The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021/11/09-Attachments-RESOLUTION - Redistricting Map to Task Force with REVISED Maps-Tables 11.05.21REVISED — Maps and Tables on 11/05/2021 A RESOLUTION NO. SUBMITTING A COUNCIL -PROPOSED REDISTRICTING MAP TO THE REDISTRICTING TASK FORCE WHEREAS the City Council on August 4, 2020, adopted Resolution No. 5259-08- 2020, appointing a Redistricting Task Force (Task Force) and charging the Task Force with responsibility for advising the City Council about the criteria and procedures by which the City Council should redraw its district boundaries after publication of 2020 block -level population data by the U.S. Bureau of the Census; and WHEREAS the City Council on April 6, 2021, adopted Resolution No. 5375-04- 2021 , accepting the Task Force's final report and establishing criteria and procedures for redrawing district boundaries; and WHEREAS the City Council on October 19, 2021, adopted (i) Resolution No. 5487- 10-2021, reactivating the Task Force and charging it with certain responsibilities to receive and evaluate redistricting maps and to select an initial map for consideration by the City Council, and (ii) Resolution No. 5488-10-2021 , amending Resolution No. 5375-04-2021 to incorporate the work of the reactivated Task Force into the procedures, and referencing the possibility of a City Council -proposed map for evaluation by the Task Force. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, as follows: 1. That the City Council has considered the following maps as the Council -proposed redistricting map to be submitted for evaluation and consideration by the Task Force, all of which are attached hereto in an exhibit as designated below and made a part hereof for all purposes: a. Williams and Moon Bluebonnet Merger Map, attached as Exhibit "A". b. Williams and Nettles Map, attached as Exhibit "B". c. Moon5 Mockingbird Map, attached as Exhibit "C". d. Moon4 Armadillo Map, attached as Exhibit "D". 2. That the City Council hereby selects Exhibit " _" as the Council -proposed redistricting map to be submitted for evaluation by the Task Force. Adopted this --- day of November, 2021. ATTEST: Ronald P. Gonzales, Interim City Secretary �4 A' + Briar Knob Hill Rd 81 2 i. E 'Qeno-?d 1, E Peden Rd cr Pelican Bay O(t f 10 rik-1-11 . r ". Im Conf&d*rat@P Irk Rd Vv h t t es. - PO cross V6 h i ta Ti I oanoke 114 Trophy Club IM 1,i5titi Rd Le W Mair F1 ow er Mound 0 ) 26 Gr*ne (121) N Tarr X L r% Cdleyville 0, Watauga (Ti� q rdl North Harwood Rd q Bedford Richland and 360 Hill, E '(1�83 Glenv '-dtorn City 10 —( 83 ) 1W Arlington (Q For 7377 A* Ile C 'C"W 11 7"VZ71-1 Rd T-CR-92-C - LO "I", 4r; Briaroak'-w Sources: Esri, HERE, 'Oh u a Japan, METI, Esri Ch 17) 6penStreetMap contr cL z Southlake Keller -403 303 0 0 5. 360 Gr.-n B'" V1 Sublett Rd (A 0 Cn 11; 0 fl;'t R R' -2 Exhibit A Merger of Williams & Moon Bluebonnet District 2 5 = 8 3 6 JW 9 4 7 10 11 Prepared 11/05/21 by M. Swindle Exhibit A Merger of Williams and Moon Bluebonnet from Staff & Council feedback AKA Staff Plan Combined2 District Total Population White White % White VAP% African American African American o African American VAP% Hispanic Hispanic % Hispanic VAP% Asian Other Minority Opportunity? MMA (>50% Combined) SMMA (>75% Combined Minority) Number of Split Geographic Units Compactness Score (Polsby-Popper Ratio) Communities of Interest Voting Precincts Census Block Groups 2 90,264 19,397 21.5% 24.3% 8,823 9.8% 9.0% 56,171 62.2% 60.1% 4,032 1,841 TBD SMMA 1 NA 13 0.19 3 88,351 47,699 54.0% 57.8% 15,272 17.3% 16.2% 18,461 20.9% 18.2% 4,402 2,517 TBD NO 2 NA 4 0.06 4 90,558 31,691 35.0% 39.0% 15,228 16.8% 16.2% 35,065 38.7% 35.0% 5,996 2,578 TBD MMA 1 NA 14 0.16 5 92,385 22,060 23.9% 27.0% 36,244 39.2% 38.8% 24,580 26.6% 23.6% 6,7851 2,716 TBD SMMA 1 NA 10 0.1 6 96,121 27,370 28.5% 33.1% 31,916 33.2% 31.6% 29,112 30.3% 27.3% 5,189 2,534 TBD MMA 1 NA 4 0.15 7 88,972 46,427 52.2% 56.4% 11,629 13.1% 11.9% 24,755 27.8% 24.9% 3,231 2,930 TBD NO 4 NA 10 0.05 8 93,872 11,814 12.6% 14.8% 32,612 34.7% 36.7% 46,200 49.2% 45.0% 1,581 1,665 TBD SMMA 1 NA 10 0.08 9 94,941 29,2941 30.9% 1 36.1% 11,323 11.9% 11.6% 1 48,3901 51.0% 1 46.3% 1 4,259 1,6751 TBD MMA 1 NA 14 0.26 10 91,227 53,0231 58.1% 1 60.7% 9,278 10.2% 9.5% 1 16,7911 18.4% 1 16.8% 1 8,3691 3,7661 TBD NO 0 NA 3 0.08 11 1 92,224 47,8481 51.9% 1 54.9% 1 12,0441 13.1% 12.0% 1 20,3111 22.0% 1 20.1% 1 8,7301 3,2911 TBD NO 1 1 1 NA 8 0.07 17.3 % 16.9 % Criterion Fully Met Partially Met Unmet Comments 1. Approximately equal size X High/Low deviation <9,189 (7,770) 2. Legal compliance (per outside counsel) Requires further research 3. Minority opportunity districts Requires further research 4. Communities of interest X <25% Divided (17.3%) 5. Contiguous territory X 6. Compactness X Polsby Popper ratio >_ 0.05 (All greater than 0.05) 7. Identifiable geographic boundaries X 8. Voting precincts NA/2020 Values not published 9. Census tracts X <25% Divided (16.9%) 10. Places of residence Not evaluated _A 114 °'d I _ 1,i-tln Rd I I 81 I Cross L a I"� 'rnbars� W Mai FI ow er y ` m + L� I �� 114 V6 hlta Ti a Mound rn Briar` - - - - - - - - -- --- - - -- - -�� oanoke 114 Trophy Club- --- v Knob Hill Rd 3 r F"xCL • �'. .. RenOE a a P•� z Southlake Gr 26 ine QenoRdl , E Peden Rd r,�� 121 Pelican Bay 2 x C _ Keller - 10 LJ 199 ri �Pkwy d� ° N Tarrao ��e 199 le 81 Cdleyvillei� �7 �F�' I Wataugasf f� I F-4 North Harwood Rd , .�,,. _, p - RiHillchl and Bedford '` 360 E :..183.., 1834", _ qL ConfederataP�rIt Rd 188i i Glenvir:. _ -Itom Pity 10 183 n Whites I ;�:.�.%1.�.. C. 183 O Arlington 360 80 377 303 303 o o C c 360 I m �Benbr Gre.n Oak; Blvd I V FOr v (a IVsunlen Rd � � n I 377 w o a Q'- a F o 287 00 N 360 = A* Ile Crowley Exhibit B crawler of Rd Bur Will CR-92C t District 2 5 = 8 o Briaroak-W 3 6 9 �47 10 171 t'oh ua Sources: Esri, HERE, 11 �,�,Japan, METI, Esri Chi (917) OpenStreetMap contri Prepared 11/05/21 by M. Swindle Exhibit B Williams/Nettles- from CM Nettles & CM Williams AKA Williams & Nettles Amended Map District Total White White % White African African African Hispanic Hispanic % Hispanic Asian Other Minority Number of Split Geographic Units Compactness MMA (>50% Population VAP% American American % American VAP% Opportunity? pp y7 Score core VAP% Communities of Voting Census (Polsby-Popper SMMA (>75% Interest Precincts Block Ratio) Combined Groups Minority) 2 88,594 19,516 22.0% 24.7% 8,646 9.8% 9.1% 55,391 62.5% 60.5% 3,280 1,761 TBD SMMA 2 NA 12 0.24 3 93,467 48,628 52.0% 56.2% 17,601 18.8% 17.4% 20,209 21.6% 18.9% 321 6,708 TBD NO 2 NA 3 0.07 4 89,794 29,324 32.7% 36.9% 17,089 19.0% 18.3% 35,796 39.9% 36.0% 5,094 2,491 TBD MMA 2 NA 17 0.18 5 96,400 21,280 22.1% 25.1% 39,091 40.6% 40.6% 26,595 27.6% 24.3% 6,767 2,667 TBD SMMA 2 NA 6 0.11 6 94,087 28,507 30.3% 34.9% 30,894 32.8% 31.1% 27,074 28.8% 25.9% 5,144 2,468 TBD MMA 0 NA 1 0.17 7 90,413 49,609 54.9% 59.0% 8,701 9.6% 8.7% 25,106 27.8% 24.6% 4,004 2,993 TBD NO 4 NA 10 0.04 8 96,726 12,972 13.4% 16.0% 32,245 33.3% 34.6% 46,471 48.0% 44.4% 3,241 1,797 TBD SMMA 3 NA 14 0.08 9 88,847 28,645 32.2% 37.4% 9,019 10.2% 10.2% 46,756 52.6% 47.4% 2,850 1,577 TBD MMA 3 NA 14 0.31 10 90,687 51,786 57.1% 59.6% 9,303 10.3% 9.6% 16,786 18.5% 16.9% 9,077 3,735 TBD NO 1 NA 4 0.1 11 89,900 46,356 51.6% 54.2% 11,780 13.1% 12.2% 19,652 21.9% 20.2% 8,796 3,316 TBD NO 2 NA 8 0.05 28.00% 16.70% Criterion Fully Met PaMetlly Unmet Comments 1. Approximately equal size X High/Low deviation <9,189 (8,132) 2. Legal compliance (per outside counsel) Requires further research 3. Minority opportunity districts Requires further research 4. Communities of interest X <25% Divided (28.0%) 5. Contiguous territory X 6. Compactness X Polsby Popper ratio >_ 0.05 (District 7 = 0.04) 7. Identifiable geographic boundaries X 8. Voting precincts NA/2020 Values not published 9. Census tracts X <25% Divided (16.7%) 10. Places of residence Not evaluated �4 A' N Briar Knob Hill Rd 81 a 2 E 'Qeno-?d 1, E Peden Rd Pelican Bay r f 10 1—9 9—"m . r ". le Con f&d*r at@ P Irk Rd I - U, VV h t te em 80 377 Benbr 37 A* Ile Cr( cr(ywl ft- d CR-920 114 Trophy Club V6 �: h i ta Ti I 1,i-titi Rd Le W Mair F1 ow er Mound 0 ) 26 Gr*ne Keller ,Pkwy N Tarr 30 X Cdleyvill Watauga I F-4 North Harwood Rd Ri chl an d 360 Bedford E Hill� 183 2 2UI Glenviee. Di Itorn City 0 41J83 F cL z — Southlake 'Arlington 360 0 0 7�2�87 360 1 1 Green Oak; Blvd I V %V Sublett Rd 0 0 0 287 0 o 0i '11L L' Rd Exhibit C o . n A,?,' Moon 5 Mockingbi Briaroak'-w ' Sources: Esri, HERE, 'hue C, Japan, METI, Esri Ch 17) OpenStreetMap contr District 2 5 = 8 3 6 JW 9 4 7 10 11 Prepared 11/05/21 by M. Swindle ExhibitC_Moon5_Mockingbird from CM Moon AKA Moon5 Map District Total Population White White % White VAP% African American African American % African American VAP% Hispanic Hispanic % Hispanic VAP% Asian Other Minority Opportunity? MMA (>50% Combined) SMMA (>75% Combined Minority) Number of Split Geographic Units Compactness Score (Polsby-Popper Ratio) Communities of Interest Voting Precincts Census Block Groups 2 96,240 14,405 15.0% 18.2% 131355 13.9% 14.0% 64,940 67.5% 63.9% 1,982 1,558 TBD SMMA 2 NA 16 0.27 3 87,551 46,777 53.4% 57.3% 14,653 16.7% 15.6% 19,455 22.2% 19.5% 4,226 2,440 TBD NO 2 NA 14 0.05 4 87,892 46,130 52.4% 55.3% 9,814 11.2% 10.3% 18,836 21.4% 19.6% 9,799 3,313 TBD NO 0 NA 0 0.43 5 95,364 23,176 24.3% 27.5% 36,131 37.9% 37.6% 26,341 27.6% 24.4% 6,897 2,819 TBD SMMA 1 NA 6 0.12 6 96,380 27,465 28.5% 33.0% 32,883 34.1% 32.5% 28,101 29.2% 26.2% 5,365 2,566 TBD MMA 2 NA 9 0.08 7 87,471 43,466 49.7% 54.4% 11,267 12.9% 11.5% 27,547 31.5% 28.1% 2,464 2,727 TBD MMA 3 NA 13 0.04 8 96,584 9,447 9.8% 11.7% 34,574 35.8% 37.7% 48,230 49.9% 46.3% 2,851 1,482 TBD SMMA 1 NA 7 0.14 9 93,504 33,896 36.3% 41.4% 9,136 9.8% 9.8% 46,518 48.7% 43.6% 3,031 923 TBD MMA 3 NA 9 0.43 10 90,418 52,188 57.7% 60.3% 10,384 11.5% 10.6% 16,930 1872.0% 17.1% 7,230 3,686 TBD NO 1 NA 3 0.05 11 87,541 39,673 45.3% 48.9% 12,172 13.9% 12.9% 23,938 27.3% 24.8% 8,729 3,029 TBD MMA 1 NA 12 0.09 21.3 % 16.7% Criterion Fully Met Partially Met Unmet Comments 1. Approximately equal size X High/Low deviation <9,189 (9,113) 2. Legal compliance (per outside counsel) Requires further research 3. Minority opportunity districts Requires further research 4. Communities of interest X <25% Divided (21.3%) 5. Contiguous territory X 6. Compactness X Polsby Popper ratio >_ 0.05 (District 7 = 0.04) 7. Identifiable geographic boundaries X 8. Voting precincts NA/2020 Values not published 9. Census tracts X <25% Divided (16.7%) 10. Places of residence Not evaluated �4 A' + N Briar Knob Hill Rd 81 2 Elp Crabs) V6 h i ta Ti I 114 Trophy Club 1,i5titi Rd Le W Mair F1 ow er Mound 0 ) * 4Gr*ine enoRd, 1, E Peden Rd me Pelican Bay Keller FL ! - f 10 I 1 11 -kw le Con f0d 9r at@ P Irk Rd Vv h t t es.- i0w Benbr 377 A* Ile 11 crowl"k. OFRd cL z Southlake N Tarr 30 . Y dj 81 X Cdleyvi Ile Watauga F-4 in, -IV., T..1 North Harwood Rd Richland 360 q--* Bedford Hill- t(l 8 �3 183 .'E qL Glenviel. Itorn City 10 183 (121 F I ft Its onrL t' A CR-92C o Briaroak'-w 174 shun Sources: Esri, HERE, C. METI, Esri Ch (9 171 OpenStreetMap contr Arlington360 ,J3 043 303 0 0 5. 360 1 %V Green Oak; Blvd � V Sublett Rd 0 0 - 0 287 0 0i re R d n • Exhibit D Moon 4 Armadillo District 2 5 8 3 6 9 4 7 10 11 Prepared 11/05/21 by M. Swindle Exhibit D Moon4 Armadillo from CM Moon AKA Moon4 Map 2020 Armadillo Revised District Total Population White White % White VAP% African American African American % African American VAP% Hispanic Hispanic / ° Hispanic VAP% Asian Other Minority Opportunity? MMA (>50% Combined) SMMA (>75% Combined Minority) Number of Split Geographic Units Compactness Score (Polsby-Popper Ratio) Communities of Interest Voting Precincts Census Block Groups 2 91,749 16,380 17.9% 20.5% 1,594 15.9% 15.8% 57,284 62.4% 59.8% 1,854 14,637 TBD SMMA 6 NA 21 0.16 3 93,431 48,595 52.0% 56.0% 16,960 18.2% 16.8% 20,919 22.4% 19.6% 4,337 2,620 TBD NO 1 NA 7 0.05 4 87,531 45,942 52.5% 55.3% 9,748 11.1% 10.3% 18,770 21.4% 19.6% 9,775 3,296 TBD NO X NA 1 0.43 5 96,128 23,287 24.2% 27.5% 36,844 38.3% 38.0% 26,228 27.3% 24.1% 6,961 2,808 TBD SMMA 2 NA 7 0.11 6 94,319 27,709 29.4% 33.8% 31,972 33.9% 32.3% 27,114 28.8% 25.8% 4,988 2,536 TBD MMA 1 NA 10 0.08 7 87,785 47,767 54.4% 59.0% 8,949 10.2% 9.1% 25,387 28.9% 25.5% 2,769 2,913 TBD NO 5 NA 13 0.04 8 96,121 8,278 8.6% 10.5% 34,789 36.2% 38.2% 48,642 50.6% 46.9% 31006 1,406 TBD SMMA X NA 11 0.13 9 96,244 34,768 36.1% 41.3% 9,852 10.2% 10.1% 46,318 48.1% 43.2% 3,2621 2,044 TBD MMA 4 NA 9 0.38 10 87,789 51,170 58.3% 1 60.9% 9,937 11.3% 10.4% 16,190 18.4% 16.8% 6,908 3,584 TBD NO X NA 5 0.05 11 87,838 32,727 37.3% 1 40.7% 1 10,724 12.2% 1 11.4% 32,984 37.6% 34.7% 8,714 2,689 TBD MMA 1 2 NA 11 0.09 28.0% 17.8% Criterion Fully Met Partially Met Unmet Comments 1. Approximately equal size X High/Low deviation <9,189 (8,713) 2. Legal compliance (per outside counsel) Requires further research 3. Minority opportunity districts Requires further research 4. Communities of interest X <25% Divided (28.0%) 5. Contiguous territory X 6. Compactness X Polsby Popper ratio >_ 0.05 (District 7 = 0.04) 7. Identifiable geographic boundaries X 8. Voting precincts NA/2020 Values not published 9. Census tracts X <25% Divided (17.8%) 10. Places of residence Not evaluated