Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 7377 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No . • `�#••«% To the Mayor and Munbers of the City Council April 25, 19$9 X Subject: ••� STATE BANK FRANCHISE TAX REFUND 1 Your recent Texas court decisions have resulted in a potential liability for the City through repayment of bank franchise taxes from the years 1985, 1985 and 1987. Not all of the information and claims are yet available, however we can currently estimate the impact and the options available as well its latent effect on this years collection. COURT ISSUE Your corporations filed claims against taxing entities on the grounds of four court cases dealing with franchise tax. The cases and the major issue involved were. Bullock v. Sage Energy - Books and Records State v. Sun Oil Co. - Contingent Liabilities State v. Sun Refining & Marketing - Pre-Acquisition Earnings Bullock v. Shell Oil Co. - Impairment Reserves These decisions allow claims for the bank franchise taxes on two primary issues: -allowing a holding company to compute its investment in securities based on the lower-of-cost-or-market basis, and/or -allowing companies to adjust surplus to report certain items on a tax basis accounting method (cash versus accrual basis for depreciation, loan losses and accretion) (Sage) CLAIMS Thirty-three (33) claims have been filed on the City to date for the years 1985, 1986 and 1987 (of a potential 126 claims.) Claims for 1985 had to be filed by March 15, 1989 and these totalled $ 340,995.95 (from seventeen of the 37 banks paid). Total claims for all years filed total $ 689,150.43 however more claims for 1986 and 1987 are expected. The percentage decrease on the amended returns varies greatly and makes final estimates difficult. With one major bank's claim (NCNB) for 1986 and 1987 missing, the estimated refund for all three years increases to $ 1.1 million. Three banks are also filing for interest on these previous payments. ACTION OPTION There is a bill (HB 3032) before the current legislature which would permit repayment of these claims from future franchise taxes at the option of the bank company. This would provide for a 25% bank credit in 1990, 35% in 1991 and 40% in 1992 (except not to result in a net credit return to the bank). ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH,TEXAS--- ' � � REPORT TO crry COUNCIL MEMBERS 7377 P.2 4pril 25, 1989 STATE BANK F RAN CHISE TAX REFUND Hearings on this bill began on April 12th. It is recommended that no refund action be taken until action on this legislation is final. A letter so informing the banks will be sent in April 1989. 1989 REVENUE IMPACT Perhaps the most significant impact of these court actions will be on future revenues from bank franchise tax. Revenue in 1988-89 was budgeted at $ 950,000 and is now estimated at $ 460,000. These court actions, applied to the significantly weaker positions of the banks currently, will probably halve our normally estimated revenues for some years in the future. On a very conservative basis the impact could appear as critical Normal Estimate Amended Refund Total 1990 $1 million $500,000 <$275,000> $225,000 1991 $1.1 million $550,000 <$385,000> $165,000 1992 $1.2 million $600,000 <$440,000> $160,000 uglas Manager city it, ______