HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 7401 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7401
��'p T 6 August 22, 1989
Q4 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council Page One
us
Subject:DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING REESTABLISHMENT
1073 OF FORT WORTH IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Nd. i'
On August 15, 1989, the City Council adopted MSC G-8165 regarding
reestablishment of the Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1.
Paragraph 3 of the M&C requires the City Manager to prepare certain
documents and information and to file the same with the City Secretary
as provided in Chapter 372 of the Local Government Code.
The following documents and information are hereby submitted:
1. The general nature of the proposed improvements and/or
services of the proposed districtshall include:
(a) an improvement district maintenance and landscaping
program consisting of supplemental street sweeping,
sidewalk cleaning, bus shelter cleaning, planting and
landscape maintenance, streetscape improvements, and
trash receptacle pickup.
(b) an improvement district promotions program consisting
of recreational and cultural enhancements and
activities; promotional program; and the staging or
monitoring of special recreational and cultural events.
(c) an improvement district marketing program consisting of
an advertising and marketing campaign to promote the
use of the District to three target populations
(primarily) , downtown workers, visitors, Fort Worth and
Tarrant County residents.
(d) an improvement district security program consisting of
a public relations crime prevention campaign; a private
security force coordination campaign; a parking garage
and parking lot security program;
(e) an improvement district transportation and parking
program consisting of a campaign to promote FWTA bus
service and ridesharing; the development of a plan
concerning better utilization of short-term parking
facilities; and the improvement of traffic signs.
(f) an improvement district management program to provide
for the establishment, administration and operation of
the district/activities and programs.
The proposed improvements and/or services would be a supplement
to the standard existing level of city improvements and/or services
and would constitute an added increment to the improvements and/or
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TOI CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No.7 401
*fart n,o August 22 , 1989
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council Page Two
Subject:DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING REESTABLISHMENT
OF FORT WORTH IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
services normally provided to the taxpayers generally. The estimated
annual cost of standard improvements and/or services currently
provided by the City of Fort Worth to taxpayers in the district is
being updated from the 1986 figures shown on Exhibit "A", which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. The adjusted
current standard level of service totals will be added to and made a
part of the City Council resolution reestablishing the district, when
and if the district is reestablished. If the district is
reestablished, the City would continue to furnish or pay for standard
improvements and/or services in the district at the same level as they
are provided to the taxpayers generally.
The City Council Resolution authorizing reestablishment of the
District would contain a provision establishing the present annual
cost level of standard improvements and/or services currently
provided by the City of Fort Worth to taxpayers in the District as
enumerated in Exhibit "A" with such corrections therein as are
certified by the City Manager of the City of Fort Worth before the
Resolution is adopted. During the five year term of the district,
the City would provide the same level of standard improvements and/or
services to taxpayers in the district as enumerated in Exhibit "'A",
with such correction therein as are certified by the City Manager.
2. A preliminary estimate of the cost of the improvements
and/or services of the proposed district during the first
year of operation is:
(a) maintenance and landscaping program $445 ,000
(b) promotions program 113,257
(c) marketing program 56,743
(d) security program 23,818
(e) transportation and parking program 4 ,550
(f) management program 150 ,073
$793,441
The cost of improvements and/or services in subsequent years would be
determined in the service plan to be adopted by the City Council .
3. The boundaries of the proposed improvement district are:
The area bounded by Jones Street on the east; Lancaster
Avenue on the south; Texas Street, Macon Street, Fifth
Street, Fourth Street, Burnett Street, Belknap Street and
Taylor Street on the west; and the Trinity River and the
East 100 and East 200 blocks of Bluff Street on the north.
Such area is more particularly shown on a map which is
attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof
by reference.
- ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No.7 401
',T August 22, 1989
�a4coarp To the Mayor and Members of the City Council Page Three
p I
Subject: DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING REESTABLISHMENT
OF FORT WORTH IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
4. The proposed method of assessment is:
(a) A service plan would be approved and adopted by the
City Council for a period not less than five years.
The plan would be reviewed and updated annually by the
Council to determine the annual budget for improvements
and/or special supplemental services within the
district.
(b) The cost of an improvement and/or special service would
be assessed against real property within 'the district
according to the value of such property as determined
by the City Council , including the value of structures
or other improvements on the property.
(c) The City Council Resolution authorizing reestablishment
of the District would contain a provision which states
that during the initial five-year term of the District
the annual assessments against real property in the
District would not exceed an amount equal to 8.5 cents
per $100 of the value of such property as determined by
the City Council , including the value of structures or
other improvements on the property.
5. The proposed apportionment of costs between the improvement
district and the City as a whole is:
(a) All of the cost of an improvement and/or service would
be paid by special assessments against real property
and structures or other improvements thereon in the
district.
(b) The City of Fort Worth would be responsible for the
payment of assessments on exempt city-owned real
property and structures or other improvements thereon
in the district. The payment of assessments on
property owned by other exempt jurisdictions could be
established by contract. The City as a whole would
continue to provide the standard improvements and
services to the district as referred to in I above.
(c) The City Council of the City of Fort Worth would be
authorized to establish by ordinance reasonable
classifications and formulas for the apportionment of
costs between the City and the areas to be assessed and
to establish the methods for assessing special benefits
for various classes of improvements and/or services.
-ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No.7401
.RTJ^'fo August 22, 1989
�ofSIM' To the Mayor and Members of the City Council Page Four
w.
V4
Subject:DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING REESTABLISHMENT
1073 OF FORT WORTH IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
6. The probable maximum benefits to be conferred on each tract
in the district because of the improvements and/or services
shall be greater than the amount of the assessment against
such tract and the owners thereof.
7. The City Council Resolution authorizing reestablishment of
the district would provide that the district will exist for
five years immediately following adoption of such Resolution
unless property owners in the District petition the City
Council for re-establishment of the district, or unless the
District is sooner terminated as provided by law.
The original of the above report was filed with the City secretary of
the City of Fort Worth on August 17, 1989.
Please contact me if further information is desired.
Respectfully submitted,
"boug las Harman
City Manager
6
DR:saw
-ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
CITYWIDE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
op" APPLIED TO CENTRAL, BUSINESS DISTRICT SERVICES
lite following, coats are an estimate of the planning, admit►istrative sad
coordlttation coats for providing support services to fit%* Ae•.partme•,nts that
provide eervicaa in the central business tllatrict. All coats other that►
Planning Department figure@ were obtained by applying each d�part..e+►%t '•
indirect cost allocation rate to the departm*nt'a direct salary costs for % 010
service provision (as listed on the CeD services survey) . Lt►dlract nilocatiot►
cost rates have not beet% established for the City Services Ast+1 P►tbl is Worke
Departments. The *,am* it►direct cost rate as the Uate!r 1}e partme►tt was
therefore applied to theses salary costs. P1A#%#%i11R ,Uetpartme►►t costs reflect
actual coats for a C6D Plattner as well as associated indirect support service
coats. Indirect costs were t►ot it►cluded for CITRAN altice partial fttttditiR is
obtaittetd from the Ft. wortlt 'Cransportation Authority.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Associate Planner for CND S28,740
Supplies, Contractual Services 900 29.641)
Indirect Cost Allocation► Rate ( .8278) 21)790
Total S'1,43i}
PARK f. RECREATION
` Direct Salary Costs (b A.P. ) 586,568
x Indirect Cost Allocation Rate ( .2188) 18,941
PG..'CE
Direct Salary Costs $772.825
x Indirect Cv«t Allocation Rate (.2098) 162. ]50
CITY SERVICES
Direct Salary Costs 5109,807
x Indirect Cost Allocation Rate ( .06110) 9.661
TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC .WORKS
I
Direct Salary Costs (Est. ) $216,249
x Indirect Cost Allocation Rate ( .0880) 19,214
FIRE
Direct Salary Coots $474,059
X Indirect Cost Allocation Rate (.2024), 177.254
TOTAL $440,857
Exhibit A
• Page 1
� Z
w
K
w
r
A
•+ M '► iR
+uMr• r
t • # µ
•
A #�
•
v •
• •
f1
MM
wy! c+ M
rt • • • i ++ r A +• R • • P M
!� R
• •
A • • •.• ! • f i 11R D N
w
Opl*
y 4 rt •
4 O O N
O
M w'�a w i1 N
Y y i� w
y
r
•
w�w C 0 Z 0 0 • w ! 0 rt 4 y f
«. r n rt A rt a A w • rt •# a
• Aw r • � rt n � • a �. i r
• R fl •+ A • A A A • i rt +'� N
L C-
V.
pr
I A •i
Y `
• w w i � # � r
• • • w C • n R F! w
+F • • • • r • # 7 w A i •" i
! w
A A w �• •
• ++ A A a A • •f
w• A N • r A n ~ • wrt
w
• +1 i n 7 w r M O
s r A M
r r«+ • � c t
r• V C A C 0 i • �
•
w •
s
w A •r
4
PP
4 4 M •�
Exhibit A
Patio 2
M M
r M
� z
{� N
« r
* p A f�
r
r N
1
• � � � �r • A �i 1 H
•
v
M
31 :1 ;
.Y
t.
• • M
w
i
Of • • •
.► 7 v v
i
1!
•
1
M
S M o
yp Y N
Y Y h 1•
![xhibit A
Page 3
op" - 7 - ; ■
� ■ � - � � §
� '
| . �
« . � � � ■ � �
� k - ■ � � ' . ' n
Pr` 0 }
- .
!
n n g 2 � r
■ ; -
to
of
; ■ ; ` � ° 2
Q
ol § i � \ (
�
, or k If S
- Q ■ | � E � E kf | ' 2 � s - I cat -
% 22 � / � - k _ - kk �
as
kOR ■ �
§ � i | { | § �
. . _ ; ■ | _ i % 2 - � JI -
� a - - | -
� i� � 2 � � � k3 | . � ' q � � _ l ■
\ ; or . 0I �
_, , « � ? ; � '_ ■
k . ,
we
] |
� ds E� a
■ � -� � � � � | ■ � � , � �
-
: or
R ■ ■ � $ �
. O $ -4
* Exhibit A
Page 4
M
M
•
w � i
w
R r
A
•
M
n
• ti • M
•
� i • �n
M
M
6 N ~N
r *
IL
r O w • N M T O
r
R • •
w M R A 7
i • A O 11
i M
w a i i • • _ ry
w 0 •� O • • pp V . a w .•.. '^
N M O N M ff '� r •" r A O u ! '• '� '! 'v • r
46 q
vi
• .. . rai � 0 . •. or .lg . .. R !
01 .• •• • • 1
«. 1r! •wt i t 1 V M r A t t i i .+ • y 7r !
.� • w -,4 4 V r r •
of
w n � � i•1 w s
• •
M 1• M
.� M 4 N w M .. N •
:•i. p• a asQ e • pop "pQ • .. is o
M M O O O 4 w M Q i7 O v
" M M
y r
V .w
M •
M V"
o
8xh3bft A
Papa 5
r
M
A
n
•
M
{
' a
w
Y
n � r
• w s
o �
} 4A
N M M
• O O
• i .a
N
O
la
M
Q
M
t
r
A
t1
� N
yV
•r
M
o � c .. w n w --• e � s v
n rN ..w•a.M Xy �,,,
i '. ! '• • • r 1 . � a r. a •
Ct N '1 N C1 r • « Q� N i E1 r • i M • f1 r • •
C « • • i r -s ++ « � 0 •` • +•• A N U Op r s
• w •t w N O r .^.sN r. n A n i n ^ C h
OR • n A s
s r a n n . • • . r � A
t r • • N s
i N .4. 4r • Y i t y
r
• A •1 6 • O s V C
• ,. . v
N • • V • •ar i {
• • ar r • r
•
•
rf
r qp r r r
w w a r s rt r Sa v
4 O 4 O V P O
O P O
M
r
r
• O �
. w �"i ►
Exhibit A
Pagr 6
1
w w
r
M
~ r
yrt
}
a R
w
• R
1
V. ■ C W
M
G i
pr � • !
tl ~
� •1 R rt � }•
i r i
+ R 7
•
1
w
n
r
R • O ++ ! R 8 P. M 9 ! '7 C1MCJ •F 'I w +f
• e +t .i b w r• #( 777778 n « • �• Z 8 w w !'i „
p • • �• r nyw � • a
� •,� p 7 p • { i # f yy M Y • R O
n rt h M r V V 1 s pO • '/ R •M •
w i w ~ s + ¢ r # 4 fl ow l • M► i • «+fir
a 0! 758 � � � � 1 •17
+r Y v wy a e rt r R
ryry ..• • y 1 r r 11jj w r • 11 a t1
o. A r A •1 ! • � w+ A 3 9 e rt r of
• ! R V i r } y C r ! p •
A • A � r � • r 0 A r � a .1 +1 R
n �
n v • w. r • • IG R
R R 41 `.� M • .'� M
1 .R. Q «•.. • r r u r .. I A
o r n o ^ • "'
r .. { r ^� s sr 9 v • QQ ! A
•+ a r N N 7 {j R 1
•• R o • w
w r • • t1 w � .• •1 •
V w v t 1•
• A w IJ V N !� Y Q h N • • tl
� 1 IE
• rt :' r p75al�• 00 u. •r. 0 i •. •
n w
• 0
• rr 1+ w 1•+ M w r
♦ .• V M v 2 «
�4jM/ i r
r� O • �
two ++ V •
• ,~ C M
V
u
• M Y
h M « M
Iwi1 N F M
lJolk
Exhibit A
rapt* 7
r
C
LC C
C.
Jt-)
0
110 DAL L At
N
db
tu,u.at _.�______ ____J 0
0
• 0
-A
TEXAS
C
I-,)m,ntcwn 46 J G
l-UnVJxth'lM tj
LANCASTER
Fort Worth Improvement
District No. I Boundaries
Fringe Area
Core Area
EXITTBTT "B"