HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 60125CSC No. 60125
FRIENDS
III
OF THE
TEXAS
HISTORICAL
COMMISSION
DONATION AGREEMENT
This gift agreement is made on the 18th day of September, 2023 between the Citv of Fort
Worth (Donor) and the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission (FTHC) to support the Texas
Historical Commission's Texas Archeological Sites Atlas Internship Program.
This donation is made in response to the mitigation requirements as detailed in the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the US Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth
District, the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer, and the City of Fort Worth, regarding the
regarding the Fort Worth sewer M-338B & M-280B slope stabilization located in the City of Fort
Worth, Tarrant County, Texas (Permit Number: SWF-2016-00180).
Based on the requirements of the above referenced MOA, the Donor and FTHC agree as
follows:
1. DONOR COMMITMENT
The Donor hereby pledges to FTHC a gift of $80,755.95 to the Friends of the Texas Historical
Commission.
2. PURPOSE OF GIFT
a, Per Stipulation I (B) (Task 1) of the above referenced MOA, in an effort to mitigate any
adverse effects to the archeological site impacted by the slope stabilization project
(referenced above), the City of Fort Worth is required to make a donation to the
Friends of the Texas Historical Commission for the development of a Texas
Archeological Sites Atlas (TASA) Internship Program.
b. The goal of this program is to create and digitize archeological content for the THC's
Texas Archeological Sites Atlas.
c. It is understood and agreed that the gift will be used to establish a "Texas Archeological
Sites Atlas (TASA) Internship Fund" within the FTHC, for the specific purpose as detailed
above.
d. The TASA Internship Fund shall be used per the direction of the Archeology Division Director
of the Texas Historical Commission.
e. The TASA Fund will be used as a programmatic grant and shall be drawn down for the
purpose specified above, until the fund is fully depleted.
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TX
FTHC-City of Fort Worth Donation Agreement, September 2023 11 P a g e
3. PAYMENT
It is further understood and agreed that the gift will be paid in full on or before
October 31, 2023 according to the following payment schedule:
I NSTALLM ENT AMOUNT DATE OF PAYMENT
(ON OR BEFORE)
$80,755.95 October 31, 2023
It is also understood and agreed that the gift funds as received may be invested by the FTHC
as it shall best determine and according to the FTHC's and the Texas Historical Commission's
policies and procedures pending disbursement for the purpose or purposes described
herein.
HE 74"-1 -tV14:,42400*1
Up to 5% of this gift will be set aside by the FTHC for all expenses related to the setting up
of the TASA Internship Program, and for its administration, including but not limited to
expenses related to contracting with interns, accounting, audits, etc.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Donor will be acknowledged for this gift in support of the TASA Internship Program as per
the FTHC's existing donor acknowledgment guidelines.
a. The Donor, by initials here, consents to such acknowledgment:
b. The Donor, by initials here, requests no such acknowledgment:
If accepting such acknowledgment, the Donor will be recognized as (please print name as
you would like it listed):
The City of Fort Worth
In addition, the FTCH will provide the Donor will a formal receipt of the donation, for its
recordkeeping.
6. REPORTING
While no reporting is required because of the nature of this donation, the FTHC will provide
a brief annual report on the use of this gift to the Donor. This report may be provided in the
form of an email with a brief description of the use of funds and will be provided in the month
of September of each year until the TASA Internship Fund is depleted.
FTHC-City of Fort Worth Donation Agreement, September 2023 2 1 P a g e
7. AMENDMENT
By mutual consent between the FTHC and the Donor, the Donor's legally or duly appointed
agent or attorney -in -fact, or the personal representative of the Donor's estate, no
amendments to any provision of this agreement may be allowed.
8. INTENT
It is the agreement of the parties and the intent and wish of the Donor that this gift and any
unpaid, promised installment under this agreement shall constitute the Donor's binding
obligation and shall be enforceable at law and equity including, without limitation, against
the Donor.
The Donor and the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission acknowledge that the FTHC is
relying, and shall continue to rely, on the Donor's gift being fully satisfied as set forth
herein.
9. COMMUNICATION
All communications related to this grant and its implementation shall be sent to:
Friends of the Texas Historical Commission
Anjali Kaul Zutshi
Executive Director
P.O. Box 13497
Austin, TX 78711-3497
Email: Aniali.Zutshi@thc.texas.gov
Ph: 512-936-2241
Citv of Fort Worth
Tony Sholola
Assistant Director, Water Department
311 W. 10th Street
Fort Worth, TX 76002
Email:
Anthonv.sholola@fortworthtexas.gov
Ph: 817-392-6055
A copy of this agreement will also be sent to Brad Jones, Archeology Division Director, Texas
Historical Commission.
10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject
matter of the agreement. This agreement is subject to the laws of the State of Texas. This
agreement supersedes all other agreements and understandings, both oral and written,
between the parties relating to the subject matter of this agreement.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
FTHC-City of Fort Worth Donation Agreement, September 2023 3 1 P a g e
In witness thereof, the parties to this Agreement have affixed their signatures:
For Donor: City of Fort Worth For the Friends of the Texas Historical
Commission
Signature: Dana Burghdoff(Sep 5,20239:48CDT) Signature:
Signed by: Dana Burghdoff Signed by: Aniali Kaul Zutshi
Title: Assistant City Manager Title: Executive Director
Date: Sep 15, 2023 Date: September 18, 2023
poionIln
FORT�pd
ATTEST:
ono o=o
Jannette S. Goodall
City Secretary
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
By: Christopher Hifrder (Sep 12, 2023 13:04 CDT)
Chris Harder, P. E.
Director, Water Department
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
pl-k (Sep 14, 2023 15:1:
By: rl
Douglas W Black
Sr. Assistant City Attorney
Contract Compliance Manager:
By signing, I acknowledge that I am the person responsible for the monitoring and administration of
this ontr t, including ensuring all performance and reporting requirements.
16 it t 121
Tony Sholola, P.E.
Project Manager
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TX
FTHC-City of Font Worth Donation Agreement, September 2023 4 1 P a g e
CSC No. 59755
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE UNITED STATES ARMY. CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FORT WORTH DISTRICT.
THE TEXAS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
CITY OF FORT WORTH
REGARDING THE FORT WORTH SEWER M-338B & M-280B SLOPE STABILIZATION
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS
Permit Number: SWF-2016-00180
WHEREAS, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District (USACE), the lead
Federal agency, authorized a USACE permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the
construction of slope stabilization called the Fort Worth Sewer M-338B & M-280B Slope
Stabilization Project (Project) by the City of Fort Worth (CFW); and
WHEREAS, the CFW has completed construction of the Project, located in the City of Fort Worth,
Tarrant County, Texas (see maps in Appendix A); and
WHEREAS, the constructed activity that required a USACE permit pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act constitutes an undertaking (Undertaking) under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended); and
WHEREAS, the USACE, in consultation with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO), considered the potential effects of the Project as provided in 33 CFR 325, Appendix
C and 36 CFR 800 and established an Area of Potential Effects (APE) for direct effects to
include the 0.934-acre permit area and impacts to waters of the U.S.; and
WHEREAS, in a letter dated May 24, 2021, the USACE stated that site 41TR314 (the Violet site)
is a known historic property, and USACE determined that CFW is in violation of Special Condition
number 2 for archeological monitoring as required in the USACE permit authorization; and,
WHEREAS, the constructed Project is in violation with Special Condition number 2 for
archeological monitoring in the USACE permit authorization dated March 3, 2020, and the Project
requires corrective measures for compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which
includes this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the treatment of adverse effects to historic
properties; and
WHEREAS, CFW has completed a summary report dated June 29, 2021, and titled M-338B & M-
280B Slope Stabilization TAP ##7984/SWF-2016-00180 Cease and Desist, which reported that
construction of the Project removed previously recorded archeological site 41TR314, located
inside of the direct effects APE with a determination of eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP), and that the Project had constructed across other areas with high potential for
historic properties without archeological monitoring; and,
WHEREAS, USACE and the SHPO invited CFW to participate in the consultation and to join this
MOA as an Invited Signatory; and
WHEREAS, the USACE has consulted with the Comanche Nation of Oklahoma, Kiowa Tribe of
Oklahoma, Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma, Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas, and Wichita and Affiliated
Tribes, and invited them to sign this MOA; and
WHEREAS, USACE, in accordance with 33 CFR 325, Appendix C(2) and 36 CFR 800.2(c), the
USACE has identified consulting parties, sought their views on the effects of site 41TR314, and
provided them with documentation of the adverse effects and the proposed mitigation measures
(as well as the public outreach component), including review of this MOA; and
WHEREAS, USACE, in accordance with 33 CFR 325, Appendix C(7)(d) and 36 CFR 800.6(a)(1),
notified the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) of its adverse effect determination
with specified documentation, and the ACHP chose not to participate in the consultation pursuant
to 36 CFR 800.6(a)(1)(iii); and,
WHEREAS, the USACE, the SHPO, and CFW agreed to accomplish compliance with Section
106 through the development and execution of this MOA, and to ensure that CFW provides
mitigation for the adverse effects to site 41TR314, and to ensure that CFW adheres to the
Mitigation Plan appended to this MOA (Appendix B), and this MOA will be a corrective measure
as required by USACE; and
NOW, THEREFORE; the USACE, the SHPO, and CFW agree that the Project shall be
implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect
of the Project on site 41TR314 to satisfy the USACE's Section 106 responsibilities for this Project.
STIPULATIONS
The USACE will ensure that the following stipulations are carried out by CFW to mitigate for
adverse effects to archeological site 41TR314 that resulted from construction of the Project.
I. RESOLUTION OF ADVERSE EFFECT
A. Minimization
a. The project has been completed and only a small portion of the site was
impacted by direct effects. The majority of the site remains intact and outside of
the project area. The stabilization project further protects the site from being
eroded away by the river. Additional details are presented in the Mitigation Plan
(Appendix B).
B. Mitigation
Task 1: Donation to the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission for the
development of a Texas Archeological Sites Atlas (TASA) internship program.
Approximately 55% ($80,755.95) of the funds will be spent on this task in order to
aid in the creation and digitization of archeological content for the TASA.
Task 2: Donation to the Texas Beyond History (TBH) website. Approximately 15%
($22,024.35) of the funds will be spent on this task to aid TBH in the creation of
North Texas archeological content.
Task 3: Regulatory Training for City of Fort Worth staff. Approximately 20%
($29,365.80) of the funds will be spent on the development and execution of a
training event to educate City staff on Section 404 permitting, Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Antiquities Code of Texas
(ACT).
FNI
Task 4: Production of Texas Archeology Month Public Outreach Kits to be donated
to the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission or local archeological societies.
The final 10% ($14,682.90) of funds will be dedicated to using archeological staff
time and material costs to produce 1,000 kits.
II. CURATION AND DISPOSITION OF MATERIALS, RECORDS AND REPORTS
A. Curation. CFW shall ensure that materials and associated records as required by the
Mitigation Plan (Appendix B) in this MOA, are accessioned into a curatorial facility that
meets standards set forth in 36 CFR 79 — Curation of Federally -owned and Administered
Archaeological Collections or, for state -associated held -in -trust collections, has been
certified by the Texas Historical Commission in accordance with Title 13, Part 2, Chapter
29 Management and Care of Collections of the Texas Administrative Code.
B. Reports. CFW shall provide copies of final documentation as required in the Mitigation
Plan to the signatory's documenting completion/fulfillment of each mitigation task. The
signatories shall withhold from the public all site location information and other data that
may be of a confidential or sensitive nature pursuant to 33 CFR 325, Appendix C(4)(c)
and 36 CFR 800.11(c).
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
All historic preservation -related investigations and Mitigation Plan requirements specified in this
Agreement shall be carried out by Principal Investigators meeting the pertinent professional
qualifications of the SOI's Professional Qualification Standards (36 CFR Part 61) in a discipline
appropriate for the task and the nature of the historic properties.
IV. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Should any Signatory to this MOA object within thirty (30) calendar days upon receipt of any plans
or other documents, pursuant to this MOA, provided by USACE, the SHPO, and CFW, or object
at any time to any actions proposed or the manner in which the terms of this MOA are
implemented, the objector is encouraged to consult the other signatories in resolving the
objection. If the USACE determines that such objection cannot be resolved, USACE shall perform
the following tasks.
A. CONSULT ACHP. Forward all documentation relevant to the dispute, including the
USACE's proposed resolution, to the ACHP. The ACHP shall provide the USACE with its
advice on the resolution of the objection within 30 days of receiving adequate
documentation. Prior to reaching a final decision on the dispute, the USACE shall prepare
a written response that takes into account any timely advice or comments regarding the
dispute from the ACHP, signatories shall provide them with a copy of this written response.
The USACE will then proceed according to its final decision.
B. FINAL DECISION. If the ACHP does not provide its advice regarding the dispute within
the 30-day time period, the USACE may make a final decision on the dispute and
proceed accordingly. Prior to reaching such a final decision, the USACE shall prepare a
written response that takes into account any timely comments regarding the dispute from
the signatories and concurring parties to the MOA and shall provide the signatories and
the ACHP with a copy of such written response.
C. The parties shall carry out all other actions subject to the terms of this MOA that are not
the subject of the dispute.
D. At any time during the implementation of the measures stipulated in this MOA is raised by
interested persons, then USACE shall consider the objection and consult, as appropriate,
with the objecting party to attempt to resolve the objection.
V. DURATION, AMENDMENT, AND TERMINATION:
A. DURATION. Unless terminated or amended as outlined below, this Agreement shall
remain in effect for a period of five (5) years from the date the MOA goes into effect and
may be extended for a second 5-year term with the written consent of all the signatories.
B. AMENDMENT. This Agreement may be amended when such an amendment is agreed to
in writing by all signatories. The amendment will be effective on the date a copy signed by
all of the signatories is filed with the ACHP.
C. TERMINATION. Any Signatory to this agreement may terminate this MOA by providing
thirty (30) calendar days written notice to the other Signatories, pursuant to 36 CFR
800.6(c)(8). During the period after notification and prior to termination, the Signatories
shall consult to seek agreement on amendments or other actions that would avoid
termination. Termination of this MOA will require compliance with 36 CFR 800. This MOA
may be terminated by the execution of a subsequent MOA that explicitly terminates or
supersedes its terms.
VI. REPORTING AND MONITORING:
Each year following the execution of the MOA until it expires or it is terminated, CFW shall provide
all parties to this MOA a summary report detailing work undertaken pursuant to its terms. Such
report shall include any scheduling changes proposed, any problems encountered, and any
disputes and objections received in CFW's efforts to carry out the terms of the MOA.
VII. EXECUTION:
Signature of this Programmatic Agreement by the USACE, the SHPO, CFW, and implementation
of its terms evidence that the USACE has taken into account the effects of this Project on historic
properties and afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment. Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(b)(1)(iv)
this Agreement will go into effect when a fully executed version is received by the ACHP.
4
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FORT WORTH DISTRICT,
THE TEXAS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
CITY OF FORT WORTH
REGARDING THE FORT WORTH SEWER M-338B & M-280B SLOPE STABILIZATION
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
Permit Number: SWF-2016-00180
SIGNATORY:
United States Army, Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District
Date 10 July 2023
Brandon W. Mobley, Chief, Regulatory Division
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS. FORT WORTH DISTRICT,
THE TEXAS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
REGARDING THE FORT WORTH SEWER M-338B & M-280B SLOPE STABILIZATION
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS
Permit Number: SWF-2016-00180
SIGNATORY:
Texas State Historic Preservation Office
J-n a Date
Mark'Woife, State Historic Pr servation Officer
0
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, FORT WORTH DISTRICT,
THE TEXAS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
CITY OF FORT WORTH
REGARDING THE FORT WORTH SEWER M-338B & M-280B SLOPE STABILIZATION
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
Permit Number: SWF-2016-00180
INVITED SIGNATORY:
City of Fort Worth
D Burgh(�ff;(J�u�202, ..,91-0T)
Dana Burghdoff
Assistant City Manager
Jannette S. Goodall
City Secretary
H"Ap
Christopher Hai4ler (Jun 29, 202314:42 CDT)
Chris Harder, P.E.
Director, Water Department
Mid( M&C 23-0537 (Jun 30, 2023 14:OG CDT)
Douglas W. Black
Sr. Assistant City Attorney
Jul 3) 2023
Date:
Contract Compliance Manager: By signing, I acknowledge that I am the person responsible
for the monitoring and administration of this contract, including ensuring all performance
and reporting requirements.
i
Tony Sholola, P.E.
Assistant Water Director
Appendix A: Proiect Maps
_ Bank Key (Excavation Limits of Disturbance (TAP
Monitoring Areas 2020) Project Area 2020) aver+w.,m ru°urrIle I me e> vom
o. •worm
Approximate Known 41TR314 ••• TAP ProJeclArea
Limits Treetlne (edge of cleared area
Wall 2010) 1I71-���
—Stream Barb L �e\ �11\` Consukanis, Inc.
........n.•mra•wmtu..x+_,an.rdn�um... n,b,unumau o+�,�+ Setrrmineu 11.knq: WalrunRnn.7.l'-arirnn•-rM1guaxr-(214)1Q-UM
Figure 1. June 2020 aerial photograph showing the 2020 project components with the 2018
project components and project area.
M-338B & M-280B Slope Stabilization I 0
Elevation M Test Units (2016) Bank Key (Excavation rN1
0 N 10
102' (Edge or consl(uction CD Trenches (2018)Monitoring Areas 2020) Caw.agxm um 1111 n1 Z_l/x ucx,-urm
or, a... t50]N11 Ymm Pt. I ®I m.. rreso
access (oad) _ Post•2018 Construction Approximate Known Site Limits u,xx,rell
800' (Original ground surface Contours —Stream Barb .r'�t
®l�iL.��71iL�� y Inc.
and top of river bank) Limits of Disturbance (Project JAILD
11 'Treeline (edge of cleared area) Area 2020) �.J
rr 11wu1.11.1no•11x.,.n..nmu...or•a..0 nu fi)S Rulbx•.u/'n lnrn:Rirlmnlmn, ra'-nnvran•.hgl.mnr(llQ iRt-0JlR
Figure 2. Previous archaeological excavations and post-2018 construction contours shown
in relation to the location of the bank key excavation area shown on a May 2021
drone image (Courtesy of FNI).
v 1
M-338B & M-28OB Slope Stabilization
r«,
Elevation W Test Units (2018) Bank Key (Excavation
,++h+�mlueuuunu wr uew.rrom
482' (Edge of COnSIfuC110n QTfenChe3 (2018) Monitoring Areas2020)1
access road) _ Post-2020 Construction Approximate Known Sfle Limits w„
500' (Original ground surface Contours —Stream Barb ,rat n�I
and lop of river bank) _Limits of Disturbance (Project JAID
'( ¶ t TIIf
Treeline (edge of Geared area) Area 2020) tl./®�L.��1L�i1 11..E y Inc.
r..•...n�sn,.�..m.u�r.v.c•rar.,....nu,u.,wu....u.uu u,xarw 1-1 ,te)n,.i,—P.a(ingt 1Udrnrtlem. Man!lo ,6Acrum•(211) Pitdl7A
Figure 3. Previous archaeological excavations and post-2020 final construction contours
shown in relation to the location of the bank key excavation shown on a May
2021 drone image (Courtesy of FNI).
Figure 4.
M•338B & M-280B Slope Stabilization ° " -
a :) M
�Test Units (2010) �Bank Key (Excavation 101ARCII, 1743,
�Trenches(2018) Monitoring Areas2020) -not
Approximate Known Site Limits UPW: r)N
LimitProject
of DisArea
2 20) (TAP d TIR C j�
ProJectArea2020) l�®]nj sljj(llfanifs9 Inc.
n....wn cvN.r,n+wmva-. ms.+a:.+muu..,.rr.,..ra._elu.xalvv� 1•„ MU Rndrv... P-Axm: Rklurnluut 7S • nrtgi nrn.Ayarnnr • f?14)3he.047A
Approximate metric volume excavated without monitoring at the southern part of
the project area and 41TR314.
�
1
I.
Northern
1� •
1,
Cut`. 9513
1 �'tij�11 1
\ I `
'4
Northern Area 2
Cut: 364:8 m3
• �
,• 1 � 1 �w 1 ,, 1
M-338B & M-280B Slope Stabilization °
.�
Bank Key (Excavation ar, eavx: o, ouoa w„ o>n o,.^.r ao
Monitoring Areas 2020)
Limits or Dislurbance (TAP e m� r y �I �f
Project Area2020) �\ IR 1' onsuli fanis9 Itnco
Dvnel Pi>j yy\L:'r:MT/J•��1 LL�t3 Sn. Sn'dn III11IUrr If..l.ailbLN>�61 V Yrlin•1 d•�IS1Riinihlm\�\r.Yw\Alx�.n/: Rkh•mlmn. 7R-lln�iL,rri uaahgU.•�am - (?11111 JhY•017.0
Figure 5. Approximate metric volume excavated without monitoring in the northern part of
the project area.
Appendix B: Mitigation Plan for Adverse Effects to Archeological Site 41TR314
AR Consultants, Inc.
Archaeological and Environmental Consulting
805 Business Parkway, Richardson, Texas 75081
Phone: (214) 368-0478
Fax: (214)221-1519
E-mail: arc@arc-digs.com
Wednesday, April 12, 2023
M-338B & M-280B Slope Stabilization/41TR314 Mitigation Plan
SWF-2016-00180/TAP #7984
Introduction
In 2017, DeOtte Engineering, Inc. (DeOtte) contracted AR Consultants, Inc. (ARC) to provide a
scope of work (SOW) for monitoring construction of the Fort Worth M-338B and M-220B sewer
lines batik stabilization project in Tarrant County, Texas (Figure 1). The City of Fort Worth (CFW)
was reinforcing the north bank of the West Fork of the Trinity River where erosion was threatening
the integrity of two large diameter sewer lines (M-33813 & M-28013). The SOW was submitted at
that time with an application for a Texas Antiquities Permit (TAP). TAP 7984 was issued to ARC
on April 4, 2017, for this project to conduct construction monitoring of the riverbank excavation.
Construction did not start until April of 2018. The project originally consisted of establishing a
consistent bank grade for installation of gabion mats to protect the sewer lines. During construction
monitoring on April 5, 2018, a buried mussel shell lens with associated prehistoric artifacts was
identified and recorded as the Violet site (41TR314). ARC initiated coordination with the Fort
Worth District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), who in turn, coordinated with the Texas
Historical Commission (THC). Construction was halted and a SOW for salvage excavations was
developed as a modification to TAP 7984, which was approved on April 12, 2018. Excavations
were completed by May 01, 2018, and construction excavation monitoring was completed by July
3, 2018, and a report documenting the results of the monitoring and excavations was prepared and
submitted to the USACE and THC for review (Davis 2020a). Shortly after that submittal,
additional modifications to the design were being evaluated by the CFW and they decided to
explore new design options with Freese & Nichols, Inc. (FNI). In October 2019, a new design was
chosen, and a reverification process was initiated with the USACE on January 07, 2020, to confirm
that the new design would meet the terms and conditions of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 13.
The new design required some additional construction excavation in the southeastern end of the
project area near site 41TR314 (where archaeological excavations and monitoring had already
occurred) as well as in the northwestern end (where no monitoring occurred). This new
northwestern area required the CFW to purchase a new easement that extended out of the originally
permitted NWP13 project area. This new easement was also outside the original TAP permit
boundaries and required a modification for archaeological monitoring. A request for TAP
modification (Davis 2020b) was then submitted to the THC and approved on February 6, 2020.
The TAP stated that monitoring would occur during the construction excavation of the three bank
keys as shown on Figure 1. ARC contacted the City's construction contractor, Humphrey &
Morton, Inc., on April 27, 2020, inquiring about their construction schedule and was told it was
three or more months out based on the pier drilling and weather conditions. ARC requested to be
contacted a couple of weeks prior to the beginning of construction to prepare for monitoring. No
response was ever received. Project construction was completed in April 2021 without ARC's
knowledge and without the required monitoring being performed. The CFW voluntarily notified
the USACE about this issue and the USACE issued a Cease -and -Desist (C&D) order on May 24,
2021, as a result of violating the conditions of their Section 404 Permit.
On July 8, 2021, the CFW met with representatives of the USACE, THC, FNI, and ARC at the
project site to assess the situation and discuss a plan forward for getting the CFW back into
compliance with their Section 404 Permit and Texas Antiquities Permit. During that meeting, the
USACE and THC indicated that after -the -fact mitigation measures taken by the CFW would be
required in order to regain compliance with their permits and that the level of mitigation required
would be based on the estimated "Archeological Value" of the areas that were impacted by
construction without the required archaeological monitoring. Mitigation measures that were
discussed during that meeting included: efforts taken by the CFW to minimize direct and indirect
effects; providing database support to institutions such as the Texas Archeological Research
Laboratory (TARL), or similar institution; development of long-term website content; providing
content for local institutions such as the North Texas Archeological Society; and conducting
training for CFW staff over topics related to Section 404 permitting, Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Antiquities Code of Texas (ACT). The following
discusses the methods and assumptions utilized to estimate the "Archeological Value" and the
mitigation measures that will be taken by the CFW to regain compliance with the state and federal
permits associated with this project.
Archeological Value
For the purposes of this Mitigation Plan, "Archeological Value" (AV) was defined using the
methods outlined in Technical Brief 20 from the National Park Service (McAllister 2007).
"Archaeological Value" is defined in Section _.14 of the ARPA Uniform Regulations:
Ai-chaeological valve. For pznposes of this part, the archaeological value of any archaeological
resow-ce involved in a violation of the pi-ohibitions in § _.4 of this part or conditions of a permit
issued pta•suant to this part shall be the valve of the information associated -Oth the archaeological
resource. This valve shall be appraised in terns of the costs of the retrieval of the scientific
information tivhich ivould have been obtainable prior to the violation. These costs ino), include, but
need not be limited to, the cost of preparing a research design, conducting field ~work, carrying
out laborator}i analysis, and preparing reports as iwould be necessrny to realize the in i-ination
potential (Section _.14(a)).
The AV is a projected cost for the retrieval of scientific information as a way to assess damages to
archeological resources caused by unauthorized acts as required by the legal system (McAllister
2007:13). According to McAllister, "This determination requires the calculation of reasonable
and credible costs for appropriate retrieval of scientific infoi,ination f -oin the damaged portion of
the archeological resource if it ivas still in an undamaged condition. These costs should be
proportional to the amount of damage in order to be accepted as a justifiable measure of the harm
caused. Therefore, methodological considerations that ivould apply to actual retrieval of
information from the archeological msozv-ce do not necessarily apply in an archeological value
determination. "
To estimate the AV, the volume of the site deposit within the three construction areas (i.e., bank
key excavation areas) that were excavated without archaeological monitoring needed to first be
determined. To do this, the metric volumes of unmonitored bank key excavation areas were
estimated using surveyed topography of the bank surface after the monitored construction
excavations occurred in 2018 (Figure 2) and the final contours of the project completed in 2021
(Figure 3). The estimated volumes for each of the areas that were to be monitored are presented in
Table 1 and shown on Figure 4 and Figure 5. The total of the three monitoring areas were then
split using the 41TR314 site area to create two distinct volumes. The first AV (AV 1) is based on
estimated archaeological monitoring costs of the bank key excavation areas that were outside the
known archeological site 41TR314. The second AV (AV 2) is based on the damage to the 35.8m3
portion of the known site 41TR314 (Figure 4 and Table 1).
Table 1. Estimated Metric Volumes of Unmonitored Bank Key Construction Areas.
Archaeological
Values
2
Unmonitored Areas Volume Total
Southern Area (outside of 41TR314) 91.7 m3
Northern Area 1 95.3 m3 551.8 m3
Northern Area 2 364.8 m3
Southern Area (41TR314 overlap) 35.8 m3
Utilizing these two volumes, the total AV was then estimated using hourly rates for staff with
various project roles associated with the project and its history. The various roles and their
associated rates were provided by the USACE and are summarized in Table 2. For AV 1, this cost
is broken down in Table 3. The archeological monitoring of the 551.8 m3 of construction
excavation were estimated based on the following assumptions:
• Obtaining a TAP through coordination with USACE and THC.
• Four days of monitoring for the excavation of 551.8 m3 during construction with a
Principal Investigator) (PI) and a field tech.
• Not finding any cultural features, artifacts, or recording an archaeological site.
• A local project with no lodging needed.
• Writing up report and curating the paperwork and other project records to meet
TAP requirements.
Table 2. Hourly USACE Rates for Project Roles.
Project Roles
USACE Rates
Project Manager
$138.00
Principal Investigator/Specialists
$117.00
Project Director/Archeologist
$78.00
Crew Chief/Equipment Operators
$61.00
Field Tech
$53.00
Lab Tech
$46.00
Archivist
$64.00
Lodging
$167/day
Meals
$61/day
Table 3. Estimated Archeological Value (AV 1) of Unmonitored Areas Outside of 41TR314.
Project Role
Project Manager
Principal Investigator
Field Tech
Per Diem (days)
Coordination Field Report
& Planning (Hours) (Hours)
(Hours)
32 24
32 0
Records
Total
Curation
Hours
Rate
Total Cost
(Hours)
0
8
$138.00
$1,104.00
8
64
$117.00
$7,488.00
0
32
$53.00
$1,696.00
$61.00
$488.00
Total:
$10,776.00
To calculate AV 2 for this project, ARC relied upon two primary data sources. The first includes
statistics gathered from other data recovery efforts that have occurred in the region and that are
similar to archeological sites like 41TR314. The examples used were provided by the THC and
the statistics from each data recovery effort for those examples are summarized in Table 4. The
second data source includes the work that was previously performed at site 41TR314. This effort
included ARC gathering all the hours originally worked and invoiced for work completed at the
site between 2018 and 2020, including report writing, to establish the baseline for the excavation
data recovery efforts. The hours ARC invoiced on the fieldwork, analysis, and reporting are shown
in Table 5. Utilizing these two data sources allowed ARC to create a data recovery budget for
41TR314 that would have made the scientific information retrieved from the site comparable with
other data recovery excavations in the region and like those discussed in the original 41TR314 site
report (Davis 2020a). Table 4 shows the cumulative totals of various aspects of data recovery
projects (Statistics) from other archeological sites recommended by the USACE and THC and how
they compare to the original work at 41TR314 (row five highlighted in green). Table 4 also
provides a comparison of the proposed data recovery effort to bring the cumulative total hand
excavation to 10 in (row six highlighted in purple), which has been utilized to calculate AV 2 for
this mitigation plan.
Table 4. Comparison of Data Recovery Statistics from 41TR314 and Other Sites in the Region.
Iland N1echnnical Site Size site sizes not
ll•inondol C\CON116oa C14 Dates MIS
Sail NIng
Features Lithics Faunal OSL
FI'IR
(m3) (1112) (Acres) Analyzed
(m3)
Sus
Somides
4ITR203 23.80 13.10 244,123.00 60.32 25+ 42 86
3or4? 'I'l
394 8,346 0
0
41DLI36 17.75 285.00 9,000.00 2.22 39 54 107
257 43
43 8,700 0
0
41Tit 198 28.00 78,913.70 19.50 10 16 35
26 46
213 7,065 0
0
I 41 DN612 3.21 307.70 70.00 0.02 20 18 1
2 7
0 254 0
0
Violet (4I'I'R314) 4.70 247.40 389.00 0.09 5 10 10
6 5
106 2,144 0
0
I Violet (41'1'R314) 1.7+5.3=10 2,17.40 389.00 0.09 15 20 15-20
-13 -10+
-200+ -4000+ 4
20
*Green line represents data presented under TAP 7984 in Davis 2020a.
**Purple line represents the additional data recovery assumptions covered by AV2.
Table 5. Estimated Value of the Previous Archaeological Work Conducted Within the
Project
Area and Hours Invoiced for the 41TR314 Report
(Davis 2020a).
Field Lab/Report Rate (per
Project Role Hours Hours
hour or
Total Cost
sample)
Principal Investigator 81.75 142
$117.00
$26,178.75
Crew Chief (Backhoe Operator) 16 0
$61.00
$976.00
Field Tech 323.5 0
$53.00
$17,145.50
Lab Tech 0 194.25
$46.00
$8,935.50
Palaeobotanical Analyst 0 37
$117.00
$4,329.00
Faunal Analyst 0 66.75
$117.00
$7,809.75
Geoarchaeologist* 108.5 0
$117.00
$12,694.50
Mussel Shell Analyst 0 154.92
$117.00
$18,125.64
Per Diem (Days) 45 0
$61.00
$2,745.00
Backhoe Rental 16 0
$62.50
$1,000.00
It of
Samples
Radiocarbon Dates ($600) 5
$600.00
$3,000.00
Total:
$102,939.64
*Geoarchaeologist field and lab hours were totaled together by ARC'S subcontractor.
In addition to the data sources discussed above, the following assumptions were used to estimate
AV 2 (Table 6):
• Coordinating a modification to the existing TAP.
• A local project with no lodging needed.
• Hand excavation of 5.3 m3 as the total sample for a phased mitigation data plan based on
the previous 4.7 m3 excavations at the site. This was the most probable trajectory for the
project prior to the violation. It is possible that during the construction monitoring,
something may have been found that would have triggered a phased data recovery
mitigation plan for the site, as outlined in the 2020 TAP Modification for the project
(Davis 2020b). That mitigation plan would have been drafted in coordination with the
USACE and THC and would have been built upon the data recovered from the original
excavations. The new 5.3 m3 of excavation combined with the previous work would
bring the total excavation to 10 m3 and well within the range of data recovery percentages
shown in Table 4.
• Backhoe operator shown at Crew Chief rate. (ARC has had crew chiefs who were
equipment operators on other projects)
• Minimally what was done for the previous excavations (Davis 2020a).
o Additional Flotation (from 50% of units)
o Flotation samples from every identified feature
o Stable Isotopes
o Magnetic Susceptibility
o Particle size
o Radiocarbon Dates (minimum 10 additional dates)
• 20 Fourier -Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Samples.
• 4 Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) Dates.
• Lab Analysis of Artifacts.
• Report Writing.
Table 6. Estimated Archeological Value of the 35.8 in Unmonitored Area within the Known
Site Boundary of 41TR314.
Project Role
Field
Lab/Report
Rate (per
hour or
Total Cost
Hours
Hours
sample)
Principal Investigator
92
159
$117.00
$29,367.00
Crew Chief (Backhoe Operator)
18
0
$61.00
$1,098.00
Field Tech
362
0
$53.00
$19,186.00
Lab Tech
0
218
$46.00
$10,028.00
Palaeobotanical Analyst
0
41
$117.00
$4,797.00
Faunal Analyst
0
75
$117.00
$8,775.00
Geoarchaeologist
0
122
$117.00
$14,274.00
Mussel Shell Analyst
0
174
$117.00
$20,358.00
Per Diem (Days)
50
0
$61.00
$3,050.00
Backhoe Rental
18
0
$62.50
$1,120.00
# of
Samples
Radiocarbon Dates ($600)
10
$600.00
$6,000.00
FTIR Samples ($660)
20
$660.00
$13,200.00
OSL Dates
4
$1,200.00
$4,800.00
Total:
$136,053.00
*Hours are based on previous work completed at
site 41TR314 (Table 5), plus
12% to account for 5.3 ml of
additional hand excavation and further sampling.
Archeological Value Summary
For the purposes of this Mitigation Plan, two AVs were calculated and then added together
($10,776.00 (AV 1) + $136,053.00 (AV 2)) for a total AV of $146,829.00 (Table 7). As previously
shown in Table 4, the original archeological excavations were already comprehensive and
comparable with other sites in the region, especially considering the size of site 41TR314.
Therefore, if we consider the above data recovery assumptions and the scale of that data, it provides
more than reasonable and credible costs for an appropriate retrieval of scientific information from
the damaged portion of the archeological resource if it was still in an undamaged condition.
Furthermore, the estimated total AV for the scale of this proposed data recovery effort is much
higher than the scale of information retrieval that is possible from the 35.8 m3 cubic meter portion
of the site that was damaged during construction. As such, this combined AV is an appropriate
value to carry out 41TR314's mitigation plan.
Archaeological
Values
2
Mitigation
A. Minimization
Table 7. Final Archaeological Values.
Unmonitored Areas Volumes Total
Southern Area
(outside of 41 TR314)
Northern Area I
Northern Area 2
Southern Area
(41 TR314) overlap
91.7 rn3
95.3 rn3 551.8 m3
364.8 m3
35.8 m3
Combined Values
Total
Values
$10,776.00
$136,053.00
$146,829.00
The following measures were taken to avoid and minimize direct and indirect effects to
site 41 TR314.
• The project has been completed and only a small portion (35.8 m3) of the site
was impacted directly. The site likely extends further south along the riverbank,
which was not impacted. In addition, the bank stabilization project that was
constructed will further protect the site from erosion and preserve it.
B. Mitigation
To mitigate for the impacts to site 41TR314, the CFW proposes the following mitigation
tasks:
1. Donation to the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission for the development of a
Texas Archeological Sites Atlas (TASA) internship program. Approximately 55%
($80,755.95) of the funds will be spent on this task in order to aid in the creation and
digitization of archeological content for the TASA.
2. Donation to the Texas Beyond History (TBH) website. Approximately 15% ($22,024.35)
of the fiords will be spent on this task to aid TBH in the creation of North Texas
archeological content.
3. Regulatory Training for City of Fort Worth staff. Approximately 20% ($29,365.80) of the
funds will be spent on the development and execution of a training event or training
series to educate staff on Section 404 permitting, Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Antiquities Code of Texas (ACT).
4. Production of Texas Archeology Month Public Outreach Kits to be donated to the
Friends of the Texas Historical Commission or the North Texas Archeological Society.
This final 10% ($14,682.90) of funds will be dedicated to using archeological staff time
and material costs to produce 1,000 kits.
Table 8.
Mitigation Task Costs.
Task 1
$80,755.95
55%
Task 2
$22,024.35
15%
Task 3
$29,365.80
20%
Task 4
$14,682.90
10%
Total $146,829.00
100%
Summary & Conclusions
The construction of the slope stabilization project without archaeological monitoring resulted in a
violation of the City's Section 404 permit (USACE permit SWF-2016-00180) and the TAP.
Special condition 2 of that permit stated that "the permtttee will perform archaeological monitoring
during the activity authorized by this permit". Based on the estimated metric volume of the project
area that was excavated without archaeological monitoring, AVs were determined. The CFW will
utilize the AVs to make a donation to the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission for the
development of a TASA internship program. Approximately, $80,755.95 of the AV will be spent
on this task in order to aid in the creation and digitization of archeological content for the TASA.
A donation to the TBH website of $22,024.35 will be spent on this task to aid TBH in the creation
of North Texas archeological content., Approximately, $29,365.80 will be used for Regulatory
Training for City of Fort Worth staff. These funds will be spent on the development and execution
of a training event to educate staff on Section 404 permitting, Section 106 of the NHPA, and the
ACT. The final $14,682.90 will be used to produce 1,000 Texas Archeology Month Public
Outreach Kits to be donated to the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission or the North Texas
Archeological Society. These actions will serve as an after -the -fact mitigation strategy to bring the
CFW back into compliance with the USACE and THC permits. Additionally, since this project
involves a TAP from the THC, these after -the -fact mitigation measures will be added as an
appendix to the original monitoring report (Davis 2020a). ARC is currently preparing the
collection to be curated at the Center for Archeological Studies (CAS) at Texas State University
in San Marcos.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 214-368-0478 or 817-791-6493.
Sincerely,
ir� b
Cody S. Davis, RPA
Principal Investigator
AR Consultants, Inc.
References Cited
Davis, Cody S.
2020a Archaeological Allonitoring of the Fort Worth Seiver M-338B & A11280B Slope
Stabilization Pi-oject, Tarrant County, Texas. Cultural Resource Report 2020-08. AR
Consultants, Inc. Richardson.
2020b All--338B & M280B Slope Stabilization TAP#79841SYVF-2019-00180 TAP Allodification
for Additional Monitoring. Letter dated February 5, 2020. On file with the Texas
Historical Commission.
McAllister, Martin E.
2007 Technical Brief 20: Archeological Damage Assessment: Legal Basis and Methods. DOI
Departmental Consulting Archeologist/NPS Archeology Program, Washington, DC.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
DATE: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 REFERENCE NO.: **M&C 23-0537
LOG NAME: 60MOASLOPESM338B&M280B-USACE/THC/CFW
SUBJECT:
(CD 11) Authorize Execution of a Memorandum of Agreement for the Amount of $117,463.20 Between the
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer
and the City of Fort Worth for the Twin 90 inch Sanitary Sewer Mains M-338B and M-280B Slope
Stabilization Project
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize execution of a memorandum of agreement for the
amount of $117,463.20 between the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, the Texas
State Historic Preservation Officer and the City of Fort Worth for the Twin 90 inch Sanitary Sewer Mains
M-338B and M-280B Slope Stabilization project.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this Mayor and Council Communication (M&C) is to request authorization for execution of
a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the United States Army Corps of Engineers USACE, Fort Worth
District, the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer THC for the resolution of the violation with special
condition number 2 for archaeological monitoring in the USACE permit authorization dated March 3, 2020
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for construction of slope stabilization for the Twin 90
inch Sanitary Sewer Mains M-338B and M-280B Slope Stabilization project.
In the Spring of 2016 significant erosion of the Trinity River streambank occurred due to heavy rains and
upstream reservoir releases. The streambank erosion jeopardized the stability of the two 90-inch diameter
West Fork Collector sanitary sewer lines, which convey a significant portion of Fort Worth's wastewater to
the downstream Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility. In order to construct the necessary slope
stabilization to protect both sanitary sewer mains, a permit was obtained from the USACE pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act constituting an undertaking under section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended). Special Condition No. 2 of the permit required the City to
perform archaeological monitoring during the activity authorized by the permit.
Additional heavy rains in the Fall of 2018, Spring of 2019 and subsequent rainfall events resulted in
additional erosion of the streambank necessitating additional design (requiring modification for
archaeological monitoring) and emergency work. Due to the frantic pace of construction to install the slope
protection before the rains started again and to also prevent the two sewer mains from being undermined
and discharging a significant volume of sewage into the Trinity River, the required monitoring for the
additional construction work scope was inadvertently overlooked. The City subsequently voluntarily
notified USACE about the non-compliance, who in turn issued a Cease -and -Desist (C&D) Order on May
24, 2021 due to the violation.
On July 8, 2021, City Staff met with representatives of the USACE and THC at the project site to assess
the situation and discuss a plan for resolving the violation. Both USACE and THC indicated that after -the -
fact mitigation measures by the City would be required in order to regain compliance with their permits,
and that the level of mitigation required would be based on the Archaeological Value (AV) of the areas that
were impacted by construction without the required archaeological monitoring.
The project has been completed and only a small portion of the site was impacted by direct effects. The
stabilization project protects the site from being eroded away by the river.
Based on the estimated metric volume of the project area that was excavated without archaeological
monitoring, AVs were determined to mitigate for the impacts to the site and the following mitigation tasks
(with appropriate costs) are included in the Memorandum of Agreement to satisfy the USACE's section
106 responsibilities for this project:
Task 1: Donation to the Friends of the Texas Historical Commission for the development of a Texas
Archeological Sites Atlas (TASA) internship program. Approximately 55\% ($80,755.95) of the funds will be
spent on this task in order to aid in the creation and digitization of archeological content for the TASA.
Task 2: Donation to the Texas Beyond History (TBH) website. Approximately 15\% ($22,024.35) of the
funds will be spent on this task to aid TBH in the creation of North Texas archeological content.
Task 3: Regulatory Training for City of Fort Worth staff. Approximately 20\% ($29,365.80) of the funds will
be spent on the development and execution of a training event to educate City staff on Section 404
permitting, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Antiquities Code of
Texas (ACT). (This cost of this task is not included in the MOA total cost as it will be performed by Freese
and Nichols, Inc., at no cost to the City).
Task 4: Production of Texas Archeology Month Public Outreach Kits to be donated to the Friends of the
Texas Historical Commission or local archeological societies. The final 10\% ($14,682.90) of funds will be
dedicated to using archeological staff time and material costs to produce 1,000 kits.
The contractor, Humphrey and Morton Construction Company, has contributed $15,000.00 towards the
MOA cost and the consultant, Freese and Nichols, Inc., will conduct task 3 at no cost to the City as its
contribution towards the cost of the MOA.
The agreement shall remain in effect for a period of five (5) years from the date the MOA goes into effect
unless terminated or amended and the City shall provide to all parties of the MOA a summary report
detailing work undertaken pursuant to its terms.
Funding is budgeted in the Wastewater Dept Public Utility Departments Water & Sewer Bond 2017A Fund
for the purpose of funding the Twin 90 inch sanitary sewer mains M-338B and M-280B project.
Funding for the Slope stabilization of Twin 90 inch sanitary sewer mains M-338B and M-280B project is
depicted below:
Fund
Existing II
Additional
I project Total *I
Appropriations J
Appropriations
W&S Capital
Projects - Fund
$2,315,031.00
$0.00 $2,315,031.00
56002
Sewer Capital
Fund - Legacy
$1,144,300.00
$0.00 $1,144,300.00
59607
*Water & Sewer
Bond 2017A -
$1,695,825.00
$0.00 $1,695,825.00
Fund 56011
Project Total
$5,155,156.00
$0.00 $5,155,156.001
*Numbers rounded for presentation purposes.
The project is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 11.
FISCAL INFORMATION / CERTIFICATION:
The Director of Finance certifies that funds are available in the current capital budget, as previously
appropriated, in the Water & Sewer Bond 2017A Fund for the Twin 90 inch M-280B and M-338B project to
support the approval of the above recommendation and execution of the agreement. Prior to any
expenditures being incurred, the Water Department has the responsibility to validate the availability of
funds.
FUND IDENTIFIERS (FIDs),:
TO
Fund Department Accoun Project
ID I I ID
IProgram�Activityl Budget I Reference #
II Year (Chartfield 2)
FROM
IFundl Department IAccountl Project IProgram(Activityl Budget I Reference #
ID ID II Year (Chartfield 2)
CERTIFICATIONS:
Submitted for Citv Manaqer's Office bw Dana Burghdoff (8018)
Originating Department Head: Chris Harder (5020)
Additional Information Contact: Tony Sholola (6054)
ATTACHMENTS
1. 60MOASLOPESM338B&M280B-USAGE THC CFW funds availabilibq f (CFW Internal)
2. 60MOASLOPESM338B&M280B-USAGE THCC FW MAP. pdf (Public)
3. 60MOASLOPESM338B&M280B-USACE THC CFW Updated FID.xlsx (CFW Internal)
I4mounti
I�mountl
MAYOR AND COUNUL COMM( NIA CATS ON MAP
60MOASLOP ESM338B&M280B-USAC E/THC/CFW
Off:
��`��.t;
pal
AV
` 14
M�' �G� _,ANDI=RSONjRD',
.tom � s `+d �� �� � t�i`� 1 I �■ _�°,
r - �I ' ! •'
tie-
ELLIOTT REEDER' RD'
�—` .` �- � -� tt; r . YJ., c � � �,' 11, 1,"� hilt ,d:i! . } J } ,�t �7 � z # �n ,,, t ' • '�� �. i r
,`M ,.y,< ..:t;t., � , 1�`'i; „N i d r,�dl�} .�" 4 '! � E ��c' � • � {i,. 0�11hNU�;' •
i1N\rM•.yy` i �. ♦„!%JL�I Ik I t "�.� 9��St �:� +' 1 � I,I ,'� I11% ; �^ 4 �� q 4 �, , ,� '���e���'{j�
I L. �n L\
l:i i"T I .4 1 ,h(dt vY U
+ s'14An'•�*,iAr1'k'?, .i,' 9991�1 $�Mi;)liy.,v a -I -{II'` I{I;II�'It ! '..,� -t I� L'), 'I {IPI{ i
t � r% 9Y-
'�1��'�`
'�T" il�m,m... ` ,�"1 ' ''I'� •�'�11'�f .1 Pf4'""'�'- fllY�i1� �' ,,.. ETSIEST
t`"•$ybyt r4,X� d,i�r r P} 41,1p` ,, , if ,��- � U1 ! � .�. �^ t',
�`� n� •iY..t t � ia, t �Id. II II411 �I'I11 �y_ ��jj"��Icy- , �E L ,� a� �1. � �+�R-
, l °'�ltR i.L , 1(' ! i %'i' III{(t l 1 I��Iy�{ .(��, � '+, �----•-' j ''' � ♦ I'
�I `� �,�' u i tnL � ��1�lllil i' +�4�•iftf �j�V4, I ; +� '� ,e � �t
W@$t.F rYt ' I' ' 1,0 IhIw•Y.1 'I�fIIII
ity�R�\ n J ; �, PROJECT�'`�
LOCATIONfill,
FORTWORT
SL 2020