The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutContract 62852-PM1CSC No. 62852-PM1 FORT WORTH PROJECT MANUAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF Water, Sewer, Paving, Drainage, and Street Light Improvements to Serve Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 IPRC Record No. 23-0147 City Project No. 105042 FID No. 30114-0200431-105042-EO7685 File No. X-27962 File No. W-3009 Mattie Parker Jesus "Jay" Chapa Mayor City Manager Christopher P. Harder, P.E. Director, Water Department Lauren Prieur, P.E., PMP, CCM Director, Transportation and Public Works Department Prepared for The City of Fort Worth March 2025 Shield Engineering Group Owner/Developer TBPE Firm #F-11039 Ashton Woods TBPLS Firm # 10193890 1800 Valley View Lane, Ste 100 1600 W 7th St., Suite 400, Farmers Branch, TX. 75234 Fort Worth, TX. 76102 214-693-5378 817-810-0696 :F _` i Z�P�(E %.:......................:: *. j j LANDON G. GEARY OFFICIAL RECORD .............................. let- ' 144251 CITY SECRETARY /ON FT. WORTH, TX AL 03/11/2025 00 00 00 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 1 of 5 SECTION 00 00 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Division 00 - General Conditions Last Revised nn Invitiiti-qn� nn ins 00 42 43 nn Proposal Form Unit Price � 05/22/2019 nn ins 0045 12 Prequalification Statement 09/01/2015 en�e 00 45 26 Contractor Compliance with Workers' Compensation Law 04/02/2014 not 00 52 43 Agreement 06/16/2016 00 61 25 Certificate of Insurance 07/01/2011 00 62 13 Performance Bond 01/31/2012 00 62 14 Payment Bond 01/31/2012 0062 19 Maintenance Bond 01/31/2012 0073 10 Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer n� ins 01/10/2013 Awarded Projects Division 01— General Requirements 01 11 00 Summary of Work 12/20/2012 01 25 00 Substitution Procedures 08/30/2013 01 31 19 n, Preconstruction Meeting 08/30/2013 n� ins, 01 32 33 Preconstruction Video 08/30/2013 01 33 00 Submittals 08/30/2013 01 35 13 Special Project Procedures 08/30/2013 01 45 23 Testing and Inspection Services 03/20/2020 01 5000 Temporary Facilities and Controls 07/01/2011 01 5526 Street Use Permit and Modifications to Traffic Control 07/01/2011 01 57 13 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 07/01/2011 01 60 00 Product Requirements 03/20/2020 01 66 00 Product Storage and Handling Requirements 04/07/2014 01 70 00 Mobilization and Remobilization 04/07/2014 01 71 23 Construction Staking 04/07/2014 01 74 23 Cleaning 04/07/2014 01 77 19 Closeout Requirements 04/07/2014 01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data 04/07/2014 01 78 39 Project Record Documents 04/07/2014 CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 00 00 00 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 2 of 5 Technical Specifications which have been modified by the Engineer specifically for this Project; hard copies are included in the Project's Contract Documents NONE Technical Specifications listed below are included for this Project by reference and can be viewed/downloaded from the City's website at: htti):Hfortworthtexas.eov/ti)w/contractors/ or htti)s:Happs.fortworthtexas.eov/Proi ectResources/ Date Division 02 - Existing Conditions Modified 0241 13 Selective Site Demolition 02/11/2022 0241 14 Utility Removal/Abandonment 12/20/2012 0241 15 Paving Removal 02/02/2016 Division 03 - Concrete 03 30 00 Cast -In -Place Concrete 03/11/2022 0334 13 Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) 12/20/2012 0334 16 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 12/20/2012 Division 26 - Electrical 26 05 00 Common Work Results for Electrical 03/11/2022 2605 10 Demolition for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012 26 05 33 Raceways and Boxes for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012 26 05 43 Underground Ducts and Raceways for Electrical Systems 07/01/2016 Division 31- Earthwork 31 1000 Site Clearing 03/22/2021 3123 16 Unclassified Excavation 01/28/2013 31 23 23 Borrow 01/28/2013 31 24 00 Embankments 01/28/2013 31 25 00 Erosion and Sediment Control 04/29/2021 , „�n, , 1 1 31 37 00 Riprap 1 12/20/2012 Division 32 - Exterior Improvements phnit-Po`=ink �a _:aiJ-Aq9q#k-PpY11r- 32 01 29 Concrete Paving Repair 12/20/2012 1-2-!-!-21 ,-21' n' 32 1129 Lime Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012 1 7 1 3 Trvat-Akli _ n 1i3i-71 9-2 32 13 13 Concrete Paving 06/10/2022 CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 00 00 00 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 3 of 5 32 1320 Concrete Sidewalks, Driveways and Barrier Free Ramps 12/09/2022 32 1373 Concrete Paving Joint Sealants 12/20/2012 32 1613 Concrete Curb and Gutters and Valley Gutters 12/09/2022 32 1723 Pavement Markings 06/10/2022 ,I,L.,. 12 hain-F 12,12n 32 32 13 Cast -in -Place Concrete Retaining Walls 06/05/2018 3291 19 Topsoil Placement and Finishing of Parkways 03/11/2022 32 92 13 Hydro -Mulching, Seeding, and Sodding 05/13/2021 32 93 43 Trees and Shrubs 12/20/2012 Division 33 - Utilities 33 01 30 Sewer and Manhole Testing 09/07/2018 33 01 31 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection 03/11/2022 3304 10 Joint Bonding and Electrical Isolation 12/20/2022 3304 11 Corrosion Control Test Stations 12/20/2022 33 04 12 Magnesium Anode Cathodic Protection System 12/20/2022 Z------�_ts. - +JQ'5' 33 04 40 Cleaning and Acceptance Testing of Water Mains 02/06/2013 33 04 50 Cleaning of Sewer Mains 03/11/2022 3305 10 Utility Trench Excavation, Embedment, and Backfill 04/02/2021 3305 12 Water Line Lowering 12/20/2012 3305 13 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings - Cast Iron 09/09/2022 3305 13.10 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings - Composite 09/09/2022 3305 14 Adjusting Manholes, Inlets, Valve Boxes, and Other Structures to 03/11/2022 Grade 3305 17 Concrete Collars 03/11/2022 --�-^0 -A-� tltg-------- 33 05 26 Utility Markers/Locators 12/20/2022 33 05 30 Location of Existing Utilities 12/20/2022 33 1105 Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 12/20/2022 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe 12/09/2012 33 11 11 Ductile Iron Fittings 09/20/2017 33 11 12 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe 09/09/2022 33 t3 .aa�in41ipn-,-_uctir J i Yf0 -3-1-1-11 32 , , ,5We; J��l3pa 33 1210 Water Services 1-inch to 2-inch 02/14/2017 33-12-14 33 1220 Resilient Seated Gate Valve 05/06/2015 CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 00 00 00 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Page 4 of 5 33 n^i 33 1225 Connection to Existing Water Mains 02/06/2013 33 1230 Combination Air Valve Assemblies for Potable Water Systems 12/20/2022 33 1240 Fire Hydrants 01/03/2014 33 1250 Water Sample Stations 12/20/2022 33-3� 33-14-43 1'1/'lam -Ira---' 13 -i'_ '_ c -"@ for-c11sJs</I\ lam n ^ z-2 -2 0- 19 33 31 20 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe 09/09/2022 33 31 21 Pe ollyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Closed Profile Gravity Sanitary Sewer 12/20/2022 Pip 33-147-;a it f-SIip-Lining 334i-24 , 33 31 50 Sanitary Sewer Service Connections and Service Line 04/26/2013 ✓crib na _____ , 21-2 3339 10 Cast -in -Place Concrete Manholes 12/20/2022 33 39 20 Precast Concrete Manholes Fiberglass Ma....-I-s 12/20/2022 33 39 60 Epoxy Liners for Sanitary Sewer Structures 04/29/2021 3341 10 Reinforced Concrete Storm Sewer Pipe/Culverts 07/01/2011 --3 1-1-11 _� lyethlone 33 46 00 Subdrainage 06/10/2022 3349 10 Cast -in -Place Manholes and Junction Boxes 12/20/2022 33 49 20 Curb and Drop Inlets 03/11/2022 33 49 40 Storm Drainage Headwalls and Wingwalls 07/01/2011 Division 34 - Transportation A ii;Q �rc�I�J Trcl I141�Ti8 ✓1 1-1-1 ` Ip�'.nPmoolq, Ili=i�In __Jhri�Sil 34 41 20 Roadway Illumination Assemblies 12/20/2012 �^ ^ r,rITFT?_ J ncnci�n,c n ^ Reg , r �r� n AJ1 nci, ci�n, c 34 41 30 Aluminum Signs 11/12/2013 3471 13 Traffic Control 03/22/2021 CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 00 00 00 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS Appendix .n GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions 01 T. nsuv&TOWA li4@0 1174 ouo- -E-:n IiromW, 2n*sal .D TAir4ffitr c►n4 GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities N oft4i"rimins>i�qft GR-01 60 00 Product Requirement END OF SECTION Page 5 of 5 CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM UNIT PRICE BID Bidlist Description tem No. 1 0241.1118 4"-12" Pressure Plug 2 3305.0109 Trench Safety 3 3311.0001 Ductile Iron Water Fittings w/ Restrain 4 3311.0261 8" PVC Water Pipe 5 3312.0001 Fire Hydrant w/ Gate Valve 6 3312.2003 1" Water Service (Domestic) 7 3312.2003 1" Water Service (Future Domestic) 8 3312.3003 8" Gate Valve & Box 9 3471.0013 Traffic Control 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Project from Information JSpecification Section No. UNIT)o9TE IMPROVEMENTS 33 05 10 t 331111 33 11 12 33 12 40 33 12 10 331210 33 12 20 34 71 13 00 42 43 DAP-EIDPROPOSAL Pvge 1 016 Bidder's Application Bidders Proposal Unit of Bid Unit Price 'i Bid Value Measure Quantity EA 3 $1000.00 $3000.00 LF 2,776 $1.00 $2 776.00 TON 0.2 $9.500.00 $1.900.00 LF 2,776 $62.00 $172,112.00 EA 4 $6.500.00 $26.000.00 EA 101 $1.400.00 $141400.00 EA 2 $1.400.00 $2,800.00 EA 6 $2.500.00 $22 500.00 EA 1 $2.500.00 $2 500.00 TOTAL UNIT 1: WATER IMPROVEMENTS $374,988.00 CITY OF FORT WUk7A STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Furth Version letsy 22.2019 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 UNIT PRICE BID Bidlist Item No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM Description 3301.0002 Post -CCTV Inspection 3301.0101 Manhole Vacuum Testing 3305.0109 Trench Safety 3305.0202 Imported EmbedmenUBackfill CSS 3331.3101 4" Sewer Service 3331.3101 4" Sewer Service (Future) 3331.4115 8" Sewer Pipe 3331.4201 10" Sewer Pipe 3339.0001 Ep 0 Manhole Liner 3339.1001 Manhole 3339.1003 Extra Depth Manhole ( > 6.0') 3471.0013 Traffic Control 9999.0001 Conned to Existing 8" Sewer Main 9999.0002 Conned to Existing 10" Sewer Main Project Item Information Specification Section No. UNIT 2: SAIJ TARY?EWER IMPROVEMENTS 3301 1 33 01 30 33 05 10 33 05 10 33 31 50 3331 50 3331 20 3311 10, 33 31 12, 33 3120 33 39 60 33 39 10 33 39 10 34 71 13 00 00 00 OD 00 00 004 43 DAP-8R)PROPOSAL Pegc 2 or6 Bidder's Application Biddels Proposal Unitof Bid Unit Price Bid Value Measure Quantity LF 3,359 $4.00 $13.436.00 EA 11 $200.00 $2,200.00 LF 3,359 $2.00 $6.718.00 LF 260 $40.00 $10,400.00 EA 101 $900.00 $90,900.00 EA 2 $900.00 51.800.00 LF 2,746 $74.00 $203204.00 LF 613 $84.00 S51.492.00 VF 18 $485.00 $8.730.00 EA 11 $5 000.00 S55,000.00 VF 46 $225.00 $10.350.00 MO 1 $2 500.00 $2.500.00 EA 2 $3 500.00 $7.000.00. EA 1 $4,000.00 64,000.00 TdTAL UNIT 2: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $467,730. �O CITY OP FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS -DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS F—, V—wu M.Y 22, 2019 CATTLEMANS CROSSING PHASE 2 UNIT PRICE BID Bidlist Item No. Description I 1 3125.0101 SWPPP t 1 Acre I 2 3305.0109 Trench Safety I 3 3341.0201 21" RCP, Class III 4 3341.0205 24" RCP, Class III 5 3341.0208 27" RCP, Class III 6 3341.0302 30" RCP, Class III 7 3341.0312 36" RCP, Class III 8 3341.0402 42" RCP, Class III 9 3341.0409 48" RCP. Class III 1 10 3349.0001 4' Storm Junction Box 1 11 3349.0002 5' Storm Junction Box I 12 3349.5001 10' Curb Inlet I 13 3349.5002 15' Curb Inlet I 14 3349.7001 4' Drop Inlet I 15 9999.0003 21" Sloping Headwall I 16 9999.0004 27" Storm Plug I 17 9999.0005 24" Storm Plug 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 I SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM Project Item information Specification Section No UNIT 3: SRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 31 25 00 33 05 10 '33 41 10 3341 10 3341 10 3341 10 33 41 10 3341 10 3341 10 334910 33 49 10 33 49 20 33 49 20 33 49 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 004241 DAP-BIDPROPOSAI. Pug, 34G Bidder's Application Bidders Proposal Unitof Bid Unit Price I Bid Value Measure Quantity LS 1 $5.500.001 $5.500.001 1 LF 2,720 $1.00 $2.720.001 LF 218 $85.00 $18.530.001 LF 950 $95.00 $90.250.001 LF 495 $100.00 $49,500.001 LF 50 1%110.00 $5.500.001 LF 290 $155.00 $44,9513.001 LF 480 $180.00 $86.40D.00 LF 237 $245.00 $58,065.00 EA 4 $6 500.00 $26.000.00 EA 2 $7.500.00 $15.000.00 EA 12 $4.600.00 $55.200.00 EA 2 $5.600.00 $11.200.00 EA 1 $6500.00 $6.500.00 EA _ 2 $4.000.00 $8.000.00 EA 1 $750.OD $750.00 EA 1 $650.00 $650.00 TOTAL UNIT 3: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $484,715.60 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS -DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Fmm Vaniwi May 22, 2019 CAT MEMANS CROSSINGPHASE 2 00 42 43 DAP- Bm PROPOSAL Page 4 41, SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM UNIT PRICE BID Bidder's Application Project Item Information Bidders Proposal Bidlist Description Specification Section No. Unit of Bid Unit Price Bid Value Item No. Measure Quantity UNIT 4: PAVING IMPROVEMENT$ 1 3211.0400 Hydrated Lime 32 11 29 TON 255 $275.00 $70.125.00 2 3211.0501 6' Lime Treatment 32 11 29 SY 12.730 $4.25 $54,102.50 3 3213.0101 6" Conc Pvmt 32 13 13 SY 11.573 $68.00 $786,964.00 4 3213.0302 4" Conc Sidewalk (By Developer) 32 13 20 SF 952 $5.25 $4.998.00 5 3213.0506 Barrier Free Ramp, Type P-1 33 13 20 EA 12 $2 400.00 $28,800.001 6 3291.0100 Topsail 3291 19 CY 20 $28.00 $560.001 7 3292.0100 Block Sod Placement 32 92 13 SY 117 $8.00 $936.001 8 3292.0400 Seeding, Hydromulch (Open Space) 32 92 13 SY 14.680 $2.00 $29.360.001 9 3441.4003 Furnish/install Alum Sign Ground Mount City Std. 34 41 30 EA 5 $850.00 SA,250.001 10 3471.0001 Traffic Control 3471 13 MO 1 $3.500.00 S3,500.00 11 9999.0006 Install FOR Barricade 00 00 00 EA 3 $1 200.00 $3.600.00 1 12 9999.0007 Remove FOR Barricade 00 00 00 EA 2 $800.00 $1.600.00 13 9999.0008 Connect to Exist Pavement 00 00 00 EA 2 $2 500.00 $5.000.00. 14 15 16 17 -- 18 — ---- _ ._ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 _ 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 - - 34 35 36 -- - -- -- _ — 37 -- 38 --- 39 '----- _.. - - .- 40 TOTAL UNIT 4: PAVII413 IMPROVEMENTS $993,795.501 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCIIMF.M'S - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS F.- Version May 22.2019 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 UNIT PRICE BID Bidlist Item No. I I 1 I 2 ( 3 4 I 5 I 6 00 42 43 DAP -BID PROPOSAL Ng. 5 af6 SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM Bidder's Application Pmject Item Information Unit of Bid Description Specification Section No. Measure I Quantity UNITS: STf =`ET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 2605.3015 9f� � 1 ,�y� 3441.1410 N�10 Inn ulated E= ec Condr 3441 10 LF 1.578 3441.1646 FumisMnstall Tyype 33B Arm 34 41 20 EA 15 3441.3050 FumisMnstall LEb Lighting Fixture (70 watt ATSO 34 41 20 EA Cobra Headl 15 3441.3301 Rdwv Ilium Foundation TY 1.2. and 4 3441 20 EA 15 3441.3351 Furnish/Install Rdwav Ilium TY 11 Pole 34 41 20 EA 15 TOTAL UNIT 5: STREET LIGHTihG IMPROVEMENT$ CITY OF FORT WORTII STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVE OPER AWARDED PROJECTS Fmm Vcnion May 22.2019 Bidders Proposal Unit Price I Bid Value $16.00 $8.416.00 $4.00 $6 312.00 $950.00 $14�50.00 $950.00 $14 250.00 $1800.00 $27N0.00 $A00.00 $45&.00. $115.�28.00 CATTLEMAMS CROSSING PHASE 2 SECTION 00 42 43 Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM UNIT PRICE BID Project Item Infomtation Bidlist Description Specification Section No. Item No. Bid Summary TOTAL UNIT 1: WATER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL UNIT 2: SANITARY SEWER 1,KMRQQVEMENTS TOTAL UNIT 3: DRAINAGE IMPRO\/EMENTS TOTAL UNIT 4: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL UNIT 5: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 00 42 43 DAP -BID PROPOSAL Page 6 or6 Bidder's Application Biddels Proposal Unit of Bid Unit Price Bid Value Measure Quantity $374,988.00 $467,730.00 $484,715.001 $993.795.501 $115,228.00I Total Construction Bid $2,436,456.501 This Bid is submitted by the entity named below: BIDDER: BY: Bmc uggms CONATSER NCONSTRUCTION TX, L.P. 5327 Wichita St. TITLE: President um Ft. Worth, TX 76119 DATE_ tIG/tl6/z4 Contractor agrees to complete WORK for FINAL ACCEPTANCE within 120 working days after the date when the CONTRACT commences to run as provided in the General Conditions. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Form Veraiar Mar 22, 2019 CA'T7LEMANS CROSSING PHASE 2 0045 12 DAP PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT Page 1 of I SECTION 00 45 12 DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT Each Bidder is required to complete the information below by identifying the prequalified contractors and/or subcontractors whom they intend to utilize for the major work type(s) listed. In the "Maior Work Tvpe" box provide the complete maior work tvoe and actual description as provided by the Water Department for water and sewer and TPW for paving. Major Work Type Water Distribution, Development, 12-inch Diameter and smaller Sewer Collection System, Development, 12-inches and smaller Sanitary Sewer Manhole/Structure Interior Lining — Warren or Chesterton Coating Concrete Paving Construction/Reconstruction (15000 Square Yards and Greater) Roadway and Pedestrian Lighting Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name Prequalification Expiration Date Conatser Construction TX, L.P. +/30/25 Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 4/30/25 ACE Pipe Cleaning, Inc. •Z / z g / Z (o Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 11114121.0 Conatser Construction TX, L.P. ` `3 I -/ The undersigned hereby certifies that the contractors and/or subcontractors described in the table above are currently prequalified for the work types listed. BIDDER: Conatser Construction 5327 Wichita Street, Fort Worth TX, 76119 817-534-1743 BY: Brock Huggins Signature) TITLE: President DATE: 03/04/2025 END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 00 45 12_Prequalification Statement 2015—DAP CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 CPN: 105042 Form Version September 1, 2015 00 45 26 - 1 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Page 1 of 1 SECTION 00 45 26 CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW Pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 406.096(a), as amended, Contractor certifies that it provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City Project No. 105042 Contractor further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code, Section 406.096(b), as amended, it will provide to City its subcontractor's certificates of compliance with worker's compensation coverage. CONTRACTOR: Conatser Construction TX, L.P. Company 5327 Wichita Street Address Fort Worth TX. 76119 City/State/Zip THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § go Signature: Title: Brock Huggins (Please Print) President (Please Print) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared (-Ioxoik i 5- , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foidg6ing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same as the act and deed of L.L Tn . L - f' for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this `T day of marc k , 20215 01b- SZoi-o£-LL 'dX3'NOYO399ma, ££eL9t+££6 #01 Il��ll�JIJ��I9MI de KVI lonsumy ON Notary Public in and for the State of Texas 3SMA 3NI83HJ. A END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 2, 2014 005243-1 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Pagel of 4 1 SECTION 00 52 43 2 AGREEMENT 3 THIS AGREEMENT, authorized on 03/04/2025 is made by and between the Developer, 4 Ashton Woods authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") , and Conatser Construction TX. 5 L_P, ("CONTRACTOR"), authorized to do business in Texas, acting by and through its duly 6 authorized representative, ("Contractor"). 7 Developer and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as 8 follows: 9 Article 1. WORK 10 Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the 11 Project identified herein. 12 Article 2. PROJECT 13 The project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is 14 generally described as follows: 15 Cattleman's Crossing. Phase 2 16 Cii� ProiectNumber: 105042 17 Article 3. CONTRACT TIME 18 3.1 Time is of the essence. 19 All time limits for Milestones, if any, and Final Acceptance as stated in the Contract 20 Documents are of the essence to this Contract. 21 3.2 Final Acceptance. 22 The Work will be complete for Final Acceptance within 120 working days after the date 23 when the Contract Time commences to run as provided in Paragraph 12.04 of the Standard 24 City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 25 3.3 Liquidated damages 26 Contractor recognizes that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Developer 27 will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in 28 Paragraph 3.2 above, plus any extension thereof allowed in accordance with Article 10 of 29 the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded 30 Projects. The Contractor also recognizes the delays, expense and difficulties involved in 31 proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the Developer if the Work is not 32 completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof , Contractor agrees 33 that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay 34 Developer Six Hundred Fifty Dollars ($650) for each day that expires after the time 35 specified in Paragraph 3.2 for Final Acceptance until the City issues the Final Letter of 36 Acceptance. CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised June 16, 2016 005243-2 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 2 of 4 37 Article 4. CONTRACT PRICE 38 Developer agrees to pay Contractor for performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract 39 Documents an amount in current funds of TWO MILLION FOUR HUNDRER AND THIRTY- 40 SIX THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS 41 ($2,436,456.50) 42 43 Article 5. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 44 5.1 CONTENTS: 45 A. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between Developer and 46 Contractor concerning the Work consist of the following: 47 1. This Agreement. 48 2. Attachments to this Agreement: 49 a. Bid Form (As provided by Developer) 50 1) Proposal Form (DAP Version) 51 2) Prequalification Statement 52 3) State and Federal documents (project specific) 53 b. Insurance ACORD Form(s) 54 c. Payment Bond (DAP Version) 55 d. Performance Bond (DAP Version) 56 e. Maintenance Bond (DAP Version) 57 f. Power of Attorney for the Bonds 58 g. Worker's Compensation Affidavit 59 h. MBE and/or SBE Commitment Form (If required) 60 3. Standard City General Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer 61 Awarded Projects. 62 4. Supplementary Conditions. 63 5. Specifications specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment 64 or, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of 65 Contents of the Project's Contract Documents. 66 6. Drawings. 67 7. Addenda. 68 8. Documentation submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award. 69 9. The following which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the 70 Agreement and, if issued, become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents: 71 a. Notice to Proceed. 72 b. Field Orders. 73 c. Change Orders. 74 d. Letter of Final Acceptance. 75 76 CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised June 16, 2016 00 52 43 - 3 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 3 of 4 77 Article 6. INDEMNIFICATION 78 6.1 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own 79 expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all 80 claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed 81 by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees 82 under this contract. This indemnification provision is specifically intended to operate 83 and be effective even if it is alleged or proven that all or some of the damages being 84 sought were caused, in whole or in part, by any act. omission or neg Uii ence of the citv. 85 This indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for 86 costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the city in defending against such claims and 87 causes of actions. 88 89 6.2 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, 90 the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage 91 or destruction of property of the city, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work 92 and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, 93 subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this contract. This indemnification 94 provision is specifically intended to operate and be effective even if it is alle eg d or 95 proven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused, in whole or in part, 96 by any act, omission or negligence of the city. 97 98 Article 7. MISCELLANEOUS 99 7.1 Terms. 100 Terms used in this Agreement are defined in Article 1 of the Standard City Conditions of 101 the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 102 7.2 Assignment of Contract. 103 This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents may not be assigned by the 104 Contractor without the advanced express written consent of the Developer. 105 7.3 Successors and Assigns. 106 Developer and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal 107 representatives to the other party hereto, in respect to all covenants, agreements and 108 obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 109 7.4 Severability. 110 Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be unconstitutional, void or 111 unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction shall be deemed stricken, and all 112 remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon DEVELOPER and 113 CONTRACTOR. 114 7.5 Governing Law and Venue. 115 This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents is performable in the State of 116 Texas. Venue shall be Tarrant County, Texas, or the United States District Court for the 117 Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised June 16, 2016 118 7.6 Authority to Sign. 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 005243-4 Developer Awarded Project Agreement Page 4 of 4 Contractor shall attach evidence of authority to sign Agreement, if other than duly authorized signatory of the Contractor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and Contractor have executed this Agreement in multiple counterparts. This Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by the Parties ("Effective Date"). Contractor: Conatser Construction TX, L.P By: .� (SI rSture) Brock Huggins (Printed Name) Title: President Company Name: Conatser Construction Address: 5327 Wichita Street City/State/Zip: Fort Worth TX, 76119 03/04/2025 Date Developer: AshtpiL.Ugallas Residential L.L.C/1-1 By. (Sign e) Daniel Satsky (Printed Name) Title: VP Land Development Ashton Woods Address: 1800 Valley View Ln, Suite 100, Farmers Branch, TX 75234 City/State/Zip: Farmers Branch, TX 75234 03/04/2025 Date CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised June 16, 2016 Bond No. 0266025 0062 1 3 - 1 PERFORMANCE BOND Page i of 2 1 SECTION 00 62 13 2 PERFORMANCE BOND 3 4 THE STATE OF TEXAS § 5 § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: 6 COUNTY OF TARRANT § 7 That we, Conatser Construction TX. L.P.. known as "Principal" herein and 8 Berkle\, Insurance Compan\ , a corporate surety(sureties, if more than one) duly 9 authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), 10 are held and firmly bound unto the Ashton Woods. authorized to do business in Texas i I ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the penal 12 sum of, TWO MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND THIRTY SIX THOUSAND FOUR 13 HUNDRED FIFTY SIX DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS ($2,436,456.50) 14 lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas for the 15 payment of which sum well and truly to be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual 16 obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly l7 and severally, firmly by these presents. 18 WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of 19 community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities 20 Agreement, CFA Number CFA24-0105 and 21 WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer awarded 22 the 4th day of March . 2025. which Contract is hereby referred to and made a 23 part hereof for all purposes as iffull-v set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment labor 24 and other accessories defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Change 25 Orders, as provided for in said Contract designated as Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2. 26 NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Principal 27 shall faithfully perform it obligations under the Contract and shall in all respects duly and 28 faithfully perform the Work, including Change Orders, under the Contract, according to the plans, 29 specifications, and contract documents therein referred to, and as well during any period of 30 extension of the Contract that may be granted on the part of the Developer and/or City, then this 31 obligation shall be and become null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. CITY OF FORT WORTH CATLLF.MAN'S CROSSING PHASF 2 STANDARD CITY CONDrrioNs — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 RUY1hCU ldflUdW 31, 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 00b213-2 131 RFORMANCE BOND Page 2 of 2 PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Fort Worth Division. This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of said statue. 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have SIGNED and SEALED 8 this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 4th day of 9 March . 20 25 . 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 72 2 24 -1; 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ATTF ST: a (PrincipalI Secret NVitness as to Principal ness as to Surety PRINCIPAL: Conatser Construction TX,L.P. w BY. Signature Brock Hueeins. President Name and Title Address: 5327 Wichita St. Fort Worth_ TX 7611_9_ SURETY: Berkley Insurance Company BY: Signature Robbi Morales, Attorney -in -fact Name and Title Address: 5005 LBI Freeway, Suite 1400 Dallas. TX 75244 Telephone Number: 214/989-0000 *Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD C17FY CONDITIONS AWARDED PROJI"CTS Revised January 31, 2012 CATI-ENIAN'S CROSSING P1IASE 2 Bond No. 0266025 006_ 14- 1 PAYMENT BOND Page 1 of 2 I SECTION 00 62 14 2 PAYMENT BOND 3 4 THE STATE OF TEXAS § 5 § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: 6 COUNTY OF TARRANT § 7 That we Conatser Construction TX. L.P.. known as "Principal" herein, and 8 Berkle\ Insurance Comoaw, a corporate surety ( or sureties if 9 more than one), duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein 10 (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Ashton Woods, authorized 1 I to do business in Texas "(Developer"), and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation 12 ("City"), in the penal sum of TWO MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND THIRTY SIX 13 THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY SIX DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS 14 ($2,436,456.50) 15 lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth. Tarrant County. Texas, for the 16 payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual 17 obliges, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly 18 and severally, firmly by these presents: 19 WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of 20 community facilities in the City of Fort Worth. by and through a Community Facilities 21 Agreement, CFA Number CFA24-0"105; and 22 WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a certain written Contract with Developer, 23 awarded the 4th day of March , 20 25 , which Contract is hereby 24 referred to and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set fortli herein, to furnish all 25 materials, equipment, labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the 26 Work as provided for in said Contract and designated as Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2. 27 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that if 28 Principal shall pay all monies owing to any (and all) payment bond beneficiary (as defined in 29 Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended) in the prosecution of the Work under 30 the Contract, then this obligation shall be and become null and void; otherwise to remain in full 31 force and effect. CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CITY CONDITION'S — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised January 31.2012 006214-2 PAYMENT BOND Page 2 of 2 1 This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the 2 Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in 3 accordance with the provisions of said statute. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED 5 this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 4th day of 6 March 20 25 , 7 8 9 10 K 13 ATTEST: (Principal) Secretary Witness as to Principal ATTEST: (Surety) Secretary Xitness as to Surety PRINCIPAL: Conatser Construction TX. L.P BY: Signature Brock Hu-,Lins. President Name and Title Address: 5327 Wichita St. Fort Worth. TX 76119 SURETY: Berklev Insurance Companv BY: � .. -. ,/ Signature Robbi Morales, Attornet -in-fact Name and Title Address: 5005 LBI Freewa\-, Suite 1400 Dallas, TX 75244 Telephone Number: 214/989-0000 Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety, there must be on file a certified extract from the bylaws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is ditTerent from its mailing address, both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH CA"171-ENIAN-S CROSSING PHASE; 2 STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised Januay 31, 20E2 Bond No. 0266025 0062 19 - 1 MAINTENANCE BOND Page 1 of 3 SECTION 00 6219 MAINTENANCE BOND THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § That we Conatser Construction TX. L.P.., known as "Principal" herein and Berklev Insurance Compamr, a corporate surety (sureties, if more than one) duty authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, Ashton Woods, authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"). in the sum of TWO MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND THIRTY SIX THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY SIX DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS ($2,436,456.50) lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees and their successors, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA Number CFA24.0105; and WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer awarded the 4th day of March , 20 25, which Contract is hereby referred to and a made part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. to furnish all materials, equipment labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Work resulting from a duly authorized Change Order (collectively herein, the "Work") as provided for in said Contract and designated as Cattleman's Crossing phase 2; and WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to use such materials and to so construct the Work in accordance with the plans, specifications and Contract Documents that the Work is and will remain free from defects in materials or workmanship for and during the period of two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance of the Work by the City ("Maintenance Period'): and CITY OF FORT WORTI I CATTLEAIAN-S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised January 31, 20I2 006219-2 MAINTENANCE BONI) Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to repair or reconstruct the Work in whole or in part upon receiving notice from the Developer and/or City of the need thereof at any time within the Maintenance Period. NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if Principal shall remedy any defective Work, for which timely notice was provided by Developer or City, to a completion satisfactory to the City. then this obligation shall become null and void: otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principal shall .fail so to repair or reconstruct any timely noticed defective Work, it is agreed that the Developer or City may cause any and all such defective Work to be repaired and/or reconstructed with all associated costs thereof being borne by the Principal and the Surety under this Maintenance Bond; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant County; Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that this obligation shall be continuous in nature and successive recoveries may be had hereon for successive breaches. C[TY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS —DF,VF.LOPER AWARDC=D PROJECTS CPN; 105042 Revised lanuan• 31, 2012 006219-3 MAINTENANCE BOND Page 3 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the 4th day of March . 20 25 . PRINCIPAL. Conatser Construction TX. L.P. ATTEST: (Principal) Secre i IGV J�J Witness as to Principal ATTEST - (Surety) S cretary Hess as to Surety 01 4 BY: _ Signature Brock HuLn ins President Name and Title Address: 5327 Wichita St Fort Worth. TX 76119 SURETY: Berklev Insurance Comaanv BY: &G.Lv Signature Robbi Morales, Attornei,-in-fact Name and Title Address: 5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1400 Dallas, TX 75244 Telephone Number: 214/989-0000 *Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address. both must be provided. The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded. CITY OF FORT WOR'l'Il CATTLEMAN'S CROSSINGPHASE 2 STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Cr'N- r 05C142 Revised January 31, 2012 No. BI-72801 POWER OF ATTORNEY BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY WILMINGTON, DELAWARE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Company"), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal office in Greenwich, CT, has made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint: Ricardo J. Reyna; Don E. Cornell; Sophinie Hunter; Robbi Morales; Kelly A. Westbrook; Tina McEwan; Joshua Saunders; Tonie Petranek; or Mikaela Peppers of Aon Risk Services Southwest, Inc. of Dallas, TX its true and lawful Attomey-in-Fact, to sign its name as surety only as delineated below and to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds and undertakings, with the exception of Financial Guaranty Insurance, providing that no single obligation shall exceed Fifty Million and 00/100 U.S. Dollars (U.S.$50,000,000.00), to the same extent as if such bonds had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its principal office in their own proper persons. i E This Power of Attorney shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware, a without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. This Power of Attorney is granted pursuant to the following > resolutions which were duly and validly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on January 25, 2010: c •� o V Z RESOLVED, that, with respect to the Surety business written by Berkley Surety, the Chairman of the Board, Chief 0 o Executive Officer, President or any Vice President of the Company, in conjunction with the Secretary or any Assistant c a Secretary are hereby authorized to execute powers of attorney authorizing and qualifying the attorney -in -fact named therein o 1 to execute bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or other suretyship obligations on behalf of the Company, and to affix the ccorporate seal of the Company to powers of attorney executed pursuant hereto; and said officers may remove any such oc attorney -in -fact and revoke any power of attorney previously granted; and further Q ° RESOLVED, that such power of attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds, undertakings, recognizances, ci or other suretyship obligations specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the L manner and to the extent therein stated; and further > RESOLVED, that such power of attorney revokes all previous powers issued on behalf of the attorney -in -fact named; and b further RESOLVED, that the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any P, . power of attorney or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or other suretyship obligation of the Company; and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as 3 though manually affixed. The Company may continue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any c person or persons who shall have been such officer or officers of the Company, notwithstanding the fact that they may have ceased to be such at the time when such instruments shall be issued. d IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its 0 o corporate seal hereunto affixed this 2nd day of Mav 2024 o S4 Attest Berkley Insurance Company !' � (Seal) By �-_��i ..�o r'�� By � U PUP 5 ' Telt Je M- Executive Vice President & Secretary Senior Vice President o STATE OF CONNECTICL-T ) ss: COL-N'IY OF F 4iRFIELD ) o S�-vorn to before me, a Notary Public in the State of Connecticut, this 21d day of Mai2024 , by Philip S. Welt and N o Jeffrey M. Haffer who are sworn to me to be the Executive Vice President and Secretary, and the Senior Vice President, respectively, of Berkley Insurance Company. IIA C. RUNDBAKEN r / �� AARr l✓ ^- ^�� /1 ••- - HWARt' Puauo CONHET1ClJT Notary Public, State. of Connecticut Q c W001wflAGUM EMR1G 04-W2= CERTIFIC ATE o - - I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary- of BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a Z U true, correct. and complete copy of the original Power of Attorney; that said Power of Attorney has not been rev, oked or rescin ded 0-0 Z ' and that the authority of the Attomey-in Fact set forth therein who executed the bond or undertaking to which this Power of Attorney is attached, is in full force and effect as of thus. date. Given under my hand and seal of the Company, this day of / (Seal) Vincent P. Forte IMPORTANT NOTICE To obtain information or make a complaint: You may call Berkley Surety Group, LLC and its affiliates by telephone for information or to make a complaint: BERKLEY SURETY GROUP, LLC Please send all notices of claim on this bond to: Berkley Surety Group, LLC (866) 768-3534 412 Mount Kemble Avenue, Suite 310N Morristown, NJ 07960 Attn: Surety Claims Department You may contact the Texas Department of Insurance to obtain information on companies, coverages, rights or complaints at: 1-800-252-3439 You may write the Texas Department of Insurance: P. O. Box 149104 Austin, TX 78714-9104 Fax: (512) 475-1771 Web: htt_)://www.tdi.state.tx.us E-mail: ConsumerProtection;a)tdi.state.tx.us PREMIUM OR CLAIM DISPUTES: Should you have a dispute concerning your premium or about a claim you should contact your agent or Berkley Surety Group, LLC first. If the dispute is not resolved, you may contact the Texas Department of Insurance. ATTACH THIS NOTICE TO YOUR BOND: This notice is for information only and does not become a part or condition of the attached document and is given to comply with Texas legal and regulatory requirements. STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Article 1 — Definitions and Terminology.......... 1.01 Defined Terms ............................... 1.02 Terminology .................................. Article 2 — Preliminary Matters ....................... 2.01 Before Starting Construction...... 2.02 Preconstruction Conference........ 2.03 Public Meeting ............................ Page .............................................1 .............................................1 ............................................. 5 ....................................................... 6 ....................................................... 6 ....................................................... 6 ....................................................... 6 Article 3 — Contract Documents and Amending............................................................................................... 6 3.01 Reference Standards..................................................................................................................... 6 3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents.................................................................. 6 Article 4 — Bonds and Insurance....................................................................................................................... 7 4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers..................................................................................................... 7 4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds........................................................................ 7 4.03 Certificates of Insurance............................................................................................................... 7 4.04 Contractor's Insurance.................................................................................................................. 9 4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace...........................................................12 Article 5 — Contractor's Responsibilities........................................................................................................12 5.01 Supervision and Superintendent.................................................................................................12 5.02 Labor; Working Hours................................................................................................................13 5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment...........................................................................................13 5.04 Project Schedule..........................................................................................................................14 5.05 Substitutes and "Or-Equals".......................................................................................................14 5.06 Pre -Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors).....................................16 5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others...................................................................16 5.08 Wage Rates..................................................................................................................................18 5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties...........................................................................................................19 5.10 Laws and Regulations.................................................................................................................19 5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas.......................................................................................................19 5.12 Record Documents......................................................................................................................20 5.13 Safety and Protection.................................................................................................................. 21 5.14 Safety Representative.................................................................................................................21 5.15 Hazard Communication Programs.............................................................................................22 5.16 Submittals....................................................................................................................................22 5.17 Contractor's General Warranty and Guarantee..........................................................................23 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 5.18 Indemnification ............................................ 5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services 5.20 Right to Audit: ............................................. 5.21 Nondiscrimination ........................................ Article 6 - Other Work at the Site....... 6.01 Related Work at Site ....... Article 7 - City's Responsibilities ............................................ 7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals ....................... 7.02 Limitations on City's Responsibilities ................ 7.03 Compliance with Safety Program ........................ Article 8 - City's Observation Status During Construction....... 8.01 City's Project Representative ................................. 8.02 Authorized Variations in Work .............................. 8.03 Rejecting Defective Work ...................................... 8.04 Determinations for Work Performed ...................... Article 9 - Changes in the Work ...................... 9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work 9.02 Notification to Surety ................... Article 10 - Change of Contract Price; Change of Contract Time 10.01 Change of Contract Price ........................................... 10.02 Change of Contract Time ........................................... 10.03 Delays......................................................................... Article 11 - Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal or Acceptance of Defective Work ............ 11.01 Notice of Defects.............................................................................................................. 11.02 Access to Work................................................................................................................. 11.03 Tests and Inspections........................................................................................................ 11.04 Uncovering Work............................................................................................................. 11.05 City May Stop the Work................................................................................................... 11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work...................................................................... 11.07 Correction Period.............................................................................................................. 11.08 City May Correct Defective Work................................................................................... Article 12 - Completion .......................................... 12.01 Contractor's Warranty of Title ........... 12.02 Partial Utilization ................................ 12.03 Final Inspection ................................... 12.04 Final Acceptance ................................. Article 13 - Suspension of Work ..................................... 13.01 City May Suspend Work ............................. Article 14 - Miscellaneous ......................................... 14.01 Giving Notice ......................................... CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 24 24 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 27 a a ... 29 ... 29 ... 29 ... 29 ... 30 ... 30 ... 30 ... 30 ... 31 ................................. 32 ................................. 32 ................................. 32 ................................. 32 ................................. 33 ............................................................. 33 ............................................................. 33 34 34 14.02 Computation of Times................................................................................................................ 34 14.03 Cumulative Remedies................................................................................................................. 34 14.04 Survival of Obligations............................................................................................................... 35 14.05 Headings......................................................................................................................................35 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 1 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 1 of 35 ARTICLE 1— DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY 1.01 Defined Terms A. Wherever used in these General Conditions or in other Contract Documents, the terms listed below have the meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof, and words denoting gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter. Said terms are generally capitalized or written in italics, but not always. When used in a context consistent with the definition of a listed -defined term, the term shall have a meaning as defined below whether capitalized or italicized or otherwise. In addition to terms specifically defined, terms with initial capital letters in the Contract Documents include references to identified articles and paragraphs, and the titles of other documents or forms. 1. Agreement - The written instrument which is evidence of the agreement between Developer and Contractor covering the Work 2. Asbestos —Any material that contains more than one percent asbestos and is friable or is releasing asbestos fibers into the air above current action levels established by the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 3. Business Day — A business day is defined as a day that the City conducts normal business, generally Monday through Friday, except for federal or state holidays observed by the City. 4. Buzzsaw — City's on-line, electronic document management and collaboration system. 5. Calendar Day — A day consisting of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight. 6. City— The City of Fort Worth, Texas, a Texas home -rule municipal corporation, acting by, its governing body through its City Manager, his designee, or agents authorized pursuant to its duly authorized charter on his behalf. 7. Community Facilities Agreement (CFA) A Contract between the Developer and the City for the Construction of one or more following public facilities within the City public right-of- way or easement: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street, Storm Drain, Street Light, and Street Signs. A CFA may include private facilities within the right-of-way dedicated as private right-of- way or easement on a recorded plat. 8. Contract —The entire and integrated written document incorporating the Contract Documents between the Developer, Contractor, and/or City concerning the Work. The Contract supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or oral. 9. Contract Documents —Those items that make up the contract and which must include the Agreement, and it's attachments such as standard construction specifications, standard City Conditions, other general conditions of the Developer, including: a. An Agreement CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10-2 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 2 of 35 b. Attachments to the Agreement i. Bid Form ii. Vendor Compliance with State Law Non -Resident Bidder iii. Prequalification Statement C. Current Prevailing Wage Rates Table (if required by City) d. Insurance Accord Form e. Payment Bond f. Performance Bond g. Maintenance Bond h. Power of Attorney for Bonds i. Workers Compensation Affidavit j. MWBE Commitment Form( If required by City) k. General Conditions 1. Supplementary Conditions in. The Standard City Conditions n. Specifications specifically made part of the Contract Documents by attachment, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of the Project's Contract Documents o. Drawings P. Documentation submitted by contractor prior to Notice of Award. q. The following which may be delivered or issued after the effective date if the Agreement and, if issued become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents i. Notice to Proceed ii. Field Orders iii. Change Orders iv. Letters of Final Acceptance r. Approved Submittals, other Contractor submittals, and the reports and drawings of subsurface and physical conditions are not Contract Documents. 10. Contractor —The individual or entity with whom Developer has entered into the Agreement. 11. Day or day — A day, unless otherwise defined, shall mean a Calendar Day. 12. Developer — An individual or entity that desires to make certain improvements within the City of Fort Worth 13. Drawings —That part of the Contract Documents prepared or approved by Engineer which graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed by Contractor. Submittals are not Drawings as so defined. 14. Engineer —The licensed professional engineer or engineering firm registered in the State of Texas performing professional services for the Developer. 15. Final Acceptance — The written notice given by the City to the Developer and/or Contractor that the Work specified in the Contract Documents has been completed to the satisfaction of the City. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 3 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 3 of 35 16. Final Inspection — Inspection carried out by the City to verify that the Contractor has completed the Work, and each and every part or appurtenance thereof, fully, entirely, and in conformance with the Contract Documents. 17. General Requirements —A part of the Contract Documents between the Developer and a Contractor. 18. Laws and Regulations Any and all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, and orders of any and all governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having jurisdiction. 19. Liens —Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Project funds, real property, or personal property. 20. Milestone —A principal event specified in the Contract Documents relating to an intermediate Contract Time prior to Final Acceptance of the Work. 21. Non -Participating Change Order —A document, which is prepared for and reviewed by the City, which is signed by Contractor, and Developer, and authorizes an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement. 22. Participating Change Order —A document, which is prepared for and approved by the City, which is signed by Contractor, Developer, and City and authorizes an addition, deletion, or revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on or after the Effective Date of the Agreement. 23. Plans — See definition of Drawings. 24. Project Schedule —A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, in accordance with the General Requirements, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising the Contractor's plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Time. 25. Project —The Work to be performed under the Contract Documents. 26. Project Representative —The authorized representative of the City who will be assigned to the Site. 27. Public Meeting — An announced meeting conducted by the Developer to facilitate public participation and to assist the public in gaining an informed view of the Project. 28. Regular Working Hours — Hours beginning at 7: 00 a.m. and ending at 6:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday (excluding legal holidays). 29. Samples Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship that are representative of some portion of the Work and which establish the standards by which such portion of the Work will be judged. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 4 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 4 of 35 30. Schedule of Submittals —A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, of required submittals and the time requirements to support scheduled performance of related construction activities. 31. Site —Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by City or Developer upon which the Work is to be performed, including rights -of -way, permits, and easements for access thereto, and such other lands furnished by City or Developer which are designated for the use of Contractor. 32. Specifications —That part of the Contract Documents consisting of written requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship as applied to the Work, and certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable thereto. Specifications may be specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or, if not attached, may be incorporated by reference as indicated in the Table of Contents (Division 00 00 00) of each Project. 33. Standard City Conditions — That part of the Contract Documents setting forth requirements of the City. 34. Subcontractor —An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with any other Subcontractor for the performance of apart of the Work at the Site. 35. Submittals All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information which are specifically prepared or assembled by or for Contractor and submitted by Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. 36. Superintendent — The representative of the Contractor who is available at all times and able to receive instructions from the City and/or Developer and to act for the Contractor. 37. Supplementary Conditions —That part of the Contract Documents which amends or supplements the General Conditions. 38. Supplier —A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having a direct contract with Contractor or with any Subcontractor to furnish materials or equipment to be incorporated in the Work by Contractor or Subcontractor. 39. Underground Facilities All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires, manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, or other such facilities or attachments, and any encasements containing such facilities, including but not limited to, those that convey electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications, cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or other control systems. 40. Weekend Working Hours — Hours beginning at 9: 00 a. in. and ending at 5: 00 p.m., Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, as approved in advance by the City. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 5 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 5 of 35 41. Work —The entire construction or the various separately identifiable parts thereof required to be provided under the Contract Documents. Work includes and is the result of performing or providing all labor, services, and documentation necessary to produce such construction including any Participating Change Order, Non -Participating Change Order, or Field Order, and furnishing, installing, and incorporating all materials and equipment into such construction, all as required by the Contract Documents. 42. Working Day — A working day is defined as a day, not including Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays authorized by the City for contract purposes, in which weather or other conditions not under the control of the Contractor will permit the performance of the principal unit of work underway for a continuous period of not less than 7 hours between 7 a.m. and 6 p. m. 1.02 Terminology A. The words and terms discussed in Paragraph 1.02.13 through D are not defined but, when used in the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning. B. Defective: 1. The word "defective," when modifying the word "Work," refers to Work that is unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it: a. does not conform to the Contract Documents; or b. does not meet the requirements of any applicable inspection, reference standard, test, or approval referred to in the Contract Documents; or c. has been damaged prior to City's written acceptance. C. Furnish, Install, Perform, Provide: 1. The word "Furnish" or the word "Install" or the word "Perform" or the word "Provide" or the word "Supply," or any combination or similar directive or usage thereof, shall mean furnishing and incorporating in the Work including all necessary labor, materials, equipment, and everything necessary to perform the Work indicated, unless specifically limited in the context used. D. Unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents, words or phrases that have a well-known technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in accordance with such recognized meaning. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 6 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 6 of 35 ARTICLE 2 — PRELIMINARY MATTERS 2.01 Before Starting Construction Baseline Schedules: Submit to City in accordance with the Contract Documents, and prior to starting the Work. New schedules will be submitted to City when Participating Change Orders or Non - Participating Change Orders occur. 2.02 Preconstruction Conference Before any Work at the Site is started, the Contractor shall attend a Preconstruction Conference as specified in the Contract Documents. 2.03 Public Meeting Contractor may not mobilize any equipment, materials or resources to the Site prior to Contractor attending the Public Meeting as scheduled by the City. ARTICLE 3 — CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AMENDING 3.01 Reference Standards A. Standards, Specifications, Codes, Laws, and Regulations 1. Reference to standards, specifications, manuals, or codes of any technical society, organization, or association, or to Laws or Regulations, whether such reference be specific or by implication, shall mean the standard, specification, manual, code, or Laws or Regulations in effect at the time of opening of Bids (or on the Effective Date of the Agreement if there were no Bids), except as may be otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents. 2. No provision or instruction shall be effective to assign to City, or any of its officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors, any duty or authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work or any duty or authority to undertake responsibility inconsistent with the provisions of the Contract Documents. 3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents A. The Contract Documents may be amended to provide for additions, deletions, and revisions in the Work or to modify the terms and conditions thereof by a Participating Change Order or a Non -Participating Change Order. B. The requirements of the Contract Documents may be supplemented, and minor variations and deviations in the Work not involving a change in Contract Price or Contract Time, may be authorized, by one or more of the following ways: 1. A Field Order; CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 7 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 7 of 35 1. City's or Engineer's review of a Submittal (subject to the provisions of Paragraph 5.16.C); or 2. City's written interpretation or clarification. ARTICLE 4 — BONDS AND INSURANCE 4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers All bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents to be purchased and maintained by Contractor shall be obtained from surety or insurance companies that are duly licensed or authorized in the State of Texas to issue bonds or insurance policies for the limits and coverage so required. Such surety and insurance companies shall also meet such additional requirements and qualifications as may be provided Section 4.04. 4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds A. Contractor shall furnish performance and payment bonds in the name of Developer and City, in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2253 or successor statute, each in an amount equal to the Contract Price as security for the faithful performance and payment of all of Contractor's obligations under the Contract Documents. B. Contractor shall furnish maintenance bonds in the name of Developer and City in an amount equal to the Contract Price as security to protect the City against any defects in any portion of the Work described in the Contract Documents. Maintenance bonds shall remain in effect for two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance by the City. C. All bonds shall be in the form prescribed by the Contract Documents except as provided otherwise by Laws or Regulations, and shall be executed by such sureties as are named in the list of "Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies" as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Financial Management Service, Surety Bond Branch, U.S. Department of the Treasury. All bonds signed by an agent or attorney -in -fact must be accompanied by a sealed and dated power of attorney which shall show that it is effective on the date the agent or attorney -in -fact signed each bond. D. If the surety on any bond furnished by Contractor is declared bankrupt or becomes insolvent or its right to do business is terminated in the State of Texas or it ceases to meet the requirements of Paragraph 4.02.C, Contractor shall promptly notify City and shall, within 30 days after the event giving rise to such notification, provide another bond and surety, both of which shall comply with the requirements of Paragraphs 4.01 and 4.02.C. 4.03 Certificates of Insurance Contractor shall deliver to Developer and City, with copies to each additional insured and loss payee identified in these Standard City Conditions certificates of insurance (and other evidence of insurance requested by City or any other additional insured) which Contractor is required to purchase and maintain. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10- 8 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 8 of 35 1. The certificate of insurance shall document the City, an as "Additional Insured" on all liability policies. 2. The Contractor's general liability insurance shall include a, "per project" or "per location", endorsement, which shall be identified in the certificate of insurance provided to the City. 3. The certificate shall be signed by an agent authorized to bind coverage on behalf of the insured, be complete in its entirety, and show complete insurance carrier names as listed in the current A.M. Best Property & Casualty Guide 4. The insurers for all policies must be licensed and/or approved to do business in the State of Texas. Except for workers' compensation, all insurers must have a minimum rating of A-: VII in the current A. M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. If the rating is below that required, written approval of City is required. 5. All applicable policies shall include a Waiver of Subrogation (Rights of Recovery) in favor of the City. In addition, the Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the Engineer (if applicable), and each additional insured identified in these Standard City Conditions. Failure of the City to demand such certificates or other evidence of full compliance with the insurance requirements or failure of the City to identify a deficiency from evidence that is provided shall not be construed as a waiver of Contractor's obligation to maintain such lines of insurance coverage. 6. If insurance policies are not written for specified coverage limits, an Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance for any differences is required. Excess Liability shall follow form of the primary coverage. 7. Unless otherwise stated, all required insurance shall be written on the "occurrence basis". If coverage is underwritten on a claims -made basis, the retroactive date shall be coincident with or prior to the date of the effective date of the agreement and the certificate of insurance shall state that the coverage is claims -made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall be maintained for the duration of the Contract and for three (3) years following Final Acceptance provided under the Contract Documents or for the warranty period, whichever is longer. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall evidence such insurance coverage. 8. Policies shall have no exclusions by endorsements, which, neither nullify or amend, the required lines of coverage, nor decrease the limits of said coverage unless such endorsements are approved in writing by the City. In the event a Contract has been bid or executed and the exclusions are determined to be unacceptable or the City desires additional insurance coverage, and the City desires the contractor/engineer to obtain such coverage, the contract price shall be adjusted by the cost of the premium for such additional coverage plus 10%. 9. Any self -insured retention (SIR), in excess of $25,000.00, affecting required insurance coverage shall be approved by the City in regards to asset value and stockholders' equity. In CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 0073 10-9 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 9 of 35 lieu of traditional insurance, alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups, must also be approved by City. 10. Any deductible in excess of $5,000.00, for any policy that does not provide coverage on a first -dollar basis, must be acceptable to and approved by the City. 11. City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to review the insurance requirements and to make reasonable adjustments to insurance coverage's and their limits when deemed necessary and prudent by the City based upon changes in statutory law, court decision or the claims history of the industry as well as of the contracting party to the City. The City shall be required to provide prior notice of 90 days, and the insurance adjustments shall be incorporated into the Work by Change Order. 12. City shall be entitled, upon written request and without expense, to receive copies of policies and endorsements thereto and may make any reasonable requests for deletion or revision or modifications of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions necessary to conform the policy and endorsements to the requirements of the Contract. Deletions, revisions, or modifications shall not be required where policy provisions are established by law or regulations binding upon either parry or the underwriter on any such policies. 13. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for Contractor's insurance. 4.04 Contractor's Insurance A. Workers Compensation and Employers' Liability. Contractor shall purchase and maintain such insurance coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers' Compensation Act (Texas Labor Code, Ch. 406, as amended), and minimum limits for Employers' Liability as is appropriate for the Work being performed and as will provide protection from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from Contractor's performance of the Work and Contractor's other obligations under the Contract Documents, whether it is to be performed by Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable: 1. claims under workers' compensation, disability benefits, and other similar employee benefit acts; 2. claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of Contractor's employees. 3. The limits of liability for the insurance shall provide the following coverages for not less than the following amounts or greater where required by Laws and Regulations a. Statutory limits b. Employer's liability CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 10 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 10 of 35 1) $100,000 each accident/occurrence 2) $100,000 Disease - each employee 3) $500,000 Disease - policy limit B. Commercial General Liability. Coverage shall include but not be limited to covering liability (bodily injury or property damage) arising from: premises/operations, independent contractors, products/completed operations, personal injury, and liability under an insured contract. Insurance shall be provided on an occurrence basis, and as comprehensive as the current Insurance Services Office (ISO) policy. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to any other insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the City. The Commercial General Liability policy, shall have no exclusions by endorsements that would alter of nullify premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or advertising injury, which are normally contained with the policy, unless the City approves such exclusions in writing. 1. For construction projects that present a substantial completed operation exposure, the City may require the contractor to maintain completed operations coverage for a minimum of no less than three (3) years following the completion of the project 2. Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section which shall be on a per project basis covering the Contractor with minimum limits of: a. $1,000,000 each occurrence b. $2,000,000 aggregate limit 3. The policy must have an endorsement (Amendment — Aggregate Limits of Insurance) making the General Aggregate Limits apply separately to each job site. 4. The Commercial General Liability Insurance policies shall provide "X", "C", and "U" coverage's. Verification of such coverage must be shown in the Remarks Article of the Certificate of Insurance. C. Automobile Liability. A commercial business auto policy shall provide coverage on "any auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non -owned and provide indemnity for claims for damages because bodily injury or death of any person and or property damage arising out of the work, maintenance or use of any motor vehicle by the Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. 1. Automobile Liability, Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section, which shall be in an amount not less than the following amounts: a. Automobile Liability - a commercial business policy shall provide coverage on "Any Auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non -owned. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 11 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 11 of 35 1) $1, 000, 000 each accident on a combined single limit basis. Split limits are acceptable if limits are at least: 2) $250,000 Bodily Injury per person 3) $500,000 Bodily Injury per accident / 4) $100,000 Property Damage D. Railroad Protective Liability. If any of the work or any warranty work is within the limits of railroad right-of-way, the Contractor shall comply with the following requirements: 1. The Contractor's construction activities will require its employees, agents, subcontractors, equipment, and material deliveries to cross railroad properties and tracks owned and operatedby: Fort Worth and Denver R.R. Company Write the name of the railroad company. (If none, then write none) 2. The Contractor shall conduct its operations on railroad properties in such a manner as not to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the railroad company in any manner whatsoever in the use or operation of its/their trains or other property. Such operations on railroad properties may require that Contractor to execute a "Right of Entry Agreement" with the particular railroad company or companies involved, and to this end the Contractor should satisfy itself as to the requirements of each railroad company and be prepared to execute the right -of -entry (if any) required by a railroad company. The requirements specified herein likewise relate to the Contractor's use of private and/or construction access roads crossing said railroad company's properties. 3. The Contractual Liability coverage required by Paragraph 5.04D of the General Conditions shall provide coverage for not less than the following amounts, issued by companies satisfactory to the City and to the Railroad Company for a term that continues for so long as the Contractor's operations and work cross, occupy, or touch railroad property: a. General Aggregate: none Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none) b. Each Occurrence:: none Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none) 4. With respect to the above outlined insurance requirements, the following shall govern: a. Where a single railroad company is involved, the Contractor shall provide one insurance policy in the name of the railroad company. However, if more than one grade separation or at -grade crossing is affected by the Project at entirely separate locations on the line or lines of the same railroad company, separate coverage may be required, each in the amount stated above. b. Where more than one railroad company is operating on the same right-of-way or where several railroad companies are involved and operated on their own separate rights -of - CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 12 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 12 of 35 way, the Contractor may be required to provide separate insurance policies in the name of each railroad company. c. If, in addition to a grade separation or an at -grade crossing, other work or activity is proposed on a railroad company's right-of-way at a location entirely separate from the grade separation or at -grade crossing, insurance coverage for this work must be included in the policy covering the grade separation. d. If no grade separation is involved but other work is proposed on a railroad company's right-of-way, all such other work may be covered in a single policy for that railroad, even though the work may be at two or more separate locations. 5. No work or activities on a railroad company's property to be performed by the Contractor shall be commenced until the Contractor has furnished the City with an original policy or policies of the insurance for each railroad company named, as required above. All such insurance must be approved by the City and each affected Railroad Company prior to the Contractor's beginning work. 6. The insurance specified above must be carried until all Work to be performed on the railroad right-of-way has been completed and the grade crossing, if any, is no longer used by the Contractor. In addition, insurance must be carried during all maintenance and/or repair work performed in the railroad right-of-way. Such insurance must name the railroad company as the insured, together with any tenant or lessee of the railroad company operating over tracks involved in the Project. E. Notification of Policy Cancellation: Contractor shall immediately notify City upon cancellation or other loss of insurance coverage. Contractor shall stop work until replacement insurance has been procured. There shall be no time credit for days not worked pursuant to this section. 4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace If City has any objection to the coverage afforded by or other provisions of the bonds or insurance required to be purchased and maintained by the Contractor in accordance with Article 5 on the basis of non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the Developer and City shall so notify the Contractor in writing within 10 Business Days after receipt of the certificates (or other evidence requested). Contractor shall provide to the City such additional information in respect of insurance provided as the Developer or City may reasonably request. If Contractor does not purchase or maintain all of the bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Developer or City shall notify the Contractor in writing of such failure prior to the start of the Work, or of such failure to maintain prior to any change in the required coverage. ARTICLE 5 — CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES 5.01 Supervision and Superintendent A. Contractor shall supervise, inspect, and direct the Work competently and efficiently, devoting such attention thereto and applying such skills and expertise as may be necessary to perform the CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 13 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 13 of 35 Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction. B. At all times during the progress of the Work, Contractor shall assign a competent, English- speaking, Superintendent who shall not be replaced without written notice to City. The Superintendent will be Contractor's representative at the Site and shall have authority to act on behalf of Contractor. All communication given to or received from the Superintendent shall be binding on Contractor. C. Contractor shall notify the City 24 hours prior to moving areas during the sequence of construction. 5.02 Labor; Working Hours A. Contractor shall provide competent, suitably qualified personnel to perform construction as required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall at all times maintain good discipline and order at the Site. B. Except as otherwise required for the safety or protection of persons or the Work or property at the Site or adjacent thereto, and except as otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, all Work at the Site shall be performed during Regular Working Hours. Contractor will not permit the performance of Work beyond Regular Working Hours or for Weekend Working Hours without City's written consent (which will not be unreasonably withheld). Written request (by letter or electronic communication) to perform Work: 1. for beyond Regular Working Hours request must be made by noon at least two (2) Business Days prior 2. for Weekend Working Hours request must be made by noon of the preceding Thursday 3. for legal holidays request must be made by noon two Business Days prior to the legal holiday. 5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment A. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall provide and assume full responsibility for all services, materials, equipment, labor, transportation, construction equipment and machinery, tools, appliances, fuel, power, light, heat, telephone, water, sanitary facilities, temporary facilities, and all other facilities and incidentals necessary for the performance, Contractor required testing, start-up, and completion of the Work. B. All materials and equipment incorporated into the Work shall be as specified or, if not specified, shall be of good quality and new, except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. All special warranties and guarantees required by the Specifications shall expressly run to the benefit of City. If required by City, Contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence (including reports of required tests) as to the source, kind, and quality of materials and equipment. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 14 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 14 of 35 C. All materials and equipment to be incorporated into the Work shall be stored, applied, installed, connected, erected, protected, used, cleaned, and conditioned in accordance with instructions of the applicable Supplier, except as otherwise may be provided in the Contract Documents. 5.04 Project Schedule A. Contractor shall adhere to the Project Schedule established in accordance with Paragraph 2.01 and the General Requirements as it may be adjusted from time to time as provided below. 1. Contractor shall submit to City for acceptance (to the extent indicated in Paragraph 2.01 and the General Requirements) proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule. 2. Proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule that will change the Contract Time shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Article 9. Adjustments in Contract Time for projects with City participation shall be made by participating change orders. 5.05 Substitutes and "Or -Equals " A. Whenever an item of material or equipment is specified or described in the Contract Documents by using the name of a proprietary item or the name of a particular Supplier, the specification or description is intended to establish the type, function, appearance, and quality required. Unless the specification or description contains or is followed by words reading that no like, equivalent, or "or -equal" item or no substitution is permitted, other items of material or equipment of other Suppliers may be submitted to City for review under the circumstances described below. 1. "Or -Equal" Items: If in City's sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor is functionally equal to that named and sufficiently similar so that no change in related Work will be required, it may be considered by City as an "or -equal" item, in which case review and approval of the proposed item may, in City's sole discretion, be accomplished without compliance with some or all of the requirements for approval of proposed substitute items. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5.05.A.1, a proposed item of material or equipment will be considered functionally equal to an item so named if: a. City determines that: 1) it is at least equal in materials of construction, quality, durability, appearance, strength, and design characteristics; 2) it will reliably perform at least equally well the function and achieve the results imposed by the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole; and 3) it has a proven record of performance and availability of responsive service; and b. Contractor certifies that, if approved and incorporated into the Work: 1) there will be no increase in cost to the City or increase in Contract Time; and CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 15 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 15 of 35 2) it will conform substantially to the detailed requirements of the item named in the Contract Documents. 2. Substitute Items: a. If in City's sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor does not qualify as an "or -equal" item under Paragraph 5.05.A.1, it may be submitted as a proposed substitute item. b. Contractor shall submit sufficient information as provided below to allow City to determine if the item of material or equipment proposed is essentially equivalent to that named and an acceptable substitute therefor. Requests for review of proposed substitute items of material or equipment will not be accepted by City from anyone other than Contractor. c. Contractor shall make written application to City for review of a proposed substitute item of material or equipment that Contractor seeks to furnish or use. The application shall comply with Section 0125 00 and: 1) shall certify that the proposed substitute item will: i. perform adequately the functions and achieve the results called for by the general design; ii. be similar in substance to that specified; iii. be suited to the same use as that specified; and 2) will state: i. the extent, if any, to which the use of the proposed substitute item will prejudice Contractor's achievement of final completion on time; ii. whether use of the proposed substitute item in the Work will require a change in any of the Contract Documents (or in the provisions of any other direct contract with City for other work on the Project) to adapt the design to the proposed substitute item; iii. whether incorporation or use of the proposed substitute item in connection with the Work is subject to payment of any license fee or royalty; and 3) will identify: i. all variations of the proposed substitute item from that specified; ii. available engineering, sales, maintenance, repair, and replacement services; and CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 16 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 16 of 35 4) shall contain an itemized estimate of all costs or credits that will result directly or indirectly from use of such substitute item, including costs of redesign and Damage Claims of other contractors affected by any resulting change. B. Substitute Construction Methods or Procedures: If a specific means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure of construction is expressly required by the Contract Documents, Contractor may furnish or utilize a substitute means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure of construction approved by City. Contractor shall submit sufficient information to allow City, in City's sole discretion, to determine that the substitute proposed is equivalent to that expressly called for by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall make written application to City for review in the same manner as those provided in Paragraph 5.05.A.2. C. City's Evaluation: City will be allowed a reasonable time within which to evaluate each proposal or submittal made pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A and 5.05.13. City may require Contractor to furnish additional data about the proposed substitute. City will be the sole judge of acceptability. No "or -equal" or substitute will be ordered, installed or utilized until City's review is complete, which will be evidenced by a Change Order in the case of a substitute and an accepted Submittal for an "or -equal." City will advise Contractor in writing of its determination. D. Special Guarantee: City may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor's expense a special performance guarantee, warranty, or other surety with respect to any substitute. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City and anyone directly or indirectly employed by them from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out of the use of substituted materials or equipment. E. City's Cost Reimbursement: City will record City's costs in evaluating a substitute proposed or submitted by Contractor pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A.2 and 5.05.B. Whether or not City approves a substitute so proposed or submitted by Contractor, Contractor may be required to reimburse City for evaluating each such proposed substitute. Contractor may also be required to reimburse City for the charges for making changes in the Contract Documents. F. Contractor's Expense: Contractor shall provide all data in support of any proposed substitute or "or -equal" at Contractor's expense. G. Substitute Reimbursement: Costs (savings or charges) attributable to acceptance of a substitute shall be incorporated to the Contract by Participating Change Order. 5.06 Pre -Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors) A. The Contractor and any subcontractors are required to be prequalified for the work types requiring pre -qualification 5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others A. Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance: CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 17 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 17 of 35 ❑x Required for this Contract. (Check this box if there is any City Participation) ❑ Not Required for this Contract. It is City policy to ensure the full and equitable participation by Minority and Women Business Enterprises (MWBE) in the procurement of goods and services on a contractual basis. If the Contract Documents provide for a MWBE goal, Contractor is required to comply with the intent of the City's MWBE Ordinance (as amended) by the following: 1. Contractor shall, upon request by City, provide complete and accurate information regarding actual work performed by a MWBE on the Contract and payment therefor. 2. Contractor will not make additions, deletions, or substitutions of accepted MWBE without written consent of the City. Any unjustified change or deletion shall be a material breach of Contract and may result in debarment in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Ordinance. 3. Contractor shall, upon request by City, allow an audit and/or examination of any books, records, or files in the possession of the Contractor that will substantiate the actual work performed by an MWBE. Material misrepresentation of any nature will be grounds for termination of the Contract. Any such misrepresentation may be grounds for disqualification of Contractor to bid on future contracts with the City for a period of not less than three years. B. Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work just as Contractor is responsible for Contractor's own acts and omissions. Nothing in the Contract Documents: 1. shall create for the benefit of any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity any contractual relationship between City and any such Subcontractor, Supplier or other individual or entity; nor 2. shall create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any moneys due any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity except as may otherwise be required by Laws and Regulations. C. Contractor shall be solely responsible for scheduling and coordinating the Work of Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work under a direct or indirect contract with Contractor. D. All Subcontractors, Suppliers, and such other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work shall communicate with City through Contractor. E. All Work performed for Contractor by a Subcontractor or Supplier will be pursuant to an appropriate agreement between Contractor and the Subcontractor or Supplier which specifically binds the Subcontractor or Supplier to the applicable terms and conditions of these Contract CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 18 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 18 of 35 Documents, Contractor shall provide City contract numbers and reference numbers to the Subcontractors and/or Suppliers. 5.08 Wage Rates ® Required for this Contract. ❑ Not Required for this Contract. A. Duty to pay Prevailing Wage Rates. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code (as amended), including the payment of not less than the rates determined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth to be the prevailing wage rates in accordance with Chapter 2258. Such prevailing wage rates are included in these Contract Documents. B. Penalty for Violation. A Contractor or any Subcontractor who does not pay the prevailing wage shall, upon demand made by the City, pay to the City $60 for each worker employed for each calendar day or part of the day that the worker is paid less than the prevailing wage rates stipulated in these contract documents. This penalty shall be retained by the City to offset its administrative costs, pursuant to Texas Government Code 2258.023. C. Complaints of Violations and City Determination of Good Cause. On receipt of information, including a complaint by a worker, concerning an alleged violation of 2258.023, Texas Government Code, by a Contractor or Subcontractor, the City shall make an initial determination, before the 31 st day after the date the City receives the information, as to whether good cause exists to believe that the violation occurred. The City shall notify in writing the Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker of its initial determination. Upon the City's determination that there is good cause to believe the Contractor or Subcontractor has violated Chapter 2258, the City shall retain the full amounts claimed by the claimant or claimants as the difference between wages paid and wages due under the prevailing wage rates, such amounts being subtracted from successive progress payments pending a final determination of the violation. D. Arbitration Required if Violation Not Resolved. An issue relating to an alleged violation of Section 2258.023, Texas Government Code, including a penalty owed to the City or an affected worker, shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the Texas General Arbitration Act (Article 224 et seq., Revised Statutes) if the Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker does not resolve the issue by agreement before the 15th day after the date the City makes its initial determination pursuant to Paragraph C above. If the persons required to arbitrate under this section do not agree on an arbitrator before the 1 lth day after the date that arbitration is required, a district court shall appoint an arbitrator on the petition of any of the persons. The City is not a party in the arbitration. The decision and award of the arbitrator is final and binding on all parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction. E. Records to be Maintained. The Contractor and each Subcontractor shall, for a period of three (3) years following the date of acceptance of the work, maintain records that show (i) the name and CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 19 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 19 of 35 occupation of each worker employed by the Contractor in the construction of the Work provided for in this Contract; and (ii) the actual per diem wages paid to each worker. The records shall be open at all reasonable hours for inspection by the City. The provisions of Paragraph 6.23, Right to Audit, shall pertain to this inspection. F. Progress Payments. With each progress payment or payroll period, whichever is less, the Contractor shall submit an affidavit stating that the Contractor has complied with the requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code. G. Posting of Wage Rates. The Contractor shall post prevailing wage rates in a conspicuous place at all times. H. Subcontractor Compliance. The Contractor shall include in its subcontracts and/or shall otherwise require all of its Subcontractors to comply with Paragraphs A through G above. 5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties A. To the fullest extent permitted by Laws and Regulations, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to any infringement of patent rights or copyrights incident to the use in the performance of the Work or resulting from the incorporation in the Work of any invention, design, process, product, or device not specified in the Contract Documents. 5.10 Laws and Regulations A. Contractor shall give all notices required by and shall comply with all Laws and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. Except where otherwise expressly required by applicable Laws and Regulations, the City shall not be responsible for monitoring Contractor's compliance with any Laws or Regulations. B. If Contractor performs any Work knowing or having reason to know that it is contrary to Laws or Regulations, Contractor shall bear all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such Work. However, it shall not be Contractor's responsibility to make certain that the Specifications and Drawings are in accordance with Laws and Regulations, but this shall not relieve Contractor of Contractor's obligations under Paragraph 3.01. 5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas A. Limitation on Use of Site and Other Areas: 1. Contractor shall confine construction equipment, the storage of materials and equipment, and the operations of workers to the Site and other areas permitted by Laws and Regulations, and shall not unreasonably encumber the Site and other areas with construction equipment or CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 20 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 20 of 35 other materials or equipment. Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any damage to any such land or area, or to the owner or occupant thereof, or of any adjacent land or areas resulting from the performance of the Work. 2. At any time when, in the judgment of the City, the Contractor has obstructed or closed or is carrying on operations in a portion of a street, right-of-way, or easement greater than is necessary for proper execution of the Work, the City may require the Contractor to finish the section on which operations are in progress before work is commenced on any additional area of the Site. 3. Should any Damage Claim be made by any such owner or occupant because of the performance of the Work, Contractor shall promptly attempt to resolve the Damage Claim. 4. Pursuant to Paragraph 5.18, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages arising out of or relating to any claim or action, legal or equitable, brought by any such owner or occupant against City. B. Removal of Debris During Performance of the Work: During the progress of the Work Contractor shall keep the Site and other areas free from accumulations of waste materials, rubbish, and other debris. Removal and disposal of such waste materials, rubbish, and other debris shall conform to applicable Laws and Regulations. C. Site Maintenance Cleaning: 24 hours after written notice is given to the Contractor that the clean-up on the job site is proceeding in a manner unsatisfactory to the City or Developer, if the Contractor fails to correct the unsatisfactory procedure, the City may take such direct action as the City deems appropriate to correct the clean-up deficiencies cited to the Contractor in the written notice (by letter or electronic communication), and shall be entitled to recover its cost in doing so. The City may withhold Final Acceptance until clean-up is complete and cost are recovered. D. Final Site Cleaning: Prior to Final Acceptance of the Work Contractor shall clean the Site and the Work and make it ready for utilization by City or adjacent property owner. At the completion of the Work Contractor shall remove from the Site all tools, appliances, construction equipment and machinery, and surplus materials and shall restore to original condition or better all property disturbed by the Work. E. Loading Structures: Contractor shall not load nor permit any part of any structure to be loaded in any manner that will endanger the structure, nor shall Contractor subject any part of the Work or adjacent property to stresses or pressures that will endanger it. 5.12 Record Documents A. Contractor shall maintain in a safe place at the Site or in a place designated by the Contractor and approved by the City, one (1) record copy of all Drawings, Specifications, Addenda, Change Orders, Field Orders, and written interpretations and clarifications in good order and annotated to show changes made during construction. These record documents together with all approved CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 21 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 21 of 35 Samples and a counterpart of all accepted Submittals will be available to City for reference. Upon completion of the Work, these record documents, any operation and maintenance manuals, and Submittals will be delivered to City prior to Final Inspection. Contractor shall include accurate locations for buried and imbedded items. 5.13 Safety and Protection A. Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. Such responsibility does not relieve Subcontractors of their responsibility for the safety of persons or property in the performance of their work, nor for compliance with applicable safety Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to prevent damage, injury or loss to: 1. all persons on the Site or who may be affected by the Work; 2. all the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on or off the Site; and 3. other property at the Site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, walks, pavements, roadways, structures, utilities, and Underground Facilities not designated for removal, relocation, or replacement in the course of construction. B. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Laws and Regulations relating to the safety of persons or property, or to the protection of persons or property from damage, injury, or loss; and shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. Contractor shall notify owners of adjacent property and of Underground Facilities and other utility owners when prosecution of the Work may affect them, and shall cooperate with them in the protection, removal, relocation, and replacement of their property. C. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of City's safety programs, if any. D. Contractor shall inform City of the specific requirements of Contractor's safety program, if any, with which City's employees and representatives must comply while at the Site. E. All damage, injury, or loss to any property referred to in Paragraph 5.13.A.2 or 5.13.A.3 caused, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by Contractor, any Subcontractor, Supplier, or any other individual or entity directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, shall be remedied by Contractor. F. Contractor's duties and responsibilities for safety and for protection of the Work shall continue until such time as all the Work is completed and City has accepted the Work. 5.14 Safety Representative Contractor shall inform City in writing of Contractor's designated safety representative at the Site. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 22 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 22 of 35 5.15 Hazard Communication Programs Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating any exchange of material safety data sheets or other hazard communication information required to be made available to or exchanged between or among employers in accordance with Laws or Regulations. 5.16 Submittals A. Contractor shall submit required Submittals to City for review and acceptance. Each submittal will be identified as required by City. 1. Submit number of copies specified in the General Requirements. 2. Data shown on the Submittals will be complete with respect to quantities, dimensions, specified performance and design criteria, materials, and similar data to show City the services, materials, and equipment Contractor proposes to provide and to enable City to review the information for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C. 3. Submittals submitted as herein provided by Contractor and reviewed by City for conformance with the design concept shall be executed in conformity with the Contract Documents unless otherwise required by City. 4. When Submittals are submitted for the purpose of showing the installation in greater detail, their review shall not excuse Contractor from requirements shown on the Drawings and Specifications. 5. For -Information -Only submittals upon which the City is not expected to conduct review or take responsive action may be so identified in the Contract Documents. 6. Submit required number of Samples specified in the Specifications. 7. Clearly identify each Sample as to material, Supplier, pertinent data such as catalog numbers, the use for which intended and other data as City may require to enable City to review the submittal for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C. B. Where a Submittal is required by the Contract Documents or the Schedule of Submittals, any related Work performed prior to City's review and acceptance of the pertinent submittal will be at the sole expense and responsibility of Contractor. C. City's Review: 1. City will provide timely review of required Submittals in accordance with the Schedule of Submittals acceptable to City. City's review and acceptance will be only to determine if the items covered by the submittals will, after installation or incorporation in the Work, conform to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract Documents. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 23 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 23 of 35 2. City's review and acceptance will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction (except where a particular means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure of construction is specifically and expressly called for by the Contract Documents) or to safety precautions or programs incident thereto. The review and acceptance of a separate item as such will not indicate approval of the assembly in which the item functions. 3. City's review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for any variation from the requirements of the Contract Documents unless Contractor has complied with the requirements of Section 01 33 00 and City has given written acceptance of each such variation by specific written notation thereof incorporated in or accompanying the Submittal. City's review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 5.17 Contractor's General Warranty and Guarantee A. Contractor warrants and guarantees to City that all Work will be in accordance with the Contract Documents and will not be defective. City and its officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors shall be entitled to rely on representation of Contractor's warranty and guarantee. B. Contractor's warranty and guarantee hereunder excludes defects or damage caused by: 1. abuse, modification, or improper maintenance or operation by persons other than Contractor, Subcontractors, Suppliers, or any other individual or entity for whom Contractor is responsible; or 2. normal wear and tear under normal usage. C. Contractor's obligation to perform and complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents shall be absolute. None of the following will constitute an acceptance of Work that is not in accordance with the Contract Documents or a release of Contractor's obligation to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents: 1. observations by City; 2. recommendation or payment by City or Developer of any progress or final payment; 3. the issuance of a certificate of Final Acceptance by City or any payment related thereto by City; 4. use or occupancy of the Work or any part thereof by City; 5. any review and acceptance of a Submittal by City; 6. any inspection, test, or approval by others; or CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 24 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 24 of 35 7. any correction of defective Work by City. D. The Contractor shall remedy any defects or damages in the Work and pay for any damage to other work or property resulting therefrom which shall appear within a period of two (2) years from the date of Final Acceptance of the Work unless a longer period is specified and shall furnish a good and sufficient maintenance bond, complying with the requirements of Article 4.02.13. The City will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness. 5.18 Indemnification A. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. This indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the City in defending against such claims and causes of actions. B. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of property of the City, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. 5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services A. Contractor will not be required to provide professional design services unless such services are specifically required by the Contract Documents for a portion of the Work or unless such services are required to carry out Contractor's responsibilities for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures. B. If professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials or equipment are specifically required of Contractor by the Contract Documents, City will specify all performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. Contractor shall cause such services or certifications to be provided by a properly licensed professional, whose signature and seal shall appear on all drawings, calculations, specifications, certifications, and Submittals prepared by such professional. Submittals related to the Work designed or certified by such professional, if prepared by others, shall bear such professional's written approval when submitted to City. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 25 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 25 of 35 C. City shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy, accuracy and completeness of the services, certifications or approvals performed by such design professionals, provided City has specified to Contractor performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. D. Pursuant to this Paragraph 5.19, City's review and acceptance of design calculations and design drawings will be only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with performance and design criteria given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. City's review and acceptance of Submittals (except design calculations and design drawings) will be only for the purpose stated in Paragraph 5.16.C. 5.20 Right to Audit: A. The City reserves the right to audit all projects utilizing City funds B. The Contractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions relating to this Contract. Contractor agrees that the City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all necessary Contractor facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give Contractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits. C. Contractor further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that the subcontractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of such Subcontractor, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all Subcontractor facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give Subcontractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits. D. Contractor and Subcontractor agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the City. The City agrees to reimburse Contractor for the cost of the copies as follows at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed. 5.21 Nondiscrimination A. The City is responsible for operating Public Transportation Programs and implementing transit - related projects, which are funded in part with Federal financial assistance awarded by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), without discriminating against any person in the United States on the basis of race, color, or national origin. B. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended: Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Act and the Regulations as further defined in the Supplementary Conditions for any project receiving Federal assistance. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 26 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 26 of 35 ARTICLE 6 — OTHER WORK AT THE SITE 6.01 Related Work at Site A. City may perform other work related to the Project at the Site with City's employees, or other City contractors, or through other direct contracts therefor, or have other work performed by utility owners. If such other work is not noted in the Contract Documents, then written notice thereof will be given to Contractor prior to starting any such other work; and B. Contractor shall afford each other contractor who is a party to such a direct contract, each utility owner, and City, if City is performing other work with City's employees or other City contractors, proper and safe access to the Site, provide a reasonable opportunity for the introduction and storage of materials and equipment and the execution of such other work, and properly coordinate the Work with theirs. Contractor shall do all cutting, fitting, and patching of the Work that may be required to properly connect or otherwise make its several parts come together and properly integrate with such other work. Contractor shall not endanger any work of others by cutting, excavating, or otherwise altering such work; provided, however, that Contractor may cut or alter others' work with the written consent of City and the others whose work will be affected. C. If the proper execution or results of any part of Contractor's Work depends upon work performed by others under this Article 7, Contractor shall inspect such other work and promptly report to City in writing any delays, defects, or deficiencies in such other work that render it unavailable or unsuitable for the proper execution and results of Contractor's Work. Contractor's failure to so report will constitute an acceptance of such other work as fit and proper for integration with Contractor's Work except for latent defects in the work provided by others. ARTICLE 7 — CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals City's responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals is set forth in Paragraph 11.03. 7.02 Limitations on City's Responsibilities A. The City shall not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, nor be responsible for, Contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure of Contractor to comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. City will not be responsible for Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. B. City will notify the Contractor of applicable safety plans pursuant to Paragraph 5.13. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 27 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 27 of 35 7.03 Compliance with Safety Program While at the Site, City's employees and representatives shall comply with the specific applicable requirements of Contractor's safety programs of which City has been informed pursuant to Paragraph 5.13. ARTICLE 8 — CITY'S OBSERVATION STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION 8.01 City's Project Representative City will provide one or more Project Representative(s) during the construction period. The duties and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of City's representative during construction are set forth in the Contract Documents. A. City's Project Representative will make visits to the Site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as City deems necessary in order to observe the progress that has been made and the quality of the various aspects of Contractor's executed Work. Based on information obtained during such visits and observations, City's Project Representative will determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. City's Project Representative will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections on the Site to check the quality or quantity of the Work. City's Project Representative's efforts will be directed toward providing City a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work will conform generally to the Contract Documents. B. City's Project Representative's visits and observations are subject to all the limitations on authority and responsibility in the Contract Documents. 8.02 Authorized Variations in Work City's Project Representative may authorize minor variations in the Work from the requirements of the Contract Documents which do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time and are compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a Field Order and will be binding on City Developer, and also on Contractor, who shall perform the Work involved promptly. 8.03 Rejecting Defective Work City will have authority to reject Work which City's Project Representative believes to be defective, or will not produce a completed Project that conforms to the Contract Documents or that will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract Documents. City will have authority to conduct special inspection or testing of the Work as provided in Article 11, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or completed. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 28 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 28 of 35 8.04 Determinations for Work Performed Contractor will determine the actual quantities and classifications of Work performed. City's Project Representative will review with Contractor the preliminary determinations on such matters before rendering a written recommendation. City's written decision will be final (except as modified to reflect changed factual conditions or more accurate data). ARTICLE 9 — CHANGES IN THE WORK 9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work A. Without invalidating the Contract and without notice to any surety, City may, at any time or from time to time, order Extra Work. Upon notice of such Extra Work, Contractor shall promptly proceed with the Work involved which will be performed under the applicable conditions of the Contract Documents (except as otherwise specifically provided). Extra Work shall be memorialized by a Participating Change Order which may or may not precede an order of Extra work. B. For minor changes of Work not requiring changes to Contract Time or Contract Price on a project with City participation, a Field Order may be issued by the City. 9.02 Notification to Surety If the provisions of any bond require notice to be given to a surety of any change affecting the general scope of the Work or the provisions of the Contract Documents (including, but not limited to, Contract Price or Contract Time), the giving of any such notice will be Contractor's responsibility. The amount of each applicable bond will be adjusted by the Contractor to reflect the effect of any such change. ARTICLE 10 — CHANGE OF CONTRACT PRICE; CHANGE OF CONTRACT TIME 10.01 Change of Contract Price A. The Contract Price may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City participation. 10.02 Change of Contract Time A. The Contract Time may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City participation. 10.03 Delays A. If Contractor is delayed, City shall not be liable to Contractor for any claims, costs, losses, or damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) sustained by Contractor on or in connection with any other project or anticipated project. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 29 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 29 of 35 ARTICLE 11— TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL OR ACCEPTANCE OF DEFECTIVE WORK 11.01 Notice of Defects Notice of all defective Work of which City has actual knowledge will be given to Contractor. Defective Work may be rejected, corrected, or accepted as provided in this Article 13. 11.02 Access to Work City, independent testing laboratories, and governmental agencies with jurisdictional interests will have access to the Site and the Work at reasonable times for their observation, inspection, and testing. Contractor shall provide them proper and safe conditions for such access and advise them of Contractor's safety procedures and programs so that they may comply therewith as applicable. 11.03 Tests and Inspections A. Contractor shall give City timely notice of readiness of the Work for all required inspections, tests, or approvals and shall cooperate with inspection and testing personnel to facilitate required inspections or tests. B. If Contract Documents, Laws or Regulations of any public body having jurisdiction require any of the Work (or part thereof) to be inspected, tested, or approved, Contractor shall assume full responsibility for arranging and obtaining such independent inspections, tests, retests or approvals, pay all costs in connection therewith, and furnish City the required certificates of inspection or approval; excepting, however, those fees specifically identified in the Supplementary Conditions or any Texas Department of Licensure and Regulation (TDLR) inspections, which shall be paid as described in the Supplementary Conditions. C. Contractor shall be responsible for arranging and obtaining and shall pay all costs in connection with any inspections, tests, re -tests, or approvals required for City's acceptance of materials or equipment to be incorporated in the Work; or acceptance of materials, mix designs, or equipment submitted for approval prior to Contractor's purchase thereof for incorporation in the Work. Such inspections, tests, re -tests, or approvals shall be performed by organizations approved by City. D. City may arrange for the services of an independent testing laboratory ("Testing Lab") to perform any inspections or tests ("Testing") for any part of the Work, as determined solely by City. 1. City will coordinate such Testing to the extent possible, with Contractor; 2. Should any Testing under this Section 11.03 D result in a "fail", "did not pass" or other similar negative result, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying for any and all retests. Contractor's cancellation without cause of City initiated Testing shall be deemed a negative result and require a retest. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 30 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 30 of 35 3. Any amounts owed for any retest under this Section 11.03 D shall be paid directly to the Testing Lab by Contractor. Developer/Contractor. City will forward all invoices for retests to 4. If Contractor fails to pay the Testing Lab, City will not issue a letter of Final Acceptance until the Testing Lab is Paid E. If any Work (or the work of others) that is to be inspected, tested, or approved is covered by Contractor without written concurrence of City, Contractor shall, if requested by City, uncover such Work for observation. 11.04 Uncovering Work A. If any Work is covered contrary to the Contract Documents or specific instructions by the City, it must, if requested by City, be uncovered for City's observation and replaced at Contractor's expense. 11.05 City May Stop the Work If the Work is defective, or Contractor fails to supply sufficient skilled workers or suitable materials or equipment, or fails to perform the Work in such a way that the completed Work will conform to the Contract Documents, City may order Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, this right of City to stop the Work shall not give rise to any duty on the part of City to exercise this right for the benefit of Contractor, any Subcontractor, any Supplier, any other individual or entity, or any surety for, or employee or agent of any of them. 11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work A. Promptly after receipt of written notice, Contractor shall correct all defective Work pursuant to an acceptable schedule, whether or not fabricated, installed, or completed, or, if the Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective. Contractor shall pay all claims, costs, additional testing, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction or removal (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others). Failure to require the removal of any defective Work shall not constitute acceptance of such Work. B. When correcting defective Work under the terms of this Paragraph 11.06 or Paragraph 11.07, Contractor shall take no action that would void or otherwise impair City's special warranty and guarantee, if any, on said Work. 11.07 Correction Period A. If within two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance (or such longer period of time as may be prescribed by the terms of any applicable special guarantee required by the Contract CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 31 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 31 of 35 Documents), any Work is found to be defective, or if the repair of any damages to the land or areas made available for Contractor's use by City or permitted by Laws and Regulations as contemplated in Paragraph 5.10.A is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without cost to City and in accordance with City's written instructions: 1. repair such defective land or areas; or 2. correct such defective Work; or 3. if the defective Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective, and 4. satisfactorily correct or repair or remove and replace any damage to other Work, to the work of others or other land or areas resulting therefrom. B. If Contractor does not promptly comply with the terms of City's written instructions, or in an emergency where delay would cause serious risk of loss or damage, City may have the defective Work corrected or repaired or may have the rejected Work removed and replaced. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction or repair or such removal and replacement (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others) will be paid by Contractor. C. Where defective Work (and damage to other Work resulting therefrom) has been corrected or removed and replaced under this Paragraph 11.07, the correction period hereunder with respect to such Work may be required to be extended for an additional period of one year after the end of the initial correction period. City shall provide 30 days written notice to Contractor and Developer should such additional warranty coverage be required. Contractor's obligations under this Paragraph 11.07 are in addition to any other obligation or warranty. The provisions of this Paragraph 11.07 shall not be construed as a substitute for, or a waiver of, the provisions of any applicable statute of limitation or repose. 11.08 City May Correct Defective Work A. If Contractor fails within a reasonable time after written notice from City to correct defective Work, or to remove and replace rejected Work as required by City in accordance with Paragraph 11.06.A, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, or if Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of the Contract Documents, City may, after seven (7) days written notice to Contractor and the Developer, correct, or remedy any such deficiency. B. In exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09, City shall proceed expeditiously. In connection with such corrective or remedial action, City may exclude Contractor from all or part of the Site, take possession of all or part of the Work and suspend Contractor's services related thereto, and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment incorporated in the Work, stored at the Site or for which City has paid Contractor but which are CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 32 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 32 of 35 stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow City, City's representatives, agents, consultants, employees, and City's other contractors, access to the Site to enable City to exercise the rights and remedies under this Paragraph. C. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs) incurred or sustained by City in exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 13.09 will be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order will be issued incorporating the necessary revisions in the Contract Documents with respect to the Work; and City shall be entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price. D. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Time because of any delay in the performance of the Work attributable to the exercise of City's rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09. ARTICLE 12 — COMPLETION 12.01 Contractor's Warranty of Title Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all Work, materials, and equipment covered by any Application for Payment will pass to City no later than the time of Final Acceptance and shall be free and clear of all Liens. 12.02 Partial Utilization A. Prior to Final Acceptance of all the Work, City may use or occupy any substantially completed part of the Work which has specifically been identified in the Contract Documents, or which City, determines constitutes a separately functioning and usable part of the Work that can be used by City for its intended purpose without significant interference with Contractor's performance of the remainder of the Work. City at any time may notify Contractor in writing to permit City to use or occupy any such part of the Work which City determines to be ready for its intended use, subject to the following conditions: 1. Contractor at any time may notify City in writing that Contractor considers any such part of the Work ready for its intended use. 2. Within a reasonable time after notification as enumerated in Paragraph 14.05.A.1, City and Contractor shall make an inspection of that part of the Work to determine its status of completion. If City does not consider that part of the Work to be substantially complete, City will notify Contractor in writing giving the reasons therefor. 3. Partial Utilization will not constitute Final Acceptance by City. 12.03 Final Inspection A. Upon written notice from Contractor that the entire Work is complete in accordance with the Contract Documents: CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 33 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 33 of 35 1. within 10 days, City will schedule a Final Inspection with Contractor. 2. City will notify Contractor in writing of all particulars in which this inspection reveals that the Work is incomplete or defective. Contractor shall immediately take such measures as are necessary to complete such Work or remedy such deficiencies. 12.04 Final Acceptance A. Upon completion by Contractor to City's satisfaction, of any additional Work identified in the Final Inspection, City will issue to Contractor a letter of Final Acceptance upon the satisfaction of the following: 1. All documentation called for in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the evidence of insurance required by Paragraph 5.03; 2. consent of the surety, if any, to Final Acceptance; 3. a list of all pending or released Damage Claims against City that Contractor believes are unsettled; and 4. affidavits of payments and complete and legally effective releases or waivers (satisfactory to City) of all Lien rights arising out of or Liens filed in connection with the Work. 5. after all Damage Claims have been resolved: a. directly by the Contractor or; b. Contractor provides evidence that the Damage Claim has been reported to Contractor's insurance provider for resolution. 6. Issuing Final Acceptance by the City shall not relieve the Contractor of any guarantees or other requirements of the Contract Documents which specifically continue thereafter. ARTICLE 13 — SUSPENSION OF WORK 13.01 City May Suspend Work A. At any time and without cause, City may suspend the Work or any portion thereof by written notice to Contractor and which may fix the date on which Work will be resumed. Contractor shall resume the Work on the date so fixed. During temporary suspension of the Work covered by these Contract Documents, for any reason, the City will stop contract time on City participation projects. B. Should the Contractor not be able to complete a portion of the Project due to causes beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, and should it be determined by mutual consent of the Contractor and City that a solution to allow construction to proceed is not CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 34 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 34 of 35 available within a reasonable period of time, Contractor may request an extension in Contract Time, directly attributable to any such suspension. C. If it should become necessary to suspend the Work for an indefinite period, the Contractor shall store all materials in such a manner that they will not obstruct or impede the public unnecessarily nor become damaged in any way, and he shall take every precaution to prevent damage or deterioration of the work performed; he shall provide suitable drainage about the work, and erect temporary structures where necessary. ARTICLE 14 — MISCELLANEOUS 14.01 Giving Notice A. Whenever any provision of the Contract Documents requires the giving of written notice, it will be deemed to have been validly given i£ 1. delivered in person to the individual or to a member of the firm or to an officer of the corporation for whom it is intended; or 2. delivered at or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the last business address known to the giver of the notice. B. Business address changes must be promptly made in writing to the other party. C. Whenever the Contract Documents specifies giving notice by electronic means such electronic notice shall be deemed sufficient upon confirmation of receipt by the receiving party. 14.02 Computation of Times When any period of time is referred to in the Contract Documents by days, it will be computed to exclude the first and include the last day of such period. If the last day of any such period falls on a Saturday or Sunday or on a day made a legal holiday the next Working Day shall become the last day of the period. 14.03 Cumulative Remedies The duties and obligations imposed by these General Conditions and the rights and remedies available hereunder to the parties hereto are in addition to, and are not to be construed in any way as a limitation of, any rights and remedies available to any or all of them which are otherwise imposed or available by Laws or Regulations, by special warranty or guarantee, or by other provisions of the Contract Documents. The provisions of this Paragraph will be as effective as if repeated specifically in the Contract Documents in connection with each particular duty, obligation, right, and remedy to which they apply. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 00 73 10- 35 Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects Page 35 of 35 14.04 Survival of Obligations All representations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in accordance with the Contract Documents, as well as all continuing obligations indicated in the Contract Documents, will survive final payment, completion, and acceptance of the Work or termination or completion of the Contract or termination of the services of Contractor. 14.05 Headings Article and paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute parts of these General Conditions. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS Revised: January 10, 2013 1 2 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY SECTION 01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK 011100-1 SUMMARY OF WORK Pagel of 3 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Summary of Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents 7 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 8 1. Modified 1.2.A.1 9 2. Added 1.2.A.2 10 3. Modified 1.4.13.1 11 4. Added 1.4.13.2 12 5. Added 1.4.0 & 1.4.F 13 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 14 1. Division 0 - Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and Conditions of the Contract 15 2. Division 1 - General Requirements 16 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 17 A. Measurement and Payment 18 1. Unit Price - Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various 19 items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 20 2. Lump Sum Price - Work associated with this Item is included in the total lump 21 sum price. 22 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 23 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 24 A. Work Covered by Contract Documents 25 1. Work is to include furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing 26 all Work necessary for this construction project as detailed in the Drawings and 27 Specifications. 28 B. Subsidiary Work 29 1. Unit Price Bid - Any and all Work specifically governed by documentary 30 requirements for the project, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or 31 Contract Documents in which no specific item for bid has been provided for in the 32 Proposal and the item is not a typical unit bid item included on the standard bid 33 item list, then the item shall be considered as a subsidiary item of Work, the cost of 34 which shall be included in the price bid in the Proposal for various bid items. 35 2. Lump Sum Price — Anv and all Work specifically governed by documentary 36 reauirements for the Droiect. such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or 37 Contract Documents are included in the total lump sum price bid. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 3 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — WATER FACILITY PROJECTS CPN: 105370 Revised December 20, 2012 011100-2 SUMMARY OF WORK Page 2 of 3 1 C. Examination of the Site 2 1. Visit the site, to compare drawings and specifications with anv work in place, 3 and observe all site conditions. including other work. if anv. is being 4 performed. Failure to visit the site shall not relieve the Contractor from the 5 necessity of furnishing materials or performing work required to complete 6 work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 7 D. Use of Premises 8 1. Coordinate uses of premises under direction of the City. 9 2. Assume full responsibility for protection and safekeeping of materials and 10 equipment stored on the Site. 11 3. Use and occupy only portions of the public streets and alleys, or other public places 12 or other rights -of -way as provided for in the ordinances of the City, as shown in the 13 Contract Documents, or as may be specifically authorized in writing by the City. 14 a. A reasonable amount of tools, materials, and equipment for construction 15 purposes may be stored in such space, but no more than is necessary to avoid 16 delay in the construction operations. 17 b. Excavated and waste materials shall be stored in such a way as not to interfere 18 with the use of spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed 19 and so as not to inconvenience occupants of adjacent property. 20 c. If the street is occupied by railroad tracks, the Work shall be carried on in such 21 manner as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad. 22 1) All Work shall be in accordance with railroad requirements set forth in 23 Division 0 as well as the railroad permit. 24 E. Work within Easements 25 1. Do not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously 26 obtained permission from the owner of such property. 27 2. Do not store equipment or material on private property unless and until the 28 specified approval of the property owner has been secured in writing by the 29 Contractor and a copy furnished to the City. 30 3. Unless specifically provided otherwise, clear all rights -of -way or easements of 31 obstructions which must be removed to make possible proper prosecution of the 32 Work as a part of the project construction operations. 33 4. Preserve and use every precaution to prevent damage to, all trees, shrubbery, plants, 34 lawns, fences, culverts, curbing, and all other types of structures or improvements, 35 to all water, sewer, and gas lines, to all conduits, overhead pole lines, or 36 appurtenances thereof, including the construction of temporary fences and to all 37 other public or private property adjacent to the Work. 38 5. Notify the proper representatives of the owners or occupants of the public or private 39 lands of interest in lands which might be affected by the Work. 40 a. Such notice shall be made at least 48 hours in advance of the beginning of the 41 Work. 42 b. Notices shall be applicable to both public and private utility companies and any 43 corporation, company, individual, or other, either as owners or occupants, 44 whose land or interest in land might be affected by the Work. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 3 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — WATER FACILITY PROJECTS CPN: 105370 Revised December 20, 2012 011100-3 SUMMARY OF WORK Page 3 of 3 1 c. Be responsible for all damage or injury to property of any character resulting 2 from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in the manner or method or 3 execution of the Work, or at any time due to defective work, material, or 4 equipment. 5 6. Fence 6 a. Restore all fences encountered and removed during construction of the Project 7 to the original or a better than original condition. 8 b. Erect temporary fencing in place of the fencing removed whenever the Work is 9 not in progress and when the site is vacated overnight, and/or at all times to 10 provide site security. 11 c. The cost for all fence work within easements, including removal, temporary 12 closures and replacement, shall be subsidiary to the various items bid in the 13 project proposal, unless a bid item is specifically provided in the proposal. 14 F. Partial Owner Occuvancv 15 1. The Citv reserves the right to take possession and use anv completed or 16 partially completed portion of the Work regardless of the time of completion 17 of the Work. providing it does not interfere with the Contractor's work. Such 18 possession or use of the Work shall not be construed as final acceptance of the 19 proiect or anv portion thereof. 20 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 21 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 22 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 23 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 24 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 25 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 26 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 27 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 28 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 29 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 30 END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 31 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 3 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — WATER FACILITY PROJECTS CPN: 105370 Revised December 20, 2012 1 2 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY SECTION 01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK 011100-1 SUMMARY OF WORK Page 1 of 3 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Summary of Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents 7 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 8 1. Modified 1.2.A.1 9 2. Added 1.2.A.2 10 3. Modified 1.4.13.1 11 4. Added 1.4.13.2 12 5. Added 1.4.0 & 1.4.17 13 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 14 1. Division 0 - Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and Conditions of the Contract 15 2. Division 1 - General Requirements 16 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 17 A. Measurement and Payment 18 1. Unit Price - Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various 19 items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 20 2. Lump Sum Price - Work associated with this Item is included in the total lump 21 sum price. 22 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 23 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 24 A. Work Covered by Contract Documents 25 1. Work is to include furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing 26 all Work necessary for this construction project as detailed in the Drawings and 27 Specifications. 28 B. Subsidiary Work 29 1. Unit Price Bid - Any and all Work specifically governed by documentary 30 requirements for the project, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or 31 Contract Documents in which no specific item for bid has been provided for in the 32 Proposal and the item is not a typical unit bid item included on the standard bid 33 item list, then the item shall be considered as a subsidiary item of Work, the cost of 34 which shall be included in the price bid in the Proposal for various bid items. 35 2. Lump Sum Price — Anv and all Work specifically governed by documentary 36 requirements for the Droiect, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or 37 Contract Documents are included in the total lump sum price bid. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — WATER FACILITY PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised December 20, 2012 01 11 00 - 2 SUMMARY OF WORK Page 2 of 3 1 C. Examination of the Site 2 1. Visit the site, to compare drawings and specifications with anv work in place, 3 and observe all site conditions, including other work, if anv, is being 4 performed. Failure to visit the site shall not relieve the Contractor from the 5 necessity of furnishing materials or performing work required to complete 6 work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 7 D. Use of Premises 8 1. Coordinate uses of premises under direction of the City. 9 2. Assume full responsibility for protection and safekeeping of materials and 10 equipment stored on the Site. 11 3. Use and occupy only portions of the public streets and alleys, or other public places 12 or other rights -of -way as provided for in the ordinances of the City, as shown in the 13 Contract Documents, or as may be specifically authorized in writing by the City. 14 a. A reasonable amount of tools, materials, and equipment for construction 15 purposes may be stored in such space, but no more than is necessary to avoid 16 delay in the construction operations. 17 b. Excavated and waste materials shall be stored in such a way as not to interfere 18 with the use of spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed 19 and so as not to inconvenience occupants of adjacent property. 20 c. If the street is occupied by railroad tracks, the Work shall be carried on in such 21 manner as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad. 22 1) All Work shall be in accordance with railroad requirements set forth in 23 Division 0 as well as the railroad permit. 24 E. Work within Easements 25 1. Do not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously 26 obtained permission from the owner of such property. 27 2. Do not store equipment or material on private property unless and until the 28 specified approval of the property owner has been secured in writing by the 29 Contractor and a copy furnished to the City. 30 3. Unless specifically provided otherwise, clear all rights -of -way or easements of 31 obstructions which must be removed to make possible proper prosecution of the 32 Work as a part of the project construction operations. 33 4. Preserve and use every precaution to prevent damage to, all trees, shrubbery, plants, 34 lawns, fences, culverts, curbing, and all other types of structures or improvements, 35 to all water, sewer, and gas lines, to all conduits, overhead pole lines, or 36 appurtenances thereof, including the construction of temporary fences and to all 37 other public or private property adjacent to the Work. 38 5. Notify the proper representatives of the owners or occupants of the public or private 39 lands of interest in lands which might be affected by the Work. 40 a. Such notice shall be made at least 48 hours in advance of the beginning of the 41 Work. 42 b. Notices shall be applicable to both public and private utility companies and any 43 corporation, company, individual, or other, either as owners or occupants, 44 whose land or interest in land might be affected by the Work. CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — WATER FACILITY PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised December 20, 2012 011100-3 SUMMARY OF WORK Page 3 of 3 1 c. Be responsible for all damage or injury to property of any character resulting 2 from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in the manner or method or 3 execution of the Work, or at any time due to defective work, material, or 4 equipment. 5 6. Fence 6 a. Restore all fences encountered and removed during construction of the Project 7 to the original or a better than original condition. 8 b. Erect temporary fencing in place of the fencing removed whenever the Work is 9 not in progress and when the site is vacated overnight, and/or at all times to 10 provide site security. 11 c. The cost for all fence work within easements, including removal, temporary 12 closures and replacement, shall be subsidiary to the various items bid in the 13 project proposal, unless a bid item is specifically provided in the proposal. 14 F. Partial Owner Occuvancv 15 1. The Citv reserves the right to take possession and use anv completed or 16 partially completed portion of the Work regardless of the time of completion 17 of the Work, providing it does not interfere with the Contractor's work. Such 18 possession or use of the Work shall not be construed as final acceptance of the 19 project or anv portion thereof. 20 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 21 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 22 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 23 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 24 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 25 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 26 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 27 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 28 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 29 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 30 END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 31 CITY OF FORT WORTH STANDARD CONSTRUCTION Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — WATER FACILITY PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised December 20, 2012 012500-1 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES Page 1 of 4 1 SECTION 0125 00 2 SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. The procedure for requesting the approval of substitution of a product that is not 7 equivalent to a product which is specified by descriptive or performance criteria or 8 defined by reference to 1 or more of the following: 9 a. Name of manufacturer 10 b. Name of vendor 11 c. Trade name 12 d. Catalog number 13 2. Substitutions are not "or -equals". 14 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 15 1. None. 16 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 17 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 18 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 19 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 20 A. Measurement and Payment 21 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No 22 separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 23 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 24 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 25 A. Request for Substitution - General 26 1. Within 30 days after award of Contract (unless noted otherwise), the City will 27 consider formal requests from Contractor for substitution of products in place of 28 those specified. 29 2. Certain types of equipment and kinds of material are described in Specifications by 30 means of references to names of manufacturers and vendors, trade names, or catalog 31 numbers. 32 a. When this method of specifying is used, it is not intended to exclude from 33 consideration other products bearing other manufacturer's or vendor's names, 34 trade names, or catalog numbers, provided said products are "or -equals," as 35 determined by City. 36 3. Other types of equipment and kinds of material may be acceptable substitutions 37 under the following conditions: 38 a. Or -equals are unavailable due to strike, discontinued production of products 39 meeting specified requirements, or other factors beyond control of Contractor; 40 or, CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 012500-2 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES Page 2 of 4 1 b. Contractor proposes a cost and/or time reduction incentive to the City. 2 1.5 SUBMITTALS 3 A. See Request for Substitution Form (attached) 4 B. Procedure for Requesting Substitution 5 1. Substitution shall be considered only: 6 a. After award of Contract 7 b. Under the conditions stated herein 8 2. Submit 3 copies of each written request for substitution, including: 9 a. Documentation 10 1) Complete data substantiating compliance of proposed substitution with 11 Contract Documents 12 2) Data relating to changes in construction schedule, when a reduction is 13 proposed 14 3) Data relating to changes in cost 15 b. For products 16 1) Product identification 17 a) Manufacturer's name 18 b) Telephone number and representative contact name 19 c) Specification Section or Drawing reference of originally specified 20 product, including discrete name or tag number assigned to original 21 product in the Contract Documents 22 2) Manufacturer's literature clearly marked to show compliance of proposed 23 product with Contract Documents 24 3) Itemized comparison of original and proposed product addressing product 25 characteristics including, but not necessarily limited to: 26 a) Size 27 b) Composition or materials of construction 28 c) Weight 29 d) Electrical or mechanical requirements 30 4) Product experience 31 a) Location of past projects utilizing product 32 b) Name and telephone number of persons associated with referenced 33 projects knowledgeable concerning proposed product 34 c) Available field data and reports associated with proposed product 35 5) Samples 36 a) Provide at request of City. 37 b) Samples become the property of the City. 38 c. For construction methods: 39 1) Detailed description of proposed method 40 2) Illustration drawings 41 C. Approval or Rejection 42 1. Written approval or rejection of substitution given by the City 43 2. City reserves the right to require proposed product to comply with color and pattern 44 of specified product if necessary to secure design intent. 45 3. In the event the substitution is approved, if a reduction in cost or time results, it will 46 be documented by Change Order. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 012500-3 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES Page 3 of 4 1 4. Substitution will be rejected if: 2 a. Submittal is not through the Contractor with his stamp of approval 3 b. Request is not made in accordance with this Specification Section 4 c. In the Developer's opinion, acceptance will require substantial revision of the 5 original design 6 d. In the City's or Developer's opinion, substitution will not perform adequately 7 the function consistent with the design intent 8 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 9 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 10 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 11 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 12 A. In making request for substitution or in using an approved product, the Contractor 13 represents that the Contractor: 14 1. Has investigated proposed product, and has determined that it is adequate or 15 superior in all respects to that specified, and that it will perform function for which it 16 is intended 17 2. Will provide same guarantee for substitute item as for product specified 18 3. Will coordinate installation of accepted substitution into Work, to include building 19 modifications if necessary, making such changes as may be required for Work to be 20 complete in all respects 21 4. Waives all claims for additional costs related to substitution which subsequently 22 arise 23 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 24 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 25 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 26 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 27 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 28 END OF SECTION 29 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 30 CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 012500-4 DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION FORM: Imo. PROJECT: DATE: We hereby submit for your consideration the following product instead of the specified item for the above project: SECTION PARAGRAPH SPECIFIED ITEM Proposed Substitution: Reason for Substitution: Include complete information on changes to Drawings and/or Specifications which proposed substitution will require for its proper installation. Fill in Blanks Below: A. Will the undersigned contractor pay for changes to the building design, including engineering and detailing costs caused by the requested substitution? B. What effect does substitution have on other trades? C. Differences between proposed substitution and specified item? D. Differences in product cost or product delivery time? E. Manufacturer's guarantees of the proposed and specified items are: Equal Better (explain on attachment) The undersigned states that the function, appearance and quality are equivalent or superior to the specified item. Submitted By: For Use by City Signature as noted Firm Address Date Telephone For Use by City: Approved City Recommended Recommended Not recommended _Received late By Date Remarks Date Rejected CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 013119-1 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING f.Y1C�[1)�D7[c3f G� I9;1 :role) ►6*10:YIl4i 0Is] ►Iu 191 so 112It PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Pagel of 3 1. Provisions for the preconstruction meeting to be held prior to the start of Work to clarify construction contract administration procedures B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. No construction schedule required unless requested by the City. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1W4=914101WW177\'/u1Dle1@9ZIZy011117D6y A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Coordination 1. Attend preconstruction meeting. 2. Representatives of Contractor, subcontractors and suppliers attending meetings shall be qualified and authorized to act on behalf of the entity each represents. 3. Meeting administered by City may be tape recorded. a. If recorded, tapes will be used to prepare minutes and retained by City for future reference. B. Preconstruction Meeting 1. A preconstruction meeting will be held within 14 days after the delivery of the distribution package to the City. a. The meeting will be scheduled and administered by the City. 2. The Project Representative will preside at the meeting, prepare the notes of the meeting and distribute copies of same to all participants who so request by fully completing the attendance form to be circulated at the beginning of the meeting. 3. Attendance shall include: a. Developer and Consultant b. Contractor's project manager c. Contractor's superintendent d. Any subcontractor or supplier representatives whom the Contractor may desire to invite or the City may request CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 0131 19 - 2 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING Page 2 of 3 e. Other City representatives f. Others as appropriate 4. Preliminary Agenda may include: a. Introduction of Project Personnel b. General Description of Project c. Status of right-of-way, utility clearances, easements or other pertinent permits d. Contractor's work plan and schedule e. Contract Time f. Notice to Proceed g. Construction Staking h. Progress Payments i. Extra Work and Change Order Procedures j. Field Orders k. Disposal Site Letter for Waste Material 1. Insurance Renewals m. Payroll Certification n. Material Certifications and Quality Control Testing o. Public Safety and Convenience p. Documentation of Pre -Construction Conditions q. Weekend Work Notification r. Legal Holidays s. Trench Safety Plans t. Confined Space Entry Standards u. Coordination with the City's representative for operations of existing water systems v. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan w. Coordination with other Contractors x. Early Warning System y. Contractor Evaluation z. Special Conditions applicable to the project aa. Damages Claims bb. Submittal Procedures cc. Substitution Procedures dd. Correspondence Routing ee. Record Drawings ff. Temporary construction facilities gg. MBE/SBE procedures hh. Final Acceptance ii. Final Payment J. Questions or Comments CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 0131 19 - 3 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING Page 3 of 3 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 1 2 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY SECTION 0132 33 PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO 013233-1 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO Page 1 of 2 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Administrative and procedural requirements for: 7 a. Preconstruction Videos 8 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 9 1. Though not mandatory, it is highly recommended on infill developer projects. 10 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 11 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 12 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 13 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 14 A. Measurement and Payment 15 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. 16 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 17 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 18 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 19 A. Preconstruction Video 20 1. Produce a preconstruction video of the site/alignment, including all areas in the 21 vicinity of and to be affected by construction. 22 a. Provide digital copy of video upon request by the City. 23 2. Retain a copy of the preconstruction video until the end of the maintenance surety 24 period. 25 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 26 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 29 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 30 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 31 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 32 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 33 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 01 32 33 - 2 DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO Page 2 of 2 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 1040 IZI] wl 010M 111130 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 1 2 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY SECTION 0133 00 DAP SUBMITTALS 013300-1 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 1 of 8 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. General methods and requirements of submissions applicable to the following 7 Work -related submittals: 8 a. Shop Drawings 9 b. Product Data (including Standard Product List submittals) 10 c. Samples 11 d. Mock Ups 12 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 13 1. None. 14 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 15 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 16 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 17 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 18 A. Measurement and Payment 19 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. 20 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 21 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 22 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 23 A. Coordination 24 1. Notify the City in writing, at the time of submittal, of any deviations in the 25 submittals from the requirements of the Contract Documents. 26 2. Coordination of Submittal Times 27 a. Prepare, prioritize and transmit each submittal sufficiently in advance of 28 performing the related Work or other applicable activities, or within the time 29 specified in the individual Work Sections, of the Specifications. 30 b. Contractor is responsible such that the installation will not be delayed by 31 processing times including, but not limited to: 32 a) Disapproval and resubmittal (if required) 33 b) Coordination with other submittals 34 c) Testing 35 d) Purchasing 36 e) Fabrication 37 f) Delivery 38 g) Similar sequenced activities 39 c. No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to 40 transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the Work. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 013300-2 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 2 of 8 d. Make submittals promptly in accordance with approved schedule, and in such sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the work of any other contractor. B. Submittal Numbering 1. When submitting shop drawings or samples, utilize a 9-character submittal cross- reference identification numbering system in the following manner: a. Use the first 6 digits of the applicable Specification Section Number. b. For the next 2 digits number use numbers 01-99 to sequentially number each initial separate item or drawing submitted under each specific Section number. c. Last use a letter, A-Z, indicating the resubmission of the same drawing (i.e. A=2nd submission, B=3rd submission, C=4th submission, etc.). A typical submittal number would be as follows: 1) 03 30 00 is the Specification Section for Concrete 2) 08 is the eighth initial submittal under this Specification Section 3) B is the third submission (second resubmission) of that particular shop drawing C. Contractor Certification 1. Review shop drawings, product data and samples, including those by subcontractors, prior to submission to determine and verify the following: a. Field measurements b. Field construction criteria c. Catalog numbers and similar data d. Conformance with the Contract Documents 2. Provide each shop drawing, sample and product data submitted by the Contractor with a Certification Statement affixed including: a. The Contractor's Company name b. Signature of submittal reviewer c. Certification Statement 1) `By this submittal, I hereby represent that I have determined and verified field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions, catalog numbers and similar data and I have checked and coordinated each item with other applicable approved shop drawings." D. Submittal Format 1. Fold shop drawings larger than 8 '/2 inches x 11 inches to 8 '/2 inches x 11 inches. 2. Bind shop drawings and product data sheets together. 3. Order a. Cover Sheet 1) Description of Packet 2) Contractor Certification b. List of items / Table of Contents c. Product Data /Shop Drawings/Samples /Calculations E. Submittal Content 1. The date of submission and the dates of any previous submissions CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-3 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 3 of 8 1 2. The Project title and number 2 3. Contractor identification 3 4. The names of- 4 a. Contractor 5 b. Supplier 6 c. Manufacturer 7 5. Identification of the product, with the Specification Section number, page and 8 paragraph(s) 9 6. Field dimensions, clearly identified as such 10 7. Relation to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials 11 8. Applicable standards, such as ASTM or Federal Specification numbers 12 9. Identification by highlighting of deviations from Contract Documents 13 10. Identification by highlighting of revisions on resubmittals 14 11. An 8-inch x 3-inch blank space for Contractor and City stamps 15 F. Shop Drawings 16 1. As specified in individual Work Sections includes, but is not necessarily limited to: 17 a. Custom -prepared data such as fabrication and erection/installation (working) 18 drawings 19 b. Scheduled information 20 c. Setting diagrams 21 d. Actual shopwork manufacturing instructions 22 e. Custom templates 23 f. Special wiring diagrams 24 g. Coordination drawings 25 h. Individual system or equipment inspection and test reports including: 26 1) Performance curves and certifications 27 i. As applicable to the Work 28 2. Details 29 a. Relation of the various parts to the main members and lines of the structure 30 b. Where correct fabrication of the Work depends upon field measurements 31 1) Provide such measurements and note on the drawings prior to submitting 32 for approval. 33 G. Product Data 34 1. For submittals of product data for products included on the City's Standard Product 35 List, clearly identify each item selected for use on the Project. 36 2. For submittals of product data for products not included on the City's Standard 37 Product List, submittal data may include, but is not necessarily limited to: 38 a. Standard prepared data for manufactured products (sometimes referred to as 39 catalog data) 40 1) Such as the manufacturer's product specification and installation 41 instructions 42 2) Availability of colors and patterns 43 3) Manufacturer's printed statements of compliances and applicability 44 4) Roughing -in diagrams and templates 45 5) Catalog cuts 46 6) Product photographs CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-4 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 4 of 8 1 7) Standard wiring diagrams 2 8) Printed performance curves and operational -range diagrams 3 9) Production or quality control inspection and test reports and certifications 4 10) Mill reports 5 11) Product operating and maintenance instructions and recommended 6 spare -parts listing and printed product warranties 7 12) As applicable to the Work 8 H. Samples 9 1. As specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to: 10 a. Physical examples of the Work such as: 11 1) Sections of manufactured or fabricated Work 12 2) Small cuts or containers of materials 13 3) Complete units of repetitively used products color/texture/pattern swatches 14 and range sets 15 4) Specimens for coordination of visual effect 16 5) Graphic symbols and units of Work to be used by the City for independent 17 inspection and testing, as applicable to the Work 18 I. Do not start Work requiring a shop drawing, sample or product data nor any material to 19 be fabricated or installed prior to the approval or qualified approval of such item. 20 1. Fabrication performed, materials purchased or on -site construction accomplished 21 which does not conform to approved shop drawings and data is at the Contractor's 22 risk. 23 2. The City will not be liable for any expense or delay due to corrections or remedies 24 required to accomplish conformity. 25 3. Complete project Work, materials, fabrication, and installations in conformance 26 with approved shop drawings, applicable samples, and product data. 27 J. Submittal Distribution 28 1. Electronic Distribution 29 a. Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be 30 uploaded to City's Buzzsaw site, or another external FTP site approved by the 31 City. 32 b. Shop Drawings 33 1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate 34 City representatives via email of submittal posting. 35 2) Hard Copies 36 a) 3 copies for all submittals 37 b) If Contractor requires more than 1 hard copy of Shop Drawings 38 returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed 39 above. 40 c. Product Data 41 1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate 42 City representatives via email of submittal posting. 43 2) Hard Copies 44 a) 3 copies for all submittals 45 d. Samples 46 1) Distributed to the Project Representative 47 2. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution) CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 013300-5 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 5 of 8 a. Shop Drawings 1) Distributed to the City 2) Copies a) 8 copies for mechanical submittals b) 7 copies for all other submittals c) If Contractor requires more than 3 copies of Shop Drawings returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed above. b. Product Data 1) Distributed to the City 2) Copies a) 4 copies c. Samples 1) Distributed to the Project Representative 2) Copies a) Submit the number stated in the respective Specification Sections. 3. Distribute reproductions of approved shop drawings and copies of approved product data and samples, where required, to the job site file and elsewhere as directed by the City. a. Provide number of copies as directed by the City but not exceeding the number previously specified. K. Submittal Review 1. The review of shop drawings, data and samples will be for general conformance with the design concept and Contract Documents. This is not to be construed as: a. Permitting any departure from the Contract requirements b. Relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including details, dimensions, and materials c. Approving departures from details furnished by the City, except as otherwise provided herein 2. The review and approval of shop drawings, samples or product data by the City does not relieve the Contractor from his/her responsibility with regard to the fulfillment of the terms of the Contract. a. All risks of error and omission are assumed by the Contractor, and the City will have no responsibility therefore. 3. The Contractor remains responsible for details and accuracy, for coordinating the Work with all other associated work and trades, for selecting fabrication processes, for techniques of assembly and for performing Work in a safe manner. 4. If the shop drawings, data or samples as submitted describe variations and show a departure from the Contract requirements which City finds to be in the interest of the City and to be so minor as not to involve a change in Contract Price or time for performance, the City may return the reviewed drawings without noting an exception. 5. Submittals will be returned to the Contractor under 1 of the following codes: a. Code 1 1) "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" is assigned when there are no notations or comments on the submittal. a) When returned under this code the Contractor may release the equipment and/or material for manufacture. b. Code 2 CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 013300-6 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 6 of 8 1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED". This code is assigned when a confirmation of the notations and comments IS NOT required by the Contractor. a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture; however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the final product. c. Code 3 1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED/RESUBMIT". This combination of codes is assigned when notations and comments are extensive enough to require a resubmittal of the package. a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture; however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the final product. b) This resubmittal is to address all comments, omissions and non -conforming items that were noted. c) Resubmittal is to be received by the City within 15 Calendar Days of the date of the City's transmittal requiring the resubmittal. d. Code 4 1) "NOT APPROVED" is assigned when the submittal does not meet the intent of the Contract Documents. a) The Contractor must resubmit the entire package revised to bring the submittal into conformance. b) It may be necessary to resubmit using a different manufacturer/vendor to meet the Contract Documents. 6. Resubmittals a. Handled in the same manner as first submittals 1) Corrections other than requested by the City 2) Marked with revision triangle or other similar method a) At Contractor's risk if not marked b. Submittals for each item will be reviewed no more than twice at the City's expense. 1) All subsequent reviews will be performed at times convenient to the City and at the Contractor's expense, based on the City's or City Representative's then prevailing rates. 2) Provide Contractor reimbursement to the City within 30 Calendar Days for all such fees invoiced by the City. c. The need for more than 1 resubmission or any other delay in obtaining City's review of submittals, will not entitle the Contractor to an extension of Contract Time. 7. Partial Submittals a. City reserves the right to not review submittals deemed partial, at the City's discretion. b. Submittals deemed by the City to be not complete will be returned to the Contractor, and will be considered "Not Approved" until resubmitted. c. The City may at its option provide a list or mark the submittal directing the Contractor to the areas that are incomplete. 8. If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the shop drawings to constitute a change to the Contract Documents, then written notice must be provided thereof to the Developer at least 7 Calendar Days prior to release for manufacture. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-7 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 7 of 8 1 9. When the shop drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the 2 Contractor may carry out the construction in accordance therewith and no further 3 changes therein except upon written instructions from the City. 4 10. Each submittal, appropriately coded, will be returned within 30 Calendar Days 5 following receipt of submittal by the City. 6 L. Mock ups 7 1. Mock Up units as specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily 8 limited to, complete units of the standard of acceptance for that type of Work to be 9 used on the Project. Remove at the completion of the Work or when directed. 10 M. Qualifications 11 1. If specifically required in other Sections of these Specifications, submit a P.E. 12 Certification for each item required. 13 N. Request for Information (RFI) 14 1. Contractor Request for additional information 15 a. Clarification or interpretation of the contract documents 16 b. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between Contract Documents 17 c. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between the Drawings and 18 Specifications 19 1) Identify the conflict and request clarification 20 2. Sufficient information shall be attached to permit a written response without further 21 information. 22 23 24 25 26 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 29 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 30 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 31 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 32 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 33 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 013300-8 DAP SUBMITTALS Page 8 of 8 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 12/20/2012 D. Johnson 1.4.K.8. Working Days modified to Calendar Days CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August 30, 2013 0135 13 -1 DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES Page 1 of 7 1 SECTION 0135 13 2 SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. The procedures for special project circumstances that includes, but is not limited to: 7 a. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation 8 b. Work near High Voltage Lines 9 c. Confined Space Entry Program 10 d. Air Pollution Watch Days 11 e. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc. 12 f. Water Department Notification 13 g. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction 14 h. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers 15 i. Coordination within Railroad permits areas 16 j. Dust Control 17 k. Employee Parking 18 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 19 1. None. 20 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 21 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 22 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 23 3. Section 33 12 25 — Connection to Existing Water Mains 24 25 1.2 REFERENCES 26 A. Reference Standards 27 1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference 28 standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this 29 Specification, unless a date is specifically cited. 30 2. Health and Safety Code, Title 9. Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752. 31 High Voltage Overhead Lines. 32 3. North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) — Clean Construction 33 Specification 34 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 35 A. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation 36 1. When work in the right-of-way which is under the jurisdiction of the Texas 37 Department of Transportation (TxDOT): 38 a. Notify the Texas Department of Transportation prior to commencing any work 39 therein in accordance with the provisions of the permit CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August, 30, 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 0135 13 -2 DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES Page 2 of 7 b. All work performed in the TxDOT right-of-way shall be performed in compliance with and subject to approval from the Texas Department of Transportation B. Work near High Voltage Lines 1. Regulatory Requirements a. All Work near High Voltage Lines (more than 600 volts measured between conductors or between a conductor and the ground) shall be in accordance with Health and Safety Code, Title 9, Subtitle A, Chapter 752. 2. Warning sign a. Provide sign of sufficient size meeting all OSHA requirements. 3. Equipment operating within 10 feet of high voltage lines will require the following safety features a. Insulating cage -type of guard about the boom or arm b. Insulator links on the lift hook connections for back hoes or dippers c. Equipment must meet the safety requirements as set forth by OSHA and the safety requirements of the owner of the high voltage lines 4. Work within 6 feet of high voltage electric lines a. Notification shall be given to: 1) The power company (example: ONCOR) a) Maintain an accurate log of all such calls to power company and record action taken in each case. b. Coordination with power company 1) After notification coordinate with the power company to: a) Erect temporary mechanical barriers, de -energize the lines, or raise or lower the lines c. No personnel may work within 6 feet of a high voltage line before the above requirements have been met. C. Confined Space Entry Program 1. Provide and follow approved Confined Space Entry Program in accordance with OSHA requirements. 2. Confined Spaces include: a. Manholes b. All other confined spaces in accordance with OSHA's Permit Required for Confined Spaces D. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc. 1. When Contract Documents permit on the project the following will apply: a. Public Notification 1) Submit notice to City and proof of adequate insurance coverage, 24 hours prior to commencing. 2) Minimum 24 hour public notification in accordance with Section 0131 13 E. Water Department Coordination 1. During the construction of this project, it will be necessary to deactivate, for a period of time, existing lines. The Contractor shall be required to coordinate with the Water Department to determine the best times for deactivating and activating those lines. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August, 30, 2013 0135 13 -3 DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES Page 3 of 7 1 2. Coordinate any event that will require connecting to or the operation of an existing 2 City water line system with the City's representative. 3 a. Coordination shall be in accordance with Section 33 12 25. 4 b. If needed, obtain a hydrant water meter from the Water Department for use 5 during the life of named project. 6 c. In the event that a water valve on an existing live system be turned off and on 7 to accommodate the construction of the project is required, coordinate this 8 activity through the appropriate City representative. 9 1) Do not operate water line valves of existing water system. 10 a) Failure to comply will render the Contractor in violation of Texas Penal 11 Code Title 7, Chapter 28.03 (Criminal Mischief) and the Contractor 12 will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. 13 b) In addition, the Contractor will assume all liabilities and 14 responsibilities as a result of these actions. 15 F. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction 16 1. Prior to beginning construction on any block in the project, on a block by block 17 basis, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of the pending construction to the front 18 door of each residence or business that will be impacted by construction. The notice 19 shall be prepared as follows: 20 a. Post notice or flyer 7 days prior to beginning any construction activity on each 21 block in the project area. 22 1) Prepare flyer on the Contractor's letterhead and include the following 23 information: 24 a) Name of Project 25 b) City Project No (CPN) 26 c) Scope of Project (i.e. type of construction activity) 27 d) Actual construction duration within the block 28 e) Name of the contractor's foreman and phone number 29 f) Name of the City's inspector and phone number 30 g) City's after-hours phone number 31 2) A sample of the `pre -construction notification' flyer is attached as Exhibit 32 A. 33 3) Submit schedule showing the construction start and finish time for each 34 block of the project to the inspector. 35 4) Deliver flyer to the City Inspector for review prior to distribution. 36 b. No construction will be allowed to begin on any block until the flyer is 37 delivered to all residents of the block. 38 G. Public Notification of Temporary Water Service Interruption during Construction 39 1. In the event it becomes necessary to temporarily shut down water service to 40 residents or businesses during construction, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of 41 the pending interruption to the front door of each affected resident. 42 2. Prepared notice as follows: 43 a. The notification or flyer shall be posted 24 hours prior to the temporary 44 interruption. 45 b. Prepare flyer on the contractor's letterhead and include the following 46 information: 47 1) Name of the project 48 2) City Project Number CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August, 30, 2013 0135 13 -4 DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES Page 4 of 7 1 3) Date of the interruption of service 2 4) Period the interruption will take place 3 5) Name of the contractor's foreman and phone number 4 6) Name of the City's inspector and phone number 5 c. A sample of the temporary water service interruption notification is attached as 6 Exhibit B. 7 d. Deliver a copy of the temporary interruption notification to the City inspector 8 for review prior to being distributed. 9 e. No interruption of water service can occur until the flyer has been delivered to 10 all affected residents and businesses. 11 f. Electronic versions of the sample flyers can be obtained from the Project 12 Construction Inspector. 13 H. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 14 1. At locations in the Project where construction activities occur in areas where 15 USACE permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated 16 permit. 17 I. Coordination within Railroad Permit Areas 18 1. At locations in the project where construction activities occur in areas where 19 railroad permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated 20 railroad permit. This includes, but is not limited to, provisions for: 21 a. Flagmen 22 b. Inspectors 23 c. Safety training 24 d. Additional insurance 25 e. Insurance certificates 26 f. Other employees required to protect the right-of-way and property of the 27 Railroad Company from damage arising out of and/or from the construction of 28 the project. Proper utility clearance procedures shall be used in accordance 29 with the permit guidelines. 30 2. Obtain any supplemental information needed to comply with the railroad's 31 requirements. 32 J. Dust Control 33 1. Use acceptable measures to control dust at the Site. 34 a. If water is used to control dust, capture and properly dispose of waste water. 35 b. If wet saw cutting is performed, capture and properly dispose of slurry. 36 K. Employee Parking 37 1. Provide parking for employees at locations approved by the City. 38 L. {Coordination with North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Clean 39 Construction Specification [if required for the project] 40 1. Comply with equipment, operational, reporting and enforcement requirements set 41 forth in NCTCOG's Clean Construction Specification. } CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August, 30, 2013 0135 13 -5 DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES Page 5 of 7 1 1.4 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2 1.5 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 3 1.6 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 4 1.7 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 5 1.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 6 1.9 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 7 1.10 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 8 1.11 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 9 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 10 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] i 11QI ZI] Icy I[ON I IQ I 12 13 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 1.3.13— Added requirement of compliance with Health and Safety Code, Title 9. 8/31/2012 D. Johnson Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752. High Voltage Overhead Lines. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August, 30, 2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 01 35 13 -6 DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT A (To be printed on Contractor's Letterhead) Date: CPN No.: Project Name: Mapsco Location: Limits of Construction: THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT UNDER A CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, OUR COMPANY WILL WORK ON UTILITY LINES ON OR AROUND YOUR PROPERTY. CONSTRUCTION WILL BEGIN APPROXIMATELY SEVEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESS, SECURITY, SAFETY OR ANY OTHER ISSUE, PLEASE CALL: Mr. <CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT> AT <TELEPHONE NO.> OR Mr. <CITY INSPECTOR> AT < TELEPHONE NO.> AFTER 4:30 PM OR ON WEEKENDS, PLEASE CALL (817) 392 8306 PLEASE KEEP THIS FLYER HANDY WHEN YOU CALL CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August, 30, 2013 1 2 3 4 Date: EXHIBIT B FORT WORTH DOE NO. xxxx Project Name: 0135 13 -7 DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES Page 7 of 7 NOTICE OF TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE INTERRUPTION DUE TO UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, YOUR WATER SERVICE WILL BE INTERRUPTED ON BETWEEN THE HOURS OF AND IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS SHUT -OUT, PLEASE CALL: MR. AT (CONTRACTORS SUPERINTENDENT) (TELEPHONE NUMBER) C630 MR. AT (CITY INSPECTOR) (TELEPHONE NUMBER) THIS INCONVENIENCE WILL BE AS SHORT AS POSSIBLE. THANK YOU, CONTRACTOR CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised August, 30, 2013 01 45 23 DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Pagel of 2 ;y 0(61111301111E, &* ] Is1611NORKM1101►f39114JI00eVol11:NT/lei M11 PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Testing and inspection services procedures and coordination B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. a. Contractor is responsible for performing, coordinating, and payment of all Quality Control testing. b. City is responsible for performing and payment for first set of Quality Assurance testing. 1) If the first Quality Assurance test performed by the City fails, the Contractor is responsible for payment of subsequent Quality Assurance testing until a passing test occurs. a) Final acceptance will not be issued by City until all required payments for testing by Contractor have been paid in full. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Testing 1. Complete testing in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2. Coordination a. When testing is required to be performed by the City, notify City, sufficiently in advance, when testing is needed. b. When testing is required to be completed by the Contractor, notify City, sufficiently in advance, that testing will be performed. 3. Distribution of Testing Reports a. Electronic Distribution 1) Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be uploaded to the City's document management system, or another form of distribution approved by the City. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 01 45 23 DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Page 2 of 2 2) Upload test reports to designated project directory and notify appropriate City representatives via email of submittal posting. 3) Hard Copies a) 1 copy for all submittals submitted to the Project Representative b. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution) 1) Tests performed by City a) Distribute 1 hard copy to the Contractor 2) Tests performed by the Contractor a) Distribute 3 hard copies to City's Project Representative 4. Provide City's Project Representative with trip tickets for each delivered load of Concrete or Lime material including the following information: a. Name of pit b. Date of delivery c. Material delivered B. Inspection 1. Inspection or lack of inspection does not relieve the Contractor from obligation to perform work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 03/20/2020 D.V. Magana Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that electronic submittals be uploaded through the City's document management system. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 015000-1 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 1 of 4 SECTION 0150 00 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS PART1- GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: Provide temporary facilities and controls needed for the Work including, but not necessarily limited to: a. Temporary utilities b. Sanitary facilities c. Storage Sheds and Buildings d. Dust control e. Temporary fencing of the construction site B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES A. Measurement and Payment 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Temporary Utilities 1. Obtaining Temporary Service a. Make arrangements with utility service companies for temporary services. b. Abide by rules and regulations of utility service companies or authorities having jurisdiction. c. Be responsible for utility service costs until Work is approved for Final Acceptance. 1) Included are fuel, power, light, heat and other utility services necessary for execution, completion, testing and initial operation of Work. 2. Water a. Contractor to provide water required for and in connection with Work to be performed and for specified tests of piping, equipment, devices or other use as required for the completion of the Work. b. Provide and maintain adequate supply of potable water for domestic consumption by Contractor personnel and City's Project Representatives. c. Coordination 1) Contact City 1 week before water for construction is desired CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 01 50 00 - 2 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 2 of 4 d. Contractor Payment for Construction Water 1) Obtain construction water meter from City for payment as billed by City's established rates. 3. Electricity and Lighting a. Provide and pay for electric powered service as required for Work, including testing of Work. 1) Provide power for lighting, operation of equipment, or other use. b. Electric power service includes temporary power service or generator to maintain operations during scheduled shutdown. 4. Telephone a. Provide emergency telephone service at Site for use by Contractor personnel and others performing work or furnishing services at Site. 5. Temporary Heat and Ventilation a. Provide temporary heat as necessary for protection or completion of Work. b. Provide temporary heat and ventilation to assure safe working conditions. B. Sanitary Facilities 1. Provide and maintain sanitary facilities for persons on Site. a. Comply with regulations of State and local departments of health. 2. Enforce use of sanitary facilities by construction personnel at job site. a. Enclose and anchor sanitary facilities. b. No discharge will be allowed from these facilities. c. Collect and store sewage and waste so as not to cause nuisance or health problem. d. Haul sewage and waste off -site at no less than weekly intervals and properly dispose in accordance with applicable regulation. 3. Locate facilities near Work Site and keep clean and maintained throughout Project. 4. Remove facilities at completion of Project C. Storage Sheds and Buildings 1. Provide adequately ventilated, watertight, weatherproof storage facilities with floor above ground level for materials and equipment susceptible to weather damage. 2. Storage of materials not susceptible to weather damage may be on blocks off ground. 3. Store materials in a neat and orderly manner. a. Place materials and equipment to permit easy access for identification, inspection and inventory. 4. Equip building with lockable doors and lighting, and provide electrical service for equipment space heaters and heating or ventilation as necessary to provide storage environments acceptable to specified manufacturers. 5. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage away from temporary and existing buildings. 6. Remove building from site prior to Final Acceptance. D. Temporary Fencing 1. Provide and maintain for the duration or construction when required in contract documents E. Dust Control CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 015000-3 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 3 of 4 1. Contractor is responsible for maintaining dust control through the duration of the project. a. Contractor remains on -call at all times b. Must respond in a timely manner F. Temporary Protection of Construction 1. Contractor or subcontractors are responsible for protecting Work from damage due to weather. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 3.4 INSTALLATION A. Temporary Facilities 1. Maintain all temporary facilities for duration of construction activities as needed. 3.5 [REPAIR] / [RESTORATION] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION 3.7 FIELD [oR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES A. Temporary Facilities CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 01 50 00 - 4 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS Page 4 of 4 1. Remove all temporary facilities and restore area after completion of the Work, to a condition equal to or better than prior to start of Work. 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 015526-1 STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL Page 1 of 3 1 SECTION 0155 26 2 STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Administrative procedures for: 7 a. Street Use Permit 8 b. Modification of approved traffic control 9 c. Removal of Street Signs 10 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 11 1. None. 12 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 13 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 14 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 15 3. Section 34 71 13 — Traffic Control 16 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 17 A. Measurement and Payment 18 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 19 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 20 1.3 REFERENCES 21 A. Reference Standards 22 1. Reference standards cited in this specification refer to the current reference standard 23 published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this 24 specification, unless a date is specifically cited. 25 2. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). 26 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 27 A. Traffic Control 28 1. General 29 a. When traffic control plans are included in the Drawings, provide Traffic 30 Control in accordance with Drawings and Section 34 71 13. 31 b. When traffic control plans are not included in the Drawings, prepare traffic 32 control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13 and submit to City for 33 review. 34 1) Allow minimum 10 working days for review of proposed Traffic Control. 35 B. Street Use Permit 36 1. Prior to installation of Traffic Control, a City Street Use Permit is required. 37 a. To obtain Street Use Permit, submit Traffic Control Plans to City 38 Transportation and Public Works Department. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 015526-2 STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL Page 2 of 3 1 1) Allow a minimum of 5 working days for permit review. 2 2) Contractor's responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control plans for 3 Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed. 4 C. Modification to Approved Traffic Control 5 1. Prior to installation traffic control: 6 a. Submit revised traffic control plans to City Department Transportation and 7 Public Works Department. 8 1) Revise Traffic Control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13. 9 2) Allow minimum 5 working days for review of revised Traffic Control. 10 3) It is the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control 11 plans for Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed. 12 D. Removal of Street Sign 13 1. If it is determined that a street sign must be removed for construction, then contact 14 City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs and Markings Division to 15 remove the sign. 16 E. Temporary Signage 17 1. In the case of regulatory signs, replace permanent sign with temporary sign meeting 18 requirements of the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control 19 Devices (MUTCD). 20 2. Install temporary sign before the removal of permanent sign. 21 3. When construction is complete, to the extent that the permanent sign can be 22 reinstalled, contact the City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs 23 and Markings Division, to reinstall the permanent sign. 24 F. Traffic Control Standards 25 1. Traffic Control Standards can be found on the City's Buzzsaw website. 26 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 29 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 30 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 31 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 32 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 33 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 34 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 35 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 36 END OF SECTION CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 015526-3 STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL Page 3 of 3 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 015713-1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION Page 1 of 3 1 SECTION 0157 13 2 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Procedures for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans 7 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 8 1. None. 9 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 10 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the 11 Contract 12 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 13 3. Section 3125 00 — Erosion and Sediment Control 14 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 15 A. Measurement and Payment 16 1. Construction Activities resulting in less than 1 acre of disturbance 17 a. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items 18 bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 19 2. Construction Activities resulting in greater than 1 acre of disturbance 20 a. Measurement and Payment shall be in accordance with Section 3125 00. 21 1.3 REFERENCES 22 A. Abbreviations and Acronyms 23 1. Notice of Intent: NOI 24 2. Notice of Termination: NOT 25 3. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: SWPPP 26 4. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality: TCEQ 27 5. Notice of Change: NOC 28 A. Reference Standards 29 1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference 30 standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this 31 Specification, unless a date is specifically cited. 32 2. Integrated Storm Management (iSWM) Technical Manual for Construction 33 Controls 34 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 35 A. General 36 1. Contractor is responsible for resolution and payment of any fines issued associated 37 with compliance to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 01 57 13 - 2 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION Page 2 of 3 B. Construction Activities resulting in: 1. Less than 1 acre of disturbance a. Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with Section 3125 00 and Drawings. 2. 1 to less than 5 acres of disturbance a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction Permit is required b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements 1) TCEQ Small Construction Site Notice Required under general permit TXR150000 a) Sign and post at job site b) Prior to Preconstruction Meeting, send 1 copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392- 6088. 2) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with: a) Section 3125 00 b) The Drawings c) TXR150000 General Permit d) SWPPP e) TCEQ requirements 3. 5 acres or more of Disturbance a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction Permit is required b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements 1) Prepare a TCEQ NOI form and submit to TCEQ along with required fee a) Sign and post at job site b) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088. 2) TCEQ Notice of Change required if making changes or updates to NOI 3) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with: a) Section 3125 00 b) The Drawings c) TXR150000 General Permit d) SWPPP e) TCEQ requirements 4) Once the project has been completed and all the closeout requirements of TCEQ have been met a TCEQ Notice of Termination can be submitted. a) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088. 40 1.5 SUBMITTALS 41 A. SWPPP 42 1. Submit in accordance with Section 0133 00, except as stated herein. 43 a. Prior to the Preconstruction Meeting, submit a draft copy of SWPPP to the City 44 as follows: 45 1) 1 copy to the City Project Manager 46 a) City Project Manager will forward to the City Department of 47 Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division for review CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 0157 13 -3 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION Page 3 of 3 1 B. Modified SWPPP 2 1. If the SWPPP is revised during construction, resubmit modified SWPPP to the City 3 in accordance with Section 0133 00. 4 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 5 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 6 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 7 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 8 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 9 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 10 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 11 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 12 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 13 14 15 END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 SECTION 0160 00 PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS 171;7I IiQeI 01►101;7.11 0 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 01 60 00 DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS Pagel of 2 1. References for Product Requirements and City Standard Products List B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 1. None. C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES [NOT USED] 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A list of City approved products for use is available through the City's website at: httDs:HaDDs.fortworthtexas.gov/ProiectResources/ and following the directory path: 02 - Construction Documents\Standard Products List A. Only products specifically included on City's Standard Product List in these Contract Documents shall be allowed for use on the Project. 1. Any subsequently approved products will only be allowed for use upon specific approval by the City. B. Any specific product requirements in the Contract Documents supersede similar products included on the City's Standard Product List. 1. The City reserves the right to not allow products to be used for certain projects even though the product is listed on the City's Standard Product List. C. Although a specific product is included on City's Standard Product List, not all products from that manufacturer are approved for use, including but not limited to, that manufacturer's standard product. D. See Section 01 33 00 for submittal requirements of Product Data included on City's Standard Product List. 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 01 60 00 DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 2 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] DATE NAME END OF SECTION Revision Log SUMMARY OF CHANGE 10/12/12 D. Johnson Modified Location of City's Standard Product List 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application 03/20/2020 D.V. Magafia Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that the City approved products list is accessible through the City's website. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised March 20, 2020 016600-1 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Pagel of 4 1 SECTION 0166 00 2 PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Scheduling of product delivery 7 2. Packaging of products for delivery 8 3. Protection of products against damage from: 9 a. Handling 10 b. Exposure to elements or harsh environments 11 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 12 1. None. 13 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 14 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 15 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 16 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 17 A. Measurement and Payment 18 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 19 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 20 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 21 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 22 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 23 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS SNOT USED 24 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 25 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 26 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 27 1.10 DELIVERY AND HANDLING 28 A. Delivery Requirements 29 1. Schedule delivery of products or equipment as required to allow timely installation 30 and to avoid prolonged storage. 31 2. Provide appropriate personnel and equipment to receive deliveries. 32 3. Delivery trucks will not be permitted to wait extended periods of time on the Site 33 for personnel or equipment to receive the delivery. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 66 00 - 2 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 1 4. Deliver products or equipment in manufacturer's original unbroken cartons or other 2 containers designed and constructed to protect the contents from physical or 3 environmental damage. 4 5. Clearly and fully mark and identify as to manufacturer, item and installation 5 location. 6 6. Provide manufacturer's instructions for storage and handling. 7 B. Handling Requirements 8 1. Handle products or equipment in accordance with these Contract Documents and 9 manufacturer's recommendations and instructions. 10 C. Storage Requirements 11 1. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations and 12 requirements of these Specifications. 13 2. Make necessary provisions for safe storage of materials and equipment. 14 a. Place loose soil materials and materials to be incorporated into Work to prevent 15 damage to any part of Work or existing facilities and to maintain free access at 16 all times to all parts of Work and to utility service company installations in 17 vicinity of Work. 18 3. Keep materials and equipment neatly and compactly stored in locations that will 19 cause minimum inconvenience to other contractors, public travel, adjoining owners, 20 tenants and occupants. 21 a. Arrange storage to provide easy access for inspection. 22 4. Restrict storage to areas available on construction site for storage of material and 23 equipment as shown on Drawings, or approved by City's Project Representative. 24 5. Provide off -site storage and protection when on -site storage is not adequate. 25 a. Provide addresses of and access to off -site storage locations for inspection by 26 City's Project Representative. 27 6. Do not use lawns, grass plots or other private property for storage purposes without 28 written permission of owner or other person in possession or control of premises. 29 7. Store in manufacturers' unopened containers. 30 8. Neatly, safely and compactly stack materials delivered and stored along line of 31 Work to avoid inconvenience and damage to property owners and general public 32 and maintain at least 3 feet from fire hydrant. 33 9. Keep public and private driveways and street crossings open. 34 10. Repair or replace damaged lawns, sidewalks, streets or other improvements to 35 satisfaction of City's Project Representative. 36 a. Total length which materials may be distributed along route of construction at 37 one time is 1,000 linear feet, unless otherwise approved in writing by City's 38 Project Representative. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 016600-3 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 1 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 2 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 3 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 4 PART 3 - EXECUTION 5 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 6 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 7 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 8 3.4 ERECTION [NOT USED] 9 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 10 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 11 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL 12 A. Tests and Inspections 13 1. Inspect all products or equipment delivered to the site prior to unloading. 14 B. Non -Conforming Work 15 1. Reject all products or equipment that are damaged, used or in any other way 16 unsatisfactory for use on the project. 17 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 18 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 19 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 20 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 21 3.12 PROTECTION 22 A. Protect all products or equipment in accordance with manufacturer's written directions. 23 B. Store products or equipment in location to avoid physical damage to items while in 24 storage. 25 C. Protect equipment from exposure to elements and keep thoroughly dry if required by 26 the manufacturer. 27 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 28 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 29 END OF SECTION 30 CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 66 00 - 4 DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 017000-1 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION Page 1 of 4 1 SECTION 0170 00 2 MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 1. Mobilization and Demobilization a. Mobilization 1) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies to the Site 2) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's operation at the Site 3) Premiums paid for performance and payment bonds 4) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies to another location within the designated Site 5) Relocation of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's operation from 1 location to another location on the Site. b. Demobilization 1) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies away from the Site including disassembly 2) Site Clean-up 3) Removal of all buildings and/or other facilities assembled at the Site for this Contract c. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of work that are for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract. 2. Remobilization a. Remobilization for Suspension of Work specifically required in the Contract Documents or as required by City includes: 1) Demobilization a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies from the Site including disassembly or temporarily securing equipment, supplies, and other facilities as designated by the Contract Documents necessary to suspend the Work. b) Site Clean-up as designated in the Contract Documents 2) Remobilization a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating supplies to the Site necessary to resume the Work. b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's operation at the Site necessary to resume the Work. 3) No Payments will be made for: a) Mobilization and Demobilization from one location to another on the Site in the normal progress of performing the Work. b) Stand-by or idle time c) Lost profits 3. Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects a. Mobilization and Demobilization CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 70 00 - 2 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION Page 2 of 4 1 1) Mobilization shall consist of the activities and cost on a Work Order basis 2 necessary for: 3 a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating 4 supplies to the Site for the issued Work Order. 5 b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor's 6 operation at the Site for the issued Work Order 7 2) Demobilization shall consist of the activities and cost necessary for: 8 a) Transportation of Contractor's personnel, equipment, and operating 9 supplies from the Site including disassembly for each issued Work 10 Order 11 b) Site Clean-up for each issued Work Order 12 c) Removal of all buildings or other facilities assembled at the Site for 13 each Work Oder 14 b. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of 15 work for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract. 16 4. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects 17 a. A Mobilization for Miscellaneous Projects when directed by the City and the 18 mobilization occurs within 24 hours of the issuance of the Work Order. 19 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 20 1. None. 21 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 22 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 23 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 24 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 25 A. Measurement and Payment 26 1. Mobilization and Demobilization 27 a. Measure 28 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 29 b. Payment 30 1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 31 are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be 32 allowed. 33 2. Remobilization for suspension of Work as specifically required in the Contract 34 Documents 35 a. Measurement 36 1) Measurement for this Item shall be per each remobilization performed. 37 b. Payment 38 1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 39 and measured as provided under "Measurement" will be paid for at the unit 40 price per each "Specified Remobilization" in accordance with Contract 41 Documents. 42 c. The price shall include: 43 1) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.1) 44 2) Remobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.2) 45 d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this 46 Item. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 017000-3 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION Page 3 of 4 1 3. Remobilization for suspension of Work as required by City 2 a. Measurement and Payment 3 1) This shall be submitted as a Contract Claim in accordance with Article 10 4 of Section 00 72 00. 5 2) No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated 6 with this Item. 7 4. Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects 8 a. Measurement 9 1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and 10 Demobilization required by the Contract Documents 11 b. Payment 12 1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 13 and measured as provided under "Measurement" will be paid for at the unit 14 price per each "Work Order Mobilization" in accordance with Contract 15 Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to mobilization 16 and shall not be paid for separately. 17 c. The price shall include: 18 1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.1) 19 2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2) 20 d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this 21 Item. 22 5. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects 23 a. Measurement 24 1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and 25 Demobilization required by the Contract Documents 26 b. Payment 27 1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 28 and measured as provided under "Measurement" will be paid for at the unit 29 price per each "Work Order Emergency Mobilization" in accordance with 30 Contract Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to 31 mobilization and shall not be paid for separately. 32 c. The price shall include 33 1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.4.a) 34 2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2) 35 d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this 36 Item. 37 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 38 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 39 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 40 1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 41 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 42 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 43 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 44 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 70 00 - 4 DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION Page 4 of 4 1 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 2 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 3 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 4 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 5 END OF SECTION 6 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application 7 CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 017123-1 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 1 of 7 1 SECTION 01 71 23 2 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Requirements for construction staking and construction survey 7 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 8 1. See Changes (Highlighted in Yellow). 9 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 10 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 11 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 12 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 13 A. Measurement and Payment 14 1. Construction Staking 15 a. Measurement 16 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 17 b. Payment 18 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this 19 Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will 20 be allowed. 21 2. Construction Survey 22 a. Measurement 23 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 24 b. Payment 25 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this 26 Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be 27 allowed. 28 3. As -Built Survey 29 a. Measurement 30 1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 31 b. Payment 32 1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this 33 Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be 34 allowed. 35 1.3 REFERENCES 36 A. Definitions 37 1. Construction Survev - The survey measurements made prior to or while 38 construction is in progress to control elevation, horizontal position, dimensions and 39 configuration of structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised February 14, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 01 71 23 - 2 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 2 of 7 2. As -built Survev —The measurements made after the construction of the improvement features are complete to provide position coordinates for the features of a project. 3. Construction Stakiniz — The placement of stakes and markings to provide offsets and elevations to cut and fill in order to locate on the ground the designed structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings. Construction staking shall include staking easements and/or right of way if indicated on the plans. 4. Survev "Field Checks" — Measurements made after construction staking is completed and before construction work begins to ensure that structures marked on the ground are accurately located per Project Drawings. B. Technical References 1. City of Fort Worth — Construction Staking Standards (available on City's Buzzsaw website) — 01 71 23.16.01— Attachment A Survey Staking Standards 2. City of Fort Worth - Standard Survey Data Collector Library (fxl) files (available on City's Buzzsaw website). 3. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Survey Manual, latest revision 4. Texas Society of Professional Land Surveyors (TSPS), Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, Category 5 20 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 21 A. The Contractor's selection of a surveyor must comply with Texas Government 22 Code 2254 (qualifications based selection) for this project. 23 1.5 SUBMITTALS 24 A. Submittals, if required, shall be in accordance with Section 0133 00. 25 B. All submittals shall be received and reviewed by the City prior to delivery of work. 26 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS 27 A. Field Quality Control Submittals 28 1. Documentation verifying accuracy of field engineering work, including coordinate 29 conversions if plans do not indicate grid or ground coordinates. 30 2. Submit "Cut -Sheets" conforming to the standard template provided by the City 31 (refer to 01 71 23.16.01 — Attachment A — Survey Staking Standards). 32 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS 33 B. As -built Redline Drawing Submittal 34 1. Submit As -Built Survey Redline Drawings documenting the locations/elevations of 35 constructed improvements signed and sealed by Registered Professional Land 36 Surveyor (RPLS) responsible for the work (refer to 01 71 23.16.01 — Attachment A 37 — Survey Staking Standards) . 38 2. Contractor shall submit the proposed as -built and completed redline drawing 39 submittal one (1) week prior to scheduling the project final inspection for City 40 review and comment. Revisions, if necessary, shall be made to the as -built redline 41 drawings and resubmitted to the City prior to scheduling the construction final 42 inspection. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised February 14, 2018 017123-3 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 3 of 7 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 3 A. Construction Staking 4 1. Construction staking will be performed by the Contractor. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 2. Coordination a. Contact City and Developer's Project Representative at least one week in advance notifying the City of when Construction Staking is scheduled. b. It is the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate staking such that construction activities are not delayed or negatively impacted. 3. General a. Contractor is responsible for preserving and maintaining stakes. If Developer's Project Representative is required to re -stake for any reason, the Contractor will be responsible for costs to perform staking. If in the opinion of the City, a sufficient number of stakes or markings have been lost, destroyed disturbed or omitted that the contracted Work cannot take place then the Contractor will be required to stake or re -stake the deficient areas. B. Construction Survey 1. Construction Survey will be performed by the Contractor. 2. Coordination a. Contractor to verify that horizontal and vertical control data established in the design survey and required for construction survey is available and in place. 3. General a. Construction survey will be performed in order to construct the work shown on the Construction Drawings and specified in the Contract Documents. b. For construction methods other than open cut, the Contractor shall perform construction survey and verify control data including, but not limited to, the following: 1) Verification that established benchmarks and control are accurate. 2) Use of Benchmarks to furnish and maintain all reference lines and grades for tunneling. 3) Use of line and grades to establish the location of the pipe. 4) Submit to the City copies of field notes used to establish all lines and grades, if requested, and allow the City to check guidance system setup prior to beginning each tunneling drive. 5) Provide access for the City, if requested, to verify the guidance system and the line and grade of the carrier pipe. 6) The Contractor remains fully responsible for the accuracy of the work and correction of it, as required. 7) Monitor line and grade continuously during construction. 8) Record deviation with respect to design line and grade once at each pipe joint and submit daily records to the City. 9) If the installation does not meet the specified tolerances (as outlined in Sections 33 05 23 and/or 33 05 24), immediately notify the City and correct the installation in accordance with the Contract Documents. C. As -Built Survey 1. Required As -Built Survey will be performed by the Contractor. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised February 14, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 01 71 23 - 4 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 4 of 7 2. Coordination a. Contractor is to coordinate with City to confirm which features require as - built surveying. b. It is the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate the as -built survey and required measurements for items that are to be buried such that construction activities are not delayed or negatively impacted. c. For sewer mains and water mains 12" and under in diameter, it is acceptable to physically measure depth and mark the location during the progress of construction and take as -built survey after the facility has been buried. The Contractor is responsible for the quality control needed to ensure accuracy. 3. General a. The Contractor shall provide as -built survey including the elevation and location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction features during the progress of the construction including the following: 1) Water Lines a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for waterlines at the following locations: (1) Minimum every 250 linear feet, including (2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature, etc. (3) Fire line tee (4) Plugs, stub -outs, dead-end lines (5) Casing pipe (each end) and all buried fittings 2) Sanitary Sewer a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for force mains and siphon sanitary sewer lines (non -gravity facilities) at the following locations: (1) Minimum every 250 linear feet and any buried fittings (2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature, etc. 3) Stormwater — Not Applicable b. The Contractor shall provide as -built survey including the elevation and location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction features after the construction is completed including the following: 1) Manholes a) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each manhole 2) Water Lines a) Cathodic protection test stations b) Sampling stations c) Meter boxes/vaults (All sizes) d) Fire hydrants e) Valves (gate, butterfly, etc.) f) Air Release valves (Manhole rim and vent pipe) g) Blow off valves (Manhole rim and valve lid) h) Pressure plane valves i) Underground Vaults (1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each Underground Vault. 3) Sanitary Sewer a) Cleanouts (1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised February 14, 2018 017123-5 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 5 of 7 1 b) Manholes and Junction Structures 2 (1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each 3 manhole and junction structure. 4 4) Stormwater — Not Applicable 5 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 6 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 7 1.12 WARRANTY 8 PART 2- PRODUCTS 9 A. A construction survey will produce, but will not be limited to: 10 1. Recovery of relevant control points, points of curvature and points of intersection. 11 2. Establish temporary horizontal and vertical control elevations (benchmarks) 12 sufficiently permanent and located in a manner to be used throughout construction. 13 3. The location of planned facilities, easements and improvements. 14 a. Establishing final line and grade stakes for piers, floors, grade beams, parking 15 areas, utilities, streets, highways, tunnels, and other construction. 16 b. A record of revisions or corrections noted in an orderly manner for reference. 17 c. A drawing, when required by the client, indicating the horizontal and vertical 18 location of facilities, easements and improvements, as built. 19 4. Cut sheets shall be provided to the City inspector and Survey Superintendent for all 20 construction staking projects. These cut sheets shall be on the standard city template 21 which can be obtained from the Survey Superintendent (817-392-7925). 22 5. Digital survey files in the following formats shall be acceptable: 23 a. AutoCAD (.dwg) 24 b. ESRI Shapefile (shp) 25 c. CSV file (.csv), formatted with X and Y coordinates in separate columns (use 26 standard templates, if available) 27 6. Survey files shall include vertical and horizontal data tied to original project 28 control and benchmarks, and shall include feature descriptions 29 PART 3 - EXECUTION 30 3.1 INSTALLERS 31 A. Tolerances: 32 1. The staked location of any improvement or facility should be as accurate as 33 practical and necessary. The degree of precision required is dependent on many 34 factors all of which must remain judgmental. The tolerances listed hereafter are 35 based on generalities and, under certain circumstances, shall yield to specific 36 requirements. The surveyor shall assess any situation by review of the overall plans 37 and through consultation with responsible parties as to the need for specific 38 tolerances. 39 a. Earthwork: Grades for earthwork or rough cut should not exceed 0.1 ft. vertical 40 tolerance. Horizontal alignment for earthwork and rough cut should not exceed 41 1.0 ft. tolerance. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised February 14, 2018 017123-6 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 6 of 7 1 b. Horizontal alignment on a structure shall be within .0.Ift tolerance. 2 c. Paving or concrete for streets, curbs, gutters, parking areas, drives, alleys and 3 walkways shall be located within the confines of the site boundaries and, 4 occasionally, along a boundary or any other restrictive line. Away from any 5 restrictive line, these facilities should be staked with an accuracy producing no 6 more than 0.05ft. tolerance from their specified locations. 7 d. Underground and overhead utilities, such as sewers, gas, water, telephone and 8 electric lines, shall be located horizontally within their prescribed areas or 9 easements. Within assigned areas, these utilities should be staked with an 10 accuracy producing no more than 0.1 ft tolerance from a specified location. 11 e. The accuracy required for the vertical location of utilities varies widely. Many 12 underground utilities require only a minimum cover and a tolerance of 0.1 ft. 13 should be maintained. Underground and overhead utilities on planned profile, 14 but not depending on gravity flow for performance, should not exceed 0.1 ft. 15 tolerance. 16 B. Surveying instruments shall be kept in close adjustment according to manufacturer's 17 specifications or in compliance to standards. The City reserves the right to request a 18 calibration report at any time and recommends regular maintenance schedule be 19 performed by a certified technician every 6 months. 20 1. Field measurements of angles and distances shall be done in such fashion as to 21 satisfy the closures and tolerances expressed in Part 3.1.A. 22 2. Vertical locations shall be established from a pre -established benchmark and 23 checked by closing to a different bench mark on the same datum. 24 3. Construction survey field work shall correspond to the client's plans. Irregularities 25 or conflicts found shall be reported promptly to the City. 26 4. Revisions, corrections and other pertinent data shall be logged for future reference. 27 28 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 29 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 30 3.4 APPLICATION 31 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION 32 A. If the Contractor's work damages or destroys one or more of the control 33 monuments/points set by the Developer's Project Representative, the monuments shall be 34 adequately referenced for expedient restoration. 35 1. Notify City or Developer's Project Representative if any control data needs to be 36 restored or replaced due to damage caused during construction operations. 37 a. Contractor shall perform replacements and/or restorations. 38 b. The City or Developer's Project Representative may require at anytime a 39 survey "Field Check" of any monument or benchmarks that are set be verified 40 by the Developer's Project Representative before further associated work can 41 move forward. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised February 14, 2018 017123-7 CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY Page 7 of 7 1 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 2 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL 3 A. It is the Contractor's responsibility to maintain all stakes and control data placed by the 4 Developer's Project Representative in accordance with this Specification. This includes 5 easements and right of way, if noted on the plans. 6 B. Do not change or relocate stakes or control data without approval from the City. 7 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP 8 A. Survey Checks 9 1. The City reserves the right to perform a Survey Check at any time deemed 10 necessary. 11 2. Checks by City personnel or 31 party contracted surveyor are not intended to 12 relieve the contractor of his/her responsibility for accuracy. 13 14 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 15 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 16 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 17 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 18 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 19 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 20 21 22 END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 8/31/2012 D. Johnson Added instruction and modified measurement & payment under 1.2; added 8/31/2017 M. Owen definitions and references under 1.3; modified 1.6; added 1.7 closeout submittal requirements; modified 1.9 Quality Assurance; added PART 2 — PRODUCTS ; Added 3.1 Installers; added 3.5 Repair/Restoration; and added 3.8 System Startup. Removed "blue text"; revised measurement and payment sections for Construction Staking and As -Built Survey; added reference to selection compliance with TGC 2/14/2018 M Owen 2254; revised action and Closeout submittal requirements; added acceptable depth measurement criteria; revised list of items requiring as -built survey "during" and "after" construction; and revised acceptable digital survey file format CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised February 14, 2018 017423-1 DAP CLEANING Page 1 of 4 1 SECTION 0174 23 2 CLEANING 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Intermediate and final cleaning for Work not including special cleaning of closed 7 systems specified elsewhere 8 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 9 1. None. 10 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 11 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 12 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 13 3. Section 32 92 13 — Hydro -Mulching, Seeding and Sodding 14 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 15 A. Measurement and Payment 16 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 17 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 18 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 19 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 20 A. Scheduling 21 1. Schedule cleaning operations so that dust and other contaminants disturbed by 22 cleaning process will not fall on newly painted surfaces. 23 2. Schedule final cleaning upon completion of Work and immediately prior to final 24 inspection. 25 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 26 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 29 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 30 1.10 STORAGE, AND HANDLING 31 A. Storage and Handling Requirements 32 1. Store cleaning products and cleaning wastes in containers specifically designed for 33 those materials. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 74 23 - 2 DAP CLEANING Page 2 of 4 1 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 2 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 3 PART 2- PRODUCTS 4 2.1 OWNER -FURNISHED [oR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED] 5 2.2 MATERIALS 6 A. Cleaning Agents 7 1. Compatible with surface being cleaned 8 2. New and uncontaminated 9 3. For manufactured surfaces 10 a. Material recommended by manufacturer 11 2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED] 12 2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 13 PART 3 - EXECUTION 14 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 15 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 16 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 17 3.4 APPLICATION [NOT USED] 18 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED 19 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 20 3.7 FIELD [oR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 21 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 22 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 23 3.10 CLEANING 24 A. General 25 1. Prevent accumulation of wastes that create hazardous conditions. 26 2. Conduct cleaning and disposal operations to comply with laws and safety orders of 27 governing authorities. 28 3. Do not dispose of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits, oil or paint thinner in 29 storm or sanitary drains or sewers. 30 4. Dispose of degradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site. 31 5. Dispose of nondegradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site or in an 32 alternate manner approved by City and regulatory agencies. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 74 23 - 3 DAP CLEANING Page 3 of 4 1 6. Handle materials in a controlled manner with as few handlings as possible. 2 7. Thoroughly clean, sweep, wash and polish all Work and equipment associated with 3 this project. 4 8. Remove all signs of temporary construction and activities incidental to construction 5 of required permanent Work. 6 9. If project is not cleaned to the satisfaction of the City, the City reserves the right to 7 have the cleaning completed at the expense of the Contractor. 8 10. Do not burn on -site. 9 B. Intermediate Cleaning during Construction 10 1. Keep Work areas clean so as not to hinder health, safety or convenience of 11 personnel in existing facility operations. 12 2. At maximum weekly intervals, dispose of waste materials, debris and rubbish. 13 3. Confine construction debris daily in strategically located container(s): 14 a. Cover to prevent blowing by wind 15 b. Store debris away from construction or operational activities 16 c. Haul from site at a minimum of once per week 17 4. Vacuum clean interior areas when ready to receive finish painting. 18 a. Continue vacuum cleaning on an as -needed basis, until Final Acceptance. 19 5. Prior to storm events, thoroughly clean site of all loose or unsecured items, which 20 may become airborne or transported by flowing water during the storm. 21 C. Exterior (Site or Right of Way) Final Cleaning 22 1. Remove trash and debris containers from site. 23 a. Re -seed areas disturbed by location of trash and debris containers in accordance 24 with Section 32 92 13. 25 2. Sweep roadway to remove all rocks, pieces of asphalt, concrete or any other object 26 that may hinder or disrupt the flow of traffic along the roadway. 27 3. Clean any interior areas including, but not limited to, vaults, manholes, structures, 28 junction boxes and inlets. 29 4. If no longer required for maintenance of erosion facilities, and upon approval by 30 City, remove erosion control from site. 31 5. Clean signs, lights, signals, etc. 32 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 33 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 34 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 35 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 36 37 38 39 40 CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 74 23 - 4 DAP CLEANING Page 4 of 4 END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 1 2 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY SECTION 0177 19 CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS 017719-1 DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 3 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. The procedure for closing out a contract 7 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 8 1. None. 9 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 10 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 11 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 12 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 13 A. Measurement and Payment 14 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 15 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 16 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 17 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 18 A. Guarantees, Bonds and Affidavits 19 1. No application for final payment will be accepted until all guarantees, bonds, 20 certificates, licenses and affidavits required for Work or equipment as specified are 21 satisfactorily filed with the City. 22 B. Release of Liens or Claims 23 1. No application for final payment will be accepted until satisfactory evidence of 24 release of liens has been submitted to the City. 25 1.5 SUBMITTALS 26 A. Submit all required documentation to City's Project Representative. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 017719-2 DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 3 1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 3 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 4 PART 3 - EXECUTION 5 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 6 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 7 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 3.4 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURE A. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, submit: 1. Project Record Documents in accordance with Section 01 78 39 2. Operation and Maintenance Data, if required, in accordance with Section 0178 23 B. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, perform final cleaning in accordance with Section 01 74 23. C. Final Inspection 1. After final cleaning, provide notice to the City Project Representative that the Work is completed. a. The City will make an initial Final Inspection with the Contractor present. b. Upon completion of this inspection, the City will notify the Contractor, in writing within 10 business days, of any particulars in which this inspection reveals that the Work is defective or incomplete. 2. Upon receiving written notice from the City, immediately undertake the Work required to remedy deficiencies and complete the Work to the satisfaction of the City. 3. Upon completion of Work associated with the items listed in the City's written notice, inform the City, that the required Work has been completed. Upon receipt of this notice, the City, in the presence of the Contractor, will make a subsequent Final Inspection of the project. 4. Provide all special accessories required to place each item of equipment in full operation. These special accessory items include, but are not limited to: a. Specified spare parts b. Adequate oil and grease as required for the first lubrication of the equipment c. Initial fill up of all chemical tanks and fuel tanks d. Light bulbs e. Fuses f. Vault keys g. Handwheels h. Other expendable items as required for initial start-up and operation of all equipment 39 D. Notice of Project Completion CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 017719-3 DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 3 1. Once the City Project Representative finds the Work subsequent to Final Inspection to be satisfactory, the City will issue a Notice of Project Completion (Green Sheet). E. Supporting Documentation 1. Coordinate with the City Project Representative to complete the following additional forms: a. Final Payment Request b. Statement of Contract Time c. Affidavit of Payment and Release of Liens d. Consent of Surety to Final Payment e. Pipe Report (if required) £ Contractor's Evaluation of City g. Performance Evaluation of Contractor F. Letter of Final Acceptance 1. Upon review and acceptance of Notice of Project Completion and Supporting Documentation, in accordance with General Conditions, City will issue Letter of Final Acceptance and release the Final Payment Request for payment. 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] DATE NAME 4/7/2014 M.Domenech END OF SECTION Revision Log SUMMARY OF CHANGE Revised for DAP application CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 017823-1 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 1 of 5 1 SECTION 0178 23 2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Product data and related information appropriate for City's maintenance and 7 operation of products furnished under Contract 8 2. Such products may include, but are not limited to: 9 a. Traffic Controllers 10 b. Irrigation Controllers (to be operated by the City) 11 c. Butterfly Valves 12 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 13 1. None. 14 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 15 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 16 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 17 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 18 A. Measurement and Payment 19 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 20 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 21 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 22 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 23 A. Schedule 24 1. Submit manuals in final form to the City within 30 calendar days of product 25 shipment to the project site. 26 1.5 SUBMITTALS 27 A. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00. All submittals shall be 28 approved by the City prior to delivery. 29 1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS 30 A. Submittal Form 31 1. Prepare data in form of an instructional manual for use by City personnel. 32 2. Format 33 a. Size: 8 '/z inches x 11 inches 34 b. Paper 35 1) 40 pound minimum, white, for typed pages 36 2) Holes reinforced with plastic, cloth or metal 37 c. Text: Manufacturer's printed data, or neatly typewritten CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 01 78 23 - 2 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 2 of 5 d. Drawings 1) Provide reinforced punched binder tab, bind in with text 2) Reduce larger drawings and fold to size of text pages. e. Provide fly -leaf for each separate product, or each piece of operating equipment. 1) Provide typed description of product, and major component parts of equipment. 2) Provide indexed tabs. f. Cover 1) Identify each volume with typed or printed title "OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS". 2) List: a) Title of Project b) Identity of separate structure as applicable c) Identity of general subject matter covered in the manual 3. Binders a. Commercial quality 3-ring binders with durable and cleanable plastic covers b. When multiple binders are used, correlate the data into related consistent groupings. 4. If available, provide an electronic form of the O&M Manual. B. Manual Content 1. Neatly typewritten table of contents for each volume, arranged in systematic order a. Contractor, name of responsible principal, address and telephone number b. A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume c. List, with each product: 1) The name, address and telephone number of the subcontractor or installer 2) A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume 3) Identify area of responsibility of each 4) Local source of supply for parts and replacement d. Identify each product by product name and other identifying symbols as set forth in Contract Documents. 2. Product Data a. Include only those sheets which are pertinent to the specific product. b. Annotate each sheet to: 1) Clearly identify specific product or part installed 2) Clearly identify data applicable to installation 3) Delete references to inapplicable information 3. Drawings a. Supplement product data with drawings as necessary to clearly illustrate: 1) Relations of component parts of equipment and systems 2) Control and flow diagrams b. Coordinate drawings with information in Project Record Documents to assure correct illustration of completed installation. c. Do not use Project Record Drawings as maintenance drawings. 4. Written text, as required to supplement product data for the particular installation: a. Organize in consistent format under separate headings for different procedures. b. Provide logical sequence of instructions of each procedure. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 01 78 23 - 3 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 3 of 5 5. Copy of each warranty, bond and service contract issued a. Provide information sheet for City personnel giving: 1) Proper procedures in event of failure 2) Instances which might affect validity of warranties or bonds C. Manual for Materials and Finishes 1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form. 2. Content, for architectural products, applied materials and finishes: a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products 1) Catalog number, size, composition 2) Color and texture designations 3) Information required for reordering special manufactured products b. Instructions for care and maintenance 1) Manufacturer's recommendation for types of cleaning agents and methods 2) Cautions against cleaning agents and methods which are detrimental to product 3) Recommended schedule for cleaning and maintenance 3. Content, for moisture protection and weather exposure products: a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products 1) Applicable standards 2) Chemical composition 3) Details of installation b. Instructions for inspection, maintenance and repair D. Manual for Equipment and Systems 1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form. 2. Content, for each unit of equipment and system, as appropriate: a. Description of unit and component parts 1) Function, normal operating characteristics and limiting conditions 2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests 3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts b. Operating procedures 1) Start-up, break-in, routine and normal operating instructions 2) Regulation, control, stopping, shut -down and emergency instructions 3) Summer and winter operating instructions 4) Special operating instructions c. Maintenance procedures 1) Routine operations 2) Guide to "trouble shooting" 3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly 4) Alignment, adjusting and checking d. Servicing and lubrication schedule 1) List of lubricants required e. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions f. Description of sequence of operation by control manufacturer 1) Predicted life of parts subject to wear 2) Items recommended to be stocked as spare parts g. As installed control diagrams by controls manufacturer h. Each contractor's coordination drawings 1) As installed color coded piping diagrams CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 01 78 23 - 4 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 4 of 5 i. Charts of valve tag numbers, with location and function of each valve j. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and recommended quantities to be maintained in storage k. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications 3. Content, for each electric and electronic system, as appropriate: a. Description of system and component parts 1) Function, normal operating characteristics, and limiting conditions 2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests 3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts b. Circuit directories of panelboards 1) Electrical service 2) Controls 3) Communications c. As installed color coded wiring diagrams d. Operating procedures 1) Routine and normal operating instructions 2) Sequences required 3) Special operating instructions e. Maintenance procedures 1) Routine operations 2) Guide to "trouble shooting" 3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly 4) Adjustment and checking f. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions g. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and recommended quantities to be maintained in storage h. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications 4. Prepare and include additional data when the need for such data becomes apparent during instruction of City's personnel. 30 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 31 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 32 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 33 A. Provide operation and maintenance data by personnel with the following criteria: 34 1. Trained and experienced in maintenance and operation of described products 35 2. Skilled as technical writer to the extent required to communicate essential data 36 3. Skilled as draftsman competent to prepare required drawings CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 23 - 5 DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA Page 5 of 5 1 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 2 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 3 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 4 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 5 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 6 END OF SECTION 7 Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 8/31 /2012 D. Johnson 1.5.A.1 — title of section removed 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application 8 CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 017839-1 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 1 of 4 1 SECTION 0178 39 2 PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS 3 PART1- GENERAL 4 1.1 SUMMARY 5 A. Section Includes: 6 1. Work associated with the documenting the project and recording changes to project 7 documents, including: 8 a. Record Drawings 9 b. Water Meter Service Reports 10 c. Sanitary Sewer Service Reports 11 d. Large Water Meter Reports 12 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 13 1. None. 14 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 15 1. Division 0 — Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 16 2. Division 1 — General Requirements 17 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 18 A. Measurement and Payment 19 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 20 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 21 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 22 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 23 1.5 SUBMITTALS 24 A. Prior to submitting a request for Final Inspection, deliver Project Record Documents to 25 City's Project Representative. 26 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALSANFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 29 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 30 A. Accuracy of Records 31 1. Thoroughly coordinate changes within the Record Documents, making adequate 32 and proper entries on each page of Specifications and each sheet of Drawings and 33 other Documents where such entry is required to show the change properly. 34 2. Accuracy of records shall be such that future search for items shown in the Contract 35 Documents may rely reasonably on information obtained from the approved Project 36 Record Documents. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 01 78 39 - 2 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 2 of 4 1 3. To facilitate accuracy of records, make entries within 24 hours after receipt of 2 information that the change has occurred. 3 4. Provide factual information regarding all aspects of the Work, both concealed and 4 visible, to enable future modification of the Work to proceed without lengthy and 5 expensive site measurement, investigation and examination. 6 1.10 STORAGE AND HANDLING 7 A. Storage and Handling Requirements 8 1. Maintain the job set of Record Documents completely protected from deterioration 9 and from loss and damage until completion of the Work and transfer of all recorded 10 data to the final Project Record Documents. 11 2. In the event of loss of recorded data, use means necessary to again secure the data 12 to the City's approval. 13 a. In such case, provide replacements to the standards originally required by the 14 Contract Documents. 15 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 16 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 17 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 18 2.1 OWNER -FURNISHED [OR] OWNER -SUPPLIED PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 19 2.2 RECORD DOCUMENTS 20 A. Job set 21 1. Promptly following receipt of the Notice to Proceed, secure from the City, at no 22 charge to the Contractor, 1 complete set of all Documents comprising the Contract. 23 B. Final Record Documents 24 1. At a time nearing the completion of the Work and prior to Final Inspection, provide 25 the City 1 complete set of all Final Record Drawings in the Contract. 26 2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED] 27 2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 28 PART 3 - EXECUTION 29 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 30 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 31 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 32 3.4 MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS 33 A. Maintenance of Job Set 34 1. Immediately upon receipt of the job set, identify each of the Documents with the 35 title, "RECORD DOCUMENTS - JOB SET". CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 017839-3 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 3 of 4 1 2. Preservation 2 a. Considering the Contract completion time, the probable number of occasions 3 upon which the job set must be taken out for new entries and for examination, 4 and the conditions under which these activities will be performed, devise a 5 suitable method for protecting the job set. 6 b. Do not use the job set for any purpose except entry of new data and for review 7 by the City, until start of transfer of data to final Project Record Documents. 8 c. Maintain the job set at the site of work. 9 3. Coordination with Construction Survey 10 a. At a minimum clearly mark any deviations from Contract Documents 11 associated with installation of the infrastructure. 12 4. Making entries on Drawings 13 a. Record any deviations from Contract Documents. 14 b. Use an erasable colored pencil (not ink or indelible pencil), clearly describe the 15 change by graphic line and note as required. 16 c. Date all entries. 17 d. Call attention to the entry by a "cloud" drawn around the area or areas affected. 18 e. In the event of overlapping changes, use different colors for the overlapping 19 changes. 20 5. Conversion of schematic layouts 21 a. In some cases on the Drawings, arrangements of conduits, circuits, piping, 22 ducts, and similar items, are shown schematically and are not intended to 23 portray precise physical layout. 24 1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the 25 City's approval. 26 2) However, design of future modifications of the facility may require 27 accurate information as to the final physical layout of items which are 28 shown only schematically on the Drawings. 29 b. Show on the job set of Record Drawings, by dimension accurate to within 1 30 inch, the centerline of each run of items. 31 1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the 32 City's approval. 33 2) Show, by symbol or note, the vertical location of the Item ("under slab", "in 34 ceiling plenum", "exposed", and the like). 35 3) Make all identification sufficiently descriptive that it may be related 36 reliably to the Specifications. 37 c. The City may waive the requirements for conversion of schematic layouts 38 where, in the City's judgment, conversion serves no useful purpose. However, 39 do not rely upon waivers being issued except as specifically issued in writing 40 by the City. 41 B. Final Project Record Documents 42 1. Transfer of data to Drawings 43 a. Carefully transfer change data shown on the job set of Record Drawings to the 44 corresponding final documents, coordinating the changes as required. 45 b. Clearly indicate at each affected detail and other Drawing a full description of 46 changes made during construction, and the actual location of items. 47 c. Call attention to each entry by drawing a "cloud" around the area or areas 48 affected. CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PX 23 24 01 78 39 - 4 DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS Page 4 of 4 d. Make changes neatly, consistently and with the proper media to assure longevity and clear reproduction. 2. Transfer of data to other Documents a. If the Documents, other than Drawings, have been kept clean during progress of the Work, and if entries thereon have been orderly to the approval of the City, the job set of those Documents, other than Drawings, will be accepted as final Record Documents. b. If any such Document is not so approved by the City, secure a new copy of that Document from the City at the City's usual charge for reproduction and handling, and carefully transfer the change data to the new copy to the approval of the City. 3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 3.6 RE -INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 3.7 FIELD[OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] END OF SECTION Revision Log DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE 4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application CITY OF FORT WORTH Cattleman's Crossing Phase 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS CPN: 105042 Revised April 7, 2014 APPENDIX GC-4.01 Availability of Lands - None GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions —Geotechnical Report Provided GC-4.04 Underground Facilities - None GC-4.06 Hazardous Environmental Condition at Site -None GC-6.06.D Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance — Not Required GC-6.07 Wage Rates - Provided GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities - Urban Forestry Permit Provided GC-6.24 Nondiscrimination - None GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements — COFW Water Department & TPW Standard Product List Provided CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 R NE E N G E E R 1 N G EST: 1972 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING BETWEEN N. SAGINAW BLVD AND US HWY 287 FORT WORTH, TEXAS Prepared For: Ashton Woods — Dallas Division 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 100 Farmers Branch, Texas 75234 Attn: Mr. Scot Albert June 2022 (Revised) PROJECT NO. 21-25640 www.roneenaineers.com 96F�F NE R I N G EST: July 1, 2022 (Revised) Mr. Scot Albert Ashton Woods — Dallas Division 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 100 Farmers Branch, Texas 75234 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Cattleman's Crossing Fort Worth, Texas Rone Report No. 21-25640 Dear Mr. Albert: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EARTHWORKS CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL TESTING Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. (Rone) is pleased to submit the Geotechnical Engineering Report for the above referenced project. The geotechnical engineering services performed for this study were carried out in general accordance with Rone Proposal No. P-31722-21, dated September 13, 2021. The report was revised this date to incorporate final grading plans into the subgrade modification recommendations This report presents engineering analyses and recommendations for site grading, foundations, and pavements with respect to known project and site characteristics. Detailed results of our field exploration and laboratory testing are provided in the appendix of the report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. We look forward to providing additional Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Materials Testing services as the project progresses through the final design and construction phases. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, C ton M. Torrance, E.I.T. ject Engineer Texas Engineering Firm License No. F-1572 ...:.%......................� h 0. GRAY i :.....t...;. , 6790; r ray, P t� Partner �� s` '/ONAO -Q -yo DALLAS I FORT WORTH I AUSTIN I SAN ANTONIO I HOUSTON I KANSAS CITY 3201 NE Loop 820, SUITE 180 1 FORT WORTH, TExAs 76137 1 TEL: 817.717.1040 ra% 1 PROJECT INFORMATION..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Site Description................................................................................................................ 1 2 PURPOSES AND SCOPE OF STUDY................................................................................... 1 3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ...................................................... 2 4 SITE CONDITIONS................................................................................................................. 3 4.1 Site Geology.................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions.............................................................................................. 3 4.3 Groundwater.................................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Soluble Sulfates............................................................................................................... 6 5 ANALYSIS OF SITE AND FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVES.................................................. 7 5.1 Geotechnical Analysis...................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Subsurface Volume Change Potential.............................................................................. 8 5.3 Seismic Site Class......................................................................................................... 11 6 FOUNDATION SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................. 11 6.1 Ground Modification and Subgrade Treatment............................................................... 12 6.2 Subgrade Recompaction................................................................................................ 12 6.3 Excavation Safety Considerations.................................................................................. 13 6.4 Foundation Structure...................................................................................................... 13 7 SITE PREPARATION FOR CONSTRUCTION..................................................................... 13 7.1 General.......................................................................................................................... 13 7.2 Excavations.................................................................................................................... 13 8 CONSTRUCTION OF SUBGRADE FILLS........................................................................... 14 8.1 Subgrade Preparation.................................................................................................... 14 8.2 Subgrade Fill Construction............................................................................................. 15 8.2.1 Project Fills...............................................................................................................15 8.2.2 Fill Material Requirements........................................................................................15 8.2.3 Borrow Selection......................................................................................................15 8.3 Fill Construction Specifications....................................................................................... 16 8.3.1 Recompaction of Existing Subgrade and Grade Raise Below Buildings ...................17 8.3.2 Utility Trench Backfill................................................................................................17 8.3.3 Existing Pond Excavation and Backfill......................................................................18 8.3.4 General Site Fills for Site Grading and Drainage......................................................18 8.3.5 Compaction Specification Summary.........................................................................18 8.4 Quality Control and Field Verification Testing................................................................. 19 8.5 Construction Oversight................................................................................................... 19 9 BUILDING FOUNDATION STRUCTURE............................................................................. 20 9.1 Slab Foundation Design................................................................................................. 20 10 DETENTION / RETENTION POND..................................................................................... 21 11 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES....................................................................................... 22 11.1 Wall Drainage............................................................................................................... 23 11.2 Wall Backfill.................................................................................................................. 24 12 PAVEMENTS...................................................................................................................... 24 12.1 Rigid Pavements.......................................................................................................... 24 12.2 Pavement Base Course............................................................................................... 25 12.3 Pavement Construction and Maintenance Recommendations ...................................... 26 13 SITE COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE........................................................................ 26 13.1 Site Grading and Drainage........................................................................................... 26 13.2 Landscaping and Irrigation........................................................................................... 26 14 STUDY CLOSURE............................................................................................................. 27 15 COPYRIGHT 2022 RONE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LTD ............................................. 29 COMPACTION DESIGN — FULL SITE SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE RAISE - 563 ................... 1a COMPACTION CONTROL — FULL SITE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE RAISE - 563.................................... 1 b COMPACTION DESIGN — FULL SITE UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL.................................................................... 2a COMPACTION CONTROL — FULL SITE UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL................................................................ 2b APPENDIX A Plate VICINITYMAP.................................................................................................................................................... A.1 GEOLOGYMAP..................................................................................................................................................A.2 BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM................................................................................................................A.3a-A.3b LOGS OF BORING...................................................................................................................................A.4-A.111 KEY TO CLASSIFICATIONS AND SYMBOLS.................................................................................................. A.112 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.................................................................................................... A.113 SWELL TEST RESULTS................................................................................................................................. A.114 HYDROMETER TEST RESULTS...................................................................................................... A. 1 15a-A. 1 15b RECTM COMPACTION DESIGN REPORTS....................................................................................... A.116a-A.116e APPENDIX B Plate FIELD OPERATIONS.......................................................................................................................................... B.1 LABORATORY TESTING.................................................................................................................................... B.2 RONE SPECRICATION 400 LIME TREATMENT................................................................................................. B.3 ,PPENDIX C Plate IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT.....................................C.1 RN E GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT 1 PROJECT INFORMATION 1.1 Site Description A tabular summary of the site description is provided below. Table 1: Site Description Item Description Location The project is located between North Saginaw Boulevard and US Highway 287, north of Prairie Ridge Trail in Fort Worth, Texas. The project consists of developing 554 single-family residential lots with Project Description associated utilities and paved streets. Based on grading plans that have been provided, cuts up to 11 feet and fills up to 9 feet are indicated for the building pads at the site. At the time of our field investigation, the site was generally covered with native grass and dense trees. There are two large detention ponds on the site. One pond is located on the north side of the site and the other pond is located in the Existing Conditions center of the site. There is a small detention pond located on the west side of the site. Current development plans indicate the ponds will be reshaped and enlarged requiring portions of the existing ponds to be filled with compacted soil and rock beneath proposed residential house pads and roadways. Based on the topographic information obtained from Google Earth®, the site Topography generally slopes downward toward the north side of the property, with ground surface elevations ranging from approximately 858 feet to 810 feet. Previous Studies No known previous geotechnical studies at the site. Geologic Setting Fort Worth Limestone and Duck Creek Formation, undivided Site vicinity and geology maps are attached as Plates A.1 and A.2, respectively in Appendix A of this report. Boring locations relative to the site plan are shown on the Boring Location Diagram, Plate A.3. 2 PURPOSES AND SCOPE OF STUDY The site investigation was scoped based on the planned development and design boundaries outlined above. The principal purposes of this study are to evaluate the general subsurface conditions and develop geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of foundations and pavements. For these purposes, the study was conducted in the following phases: RN E • Borings were drilled and sampled at approximate 200-foot intervals to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the boring locations and to obtain soil samples. • Laboratory tests were conducted on selected samples recovered from the borings to evaluate the pertinent engineering characteristics of the foundation soils. • Engineering analyses were performed using field and laboratory data to develop foundation and pavement design recommendations. • Onsite soils were evaluated for potential sources of fill materials required for the project. As the Geotechnical Engineer of Record serving this project, it is recommended that a Rone engineer provide assistance during the design phase to verify the intent of the geotechnical recommendations. In addition, Rone must be retained to provide oversight of the Rone Earthwork Controls during the construction phase to verify full compaction utilizing the advanced engineering tools as discussed throughout this report. 3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING The borings were located in the field by Rone personnel with measurements taken from site landmarks and using an aerial photograph of the site. Ground surface elevations at the boring locations were interpolated from topographic information obtained from Google Earth®. The locations and elevations were not surveyed, and are accurate only to the extent implied by the technique used in their determination. A total of 107 borings were completed to depths ranging from approximately 20 feet below existing grades. Boring B-69 was not drilled due to proximity to the existing natural gas pipeline easement. The approximate boring locations are shown on Plate A.3a, Boring Location Diagram. Sample depth, description of soils, and classification (based on the Unified Soil Classification System) are presented in the Logs of Boring, Plates A.4 through A.111. Keys to terms and symbols used on the logs are also included in Appendix A. Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the borings to confirm visual classification, and to estimate material strata, in -situ consolidation states, and other pertinent engineering properties of the materials encountered. In addition, one-dimensional swell and swell pressure tests were performed on selected samples. Descriptions of the procedures used in the field and laboratory phases of this study are presented in Appendix B. RN E 4 SITE CONDITIONS 4.1 Site Geology Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings and the Geologic Atlas of Texas, Dallas Sheet (published by the Bureau of Economic Geology), the site is located within the undivided Fort Worth Limestone and Duck Creek Formation (mapped as Kfd). The Fort Worth Limestone consists of limestone and clay. The limestone is light to medium gray and weathers yellowish brown. The clay is medium gray to yellowish brown and weathers yellowish brown. The thickness of the Fort Worth Limestone is approximately 25 to 35 feet. The Duck Creek Formation consists of medium gray to yellowish gray limestone that weathers dark gray with yellowish brown patches. The thickness of the Duck Creek Formation is approximately 30 to 100 feet. Please note that the geologic mapping was originally performed using aerial photography. Local variations and anomalies do occur. 4.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions The results of the field and laboratory testing have been used to develop generalized subsurface profiles of the project site. The strata identified in the borings at this site are described below: • Stratum I — generally consisted of dark brown to brown to light brown fat clay (CH) lean clay (CL) and clayey gravel (GC) containing various amounts of silt, sand, and gravel from the ground surface to depths ranging from 2 to 20 feet. • Stratum II — generally consisted of tan weathered limestone and gray limestone extending to the termination depths of approximately 20 feet. Hand penetrometer readings ranged from 1.0 to more than 4.5 tons per square foot (tsf) in the cohesive soils. Unconfined compression strengths in the tested cohesive materials ranged from approximately 6,300 to 14,300 pounds per square foot (psf). In -situ moisture levels ranged from approximately 21 percent below to 11 percent above their measured plastic limits, indicating mostly dry soil conditions. Standard Penetration Test N-values ranged from 13 blows per foot to 50 blows for one (1) inch. The Texas Cone Penetrometer blow counts ranged from 100 blows for 9'/2 inches to 100 blows for'/2 inch. Moisture content values ranged from 1 (in limestone cuttings) up to 35 percent in the fat clays. A tabular summary of the soil properties considered for design is provided in the following table. R NE Table 2: In Situ Soil Property Estimated Specific Gravity, Gs Percent Fines (%) Liquid Limit Plasticity Index Dry Density (pcf) Void Ratio, e Moisture Content (%) Moisture Increase Potential (%) Generalized Subsurface Profile Full Range 2.66-2.70 2-99 22-91 8-69 88-104 0.60-0.90 1-35 3.8-21.4 Predominant Range 2.68 56-98 38-68 21-46 90-101 0.69-0.86 6-20 6.5-16.0 While both lean and fat clay shrink and swell with changes in moisture content, higher plasticity materials typically have greater sensitivity to moisture variation, and an increased potential for volume change. With sufficient moisture increase, swell pressures ranged from approximately 1,500 to 5,000. Modification of the upper soils will control subgrade and foundation design recommendations. A generalized profile of the subsurface conditions is included below. The Logs of Boring should be reviewed for specific information at individual boring locations. Stratification boundaries shown in the logs represent the approximate locations of changes in types of in -situ materials. The transition between material types may vary between borings and be gradual and indistinct. Variations will occur and should be expected across the site. --4 West East ► 855................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 855 33-84 850 .. %/, ......... 3_83................................................................................................................. a42.................................................................................... 850 26� % 3-82 % 3-32 / -�9 ;-23 .....................�y.........................................................845 845 ............... ......... ....... T f . 3.81................................................................... ,23' ....... /45/ % 3-58 840 .. ........ 3-80.................................. 3-59l........ % ....... % . 840 a) / -12 N / - W -- p835 ... ........ .................. /� ...........................................050 ........ % .................. .................. ........ 49� ........ .... .......; 9I ................. 835 a) = / / / _15 W 830................ _......._................�..................................%........_..............._........_........_.................. 830 _........_ .......... . 820....................................................... C�.................................. _............................................................................. ......... 820 815 815 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.010 0.011 Distance Along Baseline (Feet) Water Observations While Drilling Q At Completion 1 GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE ® Fat Clay Weathered Limestone Figure 1 Limestone 15 Cattleman's Crossing Lean Clay ® Clayey Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Gravel Fort Worth, Texas RN E 4.3 Groundwater The borings were advanced using continuous flight augers. The borings were monitored during and immediately after drilling for the presence of water seepage. Free water was observed in two (2) borings at depths of approximately 12 to 15 feet below existing grades. Groundwater was not observed in the remaining borings. A thorough assessment of the vadose zone or upper groundwater was not conducted, and the study did not include extended monitoring of groundwater levels or perched water conditions. A full hydrogeologic study can be conducted upon request to assess the sources and variation of in -situ moisture levels in the vadose zone water levels beneath the site, and how various site development alternatives could potentially effect groundwater conditions. In general, groundwater levels and moisture content in the vadose zone vary climatically and seasonally depending on topography, land use, surface hydrology, subsurface hydrogeology, and proximity to bodies of water. The rate and extent of these variations depend on many variables including subsurface stratigraphy, soil properties, moisture sources, capillary strength, consolidation states, soil structure, thermal cover, and surface infiltration and evapotranspiration rates. A limited hydrogeologic assessment of the vadose zone is provided in Section 5.1 Geotechnical Analysis. 4.4 Soluble Sulfates Soluble sulfate levels are generally considered to be high when levels exceed 3,000 parts per million (ppm). Based on testing performed on selected samples, soluble sulfate levels at the site range from less than 100 ppm to 2,253, indicating negligible to moderate soluble sulfate levels. In soil, soluble sulfates are often encountered in concentrated banks or seams, generally in the form of gypsum. As site grading is performed, these areas of concentrated sulfates are likely to be randomly distributed throughout the site. When soluble sulfates come into contact with calcium (supplied by lime or cement during subgrade treatment) and water, a process commonly referred to as "sulfate -induced heave" will occur. In this process, a chemical reaction releases aluminum from the soil, forming a material called ettringite which causes large volume increases. The rate at which the reaction occurs is highly variable and is primarily dependent on the availability of the reagents and the size of the soluble sulfate crystals. It can occur in as little as 10 to 12 hours, or take years to fully manifest itself; however, with sufficient supply of the reagents, the reaction is typically complete within 4 to 5 days. RN E 5 ANALYSIS OF SITE AND FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVES Foundation alternatives have been evaluated based on site -specific geotechnical conditions, proposed development plans, and known design preferences. 5.1 Geotechnical Analysis Subgrade preparation and foundation fill elements are critical components of all foundation systems. Foundation alternatives for the proposed buildings have been evaluated based on the following engineering criteria: • Bearing capacity • Settlement potential • Volume change (shrink -swell) potential The rate and magnitude of volume change is controlled by the rate and extent of wetting and drying cycles. Volume change potential is affected by moisture change potential, clay mineralogy, material density, soil structure, hydrogeologic environment, and confining pressure to swell pressure ratios. Moisture change potential, material density, and soil structure can be modified and controlled; and clay content, hydrogeologic environment and confining pressure can be managed to limit volume change as necessary for each foundation alternative. These are key factors in the ground modification elements of foundation alternatives when evaluating various foundation designs. The primary provisions for managing the hydrogeologic environment are long-term stabilization of subgrade moisture levels, and management of desiccation risk. A limited hydrogeologic assessment of the vadose zone indicates the primary source of subsurface moisture is likely periodic groundwater from the detention ponds, supported by seasonal surface water infiltration. The abundance of granular soil identified in the borings can impede or break the capillary action and reduce the opportunity for continuous moisture supply from a water source at depth. Given the geologic setting, such impedances are expected across the site. The site is generally undeveloped and relatively open. Free water was encountered in borings B-80 and B-104. Deeper borings and/or open piezometers would be required to further evaluate for the presence of groundwater beneath the site. The average soil moisture profile across the project site at the time of sampling is illustrated below. Figure 2: Average Soil Moisture Profile 20 18 16 v 3 14 Ln +n 12 10 INN 8 ■ 0-2' ■ 2-4' ■ 4-6' ■ 6-8' ■ 8-10' ■ 13-15' �N E ENG ERIN'G ES T: M1iT2 ■ 18-20' Foundation systems often require ground modification within the vadose zone. Each ground modification element includes provisions for limiting moisture content variation, and preparing for its effects. The following ground modification elements were evaluated for slab foundations: • Need and extent of subgrade replacement / re -compaction fill, • Management and tolerance of in -situ conditions below ground modification depths, • Grade raise elements, • Strength and stability requirements of each foundation fill element; and, • Subgrade stabilization options. Analyses of volume change and settlement potential relative to the various foundation alternatives are summarized in the following sections. 5.2 Subsurface Volume Change Potential Direct measurement of soil expansion and the resulting swell pressures under the anticipated stress conditions is the most reliable way to account for the factors that control volume change within natural clay formations and assess swell -shrink conditions within the vadose zone. These analyses indirectly account for clay mineralogy, clay content, clay mix, soil structure, compaction states, and stress states. Measurement of swell pressures allows determination of ground modification requirements for foundation system design. For this study, an assessment of swell potential was conducted on samples recovered from various depths. Due to the generally shallow limestone, swell pressure testing was not performed. Swell test results are summarized in the table below: RN E Table 3: Swell Test Details Depth Plasticity Total Moisture (%) Final Swell Boring (feet) Load (psf) Index Fines Initial Final Increase Void N (n Ratio B-1 2 375 50 93 19.7 26.9 7.2 0.73 2.3 B-3 4 625 15 35 11.7 22.5 10.8 0.61 0.0 B-6 4 625 -- -- 17.3 28.3 11.0 0.76 5.5 B-7 2 375 30 82 12.0 25.2 13.2 0.68 0.0 B-9 8 1125 22 84 26.0 29.7 3.7 0.80 1.8 B-20 4 625 15 92 10.4 21.9 11.5 0.59 0.6 B-22 6 875 22 94 12.9 19.9 7.1 0.54 7.9 B-23 2 375 43 89 18.4 33.2 14.8 0.90 4.4 B-28 6 875 21 89 10.8 15.4 4.6 0.42 2.3 B-43 2 375 28 93 9.5 28.2 18.7 0.76 0.0 B-56 8 1125 46 87 21.8 25.3 3.5 0.68 2.3 B-58 6 875 49 83 23.9 31.1 7.1 0.84 4.3 B-59 4 625 50 94 21.2 33.4 12.2 0.90 8.4 B-60 2 375 44 95 20.5 26.3 5.8 0.71 4.6 B-63 2 375 47 94 26.8 38.4 11.7 1.04 7.7 B-64 6 875 55 90 20.8 29.8 9.0 0.81 7.3 B-65 8 1125 48 90 17.1 25.0 7.9 0.68 2.8 B-66 6 875 45 91 17.3 25.8 8.5 0.70 8.1 B-70 8 1125 48 61 17.0 23.3 6.2 0.63 4.8 B-71 4 625 42 95 18.0 27.1 9.1 0.73 8.6 B-72 6 875 -- 70 6.3 27.4 21.1 0.74 0.0 B-75 2 375 59 85 19.4 31.5 12.1 0.85 7.2 B-79 4 625 37 89 14.2 27.2 13.0 0.74 8.5 B-80 6 875 -- 90 20.7 27.1 6.3 0.73 4.3 B-81 8 1125 44 89 17.7 22.7 5.0 0.62 3.3 B-84 2 375 26 85 7.7 23.4 15.7 0.63 0.4 B-88 6 875 69 94 22.3 31.0 8.7 0.84 6.6 B-89 4 625 54 94 20.6 31.2 10.6 0.84 6.3 B-90 8 1125 41 100 20.4 22.9 2.6 0.62 0.2 B-91 2 375 -- 89 13.5 25.0 11.6 0.68 1.1 B-95 4 625 -- 50 4.8 23.8 19.0 0.64 0.0 B-97 2 375 19 86 9.1 24.9 15.9 0.67 3.4 B-100 2 375 -- 67 13.8 29.3 15.5 0.79 1.7 B-103 4 625 -- 82 20.4 29.2 8.8 0.79 4.6 RN E Depth Load Total Plasticity Moisture Final Swell Depth Boring (feet) (psf) Fines Fine Index (%) Void (%) goring (feet) ( Ratio B-104 6 875 -- 92 27.2 33.5 6.3 0.91 1.9 B-105 2 375 -- 97 21.0 32.7 11.7 0.88 11.5 B-106 0 125 -- 96 22.9 28.7 5.8 0.78 2.0 The swell test results generally indicate low to high swell potential with sufficient moisture increase. Estimated swell pressures of approximately 1,500 to 5,000 psf were used in our evaluation of the Stratum I soils at the site. An average swell potential of approximately 4 percent was determined for design analyses. The resultant Potential Vertical Rise (PVR) was found to range from negligible to about 6 inches. As an additional means of evaluating subgrade swell potential, Potential Vertical Rise (PVR) estimates were also performed in general accordance with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Test Method Tex-124-E. The TxDOT method is empirical, assumption - based, generalized, and based on correlations with the Atterberg limits, density, and moisture content of the soils at the time of the investigation. All conditions influencing swell potential are not accounted for in this procedure. The procedure was applied to an estimated 12-foot deep active zone (limited by the depth to limestone in many areas), for soils in a dry moisture condition. Based on the TxDOT method, the estimated PVR is approximately 1 to 6 inches. Based on the PVR analyses, the following parameters have been used to evaluate foundation design alternatives: Table 4: Untreated Subgrade Movement Potential Design Depth Estimated Stratum I Untreated Swell Material (feet) Swell Pressure (psf) Potential (inches) Native Clays Up to 4 feet 1,500 to 5,000 1 to 6 Based on the subsurface profile encountered mostly along and near the flood plain/pond area in the central portion of the site, subgrade modification will be required to achieve the design PVR of 4'/2 inches or less. For the lots identified, the subgrade should be excavated to a depth of 4 feet below final pad elevation and replaced using the controls outlined in Section 8.3.1 later in this report. A detailed listing of the Blocks and Lots in provided in Table 5 below: R NE ENG EERIN'G ES T: M1iT2 Table 5: Lots Requiring Subgrade Modification Block Lots B 27 through 41, 62 through 65 and 86 and 87 D 1 and 2 E 5 through 10 1 1 through 14 J 1 through 13 and 24 through 32 K 1 through 32, 64 through 67 and 74 through 79 M 1, through 9, 19 through 22 and 25 though 27 Plate A.3b in the appendix graphically illustrates the boring numbers and associate blocks and lots where subgrade modification will be necessary for the lots reflected in the Table above. 5.3 Seismic Site Class The site class for seismic design is based on several factors that include subsurface profile, shear wave velocity, density, relative hardness, and strength, averaged over a depth of 100 feet. The borings for this project did not extend to a depth of 100 feet; therefore, we assumed the conditions below the depth of the borings to be similar to those encountered at the termination depth of the borings. Based on Section 1613.2.2 of the 2018 International Building Code and Table 20.3-1 of ASCE 7-16, we recommend using Site Class C (Soft Rock/Stiff Soil) for seismic design. 6 FOUNDATION SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS Design evaluations have been made for the building foundation systems based on our current understanding of the project and the available subsurface information. The proposed residential buildings may be supported on slab foundations bearing within controlled fill, suitable native soil and/or limestone rock. A schematic cross-section of the foundation system is provided below. Figure 3: Residential Slab Foundation Cross Section Schematic Existing Grade Floor Slab ---------------- _ ---- ---- Ground modification should be completed as required for the designated Blocks and Lots stated earlier and reflected on Plate A.3a. It is not necessary to over -excavate subgrade that is RN E comprised of limestone for any purpose. All fill should be place using the Rone Earthwork Controls (REC'sTM) provided in this report. Subgrade compaction will result in the following ground stability improvements when constructed as recommended in this report. These parameters should be used for design of the structural foundation system. Surficial clays with increased swell potential were identified from existing site grades in select borings as indicated in Table 5: Lots Requiring No Subgrade Excavation below: Table 6: Summary of Estimated Ground Improvement Thickness from Estimated Swell Swell Potential at Material Final Pad Elevation Pressure (psf) Finished Pad (inches) (feet) Imported Fill (if used) Negligible Negligible Negligible Recompacted RECTM Subgrade 0 to 4 800 '/2 Native Soils 20+ 1,500 to 5,000 1 to 3'/2 6.1 Ground Modification and Subgrade Treatment Modification of the existing subgrade material is designed to control the building pad subgrade and provide an improved foundation bearing material. Any grade raise fill used to achieve final pad elevations serves a similar purpose. Over -excavation will be required in the areas referenced in Table 5 earlier in the report. All fills should be placed using the compaction controls recommended in this report. Controlled fill should extend at least 5 feet laterally beyond the proposed residential buildings to allow for adequate edge preparation. Determination of the compaction energies enables this control, along with compaction efficiencies required for the existing soil property ranges. Effective construction controls for the proposed fill elements are provided in Section 8 Construction of Subgrade Fills. Estimated construction performance and results are also included. 6.2 Subgrade Recompaction The subgrade recompaction is designed to restructure the cohesive soils such that strength and volume change can be better controlled. Determination of the compaction energies and compaction efficiencies required for the existing soil property ranges allow this control. Effective construction controls for the proposed fill elements are provided in Section 8 Construction of Subgrade Fills. Estimated construction performance and results are also included. RN E 6.3 Excavation Safety Considerations All excavations should be sloped, shored, or shielded in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. In accordance with Texas state law, the design and maintenance of excavation safety systems is the sole responsibility of the construction contractor. OSHA Standards 29 CFR — 1926 Subpart P, including Appendices A and B, should be referenced for guidance in the design of such systems 6.4 Foundation Structure Slab foundations bearing in controlled fill, suitable native soil or limestone rock may be used to support the proposed residential structures provided fill construction and testing is performed as recommended in this report. Ground movement potential will be limited with the recommended design provisions; however, the grade -supported slabs should be designed to accommodate the estimated potential vertical ground movement. A moisture barrier should be placed immediately beneath the concrete slabs. 7 SITE PREPARATION FOR CONSTRUCTION 7.1 General Existing foundations, structures, deleterious materials, debris, utilities and other manmade features should be removed, and existing utilities should be relocated in accordance with the project plans and specifications. All vegetation and organic matter should be removed from within the proposed construction limits, including tree stumps and root systems. Unless otherwise indicated in the specifications, all materials resulting from clearing and grubbing operations should be properly disposed. In no case should any organic or deleterious material be used within the earthworks or fill materials, or permanently placed onsite except where authorized by the geotechnical engineer. 7.2 Excavations All excavations should be performed to the limits and grades indicated in the design documents. This study was not performed to evaluate the difficulty of ripping, processing and/or excavating the on -site materials, or estimating the volume of those excavated materials. The earthwork contractor should have experience in construction and excavation within these materials. The contractor must use his or her own experience when making decisions regarding means, methods and costs to accomplish the proposed construction, including excavation tools, excavation rates, and number of trucks. RN E 8 CONSTRUCTION OF SUBGRADE FILLS Soil fill elements are critical components of any foundation system. Strength and stability of the fill are essential to limiting subgrade movements below foundations, floor slabs, and pavements. Mechanical soil compaction is designed to improve the engineering properties of soils; however, inadequate fill control methods often do not achieve the desired compaction during construction. The soil construction specifications in this report provide for effective compaction control, including direct data verification and real-time control. The fill construction specifications provided in this report are designed for the specific geotechnical requirements of this project. The specifications provide the construction controls needed to prepare cohesive fills for saturation and drying potential. If the specified controls are not properly implemented, the fills will be vulnerable to strength loss and swell with saturation, and potential shrinkage from drying. The initiation of shrinkage or swelling can lead to increased shrink -swell cycles with moisture variation. The design of these soil compaction specifications includes estimates of compacted soil properties corresponding to varying compaction energies and compaction efficiencies, enabling assessment of the final compacted performance of the fill. The construction specifications below will prepare the fills for potential saturation; however, the environments of these fills must maintain generally moist conditions without excessive drying. In many cases, equilibrium moisture ranges can be established during construction, but in other cases equilibrium moisture cannot be achieved without maintenance following construction. Potential maintenance requirements for fills on this project are discussed in Section 12 Site Completion and Maintenance. 8.1 Subgrade Preparation After site clearing, the exposed subgrade should be prepared for construction of foundation fills. All areas that will underlie foundations, floor slabs, or pavements will require ground modification as presented in the following sections. Exposed subgrades in cut areas of 3 feet or less should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches and recompacted wet of the optimum moisture content at full compaction in construction, to at least 95 percent of maximum density in construction, as generated by a CAT 563 footed compactor or approved equivalent. Field verification testing will be conducted in accordance with Section 8.4 Quality Control and Field Verification Testing. Any areas where the specified properties are not achieved often indicate a soft or low modulus subgrade is present below the compacted lift. RN E If testing confirms that soft soils underlie any section of the recompacted surface, those sections should be overexcavated and recompacted in lifts as required by the Geotechnical Engineer. It is not necessary to over -excavate limestone exposed within the upper 3 feet. 8.2 Subgrade Fill Construction All foundations and pavements include a structural fill element. These fill elements are critical to ground modification requirements and the strength and stability of each foundation. Fill construction requirements depend on the design purpose and service conditions of each fill. Each fill element must be constructed to achieve the properties required for the long term stability of each foundation. Each completed lift of fill should be maintained at the recommended moisture level until placement of subsequent fill or permanent protective cover such as pavement or floor slabs. 8.2.1 Project Fills The fill elements identified for this project are listed below: • Recompaction of existing subgrade and grade raise below the floor slabs and pavements • Utility trench backfill • General fills for site grading and drainage 8.2.2 Fill Material Requirements The following table provides general property requirements and applications for the cohesive soils that may be used as fill on this project. Table 7: Fill Material Material Source I Property Ranges I Use Native Soils On -Site N/A Building and Pavement Subgrade Select Fill Import CL: 15 <_ PI <_ 35 or Flexible Base Building Pad Cap Percent silt <_ 20 /o (optional) Silt soil classifications are not acceptable. Gravel content should be generally less than 45 percent. Fill should be free of organics, debris, large rocks, and deleterious material. 8.2.3 Borrow Selection Rone can assist the contractor in the selection of borrow sources and compactor pairings in order to reduce moisture amendment needs during construction. With this assistance, allowable soil property limits may also be expanded by matching the compaction energy of specific compactors with the borrow materials. RN E For improved control and more consistent fill properties, stratified borrow sources approved for use as fill material should be excavated and processed in a manner to produce consistent mixing and increased uniformity of the fill materials. The Geotechnical Engineer of Record can provide additional guidance for this as needed. 8.3 Fill Construction Specifications In general, all fill soils should be placed in consistent loose lift thicknesses, and fully and uniformly compacted across each lift. The moisture content at the time of compaction should be wet of the optimum moisture content in construction as defined by the field compaction curves provided in this report. Any moisture adjustments that are required should be completed before compaction. Each lift should be compacted using at least the minimum number of passes required to achieve full compaction as specified by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The compaction specifications for soil construction provided in this report have been developed for each fill expected on this project. These specifications are based on the predetermined compaction performance of specific compactor and soil combinations relative to the known project design requirements. The recommended controls have been developed based on source soil and moisture ranges determined during the site exploration, and typical compactors suitable for these fills and fill volumes. The specifications employ family -of -curve methods for compaction curves produced during construction in order to use the compactor's performance for control and accommodate soil variation during construction. RECTM Compaction Design Reports supporting this analysis, along with the resulting process control requirements, are included in the appendix of this report. The design charts provided in the appendix are based on a whole site design as well as two zones defined by the changes in the plasticity of the soils. The zoned charts have been provided as a reference, and should not be used during construction until grading plans can be reviewed. The construction specifications and illustrations of the performance, range and limits of construction for each fill type are provided below. At the end of this section, a summary table is provided as a quick reference for the fill specifications. Additional information can also be provided regarding alternative compactors to account for changes during construction and optimal selection by the earthwork contractor. All completed lifts should be protected by subsequent lifts placed as soon as practical during construction. Completed lifts to be exposed more than 1 day should be kept wet with light water application. Completed lifts damaged by desiccation, erosion, construction traffic, or other RN E disturbances should be scarified and re -compacted according to the process control requirements for that particular fill. 8.3.1 Recompaction of Existing Subgrade and Grade Raise Below Buildings All fills should be placed using the compaction controls provided below. For the designated lots in Table 5 and reflected on Plate A.3b, the upper 4 feet of the building pad subgrade from the final pad elevation should be over -excavated, then fully and uniformly compacted wet of the optimum moisture content during construction using a footed compactor equivalent to a CAT 563, or as approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. All fill should be compacted in 9-inch loose lifts to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density in construction and to an air content not exceeding 7.1 percent. The optimum moisture content and maximum density in construction should be determined from the field moisture -density curves (field compaction curves) generated by the compactor for the range of soils used in construction. This family -of -curve range for the specified compactor energy is provided by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Compaction Performance and Design Chart 1a provides the performance and design construction range for the specified compactor and the in -situ moisture ranges relative to the design moisture range for construction for the site. This range can be refined with more soil information prior to or during construction. A diagram of the compaction specification is provided on Compaction Control Chart 1 b. The Compaction Control Chart includes the required construction range and minimum number of passes required for full lift compaction. The construction range provided is only valid for full compaction using at least the minimum number of passes. Additional control specifications are also noted on the chart. It is critical for the strength and stability requirements of the fill that each lift is fully and uniformly compacted using at least the minimum number of passes for the compactor -soil range combination. Chart 1 b can be used as a separate reference during construction. The RECTI Compaction Design Reports covering the soil ranges at the site are included in the appendix. 8.3.2 Utility Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill may consist of on -site clay uniformly compacted in 6-inch loose lifts wet of the optimum moisture contents in construction at an air content not exceeding 7.1 percent. Optimum moisture is determined from representative standard Proctor curves normalized on the lab line -of -optimums for the soil range used, and corrected according to standard dry unit weight relations. Use hand -operated compaction equipment approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The family -of -curves and construction acceptance range will be provided by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The general performance, range and limits of this construction R NE ENG EFRING using an approved compactor are illustrated on the Compaction Performance and Design Chart 2a, and on the Compaction Control Chart 2b. This information should be confirmed prior to construction using additional subsurface information. 8.3.3 Existing Pond Excavation and Backfill We understand that the existing pond will be backfilled and a majority of the backfilled area will be located within the proposed residential house pads. In order to provide a subgrade surface suitable for compaction of new fill, we recommend excavating at least 3 feet below the base of the pond and disposing of the soft soils removed from the excavation. The base of the excavation should be proofrolled prior to placement of fill. Soft areas encountered during the proofroll should be excavated until firm material is encountered. The sides of the pond overexcavation should be benched into suitable soil at a 3H:1V effective slope, with bench widths large enough to accommodate the recommended compaction equipment. New fill material should be placed and compacted according to the guidance provided in Section 8.3.1 Subgrade and Grade Raise for Building Foundations and Pavement Areas and illustrated in Charts 1 a and 1 b in the Appendix. 8.3.4 General Site Fills for Site Grading and Drainage General fill for grading and drainage may consist of native clay compacted in 12-inch loose lifts using the available earthwork equipment. Use visual controls for wet -of -optimum compaction. Surficial topsoil in landscape areas does not require additional compaction beyond that produced incidentally during spreading and grading. 8.3.5 Compaction Specification Summary The following summary table is provided for quick reference purposes. The table does not fully encompass or replace the compaction specifications provided for each fill in the sections above. Table 8: Compaction Specification Summar Fill Building Pad and Pavement Subgrade Utility Trench Backfill General Site Grading Material On -Site Soil CAT 563 6 9 8 7.1 94 14.0 3,100 On -Site Soil Hand operated NA 6 NA 7.1 92 15.5 NA On -Site Soil NA NA 12 NA NA NA NA NA Compactor Minimum Foot Length (inches) Maximum Lift Thickness (inches) Minimum Number of Passes Maximum Air Voids (%) Minimum Dry Density (pcf) Minimum Moisture Content (%) Min. Compacted Strength (psf) RN E 8.4 Quality Control and Field Verification Testing Before fill construction, the property ranges of fill materials should be determined using index property testing. During construction, index properties should be obtained periodically and upon changes in material, color, texture, or excavation procedures. Field compaction curves should be obtained upon unexpected changes in soil properties, compactor, or lift thickness, and at minimum frequencies recommended by Rone based upon the property ranges of each fill material and expected variations. Borrow material sampling during construction should be planned and coordinated to fit the required production rates, and generally at least two days in advance of the compaction of corresponding fill lifts. Rone should monitor compaction and conduct verification testing during all fill construction. Verification testing of compacted lifts should be conducted at appropriate frequencies to ensure that compaction controls are satisfied and design requirements are achieved in construction. The engineer should monitor the number of compactor passes, lift thickness, air content, moisture and density for each fill. We recommend that Rone assist in developing a work plan for effective process controls designed for engineering requirements, the construction plan, production needs, and direct data verification records. We strongly encourage Rone be included in the pre -bid process with earthwork contractors to provide guidance in regard to fill controls for this project. A pre -construction meeting including the general contractor, earthwork contractor and soils engineer is critical to an effective launch of the project. Nuclear density gauges are recommended for field testing of compacted lifts. Rone will provide the specific gravity (Gs) values required for each fill, based on compactor performance and the soil variation expected during construction. The Geotechnical Engineer must also be able to monitor the specific gravity setting remotely in real-time based on the gauge readings in the field. 8.5 Construction Oversight Design requirements and recommendations presented in this report are based on critical controls during the earthworks and soil construction process. The monitoring required to verify the controls are correctly implemented is essential to proper fill construction. The requirements of this report are based on limited geotechnical, geologic and hydrogeologic information about the subsurface conditions. Subgrade conditions have been interpolated between borings and subsurface testing locations. Anomalies are often encountered during construction. The potential for subsurface RN E variation from the conditions used for design could result in design changes and/or increased geotechnical risk during and/or following construction. We recommend that Rone be retained to provide the controls needed for proper soil construction, monitor earthwork operations, observe foundation construction, evaluate materials, and conduct periodic testing during the soil construction phase of the project. Use of grade stakes or GPS controls on earthwork equipment can aide in controlling required lift thicknesses. This enables the geotechnical engineer to verify design conditions, manage geotechnical risks, verify compliant construction, adjust design requirements when unanticipated conditions are encountered, assist the builder, and represent owner interests. 9 BUILDING FOUNDATION STRUCTURE 9.1 Slab Foundation Design The proposed residential structures may be supported on ground supported foundations consisting of a conventionally reinforced beam and slab system or a post -tensioned slab foundation system, provided the estimated floor movements can be tolerated. The foundations should be designed with exterior and interior grade beams adequate to provide sufficient rigidity to the foundation system to tolerate the potential vertical movement of the foundation subgrade. A net allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf may be used for design of all grade beams bearing in tested and approved controlled fill, suitable native soil and/or limestone rock. Exterior grade beams should bear at least 18 inches below final grade. The bottom of the beam trenches should be free of any loose or soft material prior to the placement of the concrete. All grade beams and floor slabs should be adequately reinforced for eccentric loading that could occur from potential differential subgrade movement. Design criteria for the foundation slab have been estimated according to the Post Tensioning Institute (PTI) based on the methods described in their most recent manual for designing slab -on - grade foundation systems. An effective PI of 50 may be used for design of a conventionally reinforced concrete slab foundation. Recommended PTI foundation design criteria for a Thornthwaite Moisture Index (TMI) of zero are tabulated below: RN E Table 9: PTI Design Parameters Parameter I Condition I 4%-inch PVR Center Lift 6.7 Edge Moisture Variation Distance, em (feet) Edge Lift 3.7 Center Lift 1.8 Differential Soil Movement, yn, (inches) Edge Lift 2.1 Once grading plans have been completed the site may be able to be divided into zones with lesser PVR than 4'/z inches. The PTI method incorporates multiple design assumptions associated with derivation of the variables needed to estimate the foundation design criteria. The PTI method of estimating differential soil movement is applicable when subgrade moisture conditions are controlled only by the climate on well -graded building pads (i.e. proper site drainage, properly lined landscaped areas, no utility water leaks or other free water sources). As soil moisture increases, the soils may swell. The PTI design method is intended to provide stiffened foundation systems that can perform well under typical natural changes in soil moisture. The differential foundation movements resulting from seasonal soil moisture variations are typically much lower than movements that occur due to free water sources near or beneath the structure, which are not directly addressed by the PTI design method. 10 DETENTION / RETENTION POND In general, the purpose of a detention pond is to temporarily store rainfall runoff and release the water at a controlled rate. Depending on the site, project, global stability considerations, environmental regulations and owners' expectations, the detention pond may need to have a low rate of infiltration into the ground. A detailed hydraulic conductivity (permeability) study was not included in our scope of services; therefore, the following recommendations should be considered as general guidelines for water retention, and not as an assurance that the retention pond will maintain a constant water surface elevation. Rone would be pleased to provide these as additional services if the Owner desires. If permanent water storage is desired (retention pond), a pond lining will be required. The lining may consist of clay soils, a synthetic liner, or a combination of these. If a clay liner option is selected, we recommend the material should have a liquid limit greater than 50 and a plasticity index greater than 30. Based on the boring results, such materials are available at the site. The RN E subgrade preparation and clay liner construction should follow the recommendations in Section 8 Construction of Subgrade Fills. Liner construction must be conducted wet -of - optimum moisture contents in construction, with full lift kneading and full compaction with sufficient compaction energy. The compacted thickness of the liner should be at least 2 feet. Portions of the clay liner above the permanent water elevation will be subject to typical shrink/swell behavior. The clay liner should be irrigated to maintain sufficient moisture levels and prevent the liner from drying and experiencing the formation of shrinkage cracks. The ponds slope should be kept at 3H:1V, or flatter, or as required by the City of Fort Worth. 11 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES Retaining walls or below grade walls for swimming pools will be subjected to lateral pressures from soil backfill. Lateral earth pressures will be influenced by structural design, conditions of the wall restraint, methods of construction and/or compaction, the type of materials being retained, and drainage conditions. Walls that will be restrained from movement and rotation (rigid wall) should be designed using at -rest earth -pressures. The equivalent fluid pressures (triangular distribution) provided below may be used for horizontal backfill in a drained condition. To design for a drained condition, the wall must include an adequate drainage system. The provided equivalent fluid pressures do not include a Factor of Safety and do not provide for dynamic pressures on the wall. Figure 4: Lateral Earth Pressure Diagram For active pressure movement S =Surcharge � �(0.002 H to 0.004 H) TS Horizontal Finished Grade H . q I-- p2 p,� For at -rest pressure - No Movement Assumed Horizontal Finished Grade I Retaining Wall RN E Material Free Draining Granular Soil On -Site Clay Soil Table 10: Lateral Earth Pressures Condition Equivalent Fluid Pressure, pcf Undrained At -Rest, k = 0.45 55 90 Active, k = 0.30 38 81 At -Rest, k = 0.79 100 112 Active, k = 0.67 84 104 Conditions applicable to the table above include: • A maximum in -situ total unit weight of 125 pcf • Properly compacted horizontal backfill • No surcharge loads (construction equipment, pavement, footings, floor slabs, etc.) The values provided in the table above are for a full "wedge" of material behind the wall, where the backfill extends horizontally 1 to 2 feet away from the bottom of the wall and then slopes upward and away from the wall at a slope of 1 H:1 V (horizontal to vertical), or flatter. The location and magnitude of permanent surcharge loads (if present) should be determined, and additional pressures generated by these loads should be considered during design. Surcharge loads can be factored using the appropriate earth -pressure coefficient values provided in the table above. 11.1 Wall Drainage Retaining walls, or below grade walls should be expected to collect water due to condensation, surface water infiltration, and other means. Drainage should be provided behind all below grade walls to reduce the development of hydrostatic pressure and limit saturation of the backfill and foundation soils. Collector pipes should be placed at or slightly below the bottom level of the wall to prevent the collection of water in the drainage material beneath the collector pipes. Pipes should connect to a sump or gravity drainage system to prevent the accumulation of water behind the walls. Gravity lines should include a backflow preventer to block water from being transmitted into the drainage layer in the event of flooding near the gravity outfall. The drainage material should consist of free -draining, clean, granular fill. This material should be compatible with ASTM C33, sizes 4 through 9. The drainage layer should extend at least 12 inches from the back face of the wall. A geosynthetic wrap should enclose the granular backfill to reduce the infiltration of fines. The top 2 feet of backfill should consist of clay materials with a plasticity index of 25 or more, compacted as recommended in the charts based on the zoning RN E location, and extending at least 5 feet beyond the wall excavation to reduce surface water infiltration into the underlying fill. 11.2 Wall Backfill Free -draining backfill soils should be placed in maximum lifts of 1 foot and lightly consolidated by use of a small hand -operated compactors or other appropriate methods to adequately compact the backfill. Heavy compactors and grading equipment should not be allowed to operate within 15 feet of the crest of the wall to avoid developing excessive additional temporary or long-term lateral soil pressures. If onsite clayey soils are used, these materials should be placed in maximum 6-inch lifts and compacted as recommended in the charts based on the zoning location. 12 PAVEMENTS This report includes recommendations for rigid pavements. While some minor differential movement should be anticipated, if the provisions of this report are strictly adhered to in construction, the pavement subgrades can be expected to be relatively stable. To the extent the provisions of this report are not adhered to in construction, increased risk of ground movement should be expected. Design of the proposed pavement sections should factor the performance of the subgrade construction provided for in this report. 12.1 Rigid Pavements This report includes recommendations for rigid pavements. Maintenance requirements over the life of the pavement are typically much lower for rigid pavements. Rigid pavements tend to be more durable and require less maintenance after construction, and rehabilitation/reconstruction of the pavement section is not typically considered a part of the pavement life cycle. When designing proposed pavement sections, subgrade conditions must be considered, along with expected traffic use/frequency, pavement type and intended design life. For this project, applicable traffic loading conditions and pavement design parameters were based on the City of Fort Worth Pavement Design Manual for an Industrial roadway classifications. A more precise design can be made if specific traffic loading information is provided. The following information was used in our analysis: Table 11: Pavement Design Input Parameters Item Value Roadway Designation Residential Annual Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) 35,000 Annual traffic growth (%) 0.5 Reliability, R (%) 85 Initial serviceability, p° 4.5 Terminal serviceability, pt 2.00 Design life (years) 25 Concrete modulus of rupture, S'c (psi) 620 Concrete modulus of elasticity, Ec (psi) 4,000,000 Standard deviation, S° 0.39 Load transfer coefficient, J 3.0 Drainage coefficient, Cd 1.0 Treated modulus of subgrade reaction, k (pci) 220 The pavement thickness determinations were performed in general accordance with the "AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures 1993 edition" using the WinPAS 12 software from the American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA). The minimum pavement sections are presented in the table below. Table 12: Rigid Pavement Sections Material Thickness (inches) Jointed Reinforced Concrete 6 Lime Treated Subgrade 6 The concrete pavement should have between 4 and 6 percent entrained air. We recommend a minimum concrete compressive strength of 3,600 psi. Hand -placed concrete should have a maximum slump of 6 inches. A sand leveling course should not be permitted beneath pavements. All steel reinforcement, dowel spacing/diameter, and pavement joints should conform to City of Fort Worth standards. 12.2 Pavement Base Course We recommend 6 inches of treated subgrade beneath concrete pavements. At this time, we estimate approximately 6 to 8 percent hydrated lime by weight (27 to 36 pounds per square yard for a 6 inch thickness) will be required to adequately treat the pavement subgrade, though the actual lime requirement should be determined based on the in -place soil properties and soluble sulfate levels after the pavement subgrade has reached final grade. Lime treatment should be RN E performed in accordance with Rone Specification 400, included in Appendix B. Lime treated subgrade should have a PI between 7 and 20. The treated subgrade should extend a minimum of 2 feet outside the curb line. This will improve the edge support of the pavement and reduce the effects associated with shrinkage during dry periods. Sand or other granular fill should not be used as a leveling course beneath the pavement, as these more porous materials increase water migration beneath the pavement, causing heave and strength loss of the subgrade. 12.3 Pavement Construction and Maintenance Recommendations It is important that the recommended moisture content and compaction be maintained until the concrete is placed. Maintenance after construction should include regular observation to identify and seal cracks. A flexible joint material should be used to seal cracks as they degrade, which can occur during the design life of pavements. 13 SITE COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE 13.1 Site Grading and Drainage The geotechnical design for this project includes a limited assessment of hydrogeologic conditions and intends to provide for efforts to maintain stable, moist subgrade conditions after construction. Site grading and drainage should support this intention where possible. Drainage should be efficient in paved areas and less efficient in lawn and landscape areas. Roof runoff should be collected by gutters and downspouts, and discharge onto paved areas draining away from the buildings. 13.2 Landscaping and Irrigation Subgrade moisture levels should be maintained around the building perimeter before and during construction. Irrigated landscaping and lawn areas are recommended with even distribution around the structures. Irrigated areas will serve as supplemental moisture sources surrounding the foundations and pavement areas. Accordingly, regular and uniform irrigation will be required in these areas, particularly during dry and hot weather periods. We do not recommend the use of landscaping against or around the exterior of the foundations, as landscaped areas can adversely affect subgrade moisture. Landscaped areas can create both RN E saturated and desiccated conditions that cause localized differential movements and the formation of cracks. If used, landscaping should be kept as far away from the foundation as possible and positive drainage must be maintained. Landscaping elements (such as edging) must not prohibit or slow the drainage of water. When feasible, irrigation lines and heads should not be placed in close proximity to the foundation to prevent the collection of water near the foundation or flatwork, particularly in the event of leaking lines or sprinkler heads. Trees and large vegetation should not be placed near structures or movement -sensitive flatwork. The root systems of these plants can remove relatively large quantities of moisture from the subgrade soils, causing localized soil settlement. The desiccation zone varies by tree size and species, but trees should generally be set back at least 1'/2 times the mature tree height, and in no cases should the drip -line of the mature tree extend over or within 15 feet of roof lines. 14 STUDY CLOSURE The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of the field exploration and further on the assumption that the exploratory borings are representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site with little variance beyond that found by the borings. If different subsurface conditions from those encountered in our borings are observed or appear to be present in excavations, Rone must be advised promptly so that these conditions can be evaluated and our recommendations can be reassessed as may be necessary. If there is a substantial lapse of time between submission of this report and the start of the work at the site, if conditions have changed due either to natural causes or to construction operations at or adjacent to the site, or if structure locations, structural loads or finish grades are changed, Rone should be promptly informed and retained if necessary if the changed conditions warrant review and reassessment. It is important that Rone be retained to assist in design reviews or review those portions of the plans and specifications that pertain to earthwork and foundation systems for this particular project to ensure the plans and specifications are consistent with the controls and recommendations provided in this report. It is also advised that Rone provide oversight and monitoring services during construction to ensure that the controls required for design requirements during earthworks construction are provided correctly and implemented effectively. R NE EER�� This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and their designated agents for specific application to design and construction of this project. We have exercised a degree of care and skill exceeding that ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by reputable members of our profession practicing in the same or similar locality. The engineering services and solutions provided herein are considered advanced, and while design and construction controls are improved, no warranty, expressed or implied, can be made or intended. R NE ENG EERIN'G es r: aiTz 15 COPYRIGHT 2022 RONE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LTD. This report provides advanced engineering services, and is in its entirety the sole property of the Client, Rone Engineering Services, Ltd., and its affiliates. Use of this report is subject to all applicable copyrights. This report may be used in practice or referenced by any project party as necessary, solely for the party's role on the project for which this report is prepared. Beyond that use, no part of this report may be copied, downloaded, transmitted, or otherwise reproduced or stored, in any form or means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this report must include all copyright notices, registered trademark (0) designations, and non -registered trademark (TM) designations. CHARTS 21-25640 - Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX - Full Site Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - CAT 563 Static / Dynamic High Setting, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range 130 - 0.23 ` �ti, LEGEND Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction in construction - 0,31 `, 0 Midpoint optimum at full compaction in construction Line -of -optimums in construction covering the soil range to 4' design depth i 2C: - 0.34 Compactor `�� Predominant soil range to 4' design depth - performance , Line -of -optimums extension for unexpected soil variation `,� - 0.37 across soil range -----_ ZAV (SG - 2.68 assumed average, based on 2 tests) % Air Voids (Na) �s.` 120 - 0.33 - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) `. - - - - - Design construction range- MC: 14-26%, Max %Air Voids: 7.1%, Min Dry - 0,42 Avg free swell: 0.8 ±25% �•,� Density: 94 pcf (designed to encompass SG: 2.65 - 2.70) 115 - 0.45 UCS: "3100 Ibs/ft2 ±20% •.- _ I '%% Notes: 6' 1. Compactor performance is predetermined with generally good accuracy. 2. Compactor performance and control design is based on limited soil - D•49 •� samples from on -site borings. These limited samples are assumed to be representative of the range of soils used for fill construction. j 110 - 0.52 Maximum % Air Voids: 7.1% / V 4 ter, 3. SC/CL/CH Soil Range: •, PI Range: 14 - 56 (predominant 21-46) - 0.56 %Fines Range: 25 - 99% (predominant 56 - 94%) %Gravel Range: 0-45%(predominant )-17%) }-� 105 - 059 •. `.� 4. In -Situ moisture range based on data from 10/2021. N . Predominant Soil Range:--.. ■, 5. In -Situ gravel is accounted for on this chart. c Avg free swell: 1.3 - 1.8 ±25% ��,` 6. Non -cohesive soils are not covered in this - 0.63 Avg UCS: -3900 - -6100 Ibs/ft' ±.209/6- •�' plot. p 7. Free swell does not equate to confined 100 - 0,67 '�� swell. - 0,72 Avg free swell: 2.1 ±25% UCS: -3300 Ibs/ft2 ±20% � `•�� 95 - 0.76 _ 0.81 Design Moisture Range iE--------------------- - - - - -- >i `. i 14.0% - 26.0% 90 - 0.86 ' ' �. _ '■. ZAV (2.68) ' Full In -Situ Range ' Predominant In -Situ Moisture ' Full In -Situ Moisture ' ' •_ '•� ----------- - - - - -- ------------=--- i 0.91 (4' design depth) _ Range (to 4' design depth) Range to 4' design depth 85 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Moisture Content (%) CHART 1a PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART FILE NAME: �RN�_E BUILDING AND SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 RAISE FROM CUT AREAS FOR FULL SITE REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 e v E E R i N e CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: EST: 7977 Between BetN. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 9 Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 - Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX - Full Site Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - CAT 563 Static / Dynamic High Setting, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range 125 - 0.34 -• • 120 115 110 a� v 0 105 7 100 aj ❑ 95 • LEGEND - 0.37'-._ �� • ______ ZAV (SG - 2.68 shown) • • .................. °o Air Voids (N6a) - 0.39 '•• - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) �+ I I Performance range - 0.42 Min. Moisture Co'ntenf •.(14.'0%) I ., •� •++ Control Specifications: �•.. I +, 1. Performance range requires, and is only valid with, full compaction at wet-of- - 0•45 � optimum moisture contents in construction for the range of soils on site. `�• l 2. Fully compact in 9" maximum loose lifts with minimum of 8 compactor passes. - 0.49 ++ 3. Set density meter to 2.68 SG. �. 4. Maintain cleaner bar close to the drum. +`• 5. Compact with static setting on compactor (vibrator turned off). - 0.52 ++ •' •-- • 6. Where ravel and sand are resent in lifts, compact with high vibrator setting g p P g Y g ` +•+ for the first 4 passes. Compact with static setting thereafter. - 0.56 `+ 7. When % air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 7.1%after lifts are fully Maximum % Air Voids: 7.1% ++• compacted, the solution is always wetting and recompaction. - 0.59 (with gauge Setting SG=2.68) `•+` 8. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction and on •• scarified lifts. •+ 9. Compacted lifts must be maintained in wet state after - 0,63 ++++ compaction. - 0.67 , •._ - 0.72 - 0.76 0.81 90 - 0.86 0.91 85 80 0.97 Notes: 1. Remove rocks, organics, and identifiable silt before lift placement. 4� 103 2. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These s� " limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils. 3. The controls on his chart reflect Family-of-Curv� methods for compaction control. " • :19 11� • .IOC .$% 1, 09 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 TNG OF E EST: 1972 Mo[sture Content (%) CHART 1b PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION FILE NAME: BUILDING AND SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION AND GRADE DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 RAISE FROM CUT AREAS FOR FULL SITE REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 130 125 120 115 a� 0 110 v 0 7 105 a 100 21-25640 — Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX — Full Site Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range - 0.29 �♦ LEGEND - 0.31 a ` •. as Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction in construction ♦� O Midpoint optimum at full compaction in construction - 0.34 aaa Line -of -optimums in construction covering the soil range to 4' design depth a ♦ Predominant soil range to 4' design depth - 0.37 as Line -of -optimums extension for unexpected soil variation - a Corrected/Stabilized __ �.� - - - - - - ZAV (SG - 2.68 assumed average, based on 2 tests) 039 _ Lab D-698 performance`-.. """"""""" %Air voids (Na) - 0.42 across soil range - 0.52 Void Ratio e a ( ) aaa - - - - - Design construction range - MC: 15.5 - 28.0%, Max % Air Voids: 7.1%, Min Dry 0.45 — I `♦ Density: 92 pcf (designed to encompass SG: 2.65 - 2.70) - 0.49 - 0.52 - 0.56 - 0.59 - 0.63 - 0.67 - 0.72 95 - 0.76 - 0.81 90 - 0.86 - 0.91 85 - 0.97 - 1.03 80 - 1,09 0 Notes: a 1. SC/CL/CH Soil Range: ■ aa` PI Range: 14 - 56 (predominant 21-46) %Fines Range: 25 - 99% (predominant 56 - 94%) ■a■ %Gravel Range: 0-45%(predominant 1-17%) ■■ 2. In -Situ moisture range based on data from 10/2021. \ �•� 3. Non -cohesive soils are not covered in this plot. — - — - \ — - ■ate Maximum % Air Voids: 7.1% -. ■+� ■ ■ • Design moisture range iE------------------ - =---- �•.->� •..- 15.5% - 28.0% Full In -Situ Range Predominant In -Situ Moisture ' Full In -Situ Moisture•'••.. �• 'E 4 design depth) E Range to 4' design depth) �' Range to 4' design de th =' -------- - - - - -- R E ENG EERI NG Est: 1072 5 10 15 20 Moisture Content (%) CHART 2a COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL FOR FULL SITE CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth. Texas = 30 35 PROJECT NO: 21-25640 FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 REVISED BY: DATE: APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 — Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX — Full Site Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart — D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range 125 — 0.34 -+ LEGEND — 0.37 �+ ______ ZAV (SG — 2.68 shown) • ++ .................. °o Air Voids (Na) 120 — 0.39 — a52 Void Ratio (e) �•+ I Acceptance range — 0.42 �� — — — •� Control Specifications: 115 — 0.45 1. I Acceptance range requires, and is only valid with, full compaction at wet -of- %• • optimum moisture contents in construction for the range of soils on site. +`. 2• Fully compact in 6" loose lifts. — 0.49 Min. Moisture Content (15.5%) I 3. Set density meter to 2.68 SG. 4. When % air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 7.1%after lifts are fully 110 — 0.52 compacted, the solution is always wetting and recompaction. �' �•� 5. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction and on scarified lifts. 56 ro 1 %% 0 105 — 0.59 � •• ..• +`. — 0.63 Maximum % Air Voids: 7:1% `. (with gauge setting SG=2.68)-.. \ '' •.- ��. a 100 — 0.67 ` C ❑ — 0.72 ❑ 95 — 0.76 — 0.82 Min. Dry Density (92.0 pcf) . 90 — 0,86 -•+'�.�ZAV(2.68) — 0.91 �. 85 — 0.97 Notes: - — �Og 1. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These — T.03 s' •.- limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils. . 2. The controls on this chart reflect Family-of-Curv� methods for compaction control. dq ' - . - I� ' ••. Ip' -.,• 8$ " 80 — 1.09 _ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Moisture Content (%) CHART 2b PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION R FILE NAME UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL FOR FULL SITE O�Na DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 e N � e CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 REVISED BY: DATE: E s T: 1 s 7 x Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 - Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX - Zone 1 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - CAT 563 Static / Dynamic High Setting, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range 130 - 0.23 ` �ti� LEGEND ` +ti Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction in construction - 0.31 % 0 Midpoint optimum at full compaction in construction Line -of -optimums in construction covering the soil range to 4' design depth 125 - 0.34 + ` Predominant soil range to 4' design depth Compactor % Line -of -optimums extension for unexpected soil variation - 0.37 performance `�, - - - - - - ZAV (SG - 2.68 assumed average, based on 2 tests) across soil range ��+ .................. %Air Voids (Na) 120 - 0.39 %% - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) `% - - - - - Design construction range - MC: 13.5 - 24.0%, Max % Air Voids: 6.9%, Min Dry Density 97 cf (designed to encompass SG: 2.65 - 2.70 )0.42 Avg free swell: 0.8 ±25% % 115 - 0.45 UCS: -3100 Ibs/ft2 ±20% •.- � % Notes: a� � +% 1. Compactor performance is predetermined with generally good accuracy. `% 2. Compactor performance and control design is based on limited soil - 0.49 `•, samples from on -site borings. These limited samples are assumed to be o�`�� ., \ `. representative of the range of soils used for fill construction. Maximum % Air Voids: 6.9% j 110 - 0.52 _ +3. SC/CL/CH Soil Range: •% PI Range: 14 - 50 (predominant 16-38) - 0.56 `1.%Fines Range: 25 - 96% (predominant 52 - 94%) .. �+ %Gravel Range: 0-45% (predominant 1-20%) > 105 - 0.59 Predominant Soil Range-:-- `%% 4. In -Situ moisture range based on data from 10/2021. c Avg free swell: 1.2 - 1.6 ±25%' •.- `.� 5. In -Situ gravel is accounted for on this chart. a� - 0.63 . 6. Non -cohesive soils are not covered in this Avg UCS: -4300 - -6100 Ibs/ft?...±26%- plot. `•� p� 7. Free swell does not equate to confined 100 - 0,67 '�� swell. - 0,72 Avg free swell: 2.0 ±25% l UCS: -3600 Ibs/ft2 ±20% � `•.� 95 - 0.76 _ 0.81 Design Moisture Range ; �`.■ iE----------------- - - - - -- >, i 13.5% - 24.0% 90 - 0.86 , r r - .r •■. ZAV (2.68) 'Full In -Situ Range' Predominant In -Situ Moisture ' Full In -Situ Moisture ' '•� <---------1E--------------------------- >'-- - - - -�' `. 0.91 ' (4' design depth): Range (to 4' design depth) ' Range to 4' desi n d.e th ; i •..• �`.� 85 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Moisture Content (%) CHART 3a PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART FILE NAME: R E BUILDING AND SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 1 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 LNG E E R T N G CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: EST: 1972 Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 - Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX - Zone 1 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - CAT 563 Static / Dynamic High Setting, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range 130 - 0.29 + - 0.31 125 - R34 - 0.37 . 120 - 0.39 Min. Moisture Content (13.5% - 0.42 115 - 0.45 a� 0 p - 0.49 0 110 - 0.52 - 0.56 105 L 0.59 N C p - 0.63 100 - 0.67 - 0.72 95 - 0.76 - 0.81 90 - 0.86 - 0.91 85 - 0.97 +aa LEGEND • as ------ ZAV (SG - 2.68 shown) • ................ %Air Voids (N6a) + a+a - a52 Void Ratio (e) Performance range +a+a Control Specifications: �+ 1. Performance range requires, and is only valid with, full compaction at wet -of- f I ++ optimum moisture contents in construction for the range of soils on site. +� 2. Fully compact in 9" maximum loose lifts with minimum of 8 compactor passes. 3. Set density meter to 2.68 SG. a•+ 4. Maintain cleaner bar close to the drum. 5. Compact with static setting on compactor (vibrator turned off). a `a 6. Where gravel and sand are present in lifts, compact with high vibratory setting `.` for the first 4 passes. Compact with static setting thereafter. `a 7. When % air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 6.9% after lifts are fully �•ti compacted, the solution is always wetting and recompaction. `. 8. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction and on Maximum % Air Voids: 6.9% scarified lifts. (with gauge setting SG=2.68) 9. Compacted lifts must be maintained in wet state after compaction. Notes: - - ��• 2AV {2.6$} 1. Remove rocks, organics, and identifiable silt before lift placement. 2. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils. 1 3. The controls on this chart reflect Family -of -Curve methods for compaction control. 14 ' • ,�2� ' •. job' 5 10 /R NE ENG EERING EST: IR72 15 20 25 Moisture Content CHART 3b COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION BUILDING AND SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 1 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Elm 35 PROJECT NO: 21-25640 FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 REVISED BY: DATE: APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 — Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX — Zone 1 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart — D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range 130 = 0.29 +t• LEGEND • Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction in construction + - 0,31 `_ ••• 0 Midpoint optimum at full compaction in construction '• Line -of -optimums in construction covering the soil range to 4' design depth • 125 - 0.34 `� Predominant soil range to 4' design depth ••� Line -of -optimums extension for unexpected soil variation - 0.37 Corrected/Stabilized - - - - - - ZAV (SG - 2.68 assumed average, based on 2 tests) �%� s` Lab D-698 performance `� """"""""" %Air Voids (Na) 120 - 0.39 '•` - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) across soil range � - - - - - Design construction range - MC: 15-27%, Max %Air Voids: 6.9%, Min Dry - 0.42 j �* Density: 94 pcf (designed to encompass SG: 2.65 - 2.70) J& 115 - 0.45 0 - 0.49 j 110 - 0.52 - 0.56 a }-� 105 - 0.59 c a� - 0.63 0 100 - 0.67 0.72 95 - 0.76 - 0.81 90 - 0.86 - 0.91 + Notes: • 1. SC/CL/CH Soil Range: + •• PI Range: 14-50(predominant 16-38) +�% %Fines Range: 25 - 96% (predominant 52 - 94%) %— — •� %Gravel Range:0-45%(predominant 1-20%) 2. In -Situ moisture range based on data from 10/2021. 3. Non -cohesive soils are not covered in this plot. Maximum % Air Voids: 6.9%.� - ®� '•� i ti• ;• Design moisture range'' •.. �'' -. �' ZAV (2.68) 'Full In -Situ Range' Predominant In -Situ Moisture ' Full In-Situ-Moisture <---------'E--------------------- - - - - -- >'-------- - - - - -- - �.. `• ' (4' design depth); Range (to 4' design depth) ' Range to 4' desi n de th 85 - 0:97--I ' �9� ?2�t ?�� s% 4t2 - 0 5 R JFNG E N G E EST- i9T2 10 15 20 Moisture Content (%) CHART 4a COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 1 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas 25 30 35 PROJECT NO: 21-25640 FILE NAME: DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 REVISED BY: DATE: APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 — Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX — Zone 1 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart — D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range 125 — 0.34 -+ LEGEND — 0.37 �+ ______ ZAV (SG — 2.68 shown) + ++ .................. % Air Voids (Na) 120 — 0.39 — 0.52 Void Ratio (e) �• ��---� i I Acceptance range — 0.42 Control Specifications: `•` 1. Acceptance range requires, and is only valid with, full compaction at wet -of - — 0.45 Min. Moisture Content (15.0%) Min. •� `+� optimum moisture contents in construction for the range of soils on site. 2. Fully compact in 6" loose lifts. — 0.49 `� `+% 3. Set density meter to 2.68 SG. 4. When % air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 6.9%after lifts are fully 110 — 0.52 +.� compacted, the solution is always wetting and recompaction. 5. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction and on scarified lifts. o 0,56 0 105 — 0.59 Maximum % Air Voids: 6.9% •`. (with gauge setting SG=2.68) 1, ��•� — 0.63 � V �••. 100 - 0.67 ❑ 95 — 0.76 Min. Dry Density (94.0 pcf) — 0,81 90 — 0,86 •`► �.� ZAV (2.68) — 0.91 _ rr `- 85 — 0.97 Notes: - — �Og — T.03 1. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These s'' •.- limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils. 2. The controls on this chart reflect Family-of-Curv� methods for compaction control. dq'' - . - I� ' ••. Ip' -.,• 8$ " 80 — 1.09 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Moisture Content (%) CHART4b PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION FILE NAME: R ONr, UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 ) OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 1 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 E N G E CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 - Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX - Zone 2 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - CAT 563 Static / Dynamic High Setting, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range 130 - 0.29 ♦ti♦ LEGEND ♦♦ Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction in construction - 0.32 ♦♦ 0 Midpoint optimum at full compaction in construction Line -of -optimums in construction covering the soil range to 4' design depth 125 - 0.34 `♦ _ Predominant soil range to 4' design depth `% Line -of -optimums extension for unexpected soil variation - 0,37 ♦ �♦ - - - - - - ZAV (SG - 2.68 assumed average, based on 2 tests) ♦ Compactor ♦♦ .................. %Air Voids (Na) 127 - 0.39 performance `.♦ - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) across soil range - - - - - Design construction range - MC: 14.5-27.0%, Max %Air Voids: 7.2%, Min Dry - 0.42 I' .• `+, Density: 93 pcf (designed to encompass SG: 2.66-2.70) 6' 115 - 0.45 ♦ _ �.. '♦ Notes: Avg free swell: 0.9 ±25% `♦ 1. Compactor performance is predetermined with generally good accuracy. .0 UCS: -4100 Ibs/ft2 ±20% %♦ 2. Compactor performance and control design is based on limited soil - 0.49 ♦♦ samples from on -site borings. These limited samples are assumed to be ♦tom representative of the range of soils used for fill construction. 0 110 - 0.52 `♦ 3. SC/CL/CH Soil Range: o o / "� ` ♦`♦ PI Range: 19 - 56 (predominant 28-52) Maximum / Air Voids: 7.2/ •, - 0.56 %Fines Range: 30-99%(predominant 62-96%) '\ • ♦♦ %Gravel Range: 0 - 41% (predominant 2 - 16%) }-� 105 - 0.59 - 4. In -Situ moisture range based on data from 10/2021. v 5. In -Situ gravel is accounted for on this chart. ♦��` - Predominant Soil Range: 6. Non -cohesive soils are not covered in this 0.63 Avg free swell: 1.5 -1.9 ±25%-. •�' plot. ❑ 7. Free swell does not equate to confined Avg UCS: -3600 - -6100 Ibs/ft2 ±20% ` 100 - 0.67 swell. - 0.72 '• Avg free swell: 2.1 ±25% 95 - 0.76 Sk UCS: -3300 Ibs/ft2 ±20% � ' -., �•� _ 0.81 Design Moisture Range I , - - -i - - - �`•. �E-----------------------------1 •. I 14.5% - 27.0% 90 - 0.86 _i-•--, _ _ ' I �- _ 1`. 2AV (2.68) ' Full In -Situ Moisture I Predominant In -Situ Moisture ' FUi4.l-n-Situ, Moisture' -. ' ' `•� 'E-------------------'E------------------------->'---------=----�--' ��. - 0.92 ; Range (4' design depth) Range (to 4' design depth) ; Range (to 4' .design. depth) '' • I I I : q o - 12 0 .. d0 � . ayo'•'+-,• G�-'•-.-• _4�'-•-.• d�`I 85 - 0.97 ci 5. 15 20 - 30 35 Moisture Content (%) CHART 5a PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART FILE NAME: IR E BUILDING AND SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 G E E R I N 6 OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 2 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: EST: 1 B 72 Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 - Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX - Zone 2 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - CAT 563 Static / Dynamic High Setting, 9" Maximum Loose Lift, Full Soil Range 125 - 0.34 -+ • ` LEGEND 0.37'-._ �� ______ ZAV (SG - 2.68 shown) • • .................. %Air Voids (N6a) • 120 - 0.39 ''+• _0.52 Void Ratio (e) �• i I Performance range - 0.42 '�---� Min. Moi.stur'eContent (14.5%)- '•+ Control Specifications: 115 - 0.45 I ++ 1. Performance range requires, and is only valid with, full compaction at wet -of- `! � optimum moisture contents in construction for the range of soils on site. ••� 2. Fully compact in 9" maximum loose lifts with minimum of 8 compactor passes. - 0.49 `� 3. Set density meter to 2.68 SG. �+ 4 Maintain cleaner bar close to the drum 110 - D.52 a� v_ - 0.56 0 105 - 0.59 7 - 0,63 V 100 - 0.67 N C O - 0.72 z ❑ 95 - 0.76 - 0.81 90 - 0.86 - 0.91 85 80 +. 5. Compact with static setting on compactor (vibrator turned off). 6. Where gravel and sand are present in lifts, compact with high vibratory setting �.� for the first 4 passes. Compact with static setting thereafter. -'S `. 7. When % air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 7.2%after lifts are • `• fully compacted, the solution is always wetting and recompaction. Maximum %Air Voids: 7.2% * �•� 8. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction (with gauge Setting SG=2.68) _ `` _ and on scarified lifts. 0.97 Notes: 1. Remove rocks, organics, and identifiable silt before lift placement. 4 103 2. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These sa limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils. 3. The controls on this chart reflect Family-of-Curv� methods for compaction control. " • :19 �2� I0� �� 1,09 - 5 10 i5 20 25 30 35 Mo[sture Content (%) CHART 5b PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION FILE NAME: O�NG BUILDING AND SUBGRADE RECONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 9-G1 OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 2 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 E s T: 1 9 7 z CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas REVISED BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 — Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX — Zone 2 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart — D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range 125 — 0.34 % LEGEND •• Upper and lower optimum points at full compaction in construction — 0,37 ♦% O Midpoint optimum at full compaction in construction `• Line -of -optimums in construction covering the soil range to 4design depth 120 — 0.39 • •• �; Predominant soil range to 4' design depth `•\ Line -of -optimums extension for unexpected soil variation - 0.42 Corrected/Stabilized-.j�--1 ` _ `�♦ -----' ZAV (SG — 2.68 assumed average, based on 2 tests) Lab D-698 performance """""'••••••• %Air Voids (Na) \•\ 115 — 0.45 — 0.52 Void Ratio (e) across soil range `\- — — — — Design construction range — MC: 16.5-29.0%, Max %Air Voids: 7.2%, Min Dry — 0,49 I ♦\ Density: 90 pcf (designed to encompass SG: 2.66 — 2.70) • a� 110 — 0.52 \ ' + Notes: `•` 1. SC/CL/CH Soil Range: PI Range: 19 — 56 (predominant 28-52) — 0.56 `•� %Fines Range: 30-99%(predominant 62-96%) "a `• %Gravel Range: 0-41% (predominant 2 —16%) 0 105 — 0.59 , - `♦ 2. In -Situ moisture range based on data from 10/2021. +`• 3. Non -cohesive soils are not covered in this plot. — 0.63 Maximum % Air Voids: 7.2% �� `•• 0,67 ++ C �+ ❑ — 0.72 \ ■\ ■ 95 — 0.76 +\� + — 0.81 ■ +■ 90 0,86 — 0,91 ; Design moisture range ' ''~• ►� E---------------------- ---.--_.---> 16.5% — 29.0% ; 85 — 0.97 Full In -Situ Moisture Predominant In -Situ Moisture ' Full In -Situ Moisture 1 s Range.depth) Range (4' design depth) (to 4' de depth) Range (to 4' design '; •.•: 80 �1.09 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Moisture Content (%) — CHART 6a PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CHART FILE NAME: qNG N E UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 2 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 ERINGCATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: Fs, : 1 � - ,, Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth. Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 21-25640 — Cattleman's Crossing, Fort Worth, TX — Zone 2 Moisture -Density -Air -Void Ratio Chart - D-698 Compaction Range for Full Soil Range 120 - 0.39 LEGEND - 0.42 `�, - - - - - - ZAV (SG - 2.68 shown) .................. %Air Voids (Na) 115 - 0.45 '� - 0.52 Void Ratio (e) Acceptance range - 0.49 t Control Specifications: Min. Moisture.Coritent (.16.5%) I �•� 1. Acceptance range requires, and is only valid with, full compaction at wet -of- optimum moisture contents in construction for the range of soils on site. 110 - 0.52 '•` 2. Fully compact in 6" loose lifts. •� 3. '% Set density meter to 2.68 SG. - 0.56 4. `•� When % air voids exceeds the maximum limit of 7.2%after lifts are fully compacted, the solution is always wetting and recompaction. .• •% 5. Moisture changes may only be made before compaction and on scarified lifts. v_ 105 - 0.59 `. ; `• - 0.63 j Maximum % Air Voids: 7.2% ''•., �•� 100 — 0.67 (with gauge setting SG=2.68)' •-. ��* IS + - 0,72 N C `+` 95 - 0.76 �•� - 0,81 N `. 90 — 0.86 Min. Dry Density (90.0 pcf) > - 0,91 Notes: + `•� ZAV (2.68) - 1,03 1. Compaction controls are based on limited soil samples from on -site borings. These limited samples are assumed to be representative of the properties of these fill soils.+� 2. The controls on this chart reflect Familrf-Curve methods for compaction control. jQ '' --, �2ys' •-• gyp ' --- 8� •., G -.. '' ..- 2 +1 80 - 1,09 ] —.- 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Moisture Content%} CHART 6b PROJECT NO: 21-25640 COMPACTION CONTROL CHART FOR CONSTRUCTION FILE NAME: UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL R N E DRAWN BY: GH DATE: 1-28-2022 OPTIONAL CONTROL FOR ZONE 2 REVISED BY: CJ DATE: 1-28-2022 e N e e R N c CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 EST- 1972 Fort Worth, Texas APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-28-2022 R NE E N G E E R I N G RECT'" Compaction Design Report Project Number: 21-25640 Fill: Foundation Report Number: 25640-01 Project Name: Cattleman's Crossing Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 1/27/2022 Project Owner: Ashton Woods - Dallas Division Produced By: Gary Hougardy Control Specifications and References Lift Properties at 95% Compaction on Construction Curve t Min % of Max Dry Density 95% Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO w (%) 10.1 14.7 f1% MC Compacted Fill Property Requirements y (Ibs/ft3) 114.2 114.2 f1.8% Air Voids Percentage 6.9% S (%) 59.0 85.6 f3% Factor of Safety 1.5 e 0.46 0.46 f3% Na (%) 12.9 4.5 f3% Design Compaction Conditions w Potential (%) +7.0 +2.5 f3% Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 5,687 4,708 ±20% Compactor CAT 563 Dynamic High c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 1,687 1,516 ±10% USCS Classification CL Ranges 0 (o) ASTM D 2850 29 24 ±10% Specific Gravity 2.67 2.65 - 2.70 Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 2.4 1.2 ±25% Liquid Limit (%) 34 32 - 36 CBR* (%) Soaked 1.1 3.7 ±10% Plasticity Index (%) 16 14 - 18 CBR* (%) Unsoaked 35.9 8.3 ±10% Plastic Limit (%) 18 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 1,632 5,490 ±10% % Fines (Passing #200) 52 48 - 54 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 25,282 9,882 ±10% % Gravel (Retained #4) 4 3 - 19 % Sand (Passing #4) 43 27 - 49 Construction Control Specifications Minimum % of Maximum Dry Densitv *� Construction Curve 95% ` Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Ranae for 95% +` 11.8% - 14.7% (t1% MC) Lift Construction Curve Minimum # of Roller Passes LJ - 11. g Ott •• 7 (Equiv 4 roundtno passes, full lift coverage required) = 120-2 lbs/ ft' i �'•� Compaction curves should be obtained i regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. -95C cognRaction s------- ----------1----------- `. - M-D probe depths should be centered on 3 114-2 lb TC -, the center of the compacted lift. i - * 4 t c and m - Unsaturated triaxial test, total stress soil parameter. ` UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. 1 0 - . Measured values include a, y, UCS, c, m Free Swell, and CBR (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Na, m Potential, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and Unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Swell test condition. * CBR based on field compacted state. 1 Properties represent average values. 4 I Soil Sample Date: 9/28/2021 i Loc: On -site, Zone 1 Desc: Upper -bound, predominant soil range . 111-8�k 114.74fc Authorization By: oistlrre Content, w (envI Print Name: Graphics powered byMathematica Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report ("CDR") is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("Fill') and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (®) and non -registered trademark designations Version: 2.31.1 - 7.2 PLATE A.116a R NE RECT'" Compaction Design Report Project Number: 21-25640 Fill: Foundation Report Number: 25640-02 Project Name: Cattleman's Crossing Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 1/27/2022 Project Owner: Ashton Woods - Dallas Division Produced By: Gary Hougardy Control Specifications and References Lift Properties at 95% Compaction on Construction Curve t Min % of Max Dry Density 95% Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO (%) 17.1 21.1 t1% MC Compacted Fill Property Requirements y (Ibs/ft3) 99.8 99.8 f1.9% Air Voids Percentage 6.9% S (%) 67.6 83.5 f3% Factor of Safety 1.0 a 0.68 0.68 f3% Na (%) 13.1 6.7 f3% Design Compaction Conditions w Potential (%) +8.2 +4.2 f3% Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 4,535 4,559 ±20% Compactor CAT 563 Static c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 1,488 1,692 ±10% USCS Classification CH Ranges 0 (o) ASTM D 2850 23 17 ±10% Specific Gravity 2.68 2.65 - 2.70 Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 4.5 1.6 ±25% Liquid Limit (%) 60 58 - 62 CBR* (%) Soaked 0.7 2.7 ±10% Plasticity Index (%) 38 36 - 40 CBR* (%) Unsoaked 19.5 4.7 ±10% Plastic Limit (%) 22 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 1,054 4,016 ±10% % Fines (Passing #200) 94 92 - 96 Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 17,100 6,842 ±10% % Gravel (Retained #4) 0 0-0 % Sand (Passing #4) 6 4-8 Construction Control Specifications * Minimum % of Maximum Dry Density _ - - - - - •, "4 _ �- Construction Curve 95% A �* Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Ranae for 95% "-t 18.3% - 21.1% (t1% MC) Lift Construction Curve Minimum # of Roller Passes LJ - 15. 3 % `, 8 (Equiv 4 roundtrip passes, full lift coverage required) Compaction curves should be obtained -� r regularly with changes in material index I properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. icy -95Nc campactian _- 1 ---�------•--•- .99.8 tbs;. T _ 1 `• `, ~. M-D probe depths should be centered on 1 the center of the compacted lift. . 1 t c and m - Unsaturated triaxial test, total stress soil parameter. UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. Measured values include a, y, UCS, c, m Free Swell, and CBR a (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Na, m iPotential, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and Unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Swell test 1 condition. CBR based on field compacted state. 1 Properties represent average values. I Soil Sample Date: 10/21/2021 1 Loc: On -site, Zone 1 Desc: Lower -bound, predominant soil range �18.3% 12L.I% 20 - Authorization By: aisttae Cantmt, W (Ckc) Print Name: Graphics powered byMathematica Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report ("CDR") is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("Fill') and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (®) and non -registered trademark designations Version: 2.31.1 - 7.2 PLATE A.116b R NE Project Number: 21-25640 Project Name: Cattleman's Crossing Project Owner: Ashton Woods - Dallas Division Control Specifications and References Min % of Max Dry Density 95% Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO Compacted Fill Property Requirements Air Voids Percentage 7.2% Factor of Safety 1.6 Design Compaction Conditions Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 Compactor CAT 563 Dynamic High USCS Classification SC Ranges Specific Gravity 2.66 2.66 - 2.70 Liquid Limit (%) 33 31 - 35 Plasticity Index (%) 19 17 - 21 Plastic Limit (%) 14 % Fines (Passing #200) 30 26 - 32 % Gravel (Retained #4) 4 4 - 38 % Sand (Passing #4) 66 30 - 70 RECT'" Compaction Design Report Fill: Foundation Report Number: 25640-03 Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 1/27/2022 Produced By: Gary Hougardy Lift Properties at 95% Compaction on Construction Curve t Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance (%) 10.4 14.6 t1% MC y (Ibs/ft3) 114.2 114.2 f2.0% S (%) 60.9 85.9 f3% e 0.45 0.45 t3% Na (%) 12.2 4.4 f3% co Potential (%) +6.7 +2.4 f3% UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 4,952 4,099 ±20% c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 1,476 1,321 ±10% 0 (°) ASTM D 2850 28 24 ±10% Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 2.2 0.9 ±25% CBR* (%) Soaked 1.0 4.2 ±10% CBR* (%) Unsoaked 41.3 7.4 ±10% Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 1,436 6,421 ±10% Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 27,664 9,188 ±10% 5 4 I _ . C.ocsr. Curve 1■■■■■ 4 rt Lift t Gnstructiau Curse _N'Iaist e Cantmt, W (arc) Graphics powered by Mathematica Construction Control Specifications Minimum % of Maximum Dry Density Construction Curve 95% Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Ranae for 95% 11.9% - 14.6% (t1% MC) Minimum # of Roller Passes 7 (Equiv 4 roundtno passes, full lift coverage required) Compaction curves should be obtained regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. M-D probe depths should be centered on the center of the compacted lift. t c and m - Unsaturated triaxial test, total stress soil parameter. UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. Measured values include u, y, UCS, c, m Free Swell, and CBR (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Na, m Potential, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and Unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Swell test condition. * CBR based on field compacted state. 1 Properties represent average values. Soil Sample Date: 10/21/2021 Loc: On -site, Zone 2 Desc: Upper -bound, full soil range Authorization By: Print Name: Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report ("CDR") is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("Fill') and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (®) and non -registered trademark designations Version: 2.31.1 - 7.2 PLATE A.116c R NE Project Number: 21-25640 Project Name: Cattleman's Crossing Project Owner: Ashton Woods - Dallas Division Control Specifications and References Min % of Max Dry Density 95% Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO Compacted Fill Property Requirements Air Voids Percentage 7.2% Factor of Safety 1.0 Design Compaction Conditions Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 Compactor CAT 563 Static USCS Classification CH Ranges Specific Gravity 2.69 2.66 - 2.70 Liquid Limit (%) 74 72 - 76 Plasticity Index (%) 52 50 - 54 Plastic Limit (%) 22 % Fines (Passing #200) 96 94 - 98 % Gravel (Retained #4) 0 0-0 % Sand (Passing #4) 4 2-6 1-Da - RECT'" Compaction Design Report Fill: Foundation Report Number: 25640-04 Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 1/27/2022 Produced By: Gary Hougardy Lift Properties at 95% Compaction on Construction Curve t Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance (%) 19.9 23.9 t1% MC y (Ibs/ft3) 94.9 94.9 f1.9% S (%) 69.6 83.8 f3% e 0.77 0.77 t3% Na (%) 13.2 7.1 f3% co Potential (%) +8.7 +4.6 f3% UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 3,795 3,751 ±20% c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 1,278 1,445 ±10% 0 (°) ASTM D 2850 22 15 ±10% Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 5.3 1.9 ±25% CBR* (%) Soaked 0.5 2.4 ±10% CBR* (%) Unsoaked 14.0 3.4 ±10% Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 800 3,654 ±10% Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 13,839 5,071 ±10% '4 L •« - CV1t8[. + wee 1■■■■ '«-- - - - -- 7-kv « k«` Lift Construction Curve ca : i 1-ffc y 99_9lbs/ft- -Moisture Co4ltent, ra (%) K Graphics powered by Mathematica Construction Control Specifications Minimum % of Maximum Dry Density Construction Curve 95% Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Ranae for 95% 21.0% - 23.9% (t1% MC) Minimum # of Roller Passes 8 (Equiv 4 roundtrip passes, full lift coverage required) Compaction curves should be obtained regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. M-D probe depths should be centered on the center of the compacted lift. t c and m - Unsaturated triaxial test, total stress soil parameter. UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. Measured values include u, y, UCS, c, m Free Swell, and CBR (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Na, m Potential, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and Unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Swell test condition. * CBR based on field compacted state. 1 Properties represent average values. Soil Sample Date: 10/21/2021 Loc: On -site, Zone 2 Desc: Lower -bound, predominant soil range Authorization By: Print Name: Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report ("CDR") is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("Fill') and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (®) and non -registered trademark designations Version: 2.31.1 - 7.2 PLATE A.116d R NE Project Number: 21-25640 Project Name: Cattleman's Crossing Project Owner: Ashton Woods - Dallas Division Control Specifications and References Min % of Max Dry Density 96% Lab Reference Standard ASTM D 698 (SP) Resilient Modulus Method AASHTO Compacted Fill Property Requirements Air Voids Percentage 7.2% Factor of Safety 1.0 Design Compaction Conditions Loose Lift Thickness (in) 9 Compactor CAT 563 Static USCS Classification CH Ranges Specific Gravity 2.69 2.66 - 2.70 Liquid Limit (%) 82 80 - 84 Plasticity Index (%) 56 54 - 58 Plastic Limit (%) 26 % Fines (Passing #200) 99 97 - 99 % Gravel (Retained #4) 0 0-0 % Sand (Passing #4) 1 1-3 RECT'" Compaction Design Report Fill: Foundation Report Number: 25640-05 Remarks: Subgrade Reconstruction Report Date: 1/27/2022 Produced By: Gary Hougardy Lift Properties at 96% Compaction on Construction Curve t Dry Side' Wet Side' Tolerance (%) 21.4 25.1 f1% MC y (Ibs/ft3) 93.3 93.3 f1.9% S (%) 72.1 84.4 f3% e 0.80 0.80 t3% Na (%) 12.4 6.9 f3% co Potential (%) +8.3 +4.6 f3% UCS (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2166 3,453 3,348 ±20% c (Ibs/ft2) ASTM D 2850 1,177 1,313 ±10% 0 (°) ASTM D 2850 21 14 ±10% Free Swell (%) ASTM D 4546 5.7 2.1 ±25% CBR* (%) Soaked 0.5 2.4 ±10% CBR* (%) Unsoaked 12.1 2.9 ±10% Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Soaked 713 3,531 ±10% Res Mod (Ibs/in2) Unsoaked 12,626 4,417 ±10% •4 J'.�� •5 ...... ZAV *•'. Lab c-i at 961�C compaction Dr-y- Side: 24-9 c Wet Side: 29-4 cr I:ift Construction Cun-e•, w : 22-6% •'t. y - (?7-2 lbs/fP 96 compaction AST11 D 698 (SP)* 9331bs;`f --- ---- ------ ri-26-6q '•. 91.5lbs?fO r • 22.6 '25.1% zv Massture Content_ &, f I ** ASTM D 698 (SP) equivalent, corrected to control relative moisture standard in construction. Graphics powered by Mathematica Construction Control Specifications Minimum % of Maximum Dry Density Construction Curve 96% ASTM D 698 (SP) 102% Wet -of -Optimum Moisture Ranae for 96% 22.6 - 25.1% (fl% MC) Minimum # of Roller Passes 8 (Equiv. 4 roundtrip passes, full lift coverage required) Compaction curves should be obtained regularly with changes in material index properties and upon change in color or texture for effective construction control. M-D probe depths should be centered on the center of the compacted lift. t c and m - Unsaturated triaxial test, total stress soil parameter. UCS - Unconfined Compressive Strength. Measured values include u, y, UCS, c, m Free Swell, and CBR (soaked and unsoaked). Calculated values include S, e, Na, w Potential, and Resilient Modulus (soaked and unsoaked). Wet side permeability in field not factored in Free Swell test condition. * CBR based on field compacted state. I Properties represent average values. Soil Sample Date: 10/21/2021 Loc: On site, Zone 2 Desc: Lower -bound, full soil range Authorization By: Print Name: Date: Firm Reg.#: Use of this Compaction Design Report ("CDR") is subject to all copyrights and shall comply with the terms and conditions of all software licenses applicable to the generation of this report. This CDR may be used in practice solely for design analysis purposes for the above fill lift ("Fill') and Project, and the use of this CDR for any other use or fill lift other than that Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. This report applies only to lifts compacted over stiff and well -compacted lifts and subgrades. No part of this CDR may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted, or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in writing by Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduction of any part of this CDR must contain all copyright notices and registered trademark designations (®) and non -registered trademark designations Version: 2.31.1 - 7.2 PLATE A.116e APPENDIX A ul XoFM $ ® - ■ ' SCALE: N cdo P,y d/ PC c� a° tR°a —For[ Worth-- _ -- arunca.e_ as,et Read N -9VOndu,2 iGM 71R � / Avondale Q —'y Lane 0 N R ONGE N G E EST: 1972 PLATE A.1 PROJECT NO: 21-25640 VICINITY MAP FILE NAME: 2125640.DWG DRAWN BY: CM DATE: 1-19-2022 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: BETWEEN N. SAGINAW BLVD. AND US HWY 287 FORT WORTH, TEXAS REVISED BY: DATE: APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 1-19-2022 X :l• po,R I _ � i m 15' SS EWIN 7 �'B68s`szBC92 \` m 10 10 4` ` PLATE A.3a PROJECT NO: FILE NAME: 21-25640 2125640.DWG R E BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM DRAWN BY: CM DATE: 6-28-2022 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING REVISED BY: DATE: E N G E E R I N G BETWEEN N. SAGINAW BLVD. AND US HWY 287 REVISED BY: DATE: FORT WORTH, TEXAS EST: 1972 APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 6-28-2022 -- — —— ---1 0 m !4B-110B-1-07I�B-1 Q$ r ®LOTS REQUIRED 4 FEET OF SUBGRADE MODIFICATION FROM FINAL PAD ELEVATION PROJECT NO: 21-25640 PLATEA.3b FILE NAME: 2125640.DWG R ONG GROUND MODIFICATION ZONES DIAGRAM DRAWN BY: CM DATE: 6-28-2022 E N G E CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING BETWEEN N. SAGINAW BLVD. AND US HWY 287 REVISED BY: REVISED BY: DATE: DATE: EST: 1972 FORT WORTH, TEXAS APPROVED BY: CT DATE: 6-28-2022 Log Project No. B-1 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.962850 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.42034' W End of Day Not Measured _ a O~ w V1 = a N °Y' w o Q, V) C A! o U L E O Y Stratum Description (D- -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y 4; N O N a V) > N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 813.0 feet � O � ran C r0 M a X a w LL-PL-PI 2 u CL L O. � o C V) O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U -%FAT CLAY (CH) - brown / 4.5+ 21 J / 4.5+ 93 74-24-50 20 2.3 107 5 — // 4.5+ 20 J 4.50 19 105 9,690 / 4.50 21 10— / 800.0 X WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 50/5" 10 797.0 LIMESTONE - gray n i s 50/'/4' 20 793.0 50/%" 12 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 822.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 9.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.4 Log Project No. B-2 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.962290 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.420320 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O 0 w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 818.0 feet � O H ran CM y> a X a w LL-PL-PI CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC) - brown — b 4.5+ 41 JY 4.5+ 5 � 4.5+ — 4.5+ 810.0 XWEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams50/6" 10 806.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/3/4' _ 15—= 50/%" Z S 50/'/2' 20 798.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 826.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 8.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) EN 0 a 2 rn 0 =11U 36-21-15 8 5 8 9 6 9 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.5 Log Project No. B-3 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961710 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.42035' W End of Day Not Measured O~ V1 N o O V) _ '= ° U L E O Y Stratum Description (D- -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y 4; N O N a V) > N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 820.0 feet � O � ran = r0 M a X a w LL-PL-PI 2 CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC) - brown — b 4.5+ 6 4.5+ 11 5 4.5+ 35 37-22-15 6 0.0 105 7-21-28 1e,X812.0 N=49 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 15-37-50/5" 10 t i 20 800.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 826.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.0 Feet Fill 50/1" 50/3/4' 50/1" 50/'/2' 9 12 5 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.6 Log Project No. B-4 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961180 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.42033' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N o O V) _ '= ° U L ~ O E Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a a M 0 to E y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O � = r0 a X M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 820.0 feet ran w LL-PL-PI CLAY (CH) - brown, calcareous nodules -%FAT 4.50 20 / J / 4.50 20 5 4.50 7 � / 813.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 18-34-39 N=73 21 45-21-24 4 50/2" 7 50/'/2' 10— 807.0 LIMESTONE - gray =i 50/13/" 3 50/3/4" i n i i = 50/'/2' 50/%" 800.0 s 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 827.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 7.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 = O in 0 =11 U Plate A.7 Log Project No. B-5 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960570 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.42034' W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R w o V) O N 0 i to `mE o Stratum Description 0o �> U £., o_= Z o a J >Z T a E M O i7to w Surface Elevation = 825.0 feet ul � rn CO aaApproximate W y> w LL-PL-PI b CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC) - brown — 4.5+ JY 4.5+ 821.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 1 J "W' 810.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 20 T 805.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 831.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 20-50/4" 50/%" 31-50/3%" 50/'/2' 50/3/4' 50/%" 50/%" e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.8 Log Project No. B-6 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960020 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.42034' W End of Day Not Measured _ c O w V1 = a °Y' w N o d y C A! o U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E o __ Z =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M w N O N 'O Vl > N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 831.0 feet �� O � a rn (D (D a X R m a rn o LL-PL-PI 2 FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, calcareous nodules 4.5+ 96 66-27-39 16 829.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams E f 818.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z �i 20 = 811.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 833.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill 27-22-19 N=41 11-22-24 N=46 36-28-50/4" 50/6" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 5 5 10 6 If Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.9 Log Project No. B-7 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959450 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.420320 J W End of Day Not Measured _ O a w V1 = a °�'' w N o Q, V) C A! O U L E ~ O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a 0 to a E M y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O � C r0 a X M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 836.0 feet � ran w LL-PL-PI FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with sand, calcareous nodules —% 4.5+ 15 / u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U / 4.5+ 82 51-21-30 12 -1.0 102 5 — X830.0 9-7-616 N=13 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams X 50/3" 8 50/Y4' 6 10 50/%" 825.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 50/Y4' 7 1 J 50/%" 3 S n i g 50/Ya" T 816.0 50/%" i 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 838.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.10 Log Project No. B-8 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958890 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.420320 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O 0 w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a X a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown, calcareous nodules 4.5+ 17N=27 3 27 5 — 10-12-27 N=39 4.5+ j 4.5+ 91 10 / 831.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 829.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/3/4' _ 15—= 50/%" Z S 50/%" 20 821.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 844.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 14 6 9 21 47-20-27 13 0 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.11 Log Project No. B-9 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958290 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.42035' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N o O V) _ '= ° U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 847.0 feet .O+N � O � ran = r0 M a X a w LL-PL-PI 2 —% FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, calcareous nodules 4.5+ J 4.5+ 843.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) -light brown, with sand 5 j f .0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan .0 LIMESTONE - gray �i 20 = 827.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 846.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut 4.5+ 18 24 14 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 = O rn 0 =11 U 4.5+ 84 41-19-22 15 1.8 101 50/3%" 8 50/Y4' 50/%" 6 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.12 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-10 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.957730 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.420360 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 855.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U E f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, calcareous nodules 4.5+ 853.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 842.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1�70 � Z 20 = 835.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet 13-17-22 N=39 8-10-11 N=21 43-50/3" 50/6" 50/1 %" 50/3/4' 50/3/4' 50/'/2' 14 8 15 10 11 10 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.13 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-11 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959430 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.419650 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown 4.5+ 5 j 4.5+ 89 41-18-23 9 836.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 828.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 =40 820.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 837.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Cut 14-16-14 13 N=30 3-50/6" 14 50/3" 6 50/1" 50/'/2' 7 50/'/2' 50/%" u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.14 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-12 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960020 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41969' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N o O V) _ '= ° U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 832.0 feet .O+N � O ran = r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 %/ SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown ��4.5+ 12 830.0 X WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 16-37-50/3" 4 5 X 50/5" 53 29-14-15 5 823.0 LIMESTONE - gray 10— S Z 1� 20 812.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 833.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 15-45-50/3'/2" 50/4" 50/3/4' 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 12 5 10 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 = O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.155 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-13 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960550 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.419680 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 826.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 E f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - brown 4.5+ 824.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 815.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 1� S 20 T 806.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 830.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill 11-28-36 N=64 6-15-30 N=45 12-9-9 N=18 13-26-50/5" 50/3/4' 50/'/2' 50/3/4' 50/%" 21 4 14 16 86 36-14-22 14 7 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.16 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-14 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961150 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41969' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O O y O 'w j N O o M W .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 828.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U b CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC) - brown — 4.50 16 53-25-28 4 f 826.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 815.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1�70 � Z 20 = i 808.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 827.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 32-9-13 N=22 25-34-20 N=54 16-38-29 N=67 8-50/5" 50/2'/2' 50/'/2' 50/1" 50/%" 2 7 5 11 7 Plate A.17 Log Project No. B-15 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961720 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41969' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a or M a' 0 3 c o Approximate Surface Elevation = 830.0 feet 3: O rn a W a rn LL-PL-PI 2 rn 0 O U WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams x 18-40-18 3 N=58 5 10 818.0 LIMESTONE - gray 11-12-8 12 N=20 30-50/3" 9 42-50/5'/i 10 8-16-35 98 54-20-34 21 N=51 50/2 /2' 7 _ 15—= 50/2" Z S 50/3/4' 20 810.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 825.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 5.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.18 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-16 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961720 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41902' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 831.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U f %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown ��4.50 829.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 819.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 811.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 831.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 10-11-13 N=24 11-14-15 76 N=29 12-11-15 N=26 16-17-20 N=37 50/3/4' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 12 8 6 11 8 7 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.19 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-17 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961130 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.418980 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 830.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown 11828. 4.5+ 10 828.0 X WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 18-50/4" 4 5 X 12-38-50/2" 6 X 50/1" 78 24-12-12 5 18-25-46 18 N=71 820.0 10 L LIMESTONE - gray S 4p 50/1'/" 3 15— = 50/'/2' S _ 50/'/2' 20 810.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 831.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.20 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-18 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960580 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41900' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N o O V) _ '= ° U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description (D - -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o (D d a O. a a 0 to E M y 4; N O N a V) > N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 832.0 feet � O ran = r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 E f FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.50 830.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 820.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 =4f 812.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 833.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 15-29-29 N=58 50/'/4' 10-18-21 N=39 7-15-20 N=35 50/1" 50/3/4 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 20 4 4 8 95 50-17-33 15 7 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.21 Log Project No. B-19 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960010 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.41900' W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 833.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.5+ 831.0 12(1 CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC) -brown e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 15 1—a'7' j� 4.5+ 30 68-19-49 5 829.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 5— X 50/4" 3 50/'/4' 7 825.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/3/4' 4 10 50/'/4' Z _ 50/1" 7 15—= 50/'/2' S 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 20 813.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 833.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.22 Log B-20 Project No. 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 RiEOERIFNG Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date ENG 32.959470 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-20-21 EST: 1972 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.419010 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description �> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown 5 —% 10 15 20� 820.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 837.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 4.5+ 20 4.5+ 7 4.5+ 92 31-16-15 7 0.6 115 4.5+ 11 4.5+ 11 4.5+ 6 4.5+ 12 Plate A.23 Log Project No. B-21 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958860 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.418330 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a m E > °gym 0 ya 'w� a o o M w 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 844.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown ��4.50 842.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 827.0 LIMESTONE - gray �i 20 = 824.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 838.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.0 Feet Cut 18-31-22 N=53 11-13-14 N=27 12-13-18 N=31 36-21-27 N=48 30-25-26 N=51 50/3/4' 50/%" 14 13 12 22 M Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.24 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-22 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959450 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.418330 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 838.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown 4.50 j 4.50 j 5 — j 4.50 e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 17 19 17 / 4.50 94 39-17-22 13 7.9 117 830.0 XWEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams50/4" 10 826.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/'/2' _ '/2' 15—= 50/ Z S 50/%" 20 818.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 836.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 7 5 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.25 Log Project No. B-23 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959980 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.418320 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 834.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.50 J e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U m / 4.50 89 65-21-44 17 4.4 93 5 — / 4.50 18 828.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams — X 15-20-22 N=42 10 x 50/%" 6 10 / \823.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 50/%" 5 ` 1 J 50/'/4 S —_ 50/%" T 814.0 50/%" 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 835.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.26 Log Project No. B-24 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.960580 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.418310 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 833.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U f %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown ��4.50 831.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 822.0 LIMESTONE - gray S S 20 T 813.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 834.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 12 9-11-13 7 N=24 50/%" 4 50/%" 40 22-13-9 4 50/%" 5 50/1" 5 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.27 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-25 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961150 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.418330 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O O y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 832.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U %/ SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown, with gravel / 4.50 57 43-21-22 8 830.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f X818.0 LIMESTONE -gray 15— 1 S Z 812.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 833.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 32-25-17 N=42 50/%" 50/4" 20-18-44 N=62 50/3" 50/'/2' 50/%" 2 4 12 10 3 Plate A.28 Log Project No. B-26 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961720 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.418380 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 829.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown ��4.50 14 827.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 816.0 LIMESTONE - gray 22-50/3" 4 17-23-30 gg 10 N=53 50/%" 8 15-24-30 9 N=54 50/3/4' 70 1 � 50/'/4' 7 � Z 50/'/2' 20 = 809.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 830.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.29 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-27 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.962300 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.417960 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E Z o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 825.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a N LL-PL-PI 2 E f FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.50 823.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 813.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 =4f 805.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 829.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill 12-13-16 N=29 23-24-40 N=64 50/%" 22-30-33 N=63 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 18 4 6 4 40 44-20-24 8 8 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.30 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-28 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.962880 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.417990 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 821.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O in 0 =11 U CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.5+ 32 / J / 4.5+ 25 5—/ 4.5+ 19 106 6,300 815.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) -light brown j4.5+ 89 35-14-21 9 2.3 127 j J/ 4.5+ 11 10 811.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 807.0 4p LIMESTONE - gray 50/11/2' S 15—= 3 50/1" � S s _ _ i Z i —= 50/11/2" i 20 801.0 50/3/a" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.31 Log Project No. B-29 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961730 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-28-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.417630 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 827.0 feet � O H ran CM y> a W a w LL-PL-PI e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) EN 0 a 2 rn 0 =11U —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.50 96 58-29-29 14 / 825.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams X 50/5" 5 — x 50/%" 50/%" 819.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50P 50/" 10 Z _ 50P 15— 50P _ S 50P 50P 20 807.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 829.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 2 6 5 8 9 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.32 Log Project No. B-30 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961170 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.417630 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 831.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.50 / 829.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) -light brown 4.50 827.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 819.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15— =X Z S 20 =4f 811.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 832.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 28-38-18 15 N=56 50/1'/z' 50/4" 50/1'/2' 50/'/2' 17 8 2 6 15 10 4 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.33 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-31 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960580 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.417630 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O 0 w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 836.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.00 light brown, limestone seams �j 50/2'/�" 5 -X 50/2'/2" 50/3" 87 j 4.5+ 10 826.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 823.0 LIMESTONE - gray =i 50/ 1� �_'� 50/1/1" � Z i 50/1'/2' 20 = 816.0 50/1" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 834.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 13 6 15 43-20-23 11 18 111 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.34 Log Project No. B-32 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960030 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.417610 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.00 light brown, limestone seams 50/3" 5 X 50/3" 50/2'/z' j 4.5+ 90 10 831.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 828.0 LIMESTONE - gray =i 50/23/" ` 1 J �-� 50/2'/z' � Z i 50/2%" 20 = 821.0 50/2%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 840.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 12 7 9 7 22 M Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.35 Log Project No. B-33 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959480 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.41764' W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 844.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.5+ 86 light brown, limestone seams �j 50/3" 5 -X 50/2%" 50/3" j 4.00 10 834.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 831.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/2" 1 J70 50/2" � Z i 50/1 %" 20 = 824.0 50/1%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 10 8 9 10 17 8 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.36 Log Project No. B-34 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958860 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41764' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 845.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.5+ 12 light brown, limestone seams j 23-34-38 N-72 5 X 50/1" 50/1'/z' j 4.00 10 835.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 832.0 LIMESTONE - gray =i 50/21/" 1 J �-'� 50/2'/2' � Z i 50/2%" 20 = 825.0 50/2%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 7 7 20 9 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.37 Log Project No. B-35 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958330 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.417980 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O 0 w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 849.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.50 light brown, limestone seams 18-=46 N46 5 11-86 71 / \ N=1 j� 20-18-18 N=36 21-14-16 N=30 10� j — / 836.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams — X 13-14-15 N=29 1� 833.0 LIMESTONE -gray S r = 50/3" 20 829.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 846.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 14 3 48-18-30 9 9 21 23 13 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.38 Log Project No. B-36 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957760 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.418000 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M � � wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 854.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.50 light brown, limestone seams 33-50/4" 5 X 50/1" 16-21-22 N=43 75 18-20-24 � N=44 10 j — / 841.0 X WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 50/5" 838.0 LIMESTONE -gray S 50/%" 20 834.0 50/'/4' Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 848.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 6.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 18 3 3 17 11 13 11 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.39 Log Project No. B-37 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958030 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.417630 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 850.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.5+ light brown, limestone seams 42-50/1" 5 —� 6 12 18 e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 20 4 N=30 78 33-13-20 6 7-19-16 N=35 j 4.00 10 840.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 838.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/2" 15—= 50/1'/2" Z S 50/2'/2" 20 830.0 50/2" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 847.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 7 IF 9 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.40 Log Project No. B-38 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957720 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41694' W End of Day Not Measured _ O~ a w V1 = a °Y' w N o Q, V) C A! o U L E O Y Stratum Description (D- -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a 0 to a E M y 4; N O N a V) > N _ w O C r0 a W M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 854.0 feet � ran w LL-PL-PI WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 11-11-15 x N=26 5 10 842.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 =40 834.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 849.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 5.0 Feet Cut 50/5" 15-50/3" 50/1'/d' 18-50/5" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.41 Log Project No. B-39 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958300 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.416930 W End of Day Not Measured _ O c w V1 = a °�'' w N o Q, V) C A! O U L E ~ O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a 0 to a E M y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O vi C r0 a W M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 854.0 feet � w LL-PL-PI WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 10-18-37 x N=55 5 10 841.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z 20 = � 834.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 847.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 7.0 Feet Cut 50/1" 50/4" 9-50/4'/2" 50/5'/z' 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.42 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-40 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958870 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.416930 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 852.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U \ / WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams X 50/5'/z' 1 5 10 839.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/4" 7 9-19-8 N=27 55 12 5-50/5'/2" 18 50/4" 10 =i 50/'/4' 1 � �_'� 50/'/2 " 6 � Z i 50/'/2' 20 = 832.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 11.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.43 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-41 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.959440 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41695' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 849.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 18-27-12 x N=39 2 5 10 836.0 LIMESTONE - gray 4-6-8 18 N=14 5-50/5/%" 25 6 13-10-50/4'/2" 12 17-50/1'/i' 11 =i 50/'/4' ` 1 J �_'� 50/'/2' 12 � Z i 50/'/2' 20 = 829.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 842.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 7.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.44 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-42 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960000 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41695' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N o O V) _ '= ° U L E ~ O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a 0 to a E M y O Na V)> N _ W .O+N O = r0 M 2 rn Approximate Surface Elevation = 843.0 feet � ran a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - light brown, with sand 5— j �X j� j _j �j 1 J 828.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 20 823.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 4.5+ 4 15-20-12 9 N=32 4.50 87 43-17-26 16 24-16-14 12 N=30 8-13-14 18 N=27 7-10-27 20 N=37 50/1 %" 7 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 = O rn 0 =11 U Plate A.45 Log Project No. B-43 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960590 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.41696' W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 836.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.5+ j e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 8 4.5+ 93 43-15-28 8 -0.1 92 light brown, limestone seams 7-7-7 12 5—� N=14 V 6N=35 15 35 % 50/2" 16 826.0 10 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 823.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/Y4' 5 1 70 50/%" � Z = i 50/%" 50/%" 816.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 834.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.46 Log Project No. B-44 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961140 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.416970 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 830.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.5+ j J/ 4.5+ 826.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 819.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 1� S 20 T 810.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 831.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 50/3'/z' 50/1'/z' 19-50/5'/i 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/'/2' 10 17 12 5 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.47 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-45 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961720 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.416920 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 827.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.50 j J/ 4.50 823.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 816.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 1� S 20 T 807.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 830.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Fill 12 18 25-50/5'/i' 3 50/11, 80 24-13-11 6 50/4" 7 50/3/4' 50/%" 4 50/'/2' 50/%" u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.48 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-46 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961720 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.416260 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 824.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.50 19 j 821.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 4.50 20 0 810.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15— ='' S _ Z 20 804.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 829.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 5.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 36-34-50/2" 50/4" 50/6" 18-29-50/2" 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 0 0 15 11 Plate A.49 Log Project No. B-47 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961150 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-27-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.416280 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 828.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.50 j J/ 4.50 824.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 817.0 LIMESTONE - gray S S 20 —_ 808.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 830.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill 21 10 16-38-50/1 " 4 50/1" 6 50/1" 6 19-50/6" 98 49-16-33 16 50/1" 50/'/2' 6 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.50 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-48 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960580 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41627' W End of Day Not Measured _ a O~ w V1 = a N °Y' w o Q, V) C A! o U L E O Y Stratum Description (D- -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y 4; N O N a V) > N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 832.0 feet � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown �� 4.50 14 j 4.00 6 j 5 — j 4.00 88 31-17-14 20 826.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 819.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z 20 =i812.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 833.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 13-12-4 N=16 50/%" 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 12 rA 5 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.51 Log Project No. B-49 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.960020 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41627' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O O y O 'w j N O o M W .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 837.0 feet O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) - brown 4.50 66 45-22-23 7 J 10-11-13 N=24 8 832.0 5 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 1 -12 11 11 f i 824.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1�74 � Z 20 =i817.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 50/3/4' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 10 10 4 Plate A.52 Log Project No. B-50 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.959460 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.416280 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 839.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown ��4.50 837.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 825.0 LIMESTONE -gray 15—=- S _ Z 819.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill 10-12-14 88 N=26 11-4-13 N=17 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 5 4 0 8 we 5 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.53 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-51 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958860 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.416260 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 844.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown ��4.50 842.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 830.0 LIMESTONE -gray 15—=- S _ Z 824.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 842.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Cut 14-20-22 N=42 15-17-20 59 N=37 50/'/4' 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 13 10 5 7 8 4 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.54 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-52 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958310 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41627' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 853.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown ��4.50 851.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 839.0 LIMESTONE -gray 15—=- S _ Z 833.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 848.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 5.0 Feet Cut m 12-17-19 53 35-17-18 6 N=36 15-14-21 N=35 50/%" 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 7 8 9 4 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.55 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-53 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957730 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-20-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41627' W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 854.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.5+ j J/ 4.5+ 850.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f 840.0 LIMESTONE -gray 15—=- S _ Z � 834.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 849.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 5.0 Feet Cut 50/6" 50/2" 50/1" 50/3" 50/3" 50/2" 50/2" I� 0 43 33-16-17 5 8 7 8 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.56 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-54 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957700 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.41558' W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M � � wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 851.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.00 light brown, limestone seams �j 50/2" 5 -X 50/1'/4" e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 15 7 12 50/1" 94 43-20-23 11 j 4.5+ 10 841.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 839.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/50/1'Y2' 15— _ 50/50/1 " Z S 50/50/1'Y2' 20 831.0 50/50/1" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 847.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 21 HE Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.57 Log Project No. B-55 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958280 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.41559' W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 848.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 4.00 light brown, limestone seams �j50/1 5 -X 50/2%" 50/2" j 4.00 80 10 838.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 836.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/1 %" _ 15—= 50/1" Z S 50/1" 20 828.0 50/1" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 847.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C 0 C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 15 2 1 7 15 9 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.58 Log Project No. B-56 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958870 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-20-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.415600 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 842.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —� 3.50 28 E f 2 - light brown 0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 839.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Cut 4.5+ 21 4.5+ 22 4.5+ 22 103 9,080 4.00 87 66-20-46 23 2.3 105 3.50 21 3.00 22 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.59 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-57 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.959450 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41559' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 836.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U f %/ LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown ��4.50 834.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 825.0 LIMESTONE - gray S S 20 T 816.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 840.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill 12 9-11-11 7 N=22 50/1 " 4 10-22-23 11 N=45 13-20-21 91 41-20-21 15 N=41 50/3/4' 50/'/2' 4 50/'/2' 50/%" Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.60 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-58 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960040 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.415600 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O~ w V1 = a N °Y' w o Q, V) C A! o U L E O Y Stratum Description (D- -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y 4; N O N a V) > N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 833.0 feet � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.50 19 J / 4.50 21 � 5 4.50 21 — / Jam/ 4.50 83 73-24-49 22 4.3 98 / 4.50 22 10 823.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 821.0 LIMESTONE - gray = � 50/3/4' 6 15— 50/%" Z n � T i s =4f 50/%" 50/%" 813.0 s 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 837.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.61 Log Project No. B-59 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960030 N While Drilling Not Observed 9-29-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.414920 W End of Day Not Measured O~ V1 N Q, V) C U L E O Y Stratum Description (D— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a 0 to a E M y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O C r0 a W M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 830.0 feet � ran w LL-PL-PI CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.50 21 / / 4.50 20 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U 5 4.50 94 75-25-50 21 8.4 93 — 4.50 17 / 4.50 19 10— 818.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 50/1" 3 15- 3 ' 814.0 LIMESTONE - gray n i s 50/'/2' 50/%" 7 20 810.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 834.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.62 Log Project No. B-60 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.959470 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-20-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41495' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 835.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —� 4.5+ 27 E f IN W, - light brown 15.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 836.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 4.5+ 95 62-18-44 21 4.6 100 4.00 19 3.00 22 3.00 21 2.50 23 2.50 18 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.63 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-61 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958890 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-20-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.414920 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 838.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.5+ 27 J / 4.5+ 88 67-21-46 18 5 — / 4.5+ 832.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan f 824.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=- S _ Z � 818.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 837.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut 50/4" 50/3" 50/4" 50/4" 50/3" 50/3" 7 17 1K 9 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.64 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-62 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958010 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-20-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41491' W End of Day Not Measured _ c O w V1 = a °�'' w N o d y C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E o __ Z =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M w N O N 'O Vl j N Approximate Surface Elevation = 843.0 feet 3: O rn a W a rn LL-PL-PI 2 FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —% 4.5+ 92 69-29-40 24 / 841.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan E f 829.0 LIMESTONE -gray 15—=- S _ Z � 823.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 840.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Cut 50/5" 50/1" 50/2" 50/3" 50/4" 50/4" 50/3" 50/3" 2 2 2 3 9 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.65 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-63 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.962880 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41558' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 827.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown — 2.00 23 4.00 94 75-28-47 26 7.7 89 E f IN W, - light brown 0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 828.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 4.00 26 4.5+ 26 3.00 26 3.00 10 4.5+ 19 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.66 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-64 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.962310 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41559' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N O V) _ U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 826.0 feet .O+N � O ran = r0 M a IY a N LL-PL-PI 2 -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 3.50 27 J / 4.5+ 21 5 — // 4.5+ 21 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a = O rn 0 =11 U — 4.5+ 90 77-22-55 22 7.3 101 818.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) -light brown, limestone seams / 4.5+ 9 10 j813.0 \ / WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan �( 50/1" 5 ' 1J 3 s — i n i i s s 50/2" 8 s 20 806.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 828.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.67 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-65 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961730 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41558' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N O V) _ U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 825.0 feet .O+N � O ran = r0 M a W a N LL-PL-PI 2 u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a = O in 0 =11 U CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 3.00 27 / J / 4.5+ 18 5 — // 4.5+ 18 — / 4.5+ 18 Jam/ / 4.5+ 90 70-22-48 18 2.8 101 10 815.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) -light brown, limestone seams j j 812.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan \ / �( 50/4" 6 ' 1J 3 s i n i i s s 50/1" 10 s 20 805.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 828.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.68 Log Project No. B-66 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961730 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41494' W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 829.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.00 28 J / 4.5+ 16 5 — // 4.5+ 17 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U 4.5+ 91 63-18-45 16 8.1 104 / 4.5+ 13 10— / 816.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan \ / x 50/6" 5 3 s i n i i s s 50/3" 10 s 201809.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 830.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.69 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-67 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961710 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.414240 W End of Day Not Measured _ O a w V1 = a °�'' w N o Q, V) C A! O U L E ~ O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a 0 to a E M y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O C r0 a W M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 834.0 feet ran w LL-PL-PI CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 3.50 26 / J / 4.5+ 21 5 — / 4.5+ 93 66-22-44 16 J 4.5+ 4.5+ 10— / 821.0 \ / WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan �( 50/3" ' 1J 3 s i n i i s s 50/4" 20 814.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 834.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 13 In 14 15 u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O in 0 =11 U Plate A.70 Log Project No. B-68 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961770 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.413560 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 839.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —� 3.50 14 5 4.50 56 13 4.50 8 - light brown, limestone seams 14-13-14 16 N=27 _I 10-000, _ 15— J 20_� 819.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 836.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 5-7-10 16 N=17 4.5+ 21 4.00 10 Plate A.71 Log Project No. B-69 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.961780 N While Drilling Not Observed Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.412890 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a m £ > °gy m ° 4) 'w � a o M w 16M a O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o =11 U - Unable to be drilled due to gas line easement 5- 10- 15- 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.72 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-70 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961170 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41494' W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 829.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O in 0 =11 U CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.00 24 / / 4.5+ 17 5 — 4.5+ 15 — 4.5+ 23 821.0 GRAVELY FAT CLAY (CH) -brown —/ 10—�/ 4.5+ 61 64-15-49 12 4.8 115 J/ 816.0 LIMESTONE -gray —= s 50/1'/2" 6 1 J 50/1 i n i i = 50/3/4' 50/%" 809.0 s 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 833.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.73 Log Project No. B-71 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961170 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.414240 W End of Day Not Measured _ O a w V1 = a °�'' w N o Q, V) C A! O U L E ~ O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. a 0 to a E M y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O C r0 a W M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 833.0 feet � ran w LL-PL-PI CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.5+ 28 / / 4.5+ 22 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U 5 — 4.5+ 95 66-24-42 17 8.6 99 J 4.5+ 4.5+ 10— 820.0 LIMESTONE -gray s == 50//1 50 i n i i i 50/'/2' 20 = 813.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 835.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill 17 m 0 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.74 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-72 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961160 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.413550 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 838.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.5+ 28 / J / 4.5+ 17 834.0 LEAN CLAY (CL) -light brown, with limestone seams 5 4.5+ 7 j 4.5+ 70 6 -0.2 95 j — j 4.5+ 5 10 j825.0 LIMESTONE -gray =i 50/1'/4' 6 50/1" i n i i = i 50/1" 50/%" 818.0 i 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 839.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.75 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-73 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961170 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.412880 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 842.0 feet � O H ran CM y> a W a N LL-PL-PI e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) EN 0 a 2 rn 0 =11U -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.5+ 94 62-20-42 26 J 4.5+ 5 — 4.5+ — 4.5+ 834.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 24-30-37 N=67 10 t 30-38-42 N=80 E 50/6" 2u 822.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 840.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 25 24 24 4 4 4 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.76 Log Project No. B-74 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961180 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.412210 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R w o V) O N t) i to `mE o Stratum Description 0o �> U £., o== Z o a J >Z T a M � � wul O i7to M _N w O H CO a W y> a Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet ran w LL-PL-PI FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —% J/ 1837.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams 5— 50/5" 2 x 9-21-50/5" 13-33-50/1" 10 830.0 LIMESTONE -gray S 50/1 /4" 1 J 50/'/4 � S —_i 50/1" T 821.0 50/'/2' 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 22 21 1 13 19 15 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.77 Log Project No. B-75 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.961170 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.411510 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O~ w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U L E O Y Stratum Description (D— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 24 J u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U / 85 79-20-59 20 7.2 94 837.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 1 J "W' 826.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 20 T 821.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 50/4" 50/5%" 50/1" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/2%" 50P 5 9 10 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.78 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-76 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.960590 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.410860 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 843.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.50 94 / 841.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams f ` 828.0 1 J LIMESTONE - gray S T 823.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 50/'/4' 50/'/4' 26-2%" 50/1'/2' 50/1 %" 50/1 %" 50R/4" 23 8 13 111 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.79 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-77 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960600 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.411520 W End of Day Not Measured V1 N d y C _ a w = a °�'' w o o o (D- L) E" 0 °' J d U E Y Stratum Description -1 > o _ =o a a >, a R o 0 to E a>i a; uoi H m a 'w > a _ C r0 M w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet O ran a X a w LL-PL-PI 2 -%FAT CLAY (CH) -dark brown /3.00 24 839.0 X WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 21-19-36 29 65-17-48 8 N=55 0 50/2" 5— 50/1 %" 7 50/5" 8 10 831.0 50/4' '/2 J— LIMESTONE - gray S 50/'/2' 9 15— = 50/%" S _ 50/%" 20 � 821.0 50/%"Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers u a y L C' � o c w ca 3 c o in 0 =11 U Plate A.80 Log Project No. B-78 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960590 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.412210 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O~ w V1 = a N °Y' w o Q, V) C A! o U L E O Y Stratum Description (D- -1 > L) E� Z o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y 4; N O N a V) > N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet � O ran C r0 M a W a N LL-PL-PI 2 —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 10 J/ 85 75-17-58 28 1836.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan f 827.0 LIMESTONE -gray _ X13 � Z =i820.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 840.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 20-16-11 4 N=27 10-50/3" 9 12-23-12 16 N=35 50/6" 10 50/1'/4' 50R/4' 10 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.81 Log Project No. B-79 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.960600 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-21-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.412870 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 838.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.5+ 29 / J / 4.5+ 23 94 7,400 5 — / 4.5+ 89 65-28-37 15 8.5 104 832.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan f iE 818.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 838.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 28-32-37 2 N=69 30-38-41 4 N=79 42-50/2" 6 50/4" 8 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.82 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-80 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.960030 N While Drilling SZ 12 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.412900 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 835.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —� 4.00 30 E f 2 - brown 15.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 835.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill U 2.50 29 4.00 23 4.5+ 90 21 4.3 101 3.00 23 2.00 27 2.50 22 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.83 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-81 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960050 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.412190 W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N Q, V) C U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 839.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.50 28 / J / 4.50 25 5 — // 4.50 25 — / 4.50 20 Jam/ 4.50 89 63-19-44 20 3.3 110 10— J/ 827.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/1" 15- 3 s i n 821.0 i LIMESTONE - gray i = 50/3/4' i 20 � 819.0 50/'/z" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 842.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Fill m 12 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.84 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-82 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960040 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.411500 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 E f -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.5+ 24 J / 4.5+ 92 66-21-45 21 837.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan, clay seams 825.0 LIMESTONE - gray S 20 � 82 1. 0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 28-50/5'/2" 19-50/4" 50/1" 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 2 12 12 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.85 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-83 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960050 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.410870 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E Z o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 842.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a N LL-PL-PI 2 -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.5+ 94 23-37-34 / N=71 838.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan f 828.0 LIMESTONE -gray 15—=qW S _ Z � 822.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 50/2%" 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/3/4' 50/%" 22 8 0 13 8 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.86 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-84 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.960040 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.410160 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 844.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 3.50 25 j u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O in 0 =11 U / 4.5+ 85 42-16-26 7 0.4 102 840.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/5" 5— 50/%" 6 f 832.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 =40 824.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 844.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 50/1" 50/3/4' 10 50/Y4' 50/%" 9 50/%" 50/%" Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.87 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-85 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959470 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.40948' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N o O to = '= ° U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E o __ Z =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M w N O N 'O Vl j N Approximate Surface Elevation = 847.0 feet 3: O rn a W a rn LL-PL-PI 2 FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —% 3.00 94 56-20-36 25 / 845.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan f 834.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z �i 20 = 827.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 847.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/3/4' 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 50/1 /8" 4 rA 8 Plate A.88 Log Project No. B-86 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959470 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41014' W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 844.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown J/ 1840.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan 831.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z �i 20 = 824.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 845.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 20-50/2" 30 50/1" 50/2" 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 18 18 0 9 10 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.89 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-87 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959460 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41083' W End of Day Not Measured O V1 N o O V) _ '= ° U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E o __ Z =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N M w .O+N n a- E.(, Rm o Approximate Surface Elevation = 842.0 feet � O rn a W a rn LL-PL-PI 2 FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —% 4.5+ 91 62-21-41 18 J/ 4.5+ 1838.0 S WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/3'/" 5— 50/'/4' f 829.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z �i 20 = 822.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 50/1 " 50/'/2' 50/1'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/%" 19 9 9 9 u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 = O in 0 =11 U Plate A.90 Log Project No. B-88 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.959480 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.411520 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.5+ J 4.5+ 5 — 41 4.5+ e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 27 21 22 99 14,360 — 4.5+ 94 91-22-69 24 6.6 95 833.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/'/2' 10 50/%" 9-21-30 L 826.0 N=51 1 LIMESTONE - gray S �i 50/3/4' 20 T 821.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 844.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 11 18 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.91 Log Project No. B-89 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas 9GE NVG Latitude Date E R Water Level Observations (feet) 32.959450 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.412190 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) N d V) C C O tL a+ O }' d .- a E Q Stratum Description o= __ o = a y £ > .O+ O o y O 'w j N O o M w 16M a or M a' 0 3 c o Approximate Surface Elevation = 839.0 feet O rn a W a rn LL-PL-PI 2 rn 0 O U -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.5+ 27 J / 4.5+ 21 5 — // 4.5+ 94 75-21-54 22 6.3 91 — 4.5+ 21 831.0 XWEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan10-50/1'/i" 23 10 48-29-20 11 L 824.0 N=49 1 LIMESTONE - gray S 50/'/2' 20 T 819.0 50/%" 6 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.92 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-90 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.959470 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.412900 W End of Day Not Measured = 0- y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 838.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —� 2.75 29 5 10- - light brown, limestone seams 15— /� J/ 20 818.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 839.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 3.75 19 4.5+ 17 2.50 21 3.00 100 60-18-42 22 0.2 107 50/5" 20 4-9-48 26 N=57 Plate A.93 Log Project No. B-91 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958870 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.412850 W End of Day Not Measured O~ V1 N Q, V) C U L E O Y Stratum Description (D— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 838.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U -%FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.25 34 J / 4.5+ 89 12 1.1 101 5 — // 4.5+ 13 — / 4.5+ 16 Jam/ / 4.5+ 13 10— / 825.0 X WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/1" 10 1J 3 s i n 820.0 i LIMESTONE - gray i —= 50/1'/2' i 20 � 818.0 50/'/z" 14 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 838.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.94 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-92 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958900 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.412160 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U E f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.50 / 838.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan 827.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1370 � Z 20 = i 820.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 840.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 19-33-45 N=78 39-50/2" 72 50/1" 50/1 %" 50/3/4' 50/1" 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" 24 14 14 3 3 29 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.95 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-93 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958890 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.411500 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.5+ J 4.5+ 1837.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan 828.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z �i 20 = 821.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 844.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 3.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 18-20-25 N=45 50/1 " 50/'/4' 50/1'/2' 50/1'/2' 50/'/2' 50/'/2' e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.96 Log Project No. B-94 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958900 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.410860 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 843.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 E f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.50 / 841.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan 830.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15� Z S 20 ±9823.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 844.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 22-19-13 N=32 50/1" 27 50/1 " 15 3 6 11 9 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.97 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-95 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958870 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.410160 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O 0 w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 845.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a W a w LL-PL-PI —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.5+ J 4.5+ 5 — / 4.5+ 50 839.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan f 832.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z 20 = � 825.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 846.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 50/%" 50/1" 50/'/2' e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 20 17 5 -0.6 102 9 7 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.98 Log Project No. B-96 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958890 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.40947' W End of Day Not Measured _ a w O V1 = a °�'' w N o Q, V) C A! O U L ~ O E Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. 0 a a M to E y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O C r0 a W M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 847.0 feet ran w LL-PL-PI CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 3.00 25 / J / 4.5+ 78 72-26-46 13 843.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/3/4' 2 50/'/2' 5— 50/'/2' 4 50/'/2' 10 834.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/Y4' 7 1 � 50/'/4' Z = i 50/%" 50/Y4' 20 827.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 847.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O in 0 =11 U Plate A.99 Log Project No. B-97 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958900 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.408800 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 848.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 LEAN CLAY (CL) - dark brown 3.00 12 j u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O in 0 =11 U / 4.5+ 86 38-19-19 7 3.4 99 844.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/4" 5— 50/'/2' 4 # * 835.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z 20 = � 828.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 848.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill 50/1 %" 50/3/4' 8 50/3/4' 50/%" 6 50/%" 50/1" Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.100 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-98 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958350 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.40950' W End of Day Not Measured V1 N to d = o ° o o (D- L) E" z °' J d U E Y Stratum Description -1 > o _ =o a a >, a R o 0 to E a>i a; uoi H m a 'w a Approximate Surface Elevation = 848.0 feet 3: O rn a W a rn LL-PL-PI 2 —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 3.00 93 64-19-45 23 / 846.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/3/4' 5— 50/'/2' 2 50/1" 10 50/3/4' 4 835.0 LIMESTONE -gray =i 50/'/4' " 6 50/'/2 Z = i 50/'/2' 50/Y4' 828.0 20 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 848.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill u a L C' � o c w ca 3 c o rn 0 =11 U Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.101 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-99 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958350 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41014' W End of Day Not Measured _ a w O V1 = a °�'' w N o Q, V) C A! O U L ~ O E Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� o __ 0 =o d J d a O. 0 a a M to E y O Na V)> N _ w .O+N O C r0 a W M a 2 Approximate Surface Elevation = 846.0 feet ran w LL-PL-PI CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.5+ 20 / J / 4.5+ 81 82-25-57 19 842.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 50/1" 6 50/%" 5— 50/Y4' 5 50/%" 10 833.0 LIMESTONE - gray 50/3/4' 1 � 50/%"8 Z = i 50/1" 50/'/2' 20 826.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 848.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers u i1 y L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O in 0 =11 U Plate A.102 Log Project No. B-100 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958330 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.41084' W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ W Approximate Surface Elevation = 844.0 feet .O+N � O ran C r0 M a W a w LL-PL-PI 2 f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 4.50 J/ 4.50 67 1840.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan 831.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z �i 20 = 824.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 845.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill 50/3" 50/2" 50/%" 50/2" 50/2" 50/%" 50/%" IR u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U 12 1.7 95 0 4 0 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.103 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-101 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958350 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.41148' W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 842.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —% 20 / 840.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan f 829.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1�70 � Z 20 = i 822.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 842.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 11-50/1" 49 50/4" 50/2" 50/1" 50/1" 50/%" 50P 50/%" 50/%" 9 3 8 12 Plate A.104 Log Project No. B-102 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.958340 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.412170 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O o y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 840.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 2 3 rn 0 c o O U FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 1.50 28 11-20-23 4 838 0 N=43 i f WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 827.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1370 � Z 20 = i 820.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 841.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 33-35-50/6" 89 50/2'/2' 50/'/2' 21-50/2" 50/1'/2' 50/'/2' 50/'/2' 50/%" I`l 7 12 8 Plate A.105 Log Project No. B-103 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.958320 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.412880 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o 0o Stratum Description �> U £., Z o_= o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w Approximate Surface Elevation = 838.0 feet � O H ran CO y> a X a w LL-PL-PI —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown / 3.75 J 4.5+ 5—// 4.5+ 82 — 1.00 830.0 X WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, clay seams11-12-18 N=30 10 50/3" 17, 823.0 LIMESTONE - gray S �i 50/'/2' 20 T 818.0 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U 29 24 19 4.6 100 15 14 8 9 Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.106 Log Project No. B-104 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957740 N While Drilling -V 15 10-26-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.412900 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O~ w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U L E O Y Stratum Description (D— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet .O+N � O � ran C r0 M a X a w LL-PL-PI 2 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U CLAY (CH) - dark brown -%FAT 4.5+ 13 / J / 4.5+ 21 5 — // 4.50 24 —/ 2.75 92 28 1.9 95 Jam/ / 10— 2.75 35 / 828.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan \ / X 50/4" 16 3 s — 7 i n 823.0 i LIMESTONE - gray i �7411 50/%" 18 821.0 20 50/%" Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 842.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.107 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-105 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957760 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed �9GE NVG E R 97.412200 W End of Day Not Measured _ a O w V1 = a N °�'' w o Q, V) C A! O U ~ L E O Y Stratum Description d 1— -1 > L) E� 0 o __ =o d J d a O. a a 0 to E M y O Na V)> N rn _ w Approximate Surface Elevation = 841.0 feet .O+N � O � ran C r0 M a X a w LL-PL-PI 2 f —% FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 4.5+ J/ 4.5+ 97 1837.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan 829.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 =4f 821.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 843.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Fill 18-50/6" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/%" 50/1'/2' 50/%" 22 u CL L O. � o c VVi O a 3 C O rn 0 =11 U 21 11.5 93 5 rA 10 Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Plate A.108 Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Log Project No. B-106 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 NVG Fort Worth, Texas 9GE Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date E R 32.957740 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-22-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed w 97.411500 W End of Day Not Measured = CL y G V) tL a+ N O d V) }' C O U C a E Q « Stratum Description -1> o_= o d •— a J o = a y £ > O O y O 'w j N O o M w .O+ 16M a Approximate Surface Elevation = 843.0 feet 3: O rn or a W M a' a rn LL-PL-PI 0 3 2 rn 0 c o O U E f FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown 839.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 831.0 LIMESTONE - gray 15—=� Z S 20 823.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 842.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers 3.25 96 22 2.0 97 4.5+ 17 11-50/4" 9 50/3" 50/'/2' 9 50/1'/2' 50/'/2' 8 50/1" 50/'/2' Plate A.109 Log Project No. B-107 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957760 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.41084' W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R w o V) O N t) i to `mE o Stratum Description 0o �> U £., o_= Z o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w O H CO a X y> a Approximate Surface Elevation = 845.0 feet ran w LL-PL-PI FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —% 4.5+ 843.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan X 12-31-50/6" 50/3" 50/6" V 14-42-31 N=73 50/5" 837.0 LIMESTONE - gray =i 50/'/, 10 �-'� 50/1" Z _ 50/'/2' 15—= 50/'/2' S 50/1" 50/'/2' 20 825.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 845.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.110 Log Project No. B-108 21-25640 Cattleman's Crossing Boring Location Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Latitude Water Level Observations (feet) Date 32.957750 N While Drilling Not Observed 10-25-21 Longitude At Completion Not Observed 97.410160 W End of Day Not Measured �9GE NVG E R O t) w o V) N i to `mE o Stratum Description 0o �> U £., o_= Z o a J >Z T a M wul O i7to M _N w O H CO a W y> a Approximate Surface Elevation = 847.0 feet � ran w LL-PL-PI FAT CLAY (CH) - dark brown —% 4.00 / 845.0 WEATHERED LIMESTONE -tan E f 834.0 LIMESTONE - gray 1� Z �i 20 = 827.0 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet Proposed Elevation = 848.0 Feet Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill Material boundaries are approximate, in situ, transitions may be qradual. 17-50/4" 50/3" 22-50/2" 50/1 " 50/1 " 50/%" 50/'/2' 50/1" 50/'/2' e u CL X +- V)_ O. a)L C � C U L, o y, C V) E 0 N_ O 2 rn 0 =11U Driller: Drilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.111 SOIL OR ROCK TYPES ''��•''� Undocumented Fill F1111A Lean Clay (CL) Gravelly Lean Clay (CL) r///A Fat Clay (CH) ° Gravelly Fat Clay (CH) Clayey Gravel (GC) Silt (ML) Poorly -Graded Sand (SP) Well -Graded Sand (SW) rA//Clayey Sand (SC) v�_jav Well -Graded Gravel O D O — Marl _= Weathered Shale Shale RCN VGE N G E El I DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS (GW) I X i Shelby Split Texas Tube Spoon Cone Pen Weathered Limestone I ' I ' I (Limestone I I I H CFA HSA Rock Core TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY, CONDITION, AND STRUCTURE OF SOIL Fine Grained Soils (More than 50 % Passing No. 200 Sieve) Consistency Penetrometer Reading, (tsf) Very Soft < 0.5 Soft 0.5 to 1.0 Firm 1.0 to 2.0 Hard 2.0 to 4.0 Very Hard > 4.0 Coarse Grained Soils (More than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve) Penetration Resistance (Blows / Foot) 0to4 4to10 10 to 30 30 to 50 Over 50 Soil Structure Calcareous Slickensided Laminated Fissured Interbedded Descriptive Item Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Unconfined Compression, (psf) < 1000 1000 to 2000 2000 to 4000 4000 to 8000 > 8000 Relative Density 0 to 20% 20 to 40% 40 to 70% 70 to 90% 90 to 100% Contains appreciable deposits of calcium carbonate; generally nodular Having inclined planes of weakness that ate slick and glossy in appearance Composed of thin layers of varying color or texture Containing cracks, sometimes filled with fine sand or silt Composed of alternated layers of different soil types, usually in approximately equal proportions TERMS DESCRIBING PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ROCK Hardness and Degree of Cementation Very Soft or Plastic Can be remolded in hand; corresponds in consistency up to hard in soils Soft Can be scratched with fingernail Moderately Hard Can be scratched easily with knife; cannot be scratched with fingernail Hard Difficult to scratch with knife Very Hard Cannot be scratched with knife Poorly Cemented or Friable Easily crumbled Cemented Bound together by chemically precipitated material; Quartz, calcite, dolomite, siderite, and iron oxide are common cementing materials. Degree of Weathering Unweathered Rock in its natural state before being exposed to atmospheric agents Slightly Weathered Noted predominantly by color change with no disintegrated zones Weathered Complete color change with zones of slightly decomposed rock Extremely Weathered Complete color change with consistency, texture, and general appearance approaching soil KEY TO CLASSIFICATION AND SYMBOLS PLATE A.112 Grp. Major Divisions Typical Names m Well graded gravels, w a) GW gravel -sand mixtures, .T o little or no fines c > o C o Poorly graded gravels, oU = GP gravel -sand mixtures, 5 °�,' a'� v little or no fines i�L Z M O V = M O o Z u, GM Silty gravels, gravel - o sand - silt mixtures ai �M c 4 C: = .� co ° O �' Q Clayey gravels, gravel .L 0 > o Q 0 GC - sand - clay mixtures L `i f P1 O E v U) SW Well graded sands, ^ - gravelly sands, little or ° O O O no fines >_ ° Poorly graded sands, ;n U) U Sp gravelly sands, little or no fines ° M o Z E U) a� M Silty sands, sand silt �_ mixtures ❑ L co .Co � CU UH 3 o Cn o Clayey sands, sand E m Q E SC clay mixtures U) M Inorganic silts and very fine ML sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands, or clayey U) — silts with slight plasticity o U o Inorganic clays of low to — CL medium plasticity, gravelly 5 clays, sandy clays, silty Zp clays, and lean clays O C5 J OL Organic silts and organic (n L silty clays of low plasticity 8_1 J -0 E Inorganic silts, micaceous a) U L MH or diatomaceous fine sandy cL or silty soils, elastic silts T U 0)o E"= CH Inorganic clays of high iL m cv=� plasticity, fat clays U) -0 Organic clays of medium to OH high plasticity, organic silts c c� � (D ° M o Pt Peat and other highly _� " U) =O organic soils Laboratory Classification Criteria ' RC)N E E N G E E R I N G 0 D so C = greater than 4: C = ------ between 1 and 3 u co Do D X D10 so o Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW U) U) 5 Liquid and Plastic limits Liquid and plastic > N .L 2 �, limits plotting In below A line or P.I. p g o U) greaterthan 4 hatched zone N O O between 4 and 7 Z 2 :L Liquid and Plastic limits are borderline o ? m above "A" line with P.I. cases requiring use greater than 7 of dual symbols Cn co L E Cn N U Doo �Dao�z .o Cu ---- greater than 6: Cc= ------ between 1 and 3 Dio D X D10 eo -- E a) m •. a)Not meeting all gradation requirements (n o 0 for SW CO 3 °v L Q Y 0-04 Q) c o Ln P Liquid and Plastic limits Liquid and plastic 2 ° o m Q- below "A" line or P.I. limits plotting N a :5- N_ less than 4 between 4 and 7 C ° U)L° ° are borderline E � 55 J 2 u) Liquid and Plastic limits cases requiring use m 0 ° above "A" line with P.I. of dual symbols p o co greater than 7 60 50 w 40 Z r U 30 J d '046 CL IE "L-ML / 0 1/ 0 10 20 ML and OL 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY CHART UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM PLATE A.113 SWELL TEST RESULTS Cattleman's Crossing Between N. Saginaw Blvd. and US HWY 287 Fort Worth, Texas Rone Project Number: 21-25640 Depth Liquid Plastic Plasticity Initial Final Load Swell Boring (ft) Limit Limit Index Mc (/o) Mc (/o) (psf) ( /o) B-1 3 74 24 50 20 27 375 2.3 B-3 5 37 22 15 12 22 625 0.0 B-6 5 -- -- -- 17 28 625 5.5 B-7 3 51 21 30 12 25 375 0.0 B-9 9 41 19 22 26 30 1125 1.8 B-20 5 31 16 15 10 22 625 0.6 B-22 7 39 17 22 13 20 875 7.9 B-23 3 65 21 43 18 33 375 4.4 B-28 7 35 14 21 11 15 875 2.3 B-43 3 43 15 28 9 28 375 0.0 B-56 9 66 20 46 22 25 1125 2.3 B-58 7 73 24 49 24 31 875 4.3 B-59 5 75 25 50 21 33 625 8.4 B-60 3 62 18 44 21 26 375 4.6 B-63 3 75 28 47 27 38 375 7.7 B-64 7 77 22 55 21 30 875 7.3 B-65 9 70 22 48 17 25 1125 2.8 B-66 7 63 18 45 17 26 875 8.1 B-70 9 64 15 48 17 23 1125 4.8 B-71 5 66 24 42 18 27 625 8.6 B-72 7 -- -- -- 6 27 875 0.0 B-75 3 79 20 59 19 31 375 7.2 B-79 5 65 28 37 14 27 625 8.5 B-80 7 -- -- -- 21 27 875 4.3 B-81 9 63 19 44 18 23 1125 3.3 B-84 3 42 16 26 8 23 375 0.4 B-88 7 91 22 69 22 31 875 6.6 PLATE A.114 B-89 5 75 21 54 21 31 625 6.3 B-90 9 60 18 41 20 23 1125 0.2 B-91 3 -- -- -- 13 25 375 1.1 B-95 5 -- -- -- 5 24 625 0.0 B-97 3 38 19 19 9 25 375 3.4 B-100 3 -- -- -- 14 29 375 1.7 B-103 5 -- -- -- 20 29 625 4.6 B-104 7 -- -- -- 27 33 875 1.9 B-105 3 -- -- -- 21 33 375 11.5 B-106 1 -- -- -- 23 29 125 2.0 PLATE A.114 R OFE N G E EST: 18 U.S. Standard Sieve U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers Hydrometer N V \o O O p O (p Cl) co M N N 100 90 80 \ r 70 \ t a� 60 m 50 � v_ 40 L ' W a 30 20 10 0 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size - mm Legend I Sample No I Depth, ft I % Gravel I % Sand I %Silt I %Clay I USCS � B-1 2'-40.0 6.0 47.3 46.7 0 Material Description Texture Olive Black CLAY with occasional calcareous nodules Silty Clay RESULTS OF SIEVE ANALYSIS Cattleman's Crossing Rone Engineers 21-25640 I PLATE A.115a R OFE N G E EST: 18 U.S. Standard Sieve U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers Hydrometer N V \o O O p O (p Cl) co M N N 100 r 70 t 60 50 LL r- 40 m L ' 0 a 30 20 10 0 1000 100 Legend Sample No Depth, ft --A7- I B-81 2'-4' 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size - mm % Gravel I % Sand I %Silt I %Clay I USCS 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.3 0 Material Description rayish Black CLAY with occasional calcareous nodule Texture Silty Clay RESULTS OF SIEVE ANALYSIS Cattleman's Crossing Rone Engineers 21-25640 I PLATE A.115b APPENDIX B RCN E / FIELD EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were defined by 108 sample borings located as shown on the Boring Location Diagram, Plate A.3. The borings were completed at locations staked in the field by Rone personnel. The borings were advanced between sample intervals using continuous flight auger drilling procedures. The results of each boring are shown graphically on the Logs of Boring. Sample depth, description, and soil classification based on the Unified Soil Classification System are shown on the Logs of Boring. Keys to the symbols and terms used on the Logs of Boring are presented in the appendix section of the report. Relatively undisturbed samples of cohesive soils were obtained using nominal 3-inch diameter tube samplers at the locations shown on the Logs of Boring. The tube sampler consists of a steel tube with a sharp cutting edge connected to a head equipped with a ball valve threaded for rod connection. The tube is pushed into the soil by the hydraulic pulldown of the drilling rig. The soil specimens were extruded from the tube in the field, logged, tested for consistency with a hand penetrometer, sealed and packaged to limit loss of moisture. The consistency of cohesive soil samples was evaluated in the field using a calibrated hand penetrometer. In this test, a'/4 inch diameter piston is pushed into a relatively undisturbed sample at a constant rate to a depth of approximately'/4 inch. The results of these tests are presented at the respective sample depths on the Logs of Boring. When the capacity of the penetrometer is exceeded, the value is tabulated as 4.5+. Samples of stiff and/or granular materials were obtained using split -barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM D1586. In the split -barrel procedure, a disturbed sample is obtained in a standard 2-inch OD split -barrel sampler driven 18 inches into the ground using a 140-pound hammer falling freely 30 inches. The number of blows for the last 12 inches of the standard 18-inch penetration is recorded as the Standard Penetration Test resistance (N-value). The N-values are recorded on the Logs of Boring at the depth of sampling. The samples were sealed and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. As RN E ' J `�J The rock and rock -like materials encountered in the borings were evaluated with a modified version of the Texas Cone Penetration test. Texas Department of Transportation (TX -DOT) Test Method Tex-132-E specifies driving a 3-inch diameter cone with a 170-pound hammer freely falling 24 inches. This results in 340 foot-pounds of energy for each hammer blow. This method was modified by utilizing a 140-pound hammer freely falling 30 inches. This results in 350 foot- pounds of energy per blow. In relatively soft materials, the penetrometer cone is driven 1 foot and the number of blows required for each 6-inch penetration is tabulated at the respective test depths as blows-per-6-inches on the log of boring. In hard materials (rock or rock -like), the penetrometer cone is driven and the resulting penetration distances are recorded in inches for the first and second sets of 50 blows, for a total of 100 blows. The penetration for the total 100 blows is recorded at the respective testing depths on the Logs of Boring. Groundwater observations during and at completion of drilling are shown on the Logs of Boring. Upon completion of the borings, the boreholes were backfilled with auger cuttings to ground level. B.1 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples retrieved from the borings to evaluate the engineering characteristics of the subsurface materials, and to provide data for developing engineering design parameters. The subsurface materials recovered during the field exploration were described by an engineering geologist or senior staff member in the field and/or the laboratory, and were later refined based on results of the laboratory tests performed. Classification Tests All recovered soil samples were classified and described, in part, using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Visual classification of soils was verified by index testing, including natural moisture content determinations, Atterberg limits determinations, and gradation tests (percent passing the No. 200 U.S. Standard Sieve). All testing was performed in general accordance with applicable American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedures as follows: Test Atterberg Limits Percentage of Particles Passing the No. 200 Sieve Moisture Content Dry Unit Weight Unconfined Compressive Strength — Soil Moisture -Density Relation (Standard Proctor) Swell Test Hydrometer Swell Test ASTM Standard Number D4318 D1140 D2216 D2167 D2166 D698 D4546, Method B D7928 In the swell test, a sample is placed in a consolidometer and subjected to the estimated overburden pressure. The sample is then inundated with water and allowed to swell. Moisture contents are determined both before and after completion of the test. Test results are recorded as the percent swell, with initial and final moisture content. Detailed swell test results are tabulated in Appendix A. :N R NE Unconfined Compression Strength Test -Soil In the unconfined compression test, a cylindrical specimen is subjected to axial load at a constant rate of strain until failure occurs. Strengths determined by this test are tabulated at their respective sample depths on the Logs of Boring. Results of natural moisture content and dry unit weight determinations are also tabulated at the respective sample depths on the logs. Hydrometer Test A representative sample of the material is thoroughly mixed with water and a dispersing agent, and placed into a cylindrical column of water. A sphygmomanometer is used to measure the decrease in density of the soil/water slurry as soil particles settle out of the mixture. The rate in density change is used to determine the particle size distribution of material finer than the No. 200 sieve. B.2 RONE / Rone Specification 400 LIME STABILIZATION OF COMPACTE CLAYEY SOILS 1. Description Mix and compact lime and water with in -place, pre -compacted clayey soil in order to construct a lime stabilized subgrade in accordance with this specification and as required by the geotechnical report and site design plans and specifications. 2. Materials 2.1 Lime Furnish hydrated (slaked) lime, commercial lime slurry, quicklime, or carbide lime slurry that meets the requirements of DMS-6350, "Lime and Lime Slurry" and DMS-6330 "Pre - Qualification of Lime Sources." Use Do not use quicklime when sulfates are present in quantities greater than 3,000 ppm. When furnishing quicklime, provide it in bulk. 2.2 Water Furnish potable water free of and wastes and other deleterious or objectionable material. 2.3 In -Place Clay Soils In accordance with Rone's geotechnical report. 2.4 Mix Design Rone will provide the required lime mix percentage in accordance with the geotechnical report. 3. Equipment Furnish equipment in accordance with Item 260 of the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets and Bridges, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). 4. Construction Construct the lime -stabilized subgrade as required by the geotechnical report and design specifications in accordance with the following construction steps. 4.1 In -Place, Pre -Compacted Grades The in -place clay subgrade must be fully compacted using kneading compaction wet -of the optimum moisture contents in construction in full accordance with Rone's compaction control specifications as provided in the geotechnical report or report addendum, and to the lines and grades required in the project plans and specifications. The moisture states of the finished grades shall have been maintained in accordance with the geotechnical report. 4.2 Preparation of the In -Place, Pre -Compacted Grades 5/19/21 Lightly spray the grade surface with water. If visible drying has occurred on the grade surfaces since compaction, spray additional water in those areas as may be needed to establish a Page 1 of 3 B.3 RON / Rone Specification 400 wetted surface and preserve the wet -of -optimum moisture states established during compaction. Allow soak time before scarifying any areas requiring more significant wetting. 4.3 Scarification Use a road mixer to fully scarify and pulverize the in -place grades to the design stabilization depth. The pre -kneaded clays will pulverize to optimal surface area exposure for lime coating and mixing. Spray any scarified soils that appear visibly dry. The scarified depth must appear visibly well pulverized and moist before application of lime. 4.4 Application 5/19/21 Uniformly apply lime using dry or slurry placement as shown on the plans or as directed. Slurry placement is recommended for most efficient hydration and stabilization. Add lime at the required percentage in accordance with the geotechnical report. Apply lime only on areas where mixing can be completed during the same working day. Start lime application only when the air temperature is at least 350F and rising or is at least 40°F. Temperatures must be taken in the shade and away from artificial heat. Lime may not be applied during rainfall. Suspend application when weather conditions become unsuitable. Minimize dust and scattering of lime by wind. Do not apply lime when wind conditions cause blowing lime to become dangerous to traffic or objectionable to adjacent property owners. Use of quicklime can be hazardous. Inform users of the recommended precautions for handling and storage. 4.4.1 Slurry Placement Provide lime slurry free of objectionable materials, at or above the minimum dry solids content, and with a uniform consistency that will allow ease of handling and uniform application. Deliver commercial lime slurry or carbide lime slurry to the jobsite, or use hydrated lime or quicklime to prepare lime slurry at the jobsite or other approved location, as specified. When dry quicklime is applied as slurry, use 80% of the amount required. Distribute the prepared slurry uniformly over measured sections of the scarified grades until the specified lime content is reached. Uniformly spread the residue from quicklime slurry over the length of the section being processed. 4.4.2 Dry Placement Distribute the required quantity of hydrated lime or pebble grade quicklime with approved equipment. Only hydrated lime may be distributed by bag. Do not use a motor grader to spread hydrated lime. Page 2 of 3 B.3 RON / Rone Specification 400 5. Mixing Begin mixing within 2 hours of application. Hydrated lime shall not be exposed to the open air for more than 3 hours. When pebble grade quicklime is placed dry, mixing must be done immediately after application. Mixing must be conducted thoroughly and uniformly using a road mixer. Allow the lime mixture to soak, hydrate and flocculate the pulverized clay soil for at least 4 hours and no more than 24 hours. Add water as needed to maintain a moist condition and prevent excessive drying to support hydration and chemical reaction during and after mixing and prior to compaction. Mixed soils should not be exposed to rain prior to compaction. Mixed soils exposed to rain prior to compaction may require full rework with reapplication of lime and remixing. 6. Compaction After 4 to 24 hours, the mixed layer may be compacted. The mixed lift must be fully and uniformly compacted with a footed compactor wet -of the optimum moisture contents generated during compaction in accordance with the compaction specifications provided in the geotechnical report. The footed compactors must be utilized in static mode, without vibration. Full compaction must occur before any heavy rainfall. 7. Finishing Immediately after completing compaction, blade and smooth roll the surface as needed to establish a smooth surface to the required design lines and grades. Add small amounts of water if and where needed during shaping and rolling. 8. Curing Cure the stabilized subgrade for at least 24 hours and as needed to establish a sturdy working surface before traversing with construction traffic and subsequent construction. Maintain moisture as may be needed during curing. END 5/19/21 Page 3 of 3 B.3 APPENDIX C nnnfnnhninni Cnninnnninn Onnnnf The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) has prepared this advisory to help you — assumedly a client representative — interpret and apply this geotechnical-engineering report as effectively as possible. In that way, you can benefit from a lowered exposure to problems associated with subsurface conditions at project sites and development of them that, for decades, have been a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. If you have questions or want more information about any of the issues discussed herein, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. Active engagement in GBA exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk -confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Understand the Geotechnical-Engineering Services Provided for this Report Geotechnical-engineering services typically include the planning, collection, interpretation, and analysis of exploratory data from widely spaced borings and/or test pits. Field data are combined with results from laboratory tests of soil and rock samples obtained from field exploration (if applicable), observations made during site reconnaissance, and historical information to form one or more models of the expected subsurface conditions beneath the site. Local geology and alterations of the site surface and subsurface by previous and proposed construction are also important considerations. Geotechnical engineers apply their engineering training, experience, and judgment to adapt the requirements of the prospective project to the subsurface model(s). Estimates are made of the subsurface conditions that will likely be exposed during construction as well as the expected performance of foundations and other structures being planned and/or affected by construction activities. The culmination of these geotechnical-engineering services is typically a geotechnical-engineering report providing the data obtained, a discussion of the subsurface model(s), the engineering and geologic engineering assessments and analyses made, and the recommendations developed to satisfy the given requirements of the project. These reports may be titled investigations, explorations, studies, assessments, or evaluations. Regardless of the title used, the geotechnical-engineering report is an engineering interpretation of the subsurface conditions within the context of the project and does not represent a close examination, systematic inquiry, or thorough investigation of all site and subsurface conditions. Geotechnical-Engineering Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects, and At Specific Times Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs, goals, and risk management preferences of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil -works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical-engineering study is unique, each geotechnical-engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Likewise, geotechnical-engineering services are performed for a specific project and purpose. For example, it is unlikely that a geotechnical- engineering study for a refrigerated warehouse will be the same as one prepared for a parking garage; and a few borings drilled during a preliminary study to evaluate site feasibility will not be adequate to develop geotechnical design recommendations for the project. Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project or purpose; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, the reliability of a geotechnical-engineering report can be affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying the recommendations in it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis after the passage of time - if any is required at all - could prevent major problems. Read this Report in Full Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical- engineering report did not read the report in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selective elements only. Read and refer to the report in full. You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer About Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project -specific factors when developing the scope of study behind this report and developing the confirmation -dependent recommendations the report conveys. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site's size or shape; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, function or weight of the proposed structure and the desired performance criteria; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project or site changes - even minor ones - and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. Most of the "Findings" Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site's subsurface using various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing is performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgement to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ - maybe significantly - from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team through project completion to obtain informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. This Report's Recommendations Are Confirmation -Dependent The recommendations included in this report - including any options or alternatives - are confirmation -dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotedmical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgement and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions exposed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation -dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals' misinterpretation of geotechnical- engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a continuing member of the design team, to: • confer with other design -team members; • help develop specifications; • review pertinent elements of other design professionals' plans and specifications; and • be available whenever geotechnical-engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction - phase observations. Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated -subsurface -conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical-engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you've included the material for information purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that "informational purposes" means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This happens in part because soil and rock on project sites are typically heterogeneous and not manufactured materials with well-defined engineering properties like steel and concrete. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations;' many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study - e.g., a "phase -one" or "phase -two" environmental site assessment - differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical-engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical-engineering report does not usually provide environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not obtained your own environmental information about the project site, ask your geotechnical consultant for a recommendation on how to find environmental risk -management guidance. Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, the engineer's services were not designed, conducted, or intended to prevent migration of moisture - including water vapor - from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material -performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer's recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building -envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building -envelope or mold specialists. GEOPROFESSIONAL BUSINESS SEA ASSOCIATION Telephone: 301 /565-2733 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2019 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBAs specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any kind. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent GC-6.09 Permits & Utilities THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 3 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105370 Revised July 1, 2011 FORT WORTH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 200 Texas St, Fort Worth, TX 76102 DRAINAGE STUDY ACCEPTANCE LETTER STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (SDS) S DS(d)fortworthtexas.gov Project Information: Name: Cattlemans Crossing Phase 2 Date: 12/09/2022 Location: East of BUS-287 and southwest of US-287; north of Prarie Ridge Est. Site / Plat Area (ac): 172.8 Description: Proposed A-5 single family subdivision Disturbance Area (ac): 172.8 Owner: Engineer: Surveyor: Name: Daniel Satsky Name: Kevin Glaub, PE, CFM Name: Robert Allen, RPLS Company: Ashton Woods Firm: Shield Engineering Group, PLLC Firm: 11039 Phone: 972-428-5413 Phone: 817-810-0696 Phone: 817-810-0696 Email: Daniel.Satsky@ashtonwoods.com Email: Kevin.Glaub@segplIc.com Email: Robert.Allen@segpllc.com Address: 1800 Valley View Lane, Suite 100 Address: 1600 W. 7th St., Suite 400 Address: 1600 W. 7th St., Suite 400 Farmers Branch, Texas 75234 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 ❑✓ The project has an applicable and accepted Drainage Study: DS-22-0218 ❑ If applicable, the project has an accepted Flood Study: FSR — 20_ — 0 ❑ The project does not require a drainage study because acceptable documentation was provided to confirm that the work is limited to offsite linear underground utility installation, and all land disturbance shall be remediated and re -vegetated. ❑ The project does not require a drainage study because acceptable documentation confirming all of the following items was provided to SDS staff: • The total of onsite and offsite land disturbance associated with this project is less than 1 acre. • The project is not part of a common plan of development. • Offsite areas do not drain to or through the project or plat limits. • There are no existing or proposed drainage facilities. • There is no known, adjacent, suspected or regulated flood risk that impacts this project. The accepted Drainage Study supports the following development applications (check all that apply): ❑Single -Phase ❑ Multi -Phase ❑ Concept Plan ❑ Infrastructure Plan Review Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat (Multi -Phase) ❑❑ ❑ Zone A (only) ❑ Update To Previous Study ✓ Grading Permit ✓ Final Plat Flood Study ✓ DS — 2022 — 0218 Proposed drainage improvements and mitigation (check all that apply): ❑Stormwater Low Impact Onsite Open Drainage Infrastructure Detention Facility ❑ Design (LID) ❑✓ Channels ❑ (CFA) SDS Representative or Reviewer: Name: Misty Christian, P.E. Signature:-4�ti�tC� _�. _ Date: 12/19/2022 Notes: Minor comment on HEC-RAS model to be addressed on resubmittal if needed during IPRC or Grading Permit Review. Instructions to the Applicant: 1. Complete the Project Information details and attach a project boundary map (area that study applies to). 2. Submit the completed form and attachments with the drainage study submission, or email to SDS separately. 3. Include a copy of this signed form and attachments with applications for Plats and Infrastructure Plans. Revised 01/03/2020 / Mwxs WP50 °y2 e RA N I I ors R icr� I i I I I I I I I / �I I r+RS C9�4 AA, r5�mrswcs��Wmvc' I ' I 29711' a �Ias , a oaRrcr m I 'I /z�� rz cl rT/z sursrcnr+c' C2 gg'ICIA, s -ml II ---- - - - - - I I� I I m I ,III Y�=a' ciRs S00°ifi'0.5"E .292' Ixs c� Nc00'18'ST'W ,I� CIA, Li 110.00' 3 c,06 S00°19'5TE 95500' _ } wwww.`�'w' m"',.�i° 0I II I I I I O ,,., ...w ww .., ,. ..... ,•,.. W ..w ",._ W,° w «.. .,.w �.w .., ..."c� y I I I I '¢yl 3 in S 00°19'S]" E �wsasWsvr I I _ "3 Msrcrs0cwossvaos..a , I— aU o v.R.rcr I,cl. LBu IIcl d.8 I j a 6 § �.$ a.§ ' --s� ,, Q!9' _ - m e cs L14¢ cs c SQ9 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a� - _ a mm STRE?TE ®m . _ m nm am _ 9 .' I � tors 2 _ _ �1 L15 1 L J_I___-__ __vTM�________ 3��m- _.gym '"=� ym - - zs" § Via.§ 3.6 6 3 § 3.§- 6 - A9� 9.§ xa ;/zt ®le °o= a -® ' -6 : 6 : -s : "a '.� § eW : `e ` •§ : x§ ,/w o 1 S3 I: aa6s,§ a,6 �.6 P 3 , 6 _m" _ — ._am m STREEi DE _ —� al M On1PANY SUR ,ovmem °.w,c 'w,r Ff o W tore - P a IS _ II a O I I i A I, m / ff 4:1 �I.mmE x .s`a :§6 ,6s .§a e6a w§a §a §a .6§ .§� .§e 4aa as°$$ ar. of II S. tort "1*-STREETA =-gym. °"TREETA - - Hxe. BN�I.�LE,a f a I e xx,.�aa�e IN. I u ear,eere u, L0�..10 I a saw,ema „o '-P v rvavmosE a4. VICIN YMAP use mzo� ,ao' I L,rs xIN a,rsew IN., I a„ ezr,e�e are j L,a U, INaaw s�,as>v,„aaa aaa I ,., u su a0vsw ,s 0 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I LIN e.s,eara ,., I L31 .Paaw ,., Lsa x«.aaaE ,., `7 " 1.7 Tx rA ,. I c, aa. a,rs, szo�� aem I I re z6. ar ,z z.�. Tee zroef ze.ar I I w .,a. on ro, svzo- xza ssnw e,ez I 4_ >.w c„ rva� N.op ems A. 145o so oarvo• s«.aos,r xmi� Ikon 1 sue• a,u I o„ a 5 ze°P , I c,a a, aeae 9o�omF F,4.�aw aaAa I „� HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN m' bR e § § a "a 6 �e§a=a § .6 R®� s § ,§� § a §Q 6 6e § § § § ads s 66a s�6 §III ie 0 §` OF ®m. �_� .m o �.6.x. gsp _@np w.e _ CATTLEMANS CROSSING SF; - - - — - - - - w �� L —'� LOTS 1-24, IX BLOCK A; N00°19'57"W 227220'- TOF�- - a m US BUSINESS 287 - — - 1_ - cl6s LOTS 1-12, 86-97, 8X, 86X BLOCK B; NLN__ _ (Lza tuaxi-0a-wn_v) 1 LOTS 1-29, 15X BLOCK C; LOTS 1-29, 14X BLOCK D; LEGEND —R a YOo P4R8�, PCc 563 w.x,n,° LOTS 1-42 BLOCK E; LOTS 4-22, BLOCK F; DE INDICATES A DRNNAGE EASEMEM AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, ssE = IrvDIOATEs A snrvrrnar SEWER EASEMENT TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS UE =INDICATES A UTILITY EASEMENT BEING 55.884 ACRES OF LAND BL - INDICATES A BUILDING LINE SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. & P. RR CO SURVEY, XCF INDICATES "X" CUT IN CONCRETE, FOUND ENGINEER/SURVEYOR DEVELOPER U.".w,w".w...w # 17 ABSTRACT 1131 TRACT 4 & 4A HS. sLIEtD ENGINEERING GROUP. PUG ASHTGN WOODS - DANIEL snTSNr CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS XCS =INDICATES "%" CUT IN CONCRETE SET 1 WEST TH STREET, SUITE 200 1B00 VALLEY VIEW IPNE. SUITE 100 0� (el]) 81 Gx06966102 FARMERS92)8620-5413 CIRF INDICATES 5/B-INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH PLASTIC F cw,,cma+.L wrt. GAP STAMPED "SHIELD ENGINEERING" OWNER I , SHIELD JEN 101E 31, LLC CIRS = INDICATES 5/8-INCH IRON ROD SET WITH PLASTIC CAP 1601 ELM ST STAMPED 'SHIELD ENGINEERING" DAWS. T% oeec,w ENGINEERING GROUP Cl INDICATES A CONTROLLING MONUMENT POB POINT OF BEGINNING OPRTCT OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS RM pF11039• TBLS FIRM#10193090 1600 Wect HIS Suit 400, Fort Worth, T%T6102 • 017.810.0696 T C T PIAT RECORDS. 1111 COUNTY, TE%AS nnL w. ws wax n-n-m wxx , ray.rm .„ mxz ne' ow e s am vew mxn wens esauuem wuew NOTES 1. ALL DISTANCES ALONG ARCS ARE GIVEN AS ARC LENGTHS. A S1No IRON ROD WITH BWE PLASTIC CAP STAMPED SHIELD EERING ENGINUNLESS OTHERWISE NO 4. ALL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE LOTS SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOA NO BSIRACTING HAS BEEN PERFORMED BY THE SURVEYOR THERE MAYOR ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING THE SUBJECT TRACT WHICH THE SURVEYOR IS UNA1 THEREFORE ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON V'S REQUIRED PRIVATE PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES WILL BE REQUIRED, WATE EXCEEDS 80 PSI. WASTEWATER 1.1 FEES FINE T.T. AMOUNT ASSESSED I ESTABUS.E. ON THE REG.R GT DN, BASED UPON SCHEDULE E F THE UI CURRENT DINI OR THE CONNECTION DATE TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER AND/OF WASTEWATER SYSTEM L HER BE I NSRUCTED LIVE SANITARY SEWER, DRAINAGE, GAS, ELECTRIC, OR OTHER UTILITY EASEMENT OF ANY THE C OF FORT WORTH SUN NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE GENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS,PC ACCESS ASEMENTS, EASEMENTS. RECREATION AREAS. OPEN SPACES AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, AND SATE INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY OF FORT WORTH,OTEXA TEXAS, FROM CWMS, TLOSSES AN S US HIS PARAGRAPH OUT F OR FROM PERFORMANCE OF THE BLIGA ONS OF SAID O ANY PUBLIC UTILITY INCLUDING THE CRY OF FONT WORTH, EFF&L HAVE THE RIGHT MOV VIED ALL OR PART IF DING, FENCE, FREE, ER GROWTH 0R IN ANY WAY ENDANGERS ORYINTERFER. WRHE THECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE ' IS RESPECTNE SYSTEMS ON ANY OF THE EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON, AND THEY RIGHT NTNG. ANID ADDINGNORE REMOV NG ALL OR PART LIUPON "FO ITSSRESPECTIVE SYSTEM! NECESSITY AT ANY TIME OF PROCURING THE PERMISSION OF ANYONE NO BUILDING PERMUFS SHALL BE ISSUED FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE PROVISIONS ARE MADE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY APPLICABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINAGE IMPROVEME SIDEWALKS, WORTH SIGNS OR PAVING IMPROVEMENTS, AND APPROVAL IS FIRST OBTAINED F FORTWOR PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTSSUCH AS CURB AND GUTIF RA PAVEMENT TIE-IN,, DRIVE AF SIDEWALKS IDE KSAND DRAINAGE MAY AT BE E OF BUILDING PER WA ACCESIDESS KEASEMENTS AS AND STREET LIGHTS E GUY ROEF RPOONTO RTH STANDARR ALL DS AND PRIVATE sRE A SITE DRAINAGE STUDY. SHOWING CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED ROADWAY E BE REQUIREDBEFORE ANY BUILDING PERIAN IS ISSUED ON THIS SITE A GRADING INSTANCES MAY Y BE ADEQUATE IF THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM, THEN A DRANA� REQUIRED. ALONG WITH A COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT FOR ANY REQUIRED D WORTH CITY CODE, NO BUILDING(S) NOT NECESSARY TO THE OPERATION OF AN OIL OR GAS WELL SNALL EONSTRUCIED WITHIN THE SETK BAC REQUIRED BTGAS INCE A"ADOPTED FIRE CODE FROM ANY EXISTING ORPERMInED OIL ORH GASUWELL BORE SHE DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT LINE FROM THE WELL BORE TO THE CLOSEST EXTERIOR POINT OF THE BUILDING, WITHOUT REGARDS TO INTERVENING STRUCTURES OR OBJECTS 7 CLHANNERNNAGE-WAY MANTENANCE THE E%IBRNG CREEK,• DRATUAGE LL TIRAVERSING ALONG OR ACROSS PORTIONS OF THIS ADDITION, WILLRREMAIN RUNOBSTRUCTED AT ALL TIMES AND WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS WHOSE LOTS ARE TRAVERSED BY, OR ADJACENT TO, THE ore - YS THE CITY OF FORT WORTH W NOT BE R HE MAINTENANCE, EROSION CONTROL, AND/OR OPERATION OF SAID DRAINAGE -WAYS PROPERTY OWNERS KEEPHALL THE ADJACENT DRAINAGE -WAYS TRAVERSING THEIR PROPERTY SILT OR OTHER SUBSTANCES WHICH WOULD RESULT IN UNSANITARY CONDITIONS, AND THE GUY SHALL S HAVE THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTING THE MAINTENANCE WORK BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS THE DRAINAGE -WAYS ARE OCCASIONALLY SUBJECT TO STORM WATER OVERFLOW AND/OR BANK EROSION THAT CANNOT BE DEFINED. THE CITY OF FORT WORTH SHALL NOT BE (ABLE ANYFOR ANY IDANAGEI ENI"lli NIB THE FILIRE IF STRUCTURE(S) WITHIN I'HE NG FDRAINAGE WAYSRI" THE 'HE THE DRAINAGE RENCE IF SWAY HCROSENG EACH LOT IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE I'LOOD—IN EASEMENT UNE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT 18 PRIVATE COMMON AREAS AND FACILRES. THE CITY OF FORT WORTH SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE CONSTRUCTION,FORTHE MAINTENANCE 0 OPERATION 0 ACILRES RNI"U ARS OR D SUCH ON O SINCLUDE,B NOT BE UMITED PD. PRIVATE STREETS. EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS. AND SECURITY ENTRANCES; RECREATION AREAS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OPEN SPACES, WATER AND WASTEWATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND UFFIES RAND OWNERS T FACILIFFIES, AND AND SUBSEQUENT OFHTOHES LOTSERANDSE/PARCUEEDINNSTMSD SUBDINSIOU.HACTING JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AS A LAND OWNERS ASSOCIATION, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH CONSTRUCTION. RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE SUBDIVISION'S CITY"OF FORT( WORTHTIN AN"TEXAS, FROM AND 'ACITALL CLAMS, DAMAGES•AND LOSSES ARISINGTO INDEMNIFY ANN HOLD EAT CUT OFR OR S THE RESULTING FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE OBLIGATIONS OF SAID OWNERS ASSOCIATION, AS SET FORTH HEREIN FLOODPLAIN NOTE BY GRAPHICAL PLOTTING, THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN LIES WITHIN ZONE 'X" AS DELINEATED ON THE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, NO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTLNVAGENCTZONE MARCH3"FEDERAL %'1S DEFINED AS AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.29. ANNUAL CHANCE FL SSOT CERTIFY THAT REvI INFORMATION HAS OR HAS NOT BEEN ILEUSHED BYTHE FEDERAL EMERGENCY EMANAGEMENTN AGENCY OR ANY OTHER SOURCE nRrP�onnN nc cllmr�Y DEVELOPMENT YIELD AREA(ACRRXI 55854 TOTL LNUMeea EOIS III O p BLUMBERNO F" SING A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE E EL PASO AN PACIFIC D CO NY SURVEY. ABSTRACT NO 1131, CITY OF FORT WORTH MIARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS. BEING ALL A"CERTAIN"TRACT OF LAND AIIIAGE GLEPAMILV OETACx _ SLNGLEPAMLLYATTACH TWO FAMI 111n6AMT AS DESCRIBED BY DEED TO TRIPLE W PROPERTIES. LTD. AND RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NO, D207043622. MB PRIVATE OPEN SPACE LOTS —EDA TEXAS, (OPECT) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY ACREAGE ICOMMERCTU LOT50000 wOUSTLUALLOT50000 OeEN SewCE LOT52596 TUGxT-OF-wwv T.9M METEMUNDS DFOLLOWSN( ASIS OF RENCE TO THE TEXAS STATE NE COORDINATE Locena SYSTEM,, ND RAL 20NE, NAD VN THE TRRIMB E VRS NETWORK FOR NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS PLL i.y DISTANCESARESURFACE DISTANCES) VICINTTY MAP BEGINNING AT A M-IRON ROD FOUND IN THE NORTH ONE OF THE SAD TRIPLE I AS IDEICINIED BY ED AND RECORDED INS NiNOA D204335429, (OPRTCT), ALSO BEING INETHE TO EVEREST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL AND RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT N0. D212017692, (OPRi IF FORT T). AND THE REC FDEDEIN NSIF TRUMEM NO CDAIN TT2 64. (OPIF NO AS RTCT)B A DIISTANCE OFED 'RED TO 2213 30 TIE "FEET TO AW3/4 EMCH IRON ROD FOUND FIR GIRNIR IF ID 11 OF FORT -IN TRACT PINS COMMON WITH THE sGUNTWSET RIGHT TOF W�AYRT LINE OF E HIGHWAY NO 287 (A VANABLE WILTH RIGHT OF WAY). SOCIEWEll RIGHT OF WAY ONE .1 THE SAX US WAY HIGHNO MONUMENT FOUNDFO H CORNER OF A CERTAIN 69�(OPMCr)ESCRIBED BY DEED To WJH ENERGY, INC. AND RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT NO STATE OF TEXAS $ COUNTY OF TARRANT $ E, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, ON THIS DAYPERSONALITY KNOWN TO ME TO BETHE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBEDTOAPPEARED J THEFOREGOINGN`ONUT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED THENCE WITH THE SAID TRACT 2, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS SOUTH 00-20'- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 219,97 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD MARKED 'SHIELD ENGINEERING" SET, MT COMMISSION EXPIRES. NORTH 89-26'4T EAST, A DISTANCE OF 28785 FEET TO A TXDOT ROW MONUMENT FOUND FOR THE EAST TRACT 2 AND BEING IN THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT OF WAY ONE OF THE SAD US THENCE "ITIER" "" THE 111"IEST RIGHT OF WAY LNE IF THE SAJD US HIGH— NO 2BI, THE SOUTH 05' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74170 FEEL TO A TXDDT ROW MONUMENT FOUND, SOUTH 44-57 49 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 53059 FEET To A TXDDT ROW MONUMENT FOUND. SOUTH 53-05'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 33D 28 FEET TO A TXDOT ROW MONUMENT FOUND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE OF THE SAID TRIPLE w TR AND BEING COMMON WITH THE NORTHWEST RIGHT OF WAY AY (A TOO — RIGHT OF WAY) AS OIESCRIBED BY GEED AND E 4p (OPRTCT); 0 HENCE SOUTH 36 WEST. CWITH THE SO OFTHEAFORESND TRIPLE W TRACT AND BEING COMMON WNH THE NORTHWEST RIGHT OF WAY SOUTHEAST TOM WORTH AND DE DISTANCE OF 1075 42 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER T OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRIPLES W.reTRACT AND BEING COMMON WITH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3. BLOCK 3. OF THE PRAIRIE RIDGE ESTATES. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS. RECORDED IN GOODQPRTDn. FRAM WHIGH A 5/e N x IaoNWRQo FOUND"_RE SOUTH 38 21 21 WEST. A DISTANCE OF 079 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 89-46— WEST, WITH THE SOUTH ONE OF THE SAD TRIPLE W TRACT AND BEING COMMON 5/8- CAPPED IR RINCE SEf FOR THE (NORTHWEST CORNER OE BUICNN I, OF BAD uRIE RIDGE ESTATES ANDNINTHE EAST RIGHT OF WAY ONE OF THE END US BUSINESS HIGH — NO 287; PR THENCE NORTH 00-19'57' WEST, W THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY ONE OF THE SAD US BUSINESS HIGHWAY N0. DISTANCE OAGRES OFF 22MORE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 7,472,770 SQUARE FEET OR KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT I. ROBERT P. &LEN. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I PREPARED THIS PLAT FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEYTHE LA OADD THAT THE H CORNER MONUMENTS SHOWN THEREON AS SET WERE UNDER R PRELIMINARY, THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE RECORDED FOR ANY PURPOSE AND SHALL NOT BE USED OR VIEWED OR RELIED UPON AS A FINAL SURVEY DOCUMENT ROBERT P ALLEN REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR TEXAS BEGISTRANON NV 6495 STATE OF TEXAS $ COUNTY OF TARRANT $ BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY. ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT P. ALLEN. KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED ENGINEER/SURVEYOR DEVELOPER SHIELD ENGINEERING GROUP, PLLC ASHTON WOODS - DANIEL EATSKY 1E00 OWEEST 7THH STREET. SUITZ200 1800 VALLEY VIEW LANE. SUIT 100 RT (BI]) 810-069661 AR (9]2) 428-5413 OWNER JEN FIX AS 31. LUG 1601 ELM ST D S, T% HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN OF CATTLEMANS CROSSING SF; LOTS I-24, 1X BLOCK A; LOTS 1-12, 86-97, 8X, 86X BLOCK B; LOTS 1-29, 15X BLOCK C; LOTS 1-29, 14X BLOCK D; LOTS 1-42 BLOCK E; LOTS 4-22, BLOCK F; AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING 55.884 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. & P. RR CO SURVEY, # 17 ABSTRACT 1131 TRACT 4 & 4A HS. CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I , SHIELD ENGINEERING GROUP TO PROTECT TRUNK WHEN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE LEGEND REVISIONS FENCE IS INSTALLED CLOSER DRIP LINE THANK S'TO TRUNK LANTREE PROTECTION FENCED�yyMPj71(JE,�F//�PFR ENGINEER/SURVEYORSHIELD ENGINEERING GROUP,PLLC SHAE KIPP TREE TO BE REMOVED ` / NO Q DESCRIPTION DATE R-D'HT 1800 VALLEY FIVIIEELWSALANE, SUITE 100 1600 WEST 7TH STREET, SUITE 400 CERTIFIED ARBORIST-T-51 RA '^v` METAL POST FARMERS BRANCH, TX]5234 FORT WORTH, TX 761N INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS,LLC 9] 26-5413 S1_10 S 301 ELDORADO PKWY, MCKINNEY, TX]5088 FENCEABRIC OR ORANN LINK PROTECTED TREE O y .-� NOWG FENCE O TREE PROTECTION FENCE NOTES 1 CHAIN LINK FENCE TO BE 12 GAUGE. WITH 1 a" DIAMETER SCHEDULE 20 POSTS AT S'-0' O C MAX SIGNIFICANT TREE O 2 NO -STING TREES DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL 3 PROTECT ALL INDIVIDUAL TREES OR GROWTH OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED BY ERECTING A BARRIER AROUND EACH TREEORGROUPOFTREES DRPUNErvutIESI 0 6' 4 INSTAL TOFHAVYCONIN ISTRUER TIONISSCHEDREE DRIP SCHEBARRIDULED RSHRWITHINTHEDALL REMAIN IN LIPLINEACE OF (STINGVAL IS NECESSARY. SHIELD' 5 IN THE EVENT OF HEAVY CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED TO OCCUR WITHIN DRIP LINE AN EXISTING TREE, CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT APROTECTION FENCE SIGNIFICANT PROTECTED TREE OUTSIDE OF THE DRIP LINE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDU LED TO OCCUR, THE PROTECTION FENCE MAN' THEN BE ADJUSTED AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE ou INDIVIDUAL TREE PROTECTION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA IS COMPLETED, THE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO ITS ORIGINAL LOCATION. ENGINEERING GROUP S CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PARK, CLEAN TOOL AND EQUIPMENTS OR STORE MATERIALS WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY TREE �oxi I H,rzzl e' CHAINLINK FENCE _URmuNxoinMe-rEx TREE PROTECTION DETAILS ] ALL ROO`TS�OVE�R{RILI"IN DIAMETERSHALL BE CUT CLE4N BVAH4ND SAW �� TIFF FIlM lF110J11lFU FIlM 1101fJJM �"j/Jf//7JjjTrj/J EASEMENT B ROW AREA 721�7/// — \', \ 9,pr Gy, \ PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY ®\ \\ 9 \\ THESE DOCARE FORDESIGN REVIOW D NOT TENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, SIDDINGORPEMITPURPOSES. THEYWERE \ ♦,O i PREPARED BY, OR UNDER SUPERVISION OF rvPFOR PRIxrnunF PF# wTe TREE 0 ,n no 450 2,1 0 I \ \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 22 CONSTRUCTION NOTES —� NSTRucraN noTFs B 1I i IIII II - I I ` ��,��•�' \\\ • \ 11 \ YAIHrTHE FOLLOWING AT LEasTae HOURS PRIOR TO cTNCAcL I II II NvonAnoNJvueucwoKs SUSGTRIC AT&TNERDY / ��j/T\\ \ \•�AME9 nNO slcw.L DIVISION PARns D` M ..RY SERVICES DEPT R O. TF 1 / \ \ �� µDHORIZONTAL R VERTICAL CONTROL oaa II Y NCHMn DESCRIPTION VEE p II II II I� J L J it II n n n l II II II II II II II I II II II II II I I I � GAS WELL SETBACK -- _ I II r--- -- -- — n I 1 � r__�___ ________ _____ r___ } . .. .. Per.c. .. .. 1 _.. .. I III .. •• \ .• .. .v.er c. .. .. I 'Ir l I - I j' el r � / CITY PROJECT# FILE#SD- MAPSCD#_ �/ r rr♦ •��' j 4 CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS 't� r 1 U' Z CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING / z Z URBAN FORESTRY EXHIBIT w J (DESIGNED (SCALE (DATE (SHEET: U DRAWN _ 1-15 Q -_ 0' MAR 2022 1 OF 2 Protected& Significantree Survey Dra REVISIONS DanOpv canOpv significant Net Urban Forestry Area (Phase land 2) SF AC DEN Preserved/ Protected NO DEGCRIPTION DATE Treep :ommonnameorspecie Radius Area 7 Exclusions Mi[igationMethod cOmmena Grossareaofproperty 7,525,426 172.76 • Iln) (Feet IsFl Removea• Species0• 1227,1 s + A 13 paten 2+3 26 212172 PRESERVED v - - - Regulated utilityeasementsand other deductableareas 2,133,482 48.978 L o 14 paten 261 27 22M22 PRESERVED r - - - - Net Urban Forestry Area 5,391,944 123.782 IIN 15 Paten 261 20 2463.01 PRESERVED V - - - - 16 pecan 142 17 907.92 R Y - - - - 19 kw Oak 255 26 2R Y Pecan 8 a 201.01.- - - Required Tree Canopy Area (Phase 2) 211 05 R Y - - - - 21 paean 283 26 2463. 01 R v v - - - Minimum Canoovcovera¢e Requirement S H I E L D S 22 1hum-, aak 161 16 g0y,25 R Y - - - - 23 suga"" 329 25 2" 01 R - y - - Residential (40%)/ 1,347,986 30.95 ENGINEERING GROUP 2d pecan 314 35 3848.45 R Y y - - - 2fi sugerbeny 301 34 301M PRESERVED - y - _ New Subdivision w/trees planted on each lot (25%) FIRE FIRM M-„-TIFU FIRM.,0191800 27 aagaba 240 27 229D22 PRESERVED Additional 5%if using preservation method B ("protected trees") 269,597 6.19 x 26 IneOak 2,5 26 212172 R Y - - - IITotalrequiredcano coverage including mitigation 1,617,583 37.13 29 Pecan 8.5 7 353.99 R V - - - - PY ii (including mitigation) 38 vaaan 8.6 9 254.47 R Y - - - - I PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY 31 pecan 1]] 19 1134.11 R Y - - - - THESE DOCUMENTS ARE FOR DESIGN REVIEW 32 Ine Oak 188 23 1661.90 R Y - - - - Preservation/Retention of Existing Canopy(Phase land 2) AND NOT("TENOEO FOR CONSTRUCTION• BIDDING OR PERMIT PURPOSES, THEY WERE IExistingtree canopy within net urban forestry area 22,553 0.52 PREPARED1,ORUNDER SUPERVISIONOF If seeking approval for phase 1 only, then preserve a minimum of N/A N/A r eOPP"ImxME a.E 50%canopy and stop after completing line M. I Preservation requi reme nt (25%) 5,638 0.13 (Additional 5%if using preservation method B ("protected trees") 1,128 0.03 Additional preservation option for mitigation of significant 13,162 0.30 tree removal (only if removing significant trees) Total preservation requirement 19,928 0.16 CONSTRUCTION NOTES IAreaofexisting canopy preserved 6,877 0.16 00N5`RULTgNNO- Total preservation credit toward planting 8,693 0.20 New Tree Planting (Phase 2) Required new planting coverage 1,608,890 36.94 _530_ large canopy trees@2,000sgftper tree 1,060,000 24.33 B """"G"Me"LOO"O" TMEr01R0INOATREST4a"00R6PRIORro I_795_medium canopy trees @ 700sq ft per tree 556,500 12.78 NBPO"TARON4PUBLIOWrO ILI small canopy trees @ 100sq ft per tree 0 0.00 NC - Total Planting 1,616,500 37.11 PARxa NDBI0NL0NIBI0N rs 8 �µDHORIZONTAL R V ERTICAL CONTROL Fulfillment of Requirements KENOHMAR"0660RIPTION (Total required canopy coverage forsite 1,617,583 37.13 IProvidedcanopy coverage 1,625,193 37.31 (Excess/deficient overall canopy 7,610 0.17 Significant Trees All Post Oaks/ Blackjack Oaks>_18" dbh (if east of 1-35) 0 0 All other trees 27' dbh (regardless ofspecies orlocation) 12,406 0.28 (Total of significant trees to be preserved 3,632 0.08 ISignificant Tree Preservation Credit 1,816 0.04 -- - M (Total of significant trees to be removed 8,774 0.20 PfiDO.= CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS Significant Tree Removal Mitigation Options z Preservation of exiting canopy 1.5x the canopy removed � significant trees in excess of required can or 13,162 0.30 CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING p Planting additional trees 5x the canopy of removed significant trees U in 43,872 1.01 excess of required canopy or URBAN FORESTRY TABLES w Payment into Tree Fund fortotal dbh inches of significant trees � removed @$300perinch dbh $ 27,780 $ 27,780 DFSIGNED_ (SCALE IRATE SHEET: DRAWN-_ N.T6 MAR 2022 2 OF 2 I¢ F� tovrxlcx 11 avaxlBLP BxoIxBBRNa1-1ILLo-III m I-111- FORTWORTH i-ni-vi-v.forti-northtexas. gov DECISION LETTER OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH PLAN COMMISSION This letter serves as official notice under Texas Local Government Code Section 212.001, et. seq., that your PLAT for PP-21-064 was reviewed and CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the City Plan Commission per Resolution 1- 09-2021 on the 13t" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021. The reasons are as follows: City Plan Commission approved the following: 1) Approved a Subdivision Ordinance waiver to allow one stub -out (Little Prairie Trail) to not be extended to the property boundary; 2) approved a Subdivision Ordinance waiver to allow Park Ridge Trail to function as emergency access to the subdivision to the south, which is located in the County, 3) Approved a Subdivision Ordinance waiver to allow one block face (Block B) to exceed the maximum 1,320 feet; and, 4) Conditionally approved the preliminary plat upon meeting the attached platting comments. You may submit a written response that satisfies each of the conditions for the conditional approval or remedies each reason for disapproval provided above. All revisions to the plat or plan that serve as a written response or remedy must comply with all laws and the City codes, ordinances, policies, rules, regulations, and design criteria. 10/13/2021 ,.r+ Date Don Boren, Chairman City Plan Commission 10/13/2021 (/maw Date Mary Elliott, Exetive Secretary City Plan Commission Development Services Department, Platting, 200 Texas Street, Ft. Worth, TX 76102, (817) 392-8027 Case: PP-21-064 Submitted: 8/23/2021 Title: Cattleman's Crossing FORTWORTH, Conditions and Comments Remarks Due: ZC Hearing: Case Status: In Review Case Description: Cattleman's Crossing is a proposed 171+/- AC Tract located just south of the HWY 287 & Bus HWY 287 intersection. Address: Applicant: Owner: List of Conditions: GENERAL General .This application corresponds to August 23rd deadline day. PLAN REVIEW Gas Well Acres: • 9.20.21: CLEARED - Revised plat has the gas well and lift compressor setbacks shown and labeled. Need to show and label gas well setbacks for gas well site located in the northeast corner outside the project area: 300' setback for protected uses and public buildings and 200' setback for habitable structures. Gas well site located at the northwest corner of the project area has a lift compressor, therefore a 200' setback needs to be shown and labeled for all protected uses, public buildings, and habitable structures. PLATTING Fire FWFD - (Lt. Donna York, donna.york@fortworthtexas.gov) CLEARED 09/22/2021 1. Correct US Business 287 to Saginaw Blvd. CLEARED 09/22/2021 2. Correct US Highway 287 to NW Highway 287 SB SR 3. FYI: Bates Aston Road, Park Ridge Trail, and Little Prairie Trail are existing and correct. 4. FYI: Little Prairie Trail and Park Ridge Trail are existing and correct but should be continuations into this plat. CLEARED 09/22/2021 5. Correction required: Gas Well Setback for Enervest Energy Institutional along northern border of plat: A. Show 300' Building Setback radii from each gas well bore and label: "300' Building Setback for Protected Use and Public Building Structures". B. Show 200' Building Setback radii from each gas well bore and label: "200' Building Setback for Habitable Structures" FYI: several lots fall within the gas well setbacks IFC 2015/CFW Adopted Amendments Jan 1, 2017 Section 5706.3.1.3.3 Existing Gas Wells 6. FYI: Cul-de-sac required to be marked as a minimum of 100 feet diameter. IFC 2015/CFW Adopted Amendments Jan 1, 2017 Section 503.2.5 Fire Lane Specifications 7. FYI: Streets within this subdivision will need to be named on the final plat/s. All street names in the City of Fort Worth must be approved by the Fire Department. Email FWFDStreets@fortworthtexas.gov to request approval for street names prior to FINAL PLATTING. Please include the subdivision name and plat number in the subject line. Approved streets are reserved for 6 months. Extensions are possible but will be subject to review for each 6 month period. 8. FYI: Two points of access are required for Final Plats having more than 30 lots. Approved preliminary plats must be phased such that they do not violate this ruling. IFC 2015/CFW Adopted Amendments Jan 1, 2017 Section 503.1.2 Secondary Access FYI COMMENTS: Street name errors that result from changes/additions to revisions occurring after a plat is approved by fire may result in rejection of signature/stamp for recording. Any new address, suite address, or any other permanent address must be approved by the Addressing Division of the Bureau of Fire Prevention. Any changes to existing addresses must be approved as well. Addresses must be posted in a manner that complies with the current City of Fort Worth Fire Code. DO NOT SELF ADDRESS YOUR PLAT or property. All plats within the city limits of Fort Worth will be addressed by the FWFD Fire Addressing Division AFTER recording of the plat at the county courthouse. Plats will be addressed once we receive a copy of the plat after recording. All plats will be addressed in the order in which we receive them. Most plats will be addressed and posted to the City of Fort Worth Plat Directory within 10 business days of being recorded. Failure to recognize violations of the fire code by the fire code official does not waive the requirement of meeting minimum requirements of the fire code in the future. It is the applicant's and the owner's responsibility to meet all minimum fire code requirements at all times. The City of Fort Worth has adopted the 2015 International Fire Code as its current fire code at the time of this review. The City of Fort Worth also has adopted amendments (January 1, 2017 version) to this code. The Fort Worth Fire Code Amendments can be found online at www.fortworthtexas.gov/Fire/ (click on Bureau of Fire Prevention) PACS •A Neighborhood parkland dedication is required. Minimum dedication is 5.4210 acres. 25% of the dedication is to be out of the floodplain and contiguous. Land with slopes greater than 10% will not be considered. Lots in the subdivision are to be a 10 minute walk (a 1/3 mile radius) from parkland per the 2019 Neighborhood and Community Park Dedication Policy. Submit a walkability study with proposed parkland locations for discussion. Contact Lori Gordon(lori.gordon@fortworthtexas.gov) with questions Planning • Development Services Lynn Jordan 817-392-2309 lynn.jordan@fortworthtexas.gov (FYI) (Please be advised to wait for all departments review comments before submitting a revision to address them all at one time. Revisions are subject to additional fees. Please email me and include Diana Lopez diana.lopez@fortworthtexas.gov when a revision has been submitted). 9-24-21 for the DRC meeting on 9-27-21 be prepared to talk about the revised plat in relation to block lengths, stubs, connectivity and provide a txdot letter on access. For the DRC meeting be prepared to talk about the block lengths in relation to Street A, Street B and as it comes around to Street L in relation to [SO. Sec 31-106(20)(d)(2)] lots less than 150 feet in width shall have a maximum block face of 1,320 feet; Internal Connectivity [SO. Sec 31-101(d)]; and extension of stub outs with adjoining streets [SO. Sec 31-106(c)(7)] 1. Urban Local streets shall be extended to the subdivision boundary to connect with adjoining streets or, where no adjacent streets are available for such connection, to allow for the future connection with adjoining un-platted property. [SO. Sec. 31-106(c)(7)]. A redesign or waiver will be required from the City Plan Commission. 2. (Cleared 9/10/21) The internal connectivity index must be a minimum of 1.4 [SO. Sec. 31-101(d)] Provide the connectivity index number on the plat if less than 1.4 A redesign or waiver is required from the City Plan Commission. 3. Standard public and private local streets that serve urban lots, less than 150 feet in width, shall have a maximum block face of 1,320 feet. [SO. Sec 31-106(20)(d)(2)] Along Block B, Streets A, B, L and E, F exceed the block length. A redesign or waiver is required from the City Plan Commission. 4. (Cleared 9/10/21) (FYI) Reference the plat case number PP-21-064. 5. (Cleared 9/10/21) (FYI) Show 10' x 10' triangular public open space easement (POSE) on each side of the driveway turnout section with a dedicated street. 6. Ingress/Egress is being provided by US Business 287, has there been any talks with TxDot about access, if so provide a letter from TxDot. 7. (FYI) Show boundary of existing tree canopy. 8. (FYI) Show areas of open space, homeowners association lots and park land dedications. 9. (FYI) Some lots appear to be in the gas well setback and may be unbuildable. Public Franchise Utility • Oncor I PMDS - Jimmy B. Conner Please have the customer review the attached plat. I marked up a location that Oncor still has a line on serving an old home. I am sure this will be removed but until it is it will need to show on the plat. everything else looks great. (See documents for Oncor mark-ups) T/PW Engineering -Transportation (Armond Bryant, 817-392-8702, Armond.Bryant@fortworthtexas.gov). 1. ROW Dedication: Dedication of 5 +/- feet of right-of-way is required for Saginaw a Commercial Connector. 2. The extension of Little Prairie and Park Ridge is required in accordance with the subdivision ordinance (31-102-2). Final Plat Notes: -CFA (Ch. 31-131) - Community Facilities Agreement required for streets (to include border streets, alleys and access easements), lights, signs, sidewalks, and drainage improvements. -TXDOT Permit - TXDOT permit is required for work in and along State ROW. Street connections to TXDOT ROW is contingent upon TXDOT approval. New access to and/or sidewalk improvements to US 287 and Saginaw Blvd. will require a TXDOT permit. TxDOT has updated their policies regarding sidewalks. A 10ft. shared path is required along frontage roads in most instances. -Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP): The project is adjacent to an arterial identified on the MTP. The proposed alignment of the arterial shall be included in the project. The new classification(s) are as follows: • The cross section assignment for Saginaw designates it as a CCO-L3-TO-NTMS-PO-BOP (130) o Saginaw is a Commercial Connector with 3 lane(s) in each direction 10 ft. sidewalks with a standard median (130 ft.) -Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required on all public and/or private city streets. Pedestrian mobility is a priority for the City of Fort Worth as identified within the Blue Zones Project and the Active Transportation Plan. A 10ft sidewalk is required along Saginaw and 5ft sidewalk is required within the development. A 10ft. shared path was included on the adjacent commercial development along the US 287 frontage road within a public use easement. The extension of this would provide pedestrian connectivity within this corridor. T/PW Stormwater •related to DS-21-0075 1. Has Oncor agreed to share their existing 100' electric easement with the variable width DE on the northwest corner of site? REMOVED DE FROM EASEMENT - CLEARED - RNS - 9/30/21 2. include FEMA effective statement {NOT ADDRESSED} 3. 65' UE must be exclusive DE or DE and SSE/WE. CLEARED - RNS - 9/10/21 4. DE on lot 1X must be continuous to cover culvert connection between ponds, please revise. CLEARED - RNS - 9/10/21 5. DE must extend at least 25' beyond end section and it appears the DE on Lot 1X and 8X would need to extend to the ROW to cover the culverts. Please review all DE and ensure all public infrastructure is properly protected. CULVERTS REMOVED - RNS - 9/30/21 6. show the DE for the outfall pipes within the 100' Oncor easement and see comment #1. Permission or clearance from Oncor must be provided prior to drainage study approval. If Oncor does not permit you may need to reconfigure some lots. {NOT ADDRESSED - LOT 8X V. W. D. E. LOOKS TO NARROW TO CONTAIN THE 30 " RCP, A 4'X3' RCB, AND 4, 4'X4' RCB'S; UPDATED EASEMENT} CULVERTS REMOVED - RNS - 9/30/21 7. the variable width DE appears very close to several lots, please note that no part of the DE may encroach on a residential lot. CLEARED - RNS - 9/10/21 8. it appears existing lots along Prairie Ridge drain to the site. Is a private facility planned on lot 67x? if so, please confirm existing pipeline easement(s) allows a private facility within their easement and show the private DE on the plat. {NOT ADDRESSED - APPLICANT PLANS TO CONTACT FOR ENCROACHMENTS PRIOIR TO HB3167 1ST SUB} CULVERTS REMOVED - RNS - 9/30/21 9. FYI, outstanding DS comments must be resolved prior to HB3167 IPRC 1ST SUB construction plan submittal. FYI - SWFMA will be required, must be recorded prior to precon Transportation Impact • FYI Comments: • The project is located in Transportation Impact Fee Service Area B • The project does not qualify for discounts. • The approval date of the final plat will determine the applicable collection rate for building permits Water Plat case review Performed On: 09/10/2021 You may address hold comments by emailing: DSWS@fortworthtexas.gov Note: All revisions requested per our initial review to the proposed plat document must be submitted to Platting department. Staff will upload revised plat and notify our department. If this is an electronic submittal, you must still contact the platting office when you have uploaded the document, otherwise we will not be notified. Please be advised to wait for ALL departments review comments before submitting a revision to address them all at one time. Revisions are subject to additional fees. Thank you for your understanding. Platting Department contact info: 817-392-8027 All comments based on Installation Policy and Design Criteria for Water, Wastewater and Reclaimed Water. To view Policy visit http://fortworthtexas.gov/standards/#waterdesign All comments for preliminary plats are considered FYI and will be "holds' on final plat submittal. - No Permanent Structure note required on plat face - P.R.V note required on plat face - Water Impact Fee note required on plat face - Provide Sanitary Sewer Loadings / Water Demand Provide sanitary sewer loadings/water demand at Final Plat. Loadings need to be reviewed and accepted prior to submitting for Infrastructure Plan Review (IPRC) pre -submittal meeting. Results may trigger water/sewer upsizing. Contact: Reza Broun 817-392-8073 or Mark Wilson 817-392-6149 You may submit your study by email to WPD@fortworthtexas.gov - Extend water and sewer outside development frontage - Water and Sewer Extension is required by (CFA) - Per City accepted construction plans Water and Sewer extension across frontage to every proposed lot is required - will need to be under pavement: provide a community facilities agreement for the water improvement as necessary to serve the subject property. No water/sewer in side or back of lots per Subdivision Ordinance. Per Policy and Design Criteria for Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Infrastructure May 2019 (3.3.1) - Provide adequate water/sewer exclusive easements to match city accepted construction plans per the Installation Policy and Design Criteria for Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Infrastructure May 2019. Offsite easements and or easements by separate instrument need to have recording information shown on plat before hold can be cleared. Plat will be reconciled with reviewed and accepted plans to make sure all easement are correct before hold can be cleared. minimum 15' exclusive water easement, minimum 15' sanitary sewer easement, or minimum shared 25' exclusive water and sewer easement For all mains with depths greater than 10 feet, the following equation will apply (Depth of Pipe) x 2) + (O.D. of Pipe) + (2 Feet) = Easement Width/ Width is rounded up to nearest 5 feet. Per Policy and Design Criteria for Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Infrastructure May 2019 (3.8.8) - No water and sewer lines and easement in detention ponds - Water masterplan future 24" water will come from Crumb Elevated tank south, will need to dedicate easement minimum 25' exclusive water easement - Any utilities crossing water and sewer lines and their easement will need to apply Encroachment Agreement - Rec ID 820 Sewer Basin M-618 holds a sewer per acre charge of $354.73 per acre 171.551 acres x 354.73 = $60,854.29 Two percent (2%) annual cost adjustment for pro-rata fees after January 1st Per Ordinance 23708- 06- 2019 Zoning Lynn Jordan 817-392-2309 (FYI) The zoning request for "A-5" (ZC-21-107) went to Zoning Commission on August 11, 2021, recommended for approval and scheduled to be heard by the City Council September 14, 2021. (FYI) There are several lots within the development that have projected setbacks across them and may be unbuildable, a variance from the BOA would be required should they not be reconfigured. UTILITY Planning • Please have the customer review the attached plat uploaded to accela. I marked up a location that Oncor still has a line on serving an old home. I am sure this will be removed but until it is it will need to show on the plat. everything else looks great. Jim Jimmy B. Conner Oncor I PMDS Cell: 817.470.6399 jimmy.conner@oncor.com List of Comments: GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 APPENDIX GC-4.01 Availability of Lands - None GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions —Geotechnical Report Provided GC-4.04 Underground Facilities - None GC-4.06 Hazardous Environmental Condition at Site -None GC-6.06.D Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance — Not Required GC-6.07 Wage Rates - Provided GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities - Urban Forestry Permit Provided GC-6.24 Nondiscrimination - None GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements — COFW Water Department & TPW Standard Product List Provided CITY OF FORT WORTH CATTLEMAN'S CROSSING PHASE 2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS CPN: 105042 Revised July 1, 2011 FORT WORTHS; CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 10/04/2023 Approval Spec No. Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design American Concrete Company 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design American Concrete Company 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design American Concrete Company 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design American Concrete Company 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Big D Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Big D Concrete 5/2/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Big D Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Big Town Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Big Town Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Burnco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Butnco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Butnco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Bumco Texas 4/1/2023 03 34 16 Mix Design Bumco Texas 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Chisholm Trail Redi Mix 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 30CAF029 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & ADA Ramps OIJAF382 1000 psi Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 40CNF065 4000 psi Concrete for Manholes & Utility Structures 45CAF076 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving D IOOO0001737 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving DIOOO0001791 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving DIOOO0001793 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 1310000001103 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving D IOOO0002107 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving DIOOO0001273 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving DIOOO0001617 3600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving DIOOO0008381 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving DIOOO0009857 50 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM DIOOO0001055 3000 psi Concrete for Inlets, Junction Boxes, Manholes, Channel Liners, Sidewalks, Driveways, Curb & Gutter DIOOOOO1043S 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Curbs DIOOOOO1565S 3000 psi Concrete for Curbs, Curb & Gutters, Sidewalks, Driveways, ADA Ramps DIOOOOO1615 3600 psi Concrete for Inlets, Boxes, Encasement, Blocking DIOOO0001061 3600 psi Concrete for Inlets, Boxes, Encasement, Blocking DIOOO0001083S 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads, Inlets, Structures, Headwalls, Thrust Blocking DIOOO0001083 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads, Inlets, Structures, Headwalls, Thrust Blocking DIOOO0001685 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads DIOOO0005751 750 Psi Concrete Base for Trench Repair D 10000001681 4000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Retaining Walls, Box Culverts, Valley Gutters 7SKGRT 3000 psi Concrete for Grouting 14500AE 4500 psi Concrete for High Early Strength Paving CM14520AE 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 452065-1 4500 psi hand placed paving 450065-1 4500 psi hand placed paving 45U500BG 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Structures 40U553BG 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 55U120AG 4000 psi Concrete Mix for High Early Strength Paving 30U100AG 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Pipe Collars, Inlets, Thrust Blocks, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 30U1O1AG 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Flatwork 30U500BG 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking, Encasement, Curb Inlets, Junction Boxes, Fire Hydrant Pads, Driveways, Curb & Gutters, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 40U500BG 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures, Driveways, Screen Walls, Collars 36U500BG 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 08Y450BA 800 psi Concrete Mix for Base for Trench Repair OIY690BF 100 psi Concrete Mix for Flowable Fill lOYH50BF 1000 psi Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair FWCC602021 4500 psi concrete for Hand Placed Paving FWCC552091 3600 psi for Machine Placed Paving FWCC602091 3600 psi for Machine Placed Paving FWCC359101 Flowable Fill - CLSM FWFF237501 Flowable Fill - CLSM FWCC602001 4000 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures, Manholes, Headwalls, Retaining Walls, Valley Gutters, Drive Approaches FWCC502021 3500 psi concrete for Sidewalks, Driveways, Ramps, Curb & Gutter FWCC502001 3000 psi for Sidewalks, Driveways, Ramps, Curb & Gutter, Flatwork 4142 3600 psi Concrete for Curb Inlets, Junction Boxes 4518 4000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Wingwalls 5167 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 4609 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Manholes 6103 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Manholes 4502 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 3759 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 1502 150 psi Concrete for Flowable Fill-CLSM 1518 150 Psi Concrete for Flowable Fill-CLSM 5642 4000 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures 6595 5000 psi Concrete Mix for High Early Strength Paving 6589 4500 psi Concrete Mix for High Early Strength Paving C13020AE 3000 psi Concrete for Driveways, Curb & Gutter 11-350-FF 50-150 psi Concrete for Flowable Fill-CLSM FORT WORTH: CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 10/04/2023 Approval Spec No. Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Concrete (Continued) 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 30HA25II 3000 psi Concrete for Rip -Rap 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 30HA20II 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking, Sidewalks, Flatwork, Pads 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 45NG25II 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Drilled Shafts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 50QG25II 3600 psi Slurry Displaced Drilled Shaft 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 45NA20II 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 36LA2011 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 36JAOOIJ 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 40LA2011 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures 11/16/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company CLNG25II 3600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shaft/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5/5/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company CCNA25OAG 3600 psi Concrete for Drilled ShaftsLighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5/5/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company CSSQA25OAG 3,600 psi Concrete for Slurry Displacement Shafts, Underwater Shafts 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 250 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Driveways, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 350 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Driveways, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 9 70 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 9-5-2 70 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 220-8 50 psi Concrete Mix for Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 320-8 50 psi Concrete Mix for Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 230-8 750 psi Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 330-58 750 psi Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 353 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps, Driveways, Curb & Gutter, Safety End Treatments, Non-TxDOT Retaining Walls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 253-W 3000 psi Concrete Mix Sidewalks, ADA Ramps, Driveways, Curb & Gutter, Safety End Treatments, Non-TxDOT Retaining Walls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Bridge Slabs, Box Culverts, Headwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260-1 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Headwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260-2 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Box Culverts, Headwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Bridge Slabs, Box Culverts, Headwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360-1 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Box Culverts, Headwalls, Wingwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 264-N 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 366 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 265 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 365 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 370-NC 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 370-INC 5000 psi Concrete for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 375-NC 5000 psi Concrete for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 267 4200 psi Concrete Mix for Manholes and Drainage Structures 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 270 5000 psi Concrete Mix for Cast -in -Place Box Culverts 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 370 5000 psi Concrete Mix for Cast -in -Place Box Culverts 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 255-2 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Inlets, Thrust Blocking, Concrete Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 257 3600 psi Concrete mix for Valley Gutters 11/14/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 357-M 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 33 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 257-M 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 34 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260-M 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 35 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360-M 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 255-LP 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 355-LP 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 255 3500 psi Concrete Mix for Flatwork, Inlets, Thrust Blocking Concrete Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 355 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Inlets, Thrust Blocking, Concrete Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 365-STX 4000 psi Concrete for Bridge slabs, top slabs of direct traffic culverts, approach slabs 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 357 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Valley Gutters 6/21/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360-DS 3600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shaft/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundation 1/18/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 380-NC 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design GCH Concrete Services GCH4000 4000 psi Concrete for for Sidewalks, Ramps, Headwalls, Inlets, and Storm Drain Structures 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design GCH Concrete Services GCHVS 4000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design GCH Concrete Services GCH4500 4500 psi Concrete Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates C47PV5E5 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-70J23504 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-147QW5D5 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-056PS5D5 4000 psi Concrete Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-161UV5DM 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-10MQS50N 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 161PS5EM 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates C47PV5E5 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 4/7/2023 03 30 00 mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 1 OLQS50N 3,600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shafts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 161PS5EM 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 1551 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking FORT WORTH; CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Approval Spec No. STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 10/04/2023 Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Concrete(Continued) 9/9/2022 03 3000 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, hic. 5177 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, hic. 1261 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 4 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, hic. 2125 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, hic. 1701 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures, Sanitary Sewer Manholes, Junction Box 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, hic. 5409 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Inlets 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 5507 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 12/15/2022 3 3000 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 3741 100 psi concrete for flowable fill/CSLM 9/9/2022 04 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 5017 200 psi Concrete for Base Material for Trench Repair 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 9600 3600 psi Concrete for Drill Shafts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 1851 4500 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures, Hand Placed Paving 12/5/2022 4 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 1822 3600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shafts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc. 1859 4000 psi Concrete for Drilled Shafts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 4/7/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Liquid Stone C301D 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Approaches, and Driveways. 4/27/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Liquid Stone C361DNFA 3,600 psi Concrete for Retaining wall, driveway, junction box apron, approach 4/7/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Liquid Stone C361DHR 3,600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shaft/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 1/24/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Liquid Stone C451DHR-A 4500psi Concrete for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2132214 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta D9490SC 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2131214 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2131314 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136014 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136214 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141224 4,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141024 4,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136224 3,600 psi Concrete for Curb Inlets 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141233 3,600 psi Concrete for Storm Structures, Inlets, Blocking & Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta FLOW25A 50 psi Concrete for Flowable Fill/CLSM 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2142233 3,600 psi Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146333 3,600 psi Concrete for Manholes, hilets & Headwalls, Concrete Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R21412304,000 psi Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls, Valve Pads 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146035 4,000 psi Concrete for Manholes, hilets & Headwalls, Valve Pads 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146335 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving, Inlets, Storm Drain Structures 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta Q214IN27 4,000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed paving 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta Q2141K30 4,000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146N36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 11/15/2022 33 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 11/15/2022 34 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146P36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146N35 / 6.11 sacks / 4,500 psi concrete for Hand Place Paving, Inlets, Manholes, Headwalls 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K34 4,000 psi Concrete for Inlets, Manholes, Headwalls 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141N24 4,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps 11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141K24 4,000 psi Concrete for Junction Boxes, Sidewalks and Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146038 4,500 psi Concrete for Inlets, Storm Drain Structures 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146036 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving, Inlets 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146042 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146242 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146236 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta D9493SC 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2147241 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 4/1/2023 32 1320 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136N14 / 5.00 sacks / 3,000 psi concrete for Sidewalks 4/l/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146P33 / 6.01 sacks / 4,000 psi concrete for Bridge Deck 4/1/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146033 4,000 psi Concrete for Riprap 4/7/2023 32 1320 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136K14 3,000 psi concrete for sidewalks and ramps 4/7/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R216IK70 6,000 psi (3,000 psi @ 24 hrs.) for HES Paving 4/1/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta 310LBP 3,600 psi Concrete for Retaining Walls 5/22/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K37/6.22 sack / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 4/1/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141030 4,000 psi Concrete for Riprap FORT WORTH; CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Approval Spec No. STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 10/04/2023 Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Concrete(Continued) 5/3/2023 03 3000 Mix Design Martin Marietta M7842344 4,000 psi Concrete for Bridge Deck 6/l/2023 32 1320 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136R20 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps 6/1/2023 32 1320 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136N20 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps 6/27/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta U2146N41 / 6.44sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shafts / Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 6/27/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta U2146K45 / 6.65 sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shafts / Lighting and Trafic Signal Foundations 8/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta U2146R41 / 6.44 sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete for Drilled Piers/Light Pole bases. 8/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136R14 / 5.00 sacks / 3,500 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps 8/4/2023 32 1320 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141 R24 / 5.53 / 4,000 psi Concrete for Junction Box, Box Culvert, Sidewalks and Ramps. 8/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146R35 / 6.11 / 4,500 psi Concrete for Inlets, Manholes, and Headwalls 8/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146R36 / 6.17 / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 8/30/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141 R30 / 5.85 SK / 4,000 psi Concrete for Box Culverts & Headwalls 8/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta Q214IR27 / 5.69 sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 32 1320 Mix Design NCS Redi Mix NCS5020A 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C-YY 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb Inlets 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C-NY 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb Inlets 9/12/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS Pl-YY / 6.00 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete for Collars, Manholes, Box Culverts 10/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS A-YY / 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps, and Curb & Gutter 10/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS A -NY/ 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps, and Curb & Gutter 10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C SF-YY / 5.50 Sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C SF -NY 5.50 Sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS P2-YY / 6.50 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS P2-NY / 6.50 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrte for Hand Placed Paving 10/4/2023 03 34 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix FTW FLOW FILL / 150 psi concrete for Flowable 7/10/2023 03 30 00 Mix Desing Osborn 30A50MR / 5 SK / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks 7/10/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Osbum 45A60MR / 6 SK / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 1/24/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM6320AHP 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 1/24/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM5525A 3600 psi Concrete for Valley Gutters, Sidewalks, Approaches, ADA Ramps 1/18/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM6020ASS 4000 psi Concrete for Strom Drain Structures 1/18/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM5320A 3000 psi Concrete for Blocking 1/18/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM5020A 3000 psi Concrete for Curb, Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalk, Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix DCA2E554 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Rip Rap 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix VOJ11524 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix FOCIO021 215 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OJ11524 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OJ11504 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OL11504 3,600 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Curb & Gutter 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10LI1524 3600 psi Concrete Mix Manholes, Inlets, Junction Boxes, Headwalls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1RJ11524 3500 psi Concrete Mix for Thrust Blocks, Valve Pads 9/29/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OL21524 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Manholes 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 15611524 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Cast -in -Place Storm Drain Structures 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OL115E4 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Bridge substructures 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 156115D4 4000 psi Bridge Slabs 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix F35238VN 100 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix FOD138VM 100 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OJ11554 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Rip -Rap 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix POG138K9 1000 psi Concrete Mix for Trench Repair Base Material 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OKI 1524 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Encasement 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 ONI 1507 4500 psi (2600 psi (& 24 hrs.) Concrete Mix for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 ON11504 5000 psi (3600 psi @ 2 days) Concrete Mix for HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 50KI1524 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OM115D4 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Drain Structures 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1 OM11524 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10MI 1504 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 145CD5P4 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Drain Structures 11/2/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 145P25P4 4500 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures 12/5/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10KI15C4 3500 psi Concrete for Thrust Blocks, Valve Pads 12/5/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 156115C4 4000 psi Concrete for CIP Storm Drain Structures 12/5/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10LI15C4 3600 psi Concrete for Manhole, Inlet, Junction Box, Headwall 5/15/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 80LI 15135 3600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shafts/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5/15/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10NI15136 Slurry Displacement Shafts, Underwater Drilled shafts 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 30000 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps, Curb & Gutter 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 40050 4,000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Retaining Wall, Collars 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 35023 3,600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 40068 3,600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 45000 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 45300 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 40326 4,500 (3,00 @ 3-days) psi Concrete for HISS Paving FORT WORTHS; CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Spec No. STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 10/04/2023 Classification Manufacturer Model National Approval Concrete(Continued) No. Spec 10/10/2022 03 3000 Mix Design SRM Concrete 35000 3600 psi Concrete for Sewer Manholes 10/10/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 35300 3600 psi Concrete for Swere Manholes 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 35022 3,600 psi Concrete for Junction Box, Retaining Walls 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 30050 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Ramps, Inlets, Junction Boxes, Thrust Blocks, Curb and Gutter, Driveways, Barrier Ramp 2/10/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 50310 5,000 psi Concrete for HES Paving 1/13/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 45023 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 5/5/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete D100008553CB 4,000 psi Concrete for Bdridge Approach Slab, Deck Slab 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW60AHP 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW6020AHP 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete TCFW6020AHP 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW7520AMR 4500 (3000 psi (a) 3-days) psi Concrete HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW6520AMR 4500 (3000 psi na, 3-days) psi HES Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5520AMP 3600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5320A 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FWFF150CLSM 50-150 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FWFF275 50-150 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW6020A2 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures 10/10/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete TCFW6025A2 4000 psi Concrete for Manholes 10/10/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete TCFW5020A 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5025A 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Titan Ready Mix 3020AE 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete CP5020A 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb and Gutter 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5525A2 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Drive Approaches, ADA Ramp 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Titan Ready Mix TRC4520 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0250.230 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Flatwork, Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 270.230 5000 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0250.2301 3000 psi Concret Mix for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0260.2302 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0255.2301 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0260.2301 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0265.2301 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Valley Gutters, Hand Placed Paving 9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Wise Redi Mix 3678 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations Ashall Pavia 9/9/2022 32216 1� Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 11/26/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 12/5/2022 33 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 1216 Mix Design 9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Detectable WarniuP, Surface 9/9/2022 32 1320 DW$ - Pavers 9/9/2022 32 1320 DWS - Pavers 9/9/2022 32 1320 DWS - Composite 9/9/2022 32 1320 DWS - Composite 4/7/2023 32 1320 DWS - Pavers Austin Asphalt FT5D137965 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface Austin Asphalt DA513135965 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface Austin Asphalt FT5B117965 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base Austin Asphalt FTHH39965 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base Austin Asphalt FT1B117.2 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base Reynolds Asphalt 1901D PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface Reynolds Asphalt 1112B PG64-22 Type B Fine Base Reynolds Asphalt 1612B PG64-22 Type B Fine Base Sunmount Paving 341DV6422 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface Sunmount Paving 340DV6422 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface Sunmount Paving 3076BV6422 PG62-22 Type B Fine Base Sunmount Paving 341-BRAP6422ERG PG64-22 Type B Fine Base TXBIT 37-211305-20 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base TXBIT 44-211305-17 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base TXBIT 211305 (1757) PG64-22 Type B Fine Base TXBIT 222475 (1857) PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface TXBIT 29-222475-19 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface TXBIT 1-222475-20 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface TXBIT 64-224125-18 PG70-22 Type D Fine Surface TXBIT 12-222475-19 PG64-22 Type D Fine Surface Pine Hall Brick (Winston Salem, NC) Tactile Pavers Western Brick Co. (Houston, TX) Detectable Warning Pavers Engineered Plastics, hic. (Williamsville. Armor Tile ADA Solutions (Wilmington, MA) Heritage Brick CIP Composite Paver ADA Solutions (Wilmington, MA) Detectable Warning Pavers FORT WORTH: CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Approval Spec No. STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 10/04/2023 Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Silicone Joint Sealant 9/9/2022 132 1373 Joint Sealant w 890SL - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893 9/9/2022 32 1373 Joint Sealant mco 900SL - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893 9/9/2022 32 1373 Joint Sealant om Etco 300SL - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893 9/9/2022 32 1373 Joint Sealant RoadSaver Silicone - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893 Utility Trench Embedment Sand 9/9/2022 3305 10 Embedment Sand Silver Creek Materials Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 3305 10 Embedment Sand Crouch Materials Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 3305 10 Embedment Sand F and L Dirt Movers Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 3305 10 Embedment Sand F and L Dirt Movers Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33 9/9/2022 3305 10 Embedment Sand Tin Top Martin Marietta Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33 Storm Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13 9/28/2018 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers AccuCast (Govind Steel Company, LTD) MHRC #220605 (Size - **24" Dia.) ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 3305 13 Manhole Cover Neenah Foundry NF-1274-T91 (Size - 32" Dial ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry NF-1743-LM (Hinged) (Size - 32" Dial ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 3305 13 Manhole Frame Neenah Foundry NF-1930-30 (Size - 32.25" Dial ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 9/28/2018 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry R-1743-HV (Size - 32" Dia.) ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 4/3/2019 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++ 2279ST (Size - 24" Dia.) ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 4/3/2019 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++ 2280ST (Size - 32" Dia.) ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 10/8/2020 3305 13 Manhole Frames and Covers EJ ( Formally East Jordan Iron Works) EJ1033 Z2/A (Size - 32.25" Dial ASTM A536 AASHTO M306 —Note. All new development and new installation manhole lids shall meet the minimum 30-inch opening requirement as specified in City Specification 33 0513. Any smaller opening sizes will only be allowed for existing manholes that require replacement frames and covers. FORT WORTH: CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 10/04/2023 Approval Spec No. Classification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Storm Sewer - Inlet & Structures 33-05-13 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-lOx3-405-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 3') ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Fortema FRT-lOx3-406-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 3') ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Fortema FRT-I0x4.5-407-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 4.5') ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Fortema FRT-I0x4.5-420-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 4.5') ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 3920 Manhole Fortema FRT-4X4-409-PRECAST-TOP (Size - TX T) ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 3920 Manhole Fortema FRT-4X4-409-PRECAST-BASE (Size - TX T) ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 3920 Manhole Fortema FRT-5X5-410-PRECAST-TOP (Size - 5' X 5') ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 3920 Manhole Fortema FRT-5X5-410-PRECAST-BASE (Size - 5' X T) ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 3920 Manhole Fortema FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-TOP (Size - 6' X 6') ASTM C913 10/8/2020 33 3920 Manhole Fortema FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-BASE (Size - 6' X 6') ASTM C913 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-IOX3405-PRECAST INLET** (Size - 10' X 3� ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-15X3-405-PRECAST INLET** (Size - 15' X 31 ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-20X3-405-PRECAST INLET** (Size - 20' X 7� ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4409-PRECAST TOP (Size - TX 4) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4409-PRECAST BASE (Size - TX 4) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4412-PRECAST 4-FT RISER (Size - TX T) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5410-PRECAST TOP (Size - 5' X 5� ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-410-PRECAST BASE (Size - TX 5) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5412-PRECAST 5-FT RISER (Size - 5' X 5') ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-411-PRECAST TOP (Size - 6' X 6) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-41I-PRECAST BASE (Size - 6' X 6) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-412-PRECAST 6-FT RISER (Size - 6' X 6') ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-41I-PRECAST TOP (Size - TX 7� ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-411-PRECAST BASE (Size - TX T) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7412-PRECAST 4-FT RISER (Size - TX T) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-411-PRECAST TOP (Size - 8' X 8) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-41I-PRECAST BASE (Size - 8' X 8) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 3920 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-412-PRECAST 5-FT RISER (Size - 8' X 8') ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4408-PRECAST INLET (Size - TX 4) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-408-PRECAST INLET (Size - 5' X 5) ASTM 615 3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6408-PRECAST INLET (Size - 6' X 6) ASTM 615 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast Tx 4' Stacked Manhole (Size - TX 4') ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x 8' Storm Junction Box (Size - 5' X 8') ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast Tx 4' Storm Junction Box (Size - TX T) ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x 5' Storm Junction Box (Size - 5' X 5') ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 6' x 6' Storm Junction Box (Size - 6' X 6') ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 8' x 8' Storm Junction Box Base (Size - 8' X 8') ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x 8' Storm Junction Box Base (Size - 5' X 8') ASTM C478 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Rinker Materials Reinforced 48" Diameter Spread Footing Manhole (Size - 4' X T) ASTM C433 8/28/2023 33 3920 Curb Inlet 10'x 3' Riser Thompson Pipe Group Inlet Riser (Size - 3 FT) ASTM C913-16 8/28/2023 33 3920 Curb Inlet 15 'x 3' Riser Thompson Pipe Group Inlet Riser (Size - 3 FT) ASTM C913-16 8/28/2023 33 3920 Curb Inlet 20' x 3' Riser Thompson Pipe Group Inlet Riser (Size - 3 FT) ASTM C913-16 **Note. Pre -cast inlets are appoved for the stage I portion of the structure (basin) only. Stage II portion of the structure are required to be cast inplam No exceptions to this requirement shall be allowed. Storm Sewer - Pipes & Boxes 33-05-13 4/9/2021 13341 13 Storm Drain Pipes Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (ADS) ADS HP Storm Polypropylene (PP) Pipe (Size - 12" - 60") ASTM F2881 & AASHTO M330 8/28/2023 33 49 10 Storm Drain Pipes Rinker Materials Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe (Size - 2 1 " or larger) ASTM C76, C655 1/28/2023 33 49 10 Culvert Box Rinker Materials Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (Sze - Various) ASTM C789, C850