HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 7053 IN* �'ORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7053
50PP* To the Mayor and Members of the City Council October 1, 1985
*rfX Subject: PRELIMINARY 1986-88 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
For the past several months, the City staff has been working to recommend
priorities for the 1986-88 Capital Improvement Program. The City Council will
recall that initial departmental project submittals were shared with the
Council and discussed at the June workshop. The staff is now prepared to
present the Council and citizenry with a preliminary listing of projects for
consideration.
The recommended preliminary program totals $150 million and can be divided
into the following major categories:
I. Streets and Related Improvements $115 million
II. Park and Recreation Improvements $ 15 million
III. Library Improvements $10 million
IV. Fire Safety Improvements $5.5 million
V. Municipal Facilities Improvements $4.5 million
(Animal Shelter, Southwest Police
Sector Building, and completion of
the City Hall plan)
million
(individual project
descriptions are attached)
In addition, two other projects should be considered and will be discussed
below.
The Council was previously advised that the date for the bond election should
be February, 1986 based on the projection of when existing bond funds would be
expended or obligated. With the working election date of February 4, 1986 as
the reference point, a schedule of activities leading up to the election has
been developed (ATTACHED). The schedule calls for a series of public input
meetings to be held during the month of October. The purpose of these
meetings is to explain the tentative listing of projects to interested
citizens and to receive feedback on the citizens' perception of project
priorities. It is anticipated that the Council will ultimately make several
adjustments in the program based on this input, and then establish the final
program for consideration by the public.
Once the program is set and the election is called by the City Council in
early December, another series of public meetings will be held for community
groups of all types in order to explain the projects included in the final
program. Each City Councilmember will have an opportunity to participate in
these meetings during both rounds of presentations in their respective
districts.
[ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7053 p.2
JOP,-p To the Mayor and Members of the City Council October 1 , 1985
A�
r
X , Subject: PRELIMINARY 1986-88 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
+6 73
Projecting the financial impact of the recommended bond program is difficult
due to the assumptions which must be made about such critical factors such as
interest rates and growth in assessed valuation. Nevertheless, an estimate
has been developed. It is the staff's best estimate that the $150 million
program would add, at most, 2.8 cents to the tax rate in 1986-87 and 4.8 cents
by 1988-89 (DETAIL ATTACHED). It is also true that failure to proceed with a
substantial capital improvement program at this time would significantly
worsen the condition of municipal capital investments and retard economic
development. These outcomes would likely lead to tax rate increases as well,
but the size of these increases would be speculative.
The tentatively recommended $150 million bond program does not address two
capital improvements which have been discussed in connection with the Cultural
District Masterplan. The staff seeks direction from the City Council
regarding two particular projects with the potential for extraordinary
benefits: 1) replacement of the horse barns at the Will Rogers complex and,
2) acquisition of the foundry site in the heart of the district.
The horse barn project is estimated to cost $12 million. I recommend that
Council request the voters' authorization of $8 million for this project and
seek the remaining $4 million come from private sources. Based on this
Sw understanding, the City bonds would not be sold unless the private funding
does materialize. Fort Worth's national attraction is based to a large extent
upon its cultural, entertainment and business ties with horse and ' livestock
activities. The Will Rogers Complex is the largest and beat known location
for these types of programs. The current horse barns are badly outdated, and
must be replaced and enhanced if the horse and livestock programs are to
remain viable attractions in Fort Worth.
A second project should be given serious discussion during the weeks ahead.
Despite great improvements to the Cultural District, including the recently
donated Conservatory and Lecture Hall, an iron foundry remains located in the
center of this important area. City Council should discuss the options to
achieve its relocation before finalizing the capital improvements program.
It should also be noted that , at this stage of the process, funds for the
resurfacing and reconstruction of local and collector streets have not been
associated with particular districts. Instead, priorities for these funds
will be set in the citizen input process. A sum of $24 million has been
recommended for this category. Also, another $12 million is recommended to
match $6 million in Community Development Block Grant funds for the rebuilding
of inner-city streets. Thus, a grand total of $42 million (bonds and CDBG) is
recommended to be spent for street resurfacing and reconstruction over the
next three years. It is anticipated that the bulk of these funds will be
directed toward the inner-city districts. The planned use of these funds
should be kept in mind when reviewing the geographic distribution of
recommended projects.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7053 p.3
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council October 1, 1985
Subject: PRELIMINARY 1986-88 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
It is the staff's judgment that the tentative bond program outlined in this
report addresses the highest needs of the community while being mindful of
fiscal constraints. Obviously, many additional projects could have been
recommended with persuasive justification. However, the recommended program
attempts to strike a fine balance between Fort Worth's capital needs and our
citizens' ability to pay.
It is recommended that the City Council endorse the schedule and process
outlined in this report and that we begin to conduct public input meetings in
the immediate future. The staff will endeavor to keep all Councilmembers
fully aware of the status of this important program as we progress through the
schedule.
Doug 4sJHarman
City Manager
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS