The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinance 26596-11-2023 ORDINANCE NO. 26596-11-2023 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH; PROVIDING,FOR FULL-PURPOSE ANNEXATION OF A CERTAIN 134.12 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OUT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 21 OF THE SHELBY COUNTY SCHOOL LAND SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1375, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED TO TTP PARTNERSHIP RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER D216210857, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,(CASE NO.AX- 22-008) WHICH SAID TERRITORY LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT CORPORATE BOUNDARY LIMITS OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL AMEND EVERY PRIOR ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL PRIOR ORDINANCES NOT IN DIRECT CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND NAMING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City of Fort Worth has received a petition in writing from Kevin Young, the owner, requesting the full-purpose annexation of 134.12 acres of land as described in Section 1,below(the"Property"); and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described Property is in the City's exclusive extraterritorial jurisdiction and is adjacent to and adjoins the City; and WHEREAS, Subchapter C-3 of the LGC permits the City to annex an area if each owner of land in an area requests the annexation; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Subchapter C-3 of Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code,the City section 43.0672 of the Texas Local Government Code,Kevin Young, and the Cit ne otiated and entered into a written agreement, City Secretary Contract No. , for the provisions of municipal services in the area; and WHEREAS,the City conducted one public hearing at which members of the public who wished to present testimony or evidence regarding the Municipal Service Agreement and Full-Purpose Annexation were given the opportunity to do so, in accordance with the procedural requirements of Section 43.0686 of the Local Government Code on August 22, 2023 at 10:00 a.m.,at the City Council Chamber; and square footage in the descriptions. WHEREAS,the City Council finds and determines that annexation of the Property hereinafter described is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Fort Worth and the owners and residents of the area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH,TEXAS: SECTION 1. That all portions of the Property, comprising approximately 134.12 acres of land, are hereby annexed to the City of Fort Worth as a part of the city for all municipal purposes, and the city limits are extended to include such Property being all that certain land particularly described below and depicted as on Exhibit"A" attached to and incorporated in this ordinance for all purposes: BEING a 134.12 acres or 5,842,385 square feet tract of land situated in Section 21 of the Shelby County School Land Survey, Abstract Number 1375, Tarrant County, Texas; said tract being a portion of that certain tract of land described in Warranty Deed to TTP Partnership recorded in Instrument Number D216210857,Official Public Records,Tarrant County,Texas (O.P.R.T.C.T.); said tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING(P.O.B.) at a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped"JACOBS" found for the northeast corner of said TTP Partnership tract,same also being the northwest corner of that certain tract of land described in Special Warranty Deed to CVN Partnership recorded in Instrument Number D218077650, O.P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE South 00 degrees 31 minutes 19 seconds East, with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and the west line of said CVN Partnership Tract, a distance of 1,139.32 feet to the north corner of that certain tract of land described in General Warranty Deed to J.D. Smith Living Trust, recorded in Instrument Number D209027629, O.P.R.T.C.T., said corner being the same north corner of a Save And Except tract of said CVN Partnership tract, as recorded in Volume 13372,Page 2, O.P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE South 00 degrees 36 minutes 48 seconds East, departing the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said CVN tract, with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said J.D. Smith tract, a distance of 591.30 feet to a southerly north corner of said J.D. Smith tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 32 minutes 09 seconds East, departing the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and sad J.D. Smith tract, with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and aforesaid CVN Partnership tract, a distance of 518.58 feet to the southeast corner of said TTP Partnership tract, same being the southwest corner of said CVN Partnership tract, same also being in the north line of that certain tract of land described in Warranty Deed to Everman ISD, recorded in Instrument Number D206322983, O.P.R.T.C.T.; from which a 1-inch iron rod found for witness bears North 89 degrees 25 minutes 01 seconds East, a distance of 88.00 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 25 minutes 01 seconds West, departing the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said CVN Partnership tract, with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Everman ISD Tract,passing at a distance of 1850.76 feet, the northwest corner of said Everman ISD tract, same being the northeast corner of that certain tract of land described in General Warranty Deed to Isidro Salazar, recorded in Instrument Number D218283506, O.P.R.T.C.T., continuing in all a distance of 2,212,42 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found; Annexation—AX-22-008 Ordinance No.26596-11-2023 i THENCE North 89 degrees 34 minutes 11 seconds West, continuing with the said line of TTP Partnership Tract,a total distance of 428.28 feet to a 60D Nail found for the southwest corner of said TTP Partnership Tract and aforesaid Section 21; THENCE North 00 degrees 29 minutes 16 seconds West, along the ostensible centerline of South Race Street, a distance of 2,250,12 feet to the northwest corner of said TTP Partnership tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes 43 seconds East, departing said Race Street,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tracts and that certain tract of land described in Special Warranty Deed to Everman ISD, recorded in Instrument Number D207236624, O.P.R.T.C.T., passing at a distance of 983.90 feet, the southeast corner of said Everman ISD tract, same being a southwesterly corner of that certain tract of land described in Special Warranty Deed to Housing Authority of City of Fort Worth,recorded in Instrument Number D219121945 O.P.R.T.C.T.; continuing in all a distance of 1003.04 feet to a 1/2- inch iron rod found with orange plastic cap stamped"COOMBS"; THENCE North 89 degrees 45 minutes 50 seconds East,continuing with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Housing Authority tract; passing at a distance of 377.53 feet, the southeast corner of said Housing Authority tract, same being a southwesterly corner of that certain tract of land as described in General Warranty Deed to Crimson Ridge Land Partners LLC, recorded in Instrument Number D214109111, O.P.R.T.C.T.; continuing in all a distance of 1228.58 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for an ell corner of said Crimson Ridge tract; THENCE with the common fine of said TTP Partnership tract and said Crimson Ridge Tract,the following bearings and distances: South 10 degrees 10 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 905.71 feet to a 1/2- inch iron rod found; North 79 degrees 53 minutes 05 seconds East, a distance of 110.36 feet to a 1/2- inch iron rod found; North 10 degrees 17 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 890.16 feet, to a 5/8- inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JACOBS" found for the common corner of said TTP Partnership tract,said Crimson Ridge tract,and that certain tract of land described in Special Warranty Deed to Orchard Village LTD recorded in Instrument Number D219065386, O.P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE North 89 degrees 25 minutes 58 seconds East, departing the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Crimson Ridge tract,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Orchard Village Tract, a distance of 101.54 feet to a 1-inch iron rod found; THENCE North 89 degrees 08 minutes 46 seconds East,continuing with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Orchard Village Tract, a distance of 195.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 134.12 acres or 5,842,385 square feet of land more or less. Annexation—AX-22-008 Ordinance No.26596-11-2023 The Basis of Bearing is the Texas Coordinate System of 1983,North Central Zone(4202), NAD83 (2011). SECTION 2. The above described territory is shown on Map Exhibit A attached hereto and expressly incorporated herein by reference for the purpose of depicting the location of the hereinabove described territory. SECTION 3. That the above described territory hereby annexed shall be part of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the property so added hereby shall bear its pro rata part of the taxes levied by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all of the rights and privileges of all the citizens in accordance with the Municipal Services Agreement and shall be bound by the acts, ordinances, resolutions and regulations of the City of Fort Worth, Texas. SECTION 4. That the Municipal Services Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit"B"is approved and incorporated into this ordinance for all purposes. SECTION 5. CUMULATIVE CLAUSE This ordinance amends every prior ordinance in conflict herewith,but as to all other ordinances or sections of ordinances not in direct conflict,this ordinance shall be, and the same is hereby made cumulative. SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY LAUSE It is hereby declared to be the intent of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any unconstitutional phrase, clause,sentence,paragraph or section. SECTION 7. SAVING CLAUSE The City Council hereby declares it to be its purpose to annex to the City of Fort Worth every part of the area described in Section 1 of this ordinance,regardless of whether any part of such described area is hereby not effectively annexed to the City. Should this Annexation—AX-22-008 Ordinance No.26596-11-2023 ordinance for any reason be ineffective as to any part or parts of the area hereby annexed to the City of Fort Worth for full purposes,the ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any such part or parts shall not affect the effectiveness of this ordinance as to the remainder of such area. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY SECRETARY Melinda Ramos Jannette S. Goodall Deputy City Attorney City Secretary ADOPTED AND EFFECTIVE:November 14 2023 pF'�o00000000 °o 0�� p 4Co o Q,d ow. $X� ¢V'O 0 °°0000001 0 •cY Q��q��644a Annexation—AX-22-008 Ordinance No.26596-11-2023 i EXHIBIT A SECIYON 9 20 - ,• SECTION 23 �'''`'`'=` r,7•amtn,nn // N69T6'666 'oH'u'meonw i}wawNib•4 .. .j ,wxlra,,n 6PIIQSm'!lGT,$1' 101:64' cT• +. 'NA1��7 °o°Ow ai .NB9T7B'48`C 77 ET1 ",,,`:":.)ZONE FR ZONE D ZONE R2 �_ 19o.60' N89 40'43 6 1009.04' a N89'16'60 E 1228.69' •�" f•°� p 0,R BMW='OMM' a1a,Dw Jmf,r cup EfJ m Srgcttar- aMtQt� CNOgy Y si0ti0'o47' ZONE E �Y CO ONO N0. 1 6 905 7r' a SFi OCT Nf0�Yi2 ! eso.ls' g SECTION 8 k wnu,wmumm�u m SECTION 21 tip w SAL^7YON 22 Kw,o,sria,wq,aLxn N O6xB oacanuarwccr Nyg59' ZONE H ET7 TTP PARTNERSHIP 110 sg N INST.NO.D216210857 aTL„a�,n x O.P.R•T.C.T. o ucL SV056'447 ZONE C 681.90' i w umcnun ae110,1[q,C1xT,lrlgnrty �// O,ATCT Yar IuLLmtsste,IXgiMq.n af0lbn,InrATLL Soo W,09"E 618.68' N09'34'11.6, '� 42fl28' Ar gyp•w S8926'01'N 2212.42' (1 �rJEL MCC iASL sjp8 Y EU� Cf OT N� JRO Y ,M.�a'ouo�,m DTRA ZONEA-5 M� gRAC alxrcr GRAPHIC SCALE 500' 0 250' S(HY PRELIMINARY,THIS 4� DORCUECMOERNDTSDHFAOLRLNOTBEANNEXATION EXHIBIT 1 Inch=500feet E ANY o PURPOSE AND SHALL NOT �o E IED D ORUPON AS A FINAL A 134.12 ACRES 5,842,385 SQUARE FEET RELIED UPON AS p FINAL � Q. C e SURVEY DOCUMENT. 10181 FORREST HH.L BVRRMAN ROAD o , TRACT21 URBAN OUT THE SHELBY COUNTY SCHOOL LAND SORVBY �z so STRUCTURE n,f, ABSTRACTN0.1375 0. Wdn,tHi14 Suke Dal Texas aetMr,d PrdrnM,i4rd lur'y ClTYOFFORTWORTH,TARRANTCOUMTY,TEXM �� IIPy g0$, � ]5131. 4n,elTnnutn,.H>691q Rm Repl+tr,liv,Y,m9�6,u vrrwaxtt.�atmn•a Fr9F915 Annexation—AX-22-008 Ordinance No.26596-11-2023 Exhibit B Municipal Services Agreement Annexation—AX-22-008 Ordinance No,26596-11-2023 CSC No. 60552 MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS AND TTP PARTNERSHIP This Municipal Services Agreement ('greement") s entered into on 14th day of November 2023 by and between the City of Fort Worth, Texas, a home-rule municipality of the State of Texas, ("City") and TIP Patomitip ("Owner"). RECITALS The parties agree that the following recitals are true and correct and form the basis upon which the parties have entered into this Agreement. WI3EREAS, Section 43.0671 of the LGC pen-nits the City to annex an area if each owner of land in an area requests the annexation; WHEREAS, where the City elects to annex such an area,the City s required to enter into a written agreement with the property owner(s) that sets forth the City services to be provided for the Property on or after the effective date of annexation (the "Effective Date"); WHEREAS, Owner owns certain parcels of land situated in Tarrant County, Texas, which consists of approximately 134.12 acres of land in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction, such property being more particularly described and set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"); WHEREAS, Owner has filed a written request with the City for full-purpose annexation of the Property, identified as Annexation Case No. AX-22-008 ('nnexation Case"); WHEREAS, City and Owner desire to set out the City services to be provided for the Property on or after the effective date of annexation; WHEREAS,the Annexation Case and execution of this Agreement are subject to approval by the Fort Worth City Council; and NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, City and Owner agree as follows: [ 1. PROPERTY. This Agreements only applicable to the Property, which s the subject of the 4, Annexation Case. 2. INTENT. Its the intent of the City that this Agreement provide for the delivery of full, available municipal services to the Property in accordance with state law, which may be accomplished through any means permitted by law. For purposes of this Agreement, "full municipal services" means all services provided by the City within its fill-purpose boundaries, including water and wastewater services and excluding gas or electrical service. Owner-Initiated Annexation Service Agreement 1 Ono i 3. MUNICIPAL SERVICES. a. Commencing on the Effective Date, the City will provide the municipal services set forth below. As used in this Agreement, "providing services" includes having services provided by any method or means by which the City may extend municipal services to any other area of the City, including the City's infrastructure extension policies and developer or property owner participation in accordance with applicable city ordinances,rules,regulations, and policies. i. Fire—The City's Fire Department Will provide emergency and fire protection services comparable with the provision of services available in other parts of the municipality with topography, land use and population density similar to the level of service contemplated or projected in the area. ii. Police — The City's Police Department will provide protection and law enforcement services. iii. Emergency Medical Services - The City's Fire Department and MedStar (or other entity engaged by the City after the Effective Date)will provide emergency medical services. iv. Planning and Zoning — The City's Development Services Department will provide comprehensive planning, land development, land use, and building review and inspection services in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. v. Parks and Recreational Facilities. Residents of the Property will be permitted to utilize all existing publicly-owned parks and recreational facilities and all such facilities acquired or constructed after the Effective Date(including community service facilities, libraries, swimming pools, etc.), throughout the City. Any private parks, facilities, and buildings will be unaffected by the annexation; provided,however,that the City will provide for maintenance and operation of the same upon acceptance of legal title thereto by the City and appropriations therefor. In the event the City acquires any other parks, facilities, or buildings necessary for City services within the Property,the appropriate City department will provide maintenance and operations of the same. vi. Other Publicly Owned Buildings. Residents of the Property will be permitted to use all other publicly owned buildings and facilities where the public is granted access. vii. Stormwater Utility Services — The Property will be included in the City's Stormwater Utility service area and will be assessed a monthly fee based on the amount of impervious surface. The fees will cover the direct and indirect costs of stormwater management services, viii. Roads and Streets (including Street li htg ins) - The City's Transportation and Public Works Department will maintain the public streets and streetlights over which the City has jurisdiction. The City will provide regulatory signage services in accordance with the City policies and procedures and applicable laws. ix. Water and Wastewater to Existing Structures. Occupied Structures that are using water-well and on-site sewer facilities on the Effective Date may continue to use the same. If a properly owner desires to connect an existing structure to the City water and sewer system,then the owner may request a connection and Owner-Initiated Annexalion Service Agreement 2 or to receive up to 200 linear feet of water and sewer extension at the City's cost for each occupied lot or tract in accordance with the City's "Policy for the Installation of Community Facilities" and applicable law, Once connected to the City's water and sanitary sewer mains, the water and sanitary sewage service will be provided by the City at rates established by City ordinances for such service, x. Solid Waste Services—The City will provide solid waste collection services in accordance with existing City ordinances and policies,except where prohibited by law. xi. Code Compliance, -- The City's Code Department will provide education, enforcement,and abatement relating to code violations within the Property. xii. Full Municipal Services — Commencing on the Effective Date, the City will provide to the Property all services provided by the City within its full-purpose boundaries and not otherwise listed above,except as provided in Section 3(b). b. The City will provide water service and wastewater treatment service to developments established after the Effective Date in accordance with, and on the schedule determined by, the City's extension policies and applicable law and at rates established by City ordinances for such services. c. It is understood and agreed that the City is not required to provide a service that is not included in this Agreement. d. Owner understands and acknowledges that the City departments listed above may change names or be re-organized by the City Manager. Any reference to a specific department also includes any subsequent City department that will provide the same or similar services. 4. SERVICE LEVEL. The City will provide the Property with a level of services,infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance that is comparable to the level of services, infrastructure, and infrastructure maintenance available in other parts of the City with topography, land use, and population density similar to those reasonably contemplated or projected for the Property. 5. AUTHORITY. City and Owner represent that they have full power,authority and legal right to execute, deliver and perform their obligations pursuant to this Agreement. Owner acknowledges that approval of the Annexation Case is within the sole jurisdiction of the City Council.Nothing in this Agreement guarantees favorable decisions by the City Council. 6. SEVERABILITY. If any part, term, or provision of this Agreement is held by the courts to E be illegal, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity, or unenforceability will not affect the validity of any other part,term or provision,and the rights of the parties will be construed as if the part,term,or provision was never part of the Agreement. 7, INTERPRETATION. The parties to this Agreement covenant and agree that in any litigation relating to this Agreement, the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Texas, The parties acknowledge that they are of equal bargaining power and that each of them was represented by legal counsel in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. owner-Initialed Annexation Service Agreement 3 of 10 S. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. Venue shall be in the state courts located in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division and construed in conformity with the provisions of Texas Local Government Code Chapter 43. 9. NO WAIVER. The failure of either party to insist upon the performance of any term or provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right granted hereunder shall not constitute a waiver of that parry's right to insist upon appropriate performance or to assert any such right on any future occasion. 10. GOVERNMENTAL POWERS. It is understood that by execution of this Agreement, the City does not waive or surrender any of its governmental powers or immunities. 11. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and constitute one and the same instrument. 12. CAPTIONS. The captions to the various clauses of this Agreement are for informational purposes only and shall not alter the substance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 13.AGREEMENT BINDS AND BENEFITS SUCCESSORS AND RUNS WITH THE LAND. This Agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the parties,their successors, and assigns. The term of this Agreement constitutes covenants running with the land comprising the Property, is binding on the Owner and the City, and is enforceable by any current or future owner of any portion of the Property. 14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. Except as provided in Section 15,this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements between said parties.This Agreement shall not be amended unless executed in writing by both parties. Executed as of the day and year first above written to be effective on the effective date of annexation of the Property. Owner-lnitlated Annexalion Service Agreement 4 of 10 CITY OF FORT WORTH TTP PARTNER IP,OWNER Dania gurghdaf� n ' By: DanaBar6hdor((Dec1,102113:52CSn By: Name: Name: Kevin oun Title: Assistant City Manager Title: Aifrove4s to Form and Legality: Name: Senior Assistant City Attorney �;A Attest: g $� a.•°o o=d A d�v0 ° d ° o.Ac d °°°00000000°° 'd City Secretary Approvals: M&C. 23-0909. Ordinance No, 26596-11-2023 D.sew CAwvbeU 0.Stuart CAmpbell(oec 10,2023 0:26 CST) Contract Compliance Manager Owner-Initiated Annexation Service Agreement 5 of 10 State of Texas § County of Tarrant § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 15th day of December 2024 by Dana Burghdoff ,Assistant City Manager of the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation,on behalf of said corporation, By: aao 14 8>,uue2 Notary Public, State of Texas BROOKEBONNELL Notary Public *®• STATE OF TEXAS Notary I.D.134009525 M Comm.Ex .Oct.11,2026 State of TUM § County of UAYYM - § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of Vt V 201 by Kevin Young,on behalf of TTP Partnership. By: — „"Y'�°� LLUVIA S. DIAZ Notary Public,State of Texas Notary ID 13438s87-7 Notary Public, State of ��X�S ,��Y '! My Commission Exp.05.25-2027 After Recording Return to: City Secretary City of Fort Worth 200 Texas Street Fort Worth,Texas 76102 Owner-Initiated Annexation Service Agreement 6 of 10 EXHIBIT A SEC27ON 3 EL'Tr0 AMsIK PION r08 :i.t.i NnN 4JMa C/8'lO' N89'SJr 68�6' mw.kt>nTtni, 1t�uulwu>,rot II/% !0l.64 Ito moono/ i. 6�•ONmwu,; F Nn N0• dT�10°�'11G0 ' .. o1n1 1 n n c. N88'0870'b' DIM ETJ `t'' ZONE PR ZONED: ZONE R2 N �nl�xww IU56o'oauN:vfWxi o '.j. rMflu):N`N1. fil•1.G O1S1CifV� Oi11#10 U AMC J,' rya.' •;,[ o 1- Nea 40'48 6 lD03 04' N8a'l668 6 1220.68' r-nvr fJ 0 f', snuam "�m° e1tWm r� ET7 m.•wn,i�m. 6y YAA�311' NJ D/JM!N:1 or..n. SCN001,5LANU vo s 6 T ZONE E COO Al o S000,yucl N0 13 Nlo?722.1Y 89o.18, SECJ'YOlij•9�� h� LuuoLautmxl.,rr.nwal SECTION$i SW270iV 22 lutllol+llaiaw+rtakd �:� � Hio,�y p6 6 mlwenslarA,cr 1V ZONE 8 ETJ TTP PARTNERSHIP c�4rMtlt{J9v INST. NO, D216210857 Iuam nLlu laa, wt wo oawnuo Or�1Gt =I.LIGO(I hilt O.P•R•T•C•T• • Oi1L1A010{kt�,i kr wulnsx oJara. SOU 58'4U E ZONE C 6a1.9U' 10�ueN //.u'woT»rauf PATC? f GA 1xt,N VAln,l Nt01aIH", / O nTCi LALL QOaITi`NO Sao 1ROa l)• 618.68, i N8aQ4W'W 428128' . •..,�;r' ,rt ,yt•yy S8U76'Ol"N ,P212,d2' URyEY (uaLILN1Lwn +mx ?•u�4Yjya w��Via: oauusa Y✓ 1 wiiaoaNr'i w AAJ``O. 4cTLi. 10G1 ED 00 R�� 00- O)ATet. AB' ZONE A-5 AN fOkpuTAL4Ml h1IxW W1pLID nN Pn O)OIUNN OIIAOVn14R.N0 tL A1N 1nM MTi1N UJ/ttl Or nTCT !t t .t GRAPHIC SCALE 500' 0 250, 500' IIIINWINARY•THIS POCOMENISlIkI.NOI`BE ° lurch-Soo feet kFCURUEU FOR ANY ANNEXATION EXHIBIT PURPOSE AND&fAII NOT 'v RE USED OR VIEWED OR g kn n'D UK)N AS A rINAE 134.12 ACRES/5,842,385 SQUARE FEE' C SURVEY DOCUMENT. 19101 FORRIISTHILLEVERMAN ROAD TRACP21 URBANlh OUTTHSSHELBYCOUHTY SCHOOL LANDSURVEY z AUSfMGT K IM STRUCTURE ° nM,akbvtaK,�/w.atw.n« CITY Q t Biyno.WeilrrlLtR�Hrll,.t.-�,n`y..SVltegoy,D+II Texai!¢}>• ult.dr....U—,k.$918 �V R71t,TARRANTCQUNTY,xB%f!S �'� '_+"0m VJ"^' 1—.1flIr l 11 N4I1 otI Owner-initiated Annexation Service Agreemcnl 7 of IO i 1 Exhibit A Coittinued ANNEXATION SURVEY FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION 134.12 Acres or 5,842,385 Square Feet Recorded In Instrument Number D216210857,O.P.R.T.C.T. Out of Block 21,Shelby County School Land Survey,Abstract No,1375 Tarrant County,Texas BEING a 134.12 acres or 6,842,386 squares feet tract of land situated in Section 21 of the Shelby County School Land Survey,Abstract Number 1375,TorrantCounty,Texas;sold tract being a portion of that certain tract of land described in Warranty Deed to TTP Partnership recorded in Instrument Number D216210857, Official Public Records,Tarrant County,Texas(O,P.R.T.C,T.);said tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING(P.O,B.)at a 6/8-inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped*JACOBS"found for the northeast corner of said TTP Partnership tract,same also being the northwest comer of that certain tract of land described In Special Warranty Dead to CVN Partnership recorded In instrument Number D218077650,O.P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE South 00 degrees 31 minutes 19 seconds East,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and the west line of said CVN Partnership Traci,a distance of 1,139.32 feet to the north corner of that certain tract of land described In General Warranty Deed to J.D.Smith Living Trust,recorded in Instrument Number D209027629,O.P.R.T.C.T„said comer being the same north corner of a Save And Except tract of said CVN Partnership tract,as recorded In Volume 13372,Page 2,O.P.R.T.C.T.; i THENCE South 00 degrees 36 minutes 48 seconds East, departing the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said CVN tract,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said J.D. Smith tract,a distance of 591.30 feet to a southerly north corner of said J.D.Smith tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 32 minutes 09 seconds East, departing the common line of said TTP E Partnership tract and sad J.D,Smith tract,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and aforesaid CVN Partnership tract, a distance of 518.68 feet to the southeast corner of said TTP Partnership tract,some being the southwest comer of said CVN Partnership tract,some also being in the north line of that certain tract of land described In Warranty Deed to Everman ISD,recorded in instrument Number D206322983,O.P.R.T.C.T.;from which a 1-Inch Iron rod found for witness bears North 89 degrees 25 minutes 01 seconds East,a distance of 88.00 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 26 minutes 01 seconds West,departing the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said CVN Partnership tract,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Everman ISD Tract, passing at a distance of 1850.7e feet, the northwest corner of said Everman ISD tract,same being the northeast corner of that certain tract of land described in General Warranty Deed to Isidro Salazar, recorded in Instrument Number D218263506, O.P,R.T.C.T., continuing in all a distance of 2,212.42 feet to a 1/2-Inch iron rod found; THENCE North 89 degrees 34 minutes 11 seconds West, continuing with the said line of TTP Partnership Tract,a total distance of 428.28 feet to a 60D Nail found for the southwest comer of said TTP Partnership Tract and aforesaid Section 21; THENCE North 00 degrees 29 minutes 16 seconds West,along the ostensible centerline of South Race Street,a distance of 2,260.12 feet to the northwest corner of said TTP Partnership tract; r URBAN STRUCTURE Page 1 of 3 WaInu lHd lLamSuIW M:ISURVEYIPROJF.CTS12021121630-FORESTHILLSDEVELOPMENT- 8 DoS EVER MANIACADIMAP•CIIECKi21638,ANNEXATION_SURVEY•FIELD NOTE-DESCRIPTION UJI<a5,Tcxai/St Jl DKDOcX Print Date'AuOast 17,2022 Owner-fnitiuted Annexation Service Agreement 8 of l0 Exhibit A Continued ANNEXATION SURVEY FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION 134.12 Acres or 5,842,385 Square Feet Recorded in Instrument Number D216210867,O.P.R.T.C.T. Out of Block 21,Shelby County School Land Survey,Abstract No.1375 Tarrant County,Texas THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes 43 seconds East,departing sold Race Street,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and that certain tract of land described in Special Warranty Deed to Everman ISD, recorded In Instrument Number D207238624,O,P,R.T.C.T., passing at a distance of 983.90 feet,the southeast comer of said Evermen ISO tract,same being a southwesterly comer of that certain tract of land described In Special Warranty Deed to Housing Authority of City of Fort Worth, recorded in Instrument Number D219121945 O.P.R.T.O.T.;continuing In all a distance of 1003.04 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found with orange plastic cap stamped*COOMBS*; THENCE North 89 degrees 45 minutes 50 seconds East,continuing with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Housing Authority tract;passing at a distance of 377.63 feet,the southeast comer of said Housing Authority tract,some being a southwesterly corner of that certain tract of land as described In General Warranty Deed to Crimson Ridge Land Partners LLC,recorded In Instrument Number D214109111,O.P.R.T.C.T.;continuing in all a distance of 1228.68 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found for an ell comer of said Crimson Ridge tract; THENCE with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and sold Crimson Ridge Tract, the following bearings and distances: South 10 degrees 10 minutes 04 seconds East,a distance of 905.71 feet to a 1/2-Inch Iron rod found; North 79 degrees 53 minutes 05 seconds East,a distance of 110.36 feet to a 1/2-inch Iron rod found; North 10 degrees 17 minutes 12 seconds West,a distance of 890A6 feet,to a 5/8-Inch Iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "JACOBS" found for the common corner of said TTP Partnership tract,said Crimson Ridge tract,and that certain tract of land described in Special Warranty Deed to Orchard Village LTD recorded In instrument Number D219065386, O.P.R,T.C.T.; THENCE North 89 degrees 25 minutes 58 seconds East, departing the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Crimson Ridge tract,with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and sold Orchard Village Tract,a distance of 101.64 feet to a 1-inch iron rod found; URBAN STRUCTURE Page 2of3 s nWalnN Hill Su1e M:I8URVEYIPROJEOT8%2021121638-FOREST HILLS DEVELOPMENT u 8a5 EVERMAWrAp1MAP•CHECI<121e38•ANNEXATION_SURVEY-FIELO_NOTE_DE8CRIPTION- Uolku lcxus Y523i OK.DOCX Print Date:AuOuet 17,2022 Owner-Initiated Annexation Service Agreement 9 of 10 Exhibit A Continued ANNEXATION SURVEY FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION 134.12 Acres or 5,842,385 Square Feat Recorded In Instrument Number D216210857,O.P.R.T.C.T. Out of Block 21,Shelby County School Land Survey,Abstract No,1376 Tarrant County,Texas THENCE North 89 degrees 08 minutes 46 seconds East,continuing with the common line of said TTP Partnership tract and said Orchard Village Tract, a distance of 195.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 134.12 acres or 8,842,385 square feet of land more or less. The Basis of Bearing Is the Texas Coordinate System of 1963,North Central Zone(4202),NAD83(2011), This document was prepared under 22 Texas Administrative Code§138,96,does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey,and Is not to be used to convey orestablish Interests In real property except those rights and Interests Implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which It was prepared, This metes and bounds description is accompanied by an exhibit of even date. PRELIMINARY This document shall not be recorded for any purpose and shall not be used or viewed or relied upon as a final survey document. Dustin C,Kaiser Date Registered Professional Land Surveyor No.6918 Urban Structure+Survey,PLLC TBPELS Firm No,10194610 URBAN Page 3 of 5T R U C T U R E M:ISURVEYIPROJECTS12021121e38-FOREST HILLS DEVELOPMENT- BvoWalnutHOl Lane,Sultego5 EVERMAMACADIMAP-CHECKL21630.ANNEXATION..SURVEY-FIELD_NOTE_DESC�KDOCX DaII Toxas75�3� Pont Date:Auvq%17,2022 IO of 10 Owner-Initieted Annoxelion Service Agreement City of Fort Worth,Texas Mayor and Council Communication DATE: 10/31/23 M&C FILE NUMBER: M&C 23-0909 LOG NAME: 06AX-22-008 THE PHOENIX--OWNER INITITATED SUBJECT (CD 8)Conduct Public Hearing,Authorize Execution of Municipal Services Agreement and Consider Adopting Ordinance for the Proposed Owner-Initiated Annexation of Approximately 134.12 Acres of Land in Tarrant County,Known as The Phoenix,Located Along the Eastern Edge of Race Street,North of McPherson Road and South Oak Grove Shelby Road, in the Far South Planning Sector,AX-22-008(Continued from a Previous Meeting) (PUBLIC HEARING-a.Report of City Staff:Stuart Campbell;b.Public Comment;c.Council Action:Close Public Hearing and Act on M&C) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Conduct public hearing for the proposed owner-initiated annexation of approximately 134.12 acres of land in Tarrant County,known as The Phoenix,located along the eastern edge of Race Street,north of McPherson Road and south of Oak Grove Shelby Road,as shown on Exhibit A; 2. Authorize execution of municipal services agreement between the City and property owner,Kevin Vuong;and 3. Adopt ordinance annexing AX-22-008 for full purposes. DISCUSSION: On August 1,2022,representatives for the property owner Kevin Vuong,submitted a request for full-purpose annexation of the property shown on Exhibit A into the City of Fort Worth.The subject property is located entirely in that portion of the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction which is In Tarrant County.The site Is located along the eastern edge of Race Street,north of McPherson Road and south of Oak Grove Shelby Road.The owner- initiated annexation,which is approximately 134.12 acres,is consistent with the urban development annexation criteria as established by the City's Annexation Policy.The subject area Is currently agricultural land and the property owner's proposal of residential and commercial type development is mostly consistent with the future land use map of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan. On July 12,2023,the related zoning case(ZC-23-066)was heard by the Zoning Commission,and the commission voted unanimously in favor to recommend approval of the requested zoning to City Council.The requested zoning is"A-5"One-Family,"CR"Low Density and"F"General Commercial. Upon annexation,the development will be added to the Transportation Impact Fee Service Area Z and will be subject to the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. The development will receive transportation Impact fee credit for the dedication and construction of Oak Grove Shelby Road as it is listed as a roadway on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan and the dedication and construction is adding necessary regional mobility for the City. The collection rate for the service area will be dependent upon the date of the final plat recordation. Subchapter C-3 of Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Govemment Code(LGC)provides for the process of annexation of an area upon a request of an owner of land.Section 43.0672 of the LGC requires a municipality that elects to annex an area upon the request of an owner first negotiate and enter into a written agreement with the owners of land in the area for the provision of municipal services. The agreement must include: 1. A list of each service the municipality will provide on the effective date of the annexation;and 2. A schedule that includes the period within which the municipality will provide each service that is not provided on the effective date of the annexation. The municipal services agreement includes these provisions In accordance with state law. Emergency services will be provided through the City of Fort Worth,The City's Fire Department will provide emergency and fire protection services comparable with the provision of services available in other parts of the municipality with topography,land use and population density similar to be the level of service contemplated or projected in the area.Emergency medical services will be provided by City's Fire Department and MedStar or other entity engaged by the City.The City's Police Department will provide protection and law enforcement services. The proposed uses were considered while assessing the financial impact to the General Fund.A ten-year fiscal impact analysis was prepared by the Fort Worth Lab with the assistance of other City Departments. Due to the ability of the area to meet the City's criteria for full-purpose annexation as stated in Appendix F:Annexation Policy&Program of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan,staff recommends approval of the requested owner-initiated annexation,AX-22-008. The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed annexation.The public hearing Is an opportunity for persons Interested in the annexation to be heard.Once the City Council has conducted the required public hearing,Council may close the hearing and vote on annexing AX- 22-008 for full purposes. If annexed,this property will become part of COUNCIL DISTRICT 8. FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Director of Finance certifies that based upon approval of the above recommendations and adoption of the attached ordinance,the annexation will have a long-term positive Impact to the General Fund. Submitted for City Manager's Office bk Dana Burghdoff 8018 Originating Business Unit Head: D.J.Harrell 8032 Additional Information Contact: Expedited Annexation The Phoenix Exhibit Addition of approximately 134.12 Acres to become part of Council District 8 ...... ...................... c :e I :a I :I: 1 :R Trii t'r .� i :�1 I 287 -- 1: :m•. i.i �:: J L. ------------ ... � III FIRMED AWL!LIO SCA ET 1 L� O Ve \ w Hp O / \ m� Z J � J ------.. O J - ...i•:iii;iiiiiiiii;, _ AKO OVESHE BYii:i......:::::..... . ........................... REDPINE HARV STER IAGARA WO DWINDSIm co 1 i— ALPIN f S B z -AR CLA i O w � I i it iCHIVALRY r� y � j .J f Lu I 4 1 LIJ \ 0 L 6�00 to t '. w LL v2 Z WLLLLICP NPZ��N Z ECANTR y�, cP j O GREED APP, E Q i 1 �� 2� I • I FORT WORTH.. 0 300 600 1,200 Feet _ I I I i Fort Worth Planning&Development Department 3/22/2023 DESIGNATION 1:12,000 Full Purpose Adjacent Cities COPYRIGHT 2023 CITY OF FORT WORTH UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION IS A VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAWS. THIS DATA IS TO BE USED FOR A GRAPHICAL Limited Purpose -Annexation Area REPRESENTATION ONLY.THE ACCURACY IS NOT TO BE TAKEN/USED AS DATA PRODUCED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES OR BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL Extraterritorial Jurisdiction LAND SURVEYOR. THE CITY OF FORT WORTH ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF SAID DATA. November 9, 2023 Owner-Initiated Annexation Request Case # AX-22-008 The Phoenix Approximately 134.12 Acres Staff Report on Fiscal Sustainability Impact Prepared for City Council by The FWLab A FM WY 5heUJ3V Hoe VIZ.- -WIN Z4 F-L AX-22-008 The Phoenix 0 Miles 0.25 0m5 1 City Limit , The Phoenix F7_1 P,annedService Area TABLE OF CONTENTS Existingconditions ..........................................................................................................................3 Comprehensive Plan Consistency....................................................................................................4 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues .................................................................... 5 Water............................................................................................................................................5 Transportation and Public Works - Stormwater ..........................................................................6 Roadsand Streets.........................................................................................................................7 PoliceDepartment........................................................................................................................9 FireDepartment.........................................................................................................................10 Emergency Medical Services.....................................................................................................12 Public Safety Radio Communications .......................................................................................13 Code Compliance—Code Enforcement...................................................................................14 Code Compliance—Animal Control (ACC)............................................................................15 Code Compliance—Solid Waste Services...............................................................................16 Code Compliance—Environmental Quality ......................17 EPark and Recreation...................................................................................................................18 I Library........................................................................................................................................19 Development Services—Gas Wells.........................................................................................20 Summary and Overall Recommendation ......................................................................................21 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Approximately 134.12 acres of land located at the Description southeast corner of the intersection of Race Street and Oak Grove Shelby(MTP).Property is located in Tarrant County and is approximately 2 miles to the east of I-35 W. Request type Annexation—Full Purpose. Council District 8 The 2023 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation is Single-Family Residential; Infrastructure; and Vacant,Undeveloped,Agricultural on vacant flood lain property. Floodplain Portion of property. Existing Land Use Vacant. Included in Planned Service Area Yes—Everman/SE Area. Enclave No. Planning Sector Far South. ROW No. Concept Plan No. Preliminary Plat No. Final Plat No. Independent School District Everman ISD. 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY The adopted 2023 Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed annexation area as Single-Family Residential; Vacant,Undeveloped,Agricultural(within floodplain); and Infrastructure on the City's Future Land Use Map. The annexation application,land plan, and associated preliminary plat for the property propose Single-Family Residential (90.5 acres,A-5 zoning);Low Density Residential (4.6 acres, CR zoning);Neighborhood Commercial (10.2 acres, F zoning); and Vacant, Undeveloped,Agricultural within the floodplain(approximately 25 acres). The proposed uses within the annexation area are currently inconsistent with the adopted Future Land Use Map. While the annexation proposal retains the single-family residential and vacant,undeveloped, agricultural (within floodplain)land use types identified in the Comprehensive Plan,the proposal seeks a modest increase in the intensity of these planned uses within the area. Given the developing Single- Family Residential neighborhoods to the south and west, and developed school to the north-west,the proposed land uses and designations are compatible with the surrounding uses,both existing and currently planned. Staff recommends amending the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan to designate the property Single-Family Residential and Low Density Residential where the corresponding residential development is proposed;Neighborhood Commercial; and Vacant, Undeveloped,Agricultural where floodplain is present. The Future Land Use Maps below show the currently adopted designations for the area, as well as staffs proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map to bring the map into alignment with the proposed land uses. The proposed Future Land Use Map amendments change the Single-Family designation to Low Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial, with the boundaries between the two designations adjusted based on the proposed preliminary plat. In addition,the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments adds the applicable Future Land Use designation for Vacant,Undeveloped,Agricultural(within floodplain) where shown on the applicant's submitted preliminary plat. 4 i Adopted Future Land Use: Single Family Residential Vacant,Undeveloped,Agricultural(floodplain) Infrastructure Subject Property ii �yS --..0.111 lull f rTI Mr*TI�4 n 1 9 r . � E, vo iris uIR 4-1 :J.J 1 1 I r"y"` •`icy rld r�TTTff1T z W �' JI Proposed Future Land Use: Single-Family Residential ■ Low Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial Vacant`,_Undeveloped,Agricultural(floodplain) Subject Property 'I W) U i? fi]J1W I-iT Pj 17 t(tG,•. � F 1. lITT iIM4EJ1 iTl ..u.111"L"i4-�I i— ;la '�T T, J 5 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues —Water Reviewer(s): Wade Goodman FYI Comments:Development has active water and sewer study submittals. Sewer infrastructure is already sized and in place.Any alignment changes proposed by the developer will be at their costs. Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 li 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations - - - -Capital $2,000,000 - - - - Personnel - - - - - Maintenance - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: Estimated Water Department cost participation expenditure to extend and oversize to 16-inch water line in Race Street(from Serene Creek Dr to Mc Pherson Rd). Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars, 1 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years T 40 Years Revenue 1 $2,238,459 $4,586,498 $7,054,311 $9,648,008 1 21,415,067 Departmental Review Comments—Revenues: Assumes 1%rate increase starting in 2025. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.): Planned development is adjacent to planned regional water transmission main.Water Department cost participation to extend offsite and oversize water line infrastructure will increase water capacity as well as redundancy to the region. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? Not provided. 3.Department Recommendation: Recommend annexation. 6 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues —Transportation and Public Works - Stormwater Reviewer(s): Cannon Henry, Stephen Edwini-Bonsu Review Comments: • According to the engineer's study,the development will not create any adverse impacts with the increase in flow. • According to the engineer's study, it will take ten 8' x 7' box culverts under Race Street to contain the flow at an estimated cost of$80,000 per box. • The City will look into City participation for the design and installation of the box culverts. Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(assuming 3% annual inflation) Infrastructure Operation& 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Maintenance 90 Inlets, 14,650 Linear Feet of storm drain $16,295.50 $18,421.00 $20,546.50 $22,672.00 $29,732.98 pipe Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: Stormwater has projected an increase in maintenance costs from the best information currently available.Future expenses are highly dependent on the actual development of the area as permitted by the City's Development Services Department.Based on conceptual layout plan,there will be an increase in the number of storm drain infrastructure assets generated from the proposed residential development. Estimated Cumulative 'evenues(2023 li 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years T 20 Years 40 Years Revenue $373,940.57 $747,881.15 $1,121,821.72 1 $1,495,762.30 $2,991,524.60 Departmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not provided. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?Annexation will increase future maintenance costs for storm drain infrastructure assets associated with this development.A majority of the proposed annexation area is currently vacant.The new development will be required to comply with the City's drainage standards. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Following development,this individual annexation is not expected to significantly impact KPIs for the estimated increase in storm drain assets. The cumulative impacts of all annexations on maintenance-related KPIs may be more significant. Stormwater management does not anticipate a need for stormwater capital improvements in this annexation area for the foreseeable future.Therefore,no impact to our capital delivery key performance indicators is expected at this time. Recommendation: Stormwater recommends annexation since the revenue is expected to be higher than the anticipated combined capital expenses and maintenance expenses,assuming that the new development will be built per the City's and FEMA's drainage regulations. 7 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues —Roads and Streets Reviewer(s): Armond Bryant,Transportation Development Review Review Comments: The development will require significant transportation system upgrades to account for the increased traffic along Risinger Road and Race Street.The developer has agreed to partner with the City to provide their share of improvements to serve their development,with the understanding that the city would participate as well. In order for this site to have access Race Street has to be raised to mitigate the overtopping of the road g pp g however,the developer has agreed to design and install box culverts of sufficient size to mitigate the overtopping situation(including permits to FEMA).The remainder of the improvements to Race Street including raising up the remainder,paving,storm drains,curb and gutter and lighting will be the responsibility of the City.The Transportation and Public Works department provided the initial cost estimate of$10,000,000 to bring Race Street to city standards.Race street is not on the Master Thoroughfare Plan(MTP)or the Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)and therefore not eligible for impact fee funds. Additionally,the developer has agreed to provide two lanes of Risinger Road along the frontage and four lanes of Serene Creek/Wichita within the plat boundary to provide the second point of access to the subdivision. The city will be responsible,at some point,for completing the MTP cross section and connecting Risinger Road to Rendon Road at an estimated cost of$6,243,000 (per impact fee study TIP Sheet#Z-2). Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 li 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Capital TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Personnel TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Maintenance TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: Will be determined when the City of Fort Worth decides to move forward with constructing the road projects needed. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Departmental Review Comments—Revenues: Will be determined when the City of Fort Worth decides to.move forward with constructing the road projects needed. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.): Risinger road is planned to connect to I-35,but until it does the traffic will take Race Street North to Everman Parkway. The connection is outside of their plat boundary and not within their control. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Not Provided. 3.Department Recommendation: Support Annexation with understanding that Race Street improvements will require bond funding. 8 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues —Police Department Reviewer(s): Mirian Spencer FYI Comments: The Police Department has projected demand for service based on the best information currently available.Future expenses are highly dependent on the expected uses,density level,transportation infrastructure, and timing of development. Operational, Capital, and Personnel expenses are unknown at this time and are dependent on if a new patrol division,additional personnel(patrol officers,neighborhood police officers, communications staff, etc.) or a new facility is necessary. Once the property is fully developed,call load is estimated to be approximately 28 calls for the residential,5 calls for the multi-family, and 15 calls for the non-residential, a year. The average cost per call is $710 per officer. Based on an assumption that at least two officers will respond to the call,$1,420 per call is used to calculate the cost of service. The average annual cost of service for this development is estimated to be$39,760 for the single- family,$7,100 for the multifamily,and$21,300 for the non-residential.Estimated expenditures assume that there are 48 calls per year and two officers responding to each call. An inflation rate of 3% was used to calculate the expenditures. Expenditures are rounded to the nearest whole dollar. Estimated Expenditures of Service(2023 Dollars) Costs per call 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Single-Family $46,093 $53,434 $61,945 $71,811 $129,699 Multifamily $8,231 $9,542 $11,062 $12,823 $12,823 Non-Residential $24,693 $28,625 $33,185 $38,470 $69,481 Total $79,016 $91,601 $106,191 $123,105 $222,340 Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: Not provided. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue I - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not provided. 1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Additional calls for service will increase operational needs for the Police Department. As the land is developed, the Police Department will continue to evaluate call loads to determine whether anew patrol division,additional personnel(patrol officers,neighborhood police officers; communications staff, etc.), or a new facility is necessary. 2.How will this proposal affect your Ivey performance indicators?Once the property is fully developed, Priority 1, 2, and 3 response times could increase for South Division, Police Beat I17, Police Reporting Area F260 depending on the expected uses, density level, transportation infrastructure, and timing of development. 3.Department Recommendation: Support Annexation. 9 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Fire Department Fire Data Analysis: • Fire and EMS first responder services will be dispatched from existing Fire Station 28, located at 1300 Everman Pkwy, to the proposed annexation. Current Fire Department response time goal is to arrive on the scene of emergencies within five minutes from the time of dispatch at 75%of the time. Based on the existing fire stations located close to this proposed annexation area,the Fire Department will be able to meet this response time goal. • 2022 produced 291 incidents for the area within one half mile of the proposed annexation(not including the area of the proposed annexation itself). Based on a comparison of the area of the buffer to the area of the annexation,the estimated annual count of incidents in the annexation is 36. • The estimated cost of an additional incident is $968. Multiplied by 36 incidents, the total additional annual cost of responding to the annexation is estimated to be$34,848.However,once the area becomes more fully developed or if zoning for the area changes,this number will need to be adjusted. • Basic Life Support(BLS)emergency medical services by existing personnel and equipment of the Fort Worth Fire Department will be provided to the annexation area commencing on the effective date of the annexation.The Fort Worth Fire Department serves as the first responder on life threatening medical emergencies as a part of the MedStar system. All Fort Worth Fire Department personnel are certified as Emergency Medical Technician basic level or higher. All engines, trucks, and rescue units carry Automated External Defibrillators for use with victims who are in cardiac arrest. • Current Estimated Response Criteria to the Proposed Annexation Area: These estimated response times were calculated using GIS software; traffic congestion, road conditions, time of day, and weather conditions have not been factored in. FIRE STATION ESTIMATED RESPONSE TIME Fire Station 28 111 Due Company 4.8 minutes 1300 Everman Pkwy Fire Station 42 2nd Due Company 8.5 minutes 450 E Rendon Crowley Rd Fire Station 17 31 Due Company 10.9 minutes 5151 Hemphill St Fire Station 29 0'Due Company 13.0 minutes 6400 Westcreek Dr Fire Station 42 111 Aerial 8.5 minutes 450 E Rendon Crowley Rd 10 Fire Department Continued: Fire Platting: Road conditions and weather are not factored into the response times.The poor condition of South Race St.,in addition to the frequent over-topping between Oak Grove Shelby Road and Serene Creek Lane will add additional time to the estimated response times.Flooding along this road segment will result in the 2nd due unit becoming the 1st due as their response is from the south. At 8.5 minutes, this is well outside of the 5-minute goal for 1 st due.Additionally,the response goal for a full one-alarm response(includes all units listed in the chart)is under 8 minutes. Without consideration for flooding, traffic,or road conditions,this response time is estimated at 13 minutes.Additionally,South Race Street provides the sole access to Stallion Point Apartments 9053 South Race St. and Four Seasons at Clear P p ( ) Fork Apartments(1500 Four Seasons Lane)and traffic will pose additional delays.Everman High School is also located along South Race Street,adding to traffic concerns. Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations - - - - - Capital - - - - - Personnel - - - - - Maintenance - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures:Not Provided. E stiniated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue - - - -Departmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not Provided. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.): Not Provided. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Not Provided. 3.Department Recommendation: Fire Department will be able to meet this response time goal. 11 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Emergency Medical Services Reviewer(s): Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations $4,010 $8,421 $17,684 $37,136 $77,986 Capital Included in Included in Included in Included in Included in above. above. above. above. above. Personnel Included in Included in Included in Included in Included in above. above. above. above. above. Maintenance Included in Included in Included in Included in Included in above. above. above. above. above. Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures:Not provided. Estimated Cumulative Revenues (2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue $3,950 $8,295 $17,420 $36,581 $73,162 Departmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not provided. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.): MedStar dynamically deploys resources to geography based on a combination of temporal demands and geospatial needs. Vacant land generates few EMS responses,but as the area is developed,response volume will likely increase.Projections take this into account. Costs and revenue per response were used to make these determinations.Ambulance posting plans are routinely adjusted to provide effective services,this will be the case as the annexed area is developed. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Responses for this area will be included in our monthly published aggregate KPIs.Low response volumes initially will have little impact. Higher population/responses will likely result in an addition of resources,but also revenue,to help partially offset the costs for providing services. 3.Department Recommendation: Support Annexation. 12 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues —Public Safety Radio Communications Reviewer(s): Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 li 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations - - - -Capital - - - - - Personnel - - - - - Maintenance - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: Not provided. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 li 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue - - - -Departmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not provided. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.): The public safety radio system currently provides 100%coverage of the proposed location.This does align with the department's exiting plans and policies. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?The proposal will have no impact on the department's key performance indicators. 3.Department Recommendation:No action regarding public safety radio communication will be required to accommodate the proposed annexation. 13 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Code Compliance— Code Enforcement Reviewer(s): Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations - - - -Capital - - - - - Personnel - - - - - Maintenance - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures:Not provided. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 li 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years7 20 Years 40 Years Revenue I - - - I - I - Departmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not provided. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.):Not provided. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Not provided. 3.Department Recommendation:Not provided. 14 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Code Compliance —Animal Control (ACC) Reviewer(s): Chris McAllister Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations - - - - - Capital $70,000 $140,000 $210,000 $280,000 $560,000 Personnel $325,115 $704,230 $1,056,345 $1,408,460 $2,816,920 Maintenance $30,000 $60,000 $90,000 $120,000 $240,000 Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures:No individual operational costs factored in. Dollars)Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue - - I - I - I - Departmental Review Comments—Revenues: Field ACC—No Revenue. 1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Additional calls for service will increase with the addition of 448 homes and commercial development (apartments?). Animal Control will assess and adjust as call volume increases after development completion.Animal Control responds to calls based on a priority system,with the most urgent need being the highest priority. The specific priorities in this area will need to be evaluated and staff/resource requests adjusted with operational data.Animal Control projects an increase in service-based calls. Forecasted costs are based on housing stock age, housing density, and projected development timelines. Operational,Capital,and Personnel expenses are based on the number of additional staff needed to service this area and rounded to the nearest whole. Projections are based on one (1) additional animal control officer and all associated costs. Information provided are estimates. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? The proposed development size is not large enough to affect KPIs that measure volume,such as captures,but could affect response times to other calls. 3.Department Recommendation: Support Annexation. 15 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Code Compliance - Solid Waste Services Reviewer(s): Christian Harper Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations $423,987.20 $749,414.40 $1,124,121.60 $1,498,828.80 $2,997,657.60 Capital - - - - - Personnel - - - - - Maintenance - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: 448 total households(394 single family and 54 Townhouses)would be serviced under the existing residential collections contract with Waste Management.This covers Garbage,Recycling,Yard Waste,and Bulk Waste. The current collection expense per household per month is$13.94.This rate will increase per the annual contractual cost adjustment but the rates are determined by annual index change so the total rate changes are not available at this time. $13.94 monthly x 12= $167.28 annually per household. 448 x$167.28=$74,941.44 annually.The numbers above are straight line and do not include any cost increases.There will be cost increases of up to 5%each year of the contract that will affect the final numbers. Each household will have two carts,one garbage cart and one recycling cart.At an average cost of $55 per cart, it is$55x448x2 carts each house=$49,280 first year only. This community would be served by the Old Hemphill and Southeast Drop-Off Stations,approx. 5 miles to the North.No material incremental cost would incurred by the City to service this community. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 1 15 Years 1 20 Years 40 Years Revenue $493,785.60 $987,571.20 1 $1,481,356.80 1 $1,975,142.40 $3,950,284.80 Departmental Review Comments—Revenues: 448 single family households would be serviced under existing residential collections contract with Waste Management. The current average cart revenue per household per month is$18.37. This covers Garbage,Recycling,Yard Waste,and Bulk Waste. $18.37 x 12= $220.44 annually per household,total of 448 x$220.24=$98,757.12.The numbers above are straight line and do not include any cost increases.This revenue could increase if the City decided to raise residential rates. This community would be served by the Old Hemphill and Southeast Drop-Off Stations,approx. 5 miles to the North. The drop-off stations do not generate revenue from residents. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.): This is in-line with Solid Waste planning for the southern part of the City. Surrounding streets and neighborhoods are already serviced as part of existing Friday Solid Waste routes. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? This proposal will not affect SW KPIs,this is only 448 incremental households out of over 251,915 households. 3.Department Recommendation: Proceed as planned. 16 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Code Compliance - Environmental Quality Reviewer(s): Jefferson Prado(Environmental Planner),Zack Hutcheson(Sr.Management Analyst) Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations $724.22 $1,539.56 $ 2,536.64 $3,720.86 $ 11,138.13 Capital $51.73 $ 109.97 $ 181.19 $265.78 $795.58 Personnel $2,129.80 $3,488.33 $ 5,256.45 $7,356.43 $20,509.48 Maintenance $258.65 $549.84 $905.94 $ 1,328.88 $3,977.90 Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: Expenditures at the subject site are expected to be minimal due to the residential use of the land.This land use has a low service need as inspections are limited to the development period; after development,service needs are limited to ad-hoc complaint response and litter abatement.Expenditures may increase should the development plan be altered to include additional commercial, industrial,or undeveloped land use.In particular,industrial land uses require additional site inspections,and undeveloped land experiences a higher rate of illegal dumping. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 1 20 Years 40 Years Revenue $27,264.00 $78,834.00 1 $ 129,504.00 1 $ 180,624.00 1 $315,729.60 Departmental Review Comments — Revenues: Residential revenues are estimated based on the developer's proposed number of housing units. Commercial revenues are estimated by the average number of commercial accounts per acreage. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.): The proposed land use is expected to have a low service need from our division.The largest impact on the division will be during development. Grading and land disturbance will be subject to the grading permitting process and subsequent inspections. Current staffing is sufficient to complete these duties.Following development,proposed land use is expected to have minimal impact on operations of Environmental Quality Division.Due to the low expected service needs and increased revenue to the Environmental Protection Fund,this annexation is expected to benefit Environmental Quality Division's ability to fulfill the Environment Master Plan. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?During development,the subject area would increase number of routine investigations included in KPI CC.5.2.However,current staffing is sufficient to complete these during authorized timelines.Following development,the proposed annexation is expected to provide a minimal increase to the number of inspections included in two KPIs. 1.KPI CC.5.1 -To protect human health and safety by reducing exposures in the outdoor air we breathe. Programs monitor pollutant levels in the air and encourage air pollutant emissions control and compliance for a cleaner environment,sustained economic value and community aesthetics and 2. CC.5.2-To protect human health,safety and the environment by reducing pollution in our local lakes,streams and the Trinity River. Program monitors pollutants in local watersheds and encourages compliance to reduce contaminated stormwater runoff or illicit discharges for a cleaner environment,sustained economic value and improved community aesthetics. Current staffing is sufficient to complete these during authorized timelines, and therefore this impact is expected to be negligible.The undeveloped portion of the subject area may experience an elevated rate of illegal dumping in comparison to the developed portion of the 17 i i 1 i project,which may increase the number of litter abatement requests. However,due to recent staffing and contract increases,the litter abatement program's current capacity is expected to be sufficient to meet the established goals. 3.Department Recommendation: Recommend annexation. Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Park and Recreation Reviewer(s): Craig Fox,Lori Gordon,Michelle Villafranca Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(assuming 3.5% annual inflation) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations - - - -Capital - - - - - Personnel - - - - - Maintenance $3,325.52 $3,949.68 $4,690.98 $5,571.41 $11,085.93 Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures: PARD Forestry:No expenditures anticipated for Forestry.Both sides of Race St are already within CFW limits and no other ROW currently exists.An extension of Oak Grove helby(proposed McPherson)would be developed before dedication to city. PARD ROW: Current conditions would result in an annual maintenance cost of$2,800.00 annually. *Maintenance row PARD PRM Parks: The development will be subject to Neighborhood and Community Park dedication fees and or land. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue - - - - - De artmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not Provided. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.):Not Provided. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Not Provided. 3.Department Recommendation: Not Provided. 18 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues —Library Reviewer(s): Marilyn Marvin There is no fiscal impact for the Library with this annexation. Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 1 20 Years 40 Yews Operations - - - -Capital - - - - - Personnel Maintenance - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures:Not Provided. Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 10 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue I - I - - - I - Departmental Review Comments—Revenues:Not Provided. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.):Not Provided. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Not Provided. 3.Department Recommendation:Not Provided. I 19 Estimated Expenditures and Revenues — Development Services — Gas Wells Review Comments: • The City has no funding for participating in moving the gas line. • Paving over franchise utilities requires a written agreement. • City is reviewing the Orchard Village to determine how the gas lines were paved over. Estimated Cumulative Expenditures(2023 li 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Operations - - - -Capital - - - - - Personnel - - - - - Maintenance - - - - - Departmental Review Comments—Expenditures:Not Provided. FOR AREAS WITH GAS WELLS: Estimated Cumulative Revenues(2023 Dollars) 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years Revenue $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $9,000.00 $12,000.00 1 $24,000.00 Departmental Review Comments—Revenues: If a gas well pad site is annexed into the City,the operator of the site has 45 days from the date of annexation to apply for a Multiple Gas Well Pad Site Permit. Per the Texas Railroad Commission website, there is one gas well pad site with one active well within the proposed annexation belonging to BKV. The annexation of the gas well pad site will generate a$600 per well annual fee. 1.How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?List policies from department's plan that this annexation proposal supports(Strategic Plan,Master Plan, Neighborhood Plan,etc.):Not Provided. 2.How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?Not Provided. 3. Department Recommendation:Not Provided. 20 SUMMARY AND OVERALL RECOMMENDATION (COMPLETED BY THE FWLAB) Expenditures,Revenues,and Cumulative Total Summary Significant future City expenditures and revenues are not included in the below calculations, such as sheet maintenance and future reconstruction costs. The FW Lab is working with other departments to improve estimates of future costs and phasing schedules, which is expected to provide additional clarity in the Balance and Cumulative Total figures in future project analyses. Expenditures • The development will require significant transportation system upgrades to account for the increased traffic along Risinger Road and Race Street. The developer has agreed to design and install necessary box culverts at developer's cost to prevent stormwater overtopping of Race Street, as well as to partner with the City to provide their share of improvements to serve their development,with the understanding that the city would participate as well. o Transportation—Roads & Streets ■ Initial cost estimate to bring Race Street up to City standards is$10,000,000. These Race Street improvements are not funded or scheduled. Timing of Race Street improvements to be determined by City based on need and funding availability. ■ Race Street is not on the MTP or TIP and there for not eligible for impact fee funds. ■ It is anticipated that improving Race Street to City standards will require an additional funding source, such as fixture bond funding,when the improvements become necessary. ■ Developer has agreed to provide two lanes of Risinger Road along the property frontage and four lanes of Serene Creek/Wichita within the plat boundary. City will be responsible for completing the MTP cross section and connecting Risinger Road to Rendon Road at an estimated cost of$6,243,000,per impact fee study(TIP Sheet #Z-2). Timing of the City portion of Risinger Road improvements to be determined by City based on need and funding availability. o Additional expenditures include: ■ Stormwater operation and maintenance ■ Police, Fire, EMS services ■ Environmental quality operational costs and code compliance operations • Service and infrastructure costs will increase over time as additional development occurs and as infrastructure ages and needs maintenance and eventual replacement. Depending on the development's tax generation over time,the annual revenue needed to maintain infrastructure and services to the development may be strained to cover costs associated with the development. Revenues • Following completion of the proposed development project,total City property tax revenue is estimated to be$996,317 per year with a cumulative total of$8,966,849 by FY 2033/2034 (assuming no change in value or tax rate). • Additional revenues to the City will include retail service fees for water/waste water, stormwater fees, environmental impact fees, and fees from solid waste services. 21 Applicable Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies The following Comprehensive Plan policies are relevant to the proposed annexation: 1. Promote fiscally sustainable growth on the periphery of the city by encouraging development adjacent to existing adequate infrastructure and discouraging leapfrog development. 2. Promote street system patterns that provide greater connectivity between streets and between developments to reduce traffic demands on arterial streets, improve emergency access, and make bicycling and walking more attractive transportation options. 3. Evaluate development proposals and transportation investments based on the impacts of land use and platting decisions on the overall transportation system,and the impacts of transportation decisions on land use. 4. Support diverse housing options, including duplexes, fourplexes,townhomes, and small courtyard apartments to promote walkable communities, access to neighborhood services, and multimodal transportation options,while ensuring compatibility with the form, sale, and design of existing neighborhoods. 5. Encourage clustering of development sites within new subdivisions to avoid steep slopes(greater than 15%)and to conserve 100-year floodplains, existing tree cover,wildlife habitat,storm water detention areas,riparian buffers along natural waterways, and archeologically significant sites. 6. Protect land needed for Green Infrastructure projects such as natural stormwater conveyance and detention,riparian buffer protection, and linear greenways with hike&bike trail alignments. 7. Encourage the provision of open space within new developments,with the goal of linking open spaces within adjoining subdivisions. 8. Encourage the preservation and enhancement of the natural landscape by retaining trees, natural drainage ways, and unique vistas. Land Use Recommendation The proposed residential and commercial land uses are somewhat inconsistent with the adopted Single- Family Residential; Vacant, Undeveloped,Agricultural (within floodplain); and Infrastructure Future Land Use designations. If the City Council approves this proposed annexation,FWLab staff recommends amending the Future Land Use Map to designate the property Single-Family Residential and Low Density Residential where the corresponding residential development is proposed;Neighborhood Commercial where commercial uses are proposed; and Vacant, Undeveloped, Agricultural where floodplain is present. If the property is annexed,FWLab will propose these map amendments during the next Comprehensive Plan update. Overall Recommendation The impacts on the General Fund brought about, in part, by approval of the proposed annexation are expected to be significant, as the City will likely be responsible for future improvements to Race Street 22 and Risinger Road adjacent to the proposed development. The City's portion of necessary Risinger Road improvements is estimated at$6,243,000. The City's portion of necessary Race Street improvements is estimated at$10,000,000. The estimated cumulative tax revenue generated by the proposed development over the next ten years will not cover the initial cost estimates of the likely City portions of these street improvements. Staff anticipates that additional funding sources, such as bond funding, will be required to complete at least the Race Street improvements. The Traffic Impact Analysis provided by the developer indicates that traffic generation from The Phoenix development will not cause Race Street to fail, which would indicate that Race Street improvements to City standards will not be required based solely on the proposed development's impact. Further,timing of the City's portion of Race Street improvements will be determined by the City as dictated by need and future funding availability. The developer has agreed to provide two lanes of Risinger Road along the property frontage and four lanes of Serene Creek/Wichita within the plat boundary. The City will likely be responsible for completing the MTP cross section and connecting Risinger Road to Rendon Road. Timing of the City portion of Risinger Road improvements will be determined by City based on need and future funding availability. Due to the street improvements being provided by the developer to serve the proposed development, and the limited ability of the City to require more improvements from the developer based on the Traffic Impact Analysis, a case can be made to approve the proposed annexation. In addition,the inclusion of commercial and multifamily uses within the development,along with the development's protection of floodplain open space,will contribute to a desirable diversity of housing choices and new commercial tax base in the area. Staff therefore recommends that the Phoenix(AX-23-008)be considered for annexation approval. Further,staff recommends that the above Future Land Use amendments be adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. i 23 City of Fort Worth,Texas Mayor and Council Communication DATE: 10/31/23 M&C FILE NUMBER: M&C 23-0909 LOG NAME: 06AX-22-008 THE.PHOENIX—OWNER INITITATED SUBJECT (CD 8)Conduct Public Hearing,Authorize Execution of Municipal Services Agreement and Consider Adopting Ordinance for the Proposed Owner-initiated Annexation of Approximately 134.12 Acres of Land in Tarrant County,Known as The Phoenix,Located Along the Eastern Edge of Race Street, North of McPherson Road and South Oak Grove Shelby Road, in the Far South Planning Sector,AX-22-008 (Continued from a Previous Meeting) (PUBLIC HEARING-a.Report of City Staff:Stuart Campbell; b.Public Comment;c, Council Action:Close Public Hearing and Act on M&C) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Conduct public hearing for the proposed owner-initiated annexation of approximately 134,12 acres of land in Tarrant County,known as The Phoenix,located along the eastern edge of Race Street,north of McPherson Road and south of Oak Grove Shelby Road,as shown on Exhibit A; 2. Authorize execution of municipal services agreement between the City and property owner,Kevin Vuong;and 3. Adopt ordinance annexing AX-22-008 for full purposes. I DISCUSSION: On August 1,2022,representatives for the property owner Kevin Wong,submitted a request for full-purpose annexation of the property shown on Exhibit A into the City of Fort Worth.The subject property is located entirely in that portion of the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction which is in Tarrant County.The site is located along the eastern edge of Race Street,north of McPherson Road and south of Oak Grove Shelby Road.The owner- initiated annexation,which is approximately 134.12 acres,is consistent with the urban development annexation criteria as established by the City's Annexation Policy.The subject area is currently agricultural land and the property owner's proposal of residential and commercial type development is mostly consistent with the future land use map of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan, On July 12,2023,the related zoning case(ZC-23-066)was heard by the Zoning Commission,and the commission voted unanimously in favor to recommend approval of the requested zoning to City Council.The requested zoning is"A-5"One-Family,"CR"Low Density and"F"General Commercial. Upon annexation,the development will be added to the Transportation Impact Fee Service Area Z and will be subject to the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. The development will receive transportation impact fee credit for the dedication and construction of Oak Grove Shelby Road as it is listed as a roadway on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan and the dedication and construction is adding necessary regional mobility for the City. The collection rate for the service area will be dependent upon the date of the final plat recordation. Subchapter C-3 of Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code(LGC)provides for the process of annexation of an area upon a request of an owner of land.Section 43.0672 of the LGC requires a municipality that elects to annex an area upon the request of an owner first negotiate and enter into a written agreement with the owners of land in the area for the provision of municipal services. The agreement must include: 1. A list of each service the municipality will provide on the effective date of the annexation;and 2. A schedule that includes the period within which the municipality will provide each service that is not provided on the effective date of the annexation. The municipal services agreement includes these provisions in accordance with state law. Emergency services will be provided through the City of Fort Worth.The City's Fire Department will provide emergency and fire protection services comparable with the provision of services available in other parts of the municipality with topography,land use and population density similar to be the level of service contemplated or projected in the area.Emergency medical services will be provided by City's Fire Department and MedStar or other entity engaged by the City.The City's Police Department will provide protection and law enforcement services. The proposed uses were considered while assessing the financial impact to the General Fund.A ten-year fiscal impact analysis was prepared by the Fort Worth Lab with the assistance of other City Departments.Due to the ability of the area to meet the City's criteria for full-purpose annexation as stated in Appendix F:Annexation Policy&Program of the 2023 Comprehensive Plan,staff recommends approval of the requested owner-initiated annexation,AX-22-008. The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed annexation.The public hearing is an opportunity for persons interested in the i i annexation to be heard.Once the City Council has conducted the required public hearing,Council may close the hearing and vote on annexing AX- 22-008 for full purposes, If annexed,this property will become part of COUNCIL DISTRICT 8, FISCAL INFORMATION 1 CERTIFICATION: The Director of Finance certifies that based upon approval of the above recommendations and adoption of the attached ordinance,the annexation will have a long-term positive impact to the General Fund. Submitted for Citx Manager's Office by Dana Burghdoff 8018 Originating Business Unit Head: ❑A Harrell 8032 Additional Information Contact: Expedited I