HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 8449 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. q44Q
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council November 19, 2002
Subject: Cold Case Review Update
Ian
During the Pre-Council session on August 27,2002,Captain Richard Reflogal presented information
regarding the Fort Worth Police Department's systematic review of 606 unsolved homicide cases
dating back to 1967. The goal of this "Cold Case Effort" is to determine if new technologies or
changing circumstances can provide additional information that will lead to the identification of the
suspect(s). The purpose of this report is to respond to City Council's request for additional
information and a plan to reduce the number of unsolved cases within two to three years.
The Cold Case Effort is in addition to the Homicide Unit's current caseload,which is approximately
twice the number of cases per detective in comparison to the Homicide units of Houston, San
Antonio,Austin,and Oklahoma City. However,despite their greater caseload,Fort Worth Homicide
detectives have achieved a clearance rate of 93.3% in 2002, as compared to an average 74.5%
clearance rate for these same cities.
Beginning on September 9,2002, in response to City Council's desire to expedite cold case review
the police department's cold case investigative efforts intensified. It is now the full-time
responsibility of two detectives to review all unsolved homicide cases and determine the potential
solvability of each. Due to the department's increased efforts,the timeframe for reviewing the 606
cold cases will be approximately 10 months. This is a significant reduction from the review
timeframe of six years that was reported on August 27. The initial projection of six years was based
upon the estimated work product of one part-time reviewer.
A case assessment process has been developed which results in each case being placed in one of
three categories. The criteria for each category is as follows:
Priority I cases:
■ Cases that contain evidence which has not been processed according to current forensic
technology.
■ Cases with named suspect(s), but lacking in sufficient evidence to file the case.
• Cases with witnesses that were not previously interviewed,or with witnesses that appeared
to have withheld information during their initial interview.
■ Cases with new information from any source.
• Based upon the experience of the reviewing investigator,those cases which appear to be the
most solvable.
Priority 2 cases:
• Cases that do not meet the criteria outlined for a Priority 1, but contain sufficient leads or
information to warrant an assignment to an investigator.
• Cases with indications that the steps taken by the initial investigator need to be retraced.
• Cases in which a different investigative approach might result in additional information.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH,TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. $449
` To the Mayor and Members of the City Council November 19, 2002
Page 2 of 2
�X Subject: Cold Case Review Update
r�
Priority 3 cases:
• Cases with all known leads exhausted,no physical evidence,and no suspect(s) information.
• Cases that have been thoroughly reinvestigated previously with no positive results.
■ Cases that were previously assigned to a task force and exhaustively investigated.
Cases that are categorized as a Priority 1 or 2 are assigned to a detective for further investigation.
Priority 3 cases are not assigned. The cold cases are being distributed among eight Homicide Unit
and four Major Case Unit detectives. The detectives have 30 days to evaluate the information
provided by the reviewing investigators, review the case file, and take appropriate investigative
actions. The investigative results are then documented and reviewed by the Homicide supervisor.
The supervisor determines whether further efforts are warranted. Currently 151 cold cases have been
reviewed and assessed. Of this number, 36 cases were assigned to detectives for further
investigation, resulting in I1 cases being solved. The current estimated timeframe for the
reinvestigation of all Priority 1 and 2 cold cases is two years.
When the review efforts for all unsolved cases have been completed, the process will begin again,
with the Priority 1 cases being given first consideration. The Cold Case Effort will become a
continuous process for the Fort Worth Police Department,and will ensure that an exhaustive attempt
is made to solve each homicide case.
Statistics pertaining to the number of cases rejected by the Tarrant County District Attorney's Office
that the Homicide Unit determined to be worthy of prosecution were not previously kept by the
department. In response to the Council's concerns, Homicide Lieutenant J. N. Dary has been
instructed to collect this data for current and future cases.
If you would like additional information, please don't hesitate to contact Assistant City Manager
Libby Watson or Police Chief Ralph Mendoza.
ary W. Ja on
City Manager
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH,TEXAS