HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 28106r
�
�
�NDN3�1vT NO. 2
STATE OF TEXA.S
CO[]NTiC OF' TA�N''�
f�
E�
C2�`Y S�CR]�TARY GONTRACT NO.
(Na M&C N@�ded)
0
WHER�AS, the Ca.ty ai� Fart Worth {Ca.t�) and Wade & Associates�,
�nc., (�ngineex} tnade and en�e�ed. �n�a Ci�y Secr�tary Con�rac� No.
�3I42, (th� Cantract) which was authorized by the Ci�y Counc��. �y
M&C 16217 on the l�th day og Augusf: �.997 and subsequen�ly rev� sed
by one previous ar�enc�ea�; and
A�HEREAS, the Contrac� �nvolve� engineeri.ng se�vi.ces for the
fol�.owing pro�eet:
Enginee�in,g cantract for th� design of Main 21 Drainage Area
Sanitary Sewer and Impraver�en�s {��ot�p 7, Contract 3j .
W�IER�AS,
said �ontract
�a�rimum fee;
i� has become necessaxy to �cecute A�mendment No. 2 to
�a bnc�ude an increas�d scope o� work and revised
NOW TiiE.REEORE, Cit�r and �nginee�, aCting here�n by and 'thxouc�h
�heir du].� authori�ed represerifa�ives, en�er �nto the fo�,lowing
agreement w��ch a�ends �he Conicract: � '
1.
A�tic�e � af the Cantract �.s amended ta i,nclude the addition�l
engineering se�vices specif'ied �.n a proposal le�t�r da�ed 4ctober
9, 2002, a cop� of which is attached hereta and inaarpora�ed
he�ea.n. �he cost �o Ci.ty for i�he add�l.tional design se�vices to be
per�o:rraed by �ngine�� �otal $2�,7�9.9�..
2.
Article II af the Contraat is amended to p�ovide for an
in�rease in �he �naxiYnurn �'ee to be paid to Eng�neer fox al�. work and
services perfox�►ed under the Contract, as amended, so that the
total fee paid by �he C� �.�,r for all worl� and serv�ic�s shail not
�xaeed �he sum of $949,066.45.
`�� �'����
C��� , �rJ�'
i � . . i, `��.
3.
A7.� othe� prouision� of �he Cantract which are not expressly amended
h�rein sha1Z remain in fuxl force and effect. ,
E�CUT�D on this �he � day' of
200�, �.n �'ort Worth, Ta��ant Coun�y, Texas.
_ ,
A1 �4�� : - ' t � `I _z-��_. '-"
, � Contract Authari�a��on
. _,!, , _ _ �
- {� .. , y
_ _ T�_�
G�a�ia �eaa?�on, Citiy Sec�e�ary Da�e ��- � -.-_ .__.r_W�_� _.
APPROVAL RECOMMEND�D:
� /� * /�
� r
A. Douglas Radema,ke�, P.E.
Di,rector, Depa��anent a�
]�ngineering
WADE & ASSO�IAT�S. TNC.
��� /- '
. `. G. '� A,� ,� � �) � I
�. ,, � � �C. �
APFR�VED:
►
�
�arcA. Ott
a
�ssis��nt Ci�y Manage�
Name: Mark Wade, P.E.
�r�sid�nt
5'101 Brentwood Stair R,d.� Suite 1Q0 A
�'o�t T+�orth , �X '761i2
�PROVED AS TO FORM AND L�CALI'I.'Y:
` ��
�+�C 1'� -
Ga�,r 5teiribe�ger �
P.�sistan� Ci�y Aictorney
�TCi1.�'RM(ND M&C)
���
� '''.. � , '�1�� �
� , � .�.�� �`
� . � ,� t
Page 2 of 3
Mr. John Boyer
Septe�ber 30, 2�02
Conducted 3 pre-consiruction pub lic meetings, ane iar each of the three units bid
under Part 8. Therefore, we are seeking $�U0.00 per ea�h meeiin� held %r a
tota! of $1,�Od.00.
We had to redesign 390 LF of L-$29 and 1Q1 LF of L-790 during the consiruction
phase of this project because a new manhole was discav�red � and never
incorpoTated in the ariginal design. The new manhale was construcied by ihe
City's field operations group after the projec� was designed and bid which altered
th� configuration of L-829. WADE was not notified af the changed conditions
until after the canstruction o� a portion of L-790 and Ir829 had already occunred.
We are seeking the recovery of 491 LF of sewer redesign at a reduced fee of
$3.�OILF (discounted to remove survey costs and generaI design costs} for a
tatal of $1,'��.5,�0 in costs associated with this location.
o The final M-21 Part 8 contract amendment item{s} perfarmed involved tha
redesign of I28 LF of L-793 and related edits to L-774 plan sheets, including the
submission of a railroad permi.t modification. � Tl�ese changes were required to
address the fact that the Koch Pipeline was not lacated where the information th�y
provided us noted it would be found which required the r�design of the railroad
c�-ossing af L-793. In arder to complete this praject, we charged ]� haurs oi
technician time and 4 hours of Senior Engineer time for a total fee of
$1,40211 For these activities. -
The total amendment iterra cost recovery being requested fot° �VI-21, Part 8 is
$1�,G13.01.
Design Services: Sewer Pipeline Relief for the M��� Drainage Area {M-21 Part 9)
In addition to the nurnerous aznendrnent items mentioned above far M-21, we also had
other amendment iterns to recover on the M-21, Part 9 projects. These amendment items
are itemized as follows:
Various s�wer line extensions were added to this pra�ect ta serve some houses on
the north side of Myrtle Street, extending fxam L-147S and L-30'1, respectively.
T�e line "A" extension was needed to elixninate sewer serviees illegally crossing
private property. The line "A" extension was 81 LF at a fe� of $7.OS/LF for a
total fee of $573.�8 for this item. The extension of L-307 to serve MyrtZe 5treet
properties, included 3 sewer service re-rautes and the design of 2'15 LF af sewer
at a fee of $7.08/LF for a tota7 of $1,947.00. Therefore, the total fee to be
recovered for these extens'rons and sewer service reAroutes is $2,�20.48.
� We also had to design a 22$ LF extension of L-54�4 along New York Ave. to
reconfigure the sewer services on either side of the street in order to correct illegal
sewer service crossin.g p�ivate praperties. This Iocation also requzred us to add
the design of L-316 (79 LF) into this project in order to fix the problems. The
Wade & Assaciates, inc.
Consuliing �ngineers
Page 3 of 3
Mr. 7ohn Boyer
September 30, 2002
design fee of $'�.48/LF was used which tota�ed $2,1.i3.�G in fees to be
recovered far these extensions and service re�rautes.
• Canducted 3 pre-constructian public meetings for 3 out of the 4 unrts bid under
Part 9(Nate: one contractor received the bids for 2 constr�ction contracts so a
meeting was cambined). Thereiore, we are se�king $500.00 pear each meeting
he�d ior a totaI af $�,540.00.
o The final design location ident�fied for cost recovery on M-2I 1'art 9 is L-3aS
along Magnalia Street from Ner�v Yo�k to TH-35. During the final praject review,
fihe City requested that we change our proposed plan that allowed the existing
system to remain in sex-vice while tk�e ne�v sewers were constructed. The
requested change in the pians was made in an effort to accommodate the
extensive unitization of this project part. The requircd changes were extensive
and affected more tf�an 10 design p�an sheets. There�ore, we are seeking the
reco�ery of casts associated with this item that resulted in the redesign of
1271 LF of L�30� and its connecting laterals, at a d�sign fee af $4.66/LF for a
total fee of $5,9��.86 to be recovered for this item.
The total amendment items cost recovery requested for 14� 2I, Patt 9 is $IZ,.T I6.90.
Therefare, the total costs to 6e recovered associated with the additional acti�ities
and services per%rmed in M-�1 Part S and Part 9 Projects are $2�1,7�9.91. For ynur
con�enience, a summary of the total M-21 project �ees are as follows:
Contract Iienra
Ori�inal Contract Amount
Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2
Total Ajl Items
Fee _
� ��o,so�.ao
$ 13,827.54
$ 24,72991
$ 949,06G.45
The zevised contract amouni repr�sents an increase of approxirnately 2.70 percent
(2.68°70) in the contxact va1�e. Please expedite this amendment zequest and do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions ar need any background
informatiax� concerning this matter. ThaxiZC you foz yonr tim� ancl consideration.
WADE OC ES,1NC.
�
's Bro , P. .,
Pro�ect
CC; Peter Fu, P.E., FWVUD, City of Fort Workh
Tony ShoIola, P.E., DOE, City of �ort Worth
Mark Wade; P.E., President, WADE
Wade & Assaciatss, Inc.
Cansufiing Engineers
�o�r o��
� �
-� �
. `, _
�� �_
� �
��.�
���� �
TQ; A. Douglas Ra.d�znaker, Director, DOE and
Marc A. Ott, Assistant City Manager
FRUM: Ton►y Shalola, DQE
D�1'�: Oetober 14, 2002
RE: DESIGl� FEE AIi��TI3li�dE1lFI' 1V0. 2 TO 1VdAIlV 21 DRAINAGE AREA �.�iIVITARY
�EWER EVALUATiON STUI�Y A�D II�PRQVEME�TTS (GRUU�' 7, C011TTRA►.CT 3),
SE�VER PRQJE�T liTO. P�4�-0'�04G041Q310
Tha proposed amer�clment will reimburse Wade & Assaciates, �nc. for the £ollowing additio�al s�rvices
they prpvfded on the project as req�rested by t�e City.
1, Preparation of the necessary dacuments to obtain three TxD�T permits and two rail�oad agrae-
ments for Part 8 which were nat antici�aated in tbe original contract.
2. Design oithe realignment and sewer service extsn�sian of th� J.C. Llewellqn an.d old school proper-
tzes vvhicl� incl�ded a cre�k crossing and an erosifln cantral plan,
3. Conduciing �hr�e pre-construction public mee�ngs for each a�the three u��s bid unc€er Part �.
4, Design af various sewer tine extensions in Part 9 to serve residences o� the north side of Myrt1e
Street whase services crossed athe�r private praperiy.
5: Conducting a pre-cansh uctian public meetings far four units bid under Part 9.
b. The redesign af L-305 along M�gno�ia Street in Part 9 to alIvw for the existing sewer line to rernai�
in place (instead o� r�moving and rep��.cing it iri place as originally designedj w�ith a new line coa-
structed at anather lacation. Due to the amount oi flow in the existing line, �taff deeided to leave
the old 1i�e in seruice and �arvvide a new alignment for the line. The old l�e will he abandaned
once the new main �s operat�nnal;
Wade R� Associates, Inc., has requested raimb€�rs�ment in the amount of $24,729.9I for the additianal de-
sign se�ices, thereby increasing the con�ract fee from $924,336.54 to $949,066.45. I believe thiis £ee is fair
�nd reasona.b�.e for #he additional serviees that were pr�vided.
Ptease autharize the additianal �ee by youx signa�res on the attached cantract amendment form.
Tan�r Sholola
Attaclame�zt
cc: 10� Boyer, Project Manag�r
Berc�ena Hamilta:�, V�ater Deparlxnent
Dan Pepon, Wa#er Depart�tietrt
EI�iGI1�1EER�NG DEP�IRTI�Y➢ENT
THE CITY OF F�RT W�RTH * 1DUO THROCKMORTON SiREET � FORT WORTH, 7'�xns 76IO2-fi311
(�17) Sil-�941 * Fpx (81'� Sil-'�854
� PrEnled an recyc�ed paper