Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Contract 61027-PM1
CSC No. 61027-PM1 2RTWORT PROJECT MANUAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF Westpoint Park IPRC Record No. IPRC22-0178 City Project No. 104378 FID No.30114-0200431-104378-EO7685 File No. W-2883 X File No. X-27529 Mattie Parker David Cooke Mayor City Manager Christopher P. Harder, P.E. Director, Water Department Lauren Prieur Director, Transportation and Public Works Department Prepared for The City of Fort Worth 2024 �--�:s OF r h SAMUEL P. KNIGHT ;.........,12SB45 ....,... . I �rV 2/15/2024 Pape -Dawson Engineers 201 Main St., STE 901 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Texas Board of Professional Engineers, Firm Registration #470 OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH, TX 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 1 of 8 SECTION 00 00 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Division 00 - General Conditions nn�3 inyiia4ion ! Bidders nn�3 Last Revised 03/20/2020 00 41 00 00 42 43 lastf, et rs t Bidders Bid Fefm Proposal Form Unit Price 03/20/2020 nn in s 05/22/2019 nn in 0043 13 0045 11 Bid Ben Bidders Prequalification's 4 04/02/2014 0045 12 Prequalification Statement 09/01/2015 00 45 26 Contractor Compliance with Workers' Compensation Law r, 04/02/2014 nQ i 0045 40 00 52 43 iner-ity Business E fAer- rise Goal Agreement a 06/16/2016 00 61 25 Certificate of Insurance 07/01/2011 00 62 13 Performance Bond 01/31/2012 00 62 14 Payment Bond 01/31/2012 00 62 19 00 7200 Maintenance Bond Genef.,i Conditions 01/31/2012 i ii ii T 00 73 00 0073 10 c,,,.,.io,,.,enta y r,,. difi np Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer n7inm�vzi 01/10/2013 Awarded Projects Division 01- General Requirements Last Revised 01 1100 Summary of Work 12/20/2012 01 25 00 Substitution Procedures 08/30/2013 01 31 19 nio Preconstruction Meeting D ;o 08/30/2013 n�in�n o 01 32 33 Meetings Preconstruction Video 08/30/2013 01 33 00 Submittals 08/30/2013 0' 3,5 L e.o i n, ;o et Preeedufes nQi �3 01 45 23 Testing and Inspection Services 03/20/2020 01 5000 Temporary Facilities and Controls 07/01/2011 01 5526 Street Use Permit and Modifications to Traffic Control 07/01/2011 01 57 13 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 07/01/2011 01 60 00 Product Requirements 03/20/2020 01 66 00 Product Storage and Handling Requirements 04/07/2014 01 70 00 Mobilization and Remobilization 04/07/2014 01 7123 Construction Staking 04/07/2014 01 74 23 Cleaning 04/07/2014 01 77 19 Closeout Requirements 04/07/2014 01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data 04/07/2014 01 7839 Project Record Documents 04/07/2014 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 2 of 8 Technical Specifications which have been modified by the Engineer specifically for this Project; hard copies are included in the Project's Contract Documents Date Division 02 - Existing Conditions Modified 0241 13 Seleetio U.'Si Dien lie 0 n14 r T444-y Rein ,ya4h >,a -ad ,,,,,. e lie Division 03 - Concrete 033000 Cust Z. PLava Genefete None 03 3-1 13 C f r-elloa Tow ct-efigti, T\ a4er-i l (rr SM4 N E) e T Division 26 - Electrical 2605 10 Demolition for- Qeetfieal Systems None 260543 T Tnder-gr-o ,..,1 Distets a -a Raee.: ays f ,. jtyaal Fjys4effts None Division 31- Earthwork 2'� Site r� Nene 3123 16 t.,mkaoc�rea E*ea-vati Nene 312323 Beffe Nene 3124 000 Em. i-adlme—Pts Nene 313600 Gabiens Nene 313700 Ripr-ap Nene Division 32 - Exterior Improvements N ' 32 0118 Tempefary AaOalt A-4-i r lie 320129 Genefete Pa-y ng n lie 3'� Liquid TreM l tail F,*eA1.h eF lie 32 114 16 Bfi-Ak TJ:xt - :gig Nene 32 5 rw-b Address Paip ing Nene 32 3113 Cinr. Forzias and Gateslie CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 3 of 8 Z7�9 Wood > enees and Gates Nefle 32 91 19 Topsoil n1""emc .t-_\nd PrnSojlkk� a Pafkways Nene 329i 13 Hydre N fidle> ing SmYmpr and Eadding Nene '27�3 T,-ees and Shf ubs Nefle Division 33 - Utilities 3301 30 Sewer- "..d Manhole Testing None 2'27Tv3 10 Closed r; .",,;t Television (GGTV) laspe"tieNone %,pam Ptxmli�ng-ef F r,d .jr4 E uweSystems Nefle ZZ�v 33 04 } Jcxnt Bmdifig a- d 1~'leet,.;e.,l is la4io a Nefle ref fesio rent..el Test Stations Nene 33 04 12 Z'2�o >\ ag esitff Anode r"tt,ed;" Pfete"tie.. Systeffl Nene Cle.,n;ng a d A eeepta- ee Testing of Water- Mains None 33 04 50 22� 32�'2 Cleaning of Sewef: Mains None 7 444-. Re..eb. L'*ea-,.,tior, rpnt-ed,,.,epA, "ad D.,,.1�F;11 Nerve �I a4e f 7; Lower -in e v None ZZ0z1-3✓ �1 n 33 05 1 � F-ame, Cover a d G.-"de Rings Cast1re;i None > r d r_.",le Rings r n- a�r�C—ewer "� � omr 0 cilo None Adjusting Valve 33 05 14 11 05- r6 None G%ade CC41C\�.�0 `xl.,te e 3305 17 3 Z�v Cccxxm,.�o CallafS None Auger- Bar-ing None 22� 330522 330523 T,,.,.,el Liner- e. Ula4e Steel Coin; P*,e e 33 05 26 U4iht- , Nl -ke -s/T ee e -s None 33 05 30 33 1105 r ee"tien fEdstiag U44i ;"" Nene RkAt�o�, Nuto, and 'Caskets None 33 11 10 YTY'uetilo 12on PiN 33 11 11 TNiion„e,, lie T2Z'7 Fittings None ✓3 11 12 Polyvinyl C lef de (PVC) D-esswe Pipe None 23 3 11 1., Co Baf xxfapped Steel Cyli def Type Nene �C7nC�@7=eic[ice—vrxuppccrvcccrc�rrnacrrypc ✓3 11 11 Btff;ed Steel Pipe "..d >;iAip - None 33 11 15 We St,.essed Cone.-ete Cylinder- Pipe None 2Z�o �x„ iczo 1 ii�'\11 t None ?i3 1211 33 1229 Large Water- Metefs Nene Resilient Seated Gate Valve e ZZ�T ZZ�a AWWA Rubber- SeatedBu#e-fl..x7.,iy None ri0 �I>'U.�`• �x a4ef Mai None � Cefineetion 33 1230 �„ T� Ti .�'wbV m a Air- - Valve �„ w l�Fo Nx' \1zRzj `x rtef Sy stems None 33 1240 F4fo I ydram*,, Ike 33 1250 ZZ�o Ito Emrrledens e St"rdafd Blow Valve 33 21 12 off sseffyb1..None Exred ix Place P) None ✓3 3,1 13 F4-b(r,-4ax R ainf reed Pipe for- Gm-y t., E t07y Sewers Nene CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 4 of 8 12 3,11 IS High Deficit-y Polyethylene (14PP ) Pipe ahal,'Sewer- Nefle 333120 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gfa-vity Sa-aitafy Sewer- Pipe Nefle 22 3i 2i Uffitar, e1= None Pipe 22 21 C` 77 an t.,,-., Sewor �z nFlip T �xixg Nene 22�3 C`m;tafy Sewer- Pipe Emmwxa-meat None 33-31 50 c, a tafy Sewer- Sef- ; e r nneetions ,-ad Sefy; e r ; o Nefte 33-31 70 Ce 1.in do Air- v,ye for- c, a tafy Sewer- ,Free Mai left 33-391-0 Cml, c P.Vae-Gorrlrctlj manholes left 22�o P�eyAlmr- lees left 333940 Wastewater- n eeess Chamber- (WAC) left 33 39 60 L'..e*y r ; o s for- Sa-a tafy Sewer- Struetwes Nene 3,32 11 11 High Defisit-y Polyethylene (14PP ) Pipe f6f ctmxn Dyais None / PirQ None 33 4600 Stibdfainage Nene 33 4601 Slotted to Diutu plane 22� Tf:efi .l. D - None 22� Cast i Dlaee Manholes a -ad r,,netio Boxes None 33-4 20 rw-b a -a rfop inlets None 33 4940 Storm Dios age Head -walls and nxr,,,,,. ally None Division 34 - Transportation 24�-4-1 10 Tf ff:e e;,.na s N9ne 34 ^�-�z-i 0.011 Attaehmelat A EefAfeller- Gabinet -Nene 34 ^�-�z-i 0.02 Attaehmelat B GeatfellerSpeeie-atien -Neese 24 41 10.03 AttaehmentC Seftwaf:e-vpeei ieation Nene ?/1 11 12 Ro,.,,,ving T,-..ff e Signals None ?/1 11 if Reef -uk— I i.3 Fkadhir. n Nene 2� ^moo Ple3oo*�_\A I-I;,>,,.;a� plane 34 4129 Rea+;lw,111w%gnat e n sseff lAies None 34 41 20.011 Afte .,a) 114nsinai s None 34 .oz Freeway LED Readw Ll.x-A11RaiYrs None 34 ^�-�z-z .03 Resi3orti l LT'r' , !l.w.inair@s Nene 34 41 30 Aluminum f"i.gis Nene CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS -DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 5 of 8 Technical Specifications listed below are included for this Project by reference and can be viewed/downloaded from the City's website at: httD:Hfortworthtexas.2ov/tDw/contractors/ or httvs:HaviDs.fortworthtexas.gov/Proi ectResources/ Division 02 - Existing Conditions Last Revised 0241 13 Selective Site Demolition 12/20/2012 0241 14 Utility Removal/Abandonment 12/20/2012 0241 15 Paving Removal 02/02/2016 Division 03 - Concrete 03 30 00 Cast -In -Place Concrete 12/20/2012 0334 13 Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) 12/20/2012 0334 16 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 03 90 00 >\aedifie leas t E*istiag Gone,-ete ct,.,,etffes 12/20/2012 Q/20Q014 Division 26 - Electrical 2605 00 !-''.,..-,..-,e W,.,-L Results for- Qe t,.iea ,- 1 11 1 /7 J Demolition f Eleetmfiea Systems 260533 Raeew ays as 1?e*es for- Eleetfieal Systems 2tip r Tnder-gr-e ,..,1 Distets a -a Raee,. ays f ,. >r l ojtriaal Fj,,steffts 12/20/2012 12/zz�-zvizviz 07 /no,, 1�n Division 31- Earthwork 31 1000 Site Clearing 12/20/2012 /gin 31�o U-nelassifie Exea-vatie 31 23 23 Borrow 01 01/28/2013 l �8 E47.1+".'4I.14M�tC 1 /28/-2n1�4 0� 31 25 00 Erosion and Sediment Control 12/20/2012 12 /'f�rsv;L2viz 313600 dens 31 37 00 Riprap 12/20/2012 Division 32 - Exterior Improvements 3201 17 Permanent Asphalt Paving Repair 12/20/2012 7-2-0-r-ry rtravravzz 32 01 29 Concrete Paving Repair 12/20/2012 32 1129 Lime Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012 Eamoxt TY., rLrtvravzz 32 1 1 37 Liquid T-Fe 4e Soil Siab;l:.nor 08/2 /7n1 G �T var�2vz� 37� 1kor';lalt 112/7zz�-20QO12 32 13 13 Concrete Paving 12/20/2012 32 1320 Concrete Sidewalks, Driveways and Barrier Free Ramps 06/05/2018 32 i3 �3 12-20r201z 32 14 16 lfial- umt -%-,4ng 12/20QO12 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 6 of 8 32 5 ram,, t, Address n.,;,. ing 1 11 1 /l1 3 3231 3 Cia Gates 12/20QO12nr. F��r� �� '27�o Wir-e L'enees and (`_a4es 12/'1r�-zvriviz '27�9 Wood L'enees and !`_.,tes 12/'1r�-zvriviz 3291 19 Topsoil Placement and Finishing of Parkways 12/20/2012 32 92 13 Hydro -Mulching, Seeding, and Sodding 12/20/2012 'i�2 Tf:ees and Shizubs 11/'frz�-svriviz Division 33 - Utilities 33 01 30 Sewer and Manhole Testing 12/20/2012 33 0131 Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection 03/03/2016 Z'2�v 22� 7Cllosed Puz xng „f Existing Sewer- Systems C..+-,-esio,+ Gent e Test St.,tiens 12/'fr�-svriviz 12/'lzzr20QO 2 33 04 12 ZZ�no 33 04 40 >\aagaesitff node r.,tt,edie Pfete fie Systeffl Tempef:ar- , W.,tef: So..,,ie Cleaning and Acceptance Testing of Water Mains 12/�12 0�/n�ii 02/06/2013 33 04 50 Cleaning of Sewer Mains 12/20/2012 3305 10 Utility Trench Excavation, Embedment, and Backfill nx/a4e 12/12/2016 33 05 12 3305 13 f Line e Lower -in. Frame, Cover and Grade Rings — Cast Iron 12/20,L2012 01/22/2016 3305 13.10 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings — Composite 01/22/2016 33 05 14 Adjusting Manholes, Inlets, Valve Boxes, and Other Structures to 12/20/2012 Grade 33 05 17 Concrete Collars 12/20/2012 11 /7 33 05 20 33-03-21 22 330523 23 Ig Tu�rr.wl r �mar- Pla4e Stool Gass g Ripe 17.,*.1 T,mnoli*g z 11 /7z 12P2z 12/2z 33 05 24 33 05 26 33 05 30 last.,lla4ion.,FCat:Fief: Pipe i (`.,s;ng o- T,,fmel Liner- e- Dl.,t-e U4ih „ Nla-kefs/T ..,.., e fs Location of Existing Utilities 06/19QO 3 12/20Qz 12/20/2012 33 1105 Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 12/20/2012 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe 12/20/2012 33 11 11 Ductile Iron Fittings 12/20/2012 33 11 12 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe 11/16/2018 ?,3 11 13 ZZ�4 Conefete P2a�ja7.- P*,c, Dar 114appe Stool Cylinder- Type LZtuied 11 /�12 12/'fizrzvriviz 33 12 10 Steel Pipe and Fittings Water Services 1-inch to 2-inch 02/14/2017 l.. 1 2 1 1 T .fge Water- - Metef:s 1 2/7 z 33 1220 Resilient Seated Gate Valve 12/20/2012 33 1221 AWWA Rubber -Seated Butterfly Valves 12/20/2012 33 1225 Connection to Existing Water Mains 02/06/2013 33 12 30 E4biL1%1"" Air- Valve Assemblies for- Petable Water- System 12/70QO12 33 1240 Fire Hydrants 01/03/2014 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 7 of 8 33 1250 Z'2�o Water Sample Stations St.,,idaf:,a Blow off Valve Assembly 12/20/2012 06/1942013 2 3 Giffed i Dlaee Pipe /rmn4 Fibef;1xa R oCf fee Pipe f . r -a-y t ganita?y-Sewefs 11 /�12 12/20QO12 �z 3,1 1,5 High Deficit-y Polyethylene (14PPE) Pipe Sandary- ewer- 12/'fizr20,L2 z 33 31 20 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe `-a-y ty eaff tafy Cewer- 06/19/2013 ZZ 2T1 LT Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Closed Profile r 12r20r/2012Pipe 44 112 Sa-aitafy SePar F).*, L;&,i&g 12/'%12 ZZ�3 Safi t., y SewerPipe BnAlargamet 12/'frz�-svriviz 33 31 50 Sanitary Sewer Service Connections and Service Line 04/26/2013 33 39 10 Cast -in -Place Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012 33 39 20 Precast Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012 3Z�v F-ibzrglxr_ Manholes 11 /�12 33 39 60 Epoxy Liners for Sanitary Sewer Structures 12/20/2012 3341 10 Reinforced Concrete Storm Sewer Pipe/Culverts 07/01/2011 1 11 High Teri.*. Polyethylene (14PPE) Pipe for- St�vn Drx..N 12/'ftzrsvriviz ZZ�= Reifif-. .e ye Poltl.lene / �DE) Diyv P' " � 1111 /11 2 /7zz�-20QO 12 �tibe Slotted St3rm DiuiFlf n�/no 1�11 �3-4H-02 ��rr�h ��r� n�/n1 /2n1 1 ,n 33 49 10 Cast -in -Place Manholes and Junction Boxes 12/20/2012 33 49 20 Curb and Drop Inlets 12/20/2012 33 49 40 Storm Drainage Headwalls and Wingwalls 07/01/2011 Division 34 - Transportation 34 ^�-�z-i 0.011 34 ^T-�z-i 002 AtttaGYLY.meatYA �C+�,G�fAfell'Cet AttraGLhmeattY�T+ G+,eatf.01 Ax Srw � emien Attaehme tt G Seftw �fe-Speei iea4ien To..-, -y T,-., Fr- 12/1L8/2015 ntl 1�QnO 112 tl�7L2H ti 1 1 /'Z�vi3 34 ^�-�z-i 003 34 41 11 ?/I i i 1f pef:a e Signals Reet gula rL-*,:d Pl-.\AAimg Beaeon 1111 /'�13 34 41- 16 Redo6*�_\4 I_Iybri 1 1 /n 22QO13 34 41 20 Roadway Illumination Assemblies 12/20/2012 34 ^env-1 Aftar�J..J�TT �, Dan. �i:�r.-rs 06/1 GL20�15 � 34 4120.02 Free ay LED n,..,dw .. !_/wn�,vaives06/15QO c 34 41 20.03 Residential LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015 34 41 30 ZA�no Aluminum Signs 11/12/2013 3471 13 Single Mode Fite- Optie Cable Traffic Control 02/moo 11/22/2013 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS -DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 000010 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Appendix Page 8 of 8 CG-4.91 AvaiLu1ity GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions (Geotech Report) CG-4✓1 UrI Fib-406 I azarl etis Enyi.efff en4 i Gend fie at Site GG 6.07 1 . _ GG-6-M f\Jrmitvazn r T C-C-S.21 N GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 Utilities DAP - BID PROPOSAL Page] of 3 UNIT PRICE BID SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM Project Item Information IBidlist Item NO.Description 1 3305.0109 Trench Safety 2 3311.0001 Ductile Iron Water Fittings w/Restraint 3 3311.0241 8" Water Pipe 4 3312.0001 Fire Hydrant 6 3312.0117 Connection to Existing 4"-12" Water Mai 7 3312.20031"Water Service 8 3312.2003 1" Water Service (Irrigation) 9 3312.3003 8" Gate Valve 10 3312.4107 12" x 8" Tapping Sleeve & Valve 11 3312.4206 20"x16" Tapping Sleeve & Valve 12 2605.3031 4" CONDT PVC SCH 40 (T) 13 3471.001 Traffic Control 14 3201.0127 10' Wide Asphalt Pvmt Repair, Arterial 15 3201.0614 Conc Pvmt Repair, Residential 16 9999.0001 8" Pressure Plane Valve Bidder's Application Bidder's Proposal Specification Section No. Unit of Bid Unit Price Bid Value Measure Quantity UNIT I: WATER MPROVEMENTS 33 05 10 LF 8,826 $1.00 $8,826.00 331111 TON 10.4 $9,357.00 $97,312.80 33 11 10, 33 11 12 LF 8,826 $65.00 $573,690.00 33 12 40 EA 9 $8,501.00 $76,509.00 n 331225 EA 2 $3,095.00 $6,190.00 331210 EA 218 $1,801.00 $392,618.00 331210 EA 5 $1,810.00 $9,050.00 331220 EA 17 $2,891.00 $49,147.00 33 12 25 EA 1 $8,946.00 $8,946.00 33 12 25 EA 1 $26,994.00 $26,994.00 LF 80 $24.00 $1,920.00 3471 13 MO 1 $3,344.00 $3,344.00 3201 17 LF 24 $267.00 $6,408.00 3201 29 SY 23 $240.00 $5,520.00 33 12 20 EA 1 $2,826.00 $2,826.00 TOTAL UNIT I: WATER IMPROVEMENTS $1,269,300.80 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP.xlsx Utilities DAP - BID PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3 SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM UNIT PRICE BID Project Item Information Bidlist Item NO.Description 1 3301.0001 Pre -CCTV Inspection 2 3301.0002 Post -CCTV Inspection 3 3301.0101 Manhole Vacuum Testing 4 3305.0109 Trench Safety 5 3305.0112 Concrete Collar for Manhole 6 3305.0113 Trench Water Stop 7 3331.3101 4" Sewer Service 8 3331.3312 6" Sewer Service, Reconnection 9 3331.4115 8" Sewer Pipe 10 3331.4116 8" Sewer Pipe, CSS Backfill 11 3339.0001 Epoxy Manhole Liner 12 3339.1001 4' Manhole 13 3339.1002 4' Drop Manhole 14 3339.1003 Extra Depth Manhole 15 9999.0002 Core into Existing Manhole Bidder's Application Bidder's Proposal Specification Section No. Unit of Bid Unit Price Bid Value Measure Quantity UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 3301 31 LF 200 $3.00 $600.00 3301 31 LF 8,192 $3.00 $24,576.00 3301 30 EA 46 $200.00 $9,200.00 33 05 10 LF 8,192 $2.00 $16,384.00 33 05 17 EA 3 $2,250.00 $6,750.00 330515 EA 36 $1,338.00 $48,168.00 333150 EA 218 $1,204.00 $262,472.00 333150 EA 1 $2,106.00 $2,106.00 33 11 10, 33 31 12, 33 31 LF 7,632 $54.00 $412,128.00 33 11 10, 33 31 12, 33 31 LF 560 $115.00 $64,400.00 33 39 60 VF 228 $327.00 $74,556.00 33 39 10, 33 39 20 EA 45 $6,239.00 $280,755.00 34 39 10, 33 39 20 EA 1 $12,206.00 $12,206.00 33 39 10, 33 39 20 VF 184 $234.00 $43,056.00 99 99 99 EA 1 $3,154.00 $3,154.00 TOTAL UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $1,260,511.00 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP.xlsx Utilities DAP - BID PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3 UNIT PRICE BID lBidlist Item No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM Bidder's Application Project Item Information Description Specification Section No. Unit of Bid Measure Quantity UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 3137.0104 Medium Stone Riprap, dry 31 3700 SY 422 3305.0109 Trench Safety 33 05 10 LF 4,123 3341.0201 21" RCP, Class III 3241 10 LF 353 3341.0205 24" RCP, Class III 3341 10 LF 982 3341.0208 27" RCP, Class III 3341 10 LF 412 3341.0302 30" RCP, Class III 3341 10 LF 753 3341.0309 36" RCP, Class III 3341 10 LF 680 3341.0402 42" RCP, Class III 3341 10 LF 42 3341.0409 48" RCP, Class III 3341 10 LF 20 3341.1602 9x5 Box Culvert 3341 10 LF 754 3341.2002 10x5 Box Culvert 3341 10 LF 127 3349.0001 4' Storm Junction Box 33 49 10 EA 10 3349.0002 5' Storm Junction Box 33 49 10 EA 1 3349.2011 48" Parallel Headwall, 1 pipe 33 49 40 EA 1 3349.5001 10' Curb Inlet 33 49 20 EA 10 3349.5002 15' Curb Inlet 33 49 20 EA 14 3349.5003 20' Curb Inlet 33 49 20 EA 3 3349.7002 5' Drop Inlet (with riprap) 33 49 20 EA 1 9999.0003 6'xl2' Junction Box 99 99 99 EA 3 9999.0004 TxDOT SW-0 Wingwall (10x5 Box Culvert, 1 Pipe) 99 99 99 EA 1 9999.0005 TxDOT PWA Wingwall (9x5 Box Culvert, 1 Pipe) 99 99 99 EA 1 9999.0006 Sloped End Headwall (24" RCP, 1 Pipe) 99 99 99 EA 1 9999.0007 Pond Outfall Structure 99 99 99 EA 1 9999.0008 TXDOT Stom Drain Manhole Type A 99 99 99 EA 2 9999.0009 Pedestrian Handrail 99 99 99 LF 230 TOTAL UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Bid Summary UNIT I: WATER IMPROVEMENTS UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS This Bid is submitted by the entity named below: BIDDER: A'Lure General Contractors, LLC 352 Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Contractor agrees to complete WORK for FINAL ACCEPTANCE within CONTRACT commences to run as provided in the General Conditions. END OF SECTION Total Construction Bidl Bidder's Proposal Unit Price I Bid Value $137.00 $1.00 $82.00 $96.00 $106.00 $120.00 $161.00 $209.00 $252.00 $878.00 $1,110.00 $5,039.00 $4,963.00 $9,467.00 $6,613.00 $8,538.00 $10,609.00 $8,732.00 $17,055.00 $21,448.00 $17,360.00 $1,764.00 $75,652.00 $10,705.00 $173.00 BY: ( nt,�(. I r/ C. & q SSiignN o4wet-ssiignatture, ID: 44acac77f5... TITLE: VGI(y6IldrM&Kd&r DATE: 4/12/2023 $57,814.00 $4,123.00 $28,946.00 $94,272.00 $43, 672.00 $90,360.00 $109,480.00 $8,778.00 $5,040.00 $662,012.00 $140, 970.00 $50,390.00 $4, 963.00 $9,467.00 $66,130.00 $119, 532.00 $31,827.00 $8,732.00 $51,165.00 $21,448.00 $17,360.00 $1,764.00 $75,652.00 $21,410.00 $39,790.00 $1,765,097.00 $1,269,300.80� $1,260, 511.00 $1,765,097.00 $4, 294,908.80 1 working days after the date when the CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP.xlsx 0045 11 -1 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 1 of 3 SECTION 00 45 11 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS 1. Summary. All contractors are required to be prequalified by the City prior to submitting bids. To be eligible to bid the contractor must submit Section 00 45 12, Prequalification Statement for the work type(s) listed with their Bid. Any contractor or subcontractor who is not prequalified for the work type(s) listed must submit Section 00 45 13, Bidder Prequalification Application in accordance with the requirements below. The prequalification process will establish a bid limit based on a technical evaluation and financial analysis of the contractor. The information must be submitted seven (7) days prior to the date of the opening of bids. For example, a contractor wishing to submit bids on projects to be opened on the 7th of April must file the information by the 31 st day of March in order to bid on these projects. In order to expedite and facilitate the approval of a Bidder's Prequalification Application, the following must accompany the submission. a. A complete set of audited or reviewed financial statements. (1) Classified Balance Sheet (2) Income Statement (3) Statement of Cash Flows (4) Statement of Retained Earnings (5) Notes to the Financial Statements, if any b. A certified copy of the firm's organizational documents (Corporate Charter, Articles of Incorporation, Articles of Organization, Certificate of Formation, LLC Regulations, Certificate of Limited Partnership Agreement). c. A completed Bidder Prequalification Application. (1) The firm's Texas Taxpayer Identification Number as issued by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. To obtain a Texas Taxpayer Identification number visit the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts online at the following web address www.window.state.tx.us/taxi)ennit/ and fill out the application to apply for your Texas tax ID. (2) The firm's e-mail address and fax number. (3) The firm's DUNS number as issued by Dun & Bradstreet. This number is used by the City for required reporting on Federal Aid projects. The DUNS number may be obtained at www.dnb.com. d. Resumes reflecting the construction experience of the principles of the firm for firms submitting their initial prequalification. These resumes should include the size and scope of the work performed. e. Other information as requested by the City. 2. Prequalification Requirements a. Financial Statements. Financial statement submission must be provided in accordance with the following: (1) The City requires that the original Financial Statement or a certified copy be submitted for consideration. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 11 -2 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 2 of 3 (2) To be satisfactory, the financial statements must be audited or reviewed by an independent, certified public accounting firm registered and in good standing in any state. Current Texas statues also require that accounting firms performing audits or reviews on business entities within the State of Texas be properly licensed or registered with the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy. (3) The accounting firm should state in the audit report or review whether the contractor is an individual, corporation, or limited liability company. (4) Financial Statements must be presented in U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange of the Balance Sheet date. (5) The City will not recognize any certified public accountant as independent who is not, in fact, independent. (6) The accountant's opinion on the financial statements of the contracting company should state that the audit or review has been conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. This must be stated in the accounting firm's opinion. It should: (1) express an unqualified opinion, or (2) express a qualified opinion on the statements taken as a whole. (7) The City reserves the right to require a new statement at any time. (8) The financial statement must be prepared as of the last day of any month, not more than one year old and must be on file with the City 16 months thereafter, in accordance with Paragraph 1. (9) The City will determine a contractor's bidding capacity for the purposes of awarding contracts. Bidding capacity is determined by multiplying the positive net working capital (working capital = current assets — current liabilities) by a factor of 10.Only those statements reflecting a positive net working capital position will be considered satisfactory for prequalification purposes. (10) In the case that a bidding date falls within the time a new financial statement is being prepared, the previous statement shall be updated with proper verification. b. Bidder Prequalification Application. A Bidder Prequalifcation Application must be submitted along with audited or reviewed financial statements by firms wishing to be eligible to bid on all classes of construction and maintenance projects. Incomplete Applications will be rejected. (1) In those schedules where there is nothing to report, the notation of "None" or "N/A" should be inserted. (2) A minimum of five (5) references of related work must be provided. (3) Submission of an equipment schedule which indicates equipment under the control of the Contractor and which is related to the type of work for which the Contactor is seeking prequalification. The schedule must include the manufacturer, model and general common description of each piece of equipment. Abbreviations or means of describing equipment other than provided above will not be accepted. 3. Eligibility to Bid a. The City shall be the sole judge as to a contractor's prequalification. b. The City may reject, suspend, or modify any prequalification for failure by the contractor to demonstrate acceptable financial ability or performance. c. The City will issue a letter as to the status of the prequalification approval. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 11 -3 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 3 of 3 d. If a contractor has a valid prequalification letter, the contractor will be eligible to bid the prequalified work types until the expiration date stated in the letter. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 12 DAP PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT Page 1 of 1 SECTION 00 45 12 DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT Each Bidder is required to complete the information below by identifying the prequalified contractors and/or subcontractors whom they intend to utilize for the major work type(s) listed. In the "Mai or Work Tvpe" box provide the complete maior work tvDe and actual description as Drovided by the Water DeDartment for water and sewer and TPW for Davina. Major Work Type Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name Prequalification Expiration Date Wastewater New Development Acadia Services, LLC Open Cut (54" and under); Water New Development Open 4/30/2024 Cut (24" and under); Facility Lift Station The undersigned hereby certifies that the contractors and/or subcontractors described in the table above are currently prequalified for the work types listed. BIDDER: A'Lure General Contractors, LLC 351 W.3-S2 Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 BY: (Wnt& q.�' i df-& SignNow e-signature ID: 4943a91de1... nonatnrna 17-91-11 urc (Signature) TITLE: General Manager DATE: 09/28/2023 END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 00 45 12_Prequalification Statement 2015_DAP.docx Form Version September 1, 2015 00 45 26 - 1 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Page 1 of 1 SECTION 00 45 26 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 406.096(a), as amended, Contractor certifies that it provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City Project No. 104378. Contractor further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code, Section 406.096(b), as amended, it will provide to City its subcontractor's certificates of compliance with worker's compensation coverage. CONTRACTOR: A'Lure General Contractors. LLC Company 351 W. 3i&lSouthlake Blvd. Address Southlake, Texas 76092 City/State/Zip THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT By: Gene DeVore (Please Print) Signature: (W&,t& SignNow e-signature ID: 4e971e%ab... 09/28/2023 17:21:11 UTC Title: General Manager (Please Print) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Gene DeVore , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same as the act and deed of A'Lure General Contractors, LLC for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this 28th day of September 2023. CjS;! Hoffman My aeml SignNow e-signature ID: dbab64dd99... 6/U1l2027 02 12249 ® a itvto i ry v u i Notary Pu`��ic m anc� i`'or `the State of Texas Notary ID192012240 t d SignNow e-signature ID: 4016d9d234... 09/28/2023 17:03:02 UTC END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 00 52 43 - 1 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Pagel of 4 SECTION 00 52 43 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, authorized on 2/15/2024 is made by and between the Developer, Weatherford 55, LTD , authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") , and A'Lure General Contractors. LLC.. authorized to do business in Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized representative, ("Contractor"). Developer and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: Article 1. WORK Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the Project identified herein. Article 2. PROJECT The project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows: Westnoint Park 104378 Article 3. CONTRACT TIME 3.1 Time is of the essence. All time limits for Milestones, if any, and Final Acceptance as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence to this Contract. 3.2 Final Acceptance. The Work will be complete for Final Acceptance within 150 working days after the date when the Contract Time commences to run as provided in Paragraph 12.04 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 3.3 Liquidated damages Contractor recognizes that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Developer will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in Paragraph 3.2 above, plus any extension thereof allowed in accordance with Article 10 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. The Contractor also recognizes the delays, expense and difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the Developer if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof , Contractor agrees that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay Developer FIVE HUNDRED Dollars ($500.00 ) for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.2 for Final Acceptance until the City issues the Final Letter of Acceptance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 005243-2 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 2 of 4 Article 4. CONTRACT PRICE Developer agrees to pay Contractor for performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents an amount in current funds of four million, two hundred and ninety-four thousand, nine hundred and Dollars oo/,00) ($ 4,294,908.80 ) eigni Article 5. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 5.1 CONTENTS: A. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between Developer and Contractor concerning the Work consist of the following: 1. This Agreement. 2. Attachments to this Agreement: a. Bid Form (As provided by Developer) 1) Proposal Form (DAP Version) 2) Prequalification Statement 3) State and Federal documents (project specific) b. Insurance ACORD Form(s) c. Payment Bond (DAP Version) d. Performance Bond (DAP Version) e. Maintenance Bond (DAP Version) f. Power of Attorney for the Bonds g. Worker's Compensation Affidavit h. MBE and/or SBE Commitment Form (If required) 3. Standard City General Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 4. Supplementary Conditions. 5. Specifications specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of the Project's Contract Documents. 6. Drawings. 7. Addenda. 8. Documentation submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award. 9. The following which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the Agreement and, if issued, become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents: a. Notice to Proceed. b. Field Orders. c. Change Orders. d. Letter of Final Acceptance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 00 52 43 - 3 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 3 of 4 Article 6. INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this contract. This indemnification provision is specifically intended to overate and be effective even if it is alleged or vroven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused, in whole or in cart, by anv act. omission or negligence of the citv. This indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the city in defending against such claims and causes of actions. 6.2 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of property of the city, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this contract. This indemnification urovision is suecifically intended to overate and be effective even if it is alleged or vroven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused, in whole or in cart, by anv act, omission or negligence of the citv. Article 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Terms. 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 Terms used in this Agreement are defined in Article 1 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. Assignment of Contract. This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents may not be assigned by the Contractor without the advanced express written consent of the Developer. Successors and Assigns. Developer and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. Severability. Any provision or part of the Contract unenforceable by a court of competent remaining provisions shall continue to CONTRACTOR. Governing Law and Venue. Documents held to be jurisdiction shall be be valid and binding unconstitutional, void or deemed stricken, and all upon DEVELOPER and This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents is performable in the State of Texas. Venue shall be Tarrant County, Texas, or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 005243-4 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 4 of 4 7.6 Authority to Sign. Contractor shall attach evidence of authority to sign Agreement, if other than duly authorized signatory of the Contractor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and Contractor have executed this Agreement in multiple counterparts, This Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by the Parties ("Effective Date"). Contractor: Developer: A'Lure General Contractors, LLC. By. wwjo tnm IM Inn urf,7,f osne1202311:21tVjnature) (Si . ature) A — Gene DeVore (Printed Name) Title: Company Name: A'Lure General Contractors, LLC. Address: 37- 11..1' I. \. L'}rci- 351 W. Southlake Blvd. City/State/Zip: Southlake, TX 76092 09/28/2023 Date --F, r-N Fl. Fled (Printed Name) Title: �,r%-- S► r,t Company name: Weatherford 55, LTD Address: 3045 Lackland Rd. City;State/Zip: Fort Worth, TX 76116 2/15/2024 Date CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 006213-1 PERFORMANCE BOND Pagel of 2 SECTION 00 62 13 Bond No. 4407941 PERFORMANCE BOND THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That we, A'Lure General Contractors. LLC known as "Principal" herein and FCCI Insurance Company , a corporate surety(sureties, if more than one) duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weatherford 55, LTD, authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the penal sum of, Four Million Two Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Nine Hundred Eight and 80/100— Dollars ($ 4,294,908.80---- ), lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA Number CFA23-0027; and WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer awarded the 15 day of February , 20 24 , which Contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment labor and other accessories defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Change Orders, as provided for in said Contract designated as Westnoint Park. NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Principal shall faithfully perform it obligations under the Contract and shall in all respects duly and faithfully perform the Work, including Change Orders, under the Contract, according to the plans, specifications, and contract documents therein referred to, and as well during any period of extension of the Contract that may be granted on the part of the Developer and/or City, then this obligation shall be and become null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CitJ, Project No.: 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 006213-2 PERFORMANCE BOND Page 2 of 2 PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of said statue. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February 32024 . ATTEST: (Principal Secretary UU (Woiess ' cipal SAP�Ad,�A Witness as to Sur6y Sena Sells PRINCIPAL: A'Lure General Contractors. LLC. BY. ignature Name and Title Address: 352 Southlake Blvd. Southlake. Texas 76092 SURETY: FCCI Insurance Company A B ture Jennifer Upton, Attomey-in-Fact Name and Title Address: 6300 University Parkway oapQ .. P6, Sarasota, FL 34240 LL ` SEAT, <' 1994 Telephone Number: (254) 749 - 0597 i .toR.... � *Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Cr0 Project No.. 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 0062 14 - 1 PAYMENT BOND Page 1 of 2 SECTION 00 62 14 Bond No. 4407941 PAYMENT BOND THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That we, A'Lure General Contractors. LLC. , known as "Principal" herein, and FCCI Insurance Company , a corporate surety ( or sureties if more than one), duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weatherford 55. LTD, authorized to do business in Texas "(Developer"), and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the penal sum Four Million Two Hundred Ninety Four Thousand ($ 4,294,908.80--- Of Nine Hundred Eight and 801100--- Dollars , lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for the payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents: WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of community facilities in the City of Fort Worth, by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA Number CFA23-0027; and WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a certain written Contract with Developer, awarded the 15 day of February , 20 24 , which Contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment, labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work as provided for in said Contract and designated as Westnoint Park. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that if Principal shall pay all monies owing to any (and all) payment bond beneficiary (as defined in Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended) in the prosecution of the Work under the Contract, then this obligation shall be and become null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 006214-2 PAYMENTBOND Page 2 of 2 This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of said statute. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February 20 24 ATTEST: f4 (Principal) cretary qW-ess as to Principal ATTEST: N/A (Surety) Secretary PRINCIPAL: A'Lure General Contractors. LLC. BY: i{ Signature Name and Title Address: 352 Southlake Blvd. Southlake. Texas 76092 SURETY: FCCI Insurance Company e Jennifer Upton, Attorney -in -Fact Name and Title 6300 University Parkway Address: Sarasota, FL 34240 ; u:` LL' 3Ti.A1 t Witness as to ure - Elena Sells '•. 1994� Telephone Number: (254) 749 - 0597 Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety, there must be on file a certified extract from the bylaws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 SECTION 00 62 19 MAINTENANCE BOND 0062 19 - l MAINTENANCE BOND Page I of 3 Bond No. 4407941 THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That we A'Lure General Contractors. LLC. , known as "Principal" herein and FCCI Insurance Company , a corporate surety (sureties, if more than one) duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weatherford 55, LTD, authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal Four Million Two Hundred Ninety Four Thousand corporation ("City"), in the sum of Nine Hundred Eight and 80/100-- Dollars ($ 4,294,908.80--- ), lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees and their successors, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA Number CFA23-0027 ;and WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer awarded the 15 day of February , 20 24 , which Contract is hereby referred to and a made part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Work resulting from a duly authorized Change Order (collectively herein, the "Work") as provided for in said Contract and designated as Westpoint Park; and WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to use such materials and to so construct the Work in accordance with the plans, specifications and Contract Documents that the Work is and will remain free from defects in materials or workmanship for and during the period of two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance of the Work by the City ("Maintenance Period"); and CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS -- DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 006219-2 MAINTENANCE BOND Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to repair or reconstruct the Work in whole or in part upon receiving notice from the Developer and/or City of the need thereof at any time within the Maintenance Period. NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if Principal shall remedy any defective Work, for which timely notice was provided by Developer or City, to a completion satisfactory to the City, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principal shall fail so to repair or reconstruct any timely noticed defective Work, it is agreed that the Developer or City may cause any and all such defective Work to be repaired and/or reconstructed with all associated costs thereof being borne by the Principal and the Surety under this Maintenance Bond; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that this obligation shall be continuous in nature and successive recoveries may be had hereon for successive breaches. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 006219-3 MAINTENANCE BOND Page 3 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February . 20 24 PRINCIPAL: A'Lure General Contractors. LLC. BY: � — - Signature ATTEST: a_�I� tfe�� � .� A., (Principal) Secretary Name and Title Address: 352 Southlake Blvd. Southlake. Texas 76092 Witless as to tpal SURETY: FCCI Insurance Company B*Jennffer Attorney-in-Fact ATTEST: Name and Title N/A Address: 6300 University Parkway•"'�I-F #�?` ..........CO N (Surety) Secretary Sarasota, FL 34240 �U� •�oRd, sy SEAL Witness �s'fo Surety -Elena Sells Telephone Number: (254) 749 - 0597 t984 :i �'''•�„F�ORIO i•�, �'uwrrr+" *Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE To obtain information or make a complaint: You may call FCCI Insurance Group's (FCCI)* toll -free telephone number for information or to make a complaint at 1-800-226-3224. You may also write to FCCI Insurance Group Compliance Department e-mail at StateComplaintsefcci-orour).com. For Claims, you may write to FCCI Insurance Group Claim Department e-mail at newclaim(cDfcci-orouo.com. You may contact the Texas Department of Insurance to obtain information on companies, coverages, rights or complaints at 1-800-252-3439. You may write the Texas Department of Insurance: PO Box 149104 Austin TX 78714-9104 Fax: 1-512-490-1007 Web: htto://www.tdi.texas.00v E-mail: ConsumerProtections(a)tdi.texas.00v PREMIUM OR CLAIM DISPUTES Should you have a dispute concerning your premium or about a claim you should contact FCCI first. If the dispute is not resolved, you may contact the Texas Department of Insurance. ATTACH THIS NOTICE TO YOUR BOND This notice is for information only and does not become a part or condition of the attached documents. *The FCCI Insurance Group includes the following insurance carriers: Brierfield Insurance Company, FCCI Advantage Insurance Company, FCCI Commercial Insurance Company, FCCI Insurance Company, Monroe Guaranty Insurance Company, and National Trust Insurance Company. 1-BD-TX-21690-NTP-07 15 Page 1 of 1 Copyright 2015 FCCI Insurance Group. FCCIGROUP INSURANCE GROUP GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY Know all men by these presents: That the FCCI Insurance Company, a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida (the "Corporation") does make, constitute and appoint: Allen Bale; Chris Brower; Dana Mickey; Dane Bubela; Daniel Cokenour; Elena Sells; Ericka Hamman; Nikki Adams; Greg Wilkerson; Jason Nobles; Jennifer Upton; Margery Hall; Parker Hamilton; Rick Bondurant; Samantha Kato; Eyvoune Cantu Each, its true and lawful Attorney -In -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed in all bonds and undertakings provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed the sum of (not to exceed $30,000,000.00): $30,000,000.00 This Power of Attorney is made and executed by authority of a Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors. That resolution also authorized any further action by the officers of the Company necessary to effect such transaction. The signatures below and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed by facsimile, and any such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be binding upon the Corporation when so affixed and in the future with regard to any bond, undertaking or contract of surety to which it is attached. In witness whereof, the FCCI Insurance Company has caused these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed, this 23rd day of July 2020. Attest: /. e& 3G o�E, Christina D. Welch, President SEAL •{` Christopher Shoucair, FCCI Insurance Company I,,, EVP, CFO, Treasurer, Secretary FCCI Insurance Company State of Florida County of Sarasota Before me this day personally appeared Christina D. Welch, who is personally known to me and who executed the foregoing document for the purposes expressed therein. My commission expires: 2/27/2027 ,�+vftt- K-MYSNN s� C1.3 + j • Conn�don#HH32 ep6 Notary Public .Inv EoaF.b"V.Xv State of Florida County of Sarasota Before me this day personally appeared Christopher Shoucair, who is personally known to me and who executed the foregoing document for the purposes expressed therein. PE My commission expires: 2/27/2027w`•rsHow``6'^� can��w�axe�s Notary Public CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned Secretary of FCCI Insurance Company, a Florida Corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that the February 27, 2020 Resolution of the Board of Directors, referenced in said Power of Attorney, is now in force. Dated this day of .LL SEAL %< X'' 1994 : ' Christopher Shoucair, EVP, CFO, Treasurer, Secretary `�..°�w'•''� FCCI Insurance Company 1-IONA-3592-NA-04. 7/2021 UNIT PRICE BID SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects- PROPOSAL FORM Project Item Information Paving DAP-BIDPROPOSAL Page I of I Bidder's Application Bidder's Proposal BidN Item) No. Description I Specification Section No. ( Unit I Bid ( Unit Price I Bid Value r Measure II Quantity UNIT, IV,:,PAVING,JMPRQVEMENTS 1 0241.1000 Remove Conc Pvmt 0241 13 SY 1,032 $15.00 $15,480.00 2 02411.1300 Remove Cone Curb&Gutter 02 41 15 LF 90 $25.00 $2,250.00 3 3211.0400 Hydrated Lime 3211 29 TN 508 $295.00 $149,860.00 4 _. 3211.0501 a' Lime Treatment 3211 29 SY 23,217 $4.75 _. $134,030.75 5 3213.0101 6" Conc Pvmt 32 13 13 SY 26,487 $49.10 $1,300,511.70 6 3213.0301 4" Conc Sidewalk 32 13 20 SF 14,759 $7.75 $114,382.25 7 32 13.0501 Barrier Free Ramp, Type R-1 32 13 20 EA 7 $2,850.00 $19,950,00 8 3213.0506 Barrier Free Ramp, Type P-1 32 13 20 EA 13 $2,350.00 $30,550.00 9 3292.0100 Block Sod Placement __ 32 92 13 SY _ _ --_ 1,718 _ $5.26 $9,036.68 10 3291.0100 Topsoil (Finishing Parkways & Medians) 3291 19 CY 287 $4.10 $1,176.70 11 3441.4003 Furnish/Install Alum Sign Ground Mount City Std. (R1-1) 34 41 30 EA 10 $400.00 $4,000.00 12 3441.4003 Furnish/Install Alum Sign Ground Mount City Std. (D3-1) _ 34 41 30 EA 44 $250.00 $11,000.00 13 3471.001 Traffic Control 34 71 13 MO 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 14 9999.0010 Mailbox Cluster Concrete Foundation 99 99 99 EA 3 $1,650.00 $4,950.00 TOTAL UNIT IV. PAVING IM> DEMENTS $1,799,678.08 Bid Summary UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS This Bid is submitted by the entity named below: BIDDER: Glenn Thurman, Inc. P.O. Box 850842 Mesquite, Texas 75185 Contractor agrees to complete WORK for FINAL ACCEPTANCE within CONTRACT commences to run as provided in the General Conditions. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Form Version May 22, 2019 $1,799,678.081 Total Construction Bid $1,799,678.08 a" r BY: 3 TITLE,..„,.%'^, DATE: 45 working days after the date when the 004243—Bid Proposal DAP.,Iss 0045 11 -1 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 1 of 3 SECTION 00 45 11 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS 1. Summary. All contractors are required to be prequalified by the City prior to submitting bids. To be eligible to bid the contractor must submit Section 00 45 12, Prequalification Statement for the work type(s) listed with their Bid. Any contractor or subcontractor who is not prequalified for the work type(s) listed must submit Section 00 45 13, Bidder Prequalification Application in accordance with the requirements below. The prequalification process will establish a bid limit based on a technical evaluation and financial analysis of the contractor. The information must be submitted seven (7) days prior to the date of the opening of bids. For example, a contractor wishing to submit bids on projects to be opened on the 7th of April must file the information by the 31 st day of March in order to bid on these projects. In order to expedite and facilitate the approval of a Bidder's Prequalification Application, the following must accompany the submission. a. A complete set of audited or reviewed financial statements. (1) Classified Balance Sheet (2) Income Statement (3) Statement of Cash Flows (4) Statement of Retained Earnings (5) Notes to the Financial Statements, if any b. A certified copy of the firm's organizational documents (Corporate Charter, Articles of Incorporation, Articles of Organization, Certificate of Formation, LLC Regulations, Certificate of Limited Partnership Agreement). c. A completed Bidder Prequalification Application. (1) The firm's Texas Taxpayer Identification Number as issued by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. To obtain a Texas Taxpayer Identification number visit the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts online at the following web address www.window.state.tx.us/taxi)ennit/ and fill out the application to apply for your Texas tax ID. (2) The firm's e-mail address and fax number. (3) The firm's DUNS number as issued by Dun & Bradstreet. This number is used by the City for required reporting on Federal Aid projects. The DUNS number may be obtained at www.dnb.com. d. Resumes reflecting the construction experience of the principles of the firm for firms submitting their initial prequalification. These resumes should include the size and scope of the work performed. e. Other information as requested by the City. 2. Prequalification Requirements a. Financial Statements. Financial statement submission must be provided in accordance with the following: (1) The City requires that the original Financial Statement or a certified copy be submitted for consideration. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 11 -2 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 2 of 3 (2) To be satisfactory, the financial statements must be audited or reviewed by an independent, certified public accounting firm registered and in good standing in any state. Current Texas statues also require that accounting firms performing audits or reviews on business entities within the State of Texas be properly licensed or registered with the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy. (3) The accounting firm should state in the audit report or review whether the contractor is an individual, corporation, or limited liability company. (4) Financial Statements must be presented in U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange of the Balance Sheet date. (5) The City will not recognize any certified public accountant as independent who is not, in fact, independent. (6) The accountant's opinion on the financial statements of the contracting company should state that the audit or review has been conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. This must be stated in the accounting firm's opinion. It should: (1) express an unqualified opinion, or (2) express a qualified opinion on the statements taken as a whole. (7) The City reserves the right to require a new statement at any time. (8) The financial statement must be prepared as of the last day of any month, not more than one year old and must be on file with the City 16 months thereafter, in accordance with Paragraph 1. (9) The City will determine a contractor's bidding capacity for the purposes of awarding contracts. Bidding capacity is determined by multiplying the positive net working capital (working capital = current assets — current liabilities) by a factor of 10.Only those statements reflecting a positive net working capital position will be considered satisfactory for prequalification purposes. (10) In the case that a bidding date falls within the time a new financial statement is being prepared, the previous statement shall be updated with proper verification. b. Bidder Prequalification Application. A Bidder Prequalifcation Application must be submitted along with audited or reviewed financial statements by firms wishing to be eligible to bid on all classes of construction and maintenance projects. Incomplete Applications will be rejected. (1) In those schedules where there is nothing to report, the notation of "None" or "N/A" should be inserted. (2) A minimum of five (5) references of related work must be provided. (3) Submission of an equipment schedule which indicates equipment under the control of the Contractor and which is related to the type of work for which the Contactor is seeking prequalification. The schedule must include the manufacturer, model and general common description of each piece of equipment. Abbreviations or means of describing equipment other than provided above will not be accepted. 3. Eligibility to Bid a. The City shall be the sole judge as to a contractor's prequalification. b. The City may reject, suspend, or modify any prequalification for failure by the contractor to demonstrate acceptable financial ability or performance. c. The City will issue a letter as to the status of the prequalification approval. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 11 -3 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 3 of 3 d. If a contractor has a valid prequalification letter, the contractor will be eligible to bid the prequalified work types until the expiration date stated in the letter. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 12 DAP PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT Page 1 of I SECTION 00 4512 DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT Each Bidder is required to complete the information below by identifying the prequalified contractors and/or subcontractors whom they intend to utilize for the major work type(s) listed. In the "Mai or Work Tvpe" box provide the complete major work tvoe and actual description as nrovided by the Water Department for water and sewer and TPW for paving. Major Work Type Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name Prequalification Expiration Date Concrete Construction/ Glenn Thurman, Inc. 7/30/2025 Reconstruction Unlimited. Asphalt Construction/ Reconstruction Unlimited. Asphalt Maint Unlimited The undersigned hereby certifies that the contractors and/or subcontractors described in the table above are currently prequalified for the work types listed. BIDDER: Glenn Thurman, Inc. BY: P.O. Box 850842 Mesquite, Texas 75185 ( *nature) TITLE: CONTRACT Mii(•:Ai;GER DATE: / %j 7/Z-0y� END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PREQUALI FICATION STATEMENT— DEVELOPER: AWARDED PROJECTS Form Version September 1, 2015 00 45 12—Prequalification Statement 2015—DAP-Paving.docx 00 45 26 - 1 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Page 1 of 1 SECTION 00 45 26 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 406.096(a), as amended, Contractor certifies that it provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City Project No. 104378. Contractor further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code, Section 406.096(b), as amended, it will provide to City its subcontractor's certificates of compliance with worker's compensation coverage. CONTRACTOR: Glenn Thurman, Inc By: chadsan Juan Company PI Pr t) P.O. Box 850842 Signature: Address _ Mesauite. Texas 75185 Title: Vice President City/State/Zip (Please Print) THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TA ANT . § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared ;,wFc:;t Air"3 .>a.�tn , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same as the act and deed of , , . , t 1 1 i ,, ' i _ a I \ ((, for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity ft%e&1h stated. GIVEN E MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this lb-4- day of ,200;9 Traci A, Meek Notary Public, State of Texas �t ry IN 10546144 My Commission Expires 0610612024 = Notary Public in and for the State o1rTexas END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 00 52 43 - 1 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Pagel of 4 SECTION 00 52 43 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, authorized on 02/15/2024 is made by and between the Developer, Weatherford 55, LTD., authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") , and Glenn Thurman, Inc., authorized to do business in Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized representative, ("Contractor"). Developer and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: Article 1. WORK Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the Project identified herein. Article 2. PROJECT The project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows: Westnoint Park 104378 Article 3. CONTRACT TIME 3.1 Time is of the essence. All time limits for Milestones, if any, and Final Acceptance as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence to this Contract. 3.2 Final Acceptance. The Work will be complete for Final Acceptance within 45 working days after the date when the Contract Time commences to run as provided in Paragraph 12.04 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 3.3 Liquidated damages Contractor recognizes that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Developer will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in Paragraph 3.2 above, plus any extension thereof allowed in accordance with Article 10 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. The Contractor also recognizes the delays, expense and difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the Developer if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof , Contractor agrees that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay Developer FIVE HUNDRED Dollars ($ 500.00 ) for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.2 for Final Acceptance until the City issues the Final Letter of Acceptance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 00 52 43 - 2 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 2 of 4 Article 4. CONTRACT PRICE Developer agrees to pay Contractor for performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents an amount in current funds of one million, seven hundred ninety-nine thousand, Dollars ($1,799,678.08 ) six nunarea seventy-eignt, ana eignt cents Article 5. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 5.1 CONTENTS: A. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between Developer and Contractor concerning the Work consist of the following: 1. This Agreement. 2. Attachments to this Agreement: a. Bid Form (As provided by Developer) 1) Proposal Form (DAP Version) 2) Prequalification Statement 3) State and Federal documents (project specific) b. Insurance ACORD Form(s) c. Payment Bond (DAP Version) d. Performance Bond (DAP Version) e. Maintenance Bond (DAP Version) f. Power of Attorney for the Bonds g. Worker's Compensation Affidavit h. MBE and/or SBE Commitment Form (If required) Standard City General Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 4. Supplementary Conditions. Specifications specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of the Project's Contract Documents. 6. Drawings. 7. Addenda. 8. Documentation submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award. The following which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the Agreement and, if issued, become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents: a. Notice to Proceed. b. Field Orders. c. Change Orders. d. Letter of Final Acceptance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 00 52 43 - 3 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 3 of 4 Article 6. INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this contract. This indemnification provision is specifically intended to overate and be effective even if it is alleged or vroven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused, in whole or in cart, by anv act. omission or negligence of the citv. This indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the city in defending against such claims and causes of actions. 6.2 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of property of the city, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this contract. This indemnification urovision is suecifically intended to overate and be effective even if it is alleged or vroven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused, in whole or in cart, by anv act, omission or negligence of the citv. Article 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Terms. 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 Terms used in this Agreement are defined in Article 1 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. Assignment of Contract. This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents may not be assigned by the Contractor without the advanced express written consent of the Developer. Successors and Assigns. Developer and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. Severability. Any provision or part of the Contract unenforceable by a court of competent remaining provisions shall continue to CONTRACTOR. Governing Law and Venue. Documents held to be jurisdiction shall be be valid and binding unconstitutional, void or deemed stricken, and all upon DEVELOPER and This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents is performable in the State of Texas. Venue shall be Tarrant County, Texas, or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 00 52 43 - 4 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 4 of 4 7.6 Authority to Sign. Contractor shall attach evidence of authority to sign Agreement, if other than duly authorized signatory of the Contractor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and Contractor have executed this Agreement in multiple counterparts. This Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by the Parties ("Effective Date"). Contractor: Developer: Glenn Thurman, Ingature) z�g By: Bar: _ i,"A(( g ture) Chad San Juan vj_r.H president (Printed Name) Title: Company Name: Glenn Thurman, Inc. Address: P.O. Box 850842 City/State/Zip: Mesquite, Texas 75185 10 Date (Printed Name) Title: Company name: Weatherford 55, LTD Address: 3045 Lackland Rd. City/State/Zip: Fort Worth, TX 76116 02/15/2024 Date CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 -- Bond No. 9439357 0062 13- 1 PERFORMANCE BONI) Page t of 2 SECTION 00 62 13 PERFORMANCE BOND THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That we, Glenn Thurman. Inc. , known as "Principal" Colonial American Casualty and Nurety Company and herein and Fidelity and Det)osit Comganv of Maryland , a corporate sure ty(sureties, if more than one) duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weathertord 55. LTD, authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the penal sum of One Million, Seven Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand, Six Hundred Seventy Eight and 08/100 Dollars ($ 1,799,678.08 ), lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA Number CFA23-0027; and WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer awarded the 15 day of February , 20 24_, which Contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment labor and other accessories defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Change Orders, as provided for in said Contract designated as Wesmoint Park. NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Principal shall faithfully perform it obligations under the Contract and shall in all respects duly and faithfully perform the Work, including Change Orders, under the Contract, according to the plans, specifications. and contract documents therein referred to, and as well during any period of extension of the Contract that may be granted on the part of the Developer and/or City, then this obligation shall be and become null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. CITY OF FORT WORTH b3eslpoint Park - STANDARD CITY CONMTIONS — p&VELOPER AW ARDM PROJECTS City Prajoct T,o,: 104374 Revised lanuan, 31, 2012 006213-2 PERFORMANCE BOND Page 2 of PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of said statue, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February , 2024 . ATTE (Principal) Secretary Witness as to Principal tness as to Suren PRINCIPAL: Glenn Thurman. Inc. BY: ignani Cjwo San Juan Vice p; SAdent Name and Title Address: P.O. Box 850842 Mesquite. Texas 75185 SURETY: Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company and Fidelity any osit ColnDanv of Maryland BY: Signature Robbi Morales. Attornev-in-fact Name and Title Address: 5005 LBJ Freewayy. Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75244 Telephone Number: 214/989-0000 *Note: if signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded, CITY OF FOR'r WORTH iiestpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDJFIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 01), Project A%a.: 104378 Rcwtord January 31, 2012 Bond No 9439357 0062 14 - 1 PAYMENT BOND Page I of 2 SECTION 00 62 14 PAYMENT BOND THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That we, Glenn Thunnaq, Inc. , known as "Principal" Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company and herein, and Fidelitv and Deposit Comoanv of Maryland a corporate surety ( or sureties if more than one), duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weatherford 55, LTD, authorized to do business in Texas "(Developer'), and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the penal sum one Million, Seven Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand, of Six Hundred Seventy Eight and 081100-------------------------- Dollars ($ 1,799,678.08 ), lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for the payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents: WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of community facilities in the City of Fort Worth, by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA Number CFA23-0027; and WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a certain wrritten Contract with Developer, awarded the 15 day of February 2024 which Contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment, labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work as provided for in said Contract and designated as WestDoi nt Park. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that if Principal shall pay all monies owing to any (and all) payment bond beneficiary (as defined in Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended) in the prosecution of the Work under the Contract, then this obligation shall be and become null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoirit Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS— DFVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Rey fncl January 3 1, 2012 006214-2 PAYMENTBOND Page 2 of 2 This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of said statute. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February . 20 24 ATTEST: c A6,4—.4Ot t ( rin ipai) Secretary Witness as to Principal ATTEST: (Surety) Secretary -��,, WAess as to Surety PRINCIPAL.: Glenn Thurman. Inc. BY: Slg5 San Juan Vice President Name and Title Address: P.O. Box 850842 Mesauite. Texas 75185 SURETY: Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland BY: Signature Robbi Morales, Attorney -in -fact Name and Title Address: 5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75244 Telepbone Number: 214/989-0000 Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety, there must be on file a certified extract from the bylaws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. END OF SECTION CTTY OF FORT R'ORTH Westpoint Park ITANDARD C]TY CONDTTiONS — DEVEL:OPM AWARDED PROJ X'TS City Project No.: 104378 Revised Januan, 3 L 20I2 Bond No. 9439357 SECTION 00 62 19 MAINTENANCE BOND THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § 006219- 1 MAINTENANCE BOND Page 1 d3 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That we Glenn Thurman. Inc. , known as "Principal" Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company and herein and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland , a corporate surety (sureties, if more than one) duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weatherford 55. LTD. authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal One Million. Seven Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand, corporation ("City"), in the sum of Six I fundred Seventy N2111 and 08/100------------ ------ Dollars ($ 1.799.678.08 1, lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees and their successors, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA Number CFA23-0027;and WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer awarded theme_ day of February . 20 24 , which Contract is hereby referred to and a made part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Work resulting from a duly authorized Change Order (collectively herein, the "Work") as provided for in said Contract and designated as Westooint Park, and WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to use such materials and to so construct the Work in accordance with the plans, specifications and Contract Documents that the Work is and will remain free from defects in materials or workmanship for and during the period of two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance of the Work by the City ("Maintenance Period"); and CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Ciq; Pra.iect Na 104378 Revised Januan, 31. 2012 006219-2 MAINTENANCE BOND Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS. Principal binds itself to repair or reconstruct the Work in whole or in part upon receiving notice from the Developer and/or City of the need thereof at any time within the Maintenance Period. NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if Principal shall remedy any defective Work, for which timely notice was provided by Developer or City, to a completion satisfactory to the City, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise to remain in ful I force and effect. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principal shall fail so to repair or reconstruct any timely noticed defective Work, it is agreed that the Developer or City may cause any and all such defective Work to be repaired and/or reconstructed with all associated costs thereof being borne by the Principal and the Surety under this Maintenance Bond; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Fort Worth Division; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that this obligation shal I be continuous in nature and successive recoveries may be had hereon for successive breaches. CITY OF FORT WORTH Wmtpoint Park STANDARD C[TY CONDITIONS — DFVELOPER AWARDED PROJEC'rs City Project No 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 00 62 19-3 MAINTENANCfi BOND Page 3 or3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February , 2024 . ATTE T: (PFmc pal) Secretary Witness as to PrincipaX`F ATTEST: PRINCIPAL: Glenn "Thurman. Inc BY: Signature ChWd San Juan lace President Name and Title Address: P.O. Box 850842. Mesouite. Texas 75185 SURETY: Colonial American Casualty and Surety Company and Fidelitv and Deposit Company of Maryland BY: CCa.�.� Signature Robbi Morales. AttorneN -in-fact Name and Title r t1c4L , Address: 5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1500 (Surety) ecretaty Dallas. TX 75244 Atness as to Surety Telephone Number: 214/989-0000 *Note: if signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. CITY 01' FORT WORTH Westpotnt Park STANDARD CITY CONDIT[ONS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No, 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 ZI-FRiCiI AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY Tl-TESE PRESENTS: That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation ofthe State ol'New York, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Illinois, and the I-fDELI'TY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Illinois (herein collectively called the "Companics" ), by Robert D. Murray, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V. Section 8. of the By -Laws of said Companies, which are set forth oft the reverse side hereof and are licreby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, do hereby nominate, constitute, and appoint Ricardo J. REYNA, Tina MCEWAN, Don E. CORNELL, Joshua SAUNDERS, Robbi MORALES, Sophinie HUNTER, Kelly A. WESTBROOK, Tonie PETRANEK, Milcaela PEPPERS of Dallas, Texas, its true and lawful agent and Attorney -in -Fact, to Inalce, execute, seal tuid deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act told deed: any and all bonds and undertakings, and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall he as binding upon said Companies, as fully and amply_ to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York. New York., the regularly elected officers ofthe COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., and the regularly elected officers of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., in their own proper persons. The said Vice President does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V. Section 8, of the By -Laws of said Companies, and is now in force. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President has hereunto subscribed his/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said ZURiCH AMERiCAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 14th day of September. A.D. 2023. 011UMII, HIIIIII 4fV�PO<%- `„2`OQ,PORq 1V•"'s,°pm0Qpp� z SEAL` li� S $ SEAL�SEAL`� ATTEST: ZURiCH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT C0IiPANY OF MARYLAND By: Robert U. Mm-i-ay Vice President >CZW7L, Iv Idw6 K_ _f By: Dcnvn E. Bron-n secrelmy State of Maryland County of Baltimore On this loth day of September, A,D. 2023, belbre the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, Robert D. Murray, Vice President and Dawn E. Brown, Secretary of the Companics, to me personally known to he the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution of same, and being by me duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he/she is the said officer ofthe Company aforesaid, and that the seals affixed to the preceding instrument are the Corporate Seals ofsaid Companies, and that the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officerwere duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporations. INTESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written Genevieve M. Maison VE R GENEVIEVE M_ MAI50N NOTARY PUBLIC A BALTIMORE COUNTY, MID •• �m "`� rM Cammam EVm JANUARY 27, 2025 Authenticity of this bond can be confirmed at bondvalidator.zurich na.com or 410-559-8790 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES "Article V, Section 8, Allornevs-in-Fact. -[-lie Chief Executive Officer, the President. or any Gxccutive Vice PI'CSiden[ or Vice President may. by Wlripen instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attorneys -in -fact wiLh au[I71061[� to cxectttC bonds. policies, recognizances, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on hehalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such attorney -in -fact to affix the corporate seal there[o; and nun' with or without cause rluldil} of revolve any such appointment or authority at an} Lillie." CERTIFICATE 1, the undenOymed. Vice President of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE, COMPANY, the COLONIAL. AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OI' MARYL.AND. do hereby certify that the foregoing Power ol'Atlorney is still in full force and effect on the date ofthis certificate: and I do further ccrtilj' that Article V. Section 8. of the By -Laws of the Companies is still in force. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the folloWing resolution of the Board of Directors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE- COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day ol'December 1998. RESOLVED: "That the si nature oflhe President or a Vicc Presidenl and the a[lcsling signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and [lie Seal of the Company may he affixed by Facsimile on any Power of Attorney... Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such facsimile signauu-c and seal shall be valid and bindin.- on the Company." This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authoriq- of the lolloWirlg resolution of the Board of Directors of lie COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5l1 day of May, 1994. and the following resolution of the Board ol' Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY 01- MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 101h day of May. 1990. RL=SOLVE"o "That the facsfnlife or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of' any Vicc-President. Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company. whether made hcretoliue or hereafter, Wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall tic valid and binding upon the Company t�ith the same force and covet as though manually affixed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hel'etnnto SLIhSCI"Ibcd my Millie and allixed the corporate seals of the said Companies, this day of 0 Po EAL01-B AL 5 =9USEAL _ {USFnz f.L ti. JY ``� �-C� d. . 1ian Hpnl00 Thomas O. McClellan Vice Prusiden[ TO REPORT A CLAIM WITH REGARD TO A SURETY BOND, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE CLAIM INCLUDING THE PRINCIPAL ON THE BOND, THE BOND NUMBER, AND YOUR CONTACT INFORIVIATION 'r0: Zurich Sut•ety Claims 1299 Zurich Way Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056 reportsfclailns(I)Zw'ichna.com 800-626-4577 Authenticity of this bond can be confirmed at bondvalidator.zurichna.com or 4I0-559-8790 Texas Important Notice IMPORTANT NOTICE To obtain information or make a complaint: You may call Zurich North America's toll -free telephone number for information or to make a complaint at: 1-800-382-2150 You may contact the Texas Department of Insurance to obtain information on companies, coverages, rights, or complaints at: 1-800-252-3439 You may write the Texas Department of Insurance: P.O. Box 149104 Austin, TX 78714-9104 Fax: (512) 490-1007 Web: www.tdi.texas.gov E-mail: ConsumerProtection@tdi.texas.gov PREMIUM OR CLAIM DISPUTES: Should you have a dispute concerning your premium or about a claim, you should contact the company first. If the dispute is not resolved, you may contact the Texas Department of Insurance. ATTACH THIS NOTICE TO YOUR POLICY: This notice is for information only and does not become a part or condition of the attached document. 9 ZURICH AVISO IMPORTANTE Para obtener informacion o para presentar una queja Usted puede Ilamar al numero de telefono gratuito de Zurich North America's para obtener informacion o para presenter una queja al: 1-800-382-2150 Usted puede comunicarse con el Departamento de Se- guros de Texas para obtener informacion sobre com- pah[as, coberturas, derechos, o quejas al: 1-800-252-3439 Usted puede escribir al Departamento de Seguros de Texas a: P.O. Box 149104 Austin, TX 78714-9104 Fax: (512) 490-1007 Sitio web: www.tdi.texas.gov E-mail: ConsumerProtection@tdi.texas.gov DISPUTAS POR PRIMAS DE SEGUROS O RECLAMACIONES: Si tiene una disputa relacionada con su prima de seguro o con una reclamacion, usted debe comunicarse con la compania primero. Si la disputa no es resuelta, usted puede comunicarse con el Departamento de Seguros de Texas. ADJUNTE ESTE AVISO A SU POLIZA: Este aviso es solamente para propositos informativos y no se con- vierte en parte o en condicion del documento adjunto. U-GU-296-E (06/15) Page 1 of 1 Street Lights DAP - BID PROPOSAL Page 1 of 1 UNIT PRICE BID SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM Project Item Information Bidder's Application Bidhst Item Description Specification Section No. Unit of Bid No. Measure Quantity UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 1 2605.3015 2" CONDT PVC SCH 80 (T) 26 05 33 LF 1,289 2 3341.1410 NO 10 Insulated Elec Condr 3441 10 LF 3,867 3 3441.1633 Install Type 33B Arm 3441 20 EA 41 4 3341.3002 Rdwy Illum Assmbly TY 8,11,D-25 and D-30 3441 20 EA 41 5 3441.3050 Furnish/Install LED Lighting Fixture (70 watt ATBO Cobra 3441 20 EA Head) 41 6 3441.3301 Rdwy Illum Foundation TY 1,2 and 4 3441 20 EA 41 TOTAL UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS Bid Summary UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS Total Construction Bid This Bid is submitted by the entity named below: BIDDER: Independent Utility Construction, Inc. 5109 Sun Valley Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76119 Contractor agrees to complete WORK for FINAL ACCEPTANCE within CONTRACT commences to run as provided in the General Conditions. END OF SECTION Bidder's Proposal Unit Price I Bid Value $20.84 $26,862.761 $1.73 $6,689.911 $277.00 $11,357.001 $2,379.00 $97,539.001 $387.00 $15,867.00 $1,804.00 $73,964.001 $232,279.671 BY: i yard Wolfe lJi��I� TITLE: President DATE: 03/09/2023 $232,279.671 $232,279.671 45 working days after the date when the CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS -DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP.xlsx 0045 11 -1 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 1 of 3 SECTION 00 45 11 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS 1. Summary. All contractors are required to be prequalified by the City prior to submitting bids. To be eligible to bid the contractor must submit Section 00 45 12, Prequalification Statement for the work type(s) listed with their Bid. Any contractor or subcontractor who is not prequalified for the work type(s) listed must submit Section 00 45 13, Bidder Prequalification Application in accordance with the requirements below. The prequalification process will establish a bid limit based on a technical evaluation and financial analysis of the contractor. The information must be submitted seven (7) days prior to the date of the opening of bids. For example, a contractor wishing to submit bids on projects to be opened on the 7th of April must file the information by the 31 st day of March in order to bid on these projects. In order to expedite and facilitate the approval of a Bidder's Prequalification Application, the following must accompany the submission. a. A complete set of audited or reviewed financial statements. (1) Classified Balance Sheet (2) Income Statement (3) Statement of Cash Flows (4) Statement of Retained Earnings (5) Notes to the Financial Statements, if any b. A certified copy of the firm's organizational documents (Corporate Charter, Articles of Incorporation, Articles of Organization, Certificate of Formation, LLC Regulations, Certificate of Limited Partnership Agreement). c. A completed Bidder Prequalification Application. (1) The firm's Texas Taxpayer Identification Number as issued by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. To obtain a Texas Taxpayer Identification number visit the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts online at the following web address www.window.state.tx.us/taxi)ennit/ and fill out the application to apply for your Texas tax ID. (2) The firm's e-mail address and fax number. (3) The firm's DUNS number as issued by Dun & Bradstreet. This number is used by the City for required reporting on Federal Aid projects. The DUNS number may be obtained at www.dnb.com. d. Resumes reflecting the construction experience of the principles of the firm for firms submitting their initial prequalification. These resumes should include the size and scope of the work performed. e. Other information as requested by the City. 2. Prequalification Requirements a. Financial Statements. Financial statement submission must be provided in accordance with the following: (1) The City requires that the original Financial Statement or a certified copy be submitted for consideration. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 11 -2 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 2 of 3 (2) To be satisfactory, the financial statements must be audited or reviewed by an independent, certified public accounting firm registered and in good standing in any state. Current Texas statues also require that accounting firms performing audits or reviews on business entities within the State of Texas be properly licensed or registered with the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy. (3) The accounting firm should state in the audit report or review whether the contractor is an individual, corporation, or limited liability company. (4) Financial Statements must be presented in U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange of the Balance Sheet date. (5) The City will not recognize any certified public accountant as independent who is not, in fact, independent. (6) The accountant's opinion on the financial statements of the contracting company should state that the audit or review has been conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. This must be stated in the accounting firm's opinion. It should: (1) express an unqualified opinion, or (2) express a qualified opinion on the statements taken as a whole. (7) The City reserves the right to require a new statement at any time. (8) The financial statement must be prepared as of the last day of any month, not more than one year old and must be on file with the City 16 months thereafter, in accordance with Paragraph 1. (9) The City will determine a contractor's bidding capacity for the purposes of awarding contracts. Bidding capacity is determined by multiplying the positive net working capital (working capital = current assets — current liabilities) by a factor of 10.Only those statements reflecting a positive net working capital position will be considered satisfactory for prequalification purposes. (10) In the case that a bidding date falls within the time a new financial statement is being prepared, the previous statement shall be updated with proper verification. b. Bidder Prequalification Application. A Bidder Prequalifcation Application must be submitted along with audited or reviewed financial statements by firms wishing to be eligible to bid on all classes of construction and maintenance projects. Incomplete Applications will be rejected. (1) In those schedules where there is nothing to report, the notation of "None" or "N/A" should be inserted. (2) A minimum of five (5) references of related work must be provided. (3) Submission of an equipment schedule which indicates equipment under the control of the Contractor and which is related to the type of work for which the Contactor is seeking prequalification. The schedule must include the manufacturer, model and general common description of each piece of equipment. Abbreviations or means of describing equipment other than provided above will not be accepted. 3. Eligibility to Bid a. The City shall be the sole judge as to a contractor's prequalification. b. The City may reject, suspend, or modify any prequalification for failure by the contractor to demonstrate acceptable financial ability or performance. c. The City will issue a letter as to the status of the prequalification approval. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 11 -3 BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS Page 3 of 3 d. If a contractor has a valid prequalification letter, the contractor will be eligible to bid the prequalified work types until the expiration date stated in the letter. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 0045 12 DAP PREQLJALIFIC4TION STATEMENT Page I of I SECTION 00 45 12 DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT Each Bidder is required to complete the information below by identifying the prequalified contractors and/or subcontractors whom they intend to utilize for the major work type(s) listed. In the "Maior Work Tvne" box provide the complete maior work tv_ ne and actual description as provided by the Water Department for water and sewer and TPW for pavine. Major Work Type Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name I Prequalification Expiration Date Street Lights Independent Utility Construction, Inc. 1 2/27/2025 The undersigned hereby certifies that the contractors and/or subcontractors described in the table above are currently prequalified for the work types listed. BIDDER: Independent Utility Construction, Inc 5109 Sun Valley Dr. Fort Worth, Texas 76119 BY: ' hard Wolfe (Signature) TITLE: President DATE: 01/18/2024 END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 00 45 12_Prequalification Statement 2015_DAP.docx Form Version September 1, 2015 00 45 26 - 1 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Page 1 of 1 SECTION 00 45 26 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 406.096(a), as amended, Contractor certifies that it provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City Project No. 104378. Contractor further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code, Section 406.096(b), as amended, it will provide to City its subcontractor's certificates of compliance with worker's compensation coverage. CONTRACTOR: Independent Utilitv Construction. Inc. By: Richard Wolfe Company .Please Prin 5109 Sun Vallev Dr. Signature: Address Fort Worth. Texas 76119 Title: President City/State/Zip (Please Print) THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Richard Wolfe , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same as the act and deed of Independent Utility Construction, Inc£or the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein statedd. ffi�DERMYPANDANDLSFAL OF OFFICE this I ?� day of �t 20; q otary Public in and for the END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 2, 2014 00 52 43 - 1 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 1 of 4 SECTION 00 52 43 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, authorized on 02/15/2024 is made by and between the Developer, Weatherford 55, LTD , authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") , and Independent Utilitv Construction, Inc. , authorized to do business in Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized representative, ("Contractor"). Developer and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: Article 1. WORK Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the Project identified herein. Article 2. PROJECT The project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is generally described as follows: WestDoint Park 104378 Article 3. CONTRACT TIME 3.1 Time is of the essence. All time limits for Milestones, if any, and Final Acceptance as stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence to this Contract. 3.2 Final Acceptance. The Work will be complete for Final Acceptance within 45 working days after the date when the Contract Time commences to run as provided in Paragraph 12.04 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 3.3 Liquidated damages Contractor recognizes that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Developer will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in Paragraph 3.2 above, plus any extension thereof allowed in accordance with Article 10 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. The Contractor also recognizes the delays, expense and difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the Developer if the Work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof , Contractor agrees that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay Developer Five Hundred Dollars ($ 500.00 ) for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.2 for Final Acceptance until the City issues the Final Letter of Acceptance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 005243-3 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 3 of 4 Article 6. INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this contract. This indemnification Drovision is specifically intended to overate and be effective even if it is alleged or Droven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused. in whole or in Dart, by anv act. omission or negligence of the city. This indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the city in defending against such claims and causes of actions. 6.2 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of property of the city, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this contract. This indemnification provision is specifically intended to operate and be effective even if it is alleged or proven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused. in whole or in Dart. by anv act. omission or negligence of the city. Article 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Terms. Terms used in this Agreement are defined in Article 1 of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 7.2 Assignment of Contract. This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents may not be assigned by the Contractor without the advanced express written consent of the Developer. 7.3 Successors and Assigns. Developer and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 7.4 Severability. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be unconstitutional, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon DEVELOPER and CONTRACTOR. 7.5 Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents is performable in the State of Texas. Venue shall be Tarrant County, Texas, or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 005243-4 Developer AN3rded Project Agreement Page 4 of 4 7.6 Authority to Sign. Contractor shall attach evidence of authority to sign Agreement, if other than duly authorized signatory of the Contractor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and Contractor have executed this Agreement in multiple counterparts. This Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by the Parties ("Effective Date") - Contractor: Developer: Indepepdent Utiliti, Construction. Inc. / /7 B '/' _ By: �i� •�' l vature) (Signature) Richard Wolfe (Printed Name) Title: President Company Name: Independent Utility Construction, Inc. Address: 5109 Sun Valley Dr. City State Zip: Fort Worth, TX 76116 I - N- zc2q Date 1 �15titltlll/t// 1 R UC,,, v % .�NTIE— i!ttt (Printed Name) 'f itle: C�Q'� 5 Z C-4-4-r` 4— Company name: Weatherford 55, LTD Address: 3045 Lackland Rd. City State Zip: Fort Worth, TX 76116 02/15/2024 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROTECTS Ciry Project No 104378 Rey iced June 16 2016 005243-2 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 2 of 4 Article 4. CONTRACT PRICE Developer agrees to pay Contractor for performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents an amount in current funds of two hundred thirty-two thousand, two hundred seventy-nine and sixb1511, yts ($ 232,279.67 ). Article 5. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 5.1 CONTENTS: A. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between Developer and Contractor concerning the Work consist of the following: 1. This Agreement. 2. Attachments to this Agreement: a. Bid Form (As provided by Developer) 1) Proposal Form (DAP Version) 2) Prequalification Statement 3) State and Federal documents (project specific) b. Insurance ACORD Form(s) c. Payment Bond (DAP Version) d. Performance Bond (DAP Version) e. Maintenance Bond (DAP Version) f. Power of Attorney for the Bonds g. Worker's Compensation Affidavit h. MBE and/or SBE Commitment Form (If required) 3. Standard City General Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 4. Supplementary Conditions. 5. Specifications specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of the Project's Contract Documents. 6. Drawings. 7. Addenda. 8. Documentation submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award. 9. The following which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the Agreement and, if issued, become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents: a. Notice to Proceed. b. Field Orders. c. Change Orders. d. Letter of Final Acceptance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised June 16, 2016 , 0061 13- 1 VERI'`ORMANC'G BOND Page I nl'2 Bond No. 377557G I SECTION 00 62 13 PERFORMANCE BOND 3 4 THE STATE OF TEXAS § 5 § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: 6 COUNTY OF TARRANT § 7 That we, Independent Utility Construction. Inc. . known as "Principal" herein and 8 Westfield Insurance Company , a corporate surety(sureties, if more than one) duly 9 authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), 10 are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weatherford 55. LTD, authorized to do business in I I Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the 12 penal sum of, Two Hundred Thirty -Two Thousand. Two Hundred Seventv-Nine Dollars & Sixty- 13 Seven Cents ($232.279.67) lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Foil Worth, Tarrant 14 County, Texas for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, jointly unto the Developer 15 and the City as dual obliges, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and 16 assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. 17 WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of 18 community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, 19 CFA Number 23-0027 :and 20 WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer 21 awarded the 15 day of February , 2024 which Contract is hereby referred to and 22 made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment 23 labor and other accessories defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Change 24 Orders, as provided for in said Contract designated as Street Li6tinl? Improvements to serve 25 Westpoint Park. 26 NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Principal 27 shall faithfully perform it obligations under the Contract and shall in all respects duly and faithfully 28 perform the Work, including Change Orders, under the Contract, according to the plans, 29 specifications, and contract documents therein referred to, and as well during any period of 30 extension of the Contract that may be granted on the part of the Developer and/or City, then this 31 obligation shall be and become null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. 32 33 CITY OF PORT WORTI I Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Prgicct No. 104378 Revised January 31. 2012 0001 13-2 PERPORMANCI BOND Page 2 nl 2 Bond No. 377557G PROVIDED FURTIIER, that If all), legal action be tiled on this Bond, venue shall lie ill 2 Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort 3 Worth Division. 4 This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the 5 Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in 6 accordance with the provisions of said statue. 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have SIGNED and SEALED this 8 instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February 2024. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ATTE� ( rincipa ecretary Morgan fe Lnesspal CTiristina Garcia QAk�� J&aq Witne as to Surety Elizabeth Gr y PRINCIPA INDEP ENT UTILITY CONS CTION. IN' BY: �+glia Richard Wolfe. President Name and Title Address: 5109 Sun Vallev Drive Fort Worth. Texas 76119 SURETY: WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY BY: IK��, >�,l//.r tgnahlre Kyle W. Sweenev. Attornev-in- Fact Name and Title Address: 955 Garden Park Drive. Suite 230 Allen. Texas 75013 Telephone Number: 972-516-2600 *Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westlwml Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 104378 Revised January 31, 2012 0061 14- 1 PAYMENT BOND Pace 1 (2 Bond No. 377557G i SECTION 00 62 14 2 PAYMENT BOND 3 4 THE STATE OF TEXAS § 5 § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: 6 COUNTY OF TARRANT § 7 That we, Independent Utilitv Construction, Inc. , known as "Principal" herein, 8 and Westfield Insurance Comnanv , a Corporate surety (or sureties if more than 9 one), duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one 10 or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer Weatherford 55, LTD, authorized to do 11 business in Texas ("Developer"), and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation 12 ("City"), in the penal sum of Two hundred Thirty -Two Thousand, Two ilundred Seventy -Nine 13 Dollars & Sixty -Seven Cents ($232,279.67) lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort 14 Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for the payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto 15 the Developer and City as dual obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, 16 successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents: 17 WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of 18 community facilities in the City of Fort Worth, by and through a Community Facilities 19 Agreement, CFA Number 23-0027 ; and 20 WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a certain written Contract with Developer, 21 awarded the 15 day of February , 2024, which Contract is hereby referred to and 22 made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment, 23 labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work as provided for in 24 said Contract and designated as Street Liehtine Irinrovements to serve Westnoint Park.. 25 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that if 26 Principal shall pay all monies owing to any (and all) payment bond beneficiary (as defined in 27 Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended) in the prosecution of the Work under 28 the Contract, then this obligation shall be and become null and void; otherwise to remain in full 29 force and effect. 30 CITY OF FORT WORTH Wesirxmnt 1'ttrk STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DFVCLOPI;R AWARDED PROJECTS City Prniect No. 104 378 Rev iscd January 31, 2012 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 t0 11 12 13 M61 14-2 PAYMt:N'1' 130N[) Page 2 of 2 Bond No. 377557G This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of said statute. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February 2024 ATTEST: (Principal) cretary Mor n Wolfe Jtness as to Principal Christina Garcia ATTEST: (Surety) Secretary Frank A. Carrino ctlA , Witnes as to OuretyElizabe�Gray� PRINCIPAL: INDEPENDENT UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. INC. . BY: Sknre - - Richard Wolfe, President Name and Title Address: 5109 Sun Valley Drive Fort Worth. Texas 76119 SURETY: WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY BY: Sig, ZatUre Kyle W. Sweenev, Attornev-in-Fact Name and Title Address: 955 Garden Park Drive. Suite 230, Allen, Texas 75013 Telephone Number: 972-516-2600 Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety, there must be on file a certified extract from the bylaws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT' WORTI-1 STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DI:VLLOPGR AWARDED PROJECTS Rcvi,- d Januuty 31. 2012 westpoinl ['ark City Prgjecl No I0d378 006219-I MAINTENANCE13OND Page I ol'3 Bond No. 377557G I SECTION 00 62 19 2 MAINTENANCE BOND 3 4 THE STATE OF TEXAS § 5 § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: 6 COUNTY OF TARRANT § 7 8 That we Independent Utility Construction. Inc. , known as "Principal" herein and 9 Westfield Insurance Comoanv , a corporate surety (sureties, if more than one) duly 10 authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), I I are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Weatherford 55, LTD. authorized to do business in 12 Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the 13 sum of Two Hundred Thirtv-Two Thousand. Two Hundred Seventv-Nine Dollars & Sixty -Seven 14 Cents ($232,279.67) lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarnant County, 15 Texas, for payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto the Developer and the City 16 as dual obligees and their successors, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, 17 successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. I8 19 WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of 20 community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities 21 Agreement, CFA Number 23-0027 ; and 22 WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contact with the Developer 23 awarded the 15 day of February , 2024 which Contract is hereby referred to and 24 a made part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment 25 labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any 26 Work resulting from a duly authorized Change Order (collectively herein, the "Work") as 27 provided for in said Contract and designated as Street Liahtinz lmurovements to serve Westpoint 28 Park -,and 29 30 WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to use such materials and to so construct the Work in 31 accordance with the plans, specifications and Contract Documents that the Work is and will 32 remain free from defects in materials or workmanship for and during the period of two (2) years 33 after the date of Final Acceptance of the Work by the City ("Maintenance Period"); and 34 CITY OF FORT WORTti Wesllxtinl ]'lark STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Protect No. 104379 Revised Janwary 31, 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WG219-2 MAINTNANCT nOND Past 2 of 3 Bond No. 377557G WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to repair or reconstruct the Work in whole or in part upon receiving notice from the Developer and/or City of the need thereof at any time within the Maintenance Period, NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if Principal shall remedy any defective Work, for which timely notice was provided by Developer or City, to a completion satisfactory to the City, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principal shall fail so to repair or reconstruct any timely noticed defective Work, it is agreed that the Developer or City may cause any and all such defective Work to be repaired and/or reconstructed with all associated costs thereof being borne by the Principal and the Surety tender this Maintenance Bond; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that this obligation shall be continuous in nature and successive recoveries may be had hereon for successive breaches. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDI'r1ONS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised Jantkiry 31, 2012 Westrmint Park City Protect No 104378 0062 19-3 MAI N'ITNANC E BOND Piee 3 ol'3 Bond No. 377557G IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly aLlthorized agents and officers on this the 15 day of February , 2024. 4 PRINCIPAL.: 5 INDEPENDENT UTILITY 6 CON! ION.INC. / 7 8 BY: ) _4 Sig ure 10 11 ATT 12 4eretary Richard Wolfe. President l3 ( rinctpcMorgat Wol Name and Title 14 15 _ — Address: 5109 Sun Vallev Drive 16 ', Fort Worth. 'Texas 76119 17 18 -- 19 ttness as to Principal Christina Garcia 20 SURETY: 21 WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY 22 23 24 BY:25 Signature 26 27 Kvle W. Sweenev. Attornev-in-Fact 28 ATTEST: Name and Title 29 30 Address: 955 Garden Park Drive. Suite 230 31 (Surety) Secretary Frank A. Carrino Allen. "Texas 75013 32 33 34 Witne�tSurty lizabeth Gray Telephone Number: 972-516-2600 35 36 *Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract 37 from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If 38 Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. 39 40 The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded 41 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Projecl No. 104378 Revised .lemuuv 31. 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE To obtain information or make a complaint You may call Westfield Insurance Company's and/or Ohio Farmers Insurance Company's toll -free telephone number for information or to make a complaint at: 1-800-368-3597 You may also write to Westfield Insurance Company and/or Ohio Farmers Insurance Company at: 955 Garden Park Drive, Suite 230 Allen, Texas 75013-3742 You may contact the Texas Department of Insurance to obtain information on companies, coverages, rights or complaints at: 1-800-252-3439 You may write the Texas Department of Insurance: P. O. Box 149104 Austin, TX 78714-9104 Fax: (512) 475-1771 Web: htto://www.tdi.state.tx.us E-mail: ConsumerProtectiona-tdi.state.tx.us PREMIUM OR CLAIM DISPUTES: Should you have a dispute concerning your premium or about a claim you should contact the agent or Westfield Insurance Company and/or Ohio Farmers Insurance Comapny first. If the dispute is not resolved, you may contact the Texas Department of Insurance. ATTACH THIS NOTICE TO YOUR POLICY: This notice is for information only and does not become a part or condition of the attached document. AVISO IMPORTANTE Para obtener informacion o para someter una queja: Usted puede Ilamar al numero de telefono gratis de Westfield Insurance Company's / Ohio Farmers Insurance Company's para informacion o para someter una queja al: 1-800-368-3597 Usted tarnbien puede escribir a Westfield Insurance Company / Ohio Farmers Insurance Company: 955 Garden Park Drive, Suite 230 Allen, Texas 75013-3742 Puede comunicarse con el Departamento de Seguros de Texas para obtener informacion acerca de companias, coberturas, derechos o quejas al: 1-800-252-3439 Puede escribir al Departamento de Seguros de Texas: P. O. Box 149104 Austin, TX 78714-9104 Fax: (512) 475-1771 Web: http;//www.tdi.state.tx.us E-mail: ConsumerProtection(a�tdi.state.tx.us DISPUTAS SOBRE PRIMAS O RECLAMOS: Si tiene una disputa concerniente a su prima o a un reclamo, debe comunicarse con el agente o Westfield Insurance Company / Ohio Farmers Insurance Company primero. Si no se resuelve la disputa, puede entonces comunicarse con el departamento (TDI). UNA ESTE AVISO A SU POLIZA: Este aviso es solo para proposito de informacion y no se convierte en parte o condicion del documento adjunto. THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SUPERCEDES ANY PREVIOUS POWER BEARING THIS SAME POWER # AND ISSUED PRIOR TO 09/28/23, FOR ANY PERSON OR PERSONS NAMED BELOW. POWER NO. 4220052 06 General Westfield Insurance Co. Power of Attorney Westfield National Insurance Co. Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. CERTIFIED COPY Westfield Center, Ohio Know All Men by These Presents, That WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY. WESTFIELD NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, corporations; hereinafter referred to individually as a-Cornpany' and collectively as "Companies," duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ohio, and having its principal offico in Westfield Center. Medina County. Ohio, do by these presents make, constitute and appoint CHARLES D. SWEENEY, MICHAEL A. SWEENEY, KYLE W. SWEENEY, ELIZABETH GRAY, DAVID W. SWEENEY, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY of FORT WORTH and State of TX its true and lawful Attorneys) -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, recogni2ances, undertakings, or other instruments or contracts of suretyship in any penal limit. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - -- LIMITATION: THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY CANNOT BE USED TO EXECUTE NOTE GUARANTEE, MORTGAGE DEFICIENCY, MORTGAGE GUARANTEE, OR BANK DEPOSITORY BONDS. and to bind any of the Comparies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seal of the applicable Company and duly attested by its Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attorney(s)-in-Fact may do in the Premises. Said appointment is made under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTFIELD NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY: Be it Resolved, that the President, any Senior Executive, any Secretary or any Fidelity & Surety Operations Executive or other Executive shall be and is hereby vested with full power and authority to appoint any one or more suitable persons as Attorneys) -in -Fact to represent and act for and on behalf of the Company subject to the following provisions: The Attorney -in -Fact. may be given full power and authority for and in the name of and on behalf of the Company, to execute, acknowledge and deliver, any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts, agreements or indemnity and other conditional or obligatory undertakings and any and all notices and documents canceling or terminating the Compam/"s liability thereunder, and any such instruments so executed by any such Attorney -in -Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the Corporate Secretary." "Be it Further Resolved, that the signature of any such designated person and the seal of the Company heretofore or hereafter affixed to any power of attorney or any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any power of attorney or certificate bearirg facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached." (Each adopted at a meeting held on February 8, 2000). In Witness Whereof, WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTFIELD NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY have caused these presents to be signed by their National Surely Leader and Senior Executive and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed this 28th day of SEPTEMBER A.D., 2023 . "" """""" WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY corporate ••'�SUfl.t�''''- ��•"��(?NAt, Jn'•' •�%NSU Seals . • o�"� :'�! • '""" JSL ; : +./WESTFIELD NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Affixed i �� w. '.io 'v Tr ;9= a'a OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY �. '=v SEAL TE m =o_ Paz Via,; Y =,�. '�; Z:, 1848 L State of Ohio By' County of Medina ss.: Gary W.t$tumper, National "Surety Leader and Senior Executive On this 28th day of SEPTEMBER A.D., 2023 , before me personally came Gary W. Stumper to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say, that he resides in Medina, OH; that he is National Surety Leader and Senior Executive of WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTFIELD NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, the companies described in and which executed the above instrument: that he knows the seals of said Companies: that the seals affixed to said instrument are such corporate seals: that they were so affixed by order of the Boards of Directors of said Companies: and that he signed his name thereto by like Order. Notarial Seal ....�1 A L Affixed ,CP•:'•••"•' S�: State of Ohio = .p ✓ 4mi, David A. Kotnik, Attorney at Law, Notary Pubiir. County of Medina ss.: '•., 9 ��•- My Commission Does Not Expire (Sec. 147,03 Ohio Revised Code) TF0F�, I. Frank A. Carrino, Secretary of WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTFIELD NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and OH10 FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Power of Attorney, executed by said Companies, which is still In full force and effect; and furthermore, the resolutions of the Boards of Directors, set out in the Power of Attorney are in full force and effect. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seals of said Companies at Westfield Center, Ohio, this day of A.D.. a'a6Yf".. F �;,i. i;�;',, 1NSUp`,,- SEAL SFj .A ' U II, p _ '6111►RTERfp ry M I' SQC►YiQ Frank A. Carrino, Secretary BPOAC2 (combined) (03.22) STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Article 1 — Definitions and Terminology.......... 1.01 Defined Terms ............................... 1.02 Terminology .................................. Article 2 — Preliminary Matters ....................... 2.01 Before Starting Construction...... 2.02 Preconstruction Conference........ 2.03 Public Meeting ............................ Page .............................................1 .............................................1 ............................................. 5 ....................................................... 6 ....................................................... 6 ....................................................... 6 ....................................................... 6 Article 3 — Contract Documents and Amending............................................................................................... 6 3.01 Reference Standards..................................................................................................................... 6 3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents.................................................................. 6 Article 4 — Bonds and Insurance....................................................................................................................... 7 4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers..................................................................................................... 7 4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds........................................................................ 7 4.03 Certificates of Insurance............................................................................................................... 7 4.04 Contractor's Insurance.................................................................................................................. 9 4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace...........................................................12 Article 5 — Contractor's Responsibilities........................................................................................................12 5.01 Supervision and Superintendent.................................................................................................12 5.02 Labor; Working Hours................................................................................................................13 5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment...........................................................................................13 5.04 Project Schedule..........................................................................................................................14 5.05 Substitutes and "Or-Equals".......................................................................................................14 5.06 Pre -Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors).....................................16 5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others...................................................................16 5.08 Wage Rates..................................................................................................................................18 5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties...........................................................................................................19 5.10 Laws and Regulations.................................................................................................................19 5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas.......................................................................................................19 5.12 Record Documents......................................................................................................................20 5.13 Safety and Protection.................................................................................................................. 21 5.14 Safety Representative.................................................................................................................21 5.15 Hazard Communication Programs.............................................................................................22 5.16 Submittals....................................................................................................................................22 5.17 Contractor's General Warranty and Guarantee..........................................................................23 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 5.18 Indemnification ............................................ 5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services 5.20 Right to Audit: ............................................. 5.21 Nondiscrimination ........................................ Article 6 - Other Work at the Site....... 6.01 Related Work at Site ....... Article 7 - City's Responsibilities ............................................ 7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals ....................... 7.02 Limitations on City's Responsibilities ................ 7.03 Compliance with Safety Program ........................ Article 8 - City's Observation Status During Construction....... 8.01 City's Project Representative ................................. 8.02 Authorized Variations in Work .............................. 8.03 Rejecting Defective Work ...................................... 8.04 Determinations for Work Performed ...................... Article 9 - Changes in the Work ...................... 9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work 9.02 Notification to Surety ................... Article 10 - Change of Contract Price; Change of Contract Time 10.01 Change of Contract Price ........................................... 10.02 Change of Contract Time ........................................... 10.03 Delays......................................................................... Article 11 - Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal or Acceptance of Defective Work ............ 11.01 Notice of Defects.............................................................................................................. 11.02 Access to Work................................................................................................................. 11.03 Tests and Inspections........................................................................................................ 11.04 Uncovering Work............................................................................................................. 11.05 City May Stop the Work................................................................................................... 11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work...................................................................... 11.07 Correction Period.............................................................................................................. 11.08 City May Correct Defective Work................................................................................... Article 12 - Completion .......................................... 12.01 Contractor's Warranty of Title ........... 12.02 Partial Utilization ................................ 12.03 Final Inspection ................................... 12.04 Final Acceptance ................................. Article 13 - Suspension of Work ..................................... 13.01 City May Suspend Work ............................. Article 14 - Miscellaneous ......................................... 14.01 Giving Notice ......................................... CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 24 24 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 27 a a ... 29 ... 29 ... 29 ... 29 ... 30 ... 30 ... 30 ... 30 ... 31 ................................. 32 ................................. 32 ................................. 32 ................................. 32 ................................. 33 ............................................................. 33 ............................................................. 33 ................. 34 ................. 34 Westpoint Park City Project No.: 104378 14.02 Computation of Times ........... 14.03 Cumulative Remedies ............ 14.04 Survival of Obligations.......... 14.05 Headings ................................. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 34 34 35 35 Westpoint Park City Project No.: 104378 0073 10- 1 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 1 of 35 ARTICLE I — DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY 1.01 Defined Terms A. Wherever used in these General Conditions or in other Contract Documents, the terms listed below have the meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof, and words denoting gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter. Said terms are generally capitalized or written in italics, but not always. When used in a context consistent with the definition of a listed -defined term, the term shall have a meaning as defined below whether capitalized or italicized or otherwise. In addition to terms specifically defined, terms with initial capital letters in the Contract Documents include references to identified articles and paragraphs, and the titles of other documents or forms. 1. Agreement - The written instrument which is evidence of the agreement between Developer and Contractor covering the Work 2. Asbestos —Any material that contains more than one percent asbestos and is friable or is releasing asbestos fibers into the air above current action levels established by the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 3. Business Day — A business day is defined as a day that the City conducts normal business, generally Monday through Friday, except for federal or state holidays observed by the City. 4. Buzzsaw — City's on-line, electronic document management and collaboration system. 5. Calendar Day — A day consisting of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight. 6. City— The City of Fort Worth, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation, acting by, its governing body through its City Manager, his designee, or agents authorized pursuant to its duly authorized charter on his behalf. 7. Community Facilities Agreement (CFA) A Contract between the Developer and the City for the Construction of one or more following public facilities within the City public right-of- way or easement: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street, Storm Drain, Street Light, and Street Signs. A CFA may include private facilities within the right-of-way dedicated as private right-of- way or easement on a recorded plat. 8. Contract —The entire and integrated written document incorporating the Contract Documents between the Developer, Contractor, and/or City concerning the Work. The Contract supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or oral. 9. Contract Documents —Those items that make up the contract and which must include the Agreement, and it's attachments such as standard construction specifications, standard City Conditions, other general conditions of the Developer, including: a. An Agreement CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10-2 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 2 of 35 b. Attachments to the Agreement i. Bid Form ii. Vendor Compliance with State Law Non -Resident Bidder iii. Prequalification Statement C. Current Prevailing Wage Rates Table (if required by City) d. Insurance Accord Form e. Payment Bond f. Performance Bond g. Maintenance Bond h. Power of Attorney for Bonds i. Workers Compensation Affidavit j. MWBE Commitment Form( If required by City) k. General Conditions 1. Supplementary Conditions in. The Standard City Conditions n. Specifications specifically made part of the Contract Documents by attachment, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of the Project's Contract Documents o. Drawings P. Documentation submitted by contractor prior to Notice of Award. q. The following which may be delivered or issued after the effective date if the Agreement and, if issued become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents i. Notice to Proceed ii. Field Orders iii. Change Orders iv. Letters of Final Acceptance r. Approved Submittals, other Contractor submittals, and the reports and drawings of subsurface and physical conditions are not Contract Documents. 10. Contractor —The individual or entity with whom Developer has entered into the Agreement. 11. Day or day —A day, unless otherwise defined, shall mean a Calendar Day. 12. Developer — An individual or entity that desires to make certain improvements within the City of Fort Worth 13. Drawings —That part of the Contract Documents prepared or approved by Engineer which graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed by Contractor. Submittals are not Drawings as so defined. 14. Engineer —The licensed professional engineer or engineering firm registered in the State of Texas performing professional services for the Developer. 15. Final Acceptance — The written notice given by the City to the Developer and/or Contractor that the Work specified in the Contract Documents has been completed to the satisfaction of the City. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 3 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 3 of 35 16. Final Inspection — Inspection carried out by the City to verify that the Contractor has completed the Work, and each and every part or appurtenance thereof, fully, entirely, and in conformance with the Contract Documents. 17. General Requirements —A part of the Contract Documents between the Developer and a Contractor. 18. Laws and Regulations Any and all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, and orders of any and all governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having jurisdiction. 19. Liens —Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Project funds, real property, or personal property. 20. Milestone —A principal event specified in the Contract Documents relating to an intermediate Contract Time prior to Final Acceptance of the Work. 21. Non -Participating Change Order —A document, which is prepared for and reviewed by the City, which is signed by Contractor, and Developer, and authorizes an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement. 22. Participating Change Order —A document, which is prepared for and approved by the City, which is signed by Contractor, Developer, and City and authorizes an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement. 23. Plans — See definition of Drawings. 24. Project Schedule —A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, in accordance with the General Requirements, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising the Contractor's plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Time. 25. Project —The Work to be performed under the Contract Documents. 26. Project Representative —The authorized representative of the City who will be assigned to the Site. 27. Public Meeting — An announced meeting conducted by the Developer to facilitate public participation and to assist the public in gaining an informed view of the Project. 28. Regular Working Hours — Hours beginning at 7: 00 a.m. and ending at 6:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday (excluding legal holidays). 29. Samples Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship that are representative of some portion of the Work and which establish the standards by which such portion of the Work will be judged. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 4 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 4 of 35 30. Schedule of Submittals —A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, of required submittals and the time requirements to support scheduled performance of related construction activities. 31. Site —Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by City or Developer upon which the Work is to be performed, including rights -of -way, permits, and easements for access thereto, and such other lands furnished by City or Developer which are designated for the use of Contractor. 32. Specifications —That part of the Contract Documents consisting of written requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship as applied to the Work, and certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable thereto. Specifications may be specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or, if not attached, may be incorporated by reference as indicated in the Table of Contents (Division 00 00 00) of each Project. 33. Standard City Conditions — That part of the Contract Documents setting forth requirements of the City. 34. Subcontractor —An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with any other Subcontractor for the performance of apart of the Work at the Site. 35. Submittals All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information which are specifically prepared or assembled by or for Contractor and submitted by Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. 36. Superintendent — The representative of the Contractor who is available at all times and able to receive instructions from the City and/or Developer and to act for the Contractor. 37. Supplementary Conditions —That part of the Contract Documents which amends or supplements the General Conditions. 38. Supplier —A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having a direct contract with Contractor or with any Subcontractor to furnish materials or equipment to be incorporated in the Work by Contractor or Subcontractor. 39. Underground Facilities All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires, manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, or other such facilities or attachments, and any encasements containing such facilities, including but not limited to, those that convey electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications, cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or other control systems. 40. Weekend Working Hours — Hours beginning at 9: 00 a. in. and ending at 5: 00 p.m., Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, as approved in advance by the City. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 5 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 5 of 35 41. Work —The entire construction or the various separately identifiable parts thereof required to be provided under the Contract Documents. Work includes and is the result of performing or providing all labor, services, and documentation necessary to produce such construction including any Participating Change Order, Non -Participating Change Order, or Field Order, and furnishing, installing, and incorporating all materials and equipment into such construction, all as required by the Contract Documents. 42. Working Day — A working day is defined as a day, not including Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays authorized by the City for contract purposes, in which weather or other conditions not under the control of the Contractor will permit the performance of the principal unit of work underway for a continuous period of not less than 7 hours between 7 a.m. and 6 p. m. 1.02 Terminology A. The words and terms discussed in Paragraph 1.02.13 through D are not defined but, when used in the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning. B. Defective: 1. The word "defective," when modifying the word "Work," refers to Work that is unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it: a. does not conform to the Contract Documents; or b. does not meet the requirements of any applicable inspection, reference standard, test, or approval referred to in the Contract Documents; or c. has been damaged prior to City's written acceptance. C. Furnish, Install, Perform, Provide: 1. The word "Furnish" or the word "Install" or the word "Perform" or the word "Provide" or the word "Supply," or any combination or similar directive or usage thereof, shall mean furnishing and incorporating in the Work including all necessary labor, materials, equipment, and everything necessary to perform the Work indicated, unless specifically limited in the context used. D. Unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents, words or phrases that have a well-known technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in accordance with such recognized meaning. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 6 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 6 of 35 ARTICLE 2 — PRELIMINARY MATTERS 2.01 Before Starting Construction Baseline Schedules: Submit to City in accordance with the Contract Documents, and prior to starting the Work. New schedules will be submitted to City when Participating Change Orders or Non - Participating Change Orders occur. 2.02 Preconstruction Conference Before any Work at the Site is started, the Contractor shall attend a Preconstruction Conference as specified in the Contract Documents. 2.03 Public Meeting Contractor may not mobilize any equipment, materials or resources to the Site prior to Contractor attending the Public Meeting as scheduled by the City. ARTICLE 3 — CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AMENDING 3.01 Reference Standards A. Standards, Specifications, Codes, Laws, and Regulations 1. Reference to standards, specifications, manuals, or codes of any technical society, organization, or association, or to Laws or Regulations, whether such reference be specific or by implication, shall mean the standard, specification, manual, code, or Laws or Regulations in effect at the time of opening of Bids (or on the Effective Date of the Agreement if there were no Bids), except as may be otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents. 2. No provision or instruction shall be effective to assign to City, or any of its officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors, any duty or authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work or any duty or authority to undertake responsibility inconsistent with the provisions of the Contract Documents. 3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents A. The Contract Documents may be amended to provide for additions, deletions, and revisions in the Work or to modify the terms and conditions thereof by a Participating Change Order or a Non -Participating Change Order. B. The requirements of the Contract Documents may be supplemented, and minor variations and deviations in the Work not involving a change in Contract Price or Contract Time, may be authorized, by one or more of the following ways: 1. A Field Order; CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 7 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 7 of 35 1. City's or Engineer's review of a Submittal (subject to the provisions of Paragraph 5.16.C); or 2. City's written interpretation or clarification. ARTICLE 4 — BONDS AND INSURANCE 4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers All bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents to be purchased and maintained by Contractor shall be obtained from surety or insurance companies that are duly licensed or authorized in the State of Texas to issue bonds or insurance policies for the limits and coverage so required. Such surety and insurance companies shall also meet such additional requirements and qualifications as may be provided Section 4.04. 4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds A. Contractor shall furnish performance and payment bonds in the name of Developer and City, in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2253 or successor statute, each in an amount equal to the Contract Price as security for the faithful performance and payment of all of Contractor's obligations under the Contract Documents. B. Contractor shall furnish maintenance bonds in the name of Developer and City in an amount equal to the Contract Price as security to protect the City against any defects in any portion of the Work described in the Contract Documents. Maintenance bonds shall remain in effect for two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance by the City. C. All bonds shall be in the form prescribed by the Contract Documents except as provided otherwise by Laws or Regulations, and shall be executed by such sureties as are named in the list of "Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies" as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Financial Management Service, Surety Bond Branch, U.S. Department of the Treasury. All bonds signed by an agent or attorney -in -fact must be accompanied by a sealed and dated power of attorney which shall show that it is effective on the date the agent or attorney -in -fact signed each bond. D. If the surety on any bond furnished by Contractor is declared bankrupt or becomes insolvent or its right to do business is terminated in the State of Texas or it ceases to meet the requirements of Paragraph 4.02.C, Contractor shall promptly notify City and shall, within 30 days after the event giving rise to such notification, provide another bond and surety, both of which shall comply with the requirements of Paragraphs 4.01 and 4.02.C. 4.03 Certificates of Insurance Contractor shall deliver to Developer and City, with copies to each additional insured and loss payee identified in these Standard City Conditions certificates of insurance (and other evidence of insurance requested by City or any other additional insured) which Contractor is required to purchase and maintain. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 8 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 8 of 35 1. The certificate of insurance shall document the City, an as "Additional Insured" on all liability policies. 2. The Contractor's general liability insurance shall include a, "per project" or "per location", endorsement, which shall be identified in the certificate of insurance provided to the City. 3. The certificate shall be signed by an agent authorized to bind coverage on behalf of the insured, be complete in its entirety, and show complete insurance carrier names as listed in the current A.M. Best Property & Casualty Guide 4. The insurers for all policies must be licensed and/or approved to do business in the State of Texas. Except for workers' compensation, all insurers must have a minimum rating of A-: VII in the current A. M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. If the rating is below that required, written approval of City is required. 5. All applicable policies shall include a Waiver of Subrogation (Rights of Recovery) in favor of the City. In addition, the Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the Engineer (if applicable), and each additional insured identified in these Standard City Conditions. Failure of the City to demand such certificates or other evidence of full compliance with the insurance requirements or failure of the City to identify a deficiency from evidence that is provided shall not be construed as a waiver of Contractor's obligation to maintain such lines of insurance coverage. 6. If insurance policies are not written for specified coverage limits, an Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance for any differences is required. Excess Liability shall follow form of the primary coverage. 7. Unless otherwise stated, all required insurance shall be written on the "occurrence basis". If coverage is underwritten on a claims -made basis, the retroactive date shall be coincident with or prior to the date of the effective date of the agreement and the certificate of insurance shall state that the coverage is claims -made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall be maintained for the duration of the Contract and for three (3) years following Final Acceptance provided under the Contract Documents or for the warranty period, whichever is longer. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall evidence such insurance coverage. 8. Policies shall have no exclusions by endorsements, which, neither nullify or amend, the required lines of coverage, nor decrease the limits of said coverage unless such endorsements are approved in writing by the City. In the event a Contract has been bid or executed and the exclusions are determined to be unacceptable or the City desires additional insurance coverage, and the City desires the contractor/engineer to obtain such coverage, the contract price shall be adjusted by the cost of the premium for such additional coverage plus 10%. 9. Any self -insured retention (SIR), in excess of $25,000.00, affecting required insurance coverage shall be approved by the City in regards to asset value and stockholders' equity. In CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10-9 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 9 of 35 lieu of traditional insurance, alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups, must also be approved by City. 10. Any deductible in excess of $5,000.00, for any policy that does not provide coverage on a first -dollar basis, must be acceptable to and approved by the City. 11. City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to review the insurance requirements and to make reasonable adjustments to insurance coverage's and their limits when deemed necessary and prudent by the City based upon changes in statutory law, court decision or the claims history of the industry as well as of the contracting party to the City. The City shall be required to provide prior notice of 90 days, and the insurance adjustments shall be incorporated into the Work by Change Order. 12. City shall be entitled, upon written request and without expense, to receive copies of policies and endorsements thereto and may make any reasonable requests for deletion or revision or modifications of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions necessary to conform the policy and endorsements to the requirements of the Contract. Deletions, revisions, or modifications shall not be required where policy provisions are established by law or regulations binding upon either parry or the underwriter on any such policies. 13. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for Contractor's insurance. 4.04 Contractor's Insurance A. Workers Compensation and Employers' Liability. Contractor shall purchase and maintain such insurance coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers' Compensation Act (Texas Labor Code, Ch. 406, as amended), and minimum limits for Employers' Liability as is appropriate for the Work being performed and as will provide protection from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from Contractor's performance of the Work and Contractor's other obligations under the Contract Documents, whether it is to be performed by Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable: 1. claims under workers' compensation, disability benefits, and other similar employee benefit acts; 2. claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of Contractor's employees. 3. The limits of liability for the insurance shall provide the following coverages for not less than the following amounts or greater where required by Laws and Regulations a. Statutory limits b. Employer's liability CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 10 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 10 of 35 1) $100,000 each accident/occurrence 2) $100,000 Disease - each employee 3) $500,000 Disease - policy limit B. Commercial General Liability. Coverage shall include but not be limited to covering liability (bodily injury or property damage) arising from: premises/operations, independent contractors, products/completed operations, personal injury, and liability under an insured contract. Insurance shall be provided on an occurrence basis, and as comprehensive as the current Insurance Services Office (ISO) policy. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to any other insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the City. The Commercial General Liability policy, shall have no exclusions by endorsements that would alter of nullify premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or advertising injury, which are normally contained with the policy, unless the City approves such exclusions in writing. 1. For construction projects that present a substantial completed operation exposure, the City may require the contractor to maintain completed operations coverage for a minimum of no less than three (3) years following the completion of the project 2. Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section which shall be on a per project basis covering the Contractor with minimum limits of: a. $1,000,000 each occurrence b. $2,000,000 aggregate limit 3. The policy must have an endorsement (Amendment — Aggregate Limits of Insurance) making the General Aggregate Limits apply separately to each job site. 4. The Commercial General Liability Insurance policies shall provide "X", "C", and "U" coverage's. Verification of such coverage must be shown in the Remarks Article of the Certificate of Insurance. C. Automobile Liability. A commercial business auto policy shall provide coverage on "any auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non -owned and provide indemnity for claims for damages because bodily injury or death of any person and or property damage arising out of the work, maintenance or use of any motor vehicle by the Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. 1. Automobile Liability, Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section, which shall be in an amount not less than the following amounts: a. Automobile Liability - a commercial business policy shall provide coverage on "Any Auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non -owned. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 11 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 1 I of 35 1) $1, 000, 000 each accident on a combined single limit basis. Split limits are acceptable if limits are at least: 2) $250,000 Bodily Injury per person 3) $500,000 Bodily Injury per accident / 4) $100,000 Property Damage D. Railroad Protective Liability. If any of the work or any warranty work is within the limits of railroad right-of-way, the Contractor shall comply with the following requirements: 1. The Contractor's construction activities will require its employees, agents, subcontractors, equipment, and material deliveries to cross railroad properties and tracks owned and operated by: None 2. The Contractor shall conduct its operations on railroad properties in such a manner as not to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the railroad company in any manner whatsoever in the use or operation of its/their trains or other property. Such operations on railroad properties may require that Contractor to execute a "Right of Entry Agreement" with the particular railroad company or companies involved, and to this end the Contractor should satisfy itself as to the requirements of each railroad company and be prepared to execute the right -of -entry (if any) required by a railroad company. The requirements specified herein likewise relate to the Contractor's use of private and/or construction access roads crossing said railroad company's properties. 3. The Contractual Liability coverage required by Paragraph 5.04D of the General Conditions shall provide coverage for not less than the following amounts, issued by companies satisfactory to the City and to the Railroad Company for a term that continues for so long as the Contractor's operations and work cross, occupy, or touch railroad property: a. General Aggregate: None b. Each Occurrence:: None 4. With respect to the above outlined insurance requirements, the following shall govern: a. Where a single railroad company is involved, the Contractor shall provide one insurance policy in the name of the railroad company. However, if more than one grade separation or at -grade crossing is affected by the Project at entirely separate locations on the line or lines of the same railroad company, separate coverage may be required, each in the amount stated above. b. Where more than one railroad company is operating on the same right-of-way or where several railroad companies are involved and operated on their own separate rights -of - CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 12 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 12 of 35 way, the Contractor may be required to provide separate insurance policies in the name of each railroad company. c. If, in addition to a grade separation or an at -grade crossing, other work or activity is proposed on a railroad company's right-of-way at a location entirely separate from the grade separation or at -grade crossing, insurance coverage for this work must be included in the policy covering the grade separation. d. If no grade separation is involved but other work is proposed on a railroad company's right-of-way, all such other work may be covered in a single policy for that railroad, even though the work may be at two or more separate locations. 5. No work or activities on a railroad company's property to be performed by the Contractor shall be commenced until the Contractor has furnished the City with an original policy or policies of the insurance for each railroad company named, as required above. All such insurance must be approved by the City and each affected Railroad Company prior to the Contractor's beginning work. 6. The insurance specified above must be carried until all Work to be performed on the railroad right-of-way has been completed and the grade crossing, if any, is no longer used by the Contractor. In addition, insurance must be carried during all maintenance and/or repair work performed in the railroad right-of-way. Such insurance must name the railroad company as the insured, together with any tenant or lessee of the railroad company operating over tracks involved in the Project. E. Notification of Policy Cancellation: Contractor shall immediately notify City upon cancellation or other loss of insurance coverage. Contractor shall stop work until replacement insurance has been procured. There shall be no time credit for days not worked pursuant to this section. 4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace If City has any objection to the coverage afforded by or other provisions of the bonds or insurance required to be purchased and maintained by the Contractor in accordance with Article 5 on the basis of non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the Developer and City shall so notify the Contractor in writing within 10 Business Days after receipt of the certificates (or other evidence requested). Contractor shall provide to the City such additional information in respect of insurance provided as the Developer or City may reasonably request. If Contractor does not purchase or maintain all of the bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Developer or City shall notify the Contractor in writing of such failure prior to the start of the Work, or of such failure to maintain prior to any change in the required coverage. ARTICLE 5 — CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES 5.01 Supervision and Superintendent A. Contractor shall supervise, inspect, and direct the Work competently and efficiently, devoting such attention thereto and applying such skills and expertise as may be necessary to perform the CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 13 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 13 of 35 Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction. B. At all times during the progress of the Work, Contractor shall assign a competent, English- speaking, Superintendent who shall not be replaced without written notice to City. The Superintendent will be Contractor's representative at the Site and shall have authority to act on behalf of Contractor. All communication given to or received from the Superintendent shall be binding on Contractor. C. Contractor shall notify the City 24 hours prior to moving areas during the sequence of construction. 5.02 Labor; Working Hours A. Contractor shall provide competent, suitably qualified personnel to perform construction as required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall at all times maintain good discipline and order at the Site. B. Except as otherwise required for the safety or protection of persons or the Work or property at the Site or adjacent thereto, and except as otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, all Work at the Site shall be performed during Regular Working Hours. Contractor will not permit the performance of Work beyond Regular Working Hours or for Weekend Working Hours without City's written consent (which will not be unreasonably withheld). Written request (by letter or electronic communication) to perform Work: 1. for beyond Regular Working Hours request must be made by noon at least two (2) Business Days prior 2. for Weekend Working Hours request must be made by noon of the preceding Thursday 3. for legal holidays request must be made by noon two Business Days prior to the legal holiday. 5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment A. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall provide and assume full responsibility for all services, materials, equipment, labor, transportation, construction equipment and machinery, tools, appliances, fuel, power, light, heat, telephone, water, sanitary facilities, temporary facilities, and all other facilities and incidentals necessary for the performance, Contractor required testing, start-up, and completion of the Work. B. All materials and equipment incorporated into the Work shall be as specified or, if not specified, shall be of good quality and new, except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. All special warranties and guarantees required by the Specifications shall expressly run to the benefit of City. If required by City, Contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence (including reports of required tests) as to the source, kind, and quality of materials and equipment. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 14 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 14 of 35 C. All materials and equipment to be incorporated into the Work shall be stored, applied, installed, connected, erected, protected, used, cleaned, and conditioned in accordance with instructions of the applicable Supplier, except as otherwise may be provided in the Contract Documents. 5.04 Project Schedule A. Contractor shall adhere to the Project Schedule established in accordance with Paragraph 2.01 and the General Requirements as it may be adjusted from time to time as provided below. 1. Contractor shall submit to City for acceptance (to the extent indicated in Paragraph 2.01 and the General Requirements) proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule. 2. Proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule that will change the Contract Time shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Article 9. Adjustments in Contract Time for projects with City participation shall be made by participating change orders. 5.05 Substitutes and "Or -Equals " A. Whenever an item of material or equipment is specified or described in the Contract Documents by using the name of a proprietary item or the name of a particular Supplier, the specification or description is intended to establish the type, function, appearance, and quality required. Unless the specification or description contains or is followed by words reading that no like, equivalent, or "or -equal" item or no substitution is permitted, other items of material or equipment of other Suppliers may be submitted to City for review under the circumstances described below. 1. "Or -Equal" Items: If in City's sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor is functionally equal to that named and sufficiently similar so that no change in related Work will be required, it may be considered by City as an "or -equal" item, in which case review and approval of the proposed item may, in City's sole discretion, be accomplished without compliance with some or all of the requirements for approval of proposed substitute items. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5.05.A.1, a proposed item of material or equipment will be considered functionally equal to an item so named if: a. City determines that: 1) it is at least equal in materials of construction, quality, durability, appearance, strength, and design characteristics; 2) it will reliably perform at least equally well the function and achieve the results imposed by the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole; and 3) it has a proven record of performance and availability of responsive service; and b. Contractor certifies that, if approved and incorporated into the Work: 1) there will be no increase in cost to the City or increase in Contract Time; and CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 15 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 15 of 35 2) it will conform substantially to the detailed requirements of the item named in the Contract Documents. 2. Substitute Items: a. If in City's sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor does not qualify as an "or -equal" item under Paragraph 5.05.A.1, it may be submitted as a proposed substitute item. b. Contractor shall submit sufficient information as provided below to allow City to determine if the item of material or equipment proposed is essentially equivalent to that named and an acceptable substitute therefor. Requests for review of proposed substitute items of material or equipment will not be accepted by City from anyone other than Contractor. c. Contractor shall make written application to City for review of a proposed substitute item of material or equipment that Contractor seeks to furnish or use. The application shall comply with Section 0125 00 and: 1) shall certify that the proposed substitute item will: i. perform adequately the functions and achieve the results called for by the general design; ii. be similar in substance to that specified; iii. be suited to the same use as that specified; and 2) will state: i. the extent, if any, to which the use of the proposed substitute item will prejudice Contractor's achievement of final completion on time; ii. whether use of the proposed substitute item in the Work will require a change in any of the Contract Documents (or in the provisions of any other direct contract with City for other work on the Project) to adapt the design to the proposed substitute item; iii. whether incorporation or use of the proposed substitute item in connection with the Work is subject to payment of any license fee or royalty; and 3) will identify: i. all variations of the proposed substitute item from that specified; ii. available engineering, sales, maintenance, repair, and replacement services; and CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 16 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 16 of 35 4) shall contain an itemized estimate of all costs or credits that will result directly or indirectly from use of such substitute item, including costs of redesign and Damage Claims of other contractors affected by any resulting change. B. Substitute Construction Methods or Procedures: If a specific means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure of construction is expressly required by the Contract Documents, Contractor may furnish or utilize a substitute means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure of construction approved by City. Contractor shall submit sufficient information to allow City, in City's sole discretion, to determine that the substitute proposed is equivalent to that expressly called for by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall make written application to City for review in the same manner as those provided in Paragraph 5.05.A.2. C. City's Evaluation: City will be allowed a reasonable time within which to evaluate each proposal or submittal made pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A and 5.05.13. City may require Contractor to furnish additional data about the proposed substitute. City will be the sole judge of acceptability. No "or -equal" or substitute will be ordered, installed or utilized until City's review is complete, which will be evidenced by a Change Order in the case of a substitute and an accepted Submittal for an "or -equal." City will advise Contractor in writing of its determination. D. Special Guarantee: City may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor's expense a special performance guarantee, warranty, or other surety with respect to any substitute. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City and anyone directly or indirectly employed by them from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out of the use of substituted materials or equipment. E. City's Cost Reimbursement: City will record City's costs in evaluating a substitute proposed or submitted by Contractor pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A.2 and 5.05.B. Whether or not City approves a substitute so proposed or submitted by Contractor, Contractor may be required to reimburse City for evaluating each such proposed substitute. Contractor may also be required to reimburse City for the charges for making changes in the Contract Documents. F. Contractor's Expense: Contractor shall provide all data in support of any proposed substitute or "or -equal" at Contractor's expense. G. Substitute Reimbursement: Costs (savings or charges) attributable to acceptance of a substitute shall be incorporated to the Contract by Participating Change Order. 5.06 Pre -Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors) A. The Contractor and any subcontractors are required to be prequalified for the work types requiring pre -qualification 5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others A. Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance: CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 17 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 17 of 35 ❑ Required for this Contract. ❑ x Not Required for this Contract. It is City policy to ensure the full and equitable participation by Minority and Women Business Enterprises (MWBE) in the procurement of goods and services on a contractual basis. If the Contract Documents provide for a MWBE goal, Contractor is required to comply with the intent of the City's MWBE Ordinance (as amended) by the following: 1. Contractor shall, upon request by City, provide complete and accurate information regarding actual work performed by a MWBE on the Contract and payment therefor. 2. Contractor will not make additions, deletions, or substitutions of accepted MWBE without written consent of the City. Any unjustified change or deletion shall be a material breach of Contract and may result in debarment in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Ordinance. 3. Contractor shall, upon request by City, allow an audit and/or examination of any books, records, or files in the possession of the Contractor that will substantiate the actual work performed by an MWBE. Material misrepresentation of any nature will be grounds for termination of the Contract. Any such misrepresentation may be grounds for disqualification of Contractor to bid on future contracts with the City for a period of not less than three years. B. Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work just as Contractor is responsible for Contractor's own acts and omissions. Nothing in the Contract Documents: 1. shall create for the benefit of any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity any contractual relationship between City and any such Subcontractor, Supplier or other individual or entity; nor 2. shall create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any moneys due any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity except as may otherwise be required by Laws and Regulations. C. Contractor shall be solely responsible for scheduling and coordinating the Work of Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work under a direct or indirect contract with Contractor. D. All Subcontractors, Suppliers, and such other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work shall communicate with City through Contractor. E. All Work performed for Contractor by a Subcontractor or Supplier will be pursuant to an appropriate agreement between Contractor and the Subcontractor or Supplier which specifically binds the Subcontractor or Supplier to the applicable terms and conditions of these Contract CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 18 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 18 of 35 Documents, Contractor shall provide City contract numbers and reference numbers to the Subcontractors and/or Suppliers. 5.08 Wage Rates ❑ Required for this Contract. ❑x Not Required for this Contract. A. Duty to pay Prevailing Wage Rates. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code (as amended), including the payment of not less than the rates determined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth to be the prevailing wage rates in accordance with Chapter 2258. Such prevailing wage rates are included in these Contract Documents. B. Penalty for Violation. A Contractor or any Subcontractor who does not pay the prevailing wage shall, upon demand made by the City, pay to the City $60 for each worker employed for each calendar day or part of the day that the worker is paid less than the prevailing wage rates stipulated in these contract documents. This penalty shall be retained by the City to offset its administrative costs, pursuant to Texas Government Code 2258.023. C. Complaints of Violations and City Determination of Good Cause. On receipt of information, including a complaint by a worker, concerning an alleged violation of 2258.023, Texas Government Code, by a Contractor or Subcontractor, the City shall make an initial determination, before the 31 st day after the date the City receives the information, as to whether good cause exists to believe that the violation occurred. The City shall notify in writing the Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker of its initial determination. Upon the City's determination that there is good cause to believe the Contractor or Subcontractor has violated Chapter 2258, the City shall retain the full amounts claimed by the claimant or claimants as the difference between wages paid and wages due under the prevailing wage rates, such amounts being subtracted from successive progress payments pending a final determination of the violation. D. Arbitration Required if Violation Not Resolved. An issue relating to an alleged violation of Section 2258.023, Texas Government Code, including a penalty owed to the City or an affected worker, shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the Texas General Arbitration Act (Article 224 et seq., Revised Statutes) if the Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker does not resolve the issue by agreement before the 15th day after the date the City makes its initial determination pursuant to Paragraph C above. If the persons required to arbitrate under this section do not agree on an arbitrator before the 1 lth day after the date that arbitration is required, a district court shall appoint an arbitrator on the petition of any of the persons. The City is not a party in the arbitration. The decision and award of the arbitrator is final and binding on all parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction. E. Records to be Maintained. The Contractor and each Subcontractor shall, for a period of three (3) years following the date of acceptance of the work, maintain records that show (i) the name and CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 19 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 19 of 35 occupation of each worker employed by the Contractor in the construction of the Work provided for in this Contract; and (ii) the actual per diem wages paid to each worker. The records shall be open at all reasonable hours for inspection by the City. The provisions of Paragraph 6.23, Right to Audit, shall pertain to this inspection. F. Progress Payments. With each progress payment or payroll period, whichever is less, the Contractor shall submit an affidavit stating that the Contractor has complied with the requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code. G. Posting of Wage Rates. The Contractor shall post prevailing wage rates in a conspicuous place at all times. H. Subcontractor Compliance. The Contractor shall include in its subcontracts and/or shall otherwise require all of its Subcontractors to comply with Paragraphs A through G above. 5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties A. To the fullest extent permitted by Laws and Regulations, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to any infringement of patent rights or copyrights incident to the use in the performance of the Work or resulting from the incorporation in the Work of any invention, design, process, product, or device not specified in the Contract Documents. 5.10 Laws and Regulations A. Contractor shall give all notices required by and shall comply with all Laws and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. Except where otherwise expressly required by applicable Laws and Regulations, the City shall not be responsible for monitoring Contractor's compliance with any Laws or Regulations. B. If Contractor performs any Work knowing or having reason to know that it is contrary to Laws or Regulations, Contractor shall bear all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such Work. However, it shall not be Contractor's responsibility to make certain that the Specifications and Drawings are in accordance with Laws and Regulations, but this shall not relieve Contractor of Contractor's obligations under Paragraph 3.01. 5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas A. Limitation on Use of Site and Other Areas: 1. Contractor shall confine construction equipment, the storage of materials and equipment, and the operations of workers to the Site and other areas permitted by Laws and Regulations, and shall not unreasonably encumber the Site and other areas with construction equipment or CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 20 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 20 of 35 other materials or equipment. Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any damage to any such land or area, or to the owner or occupant thereof, or of any adjacent land or areas resulting from the performance of the Work. 2. At any time when, in the judgment of the City, the Contractor has obstructed or closed or is carrying on operations in a portion of a street, right-of-way, or easement greater than is necessary for proper execution of the Work, the City may require the Contractor to finish the section on which operations are in progress before work is commenced on any additional area of the Site. 3. Should any Damage Claim be made by any such owner or occupant because of the performance of the Work, Contractor shall promptly attempt to resolve the Damage Claim. 4. Pursuant to Paragraph 5.18, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages arising out of or relating to any claim or action, legal or equitable, brought by any such owner or occupant against City. B. Removal of Debris During Performance of the Work: During the progress of the Work Contractor shall keep the Site and other areas free from accumulations of waste materials, rubbish, and other debris. Removal and disposal of such waste materials, rubbish, and other debris shall conform to applicable Laws and Regulations. C. Site Maintenance Cleaning: 24 hours after written notice is given to the Contractor that the clean-up on the job site is proceeding in a manner unsatisfactory to the City or Developer, if the Contractor fails to correct the unsatisfactory procedure, the City may take such direct action as the City deems appropriate to correct the clean-up deficiencies cited to the Contractor in the written notice (by letter or electronic communication), and shall be entitled to recover its cost in doing so. The City may withhold Final Acceptance until clean-up is complete and cost are recovered. D. Final Site Cleaning: Prior to Final Acceptance of the Work Contractor shall clean the Site and the Work and make it ready for utilization by City or adjacent property owner. At the completion of the Work Contractor shall remove from the Site all tools, appliances, construction equipment and machinery, and surplus materials and shall restore to original condition or better all property disturbed by the Work. E. Loading Structures: Contractor shall not load nor permit any part of any structure to be loaded in any manner that will endanger the structure, nor shall Contractor subject any part of the Work or adjacent property to stresses or pressures that will endanger it. 5.12 Record Documents A. Contractor shall maintain in a safe place at the Site or in a place designated by the Contractor and approved by the City, one (1) record copy of all Drawings, Specifications, Addenda, Change Orders, Field Orders, and written interpretations and clarifications in good order and annotated to show changes made during construction. These record documents together with all approved CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 21 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 21 of 35 Samples and a counterpart of all accepted Submittals will be available to City for reference. Upon completion of the Work, these record documents, any operation and maintenance manuals, and Submittals will be delivered to City prior to Final Inspection. Contractor shall include accurate locations for buried and imbedded items. 5.13 Safety and Protection A. Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. Such responsibility does not relieve Subcontractors of their responsibility for the safety of persons or property in the performance of their work, nor for compliance with applicable safety Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to prevent damage, injury or loss to: 1. all persons on the Site or who may be affected by the Work; 2. all the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on or off the Site; and 3. other property at the Site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, walks, pavements, roadways, structures, utilities, and Underground Facilities not designated for removal, relocation, or replacement in the course of construction. B. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Laws and Regulations relating to the safety of persons or property, or to the protection of persons or property from damage, injury, or loss; and shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. Contractor shall notify owners of adjacent property and of Underground Facilities and other utility owners when prosecution of the Work may affect them, and shall cooperate with them in the protection, removal, relocation, and replacement of their property. C. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of City's safety programs, if any. D. Contractor shall inform City of the specific requirements of Contractor's safety program, if any, with which City's employees and representatives must comply while at the Site. E. All damage, injury, or loss to any property referred to in Paragraph 5.13.A.2 or 5.13.A.3 caused, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by Contractor, any Subcontractor, Supplier, or any other individual or entity directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, shall be remedied by Contractor. F. Contractor's duties and responsibilities for safety and for protection of the Work shall continue until such time as all the Work is completed and City has accepted the Work. 5.14 Safety Representative Contractor shall inform City in writing of Contractor's designated safety representative at the Site. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 22 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 22 of 35 5.15 Hazard Communication Programs Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating any exchange of material safety data sheets or other hazard communication information required to be made available to or exchanged between or among employers in accordance with Laws or Regulations. 5.16 Submittals A. Contractor shall submit required Submittals to City for review and acceptance. Each submittal will be identified as required by City. 1. Submit number of copies specified in the General Requirements. 2. Data shown on the Submittals will be complete with respect to quantities, dimensions, specified performance and design criteria, materials, and similar data to show City the services, materials, and equipment Contractor proposes to provide and to enable City to review the information for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C. 3. Submittals submitted as herein provided by Contractor and reviewed by City for conformance with the design concept shall be executed in conformity with the Contract Documents unless otherwise required by City. 4. When Submittals are submitted for the purpose of showing the installation in greater detail, their review shall not excuse Contractor from requirements shown on the Drawings and Specifications. 5. For -Information -Only submittals upon which the City is not expected to conduct review or take responsive action may be so identified in the Contract Documents. 6. Submit required number of Samples specified in the Specifications. 7. Clearly identify each Sample as to material, Supplier, pertinent data such as catalog numbers, the use for which intended and other data as City may require to enable City to review the submittal for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C. B. Where a Submittal is required by the Contract Documents or the Schedule of Submittals, any related Work performed prior to City's review and acceptance of the pertinent submittal will be at the sole expense and responsibility of Contractor. C. City's Review: 1. City will provide timely review of required Submittals in accordance with the Schedule of Submittals acceptable to City. City's review and acceptance will be only to determine if the items covered by the submittals will, after installation or incorporation in the Work, conform to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract Documents. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 23 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 23 of 35 2. City's review and acceptance will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction (except where a particular means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure of construction is specifically and expressly called for by the Contract Documents) or to safety precautions or programs incident thereto. The review and acceptance of a separate item as such will not indicate approval of the assembly in which the item functions. 3. City's review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for any variation from the requirements of the Contract Documents unless Contractor has complied with the requirements of Section 01 33 00 and City has given written acceptance of each such variation by specific written notation thereof incorporated in or accompanying the Submittal. City's review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 5.17 Contractor's General Warranty and Guarantee A. Contractor warrants and guarantees to City that all Work will be in accordance with the Contract Documents and will not be defective. City and its officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors shall be entitled to rely on representation of Contractor's warranty and guarantee. B. Contractor's warranty and guarantee hereunder excludes defects or damage caused by: 1. abuse, modification, or improper maintenance or operation by persons other than Contractor, Subcontractors, Suppliers, or any other individual or entity for whom Contractor is responsible; or 2. normal wear and tear under normal usage. C. Contractor's obligation to perform and complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents shall be absolute. None of the following will constitute an acceptance of Work that is not in accordance with the Contract Documents or a release of Contractor's obligation to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents: 1. observations by City; 2. recommendation or payment by City or Developer of any progress or final payment; 3. the issuance of a certificate of Final Acceptance by City or any payment related thereto by City; 4. use or occupancy of the Work or any part thereof by City; 5. any review and acceptance of a Submittal by City; 6. any inspection, test, or approval by others; or CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 24 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 24 of 35 7. any correction of defective Work by City. D. The Contractor shall remedy any defects or damages in the Work and pay for any damage to other work or property resulting therefrom which shall appear within a period of two (2) years from the date of Final Acceptance of the Work unless a longer period is specified and shall furnish a good and sufficient maintenance bond, complying with the requirements of Article 4.02.13. The City will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness. 5.18 Indemnification A. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. This indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the City in defending against such claims and causes of actions. B. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of property of the City, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. 5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services A. Contractor will not be required to provide professional design services unless such services are specifically required by the Contract Documents for a portion of the Work or unless such services are required to carry out Contractor's responsibilities for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures. B. If professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials or equipment are specifically required of Contractor by the Contract Documents, City will specify all performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. Contractor shall cause such services or certifications to be provided by a properly licensed professional, whose signature and seal shall appear on all drawings, calculations, specifications, certifications, and Submittals prepared by such professional. Submittals related to the Work designed or certified by such professional, if prepared by others, shall bear such professional's written approval when submitted to City. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 25 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 25 of 35 C. City shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy, accuracy and completeness of the services, certifications or approvals performed by such design professionals, provided City has specified to Contractor performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. D. Pursuant to this Paragraph 5.19, City's review and acceptance of design calculations and design drawings will be only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with performance and design criteria given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. City's review and acceptance of Submittals (except design calculations and design drawings) will be only for the purpose stated in Paragraph 5.16.C. 5.20 Right to Audit: A. The City reserves the right to audit all projects utilizing City funds B. The Contractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions relating to this Contract. Contractor agrees that the City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all necessary Contractor facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give Contractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits. C. Contractor further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that the subcontractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of such Subcontractor, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all Subcontractor facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give Subcontractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits. D. Contractor and Subcontractor agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the City. The City agrees to reimburse Contractor for the cost of the copies as follows at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed. 5.21 Nondiscrimination A. The City is responsible for operating Public Transportation Programs and implementing transit - related projects, which are funded in part with Federal financial assistance awarded by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), without discriminating against any person in the United States on the basis of race, color, or national origin. B. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended: Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Act and the Regulations as further defined in the Supplementary Conditions for any project receiving Federal assistance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 26 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 26 of 35 ARTICLE 6 — OTHER WORK AT THE SITE 6.01 Related Work at Site A. City may perform other work related to the Project at the Site with City's employees, or other City contractors, or through other direct contracts therefor, or have other work performed by utility owners. If such other work is not noted in the Contract Documents, then written notice thereof will be given to Contractor prior to starting any such other work; and B. Contractor shall afford each other contractor who is a party to such a direct contract, each utility owner, and City, if City is performing other work with City's employees or other City contractors, proper and safe access to the Site, provide a reasonable opportunity for the introduction and storage of materials and equipment and the execution of such other work, and properly coordinate the Work with theirs. Contractor shall do all cutting, fitting, and patching of the Work that may be required to properly connect or otherwise make its several parts come together and properly integrate with such other work. Contractor shall not endanger any work of others by cutting, excavating, or otherwise altering such work; provided, however, that Contractor may cut or alter others' work with the written consent of City and the others whose work will be affected. C. If the proper execution or results of any part of Contractor's Work depends upon work performed by others under this Article 7, Contractor shall inspect such other work and promptly report to City in writing any delays, defects, or deficiencies in such other work that render it unavailable or unsuitable for the proper execution and results of Contractor's Work. Contractor's failure to so report will constitute an acceptance of such other work as fit and proper for integration with Contractor's Work except for latent defects in the work provided by others. ARTICLE 7 — CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals City's responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals is set forth in Paragraph 11.03. 7.02 Limitations on City's Responsibilities A. The City shall not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, nor be responsible for, Contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure of Contractor to comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. City will not be responsible for Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. B. City will notify the Contractor of applicable safety plans pursuant to Paragraph 5.13. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 27 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 27 of 35 7.03 Compliance with Safety Program While at the Site, City's employees and representatives shall comply with the specific applicable requirements of Contractor's safety programs of which City has been informed pursuant to Paragraph 5.13. ARTICLE 8 — CITY'S OBSERVATION STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION 8.01 City's Project Representative City will provide one or more Project Representative(s) during the construction period. The duties and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of City's representative during construction are set forth in the Contract Documents. A. City's Project Representative will make visits to the Site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as City deems necessary in order to observe the progress that has been made and the quality of the various aspects of Contractor's executed Work. Based on information obtained during such visits and observations, City's Project Representative will determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. City's Project Representative will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections on the Site to check the quality or quantity of the Work. City's Project Representative's efforts will be directed toward providing City a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work will conform generally to the Contract Documents. B. City's Project Representative's visits and observations are subject to all the limitations on authority and responsibility in the Contract Documents. 8.02 Authorized Variations in Work City's Project Representative may authorize minor variations in the Work from the requirements of the Contract Documents which do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time and are compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a Field Order and will be binding on City Developer, and also on Contractor, who shall perform the Work involved promptly. 8.03 Rejecting Defective Work City will have authority to reject Work which City's Project Representative believes to be defective, or will not produce a completed Project that conforms to the Contract Documents or that will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract Documents. City will have authority to conduct special inspection or testing of the Work as provided in Article 11, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or completed. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 28 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 28 of 35 8.04 Determinations for Work Performed Contractor will determine the actual quantities and classifications of Work performed. City's Project Representative will review with Contractor the preliminary determinations on such matters before rendering a written recommendation. City's written decision will be final (except as modified to reflect changed factual conditions or more accurate data). ARTICLE 9 — CHANGES IN THE WORK 9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work A. Without invalidating the Contract and without notice to any surety, City may, at any time or from time to time, order Extra Work. Upon notice of such Extra Work, Contractor shall promptly proceed with the Work involved which will be performed under the applicable conditions of the Contract Documents (except as otherwise specifically provided). Extra Work shall be memorialized by a Participating Change Order which may or may not precede an order of Extra work. B. For minor changes of Work not requiring changes to Contract Time or Contract Price on a project with City participation, a Field Order may be issued by the City. 9.02 Notification to Surety If the provisions of any bond require notice to be given to a surety of any change affecting the general scope of the Work or the provisions of the Contract Documents (including, but not limited to, Contract Price or Contract Time), the giving of any such notice will be Contractor's responsibility. The amount of each applicable bond will be adjusted by the Contractor to reflect the effect of any such change. ARTICLE 10 — CHANGE OF CONTRACT PRICE; CHANGE OF CONTRACT TIME 10.01 Change of Contract Price A. The Contract Price may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City participation. 10.02 Change of Contract Time A. The Contract Time may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City participation. 10.03 Delays A. If Contractor is delayed, City shall not be liable to Contractor for any claims, costs, losses, or damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) sustained by Contractor on or in connection with any other project or anticipated project. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 29 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 29 of 35 ARTICLE 11— TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL OR ACCEPTANCE OF DEFECTIVE WORK 11.01 Notice of Defects Notice of all defective Work of which City has actual knowledge will be given to Contractor. Defective Work may be rejected, corrected, or accepted as provided in this Article 13. 11.02 Access to Work City, independent testing laboratories, and governmental agencies with jurisdictional interests will have access to the Site and the Work at reasonable times for their observation, inspection, and testing. Contractor shall provide them proper and safe conditions for such access and advise them of Contractor's safety procedures and programs so that they may comply therewith as applicable. 11.03 Tests and Inspections A. Contractor shall give City timely notice of readiness of the Work for all required inspections, tests, or approvals and shall cooperate with inspection and testing personnel to facilitate required inspections or tests. B. If Contract Documents, Laws or Regulations of any public body having jurisdiction require any of the Work (or part thereof) to be inspected, tested, or approved, Contractor shall assume full responsibility for arranging and obtaining such independent inspections, tests, retests or approvals, pay all costs in connection therewith, and furnish City the required certificates of inspection or approval; excepting, however, those fees specifically identified in the Supplementary Conditions or any Texas Department of Licensure and Regulation (TDLR) inspections, which shall be paid as described in the Supplementary Conditions. C. Contractor shall be responsible for arranging and obtaining and shall pay all costs in connection with any inspections, tests, re -tests, or approvals required for City's acceptance of materials or equipment to be incorporated in the Work; or acceptance of materials, mix designs, or equipment submitted for approval prior to Contractor's purchase thereof for incorporation in the Work. Such inspections, tests, re -tests, or approvals shall be performed by organizations approved by City. D. City may arrange for the services of an independent testing laboratory ("Testing Lab") to perform any inspections or tests ("Testing") for any part of the Work, as determined solely by City. 1. City will coordinate such Testing to the extent possible, with Contractor; 2. Should any Testing under this Section 11.03 D result in a "fail", "did not pass" or other similar negative result, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying for any and all retests. Contractor's cancellation without cause of City initiated Testing shall be deemed a negative result and require a retest. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 30 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 30 of 35 3. Any amounts owed for any retest under this Section 11.03 D shall be paid directly to the Testing Lab by Contractor. Developer/Contractor. City will forward all invoices for retests to 4. If Contractor fails to pay the Testing Lab, City will not issue a letter of Final Acceptance until the Testing Lab is Paid E. If any Work (or the work of others) that is to be inspected, tested, or approved is covered by Contractor without written concurrence of City, Contractor shall, if requested by City, uncover such Work for observation. 11.04 Uncovering Work A. If any Work is covered contrary to the Contract Documents or specific instructions by the City, it must, if requested by City, be uncovered for City's observation and replaced at Contractor's expense. 11.05 City May Stop the Work If the Work is defective, or Contractor fails to supply sufficient skilled workers or suitable materials or equipment, or fails to perform the Work in such a way that the completed Work will conform to the Contract Documents, City may order Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, this right of City to stop the Work shall not give rise to any duty on the part of City to exercise this right for the benefit of Contractor, any Subcontractor, any Supplier, any other individual or entity, or any surety for, or employee or agent of any of them. 11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work A. Promptly after receipt of written notice, Contractor shall correct all defective Work pursuant to an acceptable schedule, whether or not fabricated, installed, or completed, or, if the Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective. Contractor shall pay all claims, costs, additional testing, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction or removal (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others). Failure to require the removal of any defective Work shall not constitute acceptance of such Work. B. When correcting defective Work under the terms of this Paragraph 11.06 or Paragraph 11.07, Contractor shall take no action that would void or otherwise impair City's special warranty and guarantee, if any, on said Work. 11.07 Correction Period A. If within two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance (or such longer period of time as may be prescribed by the terms of any applicable special guarantee required by the Contract CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 31 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 31 of 35 Documents), any Work is found to be defective, or if the repair of any damages to the land or areas made available for Contractor's use by City or permitted by Laws and Regulations as contemplated in Paragraph 5.10.A is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without cost to City and in accordance with City's written instructions: 1. repair such defective land or areas; or 2. correct such defective Work; or 3. if the defective Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective, and 4. satisfactorily correct or repair or remove and replace any damage to other Work, to the work of others or other land or areas resulting therefrom. B. If Contractor does not promptly comply with the terms of City's written instructions, or in an emergency where delay would cause serious risk of loss or damage, City may have the defective Work corrected or repaired or may have the rejected Work removed and replaced. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction or repair or such removal and replacement (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others) will be paid by Contractor. C. Where defective Work (and damage to other Work resulting therefrom) has been corrected or removed and replaced under this Paragraph 11.07, the correction period hereunder with respect to such Work may be required to be extended for an additional period of one year after the end of the initial correction period. City shall provide 30 days written notice to Contractor and Developer should such additional warranty coverage be required. Contractor's obligations under this Paragraph 11.07 are in addition to any other obligation or warranty. The provisions of this Paragraph 11.07 shall not be construed as a substitute for, or a waiver of, the provisions of any applicable statute of limitation or repose. 11.08 City May Correct Defective Work A. If Contractor fails within a reasonable time after written notice from City to correct defective Work, or to remove and replace rejected Work as required by City in accordance with Paragraph 11.06.A, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, or if Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of the Contract Documents, City may, after seven (7) days written notice to Contractor and the Developer, correct, or remedy any such deficiency. B. In exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09, City shall proceed expeditiously. In connection with such corrective or remedial action, City may exclude Contractor from all or part of the Site, take possession of all or part of the Work and suspend Contractor's services related thereto, and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment incorporated in the Work, stored at the Site or for which City has paid Contractor but which are CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 32 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 32 of 35 stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow City, City's representatives, agents, consultants, employees, and City's other contractors, access to the Site to enable City to exercise the rights and remedies under this Paragraph. C. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs) incurred or sustained by City in exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 13.09 will be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order will be issued incorporating the necessary revisions in the Contract Documents with respect to the Work; and City shall be entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price. D. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Time because of any delay in the performance of the Work attributable to the exercise of City's rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09. ARTICLE 12 — COMPLETION 12.01 Contractor's Warranty of Title Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all Work, materials, and equipment covered by any Application for Payment will pass to City no later than the time of Final Acceptance and shall be free and clear of all Liens. 12.02 Partial Utilization A. Prior to Final Acceptance of all the Work, City may use or occupy any substantially completed part of the Work which has specifically been identified in the Contract Documents, or which City, determines constitutes a separately functioning and usable part of the Work that can be used by City for its intended purpose without significant interference with Contractor's performance of the remainder of the Work. City at any time may notify Contractor in writing to permit City to use or occupy any such part of the Work which City determines to be ready for its intended use, subject to the following conditions: 1. Contractor at any time may notify City in writing that Contractor considers any such part of the Work ready for its intended use. 2. Within a reasonable time after notification as enumerated in Paragraph 14.05.A.1, City and Contractor shall make an inspection of that part of the Work to determine its status of completion. If City does not consider that part of the Work to be substantially complete, City will notify Contractor in writing giving the reasons therefor. 3. Partial Utilization will not constitute Final Acceptance by City. 12.03 Final Inspection A. Upon written notice from Contractor that the entire Work is complete in accordance with the Contract Documents: CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 33 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 33 of 35 1. within 10 days, City will schedule a Final Inspection with Contractor. 2. City will notify Contractor in writing of all particulars in which this inspection reveals that the Work is incomplete or defective. Contractor shall immediately take such measures as are necessary to complete such Work or remedy such deficiencies. 12.04 Final Acceptance A. Upon completion by Contractor to City's satisfaction, of any additional Work identified in the Final Inspection, City will issue to Contractor a letter of Final Acceptance upon the satisfaction of the following: 1. All documentation called for in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the evidence of insurance required by Paragraph 5.03; 2. consent of the surety, if any, to Final Acceptance; 3. a list of all pending or released Damage Claims against City that Contractor believes are unsettled; and 4. affidavits of payments and complete and legally effective releases or waivers (satisfactory to City) of all Lien rights arising out of or Liens filed in connection with the Work. 5. after all Damage Claims have been resolved: a. directly by the Contractor or; b. Contractor provides evidence that the Damage Claim has been reported to Contractor's insurance provider for resolution. 6. Issuing Final Acceptance by the City shall not relieve the Contractor of any guarantees or other requirements of the Contract Documents which specifically continue thereafter. ARTICLE 13 — SUSPENSION OF WORK 13.01 City May Suspend Work A. At any time and without cause, City may suspend the Work or any portion thereof by written notice to Contractor and which may fix the date on which Work will be resumed. Contractor shall resume the Work on the date so fixed. During temporary suspension of the Work covered by these Contract Documents, for any reason, the City will stop contract time on City participation projects. B. Should the Contractor not be able to complete a portion of the Project due to causes beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, and should it be determined by mutual consent of the Contractor and City that a solution to allow construction to proceed is not CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 34 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 34 of 35 available within a reasonable period of time, Contractor may request an extension in Contract Time, directly attributable to any such suspension. C. If it should become necessary to suspend the Work for an indefinite period, the Contractor shall store all materials in such a manner that they will not obstruct or impede the public unnecessarily nor become damaged in any way, and he shall take every precaution to prevent damage or deterioration of the work performed; he shall provide suitable drainage about the work, and erect temporary structures where necessary. ARTICLE 14 — MISCELLANEOUS 14.01 Giving Notice A. Whenever any provision of the Contract Documents requires the giving of written notice, it will be deemed to have been validly given i£ 1. delivered in person to the individual or to a member of the firm or to an officer of the corporation for whom it is intended; or 2. delivered at or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the last business address known to the giver of the notice. B. Business address changes must be promptly made in writing to the other party. C. Whenever the Contract Documents specifies giving notice by electronic means such electronic notice shall be deemed sufficient upon confirmation of receipt by the receiving party. 14.02 Computation of Times When any period of time is referred to in the Contract Documents by days, it will be computed to exclude the first and include the last day of such period. If the last day of any such period falls on a Saturday or Sunday or on a day made a legal holiday the next Working Day shall become the last day of the period. 14.03 Cumulative Remedies The duties and obligations imposed by these General Conditions and the rights and remedies available hereunder to the parties hereto are in addition to, and are not to be construed in any way as a limitation of, any rights and remedies available to any or all of them which are otherwise imposed or available by Laws or Regulations, by special warranty or guarantee, or by other provisions of the Contract Documents. The provisions of this Paragraph will be as effective as if repeated specifically in the Contract Documents in connection with each particular duty, obligation, right, and remedy to which they apply. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 35 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 35 of 35 14.04 Survival of Obligations All representations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in accordance with the Contract Documents, as well as all continuing obligations indicated in the Contract Documents, will survive final payment, completion, and acceptance of the Work or termination or completion of the Contract or termination of the services of Contractor. 14.05 Headings Article and paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute parts of these General Conditions. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised: January 10, 2013 011100-1 DAP SUMMARY OF WORK SECTION 01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Pagel of 3 1. Summary of Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 - Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 - General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Work Covered by Contract Documents 1. Work is to include furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing all Work necessary for this construction project as detailed in the Drawings and Specifications. B. Subsidiary Work Any and all Work specifically governed by documentary requirements for the project, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or Contract Documents in which no specific item for bid has been provided for in the Proposal and the item is not a typical unit bid item included on the standard bid item list, then the item shall be considered as a subsidiary item of Work, the cost of which shall be included in the price bid in the Proposal for various bid items. C. Use of Premises 1. Coordinate uses of premises under direction of the City. 2. Assume full responsibility for protection and safekeeping of materials and equipment stored on the Site. Use and occupy only portions of the public streets and alleys, or other public places or other rights -of -way as provided for in the ordinances of the City, as shown in the Contract Documents, or as may be specifically authorized in writing by the City. a. A reasonable amount of tools, materials, and equipment for construction purposes may be stored in such space, but no more than is necessary to avoid delay in the construction operations. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — Developer Awarded Projects City Project No.: 104378 Revised December 20, 2012 011100-2 DAP SUMMARY OF WORK Page 2 of 3 b. Excavated and waste materials shall be stored in such a way as not to interfere with the use of spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed and so as not to inconvenience occupants of adjacent property. c. If the street is occupied by railroad tracks, the Work shall be carried on in such manner as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad. 1) All Work shall be in accordance with railroad requirements set forth in Division 0 as well as the railroad permit. D. Work within Easements 1. Do not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously obtained permission from the owner of such property. 2. Do not store equipment or material on private property unless and until the specified approval of the property owner has been secured in writing by the Contractor and a copy furnished to the City. 3. Unless specifically provided otherwise, clear all rights -of -way or easements of obstructions which must be removed to make possible proper prosecution of the Work as a part of the project construction operations. 4. Preserve and use every precaution to prevent damage to, all trees, shrubbery, plants, lawns, fences, culverts, curbing, and all other types of structures or improvements, to all water, sewer, and gas lines, to all conduits, overhead pole lines, or appurtenances thereof, including the construction of temporary fences and to all other public or private property adjacent to the Work. 5. Notify the proper representatives of the owners or occupants of the public or private lands of interest in lands which might be affected by the Work. a. Such notice shall be made at least 48 hours in advance of the beginning of the Work. b. Notices shall be applicable to both public and private utility companies and any corporation, company, individual, or other, either as owners or occupants, whose land or interest in land might be affected by the Work. c. Be responsible for all damage or injury to property of any character resulting from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in the manner or method or execution of the Work, or at any time due to defective work, material, or equipment. 6. Fence a. Restore all fences encountered and removed during construction of the Project to the original or a better than original condition. b. Erect temporary fencing in place of the fencing removed whenever the Work is not in progress and when the site is vacated overnight, and/or at all times to provide site security. c. The cost for all fence work within easements, including removal, temporary closures and replacement, shall be subsidiary to the various items bid in the project proposal, unless a bid item is specifically provided in the proposal. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — Developer Awarded Projects City Project No.: 104378 Revised December 20, 2012 011100-3 DAP SUMMARY OF WORK Page 3 of 3 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — Developer Awarded Projects City Project No.: 104378 Revised December 20, 2012 012500-1 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES SECTION 0125 00 SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Page 1 of 4 The procedure for requesting the approval of substitution of a product that is not equivalent to a product which is specified by descriptive or performance criteria or defined by reference to 1 or more of the following: a. Name of manufacturer b. Name of vendor c. Trade name d. Catalog number 2. Substitutions are not "or -equals". B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Request for Substitution - General 1. Within 30 days after award of Contract (unless noted otherwise), the City will consider formal requests from Contractor for substitution of products in place of those specified. 2. Certain types of equipment and kinds of material are described in Specifications by means of references to names of manufacturers and vendors, trade names, or catalog numbers. a. When this method of specifying is used, it is not intended to exclude from consideration other products bearing other manufacturer's or vendor's names, trade names, or catalog numbers, provided said products are "or -equals," as determined by City. 3. Other types of equipment and kinds of material may be acceptable substitutions under the following conditions: a. Or -equals are unavailable due to strike, discontinued production of products meeting specified requirements, or other factors beyond control of Contractor; or, CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 012500-2 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES Page 2 of 4 b. Contractor proposes a cost and/or time reduction incentive to the City. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. See Request for Substitution Form (attached) B. Procedure for Requesting Substitution 1. Substitution shall be considered only: a. After award of Contract b. Under the conditions stated herein 2. Submit 3 copies of each written request for substitution, including: a. Documentation 1) Complete data substantiating compliance of proposed substitution with Contract Documents 2) Data relating to changes in construction schedule, when a reduction is proposed 3) Data relating to changes in cost b. For products 1) Product identification a) Manufacturer's name b) Telephone number and representative contact name c) Specification Section or Drawing reference of originally specified product, including discrete name or tag number assigned to original product in the Contract Documents 2) Manufacturer's literature clearly marked to show compliance of proposed product with Contract Documents 3) Itemized comparison of original and proposed product addressing product characteristics including, but not necessarily limited to: a) Size b) Composition or materials of construction c) Weight d) Electrical or mechanical requirements 4) Product experience a) Location of past projects utilizing product b) Name and telephone number of persons associated with referenced projects knowledgeable concerning proposed product c) Available field data and reports associated with proposed product 5) Samples a) Provide at request of City. b) Samples become the property of the City. c. For construction methods: 1) Detailed description of proposed method 2) Illustration drawings C. Approval or Rejection 1. Written approval or rejection of substitution given by the City 2. City reserves the right to require proposed product to comply with color and pattern of specified product if necessary to secure design intent. 3. In the event the substitution is approved, if a reduction in cost or time results, it will be documented by Change Order. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 012500-3 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES Page 3 of 4 4. Substitution will be rejected if: a. Submittal is not through the Contractor with his stamp of approval b. Request is not made in accordance with this Specification Section c. In the Developer's opinion, acceptance will require substantial revision of the original design d. In the City's or Developer's opinion, substitution will not perform adequately the function consistent with the design intent 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. In making request for substitution or in using an approved product, the Contractor represents that the Contractor: 1. Has investigated proposed product, and has determined that it is adequate or superior in all respects to that specified, and that it will perform function for which it is intended 2. Will provide same guarantee for substitute item as for product specified 3. Will coordinate installation of accepted substitution into Work, to include building modifications if necessary, making such changes as may be required for Work to be complete in all respects 4. Waives all claims for additional costs related to substitution which subsequently arise 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 012500-4 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION FORM: PROJECT: DATE: We hereby submit for your consideration the following product instead of the specified item for the above project: SECTION PARAGRAPH SPECIFIED ITEM Proposed Substitution: Reason for Substitution: Include complete information on changes to Drawings and/or Specifications which proposed substitution will require for its proper installation. Fill in Blanks Below: A. Will the undersigned contractor pay for changes to the building design, including engineering and detailing costs caused by the requested substitution? B. What effect does substitution have on other trades? C. Differences between proposed substitution and specified item? D. Differences in product cost or product delivery time? E. Manufacturer's guarantees of the proposed and specified items are: Equal Better (explain on attachment) The undersigned states that the function, appearance and quality are equivalent or superior to the specified item. Submitted By: For Use by City Signature Recommended as noted Firm Not recommended Address By Date Date Remarks Telephone For Use by City: Approved Rejected City Date Recommended Received late CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013119-1 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING SECTION 01 31 19 PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Page 1 of 3 1. Provisions for the preconstruction meeting to be held prior to the start of Work to clarify construction contract administration procedures B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. No construction schedule required unless requested by the City. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Coordination 1. Attend preconstruction meeting. 2. Representatives of Contractor, subcontractors and suppliers attending meetings shall be qualified and authorized to act on behalf of the entity each represents. 3. Meeting administered by City may be tape recorded. a. If recorded, tapes will be used to prepare minutes and retained by City for future reference. B. Preconstruction Meeting 1. A preconstruction meeting will be held within 14 days after the delivery of the distribution package to the City. a. The meeting will be scheduled and administered by the City. 2. The Project Representative will preside at the meeting, prepare the notes of the meeting and distribute copies of same to all participants who so request by fully completing the attendance form to be circulated at the beginning of the meeting. 3. Attendance shall include: a. Developer and Consultant b. Contractor's project manager c. Contractor's superintendent d. Any subcontractor or supplier representatives whom the Contractor may desire to invite or the City may request CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 01 31 19 - 2 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING Page 2 of 3 e. Other City representatives f. Others as appropriate 4. Preliminary Agenda may include: a. Introduction of Project Personnel b. General Description of Project c. Status of right-of-way, utility clearances, easements or other pertinent permits d. Contractor's work plan and schedule e. Contract Time f. Notice to Proceed g. Construction Staking h. Progress Payments i. Extra Work and Change Order Procedures j. Field Orders k. Disposal Site Letter for Waste Material 1. Insurance Renewals m. Payroll Certification n. Material Certifications and Quality Control Testing o. Public Safety and Convenience p. Documentation of Pre -Construction Conditions q. Weekend Work Notification r. Legal Holidays s. Trench Safety Plans t. Confined Space Entry Standards u. Coordination with the City's representative for operations of existing water systems v. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan w. Coordination with other Contractors x. Early Warning System y. Contractor Evaluation z. Special Conditions applicable to the project aa. Damages Claims bb. Submittal Procedures cc. Substitution Procedures dd. Correspondence Routing ee. Record Drawings ff. Temporary construction facilities gg. MBE/SBE procedures hh. Final Acceptance ii. Final Payment J. Questions or Comments CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013119-3 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING Page 3 of 3 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013233-1 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO Page 1 of 2 SECTION 0132 33 PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Administrative and procedural requirements for: a. Preconstruction Videos B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. Though not mandatory, it is highly recommended on infill developer projects. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Preconstruction Video 1. Produce a preconstruction video of the site/alignment, including all areas in the vicinity of and to be affected by construction. a. Provide digital copy of video upon request by the City. 2. Retain a copy of the preconstruction video until the end of the maintenance surety period. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 01 32 33 - 2 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO Page 2 of 2 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 SECTION 0133 00 DAP SUBMITTALS PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 013300-1 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 1 of 8 General methods and requirements of submissions applicable to the following Work -related submittals: a. Shop Drawings b. Product Data (including Standard Product List submittals) c. Samples d. Mock Ups B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Coordination 1. Notify the City in writing, at the time of submittal, of any deviations in the submittals from the requirements of the Contract Documents. 2. Coordination of Submittal Times a. Prepare, prioritize and transmit each submittal sufficiently in advance of performing the related Work or other applicable activities, or within the time specified in the individual Work Sections, of the Specifications. b. Contractor is responsible such that the installation will not be delayed by processing times including, but not limited to: a) Disapproval and resubmittal (if required) b) Coordination with other submittals c) Testing d) Purchasing e) Fabrication f) Delivery g) Similar sequenced activities c. No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the Work. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-2 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 2 of 8 d. Make submittals promptly in accordance with approved schedule, and in such sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the work of any other contractor. B. Submittal Numbering When submitting shop drawings or samples, utilize a 9-character submittal cross- reference identification numbering system in the following manner: a. Use the first 6 digits of the applicable Specification Section Number. b. For the next 2 digits number use numbers 01-99 to sequentially number each initial separate item or drawing submitted under each specific Section number. c. Last use a letter, A-Z, indicating the resubmission of the same drawing (i.e. A=2nd submission, B=3rd submission, C=4th submission, etc.). A typical submittal number would be as follows: 03 30 00-08-B 1) 03 30 00 is the Specification Section for Concrete 2) 08 is the eighth initial submittal under this Specification Section 3) B is the third submission (second resubmission) of that particular shop drawing C. Contractor Certification Review shop drawings, product data and samples, including those by subcontractors, prior to submission to determine and verify the following: a. Field measurements b. Field construction criteria c. Catalog numbers and similar data d. Conformance with the Contract Documents 2. Provide each shop drawing, sample and product data submitted by the Contractor with a Certification Statement affixed including: a. The Contractor's Company name b. Signature of submittal reviewer c. Certification Statement 1) `By this submittal, I hereby represent that I have determined and verified field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions, catalog numbers and similar data and I have checked and coordinated each item with other applicable approved shop drawings." D. Submittal Format 1. Fold shop drawings larger than 8 '/2 inches x 11 inches to 8 '/2 inches x 11 inches. 2. Bind shop drawings and product data sheets together. 3. Order a. Cover Sheet 1) Description of Packet 2) Contractor Certification b. List of items / Table of Contents c. Product Data /Shop Drawings/Samples /Calculations E. Submittal Content 1. The date of submission and the dates of any previous submissions CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-3 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 3 of 8 2. The Project title and number 3. Contractor identification 4. The names of: a. Contractor b. Supplier c. Manufacturer 5. Identification of the product, with the Specification Section number, page and paragraph(s) 6. Field dimensions, clearly identified as such 7. Relation to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials 8. Applicable standards, such as ASTM or Federal Specification numbers 9. Identification by highlighting of deviations from Contract Documents 10. Identification by highlighting of revisions on resubmittals 11. An 8-inch x 3-inch blank space for Contractor and City stamps F. Shop Drawings 1. As specified in individual Work Sections includes, but is not necessarily limited to: a. Custom -prepared data such as fabrication and erection/installation (working) drawings b. Scheduled information c. Setting diagrams d. Actual shopwork manufacturing instructions e. Custom templates f. Special wiring diagrams g. Coordination drawings h. Individual system or equipment inspection and test reports including: 1) Performance curves and certifications i. As applicable to the Work 2. Details a. Relation of the various parts to the main members and lines of the structure b. Where correct fabrication of the Work depends upon field measurements 1) Provide such measurements and note on the drawings prior to submitting for approval. G. Product Data 1. For submittals of product data for products included on the City's Standard Product List, clearly identify each item selected for use on the Project. 2. For submittals of product data for products not included on the City's Standard Product List, submittal data may include, but is not necessarily limited to: a. Standard prepared data for manufactured products (sometimes referred to as catalog data) 1) Such as the manufacturer's product specification and installation instructions 2) Availability of colors and patterns 3) Manufacturer's printed statements of compliances and applicability 4) Roughing -in diagrams and templates 5) Catalog cuts 6) Product photographs CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-4 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 4 of 8 7) Standard wiring diagrams 8) Printed performance curves and operational -range diagrams 9) Production or quality control inspection and test reports and certifications 10) Mill reports 11) Product operating and maintenance instructions and recommended spare -parts listing and printed product warranties 12) As applicable to the Work H. Samples As specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Physical examples of the Work such as: 1) Sections of manufactured or fabricated Work 2) Small cuts or containers of materials 3) Complete units of repetitively used products color/texture/pattern swatches and range sets 4) Specimens for coordination of visual effect 5) Graphic symbols and units of Work to be used by the City for independent inspection and testing, as applicable to the Work I. Do not start Work requiring a shop drawing, sample or product data nor any material to be fabricated or installed prior to the approval or qualified approval of such item. 1. Fabrication performed, materials purchased or on -site construction accomplished which does not conform to approved shop drawings and data is at the Contractor's risk. 2. The City will not be liable for any expense or delay due to corrections or remedies required to accomplish conformity. 3. Complete project Work, materials, fabrication, and installations in conformance with approved shop drawings, applicable samples, and product data. J. Submittal Distribution Electronic Distribution a. Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be uploaded to City's Buzzsaw site, or another external FTP site approved by the City. b. Shop Drawings 1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate City representatives via email of submittal posting. 2) Hard Copies a) 3 copies for all submittals b) If Contractor requires more than 1 hard copy of Shop Drawings returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed above. c. Product Data 1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate City representatives via email of submittal posting. 2) Hard Copies a) 3 copies for all submittals d. Samples 1) Distributed to the Project Representative 2. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution) CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-5 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 5 of 8 a. Shop Drawings 1) Distributed to the City 2) Copies a) 8 copies for mechanical submittals b) 7 copies for all other submittals c) If Contractor requires more than 3 copies of Shop Drawings returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed above. b. Product Data 1) Distributed to the City 2) Copies a) 4 copies c. Samples 1) Distributed to the Project Representative 2) Copies a) Submit the number stated in the respective Specification Sections. Distribute reproductions of approved shop drawings and copies of approved product data and samples, where required, to the job site file and elsewhere as directed by the City. a. Provide number of copies as directed by the City but not exceeding the number previously specified. K. Submittal Review 1. The review of shop drawings, data and samples will be for general conformance with the design concept and Contract Documents. This is not to be construed as: a. Permitting any departure from the Contract requirements b. Relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including details, dimensions, and materials c. Approving departures from details furnished by the City, except as otherwise provided herein 2. The review and approval of shop drawings, samples or product data by the City does not relieve the Contractor from his/her responsibility with regard to the fulfillment of the terms of the Contract. a. All risks of error and omission are assumed by the Contractor, and the City will have no responsibility therefore. 3. The Contractor remains responsible for details and accuracy, for coordinating the Work with all other associated work and trades, for selecting fabrication processes, for techniques of assembly and for performing Work in a safe manner. 4. If the shop drawings, data or samples as submitted describe variations and show a departure from the Contract requirements which City finds to be in the interest of the City and to be so minor as not to involve a change in Contract Price or time for performance, the City may return the reviewed drawings without noting an exception. 5. Submittals will be returned to the Contractor under 1 of the following codes: a. Code 1 1) "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN' is assigned when there are no notations or comments on the submittal. a) When returned under this code the Contractor may release the equipment and/or material for manufacture. b. Code 2 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-6 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 6 of 8 1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED". This code is assigned when a confirmation of the notations and comments IS NOT required by the Contractor. a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture; however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the final product. c. Code 3 1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED/RESUBMIT". This combination of codes is assigned when notations and comments are extensive enough to require a resubmittal of the package. a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture; however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the final product. b) This resubmittal is to address all comments, omissions and non -conforming items that were noted. c) Resubmittal is to be received by the City within 15 Calendar Days of the date of the City's transmittal requiring the resubmittal. d. Code 4 1) "NOT APPROVED" is assigned when the submittal does not meet the intent of the Contract Documents. a) The Contractor must resubmit the entire package revised to bring the submittal into conformance. b) It may be necessary to resubmit using a different manufacturer/vendor to meet the Contract Documents. 6. Resubmittals a. Handled in the same manner as first submittals 1) Corrections other than requested by the City 2) Marked with revision triangle or other similar method a) At Contractor's risk if not marked b. Submittals for each item will be reviewed no more than twice at the City's expense. 1) All subsequent reviews will be performed at times convenient to the City and at the Contractor's expense, based on the City's or City Representative's then prevailing rates. 2) Provide Contractor reimbursement to the City within 30 Calendar Days for all such fees invoiced by the City. c. The need for more than 1 resubmission or any other delay in obtaining City's review of submittals, will not entitle the Contractor to an extension of Contract Time. 7. Partial Submittals a. City reserves the right to not review submittals deemed partial, at the City's discretion. b. Submittals deemed by the City to be not complete will be returned to the Contractor, and will be considered "Not Approved" until resubmitted. c. The City may at its option provide a list or mark the submittal directing the Contractor to the areas that are incomplete. 8. If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the shop drawings to constitute a change to the Contract Documents, then written notice must be provided thereof to the Developer at least 7 Calendar Days prior to release for manufacture. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-7 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 7 of 8 9. When the shop drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the Contractor may carry out the construction in accordance therewith and no further changes therein except upon written instructions from the City. 10. Each submittal, appropriately coded, will be returned within 30 Calendar Days following receipt of submittal by the City. L. Mock ups 1. Mock Up units as specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to, complete units of the standard of acceptance for that type of Work to be used on the Project. Remove at the completion of the Work or when directed. M. Qualifications 1. If specifically required in other Sections of these Specifications, submit a P.E. Certification for each item required. N. Request for Information (RFI) 1. Contractor Request for additional information a. Clarification or interpretation of the contract documents b. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between Contract Documents c. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between the Drawings and Specifications 1) Identify the conflict and request clarification 2. Sufficient information shall be attached to permit a written response without further information. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-8 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 8 of 8 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 1040 IZI] wl X40 I Mei Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 12/20/2012 D. Johnson 1.4.K.8. Working Days modified to Calendar Days CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised August 30, 2013 01 45 23 DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Page 1 of 2 SECTION 0145 23 TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Testing and inspection services procedures and coordination B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. a. Contractor is responsible for performing, coordinating, and payment of all Quality Control testing. b. City is responsible for performing and payment for first set of Quality Assurance testing. 1) If the first Quality Assurance test performed by the City fails, the Contractor is responsible for payment of subsequent Quality Assurance testing until a passing test occurs. a) Final acceptance will not be issued by City until all required payments for testing by Contractor have been paid in full. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Testing 1. Complete testing in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2. Coordination a. When testing is required to be performed by the City, notify City, sufficiently in advance, when testing is needed. b. When testing is required to be completed by the Contractor, notify City, sufficiently in advance, that testing will be performed. 3. Distribution of Testing Reports a. Electronic Distribution 1) Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be uploaded to the City's document management system, or another form of distribution approved by the City. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 01 45 23 DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Page 2 of 2 2) Upload test reports to designated project directory and notify appropriate City representatives via email of submittal posting. 3) Hard Copies a) 1 copy for all submittals submitted to the Project Representative b. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution) 1) Tests performed by City a) Distribute 1 hard copy to the Contractor 2) Tests performed by the Contractor a) Distribute 3 hard copies to City's Project Representative 4. Provide City's Project Representative with trip tickets for each delivered load of Concrete or Lime material including the following information: a. Name of pit b. Date of delivery c. Material delivered B. Inspection 1. Inspection or lack of inspection does not relieve the Contractor from obligation to perform work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 03/20/2020 D.V. Magaiia Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that electronic submittals be uploaded through the City's document management system. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 015000-1 DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 1 of 4 SECTION 0150 00 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Provide temporary facilities and controls needed for the Work including, but not necessarily limited to: a. Temporary utilities b. Sanitary facilities c. Storage Sheds and Buildings d. Dust control e. Temporary fencing of the construction site B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Temporary Utilities 1. Obtaining Temporary Service a. Make arrangements with utility service companies for temporary services. b. Abide by rules and regulations of utility service companies or authorities having jurisdiction. c. Be responsible for utility service costs until Work is approved for Final Acceptance. 1) Included are fuel, power, light, heat and other utility services necessary for execution, completion, testing and initial operation of Work. 2. Water a. Contractor to provide water required for and in connection with Work to be performed and for specified tests of piping, equipment, devices or other use as required for the completion of the Work. b. Provide and maintain adequate supply of potable water for domestic consumption by Contractor personnel and City's Project Representatives. c. Coordination 1) Contact City 1 week before water for construction is desired CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised JULY 1, 2011 01 50 00 - 2 DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 2 of 4 d. Contractor Payment for Construction Water 1) Obtain construction water meter from City for payment as billed by City's established rates. 3. Electricity and Lighting a. Provide and pay for electric powered service as required for Work, including testing of Work. 1) Provide power for lighting, operation of equipment, or other use. b. Electric power service includes temporary power service or generator to maintain operations during scheduled shutdown. 4. Telephone a. Provide emergency telephone service at Site for use by Contractor personnel and others performing work or furnishing services at Site. 5. Temporary Heat and Ventilation a. Provide temporary heat as necessary for protection or completion of Work. b. Provide temporary heat and ventilation to assure safe working conditions. B. Sanitary Facilities 1. Provide and maintain sanitary facilities for persons on Site. a. Comply with regulations of State and local departments of health. 2. Enforce use of sanitary facilities by construction personnel at job site. a. Enclose and anchor sanitary facilities. b. No discharge will be allowed from these facilities. c. Collect and store sewage and waste so as not to cause nuisance or health problem. d. Haul sewage and waste off -site at no less than weekly intervals and properly dispose in accordance with applicable regulation. 3. Locate facilities near Work Site and keep clean and maintained throughout Project. 4. Remove facilities at completion of Project C. Storage Sheds and Buildings 1. Provide adequately ventilated, watertight, weatherproof storage facilities with floor above ground level for materials and equipment susceptible to weather damage. 2. Storage of materials not susceptible to weather damage may be on blocks off ground. 3. Store materials in a neat and orderly manner. a. Place materials and equipment to permit easy access for identification, inspection and inventory. 4. Equip building with lockable doors and lighting, and provide electrical service for equipment space heaters and heating or ventilation as necessary to provide storage environments acceptable to specified manufacturers. 5. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage away from temporary and existing buildings. 6. Remove building from site prior to Final Acceptance. D. Temporary Fencing Provide and maintain for the duration or construction when required in contract documents E. Dust Control CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised JULY 1, 2011 01 50 00 - 3 DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 3 of 4 1. Contractor is responsible for maintaining dust control through the duration of the project. a. Contractor remains on -call at all times b. Must respond in a timely manner F. Temporary Protection of Construction 1. Contractor or subcontractors are responsible for protecting Work from damage due to weather. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 3.4 INSTALLATION A. Temporary Facilities 1. Maintain all temporary facilities for duration of construction activities as needed. 3.5 [REPAIR] / [RESTORATION] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES A. Temporary Facilities CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised JULY 1, 2011 01 50 00 - 4 DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 4 of 4 1. Remove all temporary facilities and restore area after completion of the Work, to a condition equal to or better than prior to start of Work. 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised JULY 1, 2011 015526-1 DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL Page 1 of 3 SECTION 0155 26 STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Administrative procedures for: a. Street Use Permit b. Modification of approved traffic control c. Removal of Street Signs B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 3. Section 34 71 13 — Traffic Control 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES A. Reference Standards 1. Reference standards cited in this specification refer to the current reference standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this specification, unless a date is specifically cited. 2. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Traffic Control 1. General a. When traffic control plans are included in the Drawings, provide Traffic Control in accordance with Drawings and Section 34 71 13. b. When traffic control plans are not included in the Drawings, prepare traffic control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13 and submit to City for review. 1) Allow minimum 10 working days for review of proposed Traffic Control. B. Street Use Permit 1. Prior to installation of Traffic Control, a City Street Use Permit is required. a. To obtain Street Use Permit, submit Traffic Control Plans to City Transportation and Public Works Department. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised July 1, 2011 015526-2 DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL Page 2 of 3 1) Allow a minimum of 5 working days for permit review. 2) Contractor's responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control plans for Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed. C. Modification to Approved Traffic Control Prior to installation traffic control: a. Submit revised traffic control plans to City Department Transportation and Public Works Department. 1) Revise Traffic Control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13. 2) Allow minimum 5 working days for review of revised Traffic Control. 3) It is the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control plans for Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed. D. Removal of Street Sign 1. If it is determined that a street sign must be removed for construction, then contact City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs and Markings Division to remove the sign. E. Temporary Signage 1. In the case of regulatory signs, replace permanent sign with temporary sign meeting requirements of the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 2. Install temporary sign before the removal of permanent sign. 3. When construction is complete, to the extent that the permanent sign can be reinstalled, contact the City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs and Markings Division, to reinstall the permanent sign. F. Traffic Control Standards 1. Traffic Control Standards can be found on the City's Buzzsaw website. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised July 1, 2011 015526-3 DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL Page 3 of 3 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised July 1, 2011 015713-1 DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION Page 1 of 3 SECTION 0157 13 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Procedures for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 3. Section 3125 00 — Erosion and Sediment Control 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Construction Activities resulting in less than 1 acre of disturbance a. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 2. Construction Activities resulting in greater than 1 acre of disturbance a. Measurement and Payment shall be in accordance with Section 3125 00. 1.3 REFERENCES A. Abbreviations and Acronyms 1. Notice of Intent: NOI 2. Notice of Termination: NOT 3. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: SWPPP 4. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality: TCEQ 5. Notice of Change: NOC A. Reference Standards 1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this Specification, unless a date is specifically cited. 2. Integrated Storm Management (iSWM) Technical Manual for Construction Controls 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. General 1. Contractor is responsible for resolution and payment of any fines issued associated with compliance to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised July 1, 2011 01 57 13 - 2 DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION Page 2 of 3 B. Construction Activities resulting in: 1. Less than 1 acre of disturbance a. Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with Section 3125 00 and Drawings. 2. 1 to less than 5 acres of disturbance a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction Permit is required b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements 1) TCEQ Small Construction Site Notice Required under general permit TXR150000 a) Sign and post at job site b) Prior to Preconstruction Meeting, send 1 copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392- 6088. 2) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with: a) Section 3125 00 b) The Drawings c) TXR150000 General Permit d) SWPPP e) TCEQ requirements 5 acres or more of Disturbance a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction Permit is required b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements 1) Prepare a TCEQ NOI form and submit to TCEQ along with required fee a) Sign and post at job site b) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088. 2) TCEQ Notice of Change required if making changes or updates to NOI 3) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with: a) Section 3125 00 b) The Drawings c) TXR150000 General Permit d) SWPPP e) TCEQ requirements 4) Once the project has been completed and all the closeout requirements of TCEQ have been met a TCEQ Notice of Termination can be submitted. a) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. SWPPP Submit in accordance with Section 0133 00, except as stated herein. a. Prior to the Preconstruction Meeting, submit a draft copy of SWPPP to the City as follows: 1) 1 copy to the City Project Manager a) City Project Manager will forward to the City Department of Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division for review CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised July 1, 2011 0157 13 -3 DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION Page 3 of 3 B. Modified SWPPP 1. If the SWPPP is revised during construction, resubmit modified SWPPP to the City in accordance with Section 0133 00. 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised July 1, 2011 SECTION 0160 00 PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 01 60 00 DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 2 1. References for Product Requirements and City Standard Products List B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES [NOT USED] 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A list of City approved products for use is available through the City's website at: httDs://apps.fortworthtexas.2ov/ProiectResources/ and following the directory path: 02 - Construction Documents\Standard Products List A. Only products specifically included on City's Standard Product List in these Contract Documents shall be allowed for use on the Project. 1. Any subsequently approved products will only be allowed for use upon specific approval by the City. B. Any specific product requirements in the Contract Documents supersede similar products included on the City's Standard Product List. 1. The City reserves the right to not allow products to be used for certain projects even though the product is listed on the City's Standard Product List. C. Although a specific product is included on City's Standard Product List, not all products from that manufacturer are approved for use, including but not limited to, that manufacturer's standard product. D. See Section 0133 00 for submittal requirements of Product Data included on City's Standard Product List. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 01 60 00 DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 2 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 10/12/12 D. Johnson Modified Location of City's Standard Product List 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application 03/20/2020 D.V. Magana Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that the City approved products list is accessible through the City's website. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised March 20, 2020 016600-1 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 4 SECTION 0166 00 PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Scheduling of product delivery 2. Packaging of products for delivery 3. Protection of products against damage from: a. Handling b. Exposure to elements or harsh environments B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY AND HANDLING A. Delivery Requirements 1. Schedule delivery of products or equipment as required to allow timely installation and to avoid prolonged storage. 2. Provide appropriate personnel and equipment to receive deliveries. 3. Delivery trucks will not be permitted to wait extended periods of time on the Site for personnel or equipment to receive the delivery. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 66 00 - 2 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 4. Deliver products or equipment in manufacturer's original unbroken cartons or other containers designed and constructed to protect the contents from physical or environmental damage. 5. Clearly and fully mark and identify as to manufacturer, item and installation location. 6. Provide manufacturer's instructions for storage and handling. B. Handling Requirements 1. Handle products or equipment in accordance with these Contract Documents and manufacturer's recommendations and instructions. C. Storage Requirements 1. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations and requirements of these Specifications. 2. Make necessary provisions for safe storage of materials and equipment. a. Place loose soil materials and materials to be incorporated into Work to prevent damage to any part of Work or existing facilities and to maintain free access at all times to all parts of Work and to utility service company installations in vicinity of Work. 3. Keep materials and equipment neatly and compactly stored in locations that will cause minimum inconvenience to other contractors, public travel, adjoining owners, tenants and occupants. a. Arrange storage to provide easy access for inspection. 4. Restrict storage to areas available on construction site for storage of material and equipment as shown on Drawings, or approved by City's Project Representative. 5. Provide off -site storage and protection when on -site storage is not adequate. a. Provide addresses of and access to off -site storage locations for inspection by City's Project Representative. 6. Do not use lawns, grass plots or other private property for storage purposes without written permission of owner or other person in possession or control of premises. 7. Store in manufacturers' unopened containers. 8. Neatly, safely and compactly stack materials delivered and stored along line of Work to avoid inconvenience and damage to property owners and general public and maintain at least 3 feet from fire hydrant. 9. Keep public and private driveways and street crossings open. 10. Repair or replace damaged lawns, sidewalks, streets or other improvements to satisfaction of City's Project Representative. a. Total length which materials may be distributed along route of construction at one time is 1,000 linear feet, unless otherwise approved in writing by City's Project Representative. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 016600-3 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 3.4 ERECTION [NOT USED] 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL A. Tests and Inspections 1. Inspect all products or equipment delivered to the site prior to unloading. B. Non -Conforming Work 1. Reject all products or equipment that are damaged, used or in any other way unsatisfactory for use on the project. 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 3.12 PROTECTION A. Protect all products or equipment in accordance with manufacturer's written directions. B. Store products or equipment in location to avoid physical damage to items while in storage. C. Protect equipment from exposure to elements and keep thoroughly dry if required by the manufacturer. 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 66 00 - 4 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 017000-1 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION Page 1 of 4 SECTION 0170 00 MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Mobilization and Demobilization a. Mobilization 1) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies to the Site 2) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's operation at the Site 3) Premiums paid for performance and payment bonds 4) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies to another location within the designated Site 5) Relocation of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's operation from 1 location to another location on the Site. b. Demobilization 1) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies away from the Site including disassembly 2) Site Clean-up 3) Removal of all buildings and/or other facilities assembled at the Site for this Contract c. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of work that are for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract. 2. Remobilization a. Remobilization for Suspension of Work specifically required in the Contract Documents or as required by City includes: 1) Demobilization a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies from the Site including disassembly or temporarily securing equipment, supplies, and other facilities as designated by the Contract Documents necessary to suspend the Work. b) Site Clean-up as designated in the Contract Documents 2) Remobilization a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies to the Site necessary to resume the Work. b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's operation at the Site necessary to resume the Work. 3) No Payments will be made for: a) Mobilization and Demobilization from one location to another on the Site in the normal progress of performing the Work. b) Stand-by or idle time c) Lost profits 3. Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects a. Mobilization and Demobilization CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 70 00 - 2 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION Page 2 of 4 1) Mobilization shall consist of the activities and cost on a Work Order basis necessary for: a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies to the Site for the issued Work Order. b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's operation at the Site for the issued Work Order 2) Demobilization shall consist of the activities and cost necessary for: a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies from the Site including disassembly for each issued Work Order b) Site Clean-up for each issued Work Order c) Removal of all buildings or other facilities assembled at the Site for each Work Oder b. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of work for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract. 4. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects a. A Mobilization for Miscellaneous Projects when directed by the City and the mobilization occurs within 24 hours of the issuance of the Work Order. B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Mobilization and Demobilization a. Measure 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. b. Payment 1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be allowed. 2. Remobilization for suspension of Work as specifically required in the Contract Documents a. Measurement 1) Measurement for this Item shall be per each remobilization performed. b. Payment 1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item and measured as provided under "Measurement" will be paid for at the unit price per each "Specified Remobilization" in accordance with Contract Documents. c. The price shall include: 1) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.1) 2) Remobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.2) d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this Item. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 70 00 - 3 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION Page 3 of 4 Remobilization for suspension of Work as required by City a. Measurement and Payment 1) This shall be submitted as a Contract Claim in accordance with Article 10 of Section 00 72 00. 2) No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated with this Item. 4. Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects a. Measurement 1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and Demobilization required by the Contract Documents b. Payment 1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item and measured as provided under "Measurement" will be paid for at the unit price per each "Work Order Mobilization" in accordance with Contract Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to mobilization and shall not be paid for separately. c. The price shall include: 1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.1) 2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2) d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this Item. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects a. Measurement 1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and Demobilization required by the Contract Documents b. Payment 1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item and measured as provided under "Measurement" will be paid for at the unit price per each "Work Order Emergency Mobilization" in accordance with Contract Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to mobilization and shall not be paid for separately. c. The price shall include 1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.4.a) 2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2) d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 70 00 - 4 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] DATE NAME 4/7/2014 M.Domenech END OF SECTION Revision Log SUMMARY OF CHANGE Revised for DAP application Page 4 of 4 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 017123-1 DAP CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 1 of 4 SECTION 01 71 23 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Requirements for construction staking and construction survey B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Construction Staking a. Measurement 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. b. Payment 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be allowed. 2. Construction Survey a. Measurement 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. b. Payment 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be allowed. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Submittals, if required, shall be in accordance with Section 0133 00. B. All submittals shall be approved by the City prior to delivery. 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS A. Certificates 1. Provide certificate certifying that elevations and locations of improvements are in conformance or non-conformance with requirements of the Contract Documents. a. Certificate must be sealed by a registered professional land surveyor in the State of Texas. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 71 23 - 2 DAP CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 2 of 4 B. Field Quality Control Submittals 1. Documentation verifying accuracy of field engineering work. 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Construction Staking 1. Construction staking will be performed by the City. 2. Coordination a. Contact City's Project Representative at least 2 weeks in advance for scheduling of Construction Staking. b. It is the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate staking such that construction activities are not delayed or negatively impacted. 3. General a. Contractor is responsible for preserving and maintaining stakes furnished by City. b. If in the opinion of the City, a sufficient number of stakes or markings have been lost, destroyed or disturbed, by Contractor's neglect, such that the contracted Work cannot take place, then the Contractor will be required to pay the City for new staking with a 25 percent markup. The cost for staking will be deducted from the payment due to the Contractor for the Project. B. Construction Survey 1. Construction Survey will be performed by the City. 2. Coordination a. Contractor to verify that control data established in the design survey remains intact. b. Coordinate with the City prior to field investigation to determine which horizontal and vertical control data will be required for construction survey. c. It is the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate Construction Survey such that construction activities are not delayed or negatively impacted. d. Notify City if any control data needs to be restored or replaced due to damage caused during construction operations. 1) City shall perform replacements and/or restorations. General a. Construction survey will be performed in order to maintain complete and accurate logs of control and survey work as it progresses for Project Records. b. The Contractor will need to ensure coordination is maintained with the City to perform construction survey to obtain construction features, including but not limited to the following: 1) All Utility Lines a) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each manhole or junction structure 2) Water Lines a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for waterlines at the following locations: (1) Every 250 linear feet CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 71 23 - 3 DAP CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 3 of 4 (2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature, etc. (All Fittings) (3) Cathodic protection test stations (4) Sampling stations (5) Meter boxes/vaults (All sizes) (6) Fire lines (7) Fire hydrants (8) Gate valves (9) Plugs, stubouts, dead-end lines (10) Air Release valves (Manhole rim and vent pipe) (11) Blow off valves (Manhole rim and valve lid) (12) Pressure plane valves (13) Cleaning wyes (14) Casing pipe (each end) b) Storm Sewer (1) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates at the following locations: (a) Every 250 linear feet (b) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature, etc. c) Sanitary Sewer (1) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for sanitary sewer lines at the following locations: (a) Every 250 linear feet (b) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature, etc. (c) Cleanouts c. Construction survey will be performed in order to maintain complete and accurate logs of control and survey work associated with meeting or exceeding the line and grade required by these Specifications. d. The Contractor will need to ensure coordination is maintained with the City to perform construction survey and to verify control data, including but not limited to the following: 1) Established benchmarks and control points provided for the Contractor's use are accurate 2) Benchmarks were used to furnish and maintain all reference lines and grades for tunneling 3) Lines and grades were used to establish the location of the pipe 4) Submit to the City copies of field notes used to establish all lines and grades and allow the City to check guidance system setup prior to beginning each tunneling drive. 5) Provide access for the City to verify the guidance system and the line and grade of the carrier pipe on a daily basis. 6) The Contractor remains fully responsible for the accuracy of the work and the correction of it, as required. 7) Monitor line and grade continuously during construction. 8) Record deviation with respect to design line and grade once at each pipe joint and submit daily records to City. 9) If the installation does not meet the specified tolerances, immediately notify the City and correct the installation in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 71 23 - 4 DAP CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 4 of 4 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 3.4 APPLICATION 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL A. It is the Contractor's responsibility to maintain all stakes and control data placed by the City in accordance with this Specification. B. Do not change or relocate stakes or control data without approval from the City. 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 SECTION 0174 23 CLEANING PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY 017423-1 DAP CLEANING Page 1 of 4 A. Section Includes: 1. Intermediate and final cleaning for Work not including special cleaning of closed systems specified elsewhere B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 3. Section 32 92 13 — Hydro -Mulching, Seeding and Sodding 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Scheduling 1. Schedule cleaning operations so that dust and other contaminants disturbed by cleaning process will not fall on newly painted surfaces. 2. Schedule final cleaning upon completion of Work and immediately prior to final inspection. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Storage and Handling Requirements 1. Store cleaning products and cleaning wastes in containers specifically designed for those materials. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 74 23 - 2 DAP CLEANING Page 2 of 4 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART2- PRODUCTS 2.1 OWNER -FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED] 2.2 MATERIALS A. Cleaning Agents 1. Compatible with surface being cleaned 2. New and uncontaminated 3. For manufactured surfaces a. Material recommended by manufacturer 2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED] 2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 3.4 APPLICATION [NOT USED] 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING A. General 1. Prevent accumulation of wastes that create hazardous conditions. 2. Conduct cleaning and disposal operations to comply with laws and safety orders of governing authorities. 3. Do not dispose of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits, oil or paint thinner in storm or sanitary drains or sewers. 4. Dispose of degradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site. 5. Dispose of nondegradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site or in an alternate manner approved by City and regulatory agencies. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 74 23 - 3 DAP CLEANING Page 3 of 4 6. Handle materials in a controlled manner with as few handlings as possible. 7. Thoroughly clean, sweep, wash and polish all Work and equipment associated with this project. 8. Remove all signs of temporary construction and activities incidental to construction of required permanent Work. 9. If project is not cleaned to the satisfaction of the City, the City reserves the right to have the cleaning completed at the expense of the Contractor. 10. Do not burn on -site. B. Intermediate Cleaning during Construction 1. Keep Work areas clean so as not to hinder health, safety or convenience of personnel in existing facility operations. 2. At maximum weekly intervals, dispose of waste materials, debris and rubbish. 3. Confine construction debris daily in strategically located container(s): a. Cover to prevent blowing by wind b. Store debris away from construction or operational activities c. Haul from site at a minimum of once per week 4. Vacuum clean interior areas when ready to receive finish painting. a. Continue vacuum cleaning on an as -needed basis, until Final Acceptance. 5. Prior to storm events, thoroughly clean site of all loose or unsecured items, which may become airborne or transported by flowing water during the storm. C. Exterior (Site or Right of Way) Final Cleaning 1. Remove trash and debris containers from site. a. Re -seed areas disturbed by location of trash and debris containers in accordance with Section 32 92 13. 2. Sweep roadway to remove all rocks, pieces of asphalt, concrete or any other object that may hinder or disrupt the flow of traffic along the roadway. 3. Clean any interior areas including, but not limited to, vaults, manholes, structures, junction boxes and inlets. 4. If no longer required for maintenance of erosion facilities, and upon approval by City, remove erosion control from site. 5. Clean signs, lights, signals, etc. 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 DATE NAME 4/7/2014 M.Domenech END OF SECTION Revision Log SUMMARY OF CHANGE Revised for DAP application 01 74 23 - 4 DAP CLEANING Page 4 of 4 CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 SECTION 0177 19 CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY 017719-1 DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 3 A. Section Includes: 1. The procedure for closing out a contract B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Guarantees, Bonds and Affidavits 1. No application for final payment will be accepted until all guarantees, bonds, certificates, licenses and affidavits required for Work or equipment as specified are satisfactorily filed with the City. B. Release of Liens or Claims 1. No application for final payment will be accepted until satisfactory evidence of release of liens has been submitted to the City. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Submit all required documentation to City's Project Representative. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 017719-2 DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 3 1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 3.4 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURE A. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, submit: 1. Project Record Documents in accordance with Section 01 78 39 2. Operation and Maintenance Data, if required, in accordance with Section 0178 23 B. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, perform final cleaning in accordance with Section 01 74 23. C. Final Inspection 1. After final cleaning, provide notice to the City Project Representative that the Work is completed. a. The City will make an initial Final Inspection with the Contractor present. b. Upon completion of this inspection, the City will notify the Contractor, in writing within 10 business days, of any particulars in which this inspection reveals that the Work is defective or incomplete. 2. Upon receiving written notice from the City, immediately undertake the Work required to remedy deficiencies and complete the Work to the satisfaction of the City. 3. Upon completion of Work associated with the items listed in the City's written notice, inform the City, that the required Work has been completed. Upon receipt of this notice, the City, in the presence of the Contractor, will make a subsequent Final Inspection of the project. 4. Provide all special accessories required to place each item of equipment in full operation. These special accessory items include, but are not limited to: a. Specified spare parts b. Adequate oil and grease as required for the first lubrication of the equipment c. Initial fill up of all chemical tanks and fuel tanks d. Light bulbs e. Fuses f. Vault keys g. Handwheels h. Other expendable items as required for initial start-up and operation of all equipment D. Notice of Project Completion CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 017719-3 DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 3 1. Once the City Project Representative finds the Work subsequent to Final Inspection to be satisfactory, the City will issue a Notice of Project Completion (Green Sheet). E. Supporting Documentation 1. Coordinate with the City Project Representative to complete the following additional forms: a. Final Payment Request b. Statement of Contract Time c. Affidavit of Payment and Release of Liens d. Consent of Surety to Final Payment e. Pipe Report (if required) £ Contractor's Evaluation of City g. Performance Evaluation of Contractor F. Letter of Final Acceptance 1. Upon review and acceptance of Notice of Project Completion and Supporting Documentation, in accordance with General Conditions, City will issue Letter of Final Acceptance and release the Final Payment Request for payment. 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] DATE NAME 4/7/2014 M.Domenech END OF SECTION Revision Log SUMMARY OF CHANGE Revised for DAP application CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 017823-1 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 1 of 5 SECTION 0178 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Product data and related information appropriate for City's maintenance and operation of products furnished under Contract 2. Such products may include, but are not limited to: a. Traffic Controllers b. Irrigation Controllers (to be operated by the City) c. Butterfly Valves B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Schedule 1. Submit manuals in final form to the City within 30 calendar days of product shipment to the project site. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 0133 00. All submittals shall be approved by the City prior to delivery. 1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS A. Submittal Form 1. Prepare data in form of an instructional manual for use by City personnel. 2. Format a. Size: 8 1/2 inches x 11 inches b. Paper 1) 40 pound minimum, white, for typed pages 2) Holes reinforced with plastic, cloth or metal c. Text: Manufacturer's printed data, or neatly typewritten CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 23 - 2 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 2 of 5 d. Drawings 1) Provide reinforced punched binder tab, bind in with text 2) Reduce larger drawings and fold to size of text pages. e. Provide fly -leaf for each separate product, or each piece of operating equipment. 1) Provide typed description of product, and major component parts of equipment. 2) Provide indexed tabs. f. Cover 1) Identify each volume with typed or printed title "OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS". 2) List: a) Title of Project b) Identity of separate structure as applicable c) Identity of general subject matter covered in the manual 3. Binders a. Commercial quality 3-ring binders with durable and cleanable plastic covers b. When multiple binders are used, correlate the data into related consistent groupings. 4. If available, provide an electronic form of the O&M Manual. B. Manual Content Neatly typewritten table of contents for each volume, arranged in systematic order a. Contractor, name of responsible principal, address and telephone number b. A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume c. List, with each product: 1) The name, address and telephone number of the subcontractor or installer 2) A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume 3) Identify area of responsibility of each 4) Local source of supply for parts and replacement d. Identify each product by product name and other identifying symbols as set forth in Contract Documents. 2. Product Data a. Include only those sheets which are pertinent to the specific product. b. Annotate each sheet to: 1) Clearly identify specific product or part installed 2) Clearly identify data applicable to installation 3) Delete references to inapplicable information 3. Drawings a. Supplement product data with drawings as necessary to clearly illustrate: 1) Relations of component parts of equipment and systems 2) Control and flow diagrams b. Coordinate drawings with information in Project Record Documents to assure correct illustration of completed installation. c. Do not use Project Record Drawings as maintenance drawings. 4. Written text, as required to supplement product data for the particular installation: a. Organize in consistent format under separate headings for different procedures. b. Provide logical sequence of instructions of each procedure. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 23 - 3 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 3 of 5 5. Copy of each warranty, bond and service contract issued a. Provide information sheet for City personnel giving: 1) Proper procedures in event of failure 2) Instances which might affect validity of warranties or bonds C. Manual for Materials and Finishes 1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form. 2. Content, for architectural products, applied materials and finishes: a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products 1) Catalog number, size, composition 2) Color and texture designations 3) Information required for reordering special manufactured products b. Instructions for care and maintenance 1) Manufacturer's recommendation for types of cleaning agents and methods 2) Cautions against cleaning agents and methods which are detrimental to product 3) Recommended schedule for cleaning and maintenance 3. Content, for moisture protection and weather exposure products: a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products 1) Applicable standards 2) Chemical composition 3) Details of installation b. Instructions for inspection, maintenance and repair D. Manual for Equipment and Systems 1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form. 2. Content, for each unit of equipment and system, as appropriate: a. Description of unit and component parts 1) Function, normal operating characteristics and limiting conditions 2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests 3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts b. Operating procedures 1) Start-up, break-in, routine and normal operating instructions 2) Regulation, control, stopping, shut -down and emergency instructions 3) Summer and winter operating instructions 4) Special operating instructions c. Maintenance procedures 1) Routine operations 2) Guide to "trouble shooting" 3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly 4) Alignment, adjusting and checking d. Servicing and lubrication schedule 1) List of lubricants required e. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions f. Description of sequence of operation by control manufacturer 1) Predicted life of parts subject to wear 2) Items recommended to be stocked as spare parts g. As installed control diagrams by controls manufacturer h. Each contractor's coordination drawings 1) As installed color coded piping diagrams CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 23 - 4 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 4 of 5 i. Charts of valve tag numbers, with location and function of each valve j. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and recommended quantities to be maintained in storage k. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications 3. Content, for each electric and electronic system, as appropriate: a. Description of system and component parts 1) Function, normal operating characteristics, and limiting conditions 2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests 3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts b. Circuit directories of panelboards 1) Electrical service 2) Controls 3) Communications c. As installed color coded wiring diagrams d. Operating procedures 1) Routine and normal operating instructions 2) Sequences required 3) Special operating instructions e. Maintenance procedures 1) Routine operations 2) Guide to "trouble shooting" 3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly 4) Adjustment and checking f. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions g. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and recommended quantities to be maintained in storage h. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications 4. Prepare and include additional data when the need for such data becomes apparent during instruction of City's personnel. 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Provide operation and maintenance data by personnel with the following criteria: 1. Trained and experienced in maintenance and operation of described products 2. Skilled as technical writer to the extent required to communicate essential data 3. Skilled as draftsman competent to prepare required drawings CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 23 - 5 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 5 of 5 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] DATE NAME 8/31/2012 D. Johnson 4/7/2014 M.Domenech END OF SECTION Revision Log SUMMARY OF CHANGE 1.5.A.1 — title of section removed Revised for DAP Application CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 017839-1 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 1 of 4 SECTION 0178 39 PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Work associated with the documenting the project and recording changes to project documents, including: a. Record Drawings b. Water Meter Service Reports c. Sanitary Sewer Service Reports d. Large Water Meter Reports B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Prior to submitting a request for Final Inspection, deliver Project Record Documents to City's Project Representative. 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Accuracy of Records 1. Thoroughly coordinate changes within the Record Documents, making adequate and proper entries on each page of Specifications and each sheet of Drawings and other Documents where such entry is required to show the change properly. 2. Accuracy of records shall be such that future search for items shown in the Contract Documents may rely reasonably on information obtained from the approved Project Record Documents. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 39 - 2 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 2 of 4 3. To facilitate accuracy of records, make entries within 24 hours after receipt of information that the change has occurred. 4. Provide factual information regarding all aspects of the Work, both concealed and visible, to enable future modification of the Work to proceed without lengthy and expensive site measurement, investigation and examination. 1.10 STORAGE AND HANDLING A. Storage and Handling Requirements 1. Maintain the job set of Record Documents completely protected from deterioration and from loss and damage until completion of the Work and transfer of all recorded data to the final Project Record Documents. 2. In the event of loss of recorded data, use means necessary to again secure the data to the City's approval. a. In such case, provide replacements to the standards originally required by the Contract Documents. 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART2- PRODUCTS 2.1 OWNER -FURNISHED [OR] OWNER -SUPPLIED PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 2.2 RECORD DOCUMENTS A. Job set 1. Promptly following receipt of the Notice to Proceed, secure from the City, at no charge to the Contractor, 1 complete set of all Documents comprising the Contract. B. Final Record Documents 1. At a time nearing the completion of the Work and prior to Final Inspection, provide the City 1 complete set of all Final Record Drawings in the Contract. 2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED] 2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 3.4 MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS A. Maintenance of Job Set 1. Immediately upon receipt of the job set, identify each of the Documents with the title, "RECORD DOCUMENTS - JOB SET". CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 017839-3 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 3 of 4 2. Preservation a. Considering the Contract completion time, the probable number of occasions upon which the job set must be taken out for new entries and for examination, and the conditions under which these activities will be performed, devise a suitable method for protecting the job set. b. Do not use the job set for any purpose except entry of new data and for review by the City, until start of transfer of data to final Project Record Documents. c. Maintain the job set at the site of work. 3. Coordination with Construction Survey a. At a minimum clearly mark any deviations from Contract Documents associated with installation of the infrastructure. 4. Making entries on Drawings a. Record any deviations from Contract Documents. b. Use an erasable colored pencil (not ink or indelible pencil), clearly describe the change by graphic line and note as required. c. Date all entries. d. Call attention to the entry by a "cloud" drawn around the area or areas affected. e. In the event of overlapping changes, use different colors for the overlapping changes. Conversion of schematic layouts a. In some cases on the Drawings, arrangements of conduits, circuits, piping, ducts, and similar items, are shown schematically and are not intended to portray precise physical layout. 1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the City's approval. 2) However, design of future modifications of the facility may require accurate information as to the final physical layout of items which are shown only schematically on the Drawings. b. Show on the job set of Record Drawings, by dimension accurate to within 1 inch, the centerline of each run of items. 1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the City's approval. 2) Show, by symbol or note, the vertical location of the Item ("under slab", "in ceiling plenum", "exposed", and the like). 3) Make all identification sufficiently descriptive that it may be related reliably to the Specifications. c. The City may waive the requirements for conversion of schematic layouts where, in the City's judgment, conversion serves no useful purpose. However, do not rely upon waivers being issued except as specifically issued in writing by the City. B. Final Project Record Documents Transfer of data to Drawings a. Carefully transfer change data shown on the job set of Record Drawings to the corresponding final documents, coordinating the changes as required. b. Clearly indicate at each affected detail and other Drawing a full description of changes made during construction, and the actual location of items. c. Call attention to each entry by drawing a "cloud" around the area or areas affected. CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 39 - 4 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 4 of 4 d. Make changes neatly, consistently and with the proper media to assure longevity and clear reproduction. 2. Transfer of data to other Documents a. If the Documents, other than Drawings, have been kept clean during progress of the Work, and if entries thereon have been orderly to the approval of the City, the job set of those Documents, other than Drawings, will be accepted as final Record Documents. b. If any such Document is not so approved by the City, secure a new copy of that Document from the City at the City's usual charge for reproduction and handling, and carefully transfer the change data to the new copy to the approval of the City. 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] DATE NAME 4/7/2014 M.Domenech END OF SECTION Revision Log SUMMARY OF CHANGE Revised for DAP Application CITY OF FORT WORTH Westpoint Park STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No.: 104378 Revised April 7, 2014 M--R-- NE ] E N G E E R I N G GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT WESTPOINT PARK 2001 CHAPEL CREEK BOULEVARD FORT WORTH, TEXAS Prepared For. Lackland Holdings, LLC 3045 Lackland Road Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Attn: Mr. Landon Darwin August 2022 PROJECT NO. 22-26481 www.roneenaineers.com R NE E N G E E R I N G EST:1972 August 1, 2022 Mr. Landon Darwin Lackland Holdings, LLC 3045 Lackland Road Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Westpoint Park Fort Worth, Texas Rone Report No. 22-26481 Dear Mr. Darwin: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTHWORKS CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL TESTING Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. (Rone) is pleased to submit the Geotechnical Engineering Report for the above referenced project. The geotechnical engineering services performed for this study were carried out in general accordance with Rone Proposal No. P-33170-22, dated May 2, 2022. This report presents engineering analyses and recommendations for site grading, foundations, and pavements with respect to known project and site characteristics. Detailed results of our field exploration and laboratory testing are provided in the appendix of the report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. We look forward to providing additional Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Materials Testing services as the project progresses through the final design and construction phases. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, la on M. Torrance, E.I.T. Pr 'ect Engineer Texas Engineering Firm License No. F-1572 I I DALLAS I FORT WORTH I AUSTIN I SAN ANTONIO I HOUSTON I KANSAS CITY 3201 NE Loop 820, SUITE 180 1 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76137 1 TEL: 817.717.1040 Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION..................................................................................................... 1 2 PURPOSES AND SCOPE OF STUDY................................................................................... 1 3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ...................................................... 2 4 SITE CONDITIONS................................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Site Geology.................................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions.............................................................................................. 3 4.3 Groundwater.................................................................................................................... 6 5 ANALYSIS OF SITE AND FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVES.................................................. 6 5.1 Geotechnical Analysis...................................................................................................... 6 5.2 Subsurface Volume Change Potential.............................................................................. 8 5.3 Seismic Site Class........................................................................................................... 9 6 FOUNDATION SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................... 9 6.1 Ground Modification and Subgrade Treatment............................................................... 11 6.2 Excavation Safety Considerations.................................................................................. 11 6.3 Foundation Structure...................................................................................................... 11 7 SITE PREPARATION FOR CONSTRUCTION..................................................................... 12 7.1 General.......................................................................................................................... 12 7.2 Excavations.................................................................................................................... 12 8 CONSTRUCTION OF SUBGRADE FILLS........................................................................... 12 8.1 Subgrade Preparation.................................................................................................... 13 8.2 Subgrade Fill Construction............................................................................................. 13 8.2.1 Project Fills...............................................................................................................14 8.2.2 Fill Material Requirements........................................................................................14 8.2.3 Borrow Selection......................................................................................................14 8.3 Fill Construction Specifications....................................................................................... 15 8.3.1 Recompaction of Existing Subgrade and Grade Raise.............................................15 8.3.2 Utility Trench Backfill................................................................................................16 8.3.3 General Site Fills for Site Grading and Drainage......................................................17 8.3.4 Compaction Specification Summary .........................................................................17 8.4 Quality Control and Field Verification Testing................................................................. 17 8.5 Construction Oversight................................................................................................... 18 9 BUILDING FOUNDATION STRUCTURE............................................................................. 19 9.1 Slab Foundation Design................................................................................................. 19 10 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES....................................................................................... 20 10.1 Wall Drainage............................................................................................................... 21 10.2 Wall Backfill.................................................................................................................. 21 11 PAVEMENTS...................................................................................................................... 22 11.1 Pavement Base Course............................................................................................... 23 11.2 Pavement Construction and Maintenance Recommendations ...................................... 23 12 SITE COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE........................................................................ 24 12.1 Site Grading and Drainage........................................................................................... 24 12.2 Landscaping and Irrigation........................................................................................... 24 13 STUDY CLOSURE............................................................................................................. 25 14 COPYRIGHT 2022 RONE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LTD ............................................. 25 CHARTS COMPACTION DESIGN — FULL SITE SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE RAISE - 563 .....................la COMPACTION CONTROL — FULL SITE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE RAISE - 563......................................1 b COMPACTION DESIGN — FULL SITE SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE RAISE - 815 .....................2a COMPACTION CONTROL — FULL SITE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE RAISE - 815......................................2b COMPACTION DESIGN — FULL SITE UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL.......................................................................3a COMPACTION CONTROL — FULL SITE UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL....................................................................3b RECTM COMPACTION DESIGN REPORTS......................................................................................... REC-01-REC-05 APPENDIX A Plate VICINITYMAP.......................................................................................................................................................... A.1 GEOLOGYMAP........................................................................................................................................................ A.2 BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM............................................................................................................................... A.3 LOGSOF BORING...........................................................................................................................................A.4-A.58 KEY TO CLASSIFICATIONS AND SYMBOLS........................................................................................................ A.59 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.......................................................................................................... A.60 SWELL TEST RESULTS............................................................................................................................. A.61 a-A.61 b SOLUBLE SULFATE TEST RESULTS.................................................................................................................... A.62 SWELL PRESSURE TEST RESULTS......................................................................................................... A.63a-A.63c HYDROMETER TEST RESULTS............................................................................................................... A.64a-A.64c APPENDIX B Plate FIELDOPERATIONS................................................................................................................................................ B.1 LABORATORYTESTING.......................................................................................................................................... B.2 RONE SPECFIICATION 400 LIME TREATMENT..................................................................................................... B.3 APPENDIX C Plate IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT ...................................... CA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT 1 PROJECT INFORMATION A tabular summary of the site description is provided below. Table 1: Project Overview Item Description Location The project is located at 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard in Fort Worth, Texas. The project consists of developing a single-family residential community with Project Description associated utilities and paved streets. Based on the provided grading plans, the project will have a maximum of approximately 18 feet of fill and 13 feet of cut. At the time of our field investigation, the site was generally covered with native Existing Conditions grass and dense trees. There is a natural drainage ditch running north and south at the approximate midline of the property. Based on the grading plans provided by Pape -Dawson Engineers, the site Topography generally slopes toward the north side of the property, with ground surface elevations ranging from approximately 870 feet to 794 feet. Previous Studies Rone completed a preliminary geotechnical report for the site, project 21-25136 dated May 5, 2021. Geologic Setting Duck Creek Limestone (Kdc) and Kiamichi Formation (Kki) Site vicinity and geology maps are attached as Plates A.1 and A.2, respectively in Appendix A of this report. Boring locations relative to the site plan are shown on the Boring Location Diagram, Plate A.3. 2 PURPOSES AND SCOPE OF STUDY The site investigation was scoped based on the planned development and design boundaries outlined above. The principal purposes of this study are to evaluate the general subsurface conditions and develop geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of foundations and pavements. For these purposes, the study was conducted in the following phases: Borings were drilled and sampled with one boring completed at evenly space intervals within the proposed lots to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the boring locations and to obtain soil samples. • Laboratory tests were conducted on selected samples recovered from the borings to evaluate the pertinent engineering characteristics of the foundation soils. • Engineering analyses were performed using field and laboratory data to develop foundation and pavement design recommendations. • Onsite soils were evaluated for potential sources of fill materials required for the project. Westpoint Park `R NE tH4 tkJ As the Geotechnical Engineer of Record serving this project, it is recommended that a Rone engineer provide assistance during the design phase to verify the intent of the geotechnical recommendations. In addition, Rone must be retained to provide oversight of the Rone Earthwork Controls during the construction phase to verify full compaction utilizing the advanced engineering tools as discussed throughout this report. 3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING The borings were located in the field by Rone personnel with measurements taken from site landmarks and using an aerial photograph of the site. Ground surface elevations at the boring locations were interpolated from the grading plans obtained from Pape -Dawson Engineers. The locations and elevations were not surveyed, and are accurate only to the extent implied by the technique used in their determination. A total of 55 borings were completed to depths of approximately 20 feet below existing grades. The approximate boring locations are shown on Plate A.3, Boring Location Diagram. Sample depth, description of soils, and classification (based on the Unified Soil Classification System) are presented in the Logs of Boring, Plates A.4 through A.58. Keys to terms and symbols used on the logs are also included in Appendix A. Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the borings to confirm visual classification, and to estimate material strata, in -situ consolidation states, and other pertinent engineering properties of the materials encountered. In addition, one-dimensional swell and swell pressure tests were performed on selected samples. Descriptions of the procedures used in the field and laboratory phases of this study are presented in Appendix B. 4 SITE CONDITIONS 4.1 Site Geology Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings and the Geologic Atlas of Texas, Dallas Sheet (published by the Bureau of Economic Geology), the site is located within the Duck Creek Limestone (Kdc) and the Kiamichi formation (Kki). Duck Creek Limestone (Kdc) The Duck Creek formation generally consists of highly active residual clay underlain by limestone. Kiamichi Formation (Kki) The Kiamichi formation generally consists of alternating units of clay and limestone with some sandstone. The clays can be moderately to highly active; however, the limestone is generally shallow with respect to the ground surface. Please note that the geologic mapping was originally performed using aerial photography. Local variations and anomalies do occur. 4.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions The results of the field and laboratory testing have been used to develop generalized subsurface profiles of the project site. The strata identified in the borings at this site are described below: • Stratum I — generally consisted of dark brown, brown, light brown, and reddish brown fat clay (CH), lean clay (CL), clayey sand (SC), or clayey gravel (GC) containing various amounts of silt, sand, gravel, and calcareous nodules from the ground surface to depths ranging between approximately 2 feet to 20 feet. • Stratum II — Weathered limestone and limestone was encountered at depths ranging between 2 to 18 feet below the existing ground surface in most of the borings. Hand penetrometer readings ranged from 1.0 to more than 4.5 tons per square foot (tsf) in the cohesive soils. In -situ moisture levels ranged from approximately 20 percent below to 6 percent above their measured plastic limits, indicating mostly dry soil moisture conditions. The Standard Penetration Test blow counts (SPT N-values) varied from 18 blows per foot (bpf) to 50 blows for '/z inch. The Texas Cone Penetrometer blow counts ranged from approximately 100 blows for 12 inches to 100 blows for inch. Moisture ranged from 2 to 31 percent. A tabular summary of the soil properties considered for design is provided in the following table. Table 2: In Situ Soil Property Estimated Specific Gravity, Gs Percent Fines (%) Liquid Limit Plasticity Index Dry Density (pcf) Void Ratio, e Moisture Content (%) Moisture Increase Potential (%) Generalized Subsurface Profile Full Range 2.66-2.68 6-99 34-74 16-50 80-118 0.41-1.09 2-31 2-30 Predominant Range 2.67 61-96 43-64 24-41 90-110 0.52-0.86 6-18 5-15 While both lean and fat clay shrink and swell with changes in moisture content, higher plasticity materials typically have greater sensitivity to moisture variation, and an increased potential for volume change. With sufficient moisture increase, the measured swell pressures ranged from approximately 2,500 to 5,100 psf. Modification of the upper soils will control subgrade and foundation design recommendations. A generalized profile of the subsurface conditions is included below. The Logs of Boring should be reviewed for specific information at individual boring locations. Stratification boundaries shown in the logs represent the approximate locations of changes in types of in -situ materials. The transition between material types may vary between borings and be gradual and indistinct. Variations will occur and should be expected across the site. Westpoint Park s Northeast tv C 0 d) W Southwest 860..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11-114 ..................... 860 > 17 35) d36A 850............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 860 '-13 -P*- ,38. 840.................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................... 840 3-31 X �1 B•1y7 3-11 / / .......... -'28- %.... ............................. 830 830............................................................................................................................ 27......... �0 44o r / _31 0 26 ( r38 B-2 3-04 W2 � X 361 441 820............................................................................... . 28 .....i..................................................820 / 5' � B-28 ' ... . 33 ` ......................... 353 44o 810 ............ .................. ................',� .. _49_......... ... ... ............................................................................ 810 1-43 1-46 B-48 3.52 A0 3-30 ,26 5 B-1 = = 12 3.1 1.50 A2 ;24 800...._....� ........._................... .. ...... ....................800 17. c30c i301 410 '21 �22e 0 _ 790............................................ ............. .............. 780 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Distance Along Baseline (Feet) GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE :R— N E Figure 1 Westpoint Park E N GE E R I N G 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Fort Worth, TX, Texas EST: 1972 ............................................................................................................. 790 780 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,200 Water Observations While Drilling 7- At Completion = Fat Clay Weathered Limestone Limestone ® Lean Clay ® Clayey Gravel ®Clayey Sand kN/. kk� NL 4.3 Groundwater The borings were advanced using continuous flight augers. The borings were monitored during and immediately after drilling for the presence of water seepage. Free water was not observed in the borings during or immediately following drilling. The borings did not collect sufficient water for measurement upon completion. A thorough assessment of the vadose zone or upper groundwater was not conducted, and the study did not include extended monitoring of groundwater levels or perched water conditions. A full hydrogeologic study can be conducted upon request to assess the sources and variation of in -situ moisture levels in the vadose zone water levels beneath the site, and how various site development alternatives could potentially effect groundwater conditions. In general, groundwater levels and moisture content in the vadose zone vary climatically and seasonally depending on topography, land use, surface hydrology, subsurface hydrogeology, and proximity to bodies of water. The rate and extent of these variations depend on many variables including subsurface stratigraphy, soil properties, moisture sources, capillary strength, consolidation states, soil structure, thermal cover, and surface infiltration and evapotranspiration rates. A limited hydrogeologic assessment of the vadose zone is provided in Section 5.1 Geotechnical Analysis. 5 ANALYSIS OF SITE AND FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVES Foundation alternatives have been evaluated based on site -specific geotechnical conditions, proposed development plans, and known design preferences. 5.1 Geotechnical Analysis Subgrade preparation and foundation fill elements are critical components of all foundation systems. Foundation alternatives for the proposed buildings have been evaluated based on the following engineering criteria: • Bearing capacity • Settlement potential • Volume change (shrink -swell) potential R NE �!! � N6 The rate and magnitude of volume change is controlled by the rate and extent of wetting and drying cycles. Volume change potential is affected by moisture change potential, clay mineralogy, material density, soil structure, hydrogeologic environment, and confining pressure to swell pressure ratios. Moisture change potential, material density, and soil structure can be modified and controlled; and clay content, hydrogeologic environment and confining pressure can be managed to limit volume change as necessary for each foundation alternative. These are key factors in the ground modification elements of foundation alternatives when evaluating various foundation designs. The primary provisions for managing the hydrogeologic environment are long-term stabilization of subgrade moisture levels, and management of desiccation risk. A limited hydrogeologic assessment of the vadose zone indicates the primary source of subsurface moisture is surface water infiltration. Perched water may be available periodically atop the limestone during wet periods; however, a persistent source of groundwater does not appear to be present. There is generally sufficient clay within the encountered soils to allow capillary rise from any groundwater to help maintain equilibrium soil moisture levels. Although not encountered in the exploratory borings, granular soil zones can break the capillary action and reduce the opportunity for moisture supply from a water source at depth. The site is generally undeveloped and relatively open. Surface water storage is negligible, and there is little thermal cover. An illustration of the average soil moisture profile at the time of sampling is presented below. Figure 2: Average Soil Moisture Profile 14 0 a� 0 12 10 oil ■ 0-2' ■ 24 ■ 4-6' ■ 6-8' ■ 8-10' 1113-15' ■ 18-20' Foundation systems often require ground modification within the vadose zone. Each ground modification element includes provisions for limiting moisture content variation, and preparing for its effects. The following ground modification elements were evaluated for slab foundations: • Need and extent of subgrade replacement / re -compaction fill, • Management and tolerance of in -situ conditions below ground modification depths, • Grade raise elements, • Strength and stability requirements of each foundation fill element; and, • Subgrade stabilization options. Analyses of volume change and settlement potential relative to the various foundation alternatives are summarized in the following sections. 5.2 Subsurface Volume Change Potential Direct measurement of soil expansion and the resulting swell pressures under the anticipated stress conditions is the most reliable way to account for the factors that control volume change within natural clay formations and assess swell -shrink conditions within the vadose zone. These analyses indirectly account for clay mineralogy, clay content, clay mix, soil structure, compaction states, and stress states. Measurement of swell pressures allows determination of ground modification requirements for foundation system design. For this study, an assessment of swell potential and swell pressure was conducted on samples recovered from various depths. Swell test results are summarized in Plate A.61a to A.61b in the Appendix of the report. Three (3) samples analyzed for swell pressure testing are presented in the table below: Table 3: Swell Test Details Depth Load Plasticity Total Moisture (% Swell Final Swell Boring (feet) feet s (p f) Index Fines (070) Initial Final Increase Pressure (psf) Void Ratio "�o ( ) B-1 7 875 41 82 2.5 22.4 19.8 2,533 0.57 0.0 B-16 3 375 35 86 16.0 26.3 10.4 2,533 0.63 1.5 B-51 5 625 49 90 17.2 27.0 9.9 5,105 0.76 2.4 The swell test results generally indicate low to high swell potential with sufficient moisture increase. Corresponding swell pressures were measured and considered to be high. Swell pressures in Stratum I of about 2,500 to 5,100 psf were used in our evaluation of the site. A swell potential of 5 percent was determined for design analyses. The resultant potential vertical rise (PVR) is on the order of 5 to 7 inches. As an additional means of evaluating subgrade swell potential, Potential Vertical Rise (PVR) estimates were also performed in general accordance with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Test Method Tex-124-E. The TxDOT method is empirical, assumption- Westpoint Park based, generalized, and based on correlations with the Atterberg limits, density, and moisture content of the soils at the time of the investigation. All conditions influencing swell potential are not accounted for in this procedure. The procedure was applied to an estimated 12-foot deep active zone, limited by depth to limestone, for soils in a dry moisture condition. Based on the TxDOT method, the estimated PVR is approximately 2 inches to 6Y2 inches, limited by the depth to limestone in many areas. The vast majority of the site exhibits PVR values of 4'/2 inches in the current moisture state and based on the existing depth to limestone. However, design depth is dictated by the presence of high swell test data recorded for several samples at various depths across the site. Based on the PVR analyses, the following parameters have been used to evaluate foundation design alternatives: Table 4: Untreated Subgrade Movement Potential Design Depth Estimated Stratum I Untreated Swell Material (feet) Swell Pressure (psf) Potential (inches) Native Clay 12 feet 2,500 to 5,100 2 to 7 5.3 Seismic Site Class The site class for seismic design is based on several factors that include subsurface profile, shear wave velocity, density, relative hardness, and strength, averaged over a depth of 100 feet. The borings for this project did not extend to a depth of 100 feet; therefore, we assumed the conditions below the depth of the borings to be similar to those encountered at the termination depth of the borings. Based on Section 1613.2.2 of the 2018 International Building Code and Table 20.3-1 of ASCE 7-16, we recommend using Site Class C (Soft Rock/Stiff Soil) for seismic design. 6 FOUNDATION SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS Design evaluations have been made for the building foundation systems based on our current understanding of the project and the available subsurface information. The proposed residential buildings may be supported on slab foundations bearing within controlled fill or weathered limestone. Schematic cross -sections of the foundation systems are provided below. Figure 3: Residential Slab Foundation Cross Section Schematic }Grade i/...r�i�lr'.'r'j:�rri:I;�',•J.r,:'. r: :i i,r Jr/,fi.f/Irfr,: ,: ::: � � r } it it i���.i arri,r .?VJOatEI� �tl llfrlest '• ' Subgrade compaction will result in the following ground stability improvements when constructed as recommended in this report. These parameters should be used for design of the structural foundation system. Based on the final grading plans prepared by Pape Dawson and provided to Rone, depth to limestone and anticipated cut and fill depths has direct impact on the lots identified that will require subgrade improvement beyond that which is accomplished by completing the cuts and fills as currently planned. The identified lots and depth of ground modification from final pad elevation is presented in Table 5: Ground Modification Requirements below: Table 5: Ground Modification Requirements Lot Block 4 ft 6 ft 8 ft 1 - 4 1 X -- 5-8 1 -- -- X 26 — 32 1 -- X -- 39 — 42 1 -- X -- 43 — 45 1 X -- -- 11 — 24 2 X -- 7-6 2 X -- -- 32 — 36 5 -- X -- Note: The depth of ground modification in the table above is from final pad elevation. It is not necessary to excavate limestone to achieve the depth of ground improvement if encountered prior to reaching the recommended depth indicated above for the listed lots and blocks. All fill should be thoroughly mixed and placed as described in Section 8 of this report. Lots requiring ground improvement should be excavated to the required depth indicated in Table 5 above, mixed and replaced as required. Ground modification for the remaining lots will be achieved through fill placement during mass grading based on depth of fill and/or depth to limestone from final pad elevation. R NE tN4 tt1 Table 6: Summary of Estimated Ground Improvement Thickness from Estimated Swell Swell Potential at Material Existing Grade (feet) Pressure (psf) Finished Pad (inches) Imported Fill (if used) Negligible Negligible Negligible Recompacted RECTM Subgrade 0 to 8 800 1 Native Soils 20+ 2,500 <3'/2 6.1 Ground Modification and Subgrade Treatment Overexcavation and subgrade modification should extend to the required depth, or to the top of weathered limestone, whichever occurs first. Controlled fill should extend at least 5 feet laterally beyond the proposed residential buildings to allow for adequate edge preparation. All fill should be placed using the advanced controls provided in this report. Determination of the compaction energies and compaction efficiencies required for the existing soil property ranges enable this control. Effective construction controls for the proposed fill elements are provided in Section 8 Construction of Subgrade Fills. Estimated construction performance and results are also included. 6.2 Excavation Safety Considerations All excavations should be sloped, shored, or shielded in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. In accordance with Texas state law, the design and maintenance of excavation safety systems is the sole responsibility of the construction contractor. OSHA Standards 29 CFR — 1926 Subpart P, including Appendices A and B, should be referenced for guidance in the design of such systems 6.3 Foundation Structure Slab foundations bearing in controlled fill, suitable native soils, or limestone may be used to support the proposed structures, provided fill construction is controlled as recommended in this report. Ground movement potential will be limited with the recommended design provisions; however, the grade -supported slabs should be designed to accommodate the anticipated potential vertical ground movement. The grade raise fill should be constructed to the planned finished grade elevations. Plastic sheeting of at least 6 mil in thickness should be placed 6 to 12 inches below final pad elevation R NE kN4 !!f for the lots requiring ground improvement. All lots should have a moisture barrier placed immediately beneath the concrete slab. 7 SITE PREPARATION FOR CONSTRUCTION 7.1 General Existing foundations, structures, deleterious materials, debris, utilities and other manmade features should be removed, and existing utilities should be relocated in accordance with the project plans and specifications. All vegetation and organic matter should be removed from within the proposed construction limits, including tree stumps and root systems. Unless otherwise indicated in the specifications, all materials resulting from clearing and grubbing operations should be properly disposed. In no case should any organic or deleterious material be used within the earthworks or fill materials, or permanently placed onsite except where authorized by the geotechnical engineer. 7.2 Excavations All excavations should be performed to the limits and grades indicated in the design documents. This study was not performed to evaluate the difficulty of ripping, processing and/or excavating the on -site materials, or estimating the volume of those excavated materials. The earthwork contractor should have experience in construction and excavation within these materials. The contractor must use his or her own experience when making decisions regarding means, methods and costs to accomplish the proposed construction, including excavation tools, excavation rates, and number of trucks. 8 CONSTRUCTION OF SUBGRADE FILLS Soil fill elements are critical components of any foundation system. Strength and stability of the fill are essential to limiting subgrade movements below foundations, floor slabs, and pavements. Mechanical soil compaction is designed to improve the engineering properties of soils; however, inadequate fill control methods often do not achieve the desired compaction during construction. The soil construction specifications in this report provide for effective compaction control, including direct data verification and real-time control. The fill construction specifications provided in this report are designed for the specific geotechnical requirements of this project. The specifications provide the construction controls needed to prepare cohesive fills for saturation and drying potential. If the specified controls are not properly implemented, the fills will be vulnerable to strength loss and swell with saturation, and potential shrinkage from drying. The initiation of shrinkage or swelling can lead to increased shrink -swell cycles with moisture variation. The design of these soil compaction specifications includes estimates of compacted soil properties corresponding to varying compaction energies and compaction efficiencies, enabling assessment of the final compacted performance of the fill. The construction specifications below will prepare the fills for potential saturation; however, the environments of these fills must maintain generally moist conditions without excessive drying. In many cases, equilibrium moisture ranges can be established during construction, but in other cases equilibrium moisture cannot be achieved without maintenance following construction. Potential maintenance requirements for fills on this project are discussed in Section 12 Site Completion and Maintenance. 8.1 Subgrade Preparation After site clearing, the exposed subgrade should be prepared for construction of foundation fills. All areas that will underlie foundations, floor slabs, or pavements will require ground modification as presented in the following sections. Exposed subgrades in cut areas of 3 feet or less should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches and recompacted wet of the optimum moisture content at full compaction in construction, to at least 95 percent of maximum density in construction, as generated by a CAT 815 footed compactor or approved equivalent. Field verification testing will be conducted in accordance with Section 8.4 Quality Control and Field Verification Testing. Any areas where the specified properties are not achieved often indicate a soft or low modulus subgrade is present below the compacted lift. If testing confirms that soft soils underlie any section of the recompacted surface, those sections should be overexcavated and recompacted in lifts as required by the Geotechnical Engineer. 8.2 Subgrade Fill Construction All foundations and pavements include a structural fill element. These fill elements are critical to ground modification requirements and the strength and stability of each foundation. Fill Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint[ ,<, �_ NE kN� ttt NL f bi: if] construction requirements depend on the design purpose and service conditions of each fill. Each fill element must be constructed to achieve the properties required for the long term stability of each foundation. Each completed lift of fill should be maintained at the recommended moisture level until placement of subsequent fill or permanent protective cover such as pavement or floor slabs. 8.2.1 Project Fills The fill elements identified for this project are listed below: • Recompaction of existing subgrade and grade raise below the floor slabs and pavements • Utility trench backfill • General fills for site grading and drainage 8.2.2 Fill Material Requirements The following table provides general property requirements and applications for the cohesive soils that may be used as fill on this project. Table 7: Fill Material Material Source Property Ranges Use Native Soils On -Site I N/A I Building and Pavement Subgrade Silt soil classifications are not acceptable. Gravel content should be generally less than 10 percent. Fill should be free of organics, debris, large rocks, and deleterious material. 8.2.3 Borrow Selection Rone can assist the contractor in the selection of borrow sources and compactor pairings in order to reduce moisture amendment needs during construction. With this assistance, allowable soil property limits may also be expanded by matching the compaction energy of specific compactors with the borrow materials. For improved control and more consistent fill properties, stratified borrow sources approved for use as fill material should be excavated and processed in a manner to produce consistent mixing and increased uniformity of the fill materials. The Geotechnical Engineer of Record can provide additional guidance for this as needed. Westpolnt Park; 8.3 Fill Construction Specifications In general, all fill soils should be placed in consistent loose lift thicknesses, and fully and uniformly compacted across each lift. The moisture content at the time of compaction should be wet of the optimum moisture content in construction as defined by the field compaction curves provided in this report. Any moisture adjustments that are required should be completed before compaction. Each lift should be compacted using at least the minimum number of passes required to achieve full compaction as specified by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The compaction specifications for soil construction provided in this report have been developed for each fill expected on this project. These specifications are based on the predetermined compaction performance of specific compactor and soil combinations relative to the known project design requirements. The recommended controls have been developed based on source soil and moisture ranges determined during the site exploration, and typical compactors suitable for these fills and fill volumes. The specifications employ family -of -curve methods for compaction curves produced during construction in order to use the compactor's performance for control and accommodate soil variation during construction. RECTM Compaction Design Reports supporting this analysis, along with the resulting process control requirements, are included in the appendix of this report. The construction specifications and illustrations of the performance, range and limits of construction for each fill type are provided below. At the end of this section, a summary table is provided as a quick reference for the fill specifications. Additional information can also be provided regarding alternative compactors to account for changes during construction and optimal selection by the earthwork contractor. All completed lifts should be protected by subsequent lifts placed as soon as practical during construction. Completed lifts to be exposed more than 1 day should be kept wet with light water application. Completed lifts damaged by desiccation, erosion, construction traffic, or other disturbances should be scarified and re -compacted according to the process control requirements for that particular fill. 8.3.1 Recompaction of Existing Subgrade and Grade Raise Residential building pad and pavement subgrade fills should be fully and uniformly compacted wet of the optimum moisture content during construction using a footed compactor equivalent to a CAT 815, or as approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The fill shall be compacted in 9-inch loose lifts to an air percentage not exceeding the optimum moisture contents in construction. The air percentage shall not exceed 6.3 percent for this soil range. Void ratios shall not exceed 0.64. The optimum moisture content and maximum density in construction should be determined from the field moisture -density curves (field compaction curves) generated by the compactor for the range of soils used in construction. This family -of -curve range for the specified compactor energy is provided by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Any additional fill greater than 6 feet should be placed in a similar manner. Compaction Performance and Design Chart 1a provides the performance and design construction range for the specified compactor and the in -situ moisture ranges relative to the design moisture range for construction for the site. This range can be refined with more soil information prior to or during construction. A diagram of the compaction specification is provided on Compaction Control Chart 1 b. The Compaction Control Chart includes the required construction range and minimum number of passes required for full lift compaction. The construction range provided is only valid for full compaction using at least the minimum number of passes. Additional control specifications are also noted on the chart. It is critical for the strength and stability requirements of the fill that each lift is fully and uniformly compacted using at least the minimum number of passes for the compactor -soil range combination. Chart 1 b can be used as a separate reference during construction. The RECTM Compaction Design Reports covering the soil ranges at the site are included in the appendix. 8.3.2 Utility Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill may consist of on -site clay uniformly compacted in 6-inch loose lifts wet of the optimum moisture contents in construction to an air content not exceeding 6.8 percent. Optimum moisture is determined from representative standard Proctor curves normalized on the lab line -of -optimums for the soil range used, and corrected according to standard dry unit weight relations. Use hand -operated compaction equipment approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The family -of -curves and construction acceptance range will be provided by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The general performance, range and limits of this construction using an approved compactor are illustrated on the Compaction Performance and Design Chart in the Compaction Design and Control Chart 2a and on the Compaction Control Chart 2b. This information should be confirmed prior to construction using additional subsurface information. Westpoint Park 8.3.3 General Site Fills for Site Grading and Drainage General fill for grading and drainage may consist of native clay compacted in 12-inch loose lifts using the available earthwork equipment. Use visual controls for wet -of -optimum compaction. Surficial topsoil in landscape areas does not require additional compaction beyond that produced incidentally during spreading and grading. 8.3.4 Compaction Specification Summary The following summary table is provided for quick reference purposes. The table does not fully encompass or replace the compaction specifications provided for each fill in the sections above. Table 8: Material Compactor Maximum Lift Thickness (in) Minimum Number of Passes Maximum Air Voids (%) Minimum Dry Density (pcf) Minimum Moisture Content (%) Min. Compacted Strength (psf) Compaction Specification Summary Building Pad, and Utility Trench General Site Pavement Backfill Grading Subgrade On -Site Soil On -Site Soil On -Site Soil CAT 815 Hand operated NA 9 6 12 10 NA NA 6.3 6.8 NA 102.0 94.0 NA 12.5 17.0 NA 5,800 NA NA 8.4 Quality Control and Field Verification Testing Before fill construction, the property ranges of fill materials should be determined using index property testing. During construction, index properties should be obtained periodically and upon changes in material, color, texture, or excavation procedures. Field compaction curves should be obtained upon unexpected changes in soil properties, compactor, or lift thickness, and at minimum frequencies recommended by Rone based upon the property ranges of each fill material and expected variations. Borrow material sampling during construction should be planned and coordinated to fit the required production rates, and generally at least two days in advance of the compaction of corresponding fill lifts. Rone should monitor compaction and conduct verification testing during all fill construction. Verification testing of compacted lifts should be conducted at appropriate frequencies to ensure that compaction controls are satisfied and design requirements are achieved in construction. The Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park R NE engineer should monitor the number of compactor passes, lift thickness, air content, moisture and density for each fill. We recommend that Rone assist in developing a work plan for effective process controls designed for engineering requirements, the construction plan, production needs, and direct data verification records. We strongly encourage Rone be included in the pre -bid process with earthwork contractors to provide guidance in regard to fill controls for this project. A pre -construction meeting including the general contractor, earthwork contractor and soils engineer is critical to an effective launch of the project. Nuclear density gauges are recommended for field testing of compacted lifts. Rone will provide the specific gravity (GS) values required for each fill, based on compactor performance and the soil variation expected during construction. The Geotechnical Engineer must also be able to monitor the specific gravity setting remotely in real-time based on the gauge readings in the field. 8.5 Construction Oversight Design requirements and recommendations presented in this report are based on critical controls during the earthworks and soil construction process. The monitoring required to verify the controls are correctly implemented is essential to proper fill construction. The requirements of this report are based on limited geotechnical, geologic and hydrogeologic information about the subsurface conditions. Subgrade conditions have been interpolated between borings and subsurface testing locations. Anomalies are often encountered during construction. The potential for subsurface variation from the conditions used for design could result in design changes and/or increased geotechnical risk during and/or following construction. We recommend that Rone be retained to provide the controls needed for proper soil construction, monitor earthwork operations, observe foundation construction, evaluate materials, and conduct periodic testing during the soil construction phase of the project. Use of grade stakes or GPS controls on earthwork equipment can aide in controlling required lift thicknesses. This enables the geotechnical engineer to verify design conditions, manage geotechnical risks, verify compliant construction, adjust design requirements when unanticipated conditions are encountered, assist the builder, and represent owner interests. 9 BUILDING FOUNDATION STRUCTURE 9.1 Slab Foundation Design The proposed residential structures may be supported on ground supported foundations consisting of a conventionally reinforced beam and slab system or a post -tensioned slab foundation system, provided the estimated floor movements can be tolerated. The foundations should be designed with exterior and interior grade beams adequate to provide sufficient rigidity to the foundation system to tolerate the potential vertical movement of the foundation subgrade. A net allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf may be used for design of all grade beams bearing in tested and approved controlled fill and/or suitable native soil or weathered limestone. Exterior grade beams should bear at least 18 inches below final grade. The bottom of the beam trenches should be free of any loose or soft material prior to the placement of the concrete. All grade beams and floor slabs should be adequately reinforced for eccentric loading that could occur from potential differential subgrade movement. Design criteria for the foundation slab have been estimated according to the Post Tensioning Institute (PTI) based on the methods described in their most recent manual for designing slab -on - grade foundation systems. An effective PI of 50 may be used for design of a conventionally reinforced concrete slab foundation. Recommended PTI foundation design criteria for a Thornthwaite Moisture Index (TMI) of zero are tabulated below: Table 9: PTI Design Parameters Parameter Edge Moisture Variation Distance, e,„ (feet) Differential Soil Movement, yn, (inches) Condition 4'/2-inch PVR — Residential Structures Center Lift 7.5 Edge Lift 3.4 Center Lift 1.8 Edge Lift 2.1 The PTI method incorporates multiple design assumptions associated with derivation of the variables needed to estimate the foundation design criteria. The PTI method of estimating differential soil movement is applicable when subgrade moisture conditions are controlled only by the climate on well -graded building pads (i.e. proper site drainage, properly lined landscaped areas, no utility water leaks or other free water sources). As soil moisture increases, the soils may swell. The PTI design method is intended to provide stiffened foundation systems that can Westpoint Park _ -NE_ !! < N Y ,nT. ,'7 perform well under typical natural changes in soil moisture. The differential foundation movements resulting from seasonal soil moisture variations are typically much lower than movements that occur due to free water sources near or beneath the structure, which are not directly aduiesse6 by the PTI design method. 10 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES Retaining walls will be subjected to lateral pressures from soil backfill. Lateral earth pressures will be influenced by structural design, conditions of the wall restraint, methods of construction and/or uu,, the type of materials being retained, and drainage conditions. Walls that will be restrained from movement and rotation (rigid wall) should be designed using at -rest earth - pressures. The equivalent fluid pressures (triangular distribution) provided below may be used for horizontal backfill in a drained condition. To design for a drained condition, the wall must include an adequate drainage system. The provided equivalent fluid pressures do not include a Factor of Safety and do not provide for dynamic pressures on the wall. Horizontal Finished Grade Material Free Draining Granular Soil On -Site Clay Soil Figure 4: Lateral Earth Pressure Diagram For active pressure movement —(0.002 H to 0.004 H) For at -rest pressure - No Movement Assumed Horizontal Finished Grade i Retaining Wall Table 10: Lateral Earth Pressures Condition At -Rest, k = 0.45 Active, k = 0.30 At -Rest, k = 0.79 Active, k = 0.67 Equivalent Fluid Pressure, pcf Drained Undrained 55 90 38 81 100 11? 84 104 II■II II . II. I=. ME- Conditions applicable to the table above include: • A maximum in -situ total unit weight of 125 pcf • Properly compacted horizontal backfill • No surcharge loads (construction equipment, pavement, footings, floor slabs, etc.) The values provided in the table above are for a full "wedge" of material behind the wall, where the backfill extends horizontally 1 to 2 feet away from the bottom of the wall and then slopes upward and away from the wall at a slope of 1 H:1 V (horizontal to vertical), or flatter. The location and magnitude of permanent surcharge loads (if present) should be determined, and additional pressures generated by these loads should be considered during design. Surcharge loads can be factored using the appropriate earth -pressure coefficient values provided in the table above. 10.1 Wall Drainage Retaining walls, or below grade walls should be expected to collect water due to condensation, surface water infiltration, and other means. Drainage should be provided behind all below grade walls to reduce the development of hydrostatic pressure and limit saturation of the backfill and foundation soils. Collector pipes should be placed at or slightly below the bottom level of the wall to prevent the collection of water in the drainage material beneath the collector pipes. Pipes should connect to a sump or gravity drainage system to prevent the accumulation of water behind the walls. Gravity lines should include a backflow preventer to block water from being transmitted into the drainage layer in the event of flooding near the gravity outfall. The drainage material should consist of free -draining, clean, granular fill. This material should be compatible with ASTM C33, sizes 4 through 9. The drainage layer should extend at least 12 inches from the back face of the wall. A geosynthetic wrap should enclose the granular backfill to reduce the infiltration of fines. The top 2 feet of backfill should consist of clay materials with a plasticity index of 25 or more, compacted as recommended in the charts based on the zoning location, and extending at least 5 feet beyond the wall excavation to reduce surface water infiltration into the underlying fill. 10.2 Wall Backfill Free -draining backfill soils should be placed in maximum lifts of 1 foot and lightly consolidated by use of a small hand -operated compactors or other appropriate methods to adequately compact the backfill. Heavy compactors and grading equipment should not be allowed to operate within 15 feet of the crest of the wall to. avoid developing excessive additional temporary or long-term R NE kN4 kk� lateral soil pressures. If onsite clayey soils are used, these materials should be placed in maximum 6-inch lifts and compacted as recommended in the charts based on the zoning location. 11 PAVEMENTS This report includes recommendations for rigid pavements. Maintenance requirements over the life of the pavement are typically much lower for rigid pavements, and many consider the long- term appearance of rigid pavements an advantage. Rigid pavements tend to be more durable and require less maintenance after construction, and rehabilitation/reconstruction of the pavement section is not typically considered a part of the pavement life cycle. When designing proposed pavement sections, subgrade conditions must be considered, along with expected traffic use/frequency, pavement type and intended design life. For this project, applicable traffic loading conditions and pavement design parameters were based on the City of Fort Worth Pavement Design Manual for a Residential -Urban roadway classifications. A more precise design can be made if specific traffic loading information is provided. The following information was used in our analysis: Table 11: Pavement Design Input Parameters Item Value Roadway Designation Residential -Urban Annual Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) 35,000 Annual traffic growth (%) 0.0 Reliability, R (%) 85 Initial serviceability, p° 4.5 Terminal serviceability, pt 2.25 Design life (years) 25 Concrete modulus of rupture, S'° (psi) 620 Concrete modulus of elasticity, E° (psi) 4,000,000 Standard deviation, S° 0.39 Load transfer coefficient, J 3.0 Drainage coefficient, Ca 1.0 Treated modulus of subgrade reaction, k (pci) 220 The pavement thickness determinations were performed in general accordance with the "AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures 1993 edition" using the WinPAS 12 software from the American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA). The minimum pavement sections are presented in the table below. Table 12: Rigid Pavement Sections Material Residential Streets - Thickness (inches) Jointed Reinforced Concrete 6 Lime Treated Subgrade 6 The concrete pavement should have between 4 and 6 percent entrained air. We recommend a minimum concrete compressive strength of 4,000 psi. Hand -placed concrete should have a maximum slump of 6 inches. A sand leveling course should not be permitted beneath pavements. All steel reinforcement, dowel spacing/diameter, and pavement joints should conform to local municipal standards. 11.1 Pavement Base Course The City of Fort Worth requires lime treatment for pavement subgrades. In accordance with their design requirements and performance expectations, we estimate approximately 8 percent hydrated lime by weight (36 pounds per square yard for a 6 inch thickness) will be required to adequately treat the pavement subgrade, though the actual lime requirement should be determined based on the in -place soil properties and soluble sulfate levels after the pavement subgrade has reached final grade. Lime treatment should be performed in accordance with Item 260, current Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets, and Bridges, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) or other similar standards approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Per the City of Fort Worth, lime treated subgrade should have a PI between 5 and 15. 11.2 Pavement Construction and Maintenance Recommendations It is important that the recommended moisture content and compaction be maintained until the concrete is placed. Maintenance after construction should include regular observation to identify and seal cracks. A flexible joint material should be used to seal cracks as they degrade, which can occur during the design life of pavements. Westpoint Park 12 SITE COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE 12.1 Site Grading and Drainage The geotechnical design for this project includes a limited assessment of hydrogeologic conditions and intends to provide for efforts to maintain stable, moist subgrade conditions after construction. Site grading and drainage should support this intention where possible. Drainage should be efficient in paved areas and less efficient in lawn and landscape areas. Roof runoff should be collected by gutters and downspouts, and discharge onto paved areas draining away from the buildings. 12.2 Landscaping and Irrigation Subgrade moisture levels should be maintained around the building perimeter before and during construction. Irrigated landscaping and lawn areas are recommended with even distribution around the structures. Irrigated areas will serve as supplemental moisture sources surrounding the foundations and pavement areas. Accordingly, regular and uniform irrigation will be required in these areas, particularly during dry and hot weather periods. We do not recommend the use of landscaping against or around the exterior of the foundations, as landscaped areas can adversely affect subgrade moisture. Landscaped areas can create both saturated and desiccated conditions that cause localized differential movements and the formation of cracks. If used, landscaping should be kept as far away from the foundation as possible and positive drainage must be maintained. Landscaping elements (such as edging) must not prohibit or slow the drainage of water. When feasible, irrigation lines and heads should not be placed in close proximity to the foundation to prevent the collection of water near the foundation or flatwork, particularly in the event of leaking lines or sprinkler heads. Trees and large vegetation should not be placed near structures or movement -sensitive flatwork. The root systems of these plants can remove relatively large quantities of moisture from the subgrade soils, causing localized soil settlement. The desiccation zone varies by tree size and species, but trees should generally be set back at least 1'/2 times the mature tree height, and in no cases should the drip -line of the mature tree extend over or within 15 feet of roof lines. Westpoint Park R NE kN It[! 13 STUDY CLOSURE The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of the field exploration and further on the assumption that the exploratory borings are representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site with little variance beyond that found by the borings. If different subsurface conditions from those encountered in our borings are observed or appear to be present in excavations, Rone must be advised promptly so that these conditions can be evaluated and our recommendations can be reassessed as may be necessary. If there is a substantial lapse of time between submission of this report and the start of the work at the site, if conditions have changed due either to natural causes or to construction operations at or adjacent to the site, or if structure locations, structural loads or finish grades are changed, Rone should be promptly informed and retained if necessary if the changed conditions warrant review and reassessment. It is important that Rone be retained to assist in design reviews or review those portions of the plans and specifications that pertain to earthwork and foundation systems for this particular project to ensure the plans and specifications are consistent with the controls and recommendations provided in this report. It is also advised that Rone provide oversight and monitoring services during construction to ensure that the controls required for design requirements during earthworks construction are provided correctly and implemented effectively. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and their designated agents for specific application to design and construction of this project. We have exercised a degree of care and skill exceeding that ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by reputable members of our profession practicing in the same or similar locality. The engineering services and solutions provided herein are considered advanced, and while design and construction controls are improved, no warranty, expressed or implied, can be made or intended. 14 COPYRIGHT 2022 RONE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LTD. This report provides advanced engineering services, and is in its entirety the sole property of the Client, Rone Engineering Services, Ltd., and its affiliates. Use of this report is subject to all applicable copyrights. This report may be used in practice or referenced by any project party as necessary, solely for the party's role on the project for which this report is prepared. Beyond that use, no part of this report may be copied, downloaded, transmitted, or otherwise reproduced or stored, in any form or means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this report must include all copyright notices, registered trademark (®) designations, and non -registered trademark (TM) designations. CHARTS 135 130 125 22-26481- Westpoint Park, Fort Worth, TX Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - CAT 815, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range �- 0.24 `� ` LEGEND I Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction In construction 0.16 Midpoint optimum at full compaction In construction Line -of -optimums in construction covering the soil range of the upper clay layer - 0.29 ��` Predominant soil range of the upper clay layer `� -� line -of -optimums extension for unexpected soil variation r 0,31 Compactor ��, - - - - - - ZAV (SG- 2.68 assumed average, based on 3 tests) 1 Performance. `�`- %Air Voids (Na) 0.34 across soil range `% - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) � --- -- Design construction range - MC: 12.5 - 21.0%,Max % AIr Voids: 6.3%,Min Dry I �%` Density: 102 pcf (designed to encompass SG: 2.66-2.70) - 0.37 I `Notes: Avg free swell: 1.1 ±25% h '' ( �`` 1. Compactor performance is predetermined with generally good accuracy. r 0.39 UCS: -5800 Ibs/ftz ±20% �� 2. Compactor performance and control design Is based on limited soil I♦� samples from on -site borings. These limited samples are assumed to be 0.42 l `� representative of the range of soils used for fill construction. `♦` 3. SC/CL/CH Soil Range, with gravel: 0.45 Maximum %Air Voids: 6.3%.,��\ `; PI Range: 16 50 (predominant 28-43) �♦`%Fines Range: 29 - 99% (predominant 73-93%) .` %Gravel Range: 0-25%(predominant )-10%) 4 In -Situ moisture range based on data from 5/2022. 0.49 II 0.52 - 0.56 105 i- 0.59 0.63 100 0,67 0.72 95 0.76 `♦ 5. In -Situ gravel is accounted for on this chart. �/ `♦ 6. /''I, �`♦ Non -cohesive soils are not covered In this plot. 7. Free swell does not equate to confined swell In Predominant Soil Range: �`� finished construction states. Avg free Swell; 3.0 - 4.6 ±25% `♦ `, `� 8. Constructed permeabilities not factored In swell numbers Avg UCS: -5800 - -7300 Ibs/ft2 ±20%'•. i, potential provided. Design Moisture Range . - I� IE--- ------- -- - -- _�- � - - - `�`♦ `.�. a 12.5% 21,0% i' , ♦� Full In -Situ Range I Predominant In -Situ Moisture i Full In -Situ Moisture I `% tE----------IE--------------------->�=------ ----- -->J t I %`♦ZAV (2.68) I t l (upper clay layer) I Range (upper clay layer) 1 Range (upper clay layer) ' . 1 ♦♦ 5 10 15 20 25 30 Moisture Content (%) CHART to PROJECT NO: 22-26481 COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART FILE NAME: BUILDING AND PAVEMENT SUBGRADE DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 7-26.2022 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 7-26-2022 W ESTPOINT PARK 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard REVISED BY: DATE: Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 7-26-2022 22-26481— Westpoint Park, Fort Worth, TX Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart — CAT 815, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range 130 r a29 ♦♦ LEGEND ♦ 0.31 �� ------ ZAV (SG - 2.68 shown) ♦ %Air Voids (Na) ♦♦ - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) 125 '- a34 - - - - — - - ' —` ♦♦ 1 - - - - ♦ I Performance range `♦ Control SoeclFlcatlons: `L I. _ 0.37 Min. Mofsfure Content* I ♦�♦ 1. Pertormance range requires, and is only valid with, full compaction at wet -of -optimum moisture ♦♦ contents in construction for the range of soils on site. ♦♦ 2. The hardened clays and limestone gravel must be effectively broken down and hydrated for 120 r- 0.39 ♦♦ effective compaction control. The CAT 81S should enable this processing. I ♦♦♦ .I 3. Fully compact in 9" maximum loose IIRs with minimum of 10 passes. 0.42 ♦♦ 4. This compaction control is valid for grade raises from on -site cut areas. l ♦♦♦ 5. Set density meter to 2.685G. • a i ♦♦ 6. Maintain cleaner bar close to the drum. 115 r- 0.45 �. `♦ 7. When %air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 6.3%after lifts are fully compacted, - - - `♦ the solution Is always wetting and recompaction. �•. > ♦♦ 8. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction and on scarified 0.49 Maximum % A)t:Voidsb,6.3% �' ♦♦♦ lifts. Q ♦♦ 9. Compacted lifts must be maintained In wet state after compaction. (with gauge setting SG=2.68) ♦♦ 110 L 0.52 �♦ Q r 0.56., ♦♦♦ `♦` 0.63 Min. Dry Density (102.0 pcf), I- ..���`♦ 100 L Notess ��, 0.72 1. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These.. ••''••."••.'''• limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils."••,,'••. ••'••,"'••- �� 2. The controls on this chart reflect Family -of -Curve methods for compaction control. •.,lq� '•.., •"••.., �� !AV (2.68) "••.8� •'' •,6� ' ••.., q� •' ••.., ?� ��,_ 95 0.76 .1�� ,lp� J 5 10 15 20 25 30 Moisture Content (%) CHART lb PROJECT NO: 22-26481 COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION FILE NAME: R oFr BUILDING AND PAVEMENT SUBGRADE DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 7-26-2022 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 7-26-2022 E .. E WPARK REVISED BY: DATE: k Boulevard 2001 ChhapelapelCreek E s T: 1 9 7 s Fort Worth, Taxes APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 7-26-2022 22-26481— Westpoint Park, Fort Worth, TX Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart — D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range 125 Ir 0.34 , LEGEND ` ` ® Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction in construction 0.37 -A 0 Midpoint optimum at full compaction in construction �% % �� Line -of -optimums In construction covering the soil range of the upper clay layer 120 r 0.39 Predominant soil range of the upper clay layer on for sl nexpected -- 0.42 `'•; .� `� -- ® LZAV (SG P2.68 assumed average,'based on 3 tests) variation %,I :., ;, `.` % Air Voids Na) L 115 r 0.45 •''•., —0.52 Void Ratio (e) �` N 100 O 95 90 85 I!- 0.49 i- 0.52 0.56 r 0.59 0.63 Lab D-698 performance across soil range Maximum %Air Voids: Design construction range— MC. 17-27%,Max %Air VoI s. 6.8 ,Min ry Density: 94 pcf (designed to encompass SG: 2.66-2.70) Notes: 1. SC/CL/CH Soil Range, with gravel: PI Range: 16 — 50 (predominant 28 — 43) %Fines Range: 29 — 99% (predominant 73 — 93%) %Gravel Range: 0 —25% (predominant 1-10%) 2. In -Situ moisture range based on data from 5/2022. 3. In -Situ gravel is accounted for on this chart. 4. Non -cohesive soils are not covered in this plot. j 0.67 ` 1 0.72 0.76 0.81 '•,I '� Design moisture range 1E------------------------�I `• 0.86 1 17.0% - 27,0% 1 - i Full In -Situ Range 1 Predominant In -Situ Moisture 1 Full In -Situ Moisture -------------- - -- 1 -y (upper clay layer) Range (upper clay layer) Range (upper clay layer) f ".... �`.. I 1 I " L.. IQ-V.., l?� .,....,..10� ...,•., f� '•......, slk........., 4% 7 0.97 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Moisture Content (%) CHART 2a PROJECT NO: 22-26481 R IV E COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 7-26-2022 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 7-26-2022 ENG IECRING WESTPOINT PARK 2001 Chapel Creak Boulevard REVISED BY: DATE; o r Fort Wodh, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 7-26-2022 22-26481— Westpoint Park, Fort Worth, TX Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart — D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range 120 0.39 LEGEND 0,42 �`� - - - - - - ZAV (SG - 2.68 shown) .................. %Air Voids (Na) � - 0.51 Vold Ratio (e) 115 ''0.45 `�` f I Acceptance range `---- `� Q•49 I Min. Moisture Content (17.0%) I I . ``� Control Soeclficatlons: 1. Acceptance range requires, and Is only valid with, full compaction at wet -of- ` %,% optimum moisture contents in construction for the range of soils on site. i ' 2. Fully compact in 6" loose lifts. 110 0.52 .. �`� 3. Set density meter to 2.68 SG, I' `.� 4. When % air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 6.8%after lifts are fully compacted, the solution Is always wetting and recompaction. 0.56 �`� S. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction and on scarified lifts. 105 0.59 '. Maximum%Air. Voids':.6.8%' 0.63 (with gauge setting 5G=1:68) 100 0.67 0.72 95 0.76.. Min. Dry Density (94.0 pd) ,. • '� .� 0.81 90 0.86 — - Notes: ZAV (2.65) 85 r- 0.97 10 1. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils. 2. The controls on this chart reflect Family -of -Curve methods for compaction control. 15 20 25 Moisture Content (%) 30 35 PROJECT NO: 22-26481 FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: GH DATE: REVISED BY: CJ DATE: REVISED BY: DATE: APPROVED BY: CT DATE: CHART 2b R NE COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL E n e E E a N 4 WESTPOWT PARK ': 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Fort Worth, Texas 7-26.2022 7-26-2022 7-26.2022 R NE E N G EERING EST: 1977 RECTM Compaction Design Report Project Number: 22-26481 Fill: Foundation Report Number: 26481-01 Project Name: Westpoint Park Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 7/25/2022 Project Owner: Lackland Holdings, LLC Produced By: Gary Hougardy Control Specifications and References Lift Properties at 96% Compaction on Construction Curve t Min % of Max Dry Density 96% Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO w (%) 8.7 12.8 ±1% MC Compacted Fill Property Requirements y (Ibs/ft3) 120.2 120.2 t2.0% Air Voids Percentage 6.3% S (%) 60.8 89.3 f3% Factor of Safety 2.1 a 0.38 0.38 f3% Na (%) 10.8 3.0 f3% Design Compaction Conditions w Potential (%) +5.6 +1.5 f3% Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 UCS (Ibs/ftz) ASTM D 2166 6,765 5,885 ±20% Compactor CAT 815 c (Ibs/ftz) ASTM D 2850 2,039 1,938 ±10% USCS Classification SC Ranges 0 (o) ASTM D 2850 28 23 ±10% Specific Gravity 2.66 2.66 - 2.70 Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 2.8 1.1 ±25% Liquid Limit (%) 34 32 - 36 CBR* (%) Soaked Li 5.4 ±10% Plasticity Index (%) 16 14 - 18 CBR* (%) Unsoaked 52.0 9.0 ±10% Plastic Limit (%) 18 Res Mod (Ibs/inz) Soaked 1,697 7,537 ±10% % Fines (Passing #200) 29 23 - 30 Res Mod (Ibs/inz) Unsoaked 32,031 10,418 ±10% % Gravel (Retained #4) 4 3 - 19 % Sand (Passing #4) 67 51 - 74 '�• Construction Control Specifications 135 - '`• coast. Cwve Minimum % of Maximum Dry Densitv •• " . - - .' . zav Construction Curve 96% ••� Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Range for 96% 130 - • 10.2% - 12.8% (t1% MC) Lift Construction Curve Minimum # of Roller Passes co : l d.2 % 9 (Equiv. 5 roundop passes, full lift coverage required) 125.21bs/111' 125 - Compaction curves should be obtained `. •'•• regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or '. texture for effective construction control. 964'c comp I- '� Z, 120 `120.21----action __ -_ ------ _ _ __ I I `•• M-D probe depths should be centered on the center of the compacted lift. I •. t c and m - Unsaturated biaxial test, total stress soil parameter. `. tics - Unconfined Compressive Strength. Qj 1 15 - ` • •, Measured values include o, y, UCS, c, 0 Free Shell, and CBR I I • • (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Na, m I • •' Potenda, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and unsoaked). • • Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Swell test I i • • condition. 110 I I ' CBR based on field compacted state. I I 1 Properties represent average values. I I Soil Sample Date: 5/17/2022 Loc: On -site 1oF - Desc: Upper -bound, full soil range 10.2% `12.8% e 10 15 20 Authorization By: N,Ioisture Content, co (�`'r•) Print Name: Graphics powered byMathematica Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report ("CDR') is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("FII'I and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain ail copyright notices and registered trademark designations (S) and non -registered trademark designations (11). Version: 2.32 - 7.2 R NE ENG EERING EST: 1912 RECT"' Compaction Design Report Project Number: 22-26481 Fill: Foundation Report Number: 26481-02 Project Name: Westpoint Park Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 7/25/2022 Project Owner: Lackland Holdings, LLC Produced By: Gary Hougardy Control Specifications and References Lift Properties at 95% Compaction on Construction Curve t Min % of Max Dry Density 95% Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO (%) 11.5 15.6 f1% MC Compacted Fill Property Requirements y (Ibs/ft3) 111.2 111.2 f1.8% Air Voids Percentage 6.3% S (%) 61.5 83.9 f3% Factor of Safety 1.2 e 0.50 0.50 f3% Na (%) 12.8 5.4 f3% Design Compaction Conditions w Potential (%) +7.2 +3.0 f3% Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 7,598 7,321 ±20% Compactor CAT 815 c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 2,386 2,589 ±10% USCS Classification CL Ranges 0 (o) ASTM D 2850 26 19 ±10% Specific Gravity 2.67 2.66 - 2.70 Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 9.2 3.0 ±25% Liquid Limit (%) 48 46 - 50 CBR* (%) Soaked 1.0 3.4 ±10% Plasticity Index (%) 28 26 - 30 CBR* (%) Unsoaked 32.2 7.8 ±10% Plastic Limit (%) 20 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 1,461 5,131 ±10% Fines (Passing #200) 73 70 - 75 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 23,553 9,523 ±10% % Gravel (Retained #4) 3 2-8 % Sand (Passing #4) 24 17 - 28 125 120 C_ ' '95% com action Q 110-111.21bs/f� r• . N 105 - 100 - eg const. Cwve -- - -- ZAP' ♦ ♦ Lift Construction Cu«,e fo : 12.9%, 117.1 lbs7ft., I I ♦ I { ♦ I 1 ' , I { ` I 1,12.9% 10 Construction Control Specifications Minimum % of Maximum Dry Densitv Construction Curve 95% Wet-of-ODt{mum Moisture Ranoe for 95% 12.9% - 15.6% (f1% MC) Minimum # of Roller Passes 10 (Equiv. 5 roundirip passes, full lilt coverage required) Compaction curves should be obtained regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. M-D probe depths should be centered on the center of the compacted lift. f c and m -Unsaturated tdaxial test, total stress soil parameter. UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. Measured values Include w y, UCS, c, 0, Free Swell, and CBR (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Iva, ra Potential, and Res0ient Modulus (soaked and unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Shell test condition. { * CBR based on field compacted state. { 1 Properties represent average values. { j Soil Sample Date: 5/17/2022 j Loc: On -site Desc: Upper -bound, predominant soil range 115.6% 1r Moisture Content; co (°r%) 20 Authorization By: Print Name: Graphics powered byMathematica Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report (CDR'J is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("Fill'I and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (0) and non -registered trademark designations Version: 2.32 - 7.2 R :ENGE9 T: RECT'" Compaction Design Report Project Number: 22-26481 Fill: Foundation Report Number: 26481-03 Project Name: Westpoint Park Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 7/25/2022 Project Owner: Lackland Holdings, LLC Produced By: Gary Hougardy Control Specifications and References Lift Properties at 95% Compaction on Construction Curve t Min % of Max Dry Density 95% Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance Lab Reference Standard ASTM D 698 (SP) w (%) 13.0 17.2 f1% MC Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO y (Ibs/ft3) 108.0 108.0 f1.9% Compacted Fill Property Requirements S (%) 63.4 83.8 f3°% Air Voids Percentage 6.3% a 0.55 0.55 t3 /o Factor of Safety 1.1 Na (%) 13.0 5.7 t3% w Potential (%) +7.5 +3.3 t3% Design Compaction Conditions UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 6,944 6,734 ±20% Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 c (Ibs/ftz) ASTM D 2850 2,229 2,458 ±10% Compactor CAT 815 0 (°) ASTM D 2850 25 18 ±10% USCS Classification CH Ranges Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 11.1 3.6 ±25% Specific Gravity 2.65 2.66 - 2.70 CBR* (%) Soaked 1.0 3.1 ±10% Liquid Limit (%) 56 54 - 58 CBR* (%) Unsoaked 28.8 6.8 ±10% Plasticity Index (%) 34 32 - 36 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 1,487 4,632 ±10% Plastic Limit (%) 22 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 21,972 8,747 ±10% % Fines (Passing #200) 82 80 - 84 % Gravel (Retained #4) 2 1-5 % Sand (Passing #4) 16 11 - 19 125 _ '.• Construction Control Specifications ++• coast. Cum Minimum % of Maximum Dry Densitv ASrn1 D 699 Construction Curve 95% ++• ASTM D 698 (SP) 105% +`• Lab ca at 95% compaction 120 +`+• Dry Side: 17.8 % Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Ranae for 95% `Vet Side: 22.6 % 14.4 - 17.20% (t1% MC) Lift Construction Curve Minimum # of Roller Passes w : 14.4 % ++ 11 (Equiv. 6 roundtr/p passes, full lift coverage required) 115 • , y : 113.7 lbs/ft3 '�+• Compaction curves should be obtained '+ regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. 95% compaction �•, M-D probe depths should be centered on __ __ _ __ __ _ lbs%ft' -} the center of the compacted lift. .108. I I AS111I l) 698 (SP)" ' I ! • 't c and m -Unsaturated triaxial test, total stress soil parameter. 105 - w : 19 -5 % • + UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. y : 103.3 lbs/fl `+ ++ Measured values include w, y, UCS, c, m, Free 5wel/, and c8R .dr .. (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Na, w Potential, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in free Swell test 100 I I condition. CBR based on field compacted state. I N 1 Properties represent average values. I I ! Soil Sample Date: 5/17/2022 Loc: On site I I Desc: Midpoint, predominant soil range 114,4% .,17-2% 10 15 `° Authorization By: Moishtre Content_ co (^?L). Print Name: * ASTM D 698 (SP) equivalent, corrected to control reladve moisture standard in construction. Graphics powered by Mathemalica Date: Firm Reg. #: Use of this Compaction Design Report ("CDR') Is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report, This CDR may be used In practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("FIII'o and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose Is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored In a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, In any form or by any means, except as permitted In writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (0) and non -registered trademark designations ('"). Version: 2.32 - 7.2 R N E_ ENG EERING FST: RECT"' Compaction Design Report Project Number: 22-26481 Fill: Foundation Report Number: 26481-04 Project Name: Westpoint Park Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 7/25/2022 Project Owner: Lackland Holdings, LLC Produced By: Gary Hougardy Control Specifications and References Lift Properties at 950/a Compaction on Construction Curve t Min % of Max Dry Density 95% Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO w (%) 14.8 18.9 f1% MC Compacted Fill Property Requirements y (Ibs/ft3) 104.5 104.5 f1.9% Air Voids Percentage 6.3% S (%) 65.4 83.7 f3% Factor of Safety 1.0 e 0.61 0.61 t3% Na (%) 13.1 6.2 f3% Design Compaction Conditions w Potential (%) +7.8 +3.7 f3% Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 6,180 5,927 ±20% Compactor CAT 815 c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 2,022 2,224 ±10% USCS Classification CH Ranges 0 (°) ASTM D 2850 24 16 ±10% Specific Gravity 2.69 2.66 - 2.70 Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 12.8 4.3 ±25% Liquid Limit (%) 65 63 - 67 CBR* (%) Soaked 0.9 2.9 ±10% Plasticity Index (%) 43 41 - 45 CBR* (%) Unsoaked 24.8 5.9 ±10% Plastic Limit (%) 22 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 1,301 4,367 ±10% % Fines (Passing #200) 93 91 - 95 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 19,961 7,960 ±10% 0/6 Gravel (Retained #4) 0 0- 1 % Sand (Passing #4) 7 4-9 Construction Control Specifications 120 - • const. Curve Minimum % of Maximum Dry Density, '. Construction Curve 95% _ � Wet-of-Ontimum Moisture Rance for 95% 11c, 16.1% - 18.9% (t1% MC) Lift Construction Curse Minimum # of Roller Passes ` [d : 16.1 Sic 11 (Equiv. 6 roundtrip passes, full lift coverage required) `. 110 - : 110. lbs/ft''`,� Compaction curves should be obtained regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. 2 .t05 _95% compaction __ _ M-D probe depths should be centered on ---•--•--•--• - •--•--•--- 104.5 Ibs/ the center of the compacted lift. I ' • t c and 0 - Unsaturated tdaxial test, total stress soil parameter. �' • UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. 100 _ ` Measured values include o, y, UCS, c, m Free Swell, and CBR I (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values Include S, e, Na, r) Potential, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Swell test I I condition. CBR based on field compacted state. I I 1 Properties represent average values. I I Soil Sample Date: 5/17/2022 I I Loc: On -site s0 - I I Desc: Lower -bound, predominant soil range !16-1 % !15.9 F 10 15 -'a 25 Authorization By: Moisture Content; &.) Print Name: Graphics powered byMathematica Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report (CDR'J is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift (" Fill') and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (@) and non -registered trademark designations Version: 2.32 - 7.2 R NE E N G EERI NG EST: 1977. RECT"' Compaction Design Report Project Number: 22-26481 Fill: Foundation Report Number: 26481-05 Project Name: Westpoint Park Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 7/25/2022 Project Owner: Lackland Holdings, LLC Produced By: Gary Hougardy Control Specifications and References Lift Properties at 96% Compaction on Construction Curve t Min % of Max Dry Density 96% Dry Side' Wet Sidel Tolerance Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO to (%) 16.5 20.0 ±1% MC Compacted Fill Property Requirements y (Ibs/ft3) 102.2 102.2 f1.9% Air Voids Percentage 6.3% S (%) 69.3 83.9 t3% Factor of Safety 1.0 e 0.64 0.64 f3% Na (%) 12.0 6.3 f3% Design Compaction Conditions w Potential (%) +7.3 +3.9 t3% Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 5,525 5,165 ±20% Compactor CAT 815 c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 1,835 1,984 ±10% USCS Classification CH Ranges 0 (o) ASTM D 2850 23 15 ±10% Specific Gravity 2.69 2.66 - 2.70 Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 14.2 4.8 ±25% Liquid Limit (%) 74 72 - 76 CBR* (%) Soaked 0.8 2.8 ±10% Plasticity Index (%) 50 48 - 52 CBR* (%) Unsoaked 22.3 5.3 ±10% Plastic Limit (%) 24 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 1,182 4,198 ±10% % Fines (Passing #200) 99 98 - 99 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 18,615 7,434 ±10% % Gravel (Retained #4) 0 0-0 % Sand (Passing #4) 1 1-2 1It - 110 - r, 96% compaction �' _V 102-21bsJf� 100 - . r� Q 9F - 20 - 8 t. _ ..... _ zav Lift Construction Curve cd : 17-7% '`. 106.5 lbs/ft'' `. I ' I ' I' I '. r ! I i17.7% '20.% 1 F. 20 25 Moisture Content, cd (4c) Graph/as powered by Mathematica Construction Control Specifications Minimum % of Maximum Dry Densitv Construction Curve 96% Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Ranoe for 96% 17.7% - 20.0% (f1% MC) Minimum # of Roller Passes 11 (Equiv. 6 roundbip passes, full lift coverage required) Compaction curves should be obtained regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. M-D probe depths should be centered on the center of the compacted lift. t c and d - Unsaturated triaxial test, total stress soil parameter. ucs - Unconfined Compressive strength. Measured values Include a, y, UGS, c, m Free Swell, and CBR (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include s, e, ha, m Potentla, and Res/llent Modulus (soaked and unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Slvell test condition. * CBR based on held compacted state. 1 Properties represent average values. Soil Sample Date: 5/15/2022 Loc: On -site Desc: Lower -bound, full soil range Authorization By: Print Name: Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report (CDR'J is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift f Fill') and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (8) and non -registered trademark designations (7M). Version: 2.32 - 7.2 /_1N»►197/:I_1 y r % Ta�no it �' I/l. /� Reran 4 1 srcv,ererwve noad s r R I r lnterme0i I to s� en' n"° , 11 sloe a iage nwa �O1 SCAL :I'NTS � f . � ':ry ,\�°• �"rury 'EL' , e. rartmereome elil I I �'k. 7.@� - 7 p 'O i .. re`L ,George Settlement \ I a I reppenee t,np. r�hfurcos d PI rn Pnik o I '�i I III It' r Ffvi- / II Purk it WlbxkeAwrwe- '-1 sl'. 4'6� V4 VL61 t ���� ffem(nfory I� Y '� *�' 51odg��+�� �7 �� 6> �da,".W_47Kj'I� 1�I aLumsay.odve - I. # w :InaaAl 71 �{� ;.Ir .I-i . , j ,,91 %, O��rlsp//�/j'r' +yam/.. \�'•I'' nl� om , t811 IT. N, 41 sadHadJI SITE 21 I I I .Ill t I gy n SI; � UnIry WFe , I � r I I I I- L Po a Lane •� -k ,.+� 1 rll.. .(p'I Ii11: l'I >'"°`rJi e,�r- — I - ,, e re 0irye `__ �i S ` Eere4a Sprugs Cowt _ C 30 � I , 3 iusun Tmace a ili eCljp�- � ' W ( RM 2871 j rj� S'7 i ,, L'. - wrLler o,r,e �, n / I �i ,o �eda�e 5aeer I • .:.{1dFce I u Lune I r.��L/N� mnrrn I Crpin—d �Qi � 3 �.• J �F All Saints i / 's E{I opal School P PROJECT NO: 22-26481 PLATEA.1 FILE NAME: 2226481.DWG R N E VICINITY MAP DRAWN BY: CM DATE: 7-18-2022 E N G E E R I N G WESTPOINT PARK REVISED BY: DATE: 2001 CHAPEL CREEK BOULEVARD REVISED BY: DATE: EST: 1072 FORT WORTH, TEXAS APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 7-18-2022 2= :I• wNesvoINT BLVD PROJECT NO: 22-26481 PLATEA.3 FILE NAME: 2226481.DWG R NE BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM DRAWN BY: CM DATE: 7-18-2022 E N G E E R I N G 3WESTPOINT PARK REVISED BY: DATE: 2001 CHAPEL CREEK BOULEVARD REVISED BY: DATE: EST: 197z FORT WORTH, TEXAS APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 7-18-2022 Log Project No. B-1 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 2, Lot 57 Fora Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.747850 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50085° W End of Day Not Measured _ c. 6 I_ c c a. > - V a a J.2 Stratum Description Z ia t7 O� W A a. Approximate Surface Elevation = 802.0 feet O tq FAT CLAY (CH) - reddish brown, with sand, calcareous nodules, iron stains 0 /-U 0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 810.7 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.7 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/'/2" 50/'/<" 50/5" 50/4" 9GE ONG EST: 187', o V a N o rn d r a C2 C N w N a) D Z J N O` C C „a_ (7n a C CCc m 4 o f a 12 a<LL-PL-PI 2 Cn o MyG4.5+ 13 4.5+ 10 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 82 57-16-41 18 -0.2 104 4.5+ 13 127 7,840 5 11 Plate A.4 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-2 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 2, Lot 53 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.747470 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50028° W End of Day Not Measured a o a E a= Stratum Description -J z a o rn E > D w H m.0 w a. Approximate Surface Elevation = 820.0 feet 3 o cn SANDY FAT CLAY (CH) - reddish brown, calcareous — nodules, iron stains 5- 812.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 1C < , 807.0 LIMESTONE - gray 13 -Z S 2C 800.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 816.1 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.9 Feet Cut 50/6" 50/Yi' 50/Y:' 50/'/a" 50/'/a" 9GE qfFNG ES'i: Ir��z w 0 or w t M w. .. IIt (E— zCL d U c N C A y 01 N d V E a W a.. in LL-PL-PI 2 cn c M c i 4.50 5 4.50 8 4.50 62 51-18-33 9 0.0 101 4.50 14 6 6 Material boundaries are aoproximate; in situ, transitions maybe gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.5 Log B-3 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 2, Lot 49 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746920 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.49999' W End of Day Not Measured C C a a a � Stratum Description J z o EF- t) w a a. Approximate Surface Elevation = 828.0 feet O N �� FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, calcareous nodules, iron stains 1 - light brown, with sand, limestone fragments 0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 0 LIMESTONE - tan 15—=� S 20 � 808.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 824.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Cut 25-11-25 N=36 5015" 20-11-11 N=22 50/2" 50P/<" 50/Ya" R)GEONG E a N c a o rn ;; r y N N.N C 01 C v w z° v ,E v a N Em ol= �� c b vNi CL ati a v 5 E ate. ate' IL in LL-PL-PI 2 cn o MU 4.50 94 62-23-39 13 8.9 109 73 61-20-41 9 13 19 liE 7 Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may he gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.6 Log B-4 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Fort Worth, TX, Texas Block 2, Lot 45 Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746220 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.49999' W End of Day Not Measured n o F c c a- > o U a > Stratum Description a N �n a W Approximate Surface Elevation = 839.0 feet 3 O to 0�0 FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand, calcareous nodules 9 1 0 LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown, with sand, calcareous nodules 0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 0 LIMESTONE - tan S- 15-=i Z gray s 2C � 819.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 829.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 10.0 Feet Cut 50/4" 50/2'/2" 50/1'Y2" 50/3/a" 50/1'/," 50/Yz' R ONGE N G E GST: 1972 o w o rn m r a N v, d a� o -a •- E Z � E U c w E of `_ �d Q on, r M a v c d o f a X fL in LL-PL-PI 2 cn c � U 4.5+ 78 55-22-33 16 10.0 95 4.5+ 95 44-21-23 12 4.5+ 10 11 10 9 Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions maV be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.7 Log Project No. B-5 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 2, Lot 41 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745810 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.49998' W End of Day Not Measured �a c a c H� C > o V Stratum Description z o (n lL A G a. Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet 3 O rn — % FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand, calcareous nodules, iron stains _/ J/ 5—, 832.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/3%" 1 C 50/1 %" 50/2'/2" 1 50/1'/4" 823.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/1'/2" 2C 820.0 50/'/;' Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 829.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 11.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. 9GE N_ EERING EST: 107z o '\ a a 01 c Y t a ar 4 w N y ul .• '� C V G w 'n .« z E � In c ca, cro aiy _ = uE a IY a in LL-PL-PI M 0) a M 0 2.50 21 4.5+ 84 69-22-47 18 2.0 102 4.5+ 11 10 11 26 Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.8 Log B-6 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Fort Worth, TX, Texas Block 2, Lot 37 Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745410 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.49997° W End of Day Not Measured a o c a a E a b Stratum Description J z o � fn b a fo LL .y0 Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet 3 O to z' FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown b'11 1C 0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 0 FAT CLAY (CH) - gray 20� 820.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 835.9 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.1 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate; In situ,_transitlons maybe gradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/2Y2' 50/1'/+" 9R NFNG E N G E E R esT: icr2 o w a v o r a CD N d C m C `� r 0 3 d o d Z 7E , E C N O C CL cm uNi� _ ouE a W a in LL-FL-PI i to o � t) 4.5+ 12 4.5+ 90 58-24-34 11 4.5+ 69 53-22-31 6 14.0 104 8 4.5+ 12 2.00 27 Plate A.9 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-7 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 2, Lot 33 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745000 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.49997° W End of Day Not Measured _ G p c a c a > O U a E a Stratum Description z i � N E w O Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet O vn Jor,a FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, limestone fragments 5- 10 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan LIMESTONE - gray —Zi 2C = 820.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 837.6 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.4 Feet Cut 50/4" 50/2Y2" 50/3Ya" 50/'%' 50/Y2" 50/Y," 9GI qfFNG o O 01 C N a L N a d w N y �v C C a z .JE V v C CL as W a in LL-PL-PI 2 tq o � c i 4.00 96 58-25-33 13 9.3 103 4.5+ 10 4.5+ 15 4.5+ 10 9 10 15 Material boundaries are approximate: in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.10 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-8 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 2, Lot 29 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744250 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.499960 W End of Day Not Measured $ wo a o c >w V E a Stratum Description a ° o Q ID N M lL .n a Approximate Surface Elevation = 842.0 feet 3 O to FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown J / 838.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown 5 834.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/3" 1 C 50/2Y2' 50/5Yi" 1 50/4" 1826 ' 0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/5" 2C � 822.0 50/Y," Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 838.6 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.4 Feet Cut v 0 0 t 0) 0 rn oMaterial boundaries are approximate; in situ. transitions may be gradual. y Driller: CoreCo F Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers o 4Gi r C N d -0o 0-4 G ° 01 C -0.2 ,., Z v ,E J V N 0) a C Vl oa C m >> d 5 E M c a a� a 0n LL-PL-PI 2 U) � U 4.00 17 6.6 104 4.5+ 85 60-22-38 9 4.5+ 95 48-20-28 11 9 12 Plate A.11 Log B-9 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 2, Lot 25 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.743590 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.49995° W End of Day Not Measured ° G t�' '0 a > o V a E a Stratum Description ` E p y E �i aa. °= u�i F- tn w Approximate Surface Elevation = 843.0 feet 3 O co /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 91 10- 15- i 2C - light brown 831.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 827.0 LIMESTONE - gray 823.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 838.5 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.5 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/3/" 50/'/a" 50/'/2' 50/'/a" 9GI qFNG 2 EST: 1972 u .•' a N a N Ol " G! w N C C E� z �E V 3 cuNi J d w EI E� Q r = a cm MCD N v = co1E a W a.. in LL-PL-PI i (n o � U 4.5+ 15 4.5+ 9 4.5+ 99 75-27-48 17 0.0 104 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 15 9 12 Plate A.12 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-10 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 1, Lot 21 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.743080 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50025° W End of Day Not Measured o o �, c o. a o a E a b Stratum Description � z o co � E a>, °' In tn . a Approximate Surface Elevation = 835.0 feet 9 O vi FAT CLAY (CH) - reddish brown, with sand, calcareous nodules, iron stains 1 211 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams i Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 836.2 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.2 Feet Fill 12-19-19 N=38 50/6" 50/6" 12-50/5'/2" 26-50/5'/2' R91NE N G E 3T: 1972 a+ a N o tm aa) r °' En C m0 ° 3 W 'N E o Z Q V ar c W d cm �> N °uE u. W a. in LL-PL-PI i to o � L) o 16 11 88 50-22-28 9 3.4 103 43 45-15-30 4 11 19 20 Material boundaries are anoroximate: in situ, transitions may be aradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.13 Log B-11 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 1, Lot 17 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.742970 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50099° W End of Day Not Measured a Cc a t Stratum Description z N E o tn w .c IL Approximate Surface Elevation = 831.0 feet O a) /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 5- - light brown 10- A'-40 /15 J / 813.0 LIMESTONE - gray 2C � 811.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 830.7 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.3 Feet Cut 50/2" 50/1" 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 20 1.0 98 4.5+ 24 4.5+ 20 4.5+ 89 58-20-38 18 3.1 108 4.5+ 28 11 Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.14 Log B-12 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Fort Worth, TX, Texas Block 1, Lot 13 Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.742840 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-134d Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50176° W End of Day Not Measured c t= m o o. a E a Stratum Description � E o c to E v °w' r- �a y w a Approximate Surface Elevation = 836.0 feet ir O N /j FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 5 1( - light brown 824.C, FAT CLAY (CH) - light brown, with sand 5� 819.0 LIMESTONE - gray 2C 816.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 837.2 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.2 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; in situ. transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/1'/2" 50/1 " R 01!�GE N G E f_.S T: _f 072 . o w c 4- CD ID d r a y U! G O1 G } N 6 0 3 m n E Z �E v r- c' Q o _ o a n. c m y> =4) 0 5 E IL tY a in LL-PL-PI 2 N o M y 4.5+ 20 4.5+ 21 4.5+ 24 4.5+ 94 67-23-44 22 3.4 104 4.5+ 20 4.5+ 78 71-27-44 18 10 Plate A.15 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-13 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 1, Lot 9 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.742750 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.502250 W End of Day Not Measured _ a p c j a 0C a U a E a - Stratum Description � z o o E 2 w N I- w Approximate Surface Elevation = 846.0 feet 3 O tan — FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 9 R ENGE NE NG EST: 10'T?. 6 a w CD c is N 4! 4 y ' c CI C (DZ z to •E J U c N tme w C C Q y o C L C a c m � d 4) m = u E a a' a in LL-PL-PI 2* 3i v o M U 4.5+ 85 64-26-38 15 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 10-12-15 — N=27 7 5 — 12-14-16 15 N=30 8-13-19 12 N=32 838.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown, with limestone / fragments 4.5+ 8 / 10 j _j 15 4.5+ 31 j829.0 LIMESTONE -gray =� 50/2%" 13 50/2" 826.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 845.1 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.9 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate: In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.16 Log B-14 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 1, Lot 5 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.742640 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50289° W End of Day Not Measured a c c w o a r= E d a a° m Stratum Description � z o p01 rn E y :% L9 H W mO Approximate Surface Elevation = 858.0 feet O vi _ % CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC) - brown 856.0 AT CLAY (CH) -light brown, limestone fragments 25-40-8 — / X N=48 �00854.0 \ / WFOTHFRFn I IMFSTC]NF -tan E 1 843.0 LIMESTONE - gray S = I 2C 838.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 856.8 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.2 Feet Cut Material boundaries are aoaroximale: In situ. transitions may be gradual. 8-9-10 N=19 7-13-50/3" 22-36-50/41/2" 50/" 50/" 50/" o a w N 6 (D C C E Z E :2 v C w 0 07 E 0 oc \ 4- a M 0 y C _ U EC ti W a i LL-PL-PI 2noMgl U 44 58-23-35 9 -0.7 100 75 55-19-36 12 7 3 10 10 11 Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.17 Log B-15 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 1, Lot 1 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.742550 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50352° W End of Day Not Measured a o c > ° a V E, a > Stratum Description o N N e a w Approximate Surface Elevation = 868.0 feet 3 O to FAT CLAY (CH) - brown / 866.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 12-10-8 N=18 0 855.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15 —Z— 2C = � 848.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 868.2 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.2 Feet Fill Material boundaries are anoroximate: In situ, transitions may be gradual. 12-34-50/3" 50/1 %" 50/1 " 50/3'Y2" 50/2" 50/1'/4" 50/1 " R NE E N G EERING 0 4- CL 4 a c a Ez -E J V cute tfi wrc •n �c a M (y _c VG E a X in LL-FL-PI 2 o o�a U 7 2 49 28-16-12 6 7 14 11 Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.18 Log B-16 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 3, Lot 1 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.743400 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-134 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.500840 W End of Day Not Measured n o c c a >w C1 a E a Stratum Description z 00 to E yE- W w �a a Approximate Surface Elevation = 827.0 feet 3 O 1n FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 9 10- 15- - light brown 816.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 810.0 LIMESTONE - gray i 2C =� 807.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 829.3 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.3 Feet Fill Material boundades are approximate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/4" 50/1'/2" 50/2" 50/1" 9GI OF EST: 1972 o w- a a a N rr " CI y�lr� t C Ew z J c ro vi> N v = 5 E CL d a.. W a in LL-PL-PI 2 v3i c M y 4.5+ 88 64-22-42 22 4.5+ 86 59-23-36 20 1.5 93 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 17 4.5+ 19 10 18 Plate AA 9 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-17 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard R N E Block 3, Lot 30 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E N G E E R I N G 32.743700 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-22 L: s F: I U.i Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.500460 W End of Day Not Measured o c c IL •- �°1 m CDa o rn "+ o c iu o _ C '" V Stratum Description o E . Z E J a U 3 c vNi a oN y o M w �n a Approximate Surface Elevation = 832.0 feet 3 O to 4)4)i a W m� m to LL-FL-PI 0 2 3 Z` to o co U FAT CLAY (CH) - brown —A 4.5+ 15 F CLAYEY SAND (SC) - light brown, limestone fragments 0 —7 15-1' 814.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 20 812.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 838.2 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.2 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. 9-18-15 N=33 8-16-18 N=34 50/3/<" 50/'Y2" 4.5+ 4.5+ 82 36-16-20 8 2.7 99 4.5+ 10 22 27 Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.20 Log B-18 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Bock 3, Lot 5 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.743960 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.500850 W End of Day Not Measured c o c �c a >w V E a > Stratum Description o rn E a w Approximate Surface Elevation = 823.0 feet O cd 5- R NE E N G E E R I N G EST:1972 w o a1 v s C' N a y W "' C V C — .te z aei .E d w voi c 2 E' = c ro uyi > c 01 u E a a in LL-PL-PI 2 cn in =r-) cO) FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand, calcareous nodules 4.50 14 - light brown, limestone fragments / 808.0 1 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 805.0 LIMESTONE - gray � 803.0 2C Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 827.7 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.7 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate: in situ, transitions may be oradual. 4.50 15 4.50 77 55-19-36 11 4.0 116 4.50 7 4.50 26 4.50 18 50P/a" 9 50/�/a" Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.21 Log B-19 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 3, Lot 26 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744230 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50047° W End of Day Not Measured n. 6 c c 0. >° U a a � Stratum Description ` z O to E a�i ro u) W aCL Approximate Surface Elevation = 829.0 feet O (n Am FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 5 0 SANDY FAT CLAY (CH) - light brown 0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 1C - 812.0 LIMESTONE - gray _T- 2C =i 809.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 837.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.4 Feet Fill 5014" 50/2'/2" 50/6" 50/2%" 50/3'/4" 50P/a" RONGE N G E EST: 1©7'� 6 a w c a �. N " Ol 2y C C EL— z° E V 3 c a c Q _ c C a cm �d �' w = c°�E a W a in LL-PL-PI 2 U) o � U 4.5+ 16 4.5+ 13 4.5+ 66 31-20-11 4 4.5+ 7 2.3 101 13 23 14 Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.22 Log B-20 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Fort Worth, TX, Texas Block 3, Lot 9 Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744490 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-134 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.500860 W End of Day Not Measured c o c c a > ° c� E Stratum Description a N m a�i m t— tn W ,a Approximate Surface Elevation = 818.0 feet 3 O vai /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown G E 12.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown 07.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 01.C, LIMESTONE - gray —Z �2c =i798.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 826.5 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.5 Feet Fill 50/'/a" 50/Y," 50/Yz' 50/'/," 9GE O�NG Er (: 1072 o a N o rn w t °' fA O �• z d .E V or a oO1w(D E` Q c� y°_ a ca) E MA ia W in LL-P-PI 2 cn M 4.5+ 18 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 55 39-16-23 8 2.3 112 4.5+ 74 44-18-26 9 2 8 Material boundaries are approximate: In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.23 Log B-21 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 3, Lot 21 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744770 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50047° W End of Day Not Measured p c > O U a E a Stratum Description ro p p E H ❑ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 826.0 feet O (n /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 5- 10- 15- - light brown 8.0 SANDY FAT CLAY (CH) - light brown 4.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan )9.0 LIMESTONE - gray i i 2C =�806.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 835.8 Feet Approximate Grading = 9.8 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate: in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/11, 50/'%' 9GE NE ERING 2 EST: 197' r) CL N CD c a N m 4- y u C 2 E� Z U011 3 �N °' 3 Co IL IY 10 LL-PL-PI 20 rn ❑ ❑ U 4.5+ 11 4.5+ 8 4.5+ 10 4.5+ 18 4.5+ 64 58-20-38 9 5.3 108 50/1 " 50/'/2" 8 Plate A.24 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-22 Project No. 22-2Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 3, Lot 13 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745040 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.500880 W End of Day Not Measured a c >, c a > o a E a Stratum Description _J z o a) im N E > m d a to w a Approximate Surface Elevation = 817.0 feet 3 O to /i FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand E 0 811.0 SANDY FAT CLAY (CH) - light brown 805.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 799.0 LIMESTONE - gray 2C 797.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 825.3 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.3 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate: in situ, transitions may be Gradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/3/a" 50/'/a" 50/1" 50P/2" 9 R NE ENGE E RING r-"T: 1972 o �, V- CL c o m r w a N y E C 3 C E`. C1 z m o 1''+ J y c vNi d °o °' av p c 0> o U o oro fia Y a t LL-PL-PI 2 4.5+ 17 4.5+ 4 4.5+ 79 55-16-39 10 4.5+ 53 72-19-53 7 5.1 104 4.5+ 14 10 8 Plate A.25 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-23 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 3, Lot 17 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745500 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-13-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.500520 W End of Day Not Measured G 6 f—� N > 2 a.a a ° Stratum Description ` z p rn E M W °= vi N W O Approximate Surface Elevation = 824.0 feet O vi —% FAT CLAY (CH) - brown - light brown _o 5 J/ J/ 1 10— J/ / 809.0 15—� LIMESTONE - gray 2C 804.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 832.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.4 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; in situ. transitions may be gradual. 9GE qFNG EST: 107'% e � n 0 of " t a N N y- y U) EE =Ew G C zo L) cvi O CCL c v o f M uNi v IL W a in LL-PL-PI 2 in 0 n v 4.5+ 16 4.5+ 9 4.5+ 92 51-18-33 16 0.5 105 4.5+ 8 4.5+ 16 4.5+ 14 50/Y2" 50/'/a" 6 Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.26 Log B-24 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 4, Lot 4 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.743590 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50139' W End of Day Not Measured c $ ao a E a- Stratum o pIm H w a Approximate Surface Elevation = 827.0 feet 3 O to SANDY FAT CLAY (CH) - brown F 1 - light brown 821.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 810.0 LIMESTONE - gray 2C = i 807.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 828.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 5013" 50/2'/4" 50/2'Y2" 50/2" 50/1 " 50P/4" qGC OF F. 3T: 1972 ° 4- °� a a c a o rn :i s � N y w C 01 C d w Z .E v a w r c. =c w w u E a. m W iLL-PL-PI 2 n MU 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 58 58-20-38 12 2.1 92 4.5+ 8 8 10 Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.27 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-25 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 4, Lot 31 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.743850 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50175° W End of Day Not Measured a o F c w c a > V a E a ° Stratum Description z >, in M W o Approximate Surface Elevation = 833.0 feet 3 O cn LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown E u - light brown 827.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 818.0 LIMESTONE - gray I S i 2C 813.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 826.7 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.3 Feet Cut 36-40-45 N=85 50/1'/2" 50/1 %" 50/2" 50/1 %" 9 R NE ENG1 ERI NG aw in o rn ;t r M d � w+ CU a� Zo �E ci v c u+ _ d — oIL cui> a of a W a 'rn LL-PL-PI 2 c3n a M L) 4.5+ 19 4.5+ 17 4.5+ 89 47-18-29 11 2.4 100 16 7 9 Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.28 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-26 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 4, Lot 8 Fora Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744120 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50140° W End of Day Not Measured c C H c >w a a E a - Stratum Description ` z o O E W ~- Approximate Surface Elevation = 822.0 feet 90 aai FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand 9 0 - light brown 6.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan )9.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1G Z _L 2C = i 802.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 825.8 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.8 Feet Fill 30-35-42 N=77 50/1 " 50/1 " 50/%" 50/'Y2" R qNGE N G E L'S f: 10%Y w O c D7 el L a W N o yu C ._ o iu C o 0 E III Z °' E v J C N +�+ C C1 =� Q w e E �_ C =A N C C, C Ind try y 0 d a V E a W a in LL-PL-Pi 2 (n M U 4.5+ 82 64-29-35 16 2.4 72 4.5+ 10 4.5+ 8 13 10 Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.29 Log B-27 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 4, Lot 28 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744390 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50177° W End of Day Not Measured _ a ° c L c a > o U E ° Stratum Description � z C Eo M (nd w (L Approximate Surface Elevation = 829.0 feet R: O N SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown E 11 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown, limestone fragments 20--L` 809.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 823.1 Feet Approximate Grading = 5.9 Feet Cut i i i L 1 1 1 1 1 ) 1 7 A 77 Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/6" 50/6" 50/4" 40-50/3" R ONGE N G E e � c a N y L C c N w .• Z NE E aUi cw J O C C�. C IBC LA y U E �a aa ULL-PL-PI 2 n o v 4.5+ 12 4.5+ 59 46-15-31 7 8.9 98 15 4 4 18 4.5+ 18 Plate A.30 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-28 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 4, Lot 12 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744660 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-154 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.501400 W End of Day Not Measured _ a H o a >w U 5, ° Stratum Description z aai a o N M M o n a to Approximate Surface Elevation = 816.0 feet 90 cn /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand E 0 0.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 13.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z 20 = � 796.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 824.6 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.6 Feet Fill 28-37-41 N=78 50/1" 50/Yz' 50/%" 50/'%' 9GE O�NG 1=3T: 10'72 6 a N r- a o rn ;; r ui y. a+ GY! N 'e •_ O •N O E� z °' E U 3 c vNi 2 ELd — :3 o Cm vyi> N d of a. W oL. in LL-PL-PI 2 co o M 0 4.5+ 13 4.5+ 5 4.5+ 73 69-20-49 11 11.2 176 16 rA 4 Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.31 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-29 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 4, Lot 24 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744930 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.501780 W End of Day Not Measured C. O H C C 0. > .2 a E a- Stratum Description J z o p01 E g>, w H N tL na. Approximate Surface Elevation = 820.0 feet 3 O U) /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown E f 0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 820.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.4 Feet Fill 50/4" 50/3" 50/2" 50/6" 38-50/5" R NE E N G E E R I N G o w c. y c o. N 01 N w yv C C J wC CyCOC. c ro 'n> c v o f a IY n lA LL-PL-PI M N In � c i 4.5+ 12 4.5+ 87 55-16-39 12 7.9 104 +i LV 6 12 16 Material boundaries are aooroxlmate: In situ. transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.32 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-30 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 4, Lot 16 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745220 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.501410 W End of Day Not Measured n c x a a >° 0 'b a t Stratum Description to N W O F- Approximate Surface Elevation = 807.0 feet O vat FAT CLAY (CH) - brown r 1 AWAe WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 823.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 16.4 Feet Fill m Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. 0 N Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 7-13-18 N=31 12-16-20 N=36 17-22-28 N=50 36-50/6" 50/6" R NE ENG E E R I N G EST:1972 a a c M N 01 L � a µ a, «. Ew z o J dE V c uyi c m y =v U Eoa W a ULL-PL-PI 2 rn M y 4.5+ 17 4.5+ 91 62-20-42 16 7.6 102 10 8 7 15 17 Plate A.33 Log B-31 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Bock 1, Lot 3 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.744620 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50232° W End of Day Not Measured a $ o �' �o a - a E a - Stratum Description _o 1° M lL a iL Approximate Surface Elevation = 834.0 feet 3 O to zM FAT CLAY (CH) - brown - light brown 5 10—/// J/ 10OZ401 light grayish brown — 15r 2A 814.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 821.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 13.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are aonroximate: in situ. transitions may be gradual. � c N L M � N Gty.. (.y c N C o M 3 L a° E Z E �_ U d U) •�., C C Q w _ C = C a c c9a My e d a U IL IX a in LL-PL-PI 2 u3i M U 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 7 4.5+ 9 4.5+ 9 4.5+ 86 51-23-28 26 0.5 99 4.5+ 21 Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.34 Log B-32 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Fort Worth, TX, Texas Block 1, Lot 7 Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745050 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.502310 W End of Day Not Measured o v co a. a E a Stratum Description z o CO V�i E b� w a Approximate Surface Elevation = 820.0 feet O rn % FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand 1c 1E 2G - light brown 808.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 800.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 819.5 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.5 Feet Cut 50/1 " 50/'/2" 50/%" 50/'Y2" R NE- E N G E E R es'r: 1072 V- \ n - o r a �• w o o v o 0 d Z ;E U we cfl Q _ 0n a W a to LL-PL-PI 2 U)c � U 4.5+ 13 4.5+ 15 4.5+ 81 63-19-44 14 4.9 94 4.5+ 22 9 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.35 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-33 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 1, Lot 11 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745400 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-15-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50269° W End of Day Not Measured p F c N > ;c U c E a° Y Stratum Description J L o N N �a to a. Approximate Surface Elevation = 813.0 feet O rn FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 5 1 C LIMESTONE - gray 15-=i � 793.0 2C Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 819.3 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.3 Feet Fill 50/1 %,, 50/1 %" 50/%" 50/'/z' 50/'%' 50/'/2" 50/'/2" 50/'Y2" 9GI OF EST: 19V o y- \, CL ti c a O � L O QI y N � in EZ C m C � o dE V 3 00 r CL :! m vi of M a tq LL-PL-PI i rq G U 4.5+ 17 4.5+ 87 53-22-31 12 1.1 88 6 6 6 Matedal boundaries are approximate; in situ. transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.36 Log B-34 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 1, Lot 13 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745390 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.503320 W End of Day Not Measured n c >. $ c n. a o E a > Stratum Description o A UJI Approximate Surface Elevation = 818.0 feet 90 to LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown, with sand - light brown, with sand 806.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 2C -�'w 798.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 820.3 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.3 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate: in situ, transitions may be aradual. Driller: CoreCo 50111/2" 50/%" 501" 50/" �— :qENGG NE E R I N G r �r:.It�rz o '\„ �- a c y o. Ww m N O y� C 0) G -O._ o` E Z E U d c uNi 2 = C � J Q � � C O. d = UE cc°d o. NW o o n a 0 LL-PL-PI 2 to c i 4.5+ 16 4.5+ 16 4.5+ 15 113 7,080 4.5+ 75 46-17-29 15 4.5+ 78 39-14-25 13 0.1 121 6 10 Plate A.37 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-35 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard R NE- LatitudeONG Water Level Observations (feet) Block 1, Lot 17 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Date E IN E 32.745370 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-22 e u r: 1 0 1 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50403° W End of Day Not Measured a N w c n. En v a 11� N V1 C C >N p O- y N O O o f c > t� z w E °' Stratum Description z a aai N E i a d o °° 0> a 0 E to w a a w a1°i m .� 0 3 Z' c o Approximate Surface Elevation = 828.0 feet 3 O v) o. a o. rn LL-FL-PI 2 to o U — FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand 4.5+ 75 62-25-37 13 7.1 115 3.00 9 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/3" 5— — 50/21/4" 10 50/2Y9 1 50/2" 50/2" 11 15 50/1 " 812.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/3/<" 5 2C � 808.0 50/'/z' Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 824.2 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.8 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate: in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.38 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. - B-36 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard R 9�NG Block 1, Lot 21 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E N G E 32.745940 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-22 ; r: t o 7 2. Longitude At Completion Not Observed o 97.50429a W End of Day Not Measured a N o ~ c >" Eoi z o� a E a Stratum Description J Z c w a w e a p N E a>i +3 vroi F- c m ai > rn d = u E to w ro.0 a vat rov 0 3 Z' co Approximate Surface Elevation = 837.0 feet 9 O to a tr a to LL-PL-PI 2 rn t7 D U FAT CLAY (CH) - brown N 1 i 2u 4.5+ 88 61-23-38 15 1.3 94 LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown, limestone fragments 50/51/2" 9 1.00 94 47-17-30 10 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/4%" 13 I Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 830.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.6 Feet Cut 50/3" 50/21/a" 8 50/1'/2" 11 50/'/a" 11 Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.39 Log B-37 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 1, Lot 25 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746540 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50422° W End of Day Not Measured ° -° F c > or- a U E ° ° >. m Stratum Description � Z a ❑ rn w . o a rn Approximate Surface Elevation = 832.0 feet 9 O to FAT CLAY (CH) - brown -% 1828.0 J/ WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/2'/2" 5 — 50/2" 0 816.0 LIMESTONE - gray __ 2C � 812.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 828.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.6 Feet Cut 50/1 %" 50/1" 50/2%" 50/2'/," 50/3/a" 50/%" R OFE N G E t:sr. tar e C a N c a o rn t c c vy— N m Ew Z° �E U CD0 J N O` - _ ❑ ° cm vi> v uE d a � a in LL-PL-PI 2 rn ❑ = 0 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 93 64-20-44 15 10 12 10 5 Material boundaries are approximate: In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.40 Log B-38 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 1, Lot 29 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746560 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-174 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.503490 W End of Day Not Measured n o �' $ �oa a E a - Description Stratum E o to w Approximate Surface Elevation = 818.0 feet 3 O U) AM FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 5 1C WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan I LIMESTONE - gray 15—=— S _ Z 20 � � 798.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 821.1 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.1 Feet Fill 50/1" 50/'Y2" 50/'Y2" 50/'/2" qGG OF EST: 1972 o w c y r - a N o C E 0 v ,�, C o N Z � J N C N OO1 �o M o D a A o f a& a N to aLL-PL-PI 2 3 v 4.5+ 9 4.5+ 97 63-24-39 17 12.2 108 4.5+ 16 11 8 Material boundaries are aporoximate: In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.41 Log B-39 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 1, Lot 33 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746580 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50283° W End of Day Not Measured _ a G H C N r > O U a E a = Stratum Description �° 1+ N w N O m � a rM Approximate Surface Elevation = 811.0 feet 3,0 W LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown An n 5 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan LIMESTONE - gray I Z S— =i 15—= Z n i i 2C 791.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 812.1 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.1 Feet Fill 45-50/5'/2' 50/2" 50/1 Y<" 50/'/a" 50/'/a" 50/'/z' 50/'/a" 50/Y<" 50/'/" R ENGiEOERING o C 0 0l c �; a t � a W N 0 Gl —in C C E� Z E V 61 c ai o c= J Q o c a cm N v o of u�i> m a� a(n LL-PL-PI 2 rn 0 � t i 4.5+ 88 38-22-16 10 0.5 91 3 4 5 8 7 Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.42 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-40 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard R OF Block 1, Lot 37 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E N G E 32.746600 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-22 e S r: 'I o.r> Longitude At Completion Not Observed \ 6 97.502000 W End of Day Not Measured Y 0. - cX a N y N o c a E c Stratum Description E ~ c °' a J g L L c L rn E > °' v O rn > y d 0 E rM W ro� a ww my O 3 Z' co Approximate Surface Elevation = 802.0 feet 3 O rn a IY a a) LL-PL-PI to G M U —000r, FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 4.50 19 5 i i 783.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/Ya" i 2C T 782.0 50/'/a" 8 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 806.1 Feet SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 4.50 16 4.50 71 50-20-30 11 0.4 110 4.50 66 36-15-21 11 122 10,840 20-50/3" 8 50/'/z' 50/'//6 Approximate Grading = 4.1 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; In situ. transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.43 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B,41 22-2Westpoint Park / Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard R ONG Block 1, Lot 41 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E N G E 32.747120 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-22 a T: 1 12 Longitude At Completion Not Observed o u 97.50204° W End of Day Not Measured c c 0. a 0 QI C a c ILwy a iu 00 H C > w U E— z a E c Stratum Description ` z ~ E °' o a) ° 'rn a) N —y M 5E G to w .0 a W W M .d 0 3 �` c o Approximate Surface Elevation = 796.0 feet 3 O c0 a W a 0 LL-FL-PI M rn 0 M V �/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown, with sand J / 4.50 28 5 j— 15 781.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 2C t*776.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 797.7 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.7 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; in situ. transitions may be Gradual. 14-10-12 N=22 50/'/2" 50/'/a" 4.50 21 3.50 21 4.50 80 45-14-31 11 4.1 122 4.50 7 13 5 Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.44 Log B-42 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 1, Lot 45 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.747660 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-17-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50207' W End of Day Not Measured _ d H c N G d >r U Ya Y � Stratum Description r� ,a O N w o F- 05 a. Approximate Surface Elevation = 794.0 feet 3 O 0 — z FAT CLAY (CH) - brown G� 786.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) -light brown, with sand 1 _ 4/z, 779.0 1 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan t 774.0 2 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 793.7 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.3 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 50/Yi' 50/%" 9GE 9�NG a w O CI L a N yC Spen L G ,e ._w O E Z 0 m o o = ar w _ co, cro u�i> d SE a (L a.. in LL-PL-PI 2 In In =) U 4.50 20 4.50 20 4.50 23 4.50 96 73-22-51 23 4.50 81 44-17-27 23 0.2 109 4.50 14 Plate A.45 Log B-43 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 2, Lot 58 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.747390 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50100a W End of Day Not Measured o t. c do a >; U a E a- Stratum Description ` z o p cn a>i m M H w Approximate Surface Elevation = 806.0 feet O ran SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown, calcareous / nodules j 5—% 800.0 / WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan E ` 1 �40791.0 LIMESTONE - gray I = I T 786.0 2C Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 813.2 Feet Approximate Grading = 7.2 Feet Fill Material boundaries are aporoximate: in situ, transitions may be aradual. Driller: CoreCo 29-5012" 50/2'/z' 50/2'/2" 50/'/s" 50/'/a" 50/'/a" 50/'/a" 9GE O�NG L � 4 : 1'9f't 0 CL 0 c a w t C1 N W t�l C 2 C ww z y.E v v'w ECL c c� Q o c � d— c� c uNi(D c ar of a lY a Un LL-FL-PI N N o M U 3.25 17 4.5+ 77 46-22-24 15 1.2 112 4.5+ 13 56 35-18-17 10 8 6 5 Plate A.46 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-44 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 2, Lot 62 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746900 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.500680 W End of Day Not Measured a $ o F c �c a >y U ° Stratum Description � E a) rn E G w w d o N .0 Approximate Surface Elevation = 820.0 feet O (n LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown, with sand l WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 5 1 C -j1810.0 —L LIMESTONE - gray S i 15—= S � 800.0 2C Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 822.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill 50/4" 50/'/a" 50/'/a" 50/t/1' 50/1/a" 50/'/a" 50/'/<" 9 R ENGG NE EST: 1972 o �- '\ o• w c 0 ;; a oI ,r N y ul C 0) C d. � w c o E z dE y cIn Vs w°I Q N - M oa c m w> a o f a W IL CO LL-PL-PI 2 to o � U 4.5+ 73 47-22-25 10 4.5+ 5 4 5 9 5 Material boundaries are approximate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.47 Log Project No. B-45 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard qNG 9�NG Block 2, Lot 63 Fort Worth, TX, TexasLatitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746630 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 5 97.50047° W End of Day Not Measured c °. N o E, CL c a w w c of c c c o '.3 L°E vw CL E o b Stratum Description Z ~ c a J ; o p to E CL w °=u01i F— CM w> ur v = c°�E to w Approximate Surface Elevation = 823.0 feet O fail CL � eL v� LL-PL-PI i (n G � 0 �// SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.00 29 49-19-30 3 �� 40-25-21 3 N=46 818.0 5 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/3/<" 3 50/'/a" 5 1 _ 50/'/a" 812.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/3/," 1 J 50/Y4' S n i i 50/%" i 20 T 803.0 50/Ya" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 825.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.4 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.48 Log Project No. B-46 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard 9GE OF Block 2, Lot 67 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746630 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-22 EST: 1972 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50095° W End of Day Not Measured a m o °t r a G1 N y N yw �❑d-+ �N�° (L �NDte° N0 -6 >tp a+ z Z JC —3 �3❑ 'cO 'Cu O"aEm StDescription 7 °E y ° m0 c .0 a 5)ai M0 ow Approximate Surface Elevation = 807.0 feet O v0 a 0: a cn LL-PL-PI 2 rn ❑ ❑ 0 �z SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.5+ 77 47-21-26 11 17-12-12 68 30-18-12 7 N=24 5 802.0 1 N 34 4 16 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan 50/Yz' 8 50/'/4" 10— — 50/'/° 6 796.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/'/4" 1 v 50/'/a" 6 i n i — E 50/�/a" i 2C T 787.0 50/'/a" 5 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 815.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; in situ. transitions may be qradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.49 Log B-47 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 5, Lot 34 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746250 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50050° W End of Day Not Measured $ o d o w E w Stratum Description z o to E y o a W w Approximate Surface Elevation = 825.0 feet O N loor' FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown, limestone fragments 5 10- - reddish brown, calcareous nodules 814.0 LIMESTONE - gray S S r = T i 805.0 2c Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 828.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Fill 38-5'/2" 50/'/z , 50/1/a" 50P/a" 50/1/a" qGi 9�NG EST: 10%'r V.. w a c N o �) W W C 2 D — z � V c ai m m o� o = d G. d — o cm ,nv `� d uE a IX a iA LL-PL-PI 2 rn o M L) 4.5+ 5 4.5+ 95 67-24-43 16 7.1 100 4.5+ 12 8 4.5+ 27 6 27 Material boundaries are aporoximate; In situ, transitions may be Gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.50 Log B-48 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Block 5, Lot 37 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.74619' N While Drilling Not Observed 5-164 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.501190 W End of Day Not Measured $ G >, N W O a a 2 = Stratum Description Z o p 0) E v l— y W Approximate Surface Elevation = 807.0 feet O vi LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 5 1 C' 797.0 1 LIMESTONE - gray S c i 15— = i i i n i i 787.0 2C 7ro Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 814.3 Feet Approximate Grading = 7.3 Feet Fill Material boundaries are aooroArnate: In situ. transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo 19-16-32 N=48 19-50/1'/2" 50/3/:' 50P/2" 50/'/a" 50/'/a" 50/'/" 50/'/a" 9 R NE_ NG t_ 3 1: 19%2 o y- a a o rn _ °' N E C -2-. III C y. �+� Vl C a •— °� U c uNi 2 �Pm M> aEca �[L W in LL-PL-PI 2 (nn v 4.5+ 85 49-24-25 4 4.5+ 54 26-17-9 4 8 12 7 6 6 Plate A.51 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-49 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 5, Lot 31 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745830 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50081 ° W End of Day Not Measured a $ o P c N > ° a. a E a Stratum Description J z o rn E a�i °= n to w Approximate Surface Elevation = 817.0 feet 0 vai /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown t 0 1.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan )5.0 LIMESTONE - gray T 15—=� Z S 20-- i 797.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 826.9 Feet Approximate Grading = 9.9 Feet Fill 50/4" 50/Y4" 50/Y4" 50/Y4" 50/'/2" 50/'/a" 50/'/a" _9GE O�NG a U c 0 o. of ;; c � N 2-5 ly. �+ Ew z° v E v 3 c N _! Ecm U)iU a)a Y a n LL-PL-PI M n a M L 4.5+ 13 4.5+ 95 57-21-36 12 3.4 101 4.5+ 4 ib 5 5 Material boundaries are approx mate; in situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.52 Log B-50 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Fort Worth, TX, Texas Block 5, Lot 27 Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745850 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50149° W End of Day Not Measured c �o a a E a b Stratum Description -J z o u, N E O > w d N tL Approximate Surface Elevation = 802.0 feet 3 O rn /M FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown E 0 E SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan i LIMESTONE - gray _Z 2C = 782.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 819.7 Feet Approximate Grading = 17.7 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/1'/," 50/Y4" 50/1" 50/'/i' 50/%" 50/3/a" 9R OETNG E N G E EST: 1072 w c a � N L N = O7 c G1 w cO1 O7 a - o w 5 5 Q w _ c c a c m u�i> �' = 5 E iL a in LL-PL-PI v3i o v 4.5+ 13 4.5+ 16 4.5+ 16 4.5+ 67 37-15-22 11 1.0 117 8 8 Plate A.53 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log B-51 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 5, Lot 25 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745840 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50205° W End of Day Not Measured a o ~ c En E a >— v a= L.E Stratum Description �a M� a r w Approximate Surface Elevation = 806.0 feet 9 O cn FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 5- 1C-4 1 0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 788.0 LIMESTONE - gray 2C 786.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 817.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 11.4 Feet Fill 50/1'/a" 50/3/a" 50/1" 50/'/z' 50/%" 50/'Y2" RONGE N G E o � 0 of w r M 2 G v� vw z �E i� dw m C N .• •— y _ C a c m vNi y m o f a.. t m in LL-PL-PI i to inM U 4.5+ 19 4.5+ 21 4.5+ 90 75-27-48 20 2.4 95 4.5+ 17 d 7 Material boundaries are awroMmate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.54 Log B-52 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Block 5, Lot 4 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746190 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50238° W End of Day Not Measured _ a O C c a > r 5, M Stratum Description z d a d d o a tEn w iL Approximate Surface Elevation = 807.0 feet O rn /M FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 1 0 LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown, with sand .0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan .0 LIMESTONE - gray 2C 787.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 808.1 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.1 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate; in situ. transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo 50/1" 50/%" 50/3/a" 5OP/a" R NE E N G E E R I N G 2 EST: 1072. o � a N c a O m W L -Q.. N N C M C d � o 'v a o E Z g, E U c v, J c m wQ e Cd > o f a o va W tLL-PL-PI 2 tn o 4.5+ 23 4.5+ 20 4.5+ 15 4.5+ 14 4.5+ 80 46-16-30 15 0.2 102 7 9 Plate A.55 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-53 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard R ONG Block 5, Lot 21 Fort Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E N G E 32.745820 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-22 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50270° W End of Day Not Measured o ° a o rn ;; t G! V1 y N N 4 C 01 C .n � o a>i = H E Z E a c u�i c a ,� Stratum Description ` Z `o c= w p rn E w �:(n F- cA vyi� �' v = 0E W w a a dv m4) 0 3 Z` co Approximate Surface Elevation = 811.0 feet 3 O to a IY a CO LL-PL-PI 2 to G L) FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand 4.5+ 21 4.5+ 81 61-2140 18 2.8 94 807.0 or 10 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/1" 5 50/%" 5— — 50/1" 1 50/'/z " 9 50/1 " 7 1, 50 /Yz' 794.0 LIMESTONE - gray _Z i 50/'/a" 2C = 791.0 50/1/2' Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 818.4 Feet Approximate Grading = 7.4 Feet Fill Material boundaries are aooroximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.56 Log B-54 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park Boring Location 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Bock 5, Lot 8 Fora Worth, TX, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.746160 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.503040 W End of Day Not Measured a t a > Y U a a .. Stratum Description ` z L. o S) o ~- eM Approximate Surface Elevation = 815.0 feet 3 O (n SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown F il 1.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 12.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1 I = Z ' S 20 = 795.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 814.2 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.8 Feet Cut gGi 9�NG 2 t ST: 1972 v c a o d t N �' W C t� C a d.. vw o WE _ o w o c E Z ar9 y cvi J wr �a w — o cm N� `� d uE a W a(0 LL-PL-PI 2 N C U 4.5+ 17 4.5+ 63 38-20-18 9 3.0 50/1 " 50/Yz5 50/%" 50/'/z' 50/'/z' 501Y2" 50/Yz' 50/Y," 6 5 102 Material boundaries are approximate: In situ. transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.57 Log B-55 Project No. 22-26481 Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Boring Location Fort Worth, TX, Texas Block 5, Lot 17 Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.745820 N While Drilling Not Observed 5-16-2 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.50337e W End of Day Not Measured C C w o a a E a Stratum Description z o G rn n to w IL Approximate Surface Elevation = 820.0 feet 3 O to LEAN CLAY (CL) -brown 4"/' u 4.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan )7.0 LIMESTONE - gray 13 Z S—i 2C = 800.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 822.3 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.3 Feet Fill 12-12-50/5'/2" 5013/4" 50/%" 50/3/4 50//2' 50/%" 50/'/2" R ONGE N G E LFT: 1972 e "" w a w c a 0 of ;: r Ey z vE v crNN� l71 - I = N o e a C. c m w> o v u E a W a in LL-PL-PI 2 (n a = U 4.5+ 11 4.5+ 86 35-21-14 6 1.0 74 9 5 5 Material boundaries are approximate; In situ, transitions may be gradual. Driller: CoreCo Plate A.58 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers SOIL OR ROCK TYPES �''��►�''� Undocumented Fill r//A Lean Clay (CL) Gravelly Lean Clay (CL) KIIA Fat Clay (CH) ° Gravelly Fat Clay (CH) Clayey Gravel (GC) Silt (ML) Poorly -Graded Sand (SP) Well -Graded Sand Clayey Sand (SC) vVov Well -Graded Gravel �— Marl ...... Weathered Shale Shale RNE(SW) E N G EERI NG ear: I ; %7 DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS (GW) i . I X_ Shelby Split Texas Tube Spoon Cone Pen / Weathered Limestone I I I I I i I Limestone I I I I I I CFA HSA HRock Core TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY, CONDITION, AND STRUCTURE OF SOIL Fine Grained Soils (More than 50% Passing No. 200 Sieve) Consistency Penetrometer Reading, (tsf) Very Soft < 0.5 Soft 0.5 to 1.0 Firm 1.0 to 2.0 Hard 2.0 to 4.0 Very Hard > 4.0 Coarse Grained Soils (More than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve) Penetration Resistance (Blows / Foot) 0to4 4to10 10 to 30 30 to 50 Over 50 Soil Structure Calcareous Slickensided Laminated Fissured Interbedded Descriptive Item Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Unconfined Compression, (psf) < 1000 1000 to 2000 2000 to 4000 4000 to 8000 > 8000 Relative Density 0 to 20% 20 to 40% 40 to 70% 70 to 90% 90 to 100% Contains appreciable deposits of calcium carbonate; generally nodular Having inclined planes of weakness that ate slick and glossy in appearance Composed of thin layers of varying color or texture Containing cracks, sometimes filled with fine sand or silt Composed of alternated layers of different soil types, usually in approximately equal proportions TERMS DESCRIBING PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ROCK Hardness and Degree of Cementation Very Soft or Plastic Can be remolded in hand; corresponds in consistency up to hard in soils Soft Can be scratched with fingernail Moderately Hard Can be scratched easily with knife; cannot be scratched with fingernail Hard Difficult to scratch with knife Very Hard Cannot be scratched with knife Poorly Cemented or Friable Easily crumbled Cemented Bound together by chemically precipitated material; Quartz, calcite, dolomite, siderite, and iron oxide are common cementing materials. Degree of Weathering Unweathered Rock in its natural state before being exposed to atmospheric agents Slightly Weathered Noted predominantly by color change with no disintegrated zones Weathered Complete color change with zones of slightly decomposed rock Extremely Weathered Complete color change with consistency, texture, and general appearance approaching soil KEY TO CLASSIFICATION AND SYMBOLS PLATE A.59 N N a� UN ) 0 0 N O Z C/) c a) a) .c ro 0 T I (� ° •c M ro U E a) t O r c ro O a) a) C0 0 0 N Grp. Typical Names Laboratory Classification Major Divisions Sym. Criteria 9GEOF Well graded gravels, 2 GW gravel -sand mixtures, N (n ` o little or no fines Dfio IDan�z c 0)e c C=---- greater than 4: C------ between 1 and 3 U °= O C �p N �o DXDso 10 .N M ° Poorly graded gravels, m > > U _ GP gravel -sand mixtures, N o Not meeting all gradation requirements N a) little or no fines 0 cn for GW > N (n a) N O o Silty gravels, gravel - 'N o- v W co Liquid and Plastic limits Liquid and plastic Z � a GM sand - silt mixtures ° N 2 � 2 — below "A" line or P.I. limits plotting in a) o Cn U greater than 4 hatched zone ro � •— 4— ° ro N between 4 and 7 m c CL Clayey gravels, gravel a) z 2= Liquid and Plastic limits are borderline %o > Q o GC - sand - clay mixtures E r_ o O P = above "A" line with P.I. cases requiring use ro .� 0 ro mbols of dual symbols greater than 7 y (n a SW Well graded sands, m i� cn o c ^ -No c raVell sands little or gravelly ' c .o ro : C C = -- greater than 6: C = -- --- between 1 and 3 U O a) tp •N C 4= M o no fines ro v 40 D X D R. ro cn ° c o m c o a (D ° a) Poorly graded sands, ° c ° ° m Not meeting all gradation requirements Zn cn U � SP gravelly sands, little or ,� N o P for SW cn o 6 J .. no fines o) a) � N Silty sands, sand silt M m 3 a a) aN a) c m Liquid and Plastic limits Liquid and plastic m c ° SM mixtures o N s ° below A line or P.I. limits plotting ro 'V _O a C: Cco "- `y less than 4 between 4 and 7 a ° m to N ° ° are borderline °`o E � a o Clayey sands, sand — � in —1 2 m Liquid and Plastic limits cases requiring use E m Q S SC clay mixtures a)aa) a) a above "A" line with P.I. of dual symbols ro o o m greater than 7 Inorganic silts and very fine ML sands, rock flour, silty or 5, (n clayey fine sands, or clayey 60 ro T ,-. silts with slight plasticity - E � Inorganic clays of low to . -0 m CL medium plasticity, gravelly M ( 5 :2 clays, sandy clays, silty 50 = clays, and lean clays ,Cr c) v Organic silts and organic OL silty clays of low plasticity 40 0 z Inorganic silts, micaceous L MH or diatomaceous fine sandy F 30 U ro or silty soils, elastic silts U) a ^ U tmo o = LO CH Inorganic clays of high 20 plasticity, fat clays co av Organic clays of medium to 10 OH high plasticity, organic silts 0 >, � u) � Peat and other highly 2 m '0 Pt organic soils O 14 \\; ,\" bt -ML, \/ 0 10 20 ML and UL 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY CHART UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM PLATE A.60 /R NE E N G E E R I N G ,.. -i ,,,i.. SWELL TEST RESULTS Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Fort Worth, Texas Rone Project Number: 22-26481 Depth Liquid Plastic Plasticity Initial Final Load Swell Boring (ft) Limit Limit Index MC (/o) MC (/a) (psf) ( /o) B-1 7 57 16 41 3 22 875 0.0 B-2 5 51 18 33 12 24 625 0.0 B-3 1 62 23 39 13 24 125 8.9 B-4 1 55 22 33 14 28 125 10.0 B-5 3 69 22 46 22 26 375 2.0 B-6 7 53 22 31 17 26 875 14.0 B-7 1 58 25 33 15 24 125 9.3 B-8 1 -- -- -- 18 24 125 6.6 B-9 5 75 27 47 17 31 625 0.0 B-10 5 50 22 28 12 24 625 3.4 B-11 3 -- -- -- 22 26 375 1.0 B-11 9 58 20 38 20 24 1125 3.1 B-12 7 67 23 45 23 27 875 3.4 B-14 1 58 23 34 18 31 125 0.0 B-16 3 59 23 35 16 26 375 1.5 B-17 5 36 16 20 11 25 625 2.7 B-18 5 55 19 36 10 19 625 4.0 B-19 7 -- -- -- 19 26 875 2.3 B-20 7 39 16 23 12 19 875 2.3 B-21 9 58 20 39 17 24 1125 5.3 B-22 7 72 19 53 18 25 875 5.1 B-23 5 51 18 32 20 32 625 0.5 B-24 3 58 20 38 13 29 375 2.1 B-25 5 47 18 29 11 23 625 2.4 B-26 1 64 29 35 15 45 125 2.4 B-27 3 46 15 32 16 26 375 8.9 B-28 5 69 20 49 10 17 625 11.2 Plate A.61 a Depth Liquid Plastic Plasticity Initial Final Load Swell Boring (ft) Limit Limit Index MC (/o) MC (/o) (psf) ( /o) B-29 3 55 16 39 13 24 375 7.9 B-30 3 62 20 43 18 26 375 7.6 B-31 14 51 23 28 24 28 1750 0.5 B-32 7 63 19 43 23 31 875 4.9 B-33 3 53 22 31 14 31 375 1.1 B-34 9 39 14 25 15 17 1125 0.1 B-35 1 62 25 38 12 24 125 7.1 B-36 1 61 23 37 16 31 125 1.3 B-38 3 63 24 39 13 25 375 12.2 B-39 1 38 22 17 13 31 125 0.5 B-40 5 50 20 30 12 16 625 0.4 B-41 7 45 14 31 11 16 875 4.1 B-42 9 44 17 27 21 24 1125 0.2 B-43 3 46 22 24 15 19 375 1.2 B-47 3 67 24 43 23 36 375 7.1 B-49 3 57 21 36 13 24 375 3.4 B-50 7 37 15 22 13 18 875 1.0 B-51 5 75 27 49 17 27 625 2.4 B-52 9 46 16 30 19 25 1125 0.2 B-53 3 61 21 40 18 30 375 2.8 B-54 3 38 20 17 8 22 375 3.0 B-55 5 35 21 14 18 43 625 1.0 Plate A.61 b R NE E N G EERING EST: 1972 SOLUBLE SULFATE TEST RESULTS Westpoint Park 2001 Chapel Creek Boulevard Fort Worth, TX, Texas Rone Project Number: 22-26481 Boring Depth (feet) Sulfates (ppm) B-2 0-2 <100 B-18 2-4 <100 B-31 0-2 <100 B-35 2-4 <100 B-37 2-4 <100 B-42 4-6 <100 B-45 2-3.5 260 B-55 2-4 <100 Plate A.62 R E N G !F N11E Swell Pressure Test Project Name Westpoint Park Test End Date June 10, 2022 Project No. 22-26481 Reviewed By C. Torrance Description 0 USCS CH Initial Final Boring No. B-1 Moisture Content, (%) 18.1 22.4 Depth, (ft) 6-8' Penetrometer, (tsf) 4.50 4.00 Percent Swell, in -situ 0.0% Dry Unit Weight, (pcf) 107.8 104.0 Liquid Limit 57 Saturation, (%) 91.8 102.7 Plasticity Index 40 Void Ratio, (e) 0.516 0.572 Passing No. 200, (%) 82 Specific Volume, (V) 1.52 1.57 Specific Gravity, (Gs) 2.62 Restraining Pressure, (psf) 2,533 875 100.00% — - ---- - -- --- -- 3,000 90.00% - - — — —I— 1 80.00% — -- ..: _ _ 2,500 ! Restraining Pressure returned to in -situ state 70.00% — — -- -- — — — at this time 2,000 a 60.00% — -- — -- -- -- ` W in 50.00% — • — — — --- -- — N N v — 1,500 IL o c v 40.00% — — — — — — — -- — — — ' .._ _. ...,.... .. _. .. .... - 1,000 In 30.00% — - 20.00% — - -- - -- -- — - -- -- - _ 500 10.00% - — — --- I — — 0.00% 0 W_�i—r; 0 5 10 15 30 60 120 180 240 300 360 1,440 2,880 4,320 5,760 7,200 1.580 1.570 1.560 5- 1.550 E 1.540 0 1.530 1.520 vai 1.510 1.500 i 1.490 1.480 Time (mins) Time vs. Vertical Swell - A- Time vs. Restraining Pressure •1/ 18.1 Moisture Content (%) 1 22.4 Plate A.63a R NE EN° EEIIING E BT: IB/2 Project Name Westpoint Park Project No. 22-26481 Description 0 USCS CH Boring No. B-16 Depth, (ft) 2-4' Percent Swell, in -situ 1.5% Liquid Limit 59 Plasticity Index 35 Passing No. 200, (%) #DIV/0! Specific Gravity, (G,$) 2.67 Swell Pressure Test Test End Date June 12, 2022 Reviewed By C.Torrance Initial Final Moisture Content, (%) 16.0 26.3 Penetrometer, (tsf) 4.5+ 4.50 Dry Unit Weight, (pcf) 111.4 102.4 Saturation, (%) 86.3 111.9 Void Ratio, (e) 0.495 0.628 Specific Volume, (v) 1.50 1.63 Restraining Pressure, (psf) 2,533 375 1.60% — — 3,000 1.40% — — -- ---- _.. ........ ............. ..... . W. ._ �.... - - - 00 -A- - 1.20% — Restraining Pressure returned to in -situ state ....• at this time 2,000 a 1.00% — •— • 1 � 1 W � •• 1 d U, 0.80% I— "A -- -- — —I — -- 1,500 a.. rn 'C 1 c j 0.60% — A-,— — ---- -- — � 11000 � 0.40% -- -- -- - - • 1 • 1 500 0.20% :.... .:.......... ...._ .. ..._. _.. ..... o.00% -1 6 — 1 0 1 = I r yJY. I I I 0 0 5 10 15 30 60 120 180 240 300 360 1,440 2,880 4,320 6,760 7,200 Time (mins) +Time vs. Vertical Swell - •A- Time vs. Restraining Pressure 1.650 1.600 a E 1.550 0 u 1.500 a 1.450 1.400 16.0 Moisture Content (%) 26.3 Plate A.63b 4G E ENCEDING Project Name Westpoint Park Project No. 22-26481 Description 0 USCS CH Boring No. B-51 Depth, (ft) 4-6' Percent Swell, in -situ 2.4% Liquid Limit 75 Plasticity Index 48 Passing No. 200, (%) 90 Specific Gravity, (Gs) 2.70 3.00% 1 --i- 2.50% --I - 0 2.00% - - - N rA 1.50% - - -- U_ W Swell Pressure Test Test End Date July 5, 2022 Reviewed By C. Torrance Initial Final Moisture Content, (%) 17.2 27.0 Penetrometer, (tsf) 4.5+ 4.50 Dry Unit Weight, (pcf) 103.5 95.5 Saturation, (%) 74.0 95.5 Vold Ratio, (e) 0.628 0.764 Specific Volume, (V) 1.63 1.76 Restraining Pressure, (psi') 5,105 625 — — -- -- - — - — -- — 6,000 -- ---- . .� — 5,000 — 1 E Restraining Pressure ; a returned to in -situ stale _ -- 4,000 q • at this time ` -- , -- - -- 3,000 0` Cn • F S > 1.00% - - ��-- -- - - - - -- - r 2,000 ,a � 0.50% -r - ----- - ---- ---- 1,000 0.00 /° - 0 tK oho �60 boo oao 000 <6�ti Time (mins) --*-Time vs. Vertical Swell •• A- Time vs. Restraining Pressure 1.800 1.750 w E 1.700 0 0 1.650 w a 1.600 1.550 17.2 27.0 Moisture Content (%) Plate A.63c 1 — R NE E N fi J E E R I �ti' G U.S. Standard Sieve U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers Hvdrometer N V—O O O O O O (O M M co N 'd' N 100 90 80 70 60 ~� J \ d 50 c ii c 40 d a. 30 20 10 0 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size - mm Legend Sample No Depth, ft % Gravel % Sand %Silt %Clay �r B-1 1 6-8' 3.0 34.3 31.6 31.1 Material Description Grayish Brown CLAY with few calcareous & iron ore nodules. RESULTS OF SIEVE ANALYSIS Westpoint Park Fort Worth, Texas Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. 22-26481 I Plate A.64a R NE L N G L E E R I N G L _1 . , 1 100 90 80 70 r 60 .n 50LL — c c 40 �- 30 -- 20 10 0 — --- 1000 U.S. Standard Sieve U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers N p �' 00 p p p p0 CDCO M c- M M �' N N -7-7- 100 10 1 Grain Size - mm Legend Sample No Depth, ft % Gravel % Sand B-16 2-4' 0.0 3.3 Material Description Olive Black CLAY with few calcareous nodules. Hvdrometer 0.1 0.01 0.001 %Silt I %clay 60.6 36.1 RESULTS OF SIEVE ANALYSIS Westpoint Park Fort Worth, Texas Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. 22-26481 1 Plate A.64b R NE E H G EER1%G 100 •I all L M 60 a 50 c LL c 40 as I- 30 U.S. Standard Sieve U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers Hvdrometer N O W O O O p O f0 M M M N V N ^r�Zn 1 n 20 10 0 1000 100 Legend Sample No Depth, ft --A— I B-51 4-6' 10 1 Grain Size - mm % Gravel I % Sand 0.0 11.0 Material Description CLAY olive black 0.1 0.01 %Silt I %Clay 49.3 39.7 0.001 RESULTS OF SIEVE ANALYSIS Westpoint Park Fort Worth, Texas Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. 22-26481 1 Plate A.64c APPENDIX B RC�N� FIELD EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were defined by 55 sample borings located as shown on the Boring Location Diagram, Plate A.3. The borings were completed at locations staked in the field by Rone personnel. The borings were advanced between sample intervals using continuous flight auger drilling procedures. The results of each boring are shown graphically on the Logs of Boring. Sample depth, description, and soil classification based on the Unified Soil Classification System are shown on the Logs of Boring. Keys to the symbols and terms used on the Logs of Boring are presented in the appendix section of the report. Relatively undisturbed samples of cohesive soils were obtained using nominal 3-inch diameter tube samplers at the locations shown on the Logs of Boring. The tube sampler consists of a steel tube with a sharp cutting edge connected to a head equipped with a ball valve threaded for rod connection. The tube is pushed into the soil by the hydraulic pulldown of the drilling rig. The soil specimens were extruded from the tube in the field, logged, tested for consistency with a hand penetrometer, sealed and packaged to limit loss of moisture. The consistency of cohesive soil samples was evaluated in the field using a calibrated hand penetrometer. In this test, a'/ inch diameter piston is pushed into a relatively undisturbed sample at a constant rate to a depth of approximately'/4 inch. The results of these tests are presented at the respective sample depths on the Logs of Boring. When the capacity of the penetrometer is exceeded, the value is tabulated as 4.5+. Samples of stiff and/or granular materials were obtained using split -barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM D1586. In the split -barrel procedure, a disturbed sample is obtained in a standard 2-inch OD split -barrel sampler driven 18 inches into the ground using a 140-pound hammer falling freely 30 inches. The number of blows for the last 12 inches of the standard 18-inch penetration is recorded as the Standard Penetration Test resistance (N-value). The N-values are recorded on the Logs of Boring at the depth of sampling. The samples were sealed and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. 99 �R NE ENG I tIG The rock and rock -like materials encountered in the borings were evaluated with a modified version of the Texas Cone Penetration test. Texas Department of Transportation (TX -DOT) Test Method Tex-132-E specifies driving a 3-inch diameter cone with a 170-pound hammer freely falling 24 inches. This results in 340 foot-pounds of energy for each hammer blow. This method was modified by utilizing a 140-pound hammer freely falling 30 inches. This results in 350 foot- pounds of energy per blow. In relatively soft materials, the penetrometer cone is driven 1 foot and the number of blows required for each 6-inch penetration is tabulated at the respective test depths as blows-per-6-inches on the log of boring. In hard materials (rock or rock -like), the penetrometer cone is driven and the resulting penetration distances are recorded in inches for the first and second sets of 50 blows, for a total of 100 blows. The penetration for the total 100 blows is recorded at the respective testing depths on the Logs of Boring. Groundwater observations during and at completion of drilling are shown on the Logs of Boring. Upon completion of the borings, the boreholes were backfilled with auger cuttings to ground level. B.1 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples retrieved from the borings to evaluate the engineering characteristics of the subsurface materials, and to provide data for developing engineering design parameters. The subsurface materials recovered during the field exploration were described by an engineering geologist or senior staff member in the field and/or the laboratory, and were later refined based on results of the laboratory tests performed. Classification Tests All recovered soil samples were classified and described, in part, using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Visual classification of soils was verified by index testing, including natural moisture content determinations, Atterberg limits determinations, and gradation tests (percent passing the No. 200 U.S. Standard Sieve). All testing was performed in general accordance with applicable American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedures as follows: Test Atterberg Limits Percentage of Particles Passing the No. 200 Sieve Moisture Content Dry Unit Weight Unconfined Compressive Strength — Soil Swell Test Swell Pressure Hydrometer Swell Test ASTM Standard Number D4318 D1140 D2216 D2167 D2166 D4546, Method B D4546, Method C D7928 In the swell test, a sample is placed in a consolidometer and subjected to the estimated overburden pressure. The sample is then inundated with water and allowed to swell. Moisture contents are determined both before and after completion of the test. Test results are recorded as the percent swell, with initial and final moisture content. Detailed swell test results are tabulated in Appendix A. R NE LNG [Ci N6 Swell Pressure Test The constant volume method of measuring the one-dimensional swelling pressure of undisturbed or remolded specimen can be performed using either fixed or floating rings. The cylindrical specimen is inundated in water, and sample expansion is prevented through the use of a vertical restraining force. The force required to keep sample expansion near zero is measured and recorded. The potential volume change is then measured by allowing the sample to undergo normal one -dimension swelling after the restraining pressure has been removed. Unconfined Compression Strength Test - Soil In the unconfined compression test, a cylindrical specimen is subjected to axial load at a constant rate of strain until failure occurs. Strengths determined by this test are tabulated at their respective sample depths on the Logs of Boring. Results of natural moisture content and dry unit weight determinations are also tabulated at the respective sample depths on the logs. Hydrometer Test A representative sample of the material is thoroughly mixed with water and a dispersing agent, and placed into a cylindrical column of water. A sphygmomanometer is used to measure the decrease in density of the soil/water slurry as soil particles settle out of the mixture. The rate in density change is used to determine the particle size distribution of material finer than the No. 200 sieve. Rone Specification 400 LIME STABILIZATION OF COMPACTED CLAYEY SOILS 1. Description Mix and compact lime and water with in -place, pre -compacted clayey soil in order to construct a lime stabilized subgrade in accordance with this specification and as required by the geotechnical report and site design plans and specifications. 2. Materials 2.1 Lime Furnish hydrated (slaked) lime, commercial lime slurry, quicklime, or carbide lime slurry that meets the requirements of DMS-6350, "Lime and Lime Slurry" and DMS-6330 "Pre - Qualification of Lime Sources." Use Do not use quicklime when sulfates are present in quantities greater than 3,000 ppm. When furnishing quicklime, provide it in bulk. 2.2 Water Furnish potable water free of and wastes and other deleterious or objectionable material. 2.3 In -Place Clay Solis In accordance with Rone's geotechnical report. 2.4 Mix Design Rone will provide the required lime mix percentage in accordance with the geotechnical report. 3. Equipment Furnish equipment in accordance with Item 260 of the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets and Bridges, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). 4. Construction Construct the lime -stabilized subgrade as required by the geotechnical report and design specifications in accordance with the following construction steps. 4.1 In -Place, Pre -Compacted Grades The in -place clay subgrade must be fully compacted using kneading compaction wet -of the optimum moisture contents in construction in full accordance with Rone's compaction control specifications as provided in the geotechnical report or report addendum, and to the lines and grades required in the project plans and specifications. The moisture states of the finished grades shall have been maintained in accordance with the geotechnical report. 4.2 Preparation of the In -Place, Pre -Compacted Grades 5/19/21 Lightly spray the grade surface with water. If visible drying has occurred on the grade surfaces since compaction, spray additional water in those areas as may be needed to establish a Page 1 of 3 B.3 Rone Specification 400 �N E ENG EERING wetted surface and preserve the wet -of -optimum moisture states established during compaction. Allow soak time before scarifying any areas requiring more significant wetting. 4.3 Scarification Use a road mixer to fully scarify and pulverize the in -place grades to the design stabilization depth. The pre -kneaded clays will pulverize to optimal surface area exposure for lime coating and mixing. Spray any scarified soils that appear visibly dry. The scarified depth must appear visibly well pulverized and moist before application of lime. 4.4 Application 5/19/21 Uniformly apply lime using dry or slurry placement as shown on the plans or as directed. Slurry placement is recommended for most efficient hydration and stabilization. Add lime at the required percentage in accordance with the geotechnical report. Apply lime only on areas where mixing can be completed during the same working day. Start lime application only when the air temperature is at least 350F and rising or is at least 40°F. Temperatures must be taken in the shade and away from artificial heat. Lime may not be applied during rainfall. Suspend application when weather conditions become unsuitable. Minimize dust and scattering of lime by wind. Do not apply lime when wind conditions cause blowing lime to become dangerous to traffic or objectionable to adjacent property owners. Use of quicklime can be hazardous. Inform users of the recommended precautions for handling and storage. 4.4.1 Slurry Placement Provide lime slurry free of objectionable materials, at or above the minimum dry solids content, and with a uniform consistency that will allow ease of handling and uniform application. Deliver commercial lime slurry or carbide lime slurry to the jobsite, or use hydrated lime or quicklime to prepare lime slurry at the jobsite or other approved location, as specified. When dry quicklime is applied as slurry, use 80% of the amount required. Distribute the prepared slurry uniformly over measured sections of the scarified grades until the specified lime content is reached. Uniformly spread the residue from quicklime slurry over the length of the section being processed. 4.4.2 Dry Placement Distribute the required quantity of hydrated lime or pebble grade quicklime with approved equipment. Only hydrated lime may be distributed by bag. Do not use a motor grader to spread hydrated lime. Page 2 of 3 B.3 R NE ENG EERING Rone Specification 400 5. Mixing Begin mixing within 2 hours of application. Hydrated lime shall not be exposed to the open air for more than 3 hours. When pebble grade quicklime is placed dry, mixing must be done immediately after application. Mixing must be conducted thoroughly and uniformly using a road mixer. Allow the lime mixture to soak, hydrate and flocculate the pulverized clay soil for at least 4 hours and no more than 24 hours. Add water as needed to maintain a moist condition and prevent excessive drying to support hydration and chemical reaction during and after mixing and prior to compaction. Mixed soils should not be exposed to rain prior to compaction. Mixed soils exposed to rain prior to compaction may require full rework with reapplication of lime and remixing. 6. Compaction After 4 to 24 hours, the mixed layer may be compacted. The mixed lift must be fully and uniformly compacted with a footed compactor wet -of the optimum moisture contents generated during compaction in accordance with the compaction specifications provided in the geotechnical report. The footed compactors must be utilized in static mode, without vibration. Full compaction must occur before any heavy rainfall. 7. Finishing Immediately after completing compaction, blade and smooth roll the surface as needed to establish a smooth surface to the required design lines and grades. Add small amounts of water if and where needed during shaping and rolling. 8. Curing Cure the stabilized subgrade for at least 24 hours and as needed to establish a sturdy working surface before traversing with construction traffic and subsequent construction. Maintain moisture as may be needed during curing. END 5/19/21 Page 3of3 AN APPENDIX C Pnnfnnhninni Cnninnnninn Dnnnnf The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) has prepared this advisory to help you — assumedly a client representative — interpret and apply this geotechnical-engineering report as effectively as possible. In that way, you can benefit from a lowered exposure to problems associated with subsurface conditions at project sites and development of them that, for decades, have been a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. If you have questions or want more information about any of the issues discussed herein, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. Active engagement in GBA exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk -confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Understand the Geotechnical-Engineering Services Provided for this Report Geotechnical-engineering services typically include the planning, collection, interpretation, and analysis of exploratory data from widely spaced borings and/or test pits. Field data are combined with results from laboratory tests of soil and rock samples obtained from field exploration (if applicable), observations made during site reconnaissance, and historical information to form one or more models of the expected subsurface conditions beneath the site. Local geology and alterations of the site surface and subsurface by previous and proposed construction are also important considerations. Geotechnical engineers apply their engineering training, experience, and judgment to adapt the requirements of the prospective project to the subsurface model(s). Estimates are made of the subsurface conditions that will likely be exposed during construction as well as the expected performance of foundations and other structures being planned and/or affected by construction activities. The culmination of these geotechnical-engineering services is typically a geotechnical-engineering report providing the data obtained, a discussion of the subsurface model(s), the engineering and geologic engineering assessments and analyses made, and the recommendations developed to satisfy the given requirements of the project. These reports may be titled investigations, explorations, studies, assessments, or evaluations. Regardless of the title used, the geotechnical-engineering report is an engineering interpretation of the subsurface conditions within the context of the project and does not represent a close examination, systematic inquiry, or thorough investigation of all site and subsurface conditions. Geotechnical-Engineering Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects, and At Specific Times Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs, goals, and risk management preferences of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer 0 will not likely meet the needs of a civil -works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical-engineering study is unique, each geotechnical-engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Likewise, geotechnical-engineering services are performed for a specific project and purpose. For example, it is unlikely that a geotechnical- engineering study for a refrigerated warehouse will be the same as one prepared for a parking garage; and a few borings drilled during a preliminary study to evaluate site feasibility will not be adequate to develop geotechnical design recommendations for the project. Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project or purpose; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, the reliability of a geotechnical-engineering report can be affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying the recommendations in it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis after the passage of time - if any is required at all - could prevent major problems. Read this Report in Full Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical- engineering report did not read the report in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selective elements only. Read and refer to the report in full. You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer About Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project -specific factors when developing the scope of study behind this report and developing the confirmation -dependent recommendations the report conveys. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site's size or shape; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, function or weight of the proposed structure and the desired performance criteria; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project or site changes - even minor ones - and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept M responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. Most of the "Findings" Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site's subsurface using various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing is performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgement to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ — maybe significantly — from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team through project completion to obtain informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. This Report's Recommendations Are Confirmation -Dependent The recommendations included in this report — including any options or alternatives — are confirmation -dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgement and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions exposed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. 7hegeotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation -dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals' misinterpretation of geotechnical- engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a continuing member of the design team, to: • confer with other design -team members; • help develop specifications; • review pertinent elements of other design professionals' plans and specifications; and • be available whenever geotechnical-engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction - phase observations. Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated -subsurface -conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical-engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you've included the material for information purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that "informational purposes" means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This happens in part because soil and rock on project sites are typically heterogeneous and not manufactured materials with well-defined engineering properties like steel and concrete. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations, many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenviron mental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study — e.g., a "phase -one" or "phase -two" environmental site assessment — differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical-engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical-engineering report does not usually provide environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not obtained your own environmental information about the project site, ask your geotechnical consultant for a recommendation on how to find environmental risk -management guidance. Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, the engineer's services were not designed, conducted, or intended to prevent migration of moisture — including water vapor — from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material -performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer's recommendations will two of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building -envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building -envelope or mold specialists. ® GEOPROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ® ASSOCIATION Telephone: 301 /565-2733 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2019 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, In whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBAs specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GSA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any kind. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent CITY OF FORT WORTH FORT WORTH. WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023 IApprovall Spec No. IClasssification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Components 33-39-10 (Rev 2/3/16) I 07/23/97 33 05 13 Urethane Hydrophilic Waterstop Asahi Kogyo K.K. Ariake Ultra -Seal P-201 ASTM 132240/13412/13792 I 04/26/00 33 05 13 Offset Joint for 4' Diam. MH Hanson Concrete Products Drawing No. 35-0048-001 I 04/26/00 33 05 13 Profile Gasket for 4' Diam. MH. Press -Seal Gasket Corp. 250-4G Gasket ASTM C-443/C-361 SS MH I 1126199 33 05 13 HOPE Manhole Adjustment Rings Ladtech, Inc HDPE Adjustment Ring Traffic and Non -traffic area I 5/13105 33 05 13 Manhole Exnmal Wrap Canusa - CPS WrapidSeal Manhole Encapsulation System I Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Fiberelass 33-39-13 (1/8/13) I I 1/26/99 33 39 13 Fiberglass Manhole Fluid Containment, Inc. Flowthe ASTM 3753 Non -traffic area I 08/30/06 I 33 39 13 Fiberglass Manhole L.F. Manufacturing Non -traffic area I Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Rectangular 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16) I33 05 13 IManhole Frames and Covers I Western Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry 1001 24"x40" WD Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16) " 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Western Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry 30024 24" Dia. * 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers McKinley It. Works Inc. A 24 AM 24" Dia. I 08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry R-1272 ASTM A48 & AASHTO M306 24" Dia. I 08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry NF 1274 ASTM A48 & AASHTO M306 30" Dia. I33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Sigma Corporation MH-144N I33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Sigma Corporation MH-143N I 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Pont-A-Mousson GTS-STD 24" dia. I33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Casting 24" dia. I 10/31/06 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers (Hinged) Powerseal Hinged Ductile Iron Manhole ASTM A536 24" Dia. I 7/25/03 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Saint-Gobain Pipelines (Pamrex/rexus) RE32-R8FS 30" Dia. I 01/31/06 3305 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover East Jordan Iron Works V1432-2 and V1483 Designs AASI-17170 M306-04 30" Dia. I 11/02/10 3305 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Sigma Corporation MH165IFWN & MH16502 30" Dia I 07/19/1 t 3305 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Star Pipe Products MR32FTWSS-DC 30" Dia I 08/10/11 3305 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Accucast 220700 Heavy Duty with Gasket Ring 30" Dia 30" ERGO XL Assembly 10/14/13 3305 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover (Hinged & Lockable) East Jordan Iron Works with Cam Lock/MPIC/T-Gasket ASSI-17170 MI 05 & ASTM A536 30" Dia I 06/01/17 3405 13 30" Dia. MH Rine and Cover (Lockable) CI SIP Industries 2280 (32") ASTM A 48 30" Dia. CAP-ONE-30-FTW, Composite, w/ Lack 09/16/19 33 05 13 It 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Composite Access Products, L.P. w/o Hing 30" Dia. 10/07/21 34 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Trumbull Manufacturing 32"(30") Frame and Cover 30" Dia. Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Water Tight & Pressure Tight 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16) * 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Pont-A-Mousson Fortnight 24" Dia. * 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Casting 24" Dia. * 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Western Iron Works,Bass & Hays Foundry 300-24P 24" Dia. * 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers McKinley Iron Works Inc. WPA24AM 24" Dia. 03/08/00 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Accucast RC-2100 ASTM A 48 24" Dia. 04/20/01 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers (SIP)Serampore Industries Private Ltd. 300-24-23.75 Ring and Cover ASTM A 48 24" Dia. Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Precast Concrete Tev 1/8/13) * 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete Hydro Conduit Corn SPL Item-1 ASTM C 478 48" * 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete Wall Concrete Pipe Co. Inc. ASTM C-443 48" 12/0S/23 33 39 10 JManhole, Precast Concrete The Turner Company 72" I.D. Manhole w/ 32" Cone ASTM C 478 72" OS/08/18 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete The Turner Company 48", 60" I.D. Manhole w/ 32" Cone ASTM C 478 48", 60" I 10/27/06 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete Oldcastle Precast Inc. 48" I.D. Manhole w/ 24" Cone ASTM C 478 48" Dian w 24" Rrng I I 06/09/10 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer)Concrete US Composite Pipe Reinforced Polymer Concrete ASTM C-76 48" to 72" I I 09/06/19 33 3920 Manhole, Precast Concrete Forterra Pipe and Precast 60" & 72" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone ASTM C-76 60" & 72" I I 10/07/21 32 39 20 Manhole, Precast Concrete Forterra Pipe and Precast 48" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone ASTM C-77 48" I I 10/07/21 33 3920 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer) Concrete Armorock 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone 48" & 60" I I 10/07/21 33 3920 Manhole, Precast (Hybrid) Polymer & PVC Predl Systems 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone 48" & 60" Non Traffic Areas I ASTM C-478; ASTM C-923; -1/07/23 33 3920 Manhole, Precast Concrete AmeriTex Pipe and Products, LLC 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone ASTM C-443 I 03/07/23 33 3920 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer) Concrete P3 Polymers, Rocklhudscp 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone I I 04/28/07 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer) Concrete Amiteeh USA Meyer Polycrete Pipe I I I I Sewer -(WAC) Wastewater Access Chamber 33 39 40 I I Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Svstems/Cementitious IE1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems Ouadex I 04/23/01 E1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems Standard Cement Materials, Inc. Relmer MSP E1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems AP/M Perma min I 4/20/01 E1-14 Manhole Rehab System Strong Company Strong Seal MS2A Rehab System I 5/12/03 E1-14 Manhole Rehab System (Liner) Triplex Lining System MH repair product to stop infiltration ASTM D5813 I08/30/06 I General Concrete Repair FlexKrete Technologies Vinyl Polyester Repair Product Misc. Use I * From Original Standard Products List 1 FORT WORTH® CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LIST (Approval Spec No. IClasssification I Manufacturer Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Svstems/NonCementitious 05/20/96 E1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems Spravrog, 12/14/01 Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior) ERTECH 01/31/06 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Chesterton 8/28/2006 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Warren Environmental 33 01 16, 33 39 10, 03/19/18 33 39 20 Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior) Sherwin Williams Water & Sewer - Manhole Inserts - Field Onerations Use Only (Rev 2/3/16) * 33 05 13 Manhole Insert Knutson Enterprises * 3305 13 Manhole Insert South Western Packaging * 33 05 13 Manhole Insert Nofiow-Inflow 09/23/96 3305 13 Manhole Insert Southwestem Packing & Seals, Inc. 09/23/96 3305 13 Manhole Insert Southwester[[ Packing & Seals, Inc. Water & Sewer - Pine Casing Spacers 33-05-24 (07/01/13) 11/04/02 Steel Band Casing Spacers Advanced Products and Systems, Inc. 02/02/93 Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Advanced Products and Systems, Inc. 04/22/87 Casing Spacers Cascade Waterworks Manufacturing 09/14/10 Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Pipeline Seal and Insulator 09/14/10 Coated Steel Casin Spacers Pipeline Seal and Insulator 05/10/11 Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Powerseal 03/19/18 Casing Spacers BWM 03/19/18 Casing Spacers BWM 03/29/22 3305 13 Casing Spacers CCI Pipeline Systems Water & Sewer - PiDes/Ductile Iron 33-11-10(1/8/13) Model No. National Spec Spray Wall Polyurethane Coating ASTM D639/D790 Series 20230 and 2100 (Asphatic Emulsion) Arc 791, S1BB, Sl, S2 Acid Resistance Test S-301 and M-301 RR&C Dampproofing Non-Fibered Spray Grade (Asphatic Emulsion) Made to Order - Plastic ASTM D 1248 Made to Order - Plastic ASTM D 1248 Made to Order - Plastic ASTM D 1248 Lifesaver - Stainless Steel TetherLok- Stainless Steel Carbon Steel Spacers, Model SI Stainless Steel Spacer, Model SSI Casing Spacers Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Coated Steel Casin Spacers 4810 Powerchock SS-12 Casing Spacer(Stainless Steel) FB-12 Casing Spacer (Coated Carbon Steel) for Non_tressure Pipe and Grouted Casing CSC12, CSS12 * 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe Griffin Pipe Products, Co. Super Bell-Tite Ductile Iron Pressure Pipe, AW WA C150, C151 08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe American Ductile Iron Pipe Co. American Futile Pipe (Bell Spigot) AW WA C150, C151 08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe American Ductile Iron Pipe Co. American Flex Ring (Restrained Joint) AW WA C150, C151 * 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co. AW WA C150, C151 * 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe McWane Cast Iron Pipe Co. AW WA C150, C151 Water & Sewer - Utility Line Marker (08/24/2018) Sewer - Coatin¢s/Enoxv 33-39-60 (01/08/13) 02/25/02 Epoxy Lining System Sauereisen, Inc SmerGard 21ORS LA County #210-1.33 12/14/01 Epoxy Lining System Enech Technical Coatings Ertech 2030 and 2100 Series 04/14/05 Interior Ductile Iron Pipe Coating Induron Protean 401 ASTM B-117 01/31/06 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Chesterton Arc 791, S1BB, Sl, S2 Acid Resistance Test 8/28/2006 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Warren Environmental S-301 and M-301 Sewer - Coatines/Polvurethane Updated:12/29/2023 Size Structures Only Sewer Applications Sewer Applications For Exterior Coating of Concrete Structures Only For 24" dia. For 24" dia. For 24" dia. For 24" dia. For 24" dia Up to 48" Up to 48" Up to 48" 3" fl m 24" 4" thm 30" 4" thin 30" Ductile Iron Pipe Only Sewer Applications Sewer Applications Sewer - Combination Air Valves 05/25/18 33-31-70 Air Release Valve A.R.I. USA, Inc. D025LTP02(Composite Body) 2" Sewer - Pines/Concrete * E:- Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Wall Concrete Pipe Co. Inc. ASTM C 76 * E I-04 Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Hydro Conduit Corporation Class III T&G, SPL Item #77 ASTM C 76 * E I-04 Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Hanson Concrete Products - - - -, -- ASTM C 76 * E I-04 Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Concrete Pipe & Products Co. Inc. ASTM C 76 Sewer - Pine Enlarement Svstem (Method)33-31-23 (01/18/13) PIM System PIM Corporation Polyethylene PIM CorP.. Piscata WaY, N.J. Approved Previously McConnell Systems McLat Construction Polyethylene Houston, Texas Approved Previously TRS Systems Trenchless Replacement System Polyethylene Calgary, Canada Approved Previously * From Original Standard Products List 2 FORT WORTH® CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023 (Approval Spec No. ]Classsification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size Sewer- PiDe/Fiber0ass Reinforced/33-31-13(1/8/13) 7/21/97 33 31 13 Cent. Cast Fiberglass (FRP) Hobas Pipe USA, Inc. Helios Pipe (Non -Pressure) ASTM D3262/D3754 03/22/10 33 31 13 Fiberglass Pipe (FRP) Ameron Bondstrand RPMP Pipe ASTM D3262/D3754 04/09/21 3331 13 Glass -Fiber Reinforced Polymer Pipe (FRP) Thompson Pipe Group Thompson Pipe (Flowtite) ASTM D3262/D3754 03/07/23 3331 13 Fiberglass Pipe (FRP) Future Pipe Industries Fiberstrong FRP ASTM D3262, ASTM D3681, ASTM D4161, AW WA M45 Sewer - PiDe/Polymer PIDe 4/14/05 Polymer Modified Concrete Pioe Amnech USA Meyer Polwrete Pipe ASTM C33, A276, -17 8" to 102'l It.. V 06/09/10 EI-9 Reinforced Polymer Concrete Pipe US Composite Pipe Reinforced Polymer Concrete Pioe ASTM C-76 Sewer - PiDes/HDPE 33-31-23(1/8/13) * High -density polyethylene pipe Phillips Driswpipe, Inc. Ovticore Ductile Polyethylene Pipe ASTM D 1248 8" * High -density polyethylene pipe Plexco Inc. ASTM D 1248 8" * High -density polyethylene pipe Polly Pipe, Inc. ASTMD 1248 8" High -density Polyethylene pipe CSR Hydro Conduit/Pioelme Systems McConnell Pipe Enlargement ASTM D 1248 Sewer - PiDes/PVC (Pressure Sewer) 33-11-12 (4/1/13) 12/02/11 33-11-13 DR -Id PVC Pressure Pipe Pipelife Jetstream PVC Pressure Pipe AW WA C900 4" thru 12" 10/22/14 33-11-12 DR-14 PVC Pressure Pipe Royal Building Products Royal Seal PVC Pressure Pipe AW WA C900 4" thru 12" Sewer - PiDes/PVC* 33-31-20 (7/1/13), * 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pioe 1-M Manufacturing Co., Inc. (JM Eagle) SDR-211(PS115) ASTM D 3034 4" - 15" 12/23/97* 33-3 Sewer Pioe Diamond Plastics Corporation SDR-26 (PS115) ASTM D 3034 4"PVC 4" thru 15" * 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pioe Lamson Vylm Pipe SDR-26 (PSI 15) ASTM D 3034 4" thru 15" 12/05/23 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pie Vin (tech PVC Pie SDR-26 PS115 ASTM D3034 4" thru 15" 12/05/23 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pie Vin ltech PVC Pie Grovi Sewer PS 115 ASTM F 679 18" * 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PiJje J-M Manufacmrinv�Co, Inc (JM Eagle) PS 115 ASTM F 679 18" - 28" 05/06/05 33-31-20 PVC Solid Wall Pipe Diamond Plastics Corporation PS 115 ASTM F-679 18" to 48" 04/27/06 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Fittings Harco SDR-26 (PS 115) Gasket Finings ASTM D-3034, D-1784, etc 4" - 15" * 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Fittings Plastic Trends, Inc.(Westlak) Gasketed PVC Sewer Main Fittings ASTM D 3034 1 3/19/2018 33 3120 PVC Sewer Pipe Pipelife Jet Stream SDR 26 (PS 115) ASTM F679 18"- 24" 1 3/19/2018 33 3120 PVC Sewer PTe Pipelife Jet Stream SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4"- 11" 1 3/29/2019 33 3120 Gasketed Fittings (PVC) GPK Products, Inc. SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4"- 15" 1 10/21/2020 33 3120 PVC Sewer Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4" - 15" 1 10/22/2020 33 3120 PVC Sewer Pipe Sanderson Pipe Corp. SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4"- 15" 1 10/21/2020 333120 PVC Sewer Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) SDR 26 PS 115 ASTM F-679 18"-36" Sewer - PiDes/Rehab/CIPP 33-31-12 (01/18/131 * Cured in Place Pioe Insituferm Texark, Inc ASTM F 1216 05/03/99 Cured in Place Pioe National Envirotech Group National Liner, (SPL) Item #27 ASF-1216/D-5813 05/29/96 Cured in Place Pipe Remolds Inc/Inlmer Technol" (Inliner USA) Inlmer Technology ASTM F 1216 Sewer - Piues/Rehab/Fold & Form * Fold and Form Pipe Cullum Pipe Systems, hic. 11/03/98 Fold and Form Pipe Insimform Technologies, Inc. Insituform "NuPlpe" ASTM F-1504 Fold and Form Pipe American Pipe & Plastics, Inc. Demo. Purpose Only 12/04/00 Fold and Form Pipe Ultralmer Ultralmer PVC Alloy Pipelmer ASTM F-1504, 1871, 1867 06/09/03 Fold and Form Pipe Miller Pipeline Corp. EX Method ASTM F-1504, F-1947 UP to 18" diameter Sewer - PiDeS/ODen PCoelle Laree Diameter 09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, Ribbed Lamson Vylon Pipe Carlon Vylon H.C. Closed Profile Pipe, ASTM F 679 18" to 48" 09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, Ribbed Extrusion Technologies, Inc. Ultra -Rib Open Profile Sewer Pipe ASTM F 679 18" to 48" E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, Ribbed Up -or ETI Company 11/10/10 (E100-2) Polwropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Double Wall Advanced Drainage Systems (ADS) SaniTite UP Double Wall (Corrugated) ASTM F 2736 24"-30" 11/10/10 (E100-2) Polwropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Triple Wall Advanced Drainage Systems (ADS) SaniTite HP Triple Wall Pipe ASTM F 2764 30" to 60" * From Original Standard Products List 3 CITY OF FORT WORTH FORT WORTH. WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023 (Approval Spec No. IClasssification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size Water - Ammr-enances 33-12-10 (07/01/13) 01/18/18 33-12-10 Double Strap Saddle Romac 202NS Nylon Coated AWWA C800 1"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe 08/28/02 Double Strap Saddle Smith Blau 4317 Nylon Coated Double Strap Saddle 07/23/12 33-12-10 Double Strap Service Saddle Mueller Company DR2S Double (SS) Strap DI Saddle AWWA C800 1"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe 03/07/23 33-12-10 Double Strap Service Saddle Powerseal 3450AS, Incl. Corp. Stop, ON Strap, Stainless NSF ANSI 372 1"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe 10/27/87 Curb Stops -Ball Meter Valves McDonald 6100M,6100MT & 61 OMT 3/4" and 1" 10/27/87 Curb Stops -Ball Meter Valves McDonald 4603B, 4604B, 6100M, 6100TM and 6101M I'/? and 2" FB600-7NL, FB1600-7-NL, FV23-777-W-NL, 1/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops -Ball Meter Valves Ford Meter Box Co., Inc. L22-77NL AWWA C800 2" FB600-6-NL, FB1600-6-NL, FV23-666-W- 1111018 33-12-10 Curb Stops -Ball Meter Valves Ford Meter Box Co., Inc. NL, L22-66NL AWWA C800 1-1 -' FB600-4-NL, FB1600-4-NL, Bt 1-444-WR- 1111018 33-12-10 Curb Stops -Ball Meter Valves Ford Meter Box Co., Inc. NL, B22444-WR-NL, L28-44NL AWWA C800 I " 13-25000N, B-24277N-3, B-20200N-3, H. AWWA C800, ANSF 61, 1/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops -Ball Meter Valves Mueller Co., Ltd. 15000N, , H-1552N, H142276N ANSI/NSF 372 _ B-25000N, B-20200N-3, B-24277N-3,H- AWWA C800, ANSF 61, 1111.1. 33-12-10 Curb Stops -Ball Meter Valves Mueller Co., Ltd. 15000N, H-14276N, H-15525N ANSI/NSF 372 1-112" B-25000N, B-20200N-3,H-15000N, H- AWWA C800, ANSF 61, 111101. 33-12-10 Curb Storai.all Meter Valves Mueller Co., Ltd. 15530N ANSI/NSF 372 V 01/26/00 Coated Tapping Saddle with Double SS Straps 1CM Industries, Inc. #406 Double Band SS Saddle 1"-2" Taps on up to 12" 0/5/21/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel) 1CM Industries, Inc. 412 Tapping Sleeve ESS AWWA C-223 Up to 30" w/12" Out 03/29/22 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated or Stainless Steel) 1CM Industries, Inc. 415 Tapping Sleeve AWWA C-223 Concrete Pipe Only 05/10/11 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel) Powerseal 3490AS (Flange) & 3490MJ 4"-8" and 16" 02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel) Romac FTS 420 AWWA C-223 up to 42" w/24" Out 02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel) Romac SST Stainless Steel AWWA C-223 Up to 24" w/12" Out 02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel) Romac SST III Stainless Steel AWWA C-223 Up to 30" w/12" Out 05/10/11 Joint Repair Clamp Powerseal 3232 Bell Joint Repair Clamp 4" to 30" Plastic Meter Box w/Composite Lid DFW Plastics Inc. DFW37C-12-1EPAF FTW Plastic Meter Box w/Composite Lid DFW Plastics Inc. DFW39C-12-1EPAF FTW 08/30/06 Plastic Meter Box w/Composite Lid DFW Plastics Inc. DFW65C-14-1EPAF FTW Class "A" Concrete Meter Box Bass & Hays CMB37-B12 1118 LID-9 Concrete Meter Box Bass & Hays CMB-18-Dual 1416 LID-9 Concrete Meter Box Bass & Hays CMB65-B65 1527 LID-9 Water - Bolts. Nuts. and Gaskets 33-11-05 (01/08/13). Water - Combination Air Release 33-31-70 (01/08/13) * E1-11 Air Release Valve GA Industries, Inc. Empire Air and Vacuum Valve, Model 935 ASTM A 126 Class B, ASTM A 1" & 2" * E1-11 [umbombination ination Air Release Valve Multiplex Manufacturing Co. Crispin Air and Vacuum Valves, Model No. 11" 1" & 2" E1-11 ombination Air Release Valve Valve and Primer Corp. APCO 4143C, #145C and #147C 1", 2" & 3" Water - Dry Barrel Fire Hvdrants 33-1240 (01/15/14) 10/01/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American -Darling Valve Drawing Nos. 90-18608, 94-18560 AWWA C-502 03/31/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American Darling Valve Shop Drawing No. 94-18791 AWWA C-502 09/30/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Clow Corporation Shop Drawing No. D-19895 AWWA C-502 01/12/93 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American AVK Company Model 2700 AWWA C-502 08/24/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Clow Corporation Drawings D20435, D20436, B20506 AWWA C-502 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant ITT Kennedy Valve Shop Drawing No. D-80783FW AWWA C-502 0.187 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant M&H Valve Company Shop Drawing No. 13476 AWWA C-502 Shop Drawings No. 6461 l0/14/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Mueller Company A-423 Centurion AWWA C-502 Shop Drawing FH-12 01/15/88 E1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Mueller Company A-423 Super Centurion 200 AWWA C-502 10/09/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant U.S. Pipe & Foundry Shop Drawing No. 960250 AWWA C-502 09/16/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American Flow Control (AFC) Waterous Pacer WB67 AWWA C-502 08/12/16 33-1240 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant EJ (East Jordan Iron Works) WaterMaster 5CD250 Water - Meters 02/05/93 E101-5 Detector Check Meter Ames Company Model HIM Detector Check Valve AW WA C550 4" - 10" 08/05/04 Magnetic Drive Vertical Turbine Hersey Magnetic Drive Vertical AWWA C701, Class 1 3/4" - 6" * From Original Standard Products List 4 CITY OF FORT WORTH FORT WORTH. WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023 IApprovall Spec No. IClasssification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size Water - Pines/PVC (Pressure Water) 33-31-70 (01/08/13) AWWA C900, AW WA C605, 12/05/23 33-I1-12 PVC Pressure Pie Vin loch PVC Pipe DR14 ASTM D1784 4"-16" AWWA C900, AWWA C605, 12/OS/23 33-11-12 PVC Pressure Pipe Vinyltech PVC Pipe DR18 ASTM D1784 16"-18" 3/19/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Pipelife Jet Stream DR14 AWWA C900 4"-12" 1 3/19/2018 3311 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Pipelife Jet Stream DR18 AWWA C900 16"-24" 1 5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Diamond Plastics Comoration DR 14 AWWA C900 4"-12" 5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Diamond Plastics Corporation DR 18 AWWA C900 16"-24" AWWA C900-16 UL 1285 12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc d/b/a JM Eagle DR 14 ANSI/NSF 61 4"-28" FM 1612 12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc d/b/a JM Eagle DR 18 ° 16"-24" 9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Underground Solutions Inc. DR14 Fusible PVC AWWA C900 4" - 8" 9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) DR18 AWWA C900 16"-24" 9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) DR14 AWWA C900 4"-12" 9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Sanderson Pipe Corp. DR14 AWWA C900 4"-12" Water - Pioes/Valves & Fittings/Ductile Iron Fittings 33-11-11 (01/08/13) 07/23/92 EI-07 Ductile Iron Fittings Star Pipe Products, Inc. Mechanical Joint Fittings AW WA C153 & C110 * E1-07 Ductile Iron Fittings Griffin Pipe Products, Co. Mechanical Joint Fittin, @ AWWA C 110 * E1-07 Ductile Iron Fittings McWane/Tyler Pipe/ Union Utilities Division Mechanical Joint Finings, SSB lass 350 AWWA C 153, C 110, C III 08/11/98 E1-07 Ductile Iron Fittings Sigma, Co. Mechanical Joint Finings, SSB Class 351 AWWA C 153, C 110, C 112 02/26/14 E1-07 MJ Fittings Accucast Class 350 C-153 MJ Finings AWWA C153 4"-12" 05/14/98 E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint Restraints Ford Meter Box Co./Uni-Flange Uni-Flange Series 1400 AW WA C111/C153 4" to 36" 05/14/98 E1-24 PVC Joint Restraints Ford Meter Box Co./Uni-Flange Uni-Flange Series 1500 Circle -Lock AW WA C111/C153 4" to 24" 11/09/04 E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint Restraints One Bolt, Inc. One Bolt Restrained Joint Fitting AWWA C111/C116/C153 4" to 12" 02/29/12 33-11-11 Ductile Iron Pipe Mechanical Joint Restraint EBAA Iron, Inc. Megalug Series 1100 (for DI Pipe) AWWA C111/C116/C153 4" to 42" 02/29/12 33-11-11 PVC Pipe Mechanical Joint Restraint EBAA Iron, Inc. Megalug Series 2000 (for PVC Pipe) AWWA C111/C116/C153 4" to 24" 08/05/04 E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC) Sigma, Co. Sigma One-Lok SLC4 - SLC10 AW WA C111/C153 4" to 10" 03/06/19 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC) Sigma, Co. Sigma One-Lok SLCS4 - SLCS12 AW WA C111/C153 4" to 12" 08/05/04 E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC) Sigma, Co. Sigma One-Lok SLCE AW WA C111/C153 12" to 24" 08/10/98 E1-07 MJ Fitrings(DIP) Sigma, Co. Sigma One-Lok SLDE AWWA C153 4" - 24" 10/12/10 E1-24 Interim Restrained Joint Svstem S & B Techncial Products Bulldog System ( Diamond Lok 21 & JM ASTM F-1624 4" to 12" 08/16/06 E1-07 Mechanical Joint Fittings SIP Industries(Serampore) Mechanical Joint Fittings AW WA C153 4" to 24" 11/07/16 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands Star Pipe Products, Inc. PVC Stargip Series 4000 ASTM A536 AW WA CI I I 11/07/16 33-11-I1 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands Star Pipe Products, Inc. DIP Sturgrip Series 3000 ASTM A536 AW WA CI I I EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Black For DIP 03/19/18 33-11-I1 Mechanical Joint Remmer Glands SIP Industries(Serampore) ASTM A536 AW WA CI I I 3"-48" EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900 03/19/18 33-I1-I1 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands SIP Industries(Serampore) DR14 PVC Pipe ASTM A536 AW WA CI I I 4"-12" EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900 03/19/18 33-I1-I1 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands SIP Industries(Serampore) DRI8 PVC Pipe ASTM A536 AW WA C111 16"-24" Water - Pines/Valves & Fittings/Resilient Seated Gate Valve* 33-12-20 (05/13/15) Resilient Wedged Gate Valve w/no Gears American Flow Control Series 2500 Drawing # 94-20247 16" 12/13/02 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2530 and Series 2536 AWWA C515 30" and 36" 08/31/99 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2520 & 2524 (SD 94-20255) AWWA C515 20" and 24" 05/18/99 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2516 (SD 94-20247) AWWA C515 16" 10/24/00 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2500 (Ductile Iron) AWWA C515 4" to 12" 08/05/04 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control 42" and 48" AFC 2500 AWWA C515 42" and 48" 05/23/91 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American AVK Company American AVK Resilient Seaded GV AWWA C509 4" to 12" 01/24/02 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American AVK Company 20" and smaller * E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve Kennedy 4" - 12" * E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve M&H 4" - 12" * E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve Mueller Co. 4" - 12" 11/08/99 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Series A2361 (SD 6647) AWWA C515 16" 01/23/03 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Series A2360 for 18"-24" (SD 6709) AWWA C515 24" and smaller 05/13/05 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Mueller 30" & 36", C-515 AWWA C515 30" and 36" 01/31/06 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Mueller 42" & 48", C-515 AWWA C515 42" and 48" 01/28/88 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. AWWA C509 4" - 12" 10/04/94 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. 16" RS GV (SD D-20995) AWWA C515 16" 11/08/99 EI-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. Clow RW Valve (SD D-21652) AWWA C515 24" and smaller 11/29/04 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. Clow 30" & 36" C-515 AWWA C515 30" and 36" (Note 3) 11/30/12 Resilient W Gate Valve eGate Clow Valve Co. Clow Valve Model 2638 AWWA C515 24" to 48" ote 3) 05/08/91 E1-26 Resilient Seat Valve Stockham Valves & Fillings AWWA C 509, ANSI 420 - stem, 4" - * E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co. Metmseal 250, requirements SPL #74 3" to 16" 10/26/16 33-12-20 Resilient Seated Gate Valve EJ (East Jordan Iron Works) EJ FlowMaster Gate Valve & Boxes 08/24/18 Mateo Gate Valve Matco-Norca 225 MR AWWA/ANSI C115/An21.15 4" to 16" * From Original Standard Products List 5 FORT WORTH® CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023 (Approval Spec No. �Classsification I Manufacturer Water - PiDes alves & Fittings/Rubber Seated Batter Valve 33-12-21 (07/10/14) Model No. National Spec Size * y E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve Hen, Pratt Co. AW WA C-504 24" * E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve Mueller Co. AW WA C-504 24"and smaller 1/11/99 E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve Dezurik Valves Co. AW WA C-504 24" and larger 06/12/03 E1-30 Valmatic American Butterfly Valve Valmanc Valve and Manufacturing Com. Valmatic American Butterfly Valve. AW WA C-504 Up to 84" diameter 04/06/07 E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve M&H Valve M&H Style 4500 & 1450 AW WA C-504 24" to 48" 03/19/18 33 1221 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve G. A. Industries (Golden Anderson) AW WA C504 Butterfly Valve AW WA C-504 30"-54" Water - Polvethvlene Encasement 33-11-10 (01/08/13) 05/12/05 E1-13 Polyethylene Encasment Fl—ol Packaging Fulton Entertnses AW WA C105 8 mil LLD 05/12/05 E1-13 Polyethylene Encasment Mountain States Plastics (MSP) and AEP Ind. Standard Hardware AW WA C105 8 mil LLD 05/12/05 E1-13 Polyethylene Encasment AEP Industries Bullstrong by Cowtown Bolt & Gasket AW WA C105 8 mil LLD 09/06/19 33-11-11 IPolvethylem, Encasment Northtown Products Inc. PE Encasement for DIP AW WA C105 8 mil LLD Water - SamDlinE Station 03/07/23 33 12 50 l Water Sampling Station Eclipse Number 88 , 12-inch Depth of Bury As shown in spec. 33 12 50 Water - Automatic Flusher HG6-A-IN-2-BRN-LPRR(Portable) 1.110 Automated Flushing System Mueller Hydroguard HG2-A-IN--2-PVC-018-LPLG(Perinancm) 04/09/21 Automated Flushing System Kupferle Foundry Company Eclipse #9800wc 04/09/21 Automated Flushing System Kupferle Foundry Company Eclipse #9700 (Portable) The Fort Worth Water Department's Standard Products List has been developed to minimize the submittal review of products which meet the Fort Worth Water Department's Standard Specifications during utility construction projects. When Technical Specifications for specific products, are included as part of the Construction Contract Documents, the regmrements of the Technical Specification will override the Fort Worth Water Department's Standard Specifications and the Fort Worth Water Department's Standard Products List and approval of the specific products will be based on the requirements of the Technical Specification whether or not the specific product meets the Fort Worth Water Department's Standard Specifications or is on the Fort Worth Water Yellow Highlight indicates recent changes * From Original Standard Products List FORT WORTH. CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 01/29/2024 National Spec Appr-1 I Spec No. Concrete Model No. 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des)) American Concrete Company 30CAF029 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & ADA 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDesYA American Concrete Company OIJAF3821000 psi Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair I9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des gn American Concrete Company 40CNF065 4000 psi Concrete for Manholes & UV Strocttres 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des American Concrete Company 45CAF076 4500 psi Comte for Placed Paving I9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos Vied D10000001737 4500 ps Concrete r $and Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDes)gn Argos D100000017914500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDesyri Argos D10000001793 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp Argos D10000001103 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDesiym Argos DI OOO0002107 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D10000001273 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Pavin1 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Dew Argos D10000001617 3600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mir Desvp Argos D100000083814500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos iQ4QQQQ0 i7 0 yy Flowable Frill- CLSM psi & 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDes Argos�00000�,55 000 Concrete for Inlets, Junction Boxes, Manholes, Channel Liners, Sidewalks, Driveways, Curb Gutter 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDes i/gn Argos DIf10000 0}3S 30QO psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Curbs 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des Argos Dff 00000 65S 30 0 psi Concrete for Curbs, Curb & Gutters, Sidewalks, Driveways, ADA Ramps 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des Fn Argos D1000001615 3600 psi Concrete for Inlets, Boxes, Encasement, Blockng 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp Argos DI00000010613600 psi Concrete for Inlets, Boxes, Encasement, Blocking 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDesign Argos D1 0000001 083S 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads, Inlets, Structures, Headwalls, Thrust Blocking 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDesign Argos D10000001083 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads, Inlets, Structures, Headwalls, Thrust Blocking 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des Argos DI0000001685 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos DI0000005751750 Psi Concrete Base for Trench Repair 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Amos DI OOO00016814000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Retaining Walls, Box Culverts, Valley Gutters 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Big D Concrete 7SKGRT 3000 psi Concrete for Groutm 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix DesP B0 D Concrete 14500AE 4500,psi Concrete for I�Y Strength Paving l5/2/2023 321313 Mix Design BT D Concrete CM14520AE 4500 psi Concrete for and Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDesna Br Town Concrete 452065-14500 psi hand)placedpaviog 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDesym Big Town Concrete 450065-1 4500psi hand placed paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desk Rom DO Texas 45U500BG 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Pirving,, Storm Structures 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desr Burnco Texas 40US53BO 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving, 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp Bunco Texas 55IJ120AG 4000 psi Concrete Mix for High Early Strength Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 MixDcsF Bunco Texas 30U100AG 3000 psi Concrete Mixfor P' a Collars, Inlets, Thrust Blocks, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 19/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bunco Texas 3OU101AG 3000 psi Concrete Mix for �twork 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumeo Texas 30U500BG 3000 psi Concrete Mck for Blocking, Encasement, Curb Inlets, Junction Boxes, Fire Hydrant Pads, Driveways, Curb & Gutters, Sidewalks, ADA Rags 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix De§0 Bunco Texas 40U500BG 4000 ps Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures, Driveways, Screen Walls, Collars I 9/9/2022 03 30 00 IMht DeSj;p Bumco Texas 36U500BG 310 V Concrete Mix for Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations I 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des Bunco Texas OSY450BA 80 psi Concrete Mix for Base for Trench Repair I 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumw Texas O1Y69OBF 100iVi Concrete Mix for Plowable Frill 1/8/2024 03 30 00 IMix Dew Bunco Texas 36U502BG / 5.74 Sacks / 3,600$$s� Concrete Mix for Lightingk & Traffic Signal Foundations I VV2023 033416 IMix Dow Bunco Texas IOYH50BF 1000 psi Concrete 11ase Material for Trench Repair I 9/9/2022 03 30 00 IMix Dear Carder Concrete IFWCC6020214500 psi concrete for Hand Placed Paving I 9/9/2022 033000 IMixDes)gn I Carder Concrete IFWCC5520913600psi forMachine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 IMix Desna 1 Carder Concrete IFWCC6020913600 psi for Machine Placed Paving I 9/9/2022 033000 IMix Deq p Carder Concrete IFWCC359101Plowable Fill -CLSM I 9/9/2022 033000 IMmDesign I Carder Concrete IFWFM7501Plowable Fill -CLSM I 9/9/2022 03 30 00 IMix Design I Carder Concrete IFWCC6020014000 psi Concrete for Storm Dram Structures, Manholes, Headwalls, Retaining Walls, Valley Gutters, Drive Approaches 9/9/2022 IMixDesign I Carder Concrete IFWCC502021 3500 psi concrete for Sidewalks, Driveways, Ramps, Curb & Gutter I 9/9/2022 1033000 03 30 00 Mix Des I Carder Concrete IFWCC502001 3000 psi for Sidew.11., Driveways, Ramps, Curb & Gutter, Platwork I 9/9/2022 30 00 MixDcsF I CharlfVs Concrete 14142 3600 psi Concrete for Curb Inlets, Junction Boes9/9/2022 3000 N Mix Dqj p I Char] s Concrete 14518 4000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Vrmgwalls 9/9/2022 3000 Mix Desp I Char s Concrete 15167 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 Mix De�� I Charley's Concrete 14609 4500 psi Concrete Mpr for Hand Placed Paving, Manholes 9/9/2022 103 30 00 MixDesk I CharWs Concrete 16103 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Manholes 9/9/2022 1033000 M x Dcsp I CharjeVs Concrete 4502 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 1033000 Mix De p I Charley's Concrete 3759 300010 Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 103 30 00 IMix Dgjp I Charl s Concrete 1502150 Concrete for Plowable Fill-CLSM 9/9/2022 103 30 00 IMixDeep I Charlp�s Concrete 1518150 Psi Concrete for Plowable FM-CLSM 9/9/2022 103 30 00 IMixDes I CharWs Concrete 5642 4000 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Strucnres 9/9/2022 103 30 00 IM x Dq I Charles's Concrete 6595 5000 psi Concrete Mix for Hie Early Stren;Q Paving 9/9/2022 103 30 00 Mix Design I Charleys Concrete 6589 4500 y�i Concrete Mix for B, arly Strength Paving 9/9/2022 103 30 00 Mix Design I Chisholm Trail Redi Mix C13020AE 000 psi Concrete for ewaj'�, Curb & Gutter 9/9/2022 103 30 00 Mix Design I City Concrete Company 11-350-F'F 50-150 psi Concrete for Plowable Ft71 CLSM FORT WORTH, CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 01/29/2024 Approval !Spec No. Classification Manufacturer Model No. Nation.] Spec Concrete (Continued) 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix De: 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mnt Da 9/92022 03 30 00 Mix Da 9/92022 03 30 00 Mix De: 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Da 9192022 03 30 00 Mix De: 9/92022 03 30 00 Mix Da 9192022 03 30 00 Mix Da 11/16/2022 03 30 00 Mix Da 5/52023 03 30 00 Mix Da 5/52023 03 30 00 Mix De: 9/92022 03 30 00 MixDe: 9/92022 03 30 00 Mix De: 9/92022 033413 Mix De: 9/9/2022 033413 MixDa 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Da 9/9/2022 033413 Mix Da 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Da 9/92022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/92022 9192022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 9192022 9/9/2022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 11/142022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/92022 9/92022 9192022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/92022 6212023 1/18/2023 1292024 129/2024 1292024 1292024 1292024 9/9/2022 9192022 9/9/2022 9192022 9/9/2022 9/92022 9/92022 9/9/2022 9/92022 9/92022 9/92022 4/7/2023 9/92022 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 32 13 13 33 1313 341313 35 13 13 03 30 00 03 30 00 033000 00 0330 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 341313 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 321313 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 03 30 00 Mix DeW' MixDesym Mix Design Mix Des" Mix Des1/gP Mix Design Mix Desi MixDesTa MixDes3gn Mix Dear Mix Desp Mix Dcsirn MixDes, Mix Desa 1Mix Dcsr Desp Dcsr Delip rDelp [Mix Desp 1Mix Design 1Mix Design IMix Design 1 Mix Dcsi%m I Mix Dew I Mix Dew IMix Dcsip IMixDew IMixDesign I Mix Dc§' 1MixDc 1MixDgjp [Mix Dgjp [Mix Design IMix Desj�r [Mix Deb jp IMix Devp Mix Design MixDesign [Km Design [Mix Desa 1Mix Desym IMix Design Mit Design MixDesign City Concrete Company City Concrete Conipany City Concrete Company City Concrete Company City Concrete Company C' Concrete Company City Concrete Company City Concrete Company City Concrete Company City Concrete Company City Concrete Co any Cow Town Redi Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Red, Mix Cow Town Red, Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Red, Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix Cow Town Redi Mix 1 Cow Town Redi Mix 1 Cow Town Redi Mix 1 Cow Town Redi Mix [Cow Town Redi Mix 1Cow Town Rcdi Mix I Cow Town Redi Mix [ Cow Town Redi Mix 1Esmida Ready Mbt IEsttada Remyy Mix tra [Esda Ready Mix [Estrada Read��Mix [Estrada Rcad Z IGCH Concrete Services [ GCH Concrete Services [GCH Concrete Services 11ngtam Concrete & Aggregates [Ingram Concrete & Aggregates [Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 1ingram Concrete & gregates I Ingram Concrete & gregates 11ngram Concrete & gregates 1Ingram Concrete & egates 1Ingram Concrete & gregates [Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 1ingram Concrete & Aggregates 30HA25II 3000 psi Concrete for ] R 30HA201I3000 psi Concrete Mix for Bloc Sidewalks, Flatwork, Pads 45NG25II 3600 Psi Concrete Mix for Drilleda8s/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5QS_G1i5II 3600 psi SLmy Dictplaced Drilled Shaft 4 A2 4500y�t Concrete M' for Hand Placed Paying, 36LA2011 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 36JA00113600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 40LA20114000 Psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures CLNG25II 3600 psi Concrete for Dulled Shaft/L' and Traffic Si Foundations CCNA250AG 3600,ypsi Concrete for Dulled S� and Traffic signal Foimdations CSSQA250AG 3,600 Concrete for Sh7— Displacement Shafts, Underwater Shafts 250 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks. Driveways. ADA Ramps 350 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Driveways. ADA Ramps 9 70 Psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9-S-2 70 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 220-8 50 s, Concrete Mix for Flowable Fill - CLSM 320-8 50 psi Concrete Mix for Plowable Fill - CLSM 230-8 750 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 330-SS 750 psi Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 353 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks. ADA Ramps. Driveways, Curb & Gutter. Safety End Treatments, Non-TxDOT Retaining Walls 253-W 3000,psi Concrete Mix Sidewalks, ADA Rqps, Drivewa Curb & Gutter, Safety End Treatments, Non-TxDOT Retaining Walls 260 4000 Concrete Mix for Bri�Fe Slabs. Box Culverts, Headwa)s 260-1 3600 Psi Concrete Na for Headwalls 260-2 3600 Vrsi Concrete Mix for Box Culverts, Headwalls 360 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Bridge Slabs, Box Culverts, Headwalls 360-1 3600 Psi Concrete Mix for Box Culverts Headwalls, Winitwalls 264-N 4500➢rsi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 366 4500 psi Concrete Mnt for Hand Placed Paving 265 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Pa* 3654500 Si Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 370-NC 4�00 psi Concrete for HES Paving 370-INC 5000 Ti Concrete for HES Paving 375-NC 5000 p Concrete for HES Paving 267420 Psi Concrete Na for Manholes and Drainage Structures 270 5000 psi Concrete Mix for Cast -in -Place Box Culverts 370 5000 QQsi Concrete Mix for Cast -in -Place Box Culverts 255-2 3000 ysi Concrete mix for Inlets, Thrust Blocking, Concrete Encasement 257 3600 y>~7 Concrete mint for Valley Gutters 357-M 3600 Psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1257-M 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving, 1260-M 4000 Psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1360-M 4000 , Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1255-LP 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter 1355-LP 3000 Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter 1255 3500 psi Concrete Mix far Flatwork, Inlets, Thrust Blocking Concrete Encasement 1355 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Inlets, Thrust Blocking, Concrete Encasement 1365-STX 4000 psi Concrete for Bridge slabs, top slabs of direct traffic culverts, approach slabs 1357 3600 psi Concrete Mnt for V.I1 Gutters 1360-DS 3600 Psi Concrete form. Shaft/Lightmg and Traffic Signal Foundation 1380-NC 4500 Psi Concrete for HES Paving 14575AESC / 7.50 Sacks / 4,500 Psi (3,000 psi (a) 3-day) Concrete for HES Paving IR3050AEWR / 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Ramps, Inlets, and Manholes IR3655AEWR / 5.50 Sacks / 3,600 Psi Concrete for Headwalls, Wmewalls, and Culverts IR4060AEWR / 6.00 Sacks / 4.000 i�i Concrete for Bridje Slabs, Tqp Slabs, and Approach Slabs IR4560AEWRI 6.00 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving I GCH4000 4000 vs, Concrete for for Sidewalks, Raps, Headwalls, Inlets, and Storm Drain Structures GCHV5 4000 1 Concrete for Machine Placed Paving I GCH4500 4560 usi Concrete Hand Placed Paving 1C47PV5E5 3000 Psi Concrete for Sidewalks, ADA RWs 12MWR 70123504 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 12MWR 147QW5D5 3000 Psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 12MWR C56PS5D5 4000 Psi Concrete Machine Placed Pavia1g 12MWR 161UV5DM 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 12MWR 10MQS50N 4500 Psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 1161PS5EM 4500 Psi Concrete Placed P I C47PV5E5 3000y�si Concrete�idewalks Rags I 1 OLOS50N 3.600 Dsi Concrete for Dulled ShaftsUghtiog and Traffic Signal Foundations 1161PSSEM 4500 Psi Concrete Mix for Hand Phgced Paving FORT WORTH., CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 01/29/2024 Manufacturer Appi-o-1 Spec No.r002110tation Model No. National Spec Concrete(Continued) 9/9/2022 03 30 00 M x Desi/gn Holcim - SOP, Inc. 5177 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOP, Inc. 12613000 si Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 4 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR Inc. 2125 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 03 30 00 Mac Des Holcim - SOR Inc. Structures, 17014000 si Concrete Mix for Storm Dram Struces, Sanitary Sewer Manholes, Junction Box 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim- SOP, Inc. 5409 4006 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Inlets 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Dew Holcim - SOR Inc. 5507 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 12/15/2022 3 30 00 Mat Design Holcim - SOR Inc. 3741 100 psi concrete or flowable WCSLM 9/9/2022 04 30 00 Mat Desrp Holcmm - SOP, Inc. 5017 200 ps Concrete r Base Material for Trench Repair 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac Design Holcim- SOR Inc. 9600 3600 psi Concrete for Dell Sbatts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Design Holchn- SOR. Inc. 18514500 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures, Hand Placed Paving 12/5/2022 4 30 00 Mix DMP Holcim - SOR Inc. 1822 3600 psi Concrete for Dulled Sbafts/L' and Traffic Ste] Foundations 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 03 30 00 03 30 00 Mix Des Holcim - SOP, Inc. 1959 4000 nsi Concrete for Dulled Shafts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations Mat Design Holcim - SOP, Inc. 15513000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking 4/7/2023 03 30 00 Mat Design Liquid Stone C301D 3,000� i Concrete for Sidewalks, Preaches, and Driveways. 3.600 ' 4/27/2023 4/7/2023 03 30 00 03 30 00 Mat Des Mix Desu�gu, Li d Stone Lid Stone C361DI isi Concrete for R�f wall, drivewa'j, Qn bo�j apro roach C361DHR 3,600)� Concrete for Drille /Lighting T Signal Founa ons and c 1/24/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design LlQuid Stone C451DHR-A 456 J i Concrete for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2132214 3,000 Psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Desgn Martin Marietta �� �999 QQ099 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & s � 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desr Martin Marietta R2131 3,000 nsi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desgn Martin Marietta R2131314 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desgu Martin Marietta R2136014 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Desgu Mart n Marietta R2136214 3,000 usi Concrete for Sidewalks & s 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Desgn Martin Marietta R2141224 4,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & s 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac Desgn Martin Marietta R2141024 4,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & s 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Design Martin Marietta R2136224 3,600 psi Concrete for Curb Inlets 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Dew Martin Marietta R2141233 3,600 psi Concrete for Storm Structures, Inlets. Blocking & Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta FLOW25A 50 ns Concrete for Plowable Fi7VCLSM 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac Design Martin Marietta R2142233 3,600 psi Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac Desk Martin Marietta R2146333 3,600 psi Concrete for Manholes. Inlets & Headwalls, Concrete Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac Design Martin Marietta R21412304000 si Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls, Valve Pads 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp Martin Marietta R2146035 �,000 nsi Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls, Valve Pads 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146335 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving, Inlets, Storm Dram Structures 111/2/2022 1321313 Mix De3F Martin Marietta 4``000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Davire I11/2/2022 1321313 Mix Des Martin Marietta 114IN27 141K30 4,000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 111/2/2022 1321313 MacDesr Martin Marietta 146N36 4,500 nsi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 111/15/2022 133 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 111/15/2022 1341313 Mac Design Martin Marietta R2146P36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving I11/2/2022 13213 13 IMix Design Martin Marietta IR2146K36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Pav py� 111/2/2022 13213 13 ]Mix Desigy Martin Marietta 1 146N35 � 6.11 sacks / 4,500 y� * concrete for Hand Place Paving, Inlets, Manholes, Headwalls 111/2/2022 132 1313 ]Mix Design Martin Marietta IR2146K34 4,000 psi Concrete for lnlets, Manholes, Headwalls 111/2/2022 13213 13 IMac Design Martin Marietta IR2141N24 4,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and I11/2/2022 1321313 I Mix Design IMartin Marietta IR214IK24 4,000 psi Concrete for Junction Boxes,ewalks and Ramos 19/9/2022 103 30 00 ]Mix Desgn ]Martin Marietta IR2146038 4,500 nsi Concrete for Inlets, Storm Drain Structures 19/9/2022 1033000 ]Mix Desp IMartm Marietta IR2146036 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving, Inlets 19/9/2022 103 30 00 Mac Des IMartiD Marietta R2146042 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving I9/9/2022 t03 30 00 I Mac Dew I Martin Marietta IR2146242 4,500 Did Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 1 Mix Des IMattin Marietta IR2146236 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving I`` 9/9/2022 03 30 00 I Mix Dew IMartinMarietta ID9493SC 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 19/9/2022 03 30 00 I Mix Dg0p IMartin Marietta IR21472414 500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 14/l/2023 321320 I Mac Dq ip IMartm Marietta IR2136NI4 75.00 sacks / 3.000 nsi concrete for Sidewalks !4/1/2023 03 30 00 1 Mac Design Wartm Marietta IR2146P33 / 6.01 sacks / 4,000 Dsi concrete for Bridge a Deck 14/1/2023 103 30 00 1 Mix Dcsign lmautin Marietta IR2146033 4.000 psi Concrete for gRii..n�.�. 4/7/2023 1321320 1 Mix D ]Martin Marietta 114 3,000 Dsi concrete f{ suldew and rates 4/7/2023 13213 13 ]Mix Design Marietta LR2136'1KK406.000 si (3,000 I24 i1. zr BES Paving 4/1/2023 1033000 ]MixDesign Martin Marietta m; 0LBP 3ee600 ps Concrete r etamin alls 5/Y2/2023 1321313 IMDc Dcsigp Martin Marietta 146K37/6.22 sack / 4,500 psi Concrete r Hand Placed Paving_ 4/1/2023 103 30 00 1Mix Design iMartm Marietta IR2141030 4,000 psi Concrete for Riprav FORT WORTH. CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATIONRUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 01/29/2024 Apprc—1 Spee No. Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec 5/3/2023 6/1/2023 6/1/2023 6/27/2023 6/27/2023 8/4/2023 8/4/2023 8/4/2023 8/4/2023 8/4/2023 8/30/2023 8/4/2023 11/20/2023 11/20/2023 121=023 12/22/2023 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/12/2023 10/4/2023 10/4/2023 10/4/2023 10/4/2023 10/4/2023 10/4/2023 10/4/2023 7/10/2023 7/10/2023 1/24/2023 11/24/2023 11/18/2023 11/18/2023 11/18/2023 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/29/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 `9/9/2022 19/9/2022 �9/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 19/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 11=022 12/5/2022 12/5/2022 12/5/2022 5/15/2023 5/15/2023 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 Concrete(Continued) 03 30 00 Mix Des 32 13 20 Mix Dest/gn 32 13 20 MixDesp 03 30 00 Mix Design 03 30 00 MixDesign 03 30 00 Mix Desym 03 30 00 Mix Design 32 13 20 Mix Desr/gn 03 30 00 Mix Delp 321313 Mix Design 03 30 00 Mix De* 321313 Mix Des ign 03 30 00 Mix Design 1b3 30 00 Mix Design 321313 Mix Des 321313 Mix Desr 321320 Mix Des 01130 00 Mix Design 03 30 00 Mix Desna 03 30 00 Mix Design 03 30 00 MuDesiitn 03 30 00 Km Design 321313 MixDesign 321313 Mix Dean 321313 Mix Design 321313 Mix Design 033413 Mix DesigA 03 30 00 Mix Dcsmg MartinMarietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta Martm Marietta Martin Marietta Martin Marietta NCS Redi Mix NBR Ready Mix NBR Read j Mix NBR Ready Mix NBR Rey Mix NBR R:7v Mix NBR Ready Mix NBR Read Mix NBR Rraiy Mix NBR Ready Mic NBR Ready Mix Osborn 321313 Mix DesignOsbum 03 30 00 Mix Dew Rar;id Redi Mat 03 30 00 Mix Des ! jd Redi Mix 03 30 00 Mix Des !4d Redi Mat 03 30 00 Mix Design Rawd Redi Mix 03 30 00 Mu Dos' id Redi Mix 03 30 00 Mix Design Re M x 1b3 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 103 34 13 IMixD90 Redi-Mgt 103 30 00 IMixDesign Redi-Mix 103 30 00 IMixDesign Redi-Mix 103 30 00 1MixDesign IRedi-Mix 103 30 00 1Mix Deep IRedi-Mix 103 30 00 Uk Design Redi-Mix 103 30 00 IMix Despa IRedi-Mix 103 30 00 IMix Design IRedi-Mix 1033000 IMixDegp IRedi-Mix 1033000 IMixDcsrn (Redi-Mat IMixDes� IRedi-Mac 1033413 033413 1Mix Dew RRedi-Mix 1Mix DeA p IRedi-Mix 1033413 033000 1Mix Design IRedi-Mix 033000 IMixDesign IRedi-Mu 103 30 00 I Mix Design 1Redi-Mix 103 30 00 1 Mix Design IRedi-Mix 103 30 00 1 Mix Design IRedi-Mix 103 30 00 IMix Desr lRedi-Mix 103 30 00 IMix Design IRedi-Mi.. 103 30 00 1Mix Dejpp Redi-Mix 103 30 00 1MixDeW Redi-Mix 103 30 00 1Mix Dew Redi-Mix 103 30 00 IMm Design Redi-Mix 1033000 (MmDes�m IRe&-Mix 103 30 00 IMu Design 1Redi-Mix 103 30 00 IMix Design IRedi-Mix 1033000 IMuDesign IRedi-Mix 1033413 IMuDesign 1SRM Concrete 1033413 IMu Design I SRM Concrete 103 30 00 Mix Design ISRM Concrete 103 30 00 Mix Design I SRM Concrete M7842344 4,000 psi Concrete for Bridge Deck R2136R20 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks audkamns R2136N20 3,000p si Concrete for Sidewalks an s U2146N41 / 6.44saeks / 3,600 i Concrete for D ed Shafts / Li g and Traffic Steal Foundations U2146K45 / 6.65 sacks / 3,606,$si Concrete for Drilled Shafts / Liand Tmfic Signal Foundations U2146R41 / 6.44 sacks / 4,506 psi Concrete for Drilled Piers/L}' t Pole Imes. R2136RA / 5.00 sacks / 3.500 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Baines R2141R24 / 5.53 / 4,000 psi Concrete for Junction Box, Box Culvert, Sidewalks and Ramps. R2146R35 / 6.11 / 4,500,psi Concrete for Inlets, Manholes, and Headwalls R2146R36 / 6.17 / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving R214UUO / 5.85 SK / 4,000 yysi Concrete for Box Culverts & Headwalls 92141R27 / 5.69 sacks / 4,060 psi Concrete far Machine Placed Pavif, 146R33 16.01 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete Mix for CIP Sewer Manholes R2146K33 / 6.01 Sacks / 4,000j3at Concrete Mix for CIP Sewer Manholes. R2146R44 / 6.60 Sacks / 4,500 i Concrete Mat for Hand Placed Paving R2146K44 / 6.60 Sacks / 4,506 isi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Pa ' NCS5020A 3000 10 Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks TX C-YY 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb Inlets TX C-NY 3000 yysi Concrete Mix for Curb Inlets CLS P1-YY / 6.d0 Sacks 14.000 psi Concrete for Collars, Manholes, Box Culverts CLS A-YY / 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & s, and Curb &Gutter CLS A -NY/ 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrate for Sidewalks & �v and Curb & Gutter TX C SF-YY / 5.50 Sacks / 3, 00 qsi Concrete for Machine P c Paving TX C SF -NY 5.50 Sacks / 3.600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving_ CLS P2-YY / 6.50 Sacks / 4.500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving CLS P2-NY / 6.50 Sacks / 4.500 psi Concrte for Hand Placed Paving FT W FLO FILL / 150 vskcoacrote for Flowable 30A50UR 5 SK / 3,000 psi Concrete fir Sidewalks 45A60MR / 6 SK / 4.500 ysi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving RRM6320AB P 450OAsi Concrete for Hand Placed Pavia RRM5525A 3600 psi Concrete for Valley Gutters, Sidew , Approaches, ADA Ramos RRM6020ASS 4000ysi Concrete for Strom Drain Structures RRM5320A 3000 psi Concrete for Blocking RRM5020A 3000 Psi Concrete for Curb, Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalk. Ramos DCA2E554 3000 vi Concrete Mix for Rio Rap VOJ11524 3000 �ar Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter FOC10021215 Pat Flowable Fill - CLSM 10J11524 3000 Psi Concrete Mu for Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 1 OJ11504 3000 j�si Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 11OL11504 / 6.00 Backs / 4,000 usi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Curb & Gutter, Sewer Manhole, Inlets, & Junction Boxes 110M 1524 / 6.00 Sacks / 4,000 pi Concrete Mix Manholes, Inlets, Junction Boxes, Headwalls I1RJ11524 3500 Psi Concrete Mix for Thrust Blocks, Valve Pads 11OL21524 4000 Psi Concrete Mix for Manholes 115611524 4000 Psi Concrete Mix for Cast -in -Place Storm Drain Structures I IOL115E4 3600 Psi Concrete for Bridge substructures 1156115D4 4000 Psi Bridge S s 1F35238VN 100 Psi Flowable Fib - CLSM IFOD138VM 100 iri. Flowable FRI - CLSM 110111554 3000 usi Concrete Mix for RiD-RaD IP00138K9 1000 Psi Concrete Mix for Trench Repair Base Material I1OK11524 3600 Psi Concrete Mi. for Encasement 11ON11507 4500 Psi (2600 Psi Q 24 hrs.) Concrete Mix for HES Paving 11ON11504 5000 Psi (3600 Psi (a)/I 2 days) Concrete Mix for HES Paving I SOK11524 3600 psi Concrete Mtt for Machine Placed Pam 110MI15D4 4.' Psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Drain Structures I1OM11524 4500 Psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 110MI1504 4500 Psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 1145CD5P4 4500 V Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Drain Structures 1145P25P4 4500 Pat Concrete for St gtm Drain Structu r I10KI15C4 3500 Psi Concrete for Thrust Blocks, Valve Pads 1156115C4 4000 Psi Concrete for CIP Storm Drain Structures 110LI15C4 3600 Psi Concrete for Manhole, Inlet, Junction Box, Headwall I SOL115D5 3600 $$si Concrete for Drilled Shafts/L�'j and Traffic Signal Foundations 11ON115D6 Shi�vlacemeat Shafts, Underwater Drilled shafts 130000 3,000 Psi ncrete for Sidewalks and Ws, Curb & Gutter 140050 4.000 Psi Concrete for Headwalls, RWall, Collars 135023 3,600 Psi Concrete for Machine Pla avmg 140068 3,600 Psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving FORT WORTH: CITE' OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Approval i Spec No. STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 01/29/2024 'Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Concrete(Continued) 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix DesP SRM Concrete 45300 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Idiix Descry¢ SRM Concrete 45000 4,500 psi Concrete far Hand Placed Pa 9/9/2022 03 30 00 infix Desiym SRM Concrete 40326 4,500 (3,00 (a13-days) psi Concrete for Pa 9/9/2022 03 30 00 infix Des SRM Concrete 35022 3``600 psi Concrete for Junction Box Ret ' ' alls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp SRM Concrete 30050 3,000 Psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Ramps ets, Junction Boxes, Thrust Blocks, Curb and Gutter, Driveways, Barrier Ramp 2/10/2023 03 30 00 Mix Desp SRM Concrete 50310 5,000 psi Concrete for HES Pa 1/13/2023 321313 Mix Desp SRM Concrete 45023 4,500 Psi Concrete for Hand Placed Pavi 5/5/2023 03 30 00 Mix Desym SRM Concrete D100008553CB 4,000 psi Concrete for Sdridoach Slab, Deck Slab 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Dear Tarrant Concrete F W60AHP 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand 'reel, avmj 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Desp Tarrant Concrete FW6020AB P 4500 Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Des Tarrant Concrete TCF16020AB P 4500 Psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed P" 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp Tarrant Concrete FW7520AU R 4500 (3000 psi 4 3-days) psi Concrete HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp Tarrant Concrete FW6520AMR 4500 (3000 psi . 3-days) psi HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desrx Tarrant Concrete FW5520AMP 3600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mat Delp Tarrant Concrete FW532OA 3000 Concrete Mat for Blocking 9/9/2022 033413 Mac Design Tarrant Concrete FWFF150CLSM 50-150 Psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 033413 Mix Desayn Tarrant Concrete FWFF275 50-150 Psi Plowable Fill- CLSM 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desp Tarrant Concrete FW6020A2 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures 10/10/2022 03 30 00 Mix Desayn Tarrant Concrete TCFW6025A2 4000 V Concrete for Manholes 10/10/2022 03 30 00 Ma Desp Tarrant Concrete TCFW5020A 3000 TiConcrete for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5M 3000 Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac Des Titan Ready Mix Tsi 3020AE 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des Tarrant Concrete CP5020A 3000 yysi Concrete Mix for Curb and Gutter 9/9/2022 9/9/2022 033000 Mix Tarrant Concrete FW5525A2 3608 Ysi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks. Drive Approaches. ADA Ramp 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix De* Titan Ready Mix TRC4520 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving. 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0250.230 3000 Psi Concrete Mix for Flatworkc, Curb & Gutter. Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mac 270.230 5000 Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac DIF True Grit Redi Mix 0250.2301 3000 psi Concret Mnc for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mac Desym True Grit Redi Mix 0260.2302 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Maclaine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des fa True Grit Redi Mix 0255.2301 3600 psi Concrete Mixfor Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 0213000 Mac Des To True Grit Redi Mix 0260.2301 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Des True Grit Redi Mix 0265.23014500 psi Concrete Mix for Valle Gutters, Hand Placed Paving 11/30/2023 3211313 Mix Des FM Wildcatter Redi-Mix 3620AI / 6.00 Sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete Mix for Maclaine Placed Paving 11/20/2023 3211313 Mix Design Wildcatter Redi-Mac 4520AI / 6.50 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Qavmg 11/20/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design WildcattcrRedi-Mix 3020AI / 5.00 Sacks / 3\\000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks and Inlets 11/30/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Wildcatter Redi-Mix 4020AI / 6.00 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete Mac for Sidewalks and Inlets 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Wise Redi Mac 3678 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Lighting, and Traffic Signal Foundations lash Paving 9/9/2022 3 216 Mix D%V Austin Asphalt FT5D137965 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9/2022 321216 Mac Delp Austin t D } 59 � j�}'22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Des Anstm Malt FT 79�PG64 22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Design Austin Atilt t FTIBI39965 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Desp Austirihsolialt FT1B1172 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Desp Reynolds t�halt 1901D PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9l2022 321216 Mpc Design Reynolds Asphalt 1112B PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Reynolds Asphalt 1612B PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 11/20/2023 321216 Mix Des Reynolds Asphalt 2101D PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Deep Suomount Paving 341DV6422 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 11/26/2022 32 12 16 Mix Delp Simmount Paving 340DV6422 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 12/5/2022 33 12 16 Mix Delp Surmount Paving 3076BV6422 PG62-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Deep Sumnount Paving 341-BRAP6422ERG PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Deep TXBIT 37-211305-20 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 321216 Mtt Desi/pn TXBIT 44-211305-17 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Dew TXBIT 211305 (1757) PG64-22 Type B Fine Base 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Des TXBIT 222475 (1857) PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9/2022 3212 16 Mix Dep TXEIT 29-222475-19 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Design TXBIT 1-222475-20 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Design TXBIT 64-224125-18 PG70-22 Type D Fine Surface 9/9/2022 321216 Mix Design TXBIT 12-222475-19 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface FORT WORTH CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT `%'�+� STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 01/29/2024 ,, Detectable Warn mg Surface 9/9/2022 32 1320 DWS - Pavers Pme Hall Brick (Winston Salem. NC) Tactile Pavers 9/9/2022 32 13 20 DWS - Pavers Western Brick Co. (Houston, TJ`,) Detectable Warning Pavers 9/9/2022 321320 DWS - Composite Engineered Plastics, Inc. (Williamsville, l Armor Tile 9/9/2022 321320 DWS - Composite ADA Solutions (Wilmington, MA) Heritage Brick CIP Composite Paver 4/7/2023 321320 DWS -Pavers ADA Solutions (Wilmington, MA) Detectable Warning Pavers Silicone Joint Sealant 9/9/2022 13 73 Joint Sealant Dow 0SL - Cold Iced, S' a Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893 9/9/2022 3213 73 Joint Sealant Tremco 05L -Cold lied Se Component, Silicone Join Sealant ASTM D5893 �ASTMI)5893 9/9/2022 �32 321373 Joint Sealant Pecora 0SL - Cold Applied, Sin lad[Saver a Component, Silicone Join Sealant ASTM D5893 9/9/2022 321373 Joint Sealant Crafco Silicone - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant Utitit. Trench Embedment Sand 9/9/2022 330510 Embedment Sand Silver Creek Materials Ut' Ern dment Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 33 05 10 Embedment Sand Crouch Materials U ' en Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 33 05 10 Fetent ana F and L Dirt Movers U� ent Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 3305 10 ent an F and L Dirt Movers U Embe ent Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 33 05 10 Embedment Sand Tin Top Martin Marietta Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33 Storm Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13 9/28/2018 330513 Manhole Frames and Covers AccuCast (Govind Steel Conmapy, LTD) MHRC #220605,Size - **24" Dial IASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 330513 Manhole Cover Neenah Fo NF-1274-T91 (Size - 32" Di--) ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 330513 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Fount ) (Size - 2" D- NF-1743-LM7Siz.12"Di&) I ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frame Neenah Fount NF-1930-30.25" Dia) ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry R-1743-HV ASTM A48 AASHTO W 06 �ASTMA48AASHTONS06 4/3/2019 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++ 2279ST (Size - 24" Dia.) 4/3/2019 330513 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++ 2280ST (Size - 32" Dia.) IASTM A48 AASHTO M306 10/8/2020 330513 Manhole Frames and Covers EJ ( Formally East Jordan Iron Works, En 033 Z2/A (Size - 32.25" Dial ASTM A536 AASHTO M306 Non: All new development and new inna77adon manhole lids sha ) meet One miniman 304ch opening regavemenr asspeeffW it Coy 33 0513. Any smaller opening sizes will only he allawedfor edstingmanholes Mat require replacementfrmpa and Covers. FORT WORTH: CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATIONIPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 01/29/2024 0 Storm Sewer - Inlet & Structures 33-05-13 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Fartetaa FRT-l0x3-405-PRECAST** Size -10' X 3 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Fortemm FRT-10.3-406-PRECAST** ttize - 10' X 35 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Fortema FRT-l0x4.5-407-PRECAST** 10' X 4.51 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Fortenra ist: FRT-l0x4.5420-PRECAST**10'X 4.51 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 333920 Manhole Fortenta FRT-4X4-409-PRECAST-TOPj. ize - 4' X 41 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Fortenaa FRT-4X4.409-PRECAST-BAS (Size - 4' X 41 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Fortenra FRT-5X5-410-PRE T-TO (Size - 5' X 51 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Fortenra FRT-SX5-410-PRE T-BASE (Size - TX 51 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrm FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-TOP (Size - 6 X 61 ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Fortenra FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-BASE (Size - 6' X 61 ASTM C913 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-lOX3-405-PRECAST INLET** {Size -101 X 3 ASTM 615 13/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-15X3405-PRECAST INLET** (Size -15' X 31 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-20)3-405-PRECAST INLET** (Size - 20' X 71 ASTM 615 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pie Group TPG-4X4409-PRECAST TOP (Size - 4' X 4 ASTM 615 13/19/2021 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pace Group TPG-4X4-409-PRECAST BASE (Size - 4' X ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson F ,oe Group TPG-4X4-4I2-PRECAST 4-;q I�j��Fs 4' X 41 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson F pe Group TPG-5X5.410-PRECAST T Size - j 5 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson F pe Group TPG-5X5410-PRECAST BASE (Size - 5' S ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson F pe Group TPG-5X5-412-PRECAST 5-FT FISERISize - ' X 51 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Fe Group TPG-6X6411-PRECAST TOP (Size - X 61 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pie Group TPG-6X6411-PRECAST BASE Size - 6 X 61 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson P e Group TPG-6X6412-PRECAST 6-� 1' SER ($ize - 6 X 61 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7411-PRECAST T(jP ( tze - T`1C 7 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pine Group TPG-7X7411-PRECAST BASE (Size - T X 71 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pe Group 7PG-7X7412-PRECAST 4-FT RISER jSize - X 71 ASTM 615 3/19)2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson IF. Group TPG-SX8411-PRECAST TOP (Size - $ X 81 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8411-PRECAST BASE (Size - S' X 81 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8412-PRECAST (Size - ' X 81 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Ppe Group - 4' X 4 TPG4X4408-PRECAST TEQSize: ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-408-PRECAST INLET - 5'X5 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 334920 DroInlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6408-PRECAST INLET (ize - 6 X ASTM 615 8/28/2023 334910 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 4' x 4' Stacked Manhole (Size - 4' X 41 ASTM C478 8/28/2M3 334910 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x S' Storm Junction Box (Size - 5' X 81 ASTM C478 I8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 4' x 4' Storm Junction Box (Size - 4' X 41 ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 4910 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5" x 5' Storm Junction Box (Size - 5' X ASTM C478 18/28/2023 334910 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 6 x 6' Star Junction Box (Size - 6 X � ASTM C478 18/28/2023 334910 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 8' x 8' Storm Junction Box Base (Size - 8' X 81 ASTM C478 18/28/2023 334910 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x 8' Storm Junction Box Base (Size - 5' X 81 ASTM C478 18/28/2023 334910 Manhole Rinker Materials Reinforced 48" Diameter Spread Footing Manhole (Size - 4' X 41 ASTM C433 18/28/2023 133 39 20 Curb Inlet 10 'x 3' Riser Thompson Pipe Group Inlet Riser (Size - 3 FT) ASTM C913-16 18/28/2023 133 39 20 Curb Inlet 15 k 3' Riser Thotpson Pine Group Inlet R set Size - 3 FI1 ASTM C913-16 18/28/2023 133 39 20 Curb Inlet 20' x 3' Riser Thompson P/pe Gro Inlet Riser Size - 3 FT) ASTM C913-16 11/12/2024 133 49 20 Drop Inlet AmeriTex Pipe &Products Drop Ialte 4' X 4, ASTM C913 11/12/2024 133 49 20 Dro41nlet AmenTex Pipe &Products Drop lnite S X 51 ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole AmenTex Pipe &Products Precast 4St ' Storm Junction Box ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole AmenTex Pipe &Products Precast 51x5' Storm Jtnction Box ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole AmenTex PFe &Products 5' Precast Tansition MR `4' MH on the ton of 5' JB) ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole AmenTex P'e &Products Precast 65t6' Storm Junction Box ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole AmenTex Pipe &Products 6' Precast Tausition MH t4' MH on the top of 6 JB) ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole Amen-I'ex Pgre &Products Precast ftT Storm Junction Box ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole AmenTex a &Products 8' Precast Tansition MH (4' MH on the top of 8' JB) ASTM C913 11/19/2024 133 49 20 Manhole Am LT Pj a &Products Type C Storm Drain Manhole on Box (4' MH on the top of RCB) ASTM C913 Noce: Pre -cast inielr are appoved for the stage Ipordon of the sa'ucave (basin?oaiy. Stage II pardon of the s&uct a are regairedto be cast imp/ace. No =epf+ona ro this requirememshali be alrowed. 1 Storm Sewer -Pipes & Boxes 33-05-13 14/9/2021 33 41 13 Storm Drain Pj'pes Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc, (ADS) ADS HP Storm Polvpro�vlenc (PP) a (Size -12" - 60" ASTM F2881 & AASBTO W 30 18/28/2023 33 49 10 Storm Drain Pipes Rinker Materials Reinforced Concrete Ppe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe (Size - 21" or larger) ASTM C76, C655 1 &28/2023 33 49 10 Culvert Box Rinker Materials Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (Sze - Various ASTM C789, C850 110/12/2023 33 41 10 Storm Drain Pipes AmenTex Pipe &Products Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe* (Size -15" or larger) ASTM C76, C506 110/12/2023 34 41 10 Culvert Box AmenTex Pipe &Products Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (size - Various)) ASTM C1433,C1577 110/18/2023 35 41 10 Storm Drain Pipes The Turner Co. Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe* (Size -15" or lamer) ASTM C76, C506 1 I0/18/2023 36 41 10 Culvert Box The Turner Co. Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (size - Various) ASTM C1433,C1577