HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 56668-PM1PROJECT MANUAL
FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF
WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
TO SERVE
CARTER PARK EAST PHASE III & IV
IPRC20-0125
CITY PROJECT NO. 102808
FID 30114-0200431-102808-E07685
X-26676
Mattie Parker David Cooke
Mayor City Manager
Christopher P. Harder, P.E.
Director, Water Department
William Johnson
Director, Transportation and Public Works Department
Prepared for
The City of Fort Worth
August 2021
Prepared by:
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-928
801 Cherry Street, Suite 1300, Unit 11
Fort Worth, TX 76102
817.339.2269
Kimley-Horn No. 061298200
CSC No. 56668-PM1
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
SECTION 00 00 10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Division 00 - General Conditions Last Revised
00 11 13 Invitation to Bidders 03/20/2020
00 21 13 Instructions to Bidders 03/20/2020
00 41 00 Bid Form 04/02/2014
00 42 43 Proposal Form Unit Price 05/22/2019
00 43 13 Bid Bond 04/02/2014
00 45 11 Bidders Prequalification’s 04/02/2014
00 45 12 Prequalification Statement 09/01/2015
00 45 13 Bidder Prequalification Application 03/09/2020
00 45 26 Contractor Compliance with Workers' Compensation Law 04/02/2014
00 45 40 Minority Business Enterprise Goal 08/21/2018
00 52 43 Agreement 06/16/2016
00 61 25 Certificate of Insurance 07/01/2011
00 62 13 Performance Bond 01/31/2012
00 62 14 Payment Bond 01/31/2012
00 62 19 Maintenance Bond 01/31/2012
00 72 00 General Conditions 11/15/2017
00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions 03/09/2020
00 73 10 Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer
Awarded Projects 01/10/2013
Division 01 - General Requirements Last Revised
01 11 00 Summary of Work 12/20/2012
01 25 00 Substitution Procedures 08/30/2013
01 31 19 Preconstruction Meeting 08/30/2013
01 31 20 Project Meetings 07/01/2011
01 32 33 Preconstruction Video 08/30/2013
01 33 00 Submittals 08/30/2013
01 35 13 Special Project Procedures 08/30/2013
01 45 23 Testing and Inspection Services 03/20/2020
01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls 07/01/2011
01 55 26 Street Use Permit and Modifications to Traffic Control 07/01/2011
01 57 13 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 07/01/2011
01 60 00 Product Requirements 03/20/2020
01 66 00 Product Storage and Handling Requirements 04/07/2014
01 70 00 Mobilization and Remobilization 04/07/2014
01 71 23 Construction Staking (Mod) 04/07/2014
01 74 23 Cleaning 04/07/2014
01 77 19 Closeout Requirements 04/07/2014
01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data 04/07/2014
01 78 39 Project Record Documents 04/07/2014
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 2 of 6
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
Technical Specifications which have been modified by the Engineer specifically for this
Project; hard copies are included in the Project’s Contract Documents
Division 02 - Existing Conditions
None
Division 03 - Concrete
None
Division 26 – Electrical
None
Division 31 - Earthwork
31 24 00 Embankments 01/28/2013
Division 32 - Exterior Improvements
None
Division 33 – Utilities
None
Division 34 – Transportation
None
Technical Specifications listed below are included for this Project by reference and can be
viewed/downloaded from the City’s website at:
http://fortworthtexas.gov/tpw/contractors/
or
https://apps.fortworthtexas.gov/ProjectResources/
Division 02 - Existing Conditions Last Revised
02 41 13 Selective Site Demolition 12/20/2012
02 41 14 Utility Removal/Abandonment 12/20/2012
02 41 15 Paving Removal 02/02/2016
Division 03 - Concrete
03 30 00 Cast-In-Place Concrete 12/20/2012
03 34 13 Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) 12/20/2012
03 34 16 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 12/20/2012
03 80 00 Modifications to Existing Concrete Structures 12/20/2012
Division 26 - Electrical
26 05 00 Common Work Results for Electrical 11/22/2013
26 05 10 Demolition for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012
26 05 33 Raceways and Boxes for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012
26 05 43 Underground Ducts and Raceways for Electrical Systems 07/01/2011
26 05 50 Communications Multi Duct Conduit 02/26/2016
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 3 of 6
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
Division 31 - Earthwork
31 10 00 Site Clearing 12/20/2012
31 23 16 Unclassified Excavation 01/28/2013
31 23 23 Borrow 01/28/2013
31 24 00 Embankments 01/28/2013
31 25 00 Erosion and Sediment Control 12/20/2012
31 36 00 Gabions 12/20/2012
31 37 00 Riprap 12/20/2012
Division 32 - Exterior Improvements
32 01 17 Permanent Asphalt Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 01 18 Temporary Asphalt Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 01 29 Concrete Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 11 23 Flexible Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 29 Lime Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 33 Cement Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 37 Liquid Treated Soil Stabilizer 08/21/2015
32 12 16 Asphalt Paving 12/20/2012
32 12 73 Asphalt Paving Crack Sealants 12/20/2012
32 13 13 Concrete Paving 12/20/2012
32 13 20 Concrete Sidewalks, Driveways and Barrier Free Ramps 06/05/2018
32 13 73 Concrete Paving Joint Sealants 12/20/2012
32 14 16 Brick Unit Paving 12/20/2012
32 16 13 Concrete Curb and Gutters and Valley Gutters 10/05/2016
32 17 23 Pavement Markings 11/22/2013
32 17 25 Curb Address Painting 11/04/2013
32 31 13 Chain Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 31 26 Wire Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 31 29 Wood Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 32 13 Cast in Place Concrete Retaining Walls 06/05/2018
32 91 19 Topsoil Placement and Finishing of Parkways 12/20/2012
32 92 13 Hydro Mulching, Seeding, and Sodding 12/20/2012
32 93 43 Trees and Shrubs 12/20/2012
Division 33 - Utilities
33 01 30 Sewer and Manhole Testing 12/20/2012
33 01 31 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection 03/03/2016
33 03 10 Bypass Pumping of Existing Sewer Systems 12/20/2012
33 04 10 Joint Bonding and Electrical Isolation 12/20/2012
33 04 11 Corrosion Control Test Stations 12/20/2012
33 04 12 Magnesium Anode Cathodic Protection System 12/20/2012
33 04 30 Temporary Water Services 07/01/2011
33 04 40 Cleaning and Acceptance Testing of Water Mains 02/06/2013
33 04 50 Cleaning of Sewer Mains 12/20/2012
33 05 10 Utility Trench Excavation, Embedment, and Backfill 12/12/2016
33 05 12 Water Line Lowering 12/20/2012
33 05 13 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings – Cast Iron 01/22/2016
33 05 13.10 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings – Composite 01/22/2016
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 4 of 6
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
33 05 14 Adjusting Manholes, Inlets, Valve Boxes, and Other Structures to
Grade 12/20/2012
33 05 16 Concrete Water Vaults 12/20/2012
33 05 17 Concrete Collars 12/20/2012
33 05 20 Auger Boring 12/20/2012
33 05 21 Tunnel Liner Plate 12/20/2012
33 05 22 Steel Casing Pipe 12/20/2012
33 05 23 Hand Tunneling 12/20/2012
33 05 24 Installation of Carrier Pipe in Casing or Tunnel Liner Plate 06/19/2013
33 05 26 Utility Markers/Locators 12/20/2012
33 05 30 Location of Existing Utilities 12/20/2012
33 11 05 Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 12/20/2012
33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe 12/20/2012
33 11 11 Ductile Iron Fittings 12/20/2012
33 11 12 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe 11/16/2018
33 11 13 Concrete Pressure Pipe, Bar Wrapped, Steel Cylinder Type 12/20/2012
33 11 14 Buried Steel Pipe and Fittings 12/20/2012
33 12 10 Water Services 1-inch to 2-inch 02/14/2017
33 12 11 Large Water Meters 12/20/2012
33 12 20 Resilient Seated Gate Valve 12/20/2012
33 12 21 AWWA Rubber Seated Butterfly Valves 12/20/2012
33 12 25 Connection to Existing Water Mains 02/06/2013
33 12 30 Combination Air Valve Assemblies for Potable Water Systems 12/20/2012
33 12 40 Fire Hydrants 01/03/2014
33 12 50 Water Sample Stations 12/20/2012
33 12 60 Standard Blow off Valve Assembly 06/19/2013
33 31 12 Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) 12/20/2012
33 31 13 Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe for Gravity Sanitary Sewers 12/20/2012
33 31 15 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Sanitary Sewer 12/20/2012
33 31 20 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe 06/19/2013
33 31 21 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Closed Profile Gravity Sanitary Sewer
Pipe 12/20/2012
33 31 22 Sanitary Sewer Slip Lining 12/20/2012
33 31 23 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Enlargement 12/20/2012
33 31 50 Sanitary Sewer Service Connections and Service Line 04/26/2013
33 31 70 Combination Air Valve for Sanitary Sewer Force Mains 12/20/2012
33 39 10 Cast-in-Place Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 20 Precast Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 30 Fiberglass Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 40 Wastewater Access Chamber (WAC) 12/20/2012
33 39 60 Epoxy Liners for Sanitary Sewer Structures 12/20/2012
33 41 10 Reinforced Concrete Storm Sewer Pipe/Culverts 07/01/2011
33 41 11 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Storm Drain 12/20/2012
33 41 12 Reinforced Polyethlene (SRPE) Pipe 11/13/2015
33 46 00 Subdrainage 12/20/2012
33 46 01 Slotted Storm Drains 07/01/2011
33 46 02 Trench Drains 07/01/2011
33 49 10 Cast in Place Manholes and Junction Boxes 12/20/2012
33 49 20 Curb and Drop Inlets 12/20/2012
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 5 of 6
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
33 49 40 Storm Drainage Headwalls and Wingwalls 07/01/2011
Division 34 - Transportation
34 41 10 Traffic Signals 10/12/2015
34 41 10.01 Attachment A Controller Cabinet 12/18/2015
34 41 10.02 Attachment B Controller Specification 02/2012
34 41 10.03 Attachment C Software Specification 01/2012
34 41 11 Temporary Traffic Signals 11/22/2013
34 41 13 Removing Traffic Signals 12/20/2012
34 41 15 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon 11/22/2013
34 41 16 Pedestrian Hybrid Signal 11/22/2013
34 41 20 Roadway Illumination Assemblies 12/20/2012
34 41 20.01 Arterial LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 20.02 Freeway LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 20.03 Residential LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 30 Aluminum Signs 11/12/2013
34 41 50 Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable 02/26/2016
34 71 13 Traffic Control 11/22/2013
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
Appendix
GC-4.01 Availability of Lands
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
GC 4.04 Underground Facilities
GC 4.06 Hazardous Environmental Condition at Site
GC 6.06.D Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance
GC 6.07 Wage Rates
GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities
GC 6.24 Nondiscrimination
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
END OF SECTION
09 4� 43
I5A1'- Hlll YEtOYL]SAL
Page 1 0l']
SECTl�N 00 42 43
❑��eloper Awarded Projeets - PRdR�SAL F�RM
tJNIT PRIGE BiD
Bidder's Applicatian
Yrnjcct Item Ir.fnrmatinr. f3idder's 1'ruposal
Sidl'istlt�m �riptian Speceficaiian 5ection Llnit af Bid unit Price BiH Value
Na. No. Measure Quantety
NIT I: WATER iMPR VEMENT
1 024] .] 118 4"-12" i'ressure Ylue 02 41 14 ER 4 $75�.QQ $3,�00.0Q
2 31�4_O10] EmhanEcment hi Plan 31 2� €lQ CY 558 $5.04 $3,348.0�
3 3125.0141 51�4'PPP � 1 acre 31 25 Oa LS 1� $7,a�aD.aO $7,504.0❑
4 33d5.0 ] a9 Trcnch 5afd� ]3 OS 1p LF 5052, $2.flQ $10,104.�0
5 33U5.1003 20" Casin�! S�� O en Cut 33 US 22 LF 3�� $1 SD.O� $5,40a.0❑
fi 3311.�0� i Du�tile Iron Waler Fittines wl Restraant 33 1 1] 1 TON 7.97 $SA�D.�9 $39.850.00
7 33] 1.OQfi1 4" P�rC Water Pi e 33 17 12 LF Sfi $36.�0 $3,496.4q
8 3311.OI61 6" P�'C 1Vater Pi e 33 11 12 LF 1 U7 $46.�0 $4,922.00
9 3311.U251 8" DIP Waler 3311 1U LF 43 $54.p� $2,752,�fl
1U 331 I.O�C�! $" PV� WaterPi 1:s 11 12 LF 126 $54.pQ $6.8fl4.q❑
11 331 1.�3G1 ] U" PVC �V�ttr F3 �e 33 17 ] 2 L� 94 �66.(30 $6.204.OQ
�2 3311.U4�1 i2"I]IPWater 311110 LF 1769 $112.I�D $19$,128.00
j$ i31 � R�1�7 12" I]IP �ater, CLShi i3ackfill 33 11 1U LF 325 $"��2.� $42,90a.�0
14 +;1 I�]�1{� 1 12" PVC WaLcr Pi �c `� + 11 12 LF 2d42 $96.�0 $234,432.�a
15 331 1 i]-iG7 12" PVC Water Pi e, CLSMDackfiu 33 91 1� LF 60 $116.D0 $6,960.00
�fi �31�0[ltil F'ireHtidra�it 3� ]240 EA 7 $4,500.Q0 $31,50�.q�
17 ??E?.f�1[7 L'omlcc�iontoL•xis' �4"-12"Waterivlsin 331225 EA 2 $1,444.64 $2,444.�4
18 3312.20031"WaterSen•ice 331210 � 2 $�,25a.aQ $2,3flfl-�fl
19 3312.21U3 1 112" Water 5civice 32 1216 EA i $�,0��.�0 $2,aao.aa
20 3312.2203 2" L4'al�r 5crvicc 33 12 l�7 �A 2 $2,500_QD $�,OQO.aO
21 3312.3002 fi" {iale Vrih•e 33 722� EA 8 $1,250_DO $1�,OOQ.aQ
22 3312.3443 R" Ciaie Valve 33 72 2q EA 3 �1,554.04 $4 654.40
23 3312.3U0� 12"CiateVah+e 331Z2b EA 9 $3,aaa.00 $27,OOa.�O
cnY vF �osT waxra
STANl7�ViTl CON5'1 HlACIION SPECC1k77CA1 f 0 V bQCti�IF?1T5 -DEl'FLOPER AW.IRDE[1 PRdJ LC'1 S
Pmm V�nS i u n May n, Zn 19
COFVJ B i d Pn�posel Form
on aa s3
DAP - $m �NxONOS.hI.
Pa�c z nf3
SECTION D� 42 43
be�ebperAwarded Prajects - PROPdSAt FOFihA
UNIT PR1GE BID
Bidder's Application
E'rojecl lt�m infarrnatiun Bidde['s Yrnposal
BidlistIt�u S�tcification Scctinn ifnit nF Bld
�o Descriptian �;n. Mcasurc C�uantity Unit Price Hid Value
NITARY SEWER IMPRQVEMENT5
� U241.22D3 Remti�e 4' Se�•er �fanholc .i72 dl 14 EA 1 $9,5��.40 $9:500.Od
2 ;301.C10{12 Pnst-CCTV Ins:�ection 33 O1 3l LF 4,334 $4.00 $17,33fi.00
3 33�1.[1101 Manh�le VaCuum'1'Cstin� �33 �I3D EA 21 ��0.44 $4,24Q.Q4
4 33D5.0109 Tnneh Safe+� I33 05 ]p LF �,334 �3.0� $13 Ob2.00
5 3305.QI13 Trencli Wntzr S s 33 US IS EA 73 $4�0.0� $5,2Q0.00
8 ;305. ] 003 20" Casins± 8�� en GY�t 33 d5 22 LF 90 ��o.oa �22,�ao.00
7 33[]5.3[][]2 8" 5ei��er CarrierPi e 33 {}� 24 LF 1aa �8fl.0a $9,04Q.D0
8 3331.4115 8" 5ew�r['i.e 33 31 7U,3� 31 12, LF 1,648 $68,04 $111,928,40
8 3331.4115 8" 5ewer Pi e. C:SS BaA.kF13 33 f 1 i�], 33 31 12, LF 44p $�5.00 $34,32D.dd
1Q 3�� 1.99�19 S" Sewer Pi �e, D Tranc� Bacld`�Il 3; 11 1D,33 31 i2, LF 2,145 $718.�0 $253,�84.�0
'11 333i1.0003 Lihcr- 4' Sc�verll�iH 33 3960 VF 275.3 �3$5.0� $105,99Q.50
12 3??�+.IODI 4' A�anhaIe }-3 39 I6, 33 39 20 EA 19 $A,Sfl�_04 $85,5�Q.00
13 3339.140Z 4' 1?ro Manhalc 33 ;9 1 Q, 33 39 20 ER Z �5,504.00 $1 1 U�0,00
�4 3�3�),1003 4' Exua I}e ::th �Izuiliole 33 a9 1 a 33 39 20 VF 242.3 $995_00 �$7 248.5q
� 1T 1: ANITARY SEWER IAAPR YEMEN7 573Q,1S9.4D
cirsr aF �oxr waxrr�
STANDARn L'ovsnx:'r'non sYH Ci i�iChT10N DPCL'h�MTS - nF VELBPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Yn�r: �'ersinn ylay Z2, 20l A COFLV Sid Prepnsel Ferm
Oq d2 43
Ii,iP - B� PRQPOSAL
panel nC1
$ECTIDN 04 42 43
de�elaper Awsrded Prvjects - PRDPOSAL FORM
L]NIT PRICE BID
6ic�der`s Application
Prnjcct ilem Informaiion SiddePs Proposal
B�diist Item SpecificatFon Scaion Unit of Rrd
I]escnptinn UniiPriae Bid Value
�Io. �In. Mcasure Quantity
Bid 5ummary
UIVIT I: WATER IMPRflVEN[�NTS �660,�50.I
�.._......._...........�...�..._..... -- ---- ---
lJNli I I SANITRRY SEWER IMPRQVEMENTS _ �� �734,189.�
Total Codstructioa E3id
This Sid is submitted b}• ihe en[ety named belnw:
BIDDER:
['UnaE�er C'un.strsii�t#4ttTiC, I...Y
532?}YiChifa SF.
Fort W'nr-th,'1''{ �Gitl
Cuniractor akrees to eomplete WORIi fnr F1tiAI. ACCF.PTA3['E within
Cq1iRACT cvmmences ta run srs provided in the C;eneral C'aud�[ions.
Rl': 8rxi� Huggins
��l�w.�'
TlT[,E: ire5idt�ti
bA'fF.: ��— �.s— f��
EIYD DF 5F.CT1O1V
�t7r nr FOR7 wnRr��
t'rn ry t�n a� f CO vs'Cx [: r'ri0 v sPFC. il'ICATIO V I]OC1JMEtJT3 - dEVEL+OPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Fom} Yersion ],tn;• 22, Zn] 9
� norking dAys a1Yer [he date when the
CDFW Bid Pmpacal Form
flOAS]2
d14P p[7kA21JA[.JhZCAI�fON STAI�rMr:1Ci
Page 1 qf 1
SFCTIflI�i 4� 4S X2
DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEIVIENT
Each Bidder is rcqeaire� to �omplete the infarmation below by identifying the prequalified contractors
andlor subcantractors rwhom they intend ta utilize for the majvr work type(s} listed. In the "Maior Wark
T��pe" hox �rovide the �ompletc major work nne and aotual descriptian as pravided b�' the W�r
p�artment for water and s�wer and TPW for paving.
�Vlajor Work Type �onir�ctarlSubcor�traet�r Company ]+Iam� Prcc�ualificalion
Ex iration Date
V4'ater I�istribution, Cc�natser ConstruGtiosi T�, L.P. ���'� 7!�'
Development. 1 ?-inch di�neter
5c• C X, L.Y 1U.�31f2�
De� _._ . -_ _--�
sfnailer
The undersigned hereby certifies that the cantractors andJor suhcontra�tors deserihed in the table abowe
are currently prequaIified for the wark types listed.
BIDDER:
C'���iatser C',oi7struct�at� 1?i._ L.Y.
53�7 Wichita Sfrcet
Fort Worth, TX 76l 19
BY: 13rack Hu�ains
/�.:- -
a',. ,
TI'I'L�: President
bA7'�: 1111812021
�n o� sE�Tiarr
C1TY OF FORT WORTH oaa512 PrequalificaHonSta[ement 2D15 QRR.dau
STAItl oAR� C DNSFR U GTI ON PH E4U N I F ICATION STA7EMEFCi-- hF V FL p pFH A WAA�E D PROJ E CT$ Certe� PsrR F a st Phase I I I& I V
FOrm Versivn Septemtler l, 2a15 CPftl 102908
004526-t
CON"IRAGTO�i COhiPT.iANCF. WiTH WC7RKF.R'S COMPF.NSAT'�[}N LAW
Page 1 uf ]
i SECTIOI�i QD 45 26
2 CDNTRACTOR C�MPLIAhiCE WITH W�RKER'S COMPEhiSA'I'I�N LAW
3 Pursuant ta Texas Labar Code Section �t�d.�9G(a), as azr�ended, Cont�actar certi�es that it
4 pro�ides worker's compensatio� insurance co�erage far all af its emplayees employed on City
S Froject No. lOZ8U8. Cantractor further certifics that, pursuant to Tcxas Labor CQde, Section
6 4Ufi_�9b(h), a� amended, it wi I1 prn�7idc tn City its suhcontractor's certificatcs of compliance with
7 worker's cnrnpensation cn�erage.
8
9
1D
21
1�
13
14
Z5
1 fi
i�
18
19
20
21
az
23
24
CONTRACTUR:
•.�sti- �� � * ' � :.L�. ■ _/� a
_ '
..
� r'
�. 1 _■ � � ' �� ,.. 1.
+: •�
.„ .
� W�� , l-7C � io l l q r['�tle: � --
�ityJStaiclLip (Please Print)
TI-�E STATE OF TEXAS
CaLTNTY DF TARRANT
§
25 BJ:F'�HF. MF., the undersigned authority, on this d�y personally appeared
2G �jC�1L �L�I�I�n'� . known to rne to be the person whose narne is
27 subscribed to the fare t g instrument, and eknowledged ta me that helshe executed the same ss
28 the act and deed af for tho purposcs and
29 considerati�n tf�erein expressed and in the capa�ity therein stated.
34
31
32
33
34
35
3G
37
38
39
GIVEN UNDER MY I�AND ANU SEAL OF OFFICE this � day of
�.1�sU�m �, � , 2��
� .
R� ��, KAMRA H�FRIG Notary Nublic in an f#h S te of Te�s
Sf�'- 6
6 ' r
s� Nasary PubtiC 5taac of Tcxaa
*� � '�:
y., � ,'� Comm. ExpincsU61k5f20�3
*� �. �£* No� �n �� a� 3 � az-� rrn oF s�cT�o�v
C:[ i Y U h FUHI W OHl H Carter Park �ast Phase III &: 1Y
STANI]ARTS C€3145TR[1CTIpN SPF.C[FICATI(]N D(H:[fA9FNT5 CPhi 1028p8
Revised ApriE 2, 2Q14
100
oosza3-z
Dcveloper Ati►�ardcd Prajcct Agreement
Page 2 of4
37 Article 4, C�J�iTRACT PRICE
�8 Developer agrees to pay Cont�ractor for performance of the Work in accordar►ce with the Cor�tract
39 Documents an amount in aurtent £ur�ds o�QNE MYLLIDrI THREE HiTNDRED NINETY
40 THOUSAND TWO HUNDR�D '1'�1I�7'Y NINE DOLLARS AND ZERO CENT5
41 ] 390 239.QU .
42 Article 5. CUNTRACT DOCiJN��NTS
43 S.1 CONTENTS:
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
S]
52
53
54
55
56
57
5B
S9
64
6i
62
b3
G4
65
66
67
G8
d9
74
71
72
73
74
75
,4, The Contract Dacuments which co�nprise the entire agreemant between De�elaper and
Cantractor concerning t'he �VUork consist of the fol lowing:
1. This Agreernen#.
2. Attachments to this Agreement:
a. aid F�rna (,A,s prnvided by De�elaper)
1) Proposal Form {DAP Version)
2) Prequalification Statament
3) State and Federal doauman#s (pro�ect spQctfe)
b. Insurance ACaRD Farm(s)
c. Payznent .�and (DAY Version)
d. ParEar�r�ance Bond (DAF V�rsion)
e. Mainte:�ance �or�d (T�AP Version)
�: Power of Attorney fer the Bonds
g. Worker's Carnpezasatinn Affi�avit
h, MB� andlor S�E Commitment Forrn (If r�quired)
3. Standard City Creneral Conditions of the Constn�ctifln Contr�at for Develaper
Awarded Projects.
4. Supplementary Canditions.
5. Specifications speoifiaally made a park of the C�ntract Documents by attachment
or, if nat attached, as incorparated by referenee and descr�bed in the Ta'ble of
Cattten#s afthe Project's Cantract D�cume�ats.
�. I7rawings.
7. Addenda.
8. Documei�tation submitter� by Conrractar prior to Notice af Award.
9. The fvllawing which may ba delivered vr issued after ihe Effec#ive 1]ate af the
Agreement and, if issued, become an incarporated part n�'the Cantract Dacun�aer�ts: .
�. �ioticeta Proceed.
b. Field Orders.
c. Change Orders.
d. Letter af Final Acceptance.
CIT'Y Or FORT WORTH Cartar Park �st Rhesc 11I 8c IV
STANDARD CONSTRiICT7DiV SP£CIPICATION DOCUMENTS — DEV6LUPER AWA�I.7�D PIt0.1EC"£5 CAN ]02808
�evised ]une 16,201b
d0 52 43 - 3
�7evelaper Awardad Prajcct Agreernent
Pagc 3 of4
76 Article 6. INDEMNIFIC�I►TIQN
77 b.i Co�tx'act��' covenant� �nd agree$ to indeulnify, hoId harmless and defend, at i#s own
78 eapense, the city, its ofiicer�, servants and empluyee$, from and again�t an�' and all
79 claims ari�Eng out o�', or all�ge[� to s�ri�e out of, the wark and services to be performed
SO by t�e cantr�ctor, its at'ficers, �gents, em�lo�ees, subcaatractors, licenses ar in�itees
S� under tbis canfrsct. T�is iudemnificatiou ror�isiau� is s eci£�call � intended ta o er'ate
82 and he effective even if it is alle ed or roven that alE ar some of the da�a es bein
83 sought were caused�in whole ar iu pari, bv ant� act, amissipn or ne¢li�eace of the cit�.
8� Thi� indemn'tty provision is intended tu include, without limitatEo�u, inde�nnity far
85 C46�B, ��pe48eS aad [egsl fee3 incuYred b�y thB C1Ey i11 de�e�dli�g against Such Clai�1� Arid
86 cause� af actions.
87
88 �.2 Cont�actor covenants and agrees ta inc�eunai�y a�nd �aKd harmless, at i#a own ex�,ense,
89 the c,t�, its officcrs, servan#s and employees, from aad against any and alt loss, d�rnage
9� ar destruction af property of the city, arising au# af� or allegeci to arise out vf, the work
9l and services tu be perforrned by t�e cunt�ractar, its officers, agents, e�p�uyeea,
92 subcankr�ctars, licensees or invitees under this contract. �l�as indemnification
93 pravisio�. is apeci�icallv fnte�uded ta onerate and be ef#'eetive even if it .i.s_. alle e�
94 roven tLat all or sanne of the dama es bein snu hr v�crc ca�sed i� wbo�e ar in ant
95 �v aov act, omassian ar ueQli�eace af tb�_ c�•.
96
97 A�'#icle 7. MISCELLANE�US
98 7.1 Terms.
99 Terms used in t�9s Agre�m�nt are defined iri Article I af the Standard City Candi#ians aF
i0� the Constr►actinn Gontract fvr DeveEvper Awarded Projects.
lUi 7.2 Assignment ofContract.
102 This Agreemertt, including all of the Cantract Dacuments may not be assigned by the
103 Cnntractor withaut t�e advanc�d express writter� consent of the Developer.
144 7.3 Successars and Assigns.
l05 Developer and Contractor each bands irself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal
106 representatives to the other party heretn, in raspec# to a!� covenants, agreexnents and
1U7 obligatinns cantain�d in tha Contract Documents.
t p8 7,4 Sev�rability.
]09 Any pravision or part of Ehe Contract Documents held to be unconstitutianal, void ar
110 unenforceabla by a court of campeten� jt�risdiction s$all be dee;ned stricken, and alf
111 remaining pra�isians shall con#inue to be valid and binding upon DEVEi.DPER a�d
112 CaNTRACTQIt.
113 7.5 Gaverning Law and Venue.
114 Tktis Agreement, including all of the Contract Dacurnents is perf'armable in the �tate of
115 Texas. Venue shall be T�tr�1t Coutttyy Tex�s, Qr the LJnited States District Cburt for the
116 Northern Dist�ict of'�ex�s, k'ort Worth Division.
�a�-Y UF FUFLT WSJki7-1 Carter Park �asl Phase IIl &[V
5'rANnaR� CUr��'I`1tiJCT10N SFECEFiCA"FfON DQCUMENTS — DEVEL(?P�R AWARi]ED PRUJECTS Cpi�i 102$OS
Rcvised 1um l6, 2D16
405243-4
17evclnper Awarded Project Agreement
Page 4 of 4
1.17
1 I8 7.6 Au#Hority to Sign.
119
124
121
i22
123
1�4
125
]2b
Cantractar shall attach evidence of autharity to si�n Agreemen#, if other than duay
�uthori�ed signatory of the Contractor.
lN WITI�IESS Wi�ER:�OF, Develaper �nd Cor�txactor have exe�uted this Ag,�eeznent ir► multiple
cauntetparts.
This Agreement is effecti�e as afthe Iast date signed hy the Parties ("Effective Date").
Contraatar. De�eloper: �arter Park East J.,az�d, T,i.�
C`tY1�#'S�1�Cf�t"L�`IYl�1C�iC�'1�� b: Carter East Investor L.L.C. its n�ana in nnenaber
• ��
B : By:�
(Si�, re) � {Signature)
����, CL�Ji 1� �' Matthew E. Colter
( rip� n�Narne) (Printed Name)
7'itl�: {���' Tit�e: Vice �'resident
Campany Narrie: Carnpany name Carter East Investor, L.L.C.
Address: �,���y�[.tjC�fi]:,L.p Address: 3819 Maple Ave.
•� �� 1 � � �
CitylStai�JZip_ �}��,�Z{pJ (C� CitylState/Zip: Dallas, TX 75219 _
'1►jlBj�, _. _.
nace
12i
,�
<<C�al�� __
X?ate
�f . ,
CIT'Y OF FDRT WOR'E7�# Carter Faric Esst Phssc Ili & IV
STANI?ARI3 CONS'i'ItUCT[ON SPEC3FICATiOIV IiOCUM�..NTS �- DEVLLOPEI� AWARDED PR4JECTS CPIV 142806
Revised June l6, 241b
Bvnd No. 0�42714
iui r,� 1 ± - I
!'1.Rf r1R�I�tiL'f; [3SatiIJ
F;i�t' I r4l�
SECTiO;r' Uq 6a y3
�ERF�RMA�'CE SU�❑
� TNF 4TATF OF TE�Ld.� $
' § Ii1VUV4� ,#�LL 8Y THESF, PRESENTS:
� C()[iNTY UF TARRAh'T §
I h,il �1.�. ConatserCQtlSfCUCtiDr1 TX. L.A. . k1ldlLil �5
8 "Prli��ipal" li�r�in a�Sd B�rkley insurance C:onipar�y T , a corpo��te
9 surei�-{si:reties. if'nzore t�ait vn�) dul} autttnrized �n do husinrss i�� the �tate nf"fexaa, Ecnn��t� as
I U "SUrel��" hei�ir� {t.-liethz�• on� Ur r�lor•e), are l�el� anc} frmlt� hnund untu �f�e Dc�=eldper, Carter
I I Park �ast E.and, LLC, a4ftl��rized tu dp husit�ass in 'I`zxas �'`D�veivper "j a�a� the Cits� nf Fvrt
l� 1�'nrth, a ieYas ntttnicipal corporativn �..Cihr„�. in xhe pena] surn at: Qne Million Tl�r�� ��ur3dr�d
1� i�64i�et� 'Cnousand ����0 1-iundr4d Thirtti=�iin� Uollars and �crcr Cerrts � 5l .340.2;�3.Oa3. 1a�v�u1
1� rnonev �ff"tl�e CJ��it4d �tates, ta be �aid in Fe�rt 1h�ortFi. �"arr�nt Cauntp. "rt�xay fariE�e p�3•�ncr3t af
15 ��vhin�t 5um t� e1 ] ar�d truly �o be rn�de E�intl}� unto [he fle�relt�p�r ait� ti�e Cit}� �s dua3 �bli€ees_ �.�e
IG Ylltit� t}lll'SCIL'i5_ Clut' Fl�ii`S, eYecutors, a��niciistratai�s, s�i�cess��z•s ai�d assi�ns, iointty ans� sev=�raliti�.
17 fErmf�' [,�� �he�e prea�nts.
�S WHEI2EAS, De�°�loper ancl �'it�• harr enter�� inf❑ an �s�re�t�tent #'ar the canstrti�cti�n oF
1�3 co«7znun�i�- far���tics 's�i ;l�c Cit� ai' Fc�M lh'c�ri3i 1�F ai�si tl�i�tau�lt a Cat�tmu��itti� (=a�iiiti�s
?p �1�reernen#, C'FA h�un�bcr 3l-01? l: tsnd
�� VkHFRF.A4. ihe ���in�ina] Izas �:�itered snt�� �a ce��t�in �3�riuLn c��z3ua�t ��itii the D�t��lnper awarded
?? rl��: 1$ �a�- ot� Navernber ,�U �1 .«�ir� C'ontract is hereby' referred ta and made a
'�� part herzn#`fc�r ail piir��oses as if fuil7� s�t tarth h�r�ir�. t� �urnish all materiafs. e�uipm�erst labar
2�i and ather accesssaries detined �ir- law_ it7 the p�oser:ittinn izftli� �iork. ineludi�i� an� Cilar��,�
�� C7rders. as �roti�ided f`or in said C'art�razi designat�d as �I�:�T��2 �l.l'D SE�i'ER l�.fPlitJ[ ;�;f•IE'�'T
.'.G TC} ��F_Ii'�rE C�RT�'1Z Pr1RfC E.�f.SrPF1.�f ��' III � IF`.
'?7 NU�V', THERE�'ORE, tl�e conditivn ot'tiiis obii�:ation i� ;uch tl�at if tlie said Principal
�'S sl�All fa�ithfullv perfar�r� it obfi��ati�i�s undfr ti,e Cantrac� and slialE i�� ail r�sFxrt; dui� ar�d
?9 f�itltiiull}• pert€}r�7� tl�e 4L�«rk. iz��Iu�in� C�1an�e QF�ers_ llnt�eP tli� Cc?nfraCi, accordin�, to tl�e pla��s_
:p 5})eGi�i��tipns, and Loniz ��tt c�n�uments iher�in r�ferred tn. and as r�ell d�ri�3g �ny° perind af
+l �xt�nsi��i u1 t�e Contract ifiat zz�a�° hz �:rar7t�c� on th� part aFt�e I]e►-tla�er ���d1vr Citr-. t#�zn t�t��
�? ql�fig�tit�n shali i�e ttnd bec�me nufl and r�a�id. nti�en�•ise t� r�maitt in tuil tt�rce and etfect.
�i'I'Y [)!� i'i,7lt"I 1�'UH'lli C'ar[cr Parf: I:uxt E�asrli! � IV
���*�rt�.hxncrt� c�c��n��i�y�s-��t:��t�.�.«rr•.n �v�.�nnr�i��n�c�t�c�rs �•r� �cr+ac,K
lirvixJ Fmnuan = 1 _ _^f] k_`
ilfl f�? I i . �
iti}..nl {7Rtii.�l\L�lif�[ltii)
I�ug� � �+P�
�
,
PRU�3tl�D FUIt'I'HE�, tl�az if an�• lz�a! a�Eipn be fried on tf�is Bnnd. �-enue sl��!! lie ir�
�I��rr�nt Cou�zt}. � exa5 orthe United States Qistrirt Ccfur� f'or the Nurthr;rt� i3istrict �t Texas. FoR
3 1�l'c�rth �i��ision.
� 'C��is �ond i; �zlad�and r�te�ute� in ca�n�liance ��ith the }�rovisi�ns af C1��pter''�S3 o1�zh�
� "i 1:�a5 GUL'eYi3I31C37[ CO��. cZS �117�f1i��d. fli1L� RI I{I�ib1IlI1C5 Otl [I115 L7(]ttC� Shc��I h�' [�@[CI'[Ylt[iPC� Iil
6 accoi�dat�ce ►�,�i�h the prr�i=isinns ofsaidstatue.
7 iN WiTNESS WHER�OF, tlte Principal and the Sur�t�- }�a.-e Sii"rh'�.i] a�zd SFALEd
8 this i�,str�ticr��ilt b�• dt�lti• autliori��d as�ef�ts and nI ticers on rliis th� _ 1 S da� af
�� Navernber . ?� 2� .
lU
!i
1?
1;
!�
Z5
I C+
!7
I$
�9
,�
�j
�'
?;3
��
��
�G
��
�g
?g
33
��
i'�
;t-}
i�
3G
37
38
:�
��
�F
.i?
�tz
4-1
��
��
�7
A8
.�TTEST •
���,���
{�'ri�ui�aa�] 5ecre�
�L'its��ss as ta Prii�cipal
- -�r'f
!_ �'_��
'� ttnes,s as tn S►irrt�
PRI�CiFAL�
Conatser Canstrvction TX, L.P.
f3} : ����
5i�nait�re
lirac�C Hu����ins. 1'residerit
�altie ai��E i'itle
.�ddress: 5327 LVichita St.
-�� .It V4'orth Tj� 7�119 _,_w,
S[;R�."f'S',
l3erkle� Insurance Cnmpan�
83`: �C �.� �- - ----
5i�nat�zre
Ro�bi lUloraies, ,'�tic�rncy-in-fact
4�me 2nd Titlz
Address: �0051:H.] i-'reewa.., Sui#e 1500
T)allas_ TX 75244
7'elepi�ane ?�aimber 2l �#1989-DQQU
*�ote: tf si;:�3ed br� an o#fi��r ai' �he Surzt�� Cai���an�•. ihc�-e �3�ust be on tiit � c�r�tifi�d z�trart
from the bs--latiss sha�,in� t��a1 thi� pe��sqn ha� authoritti� [t� si�n su�h ohfi�atio3�. Tt`
SLllti\"�S �7�14'tii[:�1� i1{i�l"L'SS i5 d]�EPQi"iI �fD771 li5 IT711i1€]� aaC�T25�. �Uill fi1L15i �7C j7i01'If�Cd,
The date E�t`ihe bnnc� shc�li not b� prior to the date th� Contra�t is an�arded,
C'! fY (1F F[ ]R'i' �l'[ll�'C!f C'ancr i'ark F.a�t Phacr 1� E�[G'
S'i':1\17nFtf] ('f"i'1' {•�7ti[73'1'Il7�S ��iYFl.i]P�:R A4'411fii]�1] i'H[,iJ��'i4 C�P\ 1[P_i;[1H
Re�izrJlanuan 3' �fit�
Band No. U2�2710
�
�
�
�
;
fi
7
R
9
lU
1�
S�CT.IU� QQ GZ t�
��v�rt��r go�a
t,���,_ i�- i
����rarr:�r E3�a�i3
�s�r I nr,
THF STATE C?F TF�A� �
§ K1�()SV ALI. �Y THESE PRESENTS:
CULitiTY fl�' TARRANT §
'�'��t ��•�. C:onatserCanstructi«n'T�,E..P. . known 3S
"F'riitiGipal"� E;erzE�i, aiici Lier[,le� Insr�rance C:nmpan�__ _. . a
�ar�aarat� si�r�tv [ or sui�eties if inore th�n O�tC}. LfLI�4' aLItI7�CIT�CI [t7 r�n L7L1titIliSS SI1 Clle �LBL� fYf
T�xas. kna�q�rs as "Suretw" herein ��►�h�ther onz or n��rel, arc: held �n�i tir«�l�� �nu�id u��to ih�
Dtv�ic,per, Cat-ter P�rk I:ast Larzd. L�,C, a��th��ziz�d to do bttsine5� i�i T�xas -`[L]e�•elop�r"). and
!� the Cic�• ot' �'or� 1�'oi�l�, a Texas mur,icipal ec�rpnra�iar� {••�it+..y. in the.�nal suc�� vfUne Miltion
�� T�rrcjr Nu�dt�:d i�iinet+ T�ivitsand Tv�°o Hu��ct�e� Thi�t�•-�'iiie �]a1lars and T.ero C�nts
I-t ���:;9�.'39.40a. la��-tul rnone.� vt the iJnited St�cc�. to hc �aid izi Fart Vl�Qrch, T'�rrant Cnunt��.
1S Texas. ��r the pa}��nent nf whi�h sum ■.eil and �ral)• be rr:a�fe jc�intlr� t�ntc, the []e�elaper and the
IG Cit�- as clt�a� �hli�ees, we l�i�d aursel�es, our heir5. e�rcutt�rs, adrni��istrators, su��essars arzd
i7 sssi�;i�s, jointir- ��id s�verntly, fr�nly br tiiese p��es�nts.
l$
� �)
7�
WHER�AS, D�t���ope�� and Cit�• ha�>� er�t�r�c� i�ita �n A�r�ernenc fnr th� canstructiar► �f
cotnEnunit�� taciliti�s ii� the C:it}• t��" Fott Vl+nrtft_ b�' aEid thavu�h a Cq�nmurzit} f��CCIEtk@5
A�r��m�i�[, C FA Number ?�-t] i'_ i: an�i
'�l S�HER�t+►S, Principai h�� �nter�d into a ccrtain r�I'ii[e� t'�r�tract `►+tl� D�elvp�r.
�� ar��arcied tt,e 18 day of _ Navember ,�U21 .•vl�icf� [:crnta-��t i� k�crc�a�'
+? rz%rred to and m�de a prxrt h�reo#� far al] p��rpases as if 4ir11� sct t�rth herein. ttx Fur�3ish alf
?� �na��rials. eyuipnnent. labor ai�d csth�r aCC�SSDr1�� as �e#ined by I��►�. in the prosecution of the
?.; �h'ork as p�•���id�d �'ar in said Cantract and d�si�=�tated as €�:FtTEl2 .-t,�D SEi�`ER
?G I.iIPk('3i'�1fE,1�T.s T[� SERErF. C:4RT�72 P.-fRl� E_�?.4T1'H-1.��: !!I c� 1��`.
'_7' :�1UV1`, THEREF�RE, "f�i�: CC]]�I3IT�C]3� Ql= THIS QBLIGATiQN is such t�iat i�
?8 �'rincipai si�ali pa}° al[ mnnies vr�rin� tv am� [and a11) pa}E�3ent bond benefciary� [as de�ined in
?�� C�lil�}l�i' �i�� O1'lhe Z`��s Gavernmen� Code_ ax amended) ii3 the prasec[itian aCthe 1�'c�rk und�r
?U thr L'o��tract t�i�n tltis ahli�a[icro s�ta�l b�; and be�ome null st�d �'�id: .otl�er►4�ise tn r��nain in �'uil
� ] force arzd effc�t.
CS'f}' [1i� F[ ]F�'1' L�'[]R'f'li L'ur�er �ark }=..�t P}i:ue fl[ � f�'
5'1`:�ti1]_�1kF7 tl"31- L'f3�i]fTllltS— F]k:l'!:1_[�PI:R r1�5;1Ri7Ei] Ni2UlI?t'1=3 ('i'� ][i.R[��
f{c�•�sed J�nupsti ? 1 's� f :
r�ri,'_]�-�
1'.1Y'-111:4"1' H[Y:�EI]
1'agL? ni'�
] 7liis b�nd is mad� and i��cuted in rnrc-:plia�tee u-ith tlie pc•c�� isicros afCha�tzr??�; nf the
: Te�s C`rcr�°eerrrne��t Cod�. as amended. �nd al! liahflitits ��� t�iis band sl�all t�e drt�rmin�d in
3 �ccordanr� ►vitli tN�e pm�9sions n��said stazute.
� 11V WIT�I�55'�i�HERF,U�', rhe I'��incip�! and Suret� 1ia��� each SiG�'�D aizd SEALEU
5 tl�is instru»rent h�- ct�4y� ae,thori��� n��errts a�id oi'firers on t��is ti�e �$ dati nf
� Navember . ?�21 - - - .
�
[i'rfiiCi�aaV)'ieCr�[a -
AT� �,ST-
�
1�1'itness as tv Prii��i}x�a�
A�f"i'L4T:
Pft I�C f i':'�[-_
Cona�scr C�ns�ru��ian'['X, L.P.
BY; _ ��
5i�nature
Brnck Hu��ins, President
;��177L' iSl�[j �it��
Address: 5327 1�'ichita St.
l�orl4Varth. I'Y 76119
St'R�T'Y.
gerkle� Insurancc Campan�
T3Y: �r+•r.�` 7'R?s�,�^
5ignature
� �C
4�urety Y 5��r�tat�
�' �/ _ F '�- ' �
�� t3; SS 1S #q .�iUi'�t�
8
9
1D
II
1?
i�
ia
l2obbi 149�ralcs, Attarney-in-ta�t
'`�arn� a�d "i'itle
Addre'ss: �U05 LBl Frc�wa�, Suitc 15b0
Dallas, I?C 75244
T�lephnne �fuinbei-: 1� 9$9-04UU
���t�: lY'4i�ned 1�y arl oEti�;�r pf'ti�e �uret��, tis�r;; ]Tlll$i he on tile � certitied exti,7ct fi-pn� ti1�
liylar�s s�ta«�in� tilat Llyis pe�•so� i�as auritcsrit�• t;� si��� surlt �71�Ii�a[iun. ti 5ui�et��'s pl3tisiral
address is dift'er�nt r'r[��n its i�iailin� address, �csti� i��ttst 6c prn�•ided.
The c#ate nt t�tc boz�ci ;Iz�li n�at he priol ta the date the C"ontra�t is a��•ard4d.
�:� a oF s�cT�a�
tl �}' [�F }�}��• ��t7Ft"i ff CaM�r Rark LiSt f'has� E][ � Ew'
tif.1'vi]•L1iF]i'I'CY('[1?Si]]'I'Z�7�S—IS1�Vl^.l.{7PF11Al�r1R.i]Lf7filL�df?C'I'S Ci'� 1�t:2S�ls{
R�t i�J l:utudn 31. 2Sf ��
Bnnd ���. 02427] U
�l�le,'ly-]
19�Ii�1l:�ili.�CIi R(7�1I]
1''s�c I pFi
I
7
i
�
�
G
7
8
4
s�:c�r��tv aa �z 1�
�+tAI}�'�E�iA�CE �d?�'D
THE STATE d� TEJ�A� §
§ K�TOV4' �,LL BY TH�:�E F'RESENTS:
C�i�NTY (3F TARRd�'T §
Th$t �v�_ Cana.tser Constr�sc�ior� TX. L.P. . kiti�t�'it as
"Pri:zripal" herein and l3er�Cley InSurance C'.nm�any _, � tU��1t'aC� SLli'�I�"
(se�reties, i f mare than onc) dizly autl-�c�riLcd tt� d� busii�ess i 3z the State at'Tex�ts, k�io���� as
ID "Sz�rety.' lie��ein (E4�hc�th�r c�F�e c7r a,�c�r�e]. arc 3ield and iir�nlv haurad unEo lhe i�����lnpei•. CarEe�'
i� l�ark �asi [_an�, �..LC.. autl�e�rired tsa di3 husin�tis in TexaS E"��'�'��{,���'"} and tiae CitE� ni`Fprt
i? V►'onh. a�f�zaas ���ur,icipa� corporativn (..Citt�'j. 117 iFl� SUIIi (1� ne t�iil2i�n i`liree H��ndr� Ni�et��
1; 'fPtousand Ttva I lundred ?'h�rt� -Nine Dalfars a3id Z�ro Cents '$1.3�0.339.Q0 �. lawfuf mo�j��- o#
ta the lJiiitad States. tn he paid in Fort lk�c�rih. Tarra��t Ct�unt;, `�'exas. for pa�inent t7f��l�fc}� st�m
�S ��ell arid tr�Efp �re �nade�nintly untn th� f]e�e�nper �3�d the C`i[y as du�l obfi�ees anc� their
1G
17
IS
f9
?U
��
successurs, �ve bind �urs�sEti�s ovr heirs, etecutprs, ad��ini�tra�ors, su��css�rs ut�d assigns, jointfy
anei ����trail��. ti�7�llt� t���these p��esents.
WHEHF..AS. �e�elapej• �nc� Cit�� lia��e cr�t�r�d into an Agr�ment tt,� tl,e �n��si��uct#on af�
C'8iI3[TEL]Tl![�' F�ICIEI�it'S ir3 rht �'ity of F�rt 1�arth b;• snd thrata�l� a C"o�nintir�it�� FaCil:ties
A�t'eer�'t�ni, CFA �fun�ber' I-0 i? I: �F�d
�? �'VHER�AS, the Principal has crirer�d into a certsin ivritte� crnnt�art �;�ith tf�e I]e�-efn�er
a� a,aa�cted ci�e �$_ cia. a November .?021 .��hic�l contract is
?4 1���-eh.- rr1'er�-e� to ar�d a n��de part lie�-eo!`fnr a�l ptErpases a5 ifful3t' set PUrth hereir�, iU fi�t'tlish afl
'_5 m�teriafs. �qutp�nent iabc�r and ot1Z�r accessor[es c�s ��tin�d �� �a�t', i�Z tlle proseeuiinn oiihe
�G �'ark. incEudin� ari� Work resulti��� 1'ront a�i�tlJ� aut}�nrizcd Ch�n�e 4rder (culic�t€r•el}• herein_
27 the "Vdvrl:") aa prvt�Eded for in said Cai�tract aEid desi�izat�d a� iT ffT`�'R :�17� .�F��'F.R
?R Il�f1�12[)[•E•�iE�'TS T� .�'ER���" C'�RT.ER P:1R1� E:4:ST PH-t.�E III c� !1'. anr!
2�
�v
�I
??
3Z
3�
�HE�Z�AS. Pl'.�r7Ci�aI hin�5 I[5����1p pSNSLl�.Ii 113r7tCl"fa�3 a�l� 1QSpCQ�75Ii'EiC[ �i]Q VV(1f�i li]
accorda�tce ��itIi the pinns, specifieations and C`��r�cracx I)ncum�nts tliat the 1�'t�rk is ans� ti�-ill
r�����in free frcar�� ciefects in materials or.�c�rkmanshF� t�]r and �urin� the �eriod c�l`h►� {2} y�arY
8t[�C Eii�d�te Uf�i-�na1 ACce�)lapCeO�t�3� VVnrk [��-tF�� C'�c�={�`11�Ipintenance Periad"); aied
C f'f'Y [ i i f P i[{ ! �4'S 1I2�-f [ ['ancr ��ari: �:a �t ��h.�,� i t« r t�
�;i:1.n:ai�r3r«�����k�nn'rc���-r�r,t����r�r��uncv,u��r�r�uo�r;��:s c��y� �c�4t�K
Elc+�x�u Jar�i�n 7 �?{71 �
fl�liv 11-�
°+4AI�7 �ti:t�L'E : F3i �;� lJ
t'a�c = at'�
� WHEREAS= Pri r�cipal bi»dA itself to re�air c�r r'rca��5tr�ict The 1�'nrk in t�•hnle or in �ai-1
2 upc�ai re4ei�in�muEice fi���n3 the i)e��eloperandlor �it,r• afti�e ne�el thereafat ���}'tizne within t31e
� ��aint4r�ans:� Pcri�d.
�
S 1��V4' THEIiE�'[]RE, t�i� �c�nditian of thfs obli�a[ian is such cl��� it Princi�a! sha�l
G re,n�cla� any def��ti�•e L�'ork, #QI' L1"�1iCf! [Iiti�I4' i}di4�� lL•'SS {7l'Dlr l(�� i7}' D�L'�IC]Fl@C ��' CiC��. tn a
7 c�,m�,i�tion satisfa4tory- �o th�: Cin�, ihrn [E�is abl�gat�t�n sf�alf becnrn� iiu�f ar�d E'nit?: ifthcrt�ise t[a
8 r�il�ain in f'uil tQ��ce and e�i'ecr_
fj
�[) PRQti'IDE�, HQW �VE�7„ if Prit�cipal s3ia1) #'2�i1 sta Ea re�air �}i- retonsti�ti�t aii}� tim�lr'
t� nntic�:d de�eczir�� V+'ork. i� is a�re�d [h�# the D�ti�:lap�r or Cit�• may caus� a�13' aiid g1Y such
I� detecti�e 'l�Fnri� ta b� repaired ar�d�or re��anstru�ted ►��ith al# assvciated costs [ltzreof l�eing hn�ne
13 h�° th� C'rincipas ar,�d the S�ret.- under #E�is M�i�itenarsce Aon[3: and
��
�� PRUVI�E�) �1sRTHE[t, t�t�t il"arz�� te�al act'sozl he filcd on this Band_ ��enue shafl lie i�i
16 'i'arrant C�}urit�•. �€'e.r•�ts Ur tiz� [�,�ited States l7is<<�icc Cnu�-t tt��- cl�� lvor�hern Dist:-ict �rt Tex�s. Fs��-E
�i �Y�OTi�i �1VISEi]ll; $llii
t�
I� �R�YYIlEO FiiRTH�R, that rhis a�ii�atiqn si�nl� �e ca�itinuaus irt naiure a�,�d
?U suese�site reco�eri�s rnay b� had hereo� �vrsurressy�e 6rcachcs.
��
��
��
i 17 Y i�[' I�C�RT l�'ni;'11 [ c�nu i�-�„� r�:�,,c rh:,� ra � sv
51 �4 V T]A RC) L' 1"t-�' L' l}\ [)!T[[ 1\� - i}!: V!"f .[]f'rR :11L� A fi[]f�[7 €�Ri ]li �C"I :5 ['P\ 1[32kiik
Re�'isrJ Janu;�n a i, 2 f] I_'
[.Wl d*3 k'� - 3
��n�ti�r�;�.�:�c�: r�t3�.'t1
Pa�c � �s�'?
1 Il�i Wli'1YE5S WHEH���. �l�e T'i�i�icipal �srzd the 5ure[�' h���e eacl� 5iC`�tiF:C7 atid SEr�[.�:0 this
�' instr�nn�t,t b�• dulti� autharized a�ents ai�d ntticers on this the 18 d��� of
� Navernber , v� 2� ,
a
1
�
7
8
9
i�
1�
t�
1.;
i.�
I5
iG
!i
18
19
�U
?�
��
�3
z�
�s
a{�
��
'��
�q
�iq
1 1
1E
�?
x3
3-�
;j
i�
�7
3$
39
�}4
a�
��
,��-r-�s•c�:
IL�.�Gr�r�—
{�rir3c;i�al� Secrztai_
—� `• �'--��.�
li�it��ess as [o Arincipal
a C"] �ST:
���� '
1�� _.._.---
�Sure Se� cta�y.
��/ � •�
1 t��ss as tU Surtty
P3�1'�'CIPAL:
Cnnatszr C'onscru�tion TX, L.F.
B1': ���
Signature
E3r�ck [ [u��ins, Yresideni
�arne and �'iti�
Addrass' �327 �Vichiia 5t.
ro�r ��•�3�rn. Tx ��1 t 9
5L i2�:'I'S'.
�3erkle� InSuraCtCC CAl11J�ari�
T33 ' �.��.�. �' '� �-r���
5i�natttrz
Robbi 11Roralrs, Aftorn�y-in-fact
'tiame r�iid T'itic.
rlddress� 5{l(15 LBJ Freewa�. ; Suite � 5�0
Da11as_ 'I'3C 75244
T�leph4�pe;tiu�n�er 21Ar'J89-UUi]0
*Nt?Ee: it signed i��' an atficer c�t' [h� 5ur•et�• Cc+f���nn�•, th�r� r�lust h� or1 ti]e a tet-titied <�tra�t
Irc�n� [I7P �1'—Id�15 S�tpL�'1ni? that t}3is persnn 1�as authorit}° to si�n si�ch cs�iii�acini�, lt'
5urt[}'`s p���°sical nddress is diTferent fr��m its nzai�in�,address, bo�13 �a�ust lsc pr�vide�,
'C�ie da�te t��the t�ni�d s1�af � i�ot hi: �riar ta t�e �fate the Contraet is a��'ard�d,
C!'1'Y[]I� F[.TRT 1�'flH'I'I I L'dtterl�ark l��st f�!►�sr III � �l'
4'I'.1\f]ARp�)7'1'C'c.]tif7fTtllti�—L3f'4"C'.I.$)�rRAL�ARf}I"C] PitC}.li:t"E'� C'}"v I[}�tU�s
Iic� iscrl J�u»pr� i 1�(31 �
POWGR Ot� ATT�R��Y
E3l�:IiKi1FY I�fS[:RA`C��: C:Q�'IPr��Y
WiI.Mi�C'�TC]N, DEi_.��44�:hRF�:
Na, BI-?28Uj-el
'_�IQ'�'ICE: The wamin� fnund elsei��here in #his Power of Attvrney af#ects th� valid�t4 thereof. �lease reviewcaretu�ly.
KN[31�i� AI.L MEN SY THES� PRESENTS, t�at €3ERT{i_FY i7VSi:k.�NC'F. C'C]�4f'AIVY (t�e "Company"), a carparation duly
or�anizcd ae�d �:xisting under tfi� la��s of tf�e 5�ate af Delaware, hdving its principal Uflicc in Cireentivich, C'"I', has niade, c�nstituted
and appointed, and does hy these pre��iils mak�, con�titute and appoix�t: Ric•urrlo .1. Reynta; Dnn .E C'or�aell; Snpl�i�ie �Iunter;
Rob$i :'4�urrrle,s; fCelly A. Westhrook; �'irra :'l'IcEwran; .Inshua A. S'aeenders; ar Tuni� Yetrunek of Aon 1�isk ,Services Sautlewest,
Inc, oJ' 13nILr�s, T�i its true and lawl'ul Attarnew-ir3-Fact, to sign its ri&me t�s Surciy nnly as delineat�cl helo.� arsd to execute, sea�,
ackno��lcd�e and de�iver any and ail hnn�s a7�d undertakings, with the exccption nf I�inancial Giiara»ty fnsurance, providing that
��n single nbligatinn shalf exceed Fi#'ty 1Rillian and UOIlUD L'.5. Dollars {i1.5.$50,DOd,aao.aa},tothe samc �xt.cnt as ifsuct� bn;id's
had b�cn duly exccuted and acknnwled�ed by the reeularly elected affir.ers of the L'ornpany at its principal of'fice in thcir c�wn
proper persons.
'l his F�ower nf Artorney shall i�e construed and enfarced in accordan�e ��•ith, and }�Uvomed by, thc laws of ihe State of nelau�are,
r.�•ithout gi�ing c#�cct to the principles of canflicts nf laus therzof'. This Pn��zr nf .Attorney is �ranted pursuant to thc fo�lowin�
resollitions which ��•ere duly �nd �alidiy adopled ai a mccting UCthc 13o�rd o£IJircctors af lhc L�ompany hcld an Januar� 2S, 2010:
RESUI,YF11�, that, v,�ith respect to the 5uret}�• business ��ritten hy I3erkley 5urety, ti�e C:hairman of the Board, C�tief
Excculi�c CJfficer, Pr�sident ar any Vice I'resident nf the C:nrn�any, in conjtin�tinn with ihe 5e�retary' ar any Assistant
�e�retary are herehy authpri7ed ta execute powers of attorney autk�oxizing and qualifying the attorn.ey-in-fact named therein
ta �xc�utc 6onds, ur�dertakings, reco�nizaiices, or ntl�er suretyship nhligatinns ❑n hehal£ of the Cnmpany, and ta afiix the
carparate seal of t�e Campany ta powers oF xliorney ex�cule:d pursuanL hcrciU; and saicl officeCs may Cemo�e �.ny such
xtt.nrnev-in-faot and revoke any po�rer af'attarrie}� pre�iousIy granted; anc� furtfier
12N:St7I.V H;ll, that suah pnwer flf attoz�ne�� li�nits thc aGts of thos:: namcd th�rein t.n ttte bonds, t�ndertakin�as, r�cngni7ance5,
or ottier suret��ship abligations spccifically nam�d th�rcin, and t�h�y have na authority �n hind the Cc�mpany cx�ept in the
manncr and tn tlze extent therein st.aied; �nd furtE�er
H�SOi�V�:ll, ihal such pow�r c�t attoz-ney z•cvak�s all previaus powers issued on bchalf a€the at#orney-in-fact ndmed; eu�d
furthcr
H}�:�U[.Vk:J�, that the signature of an� authorized afficer a�sd the seal ol'the Cnmpany �-r�ay be affixed by [acsirnile ta any
po�ier at'attorney or �ertifi�ation thereof'authorizing the exec�iti��n and delivery nf'any bnnd, undertaking, recagi�izance, or
other suretyship ab[igation nF the [:orripany; �rid su�h signalur� and �cal whcn so �isc�i shall havc thc sarnc fc�rce and effect as
lhough manually affixed. Thc CrampanW may �onli�lue ta use t�r thc purpases hercin statcd thc f'acsimiic si�nature of any
person or persons who shall ha�°� b�cn sucli of�iccr or officers af the C:om�any, not�vithst��ndicig tf;e fact that they may have
��ascd to hc such al the liar�e w�hen such instruments shall he issued.
iN WTINESS WHEREOF, t�e Coa�any has cettsed th�5e presents t�o be 5iqo�d aud 8ttested by its apgr4priate a£fc�zs 8x�d its
cor�oraie seai �erauc�#o a.ffixed this 2nd dag of June f�2020 .
�S�aA�,�F ACfCS� � B�rkl��� �nsurance Campany
� '� c.F`s°'t�'� C°3 '� �, - 8 ' � -` ✓
� 51'.:�I. ; y L' ... �dexmem y 3� � n atter ' I
m ' 1,�5 ,: ' . �
�.��, Ex�+e V�ice Preside.�t & 5ec:reiGary 5c ' z r� e �'residenL
SI'AT� OF CO.'��C�'XCiIT }
} ss:
COii�i'TY UF F�LD )
Swarn ta h-foxc �n.e, a 33Dtaxy Pl�lic in t}3e 5�S of Gbnn��� Y�s . 2nd day of J une . 2020 ��, try Ira 5. I,edar�naa
an� Jetfrcy M. Ha�es vrba ar�e sv�arn it� me t[� �e �c Exec�iit+e Vice Presidr.n .< � Sccretary, and ~�~ Senior Viee Presidcn�,
t ';# �
�« c r�tnu�se►� �� •
respecbivety, ofB+�']cy IttsutauGc Ca�npany. �7aRv auai ie '� �
cou�ecrec�rr ���',�f��[.- _ _ _._ ��e�,.�
A11� COA�'H6E.3�. 2024AIAE� .'��LLb�.1C, 5tate of Cofaz�eatiCut
�R�`I���
I, �e undersigazd, Assist�t Secro#ar5r vfBERi�SY FIvS�JItANCE CUMPANY, Da .HEREB�f CER'iI,F3C �at the #'ore�oing is a
true, r,orrect and camglete cogy af the orig}nal Power vf Attomev; thaY said PoVvct of Attorney �ss nat been revvi�eti or rascinc�d
ax� �h..: c;�� aurhazi[y of �1ae Artoxr►�y-iz�-Facr s�t fas�i tl�erein, u+��a ��cuted t}s� bagd c� urrdcr�k�u� ra wh��h tb:s I�ower of
.�r4i.��ki1N^� ns?�,ched, i� in �ull force and effeet as of thys date.
`� ;p�' �.r ��}`�: kr � ary �8.ud a�d seal af the C�mpauY, i�is �_____ day of
� si��1�. �, _
� i575 '� �,
�`�`� Vinetnt F. Forie
fMP�l�T►4NT NC)TICE
Zo obtarn inrtarrnatian ar rn�ke a c�mpta��t:
Yvu may cal� Berkley Surety GrQup, LLG and its afifil;ates by
telephan� for �nforrr�ation or tv make a comp�iaint;
BERKLEY SURETY GFtDlJP, LLG
Please send alf nvtices of claim on thts bond tn:
B��Kley 5urety Group, LLC
�86�] 7�8-3534
472 {Vivunt Kemhle Avenue, Suite 3'I�N
Mvrristow�, NJ �79fiQ
Atin: Surety C�aims De�ariment
Yvu may contact the Texas Departmen� of insurance to obtain
informat�on an campan�es, cov���ges, r�gh�s or �amptain�� a�:
7 -BOD-�5�-3439
Ynu may write the Texas D�partment �� Insurance:
P. �. Bax 'i 4�"! ��
Aus�in, TX 78714-9'��4
Fax: �51 �3 47�-'�7T 1
ll�feh: http_�Ivvww.�di_stat�.fx.us
E-m�i�: ConsumerPrx�tectiot�[a7tdi.st_at�.�.t�5
PREMIUM QR CLAIM D�SPEJTES:
Shvuld you have a dispu#e cancernxng yo�r p��mium or aboeat a claim
you shauld cantact yaur age�t or 8erkiey 5ur�ty Graup, LLC first. ��
the drs�ute i� nvt resvl�ed, yo� rnay contact the T�xas Departrn��+t of
inruran�e.
ATTACH THI� NOT1�E TO YbUR g��l�;
This notice is f�r informativn only and daes �ot hecame a part vr
�anditian c�f the a#tached docum�nt and is given #a camply wit� Tex2�s
iegaf and reguiatc�ry r�qu�terr���ts.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS
OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Article 1 – Definitions and Terminology .......................................................................................................... 1
1.01 Defined Terms ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.02 Terminology .................................................................................................................................. 5
Article 2 – Preliminary Matters ......................................................................................................................... 6
2.01 Before Starting Construction ........................................................................................................ 6
2.02 Preconstruction Conference .......................................................................................................... 6
2.03 Public Meeting .............................................................................................................................. 6
Article 3 – Contract Documents and Amending ............................................................................................... 6
3.01 Reference Standards ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents .................................................................. 6
Article 4 – Bonds and Insurance ....................................................................................................................... 7
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers ..................................................................................................... 7
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds ........................................................................ 7
4.03 Certificates of Insurance ............................................................................................................... 7
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance .................................................................................................................. 9
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace ........................................................... 12
Article 5 – Contractor’s Responsibilities ........................................................................................................ 12
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent ................................................................................................. 12
5.02 Labor; Working Hours ................................................................................................................ 13
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment ........................................................................................... 13
5.04 Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 14
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals” ....................................................................................................... 14
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors) ..................................... 16
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others ................................................................... 16
5.08 Wage Rates.................................................................................................................................. 18
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties ........................................................................................................... 19
5.10 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................................. 19
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas ....................................................................................................... 19
5.12 Record Documents ...................................................................................................................... 20
5.13 Safety and Protection .................................................................................................................. 21
5.14 Safety Representative ................................................................................................................. 21
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs ............................................................................................. 22
5.16 Submittals .................................................................................................................................... 22
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee .......................................................................... 23
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.18 Indemnification ........................................................................................................................... 24
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services .............................................................................. 24
5.20 Right to Audit: ............................................................................................................................ 25
5.21 Nondiscrimination....................................................................................................................... 25
Article 6 – Other Work at the Site ................................................................................................................... 26
6.01 Related Work at Site ................................................................................................................... 26
Article 7 – City’s Responsibilities................................................................................................................... 26
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals .............................................................................................. 26
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities ....................................................................................... 26
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program ............................................................................................... 27
Article 8 – City’s Observation Status During Construction ........................................................................... 27
8.01 City’s Project Representative ..................................................................................................... 27
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work .................................................................................................. 27
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work .......................................................................................................... 27
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed .......................................................................................... 28
Article 9 – Changes in the Work ..................................................................................................................... 28
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work ............................................................................................... 28
9.02 Notification to Surety .................................................................................................................. 28
Article 10 – Change of Contract Price; Change of Contract Time ................................................................ 28
10.01 Change of Contract Price ............................................................................................................ 28
10.02 Change of Contract Time............................................................................................................ 28
10.03 Delays .......................................................................................................................................... 28
Article 11 – Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal or Acceptance of Defective Work ...................... 29
11.01 Notice of Defects ........................................................................................................................ 29
11.02 Access to Work ........................................................................................................................... 29
11.03 Tests and Inspections .................................................................................................................. 29
11.04 Uncovering Work ....................................................................................................................... 30
11.05 City May Stop the Work ............................................................................................................. 30
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work ................................................................................ 30
11.07 Correction Period ........................................................................................................................ 30
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work ............................................................................................. 31
Article 12 – Completion .................................................................................................................................. 32
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title ................................................................................................... 32
12.02 Partial Utilization ........................................................................................................................ 32
12.03 Final Inspection ........................................................................................................................... 32
12.04 Final Acceptance ......................................................................................................................... 33
Article 13 – Suspension of Work .................................................................................................................... 33
13.01 City May Suspend Work ............................................................................................................ 33
Article 14 – Miscellaneous .............................................................................................................................. 34
14.01 Giving Notice .............................................................................................................................. 34
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.02 Computation of Times ................................................................................................................ 34
14.03 Cumulative Remedies ................................................................................................................. 34
14.04 Survival of Obligations ............................................................................................................... 35
14.05 Headings ...................................................................................................................................... 35
00 73 10- 1
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 1 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 1 – DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
1.01 Defined Terms
A. Wherever used in these General Conditions or in other Contract Documents, the terms listed
below have the meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof,
and words denoting gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter. Said terms are
generally capitalized or written in italics, but not always. When used in a context consistent with
the definition of a listed-defined term, the term shall have a meaning as defined below whether
capitalized or italicized or otherwise. In addition to terms specifically defined, terms with initial
capital letters in the Contract Documents include references to identified articles and paragraphs,
and the titles of other documents or forms.
1. Agreement - The written instrument which is evidence of the agreement between Developer
and Contractor covering the Work
2. Asbestos—Any material that contains more than one percent asbestos and is friable or is
releasing asbestos fibers into the air above current action levels established by the United
States Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3. Business Day – A business day is defined as a day that the City conducts normal business,
generally Monday through Friday, except for federal or state holidays observed by the City.
4. Buzzsaw – City’s on-line, electronic document management and collaboration system.
5. Calendar Day – A day consisting of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight.
6. City— The City of Fort Worth, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, acting by,
its governing body through its City Manager, his designee, or agents authorized pursuant to
its duly authorized charter on his behalf.
7. Community Facilities Agreement (CFA) -–A Contract between the Developer and the City
for the Construction of one or more following public facilities within the City public right-of-
way or easement: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street, Storm Drain, Street Light, and Street Signs.
A CFA may include private facilities within the right-of-way dedicated as private right-of-
way or easement on a recorded plat.
8. Contract—The entire and integrated written document incorporating the Contract
Documents between the Developer, Contractor, and/or City concerning the Work. The
Contract supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or
oral.
9. Contract Documents—Those items that make up the contract and which must include the
Agreement, and it’s attachments such as standard construction specifications, standard City
Conditions, other general conditions of the Developer, including:
a. An Agreement
00 73 10- 2
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 2 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
b. Attachments to the Agreement
i. Bid Form
ii. Vendor Compliance with State Law Non-Resident Bidder
iii. Prequalification Statement
c. Current Prevailing Wage Rates Table (if required by City)
d. Insurance Accord Form
e. Payment Bond
f. Performance Bond
g. Maintenance Bond
h. Power of Attorney for Bonds
i. Workers Compensation Affidavit
j. MWBE Commitment Form( If required by City)
k. General Conditions
l. Supplementary Conditions
m. The Standard City Conditions
n. Specifications specifically made part of the Contract Documents by attachment, if
not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of
the Project’s Contract Documents
o. Drawings
p. Documentation submitted by contractor prior to Notice of Award.
q. The following which may be delivered or issued after the effective date if the
Agreement and, if issued become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents
i. Notice to Proceed
ii. Field Orders
iii. Change Orders
iv. Letters of Final Acceptance
r. Approved Submittals, other Contractor submittals, and the reports and drawings of
subsurface and physical conditions are not Contract Documents.
10. Contractor—The individual or entity with whom Developer has entered into the Agreement.
11. Day or day – A day, unless otherwise defined, shall mean a Calendar Day.
12. Developer – An individual or entity that desires to make certain improvements within the
City of Fort Worth
13. Drawings—That part of the Contract Documents prepared or approved by Engineer which
graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed by
Contractor. Submittals are not Drawings as so defined.
14. Engineer—The licensed professional engineer or engineering firm registered in the State of
Texas performing professional services for the Developer.
15. Final Acceptance – The written notice given by the City to the Developer and/or Contractor
that the Work specified in the Contract Documents has been completed to the satisfaction of
the City.
00 73 10- 3
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 3 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
16. Final Inspection – Inspection carried out by the City to verify that the Contractor has
completed the Work, and each and every part or appurtenance thereof, fully, entirely, and in
conformance with the Contract Documents.
17. General Requirements—A part of the Contract Documents between the Developer and a
Contractor.
18. Laws and Regulations—Any and all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes,
and orders of any and all governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having
jurisdiction.
19. Liens—Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Project funds, real property, or
personal property.
20. Milestone—A principal event specified in the Contract Documents relating to an
intermediate Contract Time prior to Final Acceptance of the Work.
21. Non-Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and reviewed by the
City, which is signed by Contractor, and Developer, and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
22. Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and approved by the City,
which is signed by Contractor, Developer, and City and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
23. Plans – See definition of Drawings.
24. Project Schedule—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, in accordance with
the General Requirements, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising
the Contractor’s plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Time.
25. Project—The Work to be performed under the Contract Documents.
26. Project Representative—The authorized representative of the City who will be assigned to
the Site.
27. Public Meeting – An announced meeting conducted by the Developer to facilitate public
participation and to assist the public in gaining an informed view of the Project.
28. Regular Working Hours – Hours beginning at 7:00 a.m. and ending at 6:00 p.m., Monday
thru Friday (excluding legal holidays).
29. Samples—Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship that are
representative of some portion of the Work and which establish the standards by which such
portion of the Work will be judged.
00 73 10- 4
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 4 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
30. Schedule of Submittals—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, of required
submittals and the time requirements to support scheduled performance of related
construction activities.
31. Site—Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by City or
Developer upon which the Work is to be performed, including rights-of-way, permits, and
easements for access thereto, and such other lands furnished by City or Developer which are
designated for the use of Contractor.
32. Specifications—That part of the Contract Documents consisting of written requirements for
materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship as applied to the Work, and
certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable thereto.
Specifications may be specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or,
if not attached, may be incorporated by reference as indicated in the Table of Contents
(Division 00 00 00) of each Project.
33. Standard City Conditions – That part of the Contract Documents setting forth requirements
of the City.
34. Subcontractor—An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with any
other Subcontractor for the performance of a part of the Work at the Site.
35. Submittals—All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information
which are specifically prepared or assembled by or for Contractor and submitted by
Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work.
36. Superintendent – The representative of the Contractor who is available at all times and able
to receive instructions from the City and/or Developer and to act for the Contractor.
37. Supplementary Conditions—That part of the Contract Documents which amends or
supplements the General Conditions.
38. Supplier—A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having
a direct contract with Contractor or with any Subcontractor to furnish materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work by Contractor or Subcontractor.
39. Underground Facilities—All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires,
manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, or other such facilities or attachments, and any
encasements containing such facilities, including but not limited to, those that convey
electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications,
cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or
other control systems.
40. Weekend Working Hours – Hours beginning at 9:00 a.m. and ending at 5:00 p.m., Saturday,
Sunday or legal holiday, as approved in advance by the City.
00 73 10- 5
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 5 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
41. Work—The entire construction or the various separately identifiable parts thereof required
to be provided under the Contract Documents. Work includes and is the result of performing
or providing all labor, services, and documentation necessary to produce such construction
including any Participating Change Order, Non-Participating Change Order, or Field
Order, and furnishing, installing, and incorporating all materials and equipment into such
construction, all as required by the Contract Documents.
42. Working Day – A working day is defined as a day, not including Saturdays, Sundays, or
legal holidays authorized by the City for contract purposes, in which weather or other
conditions not under the control of the Contractor will permit the performance of the
principal unit of work underway for a continuous period of not less than 7 hours between 7
a.m. and 6 p.m.
1.02 Terminology
A. The words and terms discussed in Paragraph 1.02.B through D are not defined but, when used in
the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning.
B. Defective:
1. The word “defective,” when modifying the word “Work,” refers to Work that is
unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it:
a. does not conform to the Contract Documents; or
b. does not meet the requirements of any applicable inspection, reference standard, test, or
approval referred to in the Contract Documents; or
c. has been damaged prior to City’s written acceptance.
C. Furnish, Install, Perform, Provide:
1. The word “Furnish” or the word “Install” or the word “Perform” or the word “Provide” or
the word “Supply,” or any combination or similar directive or usage thereof, shall mean
furnishing and incorporating in the Work including all necessary labor, materials, equipment,
and everything necessary to perform the Work indicated, unless specifically limited in the
context used.
D. Unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents, words or phrases that have a well-known
technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in
accordance with such recognized meaning.
00 73 10- 6
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 6 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 2 – PRELIMINARY MATTERS
2.01 Before Starting Construction
Baseline Schedules: Submit to City in accordance with the Contract Documents, and prior to starting
the Work. New schedules will be submitted to City when Participating Change Orders or Non-
Participating Change Orders occur.
2.02 Preconstruction Conference
Before any Work at the Site is started, the Contractor shall attend a Preconstruction Conference as
specified in the Contract Documents.
2.03 Public Meeting
Contractor may not mobilize any equipment, materials or resources to the Site prior to Contractor
attending the Public Meeting as scheduled by the City.
ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AMENDING
3.01 Reference Standards
A. Standards, Specifications, Codes, Laws, and Regulations
1. Reference to standards, specifications, manuals, or codes of any technical society,
organization, or association, or to Laws or Regulations, whether such reference be specific or
by implication, shall mean the standard, specification, manual, code, or Laws or Regulations
in effect at the time of opening of Bids (or on the Effective Date of the Agreement if there
were no Bids), except as may be otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents.
2. No provision or instruction shall be effective to assign to City, or any of its officers,
directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors, any duty or
authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work or any duty or authority to
undertake responsibility inconsistent with the provisions of the Contract Documents.
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents
A. The Contract Documents may be amended to provide for additions, deletions, and revisions in
the Work or to modify the terms and conditions thereof by a Participating Change Order or a
Non-Participating Change Order.
B. The requirements of the Contract Documents may be supplemented, and minor variations and
deviations in the Work not involving a change in Contract Price or Contract Time, may be
authorized, by one or more of the following ways:
1. A Field Order;
00 73 10- 7
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 7 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. City’s or Engineer’s review of a Submittal (subject to the provisions of Paragraph 5.16.C); or
2. City’s written interpretation or clarification.
ARTICLE 4 – BONDS AND INSURANCE
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers
All bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents to be purchased and maintained by
Contractor shall be obtained from surety or insurance companies that are duly licensed or authorized
in the State of Texas to issue bonds or insurance policies for the limits and coverage so required.
Such surety and insurance companies shall also meet such additional requirements and qualifications
as may be provided Section 4.04.
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds
A. Contractor shall furnish performance and payment bonds in the name of Developer and City, in
accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2253 or successor statute, each in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security for the faithful performance and payment of all of
Contractor’s obligations under the Contract Documents.
B. Contractor shall furnish maintenance bonds in the name of Developer and City in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security to protect the City against any defects in any portion of the
Work described in the Contract Documents. Maintenance bonds shall remain in effect for two
(2) years after the date of Final Acceptance by the City.
C. All bonds shall be in the form prescribed by the Contract Documents except as provided
otherwise by Laws or Regulations, and shall be executed by such sureties as are named in the list
of “Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and
as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies” as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Financial
Management Service, Surety Bond Branch, U.S. Department of the Treasury. All bonds signed
by an agent or attorney-in-fact must be accompanied by a sealed and dated power of attorney
which shall show that it is effective on the date the agent or attorney-in-fact signed each bond.
D. If the surety on any bond furnished by Contractor is declared bankrupt or becomes insolvent or
its right to do business is terminated in the State of Texas or it ceases to meet the requirements of
Paragraph 4.02.C, Contractor shall promptly notify City and shall, within 30 days after the event
giving rise to such notification, provide another bond and surety, both of which shall comply
with the requirements of Paragraphs 4.01 and 4.02.C.
4.03 Certificates of Insurance
Contractor shall deliver to Developer and City, with copies to each additional insured and loss payee
identified in these Standard City Conditions certificates of insurance (and other evidence of
insurance requested by City or any other additional insured) which Contractor is required to
purchase and maintain.
00 73 10- 8
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 8 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. The certificate of insurance shall document the City, an as “Additional Insured” on all
liability policies.
2. The Contractor’s general liability insurance shall include a, “per project” or “per location”,
endorsement, which shall be identified in the certificate of insurance provided to the City.
3. The certificate shall be signed by an agent authorized to bind coverage on behalf of the
insured, be complete in its entirety, and show complete insurance carrier names as listed in
the current A.M. Best Property & Casualty Guide
4. The insurers for all policies must be licensed and/or approved to do business in the State of
Texas. Except for workers’ compensation, all insurers must have a minimum rating of A-:
VII in the current A. M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial
strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. If the rating is below that
required, written approval of City is required.
5. All applicable policies shall include a Waiver of Subrogation (Rights of Recovery) in favor
of the City. In addition, the Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the
Engineer (if applicable), and each additional insured identified in these Standard City
Conditions. Failure of the City to demand such certificates or other evidence of full
compliance with the insurance requirements or failure of the City to identify a deficiency
from evidence that is provided shall not be construed as a waiver of Contractor’s obligation
to maintain such lines of insurance coverage.
6. If insurance policies are not written for specified coverage limits, an Umbrella or Excess
Liability insurance for any differences is required. Excess Liability shall follow form of the
primary coverage.
7. Unless otherwise stated, all required insurance shall be written on the “occurrence basis”. If
coverage is underwritten on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall be coincident with
or prior to the date of the effective date of the agreement and the certificate of insurance shall
state that the coverage is claims-made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall
be maintained for the duration of the Contract and for three (3) years following Final
Acceptance provided under the Contract Documents or for the warranty period, whichever is
longer. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall evidence such
insurance coverage.
8. Policies shall have no exclusions by endorsements, which, neither nullify or amend, the
required lines of coverage, nor decrease the limits of said coverage unless such endorsements
are approved in writing by the City. In the event a Contract has been bid or executed and the
exclusions are determined to be unacceptable or the City desires additional insurance
coverage, and the City desires the contractor/engineer to obtain such coverage, the contract
price shall be adjusted by the cost of the premium for such additional coverage plus 10%.
9. Any self-insured retention (SIR), in excess of $25,000.00, affecting required insurance
coverage shall be approved by the City in regards to asset value and stockholders' equity. In
00 73 10- 9
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 9 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
lieu of traditional insurance, alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk
retention groups, must also be approved by City.
10. Any deductible in excess of $5,000.00, for any policy that does not provide coverage on a
first-dollar basis, must be acceptable to and approved by the City.
11. City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to review the insurance requirements and to
make reasonable adjustments to insurance coverage’s and their limits when deemed
necessary and prudent by the City based upon changes in statutory law, court decision or the
claims history of the industry as well as of the contracting party to the City. The City shall
be required to provide prior notice of 90 days, and the insurance adjustments shall be
incorporated into the Work by Change Order.
12. City shall be entitled, upon written request and without expense, to receive copies of policies
and endorsements thereto and may make any reasonable requests for deletion or revision or
modifications of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions necessary to
conform the policy and endorsements to the requirements of the Contract. Deletions,
revisions, or modifications shall not be required where policy provisions are established by
law or regulations binding upon either party or the underwriter on any such policies.
13. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for
Contractor’s insurance.
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance
A. Workers Compensation and Employers’ Liability. Contractor shall purchase and maintain such
insurance coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers’
Compensation Act (Texas Labor Code, Ch. 406, as amended), and minimum limits for
Employers’ Liability as is appropriate for the Work being performed and as will provide
protection from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from Contractor’s
performance of the Work and Contractor’s other obligations under the Contract Documents,
whether it is to be performed by Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly
or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts
any of them may be liable:
1. claims under workers’ compensation, disability benefits, and other similar employee benefit
acts;
2. claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of
Contractor’s employees.
3. The limits of liability for the insurance shall provide the following coverages for not less
than the following amounts or greater where required by Laws and Regulations
a. Statutory limits
b. Employer's liability
00 73 10- 10
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 10 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1) $100,000 each accident/occurrence
2) $100,000 Disease - each employee
3) $500,000 Disease - policy limit
B. Commercial General Liability. Coverage shall include but not be limited to covering liability
(bodily injury or property damage) arising from: premises/operations, independent contractors,
products/completed operations, personal injury, and liability under an insured contract. Insurance
shall be provided on an occurrence basis, and as comprehensive as the current Insurance
Services Office (ISO) policy. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to
any other insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the City. The Commercial General
Liability policy, shall have no exclusions by endorsements that would alter of nullify
premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or advertising
injury, which are normally contained with the policy, unless the City approves such exclusions
in writing.
1. For construction projects that present a substantial completed operation exposure, the City
may require the contractor to maintain completed operations coverage for a minimum of no
less than three (3) years following the completion of the project
2. Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section which shall be on a per project basis
covering the Contractor with minimum limits of:
a. $1,000,000 each occurrence
b. $2,000,000 aggregate limit
3. The policy must have an endorsement (Amendment – Aggregate Limits of Insurance)
making the General Aggregate Limits apply separately to each job site.
4. The Commercial General Liability Insurance policies shall provide “X”, “C”, and “U”
coverage’s. Verification of such coverage must be shown in the Remarks Article of the
Certificate of Insurance.
C. Automobile Liability. A commercial business auto policy shall provide coverage on “any auto”,
defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned and provide indemnity for claims for damages
because bodily injury or death of any person and or property damage arising out of the work,
maintenance or use of any motor vehicle by the Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by
anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone
for whose acts any of them may be liable.
1. Automobile Liability, Contractor’s Liability Insurance under this Section, which shall be in
an amount not less than the following amounts:
a. Automobile Liability - a commercial business policy shall provide coverage on "Any
Auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned.
00 73 10- 11
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 11 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1) $1,000,000 each accident on a combined single limit basis. Split limits are
acceptable if limits are at least:
2) $250,000 Bodily Injury per person
3) $500,000 Bodily Injury per accident /
4) $100,000 Property Damage
D. Railroad Protective Liability. If any of the work or any warranty work is within the limits of
railroad right-of-way, the Contractor shall comply with the following requirements:
1. The Contractor’s construction activities will require its employees, agents, subcontractors,
equipment, and material deliveries to cross railroad properties and tracks owned and
operated by: ____________________________________________________________
Write the name of the railroad company. (If none, then write none)
2. The Contractor shall conduct its operations on railroad properties in such a manner as not to
interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the railroad company in any manner whatsoever in the use
or operation of its/their trains or other property. Such operations on railroad properties may
require that Contractor to execute a “Right of Entry Agreement” with the particular railroad
company or companies involved, and to this end the Contractor should satisfy itself as to the
requirements of each railroad company and be prepared to execute the right-of-entry (if any)
required by a railroad company. The requirements specified herein likewise relate to the
Contractor’s use of private and/or construction access roads crossing said railroad company’s
properties.
3. The Contractual Liability coverage required by Paragraph 5.04D of the General Conditions
shall provide coverage for not less than the following amounts, issued by companies
satisfactory to the City and to the Railroad Company for a term that continues for so long as
the Contractor’s operations and work cross, occupy, or touch railroad property:
a. General Aggregate: _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
b. Each Occurrence: : _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
4. With respect to the above outlined insurance requirements, the following shall govern:
a. Where a single railroad company is involved, the Contractor shall provide one insurance
policy in the name of the railroad company. However, if more than one grade separation
or at-grade crossing is affected by the Project at entirely separate locations on the line or
lines of the same railroad company, separate coverage may be required, each in the
amount stated above.
b. Where more than one railroad company is operating on the same right-of-way or where
several railroad companies are involved and operated on their own separate rights-of-
None
None
None
00 73 10- 12
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 12 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
way, the Contractor may be required to provide separate insurance policies in the name
of each railroad company.
c. If, in addition to a grade separation or an at-grade crossing, other work or activity is
proposed on a railroad company’s right-of-way at a location entirely separate from the
grade separation or at-grade crossing, insurance coverage for this work must be included
in the policy covering the grade separation.
d. If no grade separation is involved but other work is proposed on a railroad company’s
right-of-way, all such other work may be covered in a single policy for that railroad, even
though the work may be at two or more separate locations.
5. No work or activities on a railroad company’s property to be performed by the Contractor
shall be commenced until the Contractor has furnished the City with an original policy or
policies of the insurance for each railroad company named, as required above. All such
insurance must be approved by the City and each affected Railroad Company prior to the
Contractor’s beginning work.
6. The insurance specified above must be carried until all Work to be performed on the railroad
right-of-way has been completed and the grade crossing, if any, is no longer used by the
Contractor. In addition, insurance must be carried during all maintenance and/or repair work
performed in the railroad right-of-way. Such insurance must name the railroad company as
the insured, together with any tenant or lessee of the railroad company operating over tracks
involved in the Project.
E. Notification of Policy Cancellation: Contractor shall immediately notify City upon cancellation
or other loss of insurance coverage. Contractor shall stop work until replacement insurance has
been procured. There shall be no time credit for days not worked pursuant to this section.
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace
If City has any objection to the coverage afforded by or other provisions of the bonds or insurance
required to be purchased and maintained by the Contractor in accordance with Article 5 on the basis
of non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the Developer and City shall so notify the
Contractor in writing within 10 Business Days after receipt of the certificates (or other evidence
requested). Contractor shall provide to the City such additional information in respect of insurance
provided as the Developer or City may reasonably request. If Contractor does not purchase or
maintain all of the bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Developer or City
shall notify the Contractor in writing of such failure prior to the start of the Work, or of such failure
to maintain prior to any change in the required coverage.
ARTICLE 5 – CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent
A. Contractor shall supervise, inspect, and direct the Work competently and efficiently, devoting
such attention thereto and applying such skills and expertise as may be necessary to perform the
00 73 10- 13
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 13 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the
means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction.
B. At all times during the progress of the Work, Contractor shall assign a competent, English-
speaking, Superintendent who shall not be replaced without written notice to City. The
Superintendent will be Contractor’s representative at the Site and shall have authority to act on
behalf of Contractor. All communication given to or received from the Superintendent shall be
binding on Contractor.
C. Contractor shall notify the City 24 hours prior to moving areas during the sequence of
construction.
5.02 Labor; Working Hours
A. Contractor shall provide competent, suitably qualified personnel to perform construction as
required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall at all times maintain good discipline and
order at the Site.
B. Except as otherwise required for the safety or protection of persons or the Work or property at
the Site or adjacent thereto, and except as otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, all Work
at the Site shall be performed during Regular Working Hours. Contractor will not permit the
performance of Work beyond Regular Working Hours or for Weekend Working Hours without
City’s written consent (which will not be unreasonably withheld). Written request (by letter or
electronic communication) to perform Work:
1. for beyond Regular Working Hours request must be made by noon at least two (2) Business
Days prior
2. for Weekend Working Hours request must be made by noon of the preceding Thursday
3. for legal holidays request must be made by noon two Business Days prior to the legal
holiday.
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment
A. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall provide and assume full
responsibility for all services, materials, equipment, labor, transportation, construction
equipment and machinery, tools, appliances, fuel, power, light, heat, telephone, water, sanitary
facilities, temporary facilities, and all other facilities and incidentals necessary for the
performance, Contractor required testing, start-up, and completion of the Work.
B. All materials and equipment incorporated into the Work shall be as specified or, if not specified,
shall be of good quality and new, except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. All
special warranties and guarantees required by the Specifications shall expressly run to the benefit
of City. If required by City, Contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence (including reports of
required tests) as to the source, kind, and quality of materials and equipment.
00 73 10- 14
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 14 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. All materials and equipment to be incorporated into the Work shall be stored, applied, installed,
connected, erected, protected, used, cleaned, and conditioned in accordance with instructions of
the applicable Supplier, except as otherwise may be provided in the Contract Documents.
5.04 Project Schedule
A. Contractor shall adhere to the Project Schedule established in accordance with Paragraph 2.01
and the General Requirements as it may be adjusted from time to time as provided below.
1. Contractor shall submit to City for acceptance (to the extent indicated in Paragraph 2.01 and
the General Requirements) proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule.
2. Proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule that will change the Contract Time shall be
submitted in accordance with the requirements of Article 9. Adjustments in Contract Time
for projects with City participation shall be made by participating change orders.
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals”
A. Whenever an item of material or equipment is specified or described in the Contract Documents
by using the name of a proprietary item or the name of a particular Supplier, the specification or
description is intended to establish the type, function, appearance, and quality required. Unless
the specification or description contains or is followed by words reading that no like, equivalent,
or “or-equal” item or no substitution is permitted, other items of material or equipment of other
Suppliers may be submitted to City for review under the circumstances described below.
1. “Or-Equal” Items: If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by
Contractor is functionally equal to that named and sufficiently similar so that no change in
related Work will be required, it may be considered by City as an “or-equal” item, in which
case review and approval of the proposed item may, in City’s sole discretion, be
accomplished without compliance with some or all of the requirements for approval of
proposed substitute items. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5.05.A.1, a proposed item of
material or equipment will be considered functionally equal to an item so named if:
a. City determines that:
1) it is at least equal in materials of construction, quality, durability, appearance,
strength, and design characteristics;
2) it will reliably perform at least equally well the function and achieve the results
imposed by the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole; and
3) it has a proven record of performance and availability of responsive service; and
b. Contractor certifies that, if approved and incorporated into the Work:
1) there will be no increase in cost to the City or increase in Contract Time; and
00 73 10- 15
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 15 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2) it will conform substantially to the detailed requirements of the item named in the
Contract Documents.
2. Substitute Items:
a. If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor does
not qualify as an “or-equal” item under Paragraph 5.05.A.1, it may be submitted as a
proposed substitute item.
b. Contractor shall submit sufficient information as provided below to allow City to
determine if the item of material or equipment proposed is essentially equivalent to that
named and an acceptable substitute therefor. Requests for review of proposed substitute
items of material or equipment will not be accepted by City from anyone other than
Contractor.
c. Contractor shall make written application to City for review of a proposed substitute item
of material or equipment that Contractor seeks to furnish or use. The application shall
comply with Section 01 25 00 and:
1) shall certify that the proposed substitute item will:
i. perform adequately the functions and achieve the results called for by the general
design;
ii. be similar in substance to that specified;
iii. be suited to the same use as that specified; and
2) will state:
i. the extent, if any, to which the use of the proposed substitute item will prejudice
Contractor’s achievement of final completion on time;
ii. whether use of the proposed substitute item in the Work will require a change in
any of the Contract Documents (or in the provisions of any other direct contract
with City for other work on the Project) to adapt the design to the proposed
substitute item;
iii. whether incorporation or use of the proposed substitute item in connection with
the Work is subject to payment of any license fee or royalty; and
3) will identify:
i. all variations of the proposed substitute item from that specified;
ii. available engineering, sales, maintenance, repair, and replacement services; and
00 73 10- 16
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 16 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
4) shall contain an itemized estimate of all costs or credits that will result directly or
indirectly from use of such substitute item, including costs of redesign and Damage
Claims of other contractors affected by any resulting change.
B. Substitute Construction Methods or Procedures: If a specific means, method, technique,
sequence, or procedure of construction is expressly required by the Contract Documents,
Contractor may furnish or utilize a substitute means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure
of construction approved by City. Contractor shall submit sufficient information to allow City, in
City’s sole discretion, to determine that the substitute proposed is equivalent to that expressly
called for by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall make written application to City for
review in the same manner as those provided in Paragraph 5.05.A.2.
C. City’s Evaluation: City will be allowed a reasonable time within which to evaluate each
proposal or submittal made pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A and 5.05.B. City may require
Contractor to furnish additional data about the proposed substitute. City will be the sole judge of
acceptability. No “or-equal” or substitute will be ordered, installed or utilized until City’s review
is complete, which will be evidenced by a Change Order in the case of a substitute and an
accepted Submittal for an “or-equal.” City will advise Contractor in writing of its determination.
D. Special Guarantee: City may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor’s expense a special
performance guarantee, warranty, or other surety with respect to any substitute. Contractor shall
indemnify and hold harmless City and anyone directly or indirectly employed by them from and
against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out
of the use of substituted materials or equipment.
E. City’s Cost Reimbursement: City will record City’s costs in evaluating a substitute proposed or
submitted by Contractor pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A.2 and 5.05.B. Whether or not City
approves a substitute so proposed or submitted by Contractor, Contractor may be required to
reimburse City for evaluating each such proposed substitute. Contractor may also be required to
reimburse City for the charges for making changes in the Contract Documents.
F. Contractor’s Expense: Contractor shall provide all data in support of any proposed substitute or
“or-equal” at Contractor’s expense.
G. Substitute Reimbursement: Costs (savings or charges) attributable to acceptance of a substitute
shall be incorporated to the Contract by Participating Change Order.
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors)
A. The Contractor and any subcontractors are required to be prequalified for the work types
requiring pre-qualification
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others
A. Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance:
00 73 10- 17
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 17 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Required for this Contract.
(Check this box if there is any City Participation)
Not Required for this Contract.
It is City policy to ensure the full and equitable participation by Minority and Women Business
Enterprises (MWBE) in the procurement of goods and services on a contractual basis. If the
Contract Documents provide for a MWBE goal, Contractor is required to comply with the intent
of the City’s MWBE Ordinance (as amended) by the following:
1. Contractor shall, upon request by City, provide complete and accurate information regarding
actual work performed by a MWBE on the Contract and payment therefor.
2. Contractor will not make additions, deletions, or substitutions of accepted MWBE without
written consent of the City. Any unjustified change or deletion shall be a material breach of
Contract and may result in debarment in accordance with the procedures outlined in the
Ordinance.
3. Contractor shall, upon request by City, allow an audit and/or examination of any books,
records, or files in the possession of the Contractor that will substantiate the actual work
performed by an MWBE. Material misrepresentation of any nature will be grounds for
termination of the Contract. Any such misrepresentation may be grounds for disqualification
of Contractor to bid on future contracts with the City for a period of not less than three years.
B. Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the Subcontractors,
Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work just as
Contractor is responsible for Contractor’s own acts and omissions. Nothing in the Contract
Documents:
1. shall create for the benefit of any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity
any contractual relationship between City and any such Subcontractor, Supplier or other
individual or entity; nor
2. shall create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any moneys
due any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity except as may otherwise
be required by Laws and Regulations.
C. Contractor shall be solely responsible for scheduling and coordinating the Work of
Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the
Work under a direct or indirect contract with Contractor.
D. All Subcontractors, Suppliers, and such other individuals or entities performing or furnishing
any of the Work shall communicate with City through Contractor.
E. All Work performed for Contractor by a Subcontractor or Supplier will be pursuant to an
appropriate agreement between Contractor and the Subcontractor or Supplier which specifically
binds the Subcontractor or Supplier to the applicable terms and conditions of these Contract
00 73 10- 18
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 18 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents, Contractor shall provide City contract numbers and reference numbers to the
Subcontractors and/or Suppliers.
5.08 Wage Rates
Required for this Contract.
Not Required for this Contract.
A. Duty to pay Prevailing Wage Rates. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of
Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code (as amended), including the payment of not less than the
rates determined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth to be the prevailing wage rates in
accordance with Chapter 2258. Such prevailing wage rates are included in these Contract
Documents.
B. Penalty for Violation. A Contractor or any Subcontractor who does not pay the prevailing wage
shall, upon demand made by the City, pay to the City $60 for each worker employed for each
calendar day or part of the day that the worker is paid less than the prevailing wage rates
stipulated in these contract documents. This penalty shall be retained by the City to offset its
administrative costs, pursuant to Texas Government Code 2258.023.
C. Complaints of Violations and City Determination of Good Cause. On receipt of information,
including a complaint by a worker, concerning an alleged violation of 2258.023, Texas
Government Code, by a Contractor or Subcontractor, the City shall make an initial
determination, before the 31st day after the date the City receives the information, as to whether
good cause exists to believe that the violation occurred. The City shall notify in writing the
Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker of its initial determination. Upon the
City’s determination that there is good cause to believe the Contractor or Subcontractor has
violated Chapter 2258, the City shall retain the full amounts claimed by the claimant or
claimants as the difference between wages paid and wages due under the prevailing wage rates,
such amounts being subtracted from successive progress payments pending a final determination
of the violation.
D. Arbitration Required if Violation Not Resolved. An issue relating to an alleged violation of
Section 2258.023, Texas Government Code, including a penalty owed to the City or an affected
worker, shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the Texas General
Arbitration Act (Article 224 et seq., Revised Statutes) if the Contractor or Subcontractor and any
affected worker does not resolve the issue by agreement before the 15th day after the date the
City makes its initial determination pursuant to Paragraph C above. If the persons required to
arbitrate under this section do not agree on an arbitrator before the 11th day after the date that
arbitration is required, a district court shall appoint an arbitrator on the petition of any of the
persons. The City is not a party in the arbitration. The decision and award of the arbitrator is
final and binding on all parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction.
E. Records to be Maintained. The Contractor and each Subcontractor shall, for a period of three (3)
years following the date of acceptance of the work, maintain records that show (i) the name and
00 73 10- 19
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 19 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
occupation of each worker employed by the Contractor in the construction of the Work provided
for in this Contract; and (ii) the actual per diem wages paid to each worker. The records shall be
open at all reasonable hours for inspection by the City. The provisions of Paragraph 6.23, Right
to Audit, shall pertain to this inspection.
F. Progress Payments. With each progress payment or payroll period, whichever is less, the
Contractor shall submit an affidavit stating that the Contractor has complied with the
requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code.
G. Posting of Wage Rates. The Contractor shall post prevailing wage rates in a conspicuous place at
all times.
H. Subcontractor Compliance. The Contractor shall include in its subcontracts and/or shall
otherwise require all of its Subcontractors to comply with Paragraphs A through G above.
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties
A. To the fullest extent permitted by Laws and Regulations, Contractor shall indemnify and hold
harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited
to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court
or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to any infringement of
patent rights or copyrights incident to the use in the performance of the Work or resulting from
the incorporation in the Work of any invention, design, process, product, or device not specified
in the Contract Documents.
5.10 Laws and Regulations
A. Contractor shall give all notices required by and shall comply with all Laws and Regulations
applicable to the performance of the Work. Except where otherwise expressly required by
applicable Laws and Regulations, the City shall not be responsible for monitoring Contractor’s
compliance with any Laws or Regulations.
B. If Contractor performs any Work knowing or having reason to know that it is contrary to Laws
or Regulations, Contractor shall bear all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such Work.
However, it shall not be Contractor’s responsibility to make certain that the Specifications and
Drawings are in accordance with Laws and Regulations, but this shall not relieve Contractor of
Contractor’s obligations under Paragraph 3.01.
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas
A. Limitation on Use of Site and Other Areas:
1. Contractor shall confine construction equipment, the storage of materials and equipment, and
the operations of workers to the Site and other areas permitted by Laws and Regulations, and
shall not unreasonably encumber the Site and other areas with construction equipment or
00 73 10- 20
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 20 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
other materials or equipment. Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any damage to
any such land or area, or to the owner or occupant thereof, or of any adjacent land or areas
resulting from the performance of the Work.
2. At any time when, in the judgment of the City, the Contractor has obstructed or closed or is
carrying on operations in a portion of a street, right-of-way, or easement greater than is
necessary for proper execution of the Work, the City may require the Contractor to finish the
section on which operations are in progress before work is commenced on any additional
area of the Site.
3. Should any Damage Claim be made by any such owner or occupant because of the
performance of the Work, Contractor shall promptly attempt to resolve the Damage Claim.
4. Pursuant to Paragraph 5.18, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and
against all claims, costs, losses, and damages arising out of or relating to any claim or
action, legal or equitable, brought by any such owner or occupant against City.
B. Removal of Debris During Performance of the Work: During the progress of the Work
Contractor shall keep the Site and other areas free from accumulations of waste materials,
rubbish, and other debris. Removal and disposal of such waste materials, rubbish, and other
debris shall conform to applicable Laws and Regulations.
C. Site Maintenance Cleaning: 24 hours after written notice is given to the Contractor that the
clean-up on the job site is proceeding in a manner unsatisfactory to the City or Developer, if the
Contractor fails to correct the unsatisfactory procedure, the City may take such direct action as
the City deems appropriate to correct the clean-up deficiencies cited to the Contractor in the
written notice (by letter or electronic communication), and shall be entitled to recover its cost in
doing so. The City may withhold Final Acceptance until clean-up is complete and cost are
recovered.
D. Final Site Cleaning: Prior to Final Acceptance of the Work Contractor shall clean the Site and
the Work and make it ready for utilization by City or adjacent property owner. At the completion
of the Work Contractor shall remove from the Site all tools, appliances, construction equipment
and machinery, and surplus materials and shall restore to original condition or better all property
disturbed by the Work.
E. Loading Structures: Contractor shall not load nor permit any part of any structure to be loaded
in any manner that will endanger the structure, nor shall Contractor subject any part of the Work
or adjacent property to stresses or pressures that will endanger it.
5.12 Record Documents
A. Contractor shall maintain in a safe place at the Site or in a place designated by the Contractor
and approved by the City, one (1) record copy of all Drawings, Specifications, Addenda, Change
Orders, Field Orders, and written interpretations and clarifications in good order and annotated
to show changes made during construction. These record documents together with all approved
00 73 10- 21
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 21 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Samples and a counterpart of all accepted Submittals will be available to City for reference.
Upon completion of the Work, these record documents, any operation and maintenance manuals,
and Submittals will be delivered to City prior to Final Inspection. Contractor shall include
accurate locations for buried and imbedded items.
5.13 Safety and Protection
A. Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety
precautions and programs in connection with the Work. Such responsibility does not relieve
Subcontractors of their responsibility for the safety of persons or property in the performance of
their work, nor for compliance with applicable safety Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall
take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to
prevent damage, injury or loss to:
1. all persons on the Site or who may be affected by the Work;
2. all the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on
or off the Site; and
3. other property at the Site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, walks,
pavements, roadways, structures, utilities, and Underground Facilities not designated for
removal, relocation, or replacement in the course of construction.
B. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Laws and Regulations relating to the safety of
persons or property, or to the protection of persons or property from damage, injury, or loss; and
shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. Contractor shall
notify owners of adjacent property and of Underground Facilities and other utility owners when
prosecution of the Work may affect them, and shall cooperate with them in the protection,
removal, relocation, and replacement of their property.
C. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of City’s safety programs, if any.
D. Contractor shall inform City of the specific requirements of Contractor’s safety program, if any,
with which City’s employees and representatives must comply while at the Site.
E. All damage, injury, or loss to any property referred to in Paragraph 5.13.A.2 or 5.13.A.3 caused,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by Contractor, any Subcontractor, Supplier, or any
other individual or entity directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the
Work, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, shall be remedied by Contractor.
F. Contractor’s duties and responsibilities for safety and for protection of the Work shall continue
until such time as all the Work is completed and City has accepted the Work.
5.14 Safety Representative
Contractor shall inform City in writing of Contractor’s designated safety representative at the Site.
00 73 10- 22
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 22 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs
Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating any exchange of material safety data sheets or other
hazard communication information required to be made available to or exchanged between or
among employers in accordance with Laws or Regulations.
5.16 Submittals
A. Contractor shall submit required Submittals to City for review and acceptance. Each submittal
will be identified as required by City.
1. Submit number of copies specified in the General Requirements.
2. Data shown on the Submittals will be complete with respect to quantities, dimensions,
specified performance and design criteria, materials, and similar data to show City the
services, materials, and equipment Contractor proposes to provide and to enable City to
review the information for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
3. Submittals submitted as herein provided by Contractor and reviewed by City for
conformance with the design concept shall be executed in conformity with the Contract
Documents unless otherwise required by City.
4. When Submittals are submitted for the purpose of showing the installation in greater detail,
their review shall not excuse Contractor from requirements shown on the Drawings and
Specifications.
5. For-Information-Only submittals upon which the City is not expected to conduct review or
take responsive action may be so identified in the Contract Documents.
6. Submit required number of Samples specified in the Specifications.
7. Clearly identify each Sample as to material, Supplier, pertinent data such as catalog numbers,
the use for which intended and other data as City may require to enable City to review the
submittal for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
B. Where a Submittal is required by the Contract Documents or the Schedule of Submittals, any
related Work performed prior to City’s review and acceptance of the pertinent submittal will be
at the sole expense and responsibility of Contractor.
C. City’s Review:
1. City will provide timely review of required Submittals in accordance with the Schedule of
Submittals acceptable to City. City’s review and acceptance will be only to determine if the
items covered by the submittals will, after installation or incorporation in the Work, conform
to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design
concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract
Documents.
00 73 10- 23
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 23 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2. City’s review and acceptance will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or
procedures of construction (except where a particular means, method, technique, sequence,
or procedure of construction is specifically and expressly called for by the Contract
Documents) or to safety precautions or programs incident thereto. The review and
acceptance of a separate item as such will not indicate approval of the assembly in which the
item functions.
3. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for any
variation from the requirements of the Contract Documents unless Contractor has complied
with the requirements of Section 01 33 00 and City has given written acceptance of each
such variation by specific written notation thereof incorporated in or accompanying the
Submittal. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for
complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee
A. Contractor warrants and guarantees to City that all Work will be in accordance with the Contract
Documents and will not be defective. City and its officers, directors, members, partners,
employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors shall be entitled to rely on representation of
Contractor’s warranty and guarantee.
B. Contractor’s warranty and guarantee hereunder excludes defects or damage caused by:
1. abuse, modification, or improper maintenance or operation by persons other than Contractor,
Subcontractors, Suppliers, or any other individual or entity for whom Contractor is
responsible; or
2. normal wear and tear under normal usage.
C. Contractor’s obligation to perform and complete the Work in accordance with the Contract
Documents shall be absolute. None of the following will constitute an acceptance of Work that is
not in accordance with the Contract Documents or a release of Contractor’s obligation to
perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents:
1. observations by City;
2. recommendation or payment by City or Developer of any progress or final payment;
3. the issuance of a certificate of Final Acceptance by City or any payment related thereto by
City;
4. use or occupancy of the Work or any part thereof by City;
5. any review and acceptance of a Submittal by City;
6. any inspection, test, or approval by others; or
00 73 10- 24
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 24 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7. any correction of defective Work by City.
D. The Contractor shall remedy any defects or damages in the Work and pay for any damage to
other work or property resulting therefrom which shall appear within a period of two (2) years
from the date of Final Acceptance of the Work unless a longer period is specified and shall
furnish a good and sufficient maintenance bond, complying with the requirements of Article
4.02.B. The City will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness.
5.18 Indemnification
A. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the
City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or
alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers,
agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this Contract. THIS
INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE
AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME
OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY
ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. This indemnity provision is
intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by
the City in defending against such claims and causes of actions.
B. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the City, its
officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of
property of the City, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be
performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees
under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY
INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR
PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE
CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF
THE CITY.
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services
A. Contractor will not be required to provide professional design services unless such services are
specifically required by the Contract Documents for a portion of the Work or unless such
services are required to carry out Contractor’s responsibilities for construction means, methods,
techniques, sequences and procedures.
B. If professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems,
materials or equipment are specifically required of Contractor by the Contract Documents, City
will specify all performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. Contractor shall
cause such services or certifications to be provided by a properly licensed professional, whose
signature and seal shall appear on all drawings, calculations, specifications, certifications, and
Submittals prepared by such professional. Submittals related to the Work designed or certified
by such professional, if prepared by others, shall bear such professional’s written approval when
submitted to City.
00 73 10- 25
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 25 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. City shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy, accuracy and completeness of the services,
certifications or approvals performed by such design professionals, provided City has specified
to Contractor performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy.
D. Pursuant to this Paragraph 5.19, City’s review and acceptance of design calculations and design
drawings will be only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with performance
and design criteria given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. City’s
review and acceptance of Submittals (except design calculations and design drawings) will be
only for the purpose stated in Paragraph 5.16.C.
5.20 Right to Audit:
A. The City reserves the right to audit all projects utilizing City funds
B. The Contractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions relating
to this Contract. Contractor agrees that the City shall have access during Regular Working Hours
to all necessary Contractor facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space
in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall
give Contractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
C. Contractor further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that
the subcontractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of such Subcontractor, involving transactions to
the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all
Subcontractor facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to
conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give
Subcontractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
D. Contractor and Subcontractor agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the
City. The City agrees to reimburse Contractor for the cost of the copies as follows at the rate
published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed.
5.21 Nondiscrimination
A. The City is responsible for operating Public Transportation Programs and implementing transit-
related projects, which are funded in part with Federal financial assistance awarded by the U.S.
Department of Transportation and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), without
discriminating against any person in the United States on the basis of race, color, or national
origin.
B. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended: Contractor shall comply with the requirements of
the Act and the Regulations as further defined in the Supplementary Conditions for any project
receiving Federal assistance.
00 73 10- 26
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 26 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 6 – OTHER WORK AT THE SITE
6.01 Related Work at Site
A. City may perform other work related to the Project at the Site with City’s employees, or other
City contractors, or through other direct contracts therefor, or have other work performed by
utility owners. If such other work is not noted in the Contract Documents, then written notice
thereof will be given to Contractor prior to starting any such other work; and
B. Contractor shall afford each other contractor who is a party to such a direct contract, each utility
owner, and City, if City is performing other work with City’s employees or other City
contractors, proper and safe access to the Site, provide a reasonable opportunity for the
introduction and storage of materials and equipment and the execution of such other work, and
properly coordinate the Work with theirs. Contractor shall do all cutting, fitting, and patching of
the Work that may be required to properly connect or otherwise make its several parts come
together and properly integrate with such other work. Contractor shall not endanger any work of
others by cutting, excavating, or otherwise altering such work; provided, however, that
Contractor may cut or alter others' work with the written consent of City and the others whose
work will be affected.
C. If the proper execution or results of any part of Contractor’s Work depends upon work
performed by others under this Article 7, Contractor shall inspect such other work and promptly
report to City in writing any delays, defects, or deficiencies in such other work that render it
unavailable or unsuitable for the proper execution and results of Contractor’s Work. Contractor’s
failure to so report will constitute an acceptance of such other work as fit and proper for
integration with Contractor’s Work except for latent defects in the work provided by others.
ARTICLE 7 – CITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals
City’s responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals is set forth in Paragraph
11.03.
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities
A. The City shall not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, nor be responsible for,
Contractor’s means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety
precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure of Contractor to comply with Laws
and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. City will not be responsible for
Contractor’s failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
B. City will notify the Contractor of applicable safety plans pursuant to Paragraph 5.13.
00 73 10- 27
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 27 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program
While at the Site, City’s employees and representatives shall comply with the specific applicable
requirements of Contractor’s safety programs of which City has been informed pursuant to
Paragraph 5.13.
ARTICLE 8 – CITY’S OBSERVATION STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION
8.01 City’s Project Representative
City will provide one or more Project Representative(s) during the construction period. The duties
and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of City’s representative during construction are
set forth in the Contract Documents.
A. City’s Project Representative will make visits to the Site at intervals appropriate to the various
stages of construction as City deems necessary in order to observe the progress that has been
made and the quality of the various aspects of Contractor’s executed Work. Based on
information obtained during such visits and observations, City’s Project Representative will
determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents.
City’s Project Representative will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections
on the Site to check the quality or quantity of the Work. City’s Project Representative’s efforts
will be directed toward providing City a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work
will conform generally to the Contract Documents.
B. City’s Project Representative’s visits and observations are subject to all the limitations on
authority and responsibility in the Contract Documents.
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work
City’s Project Representative may authorize minor variations in the Work from the requirements of
the Contract Documents which do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract
Time and are compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a Field Order and will be
binding on City Developer, and also on Contractor, who shall perform the Work involved promptly.
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work
City will have authority to reject Work which City’s Project Representative believes to be defective,
or will not produce a completed Project that conforms to the Contract Documents or that will
prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. City will have authority to conduct special inspection or
testing of the Work as provided in Article 11, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or
completed.
00 73 10- 28
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 28 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed
Contractor will determine the actual quantities and classifications of Work performed. City’s Project
Representative will review with Contractor the preliminary determinations on such matters before
rendering a written recommendation. City’s written decision will be final (except as modified to
reflect changed factual conditions or more accurate data).
ARTICLE 9 – CHANGES IN THE WORK
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work
A. Without invalidating the Contract and without notice to any surety, City may, at any time or
from time to time, order Extra Work. Upon notice of such Extra Work, Contractor shall
promptly proceed with the Work involved which will be performed under the applicable
conditions of the Contract Documents (except as otherwise specifically provided). Extra Work
shall be memorialized by a Participating Change Order which may or may not precede an order
of Extra work.
B. For minor changes of Work not requiring changes to Contract Time or Contract Price on a
project with City participation, a Field Order may be issued by the City.
9.02 Notification to Surety
If the provisions of any bond require notice to be given to a surety of any change affecting the
general scope of the Work or the provisions of the Contract Documents (including, but not limited
to, Contract Price or Contract Time), the giving of any such notice will be Contractor’s
responsibility. The amount of each applicable bond will be adjusted by the Contractor to reflect the
effect of any such change.
ARTICLE 10 – CHANGE OF CONTRACT PRICE; CHANGE OF CONTRACT TIME
10.01 Change of Contract Price
A. The Contract Price may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.02 Change of Contract Time
A. The Contract Time may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.03 Delays
A. If Contractor is delayed, City shall not be liable to Contractor for any claims, costs, losses, or
damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and
other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) sustained by
Contractor on or in connection with any other project or anticipated project.
00 73 10- 29
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 29 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 11 – TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL OR ACCEPTANCE OF
DEFECTIVE WORK
11.01 Notice of Defects
Notice of all defective Work of which City has actual knowledge will be given to Contractor.
Defective Work may be rejected, corrected, or accepted as provided in this Article 13.
11.02 Access to Work
City, independent testing laboratories, and governmental agencies with jurisdictional interests will
have access to the Site and the Work at reasonable times for their observation, inspection, and
testing. Contractor shall provide them proper and safe conditions for such access and advise them of
Contractor’s safety procedures and programs so that they may comply therewith as applicable.
11.03 Tests and Inspections
A. Contractor shall give City timely notice of readiness of the Work for all required inspections,
tests, or approvals and shall cooperate with inspection and testing personnel to facilitate required
inspections or tests.
B. If Contract Documents, Laws or Regulations of any public body having jurisdiction require any
of the Work (or part thereof) to be inspected, tested, or approved, Contractor shall assume full
responsibility for arranging and obtaining such independent inspections, tests, retests or
approvals, pay all costs in connection therewith, and furnish City the required certificates of
inspection or approval; excepting, however, those fees specifically identified in the
Supplementary Conditions or any Texas Department of Licensure and Regulation (TDLR)
inspections, which shall be paid as described in the Supplementary Conditions.
C. Contractor shall be responsible for arranging and obtaining and shall pay all costs in connection
with any inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals required for City’s acceptance of materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work; or acceptance of materials, mix designs, or equipment
submitted for approval prior to Contractor’s purchase thereof for incorporation in the Work.
Such inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals shall be performed by organizations approved by
City.
D. City may arrange for the services of an independent testing laboratory (“Testing Lab”) to
perform any inspections or tests (“Testing”) for any part of the Work, as determined solely by
City.
1. City will coordinate such Testing to the extent possible, with Contractor;
2. Should any Testing under this Section 11.03 D result in a “fail”, “did not pass” or other
similar negative result, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying for any and all retests.
Contractor’s cancellation without cause of City initiated Testing shall be deemed a negative
result and require a retest.
00 73 10- 30
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 30 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
3. Any amounts owed for any retest under this Section 11.03 D shall be paid directly to the
Testing Lab by Contractor. City will forward all invoices for retests to
Developer/Contractor.
4. If Contractor fails to pay the Testing Lab, City will not issue a letter of Final Acceptance
until the Testing Lab is Paid
E. If any Work (or the work of others) that is to be inspected, tested, or approved is covered by
Contractor without written concurrence of City, Contractor shall, if requested by City, uncover
such Work for observation.
11.04 Uncovering Work
A. If any Work is covered contrary to the Contract Documents or specific instructions by the City, it
must, if requested by City, be uncovered for City’s observation and replaced at Contractor’s
expense.
11.05 City May Stop the Work
If the Work is defective, or Contractor fails to supply sufficient skilled workers or suitable materials
or equipment, or fails to perform the Work in such a way that the completed Work will conform to
the Contract Documents, City may order Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until
the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, this right of City to stop the Work shall not
give rise to any duty on the part of City to exercise this right for the benefit of Contractor, any
Subcontractor, any Supplier, any other individual or entity, or any surety for, or employee or agent
of any of them.
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work
A. Promptly after receipt of written notice, Contractor shall correct all defective Work pursuant to
an acceptable schedule, whether or not fabricated, installed, or completed, or, if the Work has
been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective.
Contractor shall pay all claims, costs, additional testing, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction
or removal (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others).
Failure to require the removal of any defective Work shall not constitute acceptance of such
Work.
B. When correcting defective Work under the terms of this Paragraph 11.06 or Paragraph 11.07,
Contractor shall take no action that would void or otherwise impair City’s special warranty and
guarantee, if any, on said Work.
11.07 Correction Period
A. If within two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance (or such longer period of time as may
be prescribed by the terms of any applicable special guarantee required by the Contract
00 73 10- 31
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 31 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents), any Work is found to be defective, or if the repair of any damages to the land or
areas made available for Contractor’s use by City or permitted by Laws and Regulations as
contemplated in Paragraph 5.10.A is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without
cost to City and in accordance with City’s written instructions:
1. repair such defective land or areas; or
2. correct such defective Work; or
3. if the defective Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it
with Work that is not defective, and
4. satisfactorily correct or repair or remove and replace any damage to other Work, to the work
of others or other land or areas resulting therefrom.
B. If Contractor does not promptly comply with the terms of City’s written instructions, or in an
emergency where delay would cause serious risk of loss or damage, City may have the defective
Work corrected or repaired or may have the rejected Work removed and replaced. All claims,
costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers,
architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs)
arising out of or relating to such correction or repair or such removal and replacement (including
but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others) will be paid by Contractor.
C. Where defective Work (and damage to other Work resulting therefrom) has been corrected or
removed and replaced under this Paragraph 11.07, the correction period hereunder with respect
to such Work may be required to be extended for an additional period of one year after the end
of the initial correction period. City shall provide 30 days written notice to Contractor and
Developer should such additional warranty coverage be required. Contractor’s obligations under
this Paragraph 11.07 are in addition to any other obligation or warranty. The provisions of this
Paragraph 11.07 shall not be construed as a substitute for, or a waiver of, the provisions of any
applicable statute of limitation or repose.
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work
A. If Contractor fails within a reasonable time after written notice from City to correct defective
Work, or to remove and replace rejected Work as required by City in accordance with Paragraph
11.06.A, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents,
or if Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of the Contract Documents, City may,
after seven (7) days written notice to Contractor and the Developer, correct, or remedy any such
deficiency.
B. In exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09, City shall proceed
expeditiously. In connection with such corrective or remedial action, City may exclude
Contractor from all or part of the Site, take possession of all or part of the Work and suspend
Contractor’s services related thereto, and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment
incorporated in the Work, stored at the Site or for which City has paid Contractor but which are
00 73 10- 32
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 32 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow City, City’s representatives, agents, consultants,
employees, and City’s other contractors, access to the Site to enable City to exercise the rights
and remedies under this Paragraph.
C. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of
engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution
costs) incurred or sustained by City in exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph
13.09 will be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order will be issued incorporating the
necessary revisions in the Contract Documents with respect to the Work; and City shall be
entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price.
D. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Time because of any delay in the
performance of the Work attributable to the exercise of City’s rights and remedies under this
Paragraph 11.09.
ARTICLE 12 – COMPLETION
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title
Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all Work, materials, and equipment covered by any
Application for Payment will pass to City no later than the time of Final Acceptance and shall be
free and clear of all Liens.
12.02 Partial Utilization
A. Prior to Final Acceptance of all the Work, City may use or occupy any substantially completed
part of the Work which has specifically been identified in the Contract Documents, or which
City, determines constitutes a separately functioning and usable part of the Work that can be
used by City for its intended purpose without significant interference with Contractor’s
performance of the remainder of the Work. City at any time may notify Contractor in writing to
permit City to use or occupy any such part of the Work which City determines to be ready for its
intended use, subject to the following conditions:
1. Contractor at any time may notify City in writing that Contractor considers any such part of
the Work ready for its intended use.
2. Within a reasonable time after notification as enumerated in Paragraph 14.05.A.1, City and
Contractor shall make an inspection of that part of the Work to determine its status of
completion. If City does not consider that part of the Work to be substantially complete, City
will notify Contractor in writing giving the reasons therefor.
3. Partial Utilization will not constitute Final Acceptance by City.
12.03 Final Inspection
A. Upon written notice from Contractor that the entire Work is complete in accordance with the
Contract Documents:
00 73 10- 33
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 33 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. within 10 days, City will schedule a Final Inspection with Contractor.
2. City will notify Contractor in writing of all particulars in which this inspection reveals that
the Work is incomplete or defective. Contractor shall immediately take such measures as are
necessary to complete such Work or remedy such deficiencies.
12.04 Final Acceptance
A. Upon completion by Contractor to City’s satisfaction, of any additional Work identified in the
Final Inspection, City will issue to Contractor a letter of Final Acceptance upon the satisfaction
of the following:
1. All documentation called for in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the
evidence of insurance required by Paragraph 5.03;
2. consent of the surety, if any, to Final Acceptance;
3. a list of all pending or released Damage Claims against City that Contractor believes are
unsettled; and
4. affidavits of payments and complete and legally effective releases or waivers (satisfactory to
City) of all Lien rights arising out of or Liens filed in connection with the Work.
5. after all Damage Claims have been resolved:
a. directly by the Contractor or;
b. Contractor provides evidence that the Damage Claim has been reported to Contractor’s
insurance provider for resolution.
6. Issuing Final Acceptance by the City shall not relieve the Contractor of any guarantees or
other requirements of the Contract Documents which specifically continue thereafter.
ARTICLE 13 – SUSPENSION OF WORK
13.01 City May Suspend Work
A. At any time and without cause, City may suspend the Work or any portion thereof by written
notice to Contractor and which may fix the date on which Work will be resumed. Contractor
shall resume the Work on the date so fixed. During temporary suspension of the Work covered
by these Contract Documents, for any reason, the City will stop contract time on City
participation projects.
B. Should the Contractor not be able to complete a portion of the Project due to causes beyond the
control of and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, and should it be determined by
mutual consent of the Contractor and City that a solution to allow construction to proceed is not
00 73 10- 34
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 34 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
available within a reasonable period of time, Contractor may request an extension in Contract
Time, directly attributable to any such suspension.
C. If it should become necessary to suspend the Work for an indefinite period, the Contractor shall
store all materials in such a manner that they will not obstruct or impede the public unnecessarily
nor become damaged in any way, and he shall take every precaution to prevent damage or
deterioration of the work performed; he shall provide suitable drainage about the work, and erect
temporary structures where necessary.
ARTICLE 14 – MISCELLANEOUS
14.01 Giving Notice
A. Whenever any provision of the Contract Documents requires the giving of written notice, it will
be deemed to have been validly given if:
1. delivered in person to the individual or to a member of the firm or to an officer of the
corporation for whom it is intended; or
2. delivered at or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the last business
address known to the giver of the notice.
B. Business address changes must be promptly made in writing to the other party.
C. Whenever the Contract Documents specifies giving notice by electronic means such electronic
notice shall be deemed sufficient upon confirmation of receipt by the receiving party.
14.02 Computation of Times
When any period of time is referred to in the Contract Documents by days, it will be computed to
exclude the first and include the last day of such period. If the last day of any such period falls on a
Saturday or Sunday or on a day made a legal holiday the next Working Day shall become the last
day of the period.
14.03 Cumulative Remedies
The duties and obligations imposed by these General Conditions and the rights and remedies
available hereunder to the parties hereto are in addition to, and are not to be construed in any way as
a limitation of, any rights and remedies available to any or all of them which are otherwise imposed
or available by Laws or Regulations, by special warranty or guarantee, or by other provisions of the
Contract Documents. The provisions of this Paragraph will be as effective as if repeated specifically
in the Contract Documents in connection with each particular duty, obligation, right, and remedy to
which they apply.
00 73 10- 35
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 35 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.04 Survival of Obligations
All representations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in
accordance with the Contract Documents, as well as all continuing obligations indicated in the
Contract Documents, will survive final payment, completion, and acceptance of the Work or
termination or completion of the Contract or termination of the services of Contractor.
14.05 Headings
Article and paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute parts of these
General Conditions.
01 11 00 - 1
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects CPN 102808
Revised December 20, 2012
1 SECTION 01 11 00
2 SUMMARY OF WORK
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. Summary of Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents
7 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
8 1. None.
9 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
10 1. Division 0 - Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and Conditions of the Contract
11 2. Division 1 - General Requirements
12 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
13 A. Measurement and Payment
14 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
15 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
16 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
17 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
18 A. Work Covered by Contract Documents
19 1. Work is to include furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing
20 all Work necessary for this construction project as detailed in the Drawings and
21 Specifications.
22 B. Subsidiary Work
23 1. Any and all Work specifically governed by documentary requirements for the
24 project, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or Contract Documents in
25 which no specific item for bid has been provided for in the Proposal and the item is
26 not a typical unit bid item included on the standard bid item list, then the item shall
27 be considered as a subsidiary item of Work, the cost of which shall be included in
28 the price bid in the Proposal for various bid items.
29 C. Use of Premises
30 1. Coordinate uses of premises under direction of the City.
31 2. Assume full responsibility for protection and safekeeping of materials and
32 equipment stored on the Site.
33 3. Use and occupy only portions of the public streets and alleys, or other public places
34 or other rights-of-way as provided for in the ordinances of the City, as shown in the
35 Contract Documents, or as may be specifically authorized in writing by the City.
36 a. A reasonable amount of tools, materials, and equipment for construction
37 purposes may be stored in such space, but no more than is necessary to avoid
38 delay in the construction operations.
01 11 00 - 2
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects CPN 102808
Revised December 20, 2012
1 b. Excavated and waste materials shall be stored in such a way as not to interfere
2 with the use of spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed
3 and so as not to inconvenience occupants of adjacent property.
4 c. If the street is occupied by railroad tracks, the Work shall be carried on in such
5 manner as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad.
6 1) All Work shall be in accordance with railroad requirements set forth in
7 Division 0 as well as the railroad permit.
8 D. Work within Easements
9 1. Do not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously
10 obtained permission from the owner of such property.
11 2. Do not store equipment or material on private property unless and until the
12 specified approval of the property owner has been secured in writing by the
13 Contractor and a copy furnished to the City.
14 3. Unless specifically provided otherwise, clear all rights-of-way or easements of
15 obstructions which must be removed to make possible proper prosecution of the
16 Work as a part of the project construction operations.
17 4. Preserve and use every precaution to prevent damage to, all trees, shrubbery, plants,
18 lawns, fences, culverts, curbing, and all other types of structures or improvements,
19 to all water, sewer, and gas lines, to all conduits, overhead pole lines, or
20 appurtenances thereof, including the construction of temporary fences and to all
21 other public or private property adjacent to the Work.
22 5. Notify the proper representatives of the owners or occupants of the public or private
23 lands of interest in lands which might be affected by the Work.
24 a. Such notice shall be made at least 48 hours in advance of the beginning of the
25 Work.
26 b. Notices shall be applicable to both public and private utility companies and any
27 corporation, company, individual, or other, either as owners or occupants,
28 whose land or interest in land might be affected by the Work.
29 c. Be responsible for all damage or injury to property of any character resulting
30 from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in the manner or method or
31 execution of the Work, or at any time due to defective work, material, or
32 equipment.
33 6. Fence
34 a. Restore all fences encountered and removed during construction of the Project
35 to the original or a better than original condition.
36 b. Erect temporary fencing in place of the fencing removed whenever the Work is
37 not in progress and when the site is vacated overnight, and/or at all times to
38 provide site security.
39 c. The cost for all fence work within easements, including removal, temporary
40 closures and replacement, shall be subsidiary to the various items bid in the
41 project proposal, unless a bid item is specifically provided in the proposal.
01 11 00 - 3
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects CPN 102808
Revised December 20, 2012
1 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
2 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
3 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
4 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
5 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
6 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
7 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
8 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
9 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
10 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
11 END OF SECTION
12
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
13
01 25 00 - 1
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 25 00
SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. The procedure for requesting the approval of substitution of a product that is not
equivalent to a product which is specified by descriptive or performance criteria or
defined by reference to 1 or more of the following:
a. Name of manufacturer
b. Name of vendor
c. Trade name
d. Catalog number
2. Substitutions are not "or-equals".
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No
separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Request for Substitution - General
1. Within 30 days after award of Contract (unless noted otherwise), the City will
consider formal requests from Contractor for substitution of products in place of
those specified.
2. Certain types of equipment and kinds of material are described in Specifications by
means of references to names of manufacturers and vendors, trade names, or catalog
numbers.
a. When this method of specifying is used, it is not intended to exclude from
consideration other products bearing other manufacturer's or vendor's names,
trade names, or catalog numbers, provided said products are "or-equals," as
determined by City.
3. Other types of equipment and kinds of material may be acceptable substitutions
under the following conditions:
01 25 00 - 2
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
a. Or-equals are unavailable due to strike, discontinued production of products
meeting specified requirements, or other factors beyond control of Contractor;
or,
b. Contractor proposes a cost and/or time reduction incentive to the City.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. See Request for Substitution Form (attached)
B. Procedure for Requesting Substitution
1. Substitution shall be considered only:
a. After award of Contract
b. Under the conditions stated herein
2. Submit 3 copies of each written request for substitution, including:
a. Documentation
1) Complete data substantiating compliance of proposed substitution with
Contract Documents
2) Data relating to changes in construction schedule, when a reduction is
proposed
3) Data relating to changes in cost
b. For products
1) Product identification
a) Manufacturer's name
b) Telephone number and representative contact name
c) Specification Section or Drawing reference of originally specified
product, including discrete name or tag number assigned to original
product in the Contract Documents
2) Manufacturer's literature clearly marked to show compliance of proposed
product with Contract Documents
3) Itemized comparison of original and proposed product addressing product
characteristics including, but not necessarily limited to: a) Size
b) Composition or materials of construction
c) Weight
d) Electrical or mechanical requirements
4) Product experience
a) Location of past projects utilizing product
b) Name and telephone number of persons associated with referenced
projects knowledgeable concerning proposed product
c) Available field data and reports associated with proposed product
5) Samples
a) Provide at request of City.
b) Samples become the property of the City.
c. For construction methods:
1) Detailed description of proposed method
2) Illustration drawings
C. Approval or Rejection
01 25 00 - 3
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
1. Written approval or rejection of substitution given by the City
2. City reserves the right to require proposed product to comply with color and pattern
of specified product if necessary to secure design intent.
3. In the event the substitution is approved, if a reduction in cost or time results, it will
be documented by Change Order.
4. Substitution will be rejected if:
a. Submittal is not through the Contractor with his stamp of approval
b. Request is not made in accordance with this Specification Section
c. In the Developer’s opinion, acceptance will require substantial revision of
the original design
d. In the City’s or Developer’s opinion, substitution will not perform
adequately the function consistent with the design intent
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. In making request for substitution or in using an approved product, the Contractor
represents that the Contractor:
1. Has investigated proposed product, and has determined that it is adequate or superior
in all respects to that specified, and that it will perform function for which it is
intended
2. Will provide same guarantee for substitute item as for product specified
3. Will coordinate installation of accepted substitution into Work, to include building
modifications if necessary, making such changes as may be required for Work to be
complete in all respects
4. Waives all claims for additional costs related to substitution which subsequently
arise
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
01 25 00 - 4
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION FORM:
TO:
We hereby submit for your consideration the following product instead of the specified item for
the above project:
SECTION PARAGRAPH SPECIFIED ITEM
Proposed Substitution:
Reason for Substitution:
Include complete information on changes to Drawings and/or Specifications which proposed
substitution will require for its proper installation.
Fill in Blanks Below:
A. Will the undersigned contractor pay for changes to the building design, including engineering
and detailing costs caused by the requested substitution?
B. What effect does substitution have on other trades?
C. Differences between proposed substitution and specified item?
D. Differences in product cost or product delivery time?
E. Manufacturer's guarantees of the proposed and specified items are:
Equal Better (explain on attachment)
The undersigned states that the function, appearance and quality are equivalent or superior to the
specified item.
Submitted By: For Use by City
PROJECT: DATE:
01 25 00 - 5
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 5 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
Address
By
Date
Date
Telephone
For Use by City:
Approved Rejected City Date
Signature
as noted
Recommended Recommended
Firm Not recommended Received late
Remarks
01 31 19 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 31 19
PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Provisions for the preconstruction meeting to be held prior to the start of Work to
clarify construction contract administration procedures
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. No construction schedule required unless requested by the City.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Coordination
1. Attend preconstruction meeting.
2. Representatives of Contractor, subcontractors and suppliers attending meetings
shall be qualified and authorized to act on behalf of the entity each represents.
3. Meeting administered by City may be tape recorded.
a. If recorded, tapes will be used to prepare minutes and retained by City for
future reference.
B. Preconstruction Meeting
1. A preconstruction meeting will be held within 14 days after the delivery of the
distribution package to the City.
a. The meeting will be scheduled and administered by the City.
2. The Project Representative will preside at the meeting, prepare the notes of the
meeting and distribute copies of same to all participants who so request by fully
completing the attendance form to be circulated at the beginning of the meeting.
3. Attendance shall include:
a. Developer and Consultant
b. Contractor's project manager
c. Contractor's superintendent
01 31 19 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
d. Any subcontractor or supplier representatives whom the Contractor may desire
to invite or the City may request
e. Other City representatives
f. Others as appropriate
4. Preliminary Agenda may include:
a. Introduction of Project Personnel
b. General Description of Project
c. Status of right-of-way, utility clearances, easements or other pertinent permits
d. Contractor’s work plan and schedule
e. Contract Time
f. Notice to Proceed
g. Construction Staking
h. Progress Payments
i. Extra Work and Change Order Procedures
j. Field Orders
k. Disposal Site Letter for Waste Material
l. Insurance Renewals
m. Payroll Certification
n. Material Certifications and Quality Control Testing
o. Public Safety and Convenience
p. Documentation of Pre-Construction Conditions
q. Weekend Work Notification
r. Legal Holidays
s. Trench Safety Plans
t. Confined Space Entry Standards
u. Coordination with the City’s representative for operations of existing water
systems
v. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
w. Coordination with other Contractors
x. Early Warning System
y. Contractor Evaluation
z. Special Conditions applicable to the project
aa. Damages Claims bb. Submittal Procedures cc. Substitution Procedures dd.
Correspondence Routing ee. Record Drawings ff. Temporary construction
facilities gg. MBE/SBE procedures hh. Final Acceptance ii. Final Payment jj.
Questions or Comments
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
01 31 19 - 3
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
01 32 33 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 1 of 2
SECTION 01 32 33
PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Administrative and procedural requirements for:
a. Preconstruction Videos
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. Though not mandatory, it is highly recommended on infill developer projects.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Preconstruction Video
1. Produce a preconstruction video of the site/alignment, including all areas in the vicinity
of and to be affected by construction.
a. Provide digital copy of video upon request by the City.
2. Retain a copy of the preconstruction video until the end of the maintenance surety
period.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
01 32 33 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 2 of 2
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 33 00 - 1
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 33 00
DAP SUBMITTALS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. General methods and requirements of submissions applicable to the following
Work-related submittals: a. Shop Drawings
b. Product Data (including Standard Product List submittals)
c. Samples
d. Mock Ups
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Coordination
1. Notify the City in writing, at the time of submittal, of any deviations in the
submittals from the requirements of the Contract Documents.
2. Coordination of Submittal Times
a. Prepare, prioritize and transmit each submittal sufficiently in advance of
performing the related Work or other applicable activities, or within the time
specified in the individual Work Sections, of the Specifications.
b. Contractor is responsible such that the installation will not be delayed by
processing times including, but not limited to:
a) Disapproval and resubmittal (if required)
b) Coordination with other submittals
c) Testing
d) Purchasing
e) Fabrication
f) Delivery
g) Similar sequenced activities
01 33 00 - 2
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
c. No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to
transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the Work.
d. Make submittals promptly in accordance with approved schedule, and in such
sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the work of any other
contractor.
B. Submittal Numbering
1. When submitting shop drawings or samples, utilize a 9-character submittal
crossreference identification numbering system in the following manner:
a. Use the first 6 digits of the applicable Specification Section Number.
b. For the next 2 digits number use numbers 01-99 to sequentially number each
initial separate item or drawing submitted under each specific Section number.
c. Last use a letter, A-Z, indicating the resubmission of the same drawing (i.e.
A=2nd submission, B=3rd submission, C=4th submission, etc.). A typical
submittal number would be as follows:
03 30 00-08-B
1) 03 30 00 is the Specification Section for Concrete
2) 08 is the eighth initial submittal under this Specification Section
3) B is the third submission (second resubmission) of that particular shop
drawing
C. Contractor Certification
1. Review shop drawings, product data and samples, including those by
subcontractors, prior to submission to determine and verify the following: a.
Field measurements
b. Field construction criteria
c. Catalog numbers and similar data
d. Conformance with the Contract Documents
2. Provide each shop drawing, sample and product data submitted by the Contractor
with a Certification Statement affixed including: a. The Contractor's Company
name
b. Signature of submittal reviewer
c. Certification Statement
1) “By this submittal, I hereby represent that I have determined and verified
field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions,
catalog numbers and similar data and I have checked and coordinated each
item with other applicable approved shop drawings."
D. Submittal Format
1. Fold shop drawings larger than 8 ½ inches x 11 inches to 8 ½ inches x 11inches.
2. Bind shop drawings and product data sheets together.
3. Order
a. Cover Sheet
1) Description of Packet
2) Contractor Certification
01 33 00 - 3
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
b. List of items / Table of Contents
c. Product Data /Shop Drawings/Samples /Calculations
E. Submittal Content
1. The date of submission and the dates of any previous submissions
2. The Project title and number
3. Contractor identification
4. The names of:
a. Contractor
b. Supplier
c. Manufacturer
5. Identification of the product, with the Specification Section number, page and
paragraph(s)
6. Field dimensions, clearly identified as such
7. Relation to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials
8. Applicable standards, such as ASTM or Federal Specification numbers
9. Identification by highlighting of deviations from Contract Documents
10. Identification by highlighting of revisions on resubmittals
11. An 8-inch x 3-inch blank space for Contractor and City stamps
F. Shop Drawings
1. As specified in individual Work Sections includes, but is not necessarily limited to:
a. Custom-prepared data such as fabrication and erection/installation (working)
drawings
b. Scheduled information
c. Setting diagrams
d. Actual shopwork manufacturing instructions
e. Custom templates
f. Special wiring diagrams
g. Coordination drawings
h. Individual system or equipment inspection and test reports including:
1) Performance curves and certifications
i. As applicable to the Work
2. Details
a. Relation of the various parts to the main members and lines of the structure
b. Where correct fabrication of the Work depends upon field measurements
1) Provide such measurements and note on the drawings prior to submitting
for approval.
G. Product Data
1. For submittals of product data for products included on the City’s Standard Product
List, clearly identify each item selected for use on the Project.
2. For submittals of product data for products not included on the City’s Standard
Product List, submittal data may include, but is not necessarily limited to:
a. Standard prepared data for manufactured products (sometimes referred to as
catalog data)
01 33 00 - 4
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
1) Such as the manufacturer's product specification and installation
instructions
2) Availability of colors and patterns
3) Manufacturer's printed statements of compliances and applicability
4) Roughing-in diagrams and templates
5) Catalog cuts
6) Product photographs
7) Standard wiring diagrams
8) Printed performance curves and operational-range diagrams
9) Production or quality control inspection and test reports and certifications
10) Mill reports
11) Product operating and maintenance instructions and recommended spare-
parts listing and printed product warranties
12) As applicable to the Work
H. Samples
1. As specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to:
a. Physical examples of the Work such as:
1) Sections of manufactured or fabricated Work
2) Small cuts or containers of materials
3) Complete units of repetitively used products color/texture/pattern swatches
and range sets
4) Specimens for coordination of visual effect
5) Graphic symbols and units of Work to be used by the City for independent
inspection and testing, as applicable to the Work
I. Do not start Work requiring a shop drawing, sample or product data nor any material to
be fabricated or installed prior to the approval or qualified approval of such item.
1. Fabrication performed, materials purchased or on-site construction accomplished
which does not conform to approved shop drawings and data is at the Contractor's
risk.
2. The City will not be liable for any expense or delay due to corrections or remedies
required to accomplish conformity.
3. Complete project Work, materials, fabrication, and installations in conformance
with approved shop drawings, applicable samples, and product data.
J. Submittal Distribution
1. Electronic Distribution
a. Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be
uploaded to City’s Buzzsaw site, or another external FTP site approved by the
City.
b. Shop Drawings
1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
2) Hard Copies
a) 3 copies for all submittals
01 33 00 - 5
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
b) If Contractor requires more than 1 hard copy of Shop Drawings
returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed
above.
c. Product Data
1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
2) Hard Copies
a) 3 copies for all submittals
d. Samples
1) Distributed to the Project Representative
2. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)
a. Shop Drawings
1) Distributed to the City
2) Copies
a) 8 copies for mechanical submittals
b) 7 copies for all other submittals
c) If Contractor requires more than 3 copies of Shop Drawings returned,
Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed above.
b. Product Data
1) Distributed to the City
2) Copies
a) 4 copies
c. Samples
1) Distributed to the Project Representative
2) Copies
a) Submit the number stated in the respective Specification Sections.
3. Distribute reproductions of approved shop drawings and copies of approved
product data and samples, where required, to the job site file and elsewhere as
directed by the City.
a. Provide number of copies as directed by the City but not exceeding the number
previously specified.
K. Submittal Review
1. The review of shop drawings, data and samples will be for general conformance
with the design concept and Contract Documents. This is not to be construed as: a.
Permitting any departure from the Contract requirements
b. Relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including details,
dimensions, and materials
c. Approving departures from details furnished by the City, except as otherwise
provided herein
2. The review and approval of shop drawings, samples or product data by the City
does not relieve the Contractor from his/her responsibility with regard to the
fulfillment of the terms of the Contract.
a. All risks of error and omission are assumed by the Contractor, and the City will
have no responsibility therefore.
01 33 00 - 6
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
3. The Contractor remains responsible for details and accuracy, for coordinating the
Work with all other associated work and trades, for selecting fabrication processes,
for techniques of assembly and for performing Work in a safe manner.
4. If the shop drawings, data or samples as submitted describe variations and show a
departure from the Contract requirements which City finds to be in the interest of
the City and to be so minor as not to involve a change in Contract Price or time for
performance, the City may return the reviewed drawings without noting an
exception.
5. Submittals will be returned to the Contractor under 1 of the following codes:
a. Code 1
1) "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" is assigned when there are no notations or
comments on the submittal.
a) When returned under this code the Contractor may release the
equipment and/or material for manufacture.
b. Code 2
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED". This code is assigned when a confirmation of
the notations and comments IS NOT required by the Contractor.
a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the
final product.
c. Code 3
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED/RESUBMIT". This combination of codes is
assigned when notations and comments are extensive enough to require a
resubmittal of the package.
a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the
final product.
b) This resubmittal is to address all comments, omissions and non-
conforming items that were noted.
c) Resubmittal is to be received by the City within 15 Calendar Days of
the date of the City's transmittal requiring the resubmittal.
d. Code 4
1) "NOT APPROVED" is assigned when the submittal does not meet the intent
of the Contract Documents.
a) The Contractor must resubmit the entire package revised to bring the
submittal into conformance.
b) It may be necessary to resubmit using a different manufacturer/vendor
to meet the Contract Documents.
6. Resubmittals
a. Handled in the same manner as first submittals
1) Corrections other than requested by the City
2) Marked with revision triangle or other similar method
a) At Contractor’s risk if not marked
b. Submittals for each item will be reviewed no more than twice at the City’s
expense.
01 33 00 - 7
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
1) All subsequent reviews will be performed at times convenient to the City
and at the Contractor's expense, based on the City's or City
Representative’s then prevailing rates.
2) Provide Contractor reimbursement to the City within 30 Calendar Days for
all such fees invoiced by the City.
c. The need for more than 1 resubmission or any other delay in obtaining City's
review of submittals, will not entitle the Contractor to an extension of Contract
Time.
7. Partial Submittals
a. City reserves the right to not review submittals deemed partial, at the City’s
discretion.
b. Submittals deemed by the City to be not complete will be returned to the
Contractor, and will be considered "Not Approved" until resubmitted.
c. The City may at its option provide a list or mark the submittal directing the
Contractor to the areas that are incomplete.
8. If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the shop drawings to
constitute a change to the Contract Documents, then written notice must be
provided thereof to the Developer at least 7 Calendar Days prior to release for
manufacture.
9. When the shop drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the
Contractor may carry out the construction in accordance therewith and no further
changes therein except upon written instructions from the City.
10. Each submittal, appropriately coded, will be returned within 30 Calendar Days
following receipt of submittal by the City.
L. Mock ups
1. Mock Up units as specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily
limited to, complete units of the standard of acceptance for that type of Work to be
used on the Project. Remove at the completion of the Work or when directed.
M. Qualifications
1. If specifically required in other Sections of these Specifications, submit a P.E.
Certification for each item required.
N. Request for Information (RFI)
1. Contractor Request for additional information
a. Clarification or interpretation of the contract documents
b. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between Contract Documents
c. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between the Drawings and
Specifications
1) Identify the conflict and request clarification
2. Sufficient information shall be attached to permit a written response without further
information.
01 33 00 - 8
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August 30, 2013
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
12/20/2012 D. Johnson 1.4.K.8. Working Days modified to Calendar Days
01 35 13 - 1
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 SECTION 01 35 13
2 SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. The procedures for special project circumstances that includes, but is not limited to:
7 a. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation
8 b. Work near High Voltage Lines
9 c. Confined Space Entry Program
10 d. Air Pollution Watch Days
11 e. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc.
12 f. Water Department Notification
13 g. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction
14 h. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers
15 i. Coordination within Railroad permits areas
16 j. Dust Control
17 k. Employee Parking
18
19 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
20 1. None.
21 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
22 1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
23 2. Division 1 – General Requirements
24 3. Section 33 12 25 – Connection to Existing Water Mains
25
26 1.2 REFERENCES
27 A. Reference Standards
28 1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference
29 standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
30 Specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
31 2. Health and Safety Code, Title 9. Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752.
32 High Voltage Overhead Lines.
33 3. North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) – Clean Construction
34 Specification
35 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
36 A. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation
37 1. When work in the right-of-way which is under the jurisdiction of the Texas
38 Department of Transportation (TxDOT):
39 a. Notify the Texas Department of Transportation prior to commencing any work
40 therein in accordance with the provisions of the permit
01 35 13 - 2
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 b. All work performed in the TxDOT right-of-way shall be performed in
2 compliance with and subject to approval from the Texas Department of
3 Transportation
4 B. Work near High Voltage Lines
5 1. Regulatory Requirements
6 a. All Work near High Voltage Lines (more than 600 volts measured between
7 conductors or between a conductor and the ground) shall be in accordance with
8 Health and Safety Code, Title 9, Subtitle A, Chapter 752.
9 2. Warning sign
10 a. Provide sign of sufficient size meeting all OSHA requirements.
11 3. Equipment operating within 10 feet of high voltage lines will require the following
12 safety features
13 a. Insulating cage-type of guard about the boom or arm
14 b. Insulator links on the lift hook connections for back hoes or dippers
15 c. Equipment must meet the safety requirements as set forth by OSHA and the
16 safety requirements of the owner of the high voltage lines
17 4. Work within 6 feet of high voltage electric lines
18 a. Notification shall be given to:
19 1) The power company (example: ONCOR)
20 a) Maintain an accurate log of all such calls to power company and record
21 action taken in each case.
22 b. Coordination with power company
23 1) After notification coordinate with the power company to:
24 a) Erect temporary mechanical barriers, de-energize the lines, or raise or
25 lower the lines
26 c. No personnel may work within 6 feet of a high voltage line before the above
27 requirements have been met.
28 C. Confined Space Entry Program
29 1. Provide and follow approved Confined Space Entry Program in accordance with
30 OSHA requirements.
31 2. Confined Spaces include:
32 a. Manholes
33 b. All other confined spaces in accordance with OSHA’s Permit Required for
34 Confined Spaces
35 D. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc.
36 1. When Contract Documents permit on the project the following will apply:
37 a. Public Notification
38 1) Submit notice to City and proof of adequate insurance coverage, 24 hours
39 prior to commencing.
40 2) Minimum 24 hour public notification in accordance with Section 01 31 13
41 E. Water Department Coordination
42 1. During the construction of this project, it will be necessary to deactivate, for a
43 period of time, existing lines. The Contractor shall be required to coordinate with
44 the Water Department to determine the best times for deactivating and activating
45 those lines.
01 35 13 - 3
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 2. Coordinate any event that will require connecting to or the operation of an existing
2 City water line system with the City’s representative.
3 a. Coordination shall be in accordance with Section 33 12 25.
4 b. If needed, obtain a hydrant water meter from the Water Department for use
5 during the life of named project.
6 c. In the event that a water valve on an existing live system be turned off and on
7 to accommodate the construction of the project is required, coordinate this
8 activity through the appropriate City representative.
9 1) Do not operate water line valves of existing water system.
10 a) Failure to comply will render the Contractor in violation of Texas Penal
11 Code Title 7, Chapter 28.03 (Criminal Mischief) and the Contractor
12 will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
13 b) In addition, the Contractor will assume all liabilities and
14 responsibilities as a result of these actions.
15 F. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction
16 1. Prior to beginning construction on any block in the project, on a block by block
17 basis, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of the pending construction to the front
18 door of each residence or business that will be impacted by construction. The notice
19 shall be prepared as follows:
20 a. Post notice or flyer 7 days prior to beginning any construction activity on each
21 block in the project area.
22 1) Prepare flyer on the Contractor’s letterhead and include the following
23 information:
24 a) Name of Project
25 b) City Project No (CPN)
26 c) Scope of Project (i.e. type of construction activity)
27 d) Actual construction duration within the block
28 e) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number
29 f) Name of the City’s inspector and phone number
30 g) City’s after-hours phone number
31 2) A sample of the ‘pre-construction notification’ flyer is attached as Exhibit
32 A.
33 3) Submit schedule showing the construction start and finish time for each
34 block of the project to the inspector.
35 4) Deliver flyer to the City Inspector for review prior to distribution.
36 b. No construction will be allowed to begin on any block until the flyer is
37 delivered to all residents of the block.
38 G. Public Notification of Temporary Water Service Interruption during Construction
39 1. In the event it becomes necessary to temporarily shut down water service to
40 residents or businesses during construction, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of
41 the pending interruption to the front door of each affected resident.
42 2. Prepared notice as follows:
43 a. The notification or flyer shall be posted 24 hours prior to the temporary
44 interruption.
45 b. Prepare flyer on the contractor’s letterhead and include the following
46 information:
47 1) Name of the project
48 2) City Project Number
01 35 13 - 4
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 3) Date of the interruption of service
2 4) Period the interruption will take place
3 5) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number
4 6) Name of the City’s inspector and phone number
5 c. A sample of the temporary water service interruption notification is attached as
6 Exhibit B.
7 d. Deliver a copy of the temporary interruption notification to the City inspector
8 for review prior to being distributed.
9 e. No interruption of water service can occur until the flyer has been delivered to
10 all affected residents and businesses.
11 f. Electronic versions of the sample flyers can be obtained from the Project
12 Construction Inspector.
13 H. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
14 1. At locations in the Project where construction activities occur in areas where
15 USACE permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated
16 permit.
17 I. Coordination within Railroad Permit Areas
18 1. At locations in the project where construction activities occur in areas where
19 railroad permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated
20 railroad permit. This includes, but is not limited to, provisions for:
21 a. Flagmen
22 b. Inspectors
23 c. Safety training
24 d. Additional insurance
25 e. Insurance certificates
26 f. Other employees required to protect the right-of-way and property of the
27 Railroad Company from damage arising out of and/or from the construction of
28 the project. Proper utility clearance procedures shall be used in accordance
29 with the permit guidelines.
30 2. Obtain any supplemental information needed to comply with the railroad’s
31 requirements.
32 J. Dust Control
33 1. Use acceptable measures to control dust at the Site.
34 a. If water is used to control dust, capture and properly dispose of waste water.
35 b. If wet saw cutting is performed, capture and properly dispose of slurry.
36 K. Employee Parking
37 1. Provide parking for employees at locations approved by the City.
01 35 13 - 5
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 5 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 1.4 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
2 1.5 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
3 1.6 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
4 1.7 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
5 1.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
6 1.9 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
7 1.10 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
8 1.11 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
9 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
10 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
11 END OF SECTION
12
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson
1.3.B – Added requirement of compliance with Health and Safety Code, Title 9.
Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752. High Voltage Overhead Lines.
01 35 13 - 6
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 6 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 EXHIBIT A
2 (To be printed on Contractor’s Letterhead)
3
4
5
6 Date:
7
8 CPN No.:
9 Project Name:
10 Mapsco Location:
11 Limits of Construction:
12
13
14
15
16
17 THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT UNDER A CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF FORT
18 WORTH, OUR COMPANY WILL WORK ON UTILITY LINES ON OR AROUND YOUR
19 PROPERTY.
20
21 CONSTRUCTION WILL BEGIN APPROXIMATELY SEVEN DAYS FROM THE DATE
22 OF THIS NOTICE.
23
24 IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESS, SECURITY, SAFETY OR ANY OTHER
25 ISSUE, PLEASE CALL:
26
27
28 Mr. <CONTRACTOR’S SUPERINTENDENT> AT <TELEPHONE NO.>
29
30 OR
31
32 Mr. <CITY INSPECTOR> AT < TELEPHONE NO.>
33
34 AFTER 4:30 PM OR ON WEEKENDS, PLEASE CALL (817) 392 8306
35
36 PLEASE KEEP THIS FLYER HANDY WHEN YOU CALL
01 35 13 - 7
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 7 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 EXHIBIT B
2
3
4
01 45 23
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
SECTION 01 45 23
TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Testing and inspection services procedures and coordination
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the
Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items
bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
a. Contractor is responsible for performing, coordinating, and payment of
all Quality Control testing.
b. City is responsible for performing and payment for first set of Quality
Assurance testing.
1) If the first Quality Assurance test performed by the City fails, the
Contractor is responsible for payment of subsequent Quality
Assurance testing until a passing test occurs.
a) Final acceptance will not be issued by City until all required
payments for testing by Contractor have been paid in full.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Testing
1. Complete testing in accordance with the Contract Documents.
2. Coordination
a. When testing is required to be performed by the City, notify City,
sufficiently in advance, when testing is needed.
b. When testing is required to be completed by the Contractor, notify City,
sufficiently in advance, that testing will be performed.
3. Distribution of Testing Reports
a. Electronic Distribution
01 45 23
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
1) Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals
to be uploaded to the City’s document management system, or
another form of distribution approved by the City.
2) Upload test reports to designated project directory and notify
appropriate City representatives via email of submittal posting.
3) Hard Copies
a) 1 copy for all submittals submitted to the Project
Representative
b. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)
1) Tests performed by City
a) Distribute 1 hard copy to the Contractor
2) Tests performed by the Contractor
a) Distribute 3 hard copies to City’s Project Representative
4. Provide City’s Project Representative with trip tickets for each delivered
load of Concrete or Lime material including the following information:
a. Name of pit
b. Date of delivery
c. Material delivered
B. Inspection
1. Inspection or lack of inspection does not relieve the Contractor from
obligation to perform work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
01 45 23
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
03/20/2020 D.V. Magaña Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that electronic submittals be uploaded
through the City’s document management system.
01 50 00 - 1
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised JULY 1, 2011
SECTION 01 50 00
TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Provide temporary facilities and controls needed for the Work including, but not
necessarily limited to:
a. Temporary utilities
b. Sanitary facilities
c. Storage Sheds and Buildings
d. Dust control
e. Temporary fencing of the construction site
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Temporary Utilities
1. Obtaining Temporary Service
a. Make arrangements with utility service companies for temporary services.
b. Abide by rules and regulations of utility service companies or authorities
having jurisdiction.
c. Be responsible for utility service costs until Work is approved for Final
Acceptance.
1) Included are fuel, power, light, heat and other utility services necessary for
execution, completion, testing and initial operation of Work.
2. Water
a. Contractor to provide water required for and in connection with Work to be
performed and for specified tests of piping, equipment, devices or other use as
required for the completion of the Work.
b. Provide and maintain adequate supply of potable water for domestic
consumption by Contractor personnel and City’s Project Representatives.
01 50 00 - 2
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised JULY 1, 2011
c. Coordination
1) Contact City 1 week before water for construction is desired
d. Contractor Payment for Construction Water
1) Obtain construction water meter from City for payment as billed by City’s
established rates.
3. Electricity and Lighting
a. Provide and pay for electric powered service as required for Work, including
testing of Work.
1) Provide power for lighting, operation of equipment, or other use.
b. Electric power service includes temporary power service or generator to
maintain operations during scheduled shutdown.
4. Telephone
a. Provide emergency telephone service at Site for use by Contractor personnel
and others performing work or furnishing services at Site.
5. Temporary Heat and Ventilation
a. Provide temporary heat as necessary for protection or completion of Work.
b. Provide temporary heat and ventilation to assure safe working conditions.
B. Sanitary Facilities
1. Provide and maintain sanitary facilities for persons on Site.
a. Comply with regulations of State and local departments of health.
2. Enforce use of sanitary facilities by construction personnel at job site.
a. Enclose and anchor sanitary facilities.
b. No discharge will be allowed from these facilities.
c. Collect and store sewage and waste so as not to cause nuisance or health
problem.
d. Haul sewage and waste off-site at no less than weekly intervals and properly
dispose in accordance with applicable regulation.
3. Locate facilities near Work Site and keep clean and maintained throughout Project.
4. Remove facilities at completion of Project
C. Storage Sheds and Buildings
1. Provide adequately ventilated, watertight, weatherproof storage facilities with floor
above ground level for materials and equipment susceptible to weather damage.
2. Storage of materials not susceptible to weather damage may be on blocks off
ground.
3. Store materials in a neat and orderly manner.
a. Place materials and equipment to permit easy access for identification, inspection
and inventory.
4. Equip building with lockable doors and lighting, and provide electrical service for
equipment space heaters and heating or ventilation as necessary to provide storage
environments acceptable to specified manufacturers.
5. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage away from
temporary and existing buildings.
6. Remove building from site prior to Final Acceptance.
01 50 00 - 3
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised JULY 1, 2011
D. Temporary Fencing
1. Provide and maintain for the duration or construction when required in contract
documents
E. Dust Control
1. Contractor is responsible for maintaining dust control through the duration of the
project.
a. Contractor remains on-call at all times
b. Must respond in a timely manner
F. Temporary Protection of Construction
1. Contractor or subcontractors are responsible for protecting Work from damage due
to weather.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 INSTALLATION
A. Temporary Facilities
1. Maintain all temporary facilities for duration of construction activities as needed.
3.5 [REPAIR] / [RESTORATION]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
01 50 00 - 4
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised JULY 1, 2011
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES
A. Temporary Facilities
1. Remove all temporary facilities and restore area after completion of the Work, to a
condition equal to or better than prior to start of Work.
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 57 13
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
SECTION 01 57 13
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Procedures for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the
Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 31 25 00 – Erosion and Sediment Control
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Construction Activities resulting in less than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items
bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
2. Construction Activities resulting in greater than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Measurement and Payment shall be in accordance with Section 31 25 00.
1.3 REFERENCES
A. Abbreviations and Acronyms
1. Notice of Intent: NOI
2. Notice of Termination: NOT
3. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: SWPPP
4. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality: TCEQ
5. Notice of Change: NOC
A. Reference Standards
1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference
standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
Specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
2. Integrated Storm Management (iSWM) Technical Manual for Construction
Controls
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. General
01 57 13
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
1. Contractor is responsible for resolution and payment of any fines issued associated
with compliance to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
B. Construction Activities resulting in:
1. Less than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with Section 31 25 00 and
Drawings.
2. 1 to less than 5 acres of disturbance
a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction
Permit is required
b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements
1) TCEQ Small Construction Site Notice Required under general permit
TXR150000
a) Sign and post at job site
b) Prior to Preconstruction Meeting, send 1 copy to City Department of
Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817)
3926088.
2) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with:
a) Section 31 25 00
b) The Drawings
c) TXR150000 General Permit
d) SWPPP
e) TCEQ requirements
3. 5 acres or more of Disturbance
a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction
Permit is required
b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements
1) Prepare a TCEQ NOI form and submit to TCEQ along with required fee
a) Sign and post at job site
b) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works,
Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088.
2) TCEQ Notice of Change required if making changes or updates to NOI 3)
Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with:
a) Section 31 25 00
b) The Drawings
c) TXR150000 General Permit
d) SWPPP
e) TCEQ requirements
4) Once the project has been completed and all the closeout requirements of
TCEQ have been met a TCEQ Notice of Termination can be submitted.
a) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works,
Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. SWPPP
1. Submit in accordance with Section 01 33 00, except as stated herein.
01 57 13
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
a. Prior to the Preconstruction Meeting, submit a draft copy of SWPPP to the City
as follows:
1) 1 copy to the City Project Manager
a) City Project Manager will forward to the City Department of
Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division for review
B. Modified SWPPP
1. If the SWPPP is revised during construction, resubmit modified SWPPP to the City
in accordance with Section 01 33 00.
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
01 60 00
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 2
SECTION 01 60 00
PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. References for Product Requirements and City Standard Products List
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES [NOT USED]
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A list of City approved products for use is available through the City’s website at:
https://apps.fortworthtexas.gov/ProjectResources/ and following the directory
path: 02 - Construction Documents\Standard Products List
A. Only products specifically included on City’s Standard Product List in these Contract
Documents shall be allowed for use on the Project.
1. Any subsequently approved products will only be allowed for use upon specific
approval by the City.
B. Any specific product requirements in the Contract Documents supersede similar
products included on the City’s Standard Product List.
1. The City reserves the right to not allow products to be used for certain projects even
though the product is listed on the City’s Standard Product List.
C. Although a specific product is included on City’s Standard Product List, not all products
from that manufacturer are approved for use, including but not limited to, that
manufacturer’s standard product.
D. See Section 01 33 00 for submittal requirements of Product Data included on City’s
Standard Product List.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised March 20, 2020
10 60 00
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 2
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
10/12/12 D. Johnson Modified Location of City’s Standard Product List
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
03/20/2020 D.V. Magaña Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that the City approved products list is
accessible through the City’s website.
01 66 00 - 1
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 66 00
PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Scheduling of product delivery
2. Packaging of products for delivery
3. Protection of products against damage from:
a. Handling
b. Exposure to elements or harsh environments
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY AND HANDLING
A. Delivery Requirements
1. Schedule delivery of products or equipment as required to allow timely installation
and to avoid prolonged storage.
2. Provide appropriate personnel and equipment to receive deliveries.
3. Delivery trucks will not be permitted to wait extended periods of time on the Site
for personnel or equipment to receive the delivery.
01 66 00 - 2
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
4. Deliver products or equipment in manufacturer's original unbroken cartons or other
containers designed and constructed to protect the contents from physical or
environmental damage.
5. Clearly and fully mark and identify as to manufacturer, item and installation
location.
6. Provide manufacturer's instructions for storage and handling.
B. Handling Requirements
1. Handle products or equipment in accordance with these Contract Documents and
manufacturer’s recommendations and instructions.
C. Storage Requirements
1. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations and
requirements of these Specifications.
2. Make necessary provisions for safe storage of materials and equipment.
a. Place loose soil materials and materials to be incorporated into Work to prevent
damage to any part of Work or existing facilities and to maintain free access at
all times to all parts of Work and to utility service company installations in
vicinity of Work.
3. Keep materials and equipment neatly and compactly stored in locations that will
cause minimum inconvenience to other contractors, public travel, adjoining owners,
tenants and occupants.
a. Arrange storage to provide easy access for inspection.
4. Restrict storage to areas available on construction site for storage of material and
equipment as shown on Drawings, or approved by City’s Project Representative.
5. Provide off-site storage and protection when on-site storage is not adequate.
a. Provide addresses of and access to off-site storage locations for inspection by
City’s Project Representative.
6. Do not use lawns, grass plots or other private property for storage purposes without
written permission of owner or other person in possession or control of premises.
7. Store in manufacturers’ unopened containers.
8. Neatly, safely and compactly stack materials delivered and stored along line of
Work to avoid inconvenience and damage to property owners and general public
and maintain at least 3 feet from fire hydrant.
9. Keep public and private driveways and street crossings open.
10. Repair or replace damaged lawns, sidewalks, streets or other improvements to
satisfaction of City’s Project Representative.
a. Total length which materials may be distributed along route of construction at
one time is 1,000 linear feet, unless otherwise approved in writing by City’s
Project Representative.
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
01 66 00 - 3
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 ERECTION [NOT USED]
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL
A. Tests and Inspections
1. Inspect all products or equipment delivered to the site prior to unloading.
B. Non-Conforming Work
1. Reject all products or equipment that are damaged, used or in any other way
unsatisfactory for use on the project.
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION
A. Protect all products or equipment in accordance with manufacturer's written directions.
B. Store products or equipment in location to avoid physical damage to items while in
storage.
C. Protect equipment from exposure to elements and keep thoroughly dry if required by
the manufacturer.
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
01 66 00 - 4
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 70 00 - 1
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 70 00
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Mobilization and Demobilization
a. Mobilization
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to the Site
2) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation
at the Site
3) Premiums paid for performance and payment bonds
4) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to another location within the designated Site
5) Relocation of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation
from 1 location to another location on the Site.
b. Demobilization
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies away from the Site including disassembly
2) Site Clean-up
3) Removal of all buildings and/or other facilities assembled at the Site for
this
Contract
c. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of
work that are for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract.
2. Remobilization
a. Remobilization for Suspension of Work specifically required in the Contract
Documents or as required by City includes:
1) Demobilization
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies from the Site including disassembly or temporarily securing
equipment, supplies, and other facilities as designated by the Contract
Documents necessary to suspend the Work.
b) Site Clean-up as designated in the Contract Documents
2) Remobilization
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to the Site necessary to resume the Work.
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s
operation at the Site necessary to resume the Work.
3) No Payments will be made for:
a) Mobilization and Demobilization from one location to another on the
Site in the normal progress of performing the Work.
01 70 00 - 2
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
b) Stand-by or idle time
c) Lost profits
3. Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects
a. Mobilization and Demobilization
1) Mobilization shall consist of the activities and cost on a Work Order basis
necessary for:
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to the Site for the issued Work Order.
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s
operation at the Site for the issued Work Order
2) Demobilization shall consist of the activities and cost necessary for:
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies from the Site including disassembly for each issued Work
Order
b) Site Clean-up for each issued Work Order
c) Removal of all buildings or other facilities assembled at the Site for
each Work Oder
b. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of
work for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract.
4. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects
a. A Mobilization for Miscellaneous Projects when directed by the City and the
mobilization occurs within 24 hours of the issuance of the Work Order.
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Mobilization and Demobilization
a. Measure
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
b. Payment
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be
allowed.
2. Remobilization for suspension of Work as specifically required in the Contract
Documents
a. Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be per each remobilization performed.
b. Payment
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
01 70 00 - 3
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
price per each “Specified Remobilization” in accordance with Contract
Documents.
c. The price shall include:
1) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.1)
2) Remobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
3. Remobilization for suspension of Work as required by City
a. Measurement and Payment
1) This shall be submitted as a Contract Claim in accordance with Article 10
of Section 00 72 00.
2) No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated
with this Item.
4. Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects
a. Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents
b. Payment
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Work Order Mobilization” in accordance with Contract
Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to mobilization
and shall not be paid for separately.
c. The price shall include:
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.1)
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
5. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects
a. Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents
b. Payment
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Work Order Emergency Mobilization” in accordance with
Contract Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to
mobilization and shall not be paid for separately.
c. The price shall include
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.4.a)
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
01 70 00 - 4
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 71 23 - 1
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
1 SECTION 01 71 23
2 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. Requirements for construction staking and construction survey
7 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
8 1. See Changes (Highlighted in Yellow).
9 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
10 1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
11 2. Division 1 – General Requirements
12 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
13 A. Measurement and Payment
14 1. Construction Staking
15 a. Measurement
16 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
17 b. Payment
18 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this
19 Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will
20 be allowed.
21 2. Construction Survey
22 a. Measurement
23 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
24 b. Payment
25 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this
26 Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be
27 allowed.
28 3. As-Built Survey
29 a. Measurement
30 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
31 b. Payment
32 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this
33 Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be
34 allowed.
35
36
37
38
39
40
01 71 23 - 2
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
1 1.3 REFERENCES
2 A. Definitions
3 1. Construction Survey - The survey measurements made prior to or while
4 construction is in progress to control elevation, horizontal position, dimensions and
5 configuration of structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings.
6 2. As-built Survey –The measurements made after the construction of the
7 improvement features are complete to provide position coordinates for the features
8 of a project.
9 3. Construction Staking – The placement of stakes and markings to provide offsets
10 and elevations to cut and fill in order to locate on the ground the designed
11 structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings. Construction staking
12 shall include staking easements and/or right of way if indicated on the plans.
13 4. Survey “Field Checks” – Measurements made after construction staking is
14 completed and before construction work begins to ensure that structures marked on
15 the ground are accurately located per Project Drawings.
16 B. Technical References
17 1. City of Fort Worth – Construction Staking Standards (available on City’s Buzzsaw
18 website) – 01 71 23.16.01_ Attachment A_Survey Staking Standards
19 2. City of Fort Worth - Standard Survey Data Collector Library (fxl) files (available
20 on City’s Buzzsaw website).
21 3. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Survey Manual, latest revision
22 4. Texas Society of Professional Land Surveyors (TSPS), Manual of Practice for Land
23 Surveying in the State of Texas, Category 5
24
25 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
26 A. The Contractor’s selection of a surveyor must comply with Texas Government
27 Code 2254 (qualifications based selection) for this project.
28 1.5 SUBMITTALS
29 A. Submittals, if required, shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00.
30 B. All submittals shall be received and reviewed by the City prior to delivery of work.
31 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS
32 A. Field Quality Control Submittals
33 1. Documentation verifying accuracy of field engineering work, including coordinate
34 conversions if plans do not indicate grid or ground coordinates.
35 2. Submit “Cut-Sheets” conforming to the standard template provided by the City
36 (refer to 01 71 23.16.01 – Attachment A – Survey Staking Standards).
37
38 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS
39 B. As-built Redline Drawing Submittal
01 71 23 - 3
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
1 1. Submit As-Built Survey Redline Drawings documenting the locations/elevations of
2 constructed improvements signed and sealed by Registered Professional Land
3 Surveyor (RPLS) responsible for the work (refer to 01 71 23.16.01 – Attachment A
4 – Survey Staking Standards) .
5 2. Contractor shall submit the proposed as-built and completed redline drawing
6 submittal one (1) week prior to scheduling the project final inspection for City
7 review and comment. Revisions, if necessary, shall be made to the as-built redline
8 drawings and resubmitted to the City prior to scheduling the construction final
9 inspection.
10 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
11 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
12 A. Construction Staking
13 1. Construction staking will be performed by the Contractor.
14 2. Coordination
15 a. Contact City and Developer’s Project Representative at least one week in
16 advance notifying the City of when Construction Staking is scheduled.
17 b. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate staking such that
18 construction activities are not delayed or negatively impacted.
19 3. General
20 a. Contractor is responsible for preserving and maintaining stakes. If City
21 surveyors or Developer’s Project Representative are required to re-stake for
22 any reason, the Contractor will be responsible for costs to perform staking. If
23 in the opinion of the City, a sufficient number of stakes or markings have been
24 lost, destroyed disturbed or omitted that the contracted Work cannot take place
25 then the Contractor will be required to stake or re-stake the deficient areas.
26 B. Construction Survey
27 1. Construction Survey will be performed by the Contractor.
28 2. Coordination
29 a. Contractor to verify that horizontal and vertical control data established in the
30 design survey and required for construction survey is available and in place.
31 3. General
32 a. Construction survey will be performed in order to construct the work shown
33 on the Construction Drawings and specified in the Contract Documents.
34 b. For construction methods other than open cut, the Contractor shall perform
35 construction survey and verify control data including, but not limited to, the
36 following:
37 1) Verification that established benchmarks and control are accurate.
38 2) Use of Benchmarks to furnish and maintain all reference lines and grades
39 for tunneling.
40 3) Use of line and grades to establish the location of the pipe.
41 4) Submit to the City copies of field notes used to establish all lines and
42 grades, if requested, and allow the City to check guidance system setup prior
43 to beginning each tunneling drive.
44 5) Provide access for the City, if requested, to verify the guidance system and
45 the line and grade of the carrier pipe.
01 71 23 - 4
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
1 6) The Contractor remains fully responsible for the accuracy of the work and
2 correction of it, as required.
3 7) Monitor line and grade continuously during construction.
4 8) Record deviation with respect to design line and grade once at each pipe
5 joint and submit daily records to the City.
6 9) If the installation does not meet the specified tolerances (as outlined in
7 Sections 33 05 23 and/or 33 05 24), immediately notify the City and correct
8 the installation in accordance with the Contract Documents.
9 C. As-Built Survey
10 1. Required As-Built Survey will be performed by the Contractor.
11 2. Coordination
12 a. Contractor is to coordinate with City to confirm which features require as-
13 built surveying.
14 b. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate the as-built survey and
15 required measurements for items that are to be buried such that construction
16 activities are not delayed or negatively impacted.
17 c. For sewer mains and water mains 12” and under in diameter, it is acceptable
18 to physically measure depth and mark the location during the progress of
19 construction and take as-built survey after the facility has been buried. The
20 Contractor is responsible for the quality control needed to ensure accuracy.
21 3. General
22 a. The Contractor shall provide as-built survey including the elevation and
23 location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction
24 features during the progress of the construction including the following:
25 1) Water Lines
26 a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for waterlines at the following
27 locations:
28 (1) Minimum every 250 linear feet, including
29 (2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature,
30 etc.
31 (3) Fire line tee
32 (4) Plugs, stub-outs, dead-end lines
33 (5) Casing pipe (each end) and all buried fittings
34 2) Sanitary Sewer
35 a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for force mains and siphon
36 sanitary sewer lines (non-gravity facilities) at the following locations:
37 (1) Minimum every 250 linear feet and any buried fittings
38 (2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature,
39 etc.
40 3) Stormwater – Not Applicable
41 b. The Contractor shall provide as-built survey including the elevation and
42 location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction
43 features after the construction is completed including the following:
44 1) Manholes
45 a) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each manhole
46 2) Water Lines
47 a) Cathodic protection test stations
48 b) Sampling stations
49 c) Meter boxes/vaults (All sizes)
01 71 23 - 5
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
1 d) Fire hydrants
2 e) Valves (gate, butterfly, etc.)
3 f) Air Release valves (Manhole rim and vent pipe)
4 g) Blow off valves (Manhole rim and valve lid)
5 h) Pressure plane valves
6 i) Underground Vaults
7 (1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each
8 Underground Vault.
9 3) Sanitary Sewer
10 a) Cleanouts
11 (1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each
12 b) Manholes and Junction Structures
13 (1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each
14 manhole and junction structure.
15 4) Stormwater – Not Applicable
16 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
17 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
18 1.12 WARRANTY
19 PART 2 - PRODUCTS
20 A. A construction survey will produce, but will not be limited to:
21 1. Recovery of relevant control points, points of curvature and points of intersection.
22 2. Establish temporary horizontal and vertical control elevations (benchmarks)
23 sufficiently permanent and located in a manner to be used throughout construction.
24 3. The location of planned facilities, easements and improvements.
25 a. Establishing final line and grade stakes for piers, floors, grade beams, parking
26 areas, utilities, streets, highways, tunnels, and other construction.
27 b. A record of revisions or corrections noted in an orderly manner for reference.
28 c. A drawing, when required by the client, indicating the horizontal and vertical
29 location of facilities, easements and improvements, as built.
30 4. Cut sheets shall be provided to the City inspector and Survey Superintendent for all
31 construction staking projects. These cut sheets shall be on the standard city template
32 which can be obtained from the Survey Superintendent (817-392-7925).
33 5. Digital survey files in the following formats shall be acceptable:
34 a. AutoCAD (.dwg)
35 b. ESRI Shapefile (.shp)
36 c. CSV file (.csv), formatted with X and Y coordinates in separate columns (use
37 standard templates, if available)
38 6. Survey files shall include vertical and horizontal data tied to original project
39 control and benchmarks, and shall include feature descriptions
40 PART 3 - EXECUTION
41 3.1 INSTALLERS
01 71 23 - 6
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
1 A. Tolerances:
2 1. The staked location of any improvement or facility should be as accurate as
3 practical and necessary. The degree of precision required is dependent on many
4 factors all of which must remain judgmental. The tolerances listed hereafter are
5 based on generalities and, under certain circumstances, shall yield to specific
6 requirements. The surveyor shall assess any situation by review of the overall plans
7 and through consultation with responsible parties as to the need for specific
8 tolerances.
9 a. Earthwork: Grades for earthwork or rough cut should not exceed 0.1 ft. vertical
10 tolerance. Horizontal alignment for earthwork and rough cut should not exceed
11 1.0 ft. tolerance.
12 b. Horizontal alignment on a structure shall be within .0.1ft tolerance.
13 c. Paving or concrete for streets, curbs, gutters, parking areas, drives, alleys and
14 walkways shall be located within the confines of the site boundaries and,
15 occasionally, along a boundary or any other restrictive line. Away from any
16 restrictive line, these facilities should be staked with an accuracy producing no
17 more than 0.05ft. tolerance from their specified locations.
18 d. Underground and overhead utilities, such as sewers, gas, water, telephone and
19 electric lines, shall be located horizontally within their prescribed areas or
20 easements. Within assigned areas, these utilities should be staked with an
21 accuracy producing no more than 0.1 ft tolerance from a specified location.
22 e. The accuracy required for the vertical location of utilities varies widely. Many
23 underground utilities require only a minimum cover and a tolerance of 0.1 ft.
24 should be maintained. Underground and overhead utilities on planned profile,
25 but not depending on gravity flow for performance, should not exceed 0.1 ft.
26 tolerance.
27 B. Surveying instruments shall be kept in close adjustment according to manufacturer’s
28 specifications or in compliance to standards. The City reserves the right to request a
29 calibration report at any time and recommends regular maintenance schedule be
30 performed by a certified technician every 6 months.
31 1. Field measurements of angles and distances shall be done in such fashion as to
32 satisfy the closures and tolerances expressed in Part 3.1.A.
33 2. Vertical locations shall be established from a pre-established benchmark and
34 checked by closing to a different bench mark on the same datum.
35 3. Construction survey field work shall correspond to the client’s plans. Irregularities
36 or conflicts found shall be reported promptly to the City.
37 4. Revisions, corrections and other pertinent data shall be logged for future reference.
38
39 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
40 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
41 3.4 APPLICATION
42 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION
43 A. If the Contractor’s work damages or destroys one or more of the control
44 monuments/points set by the City or Developer’s Project Representative, the monuments
45 shall be adequately referenced for expedient restoration.
01 71 23 - 7
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
1 1. Notify City or Developer’s Project Representative if any control data needs to be
2 restored or replaced due to damage caused during construction operations.
3 a. Contractor shall perform replacements and/or restorations.
4 b. The City or Developer’s Project Representative may require at any time a
5 survey “Field Check” of any monument or benchmarks that are set be verified
6 by the City surveyors or Developer’s Project Representative before further
7 associated work can move forward.
8 3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
9 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL
10 A. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to maintain all stakes and control data placed by the
11 City or Developer’s Project Representative in accordance with this Specification. This
12 includes easements and right of way, if noted on the plans.
13 B. Do not change or relocate stakes or control data without approval from the City.
14 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP
15 A. Survey Checks
16 1. The City reserves the right to perform a Survey Check at any time deemed
17 necessary.
18 2. Checks by City personnel or 3rd party contracted surveyor are not intended to
19 relieve the contractor of his/her responsibility for accuracy.
20
21 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
22 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
23 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
24 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
25 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
26 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
27 END OF SECTION
28
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson
8/31/2017 M. Owen
Added instruction and modified measurement & payment under 1.2; added
definitions and references under 1.3; modified 1.6; added 1.7 closeout submittal
requirements; modified 1.9 Quality Assurance; added PART 2 – PRODUCTS ;
Added 3.1 Installers; added 3.5 Repair/Restoration; and added 3.8 System Startup.
2/14/2018 M Owen
Removed “blue text”; revised measurement and payment sections for Construction
Staking and As-Built Survey; added reference to selection compliance with TGC
2254; revised action and Closeout submittal requirements; added acceptable depth
01 71 23 - 8
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised February 14, 2018
measurement criteria; revised list of items requiring as-built survey “during” and
“after” construction; and revised acceptable digital survey file format
1
01 74 23 - 1
DAP CLEANING
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 74 23
CLEANING
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Intermediate and final cleaning for Work not including special cleaning of closed
systems specified elsewhere
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 32 92 13 – Hydro-Mulching, Seeding and Sodding
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Scheduling
1. Schedule cleaning operations so that dust and other contaminants disturbed by
cleaning process will not fall on newly painted surfaces.
2. Schedule final cleaning upon completion of Work and immediately prior to final
inspection.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 STORAGE, AND HANDLING
A. Storage and Handling Requirements
1. Store cleaning products and cleaning wastes in containers specifically designed for
those materials.
01 74 23 - 2
DAP CLEANING
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED]
2.2 MATERIALS
A. Cleaning Agents
1. Compatible with surface being cleaned
2. New and uncontaminated
3. For manufactured surfaces
a. Material recommended by manufacturer
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 APPLICATION [NOT USED]
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING
A. General
1. Prevent accumulation of wastes that create hazardous conditions.
2. Conduct cleaning and disposal operations to comply with laws and safety orders of
governing authorities.
3. Do not dispose of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits, oil or paint thinner in
storm or sanitary drains or sewers.
4. Dispose of degradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site.
01 74 23 - 3
DAP CLEANING
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
5. Dispose of nondegradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site or in an
alternate manner approved by City and regulatory agencies.
6. Handle materials in a controlled manner with as few handlings as possible.
7. Thoroughly clean, sweep, wash and polish all Work and equipment associated with
this project.
8. Remove all signs of temporary construction and activities incidental to construction
of required permanent Work.
9. If project is not cleaned to the satisfaction of the City, the City reserves the right to
have the cleaning completed at the expense of the Contractor.
10. Do not burn on-site.
B. Intermediate Cleaning during Construction
1. Keep Work areas clean so as not to hinder health, safety or convenience of
personnel in existing facility operations.
2. At maximum weekly intervals, dispose of waste materials, debris and rubbish.
3. Confine construction debris daily in strategically located container(s):
a. Cover to prevent blowing by wind
b. Store debris away from construction or operational activities
c. Haul from site at a minimum of once per week
4. Vacuum clean interior areas when ready to receive finish painting.
a. Continue vacuum cleaning on an as-needed basis, until Final Acceptance.
5. Prior to storm events, thoroughly clean site of all loose or unsecured items, which
may become airborne or transported by flowing water during the storm.
C. Exterior (Site or Right of Way) Final Cleaning
1. Remove trash and debris containers from site.
a. Re-seed areas disturbed by location of trash and debris containers in accordance
with Section 32 92 13.
2. Sweep roadway to remove all rocks, pieces of asphalt, concrete or any other object
that may hinder or disrupt the flow of traffic along the roadway.
3. Clean any interior areas including, but not limited to, vaults, manholes, structures,
junction boxes and inlets.
4. If no longer required for maintenance of erosion facilities, and upon approval by
City, remove erosion control from site.
5. Clean signs, lights, signals, etc.
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
01 74 23 - 4
DAP CLEANING
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 77 19 - 1
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 77 19
CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. The procedure for closing out a contract
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Guarantees, Bonds and Affidavits
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until all guarantees, bonds,
certificates, licenses and affidavits required for Work or equipment as specified are
satisfactorily filed with the City.
B. Release of Liens or Claims
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until satisfactory evidence of
release of liens has been submitted to the City.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit all required documentation to City’s Project Representative.
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
01 77 19 - 2
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURE
A. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, submit:
1. Project Record Documents in accordance with Section 01 78 39
2. Operation and Maintenance Data, if required, in accordance with Section 01 78 23
B. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, perform final cleaning in accordance with Section
01 74 23.
C. Final Inspection
1. After final cleaning, provide notice to the City Project Representative that the Work
is completed.
a. The City will make an initial Final Inspection with the Contractor present.
b. Upon completion of this inspection, the City will notify the Contractor, in
writing within 10 business days, of any particulars in which this inspection
reveals that the Work is defective or incomplete.
2. Upon receiving written notice from the City, immediately undertake the Work
required to remedy deficiencies and complete the Work to the satisfaction of the
City.
3. Upon completion of Work associated with the items listed in the City's written
notice, inform the City, that the required Work has been completed. Upon receipt
of this notice, the City, in the presence of the Contractor, will make a subsequent
Final Inspection of the project.
4. Provide all special accessories required to place each item of equipment in full
operation. These special accessory items include, but are not limited to: a.
Specified spare parts
b. Adequate oil and grease as required for the first lubrication of the equipment
c. Initial fill up of all chemical tanks and fuel tanks
d. Light bulbs
e. Fuses
f. Vault keys
g. Handwheels
h. Other expendable items as required for initial start-up and operation of all
equipment
D. Notice of Project Completion
1. Once the City Project Representative finds the Work subsequent to Final Inspection
to be satisfactory, the City will issue a Notice of Project Completion (Green Sheet).
E. Supporting Documentation
1. Coordinate with the City Project Representative to complete the following additional
forms:
a. Final Payment Request
b. Statement of Contract Time
01 77 19 - 3
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
c. Affidavit of Payment and Release of Liens
d. Consent of Surety to Final Payment
e. Pipe Report (if required)
f. Contractor’s Evaluation of City
g. Performance Evaluation of Contractor
F. Letter of Final Acceptance
1. Upon review and acceptance of Notice of Project Completion and Supporting
Documentation, in accordance with General Conditions, City will issue Letter of
Final Acceptance and release the Final Payment Request for payment.
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 78 23 - 1
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 1 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 78 23
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Product data and related information appropriate for City's maintenance and
operation of products furnished under Contract
2. Such products may include, but are not limited to:
a. Traffic Controllers
b. Irrigation Controllers (to be operated by the City)
c. Butterfly Valves
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Schedule
1. Submit manuals in final form to the City within 30 calendar days of product
shipment to the project site.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00. All submittals shall be
approved by the City prior to delivery.
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS
A. Submittal Form
1. Prepare data in form of an instructional manual for use by City personnel.
2. Format
a. Size: 8 ½ inches x 11 inches
b. Paper
1) 40 pound minimum, white, for typed pages
2) Holes reinforced with plastic, cloth or metal
01 78 23 - 2
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 2 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
c. Text: Manufacturer’s printed data, or neatly typewritten
d. Drawings
1) Provide reinforced punched binder tab, bind in with text 2) Reduce larger
drawings and fold to size of text pages.
f. Provide fly-leaf for each separate product, or each piece of operating
equipment.
1) Provide typed description of product, and major component parts of
equipment.
2) Provide indexed tabs.
g. Cover
1) Identify each volume with typed or printed title "OPERATING AND
MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS".
2) List:
a) Title of Project
b) Identity of separate structure as applicable
c) Identity of general subject matter covered in the manual
3. Binders
a. Commercial quality 3-ring binders with durable and cleanable plastic covers
b. When multiple binders are used, correlate the data into related consistent
groupings.
4. If available, provide an electronic form of the O&M Manual.
B. Manual Content
1. Neatly typewritten table of contents for each volume, arranged in systematic order
a. Contractor, name of responsible principal, address and telephone number
b. A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume
c. List, with each product:
1) The name, address and telephone number of the subcontractor or installer
2) A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the
volume
3) Identify area of responsibility of each
4) Local source of supply for parts and replacement
d. Identify each product by product name and other identifying symbols as set forth
in Contract Documents.
2. Product Data
a. Include only those sheets which are pertinent to the specific product.
b. Annotate each sheet to:
1) Clearly identify specific product or part installed
2) Clearly identify data applicable to installation
3) Delete references to inapplicable information
3. Drawings
a. Supplement product data with drawings as necessary to clearly illustrate:
1) Relations of component parts of equipment and systems
2) Control and flow diagrams
01 78 23 - 3
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 3 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
b. Coordinate drawings with information in Project Record Documents to assure
correct illustration of completed installation.
c. Do not use Project Record Drawings as maintenance drawings.
4. Written text, as required to supplement product data for the particular installation:
a. Organize in consistent format under separate headings for different procedures.
b. Provide logical sequence of instructions of each procedure.
5. Copy of each warranty, bond and service contract issued a.
Provide information sheet for City personnel giving:
1) Proper procedures in event of failure
2) Instances which might affect validity of warranties or bonds
C. Manual for Materials and Finishes
1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
2. Content, for architectural products, applied materials and finishes:
a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
1) Catalog number, size, composition
2) Color and texture designations
3) Information required for reordering special manufactured products
b. Instructions for care and maintenance
1) Manufacturer's recommendation for types of cleaning agents and methods
2) Cautions against cleaning agents and methods which are detrimental to
product
3) Recommended schedule for cleaning and maintenance
3. Content, for moisture protection and weather exposure products:
a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
1) Applicable standards
2) Chemical composition
3) Details of installation
b. Instructions for inspection, maintenance and repair
D. Manual for Equipment and Systems
1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
2. Content, for each unit of equipment and system, as appropriate:
a. Description of unit and component parts
1) Function, normal operating characteristics and limiting conditions
2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
b. Operating procedures
1) Start-up, break-in, routine and normal operating instructions
2) Regulation, control, stopping, shut-down and emergency instructions
3) Summer and winter operating instructions
4) Special operating instructions
c. Maintenance procedures
1) Routine operations
2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
01 78 23 - 4
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 4 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
4) Alignment, adjusting and checking
d. Servicing and lubrication schedule
1) List of lubricants required
e. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
f. Description of sequence of operation by control manufacturer
1) Predicted life of parts subject to wear
2) Items recommended to be stocked as spare parts
g. As installed control diagrams by controls manufacturer
h. Each contractor's coordination drawings
1) As installed color coded piping diagrams
i. Charts of valve tag numbers, with location and function of each valve
j. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
k. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
3. Content, for each electric and electronic system, as appropriate:
a. Description of system and component parts
1) Function, normal operating characteristics, and limiting conditions
2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
b. Circuit directories of panelboards
1) Electrical service
2) Controls
3) Communications
c. As installed color coded wiring diagrams
d. Operating procedures
1) Routine and normal operating instructions
2) Sequences required
3) Special operating instructions
e. Maintenance procedures
1) Routine operations
2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
4) Adjustment and checking
f. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
g. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
h. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
4. Prepare and include additional data when the need for such data becomes apparent
during instruction of City's personnel.
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Provide operation and maintenance data by personnel with the following criteria:
01 78 23 - 5
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 5 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
1. Trained and experienced in maintenance and operation of described products
2. Skilled as technical writer to the extent required to communicate essential data
3. Skilled as draftsman competent to prepare required drawings
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson 1.5.A.1 – title of section removed
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
01 78 39 - 1
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 78 39
PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Work associated with the documenting the project and recording changes to project
documents, including: a. Record Drawings
b. Water Meter Service Reports
c. Sanitary Sewer Service Reports
d. Large Water Meter Reports
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Prior to submitting a request for Final Inspection, deliver Project Record Documents to
City’s Project Representative.
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Accuracy of Records
1. Thoroughly coordinate changes within the Record Documents, making adequate
and proper entries on each page of Specifications and each sheet of Drawings and
other Documents where such entry is required to show the change properly.
01 78 39 - 2
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
2. Accuracy of records shall be such that future search for items shown in the Contract
Documents may rely reasonably on information obtained from the approved Project
Record Documents.
3. To facilitate accuracy of records, make entries within 24 hours after receipt of
information that the change has occurred.
4. Provide factual information regarding all aspects of the Work, both concealed and
visible, to enable future modification of the Work to proceed without lengthy and
expensive site measurement, investigation and examination.
1.10 STORAGE AND HANDLING
A. Storage and Handling Requirements
1. Maintain the job set of Record Documents completely protected from deterioration
and from loss and damage until completion of the Work and transfer of all recorded
data to the final Project Record Documents.
2. In the event of loss of recorded data, use means necessary to again secure the data
to the City's approval.
a. In such case, provide replacements to the standards originally required by the
Contract Documents.
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIED PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
2.2 RECORD DOCUMENTS
A. Job set
1. Promptly following receipt of the Notice to Proceed, secure from the City, at no
charge to the Contractor, 1 complete set of all Documents comprising the Contract.
B. Final Record Documents
1. At a time nearing the completion of the Work and prior to Final Inspection, provide
the City 1 complete set of all Final Record Drawings in the Contract.
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
01 78 39 - 3
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
3.4 MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS
A. Maintenance of Job Set
1. Immediately upon receipt of the job set, identify each of the Documents with the
title, "RECORD DOCUMENTS - JOB SET".
2. Preservation
a. Considering the Contract completion time, the probable number of occasions
upon which the job set must be taken out for new entries and for examination,
and the conditions under which these activities will be performed, devise a
suitable method for protecting the job set.
b. Do not use the job set for any purpose except entry of new data and for review
by the City, until start of transfer of data to final Project Record Documents.
c. Maintain the job set at the site of work.
3. Coordination with Construction Survey
a. At a minimum clearly mark any deviations from Contract Documents
associated with installation of the infrastructure.
4. Making entries on Drawings
a. Record any deviations from Contract Documents.
b. Use an erasable colored pencil (not ink or indelible pencil), clearly describe the
change by graphic line and note as required.
c. Date all entries.
d. Call attention to the entry by a "cloud" drawn around the area or areas affected.
e. In the event of overlapping changes, use different colors for the overlapping
changes.
5. Conversion of schematic layouts
a. In some cases on the Drawings, arrangements of conduits, circuits, piping,
ducts, and similar items, are shown schematically and are not intended to
portray precise physical layout.
1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the
City's approval.
2) However, design of future modifications of the facility may require
accurate information as to the final physical layout of items which are
shown only schematically on the Drawings.
b. Show on the job set of Record Drawings, by dimension accurate to within 1
inch, the centerline of each run of items.
1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the
City's approval.
2) Show, by symbol or note, the vertical location of the Item ("under slab", "in
ceiling plenum", "exposed", and the like).
3) Make all identification sufficiently descriptive that it may be related
reliably to the Specifications.
c. The City may waive the requirements for conversion of schematic layouts
where, in the City's judgment, conversion serves no useful purpose. However,
do not rely upon waivers being issued except as specifically issued in writing
by the City.
B. Final Project Record Documents
01 78 39 - 4
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN 102808
Revised April 7, 2014
1. Transfer of data to Drawings
a. Carefully transfer change data shown on the job set of Record Drawings to the
corresponding final documents, coordinating the changes as required.
b. Clearly indicate at each affected detail and other Drawing a full description of
changes made during construction, and the actual location of items.
c. Call attention to each entry by drawing a "cloud" around the area or areas
affected.
d. Make changes neatly, consistently and with the proper media to assure
longevity and clear reproduction.
2. Transfer of data to other Documents
a. If the Documents, other than Drawings, have been kept clean during progress of
the Work, and if entries thereon have been orderly to the approval of the City,
the job set of those Documents, other than Drawings, will be accepted as final
Record Documents.
b. If any such Document is not so approved by the City, secure a new copy of that
Document from the City at the City's usual charge for reproduction and
handling, and carefully transfer the change data to the new copy to the approval
of the City.
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
31 24 00 - 1
EMBANKMENTS
Page 1 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 SECTION 31 24 00
2 EMBANKMENTS
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. Transporting and placement of Acceptable Fill Material within the boundaries of
7 the Site for construction of:
8 a. Roadways
9 b. Embankments
10 c. Drainage Channels
11 d. Site Grading
12 e. Any other operation involving the placement of on-site materials
13 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
14 1. Identified Measurement and Payment
15 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
16 1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
17 2. Division 1 – General Requirements
18 3. Section 31 23 16 – Unclassified Excavation
19 4. Section 31 23 23 – Borrow
20 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
21 A. Measurement and Payment
22 1. Embankments by Plan Quantity
23 a. Measurement
24 1) Measurement for this Item shall be by the cubic yard in its final position
25 using the average end area method. Limits of measurement are shown on
26 the Drawings.
27 2) When measured by the cubic yard in its final position, this is a plans
28 quantity measurement Item. The quantity to be paid is the quantity shown
29 in the proposal, unless modified by Article 11.04 of the General
30 Conditions. Additional measurements or calculations will be made if
31 adjustments of quantities are required.
32 b. Payment
33 1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
34 and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
35 price bid per cubic yard of “Embankment by Plan”. No additional
36 compensation will be allowed for rock or shrinkage/swell factors, as these
37 are the Contractor’s responsibility.
38 c. The price bid shall include:
39 1) Transporting or hauling material
40 2) Placing, compacting, and finishing Embankment
41 3) Construction Water
42 4) Dust Control
31 24 00 - 2
EMBANKMENTS
Page 2 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 5) Clean-up
2 6) Proof Rolling
3 7) Disposal of excess materials
4 8) Reworking or replacement of undercut material
5 1.3 REFERENCES
6 A. Reference Standards
7 1. Reference standards cited in this specification refer to the current reference standard
8 published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
9 specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
10 2. ASTM Standards
11 a. ASTM D4318-10, Test Procedure for Determining Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit,
12 and Plasticity Index of Soils
13 b. ASTM D4943-08, Standard Test Method for Shrinkage Factors of Soils by the
14 Wax Method
15 c. ASTM D698-07e1, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction
16 Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort
17 d. ASTM D1557-09, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction
18 Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort
19 e. ASTM D7382-08, Standard Test for Determination of Maximum Dry Unit
20 Weight and Water Content Range for Effective Compaction of Granular Soils
21 Using a Vibrating Hammer
22 f. ASTM D1556-07, Standard Test for Density and Unit Weight of Soil In-Place
23 by the Sand Cone Method
24 1.4 ADMINSTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
25 A. Sequencing
26 1. Sequence work such that calls of proctors are complete in accordance with ASTM
27 D698 prior to commencement of construction activities.
28 1.5 SUBMITTALS
29 A. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00.
30 B. All submittals shall be approved by the City prior to construction
31 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS
32 A. Shop Drawings
33 1. Stockpiled material
34 a. Provide a description of the storage of the excavated material only if the
35 Contract Documents do not allow storage of materials in the right-of-way or the
36 easement
31 24 00 - 3
EMBANKMENTS
Page 3 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
2 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
3 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
4 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING
5 A. Storage
6 1. Within Existing Rights-of-Way (ROW)
7 a. Soil may be stored within existing ROW, easements or temporary construction
8 easements, unless specifically disallowed in the Contract Documents.
9 b. Do not block drainage ways, inlets or driveways.
10 c. Provide erosion control in accordance with Section 31 25 00.
11 d. When the Work is performed in active traffic areas, store materials only in
12 areas barricaded as provided in the traffic control plans.
13 e. In non-paved areas, do not store material on the root zone of any trees or in
14 landscaped areas.
15 2. Designated Storage Areas
16 a. If the Contract Documents do not allow the storage within the ROW, easement
17 or temporary construction easement, then secure and maintain an adequate
18 storage location.
19 b. Provide an affidavit that rights have been secured to store the materials on
20 private property.
21 c. Provide erosion control in accordance with Section 31 25 00.
22 d. Do not block drainage ways.
23 1.11 FIELD CONDITIONS
24 A. Existing Conditions
25 1. Any data which has been or may be provided on subsurface conditions is not
26 intended as a representation or warranty of accuracy or continuity between soils. It
27 is expressly understood that neither the City nor the Engineer will be responsible
28 for interpretations or conclusions drawn there from by the Contractor.
29 2. Data is made available for the convenience of the Contractor.
30 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
31 PART 2 - PRODUCTS
32 2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [NOT USED]
33 2.2 PRODUCT TYPES AND MATERIALS
34 A. Materials
35 1. Acceptable Fill Material
36 a. In-situ or imported soils classified as CL, CH, SC or GC in accordance with
37 ASTM D2487
38 b. Free from deleterious materials, boulders over 6 inches in size and organics
39 c. Can be placed free from voids
40 d. Must have 20 percent passing the number 200 sieve
31 24 00 - 4
EMBANKMENTS
Page 4 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 2. Blended Fill Material
2 a. In-situ soils classified as GW, GP, GM, SW, SP, or SM in accordance with
3 ASTM D2487
4 b. Blended with in-situ or imported acceptable backfill material to meet the
5 requirements of an Acceptable Backfill Material
6 c. Free from deleterious materials, boulders over 6 inches in size and organics
7 d. Must have 20 percent passing the number 200 sieve
8 3. Unacceptable Fill Material
9 a. In-situ soils classified as ML, MH, PT, OL or OH in accordance with ASTM
10 D2487
11 4. Select Fill
12 a. Classified as SC or CL in accordance with ASTM D2487
13 b. Liquid limit less than 35
14 c. Plasticity index between 8 and 20
15 2.3 ASSEMBLY OR FABRICATION TOLERANCES [NOT USED]
16 2.4 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
17 2.5 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
18 PART 3 - EXECUTION
19 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
20 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
21 3.3 PREPARATION
22 A. Protection of In-Place Conditions
23 1. Pavement
24 a. Conduct activities in such a way that does not damage existing pavement that is
25 designated to remain.
26 b. Repair or replace any pavement damaged due to the negligence of the
27 contractor outside the limits designated for pavement removal at no additional
28 cost
29 2. Trees
30 a. When operating outside of existing ROW, stake permanent and temporary
31 construction easements.
32 b. Restrict all construction activities to the designated easements and ROW.
33 c. Flag and protect all trees designated to remain in accordance with Section 31 10
34 00.
35 d. Conduct embankments in a manner such that there is no damage to the tree
36 canopy.
37 e. Prune or trim tree limbs as specifically allowed by the Drawings or as
38 specifically allowed by the City.
39 1) Pruning or trimming may only be accomplished with equipment
40 specifically designed for tree pruning or trimming.
41 3. Above ground Structures
42 a. Protect all above ground structures adjacent to the construction.
31 24 00 - 5
EMBANKMENTS
Page 5 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 4. Traffic
2 a. Maintain existing traffic, except as modified by the traffic control plan, and in
3 accordance with Section 34 71 13.
4 b. Do not block access to driveways or alleys for extended periods of time unless:
5 1) Alternative access has been provided
6 2) Proper notification has been provided to the property owner or resident
7 3) It is specifically allowed in the traffic control plan
8 3.4 INSTALLATION
9 A. Embankments General
10 1. Placing and Compacting Embankment Material
11 a. Perform fill operation in an orderly and systematic manner using equipment in
12 proper sequence to meet the compaction requirements
13 b. Scarify and loosen the unpaved surface areas, except rock, to a depth of at least
14 6 inches, unless otherwise shown on the Drawings
15 c. Place fill on surfaces free from trees, stumps, roots, vegetation, or other
16 deleterious materials
17 d. Bench slopes before placing material.
18 e. Begin filling in the lowest section or the toe of the work area
19 f. When fill is placed directly or upon older fill, remove debris and any loose
20 material and proof roll existing surface.
21 g. After spreading the loose lifts to the required thickness and adjusting its
22 moisture content as necessary, simultaneously recompact scarified material
23 with the placed embankment material.
24 h. Roll with sufficient number passes to achieve the minimum required
25 compaction.
26 i. Provide water sprinkled as necessary to achieve required moisture levels for
27 specified compaction
28 j. Do not add additional lifts until the entire previous lift is properly compacted.
29 2. Surface Water Control
30 a. Grade surface horizontally but provide with sufficient longitudinal and
31 transverse slope to allow for runoff of surface water from every point.
32 b. Conduct fills so that no obstruction to drainage from any other sections of fill is
33 created.
34 c. Install temporary dewatering sumps in low areas during filling where excess
35 amounts of runoff collect.
36 d. Compact uniformly throughout. Keep surfaces of fill reasonably smooth and
37 free from humps and hollows that would prevent proper uniform compaction.
38 e. Do not place fill during or shortly after rain events which prevent proper work
39 placement of the material and compaction
40 f. Prior to resuming compaction operations, remove muddy material off the
41 surface to expose firm and compacted materials
42 B. Embankments for Roads
43 1. Only Acceptable Fill Material will be allowed for roadways
44 2. Embankments for roadbeds shall be constructed in layers approximately parallel to
45 the finished grade of the street
46 3. Construct generally to conform to the cross section of the subgrade section as
47 shown in the Drawings.
31 24 00 - 6
EMBANKMENTS
Page 6 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 4. Establish grade and shape to the typical sections shown on the Drawings
2 5. Maintain finished sections of embankment to the grade and compaction
3 requirements until the project is accepted.
4 C. Earth Embankments
5 1. Earth embankment is mainly composed of material other than rock. Construct
6 embankments in successive layers, evenly distributing materials in lengths suited
7 for sprinkling and rolling.
8 2. Rock or Concrete
9 a. Obtain approval from the City prior to incorporating rock and broken concrete
10 produced by the construction project in the lower layers of the embankment.
11 b. No Rock or Concrete will be permitted in embankments in any location where
12 future utilities are anticipated.
13 c. When the size of approved rock or broken concrete exceeds the layer thickness
14 place the rock and concrete outside the limits of the proposed structure or
15 pavement. Cut and remove all exposed reinforcing steel from the broken
16 concrete.
17 3. Move the material dumped in piles or windrows by blading or by similar methods
18 and incorporate it into uniform layers.
19 4. Featheredge or mix abutting layers of dissimilar material for at least 100 feet to
20 ensure there are no abrupt changes in the material.
21 5. Break down clods or lumps of material and mix embankment until a uniform
22 material is attained.
23 D. Rock Embankments
24 1. Rock embankment is mainly composed of rock.
25 2. Rock Embankments for roadways are only allowed when specifically designated on
26 the Drawings.
27 3. Construct rock embankments in successive layers for the full width of the roadway
28 cross-section with a depth of 18-inches or less.
29 4. The layer depth for large rock sizes shall not exceed a depth of 18-inches in any
30 case. Fill voids created by the large stone matrix with smaller stones during the
31 placement and filling operations.
32 5. Ensure the depth of the embankment layer is greater than the maximum dimension
33 of any rock.
34 6. Do not place rock greater than 18-inches in its maximum dimension.
35 7. Construct the final layer with graded material so that the density and uniformity is
36 in accordance compaction requirements.
37 8. The upper or final layer of rock embankments shall contain no material larger than
38 4 inches in their maximum dimension.
39 E. Density
40 1. Compact each layer until the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D698
41 is achieved.
42 a. Not Under Roadway or Structure:
43 1) areas to be compacted in the open, not beneath any structure, pavement,
44 flatwork, or is a minimum of 1foot outside of the edge of any structure,
45 edge of pavement, or back of curb.
31 24 00 - 7
EMBANKMENTS
Page 7 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 a) Compact each layer to a minimum of 90 percent Standard Proctor
2 Density.
3 b. Embankments under future paving:
4 1) Compact each layer to a minimum of 95 percent standard proctor density
5 with a moisture content not to exceed +4 percent or -2 percent of optimum
6 moisture or as indicated on the Drawings
7 c. Embankments under structures:
8 1) Compacted each layer as indicated on the Drawings
9 F. Maintenance of Moisture and Reworking
10 1. Maintain the density and moisture content once all requirements are met.
11 2. For soils with a PI greater than 15, maintain the moisture content no lower than 4
12 percentage points below optimum.
13 3. Rework the material to obtain the specified compaction when the material loses the
14 required stability, density, moisture, or finish.
15 4. Alter the compaction methods and procedures on subsequent work to obtain
16 specified density as directed by the City.
17 3.5 REPAIR [NOT USED]
18 3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
19 3.7 FIELD QUAILITY CONTROL
20 A. Field Tests and Inspections
21 1. Proctors
22 a. The City will perform Proctors in accordance with ASTM D698.
23 b. Test results will generally be available to within 4 calendar days and distributed
24 to:
25 1) Contractor
26 2) City Project Manager
27 3) City Inspector
28 4) Engineer
29 c. Notify the City if the characteristic of the soil changes.
30 d. City will perform new proctors for varying soils:
31 1) When indicated in the geotechnical investigation in the Appendix
32 2) If notified by the Contractor
33 3) At the convenience of the City
34 e. Embankments where different soil types are present and are blended, the
35 proctors shall be based on the mixture of those soils.
36 2. Proof Rolling
37 a. Embankments under Future Pavement
38 1) City Project Representative must be on-site during proof rolling operations.
39 2) Use equipment that will apply sufficient load to identify soft spots that rut
40 or pump.
41 a) Acceptable equipment includes fully loaded single-axle water truck
42 with a 1500 gallon capacity.
43 3) Make at least 2 passes with the proof roller (down and back = 1 pass).
44 4) Offset each trip by at most 1 tire width.
45 5) If an unstable or non-uniform area is found, correct the area.
31 24 00 - 8
EMBANKMENTS
Page 8 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1 6) Correct
2 a) Soft spots that rut or pump greater than 3/4 inch.
3 b) Areas that are unstable or non-uniform
4 7) If a non-uniform area is found then correct the area.
5 b. Embankments Not Under Future Paving
6 1) No Proof Rolling is required.
7 3. Density Testing of Embankments
8 a. Density Test shall be in conformance with ASTM D2922.
9 b. For Embankments under future pavement:
10 1) The City will perform density testing twice per working day when
11 compaction operations are being conducted.
12 2) The testing lab shall take a minimum of 3 density tests, but the number of
13 test shall be appropriate for the area being compacted.
14 3) Testing shall be representative of the current lift being compacted.
15 4) Special attention should be placed on edge conditions.
16 c. For Embankments not under future pavement or structures:
17 1) The City will perform density testing once working day when compaction
18 operations are being conducted.
19 2) The testing lab shall take a minimum of 3 density tests.
20 3) Testing shall be representative of the current lift being compacted.
21 d. Make the area where the embankment is being placed available for testing.
22 e. The City will determine the location of the test.
23 f. The City testing lab will provide results to Contractor and the City’s Inspector
24 upon completion of the testing.
25 g. A formal report will be posted to the City’s Buzzsaw site within 48 hours.
26 h. Test reports shall include:
27 1) Location of test by station number
28 2) Time and date of test
29 3) Depth of testing
30 4) Field moisture
31 5) Dry density
32 6) Proctor identifier
33 7) Percent Proctor Density
34 B. Non-Conforming Work
35 1. All non-conforming work shall be removed and replaced.
36 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
37 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
38 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
39 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
40 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
41 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
42 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
43 END OF SECTION
31 24 00 - 9
EMBANKMENTS
Page 9 of 9
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised January 28, 2013
1
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
12/20/2012 D. Johnson
1.2 – Added possible measurement and payment procedures and Blue
text for instructions on how the methods should be applied
2.2.2.a added GW and SW material classifications
1/28/13 D. Johnson 1.2 – Modified Bid Item names in payment section to differentiate
between Payment Methods on bid list.
2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
APPENDIX
GC-4.01 Availability of Lands
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
GC 6.06.D Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance
GC 6.07 Wage Rates
GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
GC-4.01 Availability of Lands
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
SEWER FACILITY EASEMENT
Rev. 1/9/18
CPN 102807 Carter Park East Phase III & IV
Parcel # 1
7500 Oak Grove Road
Blocks 3, 4, 11, & 12 Shelby County School Land Survey
STATE OF TEXAS §
§KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
CITY OF FORT WORTH
SEWER FACILITY EASEMENT
DATE: 03/04/2021
GRANTOR: CARTER PARK EAST LAND, LLC
GRANTOR’S MAILING ADDRESS (Including County);
3819 MAPLE AVE.
DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY, TX 75219
GRANTEE:CITY OF FORT WORTH
GRANTEE’S MAILING ADDRESS (including County):
200 TEXAS ST.
FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TX 76102
CONSIDERATION: Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged.
PROPERTY:Being more particularly described in the attached Exhibits “A” and “B”.
Grantor, for the consideration paid to Grantor and other good and valuable consideration,
hereby grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee, its successors and assigns, an exclusive,
perpetual easement for the construction, operation, maintenance, replacement, upgrade, and
repair of a Permanent Sewer Line Facility, hereafter referred to as “Facility”. The Facility
includes all incidental underground and aboveground attachments, equipment and
appurtenances, including, but not limited to manholes, manhole vents, lateral line connections,
pipelines, junction boxes in, upon, under and across a portion of the Property and more fully
described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein for all pertinent purposes,
SEWER FACILITY EASEMENT
Rev. 1/9/18
together with the right and privilege at any and all times to enter Property, or any part thereof,
for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, replacing, upgrading, and repairing said
Facility.
In no event shall Grantor (I) use the Property in any manner which interferes in any material way
or is inconsistent with the rights granted hereunder, or (II) erect or permit to be erected within
the easement property a permanent structure or building, including, but not limited to,
monument sign, pole sign, billboard, brick or masonry fences or walls or other structures that
require a building permit. However, Grantor shall be permitted to install and maintain a
concrete, asphalt or gravel driveway, road or parking lot across the Easement Property.
Grantee shall be obligated to restore the surface of the Property at Grantee's sole cost and
expense, including the restoration of any sidewalks, driveways, or similar surface improvements
located upon or adjacent to the Easement Tract which may have been removed, relocated,
altered, damaged, or destroyed as a result of the Grantee's use of the easement granted
hereunder. Provided, however, that Grantee shall not be obligated to restore or replace
irrigation systems or other improvements installed in violation of the provisions and intended use
of this Easement.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described easement, together with all and singular the
rights and appurtenances thereto in anyway belonging unto Grantee, and Grantee’s successors
and assigns forever; and Grantor does hereby bind itself and its successor and assigns to
warrant and forever defend all and singular the easement unto Grantee, its successor and
assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same, or any part
thereof.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]
SEWER FACILITY EASEMENT
Rev. 1/9/18
GRANTOR:
CARTER PARK EAST LAND:
CARTER PARK EAST LAND, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Carter East Investor, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, its managing member
_____________________________
GRANTEE: City of Fort Worth
By (Signature):_______________________________
(Print Name)_________________, Title____________
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
(Signature)___________________________________
(Print Name)__________________, Title___________
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas,
on this day personally appeared __________________, known to me to be the same person
whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the same
was the act of _________________ and that he/she executed the same as the act of said
_________________ the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity
therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this __________________ day of
__________________, 20__.
__________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
SEWER FACILITY EASEMENT
Rev. 1/9/18
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas,
on this day personally appeared_____________________________________,
_________________________of the City of Fort Worth, known to me to be the same person
whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the same
was the act of the City of Fort Worth and that he/she executed the same as the act of the City of
Fort Worth for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein
stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this ______________day of
_____________________, 20___.
_____________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
�rr��vn
GeoR�par��
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket
Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021
Terracon Project No. 95205197
Prepared for:
Carter Park East Land, LLC
Fort Worth, Texas
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021
Carter Park East Land, LLG
P.O. 6ox 9�7
Fork Worth, Texas 7fi1�1
Attn: Mr. Matthew E. Colter, Uice President
Re: Gevtechnical Engineerin� Repvrt
Project Rocket
�ak Grove Road
Fort Warth, Texas
Terracon Project Na. 952fl5197
Dear Mr. Colter:
1 ��rra��n
GeoRep�rt.
We ha�e completed the Geatechnical Engineering services for tha aba�e referenced project. This
stud� was performed in general accardance with Terracvn Proposal No. P95205197 dated
December 7, �fl20 and authorized an December 10, 2420. This report presents the findings of the
subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical recommendatians concerning earthwork and the
design and construction af faundatians, floar slabs and pa�ements for the proposed project.
We appre�iate the oppartunity ta be nf service ta yau an this projeGt. If you ha�e any questivns
�ancerning this report or rf we may be of further servi�e, please cantact us. `l;�����,��t, L3�A���2
Sincerely,
Terracon Cansultants, Inc,
� ���..
�.x=��.:
- �Bhusal, E.I.T.
Senior 5taff Engineer
� ��,•:.-.,:--.:.:-��;:�:�'-�l�._..
� `::�;�_ _... � °:::`�Y�:.��
�:�r--' -:;�;. �
r�*-��..,.�.,,, <..,_,-.-, .:, ,�
�:.:, _ . ; .. d _�,:y-._-.,
�� ������,�,. A �:
�:. _ . t�3::��• A:
�....�i����:�.:.:,..,,,.�.,.:.._n... �-..
_... _. ..,
a �s: , ;-�;
� ��1 �'-;., . ;t Ck4:� 5'�i � ���
'�� � �� . �e E .�-.:;. �° _ • - - et;�
�'E� � _. :�'- �Gt.. 1¢:.fi� .. �':��`'� t�a�.�:,,'. -��`�
��}� �'��A��: ���`.��a�
Cheryl C. Pedraza, P.E. -��■,���,�..�
Geatechnical Department Manager
�c: D. Tyler Baucaml Rob Riner Company (tbaucom@robriner.�om
Terrac�n Consultants, Inc, 25�1 East Loop 82� North Fort Wnrth, Texas 78118 Registration No. F-3212
P[817] 268 88D0 F[81l] 268 8802 terracon.camlaffieesffQrt-warth
REPORT TOPICS
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
SITECONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 2
GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION ...................................................................... 2
GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 5
EARTHWORK................................................................................................................ 6
DEEP FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................12
FLOOR SLABS/FLATWORK ON MODIFIED SUBGRADE .........................................15
SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................................17
TRUCKDOCK WALLS ................................................................................................18
PAVEMENTS................................................................................................................ 22
GENERALCOMMENTS ............................................................................................... 26
FIGURES...................................................................................................................... 28
Note: This report was originally delivered in a web-based format. text in the report indicates a referenced
section heading. The PDF version also includes hyperlinks which direct the reader to that section and clicking on the
GeoReport logo will bring you back to this page. For more interactive features, please view your project online at
client.terracon.com.
ATTACHMENTS
EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES
SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS
EXPLORATION RESULTS
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Note: Refer to each individual Attachment for a listing of contents.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5197
REP�RT SlJMMARY
Tvpic
Dverview Statement
1 ��rra�on
GeoRepor�
The propOsed dewelopment will include a single-s#ary distribution building and
a$sociated pavernents. Proposed building will h2�ve a faotprint Qf ahout 1,21a,84D
Project square feet.
Max. Column loads: 20� kips, Max. Wall loads: 3-5 kips per lineal foot, Floor Slab
loads: 15�-2�0 psf
averburden soils consisting of fat and lean clays with varying amaunts of sand
and limestane fragments were prasent in the borings ta depths of about 8 to 14
feet in building borings, and ta the depths of about 3 to 10 feet in pavement
borings. These nverhurden svils were underlain by tan limestone to the depths of
about 14 to 23.5 feet in building horings and ta the depths af boring termination in
pauement borings (P-12 and P-13). Gray limestane with shale seams and layers
was present beneath the tan limestone tv the bvring termina#ion depths in building
borings. Graundwater seepage was encountered in boring F-27at a depth af abqut
14 feet during drilling and a groundwater le�el af at�aut 1$ feet was measured in
boring F-2� at completi�n o# drilling.
On-site soils can be used for site filY_
Sei�mic
Consideratiar
We recommend supporting foundatian loads for the buildings on s#raight-sided
drilled shafts situated in the gray limestone with shale seams and layers stratum
(GeaModel layer 3} present at depths af abaut 14 ta 23.5 feet �elow existing
grades.
The near-surface soils are acti�e and prone to volume change with variations in
moisture levei. If movements on the orderof 1 inch are acceptable, the floar sl�bs
can be placed on a madified subgrade as discussed in sec#ion
Based vn the 2fl1�Iz015 Internatinnal Building Gode (IBC) and RSGElSEI 7-1�,
the seismic site classification for this site is C.
Portland cement cvncrete pa�ement is recommended f�r truck dri�es and aprons.
Asph�lt p�ving is vnly reCvmmended in the empl�yee parking are�s with no tr�ctflr-
trailer truck trafFc. Lirne sfabilizatian is recnmmended far subgrades supporting
asphalt pavements and heauy-duty Partland cement concrete pavements_ Pnrtland
cement concrete light duty parking lot pavements can be placed on a compacted
subgrade with or without lime subgrade stabilization. These pavernents are not
equal in performance. The Partland cement concrete pavement is expected to
require less maintenance than asphalk pa�ement.
Ger� This section contains important information about the limitations of this
�am geotechnical engineering report.
' This summary is fnr canvenience only. It should be vsed in conjunction with the entire report for design
purposes.
Responsive Resourceful Reliable
Geotechnical Engineering Repart
Project Rvcket
4ak Graue Road
F�rt Worth, Tex2�s
Terracon Praject Na. 95205197
January 20, �Q21
INTR�DLICTION
This report presents the results af vur su�surface exploratian and geotechnical engineering
services pertormed for the propased Project Rocket to be located at Dak Grove Raad in Fort
Worth, Texas. The purpose of these services is to prv�ide infarmativn and geotechnical
engineering recammendatians relative tv:
Subsurtace soil (and rock) conditians
Graundwater conditivns
Site preparation and earthwork
� Faundatian design and cons#ruction
Floar slab design and construction
Seismi� site classificatian per IBC
Lateral earth pressures
Pavement thickness
The geatechni�al engineering 5cope of 5ervices for this project in�luded the aduancement of 45
test k�orings t� depths ranging from appr�ximately 1� to 30 feet k�elow existing site grades.
Maps showing the site and boring locations are shown in the ��Ye Loca and
sections, respectively. The results of the laboratory testing pertflrmed fln soil samples
ahtained frvm the site during the field explarativn are included an #he b�ring Ivgs in the
Expiaratian Res�-' seCtipn.
SITE CQNDITIC]NS
The fallowing descriptivn af site �anditians is derived frarn oUr site aisit in assaciativn with the
field exploration and our reWiew of publicly a�ailable geologic and topographiC m�ps.
Item
Par�el Information
Existing
Impravements
Current Ground
Ca►►er
aescription
The project is located on the north east corner of the interse�tion of Enon
Avenue and Qak Grove Road in Fork Worth, Texas
32.G319�8°N, 97.298428°W {approxirna#e} See
Undeveloped parcel
The site appears to he used fnr agricultural purposes and has heavy tree
caver on the west side of the site.
Responsive■ Resaurceful■ Reliable 7
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
Item Qescriptivn
1 ��rra�on
GeoRepor�
Based on the preliminary topographic map pravidad by Kimley Horn praject
Existing Topography site appears to be relatively level to gently sloping. There is about 2� feet of
gradien# change a�ross the project while moving from west to east side of
the suhjec# parcel.
PROJECT �ESCRIPTIQN
Dur initial understanding of the project was prvuided in aur propasal and no cvmments ha�e be�n
made by the design grouplclient and ourfinal understanding of the project conditions is as follows:
It�m
Prvject Dascriptian
Building Construction
Finished Flvar
Ele►►ati�ns
Maxirnum Laads �
GradinglSlopes
Belaw Grad�
5tructures
Pa�ements
Description
We understand that the proposed development will include single story
distribution buildings and assaciated pavements. Proposed building will have
a footprint af abou# 1,215,840 square feet.
Building is anticipated ta cansist af concrete tilt-wall panels with interiar s#eel
cvlumns and raaf supports and a grade-suppvrted floar slah.
t68fl.'15 feet {anticipated�
■ Columns: 2Qa kips
� Walls: 3-5 kips per line�r fpp# (klf�
Slabs: 150-20� pounds per square fnot (psf}
Up to 10 feet of cut and 5 feet of fill will be required ta develop finishad grades.
Final slope angl�s of as steep as 4H:1V �Harizontal: Vertical) are expected.
Limited ta loading dack walls up tn ahout 4 feet in height,
We assume both rigid �c�ncrete) and flexihle �asphalt} pav�ment sections
should be considered. Please confirm this assumption.
GEOTECHNIC►4L CHARACTERIZATIQN
We have deueloped a general characterization of the subsurFace conditions based upon our
reWiew vf the subsurFace explorativn, labvratory data, genlagic setting and our understanding of
the project. This characterization, termed GeaMadel, forms the basis of aur geotechnical
calculations and e�aluation of site preparation and foundation op#ians. Conditions encoun#ered at
each expl�r�ti�n point are indiCated �n the indi�idu�l I�gs. The indi�idual logs can be fDund in ths
sectian and the GeoModel can be found in the section of this report.
Respansive■ Resourceful■ Reliable 2
Gea�echnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 �err�can
GeoRepor�
As part vf vur analyses, we identified the follawing mvdel layers within the subsurface prvfile. Fvr
a rnare detailed view of the model layer depths at each boring lacation, refer to the GevModel.
Model Layer
1
�
3 �
Layer Name
Clay
Weathered
Bedro�k
Bedrack
General �escription
Fat and lean clays with sand and limestone fragm�ents
Tan limestnne with clay seams and layers
Gray lirnestone wi#h shale seams and layers
The following table sumrriarizes the rack profile in the borings_
Appr�xim�t�
Baring p�pth ta top af
Number Tan Limestane
(feet]
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-fi
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-1 Q
F-11
F-12
F-13
F-1 �
F-1 �
F-16
F-17
F-1 S
F-19
F-20
F-21
F-22
10
11
12
13
12
13
11
12
12
11
13
13
9
12
72
74
$
13.5
10
10
9
14
Appr�ximatB
Ele�►�ti�n ta Tap
of Tan Limestane
�feet}
677
674
G71.5
869
668
665
fi55.5
Ffi�.S
664
866.5
66fi.5
669
674.5
87�.5
673.5
673
679.5
673.5
678
fi75
6?4.5
�87.5
Approxim�te
Ele►r2�ti�n to T�p �f
Gray Limestone
{feet]
668
EE6
665.a
5G3
fifi1
659
857.�
fi57
659
855.�
658.5
6fi5
665.a
557.5
667.�
668
672.�
671.�
6fi9
670.�
661.�
655
Respansive ■ Resourceful ■ Relfable 3
Appr�ximate
Depth ta Tap vf
Gray Limestone
(feet]
Gea�echnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
Baring
Number
F-23
F-2�
F-2�
F-26
F-27
F-28
F-29
F-30
F-31
F-32
P-12
P-13
Approxirnate
Deqth ta top of
Tan Limestone
(feet)
14
1i
8
74
12
72
13
12
12
11
3
8
Approximate
Elevation ta Top
af Tan Limestane
{feetj
665.5
667
B7Q.5
665.5
G69.5
671
fi71.5
674
675
876.5
69a
682
Approximate
Depth ta Tap of
Gray Limestone
��eet)
an
ci
23
22
23.5
23
N!A
N!A
1 �err�can
GeoRepor�
Apqroximate
Elevation to Top of
Gray Limestone
��eet}
66D.�
664
553.5
659.a
663
5E2:
661.5
564
663.�
664.a
N!A
N!A
The b�rehvles were observed while drilling and after completion for the presence and level of
graundwater. The water levels observed in the boreholes can be faund on the boring logs in
E, tic and are summarized in the following table.
Approximate
Depth to
Bvring Graundwater
Numt�er While Urilling
[feetj
F-27 14
6elow grnund Surface
Appraximate Appraxirnate Approximate
Elevation ta Depth ta Eleaation to
Graundwater Groundwater Groundwater
while Drilling after Orilling after Orilling
[feetj [feet) �feetj
_ 66i.5 � 18 � fi63.5 ,
Groundwater was not observed in the remaining bQrings while drilling, vr far the shart duratian the
harings cauld remain vpen. Hawe�er, this daes nvt neoessarily mean the harings terminated abvve
gmundwa#er, or the water levels summarized above are s#a�le graundwater levels. Due ta the lor+v
permeability of the soils enaauntered in the borings, a relati�ely long periad may be necessary far a
groundwater level ta develop and sta�ilize in a borehole. Lang term ot�servativns in piezometers ar
obser�ation wells sealed fram the influenoe of surface water are often required to define groundwater
leuels in materials vf this type.
Respansive■ Resource'ful■ Reliable 4
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rra�on
GeoRepor�
Groundwater level fluctuations occur d�ae ta seasonal varia#ions in the amaunt of rainfall, nanoff
and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater
leuels during construction �r at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than
the levels indicat�d an the hvring logs. The passibility af graundwater level fluctuatians shvuld be
considared when develaping tha design and constructian plans far the project.
GE�TECHNICAL �VERVIEIN
Overburden sails consisting of fat and lean clays with varying amounts af sand and limestone
fragments were present in the horings ta depths of abaut 8 to 14 feet in building barings, and to
the depths af abaut 3#a 14 feet in pavement borings. These averburden s�ils were underlain by
tan limestane to the depths of abaut 14 to 23.5 feet in building borings and ta the depths of boring
terminati�n in pavement barings �P-12 and P-13}. Gray limestane with shale seams and layers
was present beneath the tan limest�ne to the baring termination depths in building borings.
Groundwater seepage was encountered in boring F-27at a depth of about 14 feet during drilling
and a groundwater le�el af abvut 18 feet was measured in boring B-2? at cvmpletion vf drilling.
Expansive sails are present on this site. At the time of aur field operations on December 2'I ta 22
2, �D20, the averburden soils generally �aried fram average to dry state. dur laboratory
absorptivn swell test results were as hfgh as 14.fi°/a for samples tested at its natural stata. Based
on the Plasticiry Index (PI} of the svils, the potential vertical rise �PVR} Qf the site soils is estimated
to �e on the arder vf 4 to 5 inches. The PVR is es#imated utilizing the TxD�T meth�d TEX-124-
E and based an dry soil conditions.
If movements an the order of 1 inch are acceptable, the building pad shvuld be prepared with 1� feet
af maisture conditioned sails and a fi-inch cap Qf lime treated soils. If tan limestane is encountered
at a shallawer depth, it is not necessary to exca�ate the limestone. In areas where maisture
conditioning daes not extend to the top of tan limestnne, it should be nated that the lime cap is in
addition to the 1 p feet of moisture conditioned s�il f�r a total treated zone af 1�.� feet below
finished building pad elevatian �finished flaar elevatian minus the slab thieknessy.
If movements of less than vne inch are required, Terracnn shauld be contac#ed for
recammendations for a structural slab.
We reC�mrnend SuppDrting fDundation Ioads f�r the buildings �n straight-sided drilled shafts
situated in the gray limestone with shale seams and layer stratum �GeoModel layer 3} present at
depths of about 14 to 23.5 feet below existing grades.
Grade k�eamsltilt panels used in c�njunctian with drilled shaft foundations should t�e designad
with a void space between the grade heamltilt panels and the underlying clay sails.
Respansive� Resourceful. Reliahle
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021 Terracon Project No. 95205197
l��rracon
GeoReport.
Portland cement concrete pavement is recommended for truck drives and aprons. Asphalt paving
is only recommended in the employee parking areas with no tractor-trailer truck traffic. Lime
stabilization is recommended for subgrades supporting asphalt pavements and heavy-duty Portland
cement concrete pavements. Portland cement concrete light duty parking lot pavements can be
placed on a compacted subgrade with or without lime subgrade stabilization.
This summary should be used in conjunction with the entire report for design purposes. It should
be recognized that details were not included or fully developed in this section, and the report must
be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. The section
titled
EARTHWORK
should be read for an understanding of the report limitations.
The following sections provide recommendations for use in the preparation of specifications for
the work. Recommendations include critical quality criteria as necessary to render the site in the
state considered in our geotechnical engineering evaluation for foundations, floor slabs, and
pavements.
Site Preparation
Site preparation for the proposed project should include removing the existing vegetation and any
other unsuitable surFace materials from the areas of new construction. The exposed subgrade
should be proof rolled prior to placing any fill. The proof rolling should be performed with a fully
loaded, tandem-axle dump truck or other equipment providing an equivalent subgrade loading. A
minimum gross weight of 20 tons is recommended for the proof rolling equipment. The proof
rolling should consist of several overlapping passes in mutually perpendicular directions over a
given area. Any soft or pumping areas should be modified using one of the methods discussed
in this section.
Methods of subgrade improvement could include scarification and recompaction at the proper
moisture content, chemical treatment (lime), or removal of unstable materials and replacement
with granular fill (with or without a geogrid). The appropriate method of improvement, if required,
would be dependent on factors such as schedule, weather, the size of the area to be stabilized,
and the nature of the instability. More detailed recommendations can be provided during
construction as the need for subgrade modification occurs. Performing site grading operations
during warm seasons and dry periods would help to reduce the amount of subgrade stabilization
required.
Scarification and Compaction — It may be feasible to scarify, dry, and compact the exposed
soils. The success of this procedure would depend primarily upon favorable weather and
sufficient time to dry the soils. Stable subgrades likely would not be achievable if the thickness
Responsive. Resourceful. Reliable
Geatechnical €ngineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
of the unstable soil is greater than abvut 2 feet, if the unstable snil is at ar near grvundwater
levels, or if cvnstruction is performed during a peri�d af wet ar cool weather when drying is
d ifficu It.
Chemical Treatment — Impravement af su�grades with lirne cauld be considered far
improving unstahle soils. Ghamical madificatian should be perFormed by a prequalified
cantractor having experience with successfully stabilizing suhgrades in the project area on
similar sized projects with similar sail canditions. The hazards af chemicals blvwing across
the site ar onta adjacent praperty should alsa he considered. Additianal testing wauld be
needed ta develap specific recommenda#ivns tv imprave subgrade stability by blending
chemicals with the site soils. Additianal testing could include, bu# no# be limited to, eWaluating
various adrnixtures, the vptimum amounts required and the presence vf sulfates in the sail.
Grushed Stone — The use of crushed stone or crushed graael is a very cammon procedure
ta imprave subgrade stability. Typical undercut depths wvuld be expected ta range fram abvut
6 to 12 inches below finished subgrade elevati�n. The use of a geogrid could also be
considered after undergraund wark such as utility constructivn is completed. Prior to placin�
the gevgrid, we recvmmend that all belaw-grade construction, such as utility line installation,
be cornpleted to a�oid damaging the geagrid. Equipment should nat be aperated above the
geagrid until one full lift af crushed stane fill is placed abo�e it. The maximum particle size �f
granular material placed aver geotextile fabri� or geagrid should meet the manufa�turer's
specificatians, and generally shauld nat exceed 1'/z inches.
Further e�aluation af the need and recommendations for subgrade treatment can be pravided
during cdnstructidn as the geatechnical conditions are exposed.
Suitable Fill Material Types
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
The following soil materials are discussed in the caming sections of this repart. The following
table surnmarizes their nomenclature, detailed descriptions, and apprapriate usage in the context
of this project.
Svil Type
Technical Descriptian
Apprapriate llse
Qn�site soils
Free of uegetatian, organic materi�l,
debris, and racks grea#er than
� inGhes in maximum dimensian.
Clean clay soil �free of deleterious
Imparted fill material and debris} with a liquid limit
�LL} of 60 or less and no rocic greater
than 4 inches in maximum dimension
General site grading
Building pad
Pa�ement subgrades {natural ar
lime treatedy
Utility trench backfill
Responsi�e■ Resourceful■ Reliable T
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
Soil Type
Select fill
Campactian
TxDpT Item 24i, Type D, Grade 1-2.
Flexik�le base Recycled cancrete meeting this
gradation is acCeptable.
Crushed stpne or gra�el with IeSS
Granularwall #han 3°/a passing No_ 200 sieve and
backfill less than 30°Io passing Na. 4D
sieve, non-plastic
*Tx�OT — Texas Qepartm e nt of Transportatiqn
Campac#ian Requirements
A minimum of 95°/c maximum standard
Proctpr dry density (ASTM D 898}
Recommendations far compaction are presented in the following table. We recammend that
engineered fill be tested far maisture content and compa�tian during placement. Should the
results of the in-place density tests indicate the specified rnoistUre or compaction limits have not
been met, the area represented by the test rnust be reworked and retested as required until the
specified m�isture and compaction requirernents are achieved.
I#am
On�ite soils or
imqarted fills autside
the moisture
c�nditioned zane
Moisture Conditinn�d
soils
Select fill f flexible
base
Technical Descriptian Appropriate USe
Sandy clay to clayey sand with a
liquid limit (LL� of 35 or less and a
plasticity index �PI} in the range af 6
and 15
In the range af 92°/o to 98°Io maximum
st�ndard Proctor dry density �ASTM
D 698}
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
Truck do�k wall backfill
Moisture Content
For PI �20 at or above optimum
moisture content
Far PI 32� at a minimum of
+2 percentage points af optirnum
moisture
For PI � 20 at a minimum
+2 percentage points of optimum
mpistur�
I Far PI � ZU at a minimum of
+5 percentage points of aptimum
moistur�
In the r�nge of -2 to
A minirnum of 95°lo maximum standard +2 percentage paints of aptimum
Proctor dry density [ASTM p 698}
moisture content
Respansive ■ Resourceful ■ Relfable 8
Geatechnical €ngineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
Item Compaction
Clay backfill for
exterior faCe pf gr�de
beam
Pavement subgrades
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
� Mvisture Content
A minimum of 92°/6 to 98°/o maximum
standard Proctar dry density �ASTM
D 698}
A minirnum of 95°la maximum standard
PrvGtor dry density (ASTM Q 698}
Far PI � 20 at a minimum of
'2 perceniage pair�ts of aptimum
maistura
Far PI � 2D at a minimum nf
+5 percentage points of optimum
moisture
In the range of D to +3 percentage
paints af optimurn moisture
content
1, Fills should be placed in maximum I�ase lifts af 9 inches ar less.
1 The campactian cri#eria in fire lanes and roadways must meet the requirements, if any, as prescribed by
#he lacal go�erning authority.
Utility Trench 6ackfill
Lltility trenches are a camman saurce af water infiltratian and migration. Utility #renches
penetrating beneath the building shauld be efFecti�ely sealed to restrict water intrusian and flow
through the trenches, which could migrate below the building. The trench should provide an
effective trench plug that extends at least 5 feet fram the face of the building exteriar. The plug
material should consist of cementitivus flowable fill 4r low permeability clay {PIy20}. The trench
plug material should be placed ta surround the utility line. If used, the clay trench plug rnaterial
should be placed and compacted to comply wi#h #he water content and compaction
recammendations for fill stated pre�iously in this report.
Grading and Orainage
The perFormance of the praposed structures will na# only be dependent upon the quality of
canstructivn, �ut also upon the stability nf the maisture cantent �f the near surface soils.
Therefore, we highly recommend that site drainage be develaped so that panding of surface runaff
near the structures does not occur. Accumulation of water near the structures may cause
significant moisture �ariations in 5ails adjacent to the structures, thus increasing the potential far
structural distress.
EfFective drainage away from the structures and excavations must be prvvided during
construction and rnaintained through the liie of the propvsed project. lnfiltration of water into
ex�avations should he prevented during constructifln. Water retained next ta the huilding can
result in svil mavements greater than thase discussed in this repvrt. Grea#er mvvements can
result in unacceptable differential flaor slab andlor foundation movements, cracked slabs and
walls, and roaf leaks.
Respansive � Resourceful. Reliahle 9
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021 Terracon Project No. 95205197
l��rracon
GeoReport.
Exposed ground should be sloped and maintained at a minimum 5 percent away from the building
for at least 10 feet beyond the perimeter of the building. Locally, flatter grades may be necessary
to transition ADA access requirements for flatwork.
Roof runoff and surface drainage should be collected and discharged away from the structures to
prevent wetting of the foundation soils. Roof gutters should be installed and connected to
downspouts and pipes directing roof runoff at least 10 feet away from the structures or discharged
on to positively sloped pavements or to the nearest stormwater collection systems.
Sprinkler mains and spray heads should preferably be located at least 5 feet away from the
structures such that they cannot become a potential source of water directly adjacent to the
structures. In addition, the owner and/or builder should be made aware that placing large bushes
and trees adjacent to the structures may cause significant moisture variations in the soils
underlying the structures. In general, tree roots can adversely influence the subsurface soil
moisture content to a distance of at least 1'/2 times the mature height of the tree and beyond the
tree canopy. Watering of vegetation should be performed in a timely and controlled manner and
prolonged watering should be avoided. Landscaped irrigation adjacent to the foundation units
should be minimized or eliminated. Special care should be taken such that underground utilities
do not develop leaks with time.
After building construction and landscaping, final grades should be verified to document effective
drainage has been achieved. Grades around the structures should also be periodically inspected
and adjusted as necessary as part of the structure's maintenance program. Where paving or
flatwork abuts the structures, a maintenance program should be established to effectively seal
and maintain joints and prevent surface water infiltration. Water permitted to pond next to the
structures can result in greater soil movements than those discussed in this report. Estimated
movements described in this report are based on effective drainage for the life of the structures
and cannot be relied upon if effective drainage is not maintained.
Earthwork Construction Considerations
Shallow excavations, for the proposed structure, are anticipated to be accomplished with
conventional construction equipment. Upon completion of filling and grading, care should be taken
to maintain the subgrade water content prior to construction of floor slabs. Construction traffic
over the completed subgrades should be avoided. The site should also be graded to prevent
ponding of surface water on the prepared subgrades or in excavations. Water collecting over, or
adjacent to, construction areas should be removed. If the subgrade freezes, desiccates,
saturates, or is disturbed, the affected material should be removed, or the materials should be
scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted, prior to floor slab construction.
Based upon the subsurface conditions determined from the geotechnical exploration, unstable
subgrade soils may be encountered during construction. The stability of the subgrade may also
be affected by precipitation, repetitive construction traffic, closeness to the groundwater seepage,
Responsive. Resourceful. Reliable 10
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rra�on
GeoRepor�
or other factors. If unstable condi#ions deuelap, ►n►nrkability may be improued by scarifying and
drying. Lightweight excavation equipment may be required to reduce subgrade pumping. The
use af remately operated equipment, such as a backhoe, wfluld be beneficial ta perForm cuts and
reduce subgrade disturbance.
The groundwater table could afFect aver-exca�ation efForts, especially far aver�xcauati�n and
replacement of lower strength sails. A temporary dewatering system cansisting of sumps with purnps
could he necessary ta achie�e the recvmmended depth pf a�er�xcavativn.
As a minimum, excaaatiflns should be pertarmed in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926,
Subpart P, "Excavations" and its appendices, and in ac�ordance with any applicable lacal, andlor
state regulations.
Canstruction site safety is the sole responsibility of the con#ractor who cvntrols the means,
methods, and sequencing af canstruction operations. lJnder na circumstances shall the
information prowided herein be interpreted to mean Terracon is assuming resp4nsibility f4r
constructian site safety, or the contractor's aGti�ities; such respansibility shall neither he implied
npr inferred.
Construction �bseryation and Testing
The earthwark efforts sh�uld be monitored under the direction of a representative of the
GeQtechnical Engineer. Monitoring should in�lude do�umentation of adequate remaval of
vegetatian and tap sail, praof rvlling and mitigatian af areas delineated by the praof rall tv require
mitigation.
Each lift af compacted fill shauld be tested, evaluated, and rew�rked as necessary until appra�ed
by #he Geo#echnic�l Engineer's represen#�tive prior to pl��ement pf �ddition�l lifts. E��h lif# of fill
should be tested for density and water content at a frequency of at least one testfor every z,500 sf
of campacted fill in the building areas and 5,p�0 sf in pauement areas. �ne density and water
content test for every � QQ If af compacted utility trench ba�kfll.
In areas of faundation excavations, the bearing subgrade should be evaluated under the directian
of the Gevtechnical Engineer's representatiue. In the euent that unanticipated canditions are
encauntered, the Geatechnical Engineer should prescribe mitigation aptions.
For mnisture canditivned svils, the Proctar tests should be mellawed for at least 48 haurs befvre
campactian of the material ta establish the aptimum maisture cantent requirements fvr contral af
the fill placement moisture contents and unit density during construction. Swell tests should be
perFormed an the remvlded Practvr samples to verify required soil water cvntents tv limit swell
potential t� ane percent under overburdened pressure_
In addition to the documen#ation of the essential parameters necessary fvr cvnstruction, the
cantinuatian af the Geo#echnical Engineer's represent�tive into the canstructian phase of the
Respansive� Resourceful. Reliahle �1
Geatechnical €ngineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
prvject prvWi�les the continuity tv maintain the Geotechnical Engineer's representati�e ewaluation
of subsUrFace condi#ions, including assessing variatians and assaciated design changas.
DEEP FaIJNDATI�NS
Drilled Shaft Design Parameters
Soil design parameters are proVided in the follawing table for the design of drilled shaft
foundations. The values presented for all�wable side frictian and end bearing include a factor vf
safetY-
Design Parameter
Bearing stratum
Allowable end bearing
Allowa�le skin friction — compression
Allowable skin friction — tensian
Minimum penetration to develap end bearing
Recammendations
Gray limestane with shale seams �Geomodel layer 3}
4Q,�0� psf
5,�00 psf
5,2�0 psf
2 feet or 1 shaft diameter, whichever is greater
Penetration to develop skin friction
Design shaft penetratian depth
Minimum center#o centerspacing to de�elop full
skin friction
Below the surface of the limestone ar bel�w any
temporary casing set in the shaleflimestone, whichever is
deeper.
The embedment dep#h inta gray limestone can be based
on the allawable end bearing and skin friction pro�ide in
this table. The shaf#s must have sufficient em�edrnent to
resist axial and lateral loads.
�.� times the diame#er of the larger shaft. Closer spacing
may require svme reductions in skin frictian andlor
changes in installatian sequences. Closely spaced
shafts shnuld be examined !�y Terracon on a case by
c�se b�sis. As � gener�l guide, the de5ign skin frictian
will vary linearly from the full value at a spacing nf 2.5
diameters to 50 percent of the design value at 1.D
diameter.
Shauld be ewaluated an a case by case basis by
Groups of 3 or more shafks placed closer than Terracon. AlternatiWe installation sequences may be
�.5 shafit diameters needad ta allow for a minimurn of 48 hours concrete
�oaring time, before �ns#allation of adjacent shafts.
Minimum shaft diameter 18 inches
Settlement Less than '/� inch for column loads af 20fl kips or less
Allpw�ble end bearing is based on shafk �earing in �pmpetent limestone. If � spft sh�le layer is presenk in the
bottam of a shaft, the shaft should be extended k�eyond the shale layer to limestone.
Respansive ■ Resourceful ■ Relfable 12
Geatechnical €ngineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
Drilled Sh�ft L2�teral Loading
The follawing table lists input values far use in LPILE analyses. LPILE will es#imate �alues of k,,
and E�� hased on strength; hawever, nvn-default values nf kh should be used where pravided.
Since deflectian ar a service limit criterion will most likely control lateral capacity design, no
safetylresistance factar is included with the parameters.
Soil Type
LPILE Ma#erial
Type
Effecti�e Sail Unit
INeight [pcf}
Undrained
�ohesion, � [psfJ
Young's Modulus,
Er �psi}
Uniaxial
Compressi�e
Strength {psij
Rock Quality
Qesignation, RQ❑
��I4}
Moisture
Conditianed Clay
Soils
Soft Clay
124
5a4
NIA
NIA
NIA
Undisturped
Clay Sails
i Stiff clay wlv
free water
125
1,bQQ
NIA
NIA
NIA
Krm N!A � N!A
Tan
Lirnestane
Weak Rock
(Reese}
135
Gray
Limestane
Weak Rock
{Reesey
135
NJA � NJA
17,QD0 34,Q00
17a I 34a
85
� a.nao�
85
a.aoo�
upi�rt
The drilled shafts will be subject ta uplifk as a result of heave in the averlying clay soils. The
magnitude vf these I�ads �aries with the shaft diameter, soil parameters, and particularly the in-
situ moisture leaels at the time vf constructivn. The shaft5 must cvntain sufficient continuvus
vertical reinforcing and embedrnent depth into the limestone stratum to resist the net tensile laad.
Fvr the �vnditians encvuntered at this site, the uplift Ivad can be appraximated by assuming a
unif�rm uplift pf 1,5p0 psf o�er the shaft perimeter for a depth vf 10 feet. If the suhgrade is
mois#ure condi#ioned as discussed in sectian , a unifarm uplift af 5aD psf can be used
in the mvisture conditianed zane.
Orilled 5haft Canstruction Cansiderations
The cvnstructivn af all drilled shafts shauld he ohser�ed by experienced geatechnical personnel
during construction to confirm: 1] the bearing stratum; �j the rninimum bearing depth; 3) that
Respansive� Resourceful. Reliahle �3
Geatechnical €ngineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
groundwater seepage, if encountered, is correc�y handled; and 4} that the shafts are within
accep#able vertical tvlerance.
Recvmmendatians far drilled shaft construction are presented in the following table.
Item
Recvmmendatian
Drilled shaft installation Current wersian of American Cvncrete Institute's "Standard Specification far
specific�tian the Constructian of drilled Piers" ACI 336.
Top of si�aft completion
Time to carnplete
Installation methods
Groundwater cantrol
5pecial Conditinns
Enlarged �mushraam-shaped} top in contact with the clays shvuld nat be
allowed.
❑rilled shaft construc#ion shauld be completed withfn 8 hours in a cantinuous
manner to reduce side wall and base deterioration.
Shaft exca�ations should be installed using dry methods. The concrete shauld
be placed in a manner to a�aid striking the reinforeing steel during placement.
Care shauld be taken to not disturb the sides and bottom of the exca�atian
during construction. The battom of the shaft excavation should be free af loose
material before concrete pla�ement. Concrete should be placed as soon as
possible after the faundation excavation is eompleted, ta reduce potential
disturbance of the bearing surface.
5eepage was observed in one nf the boring, and groundwater could alsa k�e
enr,,pun#ered during installation pf the straigh# shafts, particularly during wet
periQds af the year. Seepage rates will be sufficient ta require the use of
temporary casing for installatipn di the straight shafts. The casing shpuld �e
seated in the IimeStDne with all water and mast of the lanse mat8rial remp�ed
prior to beginning the design penetration. While withdrawing casing, care
shauld be exercised ta maintain concrete inside the casing at a sufficient level
to resist earth and hydrastatic pressures acting an the casing exterior. Arching
of the cancrete, loss of seal and ather pro�lems can occur during casing
removal and result in contamination of #he drilled shaft. These conditions
should be cansidered during the design and construction phases. Placement
of layse soil backfill should not be permitted around the casing prior to
removal.
The limestone is hard and may be difFicult to penetrate. A contractor
experienced with drilling in hard rock shauld !�e retained for this project.
The drilled shaft installation pracess should be performed under the direction of the Geotechni�al
Engineer. The Geotechnical Engineer should document the shaft installatian pracess including
svillrock and graundwater conditions encountered, consistency with expected canditions, and
details of the installed shaft.
Respansive■ Resource'ful■ Reliable �4
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
Gr2�de BeamslPier Caps
1 ��rra�on
GeoRepor�
In conjunctian with drilled shafts, all grade beams or wall panels should be supported by the drilled
shafts. A minimum void space of 1 p inches is recvmmended between the bottom of grade beams,
pier cap axtensions ar wall panels and the subgrade. The vvid can be decreased ta 4 inches in
areas where rn�isture canditioning has been performed. This vaid will serue to minimize distress
resulting frorn swell pressures generated by the clay sails. Struckural cardbaard farrns are one
acceptahle means of pra�iding this vaid beneath cast-in-plaee elements. 5oil retainers should be
used to prevent infilling of the void.
The grade beams shauld be formed rather than cas# against earth trenches. 6ackfill against the
exterior face of grade beams, wall panels and pier caps shauld be using on site clay soils placed
and campacted as described in section �mpa�tic .�ir
�L��R SLAB5IFLATINOR�C OIV MaDIFIEO SUBGRADE
Lightly Ivaded floor slabs and flatwork placed on-grade will be subject ta mavement as a result of
moisture induced volume changes in the acti�e s�ils that can occur following construction. The
soils expand (heaue} with in�reases in moisture and contract �shrink} with decreases in maisture.
The mo�ement typi�ally occurs as post construction hea�e.
The patential magnitude �f the maisture induced mavements is rather indeterminate. It is
influenced by the soil properties, aWerburden pressures, and ta a great extent by soil moisture
levels at the time of canstructian. Based on the soil types encvuntered in the barings, m�vements
in slabs placed on grade are estimated ta be vn the arder of 4 to 5 inches far dry soil moisture
conditians that can exist prior to construction. ❑ifferential rnovements could be greater than 5
inches if one edge �f #he slab is lifted due t� soil swell and an appvsite edge is subject ta shrinkage
due ta rnaisture loss.
Nate that movements of rz inch can result in uneven floors, s#icking doars, and cracking of floor
slabs and wall partitians. If the risk of these mo�ements is unacceptable, the floor slab shauld be
structurally supported abave the active clays.
51ab vn grade canstruction shauld anly be cansidered if slah ma�ements vn the order vf vne inch
are considered ar.�eptalale. Reductians in anticipated movements can be achieved by using
methods developed in this area to reduce on-grade slab movements. A suitable methad far this
site c�nsists of mvisture �onditivning the vn-site �I�ys �nd c�pping them with � F-inch I�yer af
lime treated material. Maisture conditianing �an be accomplished as described in this section_
If movements an the arder of 1 inch are acaeptable, the building pad shauld be prepared with 1� feet
af moisture canditivned sails and a 6-inch cap af lime treated svils. If tan limestvne is encvuntered
at a shallawer depth, it is no# necessary to excavate the lirnestone. In areas where moisture
Respansive■ Resource'ful■ Reliable �5
Geatechnical €ngineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
conditioning does n�t extend ta the #op of tan limestone, it shnuld be noted that the lime cap is in
additian to the 10 feet of moisture canditioned soil for a total treated zone of 1D.5 feet below
finished building pad elevatian {finished flaor elevatian minus the slab thickness).
The moisture canditioned sail shauld be mechanically mixed with water until required soil maisture
contents are abtained. The exca�ated sails, except far deleterious materials ar rock g reater than
4 inches, can then be replaced in accordance with section far
maisture cvnditianed clays. The lower lifts af moisture canditioned soils should n�t be disturbed
once approved.
A minirnum 6-inch layer af Gme treated clays should then be placed to aboae the moisture
conditioned sails to establish finish pad elevation. The lirne treated material must be placed aba�e
the moisture canditianed sails in a short periad af time {i.e. wi#hin 48 hours� follawing campletion
of the rnaisture conditianing process to prevent the Ivss af soil rnaisture. If the surface of the
mvisture conditioned sflils is allowed to desiccate prior tn placement of the cap, the desiccated
sails should be rewvrked and placed in a moisture conditianed state.
The maisture canditioned soils shauld extend at least 5 feet beyvnd the build'+ng perimeter and
include entrances, abutting sidewalks and ather flatwvrk areas sensitive to movernent. The
excavated soils, except for deleterious materials ar roGk grea�er than 4 inches, can then be placed
in accordance with section fvr maisture canditioned clays. The
select fill or flexible base material or lime treated sails must be placed abo�re the moisture
conditioned sails in a reasonable period of time [i.e. with�n 4H haurs} following cample#ion af the
mais#ure canditioning pracess #o prevent the Ivss af sail mais#ure. If the surface of the maisture
conditioned soils is allowed to desiccate prior to placement of the �ap, the desiccated soils shoult�
be reworked and placed in a moisture conditianed s#ate.
The use af a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete sla�s on grade covered with
waad, tile, carpet, vr other moisture sensitive or imperviaus co�erings, or when the slab will
support equipment sensiti�e ta maisture. When condi#ivns warrant the use nf a vapar retarder,
the slab designer shauld refer to ACI 302 andlor A�I 360 for procedures and cautions regarding
the use and placement af a vapor retarder.
Floor 51ab Design Parameters
Item
Floor Slab 5upport
Estimated Modulus of
Sufagrade Rea�tion
Description
Prepared with 14 feet depth af moisture conditianed soils and a 6 inch layer of
lime cap as discussed abo�e in section .
10� pounds per square inch per inch �psilin} for point loads
Respansive ■ Resourceful ■ Relfable 16
Geatechnical Engineering Report l��rra�on
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191 GeoRepor�
Item Qescription
' Floor slabs shauld be structurally independent of building faatings ar walls to reduce the possibili#y of floor
slak� cracking caused by diffarential mowements between #h€ slab and foundation.
1 Modulus af subgrade reaction is an estimated value based upon our experience with the subgrade
conditi�n, the requirements noted in , and the flnor slab support as noted in this ta�le. It is
pro�ided far pvint laads. Far larga area loads the madulus of subgrade reaction would be Iower.
Saw-cut c�ntral jvints shauld be placed in the slab ta help can#rol tha Ivca#ian and exkent of
cra�king. Far additional recammendations refer to the ACI �esign Manual. Joints ar cracks should
be sealed with a water-prvaf, non-extruding campressible carnpaund specifically recvmrnended
far heaay duty cancrete pavernent and wet enviranments.
Where �aor slabs are tied to perirneter walls or turn-dawn slabs ta meet s#ructural or ather
CQ1�5t1'iICtIQCI QbJBCtIU@S, aur experience indicates differential mv�ement between the walls and
slabs will likely he obserued in adjacent slab expansion jaints or flaor slah cracks beyond the
length vf the struc#ural dowels. The 5tructural Engineer shvuld accaunt far potential differential
settlernent through use of sufficient �antral jain#s, apprapriate reinforcing or ather means.
Floor Slab Construction Considerations
Finished suhgrade, within and for at least 1a feet beyand the fl��r sla�, should be pratected fram
trafFic, ru#ting, vr other disturbance and maintained in a relatively moist condi#ion until floor slabs are
canstructed. If the subgrade shvuld becvme damaged or desiccated priar ta canstructian of floor
slabs, the affected material should be rernvved and structural fill should be added to replace the
resul#ing excavation. Final conditioning af the finished subgrade should be performed immediately
prior to placemen# vf #he flvvr slab su��ort caurse.
The Geotechnical Engineer should approve the condition of the floar slab subgrades immediately
prior tfl placement of the floor slab support cnurse, reinforcing steel, and concrete. Attention should
he paid ta high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbezl earlier, and to areas where backfilled
trenches are Iocated.
C� C�`�i'il C�I*I!T'�� � : � ��7►�L��
The seismic design requirements for buildings and other structures are based on 5eismic ❑esign
Category. Site Classification is required ta determine the Seismic �esign Categary for a structure.
The 5ite Classificativn is based ❑n the upper 1 dd feet af the site prafile defined by a weighted
average value of either shear wa�e velocity, standard penetration resistance, or undrained shear
strength in accordance with 5ectian 20.4 af ASCE 7 and the International Building Cade �IBC}.
Based an the saillbedrock praperties encountered at #he site and as described an the explaration
lags and results, it is our prafessional opinion that the 5eismi� 5ite Classification is C.
Respansive� Resourceful. Reliahle 97
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
SubsurFace exploratians at this site were extended to a maximum depth of 3� feet. The site
praperties below tha boring depth to 1 QU feet were estimated based on our experience and
knowledge of geolvgic conditions af the general area. Additional deeper barings ar geaphysical
testing may be perfvrmed tv canfirm the conditivns belaw #he current baring dep#h.
rRuc�c ooc�c w►a��s
Retaining walls (truck dock wall) up ta � feet in height may he oanstructed as part of site
develdpment. Vllalls that cannat tolerate vertical mo�ements ar that are associated with the
building shauld be supported by drilled shafts, as discussed in . A �aid space
should be provided below drilled shaft supported walls, as described in .�i . Walls that
can tolerate movements can be supported by spread footings, as discussed in
r �
Shallvw Foundations fvr Truck Dock Walls
Design parameters for spread footing foundations bearing in nati�e, undisturbed sails or properly
campacted fill are presented in the f�llawing table.
Descriptian
Net allowable bearing pressure '
Minimum dimension
Minimum embedment below finished
grade
Estimated mov�m�nts2
Allawable passive pressure
Coefficient of sliding friction
ContinuauslWall Foating
1,50a psf
18 inches
24 inches
� ta 5 inchas
kri�ngul�r di5tribu#ion
0.33
Respansi�e■ Resourceful■ Relfable 18
Geatechnical €ngineering Report �����aCO11
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191 GeoRepor�
DesCription CantinuouslVllall Foqting
The recam�mended net allowable bearing pressure is the pressure in excess af the minimum
surrounding overburden pressure at the foating base elevation, and assumes any unsuitable fill
Of 50ft 501I5, if encountered, will be undercut and replaced with engineered fill. The net allowable
bearing pressure includes a factar af safety af at least 3.
�. The foundation mavement will depend upon the variations within the subsurFace soil profile, the
struetural laading conditions, the embedment depth af the footings, the thickness of cornpacted
fill, post-cans#ruction moisture fluctuativns in the clay soils, and the quality of the earthwork
operations.
The sides of the exca�ation for the spread footing foundation must be nearly �►ertical and the
concrete should be placed neat against #hese vertical faces for the passi�e earth pressure �alues
#d be �al�d. If the loaded side is sldped �r benched, and then l�ackfilled, the allawable passive
pressure will !]e signifiCantly reduGed. Passi�e reSistanCe in the upper 2 feet qf the sDil profile
shauld be neglected. 7he allowable passi�e pressure includes a factor af safety of 2.
5hallnw Foundations — Canstruction Cansiderations
Fvoting exca�ativns shauld be pro#ected fram standing water ar desiccation. The base af all
foundation excava#ions shauld be free af wa#er and loose soil and rack prior to placing concrete.
Exca�ation af indi�idual foatings or sectians of c�ntinuous foatin�s, placement of steel and
concrete, and backfilling should be campleted in a reasanably continuous manner. It is preferable
that �amplete installation of indi�idual footings or sectians of continuous foatings be accomplished
in �8 haurs.
If the supporting sails in the battom of the footing became disturbed or unsuitable bearing soils
are encauntered in footing exca�atians, the excavations should be extended deeper to suitable
sails and the footings cvuld bear directly an these soils a# the lawer level ar an lean cvncrete
backfill placed in the exca�ativns. The footings could also bear on properly compacted backfill
extending dawn tn the suitable sails. �ver exca�ation for cnmpacted backfill placernent belaw
footings should extend laterally beyond all edges af the footings at least 8 inches per foot of over
excavation depth below footing base elevation. The aver excavation should then be bac}�filled up
to the footing base elea�tion with properly Comp�cted fill as desCribed in SeC#ir�n
Backfilling adjacent and over footings shauld proceed as soon as pra�tical to reduce disturbance.
Backfilling shauld he accamplished using soils similar to thase exca�ated. All �ackfill shauld he
uniformly campacted to the criteria presented in section of this
repart.
All foating ins#allations should be inspected by qualified geotechnical personnel to help �erify the
design depth and perFarm related duties.
Respansive� Resourceful. Reliahle �9
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021 Terracon Project No. 95205197
Lateral Earth Pressures
l��rracon
GeoReport.
The lateral earth pressure recommendations herein are applicable to the design of cast-in-place
retaining walls subject to slight rotation, such as cantilever, or gravity type concrete walls.
Walls with unbalanced backfill levels on opposite sides should be designed for earth pressures at
least equal to those indicated in the following table. Earth pressures will be influenced by
structural design of the walls, conditions of wall restraint, methods of construction and/or
compaction and the strength of the materials being restrained. Two wall restraint conditions are
shown. Active earth pressure is commonly used for design of free-standing cantilever retaining
walls and assumes wall movement. The "at-rest" condition assumes no wall movement and is
commonly used for basement walls, loading dock walls, or other walls restrained at the top. The
recommended design lateral earth pressures do not include a factor of safety and do not provide
for possible hydrostatic pressure on the walls.
S = Surcharge
SS
FkorizvntBE
Finish0d
Grade
1
I�� p:
For aciive pressure movemen
� �{O.flfl2 H to D.ff44 Hj
for at-rest pressure
- - No Ma�ement Assumed
H
Horizontal
Finished Grade
—►! Re[aining Wall
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 20
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
Earth
Pressure
Conditivn
Lateral Earth Pressure Qesign Parameters
Caefficient fvr Backfill Equivalent Surcharge
Fluid Density Pressure
Type {p��
p� �p��
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
Effecti�e Fluid
Pressures pz
�psfl
Unsaturated
Granular - 0.31 4� �D.31)5 {40}H
Select Fill — 0.42 56 , (4.42}S [55}H
Active [Ka}
Flexible Base — 4.33 47 �U.33}5 {47}H
Dn Site 5oil - a.61 $Q (0.51 ]5 {80}H
Granul�r - Q.47 55 (Q.�i]5 (55}H
5elect Fill — fl.59 8Q (U.59}5 (8�}H
At-Rest �Ko) Flexible Base — Q.� �a �o.�o}s ��o}H
Qn Site Soil �CHy - 0.75 1�0 (�.75�5 (10Q}H
Granular - 3.25 390 --- [390}H
P�551V� Select Fill 2,37 310 --- [310}H
t�l�) Flexible Base — 3.0 420 --- {420}H
�
�
�
�n Site 5oil �CH}-1.54 �15 --- 4215}H
For acti�e earth pressure, wall must rotate about �ase, with top lateral movements 0.002 H ta 0.004 H,
where H is wall height. For passive earth pressure, wall must mo�e horizontally ta mabilize resistance.
lJnifprm, hprizpn#�I b�ckfill, �pmp�C#ed #p �t le�s# 95 perCent Df #he A$TM D 69$ m�ximum dry den5ity,
rendering a maximum uni# weight af 120 pcf far granular backfill, 144 pcf far flexible base, and 130 pcf for
select fill and on-site sails.
Uniform surcharge, where S is surcharge pressure.
Lqading fr�m heavy compactian equipment is nvt included.
Na safety factor is included in these values.
In order to achieve "UnsaturatedH aonditions, follow guidelines in _ . . . , _ _ . . _
Bac�Cfill placed against structures should consist of granular soils or approved vn-site vr imported
fill sails. Wall backfill materials should be placed and campacted as described in section
. Granular backfill shauld nat be water jetted to achieve campactian
and should be placed at a moisture content to allow the desired density to be achieved. Far the
granular, select fill ar flexi�le base ualues to he �alid, the granular, select fill ar flexible base backfill
must extend out and up from the base of the wall footing at an angle of at least 45 from vertical
for the actiae vr at-rest cases and 6D degrees for passive cases. The tap vf the k�ackfill shvuld
be protected l�y flatworklpaving or a minimum thickness vf 2 feet of clay fill �PI��O) to reduce
surFace water infiltration.
Respansive � Resourceful. Reliahle 21
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021 Terracon Project No. 95205197
Subsurface Drainage for Below-Grade Walls
l��rracon
GeoReport.
A perforated rigid plastic drain line installed behind the base of walls and extends below adjacent
grade is recommended to prevent hydrostatic loading on the walls. The invert of a drain line
around a below-grade building area or exterior retaining wall should be placed near foundation
bearing level. The drain line should be sloped to provide positive gravity drainage to daylight or
to a sump pit and pump. The drain line should be surrounded by clean, free-draining granular
material having less than 3% passing the No. 200 sieve, such as No. 57 aggregate. The free-
draining aggregate should be encapsulated in a filter fabric. The granular fill should extend to
within 2 feet of final grade, where it should be capped with compacted cohesive fill to reduce
infiltration of surface water into the drain system.
� , - Slope to drain
� away hom hu[Id�ng
Lay� of -'.--. � .. - _ L_.._ _ _ _. �-�`
cohesi�efill �"'� ��--- - � _
............,_ � . �-_ "�
�..
Foundalionwa9-. � -�--�---_ �
_ _ --- ^-�
'�i� ..: ".. ':� � 1
� � ' -�� 6ackfill isee report
' � - �� � �equirements�
Fre�draining graded -. "
granular5ltPs rnalerial or � - �
non-gradedf�e�dra�ning ;� ��
material encapsulaied in . �
an appropriate 51ter -- Native, undisturhed
lah�+t Isee repor!] . J�� saii or engineered 51i
I -
� - __� � �-�-_ .. _._.
N �� -� Perfora[ed drain pipe IRigid PVC
unless stated othenvise in report)
As an alternative to free-draining granular fill, a pre-fabricated drainage structure may be used. A
pre-fabricated drainage structure is a plastic drainage core or mesh which is covered with filter
fabric to prevent soil intrusion and is fastened to the wall prior to placing backfill.
PAVEMENTS
Pavement Subgrades
Subgrade materials at this site will consist of clay soils. The clay soils are subject to loss in
support value with the moisture increases which occur beneath pavement sections. They react
with hydrated lime to improve and maintain their support value. Lime treatment is recommended
beneath flexible (asphalt) pavement sections. On-site, rigid (concrete) pavements, may be placed
on an unmodified, properly compacted subgrade. The pavement subgrades should be proof
rolled as discussed in section _.. �aai u�._...
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 22
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021 Terracon Project No. 95205197
l��rracon
GeoReport.
Based on laboratory tests, 9 percent hydrated lime (TxDOT Item 280), by dry weight, can be used
for treating the subgrade beneath pavements. Variable soil types may be present at the surface
after rough grading in the pavement areas; therefore, the lime application rate should be verified
by laboratory testing once the pavement subgrade is rough graded. The lime should be thoroughly
mixed and blended with the top 6 inches of the subgrade for on-site pavement. Lime treatment
should extend a minimum of one foot beyond the edge of the pavement.
The soils in this region may contain high level of sulfates. Sulfates can react with lime to form
ettringite crystals that can lead to heave of pavements and premature pavement failure. Sulfate
tests performed at the time of our investigation indicated sulfate of <100 ppm. If lime treatment
of the pavement subgrade is performed, the surface soils should be tested for sulfates after rough
grading is complete. When the sulfate concentrations are less than 3,000 ppm, the subgrade
soils are considered to be suitable for lime treatment in the conventional manner using a single
lime application. When sulfate concentrations are higher than about 3,000 ppm, there is risk of
lime/sulfate induced heave occurring.
The modified or natural subgrade should be uniformly compacted to the criteria described in
section . It should then be protected and maintained in a moist
condition until the pavement is placed. Pavement subgrades should be graded to prevent
ponding and infiltration of excessive moisture on or adjacent to the pavement subgrade surface.
Site grading is generally accomplished early in the construction phase. However, as construction
proceeds, the subgrade may be disturbed due to utility excavations, construction traffic,
desiccation, or rainfall. As a result, the pavement subgrade may not be suitable for pavement
construction and corrective action will be required. The subgrade should be carefully evaluated
at the time of pavement construction for signs of disturbance or excessive rutting. If disturbance
has occurred, pavement subgrade areas should be reworked, moisture conditioned, and properly
compacted to the recommendations in this report immediately prior to paving.
Support characteristics of subgrade for pavement design do not account for shrink/swell
movements of an expansive clay subgrade, such as soils encountered on this project. Thus, the
pavement may be adequate from a structural standpoint, yet still experience cracking and
deformation due to shrink/swell related movement of the subgrade.
Pavement Design Parameters
Traffic patterns and anticipated loading conditions were not available; however, typical pavement
sections with subgrade modification alternatives for 20-year design life are provided. These
represent a total of 45,000 18-Kip Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) for Light Duty pavement
and 100,000 18-Kip ESALs for the Medium Duty pavement. Light Duty and Medium Duty
pavements should be limited to the automobile parking areas and should be separated from the
Responsive. Resourceful. Reliable 23
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
truck court areas. Hea�y Du#y pavements are also provided fvr the truck c�urt areas far
compacted subgrades, with or withaut lime treatment.
If the pavements are subject ta heavier loading and higher kraffic caunts than the assumed values,
this affice should lae natified and pravided wi#h the information so that wa may reviaw these
pa�ement sectians and make revisions if necessary.
Pa�ement 5ection Thickness
Both asphalt and cancrete pavement sectivns are presented in the fallvwing tables for vn-site
pavements. They are nat considered equal. ��er the life of the pauemen#, Goncrete sections
would be expected to require less maintenance.
Pawement Thickness, Inches
Pa�ement Sectian Light Duty Medlium Duty pumpster
45,00018-kip 10p,fl0018-kip Area
ESALs ESALs
Con crete 5 6
Portland Cement ��m����� �uhgrade 6 �
Concrete
Tatal Pa�ement 5ection 11 1�
Asphaltic C�ncrete
TxDQT Itern 340
Type D
ASphaltic C�ncrete
Full ❑epth TxDQT Itern 34�
Asphaltic Concrete Type A�r B
Lime Modified Subgrade
} Total Pavement 5ection
2 2
3 4
5 6
11 12
7
6
13
�`All materials should rneet the TxDOT Standard Spe�ifications for Highway Constructian.
Respansive■ Resource'ful■ Reliable 24
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Project No. 952�5191
TRLJCK C�l1RT AREAS �Heavy Duty)
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
Allawalole Daily Tractar Trailer Repetitions
Partland Cement Cancrete
Payement Thiekness Untreated, cQmpacted Lime treated, campacted
sul�grade subgrade
7
�
�]
35
F: �
155
55
11p
22D
Dumpster and Light Duty and Medium Duty pa�ements are based on a minimum 28-day concrete
campressive streng#h vf 3,5�� psi. Truck Cvurk Areas area concrete should ha�e a rninimum 2$-
day cancrete compressiue strength af 4,000 psi.
All pavements shauld cantain a minimum of 4.5 t 1.5 percent entrained air. As a minirnum, areas
subje�t to truck trafFc should be reinfflrced with No. 3 bars on 18-inch centers in both directions.
Refer ta ACI 33a "Guide for Design and Cnnstructinn of Con�rete Parking Lats" for additianal
information concerning joint spacing, joint depth, joint location, etc,
Pa�ements will he subjec# to differential maaement due ta heave in the site soils. We estimate
the potential vertical heave ta be as much as 5 inches for this si#e. Terracan should be cantacted
far additianal recommendatians should it be desired to reduce the potential vertical heave in
pavement areas. Flat grades should be avoided with positive drainage pravided away fr�m the
pavement edges. Backfilling of �urbs shauld be accamplished as soon as practical to prevent
panding af water.
❑penings in pa�ernent, such as landscape islands, are sources for water infiltrativn into
surrvunding pavements. INater collects in the islands and migrates into the surrvunding subgrade
sails thereby degrading support of the pavement. This is espe�ially applicable for islands with
raised concrete curbs, irrigated foliage, and low permeability near-surface soils. The civil design
for the pavements with these conditians shauld include features to restrict or to collect and
discharge excess water from the islands. Examples of features are edge drains cannected to the
starm water collectian system or other suitable ou#let and impermeable barriers prewenting lateral
migration of water such as a cutoff wall installed ta a depth below the pauement structure.
Pa�ement Maintenance
The pavement sectians represent minimum recommended thicknesses and, as such, periadic
maintenance shauld be anticipated. Therefore, preventiWe maintenance should be planned and
praWided for through an on-gaing pa�ement managernent pragrarn. Maintenance actiuities are
Respansive� Resource'ful� Reliahle 25
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021 Terracon Project No. 95205197
l��rracon
GeoReport.
intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration and to preserve the pavement investment.
Maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g., crack and joint sealing and patching)
and global maintenance (e.g., surface sealing). Preventive maintenance is usually the priority
when implementing a pavement maintenance program. Additional engineering observation is
recommended to determine the type and extent of a cost-effective program. Even with periodic
maintenance, some movements and related cracking may still occur and repairs may be required.
Pavement performance is affected by its surroundings. In addition to providing preventive
maintenance, the civil engineer should consider the following recommendations in the design and
layout of pavements:
.
Final grade adjacent to paved areas should slope down from the edges at a minimum 2%.
Subgrade and pavement surfaces should have a minimum 2% slope to promote proper
surface drainage.
Install below pavement drainage systems surrounding areas anticipated for frequent
wetting.
Install joint sealant and seal cracks immediately.
Seal all landscaped areas in or adjacent to pavements to reduce moisture migration to
subgrade soils.
Place compacted, low permeability backfill against the exterior side of curb and gutter.
Place curb, gutter and/or sidewalk directly on clay subgrade soils rather than on unbound
granular base course materials.
GENERAL COMMENTS
Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical
conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variations will occur
between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather.
The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction.
Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in this report, to provide
observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations appear, we
can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are noted in the
absence of our observation and testing services on-site, we should be immediately notified so
that we can provide evaluation and supplemental recommendations.
Our Scope of Services does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or
biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of
pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for
such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken.
Our services and any correspondence or collaboration through this system are intended for the
sole benefit and exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and
Responsive. Resourceful. Reliable 26
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January 20, 2021 Terracon Project No. 95205197
l��rracon
GeoReport.
are accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices with
no third-party beneficiaries intended. Any third-party access to services or correspondence is
solely for information purposes to support the services provided by Terracon to our client.
Reliance upon the services and any work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for
third parties. Any use or reliance of the provided information by third parties is done solely at their
own risk. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made.
Site characteristics as provided are for design purposes and not to estimate excavation cost. Any
use of our report in that regard is done at the sole risk of the excavating cost estimator as there
may be variations on the site that are not apparent in the data that could significantly impact
excavation cost. Any parties charged with estimating excavation costs should seek their own site
characterization for specific purposes to obtain the specific level of detail necessary for costing.
Site safety, and cost estimating including, excavation support, and dewatering
requirements/design are the responsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location
of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid
unless we review the changes and either verify or modify our conclusions in writing.
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 27
FIGURES
Contents:
GeoModel (# of pages 3)
Lime Series
Proctor — Natural
CBR — Natural
Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above.
Responsive ■ Resourceful � Reliable
ProjectRocket Fo��o�,,Te�a ���rr�con I
Terracvn Pmjeet No. 95ZU5197 Ge�Report
.•�
�
.: � �
� � % % � � % �
:� � / i
� � /
_� % % i � i ' � �
. : � � � � i : . � �.
: _ / % � i � % -: �'._
w �� 1 � � � � � _ ■ �� —
// � ' �ii i �� e�
• � � iY O� /'1" � � j � � � ���
; � �= �= =� ' , I �� � � ■=■
�■ ' �= : =: � ' / � � =� � . , �1 ■1
, � ��
� � � � � � - ' - • ' - -
� •• - • " � � �� � � �
, _ - - � ■ - � � � - -
�� ' ■1 ■, 1 ■1 ■1
.. � e� ■e :• � =: :; " � : :: � �
� � � � � ii :: : •— ii — �� � � ■� �
. � ■� ■� ■� �� � ii -. , � � ii � ■� � -■
� � � � ■� �■ �� ■� � , � ■� � � ■�
• �� ' � � i� � i� �� ° � i� ■� - —
�'' � � ■� �� � � � �'
. � -■ ' � i� � � o ■:
' �, � � _
■� --
.• �
� - - - - - - - -- - - -
Model Layer Layer Name General Qescription
1 C18y Fat and lean clay vuith varying amount of sand and limestone
fragmerrts
� Highly Weathared 7an limestone with clay seams and layer
Bedrock
3 Bedrqck Gray limestane witri shale seams and layer
LEGEND
� Fat Glay
� Lean Clay
�Highly Weathered
Lif�'�stdhl0
� LimeStqne
Q Flrst Water ObservaUon
s Third Water Observation
Groundwater le�els are temporal, The le�els shown are representative of ihe date
and time of our exploration. Significant ohanges are possible a�er time.
Water levels shoNm are as measured during andfor after drilling. In some r�ases,
horing advancemerrt methods mask the presencelaGsenoe of groundwater. See
individual logs far details.
NOTES: �
Layering shoHm on this figure has baen de�elopad hy the geotechnical
engineer for purposes of modeling the suhsurface oonditions as
required farthe su6sequent geotechnical engineering for this project.
Num6ers adjapent to soil �lumn indic�e depth 6e1� g�ound surface,
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
Terracvn Pmjeet No. 95ZU5197
69D
�85
sso
d
s75
d
�
; s7o
�
z
o ���
a
�
w
J
W sso
���rr�con I
Ge�R�port
� �i
' � % � % % � %
, _ . r � i �i �"'e. _, _; �"'e. �i i , � '
�
„
����
�....,
30
B55
s�o
sa�
This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model vnly_ See indi�+idual logs far more detailed conditions.
Model Layer Layer Name General Qescription
1 C18y Fat and lean clay vuith varying amount of sand and limestone
fragmerrts
� Highly Weathared 7an limestone with clay seams and layer
Bedrock
3 Bedrqck Gray limestane witri shale seams and layer
LEGEND
� Fat Glay
� Lean Clay
�Highly Weathered
Lif�'�stdhl0
� LimeStqne
Q Flrst Water ObservaUon
s Third Water Observation
Groundwater le�els are temporal, The le�els shown are representative of ihe date
and time of our exploration. Significant ohanges are possible a�er time.
Water levels shoNm are as measured during andfor after drilling. In some r�ases,
horing advancemerrt methods mask the presencelaGsenoe of groundwater. See
individual logs far details.
NOTES:
Layering shoHm on this figure has baen de�elopad hy the geotechnical
engineer for purposes of modeling the suhsurface oonditions as
required farthe su6sequent geotechnical engineering for this project.
Num6ers adjapent to soil �lumn indic�e depth 6e1� g�ound surface,
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
Terracvn Pmjeet No. 95ZU5197
695
sso
sss
d
� 6$0
N
�
Z
0
Q 675
7
w
J
W
�70
ss5
���rr�con
Ge�Report
R12
� 3 P-73
... ...... ... .... .... .... .... ...... ... .... .... .... .... ...... ... .... .... .... .... ...... ... .... .... . .... ... ...
2 .�
P-�� ,�
.................................. � a
...................�,74 -...
P� P�i
�
P-4
�5 _.. _..._.
P-S .�
16
1 � �s
10 ,�
... .... .. .. .... .._. ... ..........................................
1 10
�0 1° �
,o �
.. .... ...... ... .... .... . . . . .... .... ...... _.. .... .... .... .... ...... _.. .... .... ...
�o �o
�o
ssoi
This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model vnly_ See indi�+idual logs far more detailed conditions.
Model Layer Layer Name
1 Clay
� H�ghry w�tr�red
Bedrock
3 Bedrqck
General Qescription
Fat and lean clay vuith varying amount of sand and limestone
fragmerrts
7an limestone with clay seams and layer
Gray limestane witri shale seams and layer
LEGEND
� Fat Glay
� Lean Clay
�Highly Weathered
Lif�'�stdhl0
Q Flrst Water ObservaUon
s Third Water Observation
Groundwater le�els are temporal, The le�els shown are representative of ihe date
and time of our exploration. Significant ohanges are possible a�er time.
Water levels shoNm are as measured during andfor after drilling. In some r�ases,
horing advancemerrt methods mask the presencelaGsenoe of groundwater. See
individual logs far details.
/.
�
/ '�
/ % �
� � �
�
,
NOTES:
Layering shoHm on this figure has baen de�elopad hy the geotechnical
engineer for purposes of modeling the suhsurface oonditions as
required farthe su6sequent geotechnical engineering for this project.
Num6ers adjapent to soil �lumn indic�e depth 6e1� g�ound surface,
LIME SERIES
ib.Da
�4.�6
�3_G4
; 2.44
�
a t 1 _0�
�o.00-
9.94
8.�a
7.Oa
ti 2 4 6 8 10 12
Lime Cantent (°la�
Samp�e: Bulk samp6e {P-1, P-7 & P-'11 }
Soil Descriptian: dark Brawn C�ay with Sand
LEquid Limik: 56 9�6
Plastic Limik: 20 9�6
Piasticity Index: 36
Pass�ng Na. 20f}= �6.� °la
Opt�mum Lime Applicatian Ftate: 896
Lime �ontent (°�6� pH
0_� .. . 6.8�
4_� � 12.03
fi_4 12.30
.8_4 �2.42
10.0 � i 2.46
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable
PROCTOR - NATURAL
sa
9J
�
es
�
M
� 95
W
�
M
�
�
�
�
� 95
9d
4
1
t
1
1
1
l
1
1
1
�
l
1
1
1
1
1
1
i7 i8 19 20 21 27 23 2d 25 26 27 28
MOlSTURE ��NTENT (°l�j
# fdAX. 6RY UNff WEIC,HTlQPT1MllfiS MOiSTLRE COPiTENT
SAMPLE L�CATIOhF: Bulk sample P-1. P-F 3 P-11
SAMPLE aESCRIPTION: dark Brown Ckaywith Sar�d
�A�,I�LE �EFTF 0-2 fee:
STAhL�IARQ PROCi�R �ESULTS
LAB�RdTORY PROPERTIE� Dptimit�m Maisture Conteret-' �2_0 °Io
�iq�ad Limit: 56 °!a -�
Rlas#ic �imit: 24 °l� MaxEmum Qry aensity- 96.9 pcf
�lastic�ty In�ex: 3fi
Fassing EJa. 2�0: 76.4 °!fl -
Test �net�ad: a�srrn o-saa, r��tnad a
Zefa aEr vaids far specific grav�Ey �f 2.65
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable
CBR - NATURAL
tz�
r�
84
.�
� 64
�
w
�
�
�
44
24
TE�T IN�ORN4�#T�ON
BORIN�: BuEk sample {P-i, P-7 3� P-11)
DEPTF�: ��'
S�kMPLE DESCRIPTIOH: aark Brown Glay with �and
�RIA�: Cornposite �urve
Surcharge Load: 101bs
LABDRAT�RY PR�P�R71ES
Liqutd Limit: �6 °�
Plastic Limit: 20 95
Plastic�ty Index: 36
°o I�4aterial Passir� #2Q0= 76.4 °�
Test h�ethad A�TM Q 18�3-99
�BR RE�iILTS �
��rnpfe molde� at 75.1 pcf fdry. � 6
der�sityi
�ample m�lde� at 94_6 pcf fdry 2_4
densityi
�ampie malded ak 100.7 pcf 6 9
(dry densiEY}
Esbrrsat8d C�R for 95°�G of 2 9
staepdard pracpar d�y dens�ty
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable
0
4.000 0.056 4.100 0.150 0_204 �+.2�0 0.344 �.350 0.400 0.45c: 4.500
PENETRATIO�! {ir�}
ATTACHMENTS
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable
Geatechnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Praject No. 952�5191
E)CPLC3RATIC?N AND TESTING PRD�EDl1RE�
Field Explaration
�
Mumber of Borings Boring Depth tfeetj
32
13
1 ��rr��on
GeoRepor�
Lvcation
25 to 30 Building area
10 Parking and driue lanes
Baring Layvut and Ele�atians: Unless otherwise noted, Terracon personnel pravided the boring
layaut. Caardinates were obtained with a handheld GPS unit (estimated hvrizontal accura�y af
a�vut t10 feet} and approximate elevativns far GeaMadel were obtained by interpalatian fram the
ci�il drawing provided by Kimley-Harn Assaciates. If elevativns and a more precise lavring layaut
are desired, we recornmend barings be surveyed fallowing completian af fieldwork.
Subsurf�ce Explor�#lon Procedures: We adv�nce the borings with � truck-mounted, rotary drill
rig using continuous flight augers (salid stern andlar hollow stem as necessary depending on soil
cvnditivns}. Five samples are obtained in the upper 10 feet af each baring and at intervals af 5
feet thereafter. In the thin-walled tube sampling procedure, a thin-walled tube is pushed hydrauli�ally
into the soil ta obtain a relatively �andisturhed sample. In the split-barrel sampling procedure, a
split-barrel sampling spaon is driven into the gmund. The load-carrying capacity af bedrock is
evaluated in place by the Texas Department of Transportatian [TxD�T} cone penetration test. The
samples were placed in appropriate container, taken to aur laboratary for testing, and classified
under the direction af a geatechnical engineer. In addition, we observe and recard groundwater
leuels during drilling and sampling. Far safety purpases, all borings are backfilled with auger
cuttings after their c�mpletian.
�ur exploratian team prepares field baring logs as part of the standard drilling operations, These
field logs include visual classificatians af the materials encountered during drilling and our
interpretatian af the subsurFace conditians between sarnples. Final baring lags are prepared frorn
the field logs. The final baring logs represent the geotechnical engineer's interpretatian of the field
lags and include modifications hased an ahservatians and tests of the samples in ❑ur labaratory.
Lahora#ary Testing
The project engineer reWiewed the field data and assigned laboratary tests to understand the
engineering properkies of the �ariaus sail and rack strata, as necessary, far this project.
Procedural standards noted are for reference to methadology in general. In same cases,
variatinns tv methods were applied because of la�al practice vr professivnal judgment. Standards
noted include reference to other, related standards. Such references are not necessarily
applicable to describe the spe�ific test perf�rmed.
Respansive � Resourceful. Reliahle EXPLORATIQN AN� TESTIIVG PRaCEaURES � of 2
Gea�echnical Engineering Report
Project Rocket Fort Worth, Texas
January �0, 2421 Terracon Praject No. 952�5191
■ Water �Moisture� Content af 5ail
■ Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index af Sails
■ Absorptian Swell Tests
■ Sail Lime Testing
■ Galifornia Bearing Ratio
� 5oluble Sulfates
�epth
{feety
Absvrption swell tests are pertarmed on selected samples. These tests are used ta quantitatiaely
evaluate uolume change potential at in-situ moisture levels. Selected samples ara also tested for
soluble sulfates. The results of these #ests are presented in #he fnllowing tables.
SWELL TEST RES!]LTS
6oring
Na.
F-1
F-3
F-5
F-8
F-12
F-16
F-2�
F-28
F-32
2-�
8-10
4-6
2-�
2-�
2-�
6-8
4-6
2-�
Liquid
Limit
��lO�
68
31
72
63
45
7fl
4l
5�
��
Plasticity
Index
("ID)
45
16
47
4Q
�9
4B
31
43
43
Initial
Moisture
[°/o)
17.1
16.6
27.2
21.7
15.0
18.8
17.1
17.0
17.9
Final
Maisture
(°/o}
26.7
16.7
28.5
27A
17.9
27.8
18.4
23.2
25.5
1 �err�can
GeoRepor�
Surcharge
(p�fl
375
112�
6Z5
375
375
375
875
6�5
375
SIJMMARY QF SdLl1BLE SULFATES TESTS
Boring No. Depth �ftj Saluble Sulfates [ppm]
Bulk (P-1, P-7 and P-11 } � 0-5 i �100
Swell
�%�
12.3
�
1.3
7.4
2.6
14.�a
fl.1
8.a
1 Q.4
Respansive ■ Resourceful ■ Relfable EXPLORATION AND TE5TIHG PROCEDURES 2 nf 2
SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS
Contents:
Site Location Plan
Exploration Plan
Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above.
Responsive. Resourceful. Reliable
51T _QCATIQhI l��rra�an
Project Rocket ■ Fort Worth, Texas
January 2D, 2421 ■ Terracon Project No. 95205197 G�oReport.
�
_"�''f . �� - - t .,.; �- - -_ :�-
. .�J.E�'� � �� '_ �. ��
� i i� . . � � ' 7 �� 1..��� ` •. � � • � � "'_ A. ' � � � ' �;' � .
_ � - , - , � -. .f . _.�--t,�---�� �.y �� .
. '•'�, ,��; ' �' : � � - � _ =i i�� � � — '- T .. `'K'.,;;:.� : �- •..
�r �• K' yf ` .'' _ c - - . � '� ,:y [ � � , '';,
* �f� — - � - --- � -
� - -
�— � �y'
i�r /"
_ ,L4 - t * .r.
_ =[ . . ]' _ �J�� �� . _ ' 1� �•i :_��.r �. '��
� {� .� ., �� � i_Y .4� -;,"i��.',• �.
T �^ '.L�+;�f.� �' lt�i ,�r .
�� _ ♦ �� ���x� � � � f �'�i,� �'� � �'��' w .. • . .
� t� � .��. •• _ .�' - -�• •Sr : ' .f " �+iK.`,.
� "'!ti
� ' J' i�
� ' �- ��.1 �'Ati
4; ,�� � p r:' : �
• � .t � , }� .
-_ : . .` . :' .}, `. 7I
�F. � ' � 4_ '~a� ; '
� ' ._' . , . (i',�
�� i �.- LL . • . + 4 {�'•
I ' . .*�'''` •�'
-! �' , �'_.. � •,� � CJt'��`
a— �` - .-f' r
- : .1-.: ' � '�r. -
�- , . _ -
�
i � �
: , - ' - . ���' ; :��t,y � ,' � ;. .
i
w rWf�' �y. *�
;'��, ,'�- � � J ;� , � , � � � � • �
� �.- ��" - ;
� � � :�' � � + - `� '� ��
,�, �, �r
� Is r ,',�� , r,�.� '� � � .
i� • _ -• '' � .e-�-'s' .: ". _ - _ '
II e '� � : '{ .� _ ._ F� .4:�r�A.-{ .� ' � �y,-' �'.�.. y " . .. - . — � .,-
s .�� �:�� --, J 31 T_ ,� ;�r rF. �;;�� � �
' �{ --: �,��c:�:� � � �" �= � — - ` ' s �� `'�' �,
� �d�'. f�ir. ^;i -�, �.7� F J�-`S-?.r.+ � - � �� �:��"�• •-• ! . - . 11` � i
� '� � � .�� i�.:� � � =�- _ -� �`s, � i� ':::�' `%' x -
�'�� ~�� � �� r -4 _'�� ��
��. � . T.. � •�, {.., F�' �' , } . . � � ���� ^.
.—� S[� � } } y-•
��iC' �" •W�� J� � •� �. '�^ � � ~ ! � ��i �� � `�i !q[. fA'� {' I��i � � �
L ��"` ra' r"+�,ti�.• +�.F:�-'"' y�,�-`-`' . _ � � ! +� .► �-,,,- •# _�.'��.i�!1i� ��yN°' , r _ y �,�
T :�►�.. � � ?�. ' ' : - ! � � ^_t_ - y .
t�i � �2:�:. .�',� �i � t f j�l���.. F - r '+S � ��'`�+�� ''r•
, . 4 �f;ry`:,T_r1.��Jui^, F ��k� l7�.'� �' . . .� i � ae��f.j �� ., �
' i .� � � �� 4 �� . +,- � � .
n �F...�'�''���r r `�t ' �� } . "'-}�r'� 1 k� �i u�. �. 1`�.�. .; / fi�_ �
_.��',�r.� � y�hi, - ' , _ � 1�,i1• � s ';i� ��,��� i +� r � � -
- ,� . :��' � �` �� _ ������'
�r�X �,
.�'„+F � �f�, � � � �—.7�+' ; �'
4-- _ } �, "y • ,� � • �� � ,�' � y"4* +?*�`:�'� d .+f-+.�;, : S'�
� �. . �h ! � +„�•�a �_:S �.I�a ���
�., ���r _ . ''�'} • _ _ ��, � r. i ' "
N1 �� =�.r - __ ',=�" � . ;� `�,,y��,� �+' +��.��J�� � {c -
� � , � � �`.-- - k- � �
. � r *� �'�''� ' � � ..3 F.'s` - � • ' .'� � - • �: �
. . '�.� � � '� . �� .�� - � �� -. - � + � � f *' � = ~ ' - • �
� ' � _� F '- +� '�� - .. ' �" - _, ��� - #1�
'� . � '�� ��- � � �'• �'�'.� � � � 4 �' �' �
a1r1 ��f � 1 ���4' �'' i � - L;� �,►�1�
�r � V ��� . �'�� �����:.� L, ,,��..�_ � � _
� • �� �.�'�. �:�+�4:. ; : -�•''�`3 ,J .� _ �`'�
�`�-' . :� . i � � � �+r��u �
�+ � '�:' � # Nistaric Tcrracon Prnject
�� '.. . .. • � .
• ' F'= �� "�'';m• +', . � � � _ z � � .;� -- ---
__ � .� �� � .,,i �,. - - - �
� ��
_ . ; .� � `� ' �
�IAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION DNLY, ANO IS NOT INTEN�EO F6R CANSTRl1CTION PIJRPO5E5
M,4P PROVI6E� 6Y FAICROSOFT 81NG FAAPS
�� � �
,;':;
7
r ��r
� �
�
� -
�
�
'�3
�
7
t
�
-__ r
�
- —�-
� �Ir*A��*+�m�Rr:lnr ; �
_ i � ►F�NlI�i�+Y�FI�+W,
� ,�' F u �p �IN^+�INH'71�}}lMNj:, �-
, � '�..�,. . � � h� �; i �_ .,,. �� - : �
� . -r .l t.,:�l�i�r r,� ��+ „�. .�ii�iAi114Ni�,
i �,�, +t�'-•r�.t�•,-�#4+IMhk�� ��-•,+,���t+ilh�Fi�.' -
I ��s�..��,� u.� ...�.�..��� .� ..� -r,a.a.:::.."�.-�� •
� f�
� ; ! _� �� ~_ I
�� f -s-; � -.
� - +°:,; � � �.� � __
. �_� .
� _ ; - - � ,; �; � -- � �
, ; � �.
' _ ` � , , �..;. .: :�., w . �}
r. �� � � ; � �,
� -� - -
;,
'- 4. + t . _. � � :..�
- �- - - -� - •, . � - ;
_ ,� -
� _ _ � _ . �,� . , � -
� . r�.� , . . �
� ,-- � _ ,.
�
� �
� �_ �
� � �;
, _
�
�
_ �
� �
_
;
a�
4�
�
;
��
� L'�
` �.
L
L
4 ��:,
_ ' `'
f; ���
�i�
�
.� �� �;.���� ��iu
4 �,�
�.�
�,. .. .
I
- i
� I
� � I
�� � �.
.� � �
�
�_ � �a�-�
_ �
� -
�_ _�
,. � �_ � � � -- �. +iwi� � �
+11 , �1 E tt
�
�
�
��,*
t'si �r►tr�
� ..._ .___ � � .... �
� I
! I
� ;.�, a� I
I � �• I
i �� I
i � � �
I � I
� ! �
� � �
� �
� �
i I
I I
I I
I I
1 �
i I
I !
I I
I I
I I
� llII 1I��,�,�1II��,�I`I � I� jI� I;f �;pI;.I � �� � � � �
I� � � ��,II�I :III �'�..{�1!!1}"}��"`�'�.��I � i;�l �j••f H, -�'` il 1 �
� � � � 1I
� � 1
II T- II I I �il �I I ���ip I
� � � � �',��„ •�"li!�1'� I��I 'I� I � — �. _. � _ �
;� �
1 f � ���� �
�
I�I �Ilq�lll�l}Ifq� ikllld w�il� Ifi�141�11� p��ll �l[111�1
�� � �
��.. � i �: i i i�i �l' �- 1--1�. -:-�--_l�__:!!J_�'�I�!1�!�I'�ll-_C'! ll�::i���
� . �' � . . . i . . � � . � . . 11� � 1 .��
�
i � µ, �J� i IiINi�� � I i ii ��II�II��1i: �i ��III�iiU IIYI�I�lllll�iilif�lll I
'' I�IIfi�� ��I�{E ��� �-� � � I-� r���f���: _��� � � �u �
,,_ � _-_------------_--
�-
pI'l h�. ' r -
�� �' IIWlI�!l��f�AUl�IIWI�I�I11111a����RJ���ll��' ��+�I��Ir r �-_-_..^� ..'r�---•
1 r
i
,
� �
3 O
� ro'
m �,
� �
� o
�
N �
o @
N
S �
� �
m ��
O �
� -
� �
�• v
��
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
V
� J
o �
�
��
o p
�
r"p �
EXPLORATION RESULTS
Contents:
Boring Logs (F-1 through F-32 and P-1 through P-13)
Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above.
BORING LOG NQ. F-1
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray ta gray, hard
I
7 Vi
LEAN CLAY [CL1. tan, hard
LIMESTDNE, with clav lavers, tan
5
1
��_�
19.4
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
; �r
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
19-5p15"
31-5�15"
� ao�� .z�°
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
17.4
17.1 6&23�5
17.5
13.6
9.1 3�15-18
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-1
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�� .z��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3019° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 685 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray, stiff tv �ery stiff
I
+ ri
FAT CLAY [CH1, gray, stifF to yery stiff
5
�_�
; �r
71.p
LIMESTONE, with clay seams, tan
19.4
LIME5TONE, with shale seams and layers,
gray
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
1.Q (HP]
s.a �HP}
2.25 {HP}
1.75 (HP)
2.� [HPj
� oor2.o��
144J2.25"
� ao�a.��°
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
26.5
22.1 72-24�8
25.5
28.5
27.0
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3019° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 685 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams and layers,
yray {continUed}
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �015,5"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F� Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 683.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray ta gray, stiff ta very
stiff 2.Q (HP]
I
2.75 {HP}
� 3.Q (HP]
7
3.25 (HP)
8.0 675.5+1
LEAN CLAY iCLI. tan, hard
4.5+ {HP]
1
� 7.0
LIMESZQNE. with clay layers, tan
�.
LIMEST�IE, with shale seams, gray
�■1
s��
1
10019.5"
144J1.25"
1 DOlQ.75"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
27.$
23.1 64-22�2
25.4
2Q.1
1fi.6 31-15-1fi
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 683.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �013.�"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-4
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3002° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 682 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. gray, yery stiff ta hard
I
11
o _�
; �r
FAT CLAY [CH1. tan and gray, hard
LEAN CLAY iCLf. tan and gray, hard
LIMESTpNE, with clay saams, tan
19.4
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
5
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
2.5 (HP]
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
1 D011.T5"
144J1.T5"
� ao�a.��°
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
26.8
2Q.7 71-25�6
19.5
2Q.6 �5-17�1
17.3
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-4
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.3002° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 682 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �010,5"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-5
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas Texas
Paae 1 of 2
�
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 680 {FtJ +1- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. gray, stiff to yery stiff
1.5 (HP]
I
2.75 {HP}
� 3.5 (HP]
� s.a s7a•i
LEAN CLAY iCLf. tan and gray, wery stifF
3A (HPj
3.75 (HP)
1
� 7.0
LIMESZQNE. with clay layers, tan
�:�
19.4 ss
LIME5TONE, with shale seams and layers,
gray
� 3 �`
1
10014.0"
144J�.T5"
� aato.���
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
32.9
23.5
27.2 72-25�T
17.6
1fi.7
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-5
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 680 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams and layers,
yray {continUed}
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �015.�"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-fi
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 67$ {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray ta gray, stiff ta very
I
5
i IIi
LEAN CLAY iCLI. tan and gray, hard
1
LIMESTpNE, with clay saams, tan
1
o _�
19.4
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
; �r
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
1.75 {HP}
1.75 {HP}
2.Q (HP]
2.75 (HP)
4.5+ {HP]
1 D011.25"
144J2.25"
� ao�� .z�°
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
28.8
26.1 74-25�9
26.9
18.9
21.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-fi
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 67$ {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas Texas
Paae 1 of 2
�
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2978° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 676.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray ta gray, stiff ta very
stiff 1.5 (HP]
I
s.a �HP}
� 1.5 (HP]
i
i.o sss.s•r 4.25 (HP)
LEAN CLAY [CL], kan and gray, �ery stifF ta
ha rd
4.5+ {HP]
1
� �.a
LIM€STONE, with clay layers, tan
�_�
19.4
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
� 3 �`
655
1
657
90l12"
144J1.25"
� aato.���
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
25.2
2Q.8 64-22�2
26.8
18.6
15.8
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2978° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 676.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �010,5"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-$ Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2970° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 674.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, very
stiff to hard 3.25 {HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 4.5 (HP]
� s.a ssa.s•i
FAT CLAY [CH1, tannish hrown, �ery stiff
2.25 (HP)
a.a sss.s+i
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with limestone fragments,
tan, hard 4.5+ {HP]
1
� 7.0
LIMESZQNE. with clay layers, tan
����
LIMESTONE, with shale seams, gray
��.
sss
1
1 D013.T5"
144J�.T5"
1 DOl2.75"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
25.9
21.7 63-23��
24.3
21.3
13.1
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 ��rr��on �ring Started:92-22-2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F-8
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6337° Longitude: -97.2970° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 674.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�� .7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-22-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.2969° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 67fi {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, very
I
7 F�
2 C�
LEAN CLAY iCLf. tannish hrown, hard
� 7.0
LIMESZQNE. with clay layers, tan
�7.0
LIME$TpNE, with shala seams, gray
5
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
2.75 {HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
10013.5"
144J1.25"
s L
1 DOlQ.75"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
29.2
24.1 7Q24�6
22.4
11.5 31-14-17
17.3
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 ��rr��on �ring Started:92-22-2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BORING LOG NQ. F�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT; Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.2969° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 67fi {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-22-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-1 D Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.2978° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 677.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, stiff to
�ery stiff 4.Q (HP]
I
1.5 (HPj
� 2.5 (HP]
i
4.25 (HP)
8.0 669.5+1
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with limestone fragments, 14-17-22
brown, very stiff ta hard N=39
1
� �.a 6ss
LIM€STONE, with clay seams, tan
1
z�
�IMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
; a I--r
1 D014.T5"
� ooro.5��
1 DOlQ.75"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
2D.7
25.4
19.8
23.6
19.fi
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
go�iN� �v� n�o. F-�o
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.2978° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 677.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-11 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6331 ° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 679.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard ko
�ery stiff 4.5+ (HP}
I
2.75 {HP}
� 4.5 (HP]
i
4.5+ (HP]
8.6 671.5+1
FAT CLAY [CH1. hrown, hard to �ery stifF
2.� [HPj
1
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
16.7 6a21-39
24.7
21.9
17.4
24.9
LIMESTpNE, with clay saams, tan
1
1 D011.25"
o�=
LIME5TdNE, with shale seams and layers,
gray
��C•
144J�.T5"
1 QQ10.5"
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-11
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6331 ° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 679.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams and layers,
yray {continUed}
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�s.z��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-12
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6331 ° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 682 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown, yery stiff
2.� 680+1
LEAN CLAY fCL1, with sand, brown, very stiFf
4.0 fi78 � I
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with �alcareous nodules,
light brawn and tan, hard �
11
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with limestone fragments,
tan, hard
LIMESTpNE, with clay layars, tan
z t�
�7.0
LIME$TpNE, with shala seams, gray
s L
�
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
3.25 {HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
16-25-12
N=38
1 D014.25"
144J�.T5"
1 QQ10.5"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
27.0
15.4 4rr16-29
15.5
14.8
13.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-12
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6331 ° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 682 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-13
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3003° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 683.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown, yery stiff
2.� 681.5+1
LEAN CLAY fCL1, brnwn, hard
1 I
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with limestone fragments,
tan, hard
LIMESTONE, with clav lavers, tan
o_�
LIMEST�IE, with shale seams, gray
�
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
W �
LL
3.Q (HP]
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
67I12.4"
� oor�.o��
10011,5"
�■I
1 DOlQ.75"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
W
~ ONY y � ❑� Q
c�
24.2
14.3
13.0 33-14-19
13.1
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-13
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3003° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 683.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �010,5"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-1� Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 684.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown, hard
4.5+ (HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
4.a 68(1.5+1
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with calcareous nodules,
light brawn to tan, hard � 4.5+ (HP}
7
4.5+ (HP]
a.a s�s.s � i
LEAN CLAY iCLI. shaley, with limestone
fragrnents, tan, hard 22.�p��-
1
� 7.0
LIMESZQNE. with clay layers, tan
2 CX
�7.0
LIME$TpNE, with shala seams, gray
s�s
ss�
1
1 D015.25"
144J�.T5"
s L
1 QQ11.4"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
2Q.4
17.9
13.9
15.1
11.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-1�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 684.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �013,5"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-15 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3019° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 685.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard ko
stiff 4.5+ (HP}
I
a.a �HP}
� 2.Q (HP]
� s.a 679.5+1
LEAN CLAY �CL1, light hrown and tan, very
stiff 3.25 (HP)
8.0 677.5+1
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with limestone fragments, 4.5+ {HP}
tan, hard
37I12.0"
1
� 7.0
LIMESZQNE. with clay layers, tan
�.
LIMEST�IE, with shale seams and layers,
gray
�■1
673
1
1 D015.25"
10011,�"
1 DOlQ.75"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
28.4 71-26�5
27.4
25.2
17.4
13.3
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-15
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3019° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 685.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams and layers,
yray {continUed}
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �014,5"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-1 G Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown, hard
4.5+ (HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 4.5+ (HP}
s.a sa� •i
LEAN CLAY �CL1, light hrown and tan, hard
� 4.5+ (HP]
a.a s�s+i
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with limestone fragments,
tan, hard 4.5+ {HP]
1
LIMESTDNE, with clay layers, tan
�
1
z�
19.4
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
� 3 �`
1D0111.6"
144J�.T5"
� ao�� .z�°
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
19.2
18.5 7Q24�6
2D.2
17.2
13.�
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-1 G
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6330° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-17 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 687.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown, hard
4.5+ (HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 4.0 683.5+1
LEAN CLAY [CL1. brown to tannish hrown,
hard � 4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
a.a s�s.s � i
LIMESTONE, with clayseams and layers, tan 17-2�-��
N=38
1
o:�
seams, gray
�
1
� oor3.s��
10011,�"
1 DOlQ.75"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
15.3
14.4 5rr19-36
14.4
9.fi �2-15-27
8.9
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-17
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 687.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �011,�"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-18
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3020° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard ko
�ery stiff
I
5
��i
LEAN CLAY (CLj, 6rown ta tan, hard
LIME5TONE, with clay seams, tan
z
15.5
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3 �
T
s��.s+i� �
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
2.75 {HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
� oor� .o��
10011,5"
1 QQ11.5"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
24.1
21.3
27.1
17.8
18.9
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-18
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3020° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-19
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 68fi {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, very
I
, r�
FAT CLAY [CH1. hrown to tan, �ery stiff
5
with clay seams, tan
p':
�7.0
LIME$TpNE, with shala seams, gray
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
2.75 {HP}
4.5+ (HP}
3.5 (HP]
3.25 (HP)
3.� [HPj
1 D014.T5"
10011,�"
s L
1 ��IQ"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
26.5
2Q.3
22.5
22.6
3D.8
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-19
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 68fi {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
go�iN� �v� n�o. F-�o
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3002° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 685 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard
I
7 Vi
5
LEAN CLAY iCLf. with limestone fragments,
tan, hard
with clay seams, tan
f,�.—:
LIMESTONE, with shale seams, gray
s u
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
4.25 {HP}
4.5 (HPj
4.25 {HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
� oo�� .�s•
144J1.25"
� ao�� .z�°
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
23.4
2Q.5 6�23�3
18.5
17.1 �7-1fi�1
15.3
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
go�iN� �v� n�o. F-�o
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.3002° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 685 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �011,�"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-21 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 683.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, very
stiff to hard 3.Q (HP]
I
4.5+ (HP}
t
� 4.5+ (HP}
6.6 677.5+1
FAT CLAY [CH1, tannish hrown, hard
4.5+ (HP]
s.a s�a.s+� 4.5+ {HP}
LIMESTqNE with clay seams, tan 1 Qb13.5"
1
�:�
�IMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
; a I--r
1
� 0o�2.�s•
144J1.25"
1 QQ11.4"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
23.9
19.1
14.4
2Q.1
14.6
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-21
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 683.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �011,�"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-22
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 681.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, very
I
5
� ri
s F�
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with limestone fragments,
tan, hard
LIMESTDNE, with clay seams, tan
1
1
LIMESTONE, with shale seams, gray
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
W �
LL
2.5 (HP]
4.5+ (HP}
3.25 {HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
10012.5"
144J1.25"
s r-r
� ao�� .z�°
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
W
~ ONY y � ❑� Q
c�
24.0
18.5 64-22�2
21.0
18.2
13.7
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-22
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 681.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �011,�"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-23
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6325° Longitude: -97.2977° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 679.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard
I
� ri
LEAN CLAY iCLI. brawn ta tan, hard
LIMESTDNE, with clay seams, tan
z�
19.4
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
; �r
5
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
W �
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
d,5 (HPj
4.5+ {HP]
1 D011.T5"
10010,5"
1 QQ11.4"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
W
~ ONY y � ❑� Q
c�
21.3 52-19-33
18.9
14.9
19.4
14.6 38-15-23
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 �� rr� �o n �ring Started: 92-29 -2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-23
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6325° Longitude: -97.2977° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 679.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
� ao�a.7��
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
6�RING L�G NQ. F-2� Pa �� ot �
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.6324° Longitude: -97.2970° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 67$ {FtJ +1- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, very
stiff to hard 3.25 {HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 4.5+ (HP}
1 s.a s7s•i
FAT CLAY [CH1, hrown to tannish hrowrn, hard
4.5+ (HP]
a.a s�a+i
LEAN CLAY iCLI. with limestone fragments,
tan, very stiff 13-12-6
N=98
� �.a
LIM€STONE, with clay seams, tan
��.
LIMESTDNE, with shale seams, gray
a�
8uring rer►nrnared ar zs Faer
66�.,� 1
1
� oor� .o��
144J1.25"
1 QQ11.5"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
22.3
16.5
12.9 52-18-34
14.9
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 ��rr��on �ring Started:92-22-2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
1 S.0
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
6�RING L�G NQ. F-25 Pa �� ot �
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.2969° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 678.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard
4.Q (HP]
I
4.5+ (HP}
� a.a 674.5+1
FAT CLAY [CH1. with sand, brown, hard
� 4.5+ (HP}
s.a 672.5+1
FAT CLAY [CH1, tannish hrown, hard
4.5+ (HP]
e.a 670.5+1
LIMESTONE, with clay seams and layers, tan
18-1�8
N=27
1
o:�
seams, gray
3 L
8uring rer►nrnared ar zs Faer
1
� oor� .s��
10011,�"
1 DOl1.25"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
22.5
18.3
14.0
13.1
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 ��rr��on �ring Started:92-22-2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
13.7
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-2G Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.2978° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 679.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown, yery stiff ta hard
2.75 {HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
a.a 675.5+1
FAT CLAY [CHI. hrown, hard
� 4.25 {HP}
� 4.25 (HP)
8.0 671.5+1
LEAN CLAY iCLI. tannish hrown, hard
4.5+ {HP]
1
LIMESTDNE, with clay layers, tan
o=•
LIMEST�NE, with shale searns, gray
; 3 �
1
1 D014.25"
144J�.25"
1 QQ11.5"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
22.3 54-2�-34
17.5
2D.9
22.3
12.1
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 0B5ERWAT10N5
' 1 ��rr��on �ring Started:92-22-2t120
; Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-2G
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.2978° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 679.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
WATER LEVEL
Groundwater nof encountered during drillirrg
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �011,5"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-22-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-27
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 681.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, very
I
�■�i
LEAN CLAY {�L1, with calcareous nvdules,
brown ta tan, stiff to wery stiff
� 7.0
LIMESTONE. with clay seams, tan
s I-`r
LIMESTONE, with shale seams, gray
3 I--r
5
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
W �
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
2.5 (HP]
d,p (HPj
1.5 [HPj
1 D012.T5"
144J2.25"
1 DOlQ.75"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
W
~ ONY y � ❑� Q
c�
17.1
16.4 53-19-34
22.1
3Q.3
28.3
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL 065ERWAT10PI5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
:�L Grounwater seepage @ 14' while drilling � rr� �o n
i �rill Rig: Truck
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
� Z Graur�dwafer seepage @98' after cample(iQn For1 Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-27
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 681.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
! ..,���., . r..r. ......�.,..�.-.......
: �L Grounwater seepage @ 14' while
� Z Graur�dwafer seepage @98' a(ter cample(iQn
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
1 �011,�"
HammerType= Automatic
Paae 2 of 2
$E2 f()f d NOt@S:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-28 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 683 {FtJ +1- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
dark brawn to brawn, hard 4.5+ (HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 4.5+ (HP}
� s.a sn•i
LEAN CLAY iCLf. with calcareous nodules,
tan, hard 4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
1
� 7.0
LIMESZQNE. with clay seams, tan
67
1
o•-
LIME5TdNE, with shale seams, gray
��C•
10012.5"
� oorz.5��
1 QQ11.5"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
18.0
16.4
17.0 64-21 �3
11.4
13.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
PROJECT: Project Rocket
g�RING L�G NQ. F-28 Pa � 2 ot �
CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.2984° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 683 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
i
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
HammerType= Automatic
� ao�� .z��
See fnr a Notes:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F-29 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3002° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 684.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard
4.5+ (HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 4.5+ (HP}
i
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
LEAN CLAY fCL1, with calcareous nvdules,
brown ta tan, hard
LIMESTpNE, with clay saams, tan
z t�
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
i 3 I—L
1
1
10012.5"
� oorz.a��
1 QQ11.5"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
18.0
16.5 62-21�1
16.5
18.3
13.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
PROJECT: Project Rocket
g�RING L�G NQ. F-29 Pa � 2 ot �
CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3002° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 684.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
..�.,�, � �� r-...,,.,.� .�.. �' Q c�
seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
i
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � n� � Q
HammerType= Automatic
� ao�a.7��
See fnr a Notes:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
go�iN� �v� n�o. F�o
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3012° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 68fi {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard
I
�■�i
LEAN CLAY fCL1, with calcareous nvdules,
brown ta tan, hard
� 7.0
LIMESTONE. with clay seams, tan
z t�
�IMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
; a I--r
5
1
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
10011.5"
� oor� .5��
1 DOl1.25"
Paae 1 of 2
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
21.0
16.5
18.8
15.a
12.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
PROJECT: Project Rocket
g�RING L�G NQ. F�►D Pa � 2 ot�
CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3012° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 68fi {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
i
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
HammerType= Automatic
1 �011,�"
See fnr a Notes:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F�►1 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3020° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m � ii �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. with �alcareaus nodules,
brown, hard tv very s#iff 4.5+ (HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 3.Q (HP]
� s.a sa�•i
FAT CLAY [CH1, with limestone fragments,
brawn to tan, uery stiff ta hard 3.5 (HPj
4.5+ {HP]
LEAN CLAY (CL1, tan, hard
� 7.0
LIMESTONE. with clay seams, tan
o_:
LIME$TONE, with shale seams, gray
: 3 �
1
1
1 D012.T5"
144J�.T5"
1 QQ11.4"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
26.3
2Q.7 71-25�6
21.7
2Q.a
1fi.9
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
PROJECT: Project Rocket
g�RING L�G NQ. F�►1 Pa � 2 ot�
CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3020° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
� p ca
F
LIMESTOhIE, with shale seams, gray
3
8oring rerminared at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
i
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � u� � Q
HammerType= Automatic
� ao�� .z��
See fnr a Notes:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
g�RING L�G NQ. F�►2 Pa e 1 of 2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
W a LOCATI�N See .-. wz a �
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ � F�
o a � Ww a Ww
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 687.5 [FtJ +!- o Q m � ii �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. hrown, hard
4.5+ (HP}
I
4.5+ (HP}
� 4.5+ (HP}
1 6.6 681.5+1
FAT CLAY [CH1, hrown and tan, hard
4.5+ (HP]
8.0 679.5+1
LEAN CLAY iCLI. tan, hard
4.5+ {HP]
1
� �.a 6�s
LIM€STONE, with clay seams, tan
1
o=•
LIME5TONE, with shale seams, gray
i 3 I—L
1 D014.T5"
� oorz.5��
1 QQ11.5"
1
STRENGTH TEST pTTERBERG
; LIMfTS w
� �� �� �
W m� �? �z ?� �
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r ONY y � ❑� a
c�
2D.0
17.9 6�23�3
18.4
15.9 57-2��7
11.7
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
PROJECT: Project Rocket
g�RING L�G NQ. F�►2 Pa � 2 ot�
CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631 S° Longitude: -97.3027° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 687.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
..�.,�, � �� r-...,,.,.� .�.. �' Q c�
seams, gray
3
8aring Terminated at 3� F�et
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl.
� Ad�ancemen[
❑ry Auger
i Abandonment Method:
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
i
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� a- a
w� W �_ �r z_. �
~� � m�n � �w �= z
W w F � W ffi �a � z �� LL�L-PI v
'i� w ��Y � a �� W
r p � n� � Q
HammerType= Automatic
1 �011,�"
See fnr a Notes:
descri ption of f eld and labo ratory proced u res
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
See far explanation oF
symhols and abbre�iations.
l��rr��on
2501 E Loop 820 N
For1 Warth, T�
ig Started: 92-29-2[120
Rig: Truck
�ct No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P-1 Pa �� ot �
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas ,
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.631&° Longitude: -97.3037° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 687 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray, hard
1
+ r.
FAT CLAY [CH1, with �alcareaus nodules,
gray, hard
5
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with limestone fragments,
tan, hard
Boring Terminated at 9.5 Fe�f
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
11-15-22
N=38
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
15.7 57-21-36
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
14.5
14.1
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P-2
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6314° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 685 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown, yery stiff ta hard
I
7 Vi
5
FAT CLAY [CH1, with calcareous nvdules,
brawn to tan, hard
6v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
3.5 (HP]
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
17.7
15.1 5�21-38
16.8
14.5
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6315° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 681 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray, �ery stiff to hard
I
� �//� FAT CLAY [CH1. with calcareous nvdules,
�� gray, hard
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with calcareous nodules,
gray and tan, �ery stiff
8v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
2.25 {HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.25 (HP)
1.25 (HP)
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
2D.5
17.1 5Q18-32
21.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
,
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P� Pa �� ot �
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas ,
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6315° Longitude: -97.2959° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 67fi {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
dark brawn, �ery stiff to hard
I
7 Vi
FAT CLAY [CH1, with sand, tan, hard
LEAN CLAY [CL1. tan, hard
8v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
2.Q (HP]
4.5+ (HP}
3.5 (HP]
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
27.3
21.4
22.9
13.4
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P-5
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6315° Longitude: -97.2933° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 674 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
r�rr�r� � r� r-�..r�r�.� rra • � � �
1
, r�
FAT CLAY [CH1, hrown, hard
FAT CLAY [CH1. with calcareous nvdules,
brown, stiff
LEAN CLAY iCLf. with calcareous nodules,
brown, hard to stiff
8v►rng Te►minateal at 'f� Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
1.Q (HP]
4.25 {HP}
1.75 {HP}
4.5+ (HP]
2.� [HPj
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
f]
22.7
21.4 5�21-35
23.5
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P$
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6338° Longitude: -97.293A° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 677.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
dark brawn, �ery stiff to hard
I
FAT CLAY [CH1. with calcareous nvdules,
� tannish hrown, hard �r
s.a 671.5+1
LEAN CLAY iCLf. shalywith calcereous
nodules, tannish red, hard
8v►rng Te►minateal at 'f� Feet
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
W �
LL
3.Q (HP]
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
17-19-22
N=41
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
W
~ ONY y � ❑� Q
c�
24.1 62-23-39
17.5
15.7
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P-7
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6328° Longitude: -97.2939° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 67$ {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark gray, stiff tv �ery stiff
I
� �//� FAT CLAY [CH1. with calcareous nvdules,
�� gray, wery stiff
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with calcareous nodules,
tan, hard
8v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
1.75 {HP}
a.a �HP}
3.5 (HP]
2.5 (HPj
4.25 (HP)
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
23.7
21.7
19.3
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
,
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P$
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6328° Longitude: -97.295&° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 673.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
dark gray, stiff tv very stifF
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
W �
LL
1.5 (HP]
2.5 (HPj
1.5 (HP]
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
I
7 Vi
667
5
FAT CLAY [CH1, with sand, tannish hrown,
ha rd
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with calcareous nodules,
tan, hard
8v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
1
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
W
~ ONY y � ❑� Q
c�
25.5
26.2
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
BQRING LOG NQ. P�
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6340° Longitude: -97.2961 ° V �¢ �
w a � W� a
� � Approximate Surface Ele�.: 671.5 [FtJ +!- � ¢ m ¢
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
dark gray ta gray, stiff tn medium stiff
I
FAT CLAY [CH1. with calcareous nvdules,
� gray, hard
s.a
LEAN CLAY iCLf. shalywith calcareous
nodules, tan, very stiff to hard
8v►rng Te►minateal at 'f� Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
W �
LL
1.25 {HP}
d.75 {HP}
2.Q (HP]
2.5 (HPj
17-18-36
N=5d
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
W
~ ONY y � ❑� Q
c�
31.0
24.4 5rr2d-35
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
,
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
B�RING L�G NQ. P-10
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6341 ° Longitude: -97.2986° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 679 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
dark gray, �ery stifF
I
FAT CLAY [CH1. with calcareous nvdules,
� tannish gray to tannish broum, very stiff
s.a
FAT CLAY [CH1, with calcareous nvdules, tan,
ha rd
6v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
2.25 {HP}
2.5 (HPj
2.5 (HP]
4.5+ (HP]
4.5+ {HP]
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
23.3
24.8
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
B�RING L�G NQ. P-11
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6341 ° Longitude: -97.3011 ° V � ¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 683 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
dark gray, stiff tv hard
I
71
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
1.75 {HP}
4.5+ (HP}
1.5 (HP]
1.75 (HP)
3.� [HPj
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
3D.1
21.9 6rr24�1
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-29-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with calcareous nodules,
gray, stiff
LEAN CLAY [CL1. with calcareous nodules,
tannish gray, hard
8v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
�
1
Boring Comple�ed: 12-21-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
B�RING L�G NQ. P-12
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6343° Longitude: -97.3038° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 693 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TN F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. traoe calcareous nodules,
brown, hard
i
LIMESTONE, with clay layers, tan
2
6v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ {HP}
13-13-14
N=27
7-12-13
N=25
19-38-12
N=56
41�12
N=25
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
15.0
12.6 54-19�5
9.p
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-22-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
B�RING L�G NQ. P-13
PROJECT: Project Rocket CLIENT: Carter Park East Land LLC
Dallas, Texas
SITE: Qak Grar�e Raad and Enon A�enue
Fort Warth, Texas
} J LOCATI�N See .� WD a
� v Latitude: 32.6331 ° Longitude: -97.3038° V �¢ �
w a � Ww a
� � Appropmate Surface FJev.: 690 {FtJ +1- o Q m �
TH F � � �
FAT CLAY [CH1. dark brown ta brown, hard
I
+ ri
I�_�
LEAN CLAY �CL1, tannish 6rown, hard
LIMESTONE, with clay layers, tan
6v►ing Te►minated af 'fa Feet
5
1
��
�
W J
��
❑�
J W
w�
LL
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP}
4.5+ (HP]
17-16-13
N=29
Paae 1 of 1
STRENGTH TEST a � LIMfTS �V w
� �� �� �
W N F � � Z ? H H
� � W ffi � � z �� LL�L-PI v
w
r oNY y � ❑� a
c�
19.1 57-23-34
17.7
16.3
StraGfcaGon lines are approximate. Irrsilu, 4he transiGan may Ge gradusl. HammerType= Automatic
� Ad�ancemen[ Method: See fnr a Notes:
� ❑ry Auger description of feld and laboratory procedures
used and adtlitional data [If anyy.
' See far explanation oF
i Abandonment Method: symhols and abbre�iations.
� Boring backfilled with auger cutGings upon comple[ion,
Y
' WATER LEVEL OB5ERWAT10N5
i Bonng Started: 92-22-2[120
� �rr��on �nllRig Truck
i
� 2501 E Loop 820 N
Forl Warth, T� Project No.: 95205197
Boring Comple�ed: 12-22-2�20
Dril ler: 5trataBore
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Contents:
Unified Soil Classification System
General Notes to Log Terms
Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above.
UNIFIE❑ S[31L CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Criteria for Assigning Group 5ymbols and Grvup Names lJsing Labvratary Tests
Clean Gravels:
More than 5a°Ia vf Less than 5°Io fines
Cu?4andiSCc53
Cu ¢ 4 andlor [C��1 or Ce�3.0]
1 ��rra�on
GeoReporf.
soi� c�assiscation ^
Graup Group Hame
Symqal
�� Well-graded gravel
GP Poorly graded gravel
coarse fraction Fines classify as ML or MH GM 5ilty gravel
ret�inad on NQ. 4 sie�e �ravels with Fines: _
Coars�-Grained 5ails: Mare than 12% fines Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey grayel
Mvre #han 5p°Io fBYa�IfIBd —
an No. 200 sieve Clean Sands: Cu � 6 and 1 s Cc s 3 S� Well-graded sand _
5ands: Less than 5°Io fines Cu ¢ 6 andlor {Ccai or Cc�3.0] sP Poorly graded sand
5d% or mnre Qf caarse _
Cractivn passes Mo. 4 5ands with Fines: Fines �lassify as ML or MH SM 5ilty sand
sieve
More than 12°Io fines Fines classify as GL or CH 5G Clayey sand
PI � 7 and plots on or above "A" GL Lean day
Inorganic:
SiItS dnd CIdyS: PI � 4 or plots below "A' line M� 5ilt
Liquid limit less than 54 Liquid limit - aven dried Organic clay �, N
Fine-Grained Soils: Organic: a D.75 OL
5Q°Io �r mpr9 paS5B5 the Liquid limik- not dried Organic silt • 4
No. 204 sieve PI plots on ar abo�e "A" line CH Fat clay
Inorganic: pl lots below "A" line MH Elastie Silt
Silts and Clays: P
Liquid limit 50 or more Liquid limi!- o�en dried Organic clay i� P
Organic: ¢ 0.75 OH
Liquid limik- not dried Organic silt Q
Highly arganic sails: Prirnarily organic matter, dark in calar, and organic Qdar PT Peat
6ased on the matarial passing tha 3-inch (75-mm} sie�e. If fines are arganic, add "with organic fines" tv grvup name.
If field sample contained col�bles or beulders, or laoth, add "with cobbles I# soil contains ? 15°Ia gravel, add'�vith gra�el° to group name.
or 6pulders, or k�oth" to group name, I# Atter6erg limiks plat in shaded area, soil is s CL-ML, siFty clay,
Gravels with 5 to 12°Io fines require dual symbols: GW�M well-graded if soil cvntains 15 to 29°Io plus ND. 2Q4, add "with sand" or "with
gwavel with silt, GW-GC well-c�raded gwa�el with clay, GP-GM poorly gra�el," whiche�er is predominaM,
graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded grawel with clay.
Sands with 5 tv 12°Io fines require dual symbols: 5W-SM well-graded if soil cvntains ? 30°Io plus Nv. 2p� predvminantly sand, add
sand with silt, 5W-5C well-gradad sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded ���nd�' ta group name_
sand with silt, SP�C paorly graded sand with clay. If soil cantains ? 3010 plus Na. 200, predominantly gravel, add
2 "gra�ell�' to group name.
{� 3a � PI ? 4 and plots on or atxiwe °A" line.
Cu = ��ID,� Cc = PI � 4 dr plats 6elvw "A" line,
�10 x�BQ P PI plots on ar abave "R" line.
If soil contains ? 15°�o sand, add °with sand' to group name. �4 p� plots bel�w "A" line.
If fines classify as GL-ML, use dual symbvl GC-GM, ar 5C-5M.
60
so
�
w �� ..
O
2
� 30
�-
U
H
� 20
�
�
For classificatinn vf fine-grained ,r�
soils and fine-grained fracti�n ,-'
of coarse-grained soils _ �,�.�.'
Ec{uatian of "A" - line �J r�
Horizantal at PI�4 tv LL-25.5. � I
then PI=0.73 {LL-20) — ' �� -- -
Equation o1 "[J" - lir�e ,' G�
O�
Vertical at LL=16 to PI=7, ,��
then PI=�.9 [LL-8J -�"
,� o� i
.
' t
j, ��a
/�
•� P,
,'� MH or aH
�o ,-"
7 ---- C� - ML '
�-- I I ML or QL �
o '
0 10 16 24 34
ao 5a aa �o aa so �fla ,�a
LIQUID LIMIT (LL]
GENERAL NDTES TD LDG �ERMS
SAMPLING
� �'•,ge: � R� k Care
Cu�irqs
Grah �heih}'
�.arT���a T�b�
WATER LEVEL
� Wafer Initiaily
Encvuntered
�_ i�ai0f �.CV£� flf�ei a
s�rt�� �od �rrr�
� v+rater l.e►re� After
a Specified F'eriod of Time
N
Srsr�da� w�er le�els indicated on the soil boring logs ara the le�els
Penelra-3:.r � Te� �� measured in the borehole at the times indicated.
T�� �eneuEm�r Graundwater Is�sl �ariations will accur aver tim�. In law
permeability soils, accurate determination for groundwater
leuels is nat possi4rle +r�th short term water level
observations.
DESCRIPTNE SQIL CLASSIFICATION
(HP}
I {Tf
1 ��rra�on
GeoReporf.
FIELD TEST$
5tandard Penetration Test
Resistance �61owslFt]
Hand Penetrometer
rorvane
(aCP} Rynamic Cone Penetrameter
UC Unconfined Compressl�e Strength
{Pld} P1�ato-loniiafion deteetor
{bVA} �rganic Vapar Analyxer
5oil classificatian is based on the Unified SQiI Classiiication 5ystem, Coarse Grained 5oils have more than 50°Io oi their dry weight rekained on a
#2Rp Si�v6; their pein�ipal dgscriptprs are: �qulders, cobhles, gra�el, or sand, Fine Grained Soils haye less th�n �0% of thgir dry wgight r�t�inQd pn
a#20� sie�e; they are princ�pally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Mlajor constituents may be
added as m�difiers and minor eonstituents may he added according to th� relative prnportions bBSgd on grain size. In addition kp grdd8tipn, CA8r5g-
grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency.
L�CATION AND ELEVATIDM MQTES
Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately deterrnined using a hand-held GPS de�ice. The accuracy of such devices is
variable. Surface eleuation data anno#ated with +f- indicates that nv actual topographieal sur�ey was cvnducted #v �orrfirm the surFace eleaation.
Instead, the s�rface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area.
STRENGTH TERMS
RELA7IVE DEHSITY OF C�ARSE-GRAIHED SDIL5
(Mflre than 56°/a retained an No. 2Q6 sieve.}
aansity datermined 6y S#andard Penetrakipn Resistance
descripiiye Term
(densityj
Very Laase
Loase
Medium �ense
�ense
Very dense
5tandard Penetration or
N-�alue
BlawslFt,
0-3
4-9
10-29
30-50
�50
C�J�S15TEtiCY aF FINE-GRAINEL] 501LS
[50°� ar more passing the Na. 200 sieve.}
Consistancy d�terminsd by la6oratory shear strength testing, fi�ld visual-manual
procedures or standard penetration resistance
Uescrlpti�e Term Unconfined Compressive 5trength 3tandard Penetratian or
Nrvalue
(Cvnsistency} Qu, (tsf� BlowslF},
Very 5vft
Soft
Medium Stiff
StifF
Very Stiff
Hard
�4.Op a30
RELATIVE PROPORTI�NS OF SANQ ANQ GRAVEL RELATIVE PROPORTIONS DF FINES
Qescripti�e Term[sj vf Percent of Descripti�e Term{s] of Percent of
ather cnnstltuents Ory Weight other eonstituents Dry Weight
_ Trace � �15 Trace � �5
W ith 15 — 29 W ilh 5— 12
Modifier �3�
GRAIf� SIZE TERMINflLOGY
Major Cornpanent af 5ample Particle 5ixe
Boulders �ver 12 in. [3D0 mmj
Gohhles 12 in. to 3 in. [300 mm to 75 mm]
Gravel 3 in, to #4 sieve {75mm to 4.75mm]
Sand #4 to #200 sieve {4.75mm ts� 0.�75mm]
Silt or Clay Passing #2D0 sieve [0.675mm)
�
Less than p,25 0— 1
4.25 ta 0_5 2— 4
0,5 to 1.d0 4— 8
1.Oflto2.40 8-15
2_�4 to 4.00 15 — 30
Mad if er
}12
PLASTICITY �E5CRIP71aN
Term Plasticity Index
Nan-plastic D
Law �-1D
Medium 11 — 3�
High �30
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
APPLICATI�N FOR PLEASE TYPE
FLDODPLAIN DEIIELQPIVIENT PERMIT �at� 10121f242fl PermitNo.
FDP-20-04114
NameofQwnerorApplicant Kirnley-Harn and Associates, Inc.
Address af Owner 8U1 Cherry Street, U�It 11,
5uite 13a0
Fdrt W�rth, TX 761 D2
Telephone Na. 81 �-484-4129
Nearest Stream
Narth Fork Chambers
Creek
Location of Permlt Area {Asfdress or Legal �es�rlptionJ
Sauth af Joel East, West vf Wichita, North af Enon, and Eas# af Qak Grave RQad
PURPQSE 4F RE(,�UEST: ❑Exca�ation ❑Filling ❑Qradging or Mining
Office Use anty
❑ Appro�ed � Approved
W ith
❑Denied'� �nditions'
Date In� 10f23f2��te 4ut� 1119I20
Prnr�ccari Rv L. BIC�QS
Oigitaly slgned ksy
Appm�ed By: I ica Rinnr�giggs�T
l fi31:2[1-06'dU'
❑'� Utility Cvnstructivn
❑Building Permit ❑ Grading ❑Pa�ing ❑Drilling Operations ❑Other
BRIEF �ESCRIPTIDN OF PROPQ5AL [Attach separate sheet if needed}
Proposed construction of sewer manholes over existing sewer line within the flaadplain that will ser�e the propased
dewelopment. Manhales loeated within floodplain are shawn in included exhibit.
COMPLETE APPLICABLE QUESTIONS:
1. Tatal drafnage srea af watercourse 1119 acras. 2. Rsgulatary flood elsv. ���"678 ❑ Not avaflabla.
3. Has site preyiously flooded? �❑ Yes ❑ Nd 4. Is site suhjact to flnading? ❑►� Yes � Nn
5. Is safe aecess available during times af flood? ❑� Yes ❑ Na ❑ Unknown
fi. Is ihe proposal within the designated flo-�dway? ❑ Yes �❑ N❑ ❑Llnknown
7. Have all necessary prior approval permits l�een ohtained from federal, state or Iocal go�ernmental agencies?❑� None Required
❑Yes ❑M❑ {If n�, explain; if yes, provide copies �f approval letters or permits.}
ATTACH THE FOLLOWING IF APPLICABLE:
1. Twa (2j sets scale drawings showing location, dimensions, elevatians nf existing and praposed topagraphic alterations, existing and prapased stru�tures,
lacahian relatir�e to floodplain area.
2. Extent to which watercourse Qr natural drainage will be altered vr relacated,
3. Suppvrting hydraulic calculatians, rep�rts, etc., used as a basis for prvpasad impro�aments.
4. Lowest floor elevation {induding basement} of all proposed structures.
5. Ele�ation t� which any non-residential structure shall be flood proofed.
6. CertHi�ation by registered professional engineer or architeck that flood proofing criteria are met as set forth in 5ection 7�47, Suf}-Section h, Ordinanoe No.
11998.
DURING THE OCCURRENCE OF A 100-YEAR FREQUENCY FL00� WILL THE
PR�R�SAL:
1. Reduce capacity nf channelslflaadwayslwatercourse in floodplain area?
2. Measurably increase flood flowslheightsldamage on ofF-site properties?
3. Indiwidually or c�mk�ined with other existing or anticipated development expose adjacent
properties ta ad�erse flaad efFects?
4. Increase �elacitiesl�+olumes of fload waters sufficiently to create significant erasion af
flaadalain soils on subiect aro�aertv or adiacent araaertv uastreamldownstream?
5. Encroach on floodway causing in�rease in flaod levels?
fi. Pro�ide camoensatory storaae for anv measurable loss af flood storaae ca
Yes
U
�
�❑
�❑
Info. Nat
Ma Available
'r❑ ❑
'�❑ ❑
❑'� ❑
'r❑ ❑
'�❑ ❑
❑'r ❑
FL�4DPLAIN DEVELaPMENT PERMIT
The City of Fort Worth's Floadplain Permit Program is authorized by Section 7-318 of City Ordinance No. 119g8, adopted June 13,
1995. This permit is required for all development taking place within the area of the 100-year floodplain [special flaad hazard areasy
as shown on the Gurrent Flood InsuranGe Rate Maps and Flood Boundary-Floodway Maps, published by the Federal Emergency
M�n�gement AgenCy �FEMA}, These m�ps are ��ail�ble for public inspeCtion in the Engineering Department, MuniCip�l Building,
1 D00 Throckmartpn Street,
Failure to obtain a Floodplain �e�elopment Permit or �iolating other proyisians of City Ordinance IVo. 11998 or the conditians
des�ribed within the permit canstitutes a misdemeanor and upan �anviction, a persan, firm, ar corporation could be fined up ta one
thousand dollars ($7,QQQ) a day for each day that the �ivlativn accurs.
I understand that the �onditions whi�h may be stated for permit approval or the pravisions of City Ordinance No. 11998 may be
superseded by other pro�isians of City code ar policies.
I furkher unders#and th�# this Floodpl�in ❑evelopmen# Permit does na# oons#itute fin�l appro��l until �II de�elopmen# requiremen#s
placed an the property haae been met. These requirements include, but are not limited to, City construction plan appro�al, platting and
comrnunity facilities agreements. This proposal shall be subject to any change in floodplain developrnen# policy at the actual time of
develapment.
Applir,,atian is hereby made fnr a permit td 8uthorize the aCtir�ities desCri�e� herein. I hereby Certify that I 8m f8mili8r with the
infvrmatian �on#ained an this applicatinn and to the best af my knowledge such infarmatinn is true and accurate. I further certify that I
possess the authority to undertake the proposed activity_ I understand that if my application is denied, I have sixty {60) days from the
date of such denial to appeal the adverse actinn to the City Plan Gommission,
Signature af Applicant or Authorized Agent
OFFICE USE DNLY
FL��aPLAIN AFtEA �EFINE� 6Y: � FEMA ❑ CDE ❑ FLDOD STU�IES ❑ HIGH WATER MARKS ❑ QTHER
AE I FEMA AAAP NO_ 4$439C�32UL I FLOO� ELEV_ �aries I GRDUND ELEV_ �aries
FLQQd PLAIN STUDY
PLATE ND. I FLQQd ELEV.
CONQITIONS F�R APPROVRL'' OR REAS�NS FOR �ENIAL"
* Manholes lacated within the FEMA floodplain must be watertight ta prevent inflaw or har+e the rim raised a miniu
of 2 feet above the 104 year flaodplain.
' No fill allowed within floadplain; past canstruction grade rnust match existing grade.
THIS PERMIT SHALL EXPIRE TWD YEARS FR�M THE QATE �UT �N PAGE 1 ABDYE
CITY OF FORT WORTH Carter Park East Phase III & IV
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN 102808
Revised July 1, 2011
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST
Updated: April 09, 2021
The Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Products List has been developed to
minimize the submittal review of products which meet the Fort Worth Water
Department’s Standard Specifications during utility construction projects. When
Technical Specifications for specific products, are included as part of the
Construction Contract Documents, the requirements of the Technical Specification
will override the Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Specifications and the
Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Products List and approval of the
specific products will be based on the requirements of the Technical Specification
whether or not the specific product meets the Fort Worth Water Department’s
Standard Specifications or is on the Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard
Products List.
Table of Content
(Click on items to go directly to the page)
Items Page
A.Water & Sewer
1. Manholes & Bases/Components ........................................................... 1
2.Manholes & Bases/Fiberglass ............................................................... 2
3.Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Rectangular ............................... 3
4.Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Round ....................................... 4
5.Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Water Tight & Pressure Tight .. 5
6.Manholes & Bases/Precast Concrete .................................................... 6
7.Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/Cementitious ................................ 7
8.Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/NonCementitious ......................... 8
9.Manhole Insert (Field Operations Use Only) ........................................ 9
10. Pipe Casing Spacer ............................................................................... 10
11. Pipes/Ductile Iron ................................................................................. 11
12. Utility Line Marker ............................................................................... 12
B.Sewer
13. Coatings/Epoxy ..................................................................................... 13
14. Coatings/Polyurethane .......................................................................... 14
15. Combination Air Valves ....................................................................... 15
16. Pipes/Concrete ...................................................................................... 16
17. Pipe Enlargement System (Method} ..............................................
1$. Pipes.lFiUerglass Reinforced Pipe ..................................................
19. PipesIHDPE ...................................................................................
2Q. PipeslPiiC (Pressi�re Sewer} ..........................................................
21. PipesIPVC* ....................................................................................
22. PipeslRehabICIPP ..........................................................................
23. PipeslItehablFald & Fai�i .............................................................
24. Pipe��Qpen Pro�le Large Diaineter ...............................................
17
18
19
2U
21
22
23
24
C. VLrater
25. Appw�tenances ....................................................................................... 2S
25. Balts, Nuts, and Gasl�ets ....................................................................... 26
27. Cainbination Au� Release Valve ........................................................... 27
28. Diy Barrel Fu�e Hyrit�ants ...................................................................... 28
29. Meters ................................................................................................... 29
30. PipeslP�iC (Pressi�re Water) ................................................................. 3U
31. Pipe5.lValves & Fittiv�slI]uctile I�on Fittings ....................................... 31
32. PipeslValves & Fittiv�slResilient Seated Gate Val�e .......................... 32
33. Pipe5.1�'alves & Fittiv�slRi2bber Seated Butterfly Val�e ...................... 33
34. Palyethylene En�asentent ..................................................................... 34
35. Sainplivg Stations ................................................................................. 35
3fi. Autornati� Flus}�er ................................................................................. 36
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeWater & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Components 33-39-10 (Rev 2/3/16)07/23/97 33 05 13 Urethane Hydrophilic WaterstopAsahi Kogyo K KAdeka Ultra-Seal P-201ASTM D2240/D412/D79204/26/00 33 05 13 Offset Joint for 4' Diam MHHanson Concrete ProductsDrawing No 35-0048-00104/26/00 33 05 13 Profile Gasket for 4' Diam MHPress-Seal Gasket Corp250-4G GasketASTM C-443/C-361SS MH1/26/99 33 05 13 HDPE Manhole Adjustment RingsLadtech, IncHDPE Adjustment RingNon-traffic area5/13/05 33 05 13 Manhole External WrapCanusa - CPSWrapidSeal Manhole Encapsulation SystemCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content1Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Fiberglass 33-39-13 (1/8/13)1/26/99 33 39 13 Fiberglass ManholeFluid Containment, IncFlowtiteASTM 3753Non-traffic area08/30/06 33 39 13 Fiberglass ManholeL F ManufacturingNon-traffic area* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content2Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Rectangular 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversWestern Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry100124"x40" WD* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content3Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversWestern Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry3002424" Dia*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversMcKinley Iron Works IncA 24 AM24" Dia08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryR-1272ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30624" Dia08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryR- 165-LM (Hinged)ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30624" Dia08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryNF 1274ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30630" Dia08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryR-1743-LM (Hinged)ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30630" dia33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversSigma CorporationMH-144N33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversSigma CorporationMH-143N33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversPont-A-MoussonGTS-STD24" dia33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah Casting24" dia10/31/06 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers (Hinged)PowersealHinged Ductile Iron Manhole ASTM A53624" Dia7/25/03 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversSaint-Gobain Pipelines (Pamrex/rexus)RE32-R8FS30" Dia01/31/06 33 05 13 30" Dia MH Ring and CoverEast Jordan Iron WorksV1432-2 and V1483 DesignsAASHTO M306-0430" Dia11/02/10 33 05 13 30" Dia MH Ring and CoverSigma CorporationMH1651FWN & MH1650230" Dia07/19/11 33 05 13 30" Dia MH Ring and CoverStar Pipe ProductsMH32FTWSS-DC 30" Dia08/10/11 33 05 13 30" Dia MH Ring and CoverAccucast220700 Heavy Duty with Gasket Ring30" Dia10/14/13 33 05 13 30" Dia MH Ring and Cover (Hinged & Lockable)East Jordan Iron Works 30" ERGO XL Assembly with Cam Lock/MPIC/T-Gasket ASSHTO M105 & ASTM A53630" Dia06/01/17 34 05 13 30" Dia MH Ring and Cover (Hinged & Lockable) CISIP Industries2280 (32")ASTM A 4830" Dia09/16/19 33 05 13 10 30" Dia MH Ring and Cover Composite Access Products, L PCAP-ONE-30-FTW, Composite, w/ Lock w/o Hing30" Dia* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content4Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Water Tight & Pressure Tight 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversPont-A-MoussonPamtight24" Dia*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah Casting24" Dia*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversWestern Iron Works,Bass & Hays Foundry300-24P24" Dia*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversMcKinley Iron Works IncWPA24AM24" Dia03/08/00 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversAccucastRC-2100ASTM A 4824" Dia04/20/01 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers(SIP)Serampore Industries Private Ltd300-24-23 75 Ring and CoverASTM A 4824" Dia* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content5Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Precast Concrete (Rev 1/8/13)*33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteHydro Conduit CorpSPL Item #49ASTM C 47848"*33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteWall Concrete Pipe Co IncASTM C-44348"09/23/96 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteConcrete Product Inc48" I D Manhole w/ 32" ConeASTM C 47848" w/32" cone05/08/18 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteThe Turner Company48", 60" I D Manhole w/ 32" ConeASTM C 47848", 60"10/27/06 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteOldcastle Precast Inc48" I D Manhole w/ 24" ConeASTM C 47848" Diam w 24" Ring06/09/10 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast (Reinforce Polymer)ConcreteUS Composite PipeReinforced Polymer Concrete ASTM C-7648" to 72"09/06/19 33 39 20 Manhole, Precast ConcreteForterra Pipe and Precast60" & 72" I D Manhole w/32" ConeASTM C-7660" & 72"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content6Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/Cementitious*E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsQuadex04/23/01E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsStandard Cement Materials, IncReliner MSPE1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsAP/M Permaform4/20/01E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemStrong CompanyStrong Seal MS2A Rehab System5/12/03E1-14 Manhole Rehab System (Liner)Poly-triplex TechnologiesMH repair product to stop infiltrationASTM D581308/30/06General Concrete RepairFlexKrete TechnologiesVinyl Polyester Repair ProductMisc Use* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content7Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/NonCementitious05/20/96E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsSprayroq, Spray Wall Polyurethane CoatingASTM D639/D790*E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsSun Coast12/14/01Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior)ERTECHSeries 20230 and 2100 (Asphatic Emulsion)For Exterior Coating of Concrete Structures Only01/31/06Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionChestertonArc 791, S1HB, S1, S2Acid Resistance TestSewer Applications8/28/2006Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionWarren EnvironmentalS-301 and M-301Sewer Applications08/30/06Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionCitadelSLS-30 Solids EpoxySewer Applications03/19/1833 05 16, 33 39 10, 33 39 20 Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior)Sherwin WilliamsRR&C Dampproofing Non-Fibered Spray Grade (Asphatic Emulsion)For Exterior Coating of Concrete Structures Only* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content8Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manhole Inserts - Field Operations Use Only (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole InsertKnutson EnterprisesMade to Order - PlasticASTM D 1248For 24" dia*33 05 13 Manhole InsertSouth Western PackagingMade to Order - PlasticASTM D 1248For 24" dia*33 05 13 Manhole InsertNoflow-InflowMade to Order - PlasticASTM D 1248For 24" dia09/23/96 33 05 13 Manhole InsertSouthwestern Packing & Seals, IncLifeSaver - Stainless SteelFor 24" dia09/23/96 33 05 13 Manhole InsertSouthwestern Packing & Seals, IncTetherLok - Stainless SteelFor 24" dia* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content9Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Pipe Casing Spacers 33-05-24 (07/01/13)11/04/02Steel Band Casing SpacersAdvanced Products and Systems, IncCarbon Steel Spacers, Model SI02/02/93Stainless Steel Casing SpacerAdvanced Products and Systems, IncStainless Steel Spacer, Model SSI04/22/87Casing SpacersCascade Waterworks ManufacturingCasing Spacers09/14/10Stainless Steel Casing SpacerPipeline Seal and InsulatorStainless Steel Casing SpacerUp to 48"09/14/10Coated Steel Casin SpacersPipeline Seal and InsulatorCoated Steel Casin SpacersUp to 48" 05/10/11Stainless Steel Casing SpacerPowerseal4810 PowerchockUp to 48"03/19/18Casing SpacersBWMSS-12 Casing Spacer(Stainless Steel)03/19/18Casing SpacersBWMFB-12 Casing Spacer (Coated Carbon Steel) for Non_pressure Pipe and Grouted Casing* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content10Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Pipes/Ductile Iron 33-11-10(1/8/13)*33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeGriffin Pipe Products, CoSuper Bell-Tite Ductile Iron Pressure Pipe, AWWA C150, C1513" thru 24"08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeAmerican Ductile Iron Pipe CoAmerican Fastite Pipe (Bell Spigot)AWWA C150, C1514" thru 30"08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeAmerican Ductile Iron Pipe CoAmerican Flex Ring (Restrained Joint)AWWA C150, C1514" thru 30"*33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeU S Pipe and Foundry CoAWWA C150, C151*33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeMcWane Cast Iron Pipe CoAWWA C150, C151* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content11Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Utility Line Marker (08/24/2018)* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content12Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Coatings/Epoxy 33-39-60 (01/08/13)02/25/02Epoxy Lining SystemSauereisen, IncSewerGard 210RSLA County #210-1 3312/14/01Epoxy Lining SystemErtech Technical CoatingsErtech 2030 and 2100 Series04/14/05Interior Ductile Iron Pipe CoatingInduronProtecto 401ASTM B-117Ductile Iron Pipe Only01/31/06Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionChestertonArc 791, S1HB, S1, S2Acid Resistance TestSewer Applications8/28/2006Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionWarren EnvironmentalS-301 and M-301Sewer Applications* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content13Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Coatings/Polyurethane* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content14Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Combination Air Valves 05/25/18 33-31-70 Air Release ValveA R I USA, IncD025LTP02(Composite Body)2"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content15Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Concrete*E1-04 Conc Pipe, ReinforcedWall Concrete Pipe Co IncASTM C 76*E1-04 Conc Pipe, ReinforcedHydro Conduit CorporationClass III T&G, SPL Item #77ASTM C 76*E1-04 Conc Pipe, ReinforcedHanson Concrete ProductsSPL Item #95 Manhole, #98 PipeASTM C 76*E1-04 Conc Pipe, ReinforcedConcrete Pipe & Products Co IncASTM C 76* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content16Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipe Enlargment System (Method)33-31-23 (01/18/13)PIM SystemPIM CorporationPolyethylenePIM Corp , Piscata Way, N J Approved PreviouslyMcConnell SystemsMcLat ConstructionPolyethyleneHouston, TexasApproved PreviouslyTRS SystemsTrenchless Replacement SystemPolyethyleneCalgary, CanadaApproved Previously* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content17Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipe/Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe 33-31-13(1/8/13)7/21/97 33 31 13 Cent Cast Fiberglass (FRP)Hobas Pipe USA, IncHobas Pipe (Non-Pressure)ASTM D3262/D375403/22/10 33 31 13 Fiberglass Pipe (FRP)AmeronBondstrand RPMP PipeASTM D3262/D375404/09/21Glass-Fiber Reinforced Polymer Pipe (FRP)Thompson Pipe GroupThompson Pipe (Flowtite)ASTM D3262/D37544/14/05Polymer Modified Concrete PipeAmitech USAMeyer Polycrete PipeASTM C33, A276, F4778" to 102", Class V06/09/10E1-9 Reinforced Polymer Concrete PipeUS Composite PipeReinforced Polymer Concrete PipeASTM C-76* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content18Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/HDPE 33-31-23(1/8/13)*High-density polyethylene pipePhillips Driscopipe, IncOpticore Ductile Polyethylene PipeASTM D 12488"*High-density polyethylene pipePlexco IncASTM D 12488"*High-density polyethylene pipePolly Pipe, IncASTM D 12488"High-density polyethylene pipeCSR Hydro Conduit/Pipeline SystemsMcConnell Pipe EnlargementASTM D 1248* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content19Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/PVC (Pressure Sewer) 33-11-12 (4/1/13)12/02/11 33-11-12 DR-14 PVC Pressure PipePipelife JetstreamPVC Pressure PipeAWWA C9004" thru 12"10/22/14 33-11-12 DR-14 PVC Pressure PipeRoyal Building ProductsRoyal Seal PVC Pressure PipeAWWA C9004" thru 12"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content20Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/PVC* 33-31-20 (7/1/13)*33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co , Inc (JM Eagle)SDR-26ASTM D 30344" - 15"12/23/97* 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationSDR-26ASTM D 30344" thru 15"*33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeLamson Vylon PipeASTM F 7894" thru 15"01/18/18 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeVinyltech PVC PipeGravity SewerASTM D30344" thru 15"11/11/98 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeDiamond Plastics Corporation "S" Gravity Sewer PipeASTM F 67918" to 27"*33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co, Inc (JM Eagle)SDR 26/35 PS 115/46ASTM F 67918" - 28"09/11/12 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipePipelife Jet StreamSDR-26 and SDR-35ASTM F-67918"05/06/0533-31-20PVC Solid Wall PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationSDR 26/35 PS 115/46ASTM F-67918" to 48"04/27/0633-31-20PVC Sewer Fittings HarcoSDR-26 and SDR-35 Gasket Fittings ASTM D-3034, D-1784, etc4" - 15"*33-31-20PVC Sewer FittingsPlastic Trends, In cGasketed PVC Sewer Main FittingsASTM D 30343/19/2018 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipePipelife Jet StreamSDR 35ASTM F67918"- 24"3/19/2018 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipePipelife Jet StreamSDR 26ASTM D30344"- 15"3/29/2019 33 31 20Gasketed Fittings (PVC)GPK Products, IncSDR 26ASTM D3034/F-6794"- 15"10/21/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipeNAPCOSDR 26ASTM D30344" - 15"10/22/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipeSanderson Pipe CorpSDR 26ASTM D30344"- 15"10/21/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipeNAPCOSDR 26/35 PS 115/46ASTM F-67918"- 36"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content21Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Rehab/CIPP 33-31-12 (01/18/13)*Cured in Place PipeInsituform Texark, IncASTM F 121605/03/99Cured in Place PipeNational Envirotech GroupNational Liner, (SPL) Item #27ASTM F-1216/D-581305/29/96Cured in Place PipeReynolds Inc/Inliner Technolgy (Inliner USA)Inliner TechnologyASTM F 1216* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content22Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Rehab/Fold & Form*Fold and Form PipeCullum Pipe Systems, Inc11/03/98Fold and Form PipeInsituform Technologies, IncInsituform "NuPIpe"ASTM F-1504Fold and Form PipeAmerican Pipe & Plastics, IncDemo Purpose Only12/04/00Fold and Form PipeUltralinerUltraliner PVC Alloy PipelinerASTM F-1504, 1871, 186706/09/03Fold and Form PipeMiller Pipeline CorpEX MethodASTM F-1504, F-1947Up to 18" diameter* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content23Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Open Profile Large Diameter09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, RibbedLamson Vylon PipeCarlon Vylon H C Closed Profile Pipe,ASTM F 67918" to 48"09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, RibbedExtrusion Technologies, IncUltra-Rib Open Profile Sewer PipeASTM F 67918" to 48"E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, RibbedUponor ETI Company11/10/10 (E100-2) Polypropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Double WallAdvanced Drainage Systems (ADS) SaniTite HP Double Wall (Corrugated)ASTM F 273624"-30"11/10/10 (E100-2) Polypropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Triple WallAdvanced Drainage Systems (ADS)SaniTite HP Triple Wall PipeASTM F 276430" to 60"05/16/11Steel Reinforced Polyethylene PipeConTech Construction ProductsDurmaxxASTM F 256224" to 72"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content24Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Appurtenances 33-12-10 (07/01/13)01/18/18 33-12-10 Double Strap SaddleRomac202NS Nylon CoatedAWWA C8001"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe08/28/02Double Strap SaddleSmith Blair #317 Nylon Coated Double Strap Saddle07/23/12 33-12-10 Double Strap Service SaddleMueller CompanyDR2S Double (SS) Strap DI SaddleAWWA C8001"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe10/27/87Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMcDonald6100M,6100MT & 610MT 3/4" and 1"10/27/87Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMcDonald4603B, 4604B, 6100M, 6100TM and 6101M 1½" and 2"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesFord Meter Box Co , IncFB600-7NL, FB1600-7-NL, FV23-777-W-NL, L22-77NLAWWA C8002"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesFord Meter Box Co , IncFB600-6-NL, FB1600-6-NL, FV23-666-W-NL, L22-66NLAWWA C8001-1/2"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesFord Meter Box Co , IncFB600-4-NL, FB1600-4-NL, B11-444-WR-NL, B22444-WR-NL, L28-44NLAWWA C8001"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMueller Co , LtdB-25000N, B-24277N-3, B-20200N-3, H-15000N, , H-1552N, H142276NAWWA C800, ANSF 61, ANSI/NSF 3722"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMueller Co , LtdB-25000N, B-20200N-3, B-24277N-3,H-15000N, H-14276N, H-15525NAWWA C800, ANSF 61, ANSI/NSF 3721-1/2"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMueller Co , LtdB-25000N, B-20200N-3,H-15000N, H-15530NAWWA C800, ANSF 61, ANSI/NSF 3721"01/26/00Coated Tapping Saddle with Double SS StrapsJCM Industries, Inc#406 Double Band SS Saddle1"-2" Taps on up to 12" 0/5/21/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel)JCM Industries, Inc412 Tapping Sleeve ESSAWWA C-223Up to 30" w/12" Out05/10/11Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel)Powerseal3490AS (Flange) & 3490MJ4"-8" and 16"02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel)RomacFTS 420AWWA C-223U p to 42" w/24" Out02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel)RomacSST Stainless SteelAWWA C-223Up to 24" w/12" Out02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel)RomacSST III Stainless SteelAWWA C-223Up to 30" w/12" Out05/10/11Joint Repair ClampPowerseal3232 Bell Joint Repair Clamp4" to 30"Plastic Meter Box w/Composite LidDFW Plastics IncDFW37C-12-1EPAF FTWPlastic Meter Box w/Composite LidDFW Plastics IncDFW39C-12-1EPAF FTW08/30/06Plastic Meter Box w/Composite LidDFW Plastics IncDFW65C-14-1EPAF FTWClass "A"Concrete Meter BoxBass & HaysCMB37-B12 1118 LID-9Concrete Meter BoxBass & HaysCMB-18-Dual 1416 LID-9Concrete Meter BoxBass & HaysCMB65-B65 1527 LID-9* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content25Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 33-11-05 (01/08/13)* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content26Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Combination Air Release 33-31-70 (01/08/13)*E1-11 Combination Air Release ValveGA Industries, IncEmpire Air and Vacuum Valve, Model 935 ASTM A 126 Class B, ASTM A 240 - float, ASTM A 307 - Cover Bolts1" & 2"*E1-11 Combination Air Release ValveMultiplex Manufacturing CoCrispin Air and Vacuum Valves, Model No 1/2", 1" & 2"*E1-11 Combination Air Release ValveValve and Primer CorpAPCO #143C, #145C and #147C1", 2" & 3"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content27Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Dry Barrel Fire Hydrants 33-12-40 (01/15/14)10/01/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantAmerican-Darling ValveDrawing Nos 90-18608, 94-18560AWWA C-50203/31/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantAmerican Darling ValveShop Drawing No 94-18791 AWWA C-50209/30/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantClow CorporationShop Drawing No D-19895AWWA C-50201/12/93 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantAmerican AVK CompanyModel 2700AWWA C-50208/24/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantClow CorporationDrawings D20435, D20436, B20506AWWA C-502E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantITT Kennedy ValveShop Drawing No D-80783FWAWWA C-50209/24/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantM&H Valve CompanyShop Drawing No 13476AWWA C-50210/14/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantMueller CompanyShop Drawings No 6461 A-423 CenturionAWWA C-50201/15/88E1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantMueller CompanyShop Drawing FH-12A-423 Super Centurion 200AWWA C-50210/09/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantU S Pipe & FoundryShop Drawing No 960250AWWA C-50209/16/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantWaterous CompanyShop Drawing No SK740803AWWA C-50208/12/16 33-12-40 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantEJ (East Jordan Iron Works)WaterMaster 5CD250* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content28Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Meters02/05/93 E101-5 Detector Check MeterAmes CompanyModel 1000 Detector Check ValveAWWA C5504" - 10"08/05/04Magnetic Drive Vertical TurbineHerseyMagnetic Drive VerticalAWWA C701, Class 13/4" - 6"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content29Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/PVC (Pressure Water) 33-31-70 (01/08/13)01/18/18 33-11-12 PVC Pressure PipeVinyltech PVC PipeDR14AWWA C900, AWWA C605, ASTM D17844"-12"3/19/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipePipelife Jet StreamDR14AWWA C9004"-12"3/19/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipePipelife Jet StreamDR18AWWA C90016"-24"5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationDR 14AWWA C9004"-12"5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationDR 18AWWA C90016"-24"12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co , Inc d/b/a JM EagleDR 14AWWA C900-16UL 1285ANSI/NSF 61FM 16124"-28"12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co , Inc d/b/a JM EagleDR 18AWWA C900-16UL 1285ANSI/NSF 61FM 161216"-24"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeUnderground Solutions IncDR14 Fusible PVCAWWA C9004" - 8"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeNAPCODR18AWWA C90016" - 24"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeNAPCODR14AWWA C9004"- 12"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeSanderson Pipe CorpDR14AWWA C9004"- 12"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content30Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Ductile Iron Fittings 33-11-11 (01/08/13)07/23/92E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsStar Pipe Products, IncMechanical Joint FittingsAWWA C153 & C110*E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsGriffin Pipe Products, CoMechanical Joint FittingsAWWA C 110*E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsMcWane/Tyler Pipe/ Union Utilities DivisionMechanical Joint Fittings, SSB Class 350AWWA C 153, C 110, C 11108/11/98E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsSigma, CoMechanical Joint Fittings, SSB Class 351AWWA C 153, C 110, C 11202/26/14E1-07 MJ FittingsAccucastClass 350 C-153 MJ FittingsAWWA C1534"-12"05/14/98E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint RestraintsFord Meter Box Co /Uni-FlangeUni-Flange Series 1400 AWWA C111/C1534" to 36"05/14/98E1-24 PVC Joint RestraintsFord Meter Box Co /Uni-FlangeUni-Flange Series 1500 Circle-LockAWWA C111/C1534" to 24" 11/09/04E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint RestraintsOne Bolt, IncOne Bolt Restrained Joint FittingAWWA C111/C116/C1534" to 12"02/29/12 33-11-11 Ductile Iron Pipe Mechanical Joint RestraintEBAA Iron, IncMegalug Series 1100 (for DI Pipe)AWWA C111/C116/C1534" to 42"02/29/12 33-11-11 PVC Pipe Mechanical Joint RestraintEBAA Iron, IncMegalug Series 2000 (for PVC Pipe)AWWA C111/C116/C1534" to 24"08/05/04E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC)Sigma, CoSigma One-Lok SLC4 - SLC10AWWA C111/C1534" to 10"03/06/19 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC)Sigma, CoSigma One-Lok SLCS4 - SLCS12AWWA C111/C1534" to 12"08/05/04E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC)Sigma, CoSigma One-Lok SLCEAWWA C111/C15312" to 24"08/10/98E1-07 MJ Fittings(DIP)Sigma, CoSigma One-Lok SLDEAWWA C1534" - 24"10/12/10E1-24 Interior Restrained Joint SystemS & B Techncial ProductsBulldog System ( Diamond Lok 21 & JM Eagle ASTM F-16244" to 12"08/16/06E1-07 Mechanical Joint FittingsSIP Industries(Serampore)Mechanical Joint FittingsAWWA C1534" to 24"11/07/16 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsStar Pipe Products, IncPVC Stargrip Series 4000ASTM A536 AWWA C11111/07/16 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsStar Pipe Products, IncDIP Stargrip Series 3000ASTM A536 AWWA C11103/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsSIP Industries(Serampore)EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Black For DIPASTM A536 AWWA C1113"-48"03/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsSIP Industries(Serampore)EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900 DR14 PVC PipeASTM A536 AWWA C1114"-12"03/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsSIP Industries(Serampore)EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900 DR18 PVC PipeASTM A536 AWWA C11116"-24"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content31Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Resilient Seated Gate Valve* 33-12-20 (05/13/15)Resilient Wedged Gate Valve w/no GearsAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2500 Drawing # 94-2024716"12/13/02Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2530 and Series 2536AWWA C51530" and 36"08/31/99Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2520 & 2524 (SD 94-20255)AWWA C51520" and 24"05/18/99Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2516 (SD 94-20247)AWWA C51516"10/24/00E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2500 (Ductile Iron)AWWA C5154" to 12"08/05/04Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow Control42" and 48" AFC 2500AWWA C51542" and 48"05/23/91E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican AVK CompanyAmerican AVK Resilient Seaded GVAWWA C5094" to 12"01/24/02E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican AVK Company20" and smaller*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveKennedy4" - 12"*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveM&H4" - 12"*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveMueller Co4" - 12"11/08/99Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller CoSeries A2361 (SD 6647)AWWA C51516"01/23/03Resilient Wedge Gate ValveMueller CoSeries A2360 for 18"-24" (SD 6709)AWWA C51524" and smaller05/13/05Resilient Wedge Gate ValveMueller CoMueller 30" & 36", C-515AWWA C51530" and 36"01/31/06Resilient Wedge Gate ValveMueller CoMueller 42" & 48", C-515AWWA C51542" and 48"01/28/88E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve CoAWWA C5094" - 12"10/04/94Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve Co16" RS GV (SD D-20995)AWWA C51516"11/08/99E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve CoClow RW Valve (SD D-21652)AWWA C51524" and smaller11/29/04Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve CoClow 30" & 36" C-515AWWA C51530" and 36" (Note 3)11/30/12Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve CoClow Valve Model 2638AWWA C51524" to 48" (Note 3)05/08/91E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveStockham Valves & FittingsAWWA C 509, ANSI 420 - stem, ASTM A 276 Type 304 - Bolts & nuts4" - 12"*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveU S Pipe and Foundry CoMetroseal 250, requirements SPL #743" to 16"10/26/16 33-12-20 Resilient Seated Gate ValveEJ (East Jordan Iron Works)EJ FlowMaster Gate Valve & Boxes08/24/18Matco Gate Valve Matco-Norca225 MRAWWA/ANSI C115/An21 154" to 16"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content32Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve 33-12-21 (07/10/14)*E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveHenry Pratt CoAWWA C-50424"*E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveMueller CoAWWA C-50424"and smaller1/11/99E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveDezurik Valves CoAWWA C-50424" and larger06/12/03E1-30 Valmatic American Butterfly ValveValmatic Valve and Manufacturing Corp Valmatic American Butterfly ValveAWWA C-504Up to 84" diameter04/06/07E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveM&H ValveM&H Style 4500 & 1450 AWWA C-50424" to 48"03/19/18 33 12 21 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveG A Industries (Golden Anderson)AWWA C504 Butterfly ValveAWWA C-50430"-54"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content33Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Polyethylene Encasement 33-11-10 (01/08/13)05/12/05E1-13 Polyethylene EncasmentFlexsol PackagingFulton Enterprises AWWA C1058 mil LLD05/12/05E1-13 Polyethylene EncasmentMountain States Plastics (MSP) and AEP IndStandard HardwareAWWA C1058 mil LLD05/12/05E1-13 Polyethylene EncasmentAEP IndustriesBullstrong by Cowtown Bolt & GasketAWWA C1058 mil LLD09/06/19 33-11-11 Polyethylene EncasmentNorthtown Products Inc PE Encasement for DIPAWWA C1058 mil LLD* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content34Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Sampling Station3/12/96Water Sampling StationWater PlusB20 Water Sampling Station* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content35Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Automatic Flusher10/21/20Automated Flushing SystemMueller HydroguardHG6-A-IN-2-BRN-LPRR(Portable) HG2-A-IN--2-PVC-018-LPLG(Permanent)04/09/21Automated Flushing SystemKupferle Foundry CompanyEclipse #9800wc04/09/21Automated Flushing SystemKupferle Foundry CompanyEclipse #9700 (Portable)* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content36Updated:04/09/2021