The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutIR 096 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 22-096 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council June 21, 2022 Page 1 of 5 xA. SUBJECT: MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT 1q irn { 1875 This Informal Report is in response to the City Council's request to receive a monthly update on development activity within the City and the measures staff are using to improve the development process. Staff also generates a monthly report to keep the Council informed of the volume of development activity, process improvements and staff's performance in implementing changes and improving the delivery of plan review and permits. This activity report consists of metrics associated with building permits, infrastructure, stormwater development, and water development plan review. It provides updates on continuous development process improvement efforts. The monthly Development Activity Report and the Change of Occupancy Business Process Improvement Plan are attached for your use and information. The following are highlights for the month of May 2022: May 2022 Highlights Building Permits Permits May April Mo - Mo May 2021 Yr - Yr 2022 ** 2022 Difference Difference Total commercial valuation $496M $377M 32% (incl remodels & additions) $299M 66/o New commercial permits 70 466 -85% 331 -79% issued New single-family permits 550 535 3% 849 -35% issued New commercial & new single- 620 1001 -38% 1180 -47% family permits issued New commercial permit apps 92 32 188% 30 207% received New single-family residential 685 317 116% 851 -20% apps received **Data as of June 1, 2022 ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 22-096 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council June 21, 2022 �aT� • Page 2 of 5 xA. SUBJECT: MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT 1875 Development Support Services • The Overall Customer Service Satisfaction was 67% for either Very Positive or Somewhat Positive for May 2022, based on 61 out of 78 responses. This is down from 74% for either Very Positive or Somewhat Positive for April 2022, based on 53 out of 72 responses. The majority of the negative responses were related to a dissatisfied customer experience and the permitting process being too complicated or slower than expected. Other concerns included a lack of overall customer service such as receiving inaccurate information from Customer Service Representatives over the telephone, or the website was difficult to navigate and the List of Required Documents were not accurate. Most respondents did not provide contact information. We attempted to contact a few of the respondents but were unsuccessful and received voicemails. Other respondents did not provide any feedback as to why they had a negative experience. • In May 2022, 6 out of 8 customers surveyed thought that our Inspections team was Extremely Helpful or Very Helpful. In April 2022, 4 out of 4 customers surveyed thought that our Inspections team was Extremely Helpful or Very Helpful. • Chart A shows survey responses for May 2022. Chart A How would you rate the quality of your customer service experience? 80.0% 73.9% 70.0% 66.7% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 11.9% 16.7% 11.5% 10.0% 5.1% 6.3% 3.6% 14.4% 0.0%_0.0% 41F Very Positive Somewhat Positive Neutral Somewhat Negative Very Negative Fort Worth Customers *May 2022 survey results SurveyMonkey Global Benchmark ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 22-096 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council June 21, 2022 �aT� • Page 3 of 5 xA. SUBJECT: MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT 1875 • Chart B shows commercial vs residential survey responses for May 2022. Chart B Overall, how would you rate the quality of your customer service experience? 80.0% 73.9% 71.1% 70.0% 62.5% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% ° 11.9% 20.0% 13.2% 20.0% 15.0% ° 7.9% 7.9/° 10.0% 6.3% 0.0% 3.6% 4.4% N 2 N 0.0% 0.0/ Very Positive Somewhat Positive Neutral Somewhat Negtive Very Negative Fort Worth Commercial Customers *May 2022 survey results Fort Worth Residential Customers SurveyMonkey Global Benchmark X-Team Building Plan Review X-Team Activity May-22** Apr-22 Difference- Moe May-21 Difference X-Team Applications 17 6 183% 12 42% Conferences Held 7 1 10 1 -30% 1 5 1 40% Building Permits Issued 13 45 -71% 20 -35% **Data as of June 1, 2022 X-Team Activity YTD 2022 CY 2021 CY 2020 Total Totals X-Team Applications 75 139 106 320 Conferences Held 49 68 32 149 Building Permits Issued 90 j 228 j 182 j 500 • As of June 1 , 2022, there were 129 pending X-Team building permits. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 22-096 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council June 21, 2022 �aT� • Page 4 of 5 xA. SUBJECT: MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT 1875 Building Plan Review • On June 1 , 2022 review times were as follows: Days to first review Commercial Plans Actual 10 Days Goal 7 Days Days to first review Residential Plans Actual 6 Days Goal 7 Days For May 2022, the average departmental review times to first comment were as follows: Commercial Plans Average 6 Days Goal 7 Days Residential Plans Average 6 Days Goal 7 Days Development Activity Applications • Fort Worth adopted the 2021 International Building Codes effective April 1 , 2022. Building permits submitted prior to April 1 , 2022 were allowed to follow the previous building codes as such, there was a dramatic increase in permit activity in March. April and May building permit activity returned to normal volumes. Type May 2022 April 2022 Mo - Mo Difference Building Permits* 1998 1520 31% Infrastructure Plans 65 60 8% Community Facility Agreement 7 18 -61% Platted Lots (Residential & Non-Residential) 952 859 11% Plats 45 48 -6% Zoning /Site Plans 13 24 -46% Incl:New Commercial&Residential, Comm/Res Remodel, Comm/Res Accessory, Comm/Res Addition, Occupancy Change of Use, etc. **Data as of June 1, 2022 Business Process Improvement — Certificate of Occupancy Process • The report was completed in May 2022, provided to City Council on May 171", and presented to DAC on Thursday, May 191n • The CO BPI recommendations to be implemented within six months have been started. A standing meeting with Voice of Business (City staff) has been established to coordinate and monitor implementation. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 22-096 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council June 21, 2022 �aT� • Page 5 of 5 xA. SUBJECT: MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT 1875 Business Process Improvement — Pre-Platting/Platting Process • Voice of Business (City staff) and Voice of Customer (development community) met on May 10tn for an all-day Kaizen Event meeting to identify common issues and to generate recommendations for improvement in the Pre-Platting / Platting process. The meeting was facilitated by a Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt consultant. Recommendations were identified and discussed at the meeting. The next step is for staff to prepare the report of recommendations and to work with stakeholders to implement them. • The list of recommendations will be presented to DAC on June 23, 2022. The recommendations report will follow in August 2022. Current Challenges • Technical Difficulties The city's permitting and development software has experienced several outages over the last year. This issue causes difficulty for applicants in uploading information and responding to approval conditions. DSD and ITS are currently negotiating with our external partners on potential upgrades and/or changes to the software support systems aimed at eliminating downtime. One of the first improvements ITS wil be implementing is bring up three (3) new servers the week of Jun 13tn Once the servers are online, ITS will then implement load balancing and scripting for the servers the following week. These efforts will increase the computing power and storage capacity of Accela. • Inspection delays The City's building and electrical code inspections have been delayed at times due to current staffing shortages. Although the City has entered into a contractual agreement for 3rd party inspections, the demand for inspections continues to exceed capacity. DSD is currently working with the Purchasing Department to publish a request for proposal (RFP) aimed at contracting with multiple 3rd Party companies that can help meet the current demand. Please contact D.J. Harrell, Development Services Director, at 817-392-8032 or Dalton.Harrel l(a)fortworthtexas.gov if you have any questions, concerns or comments. David Cooke City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS FORT WORTH. Development Activity Report WIN May 2022 INSIDE THIS EDITION Building Permits ...............................................................2 CFA and Platting ..............................................................8 Infrastructure ....................................................................9 Stormwater.....................................................................12 Water..............................................................................14 Development Process Improvement ..............................15 Building New Single-Family Permits 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2020 575 526 612 504 505 482 612 626 732 662 535 616 ■2021 601 480 510 655 849 906 499 331 415 752 656 475 ■2022 537 606 835 535 550 W � 91r 91r 9M YTD 2021 = 3,095 YTD 2022 = 3,063 1.0% Decrease All data is in calendar year New Commercial Permits 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 1 1 L 1 r.� r.4 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2020 126 120 139 128 69 221 81 84 84 53 105 93 ■2021 89 11 243 64 331 104 87 136 68 89 129 95 ■2022 141 232 466 70 WTD 2021 =798 1 37.2% Increase All data is in calendar year Development Activity Report 2 14 Building Building Permit Comparison 20,000 18,455 18,000 16,349 16,000 14,717 14,573 14,000 12,853 13,467 - 12,000 10,576 11,131 11,320 9,817 10,000 7 8,000 ,897 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 YTD 2022 ■Multi-Family 409 349 376 349 803 487 421 451 552 624 593 ■Residential 6,927 8,115 8,471 8,792 9,522 10,562 11,687 11,523 13,920 15,552 6,363 ■Commercial 2,481 2,112 2,284 2,179 2,528 2,418 2,609 2,599 1,877 2,279 941 All data is in calendar year Total Commercial Valuation $700 $600 $500 U) $400 c 0 $300 $200 $100 ' $0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2019 $103 $208 $230 $98 $311 $269 $221 $121 $392 $421 $588 $242 ■2020 $214 $440 $262 $258 $119 $220 $188 $130 $613 $153 $122 $281 ■2022 $286 $173 $198 $377 $496 YTD 2021 = $14Tq YTD 2022 = $1.57B 21.9% Increase All data is in cale, __ , Development Activity Report 3 Building New Commercial Permits Valuation $600 $500 $400 0 c 0 $300 $200 $100 $0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■202O $167 $282 $204 $155 $36 $134 $147 $81 $514 $102 $107 $245 ■2021 $139 $160 $226 $197 $259 $252 $94 $231 $83 $190 $178 $137 ■2022 $211 $139 $178 $324 $424 30.1% Increase All data is in calendar year "excludes additions and remodels Permit Valuation Comparison Current Prev. Difference Prev. Diff. Y-Y Year to Date CategoryMonth Month M-M Year % New SF 15 -299 -32 Permits 550 535 3% 849 -35% 3095 3063 -1% New SF $5.9M -$39.7M $0.2M $112.3M $106.3M $152.OM $581.9M $582.2M Value 6% -26% 0% New -396 -261 297 Comm 70 466 331 798 1095 Permits -85% -79% 37% New $100.3M $164.7M $294.7M Comm $424M $323.7M $259.3M $980.5M $1.313 Value 31% 64% 30% Development Activity Report 4 14 Building Large Commercial Projects Address Council Project DescriptionDistrict 3351 W Bonds Ranch Rd 7 Eagle Mountain High New Commercial Construction of $270,000,000* School Eagle Mountain High School Main Bldg 5901 Campus Dr 8 Green Bay Packaging New Commercial Construction of $40,000,000 Manufacturing and Storage Bldg 300 W Risinger Rd 8 FW Logistics Hub New Commercial Construction of $27,100,000 Bldg 2 Office/Warehouse Bldg 218 W Broadway Ave 9 West Broadway Apts New Commercial Construction of 2 $24,430,053 Bldg 125 Total Units Attached to 6 Story Parking Garage 6601 Oak Grove Rd 8 Alcon Custom Pack Commercial Remodel of Suite 300 $15,907,792 Automation Office/Warehouse 2621 and 2681 Ave J 8 Avenue at Sycamore New Commercial Construction of $15,427,144 Park Bld s A& B, 108 Units Clubhouse 9900 Hillwood Pkwy 4 Hillwood Commons II New Commercial Construction of $14,715,228 140,OOOsf Office Bldg 7655 Harris Pkwy 6 Great Hearts New Commercial Construction of $14,000,000 Lakeside Phase 2 Bldg for existing Great Hearts Lakeside Campus 273 W Everman Pkwy 8 Rhino Health Change of Use with Remodel of $11,000,000 Manufacturing Bldg 2777 E Long Ave 4 GXO Commercial Remodel of WarehOUSE $10,500,000 Lo istics/Verizon Install Conveyor System 6844 Harris Pkwy 6 DTC Lankan Medical New Commercial construction of a $6,100,000 Office Three-Story Medical Office 8250 McCart Ave 6 Ryan Family YMCA Commercial Addition of new larger $5,500,000 Natatorium Addition Indoor Pool and Pool Room 629 Mony St 8 Park 100 Foods Commercial Addition - Exist Food $4,500,000 Processing Facility, New Boiler Rm 6769 Old Decatur Rd 2 Pinnacle Montessori New Commercial construction Day $3,000,000 Academy Care Facility 1053 Everman Pkwy 8 Doll amur Tenant Change of Use with Remodel - $2,974,962 Alteration Initial Tenant Finish Out of Office with Manufacturing Space 3901 Summerfields Blvd 4 Keller Collegiate Commercial Remodel of School $2,750,000 Academy 500 W 7th St 9 61 Osteria Commercial Remodel of Mixed- $2,060,322 Use Bldg - Tenant Improvement. 1989 Colonial Pkwy 9 The Fort Worth Zoo Commercial Remodel Fort Worth $2,000,000 Zoo - Mountains & Deserts Bldg. 111 NW 24th St 2 Bancorp South Fort Commercial Remodel with new $1,500,000 Worth Stockyards HVAC, Lighting, and Electrical. 7451 McCart Ave 6 Walmart Commercial Remodel of existing $1,400,000 Walmart Store. 11801 South Fwy 6 Texas Health Commercial Addition, Hospital new $1,250,000 Hughley Hospital Site Utilities & Foundation Only 3401 East Loop 820 South 5 Beard's Trailers New Commercial Construction of $1,100,000 Fwy Office for Trailer Sales. 3529 Heritage Trace Pkwy 4 Heritage Trace Commercial Remodel of Roofing. $1,077,000 3131 W Bolt St 9 Ware space Commercial Remodel of Storage/ $1,000,000 Warehouse Bldg. *Valuation is a total of 14 permits for Eagle Mountain High School Development Activity Report 5 14 Building New Commercial Permit Heat Map N L� 1', �r i ti� O wL r � r , ' � a a I A ILI i i 4 # k 4 Legend CY 22 May Commercial Permits Per Sq.Mile o n-s O 5-16 15 =15-20 �20-25 �CFW CrfY LIMFF =Trinity River 0 125 2.5 5 7.5 10 Miles Development Activity Report 6 14 Building New Residential Permit Heat Map f N G IF'C ED a h y t. ■ J r s a * ._ *2 r ti Legend GY 22 May Residential PQmlts Per 5q_Mlle 04-5 p5-10 mid-15 M16-20 =20-26 =cFW crrY LIMIT 0 1.25 2.5 5 7.5 10 —7rinky Rover Miles Development Activity Report 7 CFA • Platting CFA Project Overview $35.0 $30.0 $25.0 c $20.0 0 $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 _ 1 $ Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ■2020 $8.0 $6.0 $17.4 $6.0 $12.0 $9.0 $16.2 $15.0 $12.6 $13.5 $12.2 $14.1 ■2021 $7.3 $21.4 $21.1 $6.3 $16.9 $23.6 $14.7 $22.3 $20.4 $14.7 $13.0 $14.2 ■2022 $16.5 $30.5 $29.3 $27.5 $1.7 44.5% Increase All data is in calendar year Platted Lots 1800 1600 1400 1200 0 1000 J 800 (6 n 0 600 N 400 z 200 0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 ■Non-Residential 26 12 25 9 21 1 12 12 0 8 24 27 121 9 19 27 ■Residential 726 507 386 386 1058 700 616 504 170 289 877 1551 947 99 840 925 All data is in calendar year Development Activity Report 8 Infrastructure Md IPRC Overview Cycles Complete 52 52 54 52 21 Total Projects 148 181 153 173 102 Avg. Project Total Per Cycle 2.9 3.5 2.8 3.3 4.9 Total Accepted Projects 139 143 136 132 81 Plan Rev. & Ret w/n 14 days 98% 94% 99% 98% 96% *All data is in calendar year IPRC Quarterly Details Cycles 13 13 13 8 Total Projects 36 59 66 36 Avg. Projects Per Cycle 2.8 4.5 5.1 4.5 Avg. Accepted Projects Per Cycle 3.6 2.3 3.7 3.9 Plan Rev. & Ret w/n 14 days 92% 98% 100% 91% *All data is in calendar year Public Infrastructure Residential Projects $30.0 $25.0 $20.0 o $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020 $7.1 $0.9 $7.6 $5.3 $7.5 $6.7 $13.8 $13.0 $8.8 $7.3 $7.6 $12.8 ■2021 $2.6 $19.5 $16.3 $0.4 $18.3 $22.9 $12.0 $13.4 $19.3 $4.3 $13.0 $4.5 ■2022 $16.5 $24.3 $25.3 $27.2 $0.3 $57.1 M IJUTD2022: $93.6M 63.9% Increase All data is in calendar year Development Activity Report 9 14 Infrastructure Public Infrastructure Commercial Projects $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 0 2 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $. �Mu .1 6. 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2020 $0.1 $0.5 $3.3 $0.3 $1.0 $2.3 $0.8 $1.4 $0.1 $0.1 $1.3 $- ■2021 $- $0.2 $1.7 $0.8 $0.8 $0.2 $0.10 $1.5 $0.7 $0.1 $0.1 $0.4 ■2022 $- $3.9 $1.5 $0.7 $1.2 �"YTD $7.31VI 108.6% Increase All data is in calendar year Public Infrastructure Industrial Projects $6.0 $5.0 $4.0 U) c $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 _ I $ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2020 $0.4 $3.6 $3.4 $- $3.5 $- $1.6 $- $3.3 $5.4 $2.6 $- ■2021 $4.3 $1.2 $2.2 $3.3 $- $- $0.6 $4.0 $- $5.4 $- $1.0 ■2022 $- $- $0.1 $- $0.1 YTD 2022: $0. 80% Decrease All data is in calendar year Development Activity Report 10 14 Infrastructure Public Infrastructure Multi-Family Projects $9.0 $8.0 $7.0 $6.0 c $5.0 0 $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2020 $0.1 $0.9 $0.7 $0.4 $- $- $- $0.5 $0.3 $0.8 $- $- ■2021 $0.4 $0.4 $0.3 $0.8 $0.2 $- $2.0 $2.9 $- $5.0 $- $7.7 ■2022 $- $2.4 $0.2 $- $0.2 YTD 2022: $2.8M 33.3% Increase All data is in calendar year Public Infrastructure Institutional Projects $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 U) c o $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2020 $0.6 $- $2.4 $- $- $- $- $0.2 $0.1 $- $0.7 $1.3 ■2021 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $0.4 $0.3 $- $- $0.6 ■YTD 2022 $- $- $- $0.2 0.1 MR2024r$0.0m YTD 2022: $0.3M� Increase All data is in calendar year Development Activity Report 11 14 Stormwater Review Performance Avg. Review Time (days) 7.4 7.1 7.8 Num. Reviews Completed 1,246 725 136 % completed in 10 business days or less 93.9 97.7 95.8 Avg. IPRC Review Iterations (City) 2.7 2.5 3.3 Avg. Drainage Studies Iterations (City)* 3.1 3.2 3.0 Overall Customer Satisfaction Rating (1-5 scale) 3.6 4.9 4.5 Num. of Surveys Taken ** 18 14 4 * Item tracked as a result of HB 3167 New Stormwater Submissions 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 11111 ` Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■2020 47 36 34 41 35 34 37 29 30 33 21 33 ■2021 26 26 39 26 35 39 47 36 38 37 49 42 ■2022 39 50 67 49 40 All data is in calendar year Development Activity Report 12 Stormwater Stormwater Pipeline Number of Reviews 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 r ■ � ■ � 0 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '22 '22 '22 '22 '22 ■Reviews in process 135 134 152 147 153 146 151 166 168 183 184 181 178 ■Reviews with City 39 45 48 39 51 41 45 44 47 70 76 65 55 Stormwater Pipeline Average Days for Review 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '21 '22 '22 '22 '22 '22 ■Avg. age of Reviews 4 3 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 with City (Days) Avg. age of Reviews 22 27 27 25 26 28 25 27 28 27 26 28 27 with Developer (Days) Development Activity Report 13 Water/Sewer Study Review Performance Water Study Review Performance CY '211 YTD '22 May '22 Newly Submitted Water Studies 131 117 12 Water Submittal Review Cycles Completed 333 120 26 Avg. Review Time in Days for Completed Water Submittals (City) 10.6 12.2 7.5 Avg. Water Study Iterations (City) 2.8 2 1.7 Sewer Study Review Performance CY '211 YTD '22 May '22 Newly Submitted Sewer Studies 134 111 12 Sewer Study Review Cycles Completed 311 156 32 Avg. Review Time in Days for Completed Sewer Submittals (City) 9.9 12.6 10 Avg. Sewer Study Iterations (City) 2.7 2.1 1.9 * A study can be submitted multiple times prior to the reported month before being approved Water/Sewer Studies in Process Water Jan Feb Mar Apr May Water Study Reviews in Process 45 51 29 38 35 Water Study Reviews in Process with City 21 30 5 16 9 Water Study Reviews in Process with Owner 24 21 24 22 26 Avg. Water Study Review Completed —time with City (Days) 15.8 8.8 14.1 14.1 7.5 Avg. Water Study Review Completed —time with Owner (Days) 6.5 7.0 8.0 11.9 10.6 Sewer Dec Jan Feb Mar A. Sewer Study Reviews in Process 47 50 32 39 34 Sewer Study Reviews in Process with City 19 23 5 14 7 Sewer Study Reviews in Process with Owner 28 27 27 25 27 Avg. Sewer Study Review Completed —time with City (Days) 10.3 13.7 13.5 13.5 10 Avg. Sewer Study Review Completed —time with Owner (Days) 8.9 10.8 6.0 12.4 13.4 Development Activity Report 14 Development Process Improvement Active Development • Improvements Department/ Status Staff Assigned Technologyprogress) Consultation is still working on the report and staff provided Create shared database for CFAs, Development input on 5/31/2022. Staff will continue to work with the IPRC, inspections and closeout for Services, TPW, consultant on the report and will test report as soon as developer-led infrastructure projects ITS updates have been completed. Staff will monitor the changes to ensure modifications do not impact other items. Development Process Tree (11 in p Update and republish process trees Development reflecting process changes as a result Services, Staff is updating the new IPRC process to determine what of HB 3167. Will provide a clear, Water, and needs to be adjusted, before it is finalized. transparent and predictable review of TPW the submittal & review processes Business ■ ■ ■ progress) The BPI report findings and implementation plan was Lean process evaluation of the Development presented to DAC at the May meeting. Staff has had the first Certificate of Occupancy Process Services VOB meeting to begin implanting report recommendations. Website improvements have begun. Accela modifications are being tested. Lean process evaluation of the Development A Kaizen Event to restart this BPI was held on May 10t"with Pre-Plat/ Platting process Services, Water both the VOC and VOB. Preliminary recommendations will be presented to DAC in June. Report to follow in August. Tarrant County Interlocal ` . progress) Update the 2008 Inter Local Development County Staff returned the last version of the County Agreement with Tarrant County regarding plat approval jurisdiction in Services, TPW, Subdivision Ordinance to their consultant for revisions, and the City of Fort Worth's ETJ and Legal will take it to the County Commissioners for approval. Development Activity Report 15 14 Contact Information Development Services D.J. Harrell, Director Development Services Department 817-392-8032 Dalton.Harrell@ Fortworthtexas.Gov Building Permits Allison Gray, Assistant Director Development Services Department Development Building Division 817-392-8030 Allison.Gray@Fortworthtexas.Gov Infrastructure Victor Tornero, Engineering Manager Development Services Department Infrastructure Development Division 817-392-7830 Victor.Tornero@Fortworthtexas.Gov Stormwater Tyson Thompson, Assistant Director Development Services Department Infrastructure Development Division 817-392-2120 Tyson.Thompson@ Fortworthtexas.Gov Water Chris Harder, Director Water Department 817-392-5020 Christopher.Harder@ Fortworthtexas.Gov Report produced by the City of Fort Worth Development Services Department - Strategic Operations Office 11 Texas Street, • •rth, Texas 76102, • Development Activity Report 16