HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 8492 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS NO. 8492
May 6, 2003
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
Page 1 of 2
..a..
xg9a SUBJECT: MOSQUITO MONITORING, SURVEILLANCE AND
EDUCATION PROGRAM
In anticipation of the mosquito season, the City of Fort Worth is prepared to detect and respond to the
presence of West Nile Virus and other mosquito-borne illnesses through an expanded mosquito sampling
and surveillance program, an interdepartmental preparedness and response team and coordinated citizen
education.
Sampling and Surveillance
The Tarrant County Public Health Department (TCPHD) has primary responsibility for public health
surveillance and has obtained a grant from the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) to expand
the collection and testing of mosquito samples in 28 cities within Tarrant County. Five surveillance sites
will be within the City of Fort Worth. In addition, the Tarrant County Public Health laboratory has been
upgraded to test samples locally rather than having to send them to Austin. This will reduce the time to
receive results from two weeks to two or three days.
The City of Fort Worth Public Health Department (CFWPHD) has a written agreement with TCPHD for
the training and supervision of two larvicide and adulticide applicators. These two staff plus two other
CFWPHD staff will be trained and licensed, independently, with the costs supported by a CDC grant.
Interdepartmental Preparedness and Response Team
The CFWPHD Director chairs a committee with representatives from Environmental Management,
Transportation/Public Works, Parks and Community Services, Code Compliance, Action Center, Water
Department and TCPHD as well as CFWPHD. This committee has reviewed the strategies necessary to
prevent the breeding of mosquitoes and has devised plans to eliminate as many sources as possible. The
committee has also developed a plan for a coordinated response to blitz any neighborhoods where positive
West Nile Virus samples are located.
Citizen Education
The CFWPHD has been the call center for mosquito complaints for several years. We have now provided
training to the call centers at the Action Center and Code Compliance to assure that citizens' complaints
are handled in a consistent and streamlined manner.
Citizens have been informed in the City Times (April water bill) and the City Page how they can reduce
the sources of mosquito breeding in their homes and provide their families with personal protection against
mosquito bites. The "Menacing Mosquitoes" brochure has been updated and is available in both Spanish
and English. Over 10,000 copies have been distributed through the Library, Parks and Community
Services, Code Compliance, Environmental Management, Water Department, neighborhood associations
and through our outreach program.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 8492
May 6, 2003
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
.. Page 2 of 2
w
SUBJECT: MOSQUITO MONITORING, SURVEILLANCE AND
EDUCATION PROGRAM
To Spray or Not to Spray?
The Fort Worth mosquito monitoring, surveillance and education program stresses source reduction and
personal protection. The distribution of environmentally-friendly larvicide will be used in locations where
mosquito larvae is reported. However, spraying pesticide for adult mosquitoes will not be used unless the
surveillance program finds the West Nile Virus present in sufficient quantity to be a threat to human
health. Spraying for mosquitoes will temporarily reduce the number of adult mosquitoes in the immediate
vicinity. However, similar to some medications, the toxins used in spraying have side effects that
generally outweigh the limited positive impact. First, spraying will not rid the city of mosquitoes. The
chemical must make direct contact with the insect to kill it, making it difficult to destroy mosquitoes
hiding in grass, bushes, trees, or backyards. Moreover, the chemicals have no residual effects and do
nothing to kill the mosquito larvae thriving in stagnant water. Secondly, spraying for mosquitoes may give
residents a false sense of security. The risk of someone being infected with West Nile Virus might then
increase if fewer people decide not to use insect repellant before working or playing outdoors. Thirdly,
adding harmful chemicals to the environment can have unwanted secondary effects. The City has four
lakes which have fishing bans or restrictions tied to pesticides. Finally, thousands of Fort Worth residents
diving with respiratory problems such as asthma would be in danger of an onset triggered by the pesticides.
The potential hazard to the general population must be weighed against the limited benefits of pesticide
application.
Conclusion
By taking responsibility for reducing their exposure to mosquito bites, residents can go much farther in
preventing a human case of West Nile Virus than can the city by spraying. Source reduction (eliminating
standing water where mosquitoes breed and grow), personal protection (protective clothing, insect
repellant, and limiting exposure to insects during dusk and dawn), and larvicide use (reducing mosquito
larvae before they hatch) are the most effective response to the threat of West Nile Virus. Nevertheless,
CFWPHD and TCPHD will continue their surveillance and education programs to monitor the status of
mosquito-borne illnesses and respond accordingly.
W. Ja on
City Manager
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS