HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 48728-A4 CSC No. 48728-A4
AMENDMENT No . 4
TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT No . 4872.8
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth (CITY) and Pliumnex Associates,
Inc. , (ENGINEER) made and entered into City Secretary Contract No. 48728 ,
(the CONTRACT) which was authorized by M&C C-28096 on the 31st day of
January, 2017 in the amount of $390 , 949 . 00; and
WHEREAS , the CONTRACT was subsequently revised by Amendment No. 1
in the amount of $25, 000 . 00 administratively authorized on July 20, 2018
and Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $74 ,890 . 00 administratively
authorized on April 29, 2020 and Amendment No. 3 in the amount of
$200, 000 . 00 authorized by M&C 20-0768 on October 29, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the CONTRACT involves engineering services for the
following project:
Mary' s Creek Water Reclamation Facility Permit Application; and
WHEREAS , it has become necessary to execute Amendment No. 4 to the
CONTRACT to include an increased scope of work and revised fee.
NOW THEREFORE , CITY and ENGINEER, acting herein by and through
their duly authorized representatives, enter into the following
agreement, which amends the CONTRACT:
1 .
Article I of the CONTRACT is amended to include the additional
engineering services specified in proposal attached hereto and
incorporated herein. The cost to City for the additional design services
to be performed by Engineer totals $287,415. 00.
2 .
Article II of the CONTRACT is amended to provide for an increase in
the fee to be paid to Engineer for all work and services performed under
the Contract, as amended, so that the total fee paid by the City for all
work and services shall be an amount of $987,254. 00.
3 .
All other provisions of the Contract, which are not expressly
amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect.
OFFICIAL RECORD
Prof Services Agreement Amendment Template CITY SECRETARY
Revision Date: November 23, 2021 [MCWRF Perm'
Page i of 2 FT. WORTH, TX
EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE as of the date subscribed by the City' s designated
Assistant City Manager.
APPROVED:
City of Fort Worth ENGINEER
Plummer Associates, Inc.
Dana Burghdoff( 15,20 2 14:51 CDT)
Dana Burghdoff Ellen McDonald, P.E.
Assistant City Manager Principal
DATE: Jul 15, 2022 DATE: 7/11/2022
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
CGI�/,I�LGI z 6�yW-
ChristopherH rder(Jul 12,202210:17 CDT)
Chris Harder, P.E.
Director, Water Department
Contract Compliance Manager:
By signing, I acknowledge that I am the person responsible for the
monitoring and administration of this contract, including ensuring all
performance and reporting requirements .
-A-041
Stacy Walt s(Jul 12,2022 10:16 CDT)
Stacy Walters
Project Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: M&C: 22-0483
ow Date: 6/28/2022
DBlack(Jul 12,2022 22:03 CDT)
Douglas W. Black Form 1295 : 2022-892539
Senior Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST: � 00
00000000 0 �
o 00
0
a�
J ette S.Goodall(Jul 15,2022 16 DT) 00 O
° °
Jannette S. Goodall 4 °° Y
ICY
City Secretary ����EXAsa�p OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
Prof Services Agreement Amendment Template
Revision Date: November 23, 2021 (MCWRF Perm FT. WORTH, TX
Page 2 of 2
PLUIV MER
July 5,2022
Ms.Stacy Walters
Regulatory Environmental Administrator
Fort Worth Water
200 Texas Street
Fort Worth,TX 76102
Re: Discharge Permit Application and Processing for the Mary's Creek Water Reclamation Facility
City Contract No,48728
Contract Amendment No.4
Dear Ms.Walters:
This Contract Amendment No.4 is provided to support the following additional tasks for the subject project:
1) Perform a feasibility study and prepare a report that meets the requirements of the Bureau of Reclamation (BoR)
Title XVI funding program;
2) Support the preparation and processing of a TCEQ Chapter 210 reclaimed water authorization for the Mary's Creek
Water Reclamation Facility service area;and
3) Support the preparation of a grant funding application through the BoR Title XVI program.
A detailed scope of work is attached to this letter.The following table summarizes the contracted amounts for the original
contract,previous amendments,and the current amendment.
Item Amount Authorization Date
Original Contract $390,949 January 31,2017
Amendment No. 1 $25,000 July 24,2018
Amendment No. 2 $74,890 April 29,2020
Amendment No. 3 $200,000 October 29,2020
Amendment No.4 $287,415 Current Request
Total Fee $978,254
We look forward to continuingto serve the City on this project, Please let me know if you have any questions related to this
Y P J
request.
Sincerely,
PLUMMER
Ellen McDonald, Ph.D., P.E.
1320 S University Drive,Suite 300
Fort Worth,TX 76107
Phone 817.806.1700
plummer.com
TBPE Firm No.13
C `. PLUMMER 5/26/2022
EXHIBIT A
City of Fort Worth
Mary's Creek Water Reuse Funding Support and Reclaimed Water Authorization
Scope of Work
Background
In anticipation of future growth,the City of Fort Worth Water Department (FWWD) has been preparing
to construct a new water reclamation facility(WRF) in the Mary's Creek basin on the west side of the
city for nearly 20 years. During this time period, a number of planning studies have been carried out,
evaluating the feasibility and cost of constructing a new WRF as compared to continuing to convey
wastewater across the city to the existing Village Creek WRF. A significant driver and consideration in
constructing a new WRF was the availability of a reclaimed water source on the west side of the city and
the ability to provide reclaimed water to new developments in the area to offset potable water
demands.
In 2018,the FWWD submitted an application to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ)
for a Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) permit for the Mary's Creek WRF. It is
expected that this permit will be issued before the end of 2022 at which time the FWWD will proceed
with design of the WRF and the initial phase of the western reclaimed water system.
The FWWD is interested in pursuing an opportunity to obtain grant funding from the Bureau of
Reclamation (BoR)Title XVI Program to offset planning, design and construction costs for the project.To
be eligible for this funding,the FWWD must complete a Title XVI feasibility study that meets BoR
requirements and has been approved by the BoR.
In preparation for development of a reclaimed water delivery system,the FWWD also wishes to apply
for and obtain a TCEQ Chapter 210 reclaimed water authorization for the Mary's Creek WRF and service
area.
The following describes the detailed scope of work to complete a Title XVI feasibility study, support the
preparation and processing of a Chapter 210 reclaimed water authorization, and provide support in
preparing an application for grant funding through the BoR Title XVI program.
Basic Services
Activity I: Title XVI Feasibility Study
Task A: Background Information
1. Review of Previous Reports: Gather and review previous reports and other documents related to
planning and evaluation of the Mary's Creek WRF and water reuse within the service area.
Documents that will be reviewed may include (but not be limited to):
• 2004—Mary's Creek WRC Feasibility Study
• 2007—Water Reuse Master Plan
1
C PLUMMER 5/26/2022
• 2010—MCWRC Site Selection Study
• 2017- Mary's Creek Wastewater System Impact Analysis (memorandum)
• 2021 Region C Water Plan
2. Review of Additional Information:The FWWD will provide Engineer with available additional
documents or data that provide information related to current and projected water
demands/supplies, potential reclaimed water customers or other relevant development plans
within the Mary's Creek WRF service area. Engineer will review and use, as appropriate, in
remainder of study.
Task B:Water Reclamation Opportunities
1. Potential Existing Reclaimed Water Customers:The FWWD will provide Engineer with 5 years of
historical monthly irrigation meter data for existing customers in the Mary's Creek service area.
Engineer will coordinate with the FWWD to identify any other potential major existing
customers that may not have an irrigation meter. If any are identified,the FWWD will provide 5
years of historical monthly potable water meter data for those customers. Engineer will analyze
data to estimate annual average and estimated peak day/peak hour demands for each potential
customer.
2. Potential Future Reclaimed Water Customers: Engineer will coordinate with FWWD planning
staff to obtain information for:
• any known potential future customers who may be candidates for use of reclaimed
water; and
• future land use/development plans within the Mary's Creek service area.
Engineer will estimate potential future annual average and peak day/peak hour demands
within the service area based on land use assumptions and/or any specific information
available for future customers.
3. GIS Map and Tabular Summary: Engineer will prepare a GIS map showing the location of
potential existing and future reclaimed water customers and existing reclaimed water
easements.A tabular summary of customers and demands will also be prepared.
4. Workshop#1: Using information developed in Tasks 61-133, Engineer will facilitate a workshop
with FWWD staff to discuss potential reclaimed water delivery concepts. Up to 3 alternative
concepts will be identified for evaluation in subsequent tasks.
5. Indirect Reuse: Engineer will summarize the concept for the proposed indirect reuse project to
be developed by Tarrant Regional Water District(TRWD).The description will include
anticipated quantity of reuse water to be diverted and delivered to supplement TRWD raw
water supply on an annual basis. Information summarized will be limited to that available from
and provided by TRWD.
2
it
PLUMMER 5/26/2022
6. Environmental and Recreational Uses: Engineer will quantify the amount of reuse water that
may be used to support downstream environmental and/or recreational uses in the Clear Fork
Trinity River. Estimates will be developed in collaboration with TRWD.
Task C:Water Supply Alternatives
1. Water Reuse Alternatives: Engineer will evaluate up to 3 alternatives for reclaimed water
delivery, as identified in Workshop#1. Each alternative will include planning-level design of
pumping, storage and pipeline systems. A hydraulic model will be developed for each alternative
to evaluate sizing and hydraulic performance. GIS maps and descriptions of infrastructure will be
developed for each alternative. For all alternatives it will be assumed that water discharged to
Mary's Creek would either be diverted by TRWD and delivered to Eagle Mountain Lake to
augment TRWD raw water supplies (indirect reuse) or will be left in Mary's Creek to provide
enhanced environmental or recreational benefits.
2. Non-Project Alternative: Engineer will prepare a description of the non-project alternative,
assuming that the Mary's Creek WRF is not constructed and instead improvements to the
collection system are made to deliver wastewater to the Village Creek WRF. For this alternative,
it is assumed that potential non-potable water demands in the Mary's Creek service area would
be met with potable water from the city's drinking water system. The non-project alternative
will be based on information provided in the April 2010 memorandum prepared by Freese and
Nichols,titled "Mary's Creek WRC Engineering Feasibility Study". In addition,for the non-
project alternative, it will be assumed that any return flows discharged would be diverted from
the Trinity River through the TRWD Richland Chambers or Cedar Creek wetland reuse projects.
3. Life Cycle Costs: Engineer will prepare opinions of probable construction and non-construction
cost, annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs, and life cycle costs for each
alternative, including the non-reuse alternative.The estimated costs will be presented in terms
of dollars per million gallons and dollars per acre-foot of capacity. Costs associated with the non-
reuse alternative will be based on the April 2010 memorandum referenced in Task C2 and
adjusted to current values using the ENR construction cost index and checked against recent
cost data for the DFW area. Costs for the Mary's Creek WRF will be updated to current dollars
from the most recent estimate prepared by Engineer in 2018.
4. Economic Analysis: Engineer will perform an economic analysis of the recommended alternative
relative to the alternative water supply alternatives (continuing to supply demands with potable
water and/or pumping raw water from TRWD East Texas supplies).The economic analysis will
include the following elements:
• Description of the conditions that exist in the area and a description of projected future
economic conditions with and without the project.
• Summary of cost comparison of the reclamation and non-reclamation alternatives.
• Description of qualitative, non-cost factors for each alternative.
3
PLUMMER 5/26/2022
Task D: Environmental Considerations and Potential Impacts
The purpose of the environmental evaluation is to provide sufficient information on the proposed Title
XVI project to assess the potential measures and costs that will be necessary to comply with NEPA, and
any other applicable Federal law. Engineer will:
1. Describe potentially significant environmental effects or unique or undefined environmental
risks.
2. Describe the status of required Federal,state,tribal,and/or local environmental compliance
measures, including copies of any documents that have been prepared, or results of any
relevant studies.
3. Describe other available information that would assist with assessing the measures that may be
necessary to comply with the NEPA and other applicable Federal, state, or local environmental
laws such as the Endangered Species Act or the Clean Water Act.
4. Describe how the proposed potable reuse alternatives will affect water supply and water quality
from the perspective of a regional,watershed, aquifer, or river basin condition.
5. Describe the extent of public involvement in the feasibility study and summarize comments
received, if any.
6. Describe the potential effects the project may have on historic properties. Include potential
mitigation measures,the potential for adaptive reuse of facilities, an analysis of historic
preservation costs, and the potential for heritage education, if necessary.
Task E: Energy Evaluation
A high level evaluation of energy requirements and potential energy saving measures will be performed.
The purpose of the evaluation is to identify potential areas of focus during design and to develop
potential strategies for inclusion in a Title XVI grant application.
1. Evaluate the energy requirements of the proposed treatment and conveyance facilities
2. Evaluate potential energy saving measures that could be incorporated in the design of the new
Mary's Creek WRF and/or reclaimed water system. Engineer will contact the landfill adjacent to
the project site to determine if there are opportunities to collaborate related to biogas
generation and energy.
3. Evaluate the availability of renewable energy, including
a. Purchasing energy produced renewably from local utilities
b. Construction of a local renewable energy project,such as solar collectors or wind
turbines.
Task F: Legal and Institutional Requirements
This task will identify potential g otential legal and institutional requirements, or other barriers to implementing
the proposed Title XVI project. Engineer will:
4
PLUMMER
5/26/2022
1. Analyze Water Rights:Any water rights issues associated with the recommended project will be
summarized.
2. Analyze Institutional and Legal Requirements:Other institutional and legal requirements will be
identified and summarized.These may include contractual agreements, settlement agreement
or other obligations related to the recommended project.
3. Analyze Multi-Jurisdictional and Interagency Aspects:Any multi-jurisdictional or interagency
agreements associated with the proposed project will be summarized in this task.
4. Analyze Permitting Requirements:This task will describe permitting requirements for project
implementation and recommendations for strategies to help streamline the permitting process.
5. Discuss Any Unresolved Issues Pertaining to Implementing the Proposed Project:Any other
unresolved legal or regulatory issues that may impact project implementation will be addressed
in this task.
Task G: Implementation and Funding Plan
Engineer will develop an implementation and funding plan, including the following information:
1. A plan for implementing the recommended alternative:
a. Describe the treatment and infrastructure requirements based on information
developed in previous tasks.
b. Describe the extent to which the proposed alternative will use proven technologies and
conventional system components.
c. Define any recommended future public outreach initiatives needed to address public
concerns related to implementation of the reuse project.
d. Identify basic research needs, if any.
i. Describe research needs associated with the proposed Title XVI project,
including the objectives to be accomplished through research. Depending on
treatment schemes identified, pilot-and/or bench-scale testing of treatment
processes will likely be necessary to obtain TCEQ approval. Research related to
concentrate disposal strategies may also be identified.
1. Describe the basis for Reclamation participation in the identified
research.
2. Identify the parties who will administer and conduct necessary research.
e. Develop a schedule for implementation of the preferred alternative, including basic
research, pilot-testing, design and construction, customer contracts, permitting, and
other necessary elements.
2. A plan for funding the proposed project construction, operation, maintenance, and replacement
costs:
5
PLUMMER
5/26/2022
a. Describe the willingness of FWWD to pay for its share of capital costs and the full
operation, maintenance, and replacement costs.
b. Describe how FWWD will pay construction, annual operation and maintenance, and
replacement costs. Identify the potential sources of revenue, including grants and/or
loans that may be available to fund design and construction of the preferred alternative.
c. Describe all Federal and non-Federal sources of funding and any restrictions on such
sources,for example, minimum or maximum cost-share limitations.
d. Describe the reasonably foreseeable future actions that FWWD would take if Federal
funding were not provided for the proposed water reclamation and reuse project,
including estimated costs.
Task H: Report
1. Draft Report: Engineer will prepare a draft Title XVI feasibility report that organizes and
describes the work performed in the previous tasks and meets applicable requirements of RM
Directives &Standards WTR 11-01. An electronic copy of the report will be provided to the
FWWD for review and comments.
2. Revised Draft Report: Engineer will address comments from FWWD and prepare a revised draft
report that will be submitted to Reclamation for review.
3. Final Report: Engineer will address comments from Reclamation and prepare a final report.
Three hard copies and one electronic copy will be provided to FWWD. Engineer will assist
FWWD in submitting the final report to Reclamation for approval.
Task I: Project Administration and Meetings
1. Proiect Administration: Project administration will include but not be limited to developing and
implementing a project management plan;tracking and managing internal schedules of work;
monitoring and addressing issues related to the scope of work, budget and deliverables;
preparing and processing monthly billings; providing labor resources necessary to fulfill scoped
work;scheduling and participating in quality control reviews; and providing updates to FWWD
on a regular basis. Engineer will prepare a standard monthly invoice and progress report for all
services.
2. Meetings:
a. Engineer will prepare for and facilitate up to 5 project meetings with FWWD staff.
b. Engineer will prepare for and facilitate up to 2 meetings with TRWD to coordinate on
efforts to complete the Feasibility Study, provide consistent information, and maximize
the opportunity to obtain grant funding for both FWWD's and TRWD's projects.
6
-� PLUMMER 5/26/2022
Activity II: Chapter 210 Reclaimed Water Authorization
Task A:Application Preparation and Processing
1. Engineer will meet with FWWD to review requirements under Chapter 210, determine service
area boundary to include in application, and confirm whether existing ordinances, user contract
templates and operation and maintenance plans used for the Village Creek Chapter 210
authorization require modifications to be applicable to the Mary's Creek system.The budget
provides an allowance for minor modifications to these documents. Major modifications would
need to be done as additional services.
2. Engineer will gather other required information for completion of an application for a new
reclaimed water authorization associated with the Mary's Creek WRF and prepare a draft
application document for review by the FWWD.
3. Engineer will address comments from FWWD and prepare a final application.The application
will be submitted on the FWWD's behalf to the TCEQfor processing. Engineer will support the
FWWD in responding to any questions or requests for information from the TCEQ during
application processing.
Activity III:Title XVI Construction Grant Application Support
Task A: Information Gathering and Technical Proposal Development
1. Engineer will review the following items associated with the BoR Title XVI Construction Grant
funding program:
a. Grant application requirements
b. Scoring criteria
c. Previous successful grant applications posted on the BoR website
2. Engineer will prepare an outline of the Technical Proposal portion of the application, including
the executive summary,the technical project description, and the evaluation criteria.The
outline will be provided to FWWD staff for review.
3. Engineer will facilitate a kickoff meeting with FWWD staff to review the grant application
format, requirements and schedule.At the kickoff meeting,the Engineer will review the draft
technical proposal outline to obtain feedback and gather additional suggestions and ideas for
strengthening or adding to each of the technical proposal application sections. In addition,the
structure, content and format of the funding plan and budget proposal and narrative will be
discussed at this meeting. Engineer will coordinate with FWWD finance staff to determine what
portions of the Project Budget tasks will be completed by FWWD and which will be completed
by the Engineer.
7
PLUMMER 5/26/2022
Task B:Application Package
Engineer will prepare a draft application package.As needed, Engineer will request information and/or
documentation from FWWD to complete the draft application. Based on previous similar funding
solicitations, it is anticipated that the application will include the following sections:
1. Administrative Forms: Engineer will complete administrative forms based on information
provided by FWWD
2. Technical Proposal: Based on the outline developed in Task A and input from the FWWD,
Engineer will develop a draft Technical Proposal that describes the project and explains how
each of the evaluation criteria will be met.
3. Environmental and Cultural Resources Compliance: Engineer will prepare a detailed discussion
of potential environmental and cultural impacts of the project and actions that will be taken to
comply with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA), and Endangered Species Act(ESA) requirements.
4. Required Permits and Approvals: Engineer will document anticipated required permits and
approvals associated with the project.
5. Project Budget:As determined in Task A3, Engineer will support FWWD in the development of a
project budget, including the following sections:
a. Funding Plan
b. Budget Proposal
c. Budget Narrative
6. Letters of Project Support: Engineer will coordinate with FWWD to identify stakeholders from
whom letters of support will be requested. Engineer will prepare draft letters that can be
provided to each stakeholder. It is assumed that FWWD staff will make the requests for letters
of support.
7. Official Resolution: Engineer will prepare a draft resolution document and provide to FWWD for
review.
8. Application Package:The draft application package will be provided to the FWWD for review.
Engineer will facilitate a meeting with FWWD to review the package and receive comments.
Engineer will address comments and prepare a final application package for submittal to the
BoR.
Task C:Application Processing Support
1. As needed, Engineer will provide support responding to questions or requests for information
during application processing.
8
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
DATE: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 REFERENCE NO.: **M&C 22-0483
LOG NAME: 60MARYS CREEK PERMIT AMEND4 - PLUMMER
SUBJECT:
(ETJ W-CD 3 and CD 7)Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 4 in the Amount of$287,415.00 to an
Engineering Agreement with Plummer Associates, Inc., for Mary's Creek Water Reclamation Facility Permit
Application and Adopt Appropriation Ordinance to Effect a Portion of Water Contribution to the Fiscal Years
2022-2026 Capital Improvement Program
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1.Authorize execution of Amendment No. 4 to City Secretary No. 48728, an agreement with Plummer
Associates, Inc., in the amount not to exceed $287,415.00 for the Mary's Creek Water Reclamation
Facility Permit Application for a revised contract amount of$978,254.00; and
2.Adopt the attached appropriation ordinance adjusting estimated receipts and appropriations in the
Water& Sewer Bond 2017A Fund by decreasing estimated receipts and appropriations in the
Unspecified—All Funds project (City Project No. UNSPEC) in the amount of$287,415.00 and
increasing estimated receipts and appropriations in the Mary's Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Permit Application project (City Project No. C01239) by the same amount to effect a portion of
Water's contribution to the Fiscal Years 2022-2026 Capital Improvement Program.
DISCUSSION:
On January 31, 2017 Mayor and Council Communication (M&C) C-28096, the City Council authorized the
execution of an agreement with Plummer Associates, Inc. (City Secretary Contract No. 48728), in the
amount of$390,949.00 for the preparation of the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES)
permit application for the proposed Mary's Creek Water Reclamation Facility (MCWRF)to be submitted to
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).
The agreement was subsequently revised by Amendment No. 1 in the amount of$25,000.00,
administratively authorized July 20, 2018, that provided for additional data review, public outreach and
coordination meetings, Amendment No. 2 in the amount of$74,890.00, administratively authorized April
29, 2020, that provided for additional water quality modeling services and data analysis to support the
permitting process and Amendment No. 3 in the amount of$200,000.00 (M&C 20-0768, October 29,
2020), that provided for additional technical support, expert testimony, and attendance at
meetings/hearings with TCEQ and State Office of Administration Hearings for the discharge permit
contested hearing.
In support of the design and future construction of the MCWRF project, Amendment No. 4 is needed for
the preparation of the reclaimed water authorization which must be issued by the TCEQ and which is
required prior providing reclaimed water to customers . Fort Worth also intends to apply for a grant with
the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)for funding to offset the costs of design and
construction of the MCWRF and its associated reclaimed water facilities. Prior to making this application,
a feasibility study must be prepared and submitted to the USBR, in accordance with federal rules and
regulations. Plummer Associates, Inc. will be providing the necessary support documentation for this
process as part of this Amendment.
60MARYS CREEK PERMIT AMEND4-PLUMMER
-- — ---� — -- --- Budget Revised
CapitalFund FY2022 CIP Change
Name Project Name Appropriations Authority (Increase/ Budget
Decrease) i Budget
Water & C01239 — $0.00 This M&C $287,415.00 $287,415.00
Sewer Bond Mary's Creek
i i
2017A Water
Fund 56011 J�RecyclingC
Funding is currently available in the Unspecified-All Funds project within the Water& Sewer Bond 2017A
Fund for the purpose of funding the Mary's Creek Water Recycling C project.
Funding for the Mary's Creek Water Recycling C Project is depicted below:
FUND Existing Appropriations
Additional Project
_ Appropriations Total*
Water&
Sewer Bond
2015A - $690,839.00 $0.00 $690,839.00
Fund 59607
Water & ---- — �-- - --j
Sewer Bond
2017A - $0.00 $287,415.00 $287,415.00
Fund 56011
Project Total $690,839.00 $287,415.001$978,254.00I
*Numbers rounded for presentation purposes.
This project will have no impact on the Water Department's annual operating budget when completed.
Business Equity—A waiver of the goal for Business Equity subcontracting requirements was requested
and approved by the DVIN, in accordance with the applicable Ordinance, because the proposed scope of
services in this Amendment No. 4 is similar to the scope of services in the original agreement.
This project is located in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction West of COUNCIL DISTRICTS 3 and 7.
FISCAL INFORMATION /CERTIFICATION:
The Director of Finance certifies that funds are currently available in the Unspecified—All Funds project
within the Water& Sewer Bond 2017A Fund and upon approval of the above recommendations and
adoption of the attached appropriation ordinance, funds will be available in the Water& Sewer Bond
2017A Fund for the Mary's Creek Water Recycling C project to support the approval of the above
recommendations and execution of the amendment to agreement and contract. Prior to an expenditure
being incurred, the Water Department has the responsibility of verifying the availability of funds.
FUND IDENTIFIERS (FIDs),:
TO__ _
Fund Departments ccount� Project Program ctivity uBuB dget Reference # Amount
T _ .
ID �'` ID 1 Year Chartfield 2
- --- - -- -J — - -- ----- -- ------�--(----field - --FROM _ _
Fund Department IAccoun] Project Program ctivity Budget Reference # Amount!
ID ID Year Chartfield 2 i
- -----— --� - -----�--- - —---- ---� ----- -- --- ---.1
CERTIFICATIONS:
Submitted for City Manager's Office by_ Dana Burghdoff (8018)
Originating Department Head: Chris Harder (5020)
Additional Information Contact: Stacy Walters (8203)
ATTACHMENTS
1. 60MARYS CREEK PERMIT AMEND4- PLUMMER 1295.pdf (CM internal)
2. 60MARYS CREEK PERMIT AMEND4 - PLUMMER Compliance Waiver.pdf (CFW Internal)
3. 60MARYS CREEK PERMIT AMEND4 - PLUMMER MAP.pdf (Public)
4.60MARYS CREEK PERMIT AMEND4- PLUMMER PBS.pdf (Public)
5. 60MARYS CREEK PERMIT AMEND4 - PLUMMER SAM.pdf (CM internal)
_O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 'nTl
r1
r"
cn
Ul W un LP U1 V1 U1 U1 Ln m Ul Un L1 Ul Ul U1 Ul W 71
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ti
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r.
0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J V V J V V V V V V J V m V m V m ?1
C-) CD O O O O (DO CD C) CD C) CDO O O 0 e
C) O O (D C:) O C) C) O O O C) CDO O CD0
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A .�
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ?�
O O O O 0 O O o O O O O Cr) O O O O C
A
N cn In to Ln to W In Ln W A A A A A
C:) W W W V W F-� V W W F- lD LD lD l0 l0
m 1-1 W F� A W F-' F' W Ul I-A C:) CD (D C) C)O C) O O O O O C) C:) O O w In Ul W Ln
C) W w W O Ul F, CD Ul F' F' F� F, " F, h'
C) Ul C) In F� (Z) O N C:) O o W W W W W
CD O O O O F-' O O N N Ul Ln Ul N Ln
F, I-' F� " F, F� F-' F� H F' F-' F' N C F-` C " C
O C) C) O C) CD 0 CD O C) (D O Z CD C:) Z
W W W W W W W W W W W W W m W ,) W In
m m m m m m m m m m m m m -0 m „ m -a
A A A A A A A A A A A A A m A m A m
00 00 00 w w m w w w w DO w CO n DO n 00 n
0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 C:) C:m o 0 0 0 o C:) C) C:) C) C) C) C:) Z
-{ F, F, N )-I F-� F" Vl
D lD l0 lD lD lD m w w w w w LD
Do 00 V 00 A A A W W W W W M
Z A A O O O O o 0 0 0 0 O
lD l0 U7 LD M lD W W M lD lD W W N N N N
lD W LD M lD W lD M LD W M lD (D O O O 0
W M lD W LD M W W LD LD lD M LD N N N N
LD W (D lD M W LD lD W W M lD LO N N N N
V). qA iA
VT Vf N " '" O J N Q) m m m m m m
W DO V). ul In C) O m V)- N C O O 0 0 0 0
V DO W O O O O 1-� W A CG 90 DO DO W 00 00
Oo W O O O O O in O Cr) A A A A A A A
J V O O O O O LD O N m m m m m m m
Ut Ui O O O O O O O U'1 t7� In (n In U'1 p Ul
O O O O O O O O O O C O C) CD C:) C:) CD
C) CD (DO C) CD CD O C) O O C:)W C) O C:) O
o o C a v v m n Di -Vv
00 C rt
3333
d o- o- n (D ID rD m h p
((DD --I n
o ° Q D D D D m n
O
V,
Ofl/ o N In In N h
O O O O O
Q 7 7 7 7
(D