HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 7852 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS NO. 7852
cH 'reREa July 26, 1994
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council Page 1 of 2
us� z
rex Subject: SETTLEMENT WITH USEPA FOR CLASS II ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY
rer�
The City of Fort Worth Water Department is responsible for development and
implementation of an industrial Pretreatment Program as part of its U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
On August 20, 1993, the City received notice of a proposed assessment of a
Class II Civil Penalty for failure to properly implement and administer its
Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program (see Attachment No. 1) . A request for
the opportunity to request a hearing was submitted to EPA on September 1,
1994 (see Attachment No. 2) .
The following six specific violations were listed:
1. The Permittee's filing system is such that ensuring proper
characterization is not always possible.
2. The Permittee failed to inspect and sample each Significant Industrial
User at least once per year.
3. The Permittee failed to escalate enforcement against noncompliant
X01 Industrial users.
4. The Permittee failed to issue all control mechanisms as required by
Administrative Order Docket VI-92-0927.
5. Permits issued to Industrial users are not clear as to which limits
apply at a sampling location.
6. The Permittee failed to review and act upon self-monitoring data
submittal by Industrial Users.
EPA stated the alleged violation occurred between August, 1989 and February,
1993 . The assessment was set at $125, 000.00.
On August 25, Mike Groomer, Richard Sawey and Robert McMillon met with
representatives of EPA and discussed the assessment. After considerable
discussion, EPA agreed to reduce the assessment to $93,500.00.
During the meeting, staff was informed of an EPA policy on the use of
Supplemental Enforcement Projects (SEP) in EPA settlements. The policy
allows implementation of an approved SEP to offset an portion of the
assessment.
Staff determined that the City should apply for a SEP and began working with
EPA staff on a project. After several meetings and submissions of materials
over the past several months, it appears a project acceptable to both parties
has been completed.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 7852
TE July 26, 1994
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council Page 2 of 2
0
ryas Subject: SETTLEMENT WITH USEPA FOR CLASS II ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY
1873
EPA has informed staff they will accept our SEP and will reduce our
assessment to $40,000.00. Upon receipt of the assessment, the Water
Department immediately began to take steps to correct the alleged violations .
The staff was reorganized and a new supervisor was hired. Two additional
Industrial Waste Specialists were hired to supplement the current staff. The
clerical and sampling sections were completely replaced and a Quality Control
Specialist was hired to insure all sampling and laboratory analyses followed
strict EPA guidelines. Computers for each Specialist were purchased and
additional automatic sampling machines were purchased.
It appears the diligent work effort has paid dividends. EPA returned to the
section in June and again in July to conduct an inspection of the
Pretreatment Program (see Attachment No. 3) . Based on the report, the
Pretreatment Program has been greatly improved and the deficiencies have been
corrected.
Bob Terrell
City Manager
BT:l
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH,TEXAS
ATTACHMENT 1
tEO Sr4j,�
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 6
T 1445 ROSS AVENUE,SUITE 1200
0 DALLAS, TX 75202-2733
110
- AUG
C r
AUG 18 1993 ^r� `4`v
REPLY TO: 6W-ET
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED (P 104 195 428)
Mr. Mike Groomer
Assistant City Manager
City of Fort Worth
P.O. Box 870
Fort Worth, Texas 76101
Re: Notice of Proposed Assessment of a Class II Civil Penalty
Docket No. VI-93-1643
NPDES Permit No. TX0047295
Dear Mr. Groomer:
Enclosed is a document entitled "Administrative Complaint,
Findings of Violation, Notice of Proposed Assessment of a Civil
Penalty, and Notice of .Opportunity to Request a Hearing Thereon"
(hereinafter the "Complaint") . We have filed this Complaint
against the city of Fort Worth under the authority of Section
309 (g) of the Clean Water Act (hereinafter the "Act") , 33 U.S.C.
S 1319(g) . In the Complaint, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) alleges that- the city of Fort Worth has violated -
various provisions of the Clean Water Act, its implementing
regulations, and the terms of the NPDES permit issued under the
authority of the Act. The violations the EPA is alleging are
specifically set out in Section II of the Complaint.
By law, you have a right to request a hearing regarding the
violations alleged in the Complaint and the proposed
administrative civil penalty. Please pay particular attention
to the Complaint Section IV entitled "Notice of Opportunity to
Request a Hearing." Note that should you fail to request a
hearing within twenty (20) days of your receipt of the Complaint,
you will waive your right to such a hearing and, the proposed
civil penalty may be assessed against you without further
proceedings. You have the right to be represented by an attorney
or to represent yourself at any stage of these proceedings.
OFFIC RECORD
,A��R �:��.� �rio CITU
ALCEIVED BY'-- DATE:! 3SEC�ETARY
. WORTH, Ta.
FILE:-
COPY
ILENCOPY TO:-
Printed on Recycled Pacer
-2-
Whether or not you request a hearing, we invite you to confer
informally with the EPA concerning the alleged violations and the
amount of the proposed penalty. You may represent yourself or be
represented by an attorney at any conference, whether in person
or by telephone. The EPA encourages all parties against whom it
files a Complaint proposing assessment of a penalty to pursue the
possibility of settlement as a result of an informal conference.
If such a mutually satisfactory settlement can be reached, it
will be formalized by the issuance of a Consent Agreement signed
by you and by the Regional Administrator of EPA Region 6. The
issuance of such a Consent Agreement shall constitute a waiver by
you of your right to a hearing on, and to a Judicial appeal of,
the agreed civil penalty. Enclosed for your convenience are two
(2) copies of the "Consent Agreement and Order Assessing
Administrative Penalties".
A request for an informal conference does not extend the twenty
(20) days by which you must request or waive a hearing on the
proposed penalty assessment; the two procedures can be pursued
simultaneously. If you have any questions, or wish to discuss
the possibility of a settlement of this matter, please contact
Ms. Astrid Larsen, U.S. EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733, or telephone (214) 655-6454.
We urge your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Myron O. Knudson, P. E.
Director
Water Management Division (6W)
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rick Ruddell
Section Chief, Enforcement
Watershed Management Division
Texas Water Commission
rI
FFICIAL RECORD
ITY SECRETARY
T. WORTH, ra
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 6
IN THE MATTER OF § DOCKET NO. VI-93-1643
§
THE CITY OF FORT WORTH §
INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM §
4500 WILMA LANE §
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012 § Proposal to Assess a
§ Class II Administrative
NPDES PERMIT NO. TX0047295 § Penalty Under CWA § 309 (g)
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT,
FINDINGS OF VIOLATION,
NOTICE OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF
A CIVIL PENALTY, AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY
TO REQUEST A HEARING THEREON
I. Statutory Authority
The following Findings are made and Notices given under the
authority vested in the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) by Section 309(g) of the Clean Water Act
(hereinafter the "Act") , 33 U.S.C. § 1319(g) . The Administrator
has delegated these authorities to the Regional Administrator of
EPA Region 6 who redelegated these authorities to the Director of
the Water Management Division of EPA Region 6, who hereby issues
this Complaint and Notice.
II. Findings of Violation
1. The city of Fort Worth (hereinafter the "Respondent") , a
person within the meaning of Section 502 (5) of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
§ 1362 (5) , owns or operates a facility located at. 4500 Wilma
Lane, Arlington, Texas, which discharges pollutants to Segment
No. 0841 of the Trinity River Basin, a navigable water of the
United States within the meaning of Section 502 of the Act, 33
U.S.C. § 1362. Respondent is, therefore, subject to the
provisions of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 It secr. OFFICK RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TOL
Docket No. VI-93-1643
Page 2
2. The Respondent has violated Section 301(a) of the Act, 33
U.S.C. § 1311(a) , by violating condition Part II.A. of NPDES
Permit No. TX0047295, which condition implements Sections
301(b) (2) and 307(c) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1311(b) (2) and
1317 (c) and which permit has been issued to the Respondent
pursuant to Section 402 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1342, by failing
to implement its pretreatment program in accordance with
requirements of 40 CFR 403, the program submitted to and approved
by EPA, and Part II.A. of the permit between August 1989 and
February 1993. Specific violations include the following:
1. The Permittee's filing system is such that
ensuring proper characterization is not
always possible.
2 . The Permittee failed to inspect and -sample
each Significant -Industrial User at- least
once per year.
3 . The Permittee failed to escalate enforcement
against noncompliant Industrial Users.
4 . The Permittee failed to issue all control
mechanisms as required by Administrative
Order Docket No. VI-92-0927.
5. Permits issued to Industrial Users are not
clear as to which limits apply at a sampling
location.
6. The Permitee failed to review and act
upon self-monitoring data submitted by
the Industrial User.
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, Ta
Docket No. VI-93-1643
Page 3
3. EPA has consulted with the State of Texas regarding this
proposed action by mailing a copy of this document to the
appropriate State official and offering an opportunity for the
State to consult with the EPA on this proposed penalty
assessment.
III. Notice of Proposed Order Assessing A Civil Penalty
Based on the foregoing Findings of Violation and pursuant to
the authority of Section 309(g) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319(g) ,
EPA Region 6 hereby proposes to issue a Final Order Assessing
Administrative Penalties to the Respondent assessing a penalty of
$125,000, which constitutes less than $10,000 per violation cited
above. The proposed penalty amount was determined by the EPA
after taking into account the nature, circumstances, extent and
gravity of the violation or violations, the Respondent's prior
compliance history, degree of culpability for the cited
violations, any economic benefit and savings accruing to
Respondent by virtue of the violations, and the Respondent's
ability to pay the proposed penalty. All factors are identified
at Section 309 (g) (3) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319 (g) (3) . The
Final Order Assessing Administrative Penalties may be issued
twenty (20) days after Respondent's receipt of this Notice unless
the Respondent, within that time, requests a hearing on this
Notice pursuant to the following section. 7�WORTHJEX.
0MCITFT.
Docket No. VI-93-1643
Page 4
IV. Notice of Ogvortunity to Request a Hearing
1. Respondent may, pursuant to Section 309(g) , of the Act,
33 U.S.C. § 1319(g) , request within twenty (20) days of receipt
of this Notice, a hearing on the civil penalty assessment
proposed herein. At the hearing the Respondent may contest any
material fact contained in the Findings of Violation at Section
II above and the appropriateness of the proposed penalty
described in Section III above. The procedures for the hearing,
if one is requested, are set out in the 40 CSF Part 22,
"Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the Administrative
Assessment of Civil Penalties and the Revocation or Suspension
of Permits", and amendments to the 40 -$ Part 22.38, copies of
which are attached hereto for your convenience.
2. Respondent must send any request for a hearing to:
Regional Hearing Clerk (6C-G)
U.S. EPA Region 6
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
3. Be aware that should you request a hearing on this
proposed penalty assessment, members of the public, to whom EPA
is obligated to give notice of this proposed action, will have a
right under Section 309(g) (4) (B) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. §
1319(g) (4) (B) , to be heard and to present evidence on the
appropriateness of the penalty assessment. Should you not
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, M.
Docket No. VI-93-1643
Page 5
request a hearing, EPA will issue a Final Order Assessing
Administrative Penalties and only members of the public who
commented on this proposal will have an additional thirty (30)
days to petition EPA to set aside the Final Order Assessing
Administrative Penalties and to hold a hearing thereon. Such a
petition will only be granted and the hearing held if the
petitioner's evidence is material and was not considered by EPA
in the issuance of the Final Order Assessing Administrative
Penalties.
4 . Neither assessment nor payment of the administrative
civil penalty pursuant to this section of the Act shall affect
your continuing obligation to comply with the Act, with every
term and condition of your NPDES permit, and° with any separate
Compliance Order issued under Section 309 (a) of the Act, 33
U.S.C. § 1319 (a) , ordering cessation of the violations alleged
herein.
AUG 18 1993
Date:
Myron O. Knuds , P.E.
Director
Water Management Division (6W)
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
Region .6
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
a. WORTH, TEX.
ATTACHMENT 2
'CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS AM -
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
1000 THROCKMORTON STREET
FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102
(817)871-6111
September 1 , 1993
Regional Hearing Clerk (6C—G)
U.S .E.P.A. Region VI
1445 Ross Avenue , Suite 1200
Dallas , TX 75202-2733
RE: NOTICE OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF A CLASS II
CIVIL PENALTY
DOCKET NO. VI-93-1643
NPDES PERMIT NO. TX0047295
Dear Sir :
Pursuant to Section 309(g) of the Clean Water Act , the City of Fort
Worth requests a hearing regarding the violations alleged in a
complaint we received under the subject document .
S ' cere y
Mi e m
Assistant City Manager
City of Fort Worth
cc: Richard W . Sawey, Director/Water
V-1obert T. McMillon; Assistant Director/Nater PollUt*1?n Contro Jj
�3/�r/�.r/era/osae�rt
OFFICIAL RECORD
CRY.SECRETARY
T. WORTH, TEC
�i Printed on Recycled Paper
ATTACHMENT 3
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION o
X445 ROSS AVENUE.SUITE 4200
DALLAS.TEXAS 75202-2733
TO: NPDES Permit Representative
RE: NPDES No. -7-)e /7Z7-5- , Facility: ove '� yvor t
An NPDES Permit Compliance Inspection of your Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment
Program was conducted by EPA on e,7 /7�
The implementation of the pretreatment program was observed to be
generally satisfactory. No major problems or deficiencies were noted.
The following major deficiencies were noted.
D
Avr r7�-- 1. Program Staffing
1/ee) 67ovq/ 2. Personnel Training
o oc� 3. Operating Budget
4. Local Limits T�� •cwt //�, 4.,2 s-va-c.
C 11-c>d 5. Control Mechanism
6. Significant Users
7. Categorical Processes
/� /h�4S-+:��Q � users Aja ve ��er, ��%i�y•
8. Inspections
J
/LIGeG� More /7Q��4 T�'y� Or7 /l/`t7iC4 x v -w-r-OC- Tyr
-r-
9. Sampling source s ,
EXcrt 'Z s4o /• ��cm�c-fr csnc/ cLia.;,.o�cus�oc�/y,
eooe./ 10. Analyses ��
A99r-ess.v1 11. Enforcement �u•��ous o-% -/�aNr �a 6�� �ss�.e�,�
7l�c G. �� Z� lux- as
12. Cai^pliance 5chedul s
-5--4 t/2s
13. Mul ti juri sdi cti ons FV. -rSld,L cusf_
a.r, er c.%vj s44i
14. Other /*I'o, i-an, C
/.r< 44,
Explanation:
7-moi . /f 9 ci a e-/"d
5i jr�i "c4r►� /� i'ovP.s-�Pn��
We/ ®�' 4�7i Z Gan l.QJ OCLI m �' p
/»u s r-o�ecJr Sst.�-�� wiz 1 S r'�CZ.�i Z.czc✓ �.,Q/ A�
Any riaj� deficiencies are expected to beocorrected at your earls t convenience.
If you have any questions regarding this inspection, you may cont: tiff #CRUARY
the above address or call me at 655-6486. TEX.
Environmental ervices Division