HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 7417 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7417
w.,�ftiRf
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council September 26, 1989
Page One
*�xr •
Subject: CITY-WIDE T� DISADVANTAGED SUS I NESS ENTERPRISE POLICY
The City of Fort Worth currently has in place a policy
(C. P. 128, July 8, 1986) aimed at increasing the level of
participation of Minority and Women Business Enterprises
(MBE and WBE) in all City funded procurement activities. As a
result of recent Supreme Court decisions, it is necessary to
implement a race-neutral Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
(DBE) Policy until the completion of additional surveys and
studies. Council Policy 145 has been included on the September
26, 1989 City Council agenda for action.
BACKGROUND
In 1978, the City Council adopted a policy that was aimed at
increasing the level of participation of minority business
enterprises (MBEs) on City projects funded by the Department of
Transportation, primarily the Urban Mass Transportation
Administration (UMTA) . The policy was revised in 1980 to include
women-owned businesses (WBEs) ; and was further revised in 1983 to
comply with UMTA' s requirement to change to a ' Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise Program. This policy applied to only those
projects which were federally funded. After program
implementation, the reports submitted to UMTA reflected that
there was sufficient participation by MBEs and WBEs to meet the
federal requirements. In comparing the MBE and WBE participation
on City- let, City-funded projects during the same time period, it
became readily apparent that the level of participation was
extremely low and in some areas non-existent. On July 8, 1986,
in order to address this passive discrimination, the City
Council adopted C. P. 123, instituting a program aimed at
increasing the level of MBE and WBE participation in all City
funded procurement activities. The participation by MBE and WBE
firms has increased each year the program has been in existence.
gOU81, ACTION§
The United States Supreme Court decision in the case of
City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co. , 109 S. Ct. 706 ( 1989) ,
establishes new standards by which the constitutionality of local
governments' MBE and WBE programs will be judged. In Croson, the
Supreme Court held that a local government say maintain a
program if it is necessary to assure that the local government is
not a "passive participant" in a system of racial /social
exclusion practiced by contractors in the private sect ; or if
such a program is necessary to eradicate the vestiges of its own
past discrimination. The Court further held ". . . that any public
entity, state or federal , has a compelling interest in
assuring that public dollars, drawn from the tax contributions of
all citizens, do not serve to finance the evil of private
prejudice. " In the concluding section of the majority opinion,
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS ---
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7417
Sicokf To the Mayor and Members of the City Council September 26, 1989
��= Page Two
rtx"y• Subject: CITY-WIDE D I SADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY
.,73
the Court reiterated that "NIhere there is a significant
statistical disparity between the number of qualified minority
contractors willing and able to perform a particular service and
the number of such contractors actually engaged by the locality
or the locality' s prime contractors, an inference of
discriminatory exclusion could arise. " Pending completion of
additional surveys and studies which are required as a result of
Croson, it is necessary to repeal C. P. 123 and adopt a DBE
program.
The DBE Program will be narrowly tailored, per the Supreme Court
decision, to include the major presumptive groups in the metro-
plex that have suffered as direct recipients of the past
exclusionary practices in the private and public sectors. For
the purposes of this policy:
1 . "Disadvantaged Business Enterprise" is defined as a business
concern currently doing business and/or located in the Fort Worth
Dallas metroplex meeting the following criteria:
a. which is at least 51 percent owned by one or more
socially and economically disadvantaged individuals,
or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at
least 51 percent of the stock is owned by one or
more socially and economically disadvantaged indi-
viduals ; and
b. whose management and daily business operations are
controlled by one or more of the socially and eco-
nomically disadvantaged individuals who own it.
C. Any person, firm, corporation, or partnership which
has a current certification from the Small Business
Administration under Section 8(a) of the Small
Business Act.
2. "Socially Disadvantaged Individuals" means individuals who
have been subject to racial or ethnic prejudice or
cultural bias because of their identity as a member of
a group without regard to their qualities as individuals or
capabilities as a business.
3. "Economically Disadvantaged Individuals" means socially
disadvantaged individuals whose ability to compete in the free
enterprise system is impaired due to diminished opportunities
to obtain capital and credit as compared to others in the same
rL line of business who are not socially disadvantaged.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER I FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7417
�&0, an,
�
o�ioRr�s To the Mayor and Members of the City Council September 26, 1989
Page Three
} xt
�' Subject. CITY-WIDE DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY
♦ts
4. For the purpose of this Policy, the City shall presume that
individuals in the groups listed below who are citizens of the
United States or lawfully admitted permanent residents, are
socially and economically disadvantaged. The presumption,
however, is rebuttable and parties may challenge whether any
particular person in one of these groups is actually
disadvantaged. The groups are:
a. Black Americans- persons having origins in the black
racial groups of Africa;
b. Hispanic Americans- persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican,
and Cuban origin; and
C. Women.
Individuals who are not members of the presumptive groups may
nevertheless be found to be socially and economically
disadvantaged on a case-by-case basis.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
An Intergovernmental Agency Group ( IAG) consisting of metroplex
MBE and DBE Coordinators have been informally meeting for the
past two (2) years. The IAG is comprised of the following
governmental agencies : City of Fort Worth, City of Dallas,
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Dallas Independent
School District, Dallas Community College District, Fort Worth
Housing Authority, Dallas Housing Authority, Dallas Area Rapid
Transit, and Dallas County.
These agencies meet monthly to exchange procedural information in
hopes of jointly performing activities that will reduce the cost
to the perspective agencies and provide the DBE community with
comprehensive programs such as joint trade fairs and workshops.
In order to formalize this relationship, all participants have
been requested to sign the Memorandum of Understanding that is
Included as Attachment G in the background material . Unless
otherwise directed by the City Council , the City Manager will
sign this memorandum on behalf of the City.
[ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7417
�artcoar� To the Mayor and Members of the City Council September 26, 1989
Page Four
Z )A` Subject. CITY-WIDE D I SADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY
1073
DISPARITY STUDY
The Supreme Court decision requires an independent study on
disparity in the areas of DBE availability, capability and past
and present discrimination in the public and private arena.
Assuming such a study is conducted, it is anticipated that the
IAG will be primarily responsible for developing the scope of
work and preparing a Request for Proposal for consideration by
the member agencies. If the authorization is granted to proceed,
a formula will be developed to identify how the cost will be
shared among the various agencies.
DBE OFFICE
Attached are the procedures used by the DBE Office to implement
the program. The DBE Office will continue to monitor, collect
statistical data, provide certification under the guidelines of
the Policy and present progress reports to the City Manager.
This policy will be discussed during the Pre-Council Meeting
during September 26, 1989. If additional information is desired,
it will be provided upon request.
4�
Douglas Harman
City Manager
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS --