Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 7410 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No.- 7410 'PTIM 0A 0, I'a e To the Mayor and Members of the City Council September 19, 1989 Subject: PROPERTY OWNER CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE GRAINGER STREET BEN[Ell-HEARING The benefit hearing for the assessment paving of Grainger Street was held June 27. Barney W. Uselton, owner of Lots 18 and 19, Block 16, Emory College bdivision, being unable to attend because of health problems, sent correspondence to the Mayor via Registered Mail . The letter was received in the City Mail Room on June 15 but did not reach the mayor and was not presented at the hearing. Because the original cannot be located, Mr. Uselton sent copies of the letter and the U.S. Postal receipt, which are attached for the Council 's con- sideration. Although the hearing has been closed and the assessments levied, the assessment can be reduced should the Council desire. The assessment against Mr. Uselton's property is in compliance with the policy. The only grounds for a reduction would be that the property would not be benefited by as much as the amount of the assessment. An independent appraiser reported at the hearing that, in his opinion, the special benefits exceeded the amount of the assessments in every case. This matter will be brought to the Council 's attention when final pay- ment for the construction contract and final assessment rolls are presented for approval and Mr. Uselton will be notified in advance. If additional information is desired it will be furnished upon request. lzl:211�4 Douglas Harman City Manager DAI :d Attachment -ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS June 13, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL #P061386842 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Bob Bolin, Mayor, and Fort Worth City Council 1000 Throckmorton Ft. Worth, Texas 76102 Re: Proposed Assessment on Block 13, Lots 18 and 19; Emory College Subdivision Benefit Hearing: 6/27/89 Gentlemen: We are in receipt of your notification of a Benefit Hearing scheduled on June 27, 1989 at 10:00 a.m. for the proposed assessment of Lilac Street, Unit 2A, College Avenue, Unit 2B, and Grainger Avenue, Unit 2C. Please read this letter into the minutes of that meeting. The proposed assessment against our property is $3,674.32. That property was received by us by inheritance and is a vacant lot where a condemned house was removed. The house was the former homestead of Barney Washington Uselton, and after his death, was rented out by us to pay the debts on the property. A city inspector at the time contacted us and indicated that the neighbors were complaining about the "undesirable" tenants, so, we moved them out on a Saturday and a "condemned" sign was placed on the property on Sunday. He explained that, since the house was vacant, he was allowed to condemn it. After an earnest and prolonged attempt to Meet city standards for the aging property, our health was deteriorating to the point that we decided our lives were more important than the house, and we tore it down, although it was clearly one of the better properties on the block. If the vacant lot is now toned "F" increasing the assessment, surely the other lots on that block are also zoned 'T' because they were rezoned by a builder who was to use the block for some sort of federally subsidized structure, which never came about. We are requesting that you take these facts, and our current income and health status into account, before any assessment is made. In short, and in sincerety, we cannot afford an assessment. We both live on a fixed income from retirement, and are both sixty-nine (69) years of age. Page Two We both had to retire at sixty-two (62), which decreased our retire- ement benefits, because of increasing health problems. I, Barney Uselton, currently am being treated for heart trouble and hypertension, and*Pauline Uselton has a rare blood disease, hypertension, chronic ulcers of both feet, and neuropathy. She is also being treated for nerve and muscle damage caused by the blood disease and is permanently disabled. Two to three time a year, she is hospitalized, and those bills are astronomical, but, even without the frequent hospitalizations, our regular monthly doctor bills exceed $325.00 per month and regular prescription bills exceed $200.00 per month. We ask that the city not charge us an assessment on the property. Thank you very much for your consideration of these matters. If we can provide any additional information, please let us know. Sincerely yours, /'��Barney W. Uselton • SENDER: Comp' Items 1 and Z when additional services are desir and complete items 3 and 4. i Put your address In OW'RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side.Failure to..this will prevent this r cord from being returned to you.The rstum rscei t fee will provide you the name of the person delivered r and the date of delivery.For eadttiona ees t • o owing services an av s •.Consult postmaster or toes and c h•c c ox es for additional servicelal requested. 1. O Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. L 0 Restricted Delivery /� (faro dune) (Faro c"e) J 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number Bob Bolin, Mayor, and P 061 386 842 . ; I_ Fort Worth City 'Council P*of Service:, ilk 1000 Throckmorton Certified l"e"nd 1 Fort Worth, Texas 76102f� pstDm R.c.�t y ❑ Ex Man rChandille sndl Always obtain signature of addressee or agent and DATE DELIVERED. i S. Signature —Address S. Addressee's Address (ONLrif X nrgresrad and fa paid) Mrs ZI AQ8 7. Da.of DoWary -i P8 Form 3811,mar. 1988 + LL&(LP.O. 1888-212-888 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT • .11�F� 7 j I-,v.7 ' 04�