HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 7039 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7039
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
July 30, 1985
Subject:
PROPOSED GOLF FEE INCREASES
This report is in response to questions that were asked by the Mayor and
Council Members during the July 23, 1985 Pre-Council Meeting. The
questions have been restated as best they were remembered.
Mayor Bolen
Question: How is the Golf Division doing in merchandise sales?
Response: Golf Division sales have evidence continued improvement since the
initiation of the Enterprise Fund.
Division-wide sales are as follows:
October 1, 1984 through June 30, 1985
Merchandise and Beer $ 305,000
Total Revenue $1,629,781
Question: What dollar amounts are we collecting per player by round in
terms of beer, vending machines, concessions, and shop merchan-
dise? How do we compare with Lake Arlington?
Response: The following chart shows a comparison of total revenue and total
expenditures per round. Methodology used in determining these
figures included all revenues received per course divided by
total number of rounds per course. Expenditures included all
expenses such as salaries, equipment, indirect charges, water,
electric carts, merchandise, etc.
The comparison of Fort Worth courses with Arlington is diffi-
cult. Some expenditures used in Fort Worth are not included in
Arlington's gross expenditures. These are water, electric carts,
merchandise, indirect charges, etc.
Comparison Per Round: 1983/84
Total Total
Revenues Expend. Merch. Beer Concess.
PecanValley $9.22 $ 7.56 .70 $ .51 $ .19
Rockwood 8.48 7.88 .72 .66 .19
Meadowbrook 9.14 8.61 1.07 .49 .19
Z. Boaz 8.49 10.81 .97 .33 .24
Sycamore Creek 4.72 10.84 .28 .44 .19
Lake Arlington* 8.68 5.19 .78 .00 1.03
Average Revenue Per Round $8.68
Average Expenditure Per Round 8.59
Average Merchandise/Sale Per Round 1.32
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No 7039 - Page 2
Prig,
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
xx" Subject: PROPOSED GOLF FEE INCREASES
+ATE
Comparison Per Round: 1984185 (as of dune 30, 1985)
Total Total
Revenues Expend. Merch. Beer Concess.
PecanValley $8.09 8.64 .88 .50 .14
Rockwood 8.68 8.65 1.03 .71 .15
Meadowbrook 7.76 8.57 1.13 .49 .17
Z. Boaz 8.02 11.42 1.18 .38 .16
Sycamore Creek 5.13 11.15 .33 .56 .13
Lake Arlington* 8.67 5.84 .97 .00 1.22
Average Revenue Per Round $8.08
Average Expenditure Per Round 9.43
Average Merchandise/Sale Per Round 1.51
Response: Do merchandise sales indicate that they are of value to the pro
shops?
Answer: Yes, the convenience of shopping on the course is offered as a
service to the golfing public. Substantial revenues are also
contributed to the Golf Program by merchandise sales.
Response: Why do we receive complaints about trash and litter on the
courses?
Answer: Litter is collected daily at each golf course. Trash containers
are located in key areas on the course. Additional containers
are located at tees, pro shops, maintenance buildings and cart
barn facilities. If current collection methods prove inadequate,
pick-up will be increased.
Council Member Russell Lancaster
Response: What are the Golf Division's operating figures for this year and
next year?
Answer: Re-estimated Expenditures for 1984185 $2,472,341
Re-estimated Revenues for 1984185 $2,480,087
Proposed Budget for 1985186 $2,881,195
*Estimated Revenues for 1985/86 $2,886,753
*Figure does not include proposed fee increase.
Response: Where are monies being expended?
f
Answer: Approximately 47% of the current Golf operating budget is ex-
pended on salaries and employee benefits. Supplies and contrac-
tual services constitute another 45% and a little over 8% is
spent on capital improvements.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS----
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7039 - Page 3
Z i JoRp To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
Subject: PROPOSED GOLF FEE INCREASES
During this fiscal year, approximately $70,000 has been spent on
cart trails while another $100,000 has been executed for
maintenance of equipment and $67,000 into new cart batteries.
Question: In the proposed 1985/86 budget, how will the fee increase be
used?
Response: The increase in fees will expand our existing maintenance efforts
and help offset rising costs. In addition, the Golf Fund must
recoup an existing negative fund balance for 1983/84 of $45,000.
On the positive side, a major capital improvement program is
planned. Over $1 million would be designated for cart trails.
Another $1.5 million would be earmarked for building and facility
improvements. Approximately half of the anticipated increase
would pay debt service on these improvements.
Council Member Bert Williams
Question: Why are ladies' greens fees discounted?
Response: Ladies' fees were discounted as a promotional effort suggested by
the Ladies Golf Association. Park Board and staff concurred,
thinking this discount would attract greater individual and
organized play.
Question: Why was there a month's delay in the greens being open for play?
Response: After all the greens were replanted in the summer of 1984, a
decision was made not to overseed them but to overseed the tem-
porary greens. -Therefore, the new greens planted in bermuda
simply did not "green-up" as quickly as the temporaries which
were overseeded with cool season grasses. As soon as the warm
weather arrived, the newly rebuilt greens were opened.
Question: Why are the Meadowbrook greens in such poor condition?
Response: The Meadowbrook greens were replanted and reopened at approxi-
mately the same time as the other courses. When they were first
opened in the late spring, it was believed that they were in
excellent condition. During the past few months, play has been
high. It may be that the greens are now showing the effects of
the heavy traffic.
Council Member Louis Zapata
Question: Have all golf associations been notified of the proposed fee
increase?
LISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7039 - Page 4
,%1kTfR,
0)?p To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
Vx
Subject: PROPOSED GOLF FEE INCREASES
107
Response: The Golf Division believes that a reasonable effort was made to
both the general public and the golf associations. During the
first few months of summer, several articles appeared in the Star
7-
Telegram concerning the possibility of a fee increase. On Ju y
20, 985, a Star Telegram story stated that the City Council
would consider —new gol e s at the July 23 Council Meeting (See
Attachment A) . In an open meeting in May, the Park and
Recreation Advisory Board had passed a recommendation for a fee
increase.
However, based on the Council 's concern, the attached notice and
fee schedule were posted in all golf shops and mailed to the
following organizations on July 24, 1985: (See Attachment B)
Meadowbrook Mens Golf Association
Meadowbrook Ladies Golf Association
Rockwood Pan American Golf Association
Pecan Valley Mens Golf Association
Fort Worth Ladies Golf Association
Fort Worth Golf Association, Inc.
Council Member Jim Bagsby
Question: Why didn't the Golf Division fulfill its promise to develop Syca-
more Creek after the completion of Pecan Valley Golf Course?
Response: It was never the Division's expectation to completely fund the
expansion and improvement of Sycamore Creek Golf Course with the
revenues from Pecan Valley but rather it was planned to proceed
with monies from General Obligation or Revenue Bonds. Currently
the expansion and improvement of Sycamore Creek is proposal in
the upcoming 1986-88 Capital Improvement Program.
Plans include a complete mid-length 18-hole golf facility com-
plete with fencing, landscaping, full service pro shop, paved
parking lot and maintenance building.
Golf management strongly supports the development of Sycamore
Creek. It will be an important addition to the golf system and
will serve as the home course for both the Junior and Senior
Programs as well as for Texas Wesleyan' s golf program.
-ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7039 - Page 5
pP T I*,,o
0-foRp To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
x
Subject: PROPOSED GOLF FEE INCREASES
Council Member Kathy Wetherby
Question: Why can't the Golf Division do away with the private carts immed-
iately? Why wait until January 1990?
Response: Staff believes that it is desirable to provide cart owners a
reasonable time to be made aware that private carts are no longer
to be allowed on public golf courses. Council Member Wetherby
suggested that carts be allowed until 1988 and this is acceptable
to staff. Remembering that private golf carts do negatively im-
pact the Golf Program, the sooner this practice is discontinued,
the better.
Council Member Bill Garrison
Question: How many private carts are currently used on the golf courses?
Response: Currently, no figures are available to determine how many indi-
vidual carts are privately owned. However, numbers are available
on total private carts used on Fort Worth municipal golf courses.
.
'4 Fiscal Fiscal Year 1983/84 - 9,058
October 1, 1984/June 30, 1985 6,794
If additional information is required, it will be furnished upon request.
4thl�uglas Harman
Attachments ri ty Manager
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS