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Westside V Pressure
Plane was greater than remaining capacity of the pump station. The pump station will
be 56% utilized in 2022, which was determined using the projected demand for 2022,
divided by the added capacity from the expansion (3 MGD).
Project Title: Northside II 48-inch Transmission Line (N2-1— 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 48-inch transmission line in the Northside II
Pressure Plane. This project runs from Cromwell Marine Creek Road to Texas
Sage Trail.
Purpose: A large transmission line is necessary to address the projected new population growth
in the area. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 39% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Northside II pressure
plane, divided by the added capacity of the transmission line (48 MGD).
C-5
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
Project Title: Expansion of the Northside Pump Station to 70 MGD Total Capacity (N2-1 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the Northside Pump Station with an
expanded capacity from 58 to 70 MGD.
Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the
Northside II Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended
in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project was allocated 100% to growth in the study period. Allocation was
determined using the projected growth in demand (2024-2031) for the Northside II
Pressure Plane, which is larger than the added capacity from the Northside Pump
Station Expansion (12 MGD). It is assumed that the expansion will be fully utilized, and
the remaining demand will be met from the Eagle Mountain WTP
High Service Pump Station.
Project Title: 8.0 MGD Southside IV Pump Station (W4-5 — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a new Southside IV Pump Station with a capacity of 8
MGD.
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in
the Southside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water
Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project was allocated 55% to growth in the study period. Allocation was
determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Southside IV
Pressure Plane, divided by the added capacity with the addition of the pump station
(8 MGD).
Project Title: 5.0 MGD Westside IV Pump Station (W4-4 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a new Westside IV Pump Station with a capacity of 5
MGD.
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in
the Westside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water
Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 26% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2023-2031) in the Westside IV Pressure
Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity that will be provided by the pump
station expansion. This value was then divided by the added capacity resulting from
the pump station (5 MGD).
C-6
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
Project Title: 5.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station (W5-8 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a new Westside V Pump Station with a capacity of 5
MGD.
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in
the Westside V Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water
Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 47% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2023-2031) in the Westside V Pressure
Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity in the Westside V Pressure Plane
that will be provided by the expansion. The resulting demand was then divided by the
capacity added by the pump station (5 MGD).
Project Title: McCart Pump Station Expansion to 45 MGD Total Capacity (S3-7 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the McCart Pump Station with an
expanded capacity from 35 to 45 MGD.
Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the
Southside III Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended
in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. The additional 10 MGD pump station capacity
increases the total pump station capacity by approximately 29% to meet future water
system demands.
Allocation: This project is allocated 33% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2029-2031) in the Southside III Pressure
Plane, divided by the capacity added by the pump station expansion (10 MGD).
Project Title: Alta Mesa Pump Station Expansion to 49.4 MGD Total Capacity (S3-11— 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the Alta Mesa Pump Station with an
expanded capacity from 39.4 to 49.4 MGD total capacity.
Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the
Southside III Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended
in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. The additional 10 MGD pump station capacity
increases the total pump station capacity by approximately 29% to meet future water
system demands.
Allocation: This project is allocated 33% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2029-2031) in the Southside III Pressure
Plane, divided by the capacity added by the pump station expansion (10 MGD).
C-7
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
STORAGE TANKS
Project Title: Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Tank and Pump Station (N2-7/N3-5 — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 5 MG ground storage tank at the Sendera Ranch
Pump Station.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed. This project was
recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 22% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand, divided by the capacity of the ground storage
tank (5 MG).
Project Title: 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank on Highway 287 (N4-2 — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Northside IV
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Northside IV
Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan
Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 81% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
assuming the remaining capacity is projected to be fully utilized in the planning
period. The pump station will be 19% utilized in 2022, which was determined using
the projected demand for 2022 in the Northside IV Pressure Plane, divided by the
added capacity from the elevated tank.
Project Title: 5.0 MG Northside II Ground Storage Tank at the Caylor Tank Site (N2-10 —2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a second 5.0 MG ground storage tank for the Northside II
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: This improvement is to provide additional storage facilities that are needed in the
Northside II Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master
Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 50% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Northside II Pressure
Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity in the Northside II Pressure Plane
that will be provided by the pump station. This value was then divided by the added
capacity resulting from storage tank (5 MG).
C-8
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
Project Title: 1.0 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank on Beggs Ranch (W5-2 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside V
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside V
Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan
Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 14% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Westside V Pressure
Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity in the Westside V Pressure Plane
that will be provided by the pump station. The resulting demand was then divided by
the added capacity resulting from the storage tank (1 MGD).
Project Title: 0.03 MG Southside IV Hydropneumatic Tank (W4-5 — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 0.03 MG hydropneumatic tank for the Southside IV
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and future water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Southside IV
Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan
Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period. Allocation was
determined based on the number of connections projected in the Southside IV
Pressure Plane. TCEQ Chapter 290.45 states, "If pressure tanks are used, a
maximum capacity of 30,000 gallons is sufficient for systems of up to 2,500
connections."
Project Title: 2.5 MG Westside III Ground Storage Tank South of IH-20 (W3-3 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 2.5 MG ground storage tank for the Westside III
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside III
Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan
Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 59% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) for the Westside IV/V Pressure
Plane, divided by the added capacity from the ground storage tank (1.5 MG).
C-9
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
Project Title: 1.0 MG Westside IV Elevated Storage Tank (W4-10 — 2005 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside IV
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside IV
Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan
Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 43% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using projected growth in demand (2024-2031) in the Westside IV Pressure Plane,
divided by the added capacity from the elevated storage tank (1 MG).
Project Title: 2.0 MG Northside III Elevated Storage Tank (N3-7 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 2.0 MG ground storage tank for the Northside III
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Northside III
Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan
Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period. Allocation was
determined assuming the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Northside
III Pressure Plane is greater than the capacity added by the elevated storage tank
(2 MG).
Project Title: 1.0 MG Southside III Elevated Storage Tank off Crowley Plover Road (S3-10 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Southside III
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to
the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Southside III.
This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 70% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using projected growth in demand (2027-2031) in the Southside III Pressure Plane,
divided by the capacity added by the elevated storage tank (1 MG).
C-10
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
Project Title: 5.0 MG Southside II Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station (S3-7 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 5.0 MG ground storage tank at the McCart Pump
Station.
Purpose: This improvement is to provide additional storage facilities that are needed
in the surrounding areas. This project was recommended in the 2017
Water Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 23% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using the projected growth in demand (2029-2031) for the Southside III Pressure
Plane, divided by the added capacity from the ground storage tank that
would be allocated to the Southside III Pressure Plane (3 MG).
Project Title: 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank (N4-5 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the
Northside IV Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due
to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Northside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water
Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 8% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using projected growth in demand (2029-2031) for the Northside IV Pressure Plane,
divided by the added capacity from the elevated storage tank (1 MG).
Project Title: 0.5 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank (W5-5 — 2017 MP)
Description: Design and construction of a 0.5 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside V
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due
to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Westside V Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water
Master Plan Update.
Allocation: This project is allocated 14% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined
using projected growth in demand (2029-2031) for the Westside V Pressure Plane,
multiplied by the proportion of the elevated storage to be provided by the elevated
storage tank, divided by the added capacity from the elevated storage tank (0.5 MG).
C-11
Appendix C
Water CIP Projects
ENGINEERING STUDIES
Project Title: 2005 Water Master Plan (2005-2025)
Description: An engineering study to update the 1994 Water Master Plan.
Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20-year
period from 2005 to 2025. This plan was updated again in 2014. The water master
plan guides the capital improvements program to ensure cost effective expansion of
the system.
Allocation: 15% of the cost for the 2005 Water Master Plan is allocated to the study period
as three of the twenty years of the plan's useful life are within the study period.
Project Title: 2017 Water Master Plan (2013-2033)
Description: An engineering study to update the 2005 Water Master Plan.
Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20-year
period from 2013 to 2033. The water master plan guides the capital
improvements program to ensure cost effective expansion of the system.
Allocation: 50% of the cost for the 2017 Water Master Plan can be allocated to the study
period as 10 of the 20 years of the plan's useful life are within the study period.
Project Title: Impact Fee Study (2022-2031)
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute, the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 100% of the cost for the 2022 impact fee study can be allocated to the study
period as all ten years are within the study period. The impactfee covers water
and wastewater, with 50% of costs allocated to each. This study replaces the
2017 Impact Fee Study, therefore the costs associated with the 2017 Impact Fee
Study are not eligible for the 2022 impact fee update.
C-12
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
Appendix D
Impact Fee Credit Analysis
801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 • Fort Worth, Texas 76102 • 817-735-7300 • fax 817-735-7492
TO: Wendy Chi-Babulal, P.E., Fort Worth Water
Matt Kusnir, P.E., Fort Worth Water
FROM: Jessica Brown, P.E, Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Mazen Kawasmi, P.E., CFM, GISP, Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Richard Campbell, Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Angie Flores, Senior Manager, Raftelis, Inc.
SUBJECT: 2022 Fort Worth Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Update:
Credit Methodology Memorandum
DATE: July 22, 2021
1.0 INTRODUCTION
www.freese.com
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned
Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI), to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. FNI contracted with Raftelis
Financial Consultants, Inc. to perform a rate credit analysis in compliance with Chapter 395. For this study, Raftelis
completed the maximum allowable impact fee calculation, including the rate credit analysis. The calculated impact
fee includes the outstanding debt service (principal and interest) of existing facilities with excess capacity and the
projected debt service (principal and interest) of the future facilities identified in the 10-year Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP). This memorandum establishes the methodology utilized for the rate credit analysis and summarizes
the results.
2.0 DEBT SERVICE INTEREST CALCULATION
The impact fee eligible interest is based on existing and future debt service. The existing debt service is debt
service associated with existing facilities with excess capacity, while the future debt service is based on future
facilities.
For the existing impact fee eligible facilities, the interest considered in the impact fee is based on the actual
interest for the already outstanding debt. Specifically, the existing debt service is based upon impact fee eligible
outstanding debt for Fort Worth, Trinity River Authority (TRA), and Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD). The
interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the term of the existing debt, per
discussions with City staff.
1
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH
July 22, 2021
The interest for the future facilities is calculated using the assumptions in Table 1. The proposed debt is based
upon the 10-year water and wastewater impact fee eligible CIP. In the CIP, if a project's start date is in 2022 or
later and is greater than $5 million, it is assumed that it will be debt -funded. Any amounts under $5 million are
assumed to be cash -funded. The interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the
term of the future debt, per discussions with City staff.
Table 1 Future Debt Service Assumptions
Debt Service Details
Bond Issuance Cost
Assumption
2.0%
Interest Rate
4.0%
Fort Worth Term
30 years
TRA Term
20 years
3.0 RATE CREDIT CALCULATION
The rate credit methodology was developed by FNI and was applied to the impact fee calculation. Chapter 395
prescribes that a utility must provide a credit to account for any portion of ad valorem tax and utility service
revenues that would also be reflected in the developed impact fees and paid by new service units in the program
period. The utility may choose to do a detailed rate credit analysis, or automatically cap the maximum allowable
impact fee at 50% of the impact fee eligible infrastructure costs. In this case, a rate credit analysis was performed
to determine the applicable credit for the program period.
The purpose of this credit is to ensure that new growth is not charged twice for the portion of capital
improvements attributed to them, once through the impact fee and then again through rates. The code does not
specifically address the way in which this credit is to be calculated. Each utility should calculate the credit in a way
that is consistent with the operation of their fund, the way they finance their capital improvements, and the way
these capital improvements costs are represented in their utility rates. The next section describes how Fort
Worth's credit was calculated.
FNI utilized the projected Service Unit Equivalents (SUE), developed as part of the Land Use Assumptions, to
determine the pro rata share of the existing debt (interest and principal) attributable to each SUE on the system
for each year of the impact fee period (2022 — 2031). The resulting cost per SUE was multiplied by the cumulative
growth in SUE's for each year of the impact fee period, resulting in the portion of the existing debt (interest and
principal) that future customers will pay for in water/wastewater rates. This represents the credit to the impact
fees required to avoid "double counting" and this credit was subtracted from the total impact fee eligible
2
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH
July 22, 2021
infrastructure costs. Table 2 summarizes the results of the water credit calculation. Table 3 summarizes the
results of the wastewater credit calculation.
3
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum
July 22, 2021
Table 2 Water Credit Analysis Summary
r011 NICHOLS
R RAFTELIS
FORT WORTH.
Year 2022
2025
20
202
02
2029
2030
2031
Water Impact Fee
Eligible Interest +
Principle for 10-
Year Period
Total Service Unit
Equivalents (SUE)
Each Year
• • '
• �'
:.
Cost per SUE
.:
Cumulative SUE's
in 10-Year Period
Portion Paid by
Growth in 10-Year $260,293
Period
Total Credit
$528,834
$774,096
$962,093
$1,172,138
$1,382,327
$1,471,490
$1,654,279
$1,626,156
$2,786,360
Table 3 Wastewater Credit Analysis Summary
2�
1
2029
2030 '
Wastewater Impa
Fee Eligible Interes l
$5,742,152
$5,749,275
$5,748,254
$5,755,437
$5,908,684
$5,137,534
$5,130,701
$5,132,433
E
+ Principle for 10-
0 Year Period —M
■ Total Service U
Equivalents (SU • • •
Each Ye
• '
• •
• :
so I
•
Cost per
• •
• •
Cumulative SUEn®
,
10-Year PerlO
Portion Paid by
Growth in 10-Year $117,966
$231,456
$340,747
$445,449
$546,912
$661,203
$658,446
$737,996
$815,857
$887,036
Period
Total Credill
$5,443,068
4
Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum
July 22, 2021
r� N;CHOLS
FORT WORTH
R RAFTELIS
4.0 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
The maximum allowable impact fees are the result of taking the total cost of expansion for the study period, minus
the calculated credit, and dividing by the increase in SUE's. This fee equals the maximum allowable impact fee per
service unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size. A summary of the maximum allowable impact fee calculation for
both water and wastewater is shown in Table 4.
Table 4 Credit Analysis Summary
Preliminary Maximum Calculated
$677,264,404
$569,442,175
Infrastructure Cost
Minus the CREDIT
($12,618,067)
($5,443,068)
Max Allowable Calculated
$664,646,337
$563,999,107
Infrastructure Cost
Service Units
136,734
126,758
ImpactMax Allowable
Service Unit
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH®
�7�NICNQLS
Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
City of Fort Worth % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
221,072
221,072
221,072
3/4"
1.50
2,698
2,698
4,047
1"
2.50
22,201
22,201
55,503
1-1/2"
5.00
2,040
2,040
10,200
2"
8.00
2,163
2,163
17,304
3"
21.75
43
43
935
4"
37.50
98
98
3,675
6"
80.00
163
163
13,040
8
1 140.00
1 46
1 46
1 6,440
10"
210.00
3
3
630
TOTALI
Non
250,527
Meters
1 250,527
332,846
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
7474
7,474
7,474
3/4"
1.50
47
47
71
1"
2.50
4241
4,241
10,603
1-1/2"
5.00
2409
2,409
12,045
2"
8.00
5885
5,885
47,080
3"
21.75
429
429
9,331
4"
37.50
349
349
13,088
6"
80.00
172
172
13,760
8"
140.00
65
65
1 9,100
10"
210.00
24
1 24
5,040
TOTALI
21,095
1 21,095
127,592
Wholesale Customer: City of Aledo % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 82%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
1,507
1,236
1,854
1"
2.50
12
10
25
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
2
2
16
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,521
Meters
1 1,248
1 1,895
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
94
77
116
1"
2.50
18
15
38
1-1/2"
5.00
10
8
40
2"
8.00
22
18
144
3"
21.75
3
2
44
4"
37.50
3
2
75
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
150
1 122
457
E-1
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Benbrook Water Authority % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0%
(Emergency Use Only)
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
5,145
0
0
3/4"
1.50
43
0
0
1"
2.50
3,075
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
17
0
0
2"
8.00
87
0
0
3"
21.75
25
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
8,392
Meters
1 0
0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
138
0
0
3/4"
1.50
4
0
0
1"
2.50
221
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
54
0
0
2"
8.00
107
0
0
3"
21.75
11
0
0
4"
37.50
3
0
0
6"
80.00
2
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
540
1 0
0
Wholesale Customer: Bethesda Water Supply % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 68%
Corportation
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
10,239
6,963
6,963
3/4"
1.50
8
5
8
1"
2.50
42
29
73
1-1/2"
5.00
4
3
15
2"
8.00
2
1
8
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
1 0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
10,296
Meters
1 7,002
7,089
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
142
97
97
3/4"
1.50
8
5
8
1"
2.50
44
30
75
1-1/2"
5.00
13
9
45
2"
8.00
55
37
296
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
8
5
188
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
272
1 185
811
E-2
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Burleson % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
13,768
13,768
13,768
3/4"
1.50
3
3
5
1"
2.50
202
202
505
1-1/2"
5.00
8
8
40
2"
8.00
1
1
8
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
13,982
Meters
1 13,982
1 14,326
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
484
484
484
3/4"
1.50
5
5
8
1"
2.50
287
287
718
1-1/2"
5.00
140
140
700
2"
8.00
285
285
2,280
3"
21.75
58
58
1,262
4"
37.50
6
6
225
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
1 140.00
0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
1 0
0
TOTALI
1,266
1 1,266
5,757
Wholesale Customer: City of Crowley % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
6,467
6,467
6,467
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
35
35
88
1-1/2"
5.00
16
16
80
2"
8.00
30
30
240
3"
21.75
2
2
44
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
1 0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
6,550
Meters
1 6,550
1 6,919
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
59
59
148
1-1/2"
5.00
14
14
70
2"
8.00
48
48
384
3"
21.75
15
15
326
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
136
136
928
E-3
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Dallas Fort Worth % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 28%
International Airport Board
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
0
Meters
1 0
1 0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
4
1
1
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
10
3
8
1-1/2"
5.00
37
10
50
2"
8.00
351
98
784
3"
21.75
149
42
914
4"
37.50
78
22
825
6"
80.00
30
8
640
8"
140.00
1 5
1 1
140
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
664
1 185
3,362
Wholesale Customer: City of Dalworthington % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 50%
Gardens
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
493
247
247
3/4"
1.50
62
31
47
1"
2.50
343
172
430
1-1/2"
5.00
10
5
25
2"
8.00
10
5
40
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
918
Meters
460
789
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
60
30
30
3/4"
1.50
14
7
11
1"
2.50
42
21
53
1-1/2"
5.00
3
2
10
2"
8.00
22
11
88
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
141
71
192
E-4
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Edgecliff Village % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
78
78
78
3/4"
1.50
1,257
1,257
1,886
1"
2.50
33
33
83
1-1/2"
5.00
5
5
25
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,373
Meters
1 1,373
1 2,072
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
3
3
5
1"
2.50
4
4
10
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
7
7
56
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
15
1 15
151
Wholesale Customer: City of Everman (Emergency %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0%
Use Only)
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
1,817
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,817
Meters
1 0
0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
156
0
0
1"
2.50
14
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
5
0
0
2"
8.00
11
0
0
3"
21.75
3
0
0
4"
37.50
1
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
190
1 0
0
E-5
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Forest Hill % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
4,559
4,559
6,839
1"
2.50
10
10
25
1-1/2"
5.00
38
38
190
2"
8.00
55
55
440
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
4,664
Meters
1 4,664
7,554
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
10
10
15
1"
2.50
7
7
18
1-1/2"
5.00
2
2
10
2"
8.00
6
6
48
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
28
1 28
231
Wholesale Customer: City of Grand Prairie %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 10%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
45,494
4,549
4,549
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
443
44
110
1-1/2"
5.00
155
16
80
2"
8.00
672
67
536
3"
21.75
13
1
22
4"
37.50
13
1
38
6"
80.00
39
4
320
8
1 140.00
1 7
1
140
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
46,836
Meters
1 4,683
1 5,795
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
1380
138
138
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
939
94
235
1-1/2"
5.00
611
61
305
2"
8.00
1458
146
1,168
3"
21.75
87
9
196
4"
37.50
72
7
263
6"
80.00
18
2
160
8'
1 140.00
1 18
1 2
280
10"
210.00
1 4
0
0
TOTALI
4,587
459
2,745
E-6
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Haltom City % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
11,369
11,369
11,369
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
4
4
10
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
37
37
296
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
11,411
Meters
1 11,411
1 11,697
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
1584
1,584
1,584
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
5
5
13
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
18
18
144
3"
21.75
1
1
22
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
2
2
160
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
1,611
1 1,611
1,961
Wholesale Customer: City of Haslet %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 99%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
741
734
734
3/4"
1.50
7
7
11
1"
2.50
13
13
33
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
1 0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
761
Meters
1 754
778
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
38
38
38
3/4"
1.50
2
2
3
1"
2.50
23
23
58
1-1/2"
5.00
6
6
30
2"
8.00
47
47
376
3"
21.75
11
11
239
4"
37.50
3
3
113
6"
80.00
2
2
160
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
132
1 132
1,017
E-7
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Hudson Oaks % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 80%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
846
677
1,016
1"
2.50
11
9
23
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
857
Meters
1 686
1 1,039
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
8
6
15
1-1/2"
5.00
2
2
10
2"
8.00
4
3
24
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
14
1 11
49
Wholesale Customer: City of Hurst %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 99%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
9,454
9,359
9,359
3/4"
1.50
1
1
2
1"
2.50
1,517
1,502
3,755
1-1/2"
5.00
33
33
165
2"
8.00
4
4
32
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
0
0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
11,010
Meters
1 10,900
1 13,351
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
465
460
460
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
367
363
908
1-1/2"
5.00
251
248
1,240
2"
8.00
239
237
1,896
3"
21.75
32
32
696
4"
37.50
18
18
675
6"
80.00
4
4
320
8"
140.00
1 1
1 1
1 140
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
1,377
1,363
16,335
E-8
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Keller % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
82
82
82
3/4"
1.50
14,311
14,311
21,467
1"
2.50
331
331
828
1-1/2"
5.00
7
7
35
2"
8.00
10
10
80
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
14,741
Meters
1 14,741
1 22,492
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
370
370
370
3/4"
1.50
44
44
66
1"
2.50
370
370
925
1-1/2"
5.00
93
93
465
2"
8.00
288
288
2,304
3"
21.75
59
59
1,283
4"
37.50
7
7
263
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 3
1 3
420
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
1,234
1 1,234
6,096
Wholesale Customer: City of Kennedale %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 20%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
2,543
509
764
1"
2.50
313
63
158
1-1/2"
5.00
5
1
5
2"
8.00
4
1
8
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
2,865
Meters
1 574
935
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
229
46
69
1"
2.50
57
11
28
1-1/2"
5.00
13
3
15
2"
8.00
38
8
64
3"
21.75
44
9
196
4"
37.50
3
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
384
78
410
E-9
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Lake Worth % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 81%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
1,663
1,347
2,021
1"
2.50
171
139
348
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
1
1
8
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,835
Meters
1 1,487
2,377
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
123
100
150
1"
2.50
129
104
260
1-1/2"
5.00
46
37
185
2"
8.00
108
87
696
3"
21.75
15
12
261
4"
37.50
7
6
225
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
428
1 346
1,777
Wholesale Customer: City of North Richland Hills %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 58%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
19,429
11,269
16,904
1"
2.50
960
557
1,393
1-1/2"
5.00
8
5
25
2"
8.00
17
10
80
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
1 0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
20,414
Meters
1 11,841
1 18,402
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
683
396
594
1"
2.50
404
234
585
1-1/2"
5.00
64
37
185
2"
8.00
827
480
3,840
3"
21.75
29
17
370
4"
37.50
18
10
375
6"
80.00
4
2
160
8"
140.00
1 2
1
140
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
2,031
1,177
6,249
E-10
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Town of Northlake % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 30%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
2,931
879
1,319
1"
2.50
96
29
73
1-1/2"
5.00
11
3
15
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
3,038
Meters
1 911
1,407
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
113
34
272
3"
21.75
99
30
653
4"
37.50
1
0
0
6"
80.00
1
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
214
1 64
925
Wholesale Customer: City of Richland Hills %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 75%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
2
2
2
3/4"
1.50
2,778
2,084
3,126
1"
2.50
79
59
148
1-1/2"
5.00
17
13
65
2"
8.00
11
8
64
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
TOTALI
Non
2,887
Meters
1 2,166
1 3,405
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
165
124
186
1"
2.50
85
64
160
1-1/2"
5.00
31
23
115
2"
8.00
42
32
256
3"
21.75
3
2
44
4"
37.50
2
2
75
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
328
247
836
E-11
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of River Oaks (Emergency % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0%
Use Onlv)
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
0
Meters
1 0
1 0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
0
1 0
0
Wholesale Customer: City of Roanoke %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
2,322
2,322
3,483
1"
2.50
101
101
253
1-1/2"
5.00
1
1
5
2"
8.00
2
2
16
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
2,427
Meters
1 2,427
3,795
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
239
239
359
1"
2.50
167
167
418
1-1/2"
5.00
56
56
280
2"
8.00
271
271
2,168
3"
21.75
44
44
957
4"
37.50
44
44
1,650
6"
80.00
4
4
320
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
825
1 825
6,152
E-12
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Saginaw % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
7,950
7,950
7,950
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
7,950
Meters
1 7,950
7,950
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
333
333
333
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
333
1 333
333
Wholesale Customer: Sansom Park (Emergency Use %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0%
Only)
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
1,413
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,413
Meters
1 0
0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
110
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
1
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
1
0
0
3"
21.75
4
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
116
0
0
E-13
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of Southlake % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
969
969
969
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
8,544
8,544
21,360
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
23
23
184
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
9,536
Meters
1 9,536
1 22,513
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
48
48
48
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
849
849
2,123
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
533
533
4,264
3"
21.75
56
56
1,218
4"
37.50
38
38
1,425
6"
80.00
7
7
560
8"
1 140.00
2
1 2
1 280
10"
210.00
0
1 0
0
TOTALI
1,533
1 1,533
9,918
Wholesale Customer: Trinity River Authority %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0%
(Emergency Use Only)
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
0
Meters
0
1 0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
0
0
0
E-14
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Trophy Club Municipal Utility % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 95%
District No. 1
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
2,467
2,344
2,344
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
2,054
1,951
4,878
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
4,521
Meters
1 4,295
1 7,222
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
37
35
35
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
41
39
98
1-1/2"
5.00
31
29
145
2"
8.00
105
100
800
3"
21.75
21
20
435
4"
37.50
12
11
413
6"
80.00
2
2
160
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
249
1 236
2,086
Wholesale Customer: Town of Westlake %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
137
137
206
1"
2.50
449
449
1,123
1-1/2"
5.00
34
34
170
2"
8.00
10
10
80
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
630
Meters
1 630
1,579
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
40
40
60
1"
2.50
41
41
103
1-1/2"
5.00
12
12
60
2"
8.00
74
74
592
3"
21.75
4
4
87
4"
37.50
9
9
338
6"
80.00
2
2
160
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
182
182
1,400
E-15
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: Town of Westover Hills % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
7
7
11
1"
2.50
110
110
275
1-1/2"
5.00
149
149
745
2"
8.00
41
41
328
3"
21.75
2
2
44
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
310
Meters
1 310
1,441
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
2
2
2
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
1
1
5
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
3
1 3
7
Wholesale Customer: City of Westworth Village %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100%
*Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study.
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
543
543
815
1"
2.50
6
6
15
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
3
3
24
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8
1 140.00
1 0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
552
Meters
1 552
854
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
0
0
0
3/4"
1.50
3
3
5
1"
2.50
15
15
38
1-1/2"
5.00
6
6
30
2"
8.00
18
18
144
3"
21.75
2
2
44
4"
37.50
1
1
38
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
46
1 46
379
E-16
Appendix E
Water Meter Summary
Wholesale Customer: City of White Settlement % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 55%
*Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study.
Residential
Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
5,156
2,836
2,836
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
0
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"
140.00
0
0
0
10"
210.00
0
0
0
TOTALI
Non
5,156
Meters
1 2,836
2,836
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
236
130
130
3/4"
1.50
0
0
0
1"
2.50
74
41
103
1-1/2"
5.00
46
25
125
2"
8.00
113
62
496
3"
21.75
13
7
152
4"
37.50
4
2
75
6"
80.00
1
1
80
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
487
1 268
1,161
Wholesale Customer: City of Willow Park %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0%
Residential Meters
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
1,841
0
0
3/4"
1.50
3
0
0
1"
2.50
1
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
0
0
0
2"
8.00
0
0
0
3"
21.75
0
0
0
4"
37.50
0
0
0
6"
80.00
0
0
0
8"1
140.00
1 0
1 0
1 0
10"
210.00
1 0
1 0
0
TOTALI
Non
1,845
Meters
1 0
0
Meter Size
Service Unit Equivalency
Factor
-Residential
Number of Meters
Number of Meters Served
by Ft. Worth
SUE Meters Served by
Ft. Worth
5/8" x 3-4"
1.00
75
0
0
3/4"
1.50
7
0
0
1"
2.50
38
0
0
1-1/2"
5.00
17
0
0
2"
8.00
26
0
0
3"
21.75
5
0
0
4"
37.50
4
0
0
6"
80.00
4
0
0
8"
140.00
1 0
1 0
0
10"
210.00
1 0
0
0
TOTALI
176
0
0
E-17
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
801 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 2800
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
817-735-7300
www.freese.com