Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 53198-A2CSC No. 53198-A2 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CITY OF FORT WORTH CONTRACT 53198 This Second Amendment is entered into by and between the City of Fort Worth (hereafter 'Buyer"), a home rule municipality, with its principal place of business at 200 Texas Street, Fort Worth, Texas, and Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. ("Vendor"), Buyer and Vendor may be referred to individually as a Party and collectively as the Parties. WHEREAS, on December 1, 2019, the Parties entered into City Secretary Contract 53198 to provide Payment Card Industry (PCI) Qualified Security Assessor services ("Agreement/Contract"); WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement to update the scope of work for the second Renewal term. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, acting herein by and through their duly authorized representatives, enter into the following agreement: 1. AMENDMENTS The Agreement is hereby amended by adding Exhibit A-2, attached to this second Amendment, as Exhibit A-2 of the Agreement. 2. ALL OTHER TERMS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME All other provisions of the Agreement which are not expressly amended herein shall remain in full force and effect. 3. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. A facsimile copy or computer image, such as a PDF or tiff image, or a signature, shall be treated as and shall have the same effect as anoriginal. OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH, TX Second Amendment to Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 53198 Page 1 of 4 ACCEPTED AND AGREED: CITY OF FORT WORTH: By: Valerie Washington (Apr 3, 202312:32 CDT) Name: Valerie Washington Title: Assistant City Manager Date: Apr 3, 2023 APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: to CONTRACT COMPLIANCE MANAGER: By signing I acknowledge that I am the person responsible for the monitoring and administration of this contract, including ensuring all performance and reporting requirements. By: Jus M Grace (Mar 29, 2023 11:42 CDT) Name: Justin Grace Title: Sr. IT Solutions Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Name: Kevin Gunn Title: Director, IT Solutions Department ATTEST: p of FORr�y°ad By: ° o� p �'=o Name: Taylor Paris Title: Assistant City Attorney �daC4 QEX A5aoair By: CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION: Name: Jannette Goodall M&C: N/A Title: City Secretary Approved: N/A 1295: N/A VENDOR: Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. ATTEST: By: 92c�7. :! By: Name: B ritt&VGeorge Title: Partner Date: March 24, 2023 Name: Title: OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH, TX Second Amendment to Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 53198 Page 2 of 4 FORT WORTH Exhibit A-2 City of Fort Worth - PCI SAQ-0 Services Roles Weaver: Perform testing over the applicable requirements and provide two completed SAQ-Us and AOC's for Wafer and Non -water payment channels. COFW: Review of the two SAQ-D's and AOC's, provide the requested documentation, and be available for walkthroughs. Re uirement Sca e Non -wafer payment channel: Requirements outlined in the SAQ P2PE are in -scope. Water payment channel: 214 Requirements based on the assumptions outlined below and in the "Requirement Type Summary"tab. Timeline: 2.5 months Activity: Low Estimate High Estimate Non -wafer Payment Channel Hrs Hrs at Rafe Hrs Hrs of Rafe Planning 1 Proj Mgmt 15 $ 3,3DD 25 $ 5,57 Fieldwork Execution & SAQ D Population 40 $ 8,800 55 $ 12,1 DD Review 1 Reporting 1 Issuance 25 $ 5,50D 35 $ 7,7DD Non -Water Payment Channel iota 8D $ 17,6W 115 $ 25,3D0 Water Payment Channel Hrs Hrs of Rafe Hrs Hrs at Rafe Planning 1 Proj Ntgmt 3D $ 6,600 40 $ 8,87 Fieldwork Execution & SAQ D Population 175 $ 38,5DC1 210 $ 46,2D0 Review 1 Reporting 1 Issuance 45 $ 9,900 55 $ 12,1 D0 Water Payment Channel Tofa 250 $ 55,ODO 305 $ 67,1D0 Overall Total: 330 $ 72,6001 420 1 $ 92,400 Assumptions {Low Eafrrnate}m 1. COFW will provide accurate do tolnetwork flaw diagrams and system and device inventories prior to the issuance of a Document Request List from Weaver. 2. IniTiol requests for documentation or evidence for testing will be fulfilled within 15 business days je.g. populations, inventories, policies, etc.). Subsequent requests for information (e.g. samples for testing, clarifications on previous requests) will be responded to within 3 business days. All initial requests are provided prior to the stars of fieldwork. 3. For the Non -wafer payment channel that encrypts cardholder data at the point of interaction and con only be decrypted by the processor, the applicable requirements outlined in the SAQ-P2PE will be evaluated. See highlighted green cells in column G of the "Requirement Type Summary" tab for the applicable requirements. 4. For the Water payment channel the applicable SAC;!-D requirements will be evaluated. See highlighted green cells in column F of the 'Requiremenf Type Summary' fob for the applicable requirements. 5. The COFW has reviewed all 1n-scope" requirements in the table "Requirement Type Summary" and agrees that the applicable requirements are In -Place and documented evidence con be made available to demonstrate it as such. 6. For both payment cho nnels the folloWng assumptions were made to identify the applicable requirements: • No ca rd holder data is retained or stored. Al card holder data is encrypted at the Point of Interaction (POI) or Point of Sale (FOSj and the CoFW only reto ins ioke nized transaction information received from the processor. • All applications are off the shelf and no custom code development is performed for the CDE. • SSL and early TLS are not utilized for encryption. 7. The city has performed scans of their networks and systems for cardholder data and can provide documentation demonstrating no cardholder data exists. 8. The Wa ter cardhol der data environment is fully segmented from other networks and systems. 9. Issues identified in prior assessments have been remediated and in place for any required periods of lime. Assumptions (High Estimate): 1. Not all'in-scope" req uirements i n the table "Requiremenf Type Summarli' hove been implemented, requiring multiple rounds of follow-up between the CcFW and Weaver. 2. Provided documentation is inaccurate or does not fully address the request or requirement. weaver .,N