HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 8208 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 8
r To the Mayor and Members of the City Council August 17, 1999
Page 1 of 4
Subject:
DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING
THE REESTABLISHMENT OF FORT WORTH
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 (DOWNTOWN)
On August 3, 1999, the City Council adopted M&C G-12621 regarding the reestablishment of
the Fort Worth Public Improvement District No. 1. Paragraph 3 of the M&C requires the City
Manager to prepare certain documents and information and to file the same with the City
Secretary as provided in Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code.
The City Council formally established PID No. 1 in 1986 for an initial three-year period, and
subsequently reestablished the District for an additional five-year period, which ended
September 30, 1994. The District was reestablished at that time for another five years, to end
September 30, 1999. This petition requests reestablishment for another five-year period ending
September 30, 2004.
The following information and documents are hereby submitted:
1. The petition for reestablishment of Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 contains
sufficient signatures and meets other requirements of Chapter 372, Subchapter A, Section
372.005 of the Texas Local Government Code and the City's current policy regarding public
improvement districts. See attached and incorporated Exhibit A.
2. The general nature of the improvements and/or services of the District shall include:
(a) an improvement district maintenance and landscaping program consisting of
supplemental street sweeping, sidewalk cleaning, bus shelter cleaning, planting and
landscape maintenance, streetscape improvements, and trash receptacle pickup.
(b) an improvement district promotions program consisting of recreational and cultural
enhancements and activities; promotional program; and the staging or monitoring of
special recreational and cultural events.
(c) an improvement district marketing program consisting of an advertising and marketing
campaign to promote the use of the District to three target populations (primarily),
downtown workers, visitors, Fort Worth and Tarrant County residents.
(d) an improvement district security program consisting of a public relations crime
prevention campaign; a private security force coordination cam q ,gn a Parking garage
and parking lot security program. ,
1
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. s"
T
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council August 17, 1999
Page 2 of 4
X Subject:
ton DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING
THE REESTABLISHMENT OF FORT WORTH
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. I (DOWNTOWN)
(e) an improvement district transportation and parking program consisting of a campaign to
promote FWTA bus service and ridesharing; the development of a plan concerning better
utilization of short-term parking facilities; and the improvement of traffic signs.
(f) an improvement district management program to provide for the establishment,
administration and operation of the District/activities and programs.
The improvements and/or services will be a supplement to the standard existing level of
City improvements andJor services and will constitute an added increment to the improvements
and/or services normally provided to the taxpayers generally. The estimated annual cost of
standard improvements and/or services currently provided by the City of Foil Worth to taxpayers
in the District has been adjusted annually since 1986. Current figures are included in the
petition's Plan of Service shown in Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof
by reference. The adjusted current standard level of service totals will be added to and made a
part of the City Council resolution reestablishing the District, when and if the District is
reestablished. If the District is reestablished, the City will continue to furnish or pay for standard
improvements andJor services in the District at the same level as they are provided to the
taxpayers generally.
The City Council resolution authorizing the reestablishment of the District will contain a
provision establishing that the present annual cost level of standard improvements and/or
services currently provided by the City of Fort Worth to taxpayers in the District is estimated to
be $234,985. During the five-year term of the District, the City will provide the same level of
standard improvements and/or services to taxpayers in the District as estimated, with such
corrections therein as certified by the City Manager.
3. A preliminary estimate of the cost of the improvements andlor services of the District during
the first year of operation in the next five-year period is:
(a) maintenance and landscaping program $543,924
(b) promotions program 46,950
(c) marketing and communications program 67,500
(d) security enhancement program 23,165
(e) transportation and parking program
(f) management program 208,8 13,
Total $978,994
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 8208
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
August 17, 1.999
Page 3 of 4
Subject:
van DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING
THE REESTABLISHMENT OF FORT WORTH
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. I (DOWNTOWN)
The cost of improvements and/or services in subsequent years will be determined in the annual
service plan to be adopted by the City Council.
4. The boundaries of the improvement district are:
The area bounded by Jones Street on the east; Lancaster Avenue on the south; Texas Street,
Macon Street, Fifth Street, Fourth Street, Burnett Street, Belknap Street and Taylor Street on
the west; and the Trinity River and the East 100 and East 200 blocks of Bluff Street on the
north. Such area is more particularly shown on a map, which is attached hereto, marked
Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof by reference.
5. The method of assessment is:
(a) A service plan will be approved and adopted by the City Council for a period not less
than five years. The plan will be reviewed and updated annually by the Council to
determine the annual budget for improvements and/or special supplemental services
within the District.
(b) The cost of an improvement and/or special service will be assessed against real property
within the District according to the value of such property as determined by the City
Council, including the value of structures or other improvements on the property.
(c) The City Council resolution authorizing reestablishment of the District will contain a
provision which states that during the five-year term of the District the annual
assessments against real property in the District will not exceed an amount equal to 15
cents per $100 of the value of such property as determined by the City Council, including
the value of structures or other improvements on the property.
6. The proposed apportionment of costs between the improvement district and the City as a
whole is:
(a) All of the cost of an improvement and/or service would be paid bY, speeidt assessments
against real property and structures or other improvements thereon in the DisCiict
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH,TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 8208
T
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council August 17, 1999
Page 4 of 4
Subject:
Ian DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING
THE REESTABLISHMENT OF FORT WORTH
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. I (DOWNTOWN)
(b) The City of Fort Worth will be responsible for the payment of assessments on exempt
city-owned real property and structures or other improvements thereon in the District.
The payment of assessments on property owned by other exempt jurisdictions may be
established by contract. The City as a whole will continue to provide the standard
improvements and services to the District as referred to in I above.
(c) The City Council of the City of Fort Worth will be authorized to establish by ordinance
reasonable classifications and formulas for the apportionment of costs between the City
and the areas to be assessed and to establish the methods for assessing special benefits for
various classes of improvements and/or services.
7. The probable maximum benefits to be conferred on each tract in the District because of its
improvements and/or services shall be greater than the amount of the assessment against such
tract and the owners thereof.
The City Council will consider a resolution authorizing reestablishment of the District which will
de that the District will for five years immediately follow
provi exist following In adoption of such
resolution unless property owners in the District petition the City Council for reestablishment of
the District, or unless the District is sooner tern-iinated as provided by law. Council action on the
resolution is planned for September 7, 1999, after a public hearing on the reestablishment of the
District.
The original of this report is on file with the City Secretary of the City of Fort Worth.
(0�9
Bob Terrell
City Manager
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" Calculationsrl
Exhibit "B" Petition
Exhibit "C" Map
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH,TEXAS
PROPOSED PIO1 PETITION FINDINGS
Texas Local Government Code, Section 372.005 Petition states:
The petition io sufficient if signed by�
�
(1) owners of taxable real property representing more than 50 percent of the appraised value of
taxable nae| property liable for eoaeaamont under the proposal, as determined by the current roll of the
appraisal district in which the property is located; and
(2) record owners of naa| property liable for assessment under the proposal who:
(A) constitute more than GO percent of all record owners of property that is liable for
assessment under the proposal; or
(B) own taxable real property that constitutes more than 50 percent of the area of all taxable
'
real property that io liable for assessment under the proposal.
Herein are the statistics:
Total appraised value of property within the district $ 508,543.245
of which $17,71O,DO4is absolute exempt property
Total appraised value of property liable for assessment $ 481.832.361
Appraised value of property belonging to records owners who signed petition $ 458.006.766
Percentage of appraised value of property liable for assessment whose
��
roo*nd owners have signed the petition 93'33 %� e above satisfies the requirements under Section 372.085(b)(1)
Total number of properties in the proposed district 310
Total number of properties represented bv petitions submitted 251
Total number of petitions whose ownership matched the TAD rm|| 251
Percentage of valid petitions within the proposed district 80.97 %
The above satisfies the requirements under Section 372.005(b)[])(A)
Total number of property owners in the proposed district 141
Total number nf property owners represented by petitions submitted 93
Percentage of valid petitions within the proposed district 65'96 %
The above satisfies the requirements under Section 372.005(b)(2)(A)
Total square footage of properties inthe proposed district 4,065.511
Total square footage of properties represented by petitions submitted 3.581.862
Percentage of valid petitions within the proposed district 88.10 %
The above satisfies the requirements under Section 372.005(b)(2)(B)
In oonoyuaion, staff finds the petitions submitted by the P|D 1 petitioners have met
the requirements under Section 372.005(b) of the Texas Local Government Code.
In addidon, staff finds the petitions submitted by the P|D 1 petitioners have nnot
the requirements of the City of Fort Worth P\O Policy. The area proposed for the —
district is same area that has been in existence since 1886.
� Exhibit
STATE OF TEXAS S _
� COUNTY OF TARRANT S
TO: The Mayor and City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas,
1000 Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102
PETITION REQUESTING ESTABLISHMENT
OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
The undersigned petitioners hereby request that the City Council of the City of Fort
Worth, Texas, initiate and establish a public improvement district under chapter 372 of the Texas
Local Government Code known as the Public Improvement District Assessment Act (The "Act"),
so that the powers granted under the Act may be exercised by the City of Fort Worth. In support
of this petition, the petitioners show the following:
1. The proposed district would be known as the"Fort Worth Improvement District No.
1."
2. The City of Fort Worth would be authorized to utilize the district to undertake
improvement projects and/or services that confer a special benefit on the part of the City within
the district. The City Council would be ahthorized to levy and collect special assessments on
property in the district, based on benefits conferred by the improvement project and/or services,
to pay all or part of the cost of such improvement project and/or services.
3. The general nature of the proposed improvements and/or services shall include:
(a) an improvement district maintenance and landscaping program consisting of
supplemental street sweeping, sidewalk clearing, bus shelter cleaning, planting and
landscape maintenance, streetscape improvements, and supplemental trash
receptacle pickup.
(b) an improvement district promotions rp ogram consisting of recreational and
cultural enhancements and activities; and the staging or monitoring of special
recreational and cultural events.
(c ) an improvement district marketing and communications program consisting of
an advertising, marketing and communications program; marketing evcpts and
cooperative merchandizing of DFWI logos, etc. in cooperation with other For
Worth non-profits; and management of a Main Street banner program.
(d) an improvement district security,enhancement program consisting ofaddilionall
bicycle, cruiser and mounted police officers; a public relations crime"pventin mmo .
campaign; a public/private security force coordination program; and other security
related projects on an as needed basis.
ExMbit B
-2-
(e) an improvement district transportation and parking program consisting of a
Transportation Management Organization; parking coordination and management
where ever feasible; way finding planning and projects; interface planning between
various transportation modes and land uses; and grantsmanship to develop and
implement transportation and parking related programs which solve identified
problems in the district.
An improvement district management program to provide for the establishment,
administration and operation of the district.
The proposed improvements and/or services would be a supplement to the standard
existing level of city improvements and/or services and would constitute an added increment to
the improvements and/or services provided by the City of Fort Worth to taxpayers in the
proposed district. An official list of City services in the District is on file with the City Secretary's
Office as part of the original Petition, Resolution and Ordinance creating the district in 1986. If
the district is created, the City would continue to furnish or pay for standard improvements and
/or services in the district at the same level as they are provided to the taxpayers generally.
4. The estimated cost of the improvements and /or services of the proposed district during
the first year of operation is:
(a ) maintenance and landscaping program - $543,924
(b ) promotions program - S 46,950
(c) marketing and communications program-$ 67,500
(d ) security enhancement program - $ 23,165
(e) transportation and parking program - $ 88,642
(f) management program - $2018 � 7g Of qq-
The cost of improvements and / or services in subsequent years would be determined in the
service plan to be adopted by the City Council. The Plan of Service and Budget Summary is
shown on Exhibit "N', which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
5. The boundaries of the proposed improvement district are:
The area bounded by Jones Street on the East; Lancaster Avenue, and Texas
Street on the south; Macon, Fourth, Burnett and Taylor Streets on the West; and the Trinity River
and the east 100 and 200 blocks of Bluff Street on the North. Such area is more particularly
shown on a map which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by
reference. ..... .........
6. The proposed method of assessment is:
(a) A service plan would be approved and adopted by the City Council,fon
a period not less than five years. The plan would be reviewed and updated
annually by the Council to determine the annual budget for improvements'ard%r
special supplemental services within the district.
P11
Exhibit B
-3-
(b) The cost of an improvement and/or special service would be assessed
against real property within the district according to the value of such property as
determined by the City Council, including the value of structures or other
improvements on the property.
(c ) During the first year of the five year term of the district, the annual
assessments against real property in the district will not exceed an amount equal to
12 cents per $100 of the value of such property as determined by the City Council,
including the value of structures or other improvements on the property.
(d) The district shall have a five year term. The district will exist for five
years immediately following publication of notice of establishment of the district
unless property owners in the district petition the City Council for re-establishment
of the district, or unless the district is sooner terminated as provided by law.
(e) During the five year term of the district, there shall be a cap on the
annual assessment rate against real property in the district not exceed an amount
equal to 14 cents per $100 value of such property as determined by the City
Council, including the value of structures or other improvements on the property.
7. The proposed apportionment of costs between the improvement district and the City as
a whole is:
(a) At least 20 percent of the cost of an improvement and/or service
would be paid by special assessments against real property and structures or other
improvements thereon in the district.
(b) The City of Fort Worth would be responsible for the payment of
assessments on exempt city-owned real property and structures or other
improvements thereon in the district. The payment of assessments on property
owned by other exempt jurisdictions may be established by contract.
(c ) The City Council of the City of Fort Worth would be authorized to
establish by ordinance reasonable classifications and formulas for the
apportionment of costs between the City and the areas to be assessed and to
establish the methods for assessing special benefits for various classes of
improvements and/or services.
8. The Proposed management structure for administration of the distract is: �
(a) The City Council of the City of Fort Worth would exercise the b*ert
granted by the Act.
(b) The City Council would specifically be responsible for the following:
Exhibit B
-4-
(1) Undertaking improvements and/or services and levying and
collecting special assessments to pay all or part of the costs;
(2) requiring feasibility reports which the Council desires to
determine whether improvements should be made as
proposed or otherwise;
(3) requiring preliminary cost estimates for proposed
improvements and /or services;
(4) holding public hearings on the advisability of proposed
improvements and/or services;
(S) making findings by resolution as to the advisability of
improvements, the estimated costs, the method of
assessment, and the apportionment of costs between the
improvement district and the City as a whole;
(6) adopting a resolution authorizing actual construction of
improvements or implementation of services;
(7) approving a service and assessment plan for a period of not
less than five years;
(8) reviewing and updating the service and assessment plan
annually to determine the annual budget for improvements
and/or special supplemental services and adjusting the
amount of the assessment for each property owner annually
following approval of the plan;
(9) apportioning the cost of improvements and/or services
-assessed against property in the district;
(10) establishing by ordinance, if the Council desires, reasonable
classifications and formulas for the apportionment of costs
between the City and the area to be assessed and the
methods of assessing the special bent fox vs s
of improvements and/or services: `r
r
(11) providing for the payment of assessments on city-awrned
property- ........., .... 1
(12) determining the assessments against each parcel of land and
Exhibit S
-5-
causing a proposed assessment roll to be prepared and
filed;
(13) holding public hearings on proposed assessments and
passing on objections to such assessments;
(14) adopting ordinances levying special assessments, specifying
the method and time for payment of assessments,
determining the rate of interest on unpaid assessments, and
fixing liens against property for unpaid assessments;
(15) holding public hearings on supplemental assessments to
correct omissions or mistakes in original assessments;
(lb) making a reassessment or new assessment if an assessment
is set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction, found
excessive by the City Council, or determined to be invalid
by the City Council on the written advice of legal counsel;
(17) creating a separate improvement district fund in the City
treasury to be used solely to pay costs incurred in the
making of improvements and/or providing services; and
(18) determining whether to issue general obligation bonds,
revenue bonds or time warrants to pay all or part of the
costs of improvement sand/or services authorized by the
Act.
(19) determining whether to maintain the project and assess the
prooerty owners of their appropriate share of the costs if the
management firm's work is unssatisfactory; unless and until
the District is disolved by the property owners of record in
accordance with the requirements of the Act.
(c ) Any or all of the improvement and/or services to be provided by the
district would be provided through City of Fort Worth employees and staff, by
contracts with the private sector or by contracts creating a public-pnte__...,,,, , ,
partnership. The method to be used in providing such services would bd
determined by the City Council after notice and public heant,'Ig,
9. The persons signing this petition request and concur with the establishment°tae
district. .
Exhibit B
-6-
roll
10. The City Council of the City of Fort Worth is authorized to establish an advisory body
with the responsibility of developing and recommending a service and improvement plan to the
Council. If the advisory body is established, the composition and membership thereof would be
approved by the City Council in accordance with the requirement of the Act.
11. This petition is sufficient because it is signed by:
(a) More than 50 percent of the owners of record of property liable for
assessment under this proposal; or
(b) the record owners of property composing more than 50 percent of the
area liable for assessment under this proposal; and
(c ) the record owners of taxable property representing more than 50
percent of the appraised value of the taxable real property, including the value of
structures and other improvements within the proposed district, as determined by
the current roll of the Tarrant Appraisal District.
The signatures, names, telephone numbers and addresses of the owners of record of
property liable for assessment under this proposal and the address, legal description, area and
appraised value of each owner's property, including the value of structures and other
improvements hereon, as determined by the current roll of the Tarrant Appraisal District, are
shown below. The percentage of the record owners of such property liable for assessment who
have signed this petition, the percentage of the total area which belongs to such owners, and the
percentage of the appraised value of the total area which belongs to such owners is more
particularly shown on Exhibit "C" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
12. The proposed district is a complete alternative to other methods by which the City of
For Worth may finance improvements and/or special supplemental services by assessing property
owners.
13. The cost of any improvement and/or services provided by the district would be paid
as follows:
(a) All costs payable by the City as a whole may be paid from general funds
available for the purpose or from other available general funds.
(b) Costs payable by special assessments which have been paid in-fulj e
paid from these assessments,
(c ) Costs payable by special assessments to be paid in installments and costs
made payable by the City as a whole but not payable from available general funds orother
available general improvement funds shall be paid by the issuance and sale of revetitit;of.........
general obligation bonds,
Exhibit B
-7-
I-r11
(d) During the progress of an improvement and/or services the City Council may
issue temporary notes or time warrants of the City to pay costs of the improvements and
/or services and on the completion of the work issue revenue or general obligation bonds.
(e) The costs of more than one improvement and/or services may be paid from a
single issue and sale of bonds without other consolidation proceedings prior to the bond
issue.
(f) Any such bonds shall be issued in accordance with the provisions of Sections
18 through 24 of the Act.
14. The City is not obligated to undertake any improvements or services proposed as
part of the Public Improvement District whether there is a district or if and when the
district is terminated.
115. The application fee for submission of this petition to the City Council is $150.00.
16. The petitions hereby attattached and made a part hereto shall be filled with the City
Secretary's office.
17. The petitioners hereby request that the City Council do the following-
(a) determine that this petition meets the requirements of the Act-,
(b) Make findings by resolution as to the advisability of the nature of the
proposed improvements and/or services, the estimated cost, the boundaries of the
improvement district, the method of assessment, and the apportionment of costs between
the proposed district and the City as a whole,
(c ) give proper notice and hold a public hearing on the advisability of establishing
the district and providing the proposed improvement and/or services;
(d) at any time within six months after final adjournment of the hearing, adopt a
resolution authorizing establishment of the improvement district in accordance with its
findings as to the advisability of the improvements and/or services,
I................. ......../.............
(e) take any and all other steps necessary to establishmen of the-district,-. 7",.............-1
Respectfully submitted,
This da of
9
000�
Exhibit B
1999-2000 PLAN OF SERVICES
Synopsis of Services:
Maintenance and Landscaping:
The Maintenance and Landscaping Services will consist of:
1. A Day Labor program which shall provide for the maintenance of the sidewalks
five days a week: Monday through Friday,Saturdays and during the evenings on
Thursdays and Fridays
2. Mechanized Sidewalk-cleaning program which shall perform mechanized
sweeping and high pressure hot water cleaning of the sidewalks in the District. This
contractor shall also clean the bus shelters five days a week.
3. A Street Sweeping program which shall sweep the 22 curb miles of curb and
gutters m the District twice a week.
4. A Landscaping program which shall provide for two plantings of blooms in the
17,000 square feet of planter boxes in the District.
Promotions:
The Promotions Services will consist of
1.The production of three signature events in the Downtown:
The MAIN ST. Fort Worth Arts Festival; Christmas Parade of Lights; and
The Fort Worth Fourth
2. Coordination,production, and/or promotion of other events, festivals and
activities in the District.
Marketing:
The Marketing and Communications Services will consist of:
1. Creation and continuation of public various marketing programs to maintain a
positive image of Downtown and the District.
2. Develop,collateral information vehicles and an on-going public information
program for the Strategic Action Plan Implementation
4. Supply information to interested groups and individuals through research,
surveys and focus groups.
5. Implement a marketing event program that generates significant publicity and
earned income to supplement District assessments.
Security:
Security Enhancement Services will consist of:
1. Monitoring the activities of the Bicycle Patrol, Mounted Patrol and Cruiser
Patrol in the Downtown
2. Provide the feed,veterinarian supplies and tack for the Downtown Mounted
Patrol.
3. Provide the support for Operation Partnership, a cooperative communications
program between the private security forces in the Downtown and the Police Department.
Transportation
Transportation and Parking Services will consist of:
1. Develop a coordinated parking management program
2. Application for a Comprehensive Way finding grant, and management of.same,` -
Administration:
Administrative Services will consist of:
1. Management and coordination of all District programs and activities
2. Fiscal administration of District programs, including an annual independent audit.
Exhibit B
1999-2000 BUDGET
SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SUMMARY
DRAFT
1ouo-20nn
BUDGET
REVENUES:
PRIVATE PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS $590.000
CITY ASSESSKCDNTRACTUALSVCS 233.144.00
SID GENERATED REVENUE 112.100.00
OTHER REVENUE-SID 4375000
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENSES:
MAINTENANCE AND LANDSCAPE
SALARIES AND WAGES 13.408.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 525.516.00
OTHER EXPENSES 6.000.00
CAPITAL OUTLAYS 0.00
PROMOTIONS
SALARIES AND WAGES 27.595.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8.130.00
OPERATIONS AND SUPPLIES 475.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9.800.00
OTHER EXPENSES 950.00
SECURITY ENHANCEMENT
�
�
SALARIES AND WAGES 13.28000
OPERATIONS AND SUPPLIES 4.000.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4.135�00
OTHER EXPENSES 175000
TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING
SALARIES AND BENEFITS 79.302.00
OPERATIONS AND SUPPLIES 2.240.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5.000.00
OTHER EXPENSES 1.000.00
CAPITAL OUTLAYS 110000
"v.o42.""
MARKETING
SALARIES AND WAGES 41.184.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 10`702.00
OPERATIONS AND SUPPLIES 9.204.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3.400,00
OTHER EXPENSES 3,010.00
"'.^""T
ADk0|N|STRAT|ON
SALARIES AND WAGES 108,778,00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 44.00O��
—,
OPERATIONS AND SUPPLIES 5.000,00 �
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43.035.00
OTHER EXPENSE 6.500.00 .
CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,500.00
Exhibit
TOTAL EXPENSES 97899400
1999-2000 Five Year Plan of Services
Revenue and Expense Summary
Or
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
PROGRAM AREA ITEM
REVENUES
Private Property Assessments 604,750 619,868 635,365 651,249 667,530
City Property Assessments 122,602 122,602 122,602 122,602 122,602
City Pay for City Services 35,851 35,851 36,389 36,389 36,389
City Pay for H/T Services 32,452 32,452 32,938 32,938 32,938
City Pay for P& R Services 42,239 42,239 42,873 42,873 42,873
Sid-Generated Revenue 122,100 132,100 132,100 132,100 132,100
Interest 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 13,000
Other 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
SUBTOTALS 979,994 1,006,112 1,024,267 1,041,151 1,057,432
Maintenance&Landscaping 543,924 543,924 557;522 557,522 557,522
Promotions 46,950 46,950 48,000 50,000 50,000
Marketing 67,500 69,500 72,000 75,000 76,000
Security Enhancement 23,165 23,165 23,665 23,665 24,000
Transportation&Parking 89,642 108;540 108,697 116,464 129,910
Administration 208,813 214,033 214,383 218,500 220,000
TOTAL 979,994 1,006,112 1,024,267 1,041,151 1,057,432
* 2.5% increase in property values is assumed in these projections.
+ Modest increases to offset inflation in expenses have been included where possible. Any neW" "grog ams would
require additional revenues or a reorientation of existing programs to downsize one or more programs in order to
fund a new one.
Exhibit B
Oy'
d v�
R(} o0o U
RNER
.rs r r �.
Downtown
Fart Worth
J
Improvement f
District # 1
40
r
4ti, c
rim
Exhibit C