Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Contract 41383
CITY SECRETARY 4/ j 8 3 CONTRACT NO . ,,. CONT Between CITY OF FORT WORTH and ACCUTEST LABORATORIES GULF COAST, INC., For LABORATORY ANALYTICAL SERVICES Transportation and Public Works Department Environmental Services Division OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH, TX December 2010 l 1 -? 1-1 1 P 4 : 4 9 I '-J --COITRAC10lt. --······· --TJIIIW. FUCC)n Page 1 of2 City of Fort Worth, Texas Mayor and Council Communication COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 11/16/2010 DATE: Tuesday, November 16 , 2010 REFERENCE NO.: **C-24592 LOG NAME: 20ACCUTEST SUBJECT: Authorize the Execution of a Professional Services Contract with Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc ., for Laboratory Analytical Services , Not to Exceed $100 ,000.00 Per Contract Year RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services contract not to exceed $100 ,000 .00 per contact year with Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc ., for laboratory analytical services . DISCUSSION: The Transportation and Public Works Department , Environmental Services Division requires a professional services contract for the furnishing of all labor, materials and equipment necessary for performing environmental laboratory analyses of air, soil , water and asbestos samples collected for various projects and inspections. The cost for the laboratory analytical services will not exceed $100 ,000 .00 per contract year. The proposed agreement will commence on the date the contract is fully executed and continue for a period of one-year with three one-year options to renew . Renewal may be effected by written notification by the City Manager or his designated representative to the contractor within 30 days of the expiration of the prior term and does not require specific City Council approval, provided the City Council has appropriated sufficient funds to satisfy the City's obligations during the renewal term. The Environmental Services Division requested proposals for environmental laboratory analysis on July 22 , 2010. Proposal packages were received on August 12 , 2010 from the following firms : Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc. Ana-Lab Corporation ERMI Environmental Laboratories , Inc . Oxidor Laboratories , LLC Southern Petroleum Laboratories , Inc. TestAmerica Laboratories , Inc. TraceAnalysis , Inc. Xenco Laboratories The proposals were evaluated and scored based on a pre-determined list of factors including cost, performance on EPA proficiency tests , experience , qualifications of personnel , testing capabilities , and subcontractors . Based on the above described evaluation , staff is recommending the contract be awarded to Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. A waiver of the M/WBE requirements was requested by the department and approved by the M/WBE office because the purchase of services is from sources where subcontracting or supplier opportunities are negligible . FISCAL INFORMATION/ CERTIFICATION: 11 /21/2 010 Page 2 of2 The Fin·ancial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current operating budget, as appropriated , of the Environmental Protection Operating Fund . FUND CENTERS: TO Fund/Account/Centers CERTIFICATIONS: Submitted for City Manager's Office by: Originating Department Head: Additional Information Contact: ATTACHMENTS FROM Fund/Account/Centers R103 531060 0204106 R 103 531060 0204104 Fernando Costa (6122) William Verkest (7801) Michael Gange (6569) 1. 20Accutest R 103 531060 0204106 .doc (CFW Internal) 2 . 20Accutest R103 531060 0204104 .doc (Publ ic) 3. MWBE Waiver Approved DEM10-09LAB.pdf (CFW In terna l) 4 . R103 531060 (2).pdf (CFW Internal) $89 ,550.00 10 450.00 11 /7 1 /?010 ST ATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT § § § KNOWN ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: This Contract is entered into by and between the City of Fort Worth ("City"), a home-rule municipality located within Tarrant, Denton, Parker, and Wise Counties, Texas, acting through Fernando Costa, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager, and Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc., a Texas corporation ("Contractor"}, acting through Vincent Pugliese, its duly authorized President. City and Contractor may be referred to herein individually as a Party, or collectively as the Parties. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the Parties hereto mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS City means the City of Fort Worth. Change Order means an officially authorized and executed written amendment to this contract or to a Task Order, issued by the City. Contract Documents means this Contract; Invitation to Bid; Request for Proposals; Request for Qualifications; the Contractor's response to the Request for Proposal/Qualifications or Invitation to Bid; Bid Documents; attachments, pre- bid amendments, and appendices to the Request for Proposal/Qualifications or Invitation to Bid; Contract Attachments, Amendments, and Modifications, and all ancillary documents submitted with the Contractor's response to the Request for Proposal/Qualifications or to the Invitation to Bid or to the Contract. Contractor means Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Notice to Proceed means the official letter issued by the City, pursuant to the Code of the City of Fort Worth and City ordinances and policies that authorizes Contractor to begin work. Task Order means an officially authorized and executed written description and specification directing the Contractor to perform specific services within the scope of this contract, issued by the City. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY ARTICLE 2. SERVICES Contractor hereby agrees to perform as an independent contractor the services set forth in the Scope of Work attached hereto as Attachment "A". This contract is to provide the City of Fort Worth with services during the term of the agreement. There is no guarantee of work granted by this contract and nothing in this contract is to be construed as an exclusive agreement with the contractor to provide the City with services of this type, or as an agreement by the City to guarantee the Contractor any specific projects or quantities of work. THERE IS NO MINIMUM GUARANTEE OF ANY WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. Individual projects will be authorized on a Task Order basis when the City elects to proceed with each specific effort. City shall not pay for any work performed by Contractor or its contractors, subcontractors and/or suppliers that has not been specifically ordered by the City in writing on a duly executed Task Order or Change Order. Contractor shall not be compensated for any work that is verbally ordered by any person and shall rely only upon written authorization to conduct work. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION Section 1. Fee Schedule. City and Contractor agree to the unit prices, employee labor rates, and other costs as specified in this contract. Contractor shall be compensated in accordance with the Fee Schedule shown in Attachment "B". Payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to complete the services described in Attachment "A". However the total fee paid by the City shall not exceed a total of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) and the City will not be liable for any Contractor fees, costs, or other remuneration in excess of this amount unless the City has signed and issued a formal modification to this contract. Section 2. Task Orders. City will issue a Task Order to Contractor that details the work to be performed by the Contractor. Task Orders will include at a minimum a unique Task Order Number, project address, scope of work, date to commence work, time period to complete work and the not to exceed payment amount for the task. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Page 2 of 23 Section 3. Invoice and Payment. The Contractor shall provide monthly invoices to the City. All invoices must reflect the City Task Order number. Invoices shall contain a detailed breakdown to include: labor including employee name, functional title, date and hours of work performed; internal supplies and services provided; and external supplies and services provided. Payment for services rendered shall be due within thirty (30) days of the uncontested performance of the particular services so ordered and receipt by City of Contractor's invoice for payment of same. In the event of a disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested may be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. No interest will accrue on any contested portion of the billing until mutually resolved. City will exercise reasonableness in contesting any billing or portion thereof. The Contractor shall also provide the City with quarterly updates showing the total and itemized costs incurred to the City for each task ordered and the amount remaining in the contract not-to-exceed amount. Contractor shall receive no additional compensation for work delays or hindrances except when direct and unavoidable extra costs to the Contractor are caused by the City's gross negligence. ARTICLE 4. TERM Unless terminated pursuant to the terms herein, this Agreement shall be for a term of one year, beginning upon the date of its execution. ARTICLE 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor shall operate hereunder as an independent contractor, and not as an officer, agent, servant, or employee of the City. Contractor shall have exclusive control of and the exclusive right to control the details of its work to be performed hereunder and all persons performing same, and shall be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors. The doctrine of respondeat superior shall not apply as between City and Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors, and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between City and Contractor. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. W at ~31f23 ARTICLE 6. PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE AND INDEMNIFICATION Work performed by Contractor shall comply in all aspects with all applicable local, state and federal laws and with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the local, state and national boards, bureaus and agencies. Approvals issued by the City or another entity shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of Contractor or its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of its services performed hereunder, which shall be performed in accordance with the applicable professional standard of care. ARTICLE 7. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Section 1. Rights in data. The City shall have unlimited rights in all data delivered under this contract, and in all data first produced in the performance of this contract. Section 2. Intellectual property rights and ownership. All work product developed by Contractor under this contract shall be the sole property of the City and the City shall have unlimited rights in such work product. All work product developed by Contractor under this contract shall be considered "work for hire" and rights, title, and interests to all intellectual property shall vest in the City. Contactor affirmatively, by executing this contract, disclaims all such intellectual property interests in favor of the City. In the event that any rights, title, or interest shall by operation of law or otherwise fail to vest in the City or become void or voidable, Contractor shall a) transfer all rights, title, and interest to intellectual property to the City; or alternatively and at the discretion of the City the Contractor shall b) grant an unlimited and exclusive license for publication, sale, reproduction, or use by the City and its authorized sublicensees of all intellectual property developed under this contract. Contractor agrees to timely execute any documents or take any other actions as may reasonably be necessary, or as the State may reasonably request, to perfect the State 's ownership, license, or other rights to any work product. Contractor shall not use, sell, transfer, or authorize a third party to use any work product, copyrights, trademarks, or other intellectual property (or derivatives thereof) of the work product developed under this contract without the express written consent of the City. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Page 4 of 23 ARTICLE 8. INDEMNIFICATION Section 1. Definitions. In this paragraph , the following words and phrases shall be defined as follows: Environmental Damages shall mean all costs , expenses, claims, judgments, damages, losses, penalties, fines, liabilities (including strict liability), encumbrances, liens, costs, and expenses of investigation and defense of any claim, whether or not such claim is ultimately defeated, and of any good faith settlement of judgment, of whatever kind or nature , contingent or otherwise, matured or unmatured , foreseeable or unforeseeable, including without limitation reasonable attorney 's fees and disbursements and consultant's fees, any of which are incurred as a result of negligence , an intentional tort, or the violation of any environmental requirements as defined herein pertaining to work performed under this contract or by the operations of the Contractor and Subcontractors , and including without limitation: a. Damages for personal injury and death or injury to property or natural resources ; b. Fees incurred for the services of attorneys, consultants, contractors, experts, laboratories, investigation, or remediation for any violation of environmental requirements as defined herein including , but not limited to , the preparation of any feasibility studies or reports of the performance of any cleanup, remediation, removal, response, abatement, containment, closure, restoration or monitoring work required by any federal, state or local governmental agency or political subdivision, or otherwise expended in connection with the violations of environmental requirements, and including without limitation any attorney's fees, costs and expenses incurred in enforcing this contract or collecting any sums due hereunder; and c. Liability to any third person or governmental agency to indemnify such person or agency for costs expended in connection with the items referenced in subparagraph (b) herein. Environmental requirements shall mean: a. all applicable present and future statutes, regulations, rules , plans, authorizations, concessions , franchises, and similar items, of all governmental agencies, departments , commission.!!s~be:o~au.:r~......1,,1.1 ........ or instrumentalities of the United States, s ates d R OF IC IC;\,\,,IRU Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. CITY ECRETARY FT. WO a . ,scIO 2 subdivisions thereof and all applicable judicial, administrative, and regulatory decrees, judgments , and orders relating to the protection of human health or the environment, including without limitation: b. All requirements, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to reporting, licensing, emissions, discharges, releases, or threatened releases of hazardous materials, pollutants, contaminants or hazardous or toxic substances, materials, or wastes whether solid, liquid, or gaseous in nature, into the air, surfacewater, groundwater, stormwater, or land, or relating to the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport, or handling of pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous or toxic substances, materials, or wastes, whether solid, liquid, or gaseous in nature; and c. All requirements pertaining to the protection of the health and safety of employees or the public; and d. The standard of care exercised by a reasonably prudent company or individual engaged in the provision of services contemplated by this contract. Section 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS, AND DEFEND THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES, AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY OR RESULTING FROM ANY ACT OF NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL TORT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT, OR FAILURE TO PAY A SUBCONTRACTOR OR SUPPLIER, WHICH IS COMMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR CONTRACTOR'S AGENT, EMPLOYEE, SUBCONTRACTOR, OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY OVER WHICH THE CONTRACTOR EXERCISES CONTROL. Section 3. General Indemnification. CONTRACTOR DOES HEREBY RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, REIMBURSE, DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, CLAIMS, SUITS, DEMANDS, OR CAUSES OF ACTIONS WHICH MAY ARISE DUE TO ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE TO PERSONAL PROPERTY, OR PERSONAL INJURY, AND/OR DEATH, OCCURRING AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, WHEN SUCH INJURIES, DEATH, OR DAMAGES ARE CAUSED BY THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF CONTRACTOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR CONTRACTORS, OR THE JOINT NEGLIGENCE Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Page 6 of 23 OF CONTRACTOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR CONTRACTORS AND ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY. Section 4. Environmental Indemnification. CONTRACTOR DOES HEREBY RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, REIMBURSE, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES, AGAINST ANY AND ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WHEN SUCH DAMAGES ARE CAUSED BY ANY ACT OR OMISSION OF CONTRACTOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR CONTRACTORS, OR THE JOINT ACT OR OMISSION OF CONTRACTOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR CONTRACTORS AND ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY. Section 5. The obligations of the Contractor under this Article shall include, but not be limited to, the burden and expense of defending all claims, suits and administrative proceedings (with counsel reasonably approved by the City), even if such claims, suits or proceedings are groundless, false, or fraudulent, and conducting all negotiations of any description, and paying and discharging, when and as the same become due, any and all judgments, penalties or other sums due against such indemnified persons. Upon learning of a claim, lawsuit, or other liability which Contractor is required hereunder to indemnify, City shall provide Contractor with reasonable timely notice of same. All Contractors under this contract agree that they assume joint and several liability for any claim by the City or for a third party claim against the City for general or environmental damages caused by any of the Contractors herein. The obligations of the Contractor under this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement and the discharge of all other obligations owed by the parties to each other hereunder. ARTICLE 9. INSURANCE AND BONDS Section 1. Contractor shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required under this Article and the City has approved such insurance, nor shall Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all similar insurance of the subcontracto~r as een so oo a1 ed OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECR TAR Contract -Analytical Lab Services FT. W Pa e 7 1 f 23 Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. • ORTH, X and approval given by the City; provided, however, Contractor may elect to add any subcontractor as an additional insured under its liability policies. A. Insurance coverage and limits: 1 . Commercial General Liability Insurance $1,000,000 each occurrence; $2,000,000 aggregate 2. Professional Liability Insurance Not applicable. 3. Automobile Liability Insurance Coverage on vehicles involved in the work performed under this contract: $1,000 ,000 per accident on a combined single limit basis or $500,000 bodily injury each person; $1,000,000 bodily injury each accident; and $250,000 property damage. The named insured and employees of Contractor shall be covered under this policy . The City of Fort Worth shall be named an Additional Insured, as its interests may appear. Liability for damage occurring while loading , unloading and transporting materials collected under the Contract shall be included under this policy . 4. Worker's Compensation Coverage A: statutory limits Coverage 8: $100 ,000 each accident $500,000 disease -policy limit $100 ,000 disease -each employee 5. Environmental Impairment Liability (Ell) and/or Pollution Liability $4,000,000 per occurrence. Ell coverage(s) must be included in policies listed in subsections 1 and 2 above; or, such insurance shall be provided under separate policy(s). Liability for damage occurring while loading, unloading and transporting materials collected under the contract shall be included under the Automobile Liability insurance or other policy(s). 8. Certificates of Insurance evidencing that the Contractor has obtained all required insurance shall be delivered to the City prior to Contractor proceeding with the Contract. 1. Applicable policies shall be endorsed to name the City an Additional Insured thereon, as its interests may appear. The term City shall include its employees, officers , officials , agents, and volunteers as respects the Conlracted services. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Page 8 of 23 2. Certificate(s) of Insurance shall document that insurance coverage specified herein are provided under applicable policies documented thereon. 3. Any failure on part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements. 4. A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material change in coverage shall be provided to the City. A ten (10) days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. Such terms shall be endorsed onto Contractor's insurance policies. Notice shall be sent to Department of Risk Management, City of Fort Worth, 1000 Throckmorton Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. a. Insurers for all policies must be authorized to do business in the state of Texas or be otherwise approved by the City; and, such insurers shall be acceptable to the City in terms of their financial strength and solvency. b. Deductible limits, or self-insured retentions, affecting insurance required herein shall be acceptable to the City in its sole discretion; and, in lieu of traditional insurance, any alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups must be also approved. Dedicated financial resources or Letters of Credit may also be acceptable to the City. c. Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City as respects the Contract. d. The City shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring expense, to review the Contractor's insurance policies including endorsements thereto and, at the City's discretion; the Contractor may be required to provide proof of insurance premium payments. e. The Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall have no exclusions by endorsements unless the City approves such exclusions. f. The City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any insurance premiums required by the contract. It is understood that insurance cost is an allowable component of Contractor's overhead. g. All insurance required above shall be written on an occurrence basis in order to be approved by the City. h. Subcontractors to the Contractor shall be require q1-by-tt1e Contract maintain the same or reasonably equivalent in surap ·o ~g Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. CITY SECRETARY required for the Contractor. When subcontractors maintain insurance coverage, Contractor shall provide City with documentation thereof on a certificate of insurance . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in the event a subcontractor's insurance coverage is canceled or terminated , such cancellation or termination shall not constitute a breach by Contractor of the contract. ARTICLE 10 . LICENSES AND PERMITS Contractor certifies and warrants that on the day any work is to commence under this contract and during the duration of the contract it shall have and maintain all of the current, valid, and appropriate federal, state , and local licenses and permits necessary for the provision of services under this contract. Contractor also certifies that if it uses any subcontractor in the performance of this contract, that such subcontractor shall have and maintain all of the current , valid, and appropriate federal, state , and local licenses and permits necessary for the provision of services under this contract. ARTICLE 11. TRANSFER OR ASSIGNMENT City and Contractor each bind themselves, and their lawful successors and assigns, to this Agreement. Contractor has been engaged as a consequence of Contractor's specific and unique skills; Assignment will only be granted under unusual circumstances and at the sole discretion of the City. Contractor, its lawful successors and assigns , shall not assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without prior written consent of the City. ARTICLE 12. RIGHT TO AUDIT (a) Contractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under th is Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of Contractor involving transactions relating to this Agreement. Contractor agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate workspace in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. City shall give Contractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits . (b) Contractor further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder, a . provision to . the effect that the subcontracting contractor agrees that the City shall , until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under the Contract -An a lytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc. Page 10 of 23 subcontract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such subcontractor, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during normal working hours to all subcontractor facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article. City shall give Contractor and any subcontractor reasonable advance notice of intended audit. ( c) Contractor and subcontractors agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the City. The City agrees to reimburse Contractor for the cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed. ARTICLE 13. MINORITY AND WOMAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (M/WBE) PARTICIPATION In accordance with City Ordinance No. 15530, there is no pre-established M/WBE goal for this contract subject to the applicable M/WBE waiver. ARTICLE 14. NON-DISCRIMINATION During the performance of this contract, Contractor shall not discriminate in its employment practices and shall comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 17, Article Ill of the Code of the City of Fort Worth. Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of because of age, race, color, religion, sex, disability, national origin, sexual orientation, transgender, gender identity or gender expression in any manner involving employment, including the recruitment of applicants for employment, advertising, hiring, layoff, recall, termination of employment, promotion, demotion, transfer, compensation, employment classification, training and selection for training or any other terms, conditions or privileges of employment. Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of the non- discrimination clause. Contractor also agrees that in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of this contract, that Contractor is an equal opportunity employer. Notices, advertisements , and solicitations placed in accordance with federal law, rule or regulation shall be deemed sufficient for the purP,GS t .e.etio ht requirements of this section. OFFICIAL RECORD Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. ARTICLE 15. OBSERVE AND COMPLY Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any way affect this Agreement and the work hereunder, and shall observe and comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which may exist or may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be considered. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and all of its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims or liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law, ordinance, or regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees. ARTICLE 16. DEFAULT If Contractor fails to begin work or to complete work within the time specified in a Task Order City shall have the right to take charge of and complete the work in such a manner as it deems appropriate. If the City exceeds the costs detailed herein or in the Task Order, City may deliver to Contractor a written itemized statement of the excess costs and Contractor shall reimburse the City for such excess costs without delay. If at any time during the terms of this contract, the work of the Contractor fails to meet the specifications of the Contract Documents or to meet the standards of duty, care, or proficiency of a reasonable and competent Contractor, City may notify the Contractor of the deficiency in writing. Failure of the Contractor to correct such deficiency and complete the work required under this contract or a Task Order to the satisfaction of the City within ten (10) days after written notice shall constitute default, and shall result in termination of this contract. Contractor shall not be deemed to be in default because of any failure to perform under this contract if the failure arises solely from causes beyond the control of the Contractor and without any fault or negligence by the Contractor. Such causes shall include acts of God, acts of war or terrorism, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, labor strikes, freight embargoes, and events of unusually severe weather. ARTICLE 17 . TERMINATION City may terminate this contract without cause by giving thirty (30) days written notice to Contractor. In the event of termination, any work in progress will continue to completion unless otherwise specified in the notice of termination. If the City Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast. Inc. Page 12 of 23 terminates this contract under this prov1s1on, City shall pay Contractor for all services performed prior to the termination. Termination shall be without prejudice to any other remedy the City may have. All data and completed or partially completed documents prepared under this contract shall be promptly turned over to the City upon termination of this contract. ARTICLE 18. VENUE AND JURISDICTION If any action, whether real or asserted, at law or in equity, arises on the basis of any provision of this Agreement, venue for such action shall lie in state courts located in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas -Fort Worth Division. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. ARTICLE 19. CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION This contract incorporates by reference all contract documents, which shall be binding upon the parties as if included herein. In the event of a discrepancy, this contract shall control over the other contract documents. The Parties acknowledge that each party and, if it so chooses, its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party must not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits hereto. ARTICLE 20. HEADINGS The headings contained herein are for the convenience in reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement. ARTICLE 21. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and each counterpart shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. ARTICLE 22. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section or other part of this Agreement or the a plication Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. .AL RECORD Cl ag ,. 23 RY FT. W RT s TX thereof to any person or circumstance shall ever be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such word, phrase , clause , sentence , paragraph, section, or other part of this Agreement to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid or unconstitutional portion had never been contained therein. ARTICLE 23. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES NOT WAIVED In no event shall the making by the City of any payment to Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by the C ity of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist , on the part of Contractor, and the making of any such payment by the City while any such breach or default exists shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to the City with respect to such breach or default. Any waiver by either party of any provision or condition of the contract shall not be construed or decreed to be a waiver of any other provision or condition of this Contract , nor a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same provision or condition , unless such waiver be expressed in writing by the party to be bound. All costs and attorneys fees incurred by the City in the enforcement of any provision of this contract shall be paid by the Contractor. The remedies provided for herein are in addition to any other remedies available to the City elsewhere in this contract and by law. ARTICLE 24. NOTICES Notices to be provided hereunder shall be sufficient if forwarded to the other Party by hand-delivery or via U.S. Postal Service certified mail return receipt requested , postage prepaid, to the address of the other Party shown below: If to the City: If to the Contractor: City of Fort Worth TPW -Environmental Services Division Attn: Michael Gange 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102-6311 Accutest Labs Gulf Coast , Inc. Attn: Harry Behzadi, PhD 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 Contract -Analytical Lab Serv ices Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Page 14 of 23 ARTICLE 25. WARRANTY Contractor warrants that it understands the currently known hazards and suspected hazards which are presented to persons, property and the environment by contaminated soils, both generally and with specific regard to this project. Contractor further warrants that it will perform all services under this Contract in a safe, efficient and lawful manner using industry accepted practices, and in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws governing its activities and is under no restraint or order which would prohibit performance of services under this Contract. ARTICLE 26. NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES This Agreement shall inure only to the benefit of the parties hereto and third persons not privy hereto shall not, in any form or manner, be considered a third party beneficiary of this Agreement. Each party hereto shall be solely responsible for the fulfillment of its own contracts or commitments. ARTICLE 27. ENTIRETY This contract, the contract documents, and any other documents incorporated by reference herein are bind ing upon the parties and contain all the terms and conditions agreed to by the City and Contractor, and no other contracts, oral or otherwise , regarding the subject matter of this contract or any part thereof shall have any validity or bind any of the parties hereto. In the event of any conflict between this contract and any other contract documents , then the terms of this contract shall govern. Remainder of page is left blank intentionally. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc . OFF C,AL RECORD CITY SECRETARY F . ge ~'5 f:~@x This page is left blank intentionally. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc. Page 16 of 23 ATIACHMENT A. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall provide laboratory analytical services of air, soil, water, sludge, sediment, tissue, and various other types of materials and media and will provide all labor, materials and equipment necessary for such analysis. The types of analytical services to be performed by the Contractor, upon the request of the City, shall include at a minimum those listed in the Request for Proposals (DEM 10-09: LAB) and the Contractor's submitted proposal. Contractor shall provide each type of test and each type of test method specified in Attachment B. Work performed under this contract may be subcontracted only as specified in the contract documents. Contractor or support laboratory shall provide alternate or additional procedures as requested by the City if such request is reasonably available. All work performed by the Contractor shall be in accordance with the specifications described in the Request for Proposals and the Contractor's proposal (which are incorporated herein as enforceable conditions of this contract) including but not lim ited to sample handling, analysis, quality assurance/quality control, chain of custody, documentation, and reporting. Contractor will provide all sample containers, preservatives , chain of custody forms and seals, and returnable shipping containers, in addition to providing pick- up and delivery services for the containers/samples at no additional charge to the City . All handling instructions and chain -of-custody protocols shall be in accordance with all federal and state regulatory requirements for laboratory methods and quality assurance. Disposal of samples shall be the responsibility of the laboratory and shall be in accordance with all federal and state regulatory requirements. Analytical results requested at a Standard Turn-Around-Time (TAT) must be returned to the city within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of sample(s). Analytical results requested at a Rush TAT must be returned to the city within three (3) calendar days after receipt of sample(s). Analytical results requested at an Emergency TAT must be returned to the city within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt of sample(s). Provider shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges, costs, and fees, and give all notices necessary and incident to the due and lawful prosecution of the work. The analysis and reporting of data will be done in a manner following the TRRP-13 Guidance document, including the Laboratory Review Checklist (LRC). Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gu lf Coast , Inc. X the services contained in this Contract. In addition, Contractor agrees to require any of its subcontractors used to perform this Contract to have and maintain current and appropriate federal, state and local licenses and permits to perform this Contract. Contractor shall be responsible for legal and proper disposal of all samples and wastes, shall assume all liability for all damages resulting from any accident, negligence, or intentional act or tort by the contractor, its employees, its subcontractors, agents, and assigns and shall indemnify the City in accordance with the terms of the contract. Remainder of page is left blank intentionally. Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Page 18 of 23 ATTACHMENT B. FEE SCHEDULE Prices for professional services rendered under this contract will be as specified in Table 1 below and are the total price agreed for the tests and services enumerated including all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to perform the service. The total fee for services under this contract shall not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). All TCLP/SPLP extraction charges are included in the TCLP/SPLP line items. Laboratory will provide pickup and delivery service as well as all sample containers, preservatives, labels, forms, and shipping containers at no additional charge to the City. T bl 1 A a e 1gree d prices f rf or services pe orme d Item Test and Method Digestion~ Unit Price Number Filtration 7day 3day 24 Hour Petroleum »; ' / .V 1 BTEX (EPA 8021 B) $29 $41 $51 2 BTEX (EPA 8260) $29 $41 $51 3 BTEX & MTBE (EPA 8021 B) $33 $46 $58 4 BTEX & MTBE (EPA 8260) $33 $46 $58 5 Ethylene Glycol $75 $105 $131 6 MTBE (8021 B) $25 $35 $44 7 MTBE (8260) $25 $35 $44 8 TPH (TX 1005) $35 $49 $61 9 TPH (TX 1006) $150 $210 $263 10 TPH (EPA 8015 DRO/GRO) $50 $70 $88 11 PAH (EPA 8310) $90 $126 $158 12 PAH (EPA 8270) $90 $126 $158 13 TCLP/SPLP PAH $115 $161 $201 14 Oil & Grease (EPA1664) $40 $56 $70 15 PCBs in oil (EPA 8082) $40 $56 $70 16 PCBs in soil/water (EPA 8082) $40 $56 $70 17 TCLP/SPLP Benzene (EPA 1311/1312/8020) $55 $77 $96 18 TCLP/SPLP Benzene (EPA 1311/1312/8260) $55 $77 $96 Organics 19 Pesticides , Chlorinated (EPA 8081) $90 $126 $158 20 TCLP/SPLP Pesticides (EPA 1311/1312/8081) -.r$l~-5 . •• $J 6l --$~01 ...... • ,..., J ,_ n.,v, ,~~ h 75 21 Pesticides, Orqanophosphorus (EPA 8141) ~r$~~0,t, -...,$.MO -· •" "'""""'"" .. ,r,nJ Contract -Analytical Lab Services FT. WORTH 2 TX Page 19 of 3 Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Item Test and Method Digestion/ Unit Price Number Filtration 7day 3day 24 Hour 22 Herbicides (EPA 8151) $100 $140 $175 23 Volatiles, voes (EPA 8260B) $65 $91 $114 24 TCLP/SPLP voes (EPA 1311/1312/82606) $90 $126 $158 25 Semi Volatiles , SVOCs (EPA 8270) $145 $203 $254 26 TCLP/SPLP SVOCs EPA (1311/1312/8270) $170 $238 $298 TCLP/SPLP Full (pesticides , herbicides, voe, SVOC, 27 & Metals) $515 $721 $901 28 Acid Extractable (EPA 625/8270C) $90 $126 $158 29 Base/Neutral Extractable (EPA 625/8270C) $90 $126 $158 ,. p: ' : ,; _~:. it¥,: :,~Y\!; :,!~ M~ (specify 8010 or 8020-ifboth available, provide cost of each, If different) ::,:, ,. '" TCLP/SPLP 8 RCRA Metals 30 (EPA 1311/1312/601 OB/6020) TCLP/SPLP 13 PP Metals (EPA 31 1311/1312/60106/6020) 32 TCLP/SPLP, one metal (EPA 1311/1312/60106/6020) 33 Total 8 RCRA Metals (EPA 60106/6020) 34 Total 13 PP Metals (EPA6010/ 6020) 35 Aluminum (EPA 6010/6020) 36 Antimony (EPA 6010/6020) 37 Arsenic (EPA 6010/6020) 38 Barium (EPA 6010/6020) 39 Beryllium ((EPA 6010/6020) 40 Boron (EPA 6010/6020) 41 Cadmium (EPA 6010/6020) 42 Calcium (EPA 6010/6020) 43 Chromium (EPA 6010/6020) 44 Chromium VI (EPA 6010/6020) 45 Cobalt (EPA 6010/6020) 46 Copper (EPA 6010/6020) 47 Iron (EPA 6010/6020) 48 Lead (EPA 6010/6020) 49 Maqnesium (EPA 6010/6020) 50 Manqanese (EPA 6010/6020) 51 Mercury(EPA 7470/7471) 52 Molybdenum (EPA 6010/6020) 53 Nickel (EPA 6010/6020) 54 Potassium (EPA 6010/6020) 55 Selenium (EPA 6010/6020) Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc. ~ $90 $126 $158 $110 $154 $193 $37 $52 $65 $65 $91 $114 $85 $119 $149 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 $20 $28 $35 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 D $6 $8 $11 Page 20 of 23 Item Test and Method Digestion/ Unit Price Number Filtration 7day 3day 24 Hour 56 Silver (EPA 6010/6020) D $6 $8 $11 57 Sodium (EPA 6010/6020) D $6 $8 $11 58 Thallium (EPA 6010/6020) D $6 $8 $11 59 Tin (EPA 6010/6020) D $6 $8 $11 60 Titanium (EPA 6010/6020) D $6 $8 $11 61 Vanadium (EPA 6010/6020) D $6 $8 $11 62 Zinc (EPA 6010/6020) D $6 $8 $11 Metal Digestion per required digestion (EPA 3010, 63 1050) $6 $8 $11 • "' .!V :,;,;ttL, 9" Hazardous Waste 14; r:r ii f 4j1\:A% i)\;\1,;11+ CAJitiP Ztt:1> l.'.'i ,m \\ti;\1,t " ''?' . 64 TOX (SW 846: 9020B or 9022) $100 $140 $175 65 RCI (SW846 Various Methods) $70 $98 $123 66 Corrosive, Steel (EPA 1110) $20 $28 $35 67 Corrosive, pH (EPA 9045) $5 $7 $9 68 Reactivity, Cyanide (EPA 9010) $25 $35 $44 69 Reactivity, Sulfide (EPA 9030) $20 $28 $35 70 pH (EPA 9040B) $5 $7 $9 71 lqnitability (Flash Point) by SW 1010 $15 $21 $26 72 Paint Filter (EPA 9095) $15 $21 $26 73 BTU $15 $21 $26 Drinking/Waste Water/Surface" Wat,.-,, ... , 101 ...... , ,. . , ..• .·,,. . .• -2'00. 7 or 200.8-lf &oth available. 6rovlcfe cost of each, if dlffererit 74 Total Orqanic Carbon (EPA 413 .1) $20 $28 $35 75 Alkalinity, Total (EPA 305.1) $20 $28 $35 76 BOD (EPA 405 / Std Meth 521 OB) $20 $28 $35 77 Chloride (EPA 300.0 or Std Method 4500CIB) $15 $21 $26 78 COD (EPA 410.4) $20 $28 $35 79 Corrosivity, pH (EPA 150.1) $5 $7 $9 80 Carbary! (EPA 531.1 /553/632) $222 $388 $444 81 Diazinon (EPA 1657) $217 $380 $434 82 E coli, MPN $35 $49 $61 83 Fecal Coliform (Std Method 9221 E) $35 $49 $61 84 Fecal Streptococcus (Std Method 9230 C) $35 $49 $61 85 Hardness, Total as CaC03 (Std Method 2340 B or C) $15 $21 $26 86 Nitroqen, Ammonia (EPA 350 .2) $20 $28 $35 87 Nitroqen, Nitrate + Nitrite (EPA 353.3) $~5 $35 !1>44 88 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl (EPA 351.3) ~far i ~·\;$~~ 1qEC$\'l I ~ i 'I ."if C.,r\E:TARY Contract -Analytical Lab Services T. W l'H TX Paqe 21 of 23 ' Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Item Test and Method Digestion/ Unit Price Number Filtration 7day 3day 89 Nitrogen, Total (EPA 300) $20 $28 90 Phosphorus, Total (EPA 365 .3) $25 $35 91 Phosphorus, Dissolved (EPA 365.2) $30 $42 92 Solids, Total Dissolved -TDS (EPA 160.1) $10 $14 93 Solids, Total Suspended -TSS (EPA 160.2) $10 $14 94 Solids, Total (EPA 160 .3) $10 $14 95 Sulfate (EPA 375 .2 or 300.0) $20 $28 96 Trihalomethanes, Total (EPA 501) EPA 524 $102 $178 97 Turbidity (EPA 180.1) $10 $14 98 Aluminum (EPA 200 .7/200.8) D $6 $8 99 Arsenic (EPA 200 .7/200 .8) D $6 $8 100 Cadmium (EPA 200.7/200.8) D $6 $8 101 Chromium (EPA 200.7/200 .8) D $6 $8 102 Copper (EPA 200.7/200.8) D $6 $8 103 Iron (EPA 200 .7/200.8) D $6 $8 104 Lead (EPA 200.7/200 .8) D $6 $8 105 Manqanese (EPA 200.7/200.8) D $6 $8 106 Mercury (EPA 245 .1 ) $20 $28 107 Silver (EPA 200 .7/200.8) D $6 $8 108 Zinc (EPA 200.7/200.8) D $6 $8 109 Filtration , Aqueous Sample D $6 $8 Blologlcal:Tlssue ,. m 110 Total 8 RCRA Metals (EPA 6010C/7471) $144 $187 111 Chlorinated Pesticides (EPA 8081 B) $126 $164 112 PCB Aroclors (EPA 8082) $126 $164 113 PCB Congeners (EPA 1668A) NC $894 $1788 114 Volatiles, voes (EPA 8260) NC $80 $112 115 Semi Volatiles, SVOCs (EPA 8270) $290 $377 116 % Lipid NC $45 $63 117 Sample homogenate preparation charge $25 $35 118 Other sample digestion/extraction charge $25 $35 Notes : • One digestion per samp le for metals (Total). • Filtration charge will apply only to dissolved metals , if requested. • 24 Hr TAT not possible on biological tissue due to preparation of sample. • A "D" in the Digestion/Filtration column next to each analysis for which a digestion or extraction charge will apply. The additional digestion cost is specified in Line 63 (Line 118 for biological tissue). Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc. Page 22 of 23 24 Hour $35 $44 $53 $18 $18 $18 $35 $204 $18 $11 $11 $11 $11 $11 $11 $11 $11 $35 $11 $11 $11 Sit 4\ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A SIGNATURE PAGE IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement in multiple originals this /L.f day of .J'A t·N·~ , 201 ~ in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. ;)-" 1 t CITY OF FORT WORTH: ~~-:."'t:L Fernando Costa Assistant City Manager ACCUTEST LABORATORIES GU F COAST, INC. Witness -~ " ... JllEN Seal: . :: --~--- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ~IJ.6~ Arthur N. Bashor Assistant City Attorney ATIEST: -=-... ~.,, .. : ---• V :- Of,-il.\L RECORD CITY f:CRETARY Fl, '!M RTH, TX Contract -Analytical Lab Services Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast , Inc. Page 23 of 23 . ,,,.. CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW ...... '. Pursuant to V.T.C .A . Labor Code §406.96 (2000), as amended , Contractor certifies that it prov ides workers' compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City of Fort Worth Department of Transportation and City of Fort Worth Project No. DEM 10-09: LAB. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT § § § CONTRACTOR ACCUT ST LABORATORIES i'u '"1Nc-- Title : _ ..... P_rl_c_-r_, '.)_t=-..,..-_T--+-' _c_t:"'_-_ll_ Date : __ I ,__/-'--;'-1_/_;_I_· __ _ I 1 Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared --------, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of ACCUTEST LABORATORIES for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. Given Under My Hand and Seal of Office this J.:L day of, ~~n.J , 20 \ \ ---\ ~Jfll~L ryPub ~ and for the State of Texas OLI VI A JOY LAWLESS NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JER SEY My Commissi on Expires August 21, 2012 --~ .- VENDORCOMPLIANCETOSTATELAW The 1985 Session of the Texas Legislature passed House Bill 620 relative to the award of contracts to non-resident bidders . This law provides that, in order to be awarded a contract as low bidder, non-resident bidders ( out of state contractors whose corporate offices or principal place of business are outside of the State or Texas) bid projects for construction, improvements, supplies or services in Texas at an amount lower than the lowest Texas resident bidder by the same amount that a Texas resident bidder would be required too underbid a non-resident bidder in order to obtain a comparable contract in the State in which the non-resident 's principal place of business is located. The appropriate blanks in Section A must be filled out by all out-of-state or non-resident bidders in order for your bid to meet specifications. The failure of out-of-state or non-resident contractors to do so will automatically disqualify that bidder. Resident bidders must check the box in Section B. A. Non-Resident vendors in-------(give State), our principal place of business, are required to be percent lower than resident bidders by State law. A copy of the Statute is attached. Non-resident vendors in-------(give State), our principle place of business, are not required to underbid resident bidders. B. Our principle place of business or corporate offices are in the State of Texas. Bidder: ACCUTEST LABORATORIES 10165 HARWIN DRIVE HOUSTON, TEXAS 77036 By : (Please Print) ct~O Title (Please Print) ' I PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS Submitted to: CITY OF FORT WORTH ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1000 THROCKMORTON FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 Fo-_-_ --R-----T ·w--_--.. ---··o·----_-R-----T __ ,ff_---: · .. ·,· ··.· ··. \····· •.. :·· •···.·•··• r ,_i --·. ' . . ' . . . --. --. .... ... --------- For: PROJECT: DEM 10-09: LAB CONTRACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS MUST BE DELIVERED TO PURCHASING DIVISION BEFORE 1 :30 ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 12, 2010 By: Accutest Laboratories Company Name 10165 Harwin Dr., Suite 150, Houston, TX 77036 Address 8-12-2010 Date 2-2 -\ '-- l!t ·' . ~ACCUTES1: August 12, 2010 VIA Hand Delivery City of Fort Worth Purchasing Division 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Subject: Request for Proposal Documents Project DEM 10-09: LAB Environmental Laboratory Analysis Contract Please find enclosed Accutest Laboratories response to the above Request for Proposal in support of the City of Fort Worth Environmental Management Department. We are very interested in the proposed procurement and have submitted the enclosed Statement of Qualifications in response. Accutest has been the Environmental Laboratory for the City of Fort Worth for the past three years, and thus, has extensive experience and knowledge of the City's needs. Accutest has all the necessary qualifications and certifications to support the City of Fort Worth for this Scope of Work. We look forward to the opportunity to present and discuss our qualifications with the City of Fort Worth. Please contact Stephanie Winquest, Business Development Manager, at 817-201-0980 or stephaniew@accutest.com to answer any questions or for further discussions. Greg Grandits, Regional Sales Manager, will be authorized to negotiate the agreement on behalf of Accutest. His contact information is 713-271-4700 or gregg@accutest.com. I will be the authorized person to contractually obligate Accutest to this contract. Regards, Harry Behzadi, Ph.D. Vice President, Operations Accutest Laboratories 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 • Houston, Texas 77036 • tel : 713/271-4700 • fax: 713/271-4770 rnrw!Mal ~l:JI !3ACCUTES1: Table of Contents Tab B. Proposal Summary and Signature Section 2.1 Tab C. Provider Qualifications and Experience Section 2.2 Tab D. Accreditations Section 2.3 Performance and QA/QC Section 2.4 Tab E. Subcontractor Information and Qualifications Section 2 .5 Tab F. Cost Section 2.6 TabG. Other Requirements Financial Statement Section 2.7 Insurance Certificate Section 2.8 Legal/Compliance History Section 2.9 101 65 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 • Houston, Texas 77036 • tel: 713/271-4 700 • fax: 713/271-4770 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals 2 .1 PROPOSAL SUMMARY A. Scope of Work Proposals are being accepted by the City of Fort Worth (City) for the furnishing of all labor, materials and equipment necessary for performing laboratory analysis of air, soil, water, sludge, sediment, tissue, and various other types of samples collected from various projects and inspections by and for the City . Samples Will be collected by City personnel or their designated representatives . The laboratory will provide all sample containers, preservatives , chain of custody and seals, and returnable shipping containers, in addition to providing pick-up and delivery services for the containers/samples. All handling instructions and chain-of-custody protocols shall be in accordance with all federal and state regulatory requirements for laboratory methods and quality assurance. Disposal of samples shall be the responsibility of the laboratory and shall be in accordance with all federal and state regulatory requirements . Laboratory firms should propose a cost for each type of sample and each type of procedure specified and if necessary , identify an alternate procedure or supporting laboratory. Analytical results requested at a Standard Turn-Around -Time (TAT) must be returned to the city within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of sample(s). Analytical results requested at a Rush TAT must be returned to the city within three (3) calendar days after receipt of sample(s). Analytical results requested at an Emergency TAT must be returned to the c ity within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt of sample(s). Provider shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges, costs, and fees, and give all notices necessary and incident to the due arid lawful prosecution of the work. The analysis and reporting of data will be done in a manner following the TRRP-13 Guidance document, including the Laboratory Review Checklist (LRC) Failure to propose on any single sample type or any single procedure may be considered grounds for rejection of the proposal unless an alternative is clearly provided . In case of ambiguity or lack of clarity in the prices stated in the proposal , the City reserves the right to adopt the most advantageous construction thereof or to reject the proposal. B. Document Control Critical documents that the laboratory will be responsible for providing in whole or in part associated with this contract shall include: a) Narrative explanation of level of analytical data review used by the laboratory and resulting data qualifiers, indicating direction of bias based on the assessment of QC samples (e.g., blanks, field and laboratory spikes). b) Results for each analyte and sample qualified for analytical limitations. c) Sample quantitation limits (SQLs) and detection limits for undetected analytes, with an explanation of the detection limits reported and any qualifications. d) Instrument printouts and logbooks, spectra, and raw data. e) Full descriptions of all deviations from analytical SOPs, the sampling and analysis plan (SAP), and the QAPP. f) Chain-of-custody forms. g) Laboratory custody records. DEM 10-09: LAB July 22 , 2010 2-3 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals C. NELAP Accreditation Laboratory (including subcontractors) must currently be NELAP (National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program) accredited under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program for the CWA and RCRA fields of testing and for the common methods used for BTEX/MTBE , VOC, SVOC , and RCRA 8 Metals , at a minimum . Scope of accreditation must be maintained throughout the duration of the contract for the prime contractor and any subcontractors. Laboratories not meeting the above criteria will be considered non- compliant and will be grounds for rejection of the proposal. D. Laboratory Quality Assurance and Quality Control The laboratory must have defined QA protocols, and have an overall Quality Assurance Plan includ ing standard operation procedures (SOPs) and analytical methods, internal QA/QC procedures and logs, and data review procedures. The laboratory shall be required to handle samples and follow chain-of-custody protocols that are in accordance with all federal and state regulatory requirements for laboratory quality assurance. All samples shall be analyzed using EPA Standard Methods, o r TCEQ approved methods and technology. When identified on the Chain of Custody , all laboratory records related to environmental site assessments performed pursuant to the City of Fort Worth Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Program shall have the EPA assigned QTRAK number placed on them . Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPP) will be developed by the City of Fort Worth in conjunction with the laboratory on all Brownfields Site Assessments and will require the laboratory to identify the lab equipment and/or systems requiring periodic maintenance and explain: a) How periodic preventive and corrective maintenance of equipment shall be performed to ensure availability and satisfactory performance. b) How the availability of critical spare parts, identified in the manufacturer's operation instructions, will be assured and maintained . c) Corrective actions for calibration check samples that exceed the control limits , drift in the calibration curve, or if a reagent blank indicates contamination. d) The QAPP will also require the laboratory to identify all lab tools, gauges, instruments and other equipment used for data collection activities that must be calibrated to maintain performance w ithin specified limits: e) Calibration procedures to be conducted using certified equipment and/or standards with known relationships to recognized performance standards. f) Procedures on the maintenance of records of calibration. E. Acknowledgement of Receipt of Addenda to the RFP The undersigned acknowledges receipt of Addenda No. _1_ thru _1_ issued for this Request for Proposals, and has included all addenda in the proposal. [Insert N/A in blanks if no addenda were issued.] F. Minority and Women Business Enterprises (M/WBE) Requirement Because subcontracting opportunities with qualified M/WBE certified laboratories are negligible a waiver of the M/WBE requirement has been obtained: there will be no M/WBE participation goal for this contract. DEM 10-09 : LAB July 22, 2010 2-4 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals G. Proposal Certllicatron and Signature The undersigned having carefully examined the specifications, Instructions, and conditions set forth in this Request for Proposals, Including all addenda, issued by the City of Fort Worth, affirms that he/she understands air requirements of this RFP, is authorized to execute this proposal and any contract(s) and/or other transactions required by award of this solicitation, and hereby proposes to provide the analytical laboratory services as specified. The undersigned further attests and certifies that: a) Corporate laboratory equipment and personnel are capable of performing each type of procedure listed In Section 2.6 either at the proposer's facility or through subcontracts . b) All proposal documents have been submitted in one sealed envelope . c} Unit prices are provided within the proposal documents. d) This proposal summary and the accompanying proposal documents are Intended to be complete and wlll remain valid for ninety (90} days from the date of submittal. All City contractors are required to comply with Chapter 17, "Human Relations," Article JII, "Discrimination," Division 3, ~Employment Practices," of the Code of the Cily of Fort Worth, prohibiting discrimination in employment practices. Proposer agrees that proposer, its employees, officers, agents, contractors or subcontractors, have fully complied with all provisions of such Ordinance, and that no employee, participant, applicant, contractor or subcontractor has been discriminated against according to the terms of such Ordinance by proposer, its employees, officers, agents, contractor or subcontractors herein. General Vendor lnfonnatlon and Proposal Signature: Firm Name: Accutest Laboratories Street Address : 10165 Harwin Dr. 150 Number Street Name Suite Houston TX 77036 City Slate Zip Same 8-12-2010 Date: Harry Behzadi VP Operations Print Name Title NOTE: Additional signature and certification are required in Section 2.9 of the proposal {provider's legal and compliance history). DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 _______ ,, . " . __ ., ____ .. 2-5 Experience A. Business Qualifications and Experience Accutest Laboratories is an independent environmental testing laboratory that has successfully delivered defensible data for over 50 years. Founded in 1956, it is the nation's 3rd largest environmental testing laboratory combining advanced technology and experienced personnel to deliver "Total Performance You Can Count On". Our commitment is to provide our clients with appropriate test methods that meet the most stringent quality standards in the environmental testing industry. Headquartered in Dayton , New Jersey , Accutest operates from state-of-the-art, integrated laboratories in New Jersey, Massachusetts , Florida, Texas , California , and Colorado. The Company boasts over 160,000 square feet of total laboratory space. In 2009, Accutest logged in more than 65,000 projects, processed over 780,000 samples and reported well over 1,500,000 tests. Accutest provides reliable and comprehensive analytical test ing services including air, water, soil , waste characterization , energetics and explosives, and emerging contaminants to industrial, consulting/engineering and government clients in support of Federal and State Environmental Programs. Our analytical programs include organic and inorganic analyses of water , soil and air samples collected in support of RCRA, ISRA , NPDES , CERCLA , CAA, CWA, SOWA, NFESC and other regulatory or industrial programs. Accutest's extensive Federal and State regulatory experience provides clients with the required expertise to assist in the development of analytical protocols and sampling and analysis plans. Our staff cons ists of over 488 professionals including chemists , biologists, chemical engineers, computer scientists, technicians, and support personnel. Our staff has the experience that clients have come to rely on. The Accutest senior management team averages over 1 O years experience with the company. Our stringent Corporate Quality Assurance Program is based on full National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation (NELAP). This enables Accutest to hold multi-state certifications that conform to a National standard . Accutest has also received Department of Defense Environmental Laboratory Accreditation (DoD ELAP) and ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Certificate of Accreditation from the Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B) to perform environmental testing in support of environmental restoration programs. Our Texas, Florida and New Jersey laboratories are Texas NELAP certified. The Texas laboratory will serve as the primary laboratory for this contract. The NJ and FL laboratories will serve as back up labs. Together with computerized data management and extensive electronic communications Accutest provides reliable and uniform analytical services to our clients on a national basis. Lablink, the most comprehensive data retrieval and information management system in the industry, provides real-time data resources that let clients generate electronic data deliveries on demand 24/7/365 days a year. Though Lablink, Accutest manages an extensive historical database of more than 300 million archived test results which can be easily searched and retrieved. Accutest's quality of service consistently exceeds our client's expectations. This is exemplified by the fact that 85% of our business is from repeat clients. Accutest participates in National Corporate Analytical Programs which are routinely audited by independent third parties. Experience Through steady, carefully managed growth, leading technology, and outstanding service , Accutest provides quality data of the highest integrity that is delivered reliably and uniformly to clients nationwide . Please see attached Corporate SOQ for more detailed information. Laboratory Contact Information: The overall Accutest Program contact for the City of Fort Worth for assisting with administration issues, communication coordination and overall issues related to laboratory performance is: Stephanie Winquest Business Development Manager 13268 Moonlake Way Fort Worth , TX 76052 817-201-0980 stephaniew@accutest.com The Project Manager will serve as technical point of contact for day to day activities and coordination of analytical testing needs. This individual may involve local QA/QC officer or Laboratory Director for technical discussions as necessary. Georgia Jones Senior Project Manager 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 georgiaj@accutest.com Sample Pick Up/ Containers: Paul Canevaro Laboratory Director 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 paulc@accutest.com Accutest can provide sample pick up and delivery to our laboratory in Houston at No Additional Charge. We have an Accutest Driver located in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. If FedEx is elected to be used for return shipping to the laboratory all cost will be incurred by Accutest. If desired Accutest can supply and maintain an inventory of containers for sampling events on site and perform sample pick up on a pre-scheduled basis without the need for pickup request. Additional Sampling Value Added Services: • Accutest can provide pre-printed chains and labeled sample containers for all analytical events if desired. All sample containers can be organized by sampling location to assist in organization of field activities. DI water can be provided at No Additional Charge. • Accutest Offers customers real time Internet access for retrieval of data results, sample log in confirmations, tracking analysis status, access to chain's of custody's, historical data review, and electronic deliverables. Experience Equipment and Instrumentation Accutest maintains automated, computerized analytical instrumentation to support large complex projects and routine analyses of standard analytical parameters. Our commitment to clients is reflected by the capital investment in facilities, equipment and technology. Our production capability, capacity and redundancy of instrumentation assure the reliability and performance needed to deliver major analytical projects successfully. Instruments are dedicated to specific matrices and analyses to accelerate productivity and prevent cross contamination . A major factor when evaluating a laboratory is the age, model and condition of its equipment. Accutest maintains a significant proportion of advanced late model instrumentation. Major Instrumentation Summary -----~ ------------~------ ~ = '-; ~ ':.: ~--, '1,,:.: ~fl'.~,.'· - , __ ,. ~"' GC/MS VOA 69 GC/MS SVOA 27 GCVOA 34 GC SVOA 51 HPLC 10 ICP/ICPMS 15 *Please see Instrumentatio n List of Houston Laboratory for details . \ ''-' '-' !Zll!'I g)ACCUTEST. Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. -Houston, Texas Equipment Summary -July 27, 2010 Instrument Eauioment Manufacture & Oescrintion GC/Others MS Serial# Serial# GC/MS-C Hewlett-Packard 5890 HPGC/5971 MSO/ 01 US10233032 US2 1853708 4552 AS/P&T 014560 GC/MS-F Hewlett-Packard 5890 HPGC/5971 MSO/ 01 29SOA2 7464 3188A032 11 4552 AS/P&T 01 4560 GC/MS-Y Agilent Technologies 6890N/5973 MSD/01 CN1041 2050 US40646501 4560AS/ P&T 014560 GC/MS-Z Agilent Technolog ies 6890N/5973 MSD/01 US10251065 US 2 1844610 4560AS/ P&T 01 4560 GC/MSM Agilent Technologies 6890/5975 MSD/014552/ CN10739023 US73327143 P&TOl 4660 GC/MSX Agilent Technologies 7890N5975CMSD/01 CN10844002 US83120963 4552/ P&T 014660 GC/MS E Agilenl Technologies 7890N5975CMSD/OI CN1021 1010 US102 12404 4551 N P&T 014660 GC-KK Hewlett-Packard 5890 GC/01 4552 AS/P&T 3203A4 1760 NA 4560 GC-EE Hewlett-Packard 589011/01 4552 AS/ P&T 0 1 3235A44696 NA 4560 GC-BB Agilent Technologies 6890/0l 4551A AS/ P&T CN10703075 NA 014660 GC-HH Agilenl Technologies 7890/0l 4551A AS/ P&T US10241003 NA 014660 GC/MS-H Hewlett-Packard 5890 HPGC/597 1 MSD/ HP 3336A58789 3501A02354 7673AS GC/MS-P Ag ilent Te chnologies 7890N5975C MSD/ CN10834087 us831 20210 7683BAS GC/MS-J Agilient Technologies 7890N5975C CN10728139 us71226767 MSDl7683B AS GC-GG Hewlett-Packard 5890 GC/HP7673A AS 2643A11566 NA GC-DD Hewlett-Packard 5890 GC/HP7673 AS 2846A2081 3 NA GC-NN Ag ilient Technologies 6890 N GC/7683 AS GN10740017 NA GC-CC Hewlett-Packard 5890NHP7673A AS 2750A15605 NA GC-LL Agilient Technologies 6890 N GC/IN CN10739025 NA 76838/7683 AS GC-IF Hewlett-Packard 6890 GC/G1513A AS US00002475 NA GC/MS-W Agilent Technologies 7890N5975C MSD/ CN10111192 us10222406 7693AS GC/MS-V Agilent Technologies 7890N5975C MSD/ CN10121001 us10222410 7693AS GC-JJ Agilent Technologies 6890N/HP7683B US10123027 NA Top load Balance AND HF-320 1283745C NA Sonicator 1 Branson Ultrasonic Corp 88804062494A NA Sonicator2 Branson Ultrasonic Corp 88806022048A NA Sonicator3 Branson Ultrasonic Corp BBB04042340A NA Sonicator4 Branson Ultrasonic Corp OBD04028360 NA TurboVap 1 Dionex TV0730N13873 NA TurboVap2 Dinoex TV0730N13875 NA TurboVap 3 Dionex TV07027N13864 NA TurboVap 4 Dionex TV1012N16760 NA TurboVap 5 Dionex TV1007N165710 NA TurboVap 6 Dionex TV9840N8358 NA L • TurboVap 7 Dionex TV0009R9408 NA '---TurboVap 8 Dionex TV9827N8197 NA Top load Balance Ohaus Adventurer -AV212C 8028371018 NA Top load Balance AV412C 8027061033 NA ICP TJA Enviro Trace 61E Simultaneous 268490 NA Year Autosamoler P&T Purchased Tvne of Analvses on Instrument Serial# Serial# 13785 N234460238 2003 624/8260 14131 H423460277 2000 624/8260 1387 6 N2 16460113 2004 624/8260 13406 N20946031 6 2003 624/8260 15187 0734466997 2007 624/8260 MS0809W092 F0244 66 462 2008 624/8260 F022458246 E020466460 2010 624/8260 141 96 8236252 2004 602/8021 13228 N304460937 2000 8015/GRO F0194581 97 E017466882 2010 8015/GRO F023458618 E020466459 2010 8015/GRO 2805A10875 NA 1999 827 0 cn82849744 NA 2008 8270 cn72944776 NA 2007 8270 2718A07504 NA 2001 608/8081 2718A08727 NA 1989 608/8082 CN73545194 NA 2007 81 51 2B47A12B07 NA 2001 80 15/DRO/TX1005 CN73645326 NA 2001 8015/DRO/TX1005 CN30322419 NA 1999 80 15DRO/TX1005 cn10170 110 NA 2010 8270/625 cn10170113 NA 2010 8270/625 US1191161 7 NA 2010 8015/DRO NA NA 2006 VARIOUS NA NA 2004 Organic Prep. NA NA 2004 Organic Prep. NA NA 2007 Organic Prep. NA NA 2007 Organic Prep. NA NA 2010 Organic Prep. NA NA 2008 Organic Prep. NA NA 2010 Organic Prep. NA NA 2004 Organic Prep. NA NA 2010 Organic Prep. NA NA 2008 Organic Prep. NA NA 2008 Organic Prep. NA NA 2008 Organic Prep. NA NA 2010 VARIOUS NA NA 2009 VARIOUS 97243 NA 2000 200.7/6010 Hg Analyzer Leeman Labs Inc. Mercury Analyzer HYDRAA 62742 NA NA NA 2003 7470(7471 ICP T JA ICAP 6500 DUO 20094405 NA 100918A520 NA 2009 200.7/6010 Hg Analyzer MERCURY ANALYZER HYDRA II AA 63851 NA NA NA 2010 7470(7471 Top load Balance AND HF-200 12855350 NA NA NA 2006 VARIOUS Discrete Analyze r Westco Smartchem 140 W0708021 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS .. TOCAnal. Shimadzu 5000 Series NS system H52104200808 NA H52104200808 NA 2006 TOG TOCAnal. Shimadzu 5000 Series NS system/SSM H521047/H525047 NA H521047034535A NA 2010 TOG pH Meter Thermo Orion (W1) 70160 NA NA NA 2004 VARIOUS pH Meter Thermo Orion (N2) 58639 NA NA NA 2005 VARIOUS pH Meter Thermo Orion (W2) 86812 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS pH Meter Thermo Orion (N1) 75599 NA NA NA 2006 VARIOUS Cond. Meter YSl-30 NA NA NA NA 2006 VARIOUS UWtS Spec Milton Roy 20-0 Out of Service NA NA NA 2005 VARIOUS UWISSpec Milton Roy Spectronic 501 Out of Service NA NA NA 2007 VARIOUS UWISSpec HACH OR2000 941200032623 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS UWISSpec Thermo Genysis 20 3SGK319010 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Colorimeter Hach DR 100 Colorimeter 41100 050920C50468 NA NA NA 2009 VARIOUS DO Meter YSl-5000A 07L100989 NA NA NA 2009 VARIOUS DO Meter YSl-5100 B 01K0797 NA NA NA 2009 VARIOUS DO Meter YSl-5100 C 99C1185 NA NA NA 2009 VARIOUS Automated 00 ThermoOrion A0078 NA NA NA 2009 VARIOUS Meter Analytical Denver Instrument Pl 314 73179 NA NA NA 2006 VARIOUS Balance Analytical Denver Instrument SI 114 24550341 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Balance Analytical Sartorius 3807005 NA NA NA 2005 VARIOUS Balance Analytical Sartorius 3406041 NA NA NA 2006 VARIOUS Balance Top load Balance Denver Instrument P37945 NA NA NA 2005 VARIOUS ,, 'Top load Balance Denver Instrument PB6082 NA NA NA 2007 VARIOUS Top load Balance Denver Instrument APEX 323 Out of Service NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Ion Oionex ASSOAuto Sampler/lC25/Eluent E650 99080401 /02090646 NA NA NA 2008 300 Chromatooraohv /04070342 Flow Segment Seal 7540687 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Analvzer SPE DEX Horizon Technologies SPE DEX 3000 XL NA NA NA 2010 1664 10-1047 Speed Vap Horizon Technologies SPEED VAP Ill 06--0318 NA NA NA 2008 1664 Mica Distillation Oionex A2000-925 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Incubator Imperial Incubator (IN2) 0596--0146 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Incubator Equatherm Incubator (IN3) 10Ar-12 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Microscope Motic Digital Microscope 30007858 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Microscope Stereo Master Microscope 9508 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Colony Counter Quebec Colony Counter 11163-1 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Digestion Block HACH COD Reactor 940800011287 NA NA NA 2008 COD Digestion Block HACH COO Reactor 94600010958 . NA NA NA 2008 COD Digestion Block HACH COD Reactor 9.604E+11 NA NA NA 2008 coo Digestion Block HACH COD Reactor 30900034919 NA NA NA 2008 COD Digestion Block HACH COD Reactor 94120001834 NA NA NA 2006 coo Digestion Block HACH COD Reactor 9.306E+11 NA NA NA 2007 coo Tray Sealer IDEXX Trace Sealer Model 2X 2991 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS UV Light Entela Model UV 56 10101-92 NA NA NA 2006 VARIOUS UV Light Meter Fisher Scientific 101715728 NA NA NA 2007 VARIOUS J Thermometer Diode Laser Class II Laser Prod. NA NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS ' Water Bath Precision Waterbath 1 M NA NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Water Bath Fisher Scientific 1 903869 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Water Bath Prescion Waterbath 2 9606003 NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Water Bath Blue M unit of General Signal Magic Whirl NA NA NA NA 2008 VARIOUS Waterbath 2M Experience Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) The Accutest Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) is the most critical and central tool in the operation of the laboratory. Accutest's LIMS is one of the most powerful and sophisticated tools in the industry today. The LIMS at each location resides on an independent server sized to ensure highly efficient performance for internal users and on-line customers simultaneously. The LIMS is based on a state-of-the-art Oracle relational database that has been specifically designed to handle the complex issues faced by the environmental laboratory. The LIMS automates virtually every phase of laboratory operations, including sample receipt/login, sample scheduling and tracking, data acquisition, calculations, quality control (QC), final reports, electronic deliverables, and invoicing. As a result, it allows Accutest to deliver the most accurate and consistent product in the industry. Electronic Data Deliverables One of the most significant trends in this industry is the increased dependence on Electronic Data Deliverables (EDDs). EDDs that are produced or modified manually cannot be relied upon for accuracy. Accutest consistently provides the most accurate EDDs through totally automated data transfer. At the front end, virtually all laboratory data is transferred automatically to the LIMS without manual transcription, followed by multiple levels of technical review. From this point, the LIMS becomes the single source for all deliverables including data reports, QC reports, and EDDs. Simply put, this means that the raw data matches the paper reports, and the reports match the EDDs. Lablink Lablink is the live , on-line client interface to the Accutest LIMS, the most comprehensive on-line data service in the industry. Available via the internet to all Accutest clients, Lablink provides real-time access to project status, current and historical data, on-line reports, EDDs, and billing information. Lablink can be configured to send reports via email automatically upon data completion. We provide a secure internet account that encrypts all communications to maintain data confidentiality. Lablink has established a new standard for electronic data management. From the minute samples are received, Lablink provides up-to-the-minute access to project information from a PC via a secure website. The Most Comprehensive On-Line Service in the Industry, Lablink service will save time, effort and money. Through Lablink, Accutest has made a long term commitment to provide the most comprehensive on-line service in the industry that includes the following features: • Automated Sample Receipt Confirmation: Allows client verification that samples have arrived at the laboratory safely and have been logged in properly. This ensures the correct tests, sample identification (IDs) and Turn-Around-Time (TAT) have been accurately communicated from the client to Accutest. An electronic copy of the chain-of- custody is delivered with the log in report for review. • Complete Project Status Information: From the minute samples are received, there is complete access to job, sample, and test information. In addition, status information is available in real time through Lablink, which allows tracking sample progress through the laboratory. Experience • On-line Chain-of-Custody Documents: As part of sample login, chain-of-custody documents are scanned into PDF f il es that are available on-line to Lablink users with a single click. • Immediate Access to Test Results : Lablink provides complete access to test results the minute they are approved by the laboratory (no more waiting for verbal results or faxes). The Lablink data query provides powerful options (e.g. hits only) to get data feedback as quickly as possible. The results can also be compared to a variety of Federal and State regulatory limits. • Access to Quality Control Data: Method blank, MS/MSD, blank spike and surrogates are available on-line. Chromatograms, spectra and other raw data can also be reviewed. • Historical Data Query: With Lablink, it is just as easy to view historical data. Powerful query options and sort criteria can be specified and executed in seconds to evaluate trends. • e-Hardcopy Reports available via Auto-email or on-line: Finished data may be generated in e-Hardcopy format complete with a signed cover page , chain-of-custody and comprehensive QC data. Lablink allows the user to activate Auto-email on projects of interest, which automatically initiates generation of an e-Hardcopy report that will be sent automatically upon completion of a job. • Billing/Invoice Information: Lablink also allows access to preliminary billing information . This enables the user to check quote prices before the invoice is delivered. In addition, historical billing information is maintained, allowing up-to-the-minute project financial summaries. Final invoices can be downloaded on demand in PDF format. • Electronic Deliverables on Demand: EDDs may be generated on demand through Lablink. This capability is unprecedented in the industry. • How to Get On-Line? Getting started with Lablink couldn't be easier. All that is needed is access to the Internet. Accutest will then set up a secure Lablink account and user to be on-line. Best of all, access to Lablink is provided at no additional charge -simply for doing business with Accutest. Accutest has recently upgraded the data retrieval options on Lab Link. It is now possible to get summary tables comparing project results to multiple regulatory limits in real time. The Tables include highlights for hits and exceedances. Multiple regulatory limits may be selected individually or as a group and include the TRRP Protective Concentration Levels. * The City of Fort Worth has almost three years of historical data stored in Lablink. Experience B . Personnel Qualifications and Experience Paul Canavero Laboratory Director/Technical Director Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Houston, Texas Mr. Canevaro is responsible for day to day laboratory operations at Accutest's Gulf Coast laboratory in Houston, TX . Accutest Gulf Coast specializes in the analyses of organic and inorganic in water, soil and sediment matrices. He has supervisory responsibility for all personnel. This includes responsibility for all departments. Mr. Canevaro analytical experience includes all environmental analyses performed at Accutest Gulf Coast and those listed in section 2.6 of the RFP. Mr. Canevaro initiates all equipment purchases, develops and implements new methodology, oversees all production efficiency , and approves all data in compliance with Accutest's QA/QC guidelines. Mr. Canevaro has 29 years of experience in the environmental field as an analyst and in management including two years as Lab Director at Accutest. EDUCATION BS, Chemistry, University of Monticello, 1983 Minor Math CONTINUING EDUCATION • Perkin-Elmer Training Course for GFAA • Thermo-Jarrell Ash Training Course for ICP • American Chemical Society Training Course on Laboratory Management PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Westco Scientific Instruments 2007 -2008: • Technical sales and support for discreet analyzers, block digesters, micro distillation systems covering the states of Florida , Georgia , Alabama, North and South Carolinas, Mississippi , Louis iana and Texas . Participated in development of additional quality control software protocols for the discreet analyzers to bring instruments into compliance with NELAC requirements. KSA Environmental Labs -Miramar, FL 2005 -2007: • VP of Technical Services -Responsibilities included technical support for lab , sales and project management staff and marketing of laboratory services. ELAB Inc. -Ormond Beach, FL 1999 -2005; • Laboratory Director/V.P. of Operations -Responsible for laboratory operations including development of marketing strategies, ensuring compliance with quality control requirements, and supervision of Laboratory Manager and project management staff. Participated in due diligence for the acquisition of a second location in Nashville , TN, increasing revenues from $3.5 million with one lab to $9.8 million with two labs . Under my direction, ELAB obtained NELAC and Army Corp certification , increased drinking water certifications to a total of 17 states, and became the largest drinking water analytical lab in the Southeast. Project experience includes FDEP UST program, FDEP Dry Cleaning program, landfill monitoring , Experience numerous AFCEE and Army Corp projects, contract with EPA for UCMR program, 5-year drinking water contract with PRASA (Puerto Rico Aqueduct Authority), South Florida Water Management District Land Procurement Division (associated with Everglades Restoration Project) encompassing large quantities of samples for pesticides, herbicides , semivolatile , volatile and metals analyses. Envirodyne Inc. -Boca Raton, FL 1998-1999: • Laboratory Director/VP of Operations -Responsible for all marketing and laboratory operations. Expanded capabilities to include phosphated pesticides and HPLC methodologies. Increased revenues in one year from $90,000 to $375,000 per month. Savannah Laboratories and Environmental Services, Inc. -Deerfield Beach, FL 1989-1998: • Laboratory Director -Opened this division of Savannah Labs and supervised build-out of facility from an office building to a full-functioning laboratory in approximately 6 months. Under my direction, this division obtained FDEP certification for a wide range of volatile, semi-volatile, metal and wet chemistry methods. Responsibilities included marketing of laboratory services , supervision of laboratory management, quality control, project management and office support. Developed this division into a $6 million laboratory in 5 years. Experience includes two EPA Superfund projects, FDEP UST, landfill monitoring, Army Corp projects, 5-year clean-up of major industrial site with jet fuel and PCB contamination in the Everglades, provided analytical support for the largest soil incineration project in the US in late 1990's, provided analytical support for research and development of low-level phosphorus removal in support of Everglades restoration, provided analytical support to a major power company for the cleanup of Arsenic and PCB's at 200 substations. Pioneer Labs, Pensacola, FL 1985-1989: • Lab Manager -Developed laboratory from a staff of 18 people to 60 people . Set up Volatile and Semivolatile GCMS labs, developed SOP's and trained staff on EPA protocols. Functioned as backup analyst for Pesticides and PCB's. Provided analytical support to Pensacola Naval Air Station , Eglin Air Force Base and Whiting Field. Oversaw implementation of Pioneer's first LIMS system. Guardian Systems, Inc . Birmingham, AL 1979-1985: • Chemist -Duties included metals analysis by FAA and GFAA, TOG, Ammonia, TKN , Total and Ortho Phosphorus, Fluoride, Total Phenols, and Cyanide analyses using spectrophotometric procedures; Oil & Grease, Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons, TSS, TDS, and VSS using gravimetric procedures, and Demand analyses such as BOD and COD. Microbiological experience included Total and Fecal Coliform on environmental and drinking water samples. Also performed mold, yeast, salmonella analyses and total plate counts on various food products. Performed onsite CO and CO2 studies at several smelting facilities. Set up Guardian's first GC to analyze PAH 's. Experience Richard Rodriguez Laboratory Supervisor/Technical Director Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Houston, Texas Mr. Rodriguez serves as the Operations Manager and Organics Technical Director . His duties include, but are not limited to directing, establishing , and planning the overall policies and goals for the laboratory. Works closely with analyst, department leads , and management to insure the highest standards of quality and service are maintained. Writes and updates standard operating procedures as needed and reviews annually to ensure that employees have current information needed to perform test. He assists in reviewing and reporting results in an accurate and efficient manner to fulfill clienVlaboratory deadlines. He has to organize and supervise various activities of the laboratory, interpret specific chemical analyses, and be a technical resource. He is also responsible for the maintenance and troubleshooting of the organics department instrumentation. Mr. Rodriguez has 19 years of experience. He has been the Organic Technical Director at Accutest for six years. His analytical experience includes all Organic environmental analyses performed at Accutest Gulf Coast and those listed in section 2.6 of the RFP. EDUCATION B.S. Agriculture, Texas State University, 1987 Masters in Environmental, Texas A&M -Corpus Christi, 1994 CONTINUING EDUCATION • Technical Training, Perkin Elmer, 1993 • Technical Training, Varian Inc., 1999 EMPLOYMENT ESN-South Mobile Laboratories, Laboratory Manager 1995-2004 • Responsibilities include general management of all the mobile laboratories and fixed based lab, project scheduling, performing maintenance of all instrumentation, developing of QA/QC plan, SOPs, MDLs , and gas chromatography method development. Performing analysis of VOC's by GC , GC/MS {8021B , 8260B), TPH(TX-1005 and US EPA 8015), SVOC's (8270C), pesticides and PCB's (8081,8082). Other responsibilities involve traveling with the mobile laboratory to perform on-site analysis, creating marketing strategies and maintaining customer relations. Core Service, Inc., Lab Technician 1991-1995 • Testing of various types of environmental parameters: BOD, TPH, Metals, BTEX, VOC's, pesticides and method developments. Assumed responsibility for the design and installation of the new laboratory and writing of the Standard Operation Procedures. Union Fishing S.A. in Casama, Peru., General Manager 1987-1991 • Responsible for the management of two farms and two offices. Also accountable for the selling of our produce. Traveled extensively in South America, Europe, and United States for the purchase of new equipment and locating potential customers for our exports. Experience Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Houston, Texas Mrs. Welch is currently Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Quality Assurance Officer. She is responsible for the facility 's adherence to Accutest's corporate quality assurance program. She oversees and coordinates data quality and corrective action for all environmental analyses performed at Accutest Gulf Coast and those listed in section 2.6 of the RFP . From time to time she generates reports as required for certain projects. She has seven years of experience and has been the QNQC officer at Accutest for four years . EDUCATION BS, Science, Grambling State University 2005 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE STL-Houston, Safety and Quality Assurance Assistant 2005 -2006: • Assist the Employee Health and Safety Coordinator with responsibility for administering the EH&S program that provides a safe , healthy working environment for all employees and the environment. Monitors all areas for unsafe conditions, acts, and potential hazards. Enforces environmental, health , and safety policies and procedures. Maintains regulatory compliance with local, state , and federal laws. Makes safety and health recommendations to laboratory management in conjunction with the facility safety committee • Assist the Quality Assurance Manager during audits and client visits, maintains reference data, and performs spot audits internally at the request of the QA Manager. Performs customer service requests for Project Management staff , supplies Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), certification information, and method information. Requests , compiles, and enters Method Detection Limit study information for each test method in the laboratory. Works with the laboratory to maintain SOP's. STL-Houston Data Package Technician 2005 -2003: • Use data provided by various analytical groups, prepares complete and accurate client report packages in accordance with contract compliance, Severn Trent Laboratories Quality Assurance practices, Standard Operating Procedures , and client requirements. STL-Houston Asst. Supervisor of Sample Administration 2003 -2001 • Responsibilities include providing assistance with planning, directing, and coordinating activities in the department. Strong, dynamic interfacing with co-workers and clients. Able to interact with all levels of management. Experience Georgia Jones Senior Project Manager Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Houston, Texas Georgia serves as a senior project manager here at Accutest Laboratories. Her duties include, but are not limited to handling numerous large and small projects using great customer service skills and technology. She works closely with analyst, department supervisors , and management to ensure the highest standards of data quality are provided to the clients. Georgia reviews reported result in an accurate and efficient manner to fulfill clients' analytical needs and deadlines . Ms. Jones has 14 years of experience in the environmental industry serving in roles such as analyst, data validator, project manager and project chemist in the environmental consulting field. Her experience includes all environmental analyses performed at Accutest Gulf Coast and those listed in section 2.6 of the RFP. She has been with Accutest for two years. EDUCATION B.S. Agriculture , minor in chemistry, Prairie View A&M University, 1995 Masters of Science in Animal Science, Prairie View A&M University, 1997 Master of education, Prairie View A&M University, 1997 CONTINUING EDUCATION • Teach er Certification North Harris College 2005 • Phd Environmental Toxicology, Texas Southern University (Pending) EMPLOYMENT Accutest Laboratories, Senior Project Manager 2009-Present Responsibilities include: • Acting as a liaison between the clients and laboratory. This includes communication between both parties on upcoming sampling events to assist with scheduling and manageability of the work load in the laboratory. • Setting up new projects based on state programs and regulatory limits. • Collaborating with subcontract laboratories for parameters not provided in our network to ensure clients' needs are met. • Providing various levels of deliverables to clients: TARP , level II, level Ill and level IV reports via hard copy reports and/or electronic deliverables. • Review data received from the laboratory for correctness based on the methods and/or programs for which the data is intended prior to sending them out to clients. • Review Chain of Custody forms (COC) submitted to the laboratory for sampling information and give feedback to the clients in case of discrepancies. Southern Petroleum Laboratory, Sr. Project Manager/Analyst 19.98-2002 & 2008-2009 Experience Responsibilities were first as an analyst then later as a project manager, then later rehired as a senior Project manager. Duties Included : • Testing of various types of environmental parameters in the inorganic area as well as assisting with method developments. • Assisted in writing of the Standard Operation Procedures. • Acting as a liaison between the clients and the laboratory. • Write Technical narratives. • Quarterly meetings with some clients to ensure their needs are being met. • Create quotes and provide cost estimates for new projects. • Continuous education on various environmental programs , state requirements and methodology amendments. • Continuous relationship building with clients via meetings, emails or phone calls. • Created, reviewed and approved invoices for analytical services of the laboratory. • Other duties were similar to those presently carried as outlined above for Accutest. Conestoga Rovers & Associates, Project Chen,ist 2006-2008 Responsibilities included: • Managing and coordinating chemistry services for CRA Houston office . • Assessment and validation of analytical data including Data Usability Summary (DUS). • Analytical services procurement and liaison with environmental laboratories in support of various investigative and remedial projects . • Assisting project managers with soil and groundwater report compilation. • Ensuring data compliance with laboratory protocols, EPA and or CLP regulations. • Monitoring analytical data generated by subcontract laboratories, and ensure that all aspects of sample processing are conducted in accordance with CRA's QA/QC program. • Preparation of Simplified Scope of work for all CRA projects. • Development of Superfund and RCRA quality assurance project plans (QAPPs) for CRA. • Coordinate and manage analytical requests to laboratories including cost control and invoice administration. • Assisting the waste group with the arrangements of getting waste from the generators to the disposers. Experience Charles Hardesty Senior Extraction Lab Analyst Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Houston, Texas Mr. Hardesty is responsible for efficiently extracting and preparing all samples received for organic analyses includ i ng Semivolatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), Herbicides , Pesticides and PCBs, with strict adherence to holding time. He is also responsible for preparation of TCLP, ZHE and SPLP samples. He has 10 years of experience in the laboratory and six years with Accutest. EDUCATION Texas A&M University-College Station , Texas , 1987 Bachelor of Science Maritime Administration U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, 1979-1982 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Pace Analytical Laboratory, Houston, Texas Organic Extraction Supervisor -Managed workload and assignments for TCLP , Texas 1005, ORO, Pesticides , PCBs , Herbicides , and 8270 extractions and concentrations. Responsible for ensuring deadlines and holing times were met. He was also the laboratory Safety Officer. Maritime Areas of Expertise Performed all vessel cargo operations including : cargo plan layout, loading , discharging, and securing vessel documentation, supervision of long shore gangs, equipment management , and warehousing. Experience Cora Vela Wet Chemistry Supervisor Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Houston, Texas Ms. Vela supervises and coordinates activities of personnel in the general chemistry laboratory as well as performs wet chemistry analysis. She has 23 years of experience working in the laboratory and has been with Accutest for two years . EDUCATION Far Eastern University 1971 B.S. Chemical Engineering PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Envirodyne Laboratories, Houston, TX, July 2005 -Jan. 2008 Laboratory Analyst -Supervised laboratory technicians and analysts as well as performed wet chemistry analysis. Developed procedures per method compliance of new parameters in the lab . Trained to analyze metals ICP. SPL. Inc .• Houston. Texas, Aug. 1998 -July 2005 Laboratory Analyst -Perform analytical testing, calibrate and maintain instruments, prepare solutions and standards and calculate results and quality control data, all of which is reviewed by the Quality Assurance/Quality Control officer for approval and also developing and validating analytical methods. RECRA Lab Net, Houston, Texas, Sept. 1987 -Aug. 1998 Wet Chemistry Lab Supervisor -Supervised laboratory technicians and analysts. Performed analysis involving the use of Technicon Traacs 800, TOC & TOX analyzers, FTIR 1600, Spectrophotometer, Turbidimeter, BOD Meter, Conductimeter, & pH meter. Responsible for job scheduling and laboratory supplies inventory in the Wet Chemistyr department. Spectrix. Houston, Texas, Feb. 1987 -Aug. 1987 Organic Extraction -Performed various organic extraction methods for samples to be analyzed by GC and GC/MS instrumentation. Experience Felix Oses, Jr. Semi-Volatile Supervisor Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Houston, Texas Mr. Oses primary responsibility is overseeing the daily production and performance of his staff . His duties also include analyzing and reporting results of SVOC's in an accurate and efficient manner to fulfill cl ient/laboratory deadlines. Instrument maintenance and upkeep are included in Mr. Oses ' responsibilities. In order to ensure the fulfillment of deadlines, when necessary, he also communicates with the organic extractions department about sample prep and analysis. Mr. Oses has 1 O years of experience working in the laboratory. He has worked for Accutest for six years. EDUCATION San Jacinto College, Pasadena, TX Associate in Electrical Technology, 1997 H.S. Diploma -Life Christian Academy, 1992 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Pace Analvtica/ Services. Inc., Houston, Texas, 2000 -2004 Lead Analyst Ill GCSV Department: Analyzed soil, water and wastewater samples referencing EPA methods 8080/8081, 8082, 8150/8151 , and 8011 GC Semi-Volatiles -Analyzed soil, water and wastewater samples for Alcohol's, ORO and TPH (TX1005 and TX1006) referencing EPA methods 8015, TX1005 and TX1006. Duties included- preparation of calibration standards and samples , analysis of samples, processing and reporting samples. Organic Extraction Supervisor -performed supervisory duties in the absence of the supervisor, extracted oil, wipes, soil and water samples using methods 3510, 3520, 3550, 8310, 8330, 9071 , 418.1, TCLP/SPLP, TCEQ1005/1006. Duties included -assign and monitor sample throughput in extractions, manage employees, order supplies as needed. Inorganic Experience: familiar with Mercury Analysis, TOC, Solids, and OG analyses among others. Field Services Experience: prepared sample kits and performed sampling duties. Assisted in sample pickups. Experience Jennifer Laidlaw Volatiles Supervisor Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Ms. Laidlaw's primary responsibility is overseeing the daily production and performance of her staff in the Volatile Organics Laboratory. Her duties also include analyzing and reporting results in an accurate and efficient manner to fulfill client/laboratory deadlines . Instrument maintenance and upkeep are also included in her responsibilities. She has three years of experience working in the laboratory and two years experience as a supervisor. EDUCATION University of Houston -Central Campus, Houston, TX, 2007 Bachelor of Science in Biology PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Accutest Laboratory, Houston. TX, May. 2008 -Present -GC/MS Analyst/Supervisor GCMS Volatiles: Analyzed soil, water and wastewater samples for VOC referencing EPA methods 624, 8260, 8020, 8021 B, and 602. Duties included -preparation of calibration standards and samples, analysis of samples, instrument maintenance and troubleshooting, processing and reporting samples. She assigned and distributed samples to analysts , performed secondary data review, training of new hires and purchased supplies as needed. Accutest Laboratory, Houston, TX, Sept 2007 -May 2008 GC Semi-Volatiles -Analyzed soil, water and wastewater samples for Alcohol's, DRO and TPH (TX1005 and TX1006) referencing EPA methods 8015, TX1005 and TX1006. Duties included- preparation of calibration standards and samples, analysis of samples, processing and reporting samples. Experience Nidia Saspa Metal Analyst/Supervisor Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Ms. Saspa is currently responsible for performing instrumental analysis of environmental samples for the determination of metal concentrations. In addition, she does workload scheduling, data review, and instrument trouble shooting. Ms. Saspa is experienced in various metal analytical techniques. These include Inductively Coupled Plasma {ICP), Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. She has 14 years of experience in the laboratory and has worked for Accutest for five years. EDUCATION Centro Escolar University -Philippines Bachelor of Science in Chemistry PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Southern Petroleum Laboratory, Houston, Texas, 01-05 Metal Analyst-Analyzed metals by ICP-MS using Agilent 7500 and T JA 61 E Trace. Pace Analytical Services, Houston, Texas 98-01 Metals Analyst-Analyzed metals by ICP using T JA61 E and T JA61 E Trace. Peformed analysis on metals by Graphite Furnace using PE41 OOZL. Recra Environmental Laboratory, Houston, Texas 97-98 Metals Analyst-Analyzed metals by ICP using Thermospec software T JA/T JA61 E and by Graphite Furnace using PE4100 and PE3030. Environ Expess Laboratory, La Porte, Texas 96-97 Metals Analyst-Analyzed metals by ICP using Perkin Elmer Optima 3000, Ran Mercury analysis using Bacharach Coleman Model 50B, Analyzed metals by Graphite Furnance using PE 4100 ZL. Experience C. References Client Reference 1: Enercon Services Inc. Buyer: Contract: Contact: Address: Contact phone No: Enercon City of Forth Worth Darren Laworn , Program Manager 12100 Ford Road , Sui te 200 Dallas, TX 75234 (972)484-3854 Enercon Services Inc. serves as the City of Fort Worth 's Env ironmental Consultant. Accutest Laboratories serves as the environmental testing laboratory for the City of Forth Worth Environmental Analyses contract. Accutest provides analytical testing for the samples taken by Enercon on behalf of the City. The analytical laboratory services are for air , soil , water, sludge, sediment , tissue and various other types of samples collected from various projects and inspections by the city. These media may be analyzed for certain volatile organ ic chemicals (VOC), semi -volatile organics (SVOC), heavy metals , inorganic chemicals, and general water quality parameters . Accutest also provides analytical testing services for var ious other contracts Enercon currently holds . Client Reference 2: City of Dallas Buyer: Contact: Address: Contact phone No : City of Dallas, Public Works and Transportation Susan G. Alvarez, P.E., Program Manager Storm Water 320 E. Jefferson Blvd . Room 108 Dallas, TX 75203 (214)948-4450 Accutest Laboratories supports the City of Dallas for analytical laboratory services for air , fish tissue , ground water , surface water , wastewater , soil, and hazardous and non-hazardous waste. These media may be analyzed for certain volatile organic chemicals (VOC), semi-volatile organics (SVOC), heavy metals, inorganic chemicals, and general water quality parameters. The analytical services are used to support storm water monitoring , illicit discharge investigations , enforcement hazardous and non-hazardous waste management, industrial waste monitoring , publicly owned treatment works (POTW) influent and effluent monitoring, enforcement investigations and other water/wastewater testing for the City of Dallas. Under this contract Accutest has supported numerous City of Dallas Departments including: The Office of Environmental Quality , Pretreatment, Fire Department and Public Works. Experience Client Reference 3: City of San Antonio -SAW's Contract Buyer: Contact: Address: Contact phone No: San Antonio Water Systems Shelly McHenry Environmental Division 3610 Valley Road San Antonio, TX 78221 (210)233-3025 Accutest Laboratories serves as the environmental testing laboratory for the "City of San Antonio municipal water contract". Providing testing for samples for monitoring Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) and (NPDES) permit compliance, pre-treatment industrial waste permit compliance and drinking water samples (SOWA) compliance. Support recycled water quality, biosolids quality, and process quality control for the water recycling centers. Client Reference 4: TCEQ Contract No: Contact: Address: Contact phone No: 582-10-99538 Marsheila Stafford, Laboratory Contracts Manager PO Box 13087-3087 Austin, TX 78711-3087 (512)239-0434 Accutest Laboratories has been a TCEQ contract laboratory for the TCEQ field Operations division for the past 11 years. Accutest routinely serves as the TCEQ quality laboratory for split sampling events when the TCEQ is involved with site investigations, emergency response and other remedial investigations. Accutest has served multiple TCEQ regions on a routine basis and serves as the TCEQ 's largest contract laboratory provider. Accutest has earned this role due to our superior quality and defensibility of our data results. Client Reference 5: SouthWest Water Company Buyer: Contact: Address: Contact phone No: Southwest Water Company Mike Thornhill, Environmental Compliance Director 11302 Tanner Road Houston, TX 77041 (832)209-5131 Accutest Laboratories serves as the environmental testing laboratory for this National operating company for the greater Houston Metropolitan area. Accutest Laboratories provides testing for samples for monitoring Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) and (NPDES) permit compliance, pre-treatment industrial waste permit compliance and drinking water samples (SOWA) compliance. Support water quality testing biosolids quality, and process quality control for the waste water treatment plants that are located in MUD districts SouthWest -\ Water operates and owns. • t .• ACCLJTEST@ LABO R ATO RIE S STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE 2010 Table of Contents Section Mission Statement 1.0 Overview Overview ............................................................................................... 2-3 Client Services and Project Management ................................................ .4-5 Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) ...................................... 6 Electronic Data Deliverables ............................................................... 6 Lablink5M ..•..•..•...•..........•...•••............••••.•..•..••....•.•.•......••••.•.••...•••.• 6-8 2.0 Analytical Methodology and Regulatory Programs Analytical Methodology ............................................................................. 9 Regulatory Programs ............................................................................... l 0 Analytical Support Activities ...................................................................... l 0 Reports and Deliverable Products .............................................................. 11 3.0 Quality Assurance Program Policy Statement ...................................................................................... 12 The Quality Assurance Standard ............................................................... 13 Corporate Quality Assurance Program ...................................................... 13 Quality Assurance at Each Laboratory ....................................................... 14 Accutest State Certifications and Accreditations ..................................... 15-17 Audits and Proficiency Testing ................................................................... 18 4.0 Facilities and Resources Laboratories, Service Centers and Courier Services ..................................... 19 Accutest Locations ................................................................................... 20 Equipment and Instrumentation ., .............................................................. 21 Health & Safety Program .......................................................................... 22 Field Services .......................................................................................... 23 5. 0 Key Staff Key Staff Profile Matrix ............................................................................. 24 Key Staff Profiles ................................................................................. 25-34 .• . .... , .. :··,/;'.,,:,,/ II ACCLJT-E):~\ LABO R 'A T ·o R "r'°E -s '" ' . ,.~ Table of Contents {continued) 6.0 Major Project Experience Engineering Firms ............................................................................... 35-36 Industrial Projects ............................................................................... 37-38 DoD Projects .......................................................................................... 39 APPENDICES Appendix A -Representative Clients Proprietary Notice -Information contained herein is the property of ·and is proprietary to Acculest Laboratories and shall not be reproduced, disclosed, or used without the prior written permission of Accutest Laboratories .. ii Mission Statement -(Jur l\/lission -' . ' ' To produce qual ity data that is accurate, time ly and of the highest integrity. To provide service that consistently exceeds our clients' expectations. To continuously improve our performance by developing and implementing the latest technology. To achieve steady growth benefiting our clients, our employees and our company . • \'{! • ACCUTES-r; L A B O A A T"O R I E S Total Performance You Can Count On Section 1.0 Overview Accutest Laboratories is a nationwide environmental testing laboratory that has successfully delivered defensible data for over 50 years. Founded in 1956, Accutest is the nation's 3rd largest environmental testing laboratory combining advanced technology and experienced personnel to deliver "Total Performance You Can Count On". Our commitment is to provide our clients with appropriate test methods that meet the most stringent quality standards in the environmental testing industry. Headquartered in Dayton, New Jersey, Accutest operates from state-of-the-art, integrated laboratories in New Jersey, Massachusetts, Florida, Texas, Colorado, and California. The Company operates over 160,000 square feet of total laboratory space. Accutest maintains five fully-staffed Service Centers conveniently located in New York, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Louisiana, and California. Accutest has a fleet of courier services for sample pickup and container delivery within a l 00-mile radius of its laboratories. We also provide contract courier services nationwide. Accutest provides reliable and comprehensive testing services including organic and inorganic analysis of air, water, soil, waste characterization, energetics and explosives, and emerging contaminants to industrial, consulting/engineering and government clients in support of Federal and State Environmental Programs. Accutest's extensive Federal and State regulatory experience provides clients with the required expertise to assist in the development of analytical protocols and sampling and analysis plans. Our staff consists of over 440 professionals including chemists, biologists, chemical engineers, computer scientists, technicians, and support personnel. The Accutest senior management team averages over 15 years experience with the company. This translates into the environmental expertise that clients have come to rely on. 2 Overview (continued) The National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) forms the foundation of our stringent Corporate Quality Assurance Program. This enables Accutest to hold multi- state accreditdtions and certifications that conform to a Notional standard. Accutest hos also received Department of Defense Environmental Laboratory Accreditation (DoD ELAP) and ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Certificate of Accreditation from the Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-8) to perform environmental testing in support of environmental restoration programs. LobLink5M, the most comprehensive data retrieval and information management system in the industry, provides real-time data resources that enables clients to generate electronic data deliveries on demand 24/7 /365 days a year. Though Lablink5M, Accutest manages an extensive historical database of more than 675 million archived test results which can be easily searched and retrieved . Accutest's quality of service consistently exceeds our client's expectations . This is exemplified by the fact that 85% of our business is from repeat clients. Accutest participates in National Corporate Analytical Programs which are routinely audited by independent third parties. Through steady, carefully managed growth, leading technology, and outstanding service, Accutest provides quality data of the highest integrity that is delivered reliably and uniformly to clients nationwide. 3 Client Services and Project Management Accutest provides services that consistently exceed our cl ients' expectations . Our primary objective is to create and maintain long-term relationships with a dedication to quality, client services, technology and strong, consistent project management . We take great pride in our customer focus and the ability of our highly qualified staff to provide consistent, accurate info r mation and support to the clients we serve . Serving clients' needs and striving to find better ways to fulfill those needs has been the heart of Accutest since 1956. Our philosophy "Total Performance You Can Count On" is our promise to deliver the best customer service in the industry . Our clients can count on us to be there to address and resolve the challenges which they face . We strive to enhance communications and teamwork through a work environment dedicated to continuous process evaluation, redesign and improvement. Our project managers have a sense of ownership which fosters their commitment to total customer satisfaction. Clients are assigned to project managers who become their advocates and their dedicated representatives and contacts for all analytical inquiries. The assigned project manager ensures that client expectations and program objectives are met by obtaining a thorough understanding of all relevant technical and contractual requirements. Effective and timely communication develops trusted client partnerships, which in turn leads to successful project outcomes. Our project managers are committed to delivering the fu l l measure of our expertise to ensure complete client satisfaction with each and every Accutest service. Project managers understand through experience that successful completion of every project requires up-front planning . Accutest's Life Cycle of Project Management Services is exhibited by the following flow diagram. 4 .Ufe: Cycle of Project, Ma~dgem~rit ,S~Kt iie s _,,. ,·, ··" . ... ' ~ .• ----------------------------------------------------, I \ : The client's decision to employ Accutest is the first step in the project lifecycle. Upon 1 : con tacti ng Accutest, a client services representative is assigned to the client who : wo rks to manage all project phases . '----------------------------------------------------/ ----------------------------------------------------, I I Project specifications originate from QAPPs, RFPs, work plans and other related documents. Accutest representatives work with the client to refi ne these specifications into clear instructions for the laboratory. '----------------------------------------------------/ ----------------------------------------------------, I : Once the specifications are defined, the setup process begins . The representative : develops a schedule with the client and generates the bottle order configuration to : match the analytical sp ecifications. , ____________________________________________________ / ----------------------------------------------------, I 1 Bottle kits are delivered to the client's site in ad vance of sampling . A ccutest employs : local courier services for most clients or comm ercial carriers when the site is beyond : the courier's service range. '----------------------------------------------------/ -----------------------------------------------------1 \ : Upon arrival, all sa mples are thoroughly checked to assure regulatory integrity . : : Chain-of-Custody information is translated to electronic log i n information and : compared to the project specifications. , ____________________________________________________ ; -----------------------------------------------------1 \ 1 Prior to analysis all specification discrepancies are resolved . As the analysis 1 proceeds, representatives monitor project status, which can be routinely communicated to the client through Accutest electronic tools. '----------------------------------------------------' ----------------------------------------------------, I I 1 When the analysis is completed electronic reports are generated to the client's I 1 specifications, which can be delivered by using Accutest sophisticated electronic tools I 1 or by conventional means . '-----------------------------------------------------' I ' 1 Representatives are available to provide interpretive services after data delivery. : 1 Responses to client queries are prompt and accurate, frequently providing them with : key information to aid their decision process . -----------------------------------------------------' ----------------------------------------------------, I 1 Invoices are generated from the same electronic information used to communicate 1 analytical specifications to the laboratory. This guarantees that it accurately reflects • the specification requested by the client. '----------------------------------------------------~ I Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) The Accutest Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) is the most critical and central tool in the operation of the laboratory. Accutest's LIMS is one of the most powerful and sophisticated tools in the industry today . The LIMS at each location resides on an independent server sized to ensure highly efficient performance for internal users and on-line customers simultaneously . The LIMS is based on a state-of-the-art Oracle relational database that has been specifically designed to handle the complex issues faced by the env i ronmental laboratory. The LIMS automates virtually every phase of laboratory operations, including sample receipt/login, sample scheduling and tracking, data acquisition, calculations, quality control (QC), final reports, electronic deliverables, and invoicing. As a result, it allows Accutest to deliver the most accurate and cons istent product in the industry . Electronic Data Deliverables One of the most significant trends in this industry is the increased dependence on Electronic Data Deliverables (EDDs). EDDs that are produced or modified manually cannot be relied upon for accuracy. Accutest consistently provides the most accurate EDDs through totally automated data transfer. At the front end, virtually all laboratory data is transferred automatically to the LIMS without manual transcription, followed by multiple levels of technical review. From this point, the LIMS becomes the single source for all deliverables including data reports, QC reports, and EDDs. Simply put, this means that the row data matches the paper reports, and the reports match the EDDs. Loblink5M Lablink5M is the live, on-line client i nterface to the Accutest LIMS, the most comprehensive on- line data service in the industry. Available via the internet to all Accutest clients, Lablink5M provides real-time access to project status, current and historical data, on-line reports, EDDs, and billing information. lablink5M can be configured to send reports via email automatically upon data completion. 6 Lablink5M (continued) We provide a secure internet account that encrypts all communications to maintain data confidentiality. Lablink5M has established a new standard for electronic data management. From the m i nute samples are received, Lablink5M provides up-to-the-minute access to project information from a PC via a secure website. The Most Comprehensive On-Line Service in the Industry, Lablink5M service saves time, effort and money. Through Lablink5M, Accutest has made a long term commitment to provide the most comprehensive on-line service in the industry that includes the following features : • Automated Sample Receipt Confirmation: Allows client verification that samples have arrived at the laboratory safely and have been logged in properly. This ensures the correct tests, sample identification (IDs) and Turn-Around-Time (TAT) have been accurately communicated from the client to Accutest. An electronic copy of the chain-of- custody is del ivered with the log in report for review . • • • Complete Project Status Information: From the minute samples are received, there is complete access to job, sample, and test information. In addition, status information is available in real time through Lablink5M, which allows tracking sample progress through the laboratory. On-line Chain-of-Custody Documents: As part of sample login, chain-of-custody documents are scanned into PDF files that are available on-line to Lablink5M users with a single click. Immediate Access to Test Results: Lablink5M provides complete access to test results the minute they are approved by the laboratory. The Lablink5M data query provides powerful options (e.g. hits only) to get data feedback as quickly as possible. The results can also be compared to a variety of Federal and State regulatory limits. 7 Loblink5M (continued) • Access to Quality Control Doto: Method blank, MS/MSD, blank spike and surrogates are available on-line. Chromatograms, spectra and other raw data con also be reviewed. • Historical Doto Query: With Lablink5M, it is just as easy to view historical data. Powerfu l query options and sort criteria can be specified and executed in seconds to evaluate trends. • e-Hordcopy Reports available via Auto-email or on-line: Finished data' may be generated in e-Hardcopy format complete with a signed cover page, chain-of-custody and comprehensive QC data. Lablink5 M allows the user to activate Auto-email on projects of interest, which automatically initiates generation of an e-Hardcopy report that will be sent automatically upon completion of a job. • Billing/Invoice Information: Lablink5M also allows access to preliminary billing information. This enables the user to check quote prices before the invoice is delivered. In addition, historical billing information is maintained, allowing up-to-the-minute project financial summaries. Final invoices can be dQwnloaded on demand in PDF format. • Electronic Deliverables on Demond: EDDs may be generated on demand through Lablink5M. This capability is unprecedented in the industry. • How to Get On-Line? Getting started with Lablink5M couldn't be easier. All that is needed is access to the Internet. Accutest will then set up a secure Lablink5M account and user to be on-line. Best of all, access to Lablink5M is provided at no additional charge - simply for doing business with Accutest. 8 Section 2.0 Analytical Methodology & Regulatory Programs Analytical Methodology The Accutest staff has extensive knowledge and experience applying analytical chemistry methods employed in environmental monitoring . This includes methods approved for Federal and State environmental regulatory programs and in-house methods developed for client's unique analytical needs. This expertise combined with a quality assurance system that meets national and international standards enables the Company to consistently produce data of known and documented quality. In 2009, Accutest logged in more than 65,000 projects, processed over 780,000 samples and reported well over 1,500,000 tests. All tests were performed within the framework of the Accutest Quality Assurance System in compliance with method specifications, regulatory requirements and client specific data quality objectives. Accutest routinely employs methods from the following compendiums : • • • • • • • • • Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846 (USEPA); Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (USEPA); Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater (USEPA); Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples (USEPA); Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances i n Environmental Samples (USEPA); Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water (USEPA); Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air (USEPA); Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (APHA, AWWA.WEF); and Technical Standards -American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) . 9 • • II ACOl.~.J~-~ LAB_ q)~l Regulatory Programs Analysis of environmental samples using methods from these compendiums is performed in accordance with Federal and State regulatory programs including: • RCRA-Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (USEPA); • CWA-Clean Water Act (USEPA); • NPDES -National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (USEPA}; • SOWA-Safe Drinking Water Act (USEPA); • CERCLA-Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation Liability Act (USEPA}; • CAA-Clean Air Act (USEPA); • TSCA-Toxic Substances Control Act (USEPA); • OSHA -Occupational Safety and Health Act; • Brownfields Recovery Act (USEPA); and • Numerous State Specific Programs Supporting Waste Management Activities and Natural Resource Protection. Analytical Support Activities Accutest routinely produces analytical data in support of projects that require testing in conformance with Federal and State remediation and regulatory compliance programs including: • Site Characterization Investigations; • Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies; • Remedial Action Activities (Cleanup and/or Removal}; • Delineation Monitoring; • Groundwater Monitoring (Natural Resource Protection & Drinking Water}; • Underground Storage Tank Monitoring and Cleanup; • Ambient & Indoor Air Monitoring; • NPDES Compliance Monitoring; and • Hazardous Waste Identification/Classification. 10 Reports and Deliverables Accutest's user friendly data reports can be produced in several formats varying in complexity from basic results to fully documented deliverables depending on client needs . Regardless of the report format, all analysis is performed to meet the quality control specifications of the analytical method and the specified regulatory program . The delivered report can therefore be configured with full confidence that the data is supported by the required quality control practices . These reports are designed for easy interpretation and efficient data validation. Reports can be produced in hard copy format or as a fully indexed electronic document. Accutest specializes in electronic data products, which not only complement the data report, but also provide the client with numerous electronic products and delivery options that simplify data management and review. These options include EDDs in over 900 data formats, including commercial and custom client formats, which are delivered in over 95% of projects. Access to lead i ng edge, interactive online features enables the user to configure data reports that meet data reporting needs, including the ability to automatically receive data upon completion which has been formatted to client specifications. Hardcopy and electronic deliverable options are as follows: Hard Copy • Full Deliverables -Comprehensive, Validation Ready (Level 4) • Reduced Deliverables -Summary Data with Quality Control (Level 2 & 3) • Standard Commercial Format -Results only (Level 1) • State -Specific Formats Electronic • Commercial Database Import Formats (i.e. EQUIS, GIS/Key, Locus & more) • Customized Client Specific Database Import Formats • Custom Spreadsheet Reports • State Regulatory Required EDD Formats • Department of Defense {ADR, SEDD, IRPIMS & others) Interactive Online Reporting • Lablink5M -Accutest Proprietary On-Line Data Management Service • e-Hard Copy -Fully Navigable, Indexed, Interactive PDF Report 11 Section 3.0 Quality Assurance Program At Accutest, we continually build quality into the product delivered to clients as a design specification. This is accomplished by incorporating the elements of our Quality System into every laboratory p rocess as an intrinsic component of day-to-day operations . This approach reflects our dedication to a quality system that meets national and international standards . This is achieved through a Corporate Quality Assurance Program that establishes the framework for the quality systems operated and maintained at each Accutest facility. This Program reflects knowledge of the regulatory analytical process and the role our product plays in safeguarding human health and the environment. Policy Statement The management and staff of Accutest share the responsibility for product quality. The Quality System is designed to ensure that all processes and procedures, which are components of environmental data production, meet established industry requirements. These processes and procedures must be adequately documented from a procedural and data traceability perspective as executed by the staff. It also assures that analytical data of known quality, meeti ng the quality objectives of the analytical method in use and the data user's requirements, are consistently produced in the laboratory. This enables the ultimate data user to make rational, confident, cost-effective decisions on the assessment and resolution of environmental issues. The Quality System provides staff with data quality and operational feedback data . This enables a determination whether the laboratory has achieved the established quality and operational standards, which are dictated by the client or established in regulation. The information obtained from the Quality System is used to assess operational performance from a quality perspective and to perform corrective action as necessary. 12 The Quality Assurance Standard Accutest operates a quality program which meets the requirements for laboratory operations established by the international community. Accutest has implemented a Quality System that follows ISO Guide 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Calibration and Testing Laboratories. The structure of ISO Guide l 7025 has been adopted by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP}, the voluntary national accreditation program originally established by the USEPA. NELAP has established a uniform national standard for environmental laboratories that places a strong emphasis on quality systems. The Quality System at Accutest has been designed to meet NELAP Standards. Accutest was among the first laboratories to submit applications to the approved state accrediting authorities for recognition as a NELAP Accredited laboratory. All laboratories in the Accutest network are NELAP Accredited. Corporate Quality Assurance Program The Corporate Quality Assurance Program establishes the quality framework for each individual Accutest fadlity. The Corporate Quality Assurance Director determines corporate policies and defines the qua lity responsibilities at the facility level. He is responsible for monitoring the quality system at each facility and providing feedback to the management staff. The reporting relationship between Corporate Quality Assurance and the Quality Assurance Officers at each laboratory reflects a dotted line responsibility. This type of relationship enables the Corporate Program to be implemented locally while enhancing day-to-day operational efficiency at each facility. 13 • II ACCLJTES·S li Quality Assurance at Each Laboratory The Accutest philosophy enables each facility to implement a quality policy using their unique operating style . This approach provides the autonomy needed to meet the requirements of the local regulatory jurisdictions using procedures that efficiently meet their operational objectives . The Quality Assurance Program at each facility incorporates the elements of NELAP and ISO Guide 17025. The operations management staff is responsible for implementing the program elements and operating the quality system . The Quality Assurance Officer monitors the program, provides feedback to local and corporate management, and assists with corrective action and training if needed . In order to measure the success of the Corporate Qua li ty Assurance Program, Accutest participates in the following regulatory proficiency test programs: • Water Pollution Study (NELAP fields of testing); • Water Supply Study (NELAP fields of testing); • RCRA Water PT Samples; • RCRA Soil PT Samples; • Independent Single Blind PT Samples; and • Independent Double Blind PT Samples . Accutest also participates in numerous national corporate proficiency test . programs/audits sponsored by our clients, utilizing independent, third party consulting firms . 14 Accutest State Certifications & Accreditations Accutest maintains accreditation for the majority of the state regulatory analytical programs offered in the United States . The program specific accreditations maintained in each sta te are essential for submitting analytical data to meet data reporting requirements . Many states ma i ntain accreditation programs for drinking water only. In these states, accred itation is not required to conduct analysis for other regulatory programs administered by them. The following map depicts the State Accreditations held by Accutest. It also shows those states where Accutest can perform analysis of envi ronmental samples in support of sta te regulatory programs where accreditation is not offered . lil Ce rt ific d [El Ce 11ifica ti on for Reg ul atory Program s (\V\V, NP\V, SHW, and Air) not requir ed A Labo rat ory ~ Ce rti fic ati on Pend ing 8 Servi ce Center 15 Accutest Laboratories' Certifications, Accreditations & Permits New Jersey Facility (Mid-Atlantic) -USEPA Federal Identification Number NJ00141 Florida Facility (Southeast) -USEPA Federal Identification Number FL00946 Texas Facility (Gulf Coast) -USEPA Federal Identification Number TX01484 Massachusetts Facility (New England) -USEPA Federal Identification Number MA00136 California Facility (West) -USEPA Federal Identification Number CA00150 Colorado Facility (Mid-West) -USEPA Federal Identification Number C000049 Certlflling Authoritl Accutest Facilitl Certification Program Registration No. Alaska Southeast Contaminated Sites UST-088 Arkansas Gulf Coast Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Waste 88-0756 Arkansas Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water 88-0620 California (N ELAP) Mid Atlantic Potable & Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste 01152CA California (NELAP) Southeast Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste 04226CA California (NELAPl West Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Waste 08258CA Colorado Mid West Potable Water None Connecticut Mid Atlantic Potable/Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Waste PH-0585 Connecticut New Enaland Potable/Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Waste, ETPH PH-0109 Delaware Mid Atlantic DNREC HSCA Proaram Not Applicable DoD ELAP Mid Atlantic Non-Potable Water, Solid/Chemical Waste, Air Toxics L2248 DoD ELAP New Ena land Non-Potable Water, Solid/Chemical Waste, Air Toxics L2235 DoD ELAP Southeast Non-Potable Water, Solid/Chemical Waste L2229 DoD ELAP West Non-Potable Water, Solid/Chemical Waste L2242 Florida (NELAP) Gulf Coast Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste E87628 Florida (NELAP) Mid Atlantic Potable , Non-Potable, Solid Waste, UST, Air Toxics E87482 Florida (NELAP) New Enaland Non-Potable Water/Solid/Hazardous Waste E87579 Florida /NELAP) Southeast Potable Non-Potable, Solid Waste, UST, Air Toxics E83510 Georaia Southeast Potable Water 934 Geor aia Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes Not Applicable Idaho Mid West Potable Water None Illinois (N ELAP) Mid Atlantic Potable & Non-Potable Water· Haz Waste 200045 Illinois (NELAP) New EnCJland Potable & Non-Potable Water: Haz Waste 002337 Indiana Mid Atlantic Potable Water C-NJ-03 Iowa Southeast UST. Solid/Hazardous Wastes , Non-Potable Water IA366 ISO/lEC 17025:2005 Mid Atlantic Non-Potable Water, Solid/Chemical Waste Air Toxics L2248 ISO/lEC 17025:2005 New England Non-Potable Water Solid/Chemical Waste, Air Toxics L2235 ISO/lEC 17025:2005 Southeast Non-Potable Water, Solid/Chemical Waste L2229 ISO/lEC 17025:2005 West Non-Potable Water Solid/Chemical Waste L2242 Kansas (NELAP) Gulf Coast Solid/Hazardous Wastes Non-Potable Water E-10366 Kansas (NELAP) Mid Atlantic Potable/Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Wastes E-10356 Kansas (NELAP) Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes Non-Potable Water E-1 0327 Kentuckv Mid Atlantic Potable Water 90131 Kentuckv Southeast Underground Storage Tank Program 0065 Louisiana (NELAP) Gulf Coast Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Waste 85695/04004 Louisi ana (NELAP) Mid Atlantic Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Waste Air Toxics 04106 Louisiana (NELAP) Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes 03051 Maine New England Potable & Non-Potable Water Maine DRO/GRO MA00136 Maryland Mid Atlantic Potable Water 167 Massachusetts Mid Atlantic Potable/Non-Potable Water NJ141 Massachusetts New EnCJland Potable & Non-Potable Water M-MA136 Massachusetts Southeast Non-Potable Water M-FL946 Minnesota Mid Atlantic Potable/Non-Potable Water, Solid/Chemical Waste, Air Toxics 035-999-439 Minnesota New Enaland Potable/Non-Potable Water Solid/Chemical Waste Air Toxics 025-999-441 16 .11 ...... ,,. II AccuTest · LABORATOF;i'(E S Accutest Laboratories' Certifications, Accreditations & Permits New Jersey Facility (Mid-Atlantic) -USEPA Federal Identification Number NJ00141 Florida Facility (Southeast) -USEPA Federal Identification Number FL00946 Texas Facility (Gulf Coast) -US EPA Federal Identification Number TX01484 Massachusetts Facility (New England) -US EPA Federal Identification Number MA00136 California Facility (West) -USEPA Federal Identification Number CA00150 Colorado Facility (Mid-West) -USEPA Federal Identification Number C000049 Certif'ling Authori~ Accutest Facilit~ Certification Program Registration No. Mississiooi Southeast Potable Water Not Annlicable Montana Mid Atlantic Petroleum Release Section Not Appl icable Montana New England Petroleum Release Section Not Annlicable Nebraska Mid West Potable Water None Nevada Southeast Non-Potable Water. Solid/Hazardous Wastes FL009462008A Nevada West Potable/Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Wastes CA00150201 OA New Hampshire (NELAP) New Enaland Potable/Non-Potable Water Solid & Chemical Materia ls 2502 New Jersey (NELAP) Mid Atlantic Potable/Non-Potable Water , Sol id Waste , Air Toxics 12129 New Jersev (NE LAP) New Enoland Non-Potable Water/Solid/Hazardous Waste MA926 New Jersev <NELAP) Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes Non-Potable Water FL002 New Mexico Mid West Potable Water None New York (NELAP) Mid Atlantic Potable/Non-Potable Water Solid/Haza rdous Waste, Air 10983 New York (NELAP) New England Non-Potable Water/Solid/Hazardous Waste 11791 North Carolina New ·Enoland Non-Potable Water 653 North Carolina Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes Non-Potable Water 573 North Dakota Mid West Potable Water R-027 North Dakota New Enoland Potable/Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste R-188 Ohio Voluntarv Action Pr. Mid Atlantic Solid/Hazardous Wastes Non-Potable Water CL0056 Oklahoma Gulf Coast Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste 9103 Oklahoma Mid Atlantic Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste 9981 Oklahoma Southeast Non-Potable Water Solid/Hazardous Waste 9959 Oreoon (NELAP) West Potable & Non-Potable Water; Haz Waste CA200011 Penns\Avan ia CNELAP) Mid Atlantic Potable & Non-Potable Water; Haz Waste 68-408 Penns\Avania (NELAP) New Enoland Non-Potabl e Solid/Hazardous Waste 68-01121 Rhode Island Mid Atlantic Potable/Non-Potable Water, Air LA000176 Rhode Island New Enoland Potable/Non-Potable Water LA000071 South Carolina Mid Atlantic Solid/Hazardous Wastes Non-Potable Water 94009001 South Carolina Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes Non-Potable Water 96038001 Texas (NELAP) Gulf Coast Non-Potable Water. Solid/Hazardous Waste T104704220-10-2 Texas (NELAP) Mid Atlantic Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste, Air Toxics T104 704234-10-1-TX Texas <NELAPl Southeast Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste T104704404-09-TX US Army Corps of Eno . Gulf Coast HTRW Solid/Hazardous Waste Not Annlicable US Dept. of Aoriculture Gulf Coast Foreion Soils Permit S-61939 US Dept. of Aariculture Mid Atlantic Foreirm Soils Permit P330-09-00162 US Deot. of Agriculture New Enoland Foreign Soils Permit S-56483 US Dept. of Aciriculture Southeast Foreian Soils Permit P330-10-00107 US Deot. of Aoriculture West Foreion Soils Permit P330-10-00029 Utah (NELAP) Mid West Potable , Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Wastes C000049 Utah (NELAP) Southeast Potable , Non-Potable Solid/Chemical Materials FL009462008A Viroinia Mid Atlantic Potable Water 00004 Washington Southeast Non-Potable , Solid/Chemical Materials C2046 Washinaton West Potable Non-Potable Solid/Chemical Materials C2057 West Viroinia Mid Atlantic Non-Potable Water. Solid/Hazardous Wastes 329 Wisconsin Southeast Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water 399043370 17 Audits & Proficiency Testing Accutest participates in national proficiency test p rograms to maintain the accred itations required by the NELAP states and those required by non-NELAP states. Accutest traditionally obtains acceptable performance on over 95% of the parameters evaluated. In 2009 Accutest reported results for over 10,000 proficiency test parameters performed under the following programs: • Water Pollution Study (NELAP fields of testing); • Water Supp ly Study (NELAP f ields of testing); • RCRA Water PT Samples ; • RCRA Soil PT Samples; Accutest also participates in numerous single and double blind proficiency test programs sponsored by national, co r porate clients, utilizing independent, thi rd party consulting firms. Audits are an essential component of Accutest's Quality Assurance Program. Accutest conducts extensive, internal audits of every aspect of the analytical system annually. This includes an assessment of numerous analytical methods and an assessment of the laboratory qual ity system . Audit findings are the basis of corrective actions that continually elevate the Company's performance . Audits are also conducted by state accrediting bodies for initial and continued accreditation. Findings from these audits are also used to improve process performance . Accutest continuously monitors key indicators to measure operational efficiency which is essential to project execution. The indicators used to evaluate performance include analytical report turn-around-time, reissued reports, holding times and rejected data . Statistical evaluations are used to measure and refine overall performance, promoting continuous improvement. 18 Laboratories Section 4.0 Facilities and Resources Accutest's state-of-the-art facilities have been designed specifically for environmental testing. Each facility is functionally designed to provide efficient processing of a large volume of samples and provide a comfortable, safe working environment for laboratory staff. The facilities are equipped with centralized process gas distribution, water purification centers and separate, dedicated HVAC systems. These systems maintain critical positive/negative pressure relationships between internal laboratories, ensuring adequate ventilation and preventing atmospheric cross-contamination. A site location map is provided on the next page. Service Centers Accutest operates five Service Centers conveniently located in the States of New York, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Louisiana, and California to ensure that samples can be shipped to each of the laboratories quickly and to accommodate project specific locations outside a l 00-mile radius of each laboratory in the network. Courier Services Accutest maintains a fleet of couriers that handle sample pickup and container delivery within a l 00-mile radius of our laboratories. All couriers are employees of Accutest with experience in handling environmental samples and sample documentation. Accutest has established contract courier services in the States of Alabama, Colorado, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, c:ind Texas. 19 ( Accutest Location Mid-Atlantic 2235 Route 130 . +.·.S0leS .CC~1e r.- Dayton, New Jersey 0881 0 Phone: (732) 329-0200 Fax : (732) 329-3499 New England 495 Technology Center West Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752 Phone: (508) 481 -6200 Fax: (508) 481-7753 Sales Centers: Dallas, Texas Laboratories Southeast 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, Florida 32811 Phone: (407) 425-6700 Fax: (407) 425-0707 Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Houston, Texas 77009 Phone : (713) 271-4700 Fax: (713) 271-4770 Overland Park, Kansas St . Louis, Missouri Indianapolis, Indiana Mid-West Flor ido Southeast 4036 Youngfield Street Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Phone: (303) 425-6021 Fax : (303) 425-6854 West 21 05 Lundy Avenue San Jose , CA 95131 Phone : (408) 588-0200 Fa x: (408) 588-020 l Service Cente~ Syracuse Service Center 6780 Northern Blvd Suite 202 East Syracuse, NY 13057 Phone : (315) 329-4763 Exton Service Center 924 Springdale Drive Exton, PA 19341 Phone: (610) 363-7 400 Fax: (610) 363-7445 Raleigh Service Center 6308 Angus Drive, Suite C Raleigh, NC 27617 Phone : (919) 208-7171 Baton Rouge Service Center 1 7 485 Opportunity Avenue, Suite l B Baton Rouge, LA 7081 7 Phone : (225) 752-8929 Fax: (713) 271-4770 Irvine Service Center 17165 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 112 Irvine, CA 92614 Phone : (949) 250-9900 Fax : (949) 250-9900 C@lrllh'©lld C@l!.!lrriers Austin, Te xa s Birmingham, Alabama Charlotte, N . Carolina Dallas, Te xa s Denver, Colorado Indianapolis, Indiana Kansas City, Missouri Nashville, Tennessee Ruston, Louisiana Tulsa, Oklahoma Wichita, Kansas fl ... -.,.-,.,?<•-. -. II ACC.U T~:Eff:{:f;f\· ,·. _., ·-:~ Equipment and Instrumentation Accutest maintains automated, computerized analytical instrumentation to support large complex projects and routine analyses of standard analytical parameters. Our commitment to clients is reflected by the capital investment in facilities, equipment and technology. Our production capability, capacity and redundancy of instrumentation assure the reliability and performance needed to deliver major analytical projects successfully. Instruments are dedicated to specific matrices and analyses to accelerate productivity and prevent cross contamination . A major factor when evaluating a laboratory is the age, model and condition of its equipment. Accutest maintains a significant proportion of advanced late model instrumentation. Major Instrumentation Summary GC/MSVOA 69 GC/MS SVOA 27 GCVOA 34 GCSVOA 51 HPLC 10 ICP/ICPMS 15 21 Health and Safety Program Accutest operates a formal Health and Safety Program that complies with the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Our goal is to provide a safe and healthy working environment for our employees and clients while protecting the public and preserving the Company's assets and property. Accutest complies with all applicable government regulations pertaining to the safety and health in the laboratory and the workplace. The objective of our Health and Safety Program is to promote safe work practices that minimize the occurrence of injuries and illness to the staff through proper health and safety training, correct laboratory technique application and the use of engineering controls. The program consists of key policies and practices that are essential to safe laboratory operation. All employees receive training on the program's elements. Job specific training is conducted to ensure safe practices for specified tasks. All employees are required to participate in the program, receive initial and annual training, and comply with the program requirements. Accutest's commitment to health and safety is demonstrated by its Experience Modification Rate (EMR) which measures its safety performance. The EMR is based on the company's safety records (injury claims). A rating less than l .0 is superior to the industry average. For the past three years, Accutest's EMR has been superior to the industry average, pointing to the success of Accutest's safety initiatives. 2006 0.906 2007 0.799 2008 0.804 22 Field Services Accutest's Field Services Department offers Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) certified sampling technicians to support environmental projects. Accutest has the capacity to fully equip and mobilize teams utilizing the appropriate level of protection to accommodate project safety requirements. Our technicians have extensive experience in the sampling of groundwater, surface water, soil, hazardous waste and air. Our sampling teams have been successfully audited by Federal and State regulatory agencies. The teams are accredited for the "analyze immediately" parameters (pH, specific conductance, temperature, residual chlorine and dissolved oxygen) to ensure accurate measurements in the field . The following field sampling equipment is utilized by the field services team: • Equipment Decontamination • Peristaltic Pumps • Bacon Bomb Samplers • Summa Canisters/T edlar Bags • T eflon/SS Boilers • 24 Hour Composite Samplers • Open Tube Samplers • Personal Air Samplers/Tubes • Submersible Well Pumps • Wheaton Grab Samplers • So i l Augers/Trowels 23 L,t(t' = AcOlfJ ®i :\f;; · · L A .B OR Al iF .O HI -~:--Xi/~:~rs~> ·~-~t}t~. Key Staff Matrix • • ACCLJTEST. ;Name ; Davi d Speis : ··----··--·-·-----------------·--·-·-- i Reza Tand / l ·-. . . .. j Harry Bel1zadi }-·--····-···--·-.. ··-······-----··-----·-··-··---........ _____ _ ;Andrew Dexte r f--·-··-··----··----------··-·-··---- i Robert Harris [)~~el : . l.l!}~ihl' ! Stephen Grant I !·----·----·----·-----------·------- !Wen-\Nen Chi ~--·--····-··-·--·-·---·-···-------·-·--· ·····---··--·---·--/ !Nanc y Cole j-·-···-··--·-··-·-·--···--·-------··-···- ; Matthe w Cordova / :----------------···-··--------- j Phillip M. Worby !--·-··-·-···-----···--------····· ---------------·- f Jamie J. Yakes i------·------------------------· !Norman Farme r l ----·-----------------------·---·--· I Brad Madad ian !-----·--·· --·-·----------··-- iJohn Hamilton ! _ ··--------. ----- ;Paul Canevaro 1---·-----··-··-----·---·-----·- k aurie Glantz-Murph y 1 ; ---··-··---···-------·------- ~-~-~s~~~----------- !Brian Davis ! .•... _, __________________________________ _ I Harold lvle issne r l .,. _____________________ ~ Section 5.0 Key Staff i X I 1-------i--------l-·l ·--·-- j x_J ___ t _ 2246 j:'__ 2151 ! i X ...... ,----!----·----.1····-·· ·1--··· ...... ! ··-··-··-------··· i i i 28 i 15 -i-----i-------l-. -·-1------ x j x I I 30 I 2 ---,---··------!-··---~---.... -i-----·------· x i j j 23 j 11 -----1----1----1··· -·:-· -····· x j j j 30 j 19 -1 -._,. · l : X i X i ! 25 i 20 :------1---------1.----···· 1-.... ,---!---·-··-·-· -·· ·-·--- i X i i ! 29 j 12 i------i---·---1--------1----· .. .' .. ·-····-· .............. . j x i I i 32 i 3 --·---··1··-·-··:.... r···----·-, X 1 X i i 11 ! 10 · 1------1---+---;--------·-· , X I ! j 20 j 14 I-·----+-----,----1 --1 ----- i X ! X i i 20 j 20 11-----1---, --···1--... ·--.. X i i I 30 ! 23 --·---~-----! ---· + ·-+·------- x I I i 31 I 3 ' ---!--·-·-:-----+ ..... -: i X I i i 25 ! 3 --····--!-··--·-!·--··-+ ..... --+·-··--·-- ! x I i i 32 I 1 I I I : I ,, .. ---i-----1-----1---! ··-----·· ·- I x I I i 27 i 23 1 . ·---1-----i-----1-....... !-. i X i i i 2G j 2G , . ,t-~---~L ____ J ______ . _____ •_~-------.. --,-~ .. ---· cl'·.-ff.\\!_· ·: ,( • r-f, • A.ccLJTEffi~Z Key Staff Profiles David N. Speis Vice President, Technical Support Years with Firm: 12 Total Years Experience: 40 Degree: BS, Science Education Experience: David Speis is Vice President/Laboratory Director for Accutest Laboratories in Dayton, New Jersey. Previously he was Accutest's Director of Corporate Quality Assurance. His experience includes eleven years with USEPA Region II as an instrumentation chemist. He served on the Editorial Advisory Board of Environmental Testing and Analysis and also the International Association of Environmental Testing Laboratories (IAETL). He is a past Board Chair of the Institute for National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation. He was also Board Co-Chair of the NELAC Institute (TNI), now serving as treasurer, a member of the Execut ive Committee for ACIL's Environmental Sciences Section and Chair of the USEPA's Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board. Reza Tand Vice President, Northeast Operations Years with Firm: 21 Total Years Experience: 24 Degree: BS, Chemistry Experience: Mr. T and is Director of the New England Division Laboratory and the Mountain States Division Laboratory. The divisions specialize in analysis of organics and inorganics in water, soil and air matrices with special programs for waste classification (TCLP) and priority turnarounds. Formerly, Mr. T and managed the Organics Laboratories at Accutest Headquarters in New Jersey. He served 3 years as GC/MS supervisor, generating EPA/CLP data for a major environmental production laboratory. He was also responsible for 2,3,7,8 TCDD analysis, instrument trouble shooting and data validation. Mr. T and's duties include coordination with the NJ laboratories on major environmental projects and overseeing all projects in the New England and Mountain States region. 25 • • A.CCLJTEBTe . L A BOR AT ORI E S Key Staff Profiles (continued) Harry Behzadi Vice President, Southeast Operations Years with Firm: 15 Total Years Experience: 26 Degree : Ph.D., Analyt ical Chemistry Experience: Dr. Behzadi is currently Director of South East Division and oversees the Gulf Coast Division and Northern Californ i a Analytical Laboratories. He has extens ive experience in trace organics and inorganic analyses of environmental samples . He has been responsible for laboratory management, analytical method development, professional training and QA/QC in both the ·environmental and pharmaceutical industries . Dr. Behzadi has extensive experience in the R&D, operation, maintenance and trouble shooti ng of the following instrumentation; GC/MS, GC, HPLC, ICP, AA, IR, GPC and UVNIS. Previously, Dr. Behzadi has served as an environmental laboratory organics manager and a pharmaceutical laboratory manager. Andrew Dexter Vice President, Chief Information Officer Years with Firm: 15 Total Years Experience : 28 Experience : Mr. Dexter has developed an overall IS strategy for Accutest and has taken the lead role in implementing a new state -of-the-art LIMS system at all Accutest Laboratories . He has over 28 years of experience in systems and laboratory automation as well as 22 years of environmental laboratory experience. Before joining Accutest, Mr. Dexter was one of seven founding members of Automated Compliance Systems, where he played a key roll in developing the LIMS software now implemented at Accutest. He was the sole designer/developer of Seedpak2, an Oracle~based instrument interfacing package that was later licensed to Perkin-Elmer for use in its SQL-LIMS product. Mr. Dexter was the sole designer/developer of AQUARIUS, a software package for automated GC/MS data acquisition. 26 • • A.CCLJTE'S L A B O R A T O .R I E S . Key Staff Profiles (continued) Robert Harris Vice President, Business Development/Marketing Years with Firm: 2 Total Years of Experience: 30 Degree: M .P.H., Environmental & Occupational Health Experience: Mr. Harris is currently Vice President Business Development/Marketing. He directs the national business development and marketing efforts to meet the analytical testing needs of the nationa l enviro n ment marketplace. He works with Accutest's management team to support the service needs of its customers and implements the Company's strategic growth and marketing plan. Mr. Harris has 30 years of experience in public and p ri vate consulting specializing in public health, regulatory compliance, environmental remediation, laboratory serv ices, business development and risk assessment . Stephen Grant Vice President, National Accounts Years with Firm: 11 Total Years of Experience : 23 Degree: BS, Chemistry Experience: Mr. Grant is Vice President, National Accounts and also the Mid-Atlantic Regional Sales Manager. His primary responsibilities are to manage the National Accounts Program and the sales effort in the Mid -Atlantic States. He has over 23 years of experience working in envi ronmental laboratories, starting as a ben\:=h chemist and working in progressively responsible positions including management of a large commercial laboratory. The last 11 years have been in d i rect sales and sales management. Mr. Grant manages many of Accutest's largest national commercial clients. Prior to working in the environmental industry, he worked as a chemist in a research laboratory. 27 .: • A.CCLJTEt:3-,;.- L A B O R A T O R I E . S Key Staff Profiles (continued) Wen-Wen Chi Corporate Technical Director/Organics Years with Firm: 19 Total Years Experience: 30 Degree: BS, Chemical Engineering Experience: · Ms . Chi has strong knowledge in the end -to-end Organics Operations from sample preparation/extraction, through sample analysis, data interpretation/review, to report generation. She has extensive experience in Priority Pollutant Analysis using GC-GCMS & HPLC, covering EPA 500/600 Series, SW846, MAEPH/NJEPH, CLP work for EPA, Appendix IX, Dioxin Analysis, and T03/T015/NJT015LL for Ambient Air & Soil Vapor Methodologies . She also has expertise in special projects (EPA, SAS), new equipment/methodology evaluations, instrumentation & Lab start-up planning, technical consultation with clients, and application programs development for laboratory operations standardization and automation. Nancy Cole Corporate Technical Diredor/lnorganics Years with Firm : 20 Tota I Years Experience: 25 D~gree: MS, lnorganics Chemistry Experience: Ms. Cole is the Corporate Technical Director/lnorganics for Accutest Laboratories . The lnorganics division includes metals, wet chemistry, and microbiology. Metals includes a variety of analytical techniques such as ICP, ICP/MS, CV MS, and Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry. Wet chemistry includes a broad range of classical and instrumental techniques ranging from ion chromatography to UV /Vis and titrametric analyses. Ms. Cole has extensive experience in EPA, SW846, Standard Methods, and ASTM methodologies as well as NELAC and DOD testing standards. She is involved in daily laboratory operations, including project set-up, data review, and client services and client interactions. 28 • ':,_ ·-~-'_\:~fii • A.CCLJT,Ef,~ft(r, L A B O R A 'T C.0 R:i h.'E,.S .-. . . .;, '< ";·:··: , .. ·-. ~:: '?\·~·:---·-.- Key Staff Profiles (continued) Matthew Cordova Director, Client Services Years with Firm: 12 Total Years of Experience: 29 Degree: BS, Marine Biology Experience: As the Client Services Director, Mr. Cordova is responsible for the implementation of the client services and project management activities within the lab. He also manages the sample log in process, to ensure that project specifications are accurately entered into the LIMS and communicated to the laboratory. Working in conjunction with the production managers, Mr. Cordova ensures that the Client Services Department meets project commitments and data quality objectives. Mr. Cordova has 29 years of environmental laboratory experience which includes, Atomic Spectroscopy, and management of Client Services, Quality Assurance, Health and Safety and Laboratory Operations. Phillip M. Worby Director, Corporate Quality Assurance Years with Firm : 3 Total Years of Experience: 32 V' Degree: S.S., Environmental Studies/Water and Wastewater Treatment Experience: Mr. Worby is Accutest's Director of Corporate Quality Assurance. He is responsible for the corporate quality assurance program in each of Accutest's laboratory facilities. Phil brings over 32 years of environmental chemistry experience to Accutest. He has previously held management positions in commercial environmental laboratories . Mr. Worby also has extensive environmental regulatory experience in New Jersey and Pennsylvania and is the past President of the Pennsylvania Association of Accredited Environmental Laboratories. He is the past Chairman of the New Jersey Environmental Laboratory Advisory Council. 29 • ·.· .. ·•· • A.CCLJTEB:~· L A B O R A T O R 1. E K:_ Key Staff Profiles (continued) Jamie J. Yokes Corporate Health and Safety Manager Years with Firm: l 0 Total Years Experience: 11 Certified: 40 Hr. Hazwoper Degree: BS, Biochemistry and Masters, Business Administration Experience: Mr. Yokes is the Corporate Health and Safety Manager for Accutest Laboratories. His primary responsibilities are to ensure Accutest provides a safe and healthy environment for its employees, visitors and clients, while ensuring public protection and the preservation of the company's assets and property. Prior to Mr. Yokes' position of Corporate Health and Safety Manager he served as Inorganic Supervisor for Accutest Headquarters in New Jersey. Mr. Yokes was also responsible for data review for regular and CLP work and worked closely with the client services department in providing information and answering questions for clients. Norman Farmer Regional Technical Director, Southeast Years with Firm: 14 Total Years Experience: 20 Degree: BS, Chemical Oceanography Experience: Mr. Farmer currently oversees the technical operations for Accutest Laboratories, Southeast, Northern California, and Gulf Coast divisions. This includes project coordination between the facilities, instrument repair and method validation guidance, and laboratory design and expansion. Mr. Farmer is familiar with the various QC and reporting criteria for Navy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and AFCEE. He is responsible for implementing the DoD processes throughout Accutest. Mr. Farmer reviews Quality Assurance Project Plans to ensure that all data quality objectives and reporting requirements are met by laboratory. 30 Key Staff Profiles (continued) Brad Madadian General Laboratory Manager, Northeast Operations Years with Firm: 20 Total Years Experience: 20 Degree: Masters, Chemistry Experience: Mr. Madadian is currently the General Laboratory Manager of the New England Division Laboratory and the Mountain States Division Laboratory. Mr. Madadian's duties include coordination and overseeing the operation, purchasing, and he reports directly to the Vice President of Operations. These divisions specialize in analysis of organics and inorganics in water, soil and air matrices with special programs for waste classification (TCLP). Mr. Madadian was formally Manager of the New England Inorganic Laboratory Division. Mr. Madadian has been involved with various method developments, and studies, and has attended numerous technical training and seminars. He works closely with our client service group to better serve client inquiries. John Hamilton Technical Manager, New England Division Years with Firm: 23 Total Years Experience: 30 Degree: BS, Chemistry Experience: Mr. Hamilton is Technical Manager at Accutest Laboratories of New England. Previous positions include Chief Chemist and Senior Chemist. He has extensive experience in analytical chemistry including GC, GC/MS, HPLC, ICP and M with a wide variety of matrices and has coordinated and evaluated multi-department projects involving Superfund/CLP, U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency, various Federal/State environmental agencies and special projects for major corporations and engineering/contractor clients. He has developed, refined and utilized all major forms of Chromatography, Gel Filtration/Permeation and Chromogenic Paired Ion. 31 Key Staff Profiles (continued) Paul Canevaro Laboratory Director, Gulf Coast Division Years with the Firm: 3 Total Years Experience: 31 Degree: BS, Chemistry Experience: Mr. Canevaro is responsible for day to day laboratory operations at Accutest Gulf Coast laboratory in Houston, Texas . He has extensive experience performing analysis in support of the Safe Drinking Water Act, Clean Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and USEPA Contract Laboratory Program . His experience includes bench expertise in metals analysis and inorganic chemistry. He has held senior staff positions including lead technical support functions, laboratory oversight and general management of laboratory operations. In those roles, he implemented laboratory operations and grew the operation from a staff of two to seventy, establishing the largest drinking water laboratory in the State of Florida with accreditation in nineteen states. Laurie Glantz-Murphy Laboratory Director, West Years with Firm: 3 Total Years Experience: 25 Degree: BA, Chemistry Experience: Ms. Glantz-Murphy is responsible for the day to day laboratory operations at Accutest's Northern California laboratory in San Jose, CA. Her career with Accutest started with the laboratory's acquisition and has continued through the laboratory's NELAP and Department of Defense certifications. The laboratory has continued to expand into its new 24,000 square feet state-of-the-art facility and expanded its capabilities into a full service laboratory. Ms. Glantz-Murphy began her career in environmental chemistry in 1985. She has hands on experience, both "in the chemistry" and on the business side of a laboratory. She has been a founding principal of an environmental laboratory, a laboratory director, LIMS administrator, and chemist. 32 •• • A.CCLJTESt . LABORATORIES Key Staff Profiles (continued) Jesse Smith Laboratory Director, Mountain States Years with Firm: 1 Total Years Experience : 32 Degree: BS, Science Experience: Mr. Smith is responsible for the day to day operations at Accutest's Mountain States laboratory in Wheat Ridge, Colorado . He has extensive laboratory operations experience in support of EPA regulatory programs relating to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Clean Water Act, and Safe Drinking Water Act. This includes laboratory experience in metals, inorganic, organic, and microbiology departments. Mr. Smith 's management experience includes laboratory operations oversight including staff, P/L, project management, client relations and sales oversight. He has extensive project management experience and provided management oversight for major client programs including numerous international chemical and refinery companies. Brian Davis Systems Manager Years with Firm : 23 Total Years Experience : 27 Degree : BA, English Experience: Mr. Davis is currently the Corporate Systems Manager for Accutest Laboratories and reports directly to the Vice President/Chief ·information Officer located in Dayton, NJ. His responsibilities include System Administration, Database Admin istration, Network Administration, Software design and development with a specialty in electronic data deliverables (EDD's) and support. His industry experience includes 10 years in Quality Assurance, 2 years auditing external laboratories and 25 years in information technology. Mr. Davis was instrumental in the design and implementation of the state-of-the-art LIMS System at all Accutest Laboratories. 33 • ·<<: • ~CC LJ TES~{t' L A B O R .A T c:i ,R I ,'£2' S ' \{ ,·;;.· Key Staff Profiles (continued) Harold Meissner Manager, Field Operations Years with the Firm: 26 Total Years of Experience: 26 Degree: BS Biology/Chemistry Experience: Mr. Meissner's Field Operations Group, with support from the Sample Management Group, provides field sampling, testing/analysis and instrumentation screening services to a wide range of clients in support of their environmental operations . The Group has extensive experience with a wide variety of environmental regulatory agency sampling procedures including USEPA, USACOE and NIOSH protocols. The group is standardized on NJDEP, and NYDEC field sampling protocols. The group, headed by Mr. Meissner, currently fields a fully-equipped team experienced in sampling a wide variety of matrices including water, wastewater, Stormwater, soil, air, solids and sludge . Mr. Meissner and all sampling personnel are fully OSHA certified. 34 • • • .ACCWTE L A -8 '0 . Section 6.0 Major Project Experience Experience (Engineering Firms) Projed Projed Description Type Multiple UST /Remediation/T reafment Projects in a 12 state area. Analys is NPDES for complete range of analytical parameters. Coordinated sample 1. RCRA management planning to process over 2,000 samples per month . ISRA Installed and trained client personnel on proprietary Lablink"" system for data access and project management. Extens ive electron ic de liverable for data manaaement and in tea ration . Multiple Remediation/Monitoring Projects RI/FS Multiple RI/FS, ISRNECRA, UST, RCRA projects throughout New Jersey 2. ISRA and New York TCL/TAL, priority pollutants, appendix IX parameters utilizing EPA 500, 600, 8000 and SW-846 methods. Extensi ve electronic deliverables for data management and integration . Multiple Remediation/Site Investigations Multiple RI/FS , UST, RCRA, Superfund projects throughout Te xas, Loui siana, Oklahoma and Arkansas in support of soil and groundwater remediation and monitoring programs 3. RI/SI for numerous consulting groups. State protocols and reporting formats tailored to specific regulatory and project requirements as needed. Electronic deliverables for data re view available for on line data assessment. Major UST Contract with National Retailer Pro vide ongo ing UST support for tank removal and replacement for National retailer chain . Our effective 4. UST pro ject management, rapid TAT capabilities and online data re vi ew for quick decision making has allowed continued support throughout the Gulf Coast Region . Oty Environmental Contract Provide testing services in support of a Major 5. RI/SI City en vironmental contract. Testing includes supporting RCRA, Stormwaler and Site investiaations on a as need basis for this Citv contract. Site Investigation/Remedial Investigation for Major Airline. Large on-going RIFS Site In vestigation/Remedial In vestigation in support of on-going 6. SI construction activ ities. Full TCL/TAL analysis utilizing SW 846 methodology and deliverables. Expedited TAT, customer EDD, 3'd party validation. RIFS Multiple RIFS Activities for 25 Federal Aviation Administration Sites. Data 7. reported according to USEPA and NJ Site Remediation Laboratory NPDES Deliverable formats . Full TCL/TAL analysis w ith custom reporting limits. Highly visible and regulated site requiring legally defensible data . Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Central Artery Big Dig. Concentrated 8. RCRA effort lo process 3000 post-excavation samples for a full suite of analysis. 48-72 hour TAT. LobUnk used to electronically transfer the data for immediate validation and use. Remedial Investigation at Former Chemical Manufacturing Site . Analysis of 9. RIFS soil and water included method developmentfor GC/MS SIM analysis to reach extremely low detection limits required for site-specific compounds . Data provided in custom electronic fonnat. Region Mid-Atlantic Mid-Atlantic Gulf Coast Gulf Coast Gulf Coast Mid-Atlantic .< New England New England Mid-Atlantic 35 LABORATORIES Project Experience (continued) Experience (Engineering Firms) Project Project Description Region Type Vapor Intrusion Study at Multiple Sites. Analys is by M ethod TO-15 for in 10. doo r air and soil gos . Lab provi ded certified Summa Canisters and Mid-Atlantic RCRA analyzed for a custom compound list. Proiect required rush turnaround, full dat; deliverables and electron ic data deliverables Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet. RCRA Underground Storage Tanks (UST) Program for over 300 site s in Eastern Central 11. UST Kentucky . Analyzed groundwater and soil samples for BTEX, PAHs, Meta ls Southeast and RCRA Characteristics utilizing SW-846 methods . Analyzed over 1000 samples in a 4 month period, all of which required expedited turnaround . RIFS RCRA Multiple Remediation/Monitoring Projects. Multiple RI/FS , UST , RCRA NPDES 12. BROWN proiects throughout New Jersey and New York. TCL/TAL, priority pol lutant Mid-Atlantic FIELDS parameters util izing EPA 500, 600, 8000 and SW -846 . Exten sive electronic deliverables for data management and integration . RIFS Remediation/Monitoring Project Soil remediation and groundwater Mid-Atlantic 13. RCRA mon itoring for a major aerospace company. SW-846 methods meeting PA ACT 2 requirements. Full deliverables and EQUIS EDD RIFS Multiple Superfund RIFS Activities for Large Utility Company Full TCL/TAL 14. CLP analyses for Superfund sites in Puerto Rico, North Carolina and Florida . Full Southeast deliverables and extensi ve electronic deliverables . RIFS Large RIFS under both EPA and NYSDEC Oversite Highly visible site 15. NYSASP requiring doily sampling for volatile organics over a three month period. Mid-Atlantic Seven-day turnaround, NYS ASP protocol. Lablink delivered all data via auto e-mail. RIFS Brownfield Redevelopment Projed Highly visible Brownfield Site. RCRA 16. BROWN Expedited analysis for priority pollutant compounds, waste classification Mid-Atlantic FIELDS and general chemistry parameters . Lablink electronically transferred data via auto e-mail. RIFS Site Investigation/Remediation Soil and groundwater investigation for 17. ISRA Fortune 50 Manufacturing Company. Full TCL/TAL analyses with Mid-Atlantic emphasis on hexavalent chromium analyses . Project included treatability and leaching studies . Custom client EDD. Long-Term RI to Establish Extent/Range of Pollutants in lake and stream 18 RI sediments and water. Additional investigation/remediation of surrounding Mid-Atlantic industrial sites. Project includes dredging of nearly 2M cubic yards of sediment 36 • • ••• • A.CCLJTEB•~.·. LABORAT ·ORIES Project Experience (continued) Experience (Industrial Projects) Project Project Description Region Type Corporate Contrad Covering 3 Regions/12 States Analytical services for east coast petroleum sites (>500) involving UST/remediation and NPDES treatment projects. Extensive management of multi-state regulations, 1. RCRA coordination of samples, supplies and transportation to multiple Gulf Coast consulting/engineering firms . Instrumental in maintaining full compliance with regulatory permits. Rated as one of the top labs in the laboratory program based on quarterly performance activity reports . Petroleum Refinery, St. Croix US Virgin Islands Large, on-going sampling and analysis program requiring Full Appendix IX and Appendix Ill analyses as part of a RCRA Facility In vestigation (RFI) and RCRA permitted land and wastewater treatment unit monitoring . The collection of Accurate, Valid, and Representative data was of the utmost importance in order to RCRA determine the chemical and physical nature of the groundwater and to Mid-Atlantic 2. demonstrate that no migration of hazardous constituents was occurring from the treatment units . Due to the large numbers of samples being ta ken during each sampling event, customized preprinted chains of custody and sample bottle labels were supplied to the client in order to minimize time spent in the field . As many as 1 0 -20 coolers filled with sample containers were prepared and shipped w ithin 24 hours notice to accommodate emergency response sampling at the facil ity. Electric/Utilily Company, Gulf Coast Region Serve as the primary analytical testing laboratory for a major electric utility company in the Gulf Coast 3. RCRA region in support of RCRA characterization of waste and transformer oils. Gulf Coast Provided rapid TAT and emergency response capabilities. Data delivered in 24, 48 and 72 hours. Extensive project management and custom electronic deliverables. Lablink5M critical tool for access to rush data. NPDES Petroleum Refinery, Linden NJ Analytical services in support of the Bayway 4. RCRA Refinery. Analyzed groundwater and soil. samples for petroleum based Gulf Coast contaminants including full TCL/TAL. Full and reduced deliverable. Custom electronic deliverables. Third party validation. RCRA Electric & Gas Company Extensive contract to support the Materials ISRA Mid-Al/antic 5. NPDES Management Group. Analytical services for MGP sites and facilities . Contract also includes emergency response and f ield sampling. RIFS Analysis of soil and water for Full TCL!TAL with emphasis on Hexavalent Mid-Atlantic 6. RCRA Chromium analysis. Special method modification and development to meet client needs. Custom electronic deliverables. Custom Waste Analysis to Support Pharmaceutical Manufaduring Facilily, RCRA as well as Routine NPDES Monitoring Custom analysis and reporting limits Mid-Al/antic 7. NPDES to expedite disposal of solvent waste. Data delivered in 24, 48 and 72 hours. Extensive project management and custom electronic deliverables. La blink critical tool for access to rush data. 37 • • • ~CCLJTE:;$~ t. A B O R A TO i=i \ Project Experience (continued) Experience (Industrial Projects) Project Project Description Region Type Blanket Analytical Con/rad for large Aerospace Manufacturer RI/FS Contract includes Corporate Remediation and Facility Environmental Mid-Atlantic 8. RCRA Management. Full TCL/TAL, Appendix IX and RCRA analysis. Extensi ve development of electronic deliverable for integration into client database. Field sampling servi ces supplied upon request. RIFS Multiple RIFSJRCRA sites throughout the mid-west. Analyses of soil and Central 9. RCRA ground-water forfull TCLJTAL. State-specific methods utilized as needed. Southeast Custom electronic data deliverables. RCRA Texas Natural Resource ConseNation Commission Analytical Services NPDES 10. UST Contract in support of Field Operations Division . Programs include UST, Gulf Coast RCRA, and NPDES, utilizing EPA 600 and 8000 Series Methods. RIFS Extensive Sampling and Analysis Con/rad for 102 Groundwater 11. RCRA We/ls for regulatory compliance . Full TCL/TAL analysis of water and soil Mid-Atlantic samples during RIFS activities. Highly vis ible site requiring 3,d party va lidation . Custom electronic deliverables . RIFS RCRA Superfund Site in West Palm Beach Exclusive laboratory contract lo 12. NPDES support RI/FS activity. Analyzed over 1800 samples for full suite of analysis . Southeast CLP Extensive PCB studies . EPA Methodology, full deliverables . NPDES Groundwater Monitoring Sampling and analysis of 70 + NPDES groundwater monitoring wel ls for regulatory compliance . Analyzed for 13. RI/FS priority pollute nls and general chemistry parameters utilizing EPA 600 series Mid-Atlantic methods. Volatile organics were analyzed by EPA method 524.2. Automated computerized slate forms were generated for submittal to NJDEP. NPDES Groundwater Monitoring Sampling and analysis of 62 NPDES groundwater monitoring we lls for regulatory compliance. Analyzed for Mid-Atlantic 14. priority pollutants and general chemistry parameters utilizing EPA 600 series methods. Automated computerized state forms generated for submittal to NJDEP. lvnerican Petroleum Institute Study Air analysis to determine vapor recover unit performance for 19 HAP/Non-HAP compounds utilizing EPA Methods 18, T0-3 and T0-14 with summa canisters . Study was carried Mid-Atlantic 15. CAAA out on behalf of the API in conjunction with Shell Oil Company and Mobil Oil Company encompassing dozens of petroleum terminals throughout the United States. Participants comprised of major oil compan ies within the API network. High Profile Groundwater and Soil Investigation and Remediation Project 16. DOE of a two mile linear accelerator -longest in the world . Directed by DOE West and funded by ''S hovel Ready" stimulus dollars. Thousands of samples on an expedited turnaround time durin a the life of the proiect. 38 • • ~CCLJTESTe LABORATORIES Project Experience (continued) Experience (DoD Projects) Project Projed Description Region Type Department of the Airforce, Airforce Center for Environmental Excellence Multiple RIFS, SI and Groundwater Monitoring Programs at Cape 1. DoD Canaveral 600 sa mples analyzed on an expedited basis for TCL Volatiles Southeast and EPA Method 831 0. Pro vi ded reduced CLP deliverables package and an ERPI MS EDD. Department of the Navy, Southern Division Navy Clean Contract l 600 samples analyzed according to NFESC protocol. Analyses included Full Mid-Atlantic 2. DoD TCL/TAL and EPA Method 8330. Provided le vel Ill delive rables and a cu stom electronic delive rable. Sites include NAS Cecil Field , NAS Jax, NAS Kev West, NTC Orlando, NAS Pensacola , and Eglin AFB. Department of the US Navy, Northern Division Navy Clean Contract 500 samples analyzed according to NF ESC protocol. Full TCL/TAL, EPH/VPH, Mid-Atlantic 3. DoD and Low Leve l VOA, SVOA a nd PCB analysis. Prov ided level I a nd II de liverables and a custom electron ic deliverable. Sites incl ude Earl AFB, NSB New London, NWIRP Bedford , NAS South Weymo uth . Department of the Navy, Atlantic Division Navy Clean Contract RIFS 4. DoD activities at Camp Lejuene, USN Cherry Point, and Yorkto wn Na val Southeast Weapons Station . Data electronica ll y transferred vi a lablink to expedite the val idation of 250 samples. Department of the Army, Natick R&D Laboratories Analytical to support Field 5. DoD Site Investigations, Treatability Stud ies and Groundwate r Monitoring. New England Ana lyses incl ud ed full TCL +, Mercury . Department of the Navy, Southern Division Navy BRAC Contract Expedi ted 6. 300 samples for Fu ll TCL/TAL. Electro nicall y tra nsferre d custom deliverable Southeast DoD via Lablin k to expedite va lidation. Leve l II hard copy delive rable requirements. Regulatory Compliance Sampling and Analysis throughout Nava l Air Station . Sampled groundwater monitoring we lls, was tewa ter grab and 24-New England 7. DoD hour co mposites, soil and was te drum samples. Analyzed for priority pollutants , was te clas sification and general chemistry parameters utilizing EP A 600 and SW-84 6 8000 series methods . us Army Corps of Engineers Fort Wingate, New Mexico, site 8. DoD investigation : Expedited 150 samples for Full TCUTAL plus Explosives. Gulf Coast Full level IV hard copy plus Electron icall y transferred custom deliverable to expedite data va lidation . Department of the . Army, Chicago District Treatability Study for the Mid-West 9. DoD Ind iana Harbor Confined Disposal Fac ility. Analysis included Full TCUTAL usina SW84 6 Methodology. US Army Corps of Engineers In a pe ri od of three months, several hundred samples were analyzed for TCL/TAL para meters, ch emical wa rfare Mid-Atlantic 10. DoD degradation byproducts , explosives and general chemistry parameters. The sample matrices included so il, water, fish worms and vege tation . Third party validation and extensive data deliverables were required for this proiect. US Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District. Indefinite deHvery 11. contract for seve ral large scale in ves tigation and remediation projects within Mid-Atlantic DoD the district. Provide full data deliverable packages, SEDD EDD and ADR EDD . 39 • •, • ~CCLJTES9"; . L A B O R A T O R ·.1 E S '' •: >-' • Appendix A Representative Clients A-l •. ' c:.· '\;1;/{!,.~ • A.CCLJTE'S=t}t'·: L A B O R ~ T O r..ft e~/ . Representative Client List AECOM AMEC Amerada Hess Arcad is Ashl and Chemica l Ato fi na Petro l eum Chem ica ls Beazer BEM Syst ems Brennt ag Brown and Ca ldwe ll CDM Chrysl er Citgo C lean H arbors Conestoga-Rovers & Assoc ia t es CSXT EA Engineering El Paso Ensafe ERtv\ Exxon Mobil Ford Gannett Fleming Genera l Eledric GEi Consultants, Inc GES Getty Properties Corp. Getty Pet roleum Gol der Associates Granite Construction HDR Engineering Hoffman -La Roche Inc. Honeywe ll Int ernati ona l I nc. IBM Kle i nfe lder Langa n Eng i neeri ng MACTEC Marat hon O il Marat hon Pet ro l eum MWH Americas N iSou rce O 'Brie n & Gere Eng i neers, Inc. Occident a l O P-TE C H Env i ronmeni a l Serv i ces PPG Industri es PS I Repub l ic Roux ,'\sso,ciates Shaw She ll Sout hV/est Wat er Corp. Sovere ign Consulting Stant ec Sunoco Terracon Tetra Tech TRC Un ited T echno lgies Warren Equ ities WESTO N Solutions Williams Energy VISP A-2 • ACCUTEST@ LABORATORIES City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals 2.3 ACCREDITATIONS AND DEMONSTRATION OF PERFORMANCE Provider shall submit proof of current NELAP Accreditation for the analyses specified in Section 2.6 if accreditation is offered for those parameters by the State of Texas. Laboratory must submit with the proposal copies of the following documents (may be submitted in electronic formant on CD in lieu of paper copy): a) Most recent NELAP assessment report b) Corrective Action Report for most recent NELAP assessment report c) Two most recent Proficiency Testing study results for both water and solid matrix 2.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL AND DOCUMENTATION Each Provider shall submit a single copy of the following documents for review (each may be submitted in electronic format on CD in lieu of paper copy): a) Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Manual b) Sample Invoice c) Representative example of a complete analytical report (TRRP-13 format) d) Sample Chain of Custody e) Sample Laboratory Data Review Package (Laboratory Review Checklist) f) MDL study for PAH and RCRA 8 Metals for water and soil to demonstrate laboratory's ability to report detection down to the lowest TRRP Residential Protective Concentration Level (PCL). DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 2-7 Texas Commiss~on on Environrnental Quality N ELAP-Recognized ·Laboratory Accreditation is hereby awarded to Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, T)( 77036-1622 in accordance with Texas Water Code Chapter 5, Subchapter R, Title 30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 25, and the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program. ' The laboratory's scope of accreditation includes the fields of accreditation that accompany this certificate . Continued accreditat (on depends upon successful ongoing participation in the program. The Texas Commission on Envlronmental Quality urges customers to iverify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. 1 · Certificate Number: T104704220-10-3 Effective Date: 6/30/2010 Expiration Date: 3/31/2011 l MJU' I I : --·--------····-··---·-······-·· .. ·-~···. ··---··· ···-· . . ... f ...... ; . Eirncutive Director Texas ission onl Environmental Quality I ! ! ,,-.. ) :I Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Drinking Water Method ldexx Laboratories Colilert® Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Escherichia coli TX 2525 60002600 Method ldexx Laboratories Colisure Test Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total coliforms TX 2500 60005201 Method SM 9215 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Heterotrophic plate count TX 2555 20035205 'ethod SM 9223 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total col iforms TX 2500 20037609 Page 1 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accred i tation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method ASTM D6503 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Enterococci TX 2520 30032 407 Method Coli lert® Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Escherichia co li TX 2 525 60002600 Method Colilert®-18 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Escherichia coli TX 2525 20212800 'nethod EPA 1010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID lgnitabi!ity TX 1780 I 0116606 Method EPA 12 0.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Conductivity TX 1610 10006 403 Method EPA 130.2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total hardness as CaC03 TX 1755 10007202 Method EPA 1311 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID TCLP TX 849 101188 06 Method EPA 1312 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID SPLP TX 850 101 190 03 Method EPA 150.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID pH TX 1900 10008409 Method EPA 160.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-filterab le (TDS) TX 1955 10 009208 letfiocl _"_EPA--1-60_2 ···---··----·--------------------.. -·-··----·-.. ·--·--------------·-·-------... -----·-------··-----·-·--·-··--··-·---·--·--·-.. ---------··-·-··---·----·----.. -·--·-··--·-..... ---·-.. -... __ _ Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Page 2 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Residue-nonfilterable (TSS) Method EPA 160.3 Analyte Res idue-total Method EPA 160.4 Analyte Res idue-volatile Method EPA 1664 Analyte n-Hexane Extractab le Material {O&G) ethod EPA 180.1 Analyte Turb idity Method EPA 200.7 Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron TX AB TX AB TX AB TX AB TX AB TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX · TX 1960 10009606 Analyte ID Method ID 1950 10010001 Analyte ID Method ID 1970 10010409 Analyte ID Method ID 1803 10127409 Analyte ID Method ID 2055 10011606 Analyte ID Method ID 1000 10013806 1005 10013806 1010 10013806 1015 10013806 1020 10013806 1025 10013806 1030 10013806 1035 10013806 1040 10013806 1050 10013806 1055 10013806 1070 10013806 Lead TX 1075 10013806 Magnesium TX I 085 10013806 _Mang an es e __ ··--····--···-··-·---------··-···-----·-----·-··--·---·----······---·-·---------·---·--··-···-----·-··-···-··-·· TX·-·-·-····-·-J 09Q _____ ·-···--·--··--·----l OQ13 806 ·-···------·---.----- \ · Molybdenum ··· TX ······ ······· ···· 1100 ····I 0013806 ·· · Page 3 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quaiity NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Nickel Potassium Selenium Silica-dissolved Si lver Sodium Strontium Thallium Tin Titanium Vanad iu m Z in c Method EPA 245 .1 Analyte Mercury Method EPA 300 .0 Analyte Bromide Chloride Fluoride Nitrate as N Nitrate-nitrit e Sulfate Method EPA310.1 Analyte Alkalinity as CaC03 Method EPA 325.3 Analyte Chloride TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX AB TX AB TX TX TX TX TX TX AB TX AB TX 1105 10013806 1125 10013806 1140 10013806 1995 10013806 1150 10013806 1155 10013806 I 160 10013806 I 165 10013806 1175 10013806 1180 10013806 1185 10013806 1190 10013806 Analyte ID Method ID 1095 10036609 Analyte ID Method ID 1540 10053006 1575 10053006 1730 10053006 1810 10053006 1820 10053006 2000 10053006 Analyte ID Method ID 1505 10054805 Analyte ID Method ID 1575 10057600 thod ---·EPA -330 .·5---·--------·-------------.---···-·--··· ·-·------····--·-·---·----············--·······--··-·--·------·····--·-·----------------····-····--·-·--··---·····-.. ···-······· .. ---·-------·--------·--·--·--·-------··- .. Analyte ·· ······ ·············AB ·· ············Analyte 10 ··· Method ID · Page 4 of 39 Texas Commission o n Environmental Qua l ity NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expirat ion Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fie l ds of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses . Matrix: Non Potable Water Total res idual ch lori ne TX 1940 1005960 6 Method EPA 335 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Amenab le cyanide TX 1510 10 060001 Method EPA 335.3 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Tota l cyanide TX 1645 10061004 Method EPA 335 .4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Tota l cyan ide TX 1645 10061402 ethod EPA 3 40 .2 Analyte AB Analyte I D Method ID Fluoride TX 1730 1006220 1 Method EPA 350 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Ammon ia as N TX 15 15 10063408 Method EPA 351 .2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Kjeldahl nit rogen -to tal TX 17 95 100 65200 Method EPA 353 .2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Nit rate as N TX 18 IO 10067400 Nitrate-nitri te TX 1820 10067400 Nit rite as N TX 1840 1006 7400 Method EPA 365.2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Met hod ID Orthophosphate as P TX 187 0 10070 40 3 Phosphorus , total TX 19 10 10070 403 Method EPA 375 .3 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID --Sulfate··--··---·-···----·-··--·--------·----------------·--·--··--··------·-------------··--------··-·-··----Tx ·------------2000··--·--··-----------roo73 402·--·--·-··-·--··-·--·--·~·- Page 5 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method EPA 376 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfide TX 2005 10074201 Method EPA 377 . 1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfite-S03 TX 20 15 10075000 Method EPA 405 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Biochemical oxygen demand TX 1530 10075602 ,ethod EPA410.4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chem ica l oxygen demand TX 1565 10077200 Method EPA 415 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total organic carbon TX 20 40 10078407 Method EPA 420.4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total pheno lics TX 1905 10080203 Method EPA 6010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum TX 1000 10155609 Antimony TX 1005 10155609 Arsenic TX 1010 10155609 Barium TX 1015 10155609 Beryllium TX 1020 10 155609 Boron TX 1025 10155609 Cadmium TX 1030 10155609 Calcium TX 1035 10155609 Chromium TX 1040 10155609 Cobalt TX 1050 10155609 . _ TX ............... 1055 ............... 10155609 Page 6 of 39 Texas Commissoon on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Iron TX 1070 10 155609 Lead TX 1075 10155609 Lithium TX 1080 10155609 Magnesium TX 1085 10155609 Manganese TX 1090 10155609 Molybdenum TX 1100 10155609 Nickel TX 1105 10155609 Potassium TX I 125 10155609 Se lenium TX I 140 10155609 Silica-dissolved TX 1995 10155609 Silver TX 1150 10 155609 Sodium TX 1155 [0155609 Strontium TX 1160 lOl 55609 Thallium TX 1165 10155609 Tin TX 1175 10155609 Titanium TX 1180 10155609 Vanadium TX 1185 10155609 Zinc TX 1190 10155609 Method EPA 602 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Benzene TX 4375 10102202 Ethylbenzene TX 4765 10102202 m+p-xylene TX 5240 10102202 a-Xylene TX 5250 10102202 Toluene TX 5140 10102202 Xylene (total) TX 5260 10102202 Method EPA 608 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 4,4'-DDD TX 7355 10103603 4, 4 '~DD[--·-·--··-····--··-··-----·-·····-----···-··-·-·--··-·-···-····-······-·-·-··----··-·---·-··----·-··· TX ·····-···--·····7J6o --·-··--·-····--·---1·o·t03 603···-···--·-·------· 4.4·~obt · tx 7365 i o i oi663 · · · · Page 7 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Aldrin TX 7025 10103603 alpha-BHC (alpha-Hexach lorocyclohexane) TX 7110 10103603 alpha-Chlordane TX 7240 10103603 Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016) TX 8880 10103603 Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221) TX 8885 10103603 Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232) TX 8890 10103603 Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242) TX 8895 10103603 Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248) TX 8900 10103603 Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254) TX 8905 10103603 Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260) TX 8910 10 103603 beta-BH C (beta-He xachlorocyclohexane) TX 71 I 5 10103603 Ch lordane (tech .) TX 7250 10 103603 delta-BHC (delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) TX 7105 10103603 Dieldrin TX 7470 10 103603 Endosulfan I TX 7510 10 103603 Endosulfan II TX 7515 10103603 Endosulfan sulfate TX 7520 10103603 Endrin TX 7540 10103603 Endrin a ldehyde TX 7530 10103603 Endrin ketone TX 7535 10103603 gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane) TX 7120 10 I 03603 gamma-Chlordane TX 7245 10103603 Heptachlor TX 7685 10103603 Heptach lor epoxide TX 7690 10103603 Methoxychlor TX 7810 !0103603 Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene) TX 8250 10103603 Method EPA 624 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,1,1-Trichloroethane TX 5160 10107207 -1·, ·1 , 2, 2-Tetrachtoroetha ne -···-····-··-·--·······--·-··--···········-···-·-------·---·-··--·-·---··--Tx-·--·-···-·······5·1··1·0 ·------···-·-··-··--roT0720T -------------- 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane TX 5165 10107207 Page 8 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Qualit y NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date : T104704220-10 -3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods a nd analyses . Matrix: Non Potable Water 1 , 1-Dich loroethane 1 , 1-Dichloroethylene (1 , 1-Dichloroethene) 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB , Ethy lene di brom ide) 1,2-D ichlorobenzene 1,2 -Dich loroethane 1,2 -Dichlo ropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Butanone (Met hyl ethyl ketone , MEK) 2-C hloroethyl viny l et he r Ac etone Acro le i n (Propena l) Acrylon itrile Benzene Bromod ich loromethane Bromoform Bromomethane (Methy l brom ide) Ca rbon tetrach loride Ch lorobenzene Ch loroethane Ch loroform Chloromethane (Methy l chlor ide) cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropylene Dibromochloromethane Ethylbenzene TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 4630 4640 4585 4610 4635 4655 461 5 4620 44 10 4500 4315 4325 4340 4375 4395 4400 4950 4455 4475 4485 4505 496 0 4645 4680 4575 4765 10 10720 7 10107207 10107207 10107207 10107207 IO I 07207 10 107207 10107207 10107207 10107207 10107207 10107207 10 107207 10 107207 IO I 07207 1010 7207 10 107207 1010 7207 10107207 10 10 7207 10 10720 7 10 10720 7 1010 720 7 10107207 10107207 10 1072 07 m+p-xylene TX 52 40 1O1072 07 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) TX 500 0 I O 10 72 07 Methylene chloride TX 497 5 1 O l 072 07 ...... N.ap~t h~l~n~.... ................ ........ ............................. .. . ....................... !~ . }QQ?. ... I Q!Q?~Q? ......... · Pag e 9 of 39 Texas Con1mission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water a-Xylene Tetrachloroethylene (Perch loroethylene) Toluene trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene trans-1 ,3-Dich loropropylene Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl ch l oride Xy lene (total) ethod EPA 625 Analyte 1,2,4 ,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-D iphenylhydrazine 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-D ichlorobenzene 2,3,4,6-Tetrach lorophenol 2,4,5-Trichloropheno l 2,4,6-Trich loropheno l 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2.4-Dimethy lphenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX AB TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 5250 5115 5!40 4700 4685 5170 5175 5235 5260 Analyte ID 67!5 5 155 46 10 6220 4615 4620 6735 6835 6840 6000 6130 6!75 6185 6190 10!07207 10107207 !0107207 10107207 10107207 10!07207 !0107207 10107207 10 107207 Method ID 10 107401 10107401 10107 40! 10 107401 10 107401 10 107401 10 107401 10107401 10 107401 10 10740! 10 I 0740 l 10!07401 10107401 10107401 2-Chloronaphthalene TX 5795 10 10740! 2-Chlorophenol TX 5800 IO I 07401 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol TX 6360 IO 107401 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) TX 6400 IO 10740 I -~=N itrophenoJ --------------------··---·-----····----·········----------------------·--·······-.. -·-·--Tx ·--·--··-·5490 ···--·------·---·--·---1·01·07401 -·-------- ..................................................... -···-··-.-···-···· ··········--~·-.. ·-··--..... . .................. . 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine TX 5945 10107401 Page 10 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenylether 4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol) 4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzi dine Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b )fluoranthene Benzo(g, h. i) perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Ch loroisopropy l) ether bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) Butyl benzy l phthalate Chrysene Dibenz{a ,h) anthracene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate F luoranthene Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 5660 5700 5825 6410 6500 5500 5505 5555 5595 5575 5580 5585 5590 5600 5760 5765 5780 6255 5670 5855 5895 6070 6135 5925 6200 6265 6270 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107 401 10107401 10 107401 1010740 1 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 6275 10107401 Hexachlorobutadiene TX 4835 1 O I 0740 I ··-Hexaclilc:frocy c: !open tad 1en e .. ······-·---·---·· ----······ -·-·-·-··-·-···--------·-··-···-······-·-···-Tx------············ 62 35···--------··-····· 1 ·o 1·o740 1 ··----·--·-- ·· · · · ······················· ·········-······-··-···" .... ................................. ...... .... ... . •·· Page 11 or 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Qualnty NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104 704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Hexachloroethane lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene lsophorone Naphthalene Nitrobenzene n-Nitrosodiethylamine n-Nitrosodimethylamine n-Nitroso-d i-n-butylamine n-Nitrosodi-n-propylam i ne n-N itrosodip heny la mine Pentachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Phenol Pyrene Pyridine Method EPA 7196 Analyte Chromium VI Method EPA 7470 Analyte Mercury Method EPA 7471 Analyte Mercury Method EPA 8011 Analyte 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) 1,2-D ibromoethane (EDB, Ethylene dibromide) TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX AB TX AB TX AB TX AB TX TX 4840 6315 6320 5005 5015 6-..,-)~) 6530 5025 6545 6535 6590 6605 6615 6625 6665 5095 Analyte ID 1045 Analyte ID 1095 Analyte ID 1095 Analyte ID 4570 4585 10107401 10107401 !0107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10 107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10 107401 10 107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 10107401 Method ID 10162206 Method ID 10165807 Method ID 10166208 Method ID 10173009 10173009 "thod --.EPA-801-5 --·---·------··-·---·------------------·---·-·-··--···--··-·····--·····---····-·-·--------·-·-·····-----·-···-·--·-·--·----·-····----------·-·----··-···---···--------·---·--·-·--·-·------·---·-···---· ···--·-·--·-··-·--····--···-·-····-······-···--·····---··--------·-------.-- ·-· Analyte ··· ·· ····· · · AB Analyte ID ··· Method ID · Page 12 of 39 Texas Commission 0111 Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Diesel range organics (ORO) TX 9369 10173601 Ethanol TX 4750 10173 601 Gasoline range organics (GRO) TX 9408 10173601 lsobutyl a lcohol (2-Methyl-1-propanol) TX 4875 10173601 Methanol TX 4930 10173601 Method EPA 8021 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Benzene TX 4375 10 17 4808 Ethyl benzene TX 4765 10174808 m+p-xyl ene TX 5240 10174808 Methyl tert-butyl ethe r (MTBE) TX 5000 10174 808 o-Xy lene TX 5250 1017 4808 Toluene TX 5140 1017 4808 Method EPA 8081 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 4 ,4'-DDD TX 7355 10178606 4,4'-DDE TX 7360 10178606 4,4'-DDT TX 7365 10178606 Aldrin TX 7025 10 178606 alpha -BHC (alpha-Hexachlorocyclohexane) TX 7110 10178606 alpha-Chlordane TX 7240 10178606 beta-BHC (beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) TX 7 115 10 178606 Chlordane (tech .) TX 7250 10178606 Chlorthalonil (Daconil) TX 7310 10178606 delta-BHC (delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) TX 7105 101786 06 Dico fo l TX 7460 10178606 Dieldrin TX 7470 10178606 Endosulfan I TX 7510 10178606 Endosulfan II TX 7515 10178606 ·Endosulfan -su lfate-------------·-·-·-···--···-··--·--·--·--·-·--·· · -·-·-·--··-······-···-··-··-······-··-····-··TX ·--------····-·752 0 ··--·-·---··----·-·l·O·J-78606---··--------- .. · ··· Eridfin···· · ·· ····· ···· ........... ······ ·· ··· ······ · ·········· ····· ............................. ·~················ ·-----····· .. -· ... ············· · ........... rx ·· .. -··· ···· ········75·46"···· · · ·· ···· ·· .... f(f t ~is·6tf6-·· Page 13 of 39 Texas Commissuon on Environmenta! Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Haiwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Endrin aldehyde TX 7530 10178606 Endrin ketone TX 7535 10178606 gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane) TX 7 120 10178606 gamma-Chlordane TX 7245 10178606 Heptachlor TX 7685 10178606 Heptach lo r epoxide TX 7690 10178606 Hexachlorobenzene TX 6275 10178606 Methoxychlor TX 7810 10 178606 Mirex TX 7870 10178606 Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene) TX 8250 10178606 Method EPA 8082 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016) TX 8880 10179007 Aroclor-1221 {PCB-1221) TX 8885 10179007 Aroclor-12 32 {PCB-1232) TX 8890 10179007 Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242) TX 8895 10179007 Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248) TX 8900 ]0179007 Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254) TX 8905 10179007 Aroclor-1260 {PCB-1260) TX 8910 10179007 PCBs TX 8870 10179007 Method EPA 8 151 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2,4 ,5-T TX 8655 10183207 2,4-D TX 8545 10183207 2,4-DB TX 8560 10183207 4-Nitrophenol TX 6500 10183207 Chloramben TX 8540 !018320 7 Dalapon TX 8555 10183207 Dicamba TX 8595 10183207 -QiGh loroprep -(!Jichforprop)······---------·-·-·----------··-----·--·--·---------·-·-·-·---T-X---·-··-·-··-··8605·-·-----·----JOJ-8-3207----------· · ····rnnoseb (2~sec~buty1~4 ;5~airiitiophe"riol,DNBPf -···· ·····-······ · ··········· ··Tx 8620 ···················· ·io TsJ26T Page 14 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77 0 36-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water MCPA TX 7775 10183207 MCPP TX 7780 10183207 Pentachlorophenol TX 6605 10183207 Picloram TX 8645 10183207 Silvex (2,4,5-TP) TX 8650 10183207 Method EPA 8260 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane TX 5105 10184802 1 , 1, 1-Trich loroethane TX 5160 10184802 1 , 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane TX 5110 10 18 4802 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane TX 5165 10184802 1, 1-D ichloroethane TX 4630 10184802 1, 1-Dich!oroethylene (1 , 1-Dichloroethene) TX 4640 10184802 1 , 1-Dichloropropene TX 4670 10184802 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene TX 5150 10184802 1 ,2 ,3-Trich loropropane TX 5180 10184802 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene TX 5155 10184802 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene TX 5210 10184802 1,2-D ibromo-3-chloropropane {DBCP) TX 4570 10184802 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDS, Ethylene dibromide) TX 4585 10184802 1,2-Dichlorobenzene TX 4610 10184802 1,2-Dich loroethane TX 4635 10184802 1,2-Dichloropropane TX 4655 10184802 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene TX 5215 10184802 1,3-Dichlorobenzene TX 4615 10184802 1 ,3-Dichloropropane TX 4660 10184802 1,4-Dichlorobenzene TX 4620 10184802 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide) TX 4735 10184802 1-Chlorohexane TX 4510 10184802 2 ,2-D ich loropropane -·-·--·---------------------·------·-··-····-··-·--··--------··-··-····-···-·Tx ---····-··-··4 66s--··--·-···--------,-oT82l8 oz ·· . .. .. . ...................... -~ ...... ······ ....... ........... ... . . . . . ............... ···········-··· .. . .... ····· . ········~---·" ................. ,---·········-····· 2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone, MEK) TX 4410 10184802 Page 15 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2-Chlorotoluene 2-Hexanone 2-Nitropropane 4-Chlorotoluene 4-lsopropyltoluene 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) Acetone Acetonitrile Acrolein (Propenal} Acrylonitrile Ally! chloride (3-Chloropropene} Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodich loromethane Bromoform Bromomethane (Methyl bromide} Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane (Methyl chloride) Chloroprene cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene Dibromochloromethane TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 4500 4535 4860 5020 4540 4915 4995 4315 4320 4325 4340 4355 4375 4385 4390 4395 4400 4950 4450 4455 4475 4485 4505 4960 4525 4645 4680 4575 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 1018 4802 10184802 10184802 [0184802 10184802 10184404 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 Dibromochloropropane TX 4580 1 O 184802 -rnoromomeTha n e -······-----··-·-----···--------·····-·--------................................ _ _ _ _ . -----i-~ _ ---·-·--···-·-4 s 9 s _--------·--··---· 1 oT 84 s·o2 ----~------~--~ Page 16 of 39 ·, ._______. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Dichlorodifluoromethane TX 4625 10184802 Ethy l methacrylate TX 48 10 10 184608 Ethylbenzene TX 4765 10184802 Ethyl-t-butylether (ETBE) TX 4770 10184608 Hexachlorobutadiene TX 4835 10184802 Hexach loroethane TX 4840 10184404 lodomethane (Methyl iodide) TX 4870 10184802 lsobutyl alcoho l (2-Methyl-1-propano l) TX 4875 10184608 lsopropyl ether TX 4905 10 184404 lsopropylbenzene TX 4900 10184802 m+p-xylene TX 5240 10184802 Methacryloniiri le TX 4925 10184404 Methyl acetate TX 4940 10184404 Methyl methacrylate TX 4990 10184404 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) TX 5000 10184802 Methylcyclohexane TX 4965 10184608 Methy lene chloride TX 4975 10184802 Naphthalene TX 5005 10184802 n-Butyl alcohol TX 4425 10184608 n-Butylbenzene TX 4435 10184802 n-Propylbenzene TX 5090 10184802 a-Xylene TX 5250 10184802 Pentachloroethane TX 5035 10184802 Propionitrile (Ethyl cyanide) TX 5080 10184802 sec-Butylbenzene TX 4440 10184802 Styrene TX 5100 10184802 T-amylmethylether (TAME) TX 4370 10184802 tert-Butyl alcohol TX 4420 10184802 tert-Butylbenzene TX 4445 l O 184802 ...... r.etr~?h'?r.?t3th.jl~~r:i. (Pt3r~~r'?.r'?.~t~yl~~~) ..... · .. --.. ·-·---·········· -....... --................... !.~.--? .. us .· .... · ......... -... -..... )91?.4~~0} .. -: ..... --·---:· Page 17 of39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Toluene TX 5140 10184802 trans-1,2 -D ichloroethylene TX 4700 1018 4 802 trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene TX 4685 10184802 trans-1,4 -Dichloro-2-butene TX 4605 10184802 T richloroethene (Tri ch loroethylene) TX 5170 10184802 Trichlorofluoromethane TX 5175 10 184802 T rich!orotrifl uoroethane TX 5 185 10184404 Vinyl acetate TX 5225 10184802 Viny l chlor ide TX 5235 1018 4 802 Xylene (total) TX 5260 [0 184802 Method EPA 8270 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene TX 6715 10185 805 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene TX 5155 10 185805 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene TX 4610 10185805 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine TX 6220 10185805 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB) TX 6885 10 185407 1,3-Dichlorobenzene TX 4615 10185805 1,3-Dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) TX 6160 10185407 1,4-Dich!orobenzene TX 4 620 10185805 1,4-Naphthoquinone TX 6420 10185407 1,4-Phenylenediam ine TX 6630 10185601 1-Naphthylamine TX 6425 10\86002 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol TX 6735 10185805 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol TX 6835 10185805 2,4,5-Trimethylaniline TX 6880 10185805 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol TX 6840 10185805 2,4-Diaminotoluene TX 5880 10185203 2,4-Dichlorophenol TX 6000 10185805 -···2;4,.Q Im eihylp h eno1 ---···-··--···--····-····---------·----·--·····--·----·---------···--·----------·Tx·--·-·-·---6T30 -------·-------·-· rcrnf58D"5 ------------ .... ··········•·· .............. ·········-··. ·-···-······--·--··-····-····-.. ·····-····· .... . . ...... ················---·-········ 2,4-Dinitrophenol TX 6175 I 0 185805 Page 18 of39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP · Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2.4-DNT) TX 6185 10185805 2,6-Dichlorophenol TX 6005 10185805 2 ,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-0NT) TX 6190 10 (85805 2-Acetylam inofluorene TX 5515 10185 805 2-Chloronaphthalene TX 5795 10185805 2-Ch lorophenol TX 5800 10185805 2-Methyl-4 ,6-dinitrophenol TX 6360 10185805 2-Methylnaphthalene TX 6385 10185805 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) TX 6400 10185805 2-Naphthylamine TX 6430 10185407 2-Nitroaniline TX 6460 10185805 2-N itrophenol TX 6490 10185805 2-P icoline (2-Methylpyridine) TX 5050 10185805 3. 3'-Dichlorobenzidine TX 5945 10 185805 3,3'-Dimethy lbenzidine TX 6120 10185407 3-Methylcholanthrene TX 6355 (0 (8560 1 3-Methylphenol (m-Cresol) TX 6405 10185805 3-Nitroani line TX 6465 (0185805 4-Aminobiphenyl TX 5540 10185203 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether TX 5660 10185805 4-Ch loro-3-methylphenol TX 5700 10185805 4-Chloroaniline TX 5745 10185805 4-Chlorophenyl phenylether TX 5825 10 185805 4-Dimethyl am inoazobenzene TX 6(05 10 186002 4-Methy lphenol (p-Cresol) TX 6410 10185805 4-Nitroaniline TX 6470 10 185805 4-Nitrophenol TX 6500 10185805 5-Nitro-o-toluidine TX 6570 10185805 7 , 12-Dimethylbenz(a) anthracene TX 6115 10185805 Page 19 oi39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc . 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: EKpiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedea ll previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges custo mers to verify the lab o ratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Acenaph thene Acenaphthyle ne Acetophenone Aniline Anthracene Aramite Atrazine Benzi dine Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo( a )pyrene Benzo(b )fluoranthene Benzo(g ,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzoic acid Benzyl a lc ohol Biphenyl bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Ch loroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) Butyl benzyl phthalate Caprolactam Carbazole Chlorobenzilate Chrysene Diallate D ib enz(a, j) acrid in e D ib enz(a, h) anthracene TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 5500 5505 5510 5545 5555 5560 7065 5595 5575 5580 5585 5590 5600 5610 5630 5640 5760 5765 5780 6255 5670 7180 5680 7260 5855 7405 5900 5895 10185805 10185805 10185601 10185805 10185805 10185407 10185805 10185805 10 [85805 10185805 10 185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185407 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 [0185805 10185805 10185805 10186002 10185805 10185407 [0185805 10185805 Oibenzofuran TX 5905 10185805 Diethyl phthc3li3tf3 . . . . . .. .. . ... . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . ... .. . .. . . T~ 6()J() .. .. . . ... l O l ~)895 . . Page 20 of39 Texas Commission on Envuronmental Qualoty NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Dimethoate TX 7475 10185407 Dimethyl phthalate TX 6135 10185805 Di-n-butyl phthalate TX 5925 10185805 Di-n-octy l phthalate TX 6200 10185805 Diphenylamine TX 6205 10185805 Disulfoton TX 8625 10185601 Ethy l methanesulfonate TX 6260 10185203 Famphur TX 7580 10185203 Fluoranthene TX 6265 10185805 Fluorene TX 6270 10185805 Hexachlorobenzene TX 6275 10185805 Hexachlorobutadiene TX 4835 10185805 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene TX 6285 10185805 Hexachtoroethane TX 4840 10185805 Hexachlorophene TX 6290 10186002 Hexachloropropene TX 6295 10185601 lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene TX 6315 10185805 lsodrin TX 7725 10185601 lsophorone TV 'I\ 6320 10185805 lsosafrole TX 6325 10185407 Kepone TX 7740 10185601 Methapyrilene TX 6345 10185805 Methyl methanesulfonate TX 6375 10186002 Naphthalene TX 5005 10185805 Nitrobenzene TX 5015 10185805 Nitroquinoline-1-oxide TX 6515 10185601 n-Nitrosodiethylamine TX 6525 10185805 n-Nitrosodimethylamine TX 6530 10185805 n-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine TX 5025 10185805 Page 21 of39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water n-Nitrosodiphenylamine TX 6535 10185805 n-Nitrosomethylethylamine TX 6550 10185805 n-Nitrosomorpholine TX 6555 10185407 n-Nitrosopiperidine TX 6560 10186002 n-Nitrosopyrrolidine TX 6565 10185203 o, o,o-T riethyl phosphorothioate TX 8290 10185407 o-Tolu idine TX 5145 10185805 Parathion, ethy l TX 7955 10185805 Parathion, methyl (Methyl parathion) TX 7825 10185203 Pentach lorobenzene TX 6590 10185805 Pentach loroni trobenzene TX 6600 10185203 Pentach lorophenol TX 6605 10185805 Phenacetin TX 6610 10185601 Phenanthrene TX 6615 10 185805 Phenol TX 6625 10 185805 Phorate TX 7985 10185203 Pronamide (Kerb) TX 6650 10185407 Pyrene TX 6665 10185805 Pyridine TX 5095 10185805 Quinoline TX 6670 10185805 Safrole TX 6685 10185407 Sulfotepp TX 8155 10185805 Thionazin (Zinophos) TX 8?.., -_.)) 10185805 Thiophenol (Benzenethiol) TX 6750 10185805 Method EPA 9012 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Amenable cyanide TX 1510 10193201 Total cyanide TX 1645 10193405 ,,ethod EPA 9040 Anaiyfo-·-·---·-····--·-······---·-·······-····-··--·-······-·-·····-·········-········-·-·-··················As··········-Analyte ··10···-····---·-Method··10·····----·-----· pH ...... ····· ...... .. . ················ ............ .. ..... ....... ...... fX .. .. i§Oo ·········· ........ .. T6T97203 Page 22 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method EPA 9056 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Bromide TX 1540 10199209 Chloride TX 1575 10199209 Fluoride TX 1730 10199209 Nitrate as N TX 1810 10199209 Nitrate-n itrite TX !S20 10199209 Sulfate TX 2000 10199209 Method EPA 9060 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total organic carbon TX 2040 10200201 Method Iowa OA-1; GRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons TX 10330 90016403 Method Iowa OA-2; ORO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Extractable Petro leum Hydrocarbons TX 10331 900 16607 Method SM 2320 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Alkalinity as CaC03 TX 1505 20003003 Method SM 2340 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total hardness as CaC03 TX 1755 20003605 Method SM 2510 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Conductivity TX 1610 20003809 Method SM 2540 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-tota l TX 1950 20004608 ·gthod SM 2540 C ... ,Ar1.ily~~ . .. . . ... . . · ....... ~_E.l _ Ani:ily~~ I[) ----·Method ID ---·-- Residue-filterable (TDS) TX 1955 20004404 Page 23 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method SM 2540 D Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-nonfilterab le (TSS) TX 1960 20004802 Method SM 2540 F Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Res idue-settleab le TX 1965 20005009 Method SM 3500 Cr B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chromium VI TX 1045 20065809 'ethod SM 4500 C l G Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total residual chlorine TX 1940 20020604 Method SM 4500 Cl -C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chloride TX 1575 20084804 Method SM 4500 CN G Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Amenable cyanide TX 1510 2002 1607 Method SM 4500 F-C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Fluoride TX 1730 20012800 Method SM 4500 H+ B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID pH TX 1900 20016404 Method SM 4500 0 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Oxygen, dissolved TX 1880 20025201 Method SM 4500 PE Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Orthophosphate as P TX 1870 20025803 -Phosphorus ,-total --· ·--·-·· ---· · ···---··-···-·------------·····-·-·-·--·--·····--···· ·-·--···---·--··-·----··-TX ···-··--··--·-·· 1·9·1 ·0-··---···----··--··-···-·2 00258 03 -·-----·---·-·- Page 24 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Qua;~ty NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water -Method SM 4500 S2 F Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfide TX 2005 20126209 Method SM 4500 Si02 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Silica-dissolved TX 1995 20 128 20 5 Method SM 4500 S03 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfite-S03 TX 2015 20026806 iethod SM 4500 S04 D Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfate TX 2000 20027207 Method SM 5210 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Biochemical oxygen demand TX 1530 20027401 Carbonaceous BOD , CBOD TX 1555 2002740 1 Method SM 5220 D Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chemical oxygen demand TX 1565 200 27809 Method SM 5310 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Tota l organic carbon TX 2040 20028200 Method SM 9222 D Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Feca l coliforms TX 2530 20037405 Method _TCEQ 1005 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Tota l Petro leum Hydrocarbons (TPH) TX 2050 90019208 Page 25 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmentai Qua~ity NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Method EPA 1010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID lgnitabi li ty TX 1780 I 0116606 Method EPA 1311 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID TCLP TX 849 10118806 Method EPA 1312 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID SPLP TX 850 I 0 119003 iethod EPA310.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Alkalinity as CaC03 TX 1505 10054805 Method EPA 340.2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Fluoride TX 1730 10062201 Method EPA 350.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Ammonia as N TX 1515 10063 408 Method EPA 353.2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Nitrate as N TX 1810 10067604 Nitrate-nitrite TX 1820 10067604 Nitrite as N TX 1840 10067604 Method EPA 365.2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Orthophosphate as P TX 1870 10070403 Phosphorus, total TX 1910 10070403 Method EPA 6010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum TX 1000 10155609 -Anfimcfriy .. ·····--··---.. -·-·----·-·-----··--···-·--···-···-······-.. ········--·--·······-·····-······-·-·--···········-········-···----·····--····--······---···-··---Tx ··-·······-·-·-··-·10 o·) ---·····--··-···-· ··-·--··1·01 5 s 609 ··-·-·--------~- . . . . . . . .... . . .. .. . . . . ... ... . . . .... ... ... .... . ....... -~-···· ... •········· .. . Arsenic TX IO 10 IO l 55609 Page 26 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: So/id & Hazardous Material Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Lithium Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Selenium Silica as Si02 Si lver Sodium Strontium Thallium Tin Titanium Vanad ium Zinc Method EPA 7196 Analyte Chromium VI ~th _o~ 1::PA]471 Analyte Page 27 of 39 TX 1015 10 155609 TX 1020 10155609 TX 1025 10155609 TX 1030 10155609 TX 1035 10155609 TX 1040 10155609 TX 1050 10155609 TX 1055 10155609 TX 1070 10155609 TX 1075 10155609 TX 1080 10155609 TX 1085 10155609 TX 1090 10155609 TX 1100 10 155609 TX 1105 10155609 TX I 125 10155609 TX 1140 10155609 TX 1990 10155609 TX I 150 10155609 TX 1155 10155609 TX 1160 10155609 TX 1165 10155609 TX 1175 10155609 TX 1180 10155609 TX 1185 10155609 TX I 190 10 155609 AB Analyte ID Method ID TX 1045 10162400 AB Analyte ID Method ID Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Mercury TX 1095 10166004 Method EPA 8011 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) TX 4570 !0173009 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB, Ethylene dibromide) TX 4585 10173009 Method EPA 8015 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2-Propanol (lsopropyl alcohol) TX 4895 10173601 Diesel range organics (ORO) TX 9369 I 0173601 Ethano l TX 4750 10173601 Gasoline range organics (GRO) TX 9408 10173601 Methanol TX 4930 10173601 Method EPA 8021 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Benzene TX 4375 10174808 Ethylbenzene TX 4765 10174808 m+p-xylene TX 5240 10174808 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) TX 5000 10174808 a-Xylene TX 5250 10174808 Toluene TX 5140 10174808 Xylene (total) TX 5260 10174808 Method EPA 8081 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 4,4'-DDD TX 7355 10178606 4,4'-DDE TX 7360 10178606 4,4'-DDT TX 7365 10178606 Aldrin TX 7025 10178606 alpha-BHC (a lpha-Hexach lorocyclohexane) TX 7110 10 178606 alpha-Chlordane TX 7240 10 I 78606 -.beta :BHC .. (beta:Hexachlor.ocyclohexane)------------·-·-·----··-·------------·---IX _________ 7_1.1.S------··-----------l-0-1-.78606 -----···---- . Chlordane (tech.) · ·· TX ·· ··· 7250 · · 10178606 · Page 28 of39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material C hlorothalonil TX 7285 10178606 de lta-BHC (delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) TX 7105 10178606 Dicofol TX 7460 10 178606 Dieldrin TX 7470 10178606 Endosulfan I TX 7510 10178606 Endosulfan II TX 7515 10178606 Endosulfan sulfate TX 7520 10178606 Endrin TX 7540 10178606 Endrin aldehyde TX 7530 10178606 Endrin ketone TX 7535 10178606 gamma-BHC {Lindane, gamma-Hexachlorocyc lohexane) TX 7120 10178606 gamma-Chlordane Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide H exach lorobenzene Methoxychlor Mirex Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene) Method EPA 8082 Analyte Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016) Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221) Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232) Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242) Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248) Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254) Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260) PCBs ·~thod EPA 8151 Analyte . ·i,4,s~'r TX 7245 10178606 TX 7685 10178606 TX 7690 10178606 TX 6275 10(78606 TX 7810 10178606 TX 7870 10178606 TX 8250 10178606 AB Analyte ID Method ID TX 8880 10179007 TX 8885 10179007 TX 8890 10179007 TX 8895 10179007 TX 8900 10179007 TX 8905 10179007 TX 8910 10179007 TX 8870 10179007 -----··-···-----·-··--·-·····----··-······--·----------··As··-····-----·Analyte·10----·-·-·--··Metfiod -lD ____________ _ ................. -··--··········· ......... t5(" 8655 10183207 Page 29 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental QuaUty NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material 2 ,4-0 2 ,4-08 4-Nitrophenol Dalapon Di camba Dichlo roprop (Dichlo rprop) Dinoseb (2 -sec-bu tyl -4 ,6-d init ropheno l, DNB P ) MCPA MCPP Pentac h lorophenol Picloram Silve x (2 .4 ,5-TP ) Method EPA 8260 Analyte 1 , 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroet hane 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1, 1,2-T richloroethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dich loroethy lene (1, 1-0ic hl oroe thene) 1, 1-D ichloroprope ne 1,2,3-Trich lorobenzene 1,2,3-Tri chloropropane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,2-D ibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX AB TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 8545 8560 65 00 8555 8595 8605 8620 7775 7780 6605 8645 86 50 Analyte ID 5 105 51 60 5110 51 65 4630 464 0 467 0 5 150 5 180 5 155 521 0 457 0 10 183207 10183 207 10 183207 10183207 10 183207 10183207 10183207 10 183207 10 183207 10 183207 10 183207 10183207 Met hod ID 101848 02 10 184 80 2 10184802 10184802 10 18 4802 10 184 802 101 848 02 10 184 802 10 18 4802 10184802 1018 480 2 10 18480 2 1,2-D ibromoethane (EDB, Ethylene dibromide) TX 4585 1 O 18480 2 1,2-D ichlorobenzene TX 461 O 1 O 184 80 2 1,2-D ichloroethane TX 4635 l O 184802 -·--1~2:n1cl1lorop-ropane -------···--···-----·-----··--·-··-·--··-··-·-·-·-----··----·-···--·----·--Tx ······--·-··;r6:,::,---·--------·-1·0-rs4 80 T _____________ _ . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . ............ .. .. . ., . . . . . . .... -·~ ··············· .. ······· . . .... . ... .. .. ..... ............... ... ..• ....... .. .. . . . .. . . . . . ...... .... ... . . . 1,3,5-Tri methylbenzene TX 5215 IO 18 4802 Page 30 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental QuaHty NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material 1,3-Dichlorobenzene TX 4615 10184802 1,3-Dichloropropane TX 4660 10184802 1,4-Dichlorobenzene TX 4620 10184802 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide) TX 4735 10184802 1-Chlorohexane TX 4510 10184802 2,2-Dichloropropane TX 4665 10184802 2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone, MEK) TX 4410 10184802 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether TX 4500 10184802 2-Chlorotoluene TX 4535 10 184802 2-Hexanone TX 4860 10184802 2-Nitropropane TX 5020 10184802 4-Chloroto luene TX 4540 10 184802 4-lsopropyltoluene TX 4915 10184802 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) TX 4995 10184802 Acetone TX 4315 10184802 Acetonitrile TX 4320 10184404 Acrolein (Propenal) TX 4325 10184802 Acrylonitrile TX 4340 10184802 Allyl chloride (3-Chloropropene) TX 4355 10184404 Benzene TX 4375 10184802 Bromobenzene TX 4385 10184802 Bromochloromethane TX 4390 10184802 Bromodichloromethane TX 4395 10184802 Bromoform TX 4400 10184802 Bromomethane (Methyl bromide) TX 4950 1018 4802 Carbon disulfide TX 4450 10184802 Carbon tetrachloride TX 4455 10184802 Chlorobenzene TX 4475 10184802 Chloroethane TX 4485 10184802 Page 31 of 39 Texas Commiss~on on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: · Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Chloromethane (Methyl chloride) Chloroprene cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene Dibromochloromethane Dibromomethane Dich lorodifluoromethane Ethyl methacrylate Ethylbenzene Hexach lo robutadiene Hexachloroethane lodomethane (Methyl iodide) lsobuty l alcohol (2-Methyl-1-propanol) lsopropylbenzene m+p-xylene Methacrylonitrile Methyl acetate Methyl methacrylate Methy l tert-butyl ether (MTBE) Methylcyclohexane Methylene ch loride Naphthalene n-Butyl alcohol n-Butylbenzene n-Propylbenzene a-Xylene Pentachloroethane Propionitrile (Ethyl cyanide) TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX · TX TX TX 4960 4525 4645 4680 4575 4595 4625 48 10 4765 4835 4840 4870 4875 4900 5240 4925 4940 4990 5000 4965 4975 10184802 10184802 1018 4802 10184802 1018 4802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184802 10184608 10184802 10184608 10184802 10184802 10184404 10184404 10184404 10184 802 10184404 10184802 5005 10184802 4425 10184608 4435 10184802 5090 10184802 5250 IO 184802 5035 10184802 5080 IO 184404 sec-Butylbenzene TX 4440 1 O 184802 Slyrene TX-5100 · IO 184802 . . . . . . . .............. ·---~ ................ ~·· .. . .... . ... . Page 32 of 39 c:: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/3112011 613012010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material tert-Butyl alcohol TX 4420 10184802 tert-Butylbenzene TX 4445 10184802 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) TX 5115 10 184802 Toluene TX 5140 10184802 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene TX 4700 10184802 trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene TX 4685 10184802 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene TX 4605 10184802 Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) TX 5170 10184802 Trichlorofluoromethane TX 5175 10184802 Trichlorotrifluoroethane TX 5185 10184608 Vinyl acetate TX -,, -)_~) 10184802 Vinyl chloride TX -'?-. -)~.J) 10184802 Xylene (total) TX 5260 10184802 Method EPA 8270 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method JD 1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene TX 6715 10185805 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene TX 5155 10 185805 1,2-Dichlorobenzene TX 4610 10 185805 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine TX 6220 10185805 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB) TX 6885 10185601 1,3-Dichlorobenzene TX 4615 10185805 1,3-Dinitrobenzene (1 ,3-DNB) TX 6160 10185407 1,4-Dich lorobenzene TX 4620 10185805 1 ,4-Naphthoquinone TX 6420 10185601 1,4-Phenylenediamine TX 6630 10186002 1-Naphthylamine TX 6425 10185203 2, 3 ,4, 6-Tetrach lorophenol TX 6735 10185805 2,4, 5-Trichlorophenol TX 6835 10185805 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol TX 6840 10185805 --2;4-D1am1notoluene ---------------·····----··----------------------------·--·--···---------· 1 x ·--··------) 8 so--··--·------To1 ·8)407 ·---------- 2, 4-Dich lorophenol TX 6000 1 O 185805 Page 33 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: -.. T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2,4-D initrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dinitroto luene (2,6-DNT) 2-Acetylaminofluorene 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Chlorophenol 2-Methyl-4 ,6-dinitrophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methyiphenol (o-Cresol) 2-Naphthylamine 2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol 2-Pico line (2-Methylpyridine) 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine 3-Methy lcholanthrene 3-Methylphenol (m-Cresol) 3-Nitroaniline 4-Aminob iphenyl 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Ch loro-3-methy lphenol 4-Chloroaniline 4-Chlorophenyl phenylether 4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol) 4-Nitroaniline TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX TX 6130 6175 6185 6005 6190 5515 5795 5800 6360 6385 6400 6430 6460 6490 5050 5945 6120 6355 6405 6465 5540 5660 5700 5745 5825 6410 6470 10185805 10185805 !0185805 10185203 10185805 10185407 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185407 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185407 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 10185805 4-Nitrophenol TX 6500 l O 185805 5-Nitro-o-toluidine TX 6570 10185805 1 ;-12~g1rr.,ethy1~~n.z(a) ant~r~9.-~n..: . . _ ____ ___ _ ___ __ . . .. ..... -~---···-. 611? . . . 1913.5.sgs . . . . . . . Page 34 of 39 Texas Cornmission on Environmental Qualnty NELAP ~ Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220 -10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material a-a-Dimethylphenethylamine TX 6125 10186002 Acenaphthene TX 5500 10185805 Acenaphthylene TX 5505 10185805 Acetophenone TX 5510 10185805 Aniline TX 5545 10185805 Anthracene TX 5555 10185805 Aram ite TX 5560 10185203 Atrazine TX 7065 10185407 Benzidine TX 5595 10185805 Benzo(a )anthracene TX 5575 10185805 Benzo(a)pyrene TX 5580 10185805 Benzo(b )fluoranthene TX 5585 10185805 Benzo(g ,h,i)pery lene TX 5590 10185805 Benzo(k)fluoranthene TX 5600 10185805 Benzoic acid TX 5610 10185805 Benzy l alcohol TX 5630 10185805 Biphenyl TX 5640 10185805 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane TX 5760 10185805 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether TX 5765 10185805 bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether TX 5780 10185805 bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) TX 6'1 --~)) 10185805 Buty l benzyl phthalate TX 5670 10185805 Caprolactam TX 7180 10186002 Carbazole TX 5680 10185805 Chlorobenzilate TX 7260 10185203 Chrysene TX 5855 10185805 Diallate TX 7405 10186002 Dibenz(a, j) acridine TX 5900 10185805 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene TX 5895 10185805 --Dibenzofu ran ---·-----·-----------------·--·--·-------·--·--··---·--·-···-------·-·--·-·--rx-----·------590 5 -------·------· 1 01 ·85 805 ________ _ ............. ····· . .. . ... . .... ... . . .. . ... ... . . ............... , ... . ....... .... .... . . . . .................. ······ ...... ~···· . . .. . . . . . . . Page 35 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104 704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Diethy l phthalate TX 6070 10185805 Dimethoate TX 7475 10186002 Dimethyl phthalate TX 6135 10185805 Di-n-buty l phtha late TX 59 25 10185805 Di-n-octyl phthalate TX 6200 10185805 Diphenylamine TX 6205 10185805 Disulfoton TX 8625 10186002 Ethyl methanesulfonate TX 62 60 10 185203 Famphur TX 7580 10185407 Fluoranthene TX 6265 10185805 Fluorene TX 6270 10185 805 Hexachlorobenzene TX 627 5 10185805 Hexachlorobutadiene TX 4835 10185805 Hexachlorocyc lopentadiene TX 6285 10185805 Hexachloroethane TX 4840 10185805 Hexachlorophene TX 6290 10185203 Hexachloropropene TX 6295 10186002 lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene TX 6315 10185805 lsodrin TX 7725 10186002 lsophorone TX 6320 10185805 lsosafrole TX 6325 10186002 Kepone TX 7740 10185805 Methapyrilene TX 6345 10185601 Methyl methanesulfonate TX 6375 10185601 Naphthalene TX 5005 10185805 Nitrobenzene TX 5015 10185805 Nitroquinol ine-1-oxide TX 6515 10 185805 n-Nitrosod iethylam ine TX 6525 10185805 n-Nitrosodimethy lamine TX 6530 10185805 .... n~f'iitr o--~a.~~i~~~~~tylc3[!1i~E3. · .......... · ...................................... _ __ _ __ ................................ T~ ........ -·--·· 5025 ·-------------~10185805- Page 36 of 39 ""' Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material n-Nitrosodi-n-propylam ine TX 6545 10185805 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine TX 6535 10185805 n-Nitrosomethylethylamine TX 6550 10185805 n-N itrosomorpholine TX 6555 10185805 n-N itrosop iperidine TX 6560 10185601 n-Nitrosopyrrolidine TX 6565 10186002 o,o,o-Triethy l phosphorothioate TX 8290 10185203 o-Toluidine TX 5145 10185407 Parathion, ethyl TX 7955 10185601 Parathion, methyl (Methyl parathion) TX 7825 10185203 Pentachlorobenzene TX 6590 10185805 Pentach loron itrobenzene TX 6600 10186002 Pentach lorophenol TX 6605 10185805 Phenacetin TX 66!0 10185805 Phenanthrene TX 6615 10185805 Phenol TX 6625 10185805 Phorate TX 7985 10185203 Pronamide (Kerb) TX 6650 10185407 Pyrene TX 6665 10!85805 Pyridine TX 5095 10185805 Quinoline TX 6670 10185601 Resorcino l TX 6680 10185805 Safrole TX 6685 10185805 Sulfotepp TX 8155 10186002 Thionazin (Zinophos) TX 8235 10185805 Thiopheno l (Benzenethiol) TX 6750 10185805 Method EPA 9012 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Amenable cyanide TX 1510 l O 19320 I ··Total cyan 1d e -----------····· ----·----------·-·---·---·--·-······-----·-·····-·· -·····----------Tx·· ·······-··-·1 64:, --··---------·--·-1··0T9 340) ---------···---- Page 37 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP M Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: So/id & Hazardous Material Method EPA 9035 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfate TX 2000 10196200 Method EPA 9040 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Corrosivity TX 1615 10196802 pH TX 1900 10196802 Method EPA 9045 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Corrosiv ity TX 1615 10244607 pH TX 1900 10 198400 Method EPA 9050 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Conductivity TX 1610 10198604 Method EPA 9060 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total organic carbon TX 2040 10200201 Method EPA 9066 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total phenolics TX 1905 10200609 Method EPA 9081 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Cation exchange capacity TX 1560 10203404 Method EPA 9095 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Paint Filter Test TX 10312 10204009 Method Iowa OA-1; GRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons TX 10330 90016403 ethod Iowa OA-2; ORO --\ . --·-Analyte -·-··--·-------··------··--·----·-----------·-···--------------------·--·-------·--A s -----------·-An alyte-10-----·-Metlicfd ·1 o·--·--- .. ······ Extractablef Petroleum Hydrocarbbiis ··· · · Tx ·· Tb33T ·· · · ·· ········ ··· 9bbi6<:i'b7 Page 38 of 39 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Inc. 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704220-10-3 3/31/2011 6/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Method SM 25"10 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Conductivity TX 1610 20003809 Method SM 2540 G Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Res idue-total TX 1950 20005203 Method SM 9222 D Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Fecal coliforms TX 2530 20037405 ethod TCEQ 1005 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) TX 2050 90019 208 ····----------------·-·--··-----·--------------------.. ---------.. --.. ----·-·---·-·-·-····----.. ·---··········-·····-·-·····-·-·····--·-----···-·-----·-··--··---··--··--···--·---·------·-~----·----- Page 39 of 39 NELAC Assessment Report Assessment #A09-12 November 20, 2008 To: Ms. Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer From: Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc . 10165 Harwin Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036-1622 Stephen Stubbs Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) P .O. Box 13087, MC-176 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 Subject: Laboratory Assessment Conducted on October 29-30, 2008 Purpose: The assessment was conducted to evaluate the laboratory 's quality system , capabilities, and qualifications and determine the extent of conformance to the standards adopted by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) and the rules enacted by the State of Texas for accreditation of environmental laboratories. Scope: The assessment involved laboratory areas producing data that pertain to TCEQ's programs related to wastewater discharges and municipal and hazardous wastes. The assessment was based on the pertinent requirements appearing in : • Title 30 , Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 25 (30 TAC 25), Subchapters A-B , • Chapters 1-6 of the standards adopted by NELAC, • The laboratory's quality assurance documentation including its quality manual, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and related documents , • Standard Methods for the Ex amination of Water and Wastewater, • Methods published by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) including those in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples, Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples , and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846), • TCEQ Method 1005 for determining total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), Revision 3, June 1, 2001 • Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations , Part 136 (40 CFR 136), Appendix A, • Title 30 TAC 319.9, 319.11, and 319.12 , and • Other documents applicable to EPA and TCEQ programs, including pertinent portions of the Code of Federal Regulations and Texas Administrative Code and EPA and TCEQ guidance documents. Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 2 of 17 November 20, 2008 Executive Summary: At the time of the assessment, the assessment team found Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. had a quality system that conformed in part to accreditation standards. The assessment team identified five positive findings. However, the team also identified deficiencies relating to management and technical requirements in the NELAC standards and the laboratory's quality manual and SOPs. The deficiencies resulted in 15 negative findings. Of these, two are considered to be critical findings. Please respond in writing within 30 days of receipt according to the response requirements in the report. The assessment will remain open until an acceptable response has been received for the negative findings. Comments do not require response . Findings and Comments For the purposes of TCEQ assessment reports, a finding is an assessment conclusion (positive or negative) that identifies a condition having a significant effect on an item or activity . A finding having a significant negative effect on data quality or defensibility, if not corrected, 1s characterized as a critical finding. Negative findings require response and corrective actions. A laboratory must give priority to correcting any critical findings identified. Comments are observations that may not impact quality and are provided by the assessment team to assist the laboratory. Comments do not require response. POSITIVE FINDINGS: 1. Materials Control : The laboratory has implemented an extensive program for controlling sampling bottles and laboratory reagents. The laboratory performs blank analyses on each lot of bottles for each parameter tested in the laboratory prior to use of the material lot. 2. Analyst Knowledge: The experience level and the technical knowledge of the analysts is . excellent. Analysts were able to converse comfortably about the methods and were able to provide an in-depth technical understanding of the methods and the method details. 3. Record Retrievability: The ability of the laboratory staff to retrieve records was noteworthy. During review of raw data records, staff retrieved numerous records within a very short time. There were no instances when records were not produced rapidly. 4. Strong Training Program: The ethics and technical training program of this laboratory Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 3 of 17 November 20, 2008 is excellent. It is comprehensive and well-documented. 5. Standard Traceability: The traceability of standards in this laboratory is excellent. The system for traceability has been implemented uniformly and only a few isolated instances of non-conformance were identified . NEGATIVE FINDINGS: Management Findings M-1 Organization 5 .4 .1 a . NELAC 5.4 .1.5.j : The laboratory did not appoint deputies for key managerial personnel including the technical directors and the quality manager. M-3 Document and Records Control 5.4.3 and 5.4.12 a. NELAC 5.4.12: The laboratory did not retain unequivocal records of laboratory activities. The temperature monitoring logs have an adhesive label taped over the previous thermometer calibration information making the previous data unreadable. b. NELAC 5.4 .12 .2.1: The laboratory did not retain records of all original observations, calculations, and derived data. The laboratory did not record both the actual temperature reading and the corrected temperature reading in the sample receiving temperature records. c. NELAC 5 .4 .12 .2.l: The laboratory did not maintain accurate records of sample bottle lots for sampling kits. Lot numbers for previously consumed lots were still appearing in the records for kits being assembled using current lots. The lot numbers had not been updated in the form used to prepare kit assembly instructions . d . NELAC 5.4.12 .2.2: For test method 8260B, the analyst did not record any information in the manual run log until the analysis and processing of the batch is complete. This failure to record activities at the time the activity is performed can result in the inability to accurately reconstruct the history of the activity. e. NELAC 5.4.12.2.5 .2.a: The laboratory did not record data for the calibration for nitrite. The calibration information for 10/6/08 was not recorded. f. NELAC 5.4.12.2.5.3.i: The laboratory did not record the information to link containers of reagents to the origin, receipt, preparation, and use as follows: 1. The laboratory did not record the preparation of the dilution water batches for the BOD test. Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 4 of 17 November 20, 2008 2 . The laboratory did not record the identity of the matrix spike solution in the cyanide run log noted on most recent entries. 3 . The laboratory did not record the identity of the solution used to determine MDLs for the phenol test. 4 . The laboratory did not record the identity of the potassium persulfate solution used to determine mercury using EPA 245.1 and SW-846 7470/7471. 5 . The laboratory did not document the preparation of the standards used for the calibration of the minerals (K, Na , Mg , Ca) by ICP. 6. The laboratory did not fully document the preparation of calibration standards for SW-846 Method 8011 determinations . Diluent and final volumes were not recorded . M-5 Subcontracting 5.4.5 a. NELAC 5.4 .5 .2: Th e laboratory did not maintain records of written notifications to clients concerning the laboratory's intention to subcontract work. b. NELAC 5.4.5.4: The laboratory did not maintain records of subcontracting arrangements to document compliance und er NELAC Section 5.4.5.1. The laboratory SOP requires records that are not maintained. Those records required by the laboratory SOP and not maintained include: 1. A valid certification to perform the requested analysis. 2. A copy of the laboratory's quality assurance plan 3. Copies of SOPs used for the subcontracted analysis. 4. A copy of the most recent performance evaluation study for the subcontracted parameter 5 . Copies of the most recent regulatory agency or third party accreditor (sic) audit report. M-6 Purchasing Services 5.4 .6 NELAC 5.4.6.1: The laboratory did not document its purchasing procedures. The existing SOP for purchasing is outdated and does not reflect current practice used to procure materials for use in the laboratory. M-10 Internal Audits 5.4.13 NELAC 5.4.13.1: The laboratory did not perform an annual quality systems audit in 2007. The corporate QA Manager conducted an assessment, but it was made clear to the assessors by the corporate QA Manager that this was not intended to serve as the Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 5 of 17 November 20, 2008 annual quality systems audit. To date, the 2008 annual audit has also not been performed. M-11 Management Reviews 5.4.14 NELAC 5.4.14.1: The laboratory did not meet the requirements for management review as follows: 1. The laboratory's quality systems documents fail to address management review requirements; 2. The laboratory did not perform an annual management review for 2007. M-12 Corrective Actions 5.4.10 a. NELAC 5.4 .10.4: Quality systems documents do not address the monitoring of corrective actions to evaluate their effectiveness. A review of corrective action reports also indicates no follow-up monitoring occurred after the corrective actions were implemented. Technical Findings: T-1 Analytical and Program Requirements NELAC 5.5.4 .5.2: The laboratory did not validate modifications of reference methods. The laboratory employs an overnight room temperature solvent evaporation technique in place of the distillation technique prescribed in EPA Method 1664. The technique prescribed in the reference method is designed to remove the solvent in less than 30 minutes rather than through an overnight process. (See also Finding T.14.b.l). T-2 Personnel 5.5.2, Appendix C a. NELAC Appendix C . l .f: The laboratory did not require additional action when one or more analytes fail to meet acceptance criteria for the demonstration of capability (DOC). For Method 8270C in a solid and chemical matrix, an analyst did not meet the precision criteria for three analytes. No re-analysis or corrective action was documented. b. NELAC Appendix C.2: The laboratory did not include the method SOP identity on the demonstration of capability form. c. NELAC Appendix C.1: The laboratory did not require the approval of analyst demonstrations of capability prior to the analyst performing tests. An analyst performed DOCs on 7 /28/08, 8/1/08, 8/2/08, and 8/5 /08. The DOC was approved by Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 6 of 17 November 20 , 2008 the Technical Director and Quality Assurance Officer on 10/20/08 . Records indicate the analyst performed analyses prior to 10/20 /08. T-3 Proficiency Testing CHAP 2 a. NELAC 2 .5 : The laboratory did not send a copy of corrective action investigations associated with proficiency testing failures to the TCEQ. b. NELAC 2.7.4: The laboratory did not consistently initiate corrective action for PT study failures . Corrective actions were not initiated for failures associated with the Soil-62 study. T-5 Test Methods and Method Validation 5.5.4 a. NELAC 5 .5.4.1: The laboratory did not maintain up-to-date procedures as follows: The SOP for Method 200.7 cites the 1993 version of the reference method rather than version 4.4 , dated 1994. b. NELAC 5.5.4 .1.1 : The laboratory did not maintain SOPs that accurately reflect actual laboratory activities. The SOP for Method 624 requires checking the samples for residual chlorine . In practice, the laboratory does not implement this requi rement. c. NELAC 5.5.4 .1.1.f: The laboratory did not maintain SOPs with sufficient details to allow another analyst to reproduce the results as follows: 1. The SOP for ammonia did not describe how to dechlorinate the sample prior to analysis. 2. The SOPs for nitrite, nitrate, cyanide, and phenols by discrete analyzer did not include procedures for preparing calibration standards and the required concentrations of the resulting standards . 3. The SOP for phenols did not provide consistent acceptance criteria. Section 13.0 contains acceptance criteria that conflict with those in the attachment example. 4 . The SOP for Total Dissolved Solids does not describe the use of overnight drying procedures. Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 7 of 17 November 20 , 2008 T-8 Equipment 5.5 .5 a. NELAC 5.5.5 .2 .1.b: The laboratory did not document the calibration verification of support equipment using NIST traceable standards: 1. Records for balance SIN 73179 and for the weight set did not identify the balance correctly . The records contained different serial numbers for the balance and the weights than those which were in use. 2. The Thermometer Calibration Logbook shows incorrect status for two thermometers in service in the laboratory . Thermometers #92 and #113 , in use in the sample receiving area , have a status of "not in use" and no entry, respectively. b. NELAC 5.5.5.2 .1.d: The laboratory did not monitor the temperature of ovens with NIST traceable references . 1. The temperature monitoring logs for "Oven 1" and "Oven 2" located in the Organic Preparations area were switched at some point. Temperatures for oven 1 were recorded on the log for oven 2 and vice versa. c. NELAC 5.5.5.2.1.e : The laboratory did not assure the use of Class A volumetric glassware or to calibrate any non-Class A volumetric ware . Calibration standards in use in the ICP are a were prepared in non-Class A volumetric flasks. T-9 Measurement Traceability 5 .5.6 a. NELAC 5.5 .6.3.2: The laboratory did not record the information to document traceability of the standards used for the determination of the MDLs for the phenol test and for the batch LCS for the determination of the MD Ls for the aqueous matrix. The laboratory records did not contain the identity of the standard used to prepare the samples for determination of the MDL for phenol and did not contain the identity of the standard used to prepare the LCS associated with the batch containing the MDL samples. b . NELAC 5.5.6.4 .b: The laboratory did not place required information on labels of original containers of reagents. The laboratory did not label neat reagents with expiration dates . c. NELAC 5.5.6.4.f: The laboratory did not place required information on labels of prepared reagents. 1. Labels on the alkaline azide and the manganese (II) solutions used for Winkler titrations contained no preparation or expiration dates or link to the information. Similarly, the labels for the potassium permanganate and potassium persulfate solutions used for mercury determinations contained no expiration dates. Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 8 of 17 November 20, 2008 2. The laboratory did not record the preparation of preservative solutions used in sampling kits. T-14 Assurance of Testing Quality 5.5.9-CRITICAL FINDING a. NELAC 5.5.9.2.c: The laboratory has did not establish acceptance criteria for the end- of-run CCV for Method 8260B required for TCEQ contract samples. b. NELAC 5 .5.9.2.d: The laboratory did not implement the most stringent of requirements as follows: 1. As a result of corrective action to a finding of the Florida DOH in 2004, the laboratory changed the hexane distillation step in Method 1664 from the incorrect 60°C to an overnight hood evaporation at room temperature. The reference method requires the removal of hexane at 70°C +/-1 °C. 2. For the BOD batches on 9/25 /08 and 10/17/08 , the laboratory did not discard the dilution water and qualify data as a result of the analysis of dilution water. The analysis of dilution water gave results of 0.91 mg /L and 0.90 mg/L, respectively. 3. The laboratory SOPs for ammonia, nitrite, nitrate , cyanide , and phenols did not require the performance of the linear dynamic range determination as required by the reference method. 4. The laboratory SOP for phenols did not evaluate matrix impacts on the measurement or the precision of the measurement. The SOP requires the MS/MSD to be performed, but there are no acceptance criteria for the MS /MSD. T-15 Reporting 5.5.10 a. NELAC 5.5 .10.2.j and 5.5.2.5: The laboratory did not provide name, function, and signature of the person authorizing the test report. The laboratory routinely issues test reports under the electronic signature of the Laboratory Director after his approval of the final report. However, in the absence of the Laboratory Director, test reports are issued by other staff members using the Laboratory Director's electronic signature. b. NELAC 5.5.10.2.m: The laboratory did not provide reasons for parameters that do not comply with all requirements of the NELAC standards. The laboratory has reported data from analyses us ing SW-846 Method 8011 for which it does not have accreditation, without identifying the accreditation status of the parameters. (Note : This practice ceased June 30, 2008). Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 9 of 17 November 20, 2008 COMMENTS 1. Accreditation Certificate Modification: The laboratory has applied for several modifications to the scope of accreditation. These modifications include: a. Addition of Analytes to 8270C -the lab has applied for the addition of the following analytes to the list of analytes accredited under Method 8270C by SIM for an aqueous matrix: 1. Methyl parathion 11. Atrazine 111. Molinate 1v. S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate b . Accreditation for Phenols by EPA 420.4 c . Accreditation for TKN by EPA 3 51.2 d . Accreditation for SW-846 Method 8011 (EDB & DBCP) During the assessment of this laboratory, MDL data and the laboratory's initial demonstration of capability for the four analytes in l .a above was reviewed. This data is included with this report. Data supporting MDL determinations for SW-846 Method 8011 were also available and reviewed. These data are also included with this report . Records (run logs, calibration data, etc.) for the analysis of samples using Method 8011 were also reviewed. Also during this assessment, the SOP the phenol method was reviewed. Deficiencies related to this SOP are found in the negative findings section. The plan to accredit for TKN was reviewed. The SOP is incomplete at this point. The laboratory's application to add TKN will not be complete without the SOP. The equipment for digestion was evaluated and found to be standard for TKN digestion. This equipment is separate from that used for cyanide and ammonia distillation because of the higher temperatures required. The plan to analyze the digestate for ammonia using the Westco discrete analyzer is already accredited as 350.1. 2. The SOP for Method 8260B indicates the acceptance criteria for the CCCs for the ICY and the CCV are <30% and <20%, respectively . In practice, <15% is used for all analytes. \ Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 10 ofl 7 November 20, 2008 Response Requirements: Please respond in writing to this office within thirty (30) days by describing (a) the specific corrective actions taken or planned to address the findings, (b) actions taken or planned to prevent recurrence , (c) the timetable for completing each action, and (d) the means to be used to document completion of each action. A template such as that provided in Attachment A may be useful for facilitating a complete response. This assessment will remain open until an acceptable response has been received for the negative findings . Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coa st Page 11 of 17 November 20 , 2008 Audit Conduct: Dates of Audit: October 29-30 , 2008 Audit Team: Thomas W. McAninch, Ph.D . (Lead Assessor) Michael C. Shepherd, Ph.D. (Assessor) Person Contacted: Ms. T amara Snowden-Welch, Quality Assurance Officer, Accutest a. Pre-Audit Conferenc e Attendees Thomas W. McAninch, Lead Assessor, Shepherd Technical Services Michael C. Shepherd, A sses s or, Shepherd Technical Services Tamara Snowden-Welch , Quality Assur ance Officer, Accutest Paul Canevaro , Laboratory Director, Accutest Phillip Worby , Director of Corporate Quality Assurance , Accutest Richard Rodri guez, Laboratory Manager, Accutest Charles Hardesty Jennifer Laidlaw Nidia Saspa b. The followin g activities were assessed and the followin g staff was interviewed: AREA REVIEWED PERSON(S) INTERVIEWED Quality Systems Tamara Welch, Paul Canevaro, Phillip Worby, Richard Rodriquez Sample Receiving/Log-in Dan Borak, Long Nguyen Sampling Kit Preparation Sarah Hail Organic Preparations Charles Hardesty TCLP Charles Hardesty Semivolatile GC Analysis Felix Oses, Alexis Barboza, Richard Rodriguez VOA Jennifer Laidlaw, Rabina Shrestha, Richard Rodriquez Wet Chemistry/ BOD Cora Vela, Shiroon Spiegelhauer SVOA Sheila Cheng, Gary Jedlicka, Richard Rodriquez HEM Shiroon Spiegelhauer Solids Shiroon Spiegelhauer Metals Digestions Luis Racelis Mercury Analysis Shaheen Momin, Nidia Saspa Metals Analysis Nidia Saspa Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 12 ofl 7 November 20, 2008 c . The objective evidence examined prior to and during the assessment included: Q r D ua 1ty ocuments R . d ev1ewe Title Number/Control ID Quality Systems Manual Vol. VIII, Rev . III, May 2008 Subcontracting Procedures TQA031-01,12/17/04 Laboratory Document Control TQA025-05 Training Checklists (Std Prep , Metals QA031, QA036, QA035, QA034, QA033, QA032, Tm, Metals Digestion, Gen. Chem. QA038 Tm, Org. Analysis, P&T Tm, Org. Dept. Personnel Tech. Tm, Training Meeting Signature Sheet QAOll Job Description -General Chemistry Electronic Copy Technician Job Description -Volatiles Electronic copy Department Team Leader Powerpoint DI/Ethics Tm Electronic copy Personnel Training and Analyst TQA009-04 Proficiency Internal Audit Procedure TQA041-04 Corrective action Procedure TQAOl 1-03 Employee Technical Ethics TQA-30-03 Responsibilities Review of Inorganic Data TQA039-03 Review of Organic Data TQA034-03 Test Method S0Ps Title Number/ID Rev. Eff. Date Metals By Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic TMA008-04 04 /01/2008 Emission Spectrometry (ICP) Metals By Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic TMAOOl 1-03 9/17/08 Emission Spectrometry (ICAP) Glassware SOP TQA012-03 12/12/04 Analysis Of 1,2-Dibromoethane (DB) And 1,2- Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP) By Gas TGC018-01 9/22 /08 Chromatography, Electron Capture Detector N-Hexane Extractable Materials (HEM, Oil And TGN040-06 10/12/08 Grease) By Gravimetric Analysis Cold Vapor Analysis Of Mercury For Soil Samples TMA009-05 3.0 10/07/08 Cold Vapor Analysis Of Mercury For Water Samples TMAOl0-05 10/10/08 Digestion Of Non-Potable Waters For ICP TMPOOl-07 10/10/08 Digestion Of Soils For ICP Analysis TMP003-05 2/15/08 Total Dissolved Solids (Total Filterable Residue). TGN026-05 2/12/08 Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page13of17 November 20 , 2008 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Volatiles Suspended TGN031-05 Solids (VSS) Determination Of Organochlorine Pesticides Using GC TGC006-07 System SW846 8082: Determination Of Polychlorinated TGC 005-06 Biphenyls (PCBs) Using GC System EPA 608: Determination Of Organochlorine Pesticides TGC013-05 And PCBs Using GC System Phenols Distillation, Soil and Water Samples by EPA TGN016-07 420.4 and SW-846 9066 Biochemical Oxygen Demand & Carbonaceous TGN003-05 Method 8270C, Semi-volatile Organic Compounds by TMSOOl-08 GC /MS Determination of Semi-volatile Organic Compounds by TMS004-04 GC /MS, EPA 625 Determination of Volatile Organics Using GC /MS, TMS003-05 EPA 624 Method 82670B , Volatile Organic Compounds by TMS002-09 GC /MS Nitrogen , Nitrite TGN012-04 Nitrate/Nitrite and N itrate Only by Cadmium Reduction TGN013-04 Analysis Nitrogen, Ammonia TGN002-06 Sulfide by EPA Method SM 4500S -F & EPA 376.1 TGN025-06 Cyanide Distillation/ Aqueous and Soil Samples , and TGN034 -08 Samples Amenable to Chlorination Phenols Distillation, Soil and Water Samples by EPA TGN016-07 420.4 and SW-846 9066 Records and Logs D t f emons ra 10ns o re bTt apa11ru Analyte D ated A n a lyst Matrix Method PCBs 10/23 /08 Oscar Moreno Soil 8082 SVOA 10/23 /08 Oscar Moreno Soil 8270C TPH 10/23 /08 Oscar Moreno Aqueous Tx1005 TPH 10/23 /08 Oscar Moreno Soil Txl005 VOA 10/20/08 Jennifer Laidlaw Aqueous 8260B VOA 10/20 /08 Jennifer Laidlaw Soil 8260B VOA 10/20 /08 Jennifer Laidlaw Aqueous 624 BTEX 10/20 /08 Jennifer Laidlaw Aqueous 8015 BTEX 10/20 /08 Jennifer Laidlaw Soil 8015 Pesticides 1/29/08 Jennifer Laidlaw Leachate 8151 TPH 1/29/08 Jennifer Laidlaw Aqueous Tx1005 VOA 10/20/08 Rabina Shrestha Aqueous 8260B 2/12 /08 2/14/08 10/12/08 10/12 /08 7.0 10/15 /08 5 .0 10/12 /08 8.0 10/13 /08 4 .0 10/12/08 5 .0 10/13 /08 9.0 10/13 /08 4 .0 10/12/08 4.0 10/12 /08 6.0 8/18 /08 6.0 3/2008 8 .0 9/26/08 7.0 10/15 /08 SOP TMSOOl -08 TMS002 -09 TMS002 -09 TMS003 -05 TMS002-09 Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 14 of 17 November 20, 2008 VOA 10/20 /08 Rabina Shrestha Pesticides 10/20 /08 Alexis Barboza PCB 10 /20 /08 Alexis Barboza Pe sticide s 10/2 0/08 Alex is Barboza PCB 10/2 0/08 Alexis Barboza Pesticides 10/2 0/08 Alex is Barboza Pe s ticides 10/2 0/08 Alexis Barboza Soil 8260B TMS002-09 Soil 8081A Soil 8082 Soil 8151 Aqueous 8082 Aqueous 8151 Aqueous 608 Trainin Records Rabina Shrestha Alexis Barboza Os car Moreno Jennifer Laidlaw Personnel Qualification Records Staff Member Record Reviewed Jennifer Laidlaw Oscar Moreno Al ex is Barboza Rabina Shrestha I t ns rumen tR d/R ecor s ea2:ents tan ar s rac n2 IS d d T ki R d ecor s Metals Digestion In Hous e Prepared Spiking and Inorganic Standard Stock Logbook : #GN200 8- Purchased Spiking Solutions , #M2006-019 003 ICP In strument M a intenance and Performance SVOA GC /MS Run Log, 7/28 /08 , 8/1 /08 , Log, #QA2008-024 8/2/08 , 8/5/08 , DOC data for Alex is Barboza Mercury Instrument Maintenance and VOA GC /MS Run Log; 8/2 1/08 ; PT s ample Performance Lo g, #QA2008-025 analysis Crib Stock Solution Log, #M2008-018 Accutest Laboratories Instrument Run Lo g : Hg ICP Daily Calibration St andards Solutions, ICP Low Check (CRIB) Standard Solution, #M2008-019 #M2008-17 CoA Ultra Scientific , ICP08 l , Lot#HO 1054 Data Records Sample Receipt Log Oil and Grease: #GN2008-29 ICP Metals Digestion Water Prep Log, #M2008-Pest/PCB Liquid Sample Prep Report: 028 #OP2008-005 Mercury Digestion Water Prep Log, #M2008-030 BNA Liquid Sample Prep Repor t: #OP2008- 017 Mercury Digestion Soil Prep Log, #M2008 -03 l Constant Weight Study : 10 /29 /08, developed for SM 2540D GC Semivolatile Analysis Log: #SVOA2008-032 Initial Calibration, Aroclor 1016 GCGG, 10/22 /08 Annual LOD/LOC Verification for Instruments Annual LOD/LOC Verification for GCNN, GCDD, and GCGG: Method 8082 , Instruments GCNN , GCDD , and GCGG: 1/23 /08-2/25 /08 Method 80 8 1, 1/08 /08-2/06 /08 Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 15 of 17 November 20, 2008 Annual Method Detection Limit Determination Instruments GCNN, GCDD , and GCGG : Method 8081, February 2008 Annual Method Detection Limit Determination 2008 -2007 , General Chemistry Department Annual Method Detection Limit Determination, SW846 8011, Instrument GCGG, 10/2008 MDL data for 8260 /624 : October, 2008 ; aqueous matrix, V AIX8260; pooled data from GC /MSB, GC /MSF , GC /MSM, GC /MSY, GC /MSZ MDL data for 8270 : Soil matrix; January , 2008; GC /MSJ MS Summary; VOA, 10/11/08; Volatile IS Area Summary, VOA, 10/7/08 MDL SIM data, atrazine, methyl parathion, molinate, S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate : Oct 23, 2008 SVOA GC /MS Run Log, 7/28 /08, 8/1/08, 8/2/08, 8/5/08 , DOC data for Alexis Barboza VOA GC /MS Run Log: 8/21/08 ; PT sample analysis MDL data for Westco discrete analyzer for Ammonia, 6/19/08 , (350 .l);Nitrite, 2/5 /08 , (353.2); Cyanide , 4/21 /08 , (335.4); Nitrate-Nitrite , 2/6/08 (353.2) Quantitation Report: 10/11/08; VOA Sample t24074-lms; Rabinas Quantitation Report: 10/22 /08; VOA; Sample LCS & ICY; Rabinas I t n erna I & Et x erna IA d't /M U IS Audit Report SVOA Technical Audit Test Method Assessment -TOC 2007 Corporate Quality Systems Assessment 2008 Test Method Assessment 2009 Audit Schedule -draft 2004 Florida DOH NELAC Assessment Report Annual Method Detection Limit Determination Instruments GCNN , GCDD , and GCGG: Method 8082 , February 2008 Annual Method Detection Limit Determination, 601 OB , 9/10/08 (water and soil) Annual LOD/LOC Verification for Instruments GCGG : Method 8011 , 10/2008 GC/MS QA-QC Check Report: 10/1 1/08; IS response monitoring data MDL data for 8270 ; Aqueous matri x; January & February , 2008; GC /MSJ & GC /MSA & GC /MSH LCS/LCSD Summary Report; VOA 10/22 /08 MS /MSD Summary Report; VOA, 10/5/08; Response Factor Report ; VOA; GC /MSJ ; 9/11 /08: Rabinas Calibration Data: 10 /23 /08; VOA; GC /MSM ; Rabinas Response Factor Report ; 10/23 /08; VOA ; GC /MSM ; Rabinas Accuracy & Precision Report: Westco Discrete Analyzer; Nitrite (Aq), Nitrite + Nitrate (Aq); Nitrite + Nitrate (soil); Chloride (Soil); Ammonia (Aq); Accuracy & Precision Report: 8270C for atrazine, molinate, methyl parathion, S-Ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate; 10/25 /08-10/28 /08; DOC for Sheila Cheng and analytes anae:emen tR ev1ew R t epor s Date of Audit Report October 21, 2008 February 7, 2008 January 21, 2008 Undated Draft May 10-12, 2004 Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast Page 16 of 17 November 20 , 2008 Com taints Date of Re ort 9/28 /2008 9/11/2008 on-on ormance N C £ IC orrec 1ve C ion f A f R eports Corrective Action Report Date of Report Corrective Action Summary Form: TGC-9/24/2008-566 9/16 /08 TGC/MS-10/28 /2008-5 67 10/28 /08 Accutest Report of Corrective Action for Florida DOH Incorporated into Florida initial Report TGC/MS-10/28 /2008-5 67 Permanent Thermometer ID Log: Thermometers #92 and #113 Pipet EMOOl, Form QC006-03 Daily Temperature Logbook: Refrigerator SIN W AS34-00164 report 10/28 /08 Current Standard/Reagent Preparation Lo books (VOA, SVOA, Wet Chem) Current Standard/Reagent Preparation Lo books VOA , SVOA , Wet Chem Balance Calibration Lo book: #GN2008-001 Top Loader Balance Calibration Log: A0#200-029 Miscellaneous Documents/Records Document/Record Date/Revision Sample Inspection Form Short Hold Notification Form Sample Kit Instruction Form: Kit #10520 Bottle Lot QC Reports, Notebook #QA2008-040 Several reviewed Technical Staff Biographies Summary Electronic copy of 2007 & 2008 new hires d. Post-Audit Conference Attendees: Thomas W. McAninch, Lead Assessor, Shepherd Technical Services Michael C. Shepherd, Assessor, Shepherd Technical Services Tamara Snowden-Welch, Quality Assurance Officer, Accutest Paul Canevaro, Laboratory Director, Accutest Phillip Worby, Director of Corporate Quality Assurance, Accutest Richard Rodriguez, Laboratory Manager, Accutest Charles Hardesty Jennifer Laidlaw Accute st L aboratories Gulf Co a st Page 17 of 17 November 20 , 2 00 8 Attachment A -Templa te for R es ponses for Asse ss m e nt #[A s ses sment No .] F . d. #1 m m g Corrective Action(s) to Corrective Action(s) to Issue Address Finding Prevent Recurrence F" d " #2 m m g Corrective Action(s) to Corrective Action(s) to Issue Address Finding Prevent Recurrence F" d " #3 m m g Corrective Action(s) to Corrective Action(s) to Issue Address Finding Prevent Recurrence Timetable for Means to Document Actions(s) Corrective Action(s) Timetable for Means to Document Actions(s) Corrective Action(s) Timetable for Means to Document Actions(s) Corrective Action(s) Finding# NE LAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC ) Audit Perfo rmed : Octo b er 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date 1 The laboratory did not appoint deputi es for Mr . Paul Canevaro will assume the duties of The Quality System 9-Dec-08 key managerial personne l including the Quality Assurance Officer and/or Organic Manual will be revised technical directors and qua lity manager. Technical Director in case of absence . to include the Mr . Richard Rodriguez will assume the duties assignments . as Laboratory Director and/or Deputy Technical lnorganics Director in case of absence . 2 The laboratory did not retain unequivoca l Thermometer Calibration calibrations are Calibrations will occur 9-Dec-08 records of laboratory activities . The re corded in the thermom eter ca libration log , before new logs are temperature monitoring logs have an which chronicles each calibration annually. issued or when adhesive label taped over the previous The history is maintained and accessible for necessary new labels thermometer calibration information making review and traceability . To avert appearance will be placed below the previous data unreadable . of incorrectness, calibrations will occur previous calibration before new logs are issued or when information . necessary new labels wil l be placed below previous calibration information . 3 The laborat ory did not retain records of all A ll re cords pertaining to sample receipt will The forms will 21-Dec-08 original observations , calculations, and be kept. The laboratory has re vised t he reviewed for derived data . The laboratory did not record sample receiving form to provide a completeness via peer both the actual temperature reading and the mechanism to record all information , re view, login corrected temperature reading in the sample including a corrected temperature reading personnel and project receiving records . and the correction factor . managers . 4 The laboratory did not maintain accurate It was determined that this occurrence was The laboratory will 2-Jan-09 records of sample bottle lots for sampling an oversight. Lot numbers are routinely provide employee kits . Lot numbers for previously con s umed updated and any kits already printed are re-training and t he lots were still appearing in the records for printed to reflect the new lot numbers . The supervisor wil l conduct kits bei ng assemb led usin g cu rrent lots. labora tory will conduct a training session to periodic reviews to The lot numbers hand not been updated in preclude further incidents . ensure effective the form used to pre pare kit assemb ly train ing . instructions . 5 For test method 82608, the analyst did not In order to ensure that all records are being Supervisor have been 26 -No v-08 record any information in the manua l run log reconstructed accurately , all run logs are to assigned the task to until the analysis and processing of the be completed by each analyst as the action monitor the batch is complete. This failure to record is being performed . A training meeting was performance of the activities at the time the activity is performed he ld on 11/26/08 to notify ana lysts of this analyst and to ta ke can result in the inabil ity to accurately change . T he superv isor is to constantly immediate correcti ve reconstruct the history of the activity . monitor the performance of the analysts to action when ensure this is being done on a · · basis . necessary. Means to Document Corrective Action(s) Attachment # No Further Action No Furthe r Action The re vised form has been pl aced in the sample receiving area for immediate Attachment #1 use . The laboratory will provide a co py of the training record . Attachment #2 A copy of the training reco rd . Attachme nt #3 -· I NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC ) Audit Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Finding# Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date 6 The laboratory did not record data for th e The instrument records calibration data in a The logbooks will 11-Dec-08 calibration for nitrite. The calibration permanent file and the laboratory retains an receive regular information for 10/6/08 was not recorded. electronic copy of those file for review. reviews by the However , the written record will be recorded supervisor . in analyzer laboratory notebook in the set-up run prior to performing the analysis . 7 The laboratory did not record the The laboratory shall document preparation in The logbooks will 11-Dec-08 preparation of the dilution water batches for the prepbook and record corresponding ID in receive regular the BOD test. the BOD logbook reviews by the supervisor. 8 The laboratory did not record the identity of Matri x spikes are being identified on all the The logbooks wi ll 11-Dec-08 the matrix spike solution in the cyanide run runs since Nov . 2008. receive regular log noted on most recent entries . reviews by the supervisor. 9 The laboratory did not record the identity of The laboratory shall document preparation The logbooks will 11-Dec-08 the solution used to determine MDLs for the the of MDL solution in the appropriate receive regular phenol test. laboratory notebook . reviews by the supervisor . 10 The laboratory did not record the identity of The Aqueous laboratory notebook form was Form has been 19-Dec-08 the potassium Persulfate solution used to revised to include the lot ID for the revised and new determine mercury using EPA 245.1 and Potassium Persulfate solution . Currently, the laboratory notebook SW 846 7470/7471 . use of Potassium Persulfate is not required has been issued . for method 7471. 11 The laboratory did not document the The laboratory has created a logbook to Permanent Form has 3-Nov-08 preparation of the standards used for the record the minerals used for calibration . been created and calibration of the minerals (K , Na, Mg , Ca) added to the by ICP . Department Form Directory . Internal Assessments will verify its use. 12 The laboratory did not fully document the The laboratory has created a logbook to Permanent Form has 19-Dec-08 preparation of the calibration standards for record the preparation of samples for the been created and SW 846 Method 8011 determinations . SW 846 Method 8011 determination. added to the Diluent and final volumes were not recorded . Department Form Directory. Internal Assessments will verify its use . Means to Document Corrective Action(s) Attachment # Copies of instrument log , calibration curve, preparation of calib . Stock , LCS , !CV , Attachment #4 CCV. Copies of preparation and the analysis run . Attachment #5 Copies of analysis run . Attachment #6 Copies of distillation and prep log. Attachment #7 Copy of prep logs. Attachment #8 Copy of standard prep log Attachment #9 Copy of prep logs . Attachment #1 O ) 2 Find ing# 13 14 15 NELAC Aud it Summary-Accutest Laboratorie s Gu lf C oast (A LGC) A u d it Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date The laboratory did not maintain records of The laboratory shall provide c lient The laboratory will 24-Dec-08 written notifications to clients concerning the notifications via email concerning the conduct a train ing laboratory's intention to subcontract work . laboratory's intent to subcontract work . sessions for responsible parties and copies of subcontract notification s hall be placed in client group files . The laboratory did not maintain records of There was miscommunication relative lo this At all practicable 19-Dec-08 subcontracting arrangements to document findings , because the laboratory does opportunities the compliance under NELAC section 5.4 .5 .1. maintain a list of subcontractors and laboratory will solicit The laboratory SOP requires records that associated information are maintained on file the required are not maintained. Those records required at the laboratory . There are some information prior by the laboratory SOP and not maintained subcontractors that have not provided the project reward to include :1. A valid certification to perform the associated information; however, prior to the subcontract requested analysis. 2. A copy of the audit , letters to those laboratories were laborato ry . laboratory's qua lity assurance plan 3 . alread y in transit. Cop ies of t hose lette r are Copies of SOPs used for the subcontracted also available and on file . analysis . 4 . A copy of the most recent performance evaluation study for the subcontracted parameter . 5 . Copies of the most recent regulatory agency or third party accreditor (sic) audit report. The laboratory did not document its The laboratory shall review and revised Annual review of 24-Dec-08 purchasing procedures . The existing SOP purchasing SOP to reflect laboratory current SOPs shou ld p reclude for purchasing is outdated and does not practices . identify outdated reflect current practice used to procure procedures . materials for use in the laboratory . Means to Doc ument Corrective Action(s) Attachment # The laboratory will provide a copy of the training rec o rd . Attachment #11 Subcontractors List , Request for Info rmati o n Letters, and Letters of Response from Subco ntract Laborato ries . Attachment #12 Revised SOP . Attachment #13 3 Finding# 16 17 18 19 20 NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC ) Aud it Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date The laboratory did not perform an annual There was miscommunication relative to this Quality Assessment 12-Jan-09 quality systems audit in 2007 . The findings . The Corporate QA Manager stated audit will be conducted corporate QA manager conducted an that the annual quality systems assessment annually. assessment , but it was made clear to the could not be used as the annual assessors by the corporate QA Manager management review . The quality system that this was not intended to serve as the assessment is part of the annual annual quality systems audit. To date the management review and should be included 2008 annual audit has also not been when management performs the annual performed . evaluation of the laboratory . The laboratory adopted this report due to the fact that it was based on our Quality System Manual. Formal meetings were conducted to address areas of concerns . Moreover , the laboratory will conduct an independent assessment annually. The laboratory's quality systems document Section 17 .8 of the Laboratory's QSM N/A 21-Dec-08 fail to address management review specifies requirement for management requirements. review . The laboratory did not perform an annual Aspects of the Quality System Assessment Management Reviews 14-Jan-09 management review for 2007 . and Management Review will be comb ined to will be scheduled most effectively carry out both functions . annually to fulfill the requirements . Quality system documents do not address Where appropriate monitoring details may be Before corrective 09-Dec-08 the monitoring of corrective actions to added ot the Corrective Action Report , in the actions are closed out, evaluate their effectiveness . A review of comment section . In addition , monitoring monitoring information corrective action reports also indicate no effectiveness are done through data will placed in the follow-up monitoring occurred after the monitoring and/or internal assessments . Corrective Action corrective actions were implemented . Report . The laboratory did not validate modification The laboratory has acquired a water bath to Revision of the SOP 1/14/2009 of reference methods . The laboratory evaporate hexane and an oven to dry @70 and implementation employs an overnight room temperature degrees . The DOC is in progress as well as method prescribe solvent evaporation technique in place of revision of the SOP . procedures should the distillation technique prescribed in EA preclude re- Method 1664 . The technique prescribes in occurrence . the reference method is designed to remove the solvent in less than 30 minutes rather than through an overnight process . ) ) Means to Document Corrective Action( s) Attachment# The laboratory will forward 2008 Quality Assessment. Attachment #14 Provide Copy of QSM Section . Attachment #15 Laboratory will forward minutes from the review . Attachment #16 The laboratory will provide recent closed Corrective Actions Reports . Attachment #17 The laboratory will forward DOC and revised SOP . Attachment #18 ) 4 Finding# 21 22 23 24 25 26 NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC) Audit Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date The laboratory did not require additional Prior to the assessment the failed analytes Missed DOCs will be 12/19/2008 action when one or more analytes fail to were acknowledge and corrective measures placed in the meet acceptance criteria for the were documented on the bottom of the DOC corrective action demonstration of capability (DOC) For report . program as well as Method 8270C in a solid and chemical documented on each matrix , an analyst did not meet the precision individual DOC criteria for three analytes. No re-analysis or Reports . corrective action was documented . The laboratory did not include the method Analysis methods are traceab le to specific N/A 12/9/2008 SOP identity on the demonstration of SOPs . Which are also indexed in our Quality caoability form . System Manual. The laboratory did not require the approval The supervisor in this case, continually IDOCs are going to 12/9/2008 of analyst demonstration of capability prior signed off on the analyst work in question . initiated and to the analyst performing tests . An analysts Nevertheless , the laboratory has to be more communicated to the performed DOCs on 7/28/08 , 8/1/08 , 8/2/08, diligent in timely completion of documenting QA Department via and 8/5/08 . The DOC was approved by the IDOC for new employees . individual laboratories . Technical Director and Quality Assurance Officer on 10/20/08 . Records indicate the analyst performed analyses prior to 10/20/08 . The laboratory did not send a copy of Laboratory acknowledges this lapse and will The laboratory will 12/9/2008 corrective action investigations associated provide the TCEQ with corrective action and forward corrective with proficiency testing failures to the TCEQ . forward all studies conducted this year and action from each PT consistently thereafter. study. The laboratory did not consistently initiate Once the lapse was identified , the laboratory Corrective action will 12/9/2008 corrective action for PT study failures . issued a corrective action and has since be initiated Corrective action were not initiated for reviewed and identified the source of the immediately after the failures associate with the Soil Study 62 . problem . receipt of the final report . The SOP for Method 200 .7 cites the 1993 SOP has been revised to reference the Annual review of 12/23/2008 version of the reference method rather than correct method . SOPs should preclude version 4.4 dated 1994 . and identify outdated procedures . Means to Document Corrective Action(s) Attachment # The laboratory will forward copies of original DOC and Re- assessed DOC . Attachment #19 N/A Copies of signed notebook pages . Attachment #20 Forward copies of Corrective actions Attachment #21 from this year studies . Copy of the corrective action. Attachment #22 Copy of revised SOP . Attachment #23 5 Finding# 27 28 29 30 31 32 NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC) Audit Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date The laboratory did not maintain SOPs that All SOP revisions will be made on the All revisions are 12/10/2008 accurately reflect laboratory activities. The computer with tracking so that each completed SOP for Method 624 requires checking the necessary change is made immediately by electronically . samples for residual chlorine. In practice , the supervisor. This system is more efficient the laboratory does not implement this than writing each change down on paper, requirement. and it reduces the chance that a necess a ry revision is overlooked , as the person reviewing the SOP is making the change as he or she deems necessary . The SOP for ammonia did not describe how Revise SOP to include process of Annual review of 12/21/2008 to dechlorinate the sample prior to analysis . dechlorination. SOPs should preclude identify and outdated procedures . The SOPs for nitrite , nitrate, cyanide , and Revise SOP to include concentration of Annual review of 12/21/2008 phenols, by discrete analyzer did not include Calibration standards . SOPs should preclude procedures for preparing calibration identify and outdated standards and the required concentration of procedures. the resultinq standards . The SOP for phenols did not provide Revise SOP to include acceptance criteria . Annual review of 12/21/2008 consistent acceptance criteria . Section 13 .0 SOPs should preclude contains acceptance criteria that conflicts identify and outdated with those in the attachment example . procedures . The SOP for Total Dissolved Solids does not Revise SOP to include overnight drying Annual review of 12/21/2008 describe the use of overnight drying @180deg .C +/-2deg. C . SOPs should preclude procedures . identify and outdated procedures. Records for balance S/N 73179 and for Logs will be reissued and revised to As new weight sets 12/21/2008 weight set did not identify the balance accurately refl ect the proper Serial Numbers are utilized their Serial correctly . The records contained different and Weight Set Ids . Numbers will be serial numbers for the balance and the added to the Weight weights than those which were in use. Set I Os for each laboratory . Means to Document Corrective Action( s) Attachment # Copy of revised SOP . Attachment #24 Copy of revised SOP. Attachment #25 Copy of revised SOP . Attachment #26, 27, 28 , & 29 Copy of revised SOP . Attachment #29, Copy of revised SOP . Attachment #30 Copy of the new log and Weight Set Directory. Attachment #31 .) 6 Finding# 33 34 35 36 NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC) Aud it Performed : Octo ber 29-30, 2008 Aud it Report:November 2 0, 2008 Corrective Action( s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Findinq to Prevent Recurrence Date The Thermometer Calibration Logbook Thermometer Record Log has been revised Entry of this 12/21/2008 shows incorrect status for two thermometers to include an area that will allow and show information into a in service in the laboratory . Thermometers the activity of a thermometer within the database system will #92 and #113 , in use in the sample laboratory. allow for regular receiving areas , have a status of "not in use" reports to be and no entry , respectively. generated to compare with written logs to keep status current The temperature monitoring logs for "Ove n Oven IDs were corrected imm ediately during Laboratories will be 1/1/2008 1" and "Oven 2" located in the Organic the assessment. required to input the Preparation area were switched at some required information point. Temperatures for oven 1 were on temperature recorded on the log on for oven 2 and vice monitoring logs versa . ensuring a verification of correct thermometer to appropriate sheet. The laboratory d id not assure the use of Al l non Class A volumetric were dis carded Through instructions 11/3/2008 C lass A vo lumetric glassware or to calibrate and ne w Class A vo lumetric were ordered in and assessment all any non-class A vo lumetric ware. their place . non-Class A Calibration standards in use in the ICP area volumetric , where were prepared in non-Class A volumetric appropriate, will be flask. replaced with Class A. The laboratory did not record the information The laboratory will record all the MDL prep of The logbooks will 12/15/2008 to document traceabil ity of the standards all the upcom ing phenol test as well as receive regu lar used for the determination of the MDLs for identity of the L CS associated with the run . reviews by the the pheno l tes t and for the batch LCS for the supervisor . determination of the MD Ls fo r the aqueous matrix. The laboratory record s did not contain the identity of the standard used to prepare the samples for determination of the M DL for phenol and did not contain the iden t ity of th e standard used to prepare the LCS associated wi t h the batch contain ing the MD L samples. Means to Document Corrective Action( s) Attachment# Copy of the new lo g . Attachment #32 No Further Action No Further Action No Further Action / 7 Finding# 37 38 39 40 41 NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC ) Audit Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date The laboratory did not place required There were a few occurrences found during Supervisor oversight, 12/21/2008 information on labe ls of original containers our assessment. Since than , laboratory staff training, and of reagent. The laboratory did not label neat has been instructed to properly label neat assessments shall reagent with expiration dates . reagents. Focused basic QA Training will be preclude further provided based on the imp lementation of a incidents . corporate training module which will emphasize this requirement Labels on the alkaline azide and Measuring bottles for alkaline azide and Supervisor oversight, 12/15/2008 manganese (11) solutions used for Winkler manganese solutions were cleaned and training, and titration contained no preparation or properly labeled and identified . assessments shall expiration dates or link to the information . preclude further Similarly , the labels for the potassium incidents . permanganate and potassium Persulfate solutions used for mercury determination contained no expiration date . The laboratory did not record the Focused basic QA Training will be provided Supervisor oversight , 1/14/2009 preparation of preservative solutions used in based on the implementation of a corporate training , and sampling kits . training module which will emphasize this assessments shall requirement. preclude further incidents. The laboratory has did not establish Currently , The laboratory contacted the N/A 12/22/2008 acceptance criteria for the end of run CCV TCEQ to determinate the appropriateness of for Method 8260B required for TCEQ this requirement and awaiting a decision . contract samples . Until a determination , the laboratory will cease analyzing an ending CCV . As a result of corrective action to finding of Since the audit , the laboratory has obtained Revision of the SOP 1/14/2009 the Florida DOH in 2004 , the laboratory the necessary equipment to perform the and implementation changed the hexane distillation step in distillation st ep at 70 deg . C +/-1 deg . C . method prescribe Method 1664 from incorrect 60 dg . C to an procedures should overnight hood evaporation at room prec lude re- temperature . The reference method occurrence . requires the removal of hexane at 70 deg . C +/-1dPn C Means to Document Corrective Action(s) Attachment # N/A No Further Action The laboratory will provide a copy of the training record . Attachment #33 To be Determined The laboratory will forward DOC and revised SOP . Attachment #34 ) 8 Finding# 42 43 44 45 46 NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (A LGC ) Aud it Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Action (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date For the BOD batches on 9/25/08 and The laboratory discards and prepares fresh Supervisor oversight, 12/11/2008 10/17/08 , the laboratory did not discard the dilution water weekly or as necessary . training, and dilution water and quality data as a result of Cause for high dilution blanks was assessments shall the analysis of dilution water. Th e analysis investigated . The laboratory has since preclude further of dilution water gave results of 0 .91 mg/I conducted a training session based on SOP incidents . and 0 .90 mg/I respectively . TGN003-5 which details proper bottle cleaning, bottle storage , reporting and corrective action. The laboratory SOPs for ammonia, nitrate The laboratory has revised and trained Annual review of 12/22/2008 cyanide, and phenols did not require the employees on the Linear Dynamic Range SOPs should preclude performance of the linear dynamic range requirement. Linear Calibration Verification identify and outdated determination as required by the reference are on schedule to be performed . procedures . method. The laboratory SOPS for pheno ls did not Revise SOP to include acceptance criteria . Annual review of 12/22/2008 evaluate matrix impacts on the SOPs should preclude measurement or the precision of the identify and outdated measurement. The SOP requires the procedures . MS/MSD to be performed , but there are no acceptance criteria for the MS/MSD . The laboratory did not provide name , The Laboratory Director's signature signifies N/A 12/22/2008 function , and signature of the person the ultimate responsibility for the content of authorizing the test report . The laboratory the report . It also grants authority to the routinely issues test reports under the project management department to issue electronic signature of the Laboratory reports on his behalf, which uniquely Director after his approval of the final report . identifies the appropriate the Project However , in the absence of the Laboratory Managers. Director , test reports are issued by other staff members using the Laboratory Director's electronic signature. The laboratory did not provide reasons for The laboratory LIMS systems is being The laboratory will 1/14/2008 parameters that do not comply with all equipped to flag any analyte/parameter in continually update requirements of the NELAC standards . The which the laboratory does not have system to laboratory has reported data from analyses accreditation . appropriately reflect using SW 846 Method 8011 for which it analyte status . does not have accreditation, without identifying the accreditation status of the parameters . (Note : This practiced ceased June 30 , 2008. Means to Document Corrective Action( s) Attachment# Copies of BOD runs and Training form . Attachment #35 Copy of revised SOP . Copy of Verifications. Attachment #25, 27, 28, 29 & 38 Copy of revised SOP . Attachment #29, No Further Action An example copy of a report exhibiting such identifiers . Attachment #36 9 Finding# 47 NELAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC) Audit Performed : October 29-30, 2008 Audit Report:November 20, 2008 Corrective Action(s) Completion Issue Corrective Act io n (s) to Address Finding to Prevent Recurrence Date The SOP for Method 8260B indi cates th e The SOP was rev ised to reflect current Annual rev iew of 12/22/2008 acceptance criteria for th e CCCs for the ICV laboratory pra cti ce . SOPs should preclude and the CCV are <30 % and <20% identify and outdated respe ctively . In practi ce <15 % is used for all procedures . ana lytes . Means to Document Corrective Action(s) Attachment # Copy of revised SOP . Attachment # 24 & 37 -10 Finding# 22 27 4 0 42 45 NE LAC Audit Summary-Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC) Issue The la boratory did not includ e the method SOP identity on the demonstration of caoabilitv form . The laboratory d id not mainta in SOPs that accurate ly reflect laboratory activities. The SOP for Method 624 requires checking the samp les for residual chlorine . In practice , the laboratory does not implement this req uirement. The laboratory did not establish acceptance crite ria for the end of run CCV for Method 82606 required for TCEQ contract sa mpl es. For the BOD batches on 9/25/08 and 10/17 /08 , the laboratory d id not d iscard the dilution water and quality data as a result of the analysis of dilution water . The analysis of d ilution water gave results of 0 .91 mg/I and 0 .90 mg/I respectively . The laboratory did not provide name , function, and signature of the person authorizing the test report . The laboratory routinely issues test reports under the e lectronic s ignature of t he Laboratory D irector after his approval of the final report. However, in the absence of the Laboratory Director, test reports are issued by other staff members using the Laboratory Director's electronic signature . Audit Performed: October 29-30, 2008 Audit Repo rt:November 20, 2008 (Amended Reponses) Corrective Action(s) Corrective Action (s ) to Add ress Findinq to Prevent The laboratory will record SOP indentity on Revise form to add the demonstration c apabil ity forms . SOP numbers . The SOP was revis ed to reflect current Annual rev iew of la bora tory practice . SOPs should preclude and identify outdated procedures . The laboratory will rev ise reports associated Revision of the SOP with EPA Method 8260B indicati ng ending and implementation CCVs were not run. In add ition , the of the prescribed laboratory has established and implemented procedures should acceptance c riteria of 2: 30 % for end ing CCV preclude re - for TCEQ contracted samples . occurrence . The laboratory discards and prepares fresh Supervisor oversight, d i lution water wee kly or as necessary. tra ining, and Cause for high dilu t ion blanks was assessments should investigated . The laboratory has since preclude further condu c ted a train ing session based on SOP incidents . TGN003-5 which details proper bottle cleaning, bottle sto rag e, reporting and corrective action . In addition , client reports were revised to includ e the qua lity control failure . The Laboratory Director's signature signifies Implementing letter of the ultimate responsibi li ty for the content of authorization the report . However, a Report Release Authorization will be included and paginated within each report in the absence of the Laboratory Dire ctor . Completion Date 28-Jan-09 10-Dec-08 06-Feb-09 30 -Jan-09 30-Jan-09 Means to Document Corrective Action(s) Attachment # Copy of the rev ised Attachment form #38 Copy of revised SOP & Training Documentation . Attachment #24 The laboratory will provide a copy of the revised SOP and Attachment training record . #37 & #39 Cop ies of BOD runs, sample copy of letter to client and Training form . Attachment #35 Copy of the R eport R elease Autho rization . Attachment #40 47 The SOP for Method 82608 indicates the The SOP was revised to reflect current Annual review of 02-Feb-09 Copy of the revised acceptance criteria for the CCCs for the ICV laboratory practice . S0Ps should report and training and the CCV are <30 % and <20 % preclude and identify documentation Attachment# respectively . In practice <15 % is used for all outdated procedures . 24 & 37 analytes . ' '~ Nicole D. Schiller Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 WatRTM Pollution Study Open Date: 01/18/10 Close Date: 03/04/10 Report Issued Date: 03/23/10 March 30 , 2010 Nicole D . Schiller Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 Enclosed is your final report for ERA 's WP-180 WatR ™Pol lution Proficiency Testing (PT) study . Your final report includes an evaluation of all results submitted by your laboratory to ERA . Data Evaluation Protocols: All analytes in ERA's WP-180 WatR ™Pollution Proficiency Testing study have been evaluated using the following tiered approach . If the analyte is listed in the most current National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NE LAC) PT Field of Testing tables , the evaluation was completed by comparing the reported result to the acceptance limits generated using the criteria contained in the NELAC FoPT tables . If t he analyte is not included in the NELAC FoPT tables , the reported result has been evaluated using the procedures outlined in ERA's Standard Operating Procedure for t he Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits (SOP 0260). Corrective Action Help : As part of your accreditation(s), you may be required to identify the root cause of any "Not Acceptable" resul ts , implement the necessary corrective actions , and then satisfy your PT requirements by participating in a Supplemental (QuiK ™ Response) or future ERA PT st udy . ERA's technical staff is availab le to help your laboratory resolve any technical issues that may be impairing your PT performance and possibly affecting your routine data quality . Our laboratory and technical staff have well over three hundred years of collective experience in performing the full range of env ironmental analyses . As part of our technical support, ERA offers QC samples that can be helpful in helping you work through your t echnical issues . Thank you for your participation in ERA's WP-180 WatR ™Pollution Proficiency Testing study. If you have any questions , please contact myself, or Curtis Wood , Director of Regulatory Affairs and Business Development, at 1-800-372-0122 . Sincerely , Shawn Kassner Proficiency Testing Manager attachments smk 6000 West 54th Ave., Arvada, CO 80002 Jay R. McBurney Quality Program Manager 800 -372-0122 fax (303) 421-0159 www.eraqc.com Report Recipient Contact/Phone Number Reporting Type Arkansas Jane Hurley/ 501-682-0938 All Analytes Florida Steve Arms/ 904-791-1502 All Analytes Kansas Lyndi Stout/ 785-296-3811 All Analytes Louisiana Paul Bergeron / 225-219-1244 All Analytes Oklahoma David Caldwell/ 405-702-1039 All Analytes Texas Max Phillips/ 512-239-3518 All Analytes Utah Kristin Brown/ 801-965-2540 All Analytes \ WP-180 Definitions & Study Discussion Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 WP Study Definitions The Reported Value is t he value that the laboratory reported to ERA. The ERA Assigned Values are compliant w ith the most current USEPA/NELAC FoPT tables . A pa rameter not added to the standard is given an Assigned Value of "O" per the guidelines contained in the USEPA's Criteria Document and NELAC standards . The Acceptance Limits are established per the crit eria contained in the most current USEPA/NELAC FoPT tables, or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits ™ as app licable . The Performance Evaluation : Acceptab le = Reported Value falls within the Acceptance Limits . Not Acceptable = Reported Value fa lls outside the Acceptance Limits . No Evaluation = Reported Value cannot be evaluated . Not Reported = No Va lue reported . The Method Description is the method the laboratory reported to ERA . Report Issued: 03/23/10 WP Study Discussion ERA's WP-180 WatR™Pollution Proficiency Testing study has been rev iewed by ERA senior management and certified compliant with the requirements of the USEPA's National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Studies Criteria Document (December 1998), and the criteria contained i n the most current NELAC FoPT tables . ERA's WP-180 WatR™Pollution study standards were examined for any anomalies . A full review of all homogeneity , stab ility and accuracy verification data was completed . All analytical verification data for all ana lytes met the acceptance criteria contained in the USEPA's National Criteria Document for Water Proficiency Testing Studies , December 1998, and the criteria contained in the most curre nt NELAC FoPT tab les . The data submitted by participating laboratories was also examined for study anomalies . There were no anomalies observed during the statistical review of the data . ERA's WP-180 WatR ™Pollution study reports shall not be reprodu ced except in their entirety and not w ithout the permission of the participating laboratories . The report must not be used by the participating laboratories to claim product endorsement by any agency of the U.S . government. The data contained herein are confidential and intended for your use only. If you have any questions or concerns regarding your assessment in ERA's WatR ™Pollution Proficiency Testing program, please contact Shawn Kassner , Proficiency Testing Manager, or Curtis Wood , Director of Regulatory Affairs and Business Development, at 1-800-372-0122 . Study: WP-180 ERA Customer Number: A116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 1 of 21 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0 . WP Minerals cat# 581 WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description 0027 ,A.l~ali _n~tV ?:' _c_a_cc_>3. . mgll 54 55.8 • ~~-5_-_6_3_. ! _ .. __ ~':c_eP!<:b}e, __ . _ .. !=.~~-3.1 o_.:. _ .. : :~~~;~ · ~~~~:t~~i;:~t ~2?~~::: ~:::: ~ ~:: : : : : : : : r ~~;~:;~~~: 1 :: ~ ttt ~ : : : : ;i-:::::: ::~r:~;r : _N:~~~:;1::rt: : : : : ;:::t~l:::: . ~02J __ ,F~ue:r~d~-. ____ .. _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . __ .. 1. _ . _";QI~._ _ . _ 1:~ ____ . _ ~ .4? ____ : :1_6_ •. ~-!~. _ --~<:c_epta_bJe, _ . . _ ~F.'!\_ 3.~o_.?. __ . -~02_6_. P_o_t~ss(u_ri;. __ • __ . . __ . _.. . ___ . ____ • ~ _ ";QI~ __ J_ _ ??·3_ _ ~~-~--.. _ ]~:\5_-_ ~2_.~ ____ A<:c~P!<:b}e,. . • ~~.L\ __ 6_0_19~. . . --6·~!~-1 ::,~:; -· ---· · -· · ----.. 1--::;t--·I··· -;;-~-· -· · ~l .: · -I · ~::~ :-~}:t -L~-~::~l:~l:1e 1-· -::-~i:r · -· _ ~0_2_1 _ · j ot~I :~i ~~~J':e_d_ ~C!lid_s a_t _1 ~9 ·'? _ . _ : : _ : : · . : : :~~I~-_ : I. ~ : ?!~ · · · · ?7? , _ ... : 2:0~: -_3-4:1: : : : : ~~~ep!~~~ : : : _ : : :s:~ii~o:~ . • · · 1950 Total Solids at 105°C mgll 263 283 243 -319 Acceptable SM2540B WP Minerals (cat# 581) . "66{~ -;~1~ 1 ;~~ ?: :C:a:c:3.::::: :·::.::::: .. -.:.:;_~_ -. II:. --~~\ .. : : i::;-: -_ ;;:::_)!j : ·I· ~:;~;:~;~;ii~:: :s~;E;~J1;f ~I~-. . _ ~0_2_9_ ~o_n_du?~~ity_':t _2?~'?. __ . _ . _ . __ . _ .. _ . . . _ . Y.m.h.~sj~~ ... ~?? .. _ _ . ~?~ _ .... _36_5_ •. ~5_1_ . J _ .A.<:c_ept<:bJe, _ _ • _ . E~~-'. ~0_.1 \...,. 0.0_2_9 __ f.11.!<:r~d~-..•.. _ . __ . _ ...... __ . . .. .. ___ ._.I. ___ ri;QI _L __ .. I . __ 1? __ .. _ . ~ .4?_ .... _ 1 _1_6 -_ ~-!! _ .... :~~c_e?!<:b_le, _ ..• _ .8.~~5.ooF_-_c _ •.. _0.0_2?_. ~o_t~~s~~": .... __ . _ ... ____ ..• ___ ..• _. __ . ___ m.9.IL _ .. _ .. _ ?2.}_ ...... _ ~~-~-_ ... J~.5._-_2_2_-~ _ .. _ -~<:c_ep!a_bJe . ____ ~~~-2.0.0_-! _ .. _ 0025 Sodium mgll 71 .600 71 .9 61.0 • 82.4 _ .A.<:c_eP!<:bJe. •. __ .. _ !=~~-2.0.0.-! _ 0.0.30 .. s~it;te .. -. . --.......... .-. . -... --• . -~~IL .. .. -73_7 --r . 19 .6-. . 15.2 -23 .5 .. _N_o_t A_ cc_ e __ i:ita_ b __ l_e_ SM4500S04-D .. 002'1 .. T-oi~I -Di;;o·l;e·d S~lid-~ -~t 1 BO ~C -............ r . -~~IL ....... --271 .. · r -272 -.. .. 203 -341 .. ~c_c_e_p_ta_b_le_ . . ..•. EPA-160.1 ••.. -1-950-.Tot~I s;iict~ ;; 1os·c· ... -... -. -.. -. --. -. r .. --~~;L· --.. -263 --r · 283 ... -.243 ·--31 ·9--.. Acceptable . EPA 160-.3 . WP Hardness (cat# 580) _ : ~-.1 _ -.. ~7_.~ _ . _ • A.<:c_ep!a_bJe. . . • . !=~~-2.0.D_-! ___ _ .. _8~:8_: ! O.~ __ ... A.~c_ep!a.ble, __ . _ , .. 8.~2.~~0_B_ ..... 156 13 7 -178 Acceptable SM2340C WP Hardness (cat# 580) .• C!.0_2_4_. -~~Q_n_e_s~u_n:i ___ ..... __ ••..• _ ..•.. _ .•...• __ .. ___ m.9-1~-..... __ ~5.} ...... _ ~5.-~-.... _ ]~·.1.·_1_7_.~ _ .... ~<:c_eP!<:bJe, __ . ___ ~F='.L\_6_0_1?~ .• __ .. ~5_5_0_ .. ~aJ~i~':1 .f:!~r9~~~~ ~~ ~'.3~?_3_ •... __ .. __ . _ .... _0;9.I~-_ •. _ .. _. _ .. _ ..• _ ~~-) ..... _8?:8.: !0.~ _ .. _ t:,J9t_ f3~e~~e,d __ . _ ••• __ •• _. _. _ •. 0022 Total Hardness as CaC03 mgll 152 156 137-178 Acceptable EPA 130.2 s.u. 7.22 7.24 7.04 • 7.44 Acceptable EPA150.1 s.u. 7.22 7.24 7.04 -7.44 Acceptable SM4500H+ B S.U . 7.22 7.24 7.04 -7.44 Acceptable EPA 9040B Page 2 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA 's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 WP-180 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Simple Nutrients (cat# 584) WP Simple Nutrients (cat# 584) WP Com lex Nutrients cat# 579 0035 Total phosphorus as P WP Com lex Nutrients cat# 579 Units mg /L EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 03/23/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Assigned Value Value 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description EPA 350.1 . .1!·.1 -.2.6_.~ ...... t:-c.c.ep(a_bJe. .. _. ___ ~_P!',_ 3.5_3_.~ .. __ 2.43 -3.55 Acceptable EPA 365.2 . ~ 0.-!. _ ..... ? ~93 .. -. ~ 3_.3. _" .. ~?~ '3~e°.rte.d_ ...... __ • _. __ ....• ?1.·~-. _ ]!·_8_-_2.5_.~. ·-. ~?t '3 ~P.C>~ed_. 1.5 21 . 9 • 1 ! ._1. -. 2.6_.~ __ . N?t. '3~P.°.~E:d_ . _ . _ _ .... _ .. 2.98 1.39 2.43 -3.55 5.37 -10 .5 1.09-1 .74 Acceptable __ A.c.c_ep!a_bJe, __ .. Acceptab le SM4500P E EP A351 .2 EPA 365 .2 . _ D_D_3:4 _ T_o!~I _Kje.l~a~l .t-!i~r?ge.~ •... _ . _ .... __ • ____ .. _ . ___ fT_lQI~-_ .. ___ 7~3. .. __ . _ . ~·!J? _ ?}7_ -_ 1_0_.~ __ . __ A.c.c.ep!a_ble, ...... -~~~~0.0.t-!f:!3. s; __ 0035 Total phosphorus as P mg/L 1.5 1.39 1.09-1.74 Acceptab le SM45 00 P E WP Nitrite cat# 888 1840 Nitrite as N mg/L 2.1 2.11 1.77-2.45 Acceptab le EPA 353 .2 WP Demand (cat# 578) . _o.o_3_8 ___ B_O.I? _ .• _. __ • _______ ... ____ . __ . _ ... ____ .. m.~i~. __ . __ ?~·~-_ .. _. ?5 .3 __ ..• 3_8 :0.: !:3. ... _ .A.c.c_ep!a_bJe. .. _ SM5210B . _D_1()_2 _<:.~C?'?. ____ . __ ... __ . .. . __ ... _. __ .. __ ..... _. _rr_iQ/~-_ _ ... ?0.·:4 . _ .... ~4 .8 • _2J:1 -_ !0.0.. _ .. _Accep!a_ble. _ .... __ .~M.~2.1_0_B_ .. _. _ . _ o_o_3_6 __ C~C?I?. __ . ___ . _ _ .. ________ . _ .. _ . _ .. _ ... __ .n:.19.'~-_ . __ . .1 ~ ~ ___ . __ .1 ?? ______ 9.2:0.: ! ~ ~ . A.c.cep!a_bJe, _ . __ . __ S_M.~~2()~ __ .. 0037 TOG mg /L 46 .7 48 .2 40.2 -55 .6 Acceptable SM5310C WP Demand (cat# 578) 0038 BOD .. ____ .. _________ . _ .. __ n;9.I~ _ .. _ . _ . ?~·:4 __ .. _ .. ?~·~ __ ..... _3_8 :0.: ! 1. 3. . _ ... _ ~c.c_ep!a_bJe, . _ . _ ... ~_P !\_ ~0.5_: '. __ ... . . _ o_1 _0:2 C:.~<?i? .. _ .... ___ .. __ . _ . ___ .. ___ .. __ . _ ... _ . _fT_lQI~. __ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ •.. ~~-_8 . __ .... :2~: 1_: ! 0.D_ .. _. _ ~?~ f3~P.°.~E:d_ _ _ _ .... __ . _ ..... . __ o_o_3_6 __ C:.C?I? ______ .. ____ . ______ . ____ . ____ . _ ... __ n;9.t~. __ 118 122 92 .0 -141 _ ..• A.c.c_ep)a_bJE: . __ . _ .. ~.P~ .. ~ 1_0_.1 _ •.. 0037 TOG mg/L 46.7 48 .2 40 .2-55 .6 Acceptable EPA 9060A WP Demand (cat# 578) __ o_o_3_8_ 8.0.C?. _. ______ . _________ . ___ . _____ ... _ . _m,9.1~. _ ... _ • _ . __ !~}--. __ 3.8:0.: ! '. 3. . ___ ~?~ '3~P.°.~E:d_ _ _ •. ___ • ___ ..... _ . _o_1._0_2_ .C:.~<?I? ... ___ . ___ ... _. __ . _ ... _ .. __ . __ .... _ .m.9.'~-_ ..... ___ .. _ .... __ ~~-.8 ....... _2~:1.: !0.0. _ .... ~?~ '3~P.°.~E:d. _. __ . __ ..• ____ ... __ . _D_D_3_6_. C:.0.1?. __ .... ___ . ______ . _____ ... __ ... _ . ___ m,9.I~-.. _ . _ ... __ .... _ ]?? _ ... __ 9:2 :D_ :_ !~~ .. ___ ~?~ '3~P.°.~E:d ____ •• __ . __ ... ____ . 0037 TOG mg/L 46 . 7 48 .2 40 .2 -55 .6 Acceptable EPA 41 5.1 WP Oil & Grease cat# 582 0104 ~i~ ~ -~r~~~E: t~ra~i_fl2E:t~i~) .. __ • __ •.. ______ ..... __ n;9.IL __ .. 54 .8 1860 Oil & Grease (Infrared) mg/L Page 3 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code: 1539-01 45 .0 28.3 -55 .5 55 .4 36.4 -67 .0 _ . A.c.c_ep!a_b!e. • _ Not Reported EPA 1664A Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Trace Metals (cat# 586) 0001 Aluminum . _D_0_1_6_. f\n_ti~o_ny __ ... WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description .. ______ µµ __ .9g ____ //LL __ -.. ·.· .. _ .. __ ·.·.1_~4!_5 2 . ___ o_. -. ·_'r ._ .... 1.-~4?_1?_0 __ -. -.. · 11 _5_0 -_ 1_ 6_6_0_. . . ':'C.G_ep!a_b}E: __ . _ .. _ ~P.A. _6_0_19~ .. _3_1~---~52 . _A.c,c_eptc:b}E: _ ...... ~P.A._6_0_19~ . . -~o_o~-. ~r~e.~i~ _______ .• _. ___ .. _ ....... ___ .. _ ... __ .. ~9!~ ___ ... _ ??? .. _ .... ?!~ __ .. __ 2_2_6_-.. ~2_1 __ .. __ A.c,c_ep!a_blE: _ •. __ . E':'A._69_19~-.... . 1015 Barium . _ ~o_o~_ . -~e_l)'I~~~ ____ ... _ . __ .. . ___ .. _ .. _ . _ . . ~g/~ _ _ _ ... _ } ?? _ ..... _ . ] ?g _ .. _ .. _ 1_0_1 _ -_ 1_~6 . _ . _ . A.c,c_ep!c:b]E: ...... __ ~P.A. _69 _19~ __ . _ __ 1_0_2_5 .. ~o:<?~ _. ___ .. __ ... __ .. __ .. _. ____ . _. __ .. _ .. yg}~ .... __ 1_4.4.0_ .... __ 16_0_0 ___ 1_3_0_0_-_1_8_6_0 __ .. _A.c,c~p!a_b]E:. _. _. _ ~P.J.'.6_019~-__ _ 0004 Cadmium µg/L 553 .... _ . ~?~ _ .. . . . 4_7~. -. 6_2_8 .. _ ... A.cc_ep_ta _blE: __ .. _ • ~':'I:\ .. 6_019~. __ . _o_o_0_6_. ~h_r<:>rniu_~ --. -.. ---. -. --.. --..... -..... ---..... ~~/~ --. . . ~~~ --.. --~~~. ---_7 _0_9_-_9_1_.9. ..... :~c.c_ep\1:b!e .. -. -... ~P.A..6?_19~ .. -.. . 0005 Cobalt -~g/~--_. _. 7??. ___ ... !14 . _ .. __ 6_5_4_--~3_4_ .... _ _.~cceptab le ..... __ ~PA _6_0_19~ .... . 0014 Vanadium ~••-~-~ ... ~-~ •·•-~~~-----~-w ~~"·•···-••·•·•--- 0015 Zinc µg/L 357 331 283 -384 Acceptable EPA 6010B Page 4 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code: 1539-01 WP-180 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: ERA Customer Number: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 ANnal. Analyte 0. Units Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description WP Trace Metals (cat# 586) 0001 Aluminum EPA 200.7 . -. -. . . -Y9!~ ---'1 . 14_50_ -.. __ 1_4_ 1_0_ .. . _qo_1_6 __ An_ti:11o_ny _. _. _ .. __ • _ .•.•. ___ • _ .. _ • __ . __ y9}~. _ ... 4!? _ .. _ ~?~ _ ... __ 3_1_9-_5_5_2 __ •. _ .A.e:c_ep!a_b_le __ .•... !=!"_A.2.0_o_.7. __ .. 0002 A_r~e.ni~ .. ______ . ___ •. _ ... _ .. _. .. _ .... __ -~9/~ _. _ .•• ??~. _ .... ?7~ ..... ___ 2_2_6_ -_ 3_2_1 _ .. .A.e:c_ep\a_bJE: _ •. ___ !=!".A_ 2.qo_.7_ . _ •. . . ~0 _1_5_ . _B_a!i~:11 •• _ . __ .. __ .. • . .• ___ ... _ .•... y9!~ _. _ ... ~~~. _ ..... ~16 . _ _ . _2_7_4 -. 3_5_6 __ ..• _ ':'C.c _ep!a_b]8. __ . _ • _ !=!"_A_ 2.~o_.7. _ .... _ . _ o_o_o_3_ .. B_e_ry1~~n1 •. ___ . . _ ...•. _ ....• _ _ _ . . __ . ~9_1~. ___ .. _ : ?~ . _ ... __ : ?g _ . _ _ _ 1_0_1 -. ~ 3_6 __ .. __ A.c_c_ep!a_bJ8. _ .. _ •.• !=!"A_ 2.~o: 7. _ .. _ 1025 Boron µ9/L 1440 1600 -~3_00 __ ·_~8_60 _____ ':'c_c_ep!a_b!8... EPA 200.7 0004 ~a~-~i ~~: : : _ ~ .... · --·· · · • • .. · • ... • .. ·· : : : :~~/~::: [ '.: ~~j _: : : : 5~~: ..... _4_7_2_ -_ 6_2_8 ___ . __ A.c_c_ep !a_bJ8.. _ . _ : : E~~)O.O.-i ::: .. 0006 ~h!?~'.u_n, .... _ . _. ___ •• _ .. ___ .. _ _ _ _ . . _ -~9!~ _ . I._ . ~~~ _. _ ..... ~J~ _ . _ _7_09 _ _-__ ~1 _9_ .•.• _A.c_cep1a_b_l8. • _ EP_A _2.q0_.7_ .. __ . ~~~~ }:;~;~:: : : : : · : : : .. -: ·_:::::: : : -_.: :c:;~:: · t:: ;;; : : ~ ·:: ~;;-~_1-__ I _1_~_-:-_;_-_;_~·_o:_ ·_:_ ·_: __ ;_._; __ :_~:_-_:_:_:_:!_ -_-__ :i_ -_ :_ i_· .f. -_~_l_:_:_;_· ~--._:_ -__ · ~~~{-t::;;·· ............ ····· ··· --1----~:;t -···l··\\3 1°· I·· \\0 { 317-41 5 __ A.c_c_ep!a_blE:_ [ EPA 200.7 ~ ... ...:0 .. 0:;:1 .. ~N•i.:C:~k: 9 e~~l~~;:8-~-.::: ~:::: ~ ~: ~ ·: ~ ~ ~:::::: : : : j:f :. : : : ;;{ ~ J :: : ;;_t : . : t}J~i :: : )~::::1;:J:::: ~:: ;~~ ~~~f :: . _. __ .... _ .. _... . ________ . _ ..... ___ ... y9j~ _ .... __ '.~4_0 _ .... '.~80 __ .. _ 1_4_2_0_-_17_6_0_ _ A.c.c_ep!a_b]8.. ___ !=~_A_ 2.qo_.7. . _. 0013 Se len ium µ9/L .• -• _ '. 2_00 __ ... __ ~3_0_0_ • _. _1_C!_3_0_ -_ 1_5_0_0 __ . . A.c_cep!a_b~E: _ ..... _ E~.A .. 2.qo_.7_. _ .. _0_0_17 __ S_il~~r . ___ . __ ..• __ • __ ..... ____ . ___ . __ Y9!~. ____ ?91 ..... ?9~ .. _ .. __ 1_79_-_2.4_0. _ ..... ':'c_c_ep!a_bJE: __ . _. _ ~!"A_~o_o.7.. __ . -~0.7:5 __ S_tco_n!i~~-.... __ ...• _ ........ __ .• _____ ._ .... __ .~QI~._. __ ~g ._6 __ .... _ ~~? .... ??-_8_-_7_4_.~ .. __ ':'<:c~p!a_bJ8. .. _ ........ ~!"!\~qo_.7.. __ _ _ -~~1 _8_. T_h31!li~~ __ . _ ... _____ . _ ••. _ .... _ ...... _ ... _ .~9}~. _ ...... :5gg .. _ . 529 426 -635 .. __ A.c_c_ep!a_bJ8. . _ .... ~ .... --, .. -----.. -~-~ . _0_0_1~_ V_a_n319~u~ . _. _. _. __ .. ___ • __ ...... _. _. _ .•.. ):19}~ .. _ .6~1 -. _ 664 582 -743 .. _ ':'c_c_ep!a_bJ~ __ . ·~ ....... '" --. -.. ~ -.. -.. -~ -.. -. 0015 Zinc µ9/L 357 331 283 -384 Acceptab le WP Mercur cat# 57 4 0009 Mercury µ9/L 7.8 10 .6 6.53 -14.4 Acceptable WP Mercur cat# 57 4 0009 Mercury µ9/L 7.8 10 .6 6.53 -14.4 Acceptable WP Hexavalent Chromium cat# 898 1045 He xav alent Chromium µ9/L 287 320 258 -378 Acceptable WP Hexavalent Chromium cat# 898 1045 He xa valent Chromium µ9/L 287 320 258 • 378 Acceptable WP Tin & Titanium cat# 573 ... ~ 1_7_5_ . TJ~ _ .. _ .. ___ • _ .. ____ • _ .... _ . _ . _ .. ____ • __ . ___ ~9!~ _ _ _ . _ .. ~~4_0_ ••. __ 2.4_6_0_ •.... 1_~4_0_ --2.9 _9_0 __ .. __ A.c_c_ep!a_bJ~ _ . 0076 Titan iu m µ9/L 279 256 220 -288 Acceptable WP Tin & Titanium cat# 573 _ ~ 1_7_5_ • TJ~ __ ... ______ . _____ . __ .. __ ... ____ . _ . _ . y9j~ _. _ • _ ~~4_0 __ •. _ .. ~46_0_ • _. _ ~ ~4~--_ 2.9_90_ _ _ • .i:-<:c_ep!~bJ~ _ • 0076 Titanium µ9/L 279 256 220 -288 Acceptable WP Turbidit cat# 893 2055 Turbidity NTU 6 .4 7.07 5 .91 -8.09 Acceptable Page 5 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 EPA 200.7 EPA200.7 EPA200 .7 EPA 7470A EPA 245.1 SM3500Cr B EPA 7196A EPA 6010B EPA 6010B EPA 200.7 EPA200 .7 EPA 180.1 WP-180 Final Com p lete Repo rt Nicole D . Schiller EPA ID: TX01484 Quality Assurance Officer ERA Customer Number: A116001 Accutest Gulf Coast Report Issued : 03/23/10 10165 Harwin Drive Study Dates : 01/18/10 · 03/04/10 Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 Anal. Analyte Un its Reported Assigned Acceptance Performance Method Description No . Value Value Limits Evaluation WP Total C anide cat# 588 007 1 Cya ni de , tota l mg/L 0.94 0 .920 0 .594 -1.24 Acceptable EPA 335.4 WP Total C anide cat# 588 00 71 Cya nide, total mg/L 0 .94 0 .920 0 .594 -1.24 Acceptable EPA 9012 WP Total Phenolics 4-AAP cat# 589 009 7 Ph enolic s , total mg /L 0 .22 0 .213 0 .110 -0 .316 Acceptab le EPA 420.4 WP Sulfide cat# 891 20 05 Sul fide mg/L 5 .0 7 .00 3.26 - 10 .0 Acceptable SM4500S2-F WP Sulfide cat# 891 2005 Su lfi de mg/L 5 .0 7 .00 3.26 -10.0 Acceptable EPA 376.1 WP Total Residual Chlorine cat# 587 0098 T~~Re~dual Ch ~rine mg/L 1.5 1.60 1.15 - 1.98 Acceptable SM4500C I G WP Total Residual Chlorine cat# 587 0098 To tal Residua l Chlorine mg/L 1.5 1.60 1.15 -1.98 Acceptable EP A 330 .5 Page 6 of 21 All analytes are in cluded in ERA's A2LA ac c redita ti on . Lab Cod e: 153 9-0 1 Study: WP-180 ERA Customer Number: A116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 7 of 21 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Volatiles (cat# 830) WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description _4_3_1_5_ . I\_C~!on_e_ .. _ ...... ___ . . .. _ ... ___ .. I ... y~/L .. _. , ..• ~ .:59 .. ___ ... g.99 _ _ ..... __ .. . l\~~-ep!a_bJ E: . _ .... ~P.A.-_8.2?9~ ... . 4320 l\_c~(~n_it~i (e_ ... _ . __ . _ .. . . . . _ ....... _ . 1 1 _ . _ y9j~ _ .. f __ ~ _10 .. _. __ g.99 . __ . _ ..... _ . _ ...... A.~c.ep!a_bJ~ _ .. .. ~P.~ _8_2_?9 ~ _ 4325 . A_c:°.l':!i_n __ .... _ _ _ . _ ...... __ ........... __ . _ . _ .. y9j~ .. _ . _ ~ _29 _ .. __ .. g.99 _ .... _ .. _ ........ _ .. _l\~c_ep!a_bJe .... ___ ~~~ _8_2_69~. 4340 A_c_f'>'.l<;>~i!r~~. ___ .. ____ .. __ .. __ . _. ___ [ _ .. _µ9!~. _ .... _ .. : _19 ___ .. _ g.oo __ .... _. _ .. _____ . _ _.~~c_epta_bJ~ ... __ . _ ~~~-8_2?9~. _ .. 0065 _B_e_nf':!~E: .... _ ...... __ . ___ .. _ . _ ......... _ I. .. YQI~ _ .. 1. _ .1~-~. _ . _ ... 1~-: _ ... _ ?~--6_ -. ~1_.~ _ _ . _ l\~c_epta_bJE: ... _ ... ~p~ _8~_?0~. _ . _ ~~:~ ::~;;:f ~~::0 ~:~~~hA~':!:: : : : : · : : : : I : --~:t · · · I : : ;tr :: :': : : ;;:;: :: : · : ;t6)~): : : : .:~:.:;~::i: : : 1 : : : : ::.~ ::~;i;: : : .. 4950 Bromometh ane I µ9/L I < 2.0 28 .8 11 .5 -46.1 Not Acceptable EPA 8260B . >i4:1_ci": :~j~t~;?~~ (~~~i .: : .. : : : : : : : :-: : [:: -~~/~::: r:: ~a.~:::.::;~.~:: J ·: i;i-:i6): J:: ~~~ep!~bJ ~::.::: ~~~_aj~9~:::: : )~:~;: :;:r-;?ut~i;~~ji;~ ~::~r:(~T:B·E:): _ .. I:: :~~~t :.: I::-~:~~-... :)!~~-... : ::~1 :·:: 5 :·:: :: N::~:;1::rr:: ... : :;t:;;i;-::. _(!_0_5_8 __ (~a_r~°.~ ~e_t~a.c~lo:i~~ .... __ . _ . I ... µ9/~. __ ... 7.9·~-.. _. '?7.·?. _ ... ~?·.9·-~2_.Q ... _ -~c;c_ep!a_b l~ ... __ ~F'~_8_2?9B .... . . (!_0_6'.4 _. ~h_!°.r_o~~~~e_n_e_ .. _ .......... __ . _ ... l .. __ µ~/~. . . . . ~~? ......... ~7. ·? .. __ . ??·_8_-_46_.~. . . Acc_epta_bJe. ... __ . ~P.A _8_2?9~ .. _ . '-' : : ~~-:;: :. ~~:,~;;t~~~~r:::h:a:n:e: : . : : · : : ·: : : __ .. __ I _ .. _ ~:;~ .. .. : : )i·t: : _ · : : ii;: : _: : :5:~8 : ~ ~ :: : : · ·: )~~:;~::::: : : : : : :;~ :!:!;i :: : : . __ 4_5_09 _. 2:<?h.'.°~~e_t~}:'.l':'.i:1Y'~~h_e'. ........ _ .. _ .. _ ... _ ... I. __ J~9!~. _ .1. :'. 1_ o_.9 .. . .. g._o_o _ .. . . ...... __ . _ . . . 11.c_c_ep!a.b_l~ . . . _ . ~F'~ _8_2?9~ _ .. . 0055 C:h_lCl r_o!o!r:n. _ .............. _.... . . _ ..... -~:;t .. ·· I · ?!} . . . 20 .7 14.2-p_.7. ....• _11.c_c_ep(a_bJe. ... , . __ ~~~ _8_2_69~ ..... . . _ 4_9_69_ . ~h_!°.r_o,:n_et~a_ne_ .. _ .. ___ .. _ .... _ .. _ ......... _ . _ ...... 1 . _ . _ . __ . _ .. g._oo _ .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. A.~cep)a_bJ~ .. . . .. . ~~~ _8_2_69~ _ . __ . _4_5 _7_0 ____ 1.1 2.·!)!~r?':1.°:~-~h.lo ~~p rCJ~a_n_e_ (.~~~F')_ ... _ ...... ~9!~ __ .. _. ~ ?·.o __ ..... g.99 _ .......... _ ........... A.~c.ep!a_b!e. ... _ .... ~P.~_8_2?9 ~ .. . . _458_5_. _1~2.-P)~r_or:n_o~~h_a:1:l _(~!)_B) ....... __ .. µg/L < 2.0 _. 9.99 _ ..... _. _ ............. A.~c_ep!a_b!e __ . __ . ~F'~ _8_2_69~ .. _. ~~:: ~.i~~~:~,::::~:ene ..... -..... ~;IL .. · 1· -. ; 2 Cl .... _ g . .99 _ . _ . ___ ........ __ .. /\~c_ep!a_bJE: .... _ . ~F'~ _8_2_69~ _ . _ . : :io:9:6: <;.~j~h}~r~~~~~e:n~: ~:: ~: ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ :: : ~:::: : ~: :j~t ::: : : : :~:r : :: : : ~U :: :·:;it:::::::·: )~~:;f;:j::::::: ;;~}!;;::::: 0095 1,4-0ichlorobenzene µ9/L I 10.4 9.6 0 _ '9 ~9_7_ -_ 1_~ .. ~ .... _ 11.c_c_ep!a_b!e. . . EPA 8260B : :~6:2~:: ~i~~,~~o~(t1~9~~~~t~~;~ ~~r~?; :1ij :::: : ·::I::~~;!~::: [::: ·::::: : : ?-~9::: _ ............ _ ~?~ ~~~°.~E:d __ . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : }~;;: : -~ J~l~~;~~::;;~;: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : , : : : ~:t : : 1: : : ;; I : : : : : ;~ t : : . : f: :?: 11.:J : : : : : i~:::;f :~: : : · : : : :; ;::;;~:: : : - . _4_6_4_0 __ 12 1_-!)!c_hJ°.r?':!~hie_n:l __ ..... _. _. __ ............ _ _1:!9!~ .....•. : 2A ..... g . .99 _ . .,. _. _ ... _ .... __ l\~c_ep!a_b_!e. ...... ~F'~_8_2_69~. _ .. . . . 4_6_4_5_ . c~s~ ~ ,_2 :[?i~~l_o'.~e_t~}:'.IE:~e. .... _ .. _ ........ ___ .. _ .. y9j~ .. _ . _: ?·.o_ . _ ... 9 . .99 ___ .. __ .. _ •....... A.~c_ep!a_bJ~ .... __ ~P.~ _8_2_69~ _ . _ . _4_7 _0_0_ -~r_a_n?:1 .!~-?!~h)°.r.°~!hy le_n_e ___ ........ __ .. _ .. _. y9j~ .... , . : ?A ........ g._09 _. _. __ ...... ___ .. _ .A.~C:_ep!a_b!~ _ .. _. ~F'~_8_2~9~. _ .. . ::6_5_5_ . \2.-q!<:h~()r_op~opa~~. _ .. _ . _ . ___ . ___ .... _ .... ~9!~ ... , _ . ?5.·9 . _ . _ . ?1·?. . . _ : ?·.7. -. ~~-! _ _ .~c.c.ep!~b!~ .... __ ~F'~ _8_2?9~ ...... . 4680 cis-1,3-0ichloropropylene µ9/L 58.7 39.4 27 .6 -51 .2 Not Acceptable EPA 8260B Page 8 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o . WP Volatiles (cat# 830) (Continued) WP-180 Final Comp let e Report Un its EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued : TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates : 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performa nc e Evaluation Method Descr iption . _ 4.6_8_5_ . t~a_ns : 1.:~·.DJ~h}<??P~°.PY~e_n.e _ .. ___ ....•.... _ •... )i9!~. .. .. . ... ~ ?·.o ..... _ . ??·P ...... ~9-.5_ ·• 8.5: ! __ . _N_oJ '."'-.?~8.~t~1?1.e .. _ .. ~P. ~ _8_2?9~ . . _ qo_6_6_ . ~th.~11?e.~z_e n.e _______ ... _________ •.• _ . _ ... __ ~gj~. _ . . .. ] 91 ...... _ ?~·:3 ..• _ . _6_:i:~: ! ?q __ . _ . A.~c_ep!a_bl8. _ ... _ .. ~F:' ~ _8_2?9~ . _4_8_3_5 ___ H_e _x~.?~l?'.°.b_uJ~c!.i8.~8. __ . ____ .. __ .. __ ••.• _. __ -~gj~. __ . _ -~ ?~O-__ .. _ 9._09 __ ... ___ ... _ .. _. _ .. _ .A.~c_ep!a_~l8. __ . ___ ~f::'~_8_2?9~. __ EP A 8260 B • ---M .• --M --4 • -M - . _qo _6_3_ . ~e.t~y1.e~8. 9~19i:i~8. ........... __ ..... _ ...•...• yQI~ .... _ . ?! ._1 _ ... _ . ?1·~. .. . _ ! ?~o_ -_3_5_.~ .... _ . A.~cep!a_b_l8. ... ___ ~F:'~ _8_269~ ... _ . _4.9_9_5 __ 4_-~.e~hy(·?:P.e_!l!a_n_o!1.e (~]~~). _ .. _. _ ....• _ ..... _. -~9!~ .• _ .. _ ?~·.1. .... _ ~?-~ ..... _ J~.3--_~2_-!. __ -~~c_ep!abl8. _. EP A 826 0B __ 5_0_0_5 ___ N_ap_h!h_a_le.~e-_ . ______ ... __ . _ ... _ ...• __ .. _ _JJ.9!~ .• _ • _ ~ ?~0-_ •.. 9.99 . _ _ ..... _ ... __ .. _ ~~c_ep)a_bJ8. _ _ _ .. ~F:' ~ _8_~?9~. __ -~1 __ 09_ . .8.ttr.e~~ __ .... ___ ... _. _ ... ___ . .. _.-~QI~_ .... _ ?q·~-..... ?q ·~-.... _ ~?-_5_-_~8_.? ..... A.~c_ep\a_b!8.. _ EP A 8260 B . _ ~1_0_5_ .. 1~ ~. \2: '!'8.1'.~c_h!o _r?e.t~'.3~8. ... _ .. ___ . _ . _ .. _ . __ yQI~ __ .. . .1~-?. __ . _ .. 1~-~-_ _ _ ?~~4--~9: ! . _ :~~<:_ep!a_b!8. __ . _ . ~F:'~ _8_2?9~ ... _ 5110 1, 1,2,2-Tetrach loro e thane . _ )-!S)/~. _ _ • _ ?~·! .. _. __ ??·.?. _ .. _ ??:~:. ~7 .~ _ ..... A.~c_ep!a_bJ8. . . . .. ~P.~_8_269~ .. __ : :o.o.~9: :,-~!r~~~l?~~eih.~I~~~::.::: ·::::::::::::: t .. ~9}~ •...... __ ~?·.? ... __ ~~·!. ___ ]~·9 _-.4.8_.? ..... A.~<:_ep\a_b_l8. _ .... ~P,~_8_2?9~. __ _ .• o_o_6_7 __ :rolu_e_n_e •. __ ... __ . __ • ___ • .. . ...... _ •• I . _ ysit~ .. _ . . _ ?~-~-. __ .... 11 -~ ... _. _ :3! ._1 -. 5_6_.1 .. __ .A.~c_ep!a_b]8. _ ...... ~P.~ _8_2?9~ _ . _ ~1 _5_5_ . _1/.~:T_r~c~~o_r°.~E:_n_z_.e~~. __ .. __ .. ___ ... _ . _ .... y9j~ .. __ .. _ ~ ?~O. .. 9-~9 . _ ................ _ A.~c _ep!a_bJ8. _ .. _ •. ~P.~ _8_2?9~. 0056 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ..• _ •. _ . __ yQI~. _ .. _ . __ . __ . __ ~1_.9 _ _ . ?9·9 -_4:2_.? _ . _ ~?~ ~~e°.rt.e_d_ .. ___ • • __ . __ '-": _"i1:65: • _1; {,?~~ri~~~O!~~th~~~ : : : : : : •.• _ .. _ . _ ....... ,YS)f~ .•.. , . _ ~?-} .. _ .. _ 9.90 _ .. . ..... _ .. __ .. !'J.°'. 1-'-.?~~~l~b,1.e .. _ .. ~f::'~ _8_2?9~ ... . .. . ysit~ _ . _ . __ ?~--1. _ .... ?~·5. _ : ::~:~~: }fr~r%~~:~:;:;;i; (~~~)::::: ·:: ~ '. .: : : : [ .. :~:t :: : : ·Ji·;~::: .. r~~-... : :~·:3 :·:~ 3 :·~: ·:: :i:~:;f:.:J:: ~::: ::~r::!;~~::: . . _ ~2_2_5_ . :'_i~tl ?~~~a!i: ___ . __ . _ .• _ .... _ .. _ . • . . . .. ):'9.1~. _ .. __ ~ .) ~-_ .. 0.0 0 . _ .. _ ............. _ ... :ll,c.c_e_p\a_b!8. __ ..• _ ~F:'~ _8_2?9~ _ .. . .. ~2_3_5_ . :'_i~tl _c~l_oEi?~ _ . __ . _ .. __ ... _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ y9j~.. .. .. . _ ~ ?:.o_ . . . o.oo .... _____ -· _ . _ ... A.c.c_ep)a_b!e. . _ . ___ ~F:'~ _8_2?9~ .. 5260 Xyle nes, total µ9/L 16 0 158 90.6 · 21 2 Acceptable EP A8260 B Page 9 of 21 All analy tes a re included in ERA 's A2LA accredi tation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP Volatiles (cat# 830) WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Page 10 of 21 Performance Evaluation Method Description All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP Volatiles (cat# 830) (Continued) WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPAID : ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description 4685 . t~a!1?·_1:~·PJ<:h_l~r9p~o_pie_ne __ . . . . ___ . _ .. . .... _µgj~ _ •. I .. _< 2._o __ .. _ . ~?-~ ... _1 1 __ 19-5_ --~5_. ! .... _N_o! ~-c~e.~t??I~-____ E.~.l\ _6_21 ___ .. . _ ~0_6_6 . E_t~~l?e.~z_e_n~ ___ .. __ ... ___ .. __ . . . .. . ..... ~9!~ __ . I. _ .. _1 g~ .. _ ...... ~5.} _ ... _ 65:_9_ :_ ! ?O_ .... _ P\c_c_ep)a_b!e. _ . _ . _ .. _ E.~ P. _6_2~ __ .. . . ~~3 _5 __ H_e_x_a~~19~o_b_u!a_d_ie~e. ___ .. _ _ _ .. _ .. __ .. .. ~g/~ .... _ . _ . ~ ?~O-__ . __ g.oo _ .. _ . ___ ... __ A.c.c_epta_b_le . _ .... _ E.~.l\ _6~~ __ _ . __ 4_8_69 __ 2-~~~~a_n_o_nJ _ .. __ .. _ .. .. .. . . ~g_l~. .. . _ .. ~ _19 _ . . _ . g.oo . ____ ....... __ . _ . A.c.c_ep(a_ble, _______ E.~f\ _6_2~. _ .. . _ 0_~6~-. _r-.1e,t~~l~~e. ~~l_?:i?~ _ . .. .. . .. . .. . .. . yg_f~ _ _ _ 21.1 _ . ?1-_9 _ .. _ 1 ?·_Q-_ 3.5_-~ .. . .. A.c.c_ep(a_b~e _ . __ . _ E.~f\ _6_2~ 4995 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) µg /L 28.1 32 .8 11.3 -52 .1 Accept ab le EPA 624 : :io:o~:: ~;-~~!~~~~~ : : : : : :: .: : : : : : : : : ·: _·: -: : : . : [ : · :~~'~: : : f : : ~ ~.:a: : : : _ : 9-~~: : : · : -: : : : : ·-: : : : : : ~~~-~p;;b]~ : : : _ : : : ~P.~ :6~~ · -~~-6~--· ;:T;.~\~t~;~hi~-r~;ih;~; -·· -· ·· ·· ---------1-·· --~~~t -· --:~:;-----!;t ----~~}-;}:~ -:: : :1~::;t~:j:-: · -----:~t!-~:-·· -· - . ~i1:1~: :_1~1.,?,i:f~t~~c:hi~r?~t~~~~::::::.::.:::.: r:: _C,;i .. : : ~~/: :: : : ~2.-~: :: .: : ?~i-.>7:.~: .. _/\c_c_epta_b!e. ... :.:: ~P.~:6i4 ... · "6~!i ):f:;~r~~e:t~:1 ::~:: __ :: ·::::::,-__ :::I· -:~:;~:: .1 : _ ;~} _ t : ;u :: :I:_ ;tt;::r :: : :t~:~;1;:J:: :1 ·: --:;t:~{: ·.:: _5_1_5;5_ .. 1~~·~:T!i~hl?_r~~e.n_ze ~~ ______ ... __ . __ .... _. .. ~g_l~--_ ... -~?A ..... _. ?·_09 _ .... __ . _ ......... _A.c_c_ep!a_bJ~ _ .. __ . -~~.l\_6_2~ .... _. 0056 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ... ___ . _ .. -~g_l~. _. 31.9 20.0 -42 .5 Not Reported V: _-_i1:6:5: _ .. _1-_,1_-,?:~r~_i,i __ o~~; __ th_~_.n_-e_·_: _·· ·_· · .. :. -. -. _µ_g __ lL _. -.... 321 ........ 0 oo · -...... -.. -.. NotAc~;pt~bl~-,-. 0 EPA 624 .. -- -~0_5_7: __ T_ri~~l?i~E:t~~I~~~. ___ . . .. --· -· .. · •• -~!i _ . : : )~:~:: : : :: )~-~:::: · ~;-~:)1j : · : : A~c~p!~~~ ·: : . : · ~~~ :6_2~_:: .. __ 5..1.7:5 __ T_ric~l_o_r~f~u_o_r~~E:lh_'.3~~ ___ . _ . _ . _ µg/L 28 .9 33 .3 13.3 -53.3 . _,~c_c_ep!a_b!E: __ ... _. ~~.I\ _6?~ ..... . . _5._1_8_D __ 1/.~:T_ri_c~~O_r()~r?p~~E: {1:~f:') __ .. _ _ _ : : . µµ:_gg_://LL: __ : _: ._· 1 · ... -:_: 2_: 1 .· 9 _0-__ ---:_. : __ : 0 0 :_ . __ o 0 _~o ·_· :_ · __ .:. ____ . . . . __ A.c_c__ep)c3:b~E:. _ .... E.~.I\ 6_2~ ... .. . 5..2_2_5 . v_i~Y_I _a?l:_l~a!E: _ ... __ ... __ .. __ . . _ _ __ _ _ _ .. _ _ __ .. _ . _ . _ _ _ -~c_c_ep!c3:ble. _ ... ___ E.~ ~ _6?~ __ . _ :~:~ )~~~-:~'~ 0:~r:i --.. --------------· ·· · -·· ------~~;t ---I· --;!t ·· ·· --~-rr ---90 :6 ~ 21·2 .. · --1~~:~1;:~:---· ---:~t -:~~--· -- '--- Page 11 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2 LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o . WP Chlorinated Acid Herbicides {cat# 829) WP PCBs in Water (cat# 832S) WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 03/23/10 Report Issued : Study Dates: Reported · Assigned Value Value 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description 00 40 ('_r<;ic,I?~ !~~6. ___ • __ ..... __ ... ., . _.. .. . . . . yQI~ ___ ... ': ~--5_. 0 .00 _. _ ••.. _ ....... J:-c.c_ep!a_b)~. __ .. _ ~P.-:'_6_0~-. __ _ _ ~8_8_5 __ ~r?c,l<;i r_ !~~1-. ______ .... _. _. __ .. __ ..... ___ . _ .~Q.'~-__ .• __ ': ~~5-. _ .. _ g.p~-_ ..... ___ .. _. _ ... _. _l:,~c_ep)a_bJE: ____ . __ • _ ~P.~_6_0~-__ .. . _ ~0_42 __ ~r<;1c,I<;>~ ! ~~~ .. ________ ....• ____ . __ .. __ .. _ . __ -~gj~. _ .. __ ': ~~5-___ . _ .. g.p~ .... __ . __ .. ___ .... _ l:,~c_ep!a_b)E: __ .•. , _ . ~P.~ _6p~ __ •• _ 0040 Aroclor 1242 ' --.. -.... , --.... --• --•• ----•• h • -•• ~ -.• --~ ------- ... y gj~ ___ ... _ ': ~~5-• __ . __ g.p~. ____ ... _ . __ .. __ ., _ .J:-~c_ep!a_bl ~ . ______ . ~P.-:' _6p~ ..... __ 0044 Aro cl or 1248 _ . )~Q!~ . ____ ': ~~5-... __ ~-.o~ __ .. _ , _ . ___ . _ .. _ . ~~c_ep!a_b)E: __ . ____ ~P.-:' _6_0~ _ .. _ . EPA 608 -----.. -.. -- 00 46 Aroclor 1260 µg/L 2.5 2.62 1.25 -3.4 7 Acceptable EPA608 WP PCBs in Oil cat# 835S 8910 Aroclor 1260 mg/kg < 4 .9 0.00 Accep table EPA8082 Page 12 of 21 A ll analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accre di tation . Lab Code : 15 39-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o . WP Base/Neutrals (cat# 833) WP-180 Final Complete Re port Un it s EPA I D: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 • 03/04/10 Reported Assign ed Acceptanc e Value Value Lim its Perfo rmance Evaluation Method Description __ ~5_o_o _ _1~c_e0a.e~1~~n.e. __ ... _______ . __ .. ______ ... I __ y9.1~ ___ -1-_ ~ 2_.9 .. _ 18 .2 _ ~._7_7 _ -2_3_.9 _ .. __ . "c.c_e_p\a_bJe __ . _ ... ~f:'i\ _6?? ___ . : ::~~;: )r~r~;-1 r.~e~;~~l~~~;e:n;:(9 :t?l:~~dj~~): --~: -: I::: :~~;t ·:: I : )~·.;:: .. _ ~9 ~;__ 6 ; 9 _7 _ -2_~-~ · -: : :i~:::;:::J::: ·: -: :;t:;}:::: . -~5_4_5 __ ~njl~n_e_ ..... _ ...... _ . _ ... _ ... ___ ... _ _ .... J . _1~9/~. _ -~ :5 ~0 .. ___ ~--0~-.. __ . ____ . . . _.l\c.c_ep!a~l8. __ ... _ .. ~f:'~ 6_2? __ . . -~5_5_5_ -~n_t~r.?~8.n.8.. _______ . _. ________ .. ___ .I. __ _µ9.1~. _ .. l ... 37 .~-__ .•. ?~·?. . ~5.._o -_~4_.0 _ . _ _.l\c.ce_p!a_b_l8. .... ___ ~f:'.l\ __ 62?_ ..... 5595 IB enzidine I µ9/L I < 25 O O 00 . __ .l\c.c_e_p!a_b!8. __ I_ _ . __ ~f:' ~ _6.?.?. _ .. _ ·. : : s_s_7~:: -~e:ni~(a)~~t~~a:c~;~:: : : : : ·::: : : : : : : : : ·: I : : :~9:1~: :: : r: · ~ ;<~: : .: : : : g:~9 : . _ _ _ _ .. _ _1~c.cep 1a_bJe. __ . ___ .. ~r.~ _62:5 . __ .. _ . _ ~5 _8_5 ___ B_e_n~?(b)fi.~o_ra.n.t~~n.8. _ . __ .. ____ .. _ .. _ ..•. __ 1 1 ..... IJ.9_/~ __ . I . _ J 7._6 _ ... _ . _ 21_ ·?. _ .. _ . _6 ~5_8_ -. 3_1_.2_ _ .. _ .l\c.c_e_p!able. • _ ... _ _ ~f:'~ _6_2:5 ___ . _ -~6_0_0_. B_e_n!?(k)~l!_o_r~n.th~n.8. _ .. _. ____ • . .. __ ......... --~9./~ _ ... I .. 2_2_ 0 _ .. _ .. ?.5.-.6 . __ . _ ?:.3.7.·.~0_.? _ .. _ .J:.c.c_ep!a_bJ8. _ . _. _. ~f:'~ _6_2:5 _. _. _ 5590 __ B_en!'.'?(9~~,i)pe.r_y(e_ne ______ .. _. I µ9/L I 20 .3 •. ?.5.·1 .'" _ :5 .3 _5_-_3_~-!.. . ,Ac.c_ep!a_b_l8. .... __ ~f:'-:"_6_2:5 _ . . . 5.5_8? ___ B_e_n~?(a)e}'.r~n.8. .... ___ .. ___ .. ___ . _:: r:: --~9./~::. [:: ?~·~-:: 38.4 _ .. _ 11 .8 __ -5.0 .€3 ___ .l\c.c_epta_bJ8. ...... ___ ~P,:'_6?? ... _ . _5.63_0 __ B_e_n3'.yl_c:IC.°.~o!. • . _ . . . • . . _ .. _ .... _ . . I .. _µ9_!~ __ . .. . : 5:0. _ g.99 __ .. . . _ .. ... .. ... _.l\c.c_epta_bJe, _ . __ . E.P.A _62?_ _ 5660 ~:~r_o~°.P_h_e0y1:~~e_ny(e)~8.r _ ........ __ •.... -~9/L 97 .2 133 _ . __ 4_2:8_ :. !?~. _. _ J:.c.c_ep!a_bJe, _ .. _. E.f:'~_6_25 __ .. \.. • , _5 5 _ 6 6_ 8 7_0 0 _. _CB_uaJryblab_. 2 e. 0 ~ 1 z~Y!Ph_th_a .. 1a.t_e __ .. .. . . .. . .. .. . _ ............ __ µ __ 9.il_ .. _ < 5.0 0.00 Acceptable EP A 625 '-"" -. _ . --~91 ~ __ _ < 5.o . o.oo -. -. .. . . -A~~e~t;bl~ .. r .. --EPA -62s · ... : :i~4~:. 4~~~1?~~~njli:n~: : : : : : : : : . . .. . .....• -Y9!~... .. . . ~ ~:o : I .: .. ~-O?: ~:::::: : : .. . .. :. -~~~epi~bJ~: : [::: · ~~~ :6~~:: . :: . . -~-7_6_0_ . b)s_(?.·.~hJ°.r_o~!h_ofy)_~e_t~~n.8. • -................... y9.1~ -.. . 9248 __ 06 . ·I· . 4]8~.~1 ...... _154:5.:3~ _:6!1~.76 . . ... AJ:.cc.cc.ee_pP!taa.bbJlee __ JI ... -E~PP .. A~ _6622 .55 ... .. . _ ~7_6_5_ _b!s_{2_·_~h _l°.r?~!hy~)~t__h_er. .. _ •..... ___ .. __ .... _ .. .. _ YQI~ ... . . 5.7 _85J .. __ b)~(?:_G_h _l°.r_o(s_opr,opy~)~~h_e~ __ ..• ___ • _ .... _ ....• _ . ~9!~ .. : : ~ ~:o· : 1 ·· : g.~9 : ". : · : : •• : _ : : : •• : : : : :;,~~~.P!~bj~ : : [ : _ : : ~~~ :6~~: : .. -· . -~7_9_0_ 1_:-(?~19~o_n_a_p~!h_a!e_n_e_ ...... -............. -... ~9!~ -. . . -.......... g.99_ ............ -..... ~'?~ f3.~e()~e_d_ -.. -....... --. -.... . . . ~7_9_5 __ _2:<?~l_o~o_n_ap~!~a.(e_n_e_ ..• ____ ... ___ . . • . .. . . _ Y9!~ .. . __ ~ ?:0 ..... __ g.9 _0_ ... ___ .. _ _ .... _.l\c.c_ep!a_b!e . _. __ .... EP,~ 6_2? .. _ .. _ . • 5.8_2_5_ . 4_:-S:~l?~°.P_he~yl _:-~~e_n.Y'.e~~8.r. _ . ____ . _ .. ____ ... _ y9_!~ _ ... . __ ?~-~-_ .. _. ]?~ ..... __ 4_6 :4.: !5.4_ ... __ J:,cc_ep!a_bJe_ _ ..... __ E.f:'~_6_2:5 ___ _ . -~8_5_5_. G_h_ry~e_n_e __ .... __ .... __ . _ .. _ . ___ .. _ .. _ _ _ -~9!~ __ . .. _ ! !-! ..... _ .. !~·9 ...... ?:1_1_-23 .0 J:,c,c_ep!a_ble. ... __ . _ E.P.-:"_62?_ ..... . . .. 5_8_9_5_ --~i ?E_:~Z_(~.~~a_n_t~r_a9~~~ .. ___ .... ____ ........ __ y9.I~ _ .. .. _ ~ ?:0_ .... _ . g.99 ____ ...... _ .. .. .. . . . __ /\c.c_ep!a_b!e_ . ___ , _ E.P.~ _6_2:5 ___ _ . _ 5.9_0_5 ... -~i?~~zoy~r~~. __ • __ .. _ •... ___ . _ . _ .... ___ . _ ... ~9!~ _ ... . . _ ~ ?:o ____ • _ g.o~_ ... __ .. ___ . __ .. _ .. __ A.c.c.ep!a_b!e_ ___ .. _ ... ~P..l\ _6_2:5 __ .. _ : )~~;: :Zr~1~~f;;~~a~~:~~:::::::::::::::::: ·: 1:: :~!t :: •: )!{:::::~If::::: :1~:1:~ i~i --•: )~~:;~::J::::::: ::;; __ :;_;::: :- -_46_1_5_ .. 1.:~·!)j<:_h]°.r.??8.n.2:.e_n_e __ ••.. __ .. _. _ .. __ • ____ . _. -~9!~ ___ . __ ?0.-_1 _ ... __ •. )?? ...... __ 1:5:6_: !~~ _ .... .l\c.c_ep!a_b!e. __ . . . _ E.f:'~_6_2?_ ... _ . . _4_6_2_0_ . \1-PJ c__h!°.r<??e.n.2:_e_n_e ... _________ • _ . ___ . __ . _ y 9j~ .• _ . __ ! ~}-_ ... __ ~2_-~ ... _ _ ~:2_8_ -. 4_3_.€3 __ .... J:.c.c_e_p!a_bJE: __ ... _ . ~f:'~ _6?:5 .. __ _ 594 5 3,3'-D ich loroben zi dine µ9/L < 10.0 0.00 : t~f --~:ttrtt:~-~1::L::::::::::::::::::::: •:: :~tt : : : r:: i:l :: -: : ~-f i::: _ .... _ • . . _ .... __ /\<:.c.ep!a_b!8. . _ ..... __ ~f:' ~ _6_2? ____ .. .... ___ • ___ ...... J:.c.c_ep!~bJ~. _. __ • _ ~F:',:'_6_2?. 13.2 -19 0 Accep table EPA 625 \. Page 13 of 21 All analytes are inclu ded in ERA's A2 LA accr editat ion . Lab Code : 153 9-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analy te 0 . WP Base/Neu trals (cat# 833) (Con tinued) WP-180 F inal C o mpl e te Re port Un its EPAID: TX01484 ERA Custome r Numbe r : A116001 03/23/10 Report Issued: Study Dates : Reported Assign ed Value Val ue 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Acceptanc e Lim its Performance Evaluatio n Met hod Descript ion :~:~ ~t~i~-:~~:~f~-:~~-· · -------· -· ----1---~:t -· -l --~tr ---~:-:-· · -_!~} ~ ~;~ J-)~~:~~:j:: _:::: :;~:::;;::: · : ::;~{ )~~lf i~;;~~j;tfh~ia:te :::: ~ ~ ~ ~: ~: ~::: r:: :j:f :: l:: ;!{::. ~: rtf : ~ : ?~ .·o:-:i~-~: J: :~:~:~i~:~::: . : : : ::~;::;;:::: :!~~ :~~;~:~:hen~. ---.... -.. -... --... -..... ·I· .. -~:;t . --. -}t~-. --. b.~~-. . _49:7 : '. ! 1_. ·I :~:-::::~:. -. --.. ~:1 {!~ 6275 .He~;~;;,;~~b~~;;~~. -... ----. -. --.. -... · r .... ·c;/L. .. -... 74.6 ° -.. -93_i," -·r. -42:9 : 121" "l " -A~;e~i;bl~ ... -. -. EPA ·6-25 -.. - 1~H:::~::~:~;,:;:~,,ea, : ~ -: ~ I j f t i!L : ~!L )t 1 :L ;:~~r : JiH~f _ -~3 _1_5_ !~~e_n_oJ!,?,3~~~)pyr~!1~ .... ____ .. __ ... ___ .1. __ ~g/~ •... I. .. ??·:5 . _ ... _ ~~--4_ .... _ ?:2_0_-_~0_.? _. _ -~~c_ep!a_bJe.. _ .. ___ ~~~-6~?. __ .. _ -~-3_20_ .!~~~h?_r~ne I µg/L I 35.9 56.4 22 .7 -73 .6 -~~c_ep_!a_b!f: _.. EPA 625 . -~3_8:5 .. 2.~~~~hJ!nap~!h'.'i~n_e: : .. ' •• : ·. : : : . : : : r -: -~~/~: : : . : : : ~ ~~o ... ' : : 0.9.0:: .. : : ·. : :. : : : : : ~ :: ' . -_ft.c:c_ep!a_bJe. ... : : ~ : i~~ :6i~: : : : : . _ .. ] ~ ~ .... __ 30 :_5_ -_ ~ 3~ _ . __ ft.c:c_ep!a_bJe. __ . ___ . ~P.~ _6?? _ . __ _ .... Q-9? .... _. _ ....... _ .. -~c:c:ep!a.b!e_ __ ..... ~P.~_6J? ... _ 6465 3-Nitroaniline µgj~ _ ....• _: ~A ...... Q-O? .. __ .. _ .. _ ....... _ .. _ :6.-~c_eptc:bl~ ........ _ ~P.~ _6J5 .... . 6470 4-Nitroa niline .....•..•....• -~Q_I~ .•. < 5.0 . _ . Q._O?. . .. . .. ___ .. _ .. _ .. __ Ac:c_ep\c:b!f: .... _ . __ ~P.~ _6_2? __ . _ 5015 Nitrobenzene µg/L < 5.0 . _ Q-9?. __ .. __ ....... _. __ A,c:c_ep!a_b!f: _ . . ___ ~~~ _6_2:5 ..... . • 0 65.25 .. N-Nit~o-s~dieih;i~~i~~-....... -....... -.... r .... ~;IL ··.. .: ~--0_ ..... Q-.?? ....... -... -....... -~c:c_eP!c:b)f:. -. -. ". ~~~-6_2?_ ... . : : 5.~3~: :~-~it~~~o~~~~t~yl~~]r:~ : : : : .. : : _ .: : : · · · · · [ · : : ~gjl : : : : ... ?! ·? ...... _ ~?-]. _ _ . ??1. ·. ~8:? _ .. __ ~~c_ep!a_b!e. . _ . __ .. ~~~ _6_2?. _ ... _ . _ .. )~QI~ •• _ . __ : ?~0-.... _ . g._O? .. _. ___ . ____ .. __ .. _ ~c:c_ep!a_b!E: . _ . _ ..... ~P.~ _6_2? _ .... _ . __ ~5_4_5 . _N_-~)t~o_S?:d_i:n.-er_op¥1.?~.i~E: . . . __ .. _ . _ . __ .Y9!~. __ .... ~Q-~ _ _ _ _ _ !~-? __ .. _ ?Q ~2_ --~6--~. __ i:-c:c_ep!a_b!e_ .... ___ ~P.~ _6J? .. __ . 6590 Pen tachlorobenzene µg/L < 5.0 0.00 Acceptab le EPA 625 . : 6.6:1_s::: fh:e~~~{h!~~~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~: : : .1 : -:~9!~: : : 1: . : ?~}. : . : . f ~.~: : : .. : ~~-~: j5..~: -: i~~ep!~bJ~ : : : : : : : ~~~ ~:2j :: : : . . . ~6_6_5_. P/!E:r:e_ _____ . _____ . _ .. ___ . ___ .. _ _ _ . __ ygl~. . . . ?~-9 ___ ... ~~-?. _ ..... ] Q~8. -_~9 -? __ ..• A.c:c_ep!a_bJE: . . . .. _ ~P.~ _6_2:5 . _ . . -~0 _9_5_ P_Y!i9~n_e_ . _. __ .. _ .. ____ .. __ .. _ ... ___ .. __ .. ~9!~ .. ____ ~ ?;0 __ . __ Q-9? ...... __ ..... _ .... _ -~c:c_ep!a_bJe_ _ .. __ ... ~P.~_6_2?_ .... . -~7_1 ? .... 1:~·~._5_-"!"e_t~a_c~!~ro~e_r:z_e!1 e. _ . _ . __ . _ .. _ . _ _ .. __ ~gj~ _ . _ .. _: ~~o. _ .. __ g._09 __ .. _ ... ___ . _ . _ .. _ .A.c:c_ep!a_bJE: ...... __ ~~~ _6J!5 __ . __ 5155 1,2,4-Tric hlorobe nzene µg /L 37.3 57.4 11.4 · 71.0 Ac cepta ble EPA 625 Page 14 of 21 All an alytes ar e include d in ERA 's A2LA accre ditati on. La b Code: 1539-01 WP-180 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: TX0148 4 ERA Custom er Number: A116001 03/23/10 Report Issued : Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 ANnal. An alyte o . Un its Re ported Assign ed Value Val ue Accep ta nc e Li mits Performanc e Evaluat ion Method Description WP Base/Neutrals (cat# 833) -:~~;-,'~:;~:~~:~;I~~~::· : : : : : : ~:. ·: .. :.: .. ":: :~:;t : : t.: ~;:;:: J:: ~:t : :·: ;~;:;·)!::~: ·.: )~~:~:;:~:::.:::;:;;:~;it ::: -~1 _4_5 __ 2:Ar:n!n.o_-:-.112e_th~l~~n.~e_n_e _(?:to lu(d_1n.e). __ .. _I . _ yQI~ _ _ [ :: ?·.o __ -1 .. _ 9.09 _ _ _. . . _. __ . __ J\~c_epta_bJe_ __ . __ ~~~ _82!9'?. __ _ 5.5_4_5_lA_n~l~n_e _____________ . _ . ___ . _. ,. . _ J . _ yQI~ __ _ :: ?A ____ 0._09 _ ... ___ ... _____ . _J\~c_ep!a_bje_ __ .... E,~~ _8J!9<?. _ .. . _555_5_ ]A_n_t~r_'.'l~~n.e_ _ .... __ .. _ ...... _ .... __ .... _ . __ . I .. _ ~QI~ __ . l .. ~? .3 _ . J _ . ?~·?. _ . _ ??:o .. -_74_.0. _ .. __ J\~c_ep(a_ble_ .... _ .. E,~~ _8J!9<? .. __ .. 5595 Benzid ine I µ9IL I < 25 .0 0.00 Acceptable EPA 8270C · ·5575-)e~i?(a)~~t;~~c~;~ ·:: : : : : : : _ : .. : : -: : : : I· _ : :µµ. 9 9 i 1 LL: . : : , .. -< 1 . 7 ~. 6 p: : -. : : 0 2 : - 1 9.9 8 .: . : : : ~ 6 : ·•· 5 : 8 .. ~: 3 : 1 :_ 2 : : : : : -~~':~P!~b!~ : : . : : : E.~;:8i?~~:: : : . 5_~8_5_. B_e_nf'.?(b)~L!_o_r~n.t~_en.e_. _ _ _ . _ _ .. _ _ _. ,L\~c_ep!a_b_le_ ..... _ . _ E,~~ _8'!-!9<? .... . . 56_0_0 .. ~e_nf'.?(k)~u_o_r~n.t~~n.e_ . _ ........ _.:: _ : [ : : :~Q!~: .. : [:: ?~·9: : J:: ?~-~:: : ·. ~~3:7: j ~.7 -:. __ J\~c_ep!a_bJe_ . _ ... _ E,~~-8?,?9'? ... . . . 5.5.99_ . -~e _nf'.c_:>(9:~·()p~ry(e_n.e .. . __ .· . _____ . _· _· I. _ __µµ_. 9 91 1 LL _____ . I·. ___ - 2 ?_ o 3 __ ··_?3 ___ · _ . ?~·~ ___ ... :5 :35_ -_ 3_8_. '. _ ... _ J\~c_ep!a_b.le .... _ . _ ~~~ _8_2??'?. . . . 5.5.8_0_. _B_e_n_~?(a)i:>~r~~~ .. __ . ___ .. _ .. _ _ _ .. . _ ~~.~ .. _ .. 1 ! .~.-.. 5.0:6. .... _,~~c_epta_b!e_ .. _ .... _ E,~~ _8'!-?9'? .. _ . 5630 B_e_n~11 _a_l~o_h_o_l __ .. _ .. _ .... _ .. __ -~91~ < 5.0 " .. 9.99 __ ... .. _ ... __ .. ___ /\cc_ep!a_bJe_ .. __ ... E.P.~.~_270C _5.6_69 _. 4:~~o.112o_ph_e~yl:~~e_ny!e_the_r _ .. _ ..... _ ......... __ ... _µ91~. .. . ... 9.!·? .. _ .. __ .1~~ __ .... 42.8 -177 _ _,·~-c.cep!a_b!e. _ .. _. _ E.P.~ _8?!9'?. _. 5670 Butylbenzylphthalate .. __ . __ .. __ •. _ . YQ.1~. _ .. __ ~ ?~0-.. ___ .. ?·99 ... _ .. ___ ...... __ .... _ i:,c.c_ep!a_b!e_ . _ ..... E.~~ _8??9<?. __ V · -568(/ · Ca-rb~;~-1~ --· · --.. ·· -·· · .. µgll < 5.0 0.00 Acceptab le EPA 827 0C : :i7_4~: >~~~~l ?~~a:n~I~~~ ~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : -: : : ·: : ·. : : : : :~~I~: ·: [ : ·: ~ ~~o-: : : ·· : g.~?: : : : : _ : : : : : : . : : : : :~~~ep!~bi~ ·: · : : .: ~~~ :.8:2?~~: : : .· --:-;-:{ :t;it-~~~:~~:::~~;~~~t~~~e_ ·· · --· · -· ----· ---~:;t ---I· -·· ~::~---· -1:.~ -· --ft,;:-;!_: -· : )~::::f;:j;::::: ::;r:;;it ::: : )i,:t~ }t~~~~~~t~~t~~~~i)~~h:~ -: ~ ~:::: ~:::::: r : : :i:t::: [: ~ ~ ~~0 :: ~::: ttr : ~::::::: ~: :: : : : : ~;~;;;~~;d_: : : : : ::~ :8 :~~~:: ·:: .• 5.7 _9_5_ ... 2:<?h.l?~o_n_ap~!h_a!e_n_e_ • __ . ___ . _ . _ .. _ .. __ .... Y9!~ __ .. I . _ ~ ?~0-__ . _ . 9.99 _ _ _ _ .... ___ . _ .... _ /\~c _ep!~bJe_ _ .. _ ..• E.~~ _8_2!9'? ... _ . . . 5.~2_5_ . ~:<?~l?~o_p_h_e!1Y1:~~e_ny(e_t~e_r_ . _ . _ ..... __ .. _ • _ . __ Y9!~ _ _ _ .. _ 9.~.~. _ .. __ .1 ?~ _ ...... ~6 :':: ! ~~ ___ . _ /\~c_ep _\a_b!e. .•.•.. E,~~ _8_2!9'? .. _ .. _ 5.8_5_5_ . ~h_ry5.e_n_e ___ .. _ . _______ . ___ .. ____ . ___ yQI~ _ _ _ __ _ ~ '. ·! .. _ ... ~ ~·9 . _ . _ ! ~ 1_1 _-_ ~3_.0. . __ J\~c_ep!a_bJe .. ... _ E,~~ _8'!-!9 '? ..... 589 5 Dibenz(a,h)a nth race ne µ9I L < 5.0 0.00 Ac_c_ep!a_b!e_ __ .•.. E,~~ _8?,!9<: : : i~o~:: -~i~~~Z5)!~r~;: : : : : : : : : : _ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . ::~;!~ .: : : [ : : ~ ~:(): : : : : : ~-~?: : : : : : : . : : : : : : _: ·: . ,L\~c.ep!~b!e_ .... _ ... E,~~-8'!-!?<? ..... . : -~::~;: : ?t~1~~f ;;r;~;:~n~: .: : : : :: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~:;~: : : I: :: : 1f} : ~ · : : ~-;r -.::: :1~~1: ~ ! ~6. : : : ~ )~:;;1::1; : ~ · : : : ;~;::;;~t : : : . _':6_1.5_ ,.1:~-~!~-~lo_r?~~~~e_n,e _ . ____ . _ .. _ .. ______ . _ . _ . -~9!~ ___ . __ ?g._1 _ . ___ :1 ?~ _____ 1?:~: !1~ ..... _ J\c.c_ep!a_ble_ . _ . ___ E.~~ _8J!9'?. _ ... -~6_29 ___ 1,~-~!':h!o_r?~~~~e_n,e __ . ___ . _ .. ___ .. __ •.... _ .... µQI~ .... _ . __ ~~-~-__ . __ ~~-~-..... ~?8 .--~3_.6.. ___ -~~c_ep!a_b!e_. _ EPA8 27 0C 594 5 3:~·:~i~~l<;>~o_b_e~~i9(n_e __ . __ . _ .. __ . __ . ____ . __ _1!.9!~ __ .... _<_ ~o_.g __ . _. 9.99 _ ... __ .... _. _ .. _ .... A.c.e:ep!a_b!e_ __ . _. _ E,~~ _8??9<? .•... 607 0 . _[~i~t~y1p~~h_a!a_t~ .. ______ .... _ .. ________ .. _ YQ!~ _ ... < 5.0 0.00 .. _ . __ .... , __ ..... ,L\~c_ep!a_b!e_ . _ EPA827 0C 6135 Dimethylpht hal ate µ9I L 98.7 132 13 .2-190 Accepta bl e EPA8 270C Page 15 of 21 All analytes are incl uded in ERA's A2LA accre ditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 WP-180 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 03/23/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 ANnal. Analyte 0 . Units Reported Assigned Value Value Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description WP Base/Neutrals (cat# 833) (Continued) 6465 _3:~i _tr_o~~ili~~. __ .... _ . _ _ _ ... _ . _ _ . ___ . _ y9j~ _ __ __ ': :5 ~0-. __ . g.~p .... _ .... __ . _______ i:,c.c_ep!a _bJ~ __ ..... E.P.A. _8~?9~ ... 64 70 4-Nitroaniline .. . y9j~ _ ...... _ ': :5 ~0-. . __ g.~9 . __ . ____ ..... ____ ... _ i:,~cep!a_bJ~ . _ EPA8270C 5015 Nitrobenzene µ9/L < 5.0 0.00 Acceptable EPA 8270C -6525-. ·N-Nlt ;;s~diethy·l~,;:,;-n~ -. -.... --... -... --.... -· , -... ~;,L · .. ---·; 5~0--- . -o.oo· .... -..... -........... A~~e~t;b·I; .. . . ... EPA .8270C -•.. : :~~3~: :~-~}t~~s~~~~~t~y 1;~~~~:.::::::: ~:::: : : [ ·: :~;!~::: .. ~-:~ii ::·::~~-~:::.: ~~~1::-:iaj : :: : :~~c~p!~~i ~:: ·::: ~~;:a_2j9~:::: . _6.53_5_. N_-~It~o_s?d~_h_e~¥1~,:n~~E:. ......................... _ ... _1~9!~ .... _ ... ~ ?~o ...... g._op _. _ ..... _ ......... _ ...... A.c.c_ep!a_b!~ ........ E.P.A..BJ!9~ ..... . . 6_5_4!5 ___ N_-~!t~o_s_o:~i :n_-pr_op}'l~~~E: ..•..•• _ ...... _ .. _ ... --~~-/~ ......... ?g}_ .• _ ... ?3.-?. _ ..... ??._2 .. ·_~6_.~ ....• ~C.c_e_p!a_bJ~. _ .. _ .. E.P.~.8~!?~ ... __ .. 6.5_9_0_ . F'_e_n!a_c_h(o_r<:>'?E:~z_e_n_e .• _ . _ ... _ ........ __ ......... y9/~ _ .... ___ ': :5._0_ .. _ .. g.op . _ ........ _ .. _____ . _ . i:,~c_ep!a_bJE: ... _ .... E.l:'A._8_279<;: ... . 6615 P._he!1~~t_h:E:r:e __ ....... _ ..... _ ............. __ ... ___ Y9!~ ...... __ 5-3.-~ .. _ ... _ .. ?g ._s ___ ... ~~~4-· .. ~~.~ ...•. A.c.c_ep!a _bJE: _ •. __ . E.P.A. _s_2?g<;: __ • . _ 6.6_65 _ . F'_Y~~f:~ ___ .. _ ...... _______ ....... _ ...•• _ ... __ -~9!~ .......... ?~·P ... __ .. _ ~~·? ..... _ _1 ~~8-· .. ~~-5. .... _ .. A.c.c_ep!a_bJE: _ ..... _ E.P.~ _8_279~ ...... . . -~~9_5 __ _PY!i9~n_e ____ .. _. _ .......... __ ....... __ ... _ .... Y.9!~ _ ... . • . : :5 ~0. ___ .. g._op ______ .... ___ . _ ....... A.~c.ep!a_bJ~ ..... _ .. EPA.,_8J!9S: ... _. 6715 __ 1~2.·~~5:!~ti:a_c~!o_r';l~~~z_e!1_e .. _ ...• _ ... __ .... _ .... yg_l~ _ .... 5155 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µ9/L 37 .3 57.4 Page 16 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 11.4 · 71.0 Accepta ble EPA 82 70C EPA8270C Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 Anal. Analyte No. WP Acids (cat# 834) WP Acids (cat# 834) WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description . -~1_7_5 __ .. 2!~-~!n_it_rCJ~~e_n_o( .. __ ••.. _ ... _. ___ . _. __ . __ J:!9!~ .. _ ... _ ~~-~-....... ]~~ ... _. __ 1_:3:8_: !~~ _ .. _ .~c.c_ep!a_bJe,.. . __ . ~P.~_6_2? ____ . -~4_05)_ .~:~_e~hJ!P_h_er,?1 ........•. ___ .• _. __ .... ___ .. _ _1:1_9}~ __ • _ •. ~5.-?. _ .. _. 5.r9 .... __ 1g ~8_-_7.2_.Q ___ .. J:-C.c_ep!a_b_le, _ .. __ • _ ~f:'~_6_2_? ____ _ 6410 4-Methylphenol µg/L 65.2 106 .. _15):6_: !~8.. __ .J:-C.C_ep!a_bJe, ....• __ ~f:'~.6~?. ___ _ : : ~4:9~~ . 2~~ijr~p~~~~I : ~ : : : : ·: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : [ : : :~9!~: :: : : : ~ ~~/ : : : : ?~-~: : : · _ ?~~o.-_ 8.9_-~ ___ .. ~c.c_ep!a_b}e, _ ...... _ ~P.~ _6~?. _ .. . : : :;~} : ;e;J~:~f ;r;!1 ~~~0] : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ : : :~~t : : : : : }ori : : : : : ~;~: : : . : ;;~~:. ;~;. : . : : i~~:;~~:J: : : . : : : : ;;;::;;: : : : : . --~6_2_5_ ~h_er,?I ___ .. _ .... _ ...... __ . __ ...... _. _ .• J:!9!~ .... __ 5.q} .. _ ... :1 ~ ~ .... __ 1_1 :3. ~-! 5.~ .... _ ~c.c_ep!a_b]e, .. __ . __ ~f:'~ 6_2_? •... _ . -~~:4. ·. ~q~ _ . __ N_oJ ~_c::~e.~t~~l_e ___ • __ ~P. ~ _6_~_? _ . _ •. 6840 2,4 ,6-Trichlorophenol µg/L 48.3 64.5 20.6 -83.4 Acceptable EPA625 Page 17 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 WP-180 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP Onanochlorine Pesticides (cat# 831) Units Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description . _ 0_0_4_7_. A.l~rin_ •...... __ . ___ •....•... __ .. . .. _ .... _ .. _ y~t~ __ ...... _2~5. ..... _. ~-~~-... _0.9.9.5.: ~--8? ___ . A.c.c_ep!a_bl e. . _____ ~f_:.i\_B_O~].i\_ .. _ . -~1 _1_0 ___ a~~h_a:~~S:. __ . _. ___ . ___ .. _____ .. _ .. _ .... _._.!:I~/~ __ ... _ .2:~ _____ . ~._()5 _. _ .. ]:1 .. 1 __ -_4.·~~ ... _ .. A.c.c_ep!a_bJe.. ____ . _ ~f_:.i\_B_O~].i\ __ .. _ _ -~1._1 _5 __ b_e!a_-~~.C. ___ .. _ .. _. _. __ . _ .. _ ..... _ ... __ y9!~ __ ..... _3:4. ....... ~._9)_ ... \6_0_-_5:4~ _ .. __ Ac.c_ep!a_b_le. .. _ .... ~f:.i\_8_0~1.1\ __ . _ 7105 delta-BHC µ9/L 12.4 9.06 3.41 -12 .6 _ .A.c.c_ep!a_b!e. __ . ___ . ~f:.i\_8_()~1.1\_. _. : }:~:{: ~~~tt-;tj:t~~~~~::: ~:::: __ ::::: -: : . ~: :~tt ~:: I. : : {;:::::: !:;!: -< t}f Hf : -.· ):;,:;i::J~:: -: : : ;~;:::~~~;::: · . -~2_4_5 .. Jl~:1:n:1~·.C_h_l~r9~~e. _. __ .... _ ....... _ ..... 1:19!~ .. __ ... _3.:2. ........ _ ~-?!. _ !:5_6_-_5.-~~ ...... A.c.c_ep!a_b!e.. __ . _ Ef:'.i\_8_0_~].i\ ___ _ .. o_o:4_9 __ 4:4.'~-~C?I? _ . ___ .• _ ... _ ... __ ... _ . _ .... _ . _ ... __ -~9/~ .... _ .. _5:2. _ .. . .. _ ~--89 _ ..... ?:_16_ -.~-~~ ...... A.c.cep!a_ble. ...... _ ~I:'./\ _8?_8_1.1\ __ .. _ . _ ~0_5_0_. 4:4.':~E?~ __ . _ ,. ......... __ . . . _ _ _ __ _ .. _ Y.9!~. __ _ . _3: 1 ____ . __ ~--3~. . _ 1.45 -4.43 ... A.c.c_ep!ab!e __ . __ ~P.,:1-_B_O~!-:\. _ . . -~()_5_1 _ .~:4.':~E?~ _ ..... _ .. _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ .. _ . ___ .. _ -~~/~. . __ 1:~ _ _ _ _ .. ~ ._53 _ .. _ _ o.~7.~ : ?·.3_3_ . __ A.c.c_ep!a_b_le. ... __ . _ ~f:'.i\ _a_o~~ ,:\ __ . _ . _o_o_4_8 __ ~i~l?'.i~. ,. _ • _ .... __ .. __ . _ _ _ __ ... _ . ~~/~ . _ ... .7:~ __ . _ . _ 9.·.?9 ,, _ . 1:.7.2_ -.1.. 3_.0 ___ .. ~c.c_ep)a_b!e. . . ___ ~l:'.i\_80~1.i\ __ .. 7540 End rin [ -~9/~ _ .. _ :4:~ ..... _. ~-B) _ ... _ 1._ao _-_7_.2~ _ ... ~c.cep!a_ble. __ ... __ ~P.i\_8_0~).i\ __ • : : t:~:~: l~~~~:~ ::ti~:~;: : : : : : : : ~ : : .. : . : ·: : . -. . [ ..... ~:t .. -...... -}~ -.... -t!:. . . ::~~ }!~ -.. --__ :_-_:_-:_--_:-.~-.:_:_-:-_::_· -.. ·_ .... ::: -:~!; t--.. '-,, _ :75:1~-. :~~d 9~~1f~n:1::::: .: : : : : . : : : : : : . : : . : : : : : : : -~;!~--~: : :. : j~-~---:: : : j~.~--: :: : ~~1~:->:~-~: . __ .A.c.cep!a_b!e.. _::·~~~:a~~}~:·· __ 7_5_1_5 __ E_n_d9s ~lfan_ I!. __ . __ .... _ ............. __ ... _ _ . _ y 9j ~ .. _. 6.7 _ . ~-.?~. _ ... ?:.7_9_-_ 11_-7. __ . _ -~~cep!a_b~e.. _ _ . ~J:'A _B O~],:\ ___ _ ... ~5_2_()_ . E_n_d_?~~l!a_n_ ~u_l f_a!e. . __ •.. _ .... _ .. _ .... __ .. __ -~9!~ _ ... _ .... a.: 1_ ___ . _ . 9.-_8) ... _ . ~:.7 1 _ -_ 1_4_.~ . _ . _ . ~~c_ep)a_b!e . __ .... ~f:'.i\ _B_O~],:\ __ .. 0052 Heptachlor µ9/L 4.2 4.30 .. oo.ia· .He-pi ~;h,;r·e-~o~id~ -<b ~t~i ..... -.. -. ----.. -f -... ~;IL ... .. 11.2 .... -9 .. 69 .. -- -ia10 ... M;th;~;ciiio.r . -• -. -...... ----. -.. --. -r. -. ~;IL . --: · 14_2 · .. -·· 11 .,· .. -.. 3.-1s · -· 1·a.4 -.. .. 4.86 -13 .5 A.c.c_ep!a_b!e. __ . __ .. ~f_:.i\_B_OBJ,:<-_ . __ Accep tab le EPA 8081A Page 18 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP Onanochlorine Pesticides (cat# 831) WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Descript ion . _ ~0_4_7. __ :'\l~r(n_ . _ _ _ _ ___ .... _ • _ .. __ .. _ .•• _ ... ___ . _ .. _ ~9./L _ •... __ ?5. .. __ . __ 3.-~~ _ .. _ ~-9~5.: 1 ·_8_2_ _ _ _ ~<:c_ep!~b!<: _. . • E,~~ _6_0~ ____ . __ ~1 _1_0 __ a_lp_h_a:1?1::1<'.:_ .... _ _ _ _ __ ..• ___ . ___ ...... __ _ __ . YQ _IL . . . _ .. ?:~ __ .. _ ... 3..9_5 __ . __ ~ ~1_1_-__ ~-3.4 ... __ ~c.c_ep)~b!<:. __ . ___ E,~~ _6_08 _ .•. 7115 beta-BHC . ___ 3~~. _ •.•.. 3.-_9~-__ .. 1 :69 _-__ 5_-1~. __ . ___ ~<:c_ep!a_bJe. _. _ •. __ E,~~-6_0? ___ • __ __ ~1 _0_5_ d~(t~·_Bf-i~ ___ ..••. _ _ _ _ __ .. _ ~9/~ .• ____ ~ 2._~ _ .. ____ ~--0_? _ .. _ _ 3~4_1 _ -. ~ 2_.~ ____ • ~<:c_ep(~bJE! • _ ...... E,~~ _60~. _ . _ . . J 1_2_0 __ 9_a111_r,:i~--B_H_~(~~-d~~~)-____ • _ .. _ .. __ . _. _ y9}~. __ . __ 5~~ _ ...... ~--4~-____ ?~6?:.~-~~ ___ .. _i:,<:c_ep!a_bJ <: __ .. ___ E,~~-6_0~ J _2_49 __ a!~ha:~h,l _o'.d_a_n_e __ ....•.. _ .....•. _ _ _ _ µ9/L 4 .7 5 .78 2 .60 -7.82 Acceptable EPA 608 . -~2_45_ 9~rnn:1~-~hJa.r?~~e. _ •.. _ ... _ . _ ... ____ : : : :: : r : : : ~~'~ .. : : 1: : : i ~ : : ··: : : j.:7~: : : : : _1 ::5:6::-: i-j j : : · · : A.~~~:P!~b]~ :: : : : : : : ~~;:6~~:: : : : _ -~D_4_9 _. 4~~·:~C?[). _ .. _____ ... ___ . _. __ .... _. _ .. ___ ~ _ . y9.t~--__ . __ . _5~~. __ . _. ~--89 _. __ ?:1_6 _-_8_-3.! ••. _ -~c.c _e_pta_bJ<: _ •. ____ E,~A .6_0_~ •.... : }~:!:~: _;~r~~i :::::::::::::::: _-. :·::::.:: -__ r:: ~:t :: I_:::!)::: -: : r;;:: :: }~1trI3: .: : )~~:;:;~::::: ·: ~ :;1 ::_~;:: .·: · ~~:~ :~~:~:i~~~ -::::::::::::::::::::: 1---~~;~-: !::-:)-::·::!:!;: __ -t:rr?t ·::)~~:;I;:J:_: ~-.-:;;_:~:.:: __ 7530 _E_n_d_ri~ _a!d.E:_h_y_~e .. _ • _ • _____ .• _ • . • . . .. __ ~Q/L . __ I .. _5~0 ..... __ • ~-_9~ ___ . _ 1._6_0_ --~-~~. . __ i:,c.c_e_pta_bJ<: _____ . _ ~~~ _6_0_~ _ ... '-" 7535 _E_n_d_ri~ _k~)°.n_e __ •.. _ • __ • ___ . _ .. _ .• _ .. _ _ _ _ _ ~9!~ .... _ .... _4 :~ .•.. __ ?.4? .. _. _ ~;O?_ -_ 7..~6 _ . _ .. _A<:c_e.P!~b}E: _ ...... _ E,~~ _6_0?_ _ _ : :~5~19:. E_n?.??~l!a_n_ I __ .. _. _________ •.• _ ... _ •....• _-~QI~_ ... __ ~ !·_6 _. _ .•• !~-~-___ .. 4 :_1_6_-_ ~9_.~ ... __ Jl.c_c_ep !~b!E:. _ .. __ • E,~,:"_6_0~-_ . _ _ ~--6J _ .. __ . ?/9_-_ 1_1_-! _ ... _ ~c.c.ep(~bl<: _ •. _ .•. E.~-:' _6_0~-•. __ 7515 En dosulfan II , ______ ,., _____ ~-·-••-v -··---··~ .. _ YQ _I~. .. . _ ... _6 : 7. .. __ . 9.83 .. ~J.1 . -_ ~ 4:_.3.. . _ . Jl.~c_ep!a_b_l<: • _ .• _ .... E.~-:' _6_0~ •.• 752 0 End osul fan sulfate ···--··· ___ ., ________ -·--.. ··----...... ··-··--· ... .. Y9.'~-_ .. __ 8: 1 ___ . 0052 Heptachlor µ9/L 4 .2 • 0 0078-··H·e~t;~hi~r·e·p~~i-d~-(b~ta) ••.. --••• ---... -r .. -~9/L -- ... · 11i --. . -ia1 ci . rvi~tti~~ycti i"o.r ••• -------• -•• ---• --.. --· 1 . -~g/L .. --. -• 14 .2 ... -- 4.30 1.40-5.91 •. __ .~<:c_ep!~b!E: . EPA 608 -. ~ ----.. ' ---.. -----. -. -------.... ·• - 9.69 4 .86 -13.5 . _ i:,~c_ep!a_b!<: .. EPA 608 ..... -... -. -,.. ·--·---~----... -. ----. ----- 11.7 3.15-18.4 Acceptable EPA 608 WP Chlordane cat# 837 0053 Chlordane , technical µ9/L 12.9 17 .2 6.46 -24.8 Acceptable EPA 8081A WP Chlordane cat# 837 0053 Chlorda ne , technical µ9/L 12 .9 17.2 6.46 -24 .8 Acceptable EPA 608 WP Toxa hene cat# 838 8250 Toxaphene µ9/L 20.9 20.8 2.08 -37.7 Acce ptabl e EPA 8081A WP Toxa hene cat# 838 8250 Toxaphene µ9/L 20.9 20.8 2.08 -37 .7 Acceptab le EPA 608 WP BTEX & MTBE in Water (cat# 643) _ -~3_7_5 ___ B_e~~~~~ .. ________ . _. ___ •••••• _ •• ___ .. _-~QI~-_ ..• _ ?~·? ......... ~~-? ...... _6~:4. •. !'!~. _ .. ~<:c_ep!a_b}<: __ .• __ E,~,:"_8_0~]~ .• _. _ • ~o_o_o_ . te,rt.·_Bu !~I !1:e.t~v.1 _eJ~E:_r _(~T_B_E_) ____ ..• _____ • __ • )~9!~ _ .. __ .. _ ?.~-? _ .. ____ ~! .9 ___ .• ~~:?. -. ~~-~ _ . __ Jl.<:c_ep!~b!<: _ •. _-_ .. E,~~ _8_0~~ ~ ___ . . ::7..6_5 ___ E_t~V.l?e,~z_e_n_e_ ••. _ .. _. _ .• _______ .. __ •. . _ .• ~9!~ ... __ .. ?.~-_9 -_ ..... _ ~~·9 ... ___ ~?-_4_-_~o_.g . __ • _Jl.~c_ep!~bJe,. _. _. _ ~~-:'-.. 8_0~]~ •... _ _ ~1 _49_ . T_o!u_e_n: _________ ..• __ ... _ . __ • ___ . ______ .. y 9!~ __ _ _ ?~--1 _____ . 3.~·.?. __ ... ?~:4_ · .. ~2--?. ... __ ~<:c_ep!a_b!E: . __ .. _ ~~~ _8_0~} ~ .• _ 5260 Xylenes , total µ9/L 106 122 69 .8 -164 Acceptable EPA 8021B Page 19 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP BTEX & MTBE in Water (cat# 643) 4375 Benzene WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 03/23/10 Study Dates: 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description .. _ y9j~ .. _ .. _. ?~·? ... __ .. ~~-?. _ ... _6~-.4.: ! ! 1 __ .. _ .A.c.c_ep!a_bJe. ... _ ... _ E.P.Jl._6_0?_ ••• _ µ9/~. .. • . _ 5.3.-~ _ •..•• (3! -9 .. _ .. _ ~?~5--. ~5_.~. ___ P<.c.c_e_p!a_bJe. . ___ ... _ E.P.~ _6_02 .. _ ..... . 4 765 __ Eth.~l?e.~z_e_n.e . _ ..• _________ • _ ••.. _ .....•.. _ . _ _l:!9!~ ...... _ . 5.3.-~ .••.•• €53..0 ____ . _ ~?-.4. -_ 8_q_.q. __ .. _ ~c.c_ep!a_bJE: _ .. _ • __ .. E.P.J\ _6_0? __ ... __ 5140 Toluene ..... JJ.~'~--_. _ ... ?~-.1_ ..... _. ?3.·? ........ ??:4_-_4.2_.5. _ •... _P<.c.c_ep!a_bJE: __ .... __ E.P.J\_6_0? __ .. _ 5260 Xylenes , tota l µ9/L 106 122 69 .8-164 Acceptable EPA602 _ -~4_0_8 __ 8.a_sol_i~E: ~-a~9~ -~r9~~i95. (~~?) _ .. ___ ...... __ .. _ y9jl _ .. ____ 3.1_4_0 ___ .. -~~7_0 __ ... _ ~?! :~~?q _ .. _ :~c.c_ep!a_blE: ... __ .• E.P.J\_8_0_15.~ ..... 4375 Benzene in GRO µ9/L ... _ ?5.-.:3 . _ .. _ . ) g._9_ -_4_2_-1 .•. _ t:-J'?~ ~~J?C>~e_d_ ...• _ .......• __ . ___ _ · -~7:6~: _ -~t~~l ~~~~e~;:i~ ~~O, ~: ~:: : : : _:: : : : : · : : I:: :~~/~::: [: :: : ·:: : ~ 76 .1 ___ •.. 4~:~: ! q~ ..... r:,Jo~ ~~pe>~e_d_. ____ ..•...• __ .. _. _ _ ~1_4_0 ____ To!~e_n~.i~ _(3.[3() ___ •....•... ___ .. _ J. ... y9j~. _ .1 ... _ .. _ 220 . _ 1_1_8_-~9 _3 ___ ... t:J?t. ~~J?C>~e_d_. _ .. _ . . .. __ .• _ . 5260 Xylenes, total in GRO µ9/L 224 128 -302 Not Reported WP Gasoline Ranae Oraanics (GRO) in Water (cat# 640) 1---~4 _0 __ 8_ _8.aso!i~E: ~-a_n9~ -~r9<.1~i~5. ~c;~()) .. . ..... -~9!~ ..... _ ~~8_0 __ ...• ~~70_ • _ . _ ??! : ~-! ?O .. _ _.~c.c_ep!a_b_le_ .•. __ ()~ .C?~? 8.1'3() .• _ V _4_3_7:5 _ ~e_n~.e~e. (n_ c;~_() . _. _ ..... _ .. __ ... . _ .4.~6_5 __ .E.th.}:'.l?~~ze_n.e _i~ ~-R.(). __ ..... __ .. .. _ ...... y9}~ ..... _ ........... ?5.-~. _ .. _ }g.9_-_4_2_-1 ..... r:,J9t_Re.J?e>~e_d_ .. _. _. _____ .. ____ _ _ .. _ _ ~9j~ _ ...... _ . _ .. . .. !~-~ _ .... _4~:9_: ! q5 _ .... N9~ ~e.J?e>~e_d_ .. _ •. _ .•. ___ • _ .. 5140 Toluene in GRO ~ ---~ -.. -. ---.. ~ ~ -. -~ .. -.. --~ ----~ -220 118-293 . t:J?~ ~~l?C>~e_d_ -¥" --, . . ... --~ ... -. ~-' -• " --·• -.. ~ .. V • 5260 Xylenes , total in GRO 224 128 -302 Not Reported 868 1970 440 -2580 Acceptable EPA 8015B 501 1970 440-2580 Acceptable OK DEQ ORO 2050 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 7.43 7.5 8 0.00 -13 .9 Acceptable TNRCC 1005 WP Texas Hi h-Level Fuels TPH 2050 Total Petro leum Hydrocarbons 25.9 39 .0 6.73 -59 .0 Acceptable TNRCC 1005 Page 20 of 21 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code: 1539-01 .... Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Massachusetts VPH in Water (cat# 481) WP-180 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 03/23/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Assigned Value Value 01/18/10 -03/04/10 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description . -~3_0_5_ C:5:S:~_,<\lip~?~C.S_ \!n.a.dj~~t1:l? J~!',_\/f::'f:l~ _ .... I._. _1~9!~ .. · l· ?~~-_21~g .. __ 1_ 1_90 _ .... ~~5.: _1??g _.. _Ac.c_ep!a_bJe_ _. _. ~."\0.~f:' .\/_f"._f-_! _ .. . _ ~3_0_7_ .. C:~:S::1? _AJip~c_3t_i_c_s L!n.a.dj~~t~d. _(M~_\/Pri)_ ... _ ·· I· . _ ygj~ ... _ 8?g._1 ??g _ .. __ 1_ 1_5_0_ . _ . ?g._1 _-_1_90~ _ _ . :':·C.c.ep!a_ble_ _ ..... ~.A.O.~F> \f~f-! ... : :~!-~t ~:~~;;tfn~f ;~~s: :~~ :v~::): : ·: ----: : : : : : i: : : :~:~:: : I: : : : : : : : : : : : ir:: ·: : : : ; ;:4~-\~~ :: : : -0~~ ;:;:~::: · · --· --: : . : : : : : : : • fl Jlm:~~1:~;~' (M TBE ) '.'. VPH. • • · • : t :::t • • l • . : • • • •• • Jl°. : :t( iii • ••• ~[i im~;t ••• · • • • : • •: : : • -~1 _4p _. T_oj~e_n~.i~ .Y?.f-! _ .. _.. . . ...... _ _ .. · I· .. ygj~ __ . . . _. . . _ •. ??g ..... _1_28 _ ·--~9_6_ ... ~'?'. ~~eC?~e_d _ . ____ .. _ . ,. .... . . . ~2_4~-.. rn.~~-?(yl _e_n_e _in Y~f-! ... ___ . . __ . . .. l:l~/~. _ I ___ . _ .... _ .. ] ?~ .. _ _ _94:5_: ?~~ .. _ . ~ot _ R1:l~C?~e_d_ .. _ _ _ . .. __ .... _ . . _ ~2_5_0_ . ?:~~,1:l~8. in_ '!P.~ ... __ ...... _ _ I µg /L I 59 .8 I 34.4 -81.4 Not Reported . ;::• ~m:!t!i:~C:c:~). . • . . . . . . • · 1 ·· .. ;;t • •• f ,50.•;90 0 ••• f H •• f: lGf :~. •· i~t;l:!:t ••• MADEP ~PH : •• '-' ~;2;~~;~~~;:;:;;c_:;; ~;;ate~ -(~a-~-~~~l __ _µ_gj~ _ . _ I _~2_5~ 1_ ~~-_ ... 1. ~2_0_ ..... 0.-?~: _1_5~~ _ . _ . ~~c_ep!a_bJe__ _ .. ~~°-~~ _E?_H. .. . -~2_1_8 _. C:1_9:<?~~ !',Jip~~ti _c_s _(~.A. EJ:'~) _ ... _ ..... _ _ .. _ ,_ .. yQI~ .... 1 .. ~~~·?? .... _. ~~-?. _ .. _ ?.:0.0. ~-?~D_ _ ... !'J_oJ A_c~~P.t?l:>le . .. -~AO.~F> _E_~H. .. : : ~~{;~: ~:;~~:;t;;;;r:~r~~::~j~~t:~ _(~~-~~H.l, ... : .: : -~:t ::: I: ::9:6~~~4:::: /Ibo.:~:: :o~:o: ~ ~~~::: : ~;~;;~~~;~. : . : ::°-~~ :E:~:::: _5.5_0_5_. J\c_e:1?P.~t~r1~:1~ !n_ ~':'~. ___ . _. _ ........ _. _ . __ .l:l9!~ __ .... __ .. _ ....... __ <_5..gg . __ .... _ ..... ___ ~'?~ ~1:l ~°.~e__d_ .... ___ .. _. __ .. _ .. . . _ ~5_5_5_. ~n~~r.'.3~~~e_ i_n_ ~~H.. _____ ...... _ .... _ .. _ . _ ... -~g/~. _. .. ___ ...... _ <_5..gg ......... _. __ . . _ r:,J()~ ~~P.'?~ed _____ . _ ......... _ . -~57_5 __ _B_e_nz9(a)~n_t~~a_c_e:1E:l !n_ _E':'~. _ ... ____ ....... _ ..... _1:)9}~ •• ___ ..•• _. _ .... < .. 5.-0.0. ........ _ ... _ .. . ~()~ ~~~()rt,e_d_ .... ___ ..... . . . ~5_8_o, ___ B_e_n!9(a)~~r~:1~ in. ~':'ti .. _ ............ __ . _ . . . ygj~ .. _ .... _. __ . _ .. _<_5.gg .. _ .. _ ...... _ .. _. ~'?~ ~~P.°.rt.e_d_ .. . . ___ .. __ ... _ . _5.5_8_:> ___ B_e_n~9(b)fJ~~r~~th1:l:1~ (n_ ~~~-_ . _ . _ .... _ . ____ 1:)9}~ •. _ _ ..... __ .. __ <_~.gg . __ ........ _. _ ... ~9t ~~P.C?~e_d _ ... _ .... _ ...... . __ 5.~o_o_. B_e_n~()(k)~u_o!c_l".t~1:ln.e_ (n_ ~P.~. ____ . ___ .... __ .l:l!:1:'~-..•...• __ .. ___ _::_5.gg ...... __ . __ ... _ ~'?~ ~1:l~°.rt.e_d _______ . __ . _ .... _ .. 5590 Benzo (g,h,i)peryl ene in EPH µg/L < 5.00 Not Reported . :i~5:5:.: ~h:~~e:n~:i; :~~~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : [ : : :~~/~: :: : [ '. : : : : : : : : .. ~: i.go.: : : : : : : : : : : : : : . : ~~{ R.;~~~~d: : : : : : : : ~: : : : : : : : . _ ~~9_:>_ . ~i~~n_z_(~.~)a.n_t~r_a_cE=l~e_ i_n_ ~':'H. .............. _ .. _ ... ygj~ ... _ ... ___ ... ____ <_ ~.gg . _ .... _ ..... __ . .. . . t:-J'?~ ~~~C?~e__d_ . . ........ _ .......... . . ~2_6_5_ . FJ~~r?n.t~~:1~ !n_ ~':'!"i. .. _ . _ ... _______ . __ .. ____ ):Jg_/~ ___ .. ____ . . . . __ <_ 5..gg _ . ____ . _____ ... ~'?~ ~1:lP.C?~e_d_ ... __ . _ . ___ . _ _ .. _6_2_7_0 __ FJ~~r~n.e_ (n_ ~F>~-... _. __ . __ . _ . _ . __ . __ .. . __ 1:)91~. .. • ___ ••• _ •. _ :'.~.gg ........ _. _ . _ . ~<?! ~~~°.~e_d_. _. __ .. _ ... _ .. . . . ~3_1_5_. l~d.e_n_oS! ,~?-~d.)pf r_en!3 _in. _E_P_H _______ ........ _ .. __ ):JQI~ .•. __ ....•.. _ . :'. 5..gg _ .. _ .......... _ .... t:-J<?~ ~~~°.~e_d_ . _ .... __ . _ ... _ ..... . . -~~8_5_. 2:l'.1!3!hincip~!h_ale_n_e_ i:1 _~f:~ .. _ ... _ .. ___ . _ .. ygj~ ___ .. _ .......... __ ~-.2? ........ ?~O_O_ •• ~ 3_.q . _ .. ~<:>~ ~~~°.~~-d-.... _ . _ ..... __ .. _ .. . _5.0_0_5 ___ f'.!_ap_h!~aJ~n_e_ i!1 _~f:J::f ____ .... __ .. _ .. __ .. . . . __ 1:)9}~. _. __ .••.• __ .:'.5.-0.g _ ... ___ .. _ ... _ ... ~?~ ~~~C?rt.8..d ... __ .. _ ... __ ..... . _ ~6_1_5 __ _P_h_e!1?~!.h:~n_e__ i_n __ ~f:J::f . _ . ___ .. ____ . _ .... __ .. _ . _):JQI~ .. _ .. _ . ___ . .. .. . .<. ~-0.0. ..... _ . ___ ...... ~'?~ ~~~C?~e_d __ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. __ .. _ . . _ ~6_6_5_ . _P_y!~".8.. i!1 _ ~~J::f ___ . _______ . ________ ... __ .. ~QI~.. _ . ___ ••..... :'. 5._.gq _ ... __ . _ .. ____ ... ~'?~ ~~P.°.~e_d __ . _ . __ .. ___ .... __ 6232 C11 -C22 Aromatics (MA EPH) µg/L 254 0.00 · 952 Not Reported Page 21 of 21 All analytes are incl uded in ERA's A2LA accred itati on . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 Soil Study Open Date: 04/19/10 Close Date: 06/03/10 Report Issued Date: 06/24/10 Final Report June 24 , 2010 Nicole D. Schiller Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 Enclosed is your final report for ERA's SOIL-70 Proficiency Testing (PT) study. Your final report includes an evaluation of all results submitted by your labora tory to ERA. Data Evalua tion Protocols : All ana lytes in ERA's SOIL-70 Proficiency Testing (PT) st udy have been evaluated using the fol lowing tiered approach . If the analyte is liste d in the most current Nationa l Env ironmental Laboratory Accreditat ion Conference (NELAC) PT Field of Testing tables , the evaluat ion was completed by comparing the reported result to the acceptance limits generated using the criteria contained in the NELAC FoPT tables. If the analyte is not included in the NE LAC FoPT tables , the reported result has been evaluated using the procedures outlined in ERA's Standard Operating Procedure for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits (SOP 0260). Corrective Action Help : As part of your accreditation(s), you may be required to identify the root cause of any "Not Acceptable" results , implement the necessary corrective actions , and then satisfy your PT requirements by participat ing in a Supplemental (Qu i K™ Response) or future ERA PT study. ERA's technical staff is available to help your labora tory resolve any technical issues that may be impairing your PT performance and poss ibly affecting your routine data quality . Our labora tory and techn ical staff have well over three hundred years of collect ive experience in performing the full range of environmental analyses. As part of our technical support, ERA offers QC samples that can be helpful in helping you wo r k through your techn ical issues . Thank you for your participation in ERA's SOIL-70 Proficiency T es ting study. If you have any questions, please contact Shawn Kassner, Proficiency Testing Manager, or Curtis Wood , Director of Regulatory Affairs and Business Development , at 1-800-372-0122. Sincerely, Shawn Kassner Proficiency Testing Manager attachments smk 6000 West 54th Ave., Arvada, CO 80002 Jay R. McBurney Quality Program Manager 800-372 -0122 fax (303) 421-0159 www.eraqc.com Report Recipient ContacUPhone Number Reporting Type Arkansas Jane Hurley/ 501 -682-0938 All Ana lytes Florida Steve Arms/ 904-791-1502 Al l Analytes Kansas Lynd i Stout/ 785-296-3811 All Ana lyt es Louisiana Paul Bergeron / 225-219-1244 All Ana lytes Oklahoma David Caldwell / 405-702-1039 All Analytes Texas Frank Jamison/ (512) 239-3754 All Analytes SOIL-70 Definitions & Study Discussion Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 SOIL Study Definitions The Reported Value is the value that the laboratory reported to ERA. The ERA assigned value for the Organic Proficiency Testing Standards is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation as applicable. The ERA assigned value for the Inorganic Proficiency Testing Standards, with the exception of the TCLP Metals in Soil, is equal to the maximum amount of the parameter available in the standard by applicable EPA methodologies . Th e ERA assigned va lue for the TCLP metals is equal to the mean of ERA's internal analytical analyses . All NELAC parameters not added to a standard are given an assigned Value of "O", per the guidance issued by the NELAC Board of Directors , on December 14 , 2000. Non-NELAC parameters not added to a standard may be given an assigned value of less than a minimum verified concentration as determined in the background soil for applicable EPA methodologies. The Acceptance Limits are established per the NELAC PT program criteria or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Pe rformance Acceptance Lim its™ as applicable. The Performance Evaluation: Acceptable = Reported Value falls within the Acceptance Limits . Not Acceptable = Reported Value falls outside the Acceptance Limits . No Evaluation = Reported Value cannot be evaluated . Not Reported = No Value reported. The Method Descriptio n is the method the laboratory reported to ERA. Report Issued: 06/24/10 SOIL Study Discussion ERA's SOIL-70 Proficiency Testing (PT) study has been reviewed by ERA senior management and certified compliant with the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC), Proficiency Testing Program Standards, Chapter 2, July 2003 . Per the requirements of the NELAC Proficiency Testing Program, a full review of all homogene ity, stability , and accuracy verification data was completed. All analytical verification data for all analytes in the Soil study standards met the acceptance criteria contained in the NELAC Proficiency Testing Program Standards, Chapter 2, July 2003. If the analyte is included in the NELAC Fields of Testing list the acceptance limits were calcu lated based on the NELAC Proficiency Testing Program Standards, Chapter 2 , July 2003. If the analyte is not included in the NELAC Fields of Testing list , the acceptance limits were calculated using the procedures outlined in ERA's Standard Operating Procedure for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits (SO P 0260, Rev . 2 .0). The data submitted by participating laboratories was also examined for study anomalies . There were no anoma lies observed during the statistical review of the data . ERA's SOIL-70 Proficiency Testing study reports shall not be reproduced except in its entirety and not without the permission of the participating laboratory. The report must not be used by the participating laboratories to claim product endorsement any agency of the U. S. government. The data contained herein are confidential and intended for your use only . If you have any questions or concerns regarding your assessment in ERA's SOIL Proficiency Testing program, please contact Shawn Kassner, Proficiency Testing Manager, or Curtis Wood, Director of Regulatory Affairs and Business Development, at 1-800-372-0122 . Study: SOIL-70 ERA Customer Number: A 116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 1 of 12 SOIL-70 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 06/24/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 ANnal. Analyte o. Units Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description SOIL Metals in Soil (cat# 620) · -~-~-~-~--1~~:~~; -· ---·· ·-· ---·· · -----· -----· I· -· ::~~: ---1· ·-· l:~---I· -·1 ~1;q --· ~~~~5~ ~ 1t!t -l· --:~:-::::-~~ -· · -· -::t -:~~ ~: --.. · : }~~~ t: : ~:a~t;~ : : : : : : ~ : : : : ~ : : ~ : : : ~ : : : : : : : : ·: [ _ : ;;;~: : ~ r : ~ ~!:: ~ ~: : : i tr : ~: : t;: ~ itt : : : : ~ ti~:~i::~~ : : : : : : :tr:;t ir : : : . )~{{. ::-:I~~~ ------. -.. -............... -.. -.. ~ .. ::~~:--f --~~: .. -... -~?t .. -.. -;~~t ~:i -... --1~::~1;;~: ...... ~::-:{-~~:----. . .. 10.30· . c;d-~i~~----... -..... --... -...... -.. -. ·· 1· -.. ~;;kd ... r -. 1si . T -.. aa.s .... -.. 62~3-: 1 as -... ·_ · __ ;,. __ ~ __ c-_e._p_ ia_·b_i~_-: .·.· · .... EPA ·601 os .. -. . • 1·0·3·5-. ca·1~i~~ ---..... --... --...• ---. -. -. ~9ik 9 . r .. -siio· -.. --63·8·o· ..... · ;,5-'20 ._.ii30:.: .. _.i:,~c_epia_b1E: _.. .. --EPA -601os · -... ::~}:t: :~:;tt 1~~::: ~:::: :: : ~: ::: : ~::: ::: : :r :: ;::}~: ·:: r: :~rt :.:: ·;:r :::::~~{J~t --: :i~:_;~::i:::: ::~:tt;tt~r :: : .. ; ~}~ l;;~pe~ ..... -----.. -.. .. . .. -. f .. ·: ;-.:~~:.: . ·_ I· -·1 ;~bo .... -1 !~60 ... 38~;2-\;3t60 .. -·;~;::I::~; -· I· .... ~:t -:~~ b: .... 1075 L~;d .•.. --. ---. . . . .. r ·: . ~9!~~ . : .... : ] ~ ~: : : . : : :1 ~~:: : : : :8~:~ ~ i ~~ : : . : . ~~c:~P!~~~ : : : : : : ~~~ :6~) ~~: : : .. '-' --f ~!~:. j:~;::~~::: : : -: : : : -: : .. : ~.:::::: ·_ -,. -::~~:---· -238o5t · -· · \Yt -· · --~i!-~-:-1:r · : )~~:;~:~::: · .. ·· -:::-:~-~b: · -- : >~6{: ~ti~t:n~~ : : : : : : : ~ ~ ~ ~ : . : : : : : : . : : ~ ._, : ~ ;!;~: : : r . : ; 3;: : : :. J;:: :: : : \6(: ~ ;} : : : . ~;~z;~~t : : : : ~ ~~i :6~~1 ;~: : : : .. ~-~-~_:_ ~~~;~sj~~: .. :::::: ·:::: · · · · · · · ·::::: : : : ;:;~:::: I:: :i1/o:::: :. jJ?i:::: :i~::~:)~:!:o: : : :~:~:;f::1::: . : : : ;;;::;~it ::: .. ~ 1_4_0_. S_e]E:n_i~f:1 ... ___ . _ . ___ ... ___ .. __ ........... ~.9(~~ .... _ ~~-~ _ .. ___ ~~-! .... _ ?~·-4_ ·. ~2_.6. __ .. :':'~e:ep!a_bJE: ....• _ . ~P.i\ _6_0)98.. _ .. . .. ~ 1_5_0 __ S_il:':~ ___ .. _ .. __ ...... _ .......... _ .. _ .. _ .......... ~.9/~~ ...... 5.~._1 _ .... _ .. ?~·.?. _ ... ~(_>._8_ -.. ~3:6. _ ...... /\~c_ep!a_b lE: ..•.... ~P.i\_6_0:198. ... _ . -~ 1_55_ -_s_o_diu.n:i ........ -.............. -.. -. -..... rng(~9 ... -' -. ~!~ ......... ~11 ...... _2_5_7_ -x5_1_ .... :':'~c_ep!a .. bJ E: .....• ~~i\_6_0:198. •• - 1160 Strontium mg/kg 194 222 144 -263 Acceptable EPA 6010B <~;} :tt i~~:::: ~:: ·: ~ ~ ~::::.::: ~::::::: .. : ~:~t : I:. J!;::: ~:ti!::::: ;{~~~ii ::. ~ )~::t!:~~: ~::: ]tf:~~tt :::: . _ 11_8_0 __ Tjt~~i .. u~ .... _ .... _ ...... _ .. . ___ . _ .......... __ ~.9(~~ ..... _ ??? . _ ... _ . 39~ ..... .0.:0.0.-:_ 5.~6-. _ .. _ .i:,~c_ep!a_bJe ....... _ ~P.i\ _6_0_19B __ .. . _ 1_ 1_8_5 ... xa_n~?~U112 ....... _ ........ _ ... _ .. .. . . ~9j~9. _ . __ 1 ?? . .. . . } 5(_> . _ ... _9_?:8. -.. ! 8.0. ..... .i:,~c.ep!a_b]E: .. _ . __ ~P.i\ _6_0_198. .. 1190 Zinc mg/kg 191 221 144-268 Acceptable EPA6010B Page 2 of 12 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 e . < SOIL-70 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller EPAID: TX01484 Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive ERA Customer Number: A116001 06/24/10 Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. SOIL Metals in Soil (cat# 620) Units Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Assigned Value Value 04/19/10 -06/03/10 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description --;~ci-~-:~::~;-----· ------· ·· --· · --·· · -· · · -· --::;~: · --1-----· -· -1--· 1~1;°" ---3~;:5:~~i:t · -~:} ::~~~;:· -· --·· ---· -· -· ·-· - . ~ ~ci:t : ~:~tt : : ~ : ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : : : : : : : : : : : ~ : ~ ~ : : : ~:;~: : : [ : : : ~ : : : ~: ~ : ; ;; : : : : : :t; j :~ :: : : : tt i t:~i~~:: : : : : : : : : ~ : ~ : : : ~ : . 102_0 ___ B_e_ryl~~n_, __ .... _. _ .. ____ .. _ ........ _ ... _ ..... _. _ m_g!~Q. __ ... _ .. ___ ..... _ )?~ ...... __ 1_04_-_1_7_2_ _ .. _ ';J?~ f3~e°.rtf:d_ .... _ .... __ .. _. __ .. ___ 10_2_5_ _B_O!()~ .. _ .. __ .. ___ . _ • _ . _ .. __ .•.... _ .. __ .. _ '71_9j~9. • • . ... __ • _ ..... __ 1 ~ '. .. _ ...• _7_3 :.~.-:_ ~ ~~ __ .. '.'l?~ f3~ee>r!f:d . _ .............•. . _ ~ 0_3_0 __ -~a_d_rf!i~n.1 .... _ .. _ .. _ . __ ..... _ . ____ ....... _ ~9!~!;1. . _ . _ .• ___ . _ . _ ~~-? _ .. ___ 6.?:~: ! °-~ __ . _ ~?t. f3~ee>rt,e_d_ .. _ ...... ___ . __ 1035 Calcium mg/kg : . ~~:{: ~~~:t~~ ~ : . : : : : : : : ·: : : : : ~ : : : : : : ~:: ~ [ : : ~:;~: : : . ~ : ~ : : ~ ~: _ . ~~8_o ___ . _ ~52~_ -_7_7_3_o ___ . ~?~ f3~eC>r!f:d _ .. . . _____ .... 187 98 .1 64 .7-109 . ~?~ f3~e()r!~d-..... --•....... - .• ~ 0_5_5 __ <=:opp~~ _ .. _ . ___ ...... __ . _____ .... __ .. _ .... ':1.9!~!;1. _ . . • _ .... _ •.. _ .. ?~9. .. _. ___ 1_4_2_ -. ~3_3_ .•.. ~()~ f3~e°.~f:d _ .. 1070 Iron mg /k g 15000 ~??0.: ?) ~ 0.0. ... ~?~ f3~e°.rt.~d-_ ... {o:7_5: · -L~~~: : : : : ~ : · : : : : ·: : : : : : :. : : : : :: : : : : : : : : : ~g!~i : : [ : : : : ·: : : : : : : :1 ?~: : : : . _8!\8_: ! ~~ ___ . ~?1. f3~e()~~d -_ .• ____ . _ ... '-' : }~:t ~:~;::~~~ : : : : : ~ ·: : -. : : : : : : : : : : : _ : . ~ : : : '. ;:;~: : : . : : : : : : : : : : jV{ : .. : ~~!?: ::r : -~;t :;~:1::: --_ :: : : : : : : : : __ ..... _ . _ ~0_9_5 .t~e.r~~')'-_____ .... __ . _ .. _ .... _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ _ •. rn_g!~9. __ ... _6~2_ __ ..• _ ~--2~-_ .... .:3 ~9J _ --~ 1_.~ _ .• -~~c_e P!1:b!e. ___ .. _ ~P.~--7~_7 ~~-. _ . . _ 11_0~_ -~~IY.~~e _n_u~ .. _ •........ ___ . _ .. __ .. _ .. _ .. _ _ _ rn_g!k,9 _ _ . __ .. ___ ... _ .. _:1 ?? ..... __ 1_0_2_-_ 1_9_4 ___ . _ ~?~ ~~e<>.rt.~d-..••.. __ . _ _ 1_1_0_5 ___ f'.!i?~e_l ..........• _ •. _ _ ..• _ . _ . _ ....•. __ .. __ . __ rn_g!~Q. _ . . .... _ . ___ ..... _1 ?9. .. _ ... __ 1 __ 1_7 _ -_ 2_0_2 ___ . _ ~?~ f3~e()rted __ . __ ......• _ .. _ ~ 1_2.:5 ___ P_o_t~~sju_n:i _ .. _____ ......... ___ . ____ •. ___ . __ rn_g!~9. _ ..•.. _____ .... _ ~~7_0_ .. _. __ 1_7_2~. -_ ~8 _4_0 __ .• ~()~ f3~e~~~d-_ . __ . _ . _ •.. __ . _ _ 1_1_40_. S_eJen_i~~-.• _ .. ____ .. ___ .... __ . ___ . __ ~9!k,9 __ .. _. _ ... _ .. ., 1~·!. _ .. _ ?1 ·!--.~2:6. _ .. ~?~ f3e.~?~f:d_ ..•.. _ ..... _. _. _ ... . __ 1_1_5_0_ .. _s _i1:'e.~ . ____ ... _ .. __ .... _ . __ .. _ .. _ ...... _ . _ ....... :11.9!k.Q. _ ..•.... _ .•• __ . 5.2_.6 __ .. _ .. 313._8_ -. 7_3:6.. _ . t:-1?~ f3 ~e<?r!~d-_ . __ . ____ ..... _ .. _ .. _ ... ~ 1_5_5_ . _s _o_d!u_n_:i .. -.....• -.. --...... -. -• . . . . • . . . • rn_g!k,Q. ...... -. -••... -. .5~1 .... -. 2_5_7_ -_ 7_5_ 1_ .... ~()~ f3e.e~~~d-.......... -...... . _ 1_ 1_6_0_ . _s_t~o_n!i~rn-_ • ___ . _ _ _ _ .. _ . _ .. _ .. . . . . . .. rn_g!k,9_ .. _ ..•... _ .. _ . __ ?~~ ..... ___ 1_4_4_-_ 2_6_3 __ .... ~<:>~ f3~e<?~~d-.. ____ . _ ..... _ ... __ . . .. ~ 1_6_5 _ . r _h_a!li_urn ___ . _ ..... ____ . ____ ... _ . __ ...... _ . _ rn_g!k.Q. •... __ .. ___ . __ _:1 ?~ .. _ .. __ 1_0~_ -_ 1_9_3 __ .. _ t:-1?~ ~e.e<?r!~d-.. ____ . __ ....... . . . ~ 1_7_5 ___ T!~ _ ............ _ .. __ . __ .. __ .. __ .. _ . _ . _ ... _ ':1.9!k,Q. _ ...•.. _ . _ . __ . _ _:1 ~6. _ ... __ 9_9.0_ -. ~2_~ _ ..• ~?~ f3e.e°.r!~d-• . ... __ . ____ • __ • _ . . _ 1 __ 1_8_0 ___ T]t'.'1~i_u1:1_ _ ••.... __ . ____ •... ___ • _ ..... _ . __ .... ':1.9(k.Q. _ •.. _ .. _ •• _ . _ _:3~~ . __ ... _o~~~ --?~~ _ .. _ ~?~ f3~e~~~d-_ . __ ... _____ . _ ...•. . . ~ 1_8_!5 _ _'J_a _n_a9i _u1:1_ .. ____ . . . _ . _ .. __ .. _ ... _ . ___ ... ':1.9!~Q _ _ ...... _ .. _ . _:1 ?6. .. . 96 .8 -180 _ ~<:>t. f3 ~e~r!e.d __ -... ---------. '• -... -.. --... ' .. ---.. " . 1190 Zinc mg/kg 221 144 -268 Not Reported SOIL Hexavalent Chromium in Soil cat# 876 mg/kg 148 192 54.2 -244 Acceptable EPA 7196A 21 .3 -72 .3 __ ~~c_ep!1:bJe. _ . EPA 9012 .. -------..... . ---.. ----.... --. -... .• ~6_3_5 __ C:_y_a!1 (d_e~ !o_t~I-______ . __ ... ____ .• __ •. __ . __ ~9!~9. _ .. _ .1~·? ..... _ ?~·.:1 ... 1640 Reactive Cyanide mg/kg < 25 .0 Not Reported SOIL I nitabilit '/Flash oint cat# 874 1780 lgnitability/Flashpoint "F 140 138 121-155 Acceptab le EPA 1010A Page 3 of 12 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code: 1539-01 Study: SOIL-70 ERA Customer Number:A116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 4 of 12 e . . SOIL-70 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. SOIL Volatiles in Soil (cat# 623) Units _4_3_1_5 __ ~c~!~n_e _____________ ..... __ .... _ • _____ ... _ ... JJ.9~k_g __ _ EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 06/24/10 Study Dates: 04/19/10 · 06/03/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits 313 259 40 .0-507 Performance Evaluation Method Description EPA 8260 B . _ '!_3_2_0 __ '.'\C_e!o_n]t~il _e_ .. __ .. _ . ___________ • _______ . __ µ9 ~k_g ___ . __ .??? ... _. __ !?~ ___ . _ g.99: _1_2!? _ _ .. _ i:,c.c_e_pta_bJe. __ . _ •. ~~~ _8_2_6?~ __ ... 4325 Acro lein µg/kg ... _ ~ ~9 __ ... _ .. g.99 . __ . __________ .... i:,c.c_e_p!a_bJE: .... _ .. _ ~~~ _8_2??~ _ . _ : :~3/5: ::~~-~!;~~:::::::: ~:::: :: ·::::::::::::: [: _ ~~~~g::: . __ )~~. __ . __ )~~ __ .. __ 8_?:~: !~~ _ .. _ .A.c.c_ep(a_bJe.. _. ___ ~~~_8_26?~ ... _. · .4'!.33.89.55. __ BB_rroo .. m':1.?o .dbe1_c~h2:loe_rno_em_. e··t·h·a-ne .. · · · .. · · · · · · · · · -···I·· -_µµ9g1t.kk_gg_ · · ·· ·· -)?~ -· · · · · .}?~ · ·· · -·3?:~: !~~ · ·· -.A.c.c_ep!a_ble. · • · ·· · · ~~~-8~??~. ·· · : :1::~-~: : -~~t:t~e~th:a:n:e: : : : : : ·. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1: : : ~µ: 9 91 1 :kk:9 9 : : : : : J::~: : : : Jit : : : ~i·:t 11t : . · )::;;;;:j; : : . : : : :;t:;;i;: : : : . __ ".: ~--9_ .•. __ ?·99 ... _ _ ... _ . _ ...... _ ... i:,c.cep!a_b!e. __ ... __ ~~~ _8_2??~ ..•. · :~~1~: :2~~~1~;?~~ l~~~)::::: :-. : _::::::::::: [:: ~~~k-~::: . _ ~~!-__ . __ ~~'.. _ ... __ 1_4_3_-.5.5_3 _ ... A.c.c_ep!a_b le. _ ... _ ~~~-8_2??~ •. _ ·. )~i_~: :;;:;:t;i;~~~~ :e:~:r:(~?:?.::.:::::::: I::: t!~~~::: . : ) ~~::: :: : : ~:~;:::::.:::::::: :: : )::::;1::J::::::: :;t::!;i;:::: : : ~:}:: }~f ;;i!~1 ~:.~;: 0 :i:: :: : : : : _: : : :: : : :. : : : : : : I: : : t:~i~:: : : : : : 1g:: : : : : ;;:;: : : · : ;;.;: )l~: _: ·:: i;~:;~;:J: : : : _ : :: ;;t :::!;;:: : -: '-': ):_:} }~j:~;:t~~o~r~:'.h:a:n:: : : : : : :: : : : : : : : : : -. I: : : ~:i:~: : : : : _ ~1~r : : : ·· : ~-:r : : : : ij:~ ~: i~( -· : :i~:;;;;::i::: : : : ;;ti.!;;:: : _ . . _ ~50_0_ J2:'?~lor.~e_t~,:l~i~yl~~h_e! ____ • ___ . ___ .. _ .. _ . __ .P§l~~g-• ____ ~ -~-° ..... __ . 9._o9 . __ . _ . _ .. _ . _ .. _ . _. _ . ~c.c_ep!a_bJ~ _ _ ..... ~~~-8_2.??~ _ .. . )!:~:~: t~~:~;;~;~n:~:::::::: : : : : : : : . : : : : : : : : : ~-:~::::: .. ) ;:::::::: b.:;;::::::::::::.::.: );~:~!:::i::: : : : : ;;r:;;i:: : 4570 1!~-!))~n:>rn?~~-9~l?~~P!<?~~~e-(D_8.~~)-. _____ ... _ _µ9f.k9 __ ... __ ~ ~--9 __ .... _ 0,-.09 _____ . ____ • ___ .. __ ~c.c_e_p!a_b]E: __ . ___ ~~~ _8_2.??~ ... __ 4585 1,~·!)!~r?i:n.?_e!h_a_n_e _(~!)_B) ____ . ___ • ____ . _ µg/kg < 3.9 0.00 Acceptable EPA 8260B . _ 4_5_9_5_ . _D_ib.r?~~~e.t~~~E: ___ . _ •.. ______ .. __ ..... _ · : : p~ik~: : : [ : : ~ ~~9: : : : : : g.?~: : : . : : .: : : : : : : : · · : ". ~~c~p!~b]~: : : : : -~~~ :8~~~~: : : : . _ ~6 _1_()_ . _1,~·!))"._h_l~r?~~~z_e_n~-.. ___ .. ___ ........... _ .. • _ _µ.9~~9 -.... __ ~ ~--9 __ ... __ g.99 ... _ .... _ .. _ . __ .... __ i:,c,c_ep!a_bJe. _ • ____ E.~~ _8_2?9~ ___ _ . _'!_6_1_5 __ 1_.~-!)!C.h~~r?~~~z_e_n_e ___ . ___ .. __ . ___ ...... _ •. __ _µ_9~k_g_. _ _ _ !~·?. _. __ 7.0,.9 _ .. ___ 25:6_ --'!O.~ _ ... _i:,c.c_ep!a_bJE: __ .... _ ~~~-8_2.??~. _ . . _ ~6_29 ___ 1 :~·!)!~h lor_?~~~z_en~ ... ___ .. ___ • ___ .. __ . __ . __ _µ9 ~k_g_ _ _ . _ . ?:5~ __ ... _ . ) ~'. ... _. __ 6:4:4_ -. ?~5. _ ... __ ~c.c_ep!a_ble. . _ . _ .. ~~ ~ _8_2??~ __ .. . . -~6_2_5 ___ D_i~~l?r_o9!f~u?~~11;E:t~~~E: i~r~?~ __ 1?) _ .. __ . ___ .... _µ9~k_g __ .. . _ ~ ~~9-__ .. _ ~-99 . __ . ____ .... _ .. __ .. -~c.c_ep!a_bJE: __ ....• ~~~-8_2_6?~ ... . . -~6_3_0 ___ 1, 1_-!)_ic_h!~r?~~h?~~ ________ • __________ .• _ _p9(k_g ___ . __ J?~ __ ... __ 1~?. _ .. __ 6_:3:5_: !~2_ _. _ -~c,c_ep!a_b]E: __ . _ .. _ ~~~_8_26?~ .. __ • . • ~6 _3_5_ . 1,~·!)]"._h]~r?~~h?~~ ____ .•. ___ . _ .... __ .. __ .. _ _µ9~kg __ _ _ _ _ ~ ~~9-__ . __ 0,-.09 . __ . __ .. __ ..... _ ... _ . ~c.c_ep!a_b]~ _ _ _ •.. ~~~ _8_2.??~ __ .. . -~6_40_. \ ~-!)!c,h!~r?~~hle_n_e _. _____ .. ___ • _______ . _ .. _µ9f.k_g ___ . __ ??~ _. __ .. ]?! __ .. __ 8~:~: ?.~~ ...... ~c.c_ep!a_b}E: __ . _. _ ~~~.8_2?9~ .... . 104 66 .7-151 . _'!_6_5_5 ___ 1/-!)J~h~~r?p~op_a~~ __ . _ ..• ______ .... __ . _ ..... _ JJ9~~g-_ ..... )1? ... 4680 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene µg/kg 87 .3 80.8 60 .3 -107 Acceptabl e EPA8260B ·-..__ Page 5 of 12 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 Anal. Analyte No . SOIL Volatiles in Soil (cat# 623) (Continued) SOIL-70 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 06/24/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Assigned Value Value 04/19/10 -06/03/10 Acceptance Limits PEerfo 1 rmt~nce Method Description va ua 10n ... 4.6_8_5_ . ~~a_n?:1!~·_DJ c_h_lo_r9p~o_pie_n_e .. _____ .... _ .... __ .... _µ9~k_9 ___ I_ _ .. _:1 ?? ... _. _ . _1 :57. _ _ _ _ _ 1_04_ -.~2_0 __ J. __ /\c_c_ep!a_bJe _ .. . _4_7_6_5_. _E_t~~,~~~z_e_n_e .. __ .... ___ .. __ .... _ ... _. _ .. _ .. _ . __ _µ9 1.k9 __ .. I. .. _ ?1·? ......... 7.1_·? ....... _3~:1. :. '.0.4. .. J . .'°:'C.c.ep!a_b_l: .. . EPA 82608 EPA 82608 __ 4_8_6 .. 0_ }:~~l_:a_n_o_n_e _______ . ____ ... __ ....... ___ .. _ ..... _µ9f.k_9 .. _ ... _ .. ~~g -_ .. _ .. .:3~~ _ ...... _8_:3 :6_: ?0.~ ..... _ A.c.c_ep!a_bJ: _ ... __ .. E.~A.-_8_2?9~. __ . . _4_9_09 __ !~°.P!?P.~'~:~z_e_n_e _______ .. ___ ....... ___ .. _ _ _ _µ9(kg _ ........ _ ~ ~~9-_ _ 0.00 ... _ . ___ . ____ -· __ ":'c_c_ep!a_bJ: __ . _ .. _ E.~/\_8_2,69~. _ _ _ 4_9_7_5 __ .. ~:t~Y.l_e~~ 5=~l.9~i9~ ___ . _ .. __ .... _ .. _ .... ____ ... _ _µ9 !k9 _ .. _ . ___ 1 ?~ __ .. _ . _:1 ?~ . __ ... _5!:4.: 1 ~8. __ ... _ ":'c_c_ep!a_bJ: _ .... _ E.PA.-__ 8_2??~ .. _ • 4995 4-Me thy l-2-pentanone (Ml8K) µ9 /k9 128 113 47.2 -168 ... _ A.c.cep!a_b]: _ ... __ . E.P.A.-.8_2?0~-__ . : :i o~o:5: _N.a:~_hj~~,~~~:::::: :·:: ·::: ~ .: : : : : : : : : : [:: :µ~ik:9::: . : : !~/ :: :: : : ~~-~:: :: __ 4p .:i ~ii ~_ ..... A.c.c_ep!a_bl~ __ . __ E.P./\_82698 _ . _ . . -~1 _0_0_ .. ~tY.r.e~_e -_______ .. __ .. _ .. ___ .•. _. _µ~'.~9. _ _ ~ ~:9 .. _ ..... _ g,?9 ........ _ ... _ .. _. _ .. _/\cc_ep!a_bJ:. . _ .. E.~.1\ .. 8~?9 ~ . _ ~1_0_5 ___ 1; '.• J ,_2: '.~t~a_c_h~o_r?~t~~~~ ___ . _____ .... ____ . __ }J§J'.k_9_ . _ .. ___ 1 ?g __ .. _ .. 1 ?? __ . __ 1_0~. -.. ~2_3_ _ _ _ _ Ac_c_ep!a_bJ~ . _ _ __ E.P./\ _8_2?9~ __ _ 511 O 1, 1,2,2-Tetrach loroe thane µ9/k9 < 3.9 0.00 .. :':'C.c_ep(a_b!~ ... ____ ~P./\ _8_2??8 _ . _ . : t~:} }:Jt~~t~~~e:t~~,;~~ : ~ ~ : : : : : : ~ : : : ~ : : _ : : i:: ~ ~~i~:: : : l : : ;;{ ~ ~: : ": ~!{ : : : _:tt ii: : -. : )~:::~;;:J: _ : : : : : ;;;:::!;i;: : .. · _ -~1 __ 5_?_ .. 1i ~.4 :T_ri_c~~o!°.b.e_n_z~~E:. ______ . _ .. _. _ ... _ ..... _µ9~~9-_ ... __ _1!~. _.. 171 .. ___ 8~:6.: ?~~ _ _ .":'c.c_ep!a_b!: _ •. _. _ E.P.-:\_8_2~98 _. ~. :~~;~: _:~~ U~t~;t:~:::~:~::: ~: ~::::::::::::: : : ~;~~:::: : ~ :;r9-. :: :: : : {11 _: :. : :?~5 : ~ ~~:: :: : )::;;f~:J:::: _·::~;_!_!;it : :: - ~1 _7_0_ .. _T_ric~l.?r.°.e_t~Y.'E:~~ _ . _ ... _ ... _ . _ ... _ . _ . _ _ .• _ _µ_g(~9-.... __ _1 ?? __ .... __ 1~9 -.. __ .. _?J :~ ~-?0.0. _ _ _ . A.~c_epta_bl~ _ . __ . ~~i\_8_2~9~. 5175 Trichlorofluoromethane µ9 /k9 110 . ~~ ·?. _ ... _5~:2.-:_ ! ~3 . _. ..A.c.c_ep!a_bl: _ ..•.. _ ~P./\ _8_2?9~ _ .. __ • •;~if ~g~~ltott • •. •:: •••·· .... f i~ • • f • •{f ~••.•·~ii:••••::::::~••• • §\gj~:. ··• ·!~If if ff ••. Page 6 of 12 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 SOIL-70 Final Complete Rep ort Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. Units SOIL Base/Neutrals and Acids in Soil (cat# 467) EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 06/24/10 Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description _ ~5.0_0_ . ~CJ0'.3P.~l~~~e. . _ ..... _ .. _______ ..... ___ .. _ . I _ _µ9~k_g_ . _ J __ ~2.2.o_ __ . _ .. ~5 _90_ _ _ . 1_4_3_0_ -_ ~5_89 __ . _ . ':'C.c_e_p!a_b}8. .. . . . _ E,P,~ _8?!9C:. __ • :!}:t t1f f 0?::i:,,b,;""' (o:,o,,":001 : • .• t • ~~;~ . J m1 • • • : !It •. • : 77 : "'' •. • • • E:~lm • • • : • iH :~f !~ · ·· · . ~5_5_5_ . ~n_t~r_a9e.~8. _ .. _ .. __ •• _ . .. • ____ . _____ .1. __ µ9 ~k_g __ . I .... 1_ ~6_0 . _ _ _ 2~40_ . _ _ ~ !? -~ ~9?0. .. . __ A.c,c_ep~a_b~8. .. _ . _ • _ E,P,i\ _8_2?9r;; 5595 t'"'idioe I µglkg ( < 1700 O 00 .. Aoc.ept,.bl, ... EPA .8270C .... • ·~:; • ~:~;!~l:1b~~:~:: •. • • •.: •:. • • •• :: [ • • f :;;; : • [. •1!{~: :•:. {,l . •• • :7~: ~2'0 : •• • lE:f ;~; • • • • • •!EmH : • • . _);~_6·_· .-:.:-~::;_-:_'.~.-~-;~:-~.1 ~~~-ee __ . -__ · ·. ·_ -_ -. ·_ •• -· ----. -I·.: -.~.:;_-~:.· __ ·I·. _· ·_:}_J __ i_ -_. _--i~~;-_--__ : ~ ·: ·: ~::: .. : :~~~ep!~b]~: -_ ,: : : :~~/\ ~'.2?9~:::. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1_4_40_ -_84_7_0_ .. _ ... ':'C.c_ep!a_b_l8. .... _ . . E,P.i\ _8?!~C: .. __ _ _ 5_5_85) __ Be_n!~(a)pyr~ne _ •.... _ •. _ .. __ . __ ... _ . _ .. 1. __ _µ_g ~k_g_ ... 1. _ .1.~3_0 __ .. __ 1610 _ ~?~: .?9~0. _ ... _Ac,c_ep!a_bJ8. _ .... _. E.P.~_8_279c _5_6_3_0 __ B_e _n_zyl _a_lc,~h_oJ __ ... __ . . . . . . .... _ _ _ _ _ I_ . _ /JJ:J!k_g_ ... <.. ! 7.~ _ _ _ _ g._09 _____ . _ .. _ _ _,~c,c_epta_~l8. __ _ E,P,i\ _8_2!9C: __ . _ ~ _ -~7_6_0 __ b!s_(?:G_hl<?r_o~~h _o_:ey )_~e.th~~8. _ . ____ . _. ___ ·I· __ _µ9 !k g_ _ . _<_. !70 . __ .. g._oo ___ ... ______ ...... ':'<:c_ep!~b}8. __ . _. E,~~-8_2?9C __ .. . -~7_6_5 __ b!s_(~--~h_l<?r_D~!hy()~t_hJ:. __ ..... _ ... ____ . _. _ _µ9!,kg __ .. __ .<. !~°--____ 9-5}9 __ .. __ . ____ . _ -· _ .A.<:c_ep!a_b_lE; .. __ . _ E,~i\ BJ?9r;; ... -· ::-:-~--:;;~~~:~~;;~~;~:~~r;r~e~r: · . _ . : : : : : : ~ : I. ~ __ -~!i~:: : -': .: ) ~% : : : : : ri;: : : : : ~:~~~~~a. · : )~:_:~I;:j: : : : . : : :;t:;;~t -.. _ 5670 _ B_u_t~l~e1:<:.Y!P_h_t~~l<.3 t_e __ ..• _. __ ..... _ _ .. _ I _. _µ9~kg _. _ _ _<_. !~O. _ ... _ 9._09 _. . . .':'C.c.ep!a_bJE:. _. __ E.f:'/\_8J.!?C:. __ . 5680 _G_a!~a7:o_1e. .. _ .•. _____ . __ . _. _ ... _. _. _. ____ _µ_g ~k~. _. _. :: :~O.. _ ... g.5)0 __ •. __ ... _. _. _ .. ':'<:c.ep!a_bJ8.. _. _. _. E,P,i\_8f!?C:. __ . __ ~7_4_5_ . 4~C::~l_o:o_a_nJli_n_e _ .. _ .••. __ • __ . _ .. __ • __ •.. _ . )J§l~k9 _ .. _ . _<_. ! ~O. _____ 0.·99 .. ____ . ___ ..... _ .. _ .. ':'~c_ep!a_bJ8. . ___ .• E,P,/\ _8_2?0.C: _ ... . . _ 5_7_0_9_. 4:C::~l_o~o_-~~-nie.t~ylp~e.~<?1 •.... _ ... _ ..... _ ...... __ _µ9 ~k_g ____ . _ 5.~1 _0 ______ 1990,9 .... _ ?~10. .: -~] ?0.0. __ .. _ ~<:c_ep)a_b!8. . __ . ___ E.P,i\ _Bf!O.r;; ... __ -_5_7_9_9_ -1:(?h.lo:c.n_ap~!h_a~e_n_e_ -" -.. -... --............. _µ9~k~_ --. -...... --.. --g._09 _ -..... -... --. --•.. t:-J()~ ~~e<?~8.~ -. -----.. -.... -.. 5800 .2:c::~19:o_P_h _ _e09~ • _ __ __ __ _ __ .... _________ -. _µ9'.k_g __ .. __ 1_ 7_8 _0 _____ . ~1_5_0 __ .. ___ ~) ~ -~ 3!~9 .... _ . ':'C.c_ep!a_bl8. .. ____ E.f:'~ _8_2!9~. _ . 5825 4:C::h.l?:°.P_h_e:iyl:r:_~~e_ny(e_t~e.r _____ .. _ . .. ___ _µ9 '.k_g __ . __ . ~6_6 _0 __ . _ . _ 6.~5_0 __ ... _ 1_ s_o_o_ -_ 8_3_7_0_ .... ~c,c _ep\abJ8. _ . EPA 8270G 5855 _ ~h_ry~~n_e ____ ••. _ .. __ •.. _ .. ___ . _____ . __ . __ . .P~!.k_g_ . _ . _ .. 1.44_0 ____ . _ 1_ 6_4_0_ . ___ ~~~: ?~90. ____ . -~c,c_ep!~b!8. . _ ... _ E,~i\ _8_279r;; ___ . . _ 5_8_9_5 __ -~i~E:f:<:.( ':•~)~n_th.~~~~~8. . _ . _ .. _ •.. ____ . ____ . _ _µ9 ~k_g __ . __ 1_ 6_9_0_ . _ . _ .. '. ~3_0 ___ . _ ~O.? : J~?9 . ____ ':'~c_ep!~b~8. _ _ ... E,~/\ _8_2!?C:. _ .. . -~9_0_5_. ~i~e.r:z_o!l!r~~ ___ . ____ . __ .. __ . _____ . __ .. _ _µ9!,k_g __ .. __ <_. !~~ _ . _. _ 9-99 . ___ . ___ . __ .. _. ___ :~·<:c_ep !a_bJ 8. ___ . _. E,f:'i\_8_2!9C:. _ .. _ . _ ~9.2_5 _ . ~i-_n_-~l!tylp~~h_a!a _te. _ .. __ ....... _ .. __ . ___ •. ___ _µ9!k9 _ . _ . __ <_ 1_ 7.0. _____ g.99 .. __ ... _ . _ . _ .... _ . ~~c_e_p!a_bJ8. • _ .•. _ E.f:'~ _8f!9C:.. _ . _ . 4_6 _1 p __ .1~~-_DJ<:h!°.r??e.~7:e_n_e _ .. _ ..• _____ ... ___ . _ ..... _ . _ _µ_~!.k~-. . _ ... <.. ~ ~O. . _. __ g.99 .. __ ... _ ... __ . __ .. _. _ .:':•c.c_ep!a_bJ8. . ____ .. E,P./\ _Bf ?9C: __ .. 0.00 ·~ ---,. ·-.. ~ _ _.~~c,ep!a_bJ8. . _ ..•• E,~/\ _8f!0.C •.... 4620 1.4-Dichlorobenzen.e µg/kg 2490 8010 801 -8810 Acceptabl e EPA 8270G Page 7 of 12 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditatio n. Lab Code : 1539-01 SOIL-70 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 06/24/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 Anal. Reported Assigned Acceptance Performance No . Analyte Units Value Value Limits Evaluation Method Description SOIL Base/Neutrals and Acids in Soil (cat# 467) (Continued) 6270 Fluorene . • .. -. -.. - ---- . -. --_µ9f.k_g_ -. < 170 0.00 ~ -' A -•, •• ~ -• -----•• -... _ .. ____ . _ ...... _ .A.c.c_ep)cl:b!E: .. _. ___ ~~!\_8~?9<?. _ ... 6275 Hexachlorobenzene .. - -.. _µi](~g --. 7070 8900 EPA 8270G 4835 He xachlorobutadiene µg/kg 3740 7740 1140 -8880 _ A.c.c_e?!cl:bJE:. _ . __ --~~!\ _8'!,?9<?. _ . _ : :5.2:8~---~~-~~~~19 ~~cy~1 9p~~t~~~e~~: .. : : ~ : : .. : : ~ : :· : [ : :: }l~~k9: : : [ : :j~~ : ~:: : ~-99: : : : : : : : : : -: : : : .. A.cc.e?!cl:b~E: _ _ .... ~~!\ _8'!-?9<? .... 4840 Hexachloroethane I µg/kg I < 170 0 00 Ac.c_e_p!a_bJe, _ ..... _ . ~~!\ _8~?9<?. __ . • ::~; .~;;:~~htt~::::;o, • : : • : •:.: ••• •: •. '. f :~f :: [. ;m : •• : • t::: •: • ':' '. t. ••: IE:~!~~;::.•--m :m~• -· . _ 63_8_5 . _2:~~\hY!.n_a?~!h_a_!e_n_e_ .......... __ ....... __ ... _ ... _µ9f.k_g __ . I. _ .. ~6_60 __ .. _ •. ~~1 _0_ ....... 1_5_2_0_ --~8-~~-..• _ A.c.c_ep!a_bJ e, _ _ _ .. _ ~~!\ _8_2?9': ... _ .. ~4_09 _ . 2:f:'l~~hy(p_h_e0?1 _ • _ • _ .• _ ..• _ ..• _ ....• _ _ .. _ .. _µ9f.k _g ___ ..... 3~_20 _ .•. __ 1} ~0.0. __ . _1] ~O.: _1 ~90.0. .. . A.c.c_e?!cl:bJe, __ ... _ . ~~!\ _8P9':. _ . _ . _ ~4_1_0_ • _3~4:~~~h.Y!Ph_e~?I __ . __ .. ___ .... _ .. _ . ____ .. _ . __ _µ9f.k_g __ ...... 2.~9_0 .. . __ ~~7_0_ _ _ _ ~ 1 __ 8_0_ -_ ~3_4_0_ .. _ • A.c.c.eP!cl:bJE: _ .... _ . ~~i\ _8_2?0.'?. __ • Page 8 of 12 All ana lytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 SOIL-70 Final Comp lete Report EPA ID : TX01484 ERA Customer N umber: A116001 06/24/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 Anal. Analyte Uni ts Reported Assigned Acceptance Performance Method Descr iption No . Value Value Limits Evaluation SOIL Base/Neutrals and Acids in Soil (cat# 467) (Continued) 7110 _a!P._h_a:~~~------.... _ -·--·-. 7115 be ta-BHC _ .. _µ9/k~--_. ___ .?~~ _. _. __ ~?~ _ .. __ 1_02_-_1s_8 __ .. __ J\c,c _epta_bJE:. ___ . _ ~PJ\_8_08}~. __ . ·---.. --··-----··----······------····--·--· _µ9~k_g_ .. _ .1~·?. __ . __ ~~}. . . . _SJ~-_ 1 ~~ _ .. _ _.~c,c_ep!a_bJE: _ .. _ . _ ~PJ\ _8~81~ __ _ 7105 delta-BHC µ9 ~k_g __ ... __ ??1 . ___ . ~J ~ _ . _. _ .7'~:~: 1~~ __ , __ J\cc_ep!a_b_le _. ___ ~~J\_8_0~:,L\_ . __ . -~1.2!J .. -~-a111_n;~--B_H_~(~~?~~~)_-_ ..... _ .... ___ ... _. __ _µ~1.k~-__ .. _. !5.·? .... _ .. 94.5 . _7_2_4_0_ a!P._h_a~S:~l_?~da_n_e _ . _ . . • . __ •• __ ....... _ . _pg~kg_ ..... _ . ~~-?-....... ?5.-~ _ .. _. __ 3_\3_: ! ~5. _ .. _ .A.c.c_ep!a_bJ~ . _ .. __ ~~J\ _8_0~J,L\ . . _ 7_2_4:i _ . ~a-~n;~·.C_h!~r9~n.e. _ . . . ____ .. µg/kg 198 206 83.4 -273 • _ J\c,c_ep!a_ble. .. _ ... __ ~~J\ _8_0~: f:.. --ii:~ -:'.t~6~ -------.. ------· : --: : : : ~ : 1-,. : ~~j~-f : ---~tr : ·: : -~tt · -: : : ::-::f ;:r · -: )~~:;t1:~: : _ ----~:1 -:~-:~ t --- : :~3:6~: : 4~~·~~~~: : : : · . : : : ·. : : : : : : .. : : . : : : : -·: [ ·. : p9~~g:· : : : _ : !~-] · __ . : ~ ~~-3 : : : : : _1 i ~4: ~ ! ~i : .. _ . J\c,c.ep!a_bJe. .•. : : : ~~~~8?~j~: :-. : . ?4_7_0 __ ~i~l9~in.. ___ . ___ .. _____ . _. ___ .. _ .. ___ . ____ _µ~lk_g_ .. _ .. _ ?:~ _. __ .. _ ??~ __ .. _ _7!:.o. -. ~'.~. ___ J\c,c_ep!a_bJe. __ . ___ ~~J\_8_0~:~. _. 7540 . _E_n_d!i:1 _______ .. _____________ •. ____ • _ ... _ p9~k_g __ . ___ ?1~ ___ . __ .??? _____ 9~:~: ~~~ .. _ ... _.~c,c_ep!a_bJe_ .... ___ ~~J\ _8!]~~,L\-__ _ .. ~~3_0_ l=_n_d!i:1 .a!ct.e_hy9~. ___ ... __ ....• _ .... _. _ . _ _ _ .. p9~k_g_ . _ .. __ ]!! _. __ . ~!?. _____ 3?:6 : ~~3-__ J\~c_ep!a_b!e_ ... ___ ~~J\_8_0~J,L\. __ _ . _7_5_3_? ___ E_n ~!i~ _k!!!o_n_e_ ••. _ •.. _ .. _____ .... _ ... _ p9f.k_g_ .. ___ .. ?~~ __ ... _ ??~ _ ... __ 8?J.: ~~~ _ .. __ J\c,c_ep!a_bJE: __ . __ . ~~~-8_0~:,L\_ . __ 751 0 _E_n_d?~~l!~n_l ___ . _ .. .. .. .. .. .. _________ ... _ _µ~f.k g ___ . __ ~0.-~. __ ... J~1 .. _ . _1~:~: ?O.~ _ .. __ A,c.c_ep!~bJe.. _,. __ ~~~-8_0~),L\ ___ . 72 50 Ch lorda ne , technical µg/k g 28 0 497 99.9 · 676 Acce ptabl e EP A 8081A SOIL Toxa hene in Soil cat# 627 8250 To xaphene µg/kg 57 9 924 92.4 -13 50 Acceptabl e EPA 8081A Page 9 of 12 All a nalyt es a re inclu de d in ERA's A2LA a ccreditati on. La b Code : 1539-0 1 SOIL-70 Final C o m ple te Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 06/24/10 Report Issued: Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 ANnal. Analyte 0. Units Reported Assigned Value Value Acceptance Limits Performa nce Evaluation Method Description SOIL Chlorinated Acid Herbicides in Soil (cat# 626) SOIL BTEX & MTBE in Soil (cat# 633) 4375 Ben zene ... _µ_g~~g-....... !~-1 .. .. 85.9 . -~o_o_o __ J~~--B_u_\~I ~e_t~Y.l _e_t~e_r _(~_T_B_I~). _ .... __ • _. ___ ..• JJ.~~k_g ___ .... 1~·9. _ ... _ ?~·? .. _ .. ??~4---~6_.~ ... _ -~<:c_ep_ta_bJe_ ..• EPA 80218 EPA 80218 __ 5_1_4~-__ To~u_e_n~-_ ... ___ • _ .... ___ • _. ___ .... _ ... __ . __ _µ91,k_g _ .. _ .. _ .:1?~ ..... 174 218 • _1 __ 0_0_-_2_4_4_ ••.. -~<:c_ep\a_bje_. __ • _ -~~~--8_0?)~-. _. 5260 Xy lenes , total µg/kg 199 107 -320 Acc eptab le EPA 80218 SOIL Gasoline Ranae Oraanics (GRO) in Soil (cat# 630) _ ~4_0_8_ . ~a_s_o!i~e_ !'{_a~§)~ -~r§l~~i~~ (C3~~) . _ .. _ . ____ . _ .. !11.9!k.9-_ .. _ .1. ~2_0 ___ . __ 1_ 5_7~-. _. _ ??? : ?~~~ _ ... _ . ~<:c_ep!a_bje_ __ ..... __ E_P_}\ ?~1. ~ .... _ 4_3_7_5 ___ B_e_n!'.~~~ (n_ ~~?. ____ ... __ ... _. __ .... __ . _ . _ .. ~.9!k.9-__ .-_. __ .. _. __ .. ~?-~ ... -· _ ~~0_0_--~1_.~. _ . ~'?~ ~~e~~ed_ ... _ •• __ ... _. __ .... . _4_7_6_5 ___ E_t~Y.l ~~~z_en~ _i~ ~-~(? ... _ ..... __ .. _ . _ . ___ . _ . !:1.9(k,g_ ... __ .. _ . _ .. ___ ?~-~-.. __ ??·_6_ --~2_.~ . _. _ ~?~ l:~e~~e_d __ .• _ .•.. _ •. __ • ___ . __ ~1_4~-. T_o~~e_n~.i~ -~~? .. _ .. _______ . ___ . ___ . __ .. _ !:1_9!k.9-_ .. ______ . _ .:1~? _____ ?.?:3_: ! ~1. ___ ~'?~ 1:~e~~e_d_ 5260 Xylenes , total in GRO mg /kg 148 90 .2 -186 Not Repo rt ed Page 10 of 12 All analytes are includ ed in ERA's A2LA accredita tion . Lab Code : 1539-01 SOIL-70 Final Complete Report Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: ERA Customer Number: TX01484 A116001 06/24/10 Report Issued : Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 Anal. Reported Assigned Acceptance Performance No . Analyte Units Value Value Limits Evaluation Method Description SOIL Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in Soil (cat# 630) • 9_4_0_8_ . (~a.s_o(i~E! ~_a_n~E! _Or~<;1~i~5. (~~()) __ . _ _ _ _ __ .. __ .. r:n _ _g!~g-___ 1, ... !?? _ __ _ _ _ 1_ 5_7_0 __ _1 1 __ ?86: ?9~~ ____ :~~c_ep\<:b!e. _____ SH_<_~~? .8.~?. __ _ _ 43_7_5 ___ B_e_n!~~e_ in_ c:;~~ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ mg/kg 16 .8 0.00-21.6 ____ ~<:>~ RE!e~'!e_d _________ . ___ _ 4765 _E_th,~l~e_n_z_e_n_e_i~ S,_~(?-___ • _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ---~~ikg ... r · .. ---. --... -50 4. . -28 ·6·--62 2 ____ ~?~ ~~e~'"!e_d_ __ _ __ _ _ _ _. ________ _ :;:~ ::;~~·:::·i~:~~ GRo -----------------------: : -:-~ii : ~ r · .: : : : : : : : : : ~tf ::: : ~tf ~ :·i : ---~~;-~:~:~::--. -------. -------- so1L Diesel Ran e Or anics DRO in Soil cat# 631 9369 Di ese l Ran ge Organics (ORO) 1480 1870 558 -2220 Acceptable EPA 8015 SOIL Diesel Ran e Or anics DRO in Soil 9369 Die se l Range Organics (ORO) 1680 1870 558-2220 Acceptable OK DEQ ORO 2050 Total Petrol eum Hy droca rb ons 113 94.2 0.00-182 Acceptable TNRCC 1005 SOIL Texas Hi h-Level Fuels TPH in Soil 2050 Tot al Petro le um Hydrocarbons 1140 1360 466 -2160 Acceptable TNRCC 1005 SOIL Massachusetts VPH in Soil (cat# 483 19 .7-1260 ~cc_ep!ablE! __ --•.o " A ., •• ~ ... '4 ~ • 5305 _ C:5_-<:~ _A,lip _h<;1~~s-U.~c:~j~st~? (~~-V.f:'~! mg /k g I. 210 97 789 MADEP VPH 5307 C:9_-<:)? ~liph.~t)c_s U.~<:dj~5.tE!? (~~-"-~~t --_ ~ -~5J!ki ~: ( :~9:<~s2: _ .. --!?~ ___ . ~-99: _1?~9 __ -~~c_ep)<:b!e_ __ : _: !vi.A.~~~ yf~::: . ~!_;_:_ )!~~;i~1~:;;~~: :~~ y::~):::::: : : : ·': _ : : :·;:;~:::I: ?:2~~:5:::.: f ;t .: : : r;r;~.;: :: : ~;~;;~~~;d:: : : : ~:~::~ v-~H ... __ 5_o_o_o __ t ~~--B_u!Y} !11e_th ~l _e!~e_r_('."1_T_BE_)_in Y_Pr! ____ .. I. _ 11:-9!~9. ___ I_ __ .. _ . _ .. ___ ~ _0 :2_5_9 ________ . ___ . ___ N9t_ R~~~~e_d _________________ . _ · : ;~:~!_ : -~~;~i~~l~~~ei;\':0: : · . : . : _· : : _ .. -. . : J . : ;:;~: . : -.... -. --. : ;j~: : -: ; ~;: J:~f i: . : ~:~ ;:~~~~::: -: : : : : : : : . : : : : : . __ 5_1_4_9 _ T_o_lue_n_e_i~ Y?..r! .. ____ . ___ .. --_ .--__ -·_ ·_ .. -. -__ I -_ r:ng (~g_. __ --.•• ·-. ____ . _1~? __ --. _1_?;~ ~-!?~ ___ ~?! ~~e~rt,e_d _ --__ . --_ ••.. ___ .• _ • ~2_4_9_ " ~~~-?<ie_ne _i~ Y_P_H_ ' • . . . r:n_g!kg_ ' --..••..••..... 19~ ..•.. --_3?:7_:. ! ~ ~ " . ' --~()~ ~~e~rt,e_d_ -' .•... " ---" • " -... . . . m_gj~g .. 39.6 148 11 .9-51 .3 . ~?~ ~~e~'!~d----------. ---.•.. - -• r:n_g(~g_ •• mg/kg . . _ .... _ . _ . __ :5~0 _ .. ____ 0.-99 .-.1.2?9 . ___ f;J?~ ~~e~rt.e_d_ ... _ . ___ •. _ 52.0 0.00-610 Not Reported Page 11 of 12 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Nicole D. Schiller Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0 . SOIL Massachusetts EPH in Soil (cat# 484 SOIL-70 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 06/24/10 Study Dates: 04/19/10 -06/03/10 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description -~2_2_2_ --~9.-~) ~ !\_lip~~tic_s_(~~ ~~!"I)_ .. ___ ........... _ .. !11_9/~g-_ .. I . _5_4JJ. __ . 1160 .. _ .. g._09 _ _-_1~~9 _ .... _. _-:.-.~:.-:-_PP __ :;bb_te-_ ._. __ II ... _. -~.·_-:_~_:_·PP ___ ... EE_.PP __ :_-_-.. _ ~2 _1_8 __ C_1_9:S:~~ ['-!i!?~~t(c~.(~-~ ~P.~) __ . _ .. _ ..... _ . __ '.11.9/~~ . _ I_ __ 7_3J9_ ___ .. ~1} __ ... __ 1_3:6_ ~-~ ~9_ . . . .. .. _ . _ ~2_3_4 __ C:1 _1:S:?? !\_r~r:!')?~~s. ~~~ci,j~5.t~? _(fyl~. E,P~2 ___ .... '.11.9!~~ _ ... __ 5_2~~0. _ .. _ .. ??~ .. _ .... _1_1_8 --~51 ___ . !°'10J /.'-_G ~E:~t?b.l~ ... _ ~~C>E,F> _E_P_f-:! _ . . -~5_o_o_. }\_c_e~?!?~t~~~E: ~n . ~~~-. __ .. _. _ ..... _ ..... _ . _. r,n_gjkQ __ .. _ ... _ .... __ ?·.~! .. _ .. 9~0_0_-_~-~~ _. _ ~?~ R~!?~rt.e_d _ ... ____ . ____ ... _. _ ~5_0_5 __ ;":c_e~~p~t~¥1~~~ _i~ ~~~-_ . _____ . __ .. _ .... ___ !11.9!~9 _ ... __ . __ .. _ ... _ ~ ._o5 .. _ .. . o.oo -2.62 _ ~?t_ f3.~t '?rt.e_d .. ___ . _____ .. _ .. __ : ::~~:: :;::~~;;~1;~t~~:;;; !~ ~~~: :: : .: : : : : : : : : . : · ~ .. :m:g:;/:k::g::: 1· :-: ·.-::: :·: :-. 11~:_~o: 0o~ --: : .·:: -: : .. : ... : ~N: :o: :t. :R: ;e·p~:o-.:rt-:e:ddd:: -: ·:::::: :: -. · --· . -~5_8_0 ___ B_e_n!()(a)p~r~~E: in_ ~P.~ ... __ .. __ . _ . .. .. .. . . . ......... . : ):-.~;: : .::_~;;t0~~:;:~:;;;: /~: :;~: : : : : : : : : : : : ~ : : ~ :;~j: : .: I: ~ ~ _ : : : ·: : : : :~a~·:: : : : .: : : : : : : : ttt ;;~:~~:: :. : : : ~ : : : : : : : -.. -. .. ~5_9_0 __ Be_n~o(g!~.()pery~e_n_e _i~ E_P_f-! ___ ... _ . _ _ I .. ':1 .. 9(~9 .. I ... _ .. __ . ~-1_.gg _ .. __ . _ _ N.?~ '3~P.<?rt.e_d_ . ______ _ _ ~8_5_5_ . ~h_ry ~e .n_e_i~ _EP r:! _ .... _______ .. _ ......... __ I_ .. _ r,n_glkg_ . _ I_ ____ .. < 1.00 ... ~o~ '3~P.~rte_d_ .. _. _ . _. _ _ _ l. . ~:6-.~2:67\0 5 : : :F~lliuu\o~rr:e::n:\e~~~1hn;aE{P!:H}~~~~ ~n: ~~~ -. : : : : : : : : : : : . : : i:nm~:g;/:k::g: : : II: : ~ --..... : : : ::1: ~.:5:~0t · · : : : : : : : : : . : : 0~t ::~~~:::: : ..... : : : : : : ... "-""' 0.00 -3. 75 _ .. _ ~o-t_ R_ ~P.~rt.e_d __ .... _ .. __ .. _ . . -6315 .. i~d;n-0(1-,2 ~3~~d)~y;e~~-i~ EP-H .......... --....... ~-gikg. .. r ..... ---....... ~-1-_cio ......... --.. --. . N.?! '3~P.~rt.e_d_ .... : _ .. --. .. .. ...... -. . 63-85-2~M~;·h;1n·a~iiih~i~n·e-i~ .EPH . -.......... --. --. ;,g·,k; .. r -......... T --4.9s -. ---o~ocJ -12.4 .. ~?t. '3~e<?rt.E:d. _ ... ____ .. _ .. _ ... . : : 5.0:0:5: : ~~.P~!h:a]~~~ i;: ~~~:: : : : .-: : : : : _ : : : : : : : [ : : ~-~!~£!: : . : -: : : : : : : ~: ?i1 : -: : : 9::0~:-: 5.-??: : . _ ~()~ R~P.'?rt.e_d_ _ .. _____ . _ . . _ .. _ ~6_15_ , _P_h~~~~!h!E:~e. i!l _ ~~':!. _ . _ _ ..... _ .. __ ..... __ '.11.Q(~Q. __ . __ .... __ • ___ <_ ~.gg _ ..... __ . _ ... _ . . _ ~()~ '3~P.~rt.e_d_ .... __ . __ . __ .. __ 6665 _F',Y~E:~e-i!l _ ~~':! __ . __ . ___ . ____ . _ .. __ . ___ .... '.11.9!~~ ... __ .. . . . . < 1.00 .. _ .. ____ . ____ ... t:J?! '3~P.~rt.e_d __ . __ . _ . _________ _ 6232 C11-C22 Arom atics (MA EPH ) mg/kg 241 88.0 · 624 Not Reported Page 12 of 12 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara Welch Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 WatR™Pollution Study Open Date: 07/13/09 Close Date: 08/27 /09 Report Issued Date: 09/14/09 F ."' . f1 1na, e o September 14, 2009 Tamara S. Welch Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 Enclosed is your final report for ERA's WP-174 WatR™Pollution Proficiency Testing (PT) study . Your final report includes an evaluation of all results submitted by your laboratory to ERA. If your laboratory is an in-house laboratory for a permittee, your report will include your USEPA DMR-QA 29 NPDES Permittee Data Reporting Forms and the Chemistry/Microbiology Analyte Checklist with your in-house laboratory graded results . Data Evaluation Protocols : All analytes in ERA's WP-174 WatR ™Pollution Proficiency Testing study have been evaluated using the following tiered approach . If the analyte is listed in the most current National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) PT Field of Testing tables , the evaluation was completed by comparing the reported result to the acceptance limits generated using the criteria contained in the NELAC FoPT tables . If the analyte is not included in the NELAC FoPT tables , the reported result has been evaluated using the procedures outlined in ERA's Standard Operating Procedure for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits (SOP 0260). Corrective Action Help : As part of your accreditation(s), you may be required to identify the root cause of any "Not Acceptable" results , implement the necessary corrective actions , and then satisfy your PT requirements by participating in a Supplemental (QuiK™ Response) or future ERA PT study . ERA's technical staff is available to help your laboratory resolve any technical issues that may be impa iring your PT performance and possibly affecting your routine data quality . Our laboratory and technical staff have well over three hundred years of collective experience in performing the full range of environmental analyses . As part of our technical support, ERA offers QC samples that can be helpful in helping you work through your technical issues . If you are using the WP-174 WatR™Pollution Proficiency Testing (PT) study to meet your DMR-QA 29 requirements, please contact your DMR-QA coordinator to negotiate the type of corrective action they are requiring. Thank you for your participation in ERA's WP-174 WatR ™Pollution Proficiency Testing study. If you have any questions, please contact myself, or Curtis Wood, Director of Regulatory Affairs and Business Development , at 1-800-372-0122. Sincerely , Shawn Kassner Proficiency Testing Manager attachments smk 6000 West 54th Ave., Arvada, CO 80002 Jay R. McBurney Quality Program Manager 800-372-0122 fax (303) 421 -0159 www.eraqc.com Report Recipient ContacUPhone Number Reporting Type Arkansas Jane Hurley/ 501 -682-0938 Al l Analytes Florida Steve Arms/ 904-791-1502 All Ana lytes Kansas Lyndi Stout/ 785-296-3811 All Ana lytes Louisiana Paul Bergeron / 225-219-324 7 All Ana lytes Ok lahoma David Caldwell/ 405-702-1039 All Ana lytes Te xas Max Phillips/ 512-239-3518 All Ana lytes Utah Kristin Brown/ 801-538-9371 All Ana lytes WP-174 Definitions & Study Discussion Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 WP Study Definitions The Reported Value is the value that the laboratory reported to ERA. The ERA Assigned Values are compliant with the most current USEPA/NELAC FoPT tables . A parameter not added to the standard is given an Assigned Value of "O" per the guidelines contained in the USEPA's Criteria Document and NELAC standards. The Acceptance Limits are established per the criteria contained in the most current USEPA/NELAC FoPT tables, or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits™ as applicable. The Performance Evaluation: Acceptable = Reported Value falls within the Acceptance Limits . Not Acceptable = Reported Value falls outside the Acceptance Limits. No Evaluation = Reported Value cannot be evaluated . Not Reported = No Value reported . The Method Description is the method the laboratory reported to ERA. Report Issued: 09/14/09 WP Study Discussion ERA's WP-174 WatR™Pollution Proficiency Testing study has been reviewed by ERA senior management and certified compliant with the requirements of the USEPA's National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Studies Criteria Document (December 1998), and the criteria contained in the most current NELAC FoPT tables . ERA's WP-174 WatR™Pollution study standards were examined for any anomalies. A full review of all homogeneity , stability and accuracy verification data was completed. All analytical verification data for all analytes met the acceptance criteria contained in the USEPA's National Criteria Document for Water Proficiency Testing Studies, December 1998 , and the criteria contained in the most current NELAC FoPT tables . The data submitted by participating laboratories was also examined for study anomalies. There were no anomalies observed during the statistical review of the data. ERA's WP-174 WatR™Pollution study reports sha ll not be reproduced except in their entirety and not without the permission of the participating laboratories. The report must not be used by the participating laboratories to claim product endorsement by any agency of the U . S . government. The data contained herein are confidential and intended for your use only . If you have any questions or concerns regarding your assessment in ERA's WatR™Pollution Proficiency Test ing program, please contact Shawn Kassner , Proficiency Testing Manager, or Curtis Wood , Director of Regulatory Affairs and Business Development, at 1-800-372-0122 . \ '--- Study: WP-17 4 ERA Customer Number: A 116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 1 of 20 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Minerals cat# 581 WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID : ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 • 08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description 0027 . J\l~a_li:1(t'>' ?~ .c _a_C.(?~ . _ _ mg/L 33 36.1 .... _ ~g.5_ -_ -:2_.~ _ . . _ ":-~c_ep!a.bJ': _ _ S M2320 B 0028 Chloride .. " .... "r . --~~/L .. " .. 101 " -.. 116 99.8 -132 Acceptable . 0 SM4500CI: c"v1s" 0020 ~o~~~~l!~i;: a:t :2~:~: : : . -. " ..... : .· : : : . : I. :~~~~sj~~: I· : : ~??: . : : : ~g?: : ·: : :~5:7: j~~ : : : : :~~c:er!~bJ~ : :: 1: : : : :~~i~1:o:B:: : : : 0029 F!~<?.r~d_e _____ .... __ . . .. __ . _ __ _ __ _ I ... _ll;QI~ __ . ___ 3? ___ .... ~·.'.1-.5 . _ ... ?;9_0_ -.. ':·g: ___ .. ~~c_ep!a_b}~ __ .. __ s_~':~~O!: _c_ . _ . 0026 P_ot~~s)u.n:i __ ....... _ ..•... _ ... _ _ .. _ . _ ... 1 .. _nig/~-__ I . _ 1.9.:~~ .. _. _ . '. ~ .~ _ ....... } 1 :?. -. 2_1.:1 ..... i:-~c_e pt a_b}~ __ l _ .. ~~J:\.6_0 J ?~ .. _ .. _ ~~!~ ·!:i~J · · ·· -· · · · · · -· · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · · · I · · .. ~;1· · · I·· 8s8~V· -·I··· ~t~---1· · t:J: 1:i_!-· · -N~1:::l:~~:1~ -1-· s:ta~0lb!o -· · 0021 T?~~I :~i~~~!~~:d: ~~l id:s .:~t ~1 ~?:~ : : : : : : .. -.... : : : :~~< : : [ : : ~~~: : ... -. 290 .... -. : :~1:7: j6:3: : : . : : ~~~ep!~bj~ : : . : ·:: ~~~~i4:o:~ : : : : 1950 Total Sol ids at 105°C mg/L 300 302 262 -338 Acceptable SM2540B WP Minerals (cat# 581) WP Hardness (cat# 580) ~~;! . ~;~:;~~a:b~~ :~:i:~: ~~::): : : ·_ : : : : : : -: : : : : ::m: :g:;,tl : -: ·I': j 2~1~.80·:92:: : . : -:2 .. !1· :_073 -... : ;;t}~t : : : :~~~::i:::J: : ~ . --}P.r~i;;~: ~ : • 0024 ~~Q_ne_s (u_m. ...... _. _ .. 1?:?.:.2.4_.~ _ .... A.~c_epi~b]': ..... __ ~~!\. 2,0_0_.? .... . ~~~~ ~;~::~Ja·r~~ts:~:: 6:f it~3 : ~ : : : : .: : : -. : : '. : : : ::~f ~ : 1: : : l!!: : : . : · lt:: : : · -}:!-:-1:;-· .. -· :~::~i:~:: · · · ----i~iii~f --· WP Hardness (cat# 580) S .U. 7 .6 7 .53 7.33 · 7 .73 Acceptable EPA150.1 s.u. 7.6 7 .53 7 .33 -7 .73 Acceptable EPA 9040B s.u. 7 .6 7 .53 7 .33 -7 .73 Acceptable SM4500H+ B Page 2 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA 's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code: 1539-01 WP-174 Final Complete Report Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 ANnal. Analyte o. Units Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description WP Simple Nutrients (cat# 584) . _D.0_3_1_ .?'..n:i'2'1?~i'.3 _a_sJ~ ... ______ ..• __ .. ___ ... _. _ •... ___ m,(,!f~-___ .... !!-2 . _ .. _. !!·9. __ .. ?~15_-.1_3? _ ....• ~c.c_ep)a_bJe. __ . __ . !=F.'.A_3.~D_·! ___ _ . _1_8_2_0 __ "!il_r~t_e .-: t:J~trit_e _a_s_~ __ •. _ ..•.. _ .. ___ .. ___ ... __ n:,QI!-__ .. ___ !3.·~-_ .. __ !3.·? .. _ .. :1~·-0_-_1_5:? ... _ :~c.c_ep!a_bJe. __ . ____ EF.'.A.3.~3:? ___ . . _D_D_3_2 __ N_it_r~t~_a_s_~ _____ . _. _ ... _ ... _. _. __ . __ . ___ r,:,it'!-.... _. !3.·~-_ .. _. !3.·?. ___ )9·_5_-_1_6:3. _ .. _ -~c.c_ep!ab_le. _ .. __ • !=F.'.A.3.5.3:? ... _ 0033 ortho -P hosphate as P mg/L 2.1 2.10 1.69 -2.53 Acceptable EPA 365.2 WP Simole Nutrients (cat# 584) 0032 Nitr ate as N 0033 ortho -Pho sphate as P WP Com lex Nutrients cat# 579 .• o_o_3_4_ .. T_o!a_l _Kjeld~~I ~i!rc)9.e.n_ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ... __ • __ . _n19./!-___ . ___ 8~3. ___ . __ ?·_o~ ___ . _ ?~0_3:_ 1_ 1_.~ __ 0035 To ta l phosphorus as P mg/L 3.4 2.0 8 1.66 -2.5 5 Not Acceptable EPA 365.2 WP Com lex Nutrients cat# 579 . _ 0_0_3~-T_o!a_l .Kje.l9~~I .N_i~r?9.e.n_ ____ . _ _ _ ......... _ ..... __ n19./~ .. . .. ___ . _. __ 9..9~-___ ?:o~ -_ 1_1 .. ~ _ .. _ N.?t. 13~e()~e.d_ .. ______ . ____ _ 0035 Total phosphorus as P mg/L 3 .4 2.08 1.66 -2.55 Not Acceptab le SM4500P E WP Nitrite cat# 888 1840 Nitrite as N mg/L 1.4 1.41 1.16 -1 .65 Acceptable EPA 353 .2 WP Demand (cat# 578) __ o_o.3_8 __ .B~f:? . _ . ___ ... __ .. _ .. ___________ ..... _ . ___ r,:,9.tL ___ . ___ so __ .. _. _ . ?O.·? ...... __ 3.:5 :~: ! O.~ .... _ ~c.c_ep!a_bJe. _ _ _ . _ ~F.'.A. ~D_5_. ! ___ . . __ .n19./L _ _ _ ... ___ . __ ... __ ?0.·? ... _ _ ?! .. 1. -_ 9_3_.9. _ _ N.?~ f3 ~e()~e_d_ ... _____ . __ . ___ •.. 0102 CBOD ¥ •• ---• ' ~ -• ---' ~ ->, ~ •• • A -•• ~ s • ... -~ ~ • -• 0036 COD ... __ n:,9.t~. _ _ . _ :119. _ .... __ :1 ~3. _. _ .. _8~:7.-. !3.1. ___ _.~c.c_e.p)a_bJe.. _. __ !=F.'.A_~1_0_.1 _. _. 0037 TOC mg/L 46.8 44.7 37 .3-51.6 Acceptable EPA415.1 WP Demand (cat# 578) ... o.o3~ _ B_~f:? __ .. _ _ _ .. ______ ... _ _ ...... __ • _ . __ .• _ .. m.~l'~ _ . _ ..... _ ~0-_ . _ . _ .. !O.·?. __ ... _3.5:~: ! O.~ _ .. __ ~c.c_ep!a_b!e. .. SM5210B . _0.1_0_2_ . .C:.~<?I?. __ . _ .. ___ .. _____ .. ____ . _. ______ .. _ .'1.:19.'~-_ .. _ .. -~6-__ . _. ?0.·? ... _ .. ?!·.1.-_9-3:?. . .~c.c_ep!a_bJe, __ .... _ -~~~~1.o_s __ ... .0..0_3_6 __ <::<?O. _ _ _ _ _ _ _______ . _ _ _ ____ . _____ . ___ n19./~-_ .... _ :1 ~ 9. _ . ___ . :1 ~ 3. _ .. __ 8~:7_: ! 3.1. _ .. _ ~c.c_ep )a_bJe. __ SM5 220 D 0037 TOC mg/L 46.8 44 .7 37.3 -51.6 Acceptab le SM5310B WP Demand (cat# 578) _o_o-3~_ .. s_qo. ______ . ___ .. _. __ .. ___ .. _______ . __ n:19.'~-__ . __ . ___ . _. 10 .2 _ .. __ 35 :4_: !O.~ __ .• t:J?~ 13~e()~e_d __ . _ .. _ . ___ . ___ .. __ _ . _o_1~_2_ .. C.~<?C?. ___ . ____ .. ___ .. ____ ... _. __ .. _____ .... n:19.'~· __ ... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. ?0.·.? __ .. _ ?! ._1 _ -_ 9_3_.? __ .. t:J?t. R~e()~e_.d __ . ___ ..... _ . _ ...... __ . . _ o_o_3_6_ . ~.<?C?. _ . _____ ... ___ ... _________ .. ___ .. ___ ... ":9.'~· . ________ . __ :1 ~ ~ ___ .. 8~:7.: ~ 3.1 __ . _ N.?~ 13~e~~i:d __ ... _ ...•.••. _ • _ . _ . 0037 TOC mg/L 46 .8 44 .7 37 .3 -51 .6 WP Oil & Grease cat# 582 . -~10_4_. ~i~ ~ -~r~~~~ (~r33:'i~E:t ~i~)-.. _. ___ • ____ .... _ . _. -~9./~-. _ .. __ ~~.~-_. 1860 Oil & Grease (Infrared) mg/L Page 3 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 32 .0 39 .4 18 .2-41 .1 23 .9-49 .3 Acceptable EPA 9060 _ _,-:,~c_ep!a_b~~ .•. __ .. ~~~-1 _6~~~-_ .. Not Reported Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0 . WP Trace Metals (cat# 586) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description : :~~:~;-. )~~t:;:_~;-.::: :-. : : : -. : : : : : : : -. : : : : : : : : • : : :~tt ::: I::-. t;;-.::::: :i:::: _: }:rJ~::: :: :N:~;:;1::r~-. : : -. J;;::-.~;~;-.::: .. ;~-~-!-:::n~~ ---. -.. -. -. -.. --· ------. ----.. -. -~!t . --~ -. ~!~ ---. --;!; · --.. -~-~t-~-:-:-. -. N-~::~!~~~;1~ .. ---~::-:~~ ~:. -... --~~-~~-: _::~~~~ ~ : ~ : : : :. : : : ~ : ~ ~ : : : : : ~ : .: ~ : -·· · • : : :j:t :: ": r : : t:i : : : . ~ : ;~r ~ : • : :}:;: J~:: : : : : ~ t~~:~1i:j: : : . -~ : : :t.t:;~ it : : - 0004 -~a_d_fTli~,::n -__ .. __ ... ___ . _ • _ . _ • _ __ .. __ ... _~QI~ __ . ___ ?~ ~ __ .. _ _6 ~ ~ _ _ _ _ --~?_3_ -. ~9_6_ . _ _ :~~c_ep!~b}~ __ . _ -·~~.I:' _6_0_19~. _ .. _ .. ~o_o_6_ "'C:h.:?r:n )u_IT1 ______ .. ____ . _ .. __ .. _ .. __ ... _ ... __ • )!9!~ ______ . ~~o_8 _____ . ~~?. ____ ~?~: _19?q _ .. _ _.~~c_ep!~b!~ __ .• __ ~P..l:'_6_0_10~_ . __ _ _ qo_o~-. C:o_b_a(t _ _ _ _ .. _ . _________ .. __ .. _______ .• _ -~9!~ _ .. ___ . ??q .. _____ ?~? .. . _ . -~-9_2_-_ ~8_2 _____ _.~~c_ep!~b}~ ___ . __ ~P.~ _6_D_1 ?~ __ .. _ _ qo _o.7 ___ <=:opper. _ .... ___ ... ____ . ___ .. __ . ____ .. . . -~9!~ ____ . _ ?!6 .... ___ . ??? . _ .... _2_3_6_ --~9_0 __ .... --'~~c_ep!~b}~ _____ .. ~~~ _6_0_19~ __ .. _ 0008 Iron µ9/L 1634 1440 1270 -1620 Not Acceptable EPA 6010B . :qo:1·2: IL:e;~::: ·.::::::::::::::.:::.::. ·_:.::I:: :~it~::: I::~~~::~·:.:~~~::::: :i 1:a:j 6~8: ·: :·: :~~~epi~b];::.::: ~~~-6?:1~~:::: __ ~0_ 1 _0 _ . ~~n_9_a_n~?E: ___ . _ .. ______ . . . __ . ~9/~ _ . _ _ _ . ~ ~ 6_6_ • _ .. _ ~ 1_0_0_ ..... ~~~: _1 ??O. _ ... _,~~c_ep!~bJ~ _ .... _ ~P.~ _6_0_19~. __ _ 0074 Molybdenum _____ -~9!~ _. ___ . ?9~ __ . ___ }?~ .. ____ 1_6_0_-_~2_4 __ .. __ /'.\c_c_ep!a_bl~ _. __ .. _ ~P,~_6_0_10~ •... V . : 0,0:1 \ · N,i~k,ei : : : : : -: : : : : · -: : : : : : : : : : : : : : __ . _ . y9!L . _ _ . __ ~~~ _ .... _ . ?!~ . _ .. __ . 3_3_1 _--~ 1_7 ____ ..• /'.\c_c_ep!a_b}~ .... __ • ~~.I:' _6_0_19~ __ _ _ _ D_D_1 _3_ -~-eJe.n_i~111 -. _ . ___ .... __ .. _. __ .. __ .. _ ... _ ..... _µ9}~ ... ____ 1_1_8_4 __ ... _. !1_5_0_ ..... ~~~: }~~q ...... _J\~c_ep!~~!~. __ ... _ ~P..l:'_6_D19~. _ .. 0017 S_il :'~r-___ ... _ _. __ .. _ . __ . __ ... ___ . __ ..... ____ . ~9!~ ___ . __ . _15~ ..... ___ } ~?. _ .. __ 1_33_-_ !7_9 __ • _ .. _ /'.\c_c~p!a_b!e. . __ •.. ~P.~ _6_0_19~. _ . 0075 ~.tco_n!i~rn. _________ .. __ .... _____ .. _. ___ . ____ . yQIL __ ) ~~ _______ 1~~ __ .. __ 1_1_2 _-_ 1_5_0 ____ _-~c_c_ep!abJe. _ .. _. _ ~~~ _6_p _19~ __ _ 0018 T_h31(li;i~ ____ . _____ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ .. _ __ -~~/~ .... __ . ??? _____ .. !~ ~ _____ 5_8_3_--~4 _6_ •... _/'.\~c_ep!~b}~. ___ . ~P..l:'_6_0_19~-.... 0014 . ~a_n?9~u:1: _ ....• _ .. _. _ ... _. _____ . _ ... _. _ .. _-~QI~_ ... _. _ ~~? ..... _. _9?~ __ .... ~1? -~ .J9?0. _ .. ___ /'.\cc _ep!~bl~ .... _. _ ~P,,:'-_6_0_19~_ 0015 Zinc µ9/L 695 619 531 -713 Accept a ble EPA 6010B Page 4 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 WP-174 Final Complete Report Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPA ID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 ANnal. Analyte 0 . Units Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description WP Trace Metals (cat# 586) . _ q_o_0_1_. ~IU.f:1~n_u0'. ___ . ______________ • ________ . ____ ygj~. __ ___ ~?~ ____ . __ ~?? ______ 2:6 5_ -::4_8 __ •. _N_oJ ~_c~e.~t~~l_e _____ !=_P_A_ ~o_o: 7. ___ _ _ _ _ ?J~ ______ ?~~ __ .. ___ 1_3_8_-.2:5_4 ____ • _i:,c.c_ep!abJe. _ .. EPA 200.7 __ q_o_o_2 __ .4:r~e.n.i~ _________ . __ •. ____ . ___ .. _____ . ___ J;:91~ _ _ ___ 7?~ _ . ____ ??~ ... ____ 6_0_8_ -_~4_6_ • _. ___ i:,c.c_ep!a_bJe. ___ .. _ E_P!\ 2:0.0_-? __ _ _ _ 1_0_1_5 __ -~a~i_u:n_ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ y~I~ _ 192 ___ 1~? __ .. __ 1_25_-_1_6_3 ____ '.'1_oJ ~_c~e.~t?b.l_e __ . ___ E_P_A_ 2:0_0_.7.. _. _ . _ q_o_o_3 ___ B_e_ry l~U.~ __ . ______ . __ .. _________ . _____ . ____ -~~/~ .. _____ ~~~ ______ ~?~ ______ 3_9_6_ -_5_2.6 _ _ _ _ _ A.c.c_ep!a_bJ e. _ .... __ !=.P.A.. 2:0.0_-? __ .. _ _ • ~0 _2_5_. B_o~a.n. ... _ .. _.. __ .. _ _ _ _. __ . _ _ µg /L 853 836 694 -975 _i:,c.c_ep!a_bJe.. _ .. _ !=_PA_ 2:0.0_-7. .. _ _ _ o.o_o~_. ~a_d_rTli ~r:n ...• _. _________ . ____________ : : : .. : : :~~!~: : _ I_ : : 6; j : : · : : ~] j:: : · : :~2:3:-: ~9:6: _____ i:-c.c:ep _ta_bJe _______ !=.P_A. ~o_o,-7.. __ _ _ 0.0._0_6 __ ~h.:c_>f!l)U_rTl . _ .. __ • __ .... _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ ~gj~ _ . __ l . _ :0_0_8 _ _ ___ ~1? •.. _ 826 -1070 __ .•. i:,c.c_ep!~_bJe. ..... __ .. !=.P A_ 2:0.0_.? ___ . -~6 _6_~_ -~:;;;'. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _______ -~:;~ ___ L _ ;;~ __ . --i?~ -----1:{~-1:}----1~;:~~:~: · -----:::-~66) -· -- __ q_o_0_8_ lr_o_n_ .... ___ . _... _____ . _ ••. _ . _ •. _. I. .. YQ'~ __ . I _ '.6_34_ _ _ .. '.4_40_ .. __ : {~7~:-: 1'.6i~ :: ~~~ ~;~~~t~~I~: [::: ~~Ajo,o:.i :::: 0012 Lead J µg/L I 614 594 _5_1_8_-_~_6_8 _____ i:,c.c_ep!a_bJe, __I __ . !=.F'!\20_0:7. . _. ·_ ·_o_-0-10_ · __ M_-~_~_g_~-_n-_e~_e_-_--·_ ·_ --_: · __ -: _· --·. --... --. · I .·. -_µ~_IL_-__ -_ . _ >_1_-6_f; ___ .. .. -...... · --_ _ _ __ _ '. 1_0_0 ___ .. ~~~: ] 220 i:,c.c_ep!a_bJe. _ .. ___ !=!" _A_ 2:qo_. 7. ___ _ \__. _ : ~6:~_~: .:~i~1~r~n:u~ : : ·: : : : : : : : : : --________ . _ .. : : : :~:~: : : 1 : : _-:;L : : _ : ;;~: : : : : )::t ~~:;: : .: : )~::::;:~: : : : : : : ;;r ~~~:;: : _ . __ o_o_13 ___ s _eJe.n_i~1'.1 . __ .. _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ________________ Yfl!~ __ _ __ __ 1_1_8_4_ . ____ '.1_5_0 _____ ~~? -~ _1 ?~~ ____ .A.c.c:ep!a_b}e _ _ . __ !=P_~_ 2:0_0.-7. _ . __ _ 0017 Silver µg/L 153 156 133 -179 Acc epta ble EPA 200 .7 . ·:a.o.7i :~t~o~!i~;: :: : : : : : :: :·:: :: : : _____ .. : ~: [: :~~/~::::: _ 1j ~: ... : : ~~<: :·: ::1:1_2:->:5:o:: :: : :A~~ep!~b]i ::::: j~~:ia.o:.f : ·: __ q_o_1 _8 ___ T_h~~li~':1. __________ • _. _____ • _ .. _______ . ___ y~I~. _____ !?? .. __ . !~~ __ .. ____ 5_8_3_-_8.4_6 __ .. __ i:,c.c_e p!a_b}e. _ .. _ ... !=F,'_A_2:0_0.-~ __ _ . _q_o_1~ __ "'.:a_n~9~u~ ______________ . _______ . ______ -~g!~. _ .. ___ ~~?-..... ___ ~?~ _____ ~~?: _:19?g _ .. _ -~~c_ep!a_bl e. __ . ___ ~f.'_A_2:0_o_.7. ..... 0015 Zinc µg /L 695 619 531 -713 Acc eptable EPA 200 .7 WP Mercur cat# 57 4 0009 Mercury µg/L 13.3 13 .7 8.43 -18.5 Ac ceptable WP Mercu cat# 574 0009 Mercury µg /L 13 .3 13 .7 8.4 3 -18 .5 Acceptable WP Hexavalent Chromium cat# 898 1045 He xava lent Chromium µg/L 370 386 312 -455 Acceptab le WP Hexava/ent Chromium cat# 898 1045 Hexavalent Chromium µg/L 370 386 312 -455 Acceptable WP Tin & Titanium cat# 573 . _ ~ 1_7_5 __ Tj~ __________ .. ____ . _____________ . ____ . __ ~gj~. _ . _ _ ~D_3_9_ . ____ '. 8.8_0 __ .. __ ~ 4_8_0_ -_ ~2_8.0 __ . __ ~~e:ep!a_b_le. • _ 0076 Titanium µg/L 123 110 93 .7 -125 Acceptable WP Tin & Titanium cat# 573 1175 Tin -.. ygj~ __ .. 2039 1880 1480 -2280 ' ...... ---~-...... ---- --.. ----,.. ..... -----~ --.. -~ --~ ~ ------.. ---. --.. -.. -,. . -.. ---... -,. -· -- 0076 Titanium µg/L 123 110 93 .7-125 Acceptab le WP Turbidit cat# 893 2055 Turbidity NTU 7 .3 8 .24 6.93 -9 .37 Accep tab le Page 5 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 EPA 7470A EPA 245.1 EPA 7196A SM3500Cr B EPA 6010 B EPA 6010 B EPA200.7 EPA 180.1 WP-174 Final Complete Report Tamara Welch EPAID: TX01484 Quality Assurance Officer ERA Customer Number: A116001 Accutest Gulf Coast Report Issued: 09/14/09 10165 Harwin Drive Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Suite 150 Houston , TX 77036 713-271-4700 Anal. Analyte Un its Reported Ass igned Acceptance Performance Method Description No . Value Value Limits Evaluation WP Total C anide cat# 588 0071 Cyan ide , tota l mg/L 0 .72 0 .719 0.450 -0 .988 Acceptab le EPA 335.4 WP Total C anide cat# 588 00 71 Cyan ide, total mg/L 0.72 0.719 0.450 - 0 .988 Accep ta bl e SM4 500 CN G WP Total Phenolics 4-AAP cat# 589 0097 Phenolics , to tal mg /L 1.6 1.78 0.985 - 2 .58 Accep table EPA 42 0 .4 WP To tal Phenolics 4-AAP cat# 589 0097 Pheno li cs, to tal mg/L 1.6 1.78 0.985 - 2 .58 Acce pt abl e EPA 9066 WP Total Residual Chlorine cat# 587 00 98 Total Residual Chlorine mg/L 0 .81 0.922 0 .665-1 .15 Acceptab le SM4500 CI G WP To tal Residual Chlorine cat# 587 0 0 98 Total Res idua l Ch lorine mg/L 0.81 0.922 0 .665-1.15 Acceptab le EP A330 .5 Page 6 of 20 All analytes are in cl uded in ERA's A 2L A accred itatio n. Lab Code : 1539-0 1 Study: WP-174 ERA Customer Number: A116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 7 of 20 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP Volatiles (cat# 830) WP-174 Final C omplete Report Units EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A11600 1 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description 43 15 ~c_e1~n_e_ ..... __ .. _ ... _ ... _ ... __ . _ ... _ ..... I .. J-:91~ .... I ... ~ :59 __ .. . 0.00 .. __ ....... _ .. ___ .. --'~~cep!a_bJ~ .. 432 0 Ace tonitr ile I µg/L I 0.00 _ ~?( ~~P.~rt ~d . EPA 826 0B : )~!f ,~:jl1;~~r~~ ~ : : : : : ~ ~ ~ : : : : : : :: : : : : : : ~ :. : : < : ~::t : :: 1 · : ; {f :. ·: ~ ~ ~:~t ~ : ~. . . _ .. __ ...... : )~:-:~1~:1; .... : : ]t.: ~;;~;: : : : . -~0_6_5_. _B_e_n_z~~~ ........ _ ... _ _ ...... __ .. __ .. __ y!;!I~. .. I _ ~6-~ .. __ . ~~-1 -. __ ~6._0_ --~3_.~. . ~cc_ep!a_b!~. _ . _ _ ~~A _8_269 ~. __ :E :::;; :::;:'"~"· : · · · · · · f · · :ft . · Ht · !ff 1 !E !Ill ::::i;::: · E!~!i: . 44-10-. 2:s~1~~;~~ i~~~i : ·:.: : : : ·: -: : -: : -~:::: [:: -~~'~::: f:: ?~-:1:: J . : ?~-~:::.: /1 /3_ -. ~~~: J:: ~~c_ep!~b:i ~:: . : : ~P.~ :8~_??~:: _ ::~~ ~::ou;y~i:~~~~~-e!h.e_r_(~_T_B_~) ......... · I· . -~:;t-. · I ·.: t~-.. 1 -. 6:~~-. 1........ .. -::::~~:-:;:.·I .. ~::-:i!~~-. -· -~~-:!--:~~~tttit;:~t.o~i~~: ~ : : : : : : : : _ : : ~ ~ . -~ .: r ~ ·: : ~~~ ~ : : I : : ~~-; -: : : : -ttr ~ ~.: ;;:;:::::::;: : : ~ :.:~:_:tl~:J: : : : : : ~ ;;f :~;~r : ~: \..,. :::: ~~-:~~~~;~:~:?rn_e th _a ne .. _ .... _ _ .. I .. _ ~~;~. _ .. 1. .. ?:~?. . . _ . ;;:~. . :~~: :~:~ .. 1;::~~:::: _ .. ___ ~::-:-~:~:-... 45 00 :2~~~1?~~e:1~~1~i;y1~i h.e~ .. _. _ _ _ _ _ . _ I . _ y g_1~ _ . _ I . _ ~ _19 __ ... _ 9._09 ___ :::: ·::::::::I: :~;c:epia bi~ _::::: ~~~ _8j~9s:::: 0055 . ~h}C!r?f.O!rn ..... --. . . l .. _ _µgj ~. -· I ·. ?7.3 ..... ~9--9 ...... 49 ._8_ -~6_.Q ... -~c_c_e_p!a_b!~. _ I .. -E.P ~_8_269 ~ ... . :?:t::i~rf f ;~;::t:,~:~;·:· (:BCP) • j : • :~t . • 1 : : t: j~: : J 1oc4 : ;,, 11:~1;;: • I j f f ::~~L 45 95 -~i~r_o~o-~e.t~~~~ ___ . __ . ___ • _ . _ I . _ yQI~ .... I.. < 2 _. 9._00_ ...... _ .. _. _ ... __ ... -~c_c_ep!a_b}~. __ .... ~~~-8_2.?9~-__ _ 009 4 1,2.-~!c_hJ~r?~~~z_e .. ne ____ . ___ ... .. .. Y!:!'~--.. . __ ?9--~ ........ ?9--8 _____ ?9 -_3_--~9-~ ___ -~~c_ep!a_b}e. . _. _ ~P.~_8_2.?9 ~. __ . _0_0_9_6 ___ 1,~-D!c_h}~r??E:~z_e_n_e _. __ .. _ .... _ .. . . . .. _. yg_l~ ...... }?9-. _ ... __ 1 ~1 . _ . _ _7_8:0_: !4_5. _ .... -~cc_ep!a_b_l~ . E.P.~_8_2?9~-_ .. . 0095 1,4 -Di chl orob enz e ne µg/L 15 .4 _ . ~4_-~ . .. ~}_6_-_ 1_9_.1 _ . -~~c_ep!a_b}E: .. _ _ . ~~~ _8?.?9~ __ .. . :~~2~:-~ii~1?;,o~in~?~~~~t~~~~ iF.;.e?~ 1jj :---.. -.. : .. :~g}~. ~: [::~?:a:::: .. 9.9 0 _ .. -...• --• -. -... -~~c~p!a_b!e. ...... --~P.~_8_2.?9 ~. -.. : )6:!;: · -~X~1;1:~;:~~;~;: -_:: : : : : : : : --: : : : : : :. :· _ : : :~:t : .. : I:: J;}: :: : : ;~~r : :: : ~~~5:-:~~-~: :: : )~~:;I::j::: . : ~: ;~;::;:i::::: . _4_6_4_0 __ 1, 1_-~!c_hJ~r?~~hl e_n_e ___ .... _____ ._. ____ I _. YQ!~. __ . __ ~9--~ ... _. _ .1~·.?_ .. . ?1-.2.-.~7.-! _" _ -~~c_ep!a_b}e, ....... ~~~-8_2.?9 ~ .... . _4_6_4_5_. c(s .. -!•?:[?i ~~l _o~~e_th,t lE:~E: .... _ ...• , ............ _. )-:!:!'~-.. . < 2.0 .. 9.09 _ ..... __ . ___ ... _ . -~c_c~p!a _bJe.. _ .. _. ~P,~_8_2_?9~ •. _. < 2.0 ... 9._09 __ ......• _ ............ __ ~~c_ep!a b!e. ... _ .... ~P.~ _8_2.?9 ~ __ .. . 4655 . _1,2.-~!c_h!~r9pcop.?~~ .•. _ .... _ •· ....... _ .. . . -.l:Q'~-....... 9-4_-?_. -.... !~·? .... . 4680 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene µg/L 24 .1 28 .1 Page 8 of 20 All analytes a re included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 51 .4 -103 19.7 -36.5 . . ~~c_ep!a_bJ~ .. Acceptab le EPA 8260B EPA 8260B Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271 -4700 ANnal. Analyte 0 . WP Volatiles (cat# 830) (Continued) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description __ ~6_85 __ t~a_n_:i:1:~·P!C.h_l~r9p~opy~e_n~-.. ___ . _______ . _ ... f.!9!~ ______ ~ ?:_O ___ ... _ 9._0? .. _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ac.cep!a_b!e. __ .... _ E.~A., __ 8_2.??~ _ . _ ~0_6_6_. _E_t~y l~E;~z_e!1~ ___ . _ .. ___ .. __ ... _ . _____ . _ __ _ _ y9!~ _ .... _ . _ 5.~-~ __ .. ___ 5.~-?. __ . _ ~5.._9_-_ 66_.~ __ _.~c.c_ep!a_bl e. _ .. .. .. _ E.P.~ __ 8_?6?~ ___ . 4835 He xac hlorobutad ie ne .. _ )~9!~ __ .. __ ~ ?:.o_ .. __ ... g._o9 __ ... _____ ... __ . _ _ _ ~c.c_ep!a_bJe. .. _ . ___ E.P0 _8_2.??~ ___ . _ ~8_6_o _ . 2:~f=l~a_n_o_n~--____ . _ . _________________ . __ y9j~. _ . __ ~ ?~O-_ ... __ 9-.?9 . __ .. _______ .. . _ :~c.c_ep!a_b!e. . __ . __ E.P.~ _8_2_?9~. __ . -~0 _6~-.. M.e.t~yl~~E; ~~l?_ri?: _____ .. __ .. ___ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ .. _ . ~S!/~ __ .. _ .1r~ ___ . _ .. ~~-~-__ ... ?1-_2_ --~6_. ~ _. __ ~c.c_ep~a_bJ e. .. EP.,:'-_8_2_??~ ___ _ 4995 4-Methy l-2-pentano ne (M IB K) µ9/L < 1 O 0.00 Acceptable EPA 8260B : :5~0:5~ · ~a:p:ht~a:1~~~:::::::::: : : : : '. : : ~ : : • : : : I : : --~~L : : : ·:: :~ ~ _·::::: g.:o~:: ·::: ·_ : : . : _: · _: ~~c:ep!~bl~:: · -· EP~ i 26~~:: · · ::~ . ~Tr[ t::;:~:;;::;:;: • • • • • · • • • • • • .• • t • j:t • ·• • Jt .. · • • 1tt • • • • ::: : ::: • u::~~: · . · · •• m:~!:t • . · -~~i~-~:;~:~~?~~et~yie.~~ -------· -· ---·· -----1---~:jt --· l --91\ -·· -· --~E · --/-1t}:-t!} _: ):::;;;:~::: : _ --:::-:{!~?- -t :}:: <tft~t~:~ii:hn~z:f~: . ~:::::::: ·: _: ~~f : •· 1:: :it}::::: t0f: ~:: ~8.~:_:~1:.~: '.~-~~:;:~~:~ii~: .. :: ~:f:~:~f -. ~ .. :i1:6~_: ::1\i;~rii~f.0~~~1~;~~:.:: :-. : ·::::.·:.:::I::·: :~QI~:'.: 1 ·: ?~-~:: ~.:: ~i-~-: :. : ~~-~:-:~oj : ... -~c.c_ep!a_ble. _ .... -~~A :8:2~9s . _0.0 _5! __ . T;i_c~l_o_r~e_t~Y.I:~':: .... _ ...•. __ .... _ .... _ .. _ . __ ... -~!:/./~ ___ 1_ ... ~7.-? ... __ ... 12.·? .. _. _ ?!-_2 -_ ~6-~ _ . _ ... ~c.c_eptable. ____ ... ~I:'~ _8_2.??B _ _ . _ ~1-7.?. _ :rri_c~l?_r~f(u?r.<?~~lh!3~e . ______ .. __ ..• __ . _ .... ):!9}L _ . _ . _ .. _<_ 2. __ . __ . g._o9 _ .... __ .. __ .... _ _ .... _ ~cc_ep\a ble. __ ..•.. E.P,:\ _8.2_??B __ _ _ _ 51 _8_0 ___ 1~2.,~:T_ri_c~~o_r<?~r?p~~E: (1::C:~)-. __ . ____ .. __ . _. _f.!9!~ ___ ... _<_ 2.. _ _ g._o9 _ .. ___ .. ___ . __ .. _.~~c_ep!a_b_le. _ .. EP.~_8_2_??~ .. _. 5225 :1_i~x_l ~_c~~a _tE:_ __ .• _________ ... _ ..• __ . ______ yQI~ __ . __ ~ _19 __ ...... g._09 _ .. _. ________ ... _.i:,c.c_ep!a_ble. __ ... E.P.,:'-_8_2.?9~ •. _ 5235 _ VJ~yl _c~l _o~i9~ ... _______ . ___ .•.. _ .• _ .. __ ..• }~9!~. _ . . __ <_ 2. __ .. _ . g.og _ .. _____ . ____ .... __ ~c.c_ep!a_bJe. _ . __ •.. E.~~ _8_2?9? .. 5260 Xy lenes, total µ9/L 226 191 110-255 Ac ceptable EPA 8260 B Page 9 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditat ion . Lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Volatiles (cat# 830) WP-17 4 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description . _"._3_1_5_ -~c~)~n_e ____ ... _. __ . _ .. __ . _ ........ _.I ... ?9!~ .. _, __ ~ .!59. _ .... g.99 _. ___ ... _. _. j . _A~c_epta_ble_ •. ____ ~~".', 6_2~-. _ 4_3_29 __ A_c_et~njt~i~e-_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ •. _ _. _ ... _ 1, .. _ ygl~ _. _ _ __ ... _ .. __ ~-99 . _ .. ______ .. JI _~?~ l:{~p~rte_d __ . _ . _ ...• __ . _ .. : :~~!:~: -,~:~:!~~~r~~ : : : ~:.:. _:::::::.::.:::: : : : : :i:(:: I.::;;;:::.:: t~~:: .. :::::::::: ... )~:;:;::j;:: . : : : . ~~t:;; ... _ ~0_6_5 ___ Be_nz~~e_ _ _ .. ___ . __ _ __ . _ .. __ .1 .. _ y~I~ .•... _ ?~-~ ___ . . ?~.1 . _ _ . ~6 ~0--_ ~3:~. ___ ~~cep(a_b!e_ __ I _ .. ~~.I:\ _6_2~ 0060 Bromodichloromethane I µg/L . _ ~~.~-..... ~~·9 ..... _5~:7_ ~-~ !~ _ .. _ . .'~~c_ep(a_bJe_. . EPA 624 : :a.o:6_2: :.~r?;?!o:r~:::::: .: : : : : : : : .: : : : : : ·:::: ·: [:: :~~/~::: ...• ?~-~-..... ?~·?. _ .. _ ~~:?:.~3 _.~ ... _ -~~c_ep(a_b!E:. _. ___ .~~;:6~~::::. 4950 Bromomethane I µg/L 28 .3 26 .0 10.4 -41 .6 Acceptable EPA 624 · -~4:1:0: :2;~~1~~?~~ i~~~>. _:::::: :: : : _ · :. :. : : : : : : [:: :~~1~::: I::~~-~::·::::: ~3..~:::.: ii~~ i4~: I: :~~c-ep!~bj~:: r:::: ~~~-6~~.: .: : : 5000 te~--B_u!y_l ~e_t~Y.1 .e_th.e_r (~TB_E). _. _ ·.· -.. _ :.·._·_I · ~ --~.--~~t .. _. __ .·I.·:--~-!_·~-~--___ -. __ i:~~-....... __ .. _. _. _ .... -~~c_ep(a_b!e_ _ .. __ . _ E~~-6_2~-.. __ . 4450 ~a!~~~ di _s~lp_de _ ... __ .. __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. . .. __ .. __ ..• _ .. _ ..... __ ... _ . .L\c_c_ep!a_b!E: •... _. _ EP.~ _6_2~-. _ .. . 0058 _Ca_r?'?n. !e_tr_ac~l _o!i?~ .. _ .. . ___ .-. __ ·_·I.· ~g/~. .. .. .. ?g-~ ........ ~~-!. __ .. ?1-_1_-__ ~9_.~ _ . _ . ,L\~c_ep!a_b!e_ __ . _ .. _. ~P.~ 6?4 _ . _ .. . __ o_o_6:4 _. ~h_l~r_o~~n.~e_n_e_ . _____ .. . .. .. yg!~ _ _ _ _. ?9.-~ ... _. ?6.-? ..... ~~-.o_,-_3.3_.6 _ .. _ -~~c_epta_b!e. _ ... _. _ -~~~-62~-... . V. -. :_-_i _:-_;_-6~;:~:::~::~?r_n_e(h_a_n_e . .. . _ . _ .. YQI~ ....... _ 7_7 ___ . . _ ?~} ... _ .. ~ ~ ._2_ ·. ~.o_.g . _ _ -~c_c_ep!a_blE: _ .... __ ~P~ _6_24 _ .. _ . .. . _ .. _ ... __ .. _ .... _. _ .. .. . ...... _ .. . __ ~gj~ __ .... ?7.·.~--_ .. _. ??-9 ..... ~:_80_-_3_5_-? _ .. _ .A.~c _epta_blE:. _. _ ... ~P.J\_6_2:4 _ ... . 4500 _2~~~1?:~e _t~y_lvin.Y.lethe!.. _ . ____ ..... _ _ .. -~gj~ . . . _ ~ _1 ~. . _ . ?-90 _ _ _ _ . ___ .. . _ J.. _.~c_cep(a_bJE: . . __ _ ~P,J\ _6_2~ .. . . :d:~:;: :~~~~:;-.~;~n~e::: _::::: .: : : : : : : .. . ..• :~:~t -: _' . : );} _ J:: ;1~.: :: : :~·:8 :·:~ 6 :·~: :I:: :i:~:;1::1:::::::. ;;;}~~:: _·:: . _"._5_7_0 __ 1,~·P!~r?r_n_o~3.-9~l_o:o_P!<;>~a_n_e_ (~~~P.)_ .. ___ .... _ YQ.'~-_ .. __ ~ ?·.o. _. o._09 _ ..... ___ ......... A.~c_ep(a_b!e.. _ .. _ ... ~P.-:>-_62~. _ .• _ . _"._5_8_5 ___ 1:?·P!~r?1n_o_e!h_a!1_e _(~p_B) .. µg/L 17 .. ~ ~-~-_ ... _:l?·.:4.:. 2_0:~ __ .. -~~c.ep!a_b_le. _. . ~P,J\ _6_24 . ___ . . . 4.5_9_5 __ ~i?r_o~o-~e.t~?~E:. __ ... __ ~::::::::::::: [:: :~~!~::: ·:: :<: i::: · _. 0..90 _. .. _ ..... _. _. _ ... .L\c_c_ep!a_b!e. ... __ .. ~P.J\?_2~-__ .. _ . _O_D_9_'.+ __ 1,~·P!~h!°.r??e.~z_e_n_e __ .. __ . _. ___ . _ •. -~Q.'~-_ ..... ?9.·.8 __ .. 29 .8 ... ??-.3:.~9_.q _ .. _ -~~c_ep!a_bJe_ ..... __ -~P,J\_6?:4 . ___ _ _ D_0_9?. __ 1,3.-P!~h!°.r.??e.~~e_n_e _ . __ •.. _______ .. . _ . ):'9/~ _ . _. __ 1?~ ___ .. _ _:1 ~1 ..... _ _7~:o.: ! ~~ ... _ -~~c_ep!a_b!E: . __ ...... ~P,J\ _6_2:4 . __ .. . . . 00_9_5 __ _1:~-pjc_h!or??e.~~e_n_e_ .. _ . _ ... _ ...... _ . __ ...... _ ygj~. _ ..... ~ ~-~ _ ..... _ ~1-~ __ ... ~:26 _ _-_ '. 9:1 ... _ _.~~c_ep!a_b!e. _ E.P.J\ _6_2~ _ . _ .. . 4625 . ~ic_~l?r_o_d(fl _u_orc.n_:ie.t~~n.e. S~re ?n. _1?~ ___ .... __ ..... -~gt~ .. __ . __ ~ ?:O_ .... _. ?·99 ..... _ ... _____ ..... _ -~c_c_ep!a_b _le. . ~P.J\ __ 6_2~ . -~6_3_0_ . _1: '. -_Djc_h!°.r?~t.h~n.~ _ .. _ ... _ . __ . __ .. _ .. ___ ... _ _1~gj~ ___ . __ ~ ?~O-_____ ?-~9 . ___________ . __ . __ ~~c_ep!a_b!e. ___ ... __ ~P.J\ _6_2~ 0054 1/-pjc_hJ °.r?~~h~n.~ ____ . ____ .. _ ... _ .. ___ . __ yQI~ __ ... __ ~g-? _____ . ~~-~ .. _ .. _ ~1 -_5_ -_ 8.4_-~. _. __ i:,c_c_ep!a_b}e_ . _ . __ .. _ E.P.".'-_6?:4 _ .. _ . _ 4640 _1: 1_-!)!c_h!~r_o ~~hy~e_n_e ___ ... ___ . ____ . _ .. _ .. __ yg!~. __ . _ . ?9.-~ .. _ ..•• 1~·? ....... ?1-_2_-_ ~7.-7. _ ..... i:-c_c_ep(a_b}e. . _ . ____ ~P.-:\ _6_2~ __ . __ . 4.6:4_5_ c!s: \2:[?i~~l.?:~e_t~~le.~E: . _ .• __ ..... __ ...... J~9!~ ___ .. _ ~ ?:O_ . • . . 9.99 __ ..... __ ... _ .... J:-~c_ep!a_b!e_ . _ ... __ ~P.,:X _6_2:4 _ .. _ . . _4_7~9. -~~a_n~:1:?·_Djc_h_lc.r__o_e~hie _n_e _ .. _ •. _ ••.. _ ....•. _ . __ -~QI~ .... __ ~ ?~O .. _ ... _ 9._09 _ ......... _____ ..• _.L\c_c_ep)a_bJe_ .• __ .. _ ~~,:\_6_2~ _ •. _ ... ~~-?. _ . . _ ?~-~--.... _5_1 :4.: ~ ~~ ....• _ ~c_c_ep(a_bJe_ __ ... ___ ~P.J\ _6_2~- 4680 cis -1 ,3-Dich loro propylene µg/L 24.1 28 .1 19 .7 -36.5 Acceptable EPA624 Page 10 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Volatiles (cat# 830) (Continued) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates : Reported Assigned Value Value 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description . _ 4_6_8_5 .. t~a.!1?:1:~-PJC.h}~r9pr.opie_n~ ________ .. __ ........ ygj~. _ . I. __ : ?~O-_ _ _ .. ?-9? __ J 1 _ .. _____ . __ . . . _ 1:-c.c_ep!a_b!E: . ____ ~~~ _6_2~. __ _ . _0_0_6_6 __ E_t~yl~(:)n.z_e_n_e ......... __ . ____ •• _ ... __ .. __ . __ .. _µgl~. _ .. 1. _. ?~·.8 __ ....... ??·?_ .. -· _ ~?-~.-.6.6.~ ___ . _J\c.ce_p!a.ble. __ .. __ .. E~A _6_2~-_ .. . . _4_8_3_5 __ f-!e_x'.39~1.?C°.b_uy~d_i(:)n.t: _ .. ___ .. ____ ........ _ _ _ _ _ _ ygj~ _ ...... _: ?~O_ .. ___ ?·9?.. . __ . _ ........ _ _ . J\c_c_ep!a_bJe, _ . __ ... ~~~-6_2~-.. _ .. _ ... 4_8_69 ... 2::-1::l:l~cl_n_o_n~. _ ....... _ .. ___ .. ____ .. ____ . _ .... __ ygj~. _____ : ?·O. __ . _ . ?·9? _ .. _____ .. __ .... _ . __ J\c_c_ep!a_b_le. _ _ _ . __ ~~~ _6~~ ____ _ 47 .4 39.8 24.2 -56.1 .. _Ac_c_ep _ta _b_le. __ . _____ ~~J\_6_2~-__ _ 4995 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MI BK) µg ll < 1 O 0.00 .... _ 1:-c_c_ep!a_b!e. __ _ EPA 624 _ : ici_o:5: • -~~p:hj~aj~~~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ : : : • : : ·: ~~~: : : [ : : :~: ~ : : : : : : g.~9 : : -: : : : : : : .: : : .. ___ 1:-c.c.ep!able. __ . : : : : E.~ ~ ~2~: : : : •- . _ ~ 1_0? .. __ 8_tyr~!1~ _ .. __ . _ .. __ .. __ . __ . __ ......... _ . __ .. ~QI~_ ...... __ ?~,? _ .. _ .. _ ?~-~. __ ... ~~--6_ ·_ 9_5_.5. _ ... _ Ac_c_ep _!a_b}e. ........ _ ~~ J\ _6_2~ _ . _ _ . _5.1 _0:5_ 1, 1_.\2:~e.t~a_c_h~o_r9(:)t_h'.3~(:) _ .. __ . ___ .. _ ..... __ .. _ .. ~9.I~ _ .. _ . __ : ?·_o __ .. _. ?·.?? .. _ -· _ .. _. _ .. _ .. _ ... ___ J\c_c_ep!a_b le.. _ ... _. _ ~~,L\_6_24 . __ 5110 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane µgll 101 86.1 50.4-126 Acceptable EPA624 : .. 1~:t: ·;:t::?~~e~h,X I~~~: _:::: : : : : : : : ·_:::: i ~: :j!~::: I·:: 9~63:: :r:: !!} : :,. : i!~-:::t~: :: : :~:~~l:~i :: : : : .. :ti i~f -::. '-;:i }Ht~:ti~:~t:~: : • • : • : : • • : • · : : . : ::t: .: : f : it} : : • : : 11': : : · : 38~ . ,, , : }::~::::L • • • • • ::t tf · · · -·0057 .. ·tl~;;{~~~~~;;;~~~: •:::::::::::.:::::: ·• :: :~:~:-.: : : : ;t;:: -.: : : ;;:;.: : :: : ;rt~;t : : :ti~:t;i~:: J: ~: J;t:~;:: ~-.: 5175 :rri_c~l_oE~f(u?!~n:1(:)t_h~~(:) _ .• _ ... _ .. _ . ___ . _ . .. .. __ yQI~ _ . ____ <_ ~ _. _ ..• _ ~-.09 ....... _ . _ . _ .. _____ . __ i:,<:c_ep!a_b~e. ... ____ • ~~~\6_21 _ .... . 5180 .\~·~:1:_ri_~~~o r~~r9p~~E: {l~~P.) ... ______ . _ . __ .. _ ygj~ ... _ _ _ :<. 2 _ .... __ q._09 ___ ....... ______ . . _ i:,c_c_ep!a_b!e. . ______ ~~I:\ _6_2_4 .. _ .... . . _ 5_2_2:5_ Yi~}'._I .'.39:lt_a!E: ... _ . _ .. __ . • _ ... _ .. _ . __ .... -~QI~. __ ... _ ~ _19 _.. • _ ?·.09 .. . . __ ......... _ . _ .... 1:-<:c.ep !a_b]E: ______ • ~~J\ _6_2~ _ ...... _ ... 5.2_3_5 _ . 'l_i~~I c~l_c>:i?~ ____ .. _ .. _______ ... _ . _ .. ________ ~9!~ _______ <_ ~ .. _ .. __ ?·.0.0. _ _ _ .. ____ .. _ . __ . __ i:-<:c_ep!a_b}E: _ _ _ .. ~~~ _6_2~. __ _ 5260 Xylenes, tota l µgll 226 191 110 -255 Acceptab le EPA 624 Page 11 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP Chlorinated Acid Herbicides (cat# 829) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Assigned Value Value 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description _8.5 _9_5 __ ~ic,c;m.?~ ..•.•.•. _ _ygl~---4.9 7.73 0.773-11.2 Accep table EPA8151 .. 8.6_09 _3,~-~!C:h!°.r??~~zoic acid •.. __ ygj~. _ . : : : -_:: .• J ... ? .. 34 · --· ~~-~! i; ~~~7: :: : ~?t: ~;~~~~d: : .• : . : : : : : : : :. : : : . ·!!~-~-~:~:I:;{:°-~ ..... -. -... -................... -~QI~ -....... ~:8. ...... : J:!!~: J::t :;:: ·.:-)::;~t::1::: I::::;;~ ;~~t :: ):fl~~tF : •:.. . . . : : •.:: 1 :~t 1 ':, ~.:: .. • : . •::: ·.: ~~: ~:~1 + : : . : . · 6500 4-Nitropheno l v. ~~6~_s: :fe:n~~c~.i~r?~~~~o]: _ ~: ··: .. _ 8645 Picloram .. --·----- --. 8655 2,4,5-T .... ,.-~---~~ .. ~--. 8650 2,4 ,5-TP (Silvex) WP PCBs in Water (cat# 832S) 0040 Aroclor 1016 8885 Aroclor 1221 0042 Aroclor 1232 µg /~-___ . _5:~ . ~-~} __ ~-~~!: ~~--1_ ... _A.cc_ep(a_b!E: .... ___ E_P_A 8151 _ ... -~9!~... 3 .6 . ___ . _ ~--0_1 _ ... -~.50 !: ~._01_ . __ A.':c_ep)a_blE: __ .. ___ E_P.~ ~!~1-__ ...... _ µg_/~ .... 8.4 -. yg_l~ ...... ..7:8. .. .. µg /L 2.4 9.77 9.02 2.48 0.977 -17.5 Acceptable EPA 8151 1.'03--1·i_1 .. ·1 · ·A~~e~i;bi~ ·r -.... i -PA s151--.. - ·o.24a : 3 _.a4 · T. -A~~e-~ia.bi; ... I'. --1:·rA s151 -.. - . _ ~--09 ___ . _ .. __ .... __ .. _. __ A.~c.ep)a_b}E: _ .. EPA 8082 _ ... ygj~. . ... : 9 ;5 __ ..•. ~-99 .. _ __ ...... _ ... A.~c_ep!a_b}e. . ___ .•• _E_P_~ ~g3.~ .. _. ~g_l~ __ .. ___ : 9~5-_ . . _ g._09 . __ . _ . _ . _ . _ .. _ .'~~c.ep!a_b!e. _______ EP_~ ~~8.2. _ .. __ 0040 !\_r?C,I?~ ~ ~~~ . • . .. • __ .. . .. • _ .... __ .... _ ... _ ~g_/L . _ _ .. : 9~5.. . __ ~-_09 _ . . __ . _ _ . ... . . _.~~c_ep!a_b!E: _ • _ .. _E_P.~ ~~~2_ _ ... 0044 Aroclor 1248 . . .. ~9!~ ___ ..... _5_:~ _. _ .. _ ~-2~-. ___ ?:2_0_ -.. 7.-18. .... _ A.c,c_ep!a_b_le. _ ..•. __ E_Pf\_ 8.~8.~ ..... _ 0045 Aroclor 1254 0046 Aroclor 1260 ... _ yQ_I~ _ . .. . < 0 .5 .... _ • ?·_o_o __ . _ .. _ • _____ .. _ • A.~c_ep!~bJE: ... _____ E_P_~ ~~8.~ .. __ . µg /L < 0.5 0.00 Acceptable EPA 8082 WP PCBs in Water (cat# 832S) . _o_o_4_0_ .!\r9c,1or. ~q~~ .. __ ... _ .. __ ...• _ _ .. _ ... _ .. _ -~Q_I~ ......... : 9~5 ..... __ ?-.99 .. ___ . __ . __ ... _ .. _ -~c,c_ep!a_b!e.. _. ____ ~~~-6_0~-.. __ _ . _ ~~8_5 __ !\_r?c,19~ ~ ~~~ _ ..... ____ .... __ ••. ___ •.. _ . ______ ygj~ .. _ .... ~ _D ~5-__ . __ ?·_09 ... "" ____ . ___ ... __ . _ A.':c.ep!a_b}e. _ _ _ • __ ~~'.:' _6_0!3 __ .... _ ... D_0_4f ... !\_r?C,I?~ ! ~3.2_ .. _ . __ ... __ .... ___ .. __ .... _ .. _ . -~QI~ ... _ .•. ~ 9._5 ___ .• _ ?-90 .... _ .. _ .. __ . ___ .... ~c.c_ep!a_b!E: .... ____ ~~~ _6_0~ .• _ •. . _D_D_49 __ A!?C.I?~ !~~2_. _ .. __ . ____ .. ___ . ___ .... __ . _. y gj~ _ ....... ~ 9~5--... __ 9._o9 __ .... ____ .. _. _ ..... -~~c _ep!a_b!e. __ •• __ ~~'.:'_6_0!3 _ •... . _o_o_4~-_A!?C.I?~ ~~~~ ___ .. _. _ ... __ .. _ ..• __ ..... _ ...... -~9!~ .... _ .. ___ 5~~ .... __ ~--2? ____ .. ?:.2_0_-_7.-18. ... _ .~c,c_ep!a_b_le.. _ ... __ . ~~~-69!3 . __ .. . • o_o_4_5_ . f\_r?c.'?~ ! ~~4. _ .. __ . _ ... ___ . __ .... ___ ... __ ... _ .. ~Q_I~ ___ . __ ~ _o ._5 __ .. __ ?·99 .... _ 0046 Aroclor 1260 µg/L < 0.5 0 .00 WP PCBs in Oil (cat# 835S) • -~c,c_ep!a_b_le. _. Acceptab le EPA608 EPA608 . _ ~8_8_0_ . (',_r?C.'?~ ! ~~ 6_ . _ . ______ . __ .. _ .. _ ... __ .. __ ... __ ':1.9!~£!. .. _ . __ ~ 9~5 .. __ . __ 9·.99 .... ___ . _ . ___ .... __ ~c.c_ep!a_bJe. ••. ____ E_P_~ ~~8.2_ __ • 8895 Aroclor 1242 . _ ':1.9!~£1. . _ _ _ ?~-? _____ . ?~·?. _ . _ '-': :~~o~:: ~r9i19 ~ j~~~: _:::::::::: : : : : : : : : : ~:: . ___ ,:n_g_l~[!. _ .•• ~ _o ._5 ___ .... ~-_o_o _. _ 3.84 -37 .3 . .. ~c,c_ep!a_b!e. _______ E_P_~ ~q~2_ .. __ . _ _ ~c,c_ep)~bJE: _ •. ____ E_P_~ 8.?~~ _ ... _ 8910 Aroclor 1260 mg/kg < 0.5 0.00 Acceptable EPA 8082 Page 12 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 -' . Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o . WP Base/Neutrals (cat# 833) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates : 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acce ptance Value Valu e Lim its Performance Eva luation Method Description ... 5..5_o_o. J~c~~~~h,t~~~E: _ . __ .... _. _ .. ___ .. _ ... ___ . I ... y~t~ ... · I· _. ~~-.?. _ ... _ ?5.·.? ___ . _) ~ ._6_ · .. ~2 .. 5. .. ____ ~~"._epia_bJ~ __ . __ . ~~~ _8_2!~'?-• ;~i t{f r:i:.;::;,;;;;;,~:(;:,;,~;,;;;i: . : : f . : ;;t : . : ; ~o . : .• :!~f : : : ':" . :· 2 . : . : NB:;~~:, : . : : : ::~ ::~:: : : : :-i:~f :~:~t:rfj~: _:: :·:::::: :: : : : : :: : :: :: : : : r :: :~:~t :-: : : ~ ~~o:: :· -. 0._o~_" -·-.::::::: ::: :: : :~~~e~!~b!~: :r:: -.~~~--8:2?9~:::: .. 5575--.Be-n~;(a)~~th;;c~~~ -· · -· · -· -·· -.. _--· · -.. · 1· · -·µ;/L · · -· -~ ?9. --· -· g._op _ --~ · · -·· · -.. · -· J,. --~~"._ep!a_b!E: -.. · · --::1 -:~~~~-· · · ·s5a_5_ -se·n;;i'biti~;r;~tti~~~ -... --...... -.... -. .. f .. -µg.tl .. -.... ;1:!-..... -;tt . -j-. fr} :-Ji.: -... -:~~::::·:~~ -... --. EPA .8.21oc · -.. · :i6:o~:: -~e-.~~?(k)~~o!~~t;~;~:.:::::::::::: : : : : [ ·: :~;!~::: .. : ?2 ·?:: : . : : ?8.-5.: J: ~~1i -:~~-7.: J: :~~c:ep!~b}~:::::: ~P.~ ~i?9~:::: ::::::~:: ;:~:;t~;~~~~;te:n_e_:: : : : : : : : : : : : ·: : : ~ t •-. :~:~:: : I::) t~::: : : i:;;::: : : : : : ~:: -: : : :i::::;;:J:: · . : : -;~; ;;;~t : : : . -~6}?. _ B_e_n~yl _a_lc.o_hyl .... ___ .. .. . . .. __ ... _. _ .. __ -~9!~. . . _ ~ ?~0-_ .. _. g.o~-...... __ . .. _ .. _ .. _ :~·c.c .. epta_b]~ ... __ . ~~~ _8?-!9'? .. _ .. _ ~6_6_0 __ 4:~~o.n:o_!)_h_e!1Y.1:~~e_nie_t~~r. _ _ __ ... _ , ___ . . . y9j~. _ ... _ . ?g ·? ... _ _ _ 8.! -~. . . . 27.0 -110 Acceptable EPA 82 70C 5670 . _B_u_t~l~e,n,~Y!P_h.~h.a_l~te _ .... ____ .... _ .... _ . __ ... _ . ~9/L _ . _ ... _ ?~·?. .. . __ !~-~ _ ..... : -.9:~2: -: j ~~: : : -. : ~~~ep!~b}~ : : [ : : : ~~~:8i?~~: : : . ~. 5680 Carbazole µ9/L 89.8 112 45 .8 -15 1 ... J\~"._ep!a_bJE: _.. EP A 827 0C • l:f: · ::;11~:;i:;i);}~;;~·"' • •:: • -· • • • • • • • r.: ;;i . • • r •. ~t • •• •: ~: f. • ·• • {t:; i:~ · · ·. •:::~:;: •• • • • •m~;f Ir ·.• . :!i.:} ::~lt~~~~i~t;;~:~)~~h~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: :. : ·:::·_:~I.: _ :~:t :: ~ I ~: ~ ~ ~: ~ ~: ~: ~.1~~ ~::: ::~~ ~ ~~~: ~-: ~iit:t:~~;: : ~ ~ ~ ~~~~8~~~~: ~ ~: . _ ~7_9_5 ... :2:<?h.l?~o_n_ap~~h_a!e_n_e_ . _ . _ .. _ ........ _ .. _ .... _ .. _ .. ~9}~ _. _ I .... ?~-~. , .. . _ ~~·?.. . . . _:19-.2. ·--~3 _.3. ... __ ~~c.ep!a.b]e, .... _ ... ~~~ _8J!9C? ..... _ . _ ~8_2_5_ . .4:<?h.1?~0_!)_h~!1Y.1:~he_n_y(e_th.e_r __ .. ___ .. _ .... __ .. _ . __ y~I~ .. .. .. . __ _:1: 8.. __ ... __ 11? __ . _ .. _5.4 :5. :. ~ ~ ~ ... _ . ~~c_ep!a_b!E: _ ... ___ ~~~ _8_2!9'?. __ _ .. 5._8_5_5_ . (;_h_ry~e_n_e_ .... _ ... ______ ... __ .. ___ .. _ _ _ __ ~gj~ _ .. ___ ~ ?·_o_ . _. _ .. g._09. __ . _ ....... __ ..... __ ~~c_ep!a_b]E: . _ . __ . E.~~ _8_2?~<?. __ . 589 5 Dibenz(a ,h }a nth rac en e µ9/L < 5.0 0.00 Acce pt able EPA 8270C . _ ~·9:o~:: Di~;~~~!~r;~: : : : : ·: : : : : : : : : _ : : · : : : : : I· . : : ~~L : : · [ : : ji.~: : : · : : ~~-4 : : : · : 1 ~i j~-?:: · : : ~~c:ep!~b)~ : : : : : : ~~~ :8~?~~: : : : . :~~~;: __ ?t~1~~r:;ih:;~~n~ :-: : . : : : .·:::::::: .1 : : :~:t :: I::: ;1 i:: :: : : ~-rr ::.: :1 ~~~ ~ i~i : ·: :N:~;:~1::~:1 :: .• : • ;;t:;;it :: _ , -~6_1_5_ .. 1!~-~j"._h]~r9~~~2;:e_n~-. _ . _ . _ . ____ .. _ . __ .. _ . _1-J_~/~ _ • _ . _ • !g·?. ___ ... .:11? _ ... __ 1!:0_: ! ~~ .... _ _.~~c_ep(a_bJ~ _ ... _ . _ ~~~-8_2.?~'? .... _ .. 4_6_2~-. _1,~-~]~h!<:r?~~~z.e_n~ .. __ .. _ . __ . _ . _____ ....... _ .. _ ~~/~ __ .... _ .1~-~ ..... __ ~~-? .. _ ... _9:2.~: ! 1_ ~ _ ...... ~~c_e_p!a_b!~ _ ... _ .. ~~~ .. 8_2.!~C: .. _ , -~9_4_5 ___ 3,~':~i~h.19~o_b~~~i9~n~-. _____ . _ ...... _ ... __ . -~9}~. _ •... ~ _1~-..... g.~9 -___ . _ ... _ .... _ .... -~~c_ep!a_b]e. _ .. _. _ ~~~ .. 8_2!9 '?. _. _ _ -~0_7_D_ --~i~t~y lp~~h_a!a_t~ •. _ ... _. _. ___ ... _ .. , _. __ , __ y9_!~-. _ .... ~~·.1_. _ ... !1·! ........ _1_?:8_: !~~ __ ... _J\~"._ep!a_b!e.. _ ..... E.~~_8_2!9'? .. _, _ 6135 Dime thylphthal ate µ9/L 120 160 16.0 · 23 0 Acce pt able EPA 8270C Page 13 of 20 All ana lyt es are included in ERA's A2LA ac credi tatio n. Lab Code : 1539 -0 1 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. WP Base/Neutrals (cat# 833) (Continued) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Assigned Value Value 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description 6465 3~NiJro~~i_li~~. ____ . _______ .. ________ • ______ . _ µ9 !~ ____ _ 0.00 Acceptable EPA 8270C _ : : :<j :: : ~-: g.9~~: . : -· -----: : : : : : : :A.~~ep (~bJ~ : ] : : _ ~~~ :ajy~~--: : : <5 6470 4-Nit roan iline . ---.... -~Q_I~ --- 5015 Nitrobenzene .. __ ?~-~-----~~-9 .... _ 1~._8--~5_.g _____ ~c.c_ep!a_b!e. .. ___ E,~i\_8_27 9<?_ _6.~2.~ •. -~-~(t~o_s9?~eJ~Y!a_1;1 ~n~. _________ • _ _ __ _ __ y9j~-.. _____ <_ ~ __ ... __ 9.99 ____ .... ___ .. ____ .. _ :~C.<:_ep!a_b)e, __ . _6.5_3_0 __ ~-~(t~o_s9?~rr;et~Y.l ?C"!t:e_ ___________________ .~9!~. ______ <__ ~ __ .• _. g.99 __ .. _________ .. _ :~c.c_ep!a_b!e, __ EPA8270C EPA 8270C . _ 6.53_5_ --~-~!t~o_s9?~~~~Y.l~~it:e_ _ .. ________ ... ___ .. _ . ___ ~9!~ _____ . _<_ ~ ______ • g.99 _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ :~c.c_ep!a_b!e, . ____ . E.~A. _8~!9<?. _ . 6545 _ -~-~)t~o_s-9:~i-_n_-pr_opY,l~!:fl_i~e_ ______________ .. _ . __ -~9!~ _________ ~~-~. __ . __ -~ ?? _ _ _ _ _3!3 :5.: ! ~~ __ . __ ~c.c_ep!a_b)e_ __ ... _ E,~A. _8~!9<? .. _ .. _ 6590 Pentachl°.r??e.r:z_en~ ___ .. ___ ... _ . __ _ __ _ _ _y9_!~ .. ___ . ___ <__ 5 ___ .. __ 9.99 _ ..... __ . _ .. _______ :~c.c_ep!a_b!e_ ___ ...... E,~A. _8_2!9<? .. __ _ 6615 Phenanthrene 5095 P_y~i9 ~n_e ____ .. __ . __ .. _____________ . __ .. _____ -~9!~ ... _ . ___ <__ ~ _____ 9.99 ________ .. _. _____ .':'C.<:_ep!a_b!e_ _____ ~~A._8~!9<? .. _. _ . _6_7_1:5 __ .. 1.:~·~·-5~,:-e,t~a_c_hlo_r??E:r:z_e:1~ .. _. _________ . __ . yQ_I~. _. _ . __ <_ ~ ___ .. _ 9._09 _ .. __ .. _____ .... __ -~c.c_ep!a_b!e_ __ ... __ E.~A._8~!9<?. __ _ 5155 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µ9/L 72 .7 130 29.2 -154 Acceptab le EPA 8270C Page 14 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . lab Code : 1539-01 ··-·· Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Base/Neutrals (cat# 833) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Descr iption ... -. -..... -g._o_o ....... ---.. --.. -~?~ ~:11:'~~~d--. --....... - -.. -. -- . 57.9_5 __ 2:<;?h.l?:~n_ap~1h_a!E:n_e_ .... _ ................. ____ ... _ .. ~gI~ _ .. _ . _ ?~-~ _ .. ____ ~~-?. _ . _ .. ~ g._2_ -_ ':3_-~. _ .... A.c.cepta_b!E: ....... _ ~P.~ _6~? .... . __ 5_~2_5 __ 4:~h.l?:~P_h_e~yl~~~e_nY'.e_thE:r ______ . _ . __ .. ___ .. _ .. ~9!~ __ . ___ ) ~ ~ _ .. _ .. _ ) ~? . __ ... _5~:5_: ! ~ ~ _ .. ___ A.c.c_ep.!a_b!E: _______ ~P.ft.. _6_2f5 _ .... . __ 5_~5? __ ~h_ry~e_n_e ___ .. _ .... ___ . ___ .. _ .. __ . _ ........ )19}~ _ ... ___ ~ ~:.o ______ g._o_o __ . __________ .. _ .. A.c.c.ep!a_b_lE: ____ . __ ~P.~_6J_? ____ . 5895 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µ9/L < 5.0 0.00 Acceptable EPA 625 5_9_0_5_ . _D_i~~~~o~~r~~: : : : : : : : : : ·· · : _: : : : : : : -. : : : : : : : ~~~ : : : · · : : ~2. i ~ : : : : ~~. j: : J : i ~ .:6 :-: ~8) : : : : ~ ~~c:epj~~~ : ~ : : .: :: : ~~ ~ :6:Z~: : : : - __ 5_9_2_5 __ ~i :n_-~~tylp~~h_a(a_t~ _____ . __ . ____ .... ___ .... ___ . y[l_l~ _ .. _ .. __ 1; '. .... _ .... g._o_o _ ... _. _ ... ____ .... _N_o_t (\.C~'::~t'.1?1~-____ . ~P.~_6_2? ... _ . . -~6_1_Q __ 1,~-!))c_hJ~r??~r:!2:.e_n!l .• __ .. _ .. __ .. _. _ ....... __ . -~9!~ ... __ ~!-~--__ .. _ )~?. _ ... _1.:3:9.-. !~~. ___ .A.c.c_ep!a_bJ~ _. _ ... -~P.~6?5 _ ... _ _ ~~1 _5_. \~·P.!C.hJ~r?~~~~e_n!l _ ... _. __ . ___ ..... _ ..... _ ... _ ):19!~. ____ . !0.-? .. _. ___ 1~? .. __ .. _1!:0_: !~': _ ..... A.c.c_ep!a_b!E:. _. _ .. __ ~P.~_6_2_?_ ... _ . . _':6_2_0 __ 1,~·P!cJhJ~r??~~':.e_n_:l _ •.. _ • ____ .. _ .. _ .... __ . _ y9j~ _ . _ .... 19.-.:3 . _ _ _ . 9.?-?. __ .. _9:~~-: ~ ! 1_ ..• __ . A.c.c_ep!a_b!E: __ ... __ ~P.~ _6_2_? ... __ _ _ 5_9_4.5_ . .3 :~·:~i?~l?~o_b~~~i9~n_:l __ .. ____ .. _ .. _ .. _. _____ . -~9!~ _. ___ . ~ _1_o _. __ . _ g._o_o _______ .... ___ .• __ •. A.c.c_ep!a_b!~ .•. __ . _ ~P.~_6_2? ____ _ 6135 Dimethylphthalate µ9/L 63.1 120 Page 15 of 20 74.7 12.8 · 106 ···---....... --~ ~ .. --....... _ 160 16.0 -230 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code: 1539-01 Acceptable EPA625 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0 . WP Base/Neutrals (cat# 833) (Continued) 6465 3-Nitroaniline 6470 4-Nitroaniline WP-174 Final Complete Report Units ' .. y9!~ --.. .. y9!~ --- EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits <5 0.00 Performance Evaluation Method Description .•• < .. 5. ..... _ g.90 __ . _ .... ____ . _ ... _.~c_c_ep)a_bJE: .... ___ ~P.,6.-_6_2? .... __ . 5.~.1 _5_ . _N_il_r<?b.E:n_z.e _n~. _ . ___ •.. _____ .. ___ .. __ . _ . _ yQ_I~ .. .. . . •.. 2~.~ _ . _ ... _ ~5.-9 _ ...... _1 ~ ._8_ -. <:5_-? _ ... _ . j\cc _ep!a_b!E: _ _ .. _ .. ~P.J\ _6_2:5 __ . _ . . -~5_2:5 ___ N_-~jtr,~s_o9~eJ~Y!c:mi_n.e .. _ .. _. _____ ...• _ ..... _ ... _ )~9!~ _ .. _ .. _. _<_ 5. __ .. __ g.99 _ ..... _ .. _ ... _. __ .. _ _.~c_c_ep!a_b}E: ..... ___ ~P.J\_6_25 ____ . _ --~5_3_0_ . N_-~itr,~s_o9~rr1e_t~yl?':1lr:!': . ___ ....... _ ... _____ . _ . ~9!~ ........ _<_ 5. _ .. _. _ .. g .. 09 __ .. __ • __ ••. ___ . __ J\c_c_ep!a_bJe_ .... ____ ~P.A _6~?. ___ . __ ~5_3_5 __ N_-~it r.~s_o9~-h~~y1?rn~1:_e_ ____ .. _ ..• _ .. ____ .. _ . __ yQ.t~ _. _ . _ . _<_ 5. .... __ . _ g.09 ______ •. __ • _____ J\c_c_ep!a_b.!E: __ .... __ ~P.-6.-_6_2_5 __ .. _ . . • 6.5_4_5_ .. N_-~It~~s_o:d.i~-~~~r_opyl.'.3,:n_in.e_ .. _ .. ___ ... __ .. _ . _ .. y9.t~ __ .. __ ~~-~-... __ 1 ?? __ .... _3~:5.: ! 5.~ .... J\c_c_ep!a_bJe_ .•. ____ ~P.J\.6_2? _ ••. _ 6590 Pe ntach lorob enzene µ9/L < 5 0.00 ___ .. _______ .. J\c_c_ep!a_b!e_. _ .•..•.. ~P.J\_6_2? ___ •. · :~6:1~: :_~h:e~~~t~!~~e-::::: _::::::::: ~::::::: [::_~QI~::'. : : : ~?-~:: :: : : 1j~:: :: __ 5_1:0_: ~~~ _ .. __ J\c_c_ep!a_bJe. __ .. _ ... ~P.J\_6J:5 . __ _ _ -~6_6_5 __ P_Y:e_n_e_ __ . _. . ..... ____ • ____ .. _ .... _ _ _ _µ,9}~ ___ .. __ <_ 5. ... _. _ .. g._09 __ ... _. ______ .. __ J\c_c_ep!a_bJe_ ___ .. _. ~P.J\_~?? __ .. _ . . _5.0_9_?_ P_Y:i9~n_e _____________ . _____ . _ _ _ _ __ .. __ -~~!'~ _______ <_ 5. _ .. ____ g.99 __ ..... ____ .. _. _ .. _ .. __ J\c_c_ep!a_bJe_ _ •. _ . __ ~P.J\_6~?. _ . __ _ _ 6.~1 _5 ___ 1~~.~~5.-"!"e.t:a_c_h!~r?b.e.nz.e!l~-______ .. __ . ___ ... ygj~ __ _ .. __ <_5. _ ... __ g._o~_ .... ____ . __ .• -· _ .A.c.c_ep!a_b}E: .. __ ... __ • ~P.J\_6??. ___ .. 5155 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µg/L 72.7 130 29.2 -154 Acceptable EPA 625 Page 16 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. WP Acids (cat# 834) WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description . _5_6_1_0_ -~e_n~c:>ic_a_c!d _____________ • -_. ___ .. ____ . __ )~9!~ __ .I. __ ~ _19 _ .. ____ ?·99 ..... ___ .. _ _ _ _ . _A.c_c~p!a_b!~ __ .. _. ~~,:\_8_2?9t?. _ . . _ 5_7_0_0_ 4:S:~19r,o_-~:n:,~t~v1p~~~CJI ____ ........ __ .. __ .. __ y9j~ .. _ -[ . _ ~'. -~ . _ .... ~!-? _ _ _ . _3!:6.-:_ '. 2.~ . ___ 1'c_c_ep!a_b!e. .. _ .-_ . ~~~ _8_2!9~. _ . . _ ~8_o_o __ 2:S:~l?'.°.P_h_e~c:>I _________________ ... __ ......... _ -~9!~ _ _ _ . _ ~8.-~. __ . __ ~8.} ___ . _ } ~--2_ -_ ~4 _. '! . _ .. _ i:,c_c_ep!a_b}~ _ .... __ ~~~ _B_2?9c;; __ .. 6000 2,4-Dichlorc:>p~e.~o_l __ _ __ ________________ . _1~9jL ___ ... ?2.·? .... _ . } 9~ . . __ 3_?:~ -. '! 2.~ _ . __ i:,c_c_ep!a_b!~ _ _ _ _ • ~~~ _82?9c;; _ . . -~o_o_5_ 2,~-D)c_h!o_rc:>p~~~o_1 __ .. __ . __ . __ .. __ ............. _ )1.QI~--.. _ . ___ 1gg __ ... __ 1~? .... __ 59 :~ :. ~8.1. _. _ .:-:-c_c_ep!a_b!~ ..... ~~~-8_2?9<:. __ 6130 2,4-Dimethylphenol µ9/L 68.6 89.4 18 .3 -118 Acceptable EPA 8270C . ii6o· . 4'.i-oi~i;~;-2~~~th~i;h~~~, .. -....• -.... -. --I --. c;,t. · --f ... 47 .5-... --?a.a -.... 1 s.a· _. 96.4 --. -. A~c-e~t;bi~ • -. ---ErA _8_21oc -. - . : ii:{ )t~!~~;::it •• : ·• : •• : ••• : •••••••• : 1 • • ~:t • • : 1 : • ir: : : •• ~;; • • r • ::~}: ;!i •• • • 1;~:;1~~: • r • • • ::r :~~:t ••• • ;~~: H!i:ff:F : • • • • • • • • • • • • · • • : :: : :( •: :;t •I• •I • .• : lH : •fl: m • ! 1::;1;~: • • · · · !~H~H! • · · .. 66-05 .. P.eni;c·h,;r;~h~~o-1. -.... -................. r -.. c;/L ... r ' . 54.6 --.... 58 .5. ... .. · 12 .2 · _.80 .. 8 ... : : : ~~~ep!~bj~ : : : : : ~ ~~A ~8_2!9~: ~ : V. i:~~ ~tt:i~etc,:N;oph~~o; : •••• : : .• : •• r. ::r . ,l ~ JB~:: : : ~t~:: :: : ~;{t t!~ .. : ~ ):~:;;~:~;:: .... : :;t:;f~~:::: . -::~-~--~~1t~~;:~}:~:~~:-~-:i .. -.. -...... -...... -. r .. --~~jt " .... '!!f . --... ;i .~-' .. · ;3!).)1.1 · .. -1~:-:-~~::~:. -. '' ::r -:~~~~-.. WP Acids (cat# 834) -:.:~;-~: tr;l;i~~~;~~~t;y1p;;;~1 ::::::: . __ :::::: : : : :~:t ::: : : : ~iI :::: Jt;::: · j/s. ~ !2.~ _ : : :~~:::;1:~::: -: : ·: ;;;~:;;:: ... . -~8_05) __ ,_2:S:~l?~<?_P_h_e~c:>I ________ •.. _ .... __ .... _ ... _ ... -~9}~. _. ___ ~8.-3 __ ..• _ ?8.-?. __ .. 1~._2_-_7_4_.! •.. _ .. A.~c_ep(a_ble.. _ ..•. _ ~~~-6_2!5 _. __ · mt ;;rn;:~,~iti ::•: : : : •• • •: •• : •: •: •: :~Lt •: ~H •• .•• : lH : ]t m : E1fJ;;: : . : : !!Ht : : . -~3_6_0_ ~,~·!JJ~it!()·.2:rr.1~~hy~-h~!:1c:il _ ..... ____ .. _ .. _ ........ 1:!9!~ ..... ~!-? ..... _ !O.·~-... _ J~:~-~-~6_.~ _ .. __ i:,c_c_ep!a_bJ~ ..... __ .~P.J\_6_2:5 ... _ . . -~-1_7_5 . 2,~·~!~it_rCJ~~e_n_o! _ .... _ •... ___ ... _ .. _ .. __ .• _ y9j~ _. _ .... !~·? ..... _. _1?? ... _. __ 1_?:9.: !!~ ..... _/\c_c_ep!a_bJ~ ...... _ .. ~~,:\_6_2:5 ___ .. . . . ~4_09 __ ~:fl:1~~hylp_h_e0c:>I_ . __ . __ . __ ... _ • ___ ...... _ . __ -~9!~ _. _ . __ ~~-?. _ .. _ . ?~--1 _ .. _ _ _1 ! :6_: ! '.~ _ . _ . i:,c_c_ep!a_b!~ _ _ ..• _ ~~J\ _6_2? ... _ . 6410 4_:-~~~hf!P_h_e~c:il _ .. _ ... _. __ .. _ .......... __ • __ ... y9j~ _ ..... _19? ... _ .... _11? ..... __ 1~:2_ ~-!8.~ _ .... _i:,~c_ep!a_b!E: ... __ .. ~~,:\_6_2:5 _. _ .. . . ~4_9_0_ ~~~~trc:>p~~~<?I __ .• _ • _ •• ___ ...... _ _ _ ... _1:!9}~ .•. ___ ?6. __ .. _ • } ~ 9 ... __ . _2!: 1_ :. !~~ __ . _. A.~c_ep!a_bJ~ _ _ . _ . _ ~P.J\ _6_2!5 ___ .. . • ~5_o_o ___ 4:~i_trc:>p~~~<?I _ .. __ . _______ . _ . _ .... _ . _ . .. • _ YQI~ _ . _ .•• ?0.·? _ ...... _:111 . _ ... __ 1_'.'I:~: '! ~~ . _ _ _ 1'c_c_e?!<:b!~ _ .. ____ ~~J\ _6_2_?_ ... .. . . ~6_0?_ . _Pe_n!<:c_h!o_rc:i~~e.~o! .• _ .•.... _ .....••. _ ........ l:!Q/~ .••. , .. _ ?~-? ... _ .. ~8.-.? .... _ _:1 ?._2_ -.8-0_.~ . . __ i:,c_c_ep!a_b!e. . _____ . ~~J\ _6_2:5 ..... . . _6_6_2_5_. P_h_~!1?1 ___ . ______ . _. _ .. _ .. __ .. _. _. _ .... y9j~ .... __ ~~-? .. _. _. }~9 . _ .. __ 1!3:0_: ?~~ _ .. __ i:,c_c~p!a_bJ~ __ . __ . EP.~_6_2!5 _. _ .. . P .3.?_. 2,~·1·_6_:'!'e.t!a_c_h!~.rc:>~~e_n_oJ ____ .............. _ .. _ y(l_l~. _ ...... ~0.-~ ....... _:19? ...... _2_'.'1:5. ·. !~'.. -.. __ i:,c_c_ep!a_bJ~ •... _ ... _ ~P.J\_6?i __ ... . . . ~8_3_5_ . _2~~·?:T_ri~~~O-~()~~e_n_?( ..... _ .... _ .••... _ ....... _1:19}~ •• _ . _ • ??-.? ...... } ~ 9 _ ... __ 3~: 1_: '. ~ '. . _. _ . i:,c_c_ep!a_bJ~ .... _ .. _ ~P.-:\ _6_2_? ___ .. 6840 2,4,6-Trich lorophenol µ9/L 44.7 56.7 18.1 -73 .9 Acceptab le EPA 625 ·- Page 17 of 20 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o . WP-174 Final Complete Report Units EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Ass igned · Value Value 07/13/09 -08/27/09 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Descript ion WP Orr,anochlorine Pesticides (cat# 831) __ ~0_4!_ . ~l~r)n ____ .. _ .. _____ .. ___ .. ___ .. ______ .... ___ • _ ~9!~ ___ ~ . __ 5:~. __ . _ . ~--0_5 __ ·1· _ ?~2?:. ~ 1_. ! _ _ _ _ /1.~c_ep!a_b!E: _ • I ___ ~P.~ _8_0~~~-__ . : :~~::~:~: :;;:.~~~;c: .. : : ·::::::: :: . : : . : : . : : :: : .... ·: :~:;t-... : : : :2~r : ·:: jt~:: :: : ;~~rx~r :· ·_ :;~:::;;;:~:: J::: :;~::;;;t ::. __ ~1_0.5 __ d_e!t?-_B_f-:!C. ___ .. ____ . __ . _ .. _______ . _ . _ . _ ~9!~ _ ..... __ 7:~ . __ . __ ! ._7! _____ ?~8_9_ -. ~ o_.~ __ . __ /1.~cep!~bli: __ .• __ EP,~ _8_0~) ~. __ _ _ _ ~1_2_o ___ 9_a!11,m~-_B_H_C.(~~n.?~~~ )_ . _ . _ .... _ . ____ . _ .. _ .. ~9_/~ _ _ _ _ ___ 7:~ __ .. __ ~-_D.5 _ .. ~~3_0_ -_ 1_ 1_. ! _ ..... ~~c_ep _ta_b!~ . • . _ . ~P.~ __ 8_0~ ~ ~-.. _ . _7_2_4.0. __ a_l~h_a:'?~lor:d_a_n_e_ ..• ___ .. _ .... _. _. _. _ ........ yg_J ~-•• _. _3 :~. _ •.. _ 3.._6?_ .... _ ];6?:~-~!-..... A.~c_ep!a_b!E: __ ..... ~P.~_8_D _8]-:"-. __ . . _7_2_4_5_ .9.~!11.":~-~-h!~r9?n,e _ _ .. _____ . _. ___ •. _ Y!;!/~ _______ 4:~ _ .. _. __ ~-?? ...... _ ??1.-_7_-~! •.. ,, _.c..~c_ep!~b_lE: _ ... __ ~P.~ __ 8_0~1,:\ __ . 0049 4,4'-DDD µ9 /L 9 .6 7.18 2.64 -10.2 __ .C..~c_ep!a_b!E: _ .. _ .. ~P.~_8_0~),:\_ •• : :~~:;: }f ~~t ~::: ~ ~::: ·::: ~:: ~ ·: -... : ~ ~ -~ : : : : ~~:t :: [ ":: :3~t ~::: };{ ~ : : ~ ntJ!f :: :N:~;::;::~:I~: : : : : :;t:;;J i:::: 0048 Dieldrin I µ9/L 9.7 11. 1 5.46 -15.0 .... _A~c_ep _t~b!E:. EP A 808 1A . 75·4:o:: :~n~!i~:: : : : :· : : : : : : . : : : : : . -.... -: . · 1.:: :~~~: :·: ... ?: ~ : . -.... 6.44 . -·: ~ ?::3_4:j.~s -. ~cc_ep(~b!~ , : : ~: ~P.~~8~~~~: ~:: 7515 En dos ulfan II 7520 Endos ulfa n sulfate . -~0_5_2_ .. H_ep t~c_h!o r_ . _ . _ .... __ .. . _ qo_7!3 _ . _H_ep!~c_h!~r.e_p_o!~d_e_ (?~l a) 781 0 Methoxych lor 7.4 _ . !-_5_5 ___ . _ ?:.1_2_ -. ~ 1.-? . _. _ -~~c_ep!8:_bJ~ . __ • _ . ~P.~ _a_o~]~_ . _ . ----~9/~---7.2 ... !·.?! _ ... _ .. ~:1.~. -11 .0 .. __ Ac.c_ep(~b]~ .... ___ E:~~-8_0~!~. _ ... -~91 ~ ...•. 2.3 ··---~q-~---· .~:1_9_-.~5J _ .!'J.ol ~?~e.P.t~?l ~_ .. __ E:P~_a_o~~'-"--· _ y9}~. . .. . _6:~ 13 .3 . ~~0_9_-_1.7_.~. -· __ .c..c,c_eP!°:.blE: .. _ •. E:~~-8_0~1,:\ ___ _ .. ~9}~ ..... _ . _9~~ .•.. , . _ ~-!?. _ .. _ . ~~6_8_ -. ~ ~-~ _ .. _ • ~~c _ep!~b]E: _ .. , •... E,P.,:'_8_0~~~-__ _ .. ___ ... . ,, _.I:!~/~_ ..• _ ... _8?. _ .... _ ~--~?. __ .. ?~1_9_-_1_3_.~ •.. __ .c..c,c_ep!a_bl~ ... _ .. _ E.P.-:\.8_0~]~-__ _ .......... _ Y!;!!~. . _ .. 2~~ .••.• _ ~--1?_. ___ ];5_4_-_~-?q _ .. __ .c..~c_ep!~b!E: .•. __ .E.~~_a_o~!~ ••. µ9/L 11 .9 8.83 2.34 • 14 .0 Acce ptab le EPA 8081A Page 18 of 20 All ana lyt es are included in ERA's A2LA accred itation . Lab Code : 1539-01 WP-174 Final Complete Report Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPA ID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 ANnal. Analyte 0 . Units Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description WP Or-:,anochlorine Pesticides (cat# 831) . -~0_4_7_ A_ld.r(n. ___ .. ___ .. _ ... _ .. ___ .•.. _. _ ... _ ........... ygl~ .... ___ 5:~. _ .. __ ~-.0? ..... ?:.2_6--~1_.~ _ ... _i:-c.c_ep!a_bJt: ... __ .. _ -~P.~_60~-_. _ . . -~1 __ 1_o __ a!p_h_a:~l:iS:. _ .... __ •...• ____ .... __ . _ ... _. __ y9.t~ .. _. _ .. _ 2~·8_ ..•.. _ ~?-P. _ .. _ ?:.4_4_-_1_6:?. __ •• A.c.c_ep!a_bJe. ..... ___ ~P.~_6_0~-__ . _ z 1_1_5 ___ be!a_-~H_G_ .. _ .• __ • _____ .. _ . _ .. __ .. . _ ...... __ ygl~ _____ . _2:~ _ .. _ ... ?·!P .. _ .. ] ~O!_ -_ ~-~~ _ .. _ . i:-c.c_eptabJe. . _ . ____ ~P.~ _6_0~-_ . __ _ 7_1_0_?_. d~(t~--8_H~ _. ____ ... ____ ........ _ ... __ .. .. . µg/L 7.8 7.77 _ ?:_89_-_ ~O_.~ _. _ :':-c.c_ep!a_b!t: _ _ _ .... ~P.~AO~-___ . _71 _2_p_ -~a~.m.~·8_r!C.(Li _n?a.n~t ............... -" .. -·. ' .• -~;/L . --r .. 'i 3 ...... sos · .... ??0_.·_1_1_.!.'' ... A.c.c_ep!a_b!e. .• ' ..•• ~P.f:-_6_0_~_. -• ' ~:f: ;~;i!t"i1:::;. :: :: : :: ::::: ;f l]LJJ[j~JJl : : H:;im :JiH:L- . -. ~~--:--~: _ :~t~~t : : : : : : : : : -: : : -: : : ·: : : -: : : : : . _ -~:;~: : _ I -: \~t : . · : : ;:;;_: : : : r:i -. );r :: :N:~;;;1~:~t: : : : : :;t~6;-. -. -. : • }~::;-: :~~~;i~~ -_ : : : : : : ~ : : : : -· -· _ : . : : : : : _ I--: -~~t : _ _ : -.::;~ : : _: :. : ;~;: : : : : t:?:r~;:: -)::-.:~~;:i: --· -: · : :;t:~;:: : : : 7530 E_n_d:i_n _aJ~e_hy9~ _ ... __ . _ . .. . . __ .. . .. ___ .... y9.I~ __ ..... _7:~ __ • _ ... !·_5? __ . _. ?~12 _-_ 1_1_.~. ___ .i:-c.cep!a.bJt: __ • _ ~P.-'._\_6_0~-__ . _ 7535 _E_n_d:i _n _k~!o_n_e__ _ µg/L 7.2 . !-.?] .. _ .. 1 :.1~ -_ 1_1_.q _ .. _ A.c.c_ep !a_bJ t: __ , _ ... ~P.~ _60~-... __ 7510 Endosulfan I µg/L 2 .3 10 .8 3.1 9 -15 .7 Not Acceptable EPA 608 7515 .·:E:n:d9 ~~1i~n:1j : ·: ... _. _. ___ . _ _ _ _ ....... ·µ;,L · ... I' -.. 6'.a ...... · 13.3 . -.... 4 ~0·9·.-1i.6 . ··: :~~c:;P!~~~::: · _:: ~~~--6!J~:: ... . 7520 Endo sulfan sulfate ........ µ~11:.· .. j" 9:8 ..... 9.76 3.68 -14.2 .'~C.c_ep!a_bJt:... . • EPA 608 ;;;; ;:1~~~:;:;o,;,.: ibe rai : • • • : .• • ·. • ;f .· 1 : : ;,:, • : • Hf • • : rt )Ji : • • : :::;::; : : · · . : : nHl : . WP Chlordane cat# 837 0053 Chlordan e , techni ca l µg /L 17.8 21.9 8.22 -31 .6 Ac ceptable EPA 808 1A WP Chlordane cat# 837 0053 Chlordane , technical µg /L 17 .8 21.9 8.22 -31 .6 Acceptable EPA 608 WP Toxa hene cat# 838 8250 Toxa phene µg /L 21.8 23 .7 2.37 • 42.9 Acceptab le EPA 8081A WP Toxa hene cat# 838 8250 To xaphe ne µg/L 21 .8 23.7 2.37 -42.9 Acceptable EPA 608 WP BTEX & MTBE in Water (cat# 643) _ ~3_7_5_. B_e_nf~~!: _ . ___ •. ___ .• _ ...• _ .. _ ..... _ ••..... y gj~. __ ... 15.·?. _ • __ . 1~·-1 ..... ??:_3_ --~2_.§ _ .. _ • ~c.c_ep!a_b!e. . _ ..... ~P.-'._\ .. 8P?] ~ •... . . ~o_o_o_. t~~-~:l!Y.I ~e_t~'.(l _e!~e_r _(~_T_8_E) •• _ . __ ... ___ ... __ ygl~. _ ... _ ?5.-_1 _ • . _ ?! -~ __ .. _ ~~~5 --_ ~5_.~ _ ..... ~~c.ep!a_bJe. ______ ~P.~ _8.0?~ ~ ___ . 4765 _E_t~'.(l?~~z_e_n~-. __ •. __ . _. ____ . __ ....• ___ . _. ygj~ _. _ . __ §~-~-_ ..... '.~-?. ___ ?~·.0_-_9_~.g ..... -~~c.ep!a_bJe. ••.• __ ~P.f:-.8_0?~~-_ ... 5140 r _o1u_e_n~-.. ____ ... _ .. _ .. _ .... _ .. __ • __ . __ . __ _1~9!~ __ • ___ 5.5.-) _ . ____ ??-~ __ . 5260 Xylenes, total µg/L 135 152 Page 19 of 20 All ana lyt es are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 . 1~--6_--~8_.~ ... _ -~~c_ep!a_b lt: _. 87 .2 -204 Acceptable EPA 80218 EPA 80218 WP-174 Final Comple te Report Tamara Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: TX01484 A116001 09/14/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: 07/13/09 -08/27/09 ANnal. Analyte 0. Un its Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description WP BTEX & MTBE in Water (cat# 643) 4375 Benze ne .. -~QI~_ •.... _ ~~-? ..... _ ~~--1 __ ... _ ~?-.3.-.~2_.~ .... _ :~<:c_e_p!a_bJe_ _ EPA 602 _ 5.0_0~_ . _t~~-_B_u!Y'..1 !1'.e_t~Y.l _e!h.e_r _(~!.B_E) _ 55.1 61.0 38 .5 -85.8 . _4_7_65 ___ E_t ~Y.l~~ri_z_e~_e_ .. _ ... _ •. _ ..... 69.5 __ ... _ .. ?~·? .. _ ... _ :5~.0_-_9.9_.g •..• .'~~c_e_p!a_b}e_ _ .... _ .. E.~,:'-_60? __ . _ ... 5.1_4_0_ T_o!u_e_n~ ... ____ ... _ .. _ . ___ . __ . _ ... __ . _ . _1:(9!~ ___ .. _ ~~-J .. 62.9 _ ~~~6--_7_8_.?. _ _ ,C~~c_e_p!a_b~e_ _ EPA 602 5260 Xy le nes , total µg/L 135 152 87 .2 -204 Accepta bl e EP A 602 . 9.4 0_8_ . (~a_s_o!i~e_ ~_an~~ -~r~<:1~i~~ /~~SJ). _ . __ .......... __ µg1 ~. __ . __ 2.5_7_0_ ...... 2,4_7_0 __ ... _ ~?~ -~ ~35g __ . EPA 801 5 4375 Be nze ne in GRO µg/L 26.4 11.4 -44.3 _ 1:J?t. ~~e°.~e_d ..... . . 47.65 "ii_th,~l~~~~e~n~:i~ ~:~()~::::::: ~ _:: ·:: : : : : I.'.:::~~/~::: I.·::: : .... -. --79 _3 -... : ~:5 ;s_ ~ i ~~: :·. 1:J?~ Reeo~e_d __ . _5_1 _49 __ T_o!u_e_n_e _i~ ~f39 .. _. _ .. _ ..... ___ ...... ___ I_ . yq_l~ .. 1 ... _. ?~g _ .... _ 1_2_4_-~0_6 ___ . N()~ f..<~P°.~e_d __ . _ 52 60 Xyl en es, total in GRO 233 133 -3 14 No t Reported 1070 1550 324 -2050 Acceptable E PA 801 5 2050 Total Petro le um Hyd ro carb ons 6.4 1 9 .4 1 0.00 -17 .3 Accepta ble T N RCC 1005 WP Texas Hi h-Level Fuels TPH in Water 20 50 Total Petro le um Hydroca rb ons 21.5 24 .7 4.26 -37.4 Accep table TNRCC 1005 Page 20 of 20 All ana lytes are included in ERA's A2LA accred itation . Lab Code : 15 39-01 Tamara S. Welch Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 s Soil Study Open Date: 10/19/09 Close Date: 12/03/09 Report Issued Date: 12/21/09 r, .. n~J r :,. ·g ep December 21, 2009 Tamara S. Welch Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 Enclosed is your final report for ERA's SOIL-68 Proficiency Testing (PT) study . Your final report includes an evaluation of all results submitted by your laboratory to ERA. Data Evaluation Protocols: All analytes in ERA's SOIL-68 Proficiency Testing (PT) study have been evaluated using the following tiered approach . If the analyte is listed in the most current National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NE LAC) PT Field of Testing tables , the evaluation was completed by comparing the reported result to the acceptance limits generated using the criteria contained in the NELAC FoPT tables. If the analyte is not included in the NELAC FoPT tables , the reported result has been evaluated using the procedures outlined in ERA's Standard Operating Procedure for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits (SOP 0260). Corrective Ac ti on Help : As part of your accred itation(s), you may be required to identify the root cause of any "Not Acceptable " results , implement the necessary corrective actions , and then satisfy your PT requirements by participating in a Supplemental (QuiK™ Response) or future ERA PT study. ERA's technical staff is available to help your laboratory resolve any technical issues that may be impairing your PT performance and possibly affecting your routine data quality . Our laboratory and technical staff have well over three hundred years of collective experience in performing the full range of environmental analyses . As part of our technical support, ERA offers QC samples that can be helpful in helping you work through your technical issues. Thank you for your participation in ERA's SOIL-68 Proficiency Testing study. If you have any questions , please contact Shawn Kassner , Proficiency Testing Manager, or Curtis Wood , Director of Regula tory Affairs and Business Development, at 1-800-372-0122 . Sincerely, Shawn Kassner Proficiency Testing Manager attachments smk 6000 West 54th Ave., · Arvada, CO 80002 Jay R. McBurney Quality Program Manager 800-372-0122 fax (303) 421 -0159 www.eraqc.com Report Recipient Contact/Phone Number Reporting Type Arkansas Jane Hurle y/ 501-682-0938 All Ana lytes Florida Steve Arms/ 904-791-1502 All Analytes Kansas Lyndi Stout/ 785-296-3811 A ll Ana lytes Louisiana Paul Bergeron/ 225-219-1244 All Ana lytes Oklahoma David Caldwell/ 405-702-1039 All Ana lytes Texas Max Phillips/ 512-239-3518 Al l Ana lytes Utah Kristin Brown/ 801-538-9371 All Analytes SOIL-68 Definitions & Study Discussion Study Dates: 10/19/09 -12/03/09 SOIL Study Definitions The Reported Value is the value that the laboratory reported to ERA. The ERA assigned value for the Organic Proficiency Testing Standards is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation as applicable . The ERA assigned value for the Inorganic Proficiency Testing Standards , with the exception of the TCLP Metals in Soil , is equal to the maximum amount of the parameter available in the standard by applicable EPA methodologies. The ERA assigned value for the TCLP metals is equal to the mean of ERA's internal analytical analyses . All NELAC parameters not added to a standard are given an assigned Value of "O", per the guidance issued by the NE LAC Board of Directors, on December 14, 2000 . Non-NELAC parameters not added to a standard may be given an assigned value of less than a minimum verified concentration as determined in the background soil for applicable EPA methodologies. The Acceptance Limits are established per the NELAC PT program criteria or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits™ as applicable . The Performance Evaluation: Acceptable = Reported Va lue falls within the Acceptance Limits. Not Acceptable = Reported Value falls outside the Acceptance Limits . No Evaluation = Reported Value cannot be evaluated. Not Reported = No Value reported . The Method Description is the method the laboratory reported to ERA. Report Issued: 12/21/09 SOIL Study Discussion ERA's SOIL-68 Proficiency Testing (PT) study has been reviewed by ERA senior management and certified compliant with the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC), Proficiency Testing Program Standards , Chapter 2 , July 2003 . Per the requirements of the NELAC Proficiency Testing Program, a full review of all homogeneity, stability , and accuracy verification data was completed . All analytica l verification data for all analytes in the Soil study standards met the acceptance criteria contained in the NELAC Proficiency Testing Program Standards, Chapter 2, July 2003 . If the analyte is included in the NELAC Fields of Testing list the acceptance limits were calculated based on the NELAC Proficiency Testing Program Standards, Chapter 2, July 2003. If the analyte is not included in the NELAC Fields of Testing list , the acceptance limits were calculated using the procedures outlined in ERA's Standard Operating Procedure for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits (SOP 0260, Rev . 2 .0). The data submitted by participating laboratories was also examined for study anomalies. There were no anomalies observed during the statistical review of the data . ERA's SOIL-68 Proficiency Testing study reports shall not be reproduced except in its entirety and not without the permission of the participating laboratory. The report must not be used by the participating laboratories to claim product endorsement any agency of the U. S. government. The data contained herein are confidential and intended for your use only . If you have any questions or concerns regarding your assessment in ERA's SOIL Proficiency Testing program , please contact Shawn Kassner, Proficiency Testing Manager, or Curtis Wood, Director of Regulatory Affairs and Business Development, at 1-800-372-0122. -' . Study: SOIL-68 ERA Customer Number: A 116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 1 of 11 Tamara S. Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. SOIL Metals in Soil (cat# 620) 1190 Zinc SOIL-68 Final Complete Report Units mg/kg EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 12/21/09 Study Dates: 10/19/09 -12/03/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits 180 116-221 Page 2 of 11 Performance Evaluation Not Reported Method Description All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 SOIL-68 Final Complete Report Tamara S. Welch EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 12/21/09 Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Study Dates: 10/19/09 -12/03/09 Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. SOIL Metals in Soil (cat# 620) 1185 Vanadium . ----... __ ... ,_ ___ H •-----·•-·• .. ---.•- 1190 Zinc Units -- --., -··--__ .. ~9!~9-__ mg/kg SOIL Hexava/ent Chromium in Soil cat# 876 mg/kg . " -----------~-9!~(! -- mg/kg DF Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits 102 109 69 .9-141 ... --........ -..... .. -.... --... ----' 154 180 116-221 243 244 83.4 -323 58 .3 70 .6 19 .2 -93.0 .. --.. -,. -.. --------.. ----------- < 25.0 137 143 126 -160 Page 3 of 11 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code: 1539-01 Performance Evaluation Method Description __ ~~c_ep !a_bJ ~ __ .. EPA 6010B ..... -----... ----- Acceptable EPA 6010B Acceptable EPA 7196A __ ~~c_ep!a_bJ~ __ EPA 9012 . ----------. -- Not Reported Acceptable EPA 1010A Study: SOIL-68 ERA Customer Number: A 116001 Laboratory Name: Accutest Gulf Coast Page 4 of 11 Tamara S. Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 1 50 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANn al. Analyte o . SOIL Volatiles in Soil (cat# 623) SOIL-68 Fina l Comp lete Report Un its EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 12/21/09 Study Dates: 10/19/09 -12/03/09 Reported Ass ign e d Acceptance Value Val u e Limits Performance Evaluation Me t hod Descr ipti on : :~!::;: ):;1::~]:ii 1e::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :. _ : : : ~: I : _ ~:i~:: : : I: : : ;f i: : : : : : ;~;: : · · : ?~t ::{ : : : )~:.:;;::J: _____ : ;~t:;_;i;: : : : . _4_325_ . )\c_r~l~i_n _ _ _____ .. _ _ _ _ _____ .. __ . _ _ _ _ I-___ µ9 ~k_g_ .. -I· _ . < 50 0.00 __ A.<:_c_ep(a_bJE: __ . __ .. ~~~ _8_2?9~ ___ _ . -~!_:_:_ :_:;;;;;;;~~~e::: ·:::::::::: ·:::::::::.I::: t:;~:::: [:: }; : : J:: ;~;:: :·: ::·:1 :·:~ 3 :·~ ·: _ : :i~:.:1:;:~;:: _:: ::~;::;;i;:::: 1::t:::~11:°':m:~!": · . · : • . : : : · I ~:,:~ : : f )b ;:r .. , . 245 :::;:~~; J:ti:!~L · -4__9_5_0_ -_B_r?r:1.?rn_eJ ~a_~e--... -. -....... --. ---_ I[ -. JJ9 ~k_g_ --[ -. _<_ 5. -. ·1 --g._oo _ • -.• --..• -. -. -~<:_e:ep!a_bJE: ... ----~~~ _8~?9~ .. --. . _ 4_4_ 19 __ 2:~~t_a~?~E_: (~~~). .. ___ .. _ . ____ .. _ . ___ . _____ µ9 ~kg ___ . _ .. _3~~ __ . __ ~?! ___ . _ ~9._o_: 5.8.4_ ____ A.<:_c_ep(a_bJ': . _ . ___ ~~~ _8_2?9~. _ . _ :~~~ . -~;;:tij;~%; :e:~:r:(~:T:B::): : : : : :: : : : I: : : ~!i~!: : : : : ) r9: : :--: :}1i: : :l : .7 :::3: ·: ~::: : : :: )~~:;;;:~~ : :: : -: : :~t:;;i:: : ~: ::~: ~~r;~~i~~t~:,~;:o~id:: . :_ _ .. _ _ .... _ _ _ .. : : : I: : : ~:i~:: : : .. ;~;-_ _ -: ~}'t: ~ : : : ::~t J~; : : -)~:;;i~:J: : : : : : : :;t:;;i:: : -: 4575 Chlorodibromomethane I µg/kg 194 186 114 -255 __ A.<:_c_ep (a_bl': _ .. EPA 8260 8 ~: _4_4_85_ -~h}~r?~ih~~~ · ------: : ·:::::::::: _·: · [:: ·µ9!k_g: _: __ ~~-!. _ .: : : ~~-9:: :: : :4~:~ ~ !~~. ___ A.<:_c_ep!a_bJE: ... :::: ~~; ~-2~9~:::: __ 4_5_o_o __ ~:'?h l9~o_e_t~~l~in¥l~~h_er. ______ .. _ . __ JJ.~~~g-_ -1-__ ~ _2!> _ _ _ _ _ 9._o9 ____ . _ .. _ . __ .. _ _ _ ... A.c.c_e_p(a_bl': _ _ • __ E.~~ _8_2_69~ ___ _ _ _ 4_5_0_5 __ C:hJ<?r?!o_rr_n _. _ .. ___ .... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _. JJ9~kg ____ • ]1? __ ·I· __ }9~ ______ 6_2 :2_: ~44_ __ .. _ -~<:_c_ep~a_b!E: _ .. __ •• E.~~-8_2?9~. __ .. _4_9_6_0 _ C_hJo_rorn_e!~~n_e __ .. _____ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .... µ9~k_g __ , rl _ _<_ 5.. ____ g.__o_o _____ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _/\<:_c_ep!a_bJE: _ , _ E.~~-8_269~. _. _ . _4_57__0 ___ 1 :~-l)_i~r?r.n?:3.-~~l?'.°.~r<_?~~n_e_ (0.8.~~t ... _ _ _ _ .. __ µ9 ~k9_ _ .. _ ;<_ 5. __ ... __ 9.__o_o __ •.• _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ -~<:_c_ep!a_bJ': ____ • _ E.~~-8_2?0~. __ _ _ 4_5_8_5 ___ 1:~·.D!~r':)r_n_o~!h_a_n~ .. (~1)_8) ____ .. _ .. _.. . __ _µg'.k_g_ , _ . _. )?? __ .. ___ _1~~ _____ 8_7:4_ :. ~86. ____ .. ~<:.c._ep!a_bJ': ____ •• ~~~-8_2_6_o~-__ _ _ 4_5_9_5 ___ D_i?r_o~o_m.e.t~~n.E! _ _ _ _ _ . ______ .... _ ..• __ . _ . _µ~~k_g_ _ ....... <. ~ __ . __ .. g._o _ _o ... __ ...... ____ ... ____ ~c.c.ep!a_bJe. ___ .. __ ~~~ _8_2_?9 ~ ___ _ 46 1 O_ . _1 ,~-1)!<:_hJo_r??~n.':e_n~-• _ .. _____ .... _ .. ____ .... ____ JJ9'.kg __ ... __ ~3.-? ___ . _ . ~7.-?, ___ .. ??-_2_ -_ ~5_.~ _ ...... ~<:_c_ep_!a_b}E; ..... ___ ~~~ _8_2?9~ ___ . 46 15 1,3-Dichlo robenzene µg/kg 223 168 65.9 -248 __ ~<:_c_e_p!a_bJe. _ _ _ _ ~~~ _8_2?_0 ~ .. _ . : : ~6:29: : ·1 i P!~~~r??~~~e:n~ _ : : : : : : : : : : : . '. ·_ . : : : _ : : p9 f.k9: : : : : : :<: ~ : : : . ·_ : 9-99 : : J : : : : : : : : : : .. : __ ~<:_<:ep(a_bJ': . _____ ~~~ _8_2?9 ~ _ . __ _ _ 4_62_5 ___ O.i~h,l?r?d(fl _u.?:D_ITle.t~~~E_: !~r~?~ _1 ?) __ .. _______ .. _µ9 f.~9. _ .. _ .. __ <_ 5. ____ ... 9-__09 ...... _____ . ___ .. _ . __ ~c.c_ep!a_bJe. ... _ . ___ E.~~ _8~?9~ __ _ _ _ 4__6_39 ___ 1, ~-1)2c.hJo_r?:~h310~ .. _______ .... __ .. ____ .. __ . __ -~-~~~g-_ .. _. _ ]14 ______ ]?~. ___ .. _7_2?: !8.~ _____ /\<:_c_ep!a_bJ':. _. __ • ~~,:"_8_2?9 ~. __ _ _ _ 4_6_3_5 ___ 1,~-l)!C.hJo_r':)~~h_an~ ____ •..... _ ... __________ .. _ µ9'.k _g ____ . __ <_ 5. .. _ .. __ 9.__o9 _ .. _. __ . _. _____ .. __ A.<:_c_ep!a_b~'= -_____ ~~~-8_2_69~. __ .. 464 0 1, 1-D ichloroe th ylene µg/kg 284 _ .. J ~?... ___ 8_2 :3_: ~3.~. ____ A.c.c_ep!a_b~': _ _ _ __ E.~A ,_8_2?_o ~ ___ _ : :~~}~:: f J:ti~~t;ti~i;t~~t1:~~: ~:: ~::: ~:::: ~ ~ r .• • ~~:. • f •• j;:. •: • bI1 : : · :'1 ''. '' 2 • • .:;~::;; • • • • J:t}:!:?: • .. :::~ · :11!:f1~6~:i1::~:!;·1;~~ --------·· · -· · --r --t:;~!----r · -?H · -----?i} -----;~t--!}:!----t::-~~::i: --· .. --~:t -:!!~?---· Page 5 of 11 All a nal ytes are inclu ded in ERA 's A2LA accredi ta ti on . La b Cod e: 1539 -0 1 Tamara S. Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o . SOIL Volatiles in Soil (cat# 623) (Continued) SOIL-68 Final Complete Report Un its EPAID: ERA Customer Number: TX01484 A116001 12/21/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: Reported Assigned Value Value 10/19/09 -12/03/09 Acceptance Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description .. ~6_8_5 __ t~a.~~:1:~-pj~h_l~r9p~opie_n_e __ .. _ .. _. __ ....... ____ JJ§J~k_g_ .. I._ ... J?~. _____ _:11~ _ .... __ 8~:5.: ~!3. ..... -~~c_ep!a_b}E:. __ . __ ~~~-8?_69 ~ .. _ .. . . 4_7_6_5_ . -~t~yl?~n,z_e_n_e ... __ .. _ ....... __ .. ___ ... _ .. -· __ .... __P§J~k_g __ . I .... _:1 ?? ....... _1 ~g . _ . . .7.?:6. --~ ~6_ _ _ _ -~cc_ep!a_b}E: _ . _ .. E~~. 8_2_69~ .. _ . "48·6·0· ·2:H.(:)~a_n_o_n_e _ ---· -· · --· · · -..... · · · · · --_µµ_ 9 91;.kkfjg_ --1 --~125_4? -..... 8?7?_?5 .. · .. · -51 .. 61-.56·~·41·52·29· .. ·· ·N·oA;t~Ac_cecpe(ap .. bt.a1eb·l·e · · __ EE_ PP.AA_ ·88.22_66 00_ BB_ · - . _4_9_0_0 _!sop_r?~~1~1:n_z_e!1_e __ . _ ... __ _ .. i!~!-. i~:r~:~-~:::~i~?}o~~ .. (M1si<i .. -.. -.. : : : : : : -: : t~~~::: : r : : ttf : : . : : 1tf : . _· :~~{: j;!-.. ~ : iji:tt::~i : .. : -: !ti ~~t~f : : : : : ici~i : ~a_~~!~a:1~~~ : : : : : : · -.. .. · -·· : : : : : .: : · : _ : }l~~~g: : : [ : . :<: ~ : : : : : : ~-~~: : .. : ~ : : : : : : : : : : . : : ~~c_~p!~bj~ : : _ : : : ~~~ :8~~~~: : : : __ 5_1_0~ .. S_tyr_e!1!:?. ___ . ____ .... -· _. ____ .. _. _ _ _ _ _ _µ9 ~k_g __ ... _ ~?? ___ . _. _:1~~ _. _ .. _1_1_2_--~8_6 __ .. _ .. ~~c_ep!a_b}E:. ___ .... ~~~.8..2_69~ .. __ 5105 1,1,1,2-Tetr achl oro et hane µg /k g 89 71 .4 46 .2-98.7 Accep tabl e EPA 8260 B : :i <1~: >J ?~2~ f ~t~~chl~r?;t~~~~: : : .. · ... : : : : .. : : : : [: }J~~k~::: : : j~.?:: ·::: j ~.~: ~:: _?~):-:~3:.~:. : :~~c:ep!~b]~:: : : :: ~P.i.<a:2~9~:::: !~-:~ .. i :t:~~?'.o.e~~y_le,~E: · -. · -·· · .. · · • · I · .. :·:;:: .. · · ·· · · ~l! · · · · -;lf · ---:~:t }~1 .... · -1~~:~:::~~ .. ·I· ... -~:1--:-~:~~-... · ·5.1 _~5: .. 1:!i.4:~ri:c~i~!~~~n:z;;~: _ ...... _ . · · · -: _:: : : I : : p~f.k:g::: : : : )~~:::::: _1~?:: ~: _ ~:1 / ){i : ·:: :~~cip!~b!~:: : : : : ~~~ :8~~9~::.: l , _5.1 _6_0 .. _ 1! !•]:T_ri .. chl?_r~e,t~~~E: .... _ ..... _ .. _ .... _ . __ µ9 f.~g-. _ ... _ ~~-~-.. ·-... ?~·? .. ___ ?8·?.·.~5.-~ __ ... A.~c_ep!a_b}E: .. _ .... ~~~-8_2?9~ .. _. '-' _ 51_65 _ .. _1! !,?:T_ric~~o_r~e.t~~~E: .. _ _ ... ___ .. _ ... __ . ___ .. p9'.k_g_ ........ ~9 ...... _ .. _ ~4..9 __ .. _ 21._1_ · .. 4.9_.~ .-__ ... A.<:c_ep)a_bJe. _ . _ •.. ~~ft...~2_69~ ... _. __ 5_1_7_0_ . T!i~hl?:°.e.t~yl!:?~e, __ .. . _____ ........ _ .. _ . __ ... _µ§J ~~g -....... _ ! ?? _ ... _ . _:1 ?9 . _ . _ . .9.?:~: ?~6 ... _ .. ~cc_ep!a_bJE: __ ..• _ ~~~ _8?69 ~ ..... . 5175 Trichlo rofluorom ethane µg/kg < 5 0.00 Acc eptab le EP A 826 0B . : i1:8~: . :<i.~~~ri:C;~O!~~r9p~~~ (~C,~): .. : : : : . : . : :: . : [ ~ : }J9ik~: : : : : : ?9?:: : : : : } ~;: ·: : : : :3i o: ~ii~: .: : :~~c~ep!~b}~: : ,. : : : ~~~ :a:2~9~:: : : • i!!! llE:~:: • • • •: : • •• :·. • • .· •: • • • · .· t: • f:;: : ·••ill :••• •Hf •·• : {~fl:r • • ::;;;: r •• !E:t:i • • • Page 6 of 11 All analyt es are included in ERA's A2LA accredit ati on . Lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara S. Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte 0. SOIL-68 Final Complete Report Units EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 12/21/09 Study Dates : 10/19/09 -12/03/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits Performance Evaluation Method Description SOIL Base/Neutrals and Acids in Soil (cat# 467) _ 5.5_0_0 __ ~-c~:1~eht~~~8. _____ . ________ . ____ . __ I_ __ .f19!k_g __ . I. _ . ~~3 _0 __ . __ ~9_9_0_ . _ _ ~ 9.0_0_ ·_ ~3_6_0_ . __ ~c_c_e_p!a_b!e_ _ .. _ •..• ~~~ _8?-?gc;-___ _ .. 5.5_0_5, . !"._c~:1~e~t~y1e:1~. _ _ _____ .... ___ .... __ .. ,I. .P.9!~9. _ ., I .. __ 5.9_9_0_ . • __ ~ 1_4_0 ____ . 15.00_ -. 7_7_8? _____ i:,c_c_ep!a_b!e. __ ... __ ~~~ _8?-!gc;, _ .... _ 5.1_4_5_ 2:~r::n!n_o_-!·me_thyl?8.~2:_e_n_e_(o ~tCJl_u(d!~e_) _______ },'_gik_g_ .. __ <__ !7~ _ .... 0-~0-_ .. ____________ _.~c_c_ep!a_b!e_. _ .• _ -~P~_8_2?g<::: ___ . 5545 Anilin e µg /k g < 830 0.00 ___ ~c_c_ep!a_ble_. _ . _ . _ ~~~ _8~!g<::: __ _ -:s~5s_ :An~h r~c~~~ ~:: ~ _:: ~.::: ------_:::::: [:: .P9!~9::: I : : 1:iio:: .. ~: i~i.o:: 1: ?7.3.; ii9~: .. _ -~c_c_ep!a_b!e_. _____ ~~~ _8_2?0e: _ .... 5595 Benz idin e I µg /kg I < 1700 0.00 I .. ___ i:,c_c_ep)a_b!e_ _ _ EPA 8270C : : i~;f ::~~tt:;i~~~~a~~~~: : : . : : : : ~ : : : : : : : . : : , -: t:f :: : -r : :11: . : . : }~~~:: : : : ~ ~o:o:-: ~;4:o: ·. : ):~:.~~:~:: : : : : j:f :~ttt ~ : : _ .. 5.5_8_5 __ B_e_n~CJ(b)~~o_r~~t~~~E: ·: -· · · : : : : : : : : : : : [ : : .~9 ~~g:: : [ : : ii5:o_· : : _ .. ~1 .1_0 __ . _ ~~? -~ ~~ ~ ~ _ .. __ ~c_c_ep!a_b]e_ . _____ ~~~-8?-_!g<::: __ •. --!}~-~--;:~~;t:~~~t~;~f;~::::::: :-_____ .. _ ·:: ~!i~:.:: I::):~;::::::)::~~:::: }/2t)~~5i: ·: ·: );:_:;~;~::::::: :;i ;;;i~:::: -}:-.:;: : :::~;:1:~:~~;r : : : : : : : : : : __ : : : __ : : : : : : : : -~:I:_:: -: I: : -.:.i1~ : _: _ : rit:: -: :~~: -:1 } ~::::: )~:_:;i;:j: : : : : : -. :;i }!; it : : : \-.,: :~~:~: -i:1:.:r~~:::~;;~~rf ~::~~~t~::e --: : : : : : : : : : : : : ~:~::: : : I: : );~~ : : : : )~~;: : : : 1 ~~ ~ ~ :1 i 9~~: -: )~:::;;;~: : : : : .: : ;;; ;;;i~: : -: __ 5.7_8_D ___ b)s_(?-_G_h_lciro(sop ~opy~)~t~_er. _ ... __ ... _ _ _. __ I_ _ _µgf.~g _ .. 1 ... 4. 7_5_0 __ .. __ .. ~~3_0 _____ ?J ~: _!_1 g~ _ . _ A.c_c_ep!c:bJe. ___ . __ ~~~ _8_2_!9<::: __ . _ 5.6_6_0_ -~:~co_~o_p_h_e_nyl:~~e_n_yl_e_t~e_r _ _ _ _ µg/kg I < 170 __ . 9-~9 ... ____ .... _ _ ___ .. _ ... ~c_c_ep!a_bJ e_ _____ ~P.~_8_2_!9<::: ___ _ . _ ~6_7_D_ . B_u_tyl?8.n.~YJP.h_t~a l~t_e ____ . _ . ·.: : : .•. : : ~91.~~:: _ : ·: : ~~~O~ : _ .. ~~2 .0_ ..... ~~?: ??~0 .. ____ i:,~c _ep)a_bJe_ _ .....• E.~~ _8:2?9<::: ...•. : : :~:~: }~;~i~~nin;: : . : : . : : : : . -: : : : : : .... --.. -~;;:_:_ -. I. . -~; ~~ --: : ~:~r : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : )~~:;i;~::: : : : : :;;;;;~i.::: : .• ~7 .o_o __ 4.~<?~l?r.~-~:n_:ie.t~y lp~E:nol ...... _ .. ______ ... _ .. µ_g '.k_g ___ I . _ 5.~~o .. __ ... _ ~1_4_0 __ .. _ ~ ~o_o_ -?2.2 .. 0_ . _ . _ ~c_c_ep!a_b]e. .. _____ E.~~ _8'!-?g<:::_ . _ . __ 5_7_9_0 ___ 1 :<?~l?r.o_n_a_p~!h_aJe_n_e ____ .... ______ .... __ .. _p_gf.k_g_ .... _ . __ . _ _ _ .. _ 0-~9 . __ _ .. _ ....... _ .... ~CJ~ 138.~?~E:d. _ . __ .. ___ .. _ • _ .... __ 5.7_9_5 ___ 2:<?h.l _?r.o_n_ap~!h_aJe.n_e ___ • ______ .. _ . ____ .... .f1_9'.k_g _____ <__ ! ~~ .. ____ 0-~9 _ .. _ .... _______ . ___ i:,c.c~p )a_bJe_ _____ .. ~P.~ _8.2_!gc;, .. __ _ _ 5.8_0? __ ~:<_?~19r.o_p_h_e_n?I_ ... _ . ______ .... _. __________ ... .P_9 '.k_g _ .. __ ! ~5_0_ ..... _ . ~2_6_0 __ ... _ ~0~: ?!~~ _ _ __ A.c_c_ep!a_b!8. __ . _ .... ~P.~ _8~?gs; __ _ _ _ ~8_2_5_ .. ~:<?h.'?'.o_p_h_e_nyl:~~e_ny(et~e.r _ ... _ _ _ _ __ .. __ .. .. _ _µ_g'.k_g _ .. __ <_ ! ~~ . ___ .. g._09 ____ " __ . __ . __ .. ___ .. ~c_c_ep!a_b!E: ...... __ ~P.~ _8'!-_!9<::: ___ . _ .5.8_5_5 ___ c_h_ry~E:_ne .... _____ .... ___ ...... _ ..... _____ ... __ _µ~'.k _g_ .. ____ 4.~o_o __ ... ___ 4.5.3_0 _____ 1_3_9_0_ -_~2_4_0 __ . __ ~~c_ep!a_bJ8. ______ E.P.~ _8_2?9 <::: ___ . 5895 ~i~e.n.~(~.h)8:n_th.ra~~~e.. _ .. ____ .. _. _____ ... __ _µ_g'.~9 . _ .... __ <_ ! ~~ __ . __ g._09 _.. . ..... __ . _ .... __ ~c.c_eP!c:bJe_ ______ ~P.~ _8'!-_!g<::: ___ _ _ -~9_0_5_ ... ~i~e.n.~o!~r?~ _ ...... _____ .... _ .. _____ . ___ ..... _µ_g f.k_g _.. _ .. <.. !~q ....... _ g.99 _ .... _ ...... _ ... _ .... _ .A.~c_ep!~_b]E: .. _ .. _ -~f:'~_8?-_!gf?_. _ .. . .. 5_9_2_5 __ -~i :n.~b.~tylp~!h_a!a_t~ __ .. ___ • ___ ... _ .. __ .. ______ _µ_g ~k_g_ ..... _<__ ! ~q . _. __ g.99 ,. _ .. ___ ..... ____ ... _ A.c_c_ep!a_bJe_ _ .. _ .. _ ~~~ _8}?gc;,_. _. _ -~6_1_0 ___ 1/-!)Jc_hJ~r??8.~2:_e_n:_ .. _ •. _ .. _ .. __ •.. _ ........ __ _p_g~k_g,. __ . __ <__ !~~ .. ____ 0-~9 . ___ . _ ........ __ ........ A.c_c_ep!a_b}e_ .. ___ .... E.~~-8?-?g <::: __ .. _ 4615 1,3-Dichlorobenzene • • • ... •> -• • ........ -• -~ ... --, ~ ..... ~ ~ '° •• -•• ,, ~ •• • H • 4620 1.4-Dichlorobenzene --F~!~g-.. µg/kg < 170 -.. -~ ..... -.. 5300 Page 7 of 11 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accred itation . Lab Code : 1539-01 0.00 7890 789-8780 . _ ~~c_ep!c:b!e_ __ Acceptable EPA8270C EPA 8270C Tamara S. Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 SOIL-68 F inal Comple te R eport EPAID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 12/21/09 Report Issued: Study Dates : 10/19/09 -12/03/09 ANnal. Analyte Units Reported Assigned Acceptance Performance Method Description o . Value Value Limits Evaluation SOIL Base/Neutrals and Acids in Soil (cat# 467) (Continued) Page 8 of 11 All analytes are included in ERA's A2LA accreditation . Lab Code : 1539-0 1 SOIL-68 Fi nal C o mp let e R eport Tamara S. Welch EPA ID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 12/21/09 Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Study Dates : 10/19/09 -12/03/09 Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 Anal. Analyte Un its Reported Assigned Acceptance No. Value Value Limits SOIL Base/Neutrals and Acids in Soil (cat# 467) (Continued) Performance Evaluation Method Description .• ~5_3_5_ . !'!-~!t'.o_so9ip_h~~~l'.3~j~e .•. ___ • _ ... ___ .. _____ _µ_g~~9 .. _ .... _ <_ 1_ 7.0. _ .. __ ~·.99 .. __ ...... ___ .... _ ...... Ac.c_ep!a_bJe, _ I EPA 827 0C _ . ~5_4_5 __ ~-~!t'.o_s_?:~i :n_-er5>py1.?~i~e, ____ . _____ . __ ... _ .. _µ_gl,k_g ___ . __ <_ ! 7.~ . _ ..... ~-~9 -.. . _ ... __ .. ___ .. _ .. _ ~c.c_ep(a_bJe, : • -. -: ~~; :8~!~C: : : . : : :~~~t ~:;1::f 1~~::;~~~n:::::: : :-: : : : : : : : : : : -: : t:i~:::: : : )1~;: _ -·:: :;!;:: -· ~:gr ~:6~0:0:: : )~:::;f ~:J:: J::; ;;; ;_i;ii ::-.: -~~1 _5 __ Ph_e!l~~th :e.n.e_. __ . __ .• __ •.• _. __ . _ _ _ l . _µ_g(.k_g __ . I . -~7.70 _ _ -~7.4_0 _ . ~~!-~7~0 _ .. __ Ac.c_eptabJe,. I .. _ ~p~\8~!~<?- -_ ~6_2_5 __ P_h_e!]?I _____ • ___ . _ _ _ _ _ _ • ________ • l . _ JJ.~~k_g_ .. , .• _ ~87_0 ______ 8~5_D _____ ~~? ~ 9~?~ J _ ~c.c_epta_b!E:. . _ _ ~P~ _8~!0<? _ .. 6665 .PY!e.~E:. _____ .. _________ . ______ . __ .I. __ _µ_g~k_g_ _ _ . _ ~82_0_ _ _ _ . ~~1 _0_ __ _ ~5?: ~] 5g _ -I ~cc_ep(abJe _ _ _ . _ ~~~ _8_?!0<? __ _ : :;~~:t .~:1r?f~t~~c~j~r?~~~~e:n;::::::: ~ .• : : : : :: l ·: -~:i~:::: 1: ·~ii.~::.: J~t:: . ~ --. : .. : : : J .: )~:::;1~:J:::. ~:: :;t:;r~t ::: · -~:-!} --~}t~~:C~t:~~hJ:-~:~~-oj _ ---· -• ·· ·· ·· · · • -I·· . t~;::--· 11 · ·; ~i~ -. --6:~~ J__ ... -... -. _:.-.~;_::. _;:·_:-_::_ -.. · .. --~:::{~~~-.. -. :~ft:lt:~;~~~i:f T t~f I tf tf f . .. · 1~~::::~: tR~t:t \,._., SOIL Orqanochlorine Pesticides in Soil (cat# 468) : )~:~;: :; 1 :~;~~~: ·::::::: :: : : : : : : : : : : : .: : : : : : -: : ~:i~:: ~ · I::::~::.:.:.: ;i;:: : : ;;;t 11ci.: ·:: :i:~::t;:j: -. ___ ;~i ;:~:~: _ J .1_1!5 ___ b_e(-:-~H_C __ .. _____ ... ___ . __ ... _ .. _ .. _ .•.. _. _µ9~k_g ______ :1~? _ . _ .. _ ??~ _. . _4_1 :~: 3.~~ ... _ .A.c.c_ep!a_b_le _ ... __ ~P.~ _8_0~~1:-..... 710 5 d~(t~--~~C.. ____ ..•.. _ . _ .. ____ • __ .. __ • ___ . _ • _µ9~k_g ___ .. _ .. ~~3. ___ .. _ ~?g _ _ _ _ _ 1 __ 24_ -_ 6_3_8 __ .... _ i:,c.c!3p!a_b!E: _ ... ___ ~~1:-_8_o~.! 1:-__ _ _ _ 7.1_29 _ g_a~m.~-~1-!C,(~~n?~~~) .. ___ .. _. _ •• _ .......... _. _µ9f.k_g_ .. _ .. _ .. ?:12. _ ... __ ~?~ __ 99:6_ -_ ~3.~ _ ..... A.c.c_ep!a_b!e, ___ .. __ ~~~-8_0~_J1:-. __ _ -.z2:49 _. a!1:h_a:~~lo~~a_n_~_ -• -... -. ---.. --.... -. -.. -.. _µ_g(.k_g_ -.. --.:1:1~ --... .1?4 .. -:4~:1_: 2.~~ -..... A.c.c_ep!a_b!e_ .•.. --E.~~-8_0~]~_ --. . _7.2_4_5_ . .9.?:11.n::i~-~-h!~r~~n.e. __ . ______ ... __ .. _ .••• _ , •• _µ_g'.k_g_ .. ___ .1?~ ___ .•. ?3.! _ .8.?:.8-~-?8_~ _ ... -~c.c_ep(a_b_lE: ___ . _. ~f:'~_8_0_81f:._ .... . _Z3_5!5 __ 4:~':0.°-1? _ .. _____ .... _. ___ .. __ .. __ . _ ..•.... _µ_gf.~9. __ ..... ?~?-_ .. __ . ~9? __ .. _ 1_3?_-_5_04_ ..... _i:,c.c_ep!a_b!E:. _ .• __ E.P.1:-_8_0~:1 A_ .• _ . _7.3_6~-. :4~~·:[)[)~. _. _ •.. _ .. __ . _. __ ...... _ ... _____ ..• _µ_g~k_g _. .. __ ~!?. _ ... __ ~?~. _ ... _1_5.7.-.~9_1 __ .. _ .~c.c_ep!a_b]E: ..... _. E.~f:._8_0~]1:-. 736 5 4,4'-DDT µg/kg 128 __ ?~~ ___ . _5_1:_0_: 3.~~. _ . :':-C.c_ep!a_~!E: __ . EPA 8081 A : : ~~7~: : -~i~l~~i~: : : : : : : : :: : ·: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : [ : : ji~i.~g: : : : _·: ?9~ : : : . _ . ??~. _ .... _9?:4_: 3.~s_ .... _ .A.c.c.ep(a_b!E: _ ... _ : : ~~~ :s~~]~: : : :. _ .Z5_49 ___ E_n_d!i~-_. __ .. _. ______ • _ .. _... .. .. .. __ _µ~~k g __ .. ___ 11!. ___ ... !~!. _ .... _6~:1: 2.~~ .... -~c.c_ep!a_b_l:. _ . _. E.~~-BO~]f:. __ . _ . _ 7.5_3 9 __ E_n_d!i~ _a!~e_h_y91;. ____ . ___ . _. _ . ___ .. ____ . __ _µ9~k_g_. _ . _ .1?~ ___ .. _ ~3.~ __ .. _ :4~:~: ~8_3. _ .. __ A.c.c_ep!a_b!E:. ___ .. _ E.P.~ _B_0~:11:-. _ . _ . _7.5_3_5 ___ E_n_d:i~_k_e!o_n_e ________ . ___ . _ .. _______ . __ . _µ.9'.k_g_ ..•. _. ?1~ __ --... ~!~ _ .. __ 97 :4.: ~'.8-... __ A.c.c~_p!~_bl: __ .. __ ~~~-8_0~:1~. __ _ . _7.5_1_0 __ E_n_d9~~l!a_n_ 1 __ . _. _____ •.... ___ . _. _____ . __ _µ.9~k_g __ •. __ ?~-~-__ . _ ??~ _____ 5?:~: 3.'.~ _ .... A.c.c_ep!a_b)E:. _ .. _. E.~~-s_o~~~-_. _ _ 7_5_1 _5 __ E_n:1?.:l~l!a_n_ l_l ___ • __ . __ . ____ .. _ . ___ . _ . ____ _µ_g(.k_g_ _ _ _ . __ 1 ~?. ___ . _ ??g __ .. _ !9:6-: 3.3.~ . _. __ A.c.c.ep!a b!e, _ . _ . __ E.P.~ _B_O~] f:.. _ . _ 7520 Endosul fan sulfat e µg/kg .. _ _1 ?3. ______ ??? .. __ .. _59:3.: 3.~~ _ . __ . A.c.c_ep!a_b_lE: __ .. _ . E.~~ _8_0~)~ .... _ -:7~66:9~05>H~:ee:pP}ta~c~hhjloo:rr:e:p:o:x·r:d:e:::::::::::::::::::: 1::: ~µ~g//-.kk9g::: . -. .119 . --.. ?]!. ---_5~:8_: 2.~7.-.... A.c.c_ep!a_bJe ---.. ~P.~ .. 8_0~:1~. --- . "ii1c; · ·M;th~;;~tiio·r------. ----.. ---. -. -·---. r ---µ;ik9. ---. -1~!-. ---!~?--... ~~~:~ i6i . -· --;~:::~::1:-.. --. ~:t -!{!~t,. -- SOIL Chlordane in Soil cat# 628 7250 Chlordane , techni cal µg/kg 175 415 80 .0 · 55 4 Acceptabl e EPA 80 81A SOIL Toxa hene in Soil cat# 627 8250 Toxap he ne µg/kg 326 105 0 105 -14 90 Accept ab le EPA 80 81A Page 9 of 11 All analytes are inc lu ded in ERA 's A2LA ac cred itat ion . Lab Code : 15 39-01 SOIL-68 Final Complete Report Tamara S. Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 EPA ID: TX01484 ERA Customer Number: A116001 12/21/09 Report Issued: Study Dates: 10/19/09 -12/03/09 ANnal. Analyte Units o . Reported Assigned Acceptance Performance Value Value Limits Evaluation Method Description SOIL Chlorinated Acid Herbicides in Soil (caffl. 626) ·. ·_. :8._~:5_:~4-_0o 5 :_ : ___ ACB __ -:h:_inlflo:_t~r-_.a:.!:":_~b:_e:n· ~ ·_. : __ :_ :_ -.-. :_ :_ :_ : :_ ·_··. : :_ ---_: ·_ :_· :_·_. -----:_ : __ :_ .·_.!-_· --:_ -_~µ:g. ;/·_._~k:_~g:_ : :_ : : : : : : : : ~: : : ;;: : : : : : ;lr\~:i. J : ~;t ~:~~~:t .. : : : : : : : : : : : : -: --_ _ r __ ........... !~? ...... -°~°-°-~~2.0. •..• N.9~~e.P.a.rt.e_d ____ •••••.•.•..• :Blf ~mtiliL::::••···· •:· :: ·•-l·:;~;·· •JI I .•rn;::: ••. •···· E~f tf : .•. !~!]t ·• -:}~-~-1~;~:;; ~~:: ----· · --· · · -·· ------· · · · I· · -:~~~: ---; ~o.~~-7-· · ·· · bt~----· · ?~ 2 · 2 ··-~ 3 ;~ __ : )~~:~}::]::: : ----:;1 !6!i · --- .. 891 ·0· . Ar;~I~; 1260 . -... -............. -....... r .. ;;g/kg ..... ; 0~0·1·:,· -..• 0.00. • • . . • • .. • . . . .. .. Acceptable .•• iPA 8082 .... . SOIL BTEX & MTBE in Soil (caffl. 633) . _4_~75 ___ B_e_n!~~e. •••• _ ..•• _. _ ••• _ .. _ ...•• _ •.•. _. _µ9 ~k_g_ ... _. J?O. ....... )~? .... __ 8_8:~: !~~ ...... ~c.c_ep!a_b!e. _ •.. __ ~~-:".8_0_?~~-.• -~o_o_o_ . !:~·-B_u!YJ ~e_t~Y.l _eJ~e.r .. (~_T_B_~) _ .. _ .. ___ •.. __ ... _ _µ9~k_g __ •.•. : ?~ _ ..... J ~ '. ..... _4~:2 : ) '.~ . . • -~c.cep!~bJe. . _ .... ~~-:" _8_D_?~ ~ _ •.... . _-:7_6? ___ E_t~Y.l~e.f!z_e_n~. _ ••.. _ . __ ..... _ ....•.. ___ •••.. _ _µ9~k!;l _ .. _ .•. } ?~ ... __ . ] ~O. .. _ ... .7.?:6_: ! ~6. _ .. _ . ~c.c_ep!~b_le.. • . .•• ~~-:" _8_D_?~ ~-.... . _ 5._1_4_0_ ..T_o!u_en:. __ ....... __ . _ ....... ______ .. __ .. _. _µ9~k_g_ ..... _ .. !! -~--_ ...... !5.-~ _ .... __ 4~:0. ~-~ O.~ .... __ t:,~c_ep!~b!~ ..•. _ ... ~I:'~ _8_0?! ~ 5260 Xylenes, tota l µg /kg 246 250 123 • 367 Ac ceptable EPA 8021 B SOIL Gasoline Ranae Omanics (GRO) in Soil (caffl. 630) . _ ~4_08_ . -~~s_o!i~E: ~!3~~~ _O,r~~~i~~ {~~?) ...... _ .. _ .... __ ~9!~!! __ ... _ ?~ ~ .. _ .. _ . 1_qo_o_ .... ]?0.: :1 ~?0.. . . ... t:-~c_ep!~b!E: ..•.• _ . _E_P_~ ~O.! ~ . ,. _ . . • -:3_7_5_ . B_e_n!~~e. (n_ S,~?_ _ .. _ . _. ___ .... _ .. _ ..... _ . _ .... ~.9!~9 .. _ . _ ...... _ ..... ~ O.·! .. _ .. _ ?~O_O_-_ '. 5_.~ . __ N.9~ ~~P.°.~e_d_ •. __ •. _ • __ • _ • __ •. . • -:7_6_5_ . E_t~Y.l~e.~z_e~~ _i~ ~-~<? __ .. _ .... __ .... __ . __ .. _ ~.9(~9 .. _ ..... _ . ___ . . ~~--1 ___ ...• q. ~ ~8.: ~!5._1 _ .. _ N.9t_ ~~P.<_>~E:d_ •.••.. _ . _ ........ _ .. . .. ~1_4_o _ . T_o!u_e_n~-i~ -~~o . __ . _ .. _ . __ . _ ........... __ ~ .. 9!~9. _ _ .. __ . _ . ~~--1 __ ... __ oyo_ -_ ! ~3. _ .. _ ~?~ ~~P.<_>~e.d_ •..• __ •• __ .. _ ..•..... 5260 Xylenes, total in GRO mg/kg 94.4 0.626 • 167 Not Reported Page 10 of 11 All analytes are included in ERA 's A2LA acc reditation . Lab Code : 1539-01 Tamara S. Welch Quality Assurance Officer Accutest Gulf Coast 10165 Harwin Drive Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 713-271-4700 ANnal. Analyte o. 2050 Total Petro leum Hy d ro carbo ns SOIL Texas Hi h-Level Fuels TPH 2050 Total Petro le um Hyd roca rb ons SOIL-68 Final Compl e te Re port EPAID: ERA Customer Number: Report Issued: TX01484 A116001 12/21/09 Study Dates: 10/19/09 • 12/03/09 Reported Assigned Acceptance Value Value Limits 38 7 706 182 -959 91 .9 86 .1 0.0 0-166 570 0 6920 2370 -11000 Page 11 of 11 Performance Evaluation Acceptab le Acceptable Accepta ble Method Description EP A 801 5 TN RC C 10 05 T NRCC 1005 . . All ana lytes are included in ERA 's A2LA accreditation. Lab Code : 1539-01 8 \. l .:i t, c, r d t C r I ~ '.: Quality Systems Manual Volume XI, Revision I: May 2010 Effective Date: May 20, 2010 Document Control Number: 34 -~ ~/ -J/~Jp/~7 ( u~ 7C( "'~uglicse, ~-esident David Speis, Lab ratory Director , Technical Director -lnorganics \.Yen Wen Chi, Technical Director -Organics Accutest Laboratories 2235 U.S. Route 130 Dayton, New Jersey 08810 732.329.0200 This document is the exclusive property of Accutest Laboratories. Reproduction without the expressed written pennission of Accutest Laboratories is prohibited J~1l~~ • ..1 • ..1~ JgAa~i.rres~ L ."1 0 ,:, i"' J t t~ I' i ~ ~ Introduction Introduction Page ii Revision Date: May 2010 The Accutest Laboratories Quality Assurance System, detailed in this plan, has been designed to meet the quality program requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC), ISO Guide 17025, ISO Guide 17011, the Department of Defense Environmental Laboratory Approval Program (DOD ELAP) and other National environmental monitoring programs. The plan establishes the framework for documenting the requirements of the quality processes regularly practiced by the Laboratory. The Quality Assurance Director is responsible for changes to the Quality Assurance Program, which is appended to the Quality Sys tem Manual (QSM) during the annual program review . The plan is also reviewed annually for compliance purposes by the Company President and Laboratory Director and edited if necess ary. Changes that are incorporated into the plan are itemized in a summary of changes following the introduction. Plan changes are communicated to the general staff in a meeting conducted b y the Director of Quality Assurance following the plan's approval. The Accutest plan is supported by standard operating procedures (S OPs), which provide specific operational instructions on the execution of each quality element and assure that compliance with the requirements of the plan are achieved. Accutest employees are responsible for knowing the requirements of the SOPs and applying them in the daily execution of their duties. These documents are updated as changes occur and the staff is trained to apply the chan ges. At Accutest, we believe that satisfying client requirements and providing a product that meets or exceeds the standards of the industry is the key to a good business relationship . However, client satisfaction cannot be g uaranteed unless there is a system that assures the product consistently meets its design requirements and is adequately documented to assure that all procedural steps are executed, properly documented and traceable . This plan has been desig ned to assure that this goal is consistently achieved and the Accutest product withstands the rigors of scrutiny that are routinely applied to analytical data and the processes that support its generation. ~fl~ ~~ ~ACCUTE~r.: Introduction Page iii Revision Date: May 2010 L :1 ~) (, i" .?. t. ~ I' i ·!'I ·.: Summary o f Changes A c cutes t L aboratorie s Q uality Sy stem Man ual -Ap ril 2010 Section P all_e D esc ription ---------------Updated Volume Number, Revision Number and Date Revised Accutest Laboratories Organization Chart Introduction 11 Added Department of Defense ELAP 2.1 8 Added San Jose location 2.4 9 Added Section on Organization Chart description 3.1 11 President/ CEO -Removed "serves as primary alternate in the absence of the QA Director." 3.1 11 Quality Assurance Officers -Added "Quality Assurance Officer serves as the primary alternate in the absence of the QA Director." 4.1 18 Vice President, Operations/Laboratory Director -Removed "Orlando, Florida, Marlborough, Massachusetts and Houston, Texas". Added "maintains operational responsibility for designated regional laboratories as defined in the Organizational Chart. Mid-Atlantic VP Operations assumes responsibilities of the CEO in his absence." 4.1 18 Director, Quality Assurance -Added "and functions independently from laboratory operations ." 4.1 19 Health & Safety Officer -Added "Reports to the Vice President Operations ... " 6.7 27 Report and Data Archiving -Changed "are" to "may be" discarded ... " 7.1 29 Changed "qualified" to "IS017025 approved vendor ... " 8.7 33 Included new section and added Limit of Detection (LO D ) 8.8 & 8.9 33 Previous section 8.7 changed to 8.8 and previous 8.8 changed to 8.9 8.10 33 Included new section and added Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) 8.9, 8.10, 34& Previous section 8.9, 8.10, 8.11 and 8.12 changed to 8.11, 8.12, 8.13 and 8.14 8.11 & 8.12 35 respectfully 9.8 41 Subcon tract Laboratory Evaluation. Added" ... and for a specific program should an approval or accredit ation be required . In addition, the QA staff may require a ... " 9.8 41 Subcontract Laboratory Evaluation. Added " ... and should obtain an example d ata deli verable package prior to initiation of sub contract work for compliance review." 10.0 44 R eq uirement. Added " ... are u ni quely identified and ... " 10.4 45 Calibra tion and Calibrati on Verificatio n . Added "In ge n eral, if a reference meth o d does not specify t h e n um ber of calibration st an dards, the minimum n umber is two (one of which is at the reportin g li mi t or limit of quan titation ." 10.4 45 Added "If continuin g calibration verification results are o u tsi d e establis h ed criteria, data associa ted with th e verification may be fully u sea bl e under th e following conditions:" When the acceptance criteria for the continuing calibration verification are L ,j i) c, i"' ct t <.~ 1· i 2-~ 10.4 45 12.8 55 12.8 56 13.2 58 15 .1 63 Ap p endix I 74 Appendix I 75 Appendix I 76 Appendix I 76 Appendix --- II, III & IV Introduction Page iv Revision D ate: May 2010 exceeded high, i.e., high bias, and there are associated samples that are non- detects, th en those non-detects may be reported. When the acceptance criteria for the continuing calibration verification are exceeded low, i.e., low bias, those sample results may be reported if they exceed a maximum regulatory limit/ decision level. Added "Sample results are quantitated from the initial instrument calibration unless otherwi se required by regul ation, method, or program specific criteria." Analytical Review -Added "Edits to electroni c data that h ave alrea dy been committed to the LIMS database are controlled through the use of the Master Edit function in LIMS . P ermission to access this program is limited to those approved by the upper levels of laboratory management and is controlled by the Information Technology staff. A GALP electronic audit record trail is maintained for all changes that are made and is automatically append ed to the record." D ata R eporting -Added "D ata reports for the D epartment of D efense ELAP also include the time of preparation and analysis." Monitoring -Add ed "Additional monitoring of t he corrective action is conducted by adding the corrective action t o a verification list by the QA staff at closure. Verification is performed by the QA Staff to assure that the corrective action has remained in effect is scheduled for six (6) months from the initial closure d ate." Procedure -Added "If sys t ematic defects are not present and the resolution is satisfactory, the QA Staff will close the complaint/inquiry with a no further action is necessary tag." Added -Calibration R ange Added -Continuing Calibration Verification A dded -Limit of D etection Added -Limit of Quantitation R evisions Applied as Appropriate L .i h Ci ;~ ,i ·r. <~ I' i e ·: Section Table of Contents Title Table of Contents Page v Revisio n D a te: May 2010 1.0 Quality Policy ----------------------------------------------------------------------------7 2.0 Organization -----------------------------------------------------------------------------8 3.0 Quality Responsibilities of the Management Team -------------------------------11 4.0 Job Descriptions Of Key Staff-------------------------------------------------------18 5.0 Signatory Approvals --------------------------------------------------------------------22 6.0 D ocumentation --------------------------------------------------------------------------24 7 .0 Reference Standard Traceability ------------------------------------------------------29 8.0 Test Procedures, Method References, & R egulatory Programs -----------------31 9.0 Sample Management, Login, Custody, Storage & Disposal ---------------------36 10.0 Laboratory Instrumentation and Measurement Standards ----------------------44 11.0 Instrument Maintenance --------------------------------------------------------------4 7 12.0 Quality Control Parameters, Procedures, and Corrective Action--------------48 13.0 Corrective Action Sys tem -------------------------------------------------------------57 14.0 Procedures For Executing Client Specifications ----------------------------------60 15.0 Client Complaint Resolution Procedure --------------------------------------------63 16.0 Control of Nonconforming Product ------------------------------------------------64 17.0 Confidentiality Protection Procedures ----------------------------------------------65 18.0 Quality Audits And System Reviews ------------------------------------------------67 19. 0 Health & Safety -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 9 I. IL III. IV. Appendices Table of Contents Page vi Revision Date: May 2010 Glossary of Terms ----------------------------------------------------------------------73 Standard Operating Procedures Directory -----------------------------------------80 Analytical Capabilities ------------------------------------------------------------------89 Laboratory Equipment ----------------------------------------------------------------97 Sectio n 1. 0: Q ualiry Poliry Page 7 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 1.0 QUALITY POLICY 1.1 Accutest Mission: 1.2 Accutest Laboratories provides analytical services to commercial and government clients in support of environmental monitoring and remedial activities as requested. The Laboratory's mission is dedicated to providing reliable data that satisfies client's requirements as explained in the following: 'Provide easy access, high quality, analytical support to commercial and govemment clients which meets or exceeds data quality objectives and provides them with the data needed to satisfy regulatory requirements and/or make confident decisions on the effectiveness of remedial activities." These services are provided impartially and are not influenced by undue commercial or financial pressures which might impact the staffs technical judgment. Coincidently, Accutest does not engage in activities that endanger the trust in our independent judgment and integrity in relation to the testing activities performed. Policv Statement . The management and staff of Acctttest Laboratories share the responsibility for product quality. Accordingly, Accutest's quality assurance program is designed to assure that all processes and procedures, which are components of environmental data production, meet established industry requirements, are adequatefy documented from a procedural and data traceability perspective, and are consistentfy executed f?y the staff. It also assures that anafytical data of known quality, meeting the quality o!:jectives of the anafytical method in itse and the data user's requirements, is consistentfy produced in the laboratory. This assurance enables the data user to make rational confident, cost-effective decisions on the assessment and resolution of environmental issues. The laboratory Quality System also provides the management staff with data quality and operational feedback ieformation. This enables them to determine if the laboratory is achieving the established quality and operational standards, which are dictated ry the client or established ry regulation. The ieformation provided to management, through the QA program, is used to assess operational performance from a quality perspective and to perform corrective action as necessary. All employees of Accutest Laboraton·es participating in environmental testing receive quality !)!Stem training and are responsible for knowing and compfying with the !)!Stem requirements. The entire staff shares Accutest's commitment to good professional practice. May 18, 2010 Vi Date 2.0 ORGANIZATION Section 2.0: OrganiZfltiOn Page 8 of 10 7 Re vision Date: May 2010 2.1 Organizational Entity. Accutest Laboratories is a privately held, independent testing laboratory founded in 1956 and registered as a New Jersey Corporation. The headquarters are located in Dayton, New Jersey where it has conducted business since 198 7. Satellite laboratories are maintained in Marlborough, Massachusetts; Orlando, Florida, Houston, Texas, San Jose, California and Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2.2 Management Responsibilities Requirement Each laboratory facility has an established chain of command. The duties and responsibilities of the management staff are linked to the President/ CEO of Accutest Laboratories who establishes the agenda for all company activities. President/CEO. Primary responsibility for all operations and busines s activities. Delega tes authority to laboratory directors, general managers, and the qu ality assurance director to conduct day to day operations and execute quality assurance duties. Each of the six operational entities (New Jersey, Florida, Ma ssachusetts, Texas, California and Colorado) report to the President/CEO. Vice President Operations/Laboratory Director. Executes day to day responsibility for laboratory operations including technical aspects of production activities and asso ci ated logistical procedures. Reports directly to the President/CEO. Quality Assurance Director. Design, oversight, and facilitation responsibility for all Quality System elements identified in the Quality Program. Reports directly to the President/CEO. Technical Directors (Organics/Inorganic). Responsible for day to day operations and activities of the organics and inorganics laboratories including scheduling, production and data quality. Reports directly to the Laboratory Director. Department Managers . Executes day to day responsibility for specific laboratory areas including technical aspects of production activities and associated logistical procedures. Direct report to the laboratory director. Section Supervisors. Executes day to day responsibility for specific laboratory units including technical aspects of production activities and associated logistical procedures. Direct report to the Department Manager. 2.3 2.4 L a !) (, t .3 t (: I' i <'I '! Chain of Command S ection 2.0: Organi zation Page 9 of 107 Revision Date: M av 2010 The responsibility for managing all aspects of the Company's operation is delegated to specific individuals, who h ave been assigned the authority to act in the absence of the senior staff. These individuals are identified in the following Chain of Command: Vince Pugliese; President and Chief Executive Officer Vince Russo; Chief Financial Officer D avid Speis; Vice President Laboratory Operations & Laboratory Director Matt Cordova, D irector, Client Services Organization Chart The hierarchy of the Company's operational control and oversight is illustrated in the Accutest Laboratories Organization Chart. Employees listed with an asterisk would be considered to be the appointed deputy in the event that the technical director or corporate quality assurance director are absent from their respective position for a period of time exceeding fifteen (15) consecutive calendar days. If this absence exceeds thirty-five (35) consecutive calendar days the laboratory shall notify the NJDEP-Office of Quality Assurance in writing. Should this absence exceed sixty-five consecutive calendar days the DOD ELAP Accrediting Body shall be notified in writing. '' I S ection 2.0: Organization Page 10 of 107 Revision D ate: May 20 10 Accutest Laboratories Organization Chart .. ' ,, V ince nt J . Pugliese Preside nt, C EO --·· ·-Vincent J. Russo Ralph J. Pugliese Vice President, CFO V ice President, Adm ··=--.. ··"'--· Reza Tand Harry Behzadi V ic e President, Operations Vice President, Northeast Operat ions ~--·"'._ ___ . I .:.;..-,. , ....... ~, I I I Jesse Smith ' ......... Laboratory Director Lauri e Gl antz-Murphy Paul Caneva ro Mid-West Labora tory Director Laboratory Di rector Laboratory West Laboratory Gulf Coast Laborat ory •. , -~ ,, , ,--.... --·~·= ,_ •· ·= Andrew Dexte r Phillip Worby • Vice President, Ch i ef Director, Corpor ate ,___ Information Officer .J Qu ality Assurance -~ =· =· , ...... He alth & Safet y -~·-· -· Officer David Speis Jam ie Yakes V ice President Ope rations I- l New Jersey ,, . Matth ew Cordova -·---Director, Client I Services . ~- ... ~--Michelle Jenkins Team Leader I I I Sample Login =- -,, -- Nancy Cole* Ron Van Blarcom Harold Me issner Wen-Wen Chi * Manager, l n o r ganics Mgr, Sa mple Mgr, Field Manager, Organics Technical Director Mgmt/Courier Services Te chn i cal Director - -. Wendy Zhou* Nick Popow * Jessica Reitan * Cheng-Hwan Ao* Asst. Mgr. lnorganics Supervisor , -Assistan t Manager A s sistant Manager -,. Receivina Or~anics Organics I ~ --- , ' Nancy Duan Dave Hunkele Ru ifeng Yao Gorge Zhang Team Leader, Metals Sample -Su pervisor, Tech Supervisor, Tech --Custodian Support Support .. Stan Sojka Kanya Veerawat Dispatcher ,__ Asst. Manager, Supervisor, Shirley Grzybowski -Organics Extracti ons Team Leaders , Wet Chemistry R. Kasperowicz Shipping >--Su Chou Supervi sor Supervisor, Report Generation -·' S ection 3. 0: Q uality Responsibilitie s of th e Management Team Page 11 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 3.0 QUALITY RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MANAGEMENT TEAM 3.1 Requirement Each member of the management team has a defined responsibility for the Quality System. System implementation and operation is designated as an operational management responsibility. System design and implementation is designated as a Quality Assurance Responsibility. President/CEO. Primary responsibility for all quality activitie s . Delegates program responsibility to the Quality Assurance Director. Has the ultimate responsibility for implementation of the Quality System. Vice President Operations/Laboratory Director. Responsible for implementing and operating the Quality System in all laboratory areas. Responsible for the design and implementation of corrective action for defective processes. Has the authority to delegate Quality System implementation responsibilities. Quality Assurance Director. Responsible for design, implementation support, training, and monitoring of the quality system. Identifies product, process, or operational defects using sta tistical monitoring tools and processes audits for elimination via corrective action. Empowered with the authority to halt production if quality issues warrant immediate action. Monitors implemented corrective actions for compliance. Technical Directors . Responsible for overseeing the technical aspects of the quality assurance system as they are integrated into method applications and employed to assess analytical control on a daily basis. The Technical directors review and acknowledge the technical feasibility of proposed QA systems involving technical applications of applied methodology. Department Managers. Responsible for applying the requirements of the Quality System in their section and assuring subordinate supervisors and staff apply all system requirements . Initiates, designs, documents, and implements corrective action for quality deficiencies. Section Supervisors & Team Leaders. Responsible for applying the requirements of the Quality System to their operation and assuring the staff applies all system requirements. Initiates, designs, documents, and implements corrective action for quality deficiencies. Quality Assurance Officers. Responsible for design support, implementation support, training, and monitoring support for the quality system. Conducts audits and product reviews to identify product, process, or operational defects using statistical monitoring tools and processes audits for elimination via corrective action. Provides monitors support for implemented corrective actions for compliance. Serves as the primary alternate in the absence of the Quality Assurance Director. L~i:-o r~tc ri ~,; S ection 3.0: Q uality Respon sibilities of the Man ageme nt T eam Page 12 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Bench Analysts. Re sponsible for applying the requirements of the Quality System to the analyses they perform, evaluating QC data and initiating corrective action for quality control deficiencies within their control. Implements global corrective action as directed by superiors. 3.2 Program Authority. Authority for program implementation originates with the President/CEO who bears the ultimate responsibility for system design, implementation, and enforcement of requirements. This authority and responsibility is delegated to the Director of Quality Assurance who performs quality functions independently without the encumbrances or biases associated with operational or production responsibilities to ensure an honest, independent assessment of quality issues . 3.3 D ata lntegrityPolic.r-The Accutest Data Integrity Policy reflects a comprehensive, systematic approach for assuring that data produced by the laboratory accurately reflects the outcome of the tests performed on field samples and has been produced in a bias free environment by ethical professionals. The policy includes a commitment to technical ethics, staff training in ethics and data integrity, an individual attestation to data integrity and procedures for evaluating data integrity. Senior management assumes the responsibility for assuring compliance with all technical ethics elements and operation of all data integrity procedures. The staff is responsible for compliance with the ethical code of conduct and for practicing data integrity procedures. The Accutest Data Integrity Policy is as follows: "Accutest Laboratories is committed to producing data that meets the data integrity requirements of the environmental regulatory community. This commitment is demonstrated through the application of a comprehensive data integrity program that includes ethics and data integrity training, data integrity evaluation procedures, staff participation and management oversight. Adherence to the specifications of the program assures that data provided to our clients is of the highest possible integrity and can be used for decision making processes with high confidence." D ata Integrity Responsibilities Management. Senior management retains oversight responsibility for the data integrity program and retains ultimate responsibility for execution of the data integrity program elements. Senior management is responsible for providing the resources required to conduct ethics training and operate data integrity evaluation procedures. They also include responsibility for creating an environment of trust among the staff and being the lead advocate for promoting the data integrity policy and the importance of technical ethics. The Quality Assurance Director is the designated ethics officer for the Company. Staf£ The staff is responsible for adhering to the company ethics policy as they perform their duties and responsibilities associated with sample analysis and reporting. By executing this responsibility, data produced by Accutest Laboratories retains its high integrity characteristics and withstands the rigors of all data integrity checks. ~~ ·~ACClJTE~f. L di}or;::tc-r t -:1:;; S ection 3.0: Q uality R espo nsibilitie s of th e M anagem ent T eam Page 13 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 The staff is also responsible for adhering to all laboratory requirements pertaining to manual data edits, data transcription and data traceability. These include the application of approved manual peak integration and documentation procedures. It also includes establishing traceability for all manual results calculations and data edits. Ethics Statement. The Accutest ethics statement reflects the standards that are expected for businesses that provide environmental services to regulated entities and regulatory agencies on a commercial basis. The Ethics Policy is comprised of key elements that are essential to organizations that perform chemical analysis for a fee. As such, it focuses on elements related to personal, technical and business activities. Accutest Laboratories provides analytical chemistry services on environmental matters to the regulated community. The data the company produces provides the foundation for determining the risk presented by a chemical pollutant to human health and the environment. The environmental industry is dependent upon the accurate portrayal of environmental chemistry data. This process is reliant upon a high level of scientific and personal ethics. It is essential to the Company that each employee understands the ethical and quality standards required to work in this industry. Accordingly, Accutest has adopted a code of ethics, which each employee is expected to adhere to as follows: o Perform chemical and microbiological analysis using accepted scientific practices and principles. o Perform tasks in an honest, principled and incorruptible manner inspiring peers & subordinates. o Maintain professional integrity as an individual. o Provide services in a confidential, honest, and forthright manner. o Produce results that are accurate and defensible. o Report data without any considerations of self-interest. o Comply with all pertinent laws and regulations associated with assigned tasks and responsibilities. D ata Integrity P rocedures . Four key elements comprise the Accutest data integrity system. Procedures have been implemented for conducting data integrity training and for documenting that employees conform to the Accutest Data Integrity and Ethics policy. The data integrity program consists of routine data integrity evaluation and documentation procedures to periodically monitor and document data integrity. These procedures are ~\lr~ ugJf~ ~ACC'l.-JTES"'ii': Sectio n 3.0: Q uality Respo nsibilitie s ef the Ma nagement T eam Page 14 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 documented as SOPs. SOPs are approved and reviewed annually following the procedures employed for all Accutest SOPs. Documentation associated with data integrity evaluations is maintained on file and is available for review. Data Integrity Training. Accutest employees receive technical ethics training during new employee orientation. Employees are also required to refresh their ethical conduct agreement annually, which verifies their understanding of Accutest's ethics policy and their ethical responsibilities. A brochure summarizing the details of the Accutest Data Integrity Policy is distributed to all employees with the Ethical Conduct Agreement. The refreshed agreement is appended to each individual's training file . The training focuses on the reasons for technical ethics training, explains the impact of data fraud on human health and the environment, and illustrates the consequences of criminal fraud on businesses and individual careers. Accutest's ethics policy and code of ethics are reviewed and explained for each new employee. Training on data integrity procedures are conducted by individual departments for groups involved in data operations. These include procedures for manual chromatographic peak integration, traceability for manual calculations and data transcription. Data Integrity Training Documentation. Records of all data integrity training are maintained in individual training folders. Attendance at all training sessions is documented and m aintained in the training archive. Accutest Data Integrity and Ethical Conduct Agreement. All employees are required to sign a Data Integrity and Ethical Conduct Agreement annually. This document is archived in individual training files, which are retained for duration of employment. The Data Integrity and Ethical Conduct Agreement is as follows: I. I understand th e high ethical standards required of me ivith regard to the duties I p erform and the data I report in connection 1vith nry emplqyment at Accutest Laboratories. II. I have received fo rmal instruction on the code of ethics that has been adapted by Accutest Laboraton·es during my orientation and agree to comp!J ivith these requirements. III. I have received formal instruction on the elements of Accutest Laboratories' Data Integriry Poliry and have been informed of the folloiving specific procedures: a. Formal procedures for the confidential reporting of data integriry issues are available, which can be used by a,ry emplqyee, b. A data integriry investigation is conducted when data issues are identified that mqy negative!J impact data integriry. l .a :.."l' 0 t .1 t C !' i 2: I Section 3. 0: Qttali!J Responsibilities of the Management Team Page 15 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 c. Routine data integ1iry monitoring is conducted on smnple data, which mqy include an evaluation of the data I produce, IV. I have read the brochure detailing Accutest Laboratories Data Integriry and Ethics Program as required. V. I am aivare that data fraud is a punishable cnme that mqy include fines and/ or imprisonment upon conviction. VI. I also agree to the following: a. I shall not intentional!; report data values, zvhich are not the actual values observed or measured. b. I shall not intentional!; modijj data values unless the modification can be technical!; justified through a measurable ana!Jtical process. c. I shall not intentional!; report dates and times of data ana!Jsis that are not the true and actual times the data ana!Jsis ivas condttcted. d. I shall not condone a,ry accidental or intentional reporting of inauthentic data ry other emplqyees and immediate!; report it's occttrrence to my superiors. e. I shall immediate!; report a,ry accidental reporting of inauthentic data ry myse!f to my superiors. Data Integrity Monitoring. Documented procedures are employed for performing data integrity monitoring. These include regular data review procedures by supervisory and management staff (Section 12.7), supervisory review and approval of manual integrations and periodic reviews of GALP audit trails from the LIMS and all computer controlled analysis. Data Revieiv. All data produced by the laboratory undergoes several levels of review, which includes two levels of management review. Detected data anomalies that appear to be related to data integrity issues are isolated for further investigation. The investigation is conducted following the procedures described in this section. Manual Peak Integration Review and Approval. Routine data review procedures for all chromatographic processes includes a review of all manual chromatographic peak integrations. This review is performed by the management staff and consists of a review of the machine integration compared to the manual integration. Manual integrations, which have been performed in accordance with Accutest's manual peak integration procedures, are approved for further processing and release. Identification of samples and analytes in which manual integration had been necessary may be recorded in a report case narrative specific to a particular client and project requirement. Manual integrations which are not performed to Accutest's specifications are set aside for corrective action, which may include analyst retraining or further investigation as necessary. L di)6r.1 t ,~r i :::~; Section 3.0: Quality Responsibilities of th e Management T eam P age 16 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 GALP Audit Trail Revieiv. Good Automated Laboratory Practice (GALP) audits are comprehensive data package audits that include a review of raw d ata, process logbooks, processe d data reports and GALP audit trails from individual instruments and LI1.\1S. GALP audit trail s, which r ecord all electronic data activities, are avai lable for the majo rity of computerize d methodology and the laboratory information manag ement system (LIMS). These audit trails are periodically reviewed to determine if interventions performed by technical staff constitute an appropriate action. The review is performed on a recently completed job and includes interviews with the staff who performed the analysis. Findings indicative of inappropriate interventions or data integrity issues are investiga ted to determine the cause and the extent of the anomaly. Confidential Reporting of Data Integrity Issues. Data integrity concerns may be raised b y any individual to their supervisor. Employees with data integrity concerns should always discu ss thos e concerns with their immediate supervisors as a first step unless the employee is concerned with the confidentiality of disclosing data integrity issues or is uncomfortable discus sing the issue with their immediate supervisors. The supervisor makes an initial assessment of the situation to determine if the concern is related to a d ata integrity vio latio n. Those issues that appear to be violations are documented by the supervisor and referred to the Director of Quality Assurance for investigation. Documented procedures for the confidential reporting of d ata integrity iss u es in the laboratory are part of the data integri ty policy. These procedures ass ure that laboratory staff can privately di scuss ethical issues or report items of ethical concern without fears of rep ercussions with senior staff. Employees with data i ntegrity concerns that they consider to be confidential are directed to the Corporate Human Resources Manager in Dayto n, New Jersey. The HR Manager acts as a conduit to arrange a private discussion between the employee and the Corporate QA Director or a local QA Officer. During the employee -QA discussion, the QA representative evaluates the situation presented by the employee to determine if the issue is a data integrity concern or a le gitimate practice . If the practice is legitimate, the QA representative clarifies the process for the employee to assure understanding. If the situation appears to be a data integrity concern, the QA representative initiates a Data Integrity Investigation following the procedures specified in SOP EQA059. D ata Integrity Investigations . Follow-up investigations are conducted for all reported instances of ethical concern related to data integrity. Investigations are performed in a confidential manner by senior management according to a documented procedure. The outcome of the investigation is documented and reported to the company president who has the ultimate responsibility for determining the final course of action in the matter. Investigation documentation includes corrective action records, client notification information and disciplinary action outcomes, which is archived for a period of five years. L.;iror.:;tcr 1 .;::~ Section 3.0: Q uality Responsibilities of the Management T eam Page 17 of 10 7 Re vision Date: May 20 10 The investigations are conducted by the senior staff and supervisory personnel from the affected area. The investigations team includes the Laboratory Director and the Quality Assurance Director. Investigations are conducted in a confidential manner until it is completed and resolved. The investiga tion includes a review o f the primary information in question b y the investigations team. The team performs a review of associated data and similar historical data to determine if patterns exist. Interviews are conducted with key staff to determine the reasons for the observed practices. Following data compila tion , the investigations te am reviews all information to formulate a consensus conclusion. The investigation results are documented along with the recommended course of action. Corrective Action, Client Notification & Discipline. Investigations that reveal sys tematic data integ rity issues will be referred for corrective action, resolution and disposition (Section 13). If the investigation indicates that an impact to data has occurred and the defective d ata h as been rele ase d to clients, clien t notification procedures will be initiated following the steps in Section 17 .6. In all cases of data integrity violations, some level of disciplinary action will be conducted on the re sponsible individual. The level of discipline will be consistent with the violation and may range from retraining and/ or verbal reprimand to termination. A zero tolerance policy is in effect for unethical actions . L .:t O C,t,;tf;l~i ~~ 4.0 J OB D ESCRIPTIONS OF KEY STAFF S ection 4 .0: J ob Descriptions OJ Kry Staff Page 18 of 107 Revi sion D ate: May 2010 4.1 Requirement. Descriptions of key positions within the organization are defined to ensure that clients and staff understand duties and the responsibilities of the management staff and the reporting relationships between positions. President/ Chief Executive Officer. Responsible for all laboratory operations and business activities. Establishes the company mission and objectives in response to business needs. Direct supervision of the Vice President of Operations, each laboratory director, client services, management information systems, quality assurance and health and safety. Vice President, Operations/Laboratory Director. Reports to the company president. Establishes laboratory operations strategy. Direct supervision of organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, field services, and sample management. Maintains operational responsibility for the designated regional laboratories as defined in the Accutest Laboratories Organization Chart. 1\llid-Atlantic Vice President Operations assumes the responsibilities of the CEO in his absence. Vice President, Chief Information Officer. Reports to the compan y president. Develops the IT software and hardware agenda. Provides system strategies to compliment company objectives. Maintains all software and hardware used for data handling. Director, Q uality Assurance . Reports to the company president and functions independently from laboratory operations. Establishes the company quality age nda, develops quality procedures, provides ass istance to operations on quality procedure implementation, coordinates all quality control activities, monitors the quality system, provides quality system feedback to management to be used for process improvement and oversees health and safety. Assumes the responsibilities of the CEO in the absence of the CEO and the Vice President Operations. Director Client Services. Reports to the company president. Establishes and maintains communications between clients and the laboratory pertaining to client requirements which are related to sample analysis and data deliverables. Initiates client orders and supervises sample login operations. Manager, O rganics (O rganics Technical D irector). Reports to the laboratory director. Directs the operations of the organics group, consisting of organics preparation and instrumental analysis. Establishes daily work schedule. Supervises method implementation, application, and data production. Responsible for following Quality System requirements . Maintains laboratory instrumentation in an operable condition. Assumes the responsibilities of the Vice President Operations in his absence. Section 4.0: Job D escriptions Of Key Staff Page 19 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Manager, Inorganics (Inorganics Technical Director). Reports to the laboratory director. Directs the operations of the inorganics group, consisting of wet chemistry and the metals laboratories. Establishes daily work schedule. Supervises method implementation, application, and data production. Responsible for following Quality System requirements. Maintains laboratory instrumentation in an operable condition. Assumes the responsibilities of the Vice President Operations in his absence. Manager, Field Services. Reports to the laboratory director. Conducts field sampling and analysis of "analyze immediately" parameters in support of ongoing field projects. Responsible for proper collection, preservation, documentation and shipment of field samples. Maintains field sampling and field instrumentation required to perform primary responsibilities. Manager, Sample Management. Reports to the laboratory director. Develops, maintains and executes all procedures required for receipt of samples, verification of preservation, and chain of custody documentation. Responsible for maintaining and documenting secure storage, delivery of samples to laboratory units on request and courier services. Health & Safety Officer. Reports to the Vice President Operations and Quality Assurance Director. Responsible for developing company safety program and chemical hygiene plan. Reviews and updates these plans annually. Responsible for employee training on relevant health and safety topics. Documents employee training. Manages laboratory waste management program. Supervisor, Wet Chemistry. Reports to the inorganics manager. Executes daily analysis schedule. Supervises the analysis of samples for wet chemistry parameters using valid, documented methodology. Maintains instrumentation in an operable condition. Reviews data for compliance to quality and methodological requirements. Assumes the responsibilities of the Inorganics Manager in his absence. Supervisor, Metals. Reports to the inorganics manager. Executes daily analysis schedule. Supervises the analysis of samples for metallic elements using valid, documented methodology. Documents all procedures and data production activities. Maintains instrumentation in an operable condition. Reviews data for compliance to quality and methodological requirements. Supervisor, Organic Preparation. Reports to the organics manager. Executes the daily sample preparation schedule. Performs the extract of multi-media samples for organic constituents using valid, documented methodology. Prepares documentation for extracted samples. Assumes custody until transfer for analysis. Technical Support Supervisor, Organics. Reports to the organic manager. Oversees all instrument maintenance and new equipment installation. Conducts method development and implementation tasks. 4.2 4.3 Section 4.0: Job Descriptions Of Kry Staff Page 20 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Assistant Manager, Organics. Reports to the organics manager. Expedites the analysis of samples and sample extracts. Executes daily analysis schedule. Supervises the analysis of samples for organic parameters using valid, documented methodology. Documents all data and data production activities. Maintains instrumentation in an operable condition. Reviews d ata for compliance to quality and methodological requirements. Assumes the responsibilities of the Organics Manager in his absence. Supervisor, Report Generation. Reports to the organics manager. Compiles raw and processed sample data and assembles into client-ready reports. Initiates report scanning for archiving purposes. Maintains raw batch data in ac cessible storage. Mails completed reports to clients according to specified report turnaround schedule. Quality Assurance Officers. Reports to the Director, Quality Assurance. Performs quality control d ata review for trend monitoring purposes . Conducts internal audits and prepares reports for management review. Oversees proficiency testing program. Process quality control data for statistical purposes. Assumes the responsibilities of the Quality Assurance Director in his absence . Employee Screening, Orientation, and Training. All potential laboratory employees are screened and interviewed by human resources and technical staff prior to their hire. The pre-s creen process includes a review of their qualifications including education, training and work experience to verify that they have adequate skills to perform the tasks of the job. Newly hired employees receive orientation training beginning the first day of employment by the Company. Orientation training consists of initial health and safety training including general laboratory safety, personal protection and building evacuation. Orientation also includes quality assurance program training, data integrity training, and an overview of the Company's goals, objectives, mission, and vision. All technical staff receives training to develop and demonstrate proficiency for the methods they perform. New analysts work under supervision until the supervisory staff is satisfied that a thorough understanding of the method is apparent and method proficiency has been demonstrated, through a precision and accuracy study that has been documented, reviewed and approved by the QA Staff. Data from the study is compared to method acceptance limits. If the data is unacceptable, additional training is required. The analyst may also demonstrate proficiency by producing acceptable data through the analysis of an independently prepared proficiency sample. Individual proficiency is demonstrated annually for each method performed. Data from initial and continuing proficiency demonstrations are archived in the individual's training folder . Training Documentation. The human resources department prepares a training file for every new employee. All information related to qualifications, experience, external training Section 4.0: Job Descriptions Of Kry Stciff Page 21 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 courses , and education are placed into the file. Verification documentation for orientation, health & safety, quality assurance, and ethics training is also included in the file. Additional training documentation is added to the file as it is developed. This includes documentation of SOP understanding, data for initial and continuing demonstrations of proficiency, performance evaluation study data and notes and attendance lists from group training sessions . The Quality Assurance Department maintains the employee training database . This database is a comprehensive inventory of training documentation for each individual employee. The database enables supervisors to obtain current status information on training data for individual employees on a job specific basis . It also enables the management staff to identify training documentation in need of completion. Employee specific database records are created by human resources on the date of hire. Data base fields for job specific requirements such as SOP documentation of understanding and annual demonstration of analytical capability are automatically generate d when the supervisor assigns a job responsibility. Employees acknowledge that their SOP responsibilities h ave been satisfied using a secure electronic process which updates the database record. Reports are produced which summarize the qualifications of individual employees or departments. L:1 t,-c,rct t,~ri -aSc Section 5.0: Sign atory Approvals Page 22 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 5.0 SIGNATORY APPROVALS 5.1 Requirement Procedures have been developed for establishing the traceability of data and documents. The procedure consists of a signature hierarchy, indicating levels of authorization for signature approvals of data and information within the organization. Signature authority is granted for approval of specific actions based on positional hierarchy within the organization and knowledge of the operation that requires signature approval. A log of signatures and initials of all employees is maintained by the HR Staff for cross-referencing purposes. Signature Hierarchy. President/ Chief Executive Officer. Authorization for contracts and binding agreements with outside parties. Approval of final reports, quality assurance policy, SOPs, pro ject specific QAPs, data review and approval in lieu of technical managers. Note: Contract signature authority resides with Company officers only, which include the President/CEO, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Administration. Vice President, Operations/Laboratory Director. Approval of fin al reports and quality assurance policy in the absence of the President. Approval of SOPs, project specific QAPs, data review and approval in lieu of technical managers. Establishes and implements technical policy. Vice President, Chief Information Officer. Department specific supplies purchase. MIS policy. Director, Quality Assurance. Approval of final reports and quality assurance policy in the absence of the President. Approval of SOPs, project specific QAPs, data review and approval in lieu of technical managers. Director, Client Services. QAP and sampling and analysis plan approval. Project specific contracts, pricing, and price modification agreements. Approval and acceptance of incoming work, Client services policy. Managers, Technical Departments. Methodology and department specific QAPs. Data review and approval, department specific supplies purchase. Technical approval of SOPs. Manager, Sample Management. Initiation of laboratory sample custody and acceptance of all samples. Approval of department policies and procedures. Department specific supplies purchase. Manager, Health & Safety. Approval of health and safety policy in the absence of the President and QA Director. Approval of health and safety SOPs. Waste manifesting and approval. Assistant Managers: Technical Departments. Data review approval, purchasing of expendable supplies. 5.2 5.3 L .:1 t> c, r a t c 1· i a s Sectio n 5. 0: S ignatory Approvals Page 23 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Supervisor, Field Services. Sampling plan design and approval. Data review for field parameters. State form certification. Department policies and procedures. Department specific supplies purchase. Supervisors, Technical Departments. Data review approval, purchasing of expendable supplies. Signature Requirements. All laboratory activities related to sample custody and generation or release of data must be approved using either initials, signatures or electronic, password protected procedures. The individual, who applies his signature initial or password to an activity or document, is authorized to do so within the limits assigned to them by their supervisor. All written signatures and initials must be applied in a readable format that can be cross-referenced to the signatures and initials log if necessary. Signature and Initials Log The HR group maintains a signature and initials log. New employee signatures and initials are appended to the log on the first day of employment. Signature of individuals no longer employed by the company are retained, but annotated with their date of termination. lii~ ~,~CCUT'~S1: LJ!'>C,r~~T.<:;1·1 ~·.: Section 6.0: Documentation & Document Control Page 24 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 6.0 DOCUMENTATION & DOCUMENT CONTROL Requirement Document control policies have been established which specify that any document used as an information source or for recording analytical or quality control information must be managed using defined document control procedures. Accordingly, policies and procedures required for the control, protection, and storage of any information related to the production of analytical data and the operation of the quality system to assure its integrity and traceability have been established and implemented in the laboratory. The system contains sufficient controls for managing, archiving and reconstructing all process steps which contributed to the generation of an analytical test result. Using this system, an audit trail for reported data can be produced, establishing complete traceability for the result. 6.1 Administrative Records. Administrative (non-analytical) records are managed by the quality assurance department. These records consist of electronic documents which are retained in a limited access electronic directory or paper documents, which are released to the technical staff upon specific request. Form Generation. Modification & Control The quality assurance group approves and manages all forms used as either stand-alone documents or in logbooks to ensure their traceability. Forms are generated as computer files only and are maintained in a limited access master directory. The QA staff also manages and approves modifications to existing forms. Obsolete editions of modified forms are retained for seven years. Approved forms are assigned a 5-character alphanumeric code. The first two alpha characters designate the department that uses the form; the next three digits are sequentially assigned number. New forms must include the name Accutest Laboratories and appropriate spaces for signatures of approval and dates. Further design specifications are the responsibility of the originating department. The technical staff is required to complete all forms to the maximum extent possible. If information for a specific item is unavailable, the analyst is required to "Z" the information block. The staff is also required to "Z" the uncompleted portions of a logbook or logbook form if the day's analysis does not fill the entire page of the form. Logbook Control All laboratory logbooks are controlled documents that are comprised of approved forms used to document specific processes. New logs are numbered and issued to a specific individual who is assigned responsibility for the log. Old logs are returned to QA for entry into the document archive system where they are retained for seven (7) years . Laboratory staff may hold a maximum of two consecutively dated logbooks of the same type in the laboratory including the most recently issued book to simplify review of recently completed analysis. Controlled Documents. Key laboratory documents that are distributed internally and externally are numbered for tracking purposes. Individuals receiving documents, who must be Section 6.0: Documentation & D ocument Control Page 25 of 107 Revi sio n Date: May 20 10 informed when changes occur, receive controlled copies of those documents . Controlled status simplifies document updates and retrieval of outdated documents. Control is maintained throug h a document numbering procedure and document control logbook which identifies the individual receiving the controlled document and the d a te of receipt. Key documents are also distributed as uncontrolled documents if the recipient does not require updated copies w h en changes occur. Key documents in uncontrolled status are numbered and tracked u sing the same procedures as controlled documents. Quality Systems Manual (QSM). All QSMs are assigned a number prior to distribution. The number, date of distribution, and identity of the individual receiving the document are recorded in the document control log book. The numbering system is restarted with each new volume, which corresponds to the annual revision of the QSM. Electronic versions are distributed as read only files that are p assword protected. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs ). SOPs are maintained by pre-designating the numbers of official copies o f documents that are placed into circulation within the laboratory. Official d ocumen ts are copied to g reen paper and placed in to the appropriate lab oratory section as follows: Administrative: One master copy for the administrative file. Sample Management: One controlled green copy for the sample management file. Organics Laboratories: Two controlled g reen copies, one for the affected laboratory area, and one for the organic s laboratory file . Inorganics Laboratories: Two controlled green copies, one for the affected laboratory area, and one for the inorganics laboratory file. Field Services : One controlled green copy for each field sampling team (ge nerally a single field technician). The original, signed copy of the SOP is maintained in the master SOP binder by the QA staff. The QA staff collects outdated versions of SOPs as they are replaced and archived for a period of seven (7) year s in the QA archives. Electronic versions of outdated SOPs are moved from the active SOP directory to the inactive directory. 6.2 Technical Records. All records related to the analysis of samples and the production of an analytical result are archived in secure document storage or on electronic media and contain sufficient detail to produce an audit trail which re-creates the analytical result. These records include information related to the original client request, bottle order, sample login and custody, storage, sample preparation, analysis, data review and data reporting. Each department involved in this process maintains controlled documents which enable them to maintain records of critical information relevant to their department's process. L.:.l)o r~t c ri ~~ Section 6.0: D ocumentation <i,~ D ocument Control Page 26 of 107 Revi sio n Date: May 2010 6.3 Q uality C ontrol Sipport D ata & Records. All information and data related to the quality system is stored in a restricted access directory on the network server. Information on this directory is backed-up daily. Users of the quality assurance information and data have "read- only" access to the files contained in the directory. The QA staff and the laboratory director have write capability in this directory . This directory contains all current and archived quality system manuals, SOPs, control limits, MDL studies, precision and accuracy d ata, official forms, internal audit reports, proficiency test scores and metrics calibration information . The following information is retained in the directory: Quality System Manuals Standard Operati ng Procedures ASTM & NIST Methods Bottleware & Pre servative QC D at a Certification Documentation Change Management D a ta External Audit Reports Internal Audit Reports Corrective Action Database Laboratory Forms Directo ry Health & Safety Manuals Inactive Standard Operating Procedures Method Detection Limit D ata Metrics Inventory & Calibration D ata Microbiology Reage nt D ata Performance Limits Proficiency Test Scores & Statistic s Project Specific Analytical Requirements QC Report Reviews Re g ulatory Agency Quality Documents Staff Bios And Job Descriptions State Specific Methods 6.4 Analytical Records. All data related to the analysis of field samples are retained as either paper or electronic records that can be retrieved to compile a traceable audit trail for any reported result. All information is linked to the client job and sample number, which serves as a reference for all sample related information tracking. Critical times in the life of the sample from collection through analysis to disposal are documented. This includes date and time of collection, receipt b y the laboratory, preparation times and dates, analysis times and dates and d a ta reporting information. Analysis times are calculated in hours for methods where holding time is specified in hours (-:::.72 hours). Sample preparation information is recorded in a separate controlled logbook. It includes sample identification numbers, types of analysis, preparation and cleanup methods, sample weights and volumes, reagent lot numbers and volumes and any other information pertinent to the preparation procedure. Information related to the identification of the instrument used for analysis is permanently attached to the electronic record. The record includes an electronic data file that indicates all instrument conditions employed for the analysis, including the type of analysis conducted. The analyst's identification is electronically attached to the record. The instrument tuning and calibration data is electronically linked to the sample or linked though paper logs which were used in the documentation of the analysis . Quality control and performance criteria are permanently linked to the paper archive or electronic file. 6.5 S ection 6.0: Documentation & D ocument Control Page 27 of 107 Revis ion Date: M ay 20 10 Paper records for the identity, receipt, preparation and evaluation of all standards and reagents used in the analysis are documented in prepared records and maintained in controlled documents or files. Lot number information linking these materials to the analysis performed is recorded in the logbooks associated with the samples in which the y were used. Manual calculations or peak integrations that were performed during the data review are retained as paper or scanned documents and included as part of the electronic archive. Signatures for data review are retained on paper or as scanned versions of the paper record for the p ermanent electronic file . C onfidential B usiness Information (CBI). Operational documents including SOPs, Quality Manuals, personnel information, internal operations statistics, and laboratory audit reports are considered confidential business information. S trict controls are placed on the release of this information to outside p arties . Releas e of CBI to outside parties or organizations m ay be authorized upon execution of a confidentiality agree ment between Accutest and the receiving organization or individual. CBI information release is authorize d for third party auditors and commercial clients in electronic mode as Adobe Acrobat .PDF format only. 6.6 Software Change Documentation & Control. Changes to software are documented as text within the code of the program undergoing change . Documentation includes a description of the change, reason for change and the d ate the change was placed into effect. Documentation indicating the adequacy of the change is prepared following the evaluation b y the user who requested the change. 6. 7 R eport and D a ta Archiving. Accutest Laboratories produces digital files of all raw and processed data which is maintained for a minimum period of seven (7) years. The archived files consist of all raw data files and source documents associated with the analysis of field samples and proficiency test samples. Data files and source documents associated with method calibration and project and method quality control are also archived. After seven years, the files may be discarded unless contractual arrangements exist which dictate different requirements. Client or regulatory agency specific data retention practices are employed for several government organizations such as the Department of Defense and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection that require a retention period of ten (10) years. Data archiving may also be extended up to ten (10) years for specific commercial clients in response to contractual requirements . Complete date and time stamped PDF reports are generated automatically from the laboratory information management system (LIMS) using the source documents archived on the document server. These source documents are maintained on a document server and archived to primary and clone tapes. The primary tapes remain on premises while the clone tapes are taken to a secure offsite location for permanent storage . Both the primary and clone tapes remain in storage for the remainder of the archive period. Section 6.0: Documentation & D ocument Control Page 28 of 107 Revisio n Date: Mav 2010 6.8 Training The company maintains a training record for all employees that documents that they have received instruction on administrative and technical tasks that are required for the job they perform. Training records for individuals employed b y the company are retained for a period of six months following their termination of employment. Training File Origination. The Human Resources Group (HR) initiates training files. The QA staff, through the Assistant Quality Assurance officer, retains the responsibility for the maintenance and tracking of all training related documentation in the file . The file is begun on the first day of employment. Information required for the file includes a copy of the individual's most current resume, detailing work experience and a copy of an y college diplomas and transcript(s). Information added on the first day includes documentation of health and safety training, quality assurance training and a signed data integrity training and ethical conduct agreement. Training documentation, training requirements, analyst proficiency information and other training related support documentation is tracked using a customize d database application (Section 4.3). Database extracts provide an itemized listing of specific training requirements by job function. Training status summaries for individual analysts portray dates of completion for job specific training requirements. 6.9 Technical Training The supervisor of each new employee is responsible for developing a training plan for each new employee. The supervisor evaluates the employees training progres s at regular frequencies. Supporting documentation, including demonstration of capability and precision and accuracy studies, which demonstrate an analyst's proficienc y for a specific te st, are added to the training file as completed. Employees and supervisors verify documentation of understanding (DOU) for all assigned standard operating procedures in the training database. Certificates or diplomas for any off-site training are also added to the file. ill!lrTil S ectio n 7.0: Reference Sta ndard Traceability Page 29 of 107 Revi sion Date: May 2010 it J.),.cel.r res,: L :1 i) C• l' .~ t <~ t' i !\ :: 7.0 REFERENCE STANDARD TRACEABILITY 7.1 R equirement. Documented procedures, which establish traceability between any measured value and a national reference standard, are established by the laboratory as required. All metric measurements are traceable to NIST reference weights or thermometers that are calibrated on a regular schedule. All chemicals used for calibration of a quantitative process are traceable to an NIST reference that is documented by the vendor using a certificate of traceability . The laboratory maintains a documentation sys tem that establishes the traceability links. The procedures for verifying and documenting traceability are documented in standard operating procedures. Traceability of Metric Measurements -Thermometers. Accutest uses NIST thermometers to calibrate commercially purchased thermometers prior to their use in the laboratory and annually thereafter for liquid in glass thermometers or quarterly for electronic temperature measuring devices . If necessary, thermometers are assigned correction factors that are determined during their calibration using an NIST thermometer as the standard. The correction factor is documented in a thermometer calibration datab ase and on a tag attached to the thermometer. The correction factor is applied to temperature measurements before recording the measurement in the temperature log. Calibration of each thermometer is verified and documented on a regular schedule. The NIST thermometer is checked for accuracy by an ISO 17025 approved vendor every five (5) years following the specifications for NIST thermometer calibration verification detailed in the united States Environmental Protection Agency's "Manual for the Certification of Laborato ries Analyzing Drinking Water", Fifth Edition, January 2005 . 7 .2 Traceability of Metric Measurements -Calibration Weights. Accutest uses calibrated weights, which are traceable to NIST standard weights to calibrate all balances used in the laboratory. Balances are calibrated to specific tolerances within the intended use range of the balance. Calibration checks are required on each day of use. If the tolerance criteria are not achieved, corrective action specified in the balance calibration SOP is applied before the balance can be used for laboratory measurements. Recalibration of all calibration weights is conducted and documented on a biannual basis. 7 .3 Traceability of Chemical Standards. All chemicals, with the ex ception of bulk dry chemicals and acids, purchased as reference standards for use in method calibration must establish traceability to NIST referenced material through a traceability certificate. Process links are established that enable a calibration standard solution to be traced to its NIST reference certificate. Chemical standards used for analysis must meet the purity specifications of the method. These specifications must be stated in the reagents section of the method SOP. 7.4 Assignment of Reagent and Standard Expiration Dates. Expiration date information for all purchased standards, prepared standard solutions and selected reagents is provided to Accutest by the vendor as a condition of purchase. Neat materials and inorganic reagents are not required to be purchased with expiration dates . Prepared solutions are labeled with the 7.5 Section 7. 0: Reference Standard Traceability Page 30 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 expiration date provided by the manufacturer. In-house prepared solutions are assigned expiration dates that are consistent with the method that employs their use unless documented experience indicates that an alternate date can be applied. If alternate expiration dates are employed, their use is documented in the method SOP. Expiration dates for prepared inorganic reagents, which have not exhibited instability, are established at two years from the date of preparation for tracking purposes. The earliest expiration date has been established as the limiting date for assigning expiration dates to prepared solutions. The assignment of expiration dates that are later than the expiration date of any derivative solution or material are prohibited. Documentation of Traceability Traceability information is documented in individual logbooks designated for specific measurement processes. The quality assurance group maintains calibration documentation for metric references in separate logbooks. Balance calibration verification is documented in logbooks that are assigned to each balance. The individual conducting the calibration is required to initial and date all calibration activities. Any defects that occur during calibration are also documented along with the corrective action applied and a demonstration of return to control. Annual service reports and certificates are retained on file by the QA staff. Temperature control is documented in logbooks assigned to the equipment being monitored. A calibrated thermometer is assigned to each individual item. Uncorrected and corrected measurements are recorded along with date and initials of the individual conducting the measurement on a daily or as used basis . Corrective action, if required, is also documented including the demonstration of return to control. Initial traceability of chemical standards is documented via a vendor-supplied certificate (not available for bulk dry chemicals and acids) that includes lot number, expiration date and certified concentration information. Solutions prepared using the vendor supplied chemical standards are documented in logbooks assigned to specific analytical processes. Alternatively, documentation may be entered into the electronic standards and reagent tracking log. The documentation includes links to the vendor's lot number, an internal lot number, dates of preparation, expiration date, and the preparer's initials. Accutest employs commercially prepared standard solutions whose traceability can be demonstrated through a vendor supplied certificate of analysis that includes an experimental verification of the standard's true concentration. The test value for the verification analysis must agree within 1 % of the vendor's true value before it can be employed for calibration purposes. If the test value differs from the nominal value by more than 1 %, then the test value is used as the true value in laboratory calibrations and calculations. Purchased standards which do not have a certificate of analysis cannot be used for calibration or calibration verification purposes and are rejected or returned to the vendor. Supervisors conduct regular reviews of logbooks, which are verified using a signature and date. Section 8.0: T est Procedures, lvf.ethod Refe rences, & Regulatory Program s P age 31 of 10 7 Revision Date: Mav 2010 8.0 TEST PROCEDURES, METHOD REFERENCES, AND REGULATORY PROGRAMS 8.1 Requirements. The laboratory employs client specified or regulatory agency approved methods for the analysis of environmental samples. A list of active methods is maintained, which specifies the type of analyses performed and cross-references the methods to applicable environmental regulations. Routine procedures used by the laboratory for the execution of a method are documented in standard operating procedures . Method performance and sensitivity are demonstrated annually where required. Defined procedures for the use of method sensitivity limits for data reporting purposes are established by the Director of Quality Assurance and used consistently for all data reporting purposes. Method Selection & Application. Accutest employs methods for environmental sample analysis that are consistent with the client's application, which are appropriate and applicable to the project objectives . Accutest informs the client if the method proposed is inappropriate or outdated and suggests alternative approaches . Accutest employs documented, validated regulatory methods in the absence of a client specification and informs the client of the method selected. These methods are available to the client and other parties as determined by the client. Documented and validated in-house methods may be applied if they are appropriate to the project. The client is informed of the method selection. 8.2 Standard Operating Procedures. Standard operating procedures (SOP) are prepared for routine methods executed by the laboratory, processes related to laboratory operations and sample or data handling. All SOPs are formatted to meet the specifications established by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference, which are detailed in Chapter Five -Quality Systems of the established Standards. The procedures describe the process steps in sufficient detail to enable an individual, who is unfamiliar with the procedure to execute it successfully. SOPs are evaluated annually and edited if necessary. Reviewed SOPs that do not require modification include an evaluation summary form indicating that an evaluation was conducted and modifications were not needed. SOPs can be edited on a more frequent basis if changes are required for any reason. These may include a change to the methodology, elimination of systematic errors that dictate a need for process changes or modifications to incorporate a new version of the method promulgated by the originating regulatory agency. Procedural modifications are indicted using a revision number. SOPs are available for client review at the Accutest facility upon request. The complete list of the laboratories SOPs available as of the date of publication of this QSM version are detailed in Appendix IL 8.3 Method Validation. Standard methods from regulatory sources are primarily used for all analysis. Standard methods do not require validation by the laboratory. Non-standard, in - house methods are validated prior to use. Validation is also performed for standard methods LJ !)c,i·,;1 t<..~l~i 1:s Section 8.0: Test Procedures, Method References, & Regulatory Programs Page 32 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 applied outside their intended scope of use. Validation is dependent upon the method application and may include analysis of quality control samples to develop precision and accuracy information for the intended use. A final method validation report is generated, which includes all data in the validation study. A statement of adequacy and/ or equivalency is included in the report. A copy of the report is archived in the quality assurance directory of the company server. Non-standard methods are validated prior to use. This includes the validation of modified standard methods to demonstrate comparability with existing methods. Demonstrations and validations are performed and documented prior to incorporating technological enhancements and non standard methods into existing laboratory methods used for general applications. The demonstration includes method specific requirements for assuring that significant performance differences do not occur when the enhancement is incorporated into the method. Validation is dependent upon method application and may include the analysis of quality control samples to develop precision and accuracy information for intended use . The study procedures and specifications for demonstrating validation include comparable method sensitivity, calibration response, method precision, method accuracy and field sample consistency for several classes of analytical methods are detailed in this document. These procedures and specifications may vary depending upon the method and the modification. 8.4 Estimated Uncertainty. A statement of the estimated uncertainty of an analytical measurement accompanies the test result when required. Estimated uncertainty is derived from the performance limits established for spiked samples of similar matrices. The degree of uncertainty is derived from the negative or positive bias for spiked samples accompanying a specific parameter. When the uncertainty estimate is applied to a measured value, the possible quantitative range for that specific parameter at that measured concentration is defined. Well recognized regulatory methods that specify values for the major sources of uncertainty and specify the data reporting format do not require a further estimate of uncertainty. 8.5 Demonstration of Capability. Confirmation testing is conducted to demonstrate that the laboratory is capable of performing the method before its application to the analysis of environmental samples. The results of the demonstration tests are compared to the quality control specifications of the method to determine if the performance is acceptable. Capability demonstrations are conducted initially for each method on every instrument and annually on a method specific basis thereafter. Acceptable demonstrations are documented for individual training files and retained by the QA staff. New analytes, which are added to the list of analytes for an accredited method, are evaluated for applicability through a demonstration of capability similar to those performed for accredited analytes. 8.6 Method Detection Limit Determination. Annual method detection limit (MDL) studies are performed as appropriate for routine methods used in the laboratory. MDL studies are also performed when there is a change to the method that affects how the method is performed or when an instrumentation change that impacts sensitivity occurs. The procedure used for determining MDLs is described in 40 CFR, Part 136, Appendix B. Studies are performed for 8.7 8.8 8.9 S ectio n 8.0: T est Pro cedures, lvlethod Refe rences, & Regtt lato ry Program s Page 33 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 each method on water, soil and air matrices for every instrument that is used to perform the method. MD Ls are established at the instrument level. The highest MDL of the pooled instrument data is used to establish a laboratory MDL. MDLs are experimentally verified through the analysis of spiked quality control samples at 2-4 times the concentration of the experimental MDL. The verification is performed on every instrument used to perform the analysis . The quality assurance staff manages the annual MDL determination process and is responsible for retaining MDL data on file . Approved MDLs are appended to the LIMS and used for data reporting purposes. Limit of Detection (LOD). For the DoD ELAP the limit of detection (LOD) for each method and target analyte of concern is established for each instrument that is used to perform the method. The LOD is established by spiking a water and / or soil matrix at approximately two to three times the calculated MDL (for a single-analyte standard) or one to four times the calculated MDL (for a multi -analyte standard). The LOD undergoes all sample processing steps and is validated by the qualitative identification of the analytes of interest. The spike concentration establishes the LOD and must be verified quarterly. Instrument Detection Limit Determination. Instrument detection limits (IDLs) are determined for all inductively coupled argon plasma emission spectrophotometers and mass spectrometers. The IDL is determined for the wavelength (emission) of each element and the ion (mass spectrometry) of each element used for sample analysis. The IDL data is used to estimate instrument sensitivity in the absence of the sample matrix. IDL determinations are conducted at the frequenc y specified in the appropriate SOPs' for ICP and ICP /MS analysis . Method Reporting Limit. The method reporting limit for organic methods is determined by the concentration of the lowest calibration standard in the calibration curve. This value is adjusted b ased on several sample preparation factors including sample volume, moisture content (soils), digestion, distillation or dilution. The low calibration standard is selected by department managers as the lowest concentration standard that can be used for calibration while continuing to meet the calibration linearity criteria of the method being used. The validity of the method reporting limits are confirmed through the analysis of a spiked quality control sample at the method reporting limit concentration. By definition, detected analytes at concentrations below the low calibration standard cannot be accurately quantitated and are qualified as estimated values. The reporting limit for inorganics methods is defined as the concentration which is greater than or equal to the MDL where method quality control criteria has been achieved. The reporting limit for general chemistry methods employing multiple point calibrations must be greater than or equal to the concentration of the lowest standard of the calibration range. 8.10 Limit ofQuantitation (LOQ). For the DoD ELAP the limit of quantitation (LOQ) for each analyte of concern is determined. The LOQ is set within the range of calibration is greater than the established LOD. Precision and bias criteria for the LOQ are established to meet client requirements and are verified quarterly. Section 8.0: Test Procedures, lvlethod References, & Regulatory Programs Page 34 of 10 7 Re vis ion D ate: May 2010 8.11 Reporting of Quantitative Data. Analytical data for all methods is reported witho ut qualification to the reporting limit established for ea ch method. Data, for organic method s m ay be reported to the established method detection limit depending upon the client's requirements provided that all qualitative identification criteria for the detected param eter ha ve been satisfied. All parameters reported at concentrations between the reporting limit and the method detection limit are qualified as estimated . Data for inorganic methods are reported to the established method reporting limits. Inorganic d ata for specific methods may also be reported to the established method detection limit at client request. However, this data is always qualified as estimated. Measured concentrations of detected analytes that exceed the upper limit of the calibration range are either diluted into the range and reanalyze d or qualified as an estimated valu e. The only exception to this applies to ICP and ICP /MS analysis, w hich can be reported to the upper limit of the experimentally determined linear range without qualification. 8.12 Precision and Accuracy Studies. Annual precision and ac curacy (P&A) studies, which demonstrate the labo ra tories ability to generate acceptable data, are performed for all routine methods u se d in the laborato ry . The procedure used for gen erating organic P&A data is referenced in the m ajority of the regulatory methodology in use. The procedure requires quadruplicate analysis of a sample spiked with targe t analytes at a concentration in the working range of the method . This d ata m ay be compiled from a series of existing blank spikes or laboratory co ntrol samples. Accuracy (percent recovery) of the replicate an alysis is average d and compared to established method performance limits. Values within method limits indicate an acceptable performance demonstration. Precision and accuracy date is also used to annually demonstrate analytical capability for individual analysts. Annual demonstration of cap ability data is archived in individual training files. 8.13 Method Sources & References. The Quality Assurance Staff maintains a list of active methods used for the analysis of samples. This list includes valid method references from sources such as USEPA, ASTM or Standard Methods designations and the current version and version date . Updated versions of approved reference methodology are placed into use as changes occur. The Quality Assurance Director informs operations management of changes in method versions as they occur. The operations management staff selects an implementation d ate. The operations staff is responsible for completing all method use requirements prior to the implementation date. This includes modification of SOPs, completion of MDL and precision and accuracy studies and staff training. Documentation of these activities is provided to the QA staff who retains this information on file . The updated method is placed into service on the implementation date and the old version is de-activated. Multiple versions of selected methods may remain in use to satisfy client specific needs . In these situations, the default method version becomes the most recent version. Client specific needs are communicated to the laboratory staff using method specific analytical method codes, Section 8.0: T est Procedures, Nlethod R eferences, & Regttlatory Programs Page 35 of 107 Re vision D ate: May 2010 which clearly depict the version to be used. The o ld method version is maintained as an a ctive method until the specified client no longer requires the u se of the older version. Accutest will not use methodology that represents significant d epartures from the reference method unless specifically directed by the client. If clients direct the laboratory to use a method modification that represents a significant d e parture from the reference met hod, the request will be documented in the project file. 8.14 Analytical Capabilities. Appendix III provides a detai led listing of the methodology employed for the analysis of test samples. Section 9.0: S ampling, Sample Nfanagement, Login, Custotfy, Storage & Dispos al Page 36 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 9.0 SAMPLING, SAMPLE MANAGEMENT, LOGIN, CUSTODY, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL Requirement The laboratory must employ a system which ensures that client supplied product or supplied product (the sample) is adequately evaluated, acknowledged, and secured upon delivery to the laboratory. The system also assures that product chain of custody is maintained and that sample receipt conditions and preservation status are documented and communicated to the client and internal staff. The login procedure assigns, documents, and maps the specifications for the analysis of each unique sample to assure that the requested analysis is performed on the correct sample and enables the sample to be tracked throughout the laboratory analytical cycle. The system includes procedures for reconciling defects in sample condition or client provided d ata, which are identified at sample arrival. The system specifies the procedures for proper sample storage, transfer to the laboratory, and disposal a fter analys is. The system is also documented in standard operating procedures. 9.1 Order Receipt and Entrv. New orders are initiated and processed b y the client services group (See Chapter 14, Procedures for Executing Client Specifications). The new order procedure includes mechanisms for providing bottles to clients, which meet the size, cleanliness, and preservatio n specifications for the analys is to be performed. For new orders, the project m anager prepares a b ottle request form, which is submitted to sample manage ment. This form provides critical project details to the sample manage ment staff, which are used to prepare and assemble the sample bottles for shipment to the client prior to sampling. The bottle order is assembled using bottles that meet USEP A specifications for contaminant free sample containers. Accutest uses a combination of commercially supplied pre-cleaned bottles and bottles that h ave been tested for residual contamination and verified to meet USEPA specifications prior to use . Sterile bottles for microbiological samples are purchased from commercial sources. Bottles, which are not purchased pre-cleaned, are checked to assure that they are free of contamination from targeted analytes before being released for use . Sterile bottles are checked for contamination with each lot. The QA staff retains a copy of the documentation of in- house contamination and sterility checks and maintains the responsibility for approving and releasing bottle lots for use following a review of the check data. Preservative solutions that are specified for the analysis requested are dispensed into the sample bottle prior to shipment. All preservative solutions are prepared in the laboratory or purchased from commercial suppliers. Each solution is checked to assure that it is free of contamination from the compounds being analyzed before being released for use. Reagent water for trip and field blanks is poured into appropriately labeled containers. All bottles are packed into ice chests with blank chain of custody forms and the original bottle order form. Completed bottle orders are delivered to clients using Accutest couriers or commercial carriers for use in field sample collection. L,j Uc, i,itC: 1~1 a.~ Section 9.0: S ampling, Sample Management, Login, Custocfy, Storage & D isposal P age 37 of 10 7 Re vision D ate : May 2010 9.2 Sampling. Documented procedures are employed by the field staff for field sample collection and are accessible during sample collection activities . Field activities are documented in controlled notebooks which detail relevant field conditions, site data and the results of field measurements. Appropriate custody procedures for collected samples are initiated b y the field staff at the time of sample collection. Samples are documented, labeled and preserved according to the specifications of the method and/ or regulatory program prior to being shipped to the laboratory. 9.3 Sample Receipt and Custod,y. Samples are delivered to the laboratory using a variety of mechanisms including Accutest couriers, commercial shippers, and client self-delivery. Documented procedures are followed for arriving samples to assure that custody and integrity are maintained and handling/ preservation requirements are documented and maintained. Sample custody documentation is initiated when the individual collecting the sample collects field samples. Custody documentation includes all information necess ary to provide an unambiguous record of sample collection, sample identification, and sample collection chronology. Initial custody documentation employs either Accutest or client generated custody forms. Accutest generates a chain of custody in situations where the individuals who collected the sample did not generate custody documentation in the field . Accutest defines sample custody as follows: The sample is in the actual custody or possession of the assigned responsible person, The sample is in a secure area. The Accutest facility is defined as a secure facility. Perimeter security has been established, which limits access to authorized individuals only. Visitors enter the facility through the building lobby and must register with the receptionist prior to entering controlled areas. While in the facility, visitors are required to wear a visitor's badge and must be accompanied by their hosts at all times. After hours, building access is controlled using a computerized passkey reader system. This system limits building access to individuals with a pre-assigned authorization status . After hours visitors are not authorized to be in the building. Clients delivering samples after hours must make advanced arrangements through client services and sample management to assure that staff is available to take delivery and maintain custody. Upon arrival at Accutest, the sample custodian reviews the chain of custody for the samples received to verify that the information on the form corresponds with the samples delivered. This includes verification that all listed samples are present and properly labeled, checks to verify that samples were transported and received at the required temperature, verification that the sample was received in proper containers, verification that sufficient volume is available to conduct the requested analysis, and a check of individual sample containers to verify test S ection 9.0: S ampling, Samp le M anagement, L ogin, Custotfy, S torage & D ispo sal Page 38 of 107 Revi sion Date: M ay 2010 specific preservation requirements including the absence of heads pace for volatile compound analysis. Sample conditions and other observations are documented on the chain of custody by the sample custodian prior to completing acceptance of custody and in an online database that creates a permanent record of all sample login activities. The sample custodian accepts sample custody upon verific ation that the custody document is correct. Discrepancies or non- compliant situations are documented and communicated to the Accutest project manager, who contacts the client for resolution. The resolution is documented and communicated to sample management for execution . The sample management staff maintains an electronic sample receipt log. This log details all sample -related information in a searchable database that is updated upon data entry and backed up daily. The log records include critical date information, numbers of samples, numbers of bottles for each parameter, descriptions of bottles for each parameter, preservation conditions, bottle refrig erator location, and bottle conditions. Data entry into the log is secured u sing individual passwords . During initial lo gin, each bottle is assigned a unique number and is labeled with a barcode corresponding to that number. A bar-coding and scanning system electronically tracks sample custody transfers between individuals within the laboratory. Internal custody documentation may be required for compliance with regulatory agency or contractual specifications. A documented, chronological record of each sample transfer identifying each individual having possession of the sample is created in the laboratory information manag ement sy stem, which can be printed and included in data reports to demonstrate continuous custody. 9.4 Labora t ory Preservation of Improperly Preserved Field Samples. Accutest will attempt to preserve field samples that were received without proper preservation to the extent that it is feasible and supported by the methods in use . Laboratory preservation of improperly preserved or handled field samples is routinely performed for metals samples. Special handling procedures may also be applied to improperly preserved volatile organics. Aqueous metals samples that were not nitric acid preserved to pH 2 in the field are laboratory preserved and held for twenty (24) hours to equilibrate prior to analysis . Aqueous metals samples requiring field filtration may be filtered in the laboratory within seventy-two (72) hours of receipt provided that the sample has not been acid preserved. Unpreserved volatile organics samples may be analyzed within seven (7) days to minimize degradation of volatile organics if the laboratory is notified in advance of the failure to preserve upon collection . Laboratory preservation of unpreserved aqueous samples is not possible. A pH check of volatile organic samples prior to analysis will compromise the sample by allowing volatile organics to escape during the check. If the laboratory is not notified of the failure to field preserve an aqueous volatile organic sample, the defect will not be identified until sample analysis has been completed and the data is qualified accordingly. Section 9.0: Sampling, Sample Management, Login, Ct1stocfy, Storage & Disposal Page 39 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 9.5 Sample Tracking Via Status Change. An automated, electronic LIMS procedure records sample exchange transactions between departments and changes in analytical status. This system tracks all preparation, analytical, and data reporting procedures to which a sample is subjected while in the possession of the laboratory. Each individual receiving samples must acknowledge the change in custody and operational status in the LIMS. This step is required to maintain an accurate electronic record of sample status, dates of analytical activity, and custody throughout the laboratory. Sample tracking is initiated at login where all chronological information related to sample collection dates and holding times are entered into the LIMS . This information is entered on an individual sample basis. 9.6 Sample Acceptance Policy. Incoming samples must satisfy Accutest's sample acceptance criteria before being logge d into the system. Sample acceptance is based on the premise that clients have exercised proper protocols for sample collection. This includes complete documentation, sufficient volume, proper chemical preservation, temperature preservation, sample container sealing and labeling, and appropriate shipping container packing. The sample management staff will make every attempt to preserve improperly preserved samples upon arrival. However, if preservation is not possible, the samples may be refused unless the client authorizes analysis. No samples will be accepted if holding times have been exceeded or will be exceeded before analysis can take place unless the client authorizes analysis. Sample acceptance criteria include proper custody and sample la beling documentation. Proper custody documentation includes an entry for all physical samples delivered to the laboratory with an identification code that matches the sample bottle and a date and signature of the individual who collected the sample and delivered them to the la boratory. Accutest reserves the right to refuse any sample which in its sole and absolute discretion and judgment is hazardous, toxic and poses or may pose a health, safety or environmental risk during handling or processing. The company will not accept samples for analysis using methodology that is not performed b y the laboratory or for methods that lab does not hold valid accreditations unless arrangements have been made to have the analysis conducted by a qualified subcontractor. 9.7 Assignment of Unique Sample Identification Codes. Unique identification codes are assigned to each sample bottle to assure traceability and unambiguously identify the tests to be performed in the laboratory. The sample identification coding process begins with the assignment of a unique alphanumeric job number. A job is defined as a group of samples received on the same day, from a specific client pertaining to a specific project. A job may consist of groups of samples received over a multi-day period. The first character of the job number is an alpha-character that identifies the laboratory facility. The next characters are numeric and sequence by one number with each new job. 9.8 L ~1 0C,r.:'!t ('.:l'i i:':S Section 9.0: Sampling,, Sample Managem en t, Login, Custocfy, Storage & Disposal Page 40 of 107 Revision Date: M ay 2010 Unique sample numbers are assigned to each bottle collected as a discrete entity from a designated sample point. This number begins with the job number and incorporates a second series of numbers beginning at one and continuing chronologically for each point of collection. The test to be performed is clearly identified on the bottle label. Multiple sample bottles collected for analysis of the same parameter are numbered bottle 1, 2, ... etc. Alpha suffixes may be added to the sample number to identify special designations such as subcontracted tes t s, in-house QC checks, or re-logs. Multiple sample bottles for a specific analysis are labeled Bottle 1, Bottle 2, etc. Subcontracted Analysis. Subcontract laboratories are employed to perform analysis not performed b y Accutest. The quality ass urance staff evaluates subcontract laboratories to assure their quality processes meet the standards of the environmental laboratory industry prior to engagement. Throughout the subcontract process, Accutest follows established procedures to assure th at sample cu s tody is maintained and the data produced by the subcontractor meets established quality criteria. Subcontracting Procedure . Subcontracting procedures are initiated through several mechanisms, which originate with sample manage ment. Samples for analysis by a subcontractor are logged into the Accutest syste m using regular login procedures . If subcontract parameters are part of the project or sample management has received subcontracting instructions for a specific project, a copy of the chain of custody is given to the appropriate project manager with the subcontracted p arameters highlighted. This procedure trigge rs the subcontract process at the pro je ct management level. The project m anager co ntacts an approved subcontractor that carries accre ditatio n in the venue of the project location to place the subcontract order. A subcontract order form (SOF) is simultaneously prepared in electronic format, by the project manager and filed with the original chain of custody. The SOF and the subcontract chain of custody are forwarded to sample management, via E-Mail, for processing. A copy is filed with the original CoC. Sample manage ment signs the subcontract chain of custody and ships the sample (s) to the subcontractor. The subcontract CoC is filed with the original CoC and the request for subcontract. Copies are distributed to the login department, the project manager, sample management and the client. Clients are verbally notified of the need to subcontract analysis as soon as the need is identified by the client services staff. This may occur during the initial project setup or at the time of login if the project setup had not been initiated through the client services staff. Copies of the subcontract CoC and the original CoC, which are electronically distributed to clients, constitutes documented client notification of the laboratories intent to subcontract analysis. Subcontractor data packages are reviewed by the QA Staff to assess completeness and quality compliance. If completeness defects are detected, the subcontractor is asked to immediately upgrade the data package. If data quality defects are detected, the QA staff retains the package for further review. The QA staff will pursue a corrective action solution before releasing defective data to the client. S ection 9.0: Sa mpling, S amp le M anagemen t, Login, Custocfy, Storage & Disposal Page 41 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Approved subcontract data is entered into the laboratory information management system (LIMS) if possible and incorporated into the final report. All subcontract data is footnoted to provide the client with a clear indication of its source. Copies of original subcontract data are included in the data report depending on the reporting level specified by the client. Applicable subcontractor accreditation information is provided with the subcontractor data. Subcontract Laboratory Evaluation. The QA staff evaluates subcontract laboratories prior to engagement. The subcontract laboratory must provide Accutest with proof of a valid certification to perform the requested analysis for the venue where they were collected and for a specific program should an approval or accreditation be required. In addition, the QA staff may require a copy of the laboratory's Quality Systems Manual, copies of SOPs used for the subcontracted analysis, a copy of the most recent performance evaluation study for the subcontracted parameter, copies of the internal data integrity policy and copies of the most recent regulatory agency or third party accreditor audit report. Certification verification must be submitted to Accutest annually. If possible, the QA staff may conduct a site visit to the laboratory to inspect the quality system. Accutest Laboratories assumes the responsibility for the performance of all subcontractors who have successfully demonstrated their qualifications and should obtain an example data deliverable package prior to initiation of subcontract work for compliance review. Qualification of a subcontract laboratory may be bypassed if the primary client directs Accutest to employ a specific subcontractor. 9.9 Sample Storage. Following sample transfer to the sample custodian, samples are assigned to various secured, refrigerated storage areas depending upon the test to be performed and the matrix of the samples. The location (refrigerator and shelf) of each sample is recorded on the chain of custody adjacent to the line corresponding to each sample number and also entered into the LIMS. Samples remain in storage until the laboratory technician requests that they be transferred into the laboratory for analysis. Second shift staff is authorized to retrieve samples from storage and initiate custody transfer. All sample request forms must be completed regardless of who performs the transfer. Samples for volatile organics analysis are placed in storage in designated refrigerators by the sample custodian and immediately transferred to the organics group control. Sample custody is transferred to the department designee. These samples are segregated according to matrix to limit opportunities for cross contamination to occur. Organics staff is authorized to retrieve samples from these storage areas for analysis. When analysis is complete, the samples are placed back into storage. 9.10 Sample Login. Following sample custody transfer to the laboratory, the documentation that describes the clients analytical requirements are delivered to the sample login group for coding and entry to the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). This process translates all information related to collection time, turnaround time, sample analysis, and deliverables into a code which enables client requirements to be electronically distributed to the various departments within the laboratory for scheduling and execution. 9.11 Section 9.0: S ampling, Sample Manag emen t, Login, Cttstocfy, Storage & Disposal Page 42 of 107 Re vision Date: May 2010 The technical staff is alerted to client or project specific requirements through the use of a unique project code that is electronically attached to the job during login. The unique project code directs the technical staff to controlled specifications documents detailing the unique requirements. Sample Retrieval for Analysis. Individual laboratory departments prepare and submit written requests to the sample custodian to retri eve sa mples for analysis. The sample custodian r e trie ve s all samples except volatile organics and delive rs them to the requesting department. Retrieval prio rities are established by the requesting department and submitted to the sample custodian when multiple requests are submitted. Internal custody transfe rs using the bar code scanning system occur whenever the samples change hands or locations. After sample analysis has been completed, the department requests pick-up and return of the sample to the storage area. The sample custodian re trieves the sample and completes the custody transfer from the department of the transfer back to sample manag ement or sample storage. 9.12 Sample Disposal Accutest retains all samples and sample ex tracts under proper storage for a minimum of 30 d ays following completion of the analysis report. Longer storage p eriods are ac commodated o n a client specific basis if required. Samples may also be returned to the client for disposal. Accutest disposes of all laboratory wastes following the requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The Company h as obtained and m aintains a waste generator identification number, NJD982533622. Sample management ge nerates a sample disposal dump sheet from the LIMS tracking system each week, which lists all samples whose holding period has ex pired. Data from each sample is compared to the hazardous waste criteria established by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). Samples containing constituents at concentrations above the criteria are labeled as hazardous and segregated into four general waste categories for disposal as follows: Waste Oil Soil (s olids -positive and negative hazardous characteristics) l\llixed Aqueous Sludges (semi-solids) PCB Hazardous Waste (USEPA 40 CPR 761 criteria). Non-hazardous aqueous samples are diluted and disposed directly into the laboratory sink. All aqueous liquids pass through a neutralization system before entering the municipal system. Solid samples are emptied into consolidation drums and disposed as hazardous waste or non- hazardous wastes depending upon the results of hazardous characteristics determination. ~~ Uff-'· 0ClD1"''~S1I': L j b G t ,;_ t <.; I' i :\ ~ Section 9.0: Sampling, Sample Man agement, Login, Custorfy, Storage & Disposal Page 43 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Samples classified as PCB hazardous wastes are labeled and packaged according to the requirements in 40 CFR 761. Empty glass and plastic bottles from aqueous and solid samples are segregated for recycling. Recycled materials are collected by a commercial contractor and transferred to a county transfer facility for separation into various materials categories. These operations are classified as secure facilities employing cameras, security guards and fiber optic security systems. The recyclable material is transported to a recycling facility for further processing. Separated glass is transported to a processing facility where it is acid washed in two, separate wash baths, rinsed in boiling water and ground into 1/2 inch chunks . The chunks are transported to an end product user for re-manufacturing into a glass product. Separated plastic is transported to a processing facility where it is acid washed to remove the labels and adhesives and boiled for sterilization. The sample containers and any remaining labels are shredded and ground resulting in complete destruction of remaining labels the ground material is sent by rail car or tractor-trailer to various end users that melt and reform the material into useful products of their industry. The recycling facility employs a Code of Ethics in which all client names are confidential and are not divulged to any individual or corporation without written permission from the client. Laboratory wastes are collected by waste stream in designated areas throughout the laboratory. \'v'aste streams are consolidated twice each week by the waste custodian and transferred to stream specific drums for disposal through a permitted waste management contractor. Filled, consolidated drums are tested for hazardous characteristics and scheduled for removal from the facility for appropriate disposal based on the laboratory data . All solvent extracts and digestates are collected for disposal following the thirty-day holding period and drummed according to their specific waste stream category. Chlorinated solvent extracts are drummed as chlorinated wastes (i.e., Methylene Chloride). Non-chlorinated solvent extracts are drummed as non-chlorinated wastes (i.e., acetone, hexane, methanol, and mixed solvents). Digestates are collected for disposal following the thirty-day holding period and drummed as corrosive liquid containing metals. S ection 10. 0: Laboratory Instrumentation an d Jvf.easurement Standards Page 44 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 10.0 LAB O RAT ORY INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT STANDARD S Requirement The laboratory has established procedures, which assure that instrumentation is performing to a pre-determined operational standard prior to the analysis of any samples. In general, these procedures follow the regulatory agency requirements established in promulgated methodology. The instrumentation selected to perform specified analysis are uniquely identified and capable of providing the method specified uncertainty of measurement needed . These procedures are documented and incorporated into the standard operating procedures for the method being executed. 10 .1 Mass Tuning-Mass Spectrometers. The mass spectrometer tune and sensitivity is monitored to assure that the instrument is assigning masses and mass abundances correctly and that the instrument has sufficient sensitivity to detect compounds at low concentrations. This is accomplished by analyzing a specific mass tuning compound at a fixed concentration. If the sensitivity is insufficient to detect the tuning compound, corrective action must be performed prior to the analysis of standards or samples. If the mass assignments or mass abundances do not meet criteria, corrective action must be performed prior to the analysis of standards or samples. 10.2 Wavelength Verification -Spectrophotometers. Spectrophotometer detectors are checked on a regular schedule to verify proper response to the wavelength of light needed for the test in use. If the detector response does not meet specifications, corrective action (detector adjustment or replacement) is performed prior to the analysis of standards or samples. 10.3 Inter-el ement Interference Checks (Metals). Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrophotometers (ICP) are subject to a variety of spectral interferences, which can be minimized or eliminated by applying interfering element correction factors and background correction points. Interfering element correction factors are checked on a specified frequency through the analysis of check samples containing high levels of interfering elements. Analysis of single element interferant solutions is also conducted at a specified frequency. If the check indicates that the method criteria have not been achieved for any element in the check standard, the analysis is halted and data from the affected samples are not reported. Sample analysis is resumed after corrective action has been performed and the correction factors have been re-calculated. New interfering element correction factors are calculated and applied whenever the checks indicate that the correction factors are no longer meeting criteria. At a minimum, correction factors are replaced once a year . Inductively Coupled Plasma -Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) also is subject to isobaric elemental and polyatomic ion interferences. These interferences are corrected through the use of calculations. The accuracy of corrections is dependent on the sample matrix and instrument conditions and is verified by quality control checks on individual runs. L J i:t c:. r .:I t <'.:: I' i -2: ~ Section 10.0 : Liboratory Instrttmentation and Measurement Standards Page 45 of 107 Revision D a te: May 2010 10 .4 Calibration and Calibration Verification. Many tests require calibration using a series of reference standards to establish the concentration range for performing quantitative analysis. Instrument calibration is performed using standards that are traceable to national standards. Method specific procedures for calibration are followed prior to any sample analysis. In general, if a reference method does not specify the number of calibration standards, the minimum number is two (o ne of which is at the reporting limit or limit of quantitation). Calibration is performed using a linear regression calculation or calibration factors calculated from the curve. The calibration must meet method specific criteria for linearity or precision . If the criteria are not achieved, corrective action (re-calibration or instrument maintenance) is performed. The instrument must be successfully calibrated before analysis of samples can be conducted. Initial calibration for metals analysis performed using inductively coupled piasma (ICP) employs the use of a single standard and a calibration blank to establish linearity. Inductively Coupled Plasma -Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) can be calibrated using either a two point or a multi-point calibration, as long as all quality control criteria for the analysis can be achieved. The calibration blank contains all reagents that are placed into the calibration standard with the exception of the target elements. Valid calibration blanks must not contain any target elements. Initial calibrations must be verified using a single concentration calibration standard from a second source (i.e . separate lot or different provider). The continuing validity of existing calibrations must be regularly verified using a single calibration standard. The response to the standard must meet pre-established criteria that indicate the initial calibration curve remains valid. If the criteria are not achieved corrective action (re-calibration) is performed before any additional samples may be analyzed. If continuing calibration verification results are outside established criteria, data associated with the verification may be fully useable under the following conditions: • When the acceptance criteria for the continuing calibration verification are exceeded high, i.e., high bias, and there are associated samples that are non-detects, then those non-detects may be reported. • When the acceptance criteria for the continuing calibration verification are exceeded low, i .e., low bias, those sample results may be reported if they exceed a maximum regulatory limit/ decision level. Calibration verification is also performed whenever it appears that the analytical system is out of calibration or no longer meets the calibration requirements. It is also performed when the time period between calibration verifications has expired. Sample results are quantitated from the initial instrument calibration unless otherwise required by regulation, method, or program specific criteria. L .i r> c, r 2 r <: 1· i ·2: ~ S ection 10.0: Laboratory I nstrumentation and M easurem ent Standards Page 46 of 107 Revis ion D ate: M ay 2010 10.5 Linear Range Verification and Calibration (ICP & ICP /MS Metals). Linear range verification is performed for all ICP and ICP /MS instrumentation. The regulatory program or analyti cal method specifies the verification frequency. A series of calibration standards are analyzed over a broad concentration range. The data from these analyses are used to determine the valid analytical range for the instrument. ICP instrument calibration is routinely performed using a single standard at a concentration within the linear range and a blank. Some methods or analytical programs require a low concentration calibration check to verify that instrument sensitivity is sufficient to detect target elements at the reporting limit. The analytical method or regulatory program defines the criteria used to evaluate the low concentration calibration check. If the low calibration check fails criteria, corrective action is performed and verified through reanalysis of the low concentration calibration check before continuing with the field sample analysis .. ICP-MS instrument calibration is normally performed using multiple standards within the linear range and a blank, but may be done with a single standard at a concentration within the linear range and a blank. 10.6 Retention Time Development and Verification (GC). Chromatographic retention time windows are developed for all analysis performed using gas chromatographs with conventional detectors. An initial experimental study is performed, which establishes the width of the retention window for each compound. The retention time width of the window defines the time ranges for elution of specified target analytes on the primary and confirmation columns. Retention time windows are established upon initial calibration, applying the retention time range from the initial study to each target compound. Retention times are regularly confirmed through the analysis of an authentic standard during calibration verification. If the target analytes do not elute within the defined range during calibration verification, the instrument must be recalibrated and new windows defined . New studies are performed when major changes, such as column replac ement are made to the chromatographic system. 10.7 Equipment List. See Appendix IV for a listing of all equipment used for measurement and / or calibration in laboratory processes. 11.0 INSTRUMENT MAINTENANCE S ection 11 .0: I nstrument lVIain te nance Page 47 of107 Revision Date: May 2010 Requirement. Documented procedures have been established for conducting equipment maintenance. The procedure includes maintenance schedules if required or documentation of daily maintenance activities . All instrument maintenance activities are documented in instrument specific logbooks. 11.1 Routine. DailyMaintenance. Routine, daily maintenance is required on an instrument specific basis and is performed each time the instrument is used. Daily maintenance includes activities to insure a continuation of good analytical performance. This may include performance checks that indicate if non-routine maintenance is needed. If performance checks indicate the need for higher level maintenance, the equipment is taken out of service until maintenance is performed. Analysis cannot be continued until all performance checks meet established criteria and a return to operational control has been demonstrated and documented. The individual assigned to the instrument is responsible for daily maintenance. 11.2 Non-routine Maintenance. Non-routine maintenance is initiated for catastrophic occurrences such as instrument failure. The need for non-routine maintenance is indicated by failures in general operating systems that result in an inability to conduct required performance checks or calibration. Equipment in this category is taken out of service, tagged accordingly and repaired before attempting further analysis. Before initiating repairs, all safety procedures for safe handling of equipment during maintenance, such as lock-out/ tag-out are followed. Analysis is not resumed until the instrument meets all operational performance check criteria, is capable of being calibrated and a return to operational control has been demonstrated and documented. Section supervisors are responsible for identifying non-routine maintenance episodes and initiating repair activities to bring the equipment on-line. This may include initiating telephone calls to maintenance contractors if necessary. They are responsible for documenting all details related to the occurrence and repair. 11.3 Scheduled Maintenance. Modern laboratory instrumentation rarely requires regular preventative maintenance. If required, the equipment is placed on a schedule, which dictates when maintenance is needed. Examples include annual balance calibration by an independent provider or ICP preventative maintenance performed by the instrument manufacturer. Section supervisors are responsible for initiating scheduled maintenance on equipment in this category. Scheduled maintenance is documented using routine documentation practices. 11.4 Maintenance Documentation. Routine and non-routine maintenance activities are documented in logbooks assigned to instruments and equipment used for analytical measurements. The logbooks contain preprinted forms, which specify the required maintenance activities. The analyst or supervisor performing or initiating the maintenance activity is required to check the activity upon its completion and initial the form. This includes documenting that the instrument has been returned to operational control following the completion of the activity. Non-routine maintenance (repairs, upgrades) is documented on the back page of the service log. Sectio n 12.0: Quality Co ntro l Parameters, Procedtt res, and Corrective Action Page 48 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 12.0 QUALITY CONTROL PARAMETERS, PROCEDURES, AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 12.1 Requirement All procedures used for test methods incorporate quality control parameters to monitor elements that are critical to method performance. Each quality parameter includes acceptance criteria that have been established b y regulatory age ncies for the methods in use. Criteria may also be established through client dictates or through the accumulation and statistical evaluation of internal performance da ta. Data obtained for these parameters during routine analysis must be evaluated by the analyst, and compared to the method criteria in use. If the criteria are not achieved, the procedures must specify corrective action and conformation of control before proceeding with sample analysis . QC parameters, procedures, and corrective action must be documented within the standard operating procedures for each method. In the a b se nc e of client specific objectives the lab oratory must define qualitative o bjective s for completeness and representativeness of data. Procedure. Bench analys ts are responsible for methodological quality control and sample specific quality control. Each method specifies th e control p arameters to be employed for the method in u se and the specific procedures for incorporating them into the analysis. These control p arameters are analyzed and evaluated with every designated sample group (batch). The data from each parameter provid es the analyst with critical decision making information on method performance. The information is used to determine if corrective action is needed to bring the method or the analysis of a specific sample into compliance. These evaluations are conducted throughout the course of the analysis. Each control parameter is indicative of a critical control feature. Failure of a methodological control parameter is indicative of either instrument or batch failure . Failure of a sample control parameter is indicative of control difficulties with a specific sample or samples . Sample Batch. All samples analyzed in the laboratory are assigned to a designated sample batch, which contains all required quality control samples and a defined m axi mum number of field samples that are prepared and / or analyzed over a defined time period. The maximum number of field samples in the batch is 20. Accutest has incorporated the NELAP batching policy as the sample-batching standard. This policy incorporates the requirement for blanks and spiked blanks as a time based function as defined by NELAP. Accordingly, the specified time period for a sample batch is 24 hours . Matrix spike/ matrix spike duplicate, matrix spikes and duplicates are defined as sample frequency based functions and may be applied to several batches until the frequency requirement has been reached. A matrix spike/ matrix spike duplicate, matrix spikes and/ or duplicate is required every 20 samples . Client criteria that defines a batch as a time bas~d function which includes a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates as a contractual specification will be honored. The typical batch contains a blank and a laboratory control sample (LCS or spiked blank). Batch documentation includes lot specifications for all reagents and standards used during preparation of the batch. Section 12.0: Oualiry Control Param eters, Procedures, and Corrective Action Page 49 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 12.2 Methodological Control Parameters and Corrective Action. Prior to the analysis of field samples the analyst must determine that the method is functioning properly. Specific control parameters indicate whether critical processes meet specified requirements before continuing with the analysis. Method specific control parameters must meet criteria before sample analysis can be conducted. Each of these parameters is related to processes that are under the control of the laboratory and can be adjusted if out of control. Method Blank. A method blank is analyzed during the analys is of any field sample . The method blank is defined as a sample. It contains the same stand ards (i nternal standards, surrogates, matrix modifiers, etc.) and reagents that are added to the fi eld sample during analysis, with the exception of the sample itself. If the method blank contains target analytes(s) at concentrations that exceed method detection limit concentrations (organics) or reporting limit concentrations (inorganics), the so urce of contamination is investigated and eliminated before proceeding with sample analysis. Target analyte(s) in method blanks at concentrations no greater than one-half of the reporting limit concentrations (me tals) may be requested on a client or project specific basis. Systematic contamination is documented for corrective action and resolved following the established corrective action procedures. Laboratory Control Samples (LCS or Spiked Blanks). A laboratory control sample (s piked blank or commercially prepared performance evaluation sample) is analyzed along with field samples to demonstrate that method accuracy is within accep ta ble limits. These spike solutions may be from different so urces than the so urces o f the solutions used for method calibration depending upon the method requirements. All target components are included in the spike mixture over a two year period. The performance limits are derived from published method specifications or from statistical data ge nerated from the analysis of laboratory method performance samples. Spiked blanks are blank matrices (reage nt water or clean sand) spiked with targe t parameters and analyzed using the same methods used for samples . Accuracy d ata is compared to laboratory derived limits to determine if the method is in control. Laboratory control samples (LCS) are commercially prepared spiked samples in an inert matrix. Performance criteria for recovery of spiked analytes are pre-es tablished by the commercial entity preparing the sample. The sample is analyzed in the laboratory as an external reference. Accuracy data is compared to the applicable performance limits. If the spike accuracy exceeds the performance limits, corrective action, as specified in the SOP for the method is performed and verified before continuing with a field sample analysis. In some cases, decisions are made to continue with sample analysis if performance limits are exceeded, provided the unacceptable result has no negative impact on the sample data. Blanks and spikes are routinely evaluated before samples are analyzed. However, in situations where sample analysis is performed using an autosampler, they may be evaluated after sample analysis has occurred. If the blanks and spikes do not meet criteria, sample analysis is repeated. Proficiency Testing. Proficiency test samples (PTs) are single or double blind spikes, introduced to the laboratory to assess method performance. PTs may be introduced as double blinds submitted by commercial clients, single or double blinds from regulatory agencies, or internal blinds submitted by the QA group. Section 12.0: Quality Control Para meters, Procedures, and Corrective Action Page 50 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 A minimum of two single blind studies must be performed each year for every parameter in aqueous and solid matrices for each field of testing for which the laboratory maintains accreditation. Proficiency samples must be purchased as blinds from an A2LA accredited vendor. Data from these studies are provided to the laboratory by the vendor and reported to accrediting agencies. If unsatisfactory performance is noted, corrective action is performed to identify and eliminate any sources of error. A new single blind must be analyzed if required to demonstrate continuing proficiency. PT samples performed for accrediting agencies or clients, which do not meet performance specifications, require a written summary that documents the corrective action investigation, findings, and corrective action implementation. A copy of this summary shall be submitted to the NELAC Primary Accrediting Authority, NJDEP Office of Quality Assurance for review. Single or double blind proficiency test samples may be employed for self-evaluation purposes. Data from these analyses are compared to established performance limits . If the data does not meet performance specifications, the system is evaluated for sources of acute or systematic error. If required, corrective action is performed and verified before initiating or continuing sa mple analysis. Trend Analysis for Control Parameters. The quality assurance staff is responsible for continuous analytical improvement through quality control data trend analysis. Accuracy data for spiked parameters in the spiked blank are statistically evaluated daily for trends indicative of systema tic problems. Data from LCS parameters and surrogates are pooled on a method, matrix , and instrument basis. This data is evaluated b y comparison to existing control and warning limits. Trend analysis is performed automatically as follows: • Any point outside the control limit • Any three consecutive points between the warning and control limits • Any eight consecutive points on the same side of the mean. • Any six consecutive points increasing or decreasing The results of the trend analysis are transmitted as .PDF files for supervisory evaluation prior to sample analysis. Trends that indicate the potential loss of statistical control are further evaluated to determine the impact on data quality and to determine if corrective action is necessary. If corrective action is indicated, the supervisor informs the analysts of the corrective actions to be performed. Return to control is demonstrated before analysis resumes. 12.3 Sampl e C ontrol P arameters and C orrective Action. The analysis of samples can be initiated following a successful demonstration that the method is operating within established controls. Additional controls are incorporated into the analysis of each sample to determine if the method is functioning within established specifications for each individual sample. Sample QC data is evaluated and compared to established performance criteria. If the criteria are not achieved the method or the SOP specifies the corrective action required to continue sample analysis. In many cases, failure to meet QC criteria is a function of sample matrix and cannot L .) i:.S (, r'" a t ,t,."; I' I I.'. S Section 12.0: Qttaliry Co ntrol Para,neters, Procedttres, and Corrective Action P age 51 of 107 Re vision D a te: May 2010 be remedied. Each p ara meter is desig ned to provide quality feedback on a defined aspect of the sa mpling and an alys is episode. Duplicates. Duplicate sample analysis is used to measure analytical precision. This can also be equated to laboratory precision for homogenous samples . Precision criteria are method dependent. If preci sion criteria are not achieved, corrective action or additional action may be required. Recommended action must be completed before sample data can be reported. Laboratory Spikes & Spiked Duplicates. Spikes and spiked duplicates are used to measure analyti cal precision and accuracy for the sample matrix selected. Precision and accuracy criteria are method dependent. If precision and accuracy criteria are not achieved, corrective action or additional action may be required. Recommended action must be completed before reporting sample d ata . A ll target components are included in the spike mix ture over a two year period. Serial Dilution (Metals). Serial dilutions of metals samples are an alyze d t o determine if analytical m a trix effects may have impacted the reported data. If the value of the serially diluted samples do es not agree with the undiluted value within a method-specified range, the sample matrix may be cau sing interferences, which may le ad to either a hi g h or low bias. If the serial dilution criterion is not achieved, it must be flagged to indicate p ossible bias from matrix effects. Post Digestion Spikes . Digested samples are spiked and analyze d to determine if matrix interferences are biasing the results when the pre-diges tion spike (matrix spike) recove ry fa lls outside the control limits. It m ay also be used to determine potential interferences per client's specification. The sample is spiked at the concentration specified in the method SOP. No action is necessary if the post diges tion spike is outside of the method criteria, unless a preparation problem is suspected with the spike, in which case the post diges tion spike should be re-prepared and reanalyzed. Surrogate Spikes (Organics). Surrogate spikes are organic compounds that are similar in behavior to the target analytes but unlikely to be found in nature. They are added to all quality control and field samples to measure method performance for each individual sample. Surrogate accuracy limits are derived from published method specifications or from the statistical evaluation of laboratory generated surrogate accuracy data. Accuracy data is compared to the applicable performance limits . If the surrogate accuracy exceeds performance limits, corrective action, as specified in the method or SOP is performed before sample d ata can be reported. Internal Standards (Organic Methods). Internal standards are retention time and instrument response markers added to every sample to be used as references for quantitation. Their response is compared to reference standards and used to evaluate instrument sensitivity on a sample specific basis. Internal standard retention time is also compared to reference standards to assure that target analytes are capable of being located by their individual relative retention time. L 4 D o r-.a t ,e 1· I .ai ~ Sectio n 12. 0: Ouality Control P ammeters, Procedures, and Corrective Action Page 52 of 107 Revision D ate: Mav 2010 If internal standard response criteria are not achieved, corrective actio n or additional ac tion may be required. The recommended action must be completed before sample data can be reported. If the internal standard retention time criteria are n ot achieved corrective actio n or additional action may be required. This may include re-calibration and re -analysis. Additional ac tion must be complete d before sample data is reported. Internal Standards (ICP and ICP /MS Metals). Internal standards are us ed on ICP instruments to compensate for variations in response caused by differences in sample matrices. Multiple internal standards are used for each sample on ICP /MS instruments to compensate for variations in response caused by differences in sample matrice s. This adjustment is performed automatically during sample analysis. The internal standard re sponse of replicated sample analysis is monitored to detect potential analyti cal problems. If an alytical proble ms are suspected, then the field samples may be reanalyzed or reanalyzed upon diluti o n to minimize the interferences. A different internal standard m ay be emplo yed for quantitation in situations where the field sample contains the element typically used as the internal standard. 12.4 LaboratoryDerived Quali(v Control Criteria. Control criteria for in-house methods and client specific modifications that exceed the scope of publish ed m eth o dol ogy are defined and documented prior to the use of the method. The Quality Assurance Director is responsible for identifying additional control criteria needs. Control parameters and criteria, based o n best technical judg ment are established using input provided by the operations staff. These control parameters and criteria are documented and incorporated into the method. The laboratory-derived criteria are evaluated for technical soundness on spiked samples prior to the use of the method on field samples. The technical evaluation is documented and archived by the Quality Assurance Staff. When sufficient data from the laboratory developed control parameter is accumulated, the d ata is statistically processed and the experimentally derived control limits are incorporated into the method. 12.5 Bench Review & Corrective Action. The bench chemists are responsible for all QC parameters. Before proceeding with sample analysis, they are required to successfully meet all instrumental QC criteria. They have the authority to perform any necessary corrective action before proceeding with sample analysis. Their authority includes the responsibility for assuring that departures from documented policies and procedures do not occur. The bench chemists are also responsible for all sample QC parameters. If the sample QC criteria are not achieved, they are authorized and required to perform the method specified corrective action before reporting sample data. 12.6 Data Qualifiers. An alpha character coding system is employed for defining use limitations for reported data. These limitations are applied to analytical data by the analyst to clarify the !Em~ . ' Section 12.0: Quality Control Param eters, Procedures, and Corrective Action P age 53 of 107 Re visio n D ate: May 20 10 -~ .. 40CUTES1: usefulness of the reported data for data user. Common d ata qualifi ers and their d e finitions are as follows: Organics. J: Indic ates an es tim ated value . Applied to calculated concentrations for tentatively identified compounds and q ualitatively identified compound s whose concentration is below the reporting limit, but a b ove the MDL. N: Indica te s qualitative evide nce of a tentatively id entified compound whose id entifi cation is b ased o n a mass spectra l lib rary search and is applie d to all TIC res ult s. C: A pplied to pesticide d ata that h as been qualitatively confirmed b y GC/MS. B: Used for analytes d ete cted in the sample and its asso ci ated method blank. E: Ap pli ed to compounds whose concentration exce eds the upper limit of the calibration range. Metals and Inorganics. B: Applied if the reported concentration value was less than the reporting limit but greater than the MDL. U: Applied if the reading is less than the MDL (or IDL if IDL reporting is being use d). E: Estimated concentration cau sed by the presence of interferences, normally ap plied when the serial diluti on is o ut. N: Spike sample recovery not within control limits . *· Duplicate or matrix spike duplic ate analysis not within control limits. 12. 7 OA Monitoring. The Q A staff conducts a spot review of completed data p a ckages prior to client release for specified projects. This review includes an examination of QC d a ta for compliance and trends indicative of sys tema tic difficulties. If non-conformances are detected, the QA staff places an immediate stop on the release of the data and initiates corrective action to rectify the situation. The data package is released when the package becomes compliant with all quality requirements. If compliance is not possible, the d ata is qualified and an appropriate case narrative is generated for inclusion in the d a ta package. If the review reveals trends indicative of systematic problems, QA initiates an investigation to determine the cause. If process defects are detected, a corrective action is implemented and monitored for effectiveness . Performance Limits. The Quality Assurance Director is responsible for compilation and maintenance of all precision and accuracy data used for performance limits. Quality control data for all test methods are accumulated and stored in the laboratory information L :=t t> c, r cl t ,;.'.: I' I -.!! :: Section 12.0: Qttality Control Param eters, Procedu re s, and Corrective Action Page 54 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 management system (LIMS). Parameter specific QC data is extracted annually and statically processed to develop laboratory specific warning limits and control limits. The new limits are reviewed and approved by the supervisory staff prior to their use for data assessment. The new limits are used to evaluate QC data for compliance with method requirements for a period of one year. Laboratory generated limits appear on all data reports. 12.8 Data Package Review. Accutest employs multiple levels of data review to assure that reported data has satisfied all quality control criteria and that client specifications and requirements have been met. Each production department has developed specific data review procedures, which must be completed before data is released to the client. Analytical Review. The analyst conducts the primary review of all data. This review begins with a check of all instrument and method quality control and progresses through sample quality control, concluding with a check to assure that the client's requirements have been executed. Analyst checks focus on a review of qualitative determinations and checks of precision and accuracy data to verify that existing laboratory criteria have been achieved. Checks at this level may include comparisons with project specific criteria if applicable. The analyst has the authority and responsibility to perform corrective action for any out-of-control parameter or nonconformance at this stage of review. Analysts who have met the qualification criteria for the method in use perform secondary, peer level data reviews. Analyst qualification requirements include a valid demonstration of capability and demonstrated understanding of the method SOP. Section supervisors may perform secondary review in-lieu of a peer review. Supervisors review 100% of the data produced by their department. It includes a check of all manual calculations; an accuracy check of manually transcribed data from bench sheets to the LIMS, a check of calibration and continuing calibration, all QC criteria and a comparison of the data package to client specified requirements . Also included are checks to assure the appropriate methodology was applied and that all anomalous information was properly flagged for communication in the case narrative. Supervisors have the authority to reject data and initiate re -analysis, corrective action, or reprocessing. All laboratory data requiring manual entry into LIMS system is double-checked by the analysts performing initial data entry and the section supervisor. Verification of supervisory review is indicated on the raw data summary by the supervisor's initials and date. Electronic data that is manually edited at the bench by the primary analyst is automatically flagged by the instrument data system indicating an override by the analyst. All manual overrides must be verified and approved by a supervisor who initials and dates all manual changes. Hard copies of manually integrated chromatographic peaks are printed that clearly depict the manually drawn baseline. The hard copy is reviewed and approved by the section supervisor (initialed and dated) and included in the data package of all full tier reports or the archived batch records of commercial report packages. L J (> ;:, t d t ~ I' i ~ ~ S ectio n 12.0 : Quality Control Param eters, Procedures, and Corrective Action P age 55 of 107 Re vis ion D a te : May 2010 Edits to electronic data that have alread y been committed to the LIMS datab ase are controlled through the use of the Master E dit function in LIMS. Permission to acces s this program is limited to those approved b y the upper levels of laboratory manage ment and is controlled b y the Information Technology staff. A GALP electronic audit record trail is m ai ntained for all changes that are made and is auto m ati call y appended to the record. The group manager performs a tertiary re view on a spot check basis. This review includes an evaluation of QC d ata against acceptance criteria and a check of the d ata package contents to assure that all analytical requirements and specifications were executed. Report Generation Review. The report generati o n group reviews all data and supporting information delivered by the laboratory for completeness and compliance with client specifications. Missing d eliverables are identified and o btained from the laboratory. The group also reviews the completed package to verify that the delive re d product complies with all client specifications. Non-analytical defects are corrected before the p ackage is sent to the client. Project Management/Quality Control Review. Spot-check d ata p ackage reviews are performed by the proj ec t management staff. Proj e ct management reviews foc u s on project specifications. If the proj ect m an age r identifies defects in t he product pri or to rele ase, he initiates immediate corrective actio n to rectify the situation. The Q A staff performs a post-delivery check of completed data p ackages to verify completenes s and compliance with established quality control procedures. Ap proximately 10% of Full-Deliverables data packages are reviewed. A formal checklist is used to assess d ata report completeness and accuracy. Detected deficiencies are documented o n the checklist and corrective actions initiated as nece ssary. Data review checklists are electronic documents, which are archived in the QA Directory of the netwo rk server. The QA review focuses on all elements of the deliverable including the client's specifications and requirements, analytical quality control, sample custody documentation and sample identification. QA reviews at this step in the production process are geared towards systematic process defects, which require procedural changes to effect a corrective action. However, if defects are identified that have an adverse affect on data, the client is immediately informed following standard notification procedures . QA data review is not used in lieu of a peer level . . . review or a supervisory review. Data Reporting. Analytical data is released to clients following a secondary review by the group supervisor. D ata release at this stage of the process is limited to electronic information, which is released to clients through a secure, encrypted, password protected, Internet connection. Hard copy support data is compiled by the report generation group and assembled into the final report. The report is sent to the client following reviews by the report generation staff. All data reports include specified information, which is required to identify the report and its contents. This information includes a title, name and address of the laboratory, a unique Section 12.0: Quality Control Parameters, Procedures, and Corrective Action Page 56 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 report number, total number of pages in the report, clients name and address, analytical method identification, arriving sample condition, sample and analysis dates, test results with units of measurement, authorized signature of data release, statement of applicability, report reproduction restrictions and NELAC requirements certification. Data reports for the Department of Defense ELAP also include the time of preparation and analysis. 12.9 Electronic D ata Reduction. Raw data from sample analysis is entered into the laboratory information management system (LIMS) using automated processes or manual entry. Final data processing is performed by the LIMS using procedures developed by the Company. All LIMS programs are tested and validated prior to use to assure that they consistently produce correct results. The Information Technology Staff performs software validation testing. The testing procedures are documented in an SOP. Software programs are not approved for use until they have demonstrated that they are capable of performing the required calculations. 12 .10 R epresentativeness. Data representativeness is based on the premise that qualitative and quantitative information developed for field samples is characteristic of the sample that was collected by the client and analyzed in the laboratory. The laboratory objective for representativeness defines data as representative if the criteria for all quality parameters associated with the analysis of the sample are achieved. 12.11 C omparability. Analytical data is defined as comparable when data from a sample set analyzed by the laboratory is representatively equivalent to other sample sets analyzed separately regardless of the analytical logistics. The laboratory will achieve 100% comparability for all sample data which meets the criteria for the quality parameters associated with its analysis using the method requested by the client. ~i!il ~ACCL.ft"ES'T. L .1 D C, t" ,.; t ~ I'" i ~ £ 13.0 CO RRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEM Section 13.0: Corrective Action System Page 57 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Requirement. The laboratory employs polices and procedures for correcting defective processes, systematic errors, and quality defects enabling the staff to systematically improve product quality. The system includes procedures for communicating items requiring corrective action to responsible individuals, corrective action tracking procedures, corrective action documentation, monitoring of effectiveness, and reports to management. The system is fully documented in a standard operating procedure. Individual corrective actions and responses are documented in a dedicated database . 13 .1 Procedure. Corrective action is the step that follows the identification of a process defect. The type of defect determines the level of documentation, communication, and training necessary to prevent re-occurrence of the defect or non-conformance. The formal system is maintained by the quality assurance department. Operations management is responsible for working within the system to resolve identified deficiencies. Routine Corrective Action. Routine corrective action is defined as the procedures used to return out of control analytical systems back to control. This level of corrective action applies to all analytical quality control parameters or analytical system specifications. Bench analysts have full responsibility and authority for performing routine corrective action. The resolution of defects at this level does not require a procedural change or staff re-training. The analyst is free to continue work once corrective action is complete and the analytical system has been returned to control. Documentation of routine corrective actions is limited to logbook comments for the analysis being performed. Process Changes. Corrective actions in this category require procedural modifications. They may be the result of systematic defects identified during audits, the investigation of client inquiries, failed proficiency tests, product defects identified during data review, or method updates. Resolution of defects of this magnitude requires formal identification of the defect, development and documentation of a corrective action plan, and staff training to communicate the procedural change. Technical Corrective Action. Technical corrective action encompasses routine corrective action performed by bench analysts for out of control systems and corrective actions performed for data produced using out of control systems. Technical corrective action for routine situations is conducted using the procedures detailed above. Non-routine corrective actions apply to situations where the bench analysts failed to perform routine corrective action before continuing analysis. Supervisors and Department Managers perform corrective action in these situations. Documentation of all non-routine corrective actions is performed using the corrective action system. Sample re-analysis is conducted if sufficient sample and holding time remain to repeat the analysis using an in-control system. If insufficient sample or holding time remains, the data is processed and qualifiers applied that describe the out of control situation. The occurrence is ~ra) ·~ACCUJT?!;!'ST. L .:.. C> o r ct r ~~ I'" i .2; ~ Section 13.0 : Corrective Action System Page 58 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 further documented in the case narrative and in the corrective action response. The corrective action must include provisions for retraining the analysts who failed to perform routine corrective action. 13.2 Documentation & Communication. Routine corrective actions are documented as part of the analytical record. Notations are made in the comments section of the analytical chronicle or data sheet detailing the nonconformance and corrective action. Continuation of the analysis indicates that return to control was successful. Corrective actions for process changes are documented, tracked and monitored for effectiveness. Supervisors or senior staff members may initiate corrective actions by generating a corrective action using the corrective action database application. The corrective action database is an Access application. The initiator generates the corrective action investigation form, which is documented, tracked, distributed to responsible parties and archived through the application. The application assigns a tracking number, initiation data and due date to each action and copies the corrective action form to the database. E-mail message containing the form is automatically distributed to the responsible parties for resolution. The re sponsible party identifies the root cause of the defect, initiates the immediate fi x and develops and implements the procedural change. Existing documentation such as SOPs are edited to reflect the chang e. The affected staff is informed of the procedural change through a formal training session. The training is documented and copies are placed into individual training files. The corrective action form is completed by the responsible party and returned to the QA staff via e-mail using the database application. Initial and completed corrective action forms are maintained in the corrective action database. This entire datab ase is backed up and archived daily. The corrective action tracking form is maintained as an active report in the database. Monitoring. The QA Staff monitors the implemented corrective action until it is evident that the action has been effective and the defect has been eliminated. The corrective action database is updated by QA to reflect closure of the corrective action. The QA staff assigns an error code to the corrective action for classification of the type of errors being committed. Additional monitoring of the corrective action is conducted during routine laboratory audits. Additional monitoring of the corrective action is conducted by adding the corrective action to a verification list by the QA staff at closure. Verification is performed by the QA Staff to assure that the corrective action has remained in effect is scheduled for six (6) months from the initial closure date. If QA determines that the corrective action response has not effectively remedied the deficiency, the process continues with a re-initiation of the corrective action. Corrective action continues until the defect is eliminated. If another procedural change is required, it is treated as a new corrective action, which is documented and monitored using established procedures. L..i t>c, r ate ri af Section 13 .0: Corrective Action System Page 59 of 107 Revision D ate: May 2010 Client Notification. Defective processes, systematic errors, a nd quality defects, detected during routine audits may have negative impacts on data quality. In some case s, data that has been released to clients may be affected. If defective data has been released for use, Accutest will notify the affected clients of the defect and provide specific details regarding the magnitude of the impact to their data. Ld f1 c, rat~ ri ~'.: S ection 14 .0: Procedures for Executing Client Specifications P age 60 of 107 Re vision D ate: May 2010 14.0 PROCEDURES FOR EXECUTING CLIENT SPECIFICATIONS Requirement. Sys tems have been established for evaluating and processing client specifications for routine and non-routine analytical services. The systems enable the client services staff to identify, evaluate, and document the requested specifications to determine if adequate resources are available to perform the analysis . The system includes procedures for communicating the specifications to the laboratory staff for execution and procedures for verifying the specifications have been executed. 14.1 Client Specific Requirements. The project manage r is the primary contact for clients requesting laboratory services. Client specifications are communicated using several mechanisms . The primary sources of information are the client's quality assurance project plan (QAPjP) and the analytical services contract b o th of which detail the analytical, quality control and data reporting specifications for the project. In the absence of a QAPjP, projects specifications can also be communicated using contracts, letters of authorization, or letters of agreement, which may be limited to a brief discussion of the analytical requirements and the terms and conditions for the work. These documents may also include pricing information, li abilities and scope of work, in addition to the analytical requirements. QAPjPs include detailed an alytic al requirem ents and data qu ality objectives, which supersede those found in the referenced methods. This information is essential to successful project completion. The client services staff provides additional assistance to cli ents who are unsure of the specifications they need to execute the sampling and analysis requirements of their project. They provide additional support to clients who require assistance in results interpretation as needed, provided they possess the ex pertise required to render an opinion. The project manager is responsible for obtaining project documents, which specify the analytical requirements. Following project management revi ew, copies are distributed to the QA Director and the appropriate departmental managers for review and comment. The original QAPjP is filed in a secure location. 14.2 Requirements for Non-Standard Analytical Specifications. Client requirements that specify departures from documented policies, procedures, or standard specifications must be submitted to Accutest in writing. These requirements are reviewed and approved b y the technical staff before the project is accepted. Once accepted, the non-standard requirements become analytical specifications, which follow the routine procedure for communicating client specifications. Departures from documented policies, procedures, or standard specifications that do not follow this procedure are not permitted. 14.3 Evaluation of Resources. A resource evaluation is completed prior to accepting projects submitted by clients. The evaluation is initiated by the client services staff who prepares a brief synopsis that includes the logistical requirements of the project. Logistical specifications for new projects are summarized in writing for evaluation by the affected departments. The specifications are evaluated by the department manager from a scheduling and hardware , resources perspective. The project is not accepted unless the department managers have the necessary resources to execute the project according to client specifications. Section 14 .0: Procedures for Executing Client Sp ecifications Page 61 of 107 Re vision Date: May 2010 14.4 Documentation. New projects a re initiated using a project set up form, which is completed prior to the start of the project. This form details all of the information needed to correctly enter the specifications for each clien t sample into the laboratory information manage ment system (LIMS). The form includes data reporting requirements, billing information, d ata turnaround times, Q A level , state of origin, and comments for detailing project specific requirements. The p ro ject manager is responsible for obtaining this information from the client and completing the form prior to sample arrival and lo gin . Sample receipt tri ggers project crea tion and the login process . The information on the set-up form is entered into the LIMS immediately prior to logging in the first sample. The set up form may be accompanied by a quotation, which details the analytical product codes and sample matrices. These details are also entered into the LIMS during login. Special information is di stributed to the laboratory supervisors and login dep artment in electronic or hardcopy format upon project setup. All, project specific information is retained b y the project manager in a secure file . The project manager maintains a personal telephone l og, which detai ls conversations with the client regarding the project. Department m anagers prepare summary sheets th at detail client specific analy tic al requirements for each test. Bench analysts use these sheets to obtain info rm ation regarding client specific analyti cal r eq uirements before analyzing samples . A program code is established for each client that links the client specifications to a client project. This code is attached to a project by the project manager at logi n and listed on the work list for each work gro up conducting analysis for clients with standing requirements. 14.5 Communication. A pre-project m eeting is held between client services and the operations managers to discuss the specifications described in the QAPjP, contract and/ or related documents. Project lo gisti cs are discussed and finalized and procedures are developed to assure proper execution of the client's analytical specifications and requirements . Questions, raised in the review m eeting, are discussed with the client for resolution . Exceptions to any requirements , if accepted by the client, are documented and incorporated into the QAPjP or project documentation records. Non-standard specifications for individual clients are documented in the LIMS at the client account level or program level. Simple specifications are documented as comments for each project. Once entered into the LIMS, these specifications become memorialized for all projects related to the client account. Complex specifications are assigned program codes that link the specification to detailed analytical specifications. Upon sample arrival, these specifications are accessed through a terminal or printed as a hard copy and stored in a binder for individuals who require access to the specification. Specifications that are not entered into the LIMS are prohibited unless documented in an interdepartmental memo, which clearly identifies the project, client and effective duration of the specification. 5 ection 14 . 0: Procedures for Executing Client 5 pecifications P age 62 of 107 Re vision Date: May 2010 14.6 Operational Execution. A work schedule is prepared for each analytical department on a daily basis. Analytical specifications or program codes from recently arrived samples have now been entered into the LIMS database. The database is sorted by analytical due date and holding time, into product specific groups. Samples are scheduled for analysis by due date and holding time. The completed schedule, which is now defined as a work list, is printed. The list contains the client requested product codes, program codes and specifications required for the selected sample(s). Special requirements are communicated to the analyst using the comments section or relayed through verbal instructions provided b y the supervisor. The bench an alyst assumes full responsibility for performing the analysis according to the specifications printed o n the work sheet. 14.7 Verification . Prior to the release of data to the client, laboratory section managers and the report ge neration staff review the report and compare the completed product to the client specifications documentation to assure that all requirements have been met. Project managers perform a spot check of projects with unique requirements to assure that the work was exe cuted acc ording to specifications. L ..:t c~ :::, rd. t ~ I' i -a :i Sectio n 15.0: Client Complaint Resolution Procedure Page 63 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 15.0 CLIENT COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE Requirement. The laboratory follows a formal system for managing and reconciling client complaints. The system includes procedures for documenting the complaint and communicating it to the appropriate department for resolution. The system also includes a quality assurance evaluation to determine if the complaint is related to systematic defects requiring corrective action and process changes. 15.1 Procedure. Client complaints are communicated to client services representatives, quality assurance staff, or senior management staff for resolution. The individual receiving the complaint retains the responsibility for documentation and communicating the nature of the complaint to the responsible department(s) for resolution. The responsible party addresses the complaint. The resolution is communicated to quality assurance (QA) and the originator for communication to the client. QA reviews the complaint and resolution to determine if systematic defects exist. If systematic defects are present, QA initiates a corrective action for the responsible party who develops and implements a response that eliminates the defect. If systematic defects are not present and the resolution is satisfactory, the QA Staff will close the complaint/inquiry with a no further action is necessary tag. 15.2 Documentation. Client's complaints are documented by the individual receiving the complaint using the Data Query and Corrective Action Inquiry Process. This process generates an E-Mail message that contains detailed information essential to the complaint resolution. A record of the telephone conversation is maintained b y client services. The message is distributed to the QA staff and the party bearing responsibility for resolution by E- Mail. The complaint resolution is documented on the message by the responsible p arty and returned to the originator. A copy is sent to QA for review and database archiving. 15.3 Corrective Action. Responses to data queries are required from the responsible party. At a minimum, the response addresses the query and provides an explanation to the complaint. Formal corrective action may focus on the single issue expressed in the complaint. Corrective action may include reprocessing of data, editing of the initial report, and re -i ssue to the client. If the QA review indicates a systematic error, process modification is required. The defective process at the root of the complaint is changed. SOPs are either created or modified to reflect the change. The party responsible for the process implements process changes. 15.4 OA Monitoring. Process changes, implemented to resolve systematic defects, are monitored for effectiveness by QA. If monitoring indicates that the process change has not resolved the defect, QA works with the department management to develop and implement an effective process. If monitoring indicates that the defect has been resolved, monitoring is slowly discontinued and the corrective action is closed. Continued monitoring is incorporated as an element of the annual system audit. = 16 .0 CONTROL OF N ONCON FORMIN G PRODU CT Section 16: Control of Nonconforming Product Page 64 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 R e q uirement: Policies and procedures have been developed and implemented that describe the procedures employed by the laboratory when any aspect of sample analysis or data reporting do not conform to established procedures or client specifications. These procedures include steps to ensure that process defects are corrected and affected work is evaluated to assess its impact to the client. P roced ure. Nonconforming product is identified through routine internal review and audit practices or through client inquiry. The individuals who identify the nonconformance or receiving a nonconformance inquiry immediately inform the Laboratory Director and the Quality Assurance Director. The Laboratory Director initiates an evaluation of the nonconformance through the Quality Assurance Department and takes full responsibility for managing the process and identifying the course of action to take, initiating corrective action and mitigating the impact of the nonconformance to the client. 16.1 C orrective Action. The outcome of the evaluation dictates the course of action. This includes client notification when the quality of data reported has been impacted an d m ay also include corrective action if applicable. Immediate corrective action is performed using the procedures specified in Accutest SOP EQA011. Howeve r, additional action may be required including cess ation of analysis and withholding and or recalling data reports. If the evaluation indicates that nonconforming data may have been issued to clients, the client is immediately notified and data may be recalled following the procedures specified in SOP EQA011. If work has been stopped because of a nonconformance, the Laboratory Director is the only individual authorized to direct a resumption of analysis. Nonconformances caused by systematic process defects require retraining of the personnel involved as an element of the corrective action solution. 5 ection 17: Confidentialiry Protection Procedtt res Page 65 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 17.0 CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTION PROCEDURES Requirements: Policies and procedures have been developed to protect client data from release to unauthorized parties or accidental release of database information through accidental electronic transmission or illegal intrusion. These policies have been communicated to clients and staff. Electronic systems are regularly evaluated for effectiveness. 17.1 Client Anonymity. Information related to the Company's clients is granted to employees on a "need to know" basis. An individual's position within the organization defines his "need to know". Individuals with "need to know" status are given password access to systems that contain client identity information and access to documents and document storage areas containing client reports and information. Access to client information by individuals outside of the Company is limited to the client and individuals authorized by the client. Individuals outside of the Company may obtain client information through subpoena issued by a court of valid jurisdiction. Clients are informed when subpoenas are received ordering the release of their information. Client information may be released directly to regulatory agencies without receiving client authorization under specified circumstances. These circumstances require that the regulatory ag ency have statutory authority under the regulations for laboratory certification and that Accutest's operations fall under the purview of the regulation. In these situations, Accutest will inform the client of the regulatory agencies request for information pertaining to his data and proceed with the delivery of the information to the regulatory agency . 17.2 Documents. Access to client documents is restricted to employees in need to know positions. Copies of all client reports are stored in secure electronic archives with restricted access. Reports and report copies are distributed to individuals who have been authorized by the client to receive them. Data reports or data are not released to third parties without verbally expressed or written permission from the client. 17.3 Electronic Data. Database Intrusion. Direct database entry is authorized for employees of Accutest only on a need to know basis. Entry to the database is restricted through a user specific multiple password entry system. Direct access to the database outside of the facility is possible through a dial -up connection. A unique password is required for access to the local area network. A second unique password is required to gain access to the database. The staff receives read or write level authorization on a hierarchical privilege basis. Internet Access. Access to client information is through an HTTP Web application only. It does not contain a mechanism that allows direct access to the database. Clients can gain access to their data only using a series of Accutest assigned client and user specific passwords. The viewable data, which is encrypted during transmission, consists of an extraction of database information only. ~[!_, iP~ ,i?> ~,-.,1 fJ"';7"11='~"'f.i'" ~·~~g~JrP~ ~ ~~ !9-p S ection 17: Confidentiality Protection Procedures P age 66 of 107 Revision D ate: M ay 2010 L.1 Dc,r.it<:1~,~~ Client Accessibility. Accessibility to client data delivered via electronic means follows strict protocols to insure confidentiality. Clients accessing electronic data are assigned a company account. The account profile, which is established by the MIS staff, grants explicit access to specific information pertaining to the client's project activity. Passwords are assigned on an individual basis within a client acco unt. These accounts can be activated or deactivated by the MIS st aff only. 17.4 Information Requests. Client specific data or information is not released to third parties without verbally expressed or written permission from the client. \Vritten permission is required from third parties, who contact the Company directly for the release of information. Verbal requests will be honored only if they are received directly from the client. These requests must be documented in a record of communication maintained by the authorized recipient. 17.5 Transfer of Records. Archived data, which has previously been reported and transmitted to clients , is the exclusive property of Accutest Laboratories. In the event of a cessation of business activities due to business fai lure or sale, The Company's legal staff will be directed to arrange for the final disposition of archived data. The final disposition of archived data will be accomplished using the approach detailed in the following sequence: 1. All data will be transferred to the new owners for the duration of the required archive p eriod as a condition of sale. 2. If the new owners will not accept the data or the business has fai led, letters will be sent to clients listed on the most recent active account roster offering them the option to obtain specific reports (identified by Accutest Job Number) at their own expense. 3. A letter w ill be sent to the NELAC accrediting authority with organizational jurisdiction over the company offering them the option to obtain all unclaimed reports at their own expense. 4 . All remaining archived data will be recycled using the most expedient means possible. L .1 o .;:, rat 1:: 1· i -a :: 18.0 QUALITY AUDITS AND SYSTEM REVIEWS S ection 18. 0: Q 14aliry A udits and System Revie ws Page 67 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Requirement The quality assurance group conducts regularly scheduled audits of the laboratory to assess compliance with quality system requirements, technical requirements of applied methodology, and adherence to documentation procedures. The information gathered during these audits is used to provide feedback to senior management and perform corrective action where needed for quality improvement purposes. 18.1 Quality System Reviews. Quality system reviews are performed annually by the Quality Assurance Director for the Company President. In this review, the laboratory is evaluated for compliance with the laboratory Quality Systems Manual (QSM) and the quality system standards of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference. Findings, which indicate non-compliance or deviation from the QSM, are flagged for corrective action. Corrective actions require either a return to compliance or a plan change to reflect an improved quality process. The Quality Assurance Director is responsible for making and documenting changes to the QSM. These changes are reviewed by the Company President and The Laboratory Director prior to the approval of the revised system. 18.2 Quality System Audits. Quality system audits are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and laboratory compliance with individual quality system elements. These audits are conducted on an established schedule. Audit findings are documented and communicated to the management staff and entered into the corrective action system for resolution. If necessary, retraining is conducted to assure complete understanding of the system requirements. 18.3 Test Method Assessments. Test Method Assessments are performed throughout the year following an established schedule. Selected analytical procedures are evaluated for compliance with standard operating procedures (SOPs) and method requirements. If non-conformances exist, the published method serves as the standard for compliance. SOPs are edited for compliance if the document does not reflect method requirements. Analysts are trained to the new requirements and the process is monitored by quality assurance. Analysts are retrained in method procedures if an evaluation of bench practices indicates non-compliance with SOP requirements. 18.4 Documentation Audits. Documentation audits are conducted monthly. This audit includes a check of measurement processes that require manual documentation. It also includes checks of data archiving systems and a search to find and remove any inactive versions of SOPs that may still be present in the laboratory and being accessed by the analysts. Non-conformances are corrected on the spot. Procedural modifications are implemented if the evaluation indicates a systematic defect. 18.5 Corrective Action Monitoring Defects or non-conformances that are identified during client or internal audits are documented in the corrective action systems and corrected through process modifications and/ or retraining. Once a corrective action has been designed and implemented, it is monitored for compliance on a regular basis by the QA staff. Spot Section 18. 0: Qitaliry Audits and System Reviews Page 68 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 corrections are performed if the staff is not following the new procedure. Monitoring of the corrective action continues until satisfactory implementation has been verified. 18.6 Preventive Action. Laboratory systems or processes, which may be faulty and pose the potential for nonconformances, errors, confusing reports or difficulties establishing traceability may be identified during internal audits. These items are highlighted for systematic change using the corrective action system and managed to resolution using the procedures for corrective action identified in EQA011. 18.7 Client Notification. Defective processes, systematic errors, and quality defects, detected during routine audits may have negative impacts on data quality. In some cases, data that has been released to clients may be affected. If defective data has been released for use, Accutest will immediately notify the affected clients of the defect and provide specific details regarding the magnitude of the impact to their data. 18.8 Management Reports. Formal reports of all audit and proficiency testing activity are prepared for the management staff and presented as they occur. Additional reports may be presented orally at regularly scheduled staff meetings Management reports may also address the following topics: • Status and results of internal and external audits, • Status and results of internal and external proficiency testing, • Identification of quality control problems in the laboratory, • Discussion of corrective action program issues, • Status of external certifications and approvals, • Status of staff training and qualifications, • Discussion of new quality system initiatives. • Recommendations for further action on listed items are included in the report. 19.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY Sectio n 19.0: H ealth & Sefery Page 69 of 107 Revi sion Date: May 2010 Requirement. The company operates a formal health and safety program that complies with the requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Administration. The program consists of key policies and practices that are essential to safe laboratory operation. All employees are required to receive training on the program elements. Job specific training is conducted to assure safe practices for specific tasks. All employees are required to participate in the program, receive initial and annual training, and comply with the program requirements. All plan and program requirements are detailed in the Health and Safety Program Manual. 19.1 Policy. Accutest Laboratories will provide a safe and healthy working environment for its employees and clients while protecting the public and preserving the Company's assets and property. The company will comply with all applicable government re gulations pertaining to safety and health in the laboratory and the workplace. The objective of the Accutest Health and Safety Program is to promote safe work practices that minimize the occurrence of injuries and illness to the staff through proper health and safety training, correct laboratory technique application and the use of engineering controls. 19.2 Responsibilities. The Health and Safety Program assists managers, supervisors and non- supervisory employees in control of hazards and risks to minimize the potential for employee and client injuries, damage to client's property and damage or destruction to Accutest's facilit y. The Health, Safety and Facilities Manager is responsible for implementing the Program's elements and updating its contents as necessary. He also conducts periodic audits to monitor compliance and assess the program's effectiveness. The Health, Safety and Facilities Manager is also responsible for creating and administering safety training for all new and existing employees. The employee is responsible for following all safety rules established for their protection, the protection of others and the proper use of protective devices provided by the Company. The employee is also expected to comply with the requirements of the program at all times. Department Managers and Supervisors are responsible for ensuring the requirements of the Safety Program are practiced daily. The Company President retains the ultimate responsibility for the program design and implementation. 19.3 Program Elements. The Accutest Health and Safety Program consists of key program elements that compliment the company's health and safety objective. These elements form the essence of the health and safety policy and assure that the objectives of the program are achieved. Safety Education and Training and Communication. Training is conducted to increase the staffs awareness of laboratory hazards and their knowledge of the safety practices and procedures required to protect them from those hazards. It is also used to communicate general safety procedures required for safe operation in a chemical laboratory. --·- Section 19.0: H ealth & Safety Page 70 of 107 Revi sion Date: May 2010 Initial health and safety training for new employees is conducted during orientation. The training focuses on the Accutest Safety and Health Program and includes specific training for the hazards that may be associated with the employees duties. Training is also conducted for all program elements focusing on general, acceptable, laboratory safety procedures. Targeted training is conducted to address 'hazards or safety procedures that are specific to individual employee's work assignments. All training activities are documented and archived in individual training folders, A health and safety training inventory is maintained in the training database. Safety Committee. The safety committee provides the employee with an opportunity to express their views and concerns on safety issues in a forum where those concerns will be addressed. This committee meets monthly to assure that the interests of the company and the well being of the employee are protected. They also serve as a catalyst for elevating the level of safety awareness among their peers. Hazard Identification and Communication. The hazard communication program enables employees to readily identify laboratory hazards and the procedures to protect themselves from those h aza rds. This program complies with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard, Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations 1910.1200 that requires the company to adopt and adhere to the following key elements: • Material Safety Data Sheets (]Y.[SDS) must be available to any employee wishing to view them, • The Company must maintain a Hazardous Chemicals Inventory (by location), which is updated on an annual basis, • Containers are properly labeled, • All employees must be provided with annual Hazard Communication and Right to Know training, The hazard communication program also complies with the requirements of the New Jersey Worker and Community Right to Know Law, NJAC 8:95 . Identification of Workplace Hazards. The workplace hazard identification procedures have been designed to assure that hazards that have the potential to cause personnel injury or destruction of property are identified, managed and/ or systematically eliminated from the operation. This system eliminates hazards, limits the potential for injury and increases the overall safety of the work environment. Employee Exposure Assessment. Employee exposure assessment is performed to identify and evaluate potential exposure hazards associated with the employees work station. The exposure assessment data is used to determine if changes or modifications to the work station are needed to limit exposure to laboratory conditions that could negatively affect an employee's existing medical conditions. S ectio n 19.0: H ealth & Sefe ry Page 71 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Bloodborne Pathogens. Accutest has implemented the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standard, 29CFR1910.1030 to reduce occupational exposure to Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and other bloodborne pathogens that employees may encounter in their workplace. Respiratory Protection Plan. The respiratory protection plan assures that Accutest employees are protected from exposure to respiratory hazards. This program is used in situations where engineering controls and/ or safe work practices do not completely control the identified hazards. In these situations, respirators and other protective equipment are used. Supplemental respiratory protection procedures are applied to specified maintenance personnel, employees who handle hazardous wastes in the hazardous waste storage area, and any employee that voluntarily elects to wear a respirator. Chemical Hygiene Plan. The Chemical Hygiene Plan complies with the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in the Laboratory Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1450. This plan establishes procedures, identifies safety equipment, personal protective equipment, and work practices that protect employees from the potential health hazards presented by hazardous chemicals in the laboratory if properly used and / or applied. Chemical Spill Response Plan. The chemical spill response plan has been designed to minimize the risks from a chemical spill or accidental chemical release in the laboratory. Risk minimization is accomplished through a planned response that follows a defined procedure. The staff has been trained to execute spill response procedures according to the specifications of the plan, which identifies the appropriate action to be taken based on the size of the spill. Emergency Action & Evacuation Plan. The Emergency Action and Evacuation Plan details the procedures used to protect and safeguard Accutest's employees and property during emergencies. Emergencies are defined as fires or explosions, gas leaks, building collapse, hazardous material spills, emergencies that immediately threaten life and health, bomb threats and natural disasters such as floods, hurricanes or tornadoes, terrorism or terrorist actions. The plan identifies and assigns responsibility for executing specific roles in situations requiring emergency action. It also describes the building security actions coinciding with the "Alert Condition", designated by the Department of Homeland Security. Lockout/Tagout Plan. Lockout/ tagout procedures have been established to assure that laboratory employees and outside contractors take steps to render equipment inoperable and/ or safe before conducting maintenance activities . The plan details the procedures for conducting maintenance on equipment that has the potential to unexpectedly energize, start up, or release energy or can be operated unexpectedly or accidentally resulting in serious injury to employees . The plan ensures that employees performing maintenance render the equipment safe through lock out or tag out procedures. Personal Protection Policy. Policies have been implemented which detail the personal protection requirements for employees. The policy includes specifications regarding engineering controls, personal protective equipment (PPE), hazardous waste, chemical exposures, working --'.. l .) i)C• t.:!l<~ l'i &~ Section 19.0: H ealth & Safety Page 72 of 107 Revi sion Date: May 2010 with chemicals and safe work practices. Safety requirements specific to processes or equipment are reviewed with the department supervisor or the Health and Safety Manager before beginning operations . Visitor and Contractor Safety Program. A safety brochure is given to all visitors and contractors who visit or conduct business at the facility. The brochure is designed to inform anyone who is not an employee of Accutest Laboratories of the laboratories safety procedures. The brochure directs them to follow all safety programs and plans while on Accutest property. This program also outlines procedures for visitors and contractors in the event of an emergency. Visitors are required to acknowledge receipt and understanding of the Accutest policy annually. Appendix I Glossary of Terms Appendix I, Glossary of Terms Page 73 of 107 R evisio n D ate: May 2010 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Appendix I, Glossary of Terms Page 74 of 107 Re vision D ate: Mav 2010 Acceptance Criteria: specified limits placed on characteristics of an item, process, or service defined in requirement documents. Accuracy: the degree of agreement between an observed value and an accepted reference value. Accuracy includes a combination of random error (precision) and systematic error (bias) components which are due to sampling and analytical operations; a d ata quality indicator. Analyst: the designated individual who performs the "hands-on" analytical methods and associated techniques and who is the one responsible for applying required laboratory practices and other pertinent quality controls to meet the required level of quality. Audit: a systematic evaluation to determine the conformance to quantitative and qttalitative specifications of some operational function or activity. Batch: environmental samples that are prepared and/ or analyzed together with the same process and personnel, using the same lot(s) of reagents. A preparation batch is composed of one to 20 environmental samples of the same NELAC-defined matrix, meeting the above mentioned criteria and with a;naximum time between the start of processing of the first and last sample in the b atch to be 24 hours . An analytical batch is composed of prepared environmental samples (extracts, digestates or concentrates) which are analyzed toge ther as a group. Blank: a sample that has not been exposed to the analyzed sample stream in order to monitor contamination during sampling, transport, storage or analysis. The blank is subjected to the usual analytical and measurement process to establish a zero baseline or background value and is sometimes used to adjust or correct routine analytical results . B lind Sample: a sub-sample for analysis with a composition known to the submitter. The analyst/laboratory may know the identity of the sample but not its composition. It is used to test the analyst's or laboratory's proficiency in the execution of the measurement process. Calibration: to determine, by measurement or comparison with a standard, the correct value of each scale reading on a meter, instrument, or other device. The levels of the applied calibration standard should bracket the range of planned or expected sample measurements. Calibrati o n Curve: the graphical relationship between the known values, such as concentrations of a series of calibration standards and their instrument response. Calibrati o n Method : a defined technical procedure for performing a calibration. Calib rati o n R ange: the range of concentrations between the lowest and highest calibration standards of a multi-level calibration curve. For metals analysis with a singe-point calibration, the low-level calibration check standard and the high standard establish the linear calibration range, which lies within the linear dynamic range . Appendix I, Glossary of Terms Page 75 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Calibration Standard: a substance or reference material used to calibrate an instrument. Certified Reference Material (CRM): a reference material one or more of whose property values are certified by a technically valid procedure, accompanied by or traceable to a certificate or other documentation, which is issued b y a certifying body. Chain of Custody: an unbroken trail of accountability that ensures the physical security of samples and includes the signatures of all who handle the samples. Confirmation: verification of the identity of a component through the use of an approach with a different scientific principle from the original method. These may include, but are not limited to second column confirmation, alternate wavelength, derivatization, mass spectral, interpretation, alternative detectors or, additional cleanup procedures. Continuing Calibration Verification: the verification of the initial calibration that is required during the course of analysis at periodic intervals. Continuing calibration verification applies to both external standard and internal standard c alibration techniques, as well as to linear and non-linear calibration models. Corrective Action: the action taken to eliminate the causes of an existing nonconformity, defect or other undesirable situation in order to prevent recurrence. Data Reduction: the process of transforming raw data by arithmetic or statistical calculations, standard curves, concentration factors, etc., and collation into a more useable form. Demonstration of Capability: a procedure to establish the ability of the analyst to generate acceptable accuracy. Document Control: the act of ensuring that documents (a nd revisions thereto) are proposed, reviewed for accuracy, approved for release by authorized personnel, distributed properly and controlled to ensure use of the correct version at the location where the prescribed activity is performed. D uplicate Analyses: the analyses or measurements of the variable of interest performed identically on two sub-samples of the same sample. The results from duplicate analyses are used to evaluate analytical or measurement precision but not the precision of sampling, preservation or storage internal to the laboratory. Field of Testing: NELAC's approach to accrediting laboratories by program, method and analyte. Laboratories requesting accreditation for a program-method-analyte combination or for an up- dated/improved method are required submit to only that portion of the accreditation process not previously addressed (see NELAC, section 1.9ff). Laboratory Control Sample (such as laboratory fortified blank, spiked blank, or Q C check sample): a sample matrix, free from the analytes of interest, spiked with verified known amounts of Appendix I, Glossary of Terms Page 76 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 analytes from a source independent of the calibration standards or a material containing known and verified amounts of analytes. It is generally used to establish intra-laboratory or analyst specific precision and bias or to assess the performance of all or a portion of the measurement system. Limit of Detection (LOD): an estimate of the minimum amount of a substance that an analytical process can reliably detect. An LOD is analyte-and matrix-specific. DoD clarification is the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present in a sample in order to be detected at a high level of confidence (99%). At the LOD, the false negative rate (Type II error) is 1 %. Limit of Quantitation (LOQ): the minimum levels, concentrations, or quantities of a target analyte that can be reported with a specified degree of confidence. DoD clarification is the lowest concentration that produces a quantitative result within specified limits of precision and bias. The LOQ shall be at or above the concentratio n of the lowest initial calibration standard. Matrix: the component or substrate that contains the analyte of interest. For purposes of batch and QC requirement determinations, the following m atrix distinctions shall be used: Aqueous: any aqueous sample excluded from the definition of Drinking Water matrix or Saline /Estuarine source. Includes surface water, groundwater, effluents, and TCLP or other extracts. Drinking Water: any aqueous sample that has been designated a potable or potential potable water source. Saline/Estuarine: any aqueous sample from an ocean or estuary, or other salt-water source such as the Great Salt Lake. Non-aqueous Liquid: any organic liquid with <15% settleable solids. Solids: includes soils, sediments, sludges and other matrices with > 15% settlable solids. Chemical Waste: a product or by-product of an industrial process that results in a matrix not previously defined . Air: whole gas or vapor samples including those contained in flexible or rigid wall containers and the extracted concentrated analytes of interest from a gas or vapor that are collected with a sorbent tube, impinger solution, filter, or other device. Biota: animal or plant tissue, consisting of entire organisms, homogenates, and/ or organ or structure specific subsamples. Matrix Spike (spiked sample or fortified sample): a sample prepared by adding a known mass of target analyte to a specified amount of matrix sample for which an independent estimate of target analyte concentration is available. Matrix spikes are used, for example, to determine the effect of the matrix on a method's recovery efficiency. Matrix Spike Duplicate (spiked sample or fortified sample duplicate): a second replicate matrix spike prepared in the laboratory and analyzed to obtain a measure of the precision of the recovery for each analyte. Appendix I, Glossary of Terms P age 77 of 107 Re vis io n Date: May 2010 Method Blank: a sample of a m atri x similar to the batch of associated samples (when available) that is free from the an alytes of interest, which is processed simultaneously with and under the same conditions as samples through all steps of the analytical procedures, and in which no target analytes or interferences are present at concentrations that impact the analytical results for sample analyses. Method Detection Limit: the minimum concentration of a substance (a n analyte) that can be measured and reported with 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero and is d etermined from analysis of a sample in a given matrix containing the analyte. National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP): the overall National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program. NELAC Standards: the plan of procedures for consistently evaluating and d ocumenting the ability of l aboratories p erforming environmental measurements to meet nationally defined standards established b y the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference. Performance Audit: the routine comparison of independently obtained qualitative and qu antita tive measurement system data with routinely obtained data in order to evaluate the proficiency of an an alyst or lab oratory. Precision: the degree to which a set of observations or measurements of the same property, obtained under similar conditions, conform to themselves; a d ata quality indicator. Precisio n is usually ex pressed as standard deviation, variance or r ange, in either absolute or relative terms. Preservation: refrigeration and/ or reagents added at the time of sample collection ( or later) to maintain the chemical and / or biological integrity of the sample. Proficiency Testing: a means of evaluating a laboratory's performance under controlled conditions relative to a give n set of criteria through analysis of unknown samples provided by an external source. Proficiency Test Sample (PT): a sample, the composition of which is unknown to the analyst and is provided to test whether the analyst/laboratory can produce analytical results within specified acceptance criteria. Quality Assurance: an integrated system of activities involving planning, quality control, quality assessment, reporting and quality improvement to ensure that a product or service meets defined standards of quality with a stated level of confidence. Quality Control: the overall system of technical activities whose purpose is to measure and control the quality of a product or service so that it meets the needs of users. Quality Manual: a document stating the management policies, objectives, principles, organizational structure and authority, responsibilities , accountability, and implementation of an agency, organization, or laboratory, to ensure the quality of its product and the utility of its product to its users. -· .. -~i!tl ~~-· ~.J . ·e57. L .1 t> ,:, r a t (; 1· i .:: ·~ Appen dix I, Glossary of Tenns Page 78 of 10 7 Re vision Date: May 2010 Quality System: a structured and documented management system describing the policies, objectives, principles, organizational authority, responsibilities, accountability, and implementation plan of an organization for ens uring quality in its work processes, products (items), and services . The quality system provides the framework for planning, implementing, and assessing work performed by the organization and for carrying out req uired QA and QC. Reporting Limits: the maximum or minimum levels, concentrations, or quantities of a target variab le (e.g., t arget analyte) that can be quantified with the confidence level required by the data user. Reagent Blank (method reagent blank or method blank): a sam ple consisting of reagent(s), without the target analyte or sample matrix, introduced into the analytical procedure at the appropriate point and carried through all sub sequ ent steps to determine the contribution of the reagents and of the involved analytical steps. Reference Material: a material or substan ce one or more properties of which are sufficiently well established to be u sed for the calibration of an apparatu s, the assessment of a measurement method, or for assigning values to materials. Reference Method: a method of known and documented accuracy and precision issued by an organization recognized as competent to do so . Reference Standard: a standard, generally of the highest metrological quality available at a given location, from which measurements made at that location are derived. Replicate Analyses: the measurements of the variable of interest performed identically on two or more sub-samples of the same sample within a short time interval. Sample Duplicate: two sample s taken from and representative of the same population and carried through all steps of the sampling and analyti cal procedures in an identical manner. Duplicate samples are used to assess variance of the total method including sampling and analysis. Spike: a known m ass of target analyte added to a blank sample or sub-sample; used to determine recovery efficiency or for other quality control purposes. Standard: the document describing the elements of laboratory accreditatio n that has been developed and established within the consensus principles of NELAC and meets the approval requirements of NELAC procedures and policies. Traceability: the property of a result of a measurement whereby it can be related to appropriate standards, generally international or national standards, throug h an unbroken chain of comparisons. Validation: the process of substantiating specified performance criteria. Work Cell: A defined group of analysts that together perform the method analysis. Members of the group and their specific functions within the work cell must be fully documented. A "work cell" is considered to be all those individuals who see a sample through the complete process of preparation, extraction, or Appendix I, Glossary of Terms Page 79 of 107 Revi sion D ate: May 2010 analysis . The entire process is completed by a group of capable individ uals; each member of the work cell demonstrates capability for each individual step in the method sequence. Appendix II Appendix II: 5 tandard Operating Procedures Page 80 of 107 Revision D ate: May 20 10 Stand ard Operating Procedures Directory Section Air Toxics Air Toxics Air Toxics Air Toxics Air Toxics Air Toxics Air Toxics General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem -, \ General Chem General Chem Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Air Analysis by T0-15 Summa Canister Cleaning and Certification Air Analysis ofTedlar Bag/Summa Canister by T0-3 Laboratory Analysis of Dissolved Gases in Aqueous Samples Air Analysis by NJDEP-SRWM Low Level USEPA T0-15 Calibration of Flow Controllers Air Analysis by T0-15 for :Minnesota Department of Health Percent Solids -EPA 160.3, ASTM D4643-00 Anionic Surfactants As MBAS Nonionic Surfactants as CTAS Total Solids, 160.3 Composite Sample Total Dissolved Solids (Total Filterable Residue) Settlable Solids, 160 .5 Nitrate /Nitrite & Nitrate Only By Cad. Red. Analysis Total Volatile Solids, 160.4 Chlorine, Total Residual And Free Total Alkalinity, 310.1 Acidity (pH 8.2) Bicarbonate, Carbonate, Free Carbon Dioxide Petroleum Hydrocarbons By IR Viscosity Total Suspended Solids (Non-Filterable Residue) Appendix II: 5 ta ndard Operating Procedures Page 81 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Number EAT001 EAT002 EAT003 EAT004 EAT005 EAT006 ETA007 EGN007 EGN008 EGN009 EGN010 EGN015 EGN020 EGN021 EGN026 EGN030 EGN033 EGN037 EGN044 EGN045 EGN062 EGN067 EGN087 Chemical Oxygen Dem: Hach 8000, Aqueous Samples -Soil Modified EGN099 Hardness As Caco3 By Titration EGN101 Orthophosphate EGN102 Nitrogen, Nitrite -Total-Waters/Soluble-Soils EGN103 Turbidity, 180.1 EGN116 Sulfide EGN118 Sulfite. EGN119 Apparent Color By Visual Comparison Method EGN120 Specific Conductance At 25.0 C EGN124 Chloride EGN131 Turbidity for Metals Drinking Waters EGN132 Odor & Odor at Elevated Temp.(Threshold Odor Test) EGN133 Biological Oxygen Demand (5 Day BOD) EGN134 Winkler Titration For DO Standardization EGN135 Dissolved Oxygen EGN136 Reactive Sulfide And Reactive Cyanide EGN137 Ignitability EGN140 TCLP -Semivolatiles/Metals Extraction EGN141 TCLP-Volatiles Extraction EGN142 Paint Filter Test EGN143 Section General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem :;eneral Chem General Chem Appendix II: Standard Op erating Procedures Page 82 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Cyanides Amenable To Chlorination Preparation Temperature Iodine, Colorimetric Analysis pH by Electrode -Water Salinity -SM182520B pH & Corrosivity for Soils/ Solid Wastes SW486 9045 BTU (Gross Calorific Value) Percent Sulfur Bulk Density (Dry Basis) Percent Ash (Dry Basis) Total Organic Content Cyanide (Lachat Autoanalyzer) Total Chlorine ASTM D808-91 Total Organic Chlorine ASTM D808-91 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Lachat Autoanalyzer) Specific Gravity Hexavalent Chromium (Soils) Moisture, Karl Fisher Ammonia (Lachat Autoanalyzer) Phenols (Lachat Autoanalyzer) Total Organic Halides Total Organic Halides, Solid And Oil Matrices Pour Point Base Sediment In Petroleum Samples Water Content In Petroleum Samples Ignitability, Bunsen Burner Method Organic Matter (Loss on Ignition) Sulfide Analysis For Reactive Sulfides Hexavalent Chromium In Waters by EPA 7196a Mod. Hexavalent Chromium In Waters by SM18 4500 CR D Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IR With ASE Extract. Total Organic Carbon In Soil Samples Total Organic Carbon In Aqueous Samples pH and Corrosivity for Aqueous and Multiphasic Wastes Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure for Non-Volatile Anal. Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure for Volatile Analytes Cation Exchange Capacity Of Soils (Sodium Acetate) Ferrous Iron Freon-113 Recycling Procedure Specific Gravity (For Sludges And Solids) N-Hexane Extract. Mat. & Silica Gel Treatment by Gravimetric Anal. Oil & Grease -Gravimetric Anal. (So & Sl) -Hexane Extraction Determination of Inorganic Anions By Ion Chromatography Neutral Leaching of Solid Waste Sam. Using Shake Extraction Oxidation-Reduction Potential Number EGN144 EGN146 EGN148 EGN151 EGN158 EGN200 EGN202 EGN203 EGN204 EGN205 EGN206 EGN207 EGN208 EGN209 EGN210 EGN211 EGN214 EGN215 EGN216 EGN217 EGN218 EGN219 EGN221 EGN222 EGN223 EGN226 EGN227 EGN228 EGN230 EGN231 EGN232 EGN233 EGN234 EGN238 EGN239 EGN240 EGN242 EGN243 EGN246 EGN247 EGN249 EGN250 EGN251 EGN252 EGN253 Section General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem ~ eneral Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem General Chem Facilities Maint. L :1 t, C• r .;; t ~::: 1· i C; ~ Appendix II: Standard Operating Procedures Page 83 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Titrametric Method For Free Carbon Dioxide Total Phosphorous EPA 365 .3 Dis so lved Silica Grain Size and Sieve Testing H ard ness By Calculation Spectrophotometer Calibration Check Mas sa chussetts Sieve Test Weak Acid Dissoci ab le Cyanide Preparation Volatile Suspended Solids Unburned Combustibles (Volatile Solids) Particulate Matter Elutriate Preparation Phosphorus, Hydrolyza ble Perchlorate by Ion Chromatography in Groundwater and Soil Percent Lipids by Gravimetric Analysis Cyanide Distillation/ Aqueous Samples /iviicro Method Cyanide Distillation /Soil Samples /Micro Method Calibration of General Chemistry Distillation Tubes Phenols Di stillation, Water Samples Pheno ls Iviicro Distill ation, Soil Samples Inorganic A nion s Determination b y ion chromatography using IC 2000 Leaching of Solid Waste Samples using China Leaching Procedure Ammonia Distillation, Water & So lid samples Weak Acid Dissociable Cyanide / Micro-Distillation Method Ferrous Iron for Hexavalent Chromium Sample Characterization Calibration of Coliform Collection Bottles Inorga nic Carbon by Calculation Procedure for H omogenization of Biota Samples Hexava lent Chromium in Water by Ion Chromatography Hexavalent Chromium in Soils by Ion Chromatography Procedure for Wand Mixer Homogenization of Soil Samples Hydrogen Sulfide TCLPME-Multiple Extractions Procedure Modified Elutriate Preparation Procedure for Particle Size Reduction (Crushing) of Solid Matrices Acid Volatile Sulfides Pore Water Extraction from Soils for NVOC and Metals Analysis Iodide, Colorimetric Analysis Percent Solids and Moisture in Soil/Solid Matrices Un-Ionized Ammonia D ensity, ASTM Definition HEM by Gravimetric Analysis Using Solid Phase E xtraction Hexavalent Chromium on Wipe Samples Facilities Maintenance Number EGN255 EGN256 EGN257 EGN258 EGN259 EGN260 EGN262 EGN263 EGN264 EGN266 EGN267 EGN268 EGN271 EGN272 EGN273 EGN275 EGN276 EGN277 EGN279 EGN280 EGN281 EGN283 EGN284 EGN286 EGN288 EGN287 EGN289 EGN290 EGN291 EGN292 EGN293 EGN294 EGN295 EGN296 EGN297 EGN298 EGN299 EGN300 EGN301 ENG302 EGN303 EGN304 EGN305 EFM001 L a t, c, r r.. r ~ 1· i Q; s Appendix II: Standard Op erating Procedure s Page 84 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Section Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations r.'ield Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Field Operations Health & Safety Health & Safety Health & Safety Health & Safe ty Health & Safety Health & Safety Health & Safety Health & Safety Information Tech Information Tech Information Tech Information Tech Information Tech Metals Analys is vietals Analysis Metals Analysis Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Aqueous Grab Sampling Procedures Use of Automatic Wastewater Sampler Free and Total residual Chlorine Decontamin atio n of Sampling Equipment Dissolved Oxygen Disso lved Oxygen by Winkler Titratio n Metal Sample Field F iltering Procedure Sampling Procedure for Monitoring Wells Sub surface Soil Sampling Procedure Surface Soil Sampling Proced ure Res idential Potable Well Sampling Procedure P o table Water Line Sampling Procedure Sampling for NJ Private Well Testi ng Act Field Sampling Coordinates b y GPS Sampling D ri nking Water Wells for Volatile Organics Sampling Drinking Water Wells for Metals Sampling Drinking Water Wells for Nitrates & Nitrites Sampling Drinking Water Wells for Gross Alpha Sampling Drinking Water Wells for Coliform Bacteria Sampling Drinking Water Wells for pH Field Oxidation-Reduction P o tential Turbidity, Field Test Analysis for Diss olved Oxygen by DO Probe Field pH in Water by Electrode Field Measurement of Specific Conductance and Resi sti vity Contamination Avoidance Procedure Measuring Face Velocities in Laboratory Fume Hoods Proper Handling of Compressed G as Cylinders Sample and Waste Disposal (Formerly ESM003) Handling and Management oflnorganic Wastes (Formerly EGN265) Handling, Treatment, and Disposal of Foreign Soils Management of Industrial Product Samples Organic Prep Air Monitoring Information Security & Integrity Procedure Procedures for Requesting Software or Software Revisions Development, Implementation, Delivery, & Revisi on of EDDs Data Sys tems Maintenance and Information Handling Procedures P rocedures for Requesting and Verifying Software or Software Revisions Mercury Analysis of Solid Samples: SW7471A Metals Waste Water ICP, EPA 200.7 Metals: ICP Emission Spec. SW846 6010B Number EFPOOl EFP002 EFP003 EFP004 EFPOOS EFP00 6 EFPOOS EFP013 EFP016 EFP017 EFP01 8 EFP019 EFP020 EFP021 EFP022 EFP023 EFP024 EFP025 EFP026 EFP 027 EFP029 EFP030 EFP031 EFP032 EFP033 EHS001 EHS002 EHS003 EHS004 EHSOOS EHS006 EHS007 EHSOOS EMI001 EMI002 EMI003 EMI004 EMIOOS El\tIA072 ENIA206 EMA207 Section Metals Analysis Metals Analysis Metals Analysis Metals Analysis Me tal s Analysis Metals Analysis Metals Analysis Metals Prep Metals Prep Metals Prep Metals Prep Metals Prep Metals Prep Metals Prep Metals Prep MetalS Prep rviicrobiology \tlicrobiology Microbiology Microbiology Microbiology Microbiology Microbiology Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organi cs-Ge Orga nics -Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-GC Organics-Ge )rganics-GC Organics-Ge Organics-GC Appendix II: S tandard Operating Proceditres P age 85 of 10 7 Revisi o n D ate: May 2010 Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Mercury Analysis of Non-Potable and Potab le Water Samples Metals by ICP-MS: E PA 200.8 Metals by ICP-MS: SW846 6020 Metals by ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometry usi ng Solid State ICP Metals by ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometry -E PA 200.7 Low Level Mercury by EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury by EPA 245.7 Digestion of DW for I CP Analys is Non-P otable Waters Digestion For ICP /Flame Analysis Soil Digestio n For I CP Analysis Non-Potable Water Digestion for Flame/ICP (Tota l & Disso lved) Digestion Of Non-Potable Waters For Total Recoverable Metals Metals Spiking Solution and Standards Prepara ti on and Use Calibration of Metals Digestio n Tubes Digestio n of DW and NP Waters fo r Total Metals for I CP /MS Analysis ICP and ICP /MS Analys is ofTPPM-10 Filters Microbiologic al Quality Co n tro l Coliform, Total By Colile rt, SM18 9223 B Total Coliform: Membrane Filtration/Fecal Coliform Confirmation T otal Plate Count SM18 92 15B General Petroleum D egraders Calibration o f :tvii crobiology Coliform Collection Bottles Coliform, Fecal Semi-Volatile P etroleum Products in H20-NJOQA25 Volatile Aromatics in Wastewater by EPA-602 Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA 603 Pesticide s & PCBs in Wastewater by EPA 608 Polyaro m atic H yd rocarbons 1,2-DBE , 1,2-DB-3-C P & 1,2,3 -TCP by Micro-extraction and GC Volatile Aromatics Halocarbons by SW8021 Pesticides Analysis by SW8081 PCB Analysis SW8082 PAHs b y SW846-8100 Herbicides by SW846 -8151 Conn. Total Semi -volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons Alcohols b y Direct Aqueous Injection GC/FID SW 8015 Analys is of Explosives by GC/ECD Connecticut Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analysis Petroleum Range Orga nic s Analys is By GC/FID (Florida) Massachusetts Extractable Petro leum Hydrocarbons Massachu setts Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons New Jersey Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Number EMA215 EMA216 Ei'vIA217 El\lIA222 Ei'vIA223 E&IA224 E&IA2 25 EMP04 8 EMP070 EMP0 73 EMP0 81 EMP200 EMP202 EMP203 EMP204 EMP207 EMBOOl EMB002 EMB003 Ei'vIB008 EMB009 EMBOlO Ei'vIB127 EGClO l EGC602 EGC603 EGC608 EGC610 EGC8011 EGC8021B EGC8081 EGC8082 EGC8100 EGC8151 EGCCTGRO EGCALDAI EGCBUSACH- PPM EGCCTETPH EGCFLPRO EGCi'vlAEPH EGGvlAVPH EGCNJEPH Section Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-Ge Organics-GC /MS Organics-GC /MS Organics-GC/MS Organics-GC /MS Organics-GC /MS Organics-GC /MS Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep rganics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics P rep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics Prep Organics -LC Project Mgmt Project Mgmt Project Mgmt >roject Mgmt Appendix II: Standard Operating Procedt1res Page 86 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Oil Identification by Gas Chromatography Fingerprint Diesel Range Organics by SW8015 Gasoline Range Organics by SW8015 Texas Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Wisconsin Diesel Range Organics Wisconsin Gasoline Range Organics Volatile Organics in Drinking Water by EPA 524 Volatile Organics in Wastewater by EPA 624 Semi-Volatile Organics by EPA 625 Volatile Organics by SW8260B Ethylene /Propylene Glycol Analysis DAI-GC/MS(SIM) Semi-Volatile Organics by SW8270 Prep of Base Neutral/ Acid Extractables: Water Matrices Prep of Base Neutrals / Acid Extractables in Solids Alumina Cleanup of Organic Extracts: SW3610 Continuous Liquid/Liquid Extraction Water: SW3520C Sulfur Cleanup of Organic Extracts: SW846 3660B Testing & Approval Of Organics Solvents Preparation & Use of MDL Check Solution Preparation of Petroleum Oils & Organic Wastes for PCBs by SW 8082 Removal of Sulfur from Extracts with Tetrabutylammonium Sulfite Soxhlet Extraction of Solids For Semi-Volatile Organics Preparation of Petroleum Products for EPA 8081 Preparation of Petroluem Products for BNA by EPA 8270C Preparation for Aqueous DRO for Wisconsin Solvent E xtraction for Soil/Sediment DRO for Wisconsin Pressurized Fluid Extraction (ASE) SW846-3545 Alumina Column Cleanup SW3611 Florisil Column Cleanup SW3620 Silica Gel Cleanup SW3630 Acid Base Partitioning SW3650 Sulfuric Acid/Permanganate Cleanup SW3665 Purge-And-Trap Extraction Of Aqueous Samples Collection/Preservation of Solids for VO Analysis : 5035 Cleanup of Organic Extracts by Gel Permeation Chromatography PAHs By HPLC Using SW-846 Method 8310 Procedure For The Management Of Client Projects Client Specific Method Modifications Procedure For The Notification Of DW Exceedences D ata Entry for Sample Log-In Number EGCOILID EGCTPHS EGCTPHV EGCTX1005 EGCWIDRO EGCWIGRO EMS524 EMS6 24 EMS625 EMS8260B EMS8260DAI EMS8270 EOP001 EOP002 EOP005 EOP007 EOP011 EOP013 EOP014 EOP017 EOP018 EOP020 EOP021 EOP022 EOP023 EOP024 EOP040 EOP3611 EOP3620 EOP3630 EOP3650 EOP3665 EOP5030 EOP5035 EOPGPC ELC8310 EPM001 EPM002 EPM003 EPM004 Section Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance uality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance uality Assurance Quality Assurance Appendix II: Standard Operating Procedures Page 87 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Preparation, Approval, Distribution & Archiving of SOPs Calibration of Analytical Balances Calibration of Thermometers Calibration and Use of Auto-Pipettes Temperature Monitoring- Sample Container Cleaning & Quality Control Calibration of Kuderna-Danish Collection Tubes Preparation and Analysis of Sample Preservatives Personnel Training and Analyst Proficiency Sample Batching Procedure Corrective Action Procedure Glassware Preparation For Inorganic Lab Use Preparation Of Glassware For Organics Extraction Standards Traceability D ocumentation Procedure Template for Standard Operating Procedures Management/Reporting Of Proficiency Test (PT) Samples Creating/Distributing/Tracking Internal Chains Of Custody Creating New Accounts Creating New Projects Creating Product Codes Procedures For The Purchase Of Laboratory Supplies Control & Archiving Of Laboratory Documents Air Quality Monitoring of Extraction Laboratory Confidentiality Protec tion Procedures Quality System Review Contract Review Procedure for the Development and Application of MD Ls and RLs Subcontracting Procedures Signature Authority Review of Inorganic Data Review of Organic Data Documentation of Equipment Maintenance Procedures for Accepting Departures from Laboratory Specifications Client Complaints Resolution Procedure Employee Technical Ethics Responsibilities Internal Audit Procedure Procedure for Obtaining Representative Sample Aliquots Procedure for Development &use of In-House QC Criteria Manual Integration of Chromatographic Peaks Deionized Water Quality Control Management and Control of Change Laboratory Equipment Purchase and Removal From Service Calibration of Microliter Syringes Autosampler Vial Labeling Procedure (formally EOP041-01) pH for Volatile Samples Number EQA001 EQA002 EQA003 EQA004 EQAOOS EQA006 EQA007 EQA008 EQA009 EQA010 EQA011 EQA012 EQA013 EQA014 EQA016 EQA017 EQA018 EQA019 EQA020 EQA021 EQA023 EQA025 EQA026 EQA027 EQA028 EQA029 EQA030 EQA031 EQA032 EQA034 EQA035 EQA036 EQA037 EQA038 EQA039 EQA041 EQA042 EQA043 EQA044 EQA046 EQA047 EQA048 EQA049 EQAOSO EQA051 L d t.-(., ( .; r ,: I' i -'.l ~ Appendix II: Standard Operating Procedures Page 88 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Section Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Report Generation eport Generation Sample Mgmt. Sample Mgmt. Sample Mgmt. Sample Mgmt. Sample Mgmt. Sample Mgmt. Accutest Laboratories Standard Operating Procedures Standard Operating Procedure Title Semivolatile Spike Solution Accuracy Verification Quality Control Review of Data Packages Procedures for Determining Method Comparability Refrigerator Storage Holding Blank Procedure Data Integrity Training Procedure Data Integrity Monitoring Procedure Procedure for Conducting Data Integrity Investigations Procedure for the Confidential Reporting of Data Integrity I ssues Calibration of Volumetric Dispensers for Volume Critical Processes Calibration of Volumetric Dispensers/ Non-Critical Volumes Processes Glassware Preparation for use in VOA analysis Control of Non-Conforming Product Client Notification of Key Personnel Changes Review of Inorganic Notebooks Disposal of Spent Semi-Volatile Organic Extracts Compressed Gas Management Procedure for Tracking Quality Control Non-Conformances New Jersey DEP Contract Compliane Screening Report Generation-Data Package Sample Storage Chain Of Custody And Log In Procedure Temperature Maintenance Of Shipping Coolers Cooler Packaging And Shipping Procedure Procedures for Sample Couriers Summa Canister Shipment & Retrieva l: NJDEP 03-X-35135 Number EQA053 EQA054 EQAOSS EQA056 EQA057 EQA058 EQA059 EQA061 EQA062 EQA063 EQA064 EQA065 EQA066 EQA067 EQA068 EQA069 EQA070 ERG001 ERG002 ESM001 ESM002 ESM004 ESM008 ESM011 ESM012 ffiMI~ r.;gjl..'.J.l ~ .. , .. C1ClJJTEST. L.1 0-~)rz1t.:.~ri 2~ Appendix III Analytical Capabilities Appendix III: Ana!Jtical Capabilities P age 89 of 107 Re vision D ate: May 201 O Appendix III: Ana!Jtical Capabilities Page 90 of 107 R evision Date: May 2010 M e thod Cap abiliti es by NELAC A c cr e di te d Field s of T es ti ng Analytes M e thod Numbe r P rogram Chemistry Field Alkalinity SM 2320 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Ammonia SM 4500 -NHJ H Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Chloride, F luoride, Sulfate EPA 300.0 Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Chlorine, Total Residual SM 4500 -CLF Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Color, Apparent SM 2120 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Conductivity SM 2510 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Cyanide EPA 335.4 Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Foaming Agents (l\lIBAS) SM 5540 C Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Nitrate/Nitrite EPA 353.2 Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Nitrite SM 4500-N02 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Odor SM 2150 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Organic Carbon, Total (TOC) SM 5310 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Orthophosphate SM 4500-P E Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Perchlorate EPA 314.0 Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis pH, Hydrogen Ion SM 4500-H + B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Silica, Dissolved SM 4500-SiD Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Temperature SM 2550 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Total Dissolved Solids SM 2540 C Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Total Organic Halides (TOX) SM 5320 B Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Turbidity EPA 180.1 Drinking Water Inorganic Analysis Hardness, Calcium EPA 200.7 Drinking Water Metals Analysis Hardness, Total EPA 200.7 Drinking Water Metals Analysis Hardness, Total SM 2340 C Drinking Water Metals Analysis Mercury EPA 245.1 Drinking Water Metals Analysis Metals EPA 200.7 Drinking Water Metals Analysis Metals EPA 200.8 Drinking Water Metals Analysis Chlorinated Herbicides EPA 515.1 Drinking Water Organics Analysis DBCP, E D B & TCP EPA 504.1 Drinking Water Organics Analysis Volatile Organics EPA 524.2 Drinking Water Organics Analysis Total Coliform/E. Coli SM 9223 B Drinking Wa ter Microbiology Heterotrophic Bacteria SM 9215 B Drinking Water Microbiology Acidity as CaC03 SM 2310 B (4A) Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Alkalinity as CaC03 SM 2320 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Ammonia SM20 4500-NH3-B +G Wastewater Inorganic Analys is Biochemical Oxygen D emand SM 5210 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Bromide, Chloride, Fluoride, Sulfate EPA 300.0 \Vastewater Inorganic Analysis L .) ;) C• t .:I t <~ I' i !:I: ~ Appendix III: Ana/ytical Capabilities Page 91 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Method Capabilities by NELAC Accredited Fields of Testing Analytes Method Number Program Chemistry Field Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) SM 5210 B \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) SM 5220 C Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Chloride SM 4500-Cl C Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Chlorine, Total Residual SM 4500-Cl F Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Chromium (VI) SM 3500-Cr D Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Chromium (VI) EPA 218.6 Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Color, Apparent SM 2120 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Cyanide (Sample Preparation) SM 4500-CN C+E Wastewater Inorganic Analys is Cyanide (Analytical Finish) EPA 335.4 \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Cyanide Amenable to Chlorine SM 4500-CN C+G Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Hardness, Total as CaC03 SM 2340 B or C \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Iron, Ferrous SM 4500-Fe D Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Kjeldah1 Nitrogen, Total EPA 351.2 \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Nitrate/Nitrite EPA 353.2 \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Nitrite SM 4500-N02 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Oil & Grease, HEM-LL EPA 1664A Wastewater Inorganic Analys is Oil & Grease, SGT-HEM, Non-Polar EPA 1664A \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Organic Nitrogen SM 4500-N B+G Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Orthophosphate SM 4500-P E \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Oxygen, Dissolved SM 4500-0 C Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Oxygen, Dissolved SM 4500-0 G Wastewater Inorganic Analysis pH Hydrogen Ion SM 4500-H+ B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Phenols EPA 420.1 +420.4 \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Phenols (Analytical Finish) SW846 9066 Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Phosphorus (f otal) EPA 365.3 Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Residue, Filterable (fDS) SM 2540 C Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Residue, Nonfi..lterable (fSS) SM 2540 D Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Residue, Settlable SM 2540 F Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Re sidue, Total SM 2540 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Residue, Volatile EPA 160.4 Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Total, fL'{ed, and volatile solids (SQAR) SM 2540 G, 18'h Ed. \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Salinity SM 2520 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Silica, Dissolved SM 4500-Si D Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Specific Conductance SM 2510 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Specific Conductance SW846 9050A Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Sulfide (S) SM 4500-S E or F Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Sulfite (S03) SM 4500-S03 B \v'astewater Inorganic Analysis Surfactants (Methyle ne Blue) SM 5540 C Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Temperature SM 2550 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Total Organic Carbon (fOC) SM 5310 B, C or D \v' as tewater Inorganic Analysis Appendix III: Ana!Jtical Capabilities Page 92 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Me thod Capa bilities by NELAC Accredited Fields o f Testing Analytes Method Number Program Chemistry Field Total Organic Halides (TOX) SW846 9020B Wastewater Inorga nic Analysis Turbidity EPA 180.1 \'{! as tewa ter Inorganic Analysis M e tal s, Total -Water SW 846 3010A \v astewater J\,fetal s Pre p Me tal s, To tal -Wate r, Rec. + Di ss olve d S\Xi846 3005A \v astewater Metal s Pr ep Hardness, Total as CaC03 EPA 200.7 Wastewater Metals Analysis H ardness, Tota l as CaC03 SM 2340 B or C Wastewater Metals Analysis Mercmy EPA 245.1 Wastewater Metals Analys is Metals, ICP EPA 200.7 Wastewater Metals Analys is Metals, ICP /MS EPA 200 .8 Wastewater Metals Analysis Mercury, Liquid Waste SW846 7470A Wastewater Metals Analysis Acrolein & Acrylonitrile EPA 603 Wastewater Organics Analys is Base/Neutrals and Acids EPA 625 Wastewater Organics Analysis Extractab le P etroleum H ydrocarbons NJDEPEPH Wastewater Organics Analysis Organochlorine P ests & PCBs EPA 608 Wastewater Organics Analysis Petroleum H ydroca rbons NJ-OQA-QAM-25 Wastewater Organics Analysis Purgeable Aromatics EPA 602 Wastewater Organics Analysis Volatile Organics EPA624 Wastewater Organics Analysis Coliform, Fecal (Count per 100 mL) SM 9222D Wastewater Microbiology Coliform, Total (Co unt per 100 mL) SM 9222 B Wastewater i'.vlicro bi ology Heterotrophic Plate Count SM 9215 B Wastewater Microbiology Acid Soluble /Insoluble Sulfides SW846 9034 Solid /H az . Waste Ino rg anic Analysis Bomb Calorimetry ASTMD-240 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analys is Bromide, Chloride, Fluo ride , Sulfate SW846 9056 Solid /H az. Waste Inorganic Analysis Cation, E xchange Capacity SW846 9081 Solid /H az. Waste Inorganic Analysis Chromium (VI) Digestio n SW846 3060A Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Chromium (VI) SW846 7196A Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analys is Chromium (VI) SW846 7199 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Corrosivity/pH, >20% H20 SW846 9040C Solid /Haz . Waste Inorganic Analysis Cya nide SW846 9010B Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Cyanide, Amenable to Chlorine SW846 9010B Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Cya nide SW846 9012B Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Extractable Organic Halides SW846 9023 Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Free Liquid SW846 9095 Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Ignitability SW8461010A Solid /Haz. W aste Inorganic Analysis Oil & Grease, HEM EPA 1664A Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis '· .~~ ~~CCUT=S1: L .1 j) c:i r 2 t <~ I' i ei S Appendix III: Ana!Jtical Capabilities Page 93 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Method Capabilities by NELAC Accredited Fields of Testing Analytes Method Number Program Chemistry Field Oil & Grease and Sludge, HEM SW846 9071B Solid /Haz. Wa ste Inorganic Analys is pH, Hydrogen Ion SW846 9040C Solid /Haz . Waste Inorganic Analysis pH, Hydrogen Ion, Waste , >20% Water SW846 9040C Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis pH, Soil and Waste SW846 9045C Solid /Ha z. Waste Inorganic Analys is Phenols (Sample Preparation) SW846 9065 Solid /Haz. Wa ste Inorganic Analysis SPLP Metals /Organics SW846 1312 Solid/Haz. Was te Inorganic Analys is TCLP Metals /Semi Volatile Organics SW846 1311 Solid /Ha z. Was te Inorganic Analysis TCLP Volatile Orga nics SW846 1311 Solid /Haz. Wa ste Ino rg anic Ana lys is Total Organic Carbon (TOC) SW846 9060 A Solid/Haz. Wa ste Inorganic Analys is Metals, Solids SW846 3050B Solid /Haz . Waste Metal s Prep Mercury, Solid Waste SW846 7471A Solid /Haz. Waste Metal s Analysis Metal s by ICP SW846 6010B Solid /H az. Wa ste Metals Analysis Metals by ICP /MS SW846 6020 Solid /Haz. Was te Metal s Analys is Semivolatiles, Acid/Base Partition SW846 3650B Solid /H az. Was te Orga nic s Prep Semivolatiles, Alumina Cleanup SW846 3610B Solid/Haz. Waste Orga nics Prep Semivolati les, Alumina Cl ea nup (Petro) SW846 361 lB Solid/Haz. Was te Orga nic s Prep Semivolatiles, Flori sil Cle anup SW846 3620B So li d /Haz. Wa ste Orga nics Prep Semivolatiles , Gel Permeation Cle anup SW846 3640A Solid /Haz. Waste Orga nic s Prep Semivolatiles, Silica Gel Cleanup SW846 3630C Solid /Haz. Waste Orga nics Prep Semivolatiles, Sulfur Cleanup SW846 3660B Solid /Haz . Waste Organics Prep Semivolatiles, Sulfuric Acid /Mn02 SW846 3665A Solid /H az. Waste Organics Prep Semivolatile Prep, Pressurized Fluid SW846 3545 Solid /Haz . Waste Organics Prep Semivolatile Prep, Waste Dilution SW846 3580A Solid /Haz. Waste Organics Prep Semivolatile Prep Solid, Sonication SW846 3550B Solid /Haz. Waste Organics Prep Semivolatile Prep Solids, Soxhlet SW846 3540C Solid /Haz. Waste Organics Prep Semivolatile Prep Water SW846 3520C Solid /Haz. Waste Organics Prep Semivolatile Prep Water SW846 3510C Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Prep Volatile, Headspace SW846 3810 Solid /Haz . Waste Organics Prep Volatile, Purge & Trap, Solids-High SW846 5035H Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Prep Volatile, Purge & Trap, Solids-Low SW846 5035L Solid /Haz. Waste Organics Prep Volatile, Purge & Trap, Water SW846 5030B Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Prep Alcohols SW846 8015B Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Aromatic/Halogenated Volatile SW846 8021B Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Base/Neutrals and Acids SW846 8270C Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Chlorinated Herbicides SW846 8151A Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis DBCP, EDB & TCP SW846 8011 Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis ID!~ fJ],t.\t7.ClJTeS'1: L ,l t:-C, r .i:. r (~ I' i ~ '1 Appendix III: Ana!Jtical Capabilities Page 94 of 107 Revision Date: May 2010 Method Cap abilitie s by NELAC Accre di te d Field s of T e sting Analy tes Meth o d Number Program Chemis try Field Diesel Range Organic SW846 8015B Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Dissolved Gas/ Aqueous Media RSK-175 Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Ethylene Glycol & Propylene Glycol SW846 8260B Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons NJDEPEPH Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Gasoline Range Organic SW846 8015B Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Organochlorine Pesticides SW846 8081 Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis PCBs SW846 8082 Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Petroleum Hydrocarbons NJ-OQA-QA.LvI-25 Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Polynuclear Aromatic HCs SW846 8100 Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Polynuclear Aromatic HCs SW846 8310 Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Volatile Organics SW846 8260B Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Volatile Organics EPA TO-3 Clean Air Act Organics Analysis Volatile Organics EPAT0-15 Clean Air Act Organics Analysis Appendix III: Ana!Jtical Capabilities Page 95 o f 107 Revi sion Date: May 2010 Method Capabilities-N on-NELAC Methods Analytes Method Number Program Chemistry Field Phenols EPA 420.4 Drinking Wat e r Inorga nic Analysis Carbon Dioxide SM 4500-C02 C or D \V astewa ter Inorga nic Analysis Iodide SM 4500-1 B Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Iodine SM 4500 -1 B \Vastew ater Ino rga nic Analys is Nonionic Surfactants as CTAS SM 5540 D \Vastewa ter Inorganic Analysis Particulate Matter EPA 160.2M \V as te wa ter Inorga ni c Analysis Petroleum H ydrocarbons EPA 418.1 W astewater Inorganic Analysis Phosphorus, H ydrolyza ble EPA 365.3 Wa stew ater Inorga ni c Analysis Redo x Potential vs H + ASTM D1498 -76 Wastewater Ino rga nic Analysis Specific Gravi ty ASTM D1298-85 Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Tetraethyl Lead ASTM D3341-91M Wastewater Ino rganic Analysis T o tal Organic Content ASTM D297 4-8 7 Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Unburned Combustibles EPA 160.1+160.4 Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Vi scosi ty ASTMD445/6 \V astewater Inorganic Analys is Volatile Suspended Solids EPA 160.2 +160.4 \Vastewater Inorga nic J\nalys is Weak Acid Disso ci able Cyanide Prep SM 4500-CN I Wastewater Inorganic Analysis Ammonia EPA 350.1M So lid /H az . Waste Inorga ni c Analysis Ammonia EPA 350.2M So lid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analys is Ba se Sediment ASTM D473 -8 1 So lid /H az. Waste Inorganic Analys is Bulk Density (D ry Basis) ASTM D2937-94M Solid /Haz. Waste Inorga nic Analys is Chemical Oxyg en Demand HACH 8000M So lid /Ha z. Waste Ino rga nic Ana lys is Chloride EPA 325.3M Solid /Haz. Waste Ino rga nic Analys is Co mbustion, Bomb Oxidation SW846 5050 Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Grain Size & Sieve Testing ASTM D422-63 Solid /Haz. Waste Ino rganic Analysis Heat Content, BTU ASTM D3286-85 Solid /Haz. Wa ste Inorga nic Analysis Ignitability (Flashpoint) ASTM D93-90 /SW846 Ch 7 Solid /Haz. Waste Inorgani c Analysis Moisture, Karl Fischer ASTM D1 744-92 Solid /H az. Waste Inorganic Analys is Multiple Extractions SW8461320 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Neutral Leaching Procedure ASTM D 3987-85 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Nitrate/Nitrite EPA 353 .2M Solid /Haz . Waste Inorga nic Analys is Organic Matter (Ignition Loss) AASHTO T267 -86M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Orthophosphate EPA365.2M Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Percent Ash (Dry Basis) ASTM D 482-91 Solid /Haz. Waste Inorga nic Analysis Percent Solids ASTM D 4643-00 Solid /Haz. Was te Inorganic Analysis Percent Sulfur ASTM D129-61 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Petroleum Hydrocarbons EPA 418.lM Solid /Haz . Waste Inorganic Analysis Phosphorus, T otal EPA365.3M Solid /Haz . Waste Inorganic Anal ys is Phosphorus, Hydrolyzable EPA 365.3M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analys is Pour Point ASTM D97-87 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorga nic Analys is L .1 D (', r a 't 1~ I" i {': :: Analyte s Reactive Cyanide Reactive Sulfide Redox Potential vs H+ Specific Gravity of Solids Sulfide (S) Su lfite (S03) Tetraethyl Lead Total Chlorin e Total Kjelda h l Nitrogen Total Organic Carbon Total Organic Carbon Total Organic Chlorine Total Plate Count Total Volatile Solids Water Content Extractable Petroleum HCs Extractable Petroleum HCs Total P etroleum Hydrocarbons T otal P etroleum Hydro carbons Volatile Petroleum HCs Volatil e P etroleum HCs Appendix III: Ana!Jtical Capabilities Page 96 of 107 Revision D ate: May 2010 Method Capabilities-Non-NELAC M e thods Metho d Numbe r Program Ch e mis try Fie ld SW846 7.3.3.2 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis SW846 7.3.4.2 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis ASTM D1498-76M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis ASTM D1429-86M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis EPA 376 .1 M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis EPA 377.lM Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis ASTM D3341-91M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis ASTM D 808-91 Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis EPA 351.2M Solid/Haz. Waste · Inorganic Analysis CORP ENG 81 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis LLOYD KAHN 1988 So li d/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis ASTM D808-91M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis SM 9215BM Solid /Haz. Waste Inorganic Ana lysis EPA 160.4M Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis ASTM D95-83 Solid/Haz. Waste Inorganic Analysis Massachusetts EPH So lid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Missouri DRO Solid /Haz. Waste Organics Analysis FLD EP FL-PRO Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Connecticut ETPH Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Massachusetts VPH Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis Missouri GRO Solid/Haz. Waste Organics Analysis L .3 b r, r d t <.~ 1~ i :: :: Appendix IV Laboratory Equipment Appendix I V: Laboratory Equipment P age 97 of 107 Revisio n D ate: May 20 10 L aoor:i t c r1 &, Equipment M anufacture & D escription Se ri al Number ASE D ionex ASE 200 99040595 ASE D io n ex ASE 200 99040 603 ASE D ionex ASE 200 03040 695 ASE Dionex ASE 200 990 30375 ASE D ionex ASE 200 990 3037 5 Balance-Ohaus TS400D (B-3) 1330 Top Load Balance-Ohaus Sco ut (B-4) BJ0 4641 7 Top Lo ad Ba lance-O h aus E400 (B-6) 871 4 Top Load Balance-Ohaus N av igator (B -7) 1121 37 0265 Top Loa d Balance-Ohaus CT200S (B -8) 17872 Top Load Balance-Ohau s TS400S (B-9) 2475 Top Lo ad Balance-O hau s GT4100 (B-1 1) 3202 Top Load Balance-Sartorious B4100 (B-13 ) 3808 00 35 Top Load Balance -D enver Inst . Co . XL500 (B -14) B045 53 0 Top Load Balance-Ohau s Navigator (B-15 ) 121370273 Top Load Balance-Ohau s Explorer (B -16) E 15 8111 92 12 17 1 Top Load Balance-O h aus Navigator (B -17) 11192 63 9994 Top Load Op era tin g Sy s tem So ftware None N one N o ne N o ne Non e None None N one N one N o ne None N o n e Non e None Non e Non e N o ne D ata Processin g Software N o ne None None N one N o ne None N o ne None None None None N o ne None N o ne None N on e None Appendix I V Laboratory •. tpment Page 98 of 107 R evis ion D ate: Ma 2010 Locati o n Purc h ase Orga nic Prep 1999 Orga nic P re p 1999 Orga nic Prep 2005 Orga nic Pre p 1999 lno rga nic s 199 9 Orga nic Pre p Pre-2000 Orga nic Prep 20 01 Out o f Pre-20 00 serv ice Organic Pre p 200 2 O ut o f 20 00 service Organic Pre p 2000 Ino rga nic s Pre-20 00 Ino rga nic s Pre-2000 Ino rga nic s Pre-2000 In o rga nic s 2002 In orga nic s 2001 O ut o f 200 1 se rvice L a tu ,r a i c r i .ii Equipment Manufacture & Description Balance-Ohaus Navigator (B-18) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Scout II (B-19) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Scout II (B-20) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventurer (B -21) Top Load Balance-AccuLab V-3mg (B-23) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Scout II (B-25) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventurer AR3130 (B-26) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventurer AV 4 12 (B-27) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Sport (B-28) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventurer AV412 (B-29) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventurer AV412 (B-30) Top Load Balance-0 haus Adventurer AV 412 (B -31) Top Load Balance-Sartorius TE31025 (B-32) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventure AV412 (B-33) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventure AV412 (B-34) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventure AV212 (B-35) Top Load Balance-Ohaus Adventure A V212 (B-36) Top Load Serial Number 11193231 38 BJ514783 BJ320905 E1021218270448 9891BL374 BJ514770 1240-P 8026251106 7124230518 8026391019 8026391160 8028041080 21950273 8028391184 80283 91117 80291711 84 8029131104 Operating System Software None None None None N o ne None None N o ne None None None None N o ne None N o ne None None D ata Processing Software N o ne None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Appendix IV: Laboratory _ tpment Page 99 of 107 Revision Date: Ma 2010 Location Purch ase Metal s Prep 2001 Out o f 2002 service Inorga nic s 2002 Inorganic s 2001 Out of 2004 service Methanol 2004 Prep In organics 2004 In organics 2005 Organic s; 2005 Volatiles Organic Prep 2005 Screen 2005 E xtra; not in 2007 use Inorganics 2007 Sample 2007 Management Oq,,rani cs ; 2007 Volatiles In organics 2008 E xtra; not in 2008 use L.l l:>o ra 1cr1 ,1.; Equipment M anufac ture & D escrip tion Seri al N u mber Balance-Ohaus Adventure AV412 (B-37) 802916112 Top Load B alance-Ohaus Adventurer-Pro (B-38) 8030441010 Top Load Balance-Mettler AE 160 (B-5) Cl 1620 Analytical Ba lance-ACCU LA 110 (B-10) 70405919 Analytica l Balance-Ohaus Adventurer (B-24) 1225032523P Analytica l Calorimeter PARR 1261EA 1499 DO Meter YS I 5000 07B1560 D O Meter YSI-50B 91L03480 1 D O Meter YSI-51B 92A035818 D O Meter YS1-55/12ft OOC0598BG FIA Analyzer Lachat Quikchem 8000 A83000-2273 FIA Analyzer Lachat Quikchem 8000 A83000-1402 Flas hpoint Koehl er -K16200 R07002563B GC-2G (I) Agi lent Technologies 6890N / 7683 CN10450110 GC-2Y/2Z Agilent Technologies 6890N & Nl 0149 CN10407032 / CN40327643 / CN40434847 GC-3G CT) Agilent Techn ologies 6890N / 7683 CN10450109 GC-3Y/3Z Agilent Technologies 7890A / 7683B CN10735014 / CN73345070 Dual FID Operati n g Sys te m Software None None None None None None None None None None Omnion FIA Omnion FIA None HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation Appendix IV Laboratory , ,,zpment Page 100 of 107 Revision Date: Ma 2010 D ata P rocessing Software None None None None None None None None None None Omnion FIA Omnion FIA None HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroguant L ocati on P urch ase Extra; not in 2008 use Inorganics 2009 Inorganics 1999 In organics 2001 lnorganics 2004 Inorganics 1996 lnorganics 2008 In organics 1988 field Serv. 1998 Field Serv. 2000 In organics 2004 Inorganics 1999 In organics 2010 Organics; 2005 SVOCs Organics; 2004 SVOCs Organics; 2005 SVOCs Organics; 2007 SVOCs L au o r at c r i~:: Equipme nt M anufa cture & D escriptio n Seri al Numbe r GC-AA Agi lent 7890A / AS 7683B CN10832133 / US08232002 G C-AB H ewle tt-Packard 5890 / D ua l ECO / 2750A16635 HP 7673 AS GC-CD Hewlett-P ackard 5890 / D ua l ECO / 3336A58788 HP 7673 AS GC-EF Hewlett-P ackard 5890 / Dual ECO / 254 1A06786 H P 7673 AS GC-G l /l H Agil ent Technologies 6890N / 7683 US10322012 / CN23326744 GC-GH Hewlett-Packard 5890 / D ua l ECO / 2938A25059 H P 7673 AS GC-II Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II 3203A40375 G C-J K H ewlett-Packard 5890 / P IO / Hall/ 4552 3336A51043 / 4560ARCHON GC-LM Hewlett-Packard 6890 /PIO / FID / US00008927 OI 45 51 / 4560 P&T GC-NP Hewlett-Packard 5890 / P IO / Fill / 3336A58858 Tekmar solatek 72 GC-OA/OB Agilent Technologies 6890N US10240147 GC-QR Hewlett Packard 5890 / PIO / FID / 3336A51044 Entech A utoAir7000 GC-QT Agil ent Technologies 6890N US10 148124 GC-SC Hewlett-P ackard 5890 / FID / 0 14551 / 2443A03797 4560 GC-S R Hewlett-Packard 5890 / FID / Tekmar 2612A07448 7000 GC-ST Hewlett-P ackard 5890 / FID / NPD / 3140A38871 HP 7673 AS / Tek GC-SV Hewlett-Packard 5890 / FID / OI4551 / LR47 -359C / N244460743 / 4560 3336A58859 Opera tin g System So ftwa re HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation H P Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chernstation HP Chemstation HP Chernstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chernstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstarjon Appendix I V Laboratory , ,,ipment P age 101 of 107 R evision Date: Ma 2010 D ata Pro cessin g Software HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroguant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant Loca ti on Organics; Vo latiles Organics; SVOCs Organics; SVOCs Organics; Volatiles Organics; SVOCs Organics; SVOCs Organics; SVOCs Organics; Vo latiles Organics; Volatiles Organ ics; Volatiles Organics; SVOCs Air Laboratory Organics; SVOCs Organics; Volatiles O rganics; Screening Organics; Vo latiles Organics; Screening Purchase 2008 1990 1995 1992 2003 1990 1994 1994 1998 1995 2002 1993 2002 1990 1992 1996 1996 LJ:t>c'..'r a tcri ~:: Equipme nt Manufacture & Des cription G C-SY H ewlett-Packard 5890 / PID / OI4551A / 4560 GC-UV H ewlett-P ackard 5890 / Dual FID / 0 1 455 1 / 4560 G C-WW H ew lett-Packard 6890 / D ua l ECD / HP 7673 AS GC-XX H ewle tt-Packard 6890 / Dual ECD / HP 7683 AS GC-YZ/ZZ H ewlett-P ackard 6890 / PID / FID / 0 1 HP GC System I n jector GCMS-lA Agi len t Tec hnologies 5973 / 6890N AS 455 1A / 4660 GCMS-1B Agi lent Techno logies 7890A / 5975C Teledyn e/ Tekmar AquaTek AS G CMS-1 C Agil ent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS 45 51 / 4560 G CMS-2A Agilen t Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS T ekmar So latek 72 GCMS -2B Agil ent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS 4551A / 4660 G CMS-2C Agile n t Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS 4551A / 4560 GCMS-2D Agilent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS 4552 / 4560 GCMS-2E Agil ent Technologies 5975 / 6890N A S 455 1A / 4660 GCMS-2M Agil en t Techn ologies 5973 / 6890N AS 45 52 / 12720 G CMS-2W Agil ent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS E n tech 70 16CA GCMS-3A Agil ent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS 455 1A / 4660 GCMS-3B Agilent Techn o logies 6890 / 5973 / 01455 1A I 4660 Se ria l Number 2643A10503 292 1A23322 US00010037 US00022968 US00011065 / US83806744 CN10314026 / US30945331 CN10845177 /US8311 1119 CN10425085 / US41746667 CN 10314028 / US30945325 CN10441033 / US 43146954 CN10441035 / US 43146953 CN10432038 / US43146771 CN10612046 / US60532596 CN10612028 / US60532578 / CN61031719 CN10413022 / US40646500 CN10432042 / US43146776 US10240044 / US2 1844015 Opera tin g Sy s te m So ft ware HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation Appendix I V: Laboratory , .ipment P age 102 of 107 R evision D at.e:3y{a 20 10 D ata Pro c e ssin g Software HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquan t HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP E nviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant H P Enviroquant H P Enviroquant L ocati o n Purchase Organics; 1990 Screening Organics; 1996 SVOCs Organics; 1997 SVOCs Organ ics; 1998 SVOCs Organics; 1998 SVOCs Organics; 2003 Volatiles Organ ics; 2008 Volatiles Organics; 2004 Volati les Organics; 2003 Volatiles Organics; 2004 Vo latiles Organics; 2004 Volati les Organics; 2004 Vo latil es Organics; 2006 Vo latiles Organics; 2006 SVOCs Air 2004 Laboratory Organics; 2004 Vo latiles O rganics; 2002 Volatiles JjjACCU TES'l: L.i t,or~1 c r1 ~1 E quipme nt M anufactu re & D escription Serial Number GCMS-3C Agilent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS CN10517038 / US44621480 45551A / 4660 GCMS-3D Agilent Technologies 5975B / 6890N AS CN10637120 I US62724193 4551A / 4660 GCMS-3E Agilent Technologies 5975 / 6890N CN10614011 / US61332852 / Agilent 7683 CN73943902 GCMS-3M Agilent Technologies 5975B / 6890N / US65125107 / CN10703029 / Agilent 7683B CN61933091 GCMS-3W Agilent Technologies 5973 / 6890N Entech CN10425086 / US41746669 / 70 16A 1351 GCMS-4M Agilent Technologies 5975( / 7890A US73317574 / CN1074251 / Agi lent 7683B US94209706 GCMS-A Hewlett-Packard 6890 / 5973 MSD / US00033272 / US94212183 OI 4552 / 4560 A RCH ON GCMS-B Hewlett-Packard 589011 + / 5972 MSD / 3336A61054 I 3524A03106 Agil ent 7673 GCMS-C Hewlett-Packard 5890 / 5970 MSD / 2643A122671 I 2807Al 146 HP OI 4552 / 4560 GCMS-D Hewlett-Packard 6890 / 5973 MSD / US00030551 / US93122843 OI 4551 / 4560 P&T GCMS-E Hewlett-Packard 6890 / 5973 MSD / US00031161 / US93112044 OI 455 1 / 4560 P&T GCMS-F Hewlett-P ackard 6890 / 5973 MSD / US00034179 / US84202752 / H P 7683 AS USO l 140200 GCMS-G Hewlett-Packard 589011 / 5970 MSD / 2919A22540 / 2807A11004 OI 4552 / 4660 GCMS-H Hewlett-Packard 589011 + / 5972 MSD / 3336A58190 / 3501A02356 H P 7673 AS GCMS-I Hewlett-Packard 5890 / 5970 MSD / 2623A08318 / 2637A01687 014551 / 4560 GCMS-J Hewlett-Packard 5890 / 5970 MSD / 2643A11557 / 3034A12779 OI 4552 / 4560 P&T GCMS-K Hewlett-Packard 589011 / 5970 MSD / 27 50A 116838 / 2905A 1162 8 OI 455 1 / 4560 P&T O peratin g Sys tem Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstati on HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation Appendix IV Laboratory , .tp111ent Page 103 of 107 Revision Date: Ma 2010 D ata Processin g Software HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP E nviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroquant HP Enviroguant Locati on Organics; Volatiles Organic s; Vol atile s Orga nics; SVOCs Organ ics; SYOCs Air Laboratory Organic s; SVOCs Organics; Volatiles Organic s; SVOCs Orga nics; Volatiles Organics; Volatiles Organics; Volatiles Orga nic s; SVOCs Organic s; Volatiles Organics ; SYOCs Orga nic s; Volatiles Organics; Volatiles Orga nics; Volatiles Purchase 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2000 1996 1990 2001 2001 1998 1989 1995 1986 1990 1990 0ACC:UTES1i: LJt>or a tcri ~i Equipme nt Manufacture & Des cription Serial Number G CMS -L H ewlett-P ackard 5890 / 5970 MS D / 2921A22898 / 2623A0 1291 0 1 455 1 / 4560 P&T G CMS-M Hewle tt-P ackard 6890 / 5973 MS D / US0002 1813 I US8021 11003 / HP 7683 AS US8 150 100 1 GCMS-N H ewlett-P ackard 5890 / 5970 MSD / 2750A17088 / 2716A10218 Tekmar 2000 / 2032 P&T GCMS-P Agile nt Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS US10251064 / US2 1844596 / 4552 I 4560 CN24828486 GCMS-Q Hewlett-Packard 589011 / 597 1 MSD / 3033A31092 I 3188A02934 E n tec h Air Samp 7000 GCMS-R Hewlett-P acka rd 6890 / 5973 MS D / US00021820 I US8121 1033 / HP 7683 AS CN40334835 GCMS-S H ewlett-Packard 6890 / 5973 MS D / US00024322 / US82311313 or 4552 / 4660 A R CHON GCMS-T H ewlett-P ackard 6890 / 5973 MS D / US00024323 / US823 11 482 or 455 1A / 4660 P &T GCMS-U H ewlett-P acka rd 6890 / 5973 MSD / US00032623 / US94212203 HP 4551A / 4660 GCMS-V Agilent T echnologies 5973 / 6890N AS US10149085 / US104419 17 4552 / 4560 GCMS-W Agile nt Techn o logies 5973 / 6890N AS US44621451 / CN 10517032 / E n tech 70 16CA 1119 GCMS-X Agil ent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS US21843889 / US10239071 4552 I 4660 GCMS-Y A gilent Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS US10240013 / US21844012 4 55 2 / 4560 G CMS-Z Agil en t Technologies 5973 / 6890N AS US10251028 / US21844586 / 4552 I 4560 CN24828485 GPC4 W aters 7 17 717-000152 Hg Analyzer Lee man Mercu ry A nalyzer HYD RAA HA-3011 Hg A n alyzer Leem an Mercury A nalyzer PS200II Hg6037 Opera tin g Sys te m Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation H P Chem station HP Chems tatio n HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation None WIN Hg Run ner Leeman PS #150-00052 Appendix I V Laboratory , .ipment P age 104 of 107 Revision D ate: Ma 20 10 D ata P ro c essin g So frwa re HP Enviroguant H P Enviroguant HP Enviroguant HP Enviroguant HP Enviroguant HP Enviroguant H P Enviroguant HP Enviroguant HP Envirog uant HP Enviroguant H P Enviroguant HP Enviroguant HP Enviroguan t HP Enviroguant None WIN Hg Runne r Leeman PS #150-00052 Locati o n Purc h ase Organics; 1992 Volatiles Organics; 1999 SVOCs Organics; 1988 Vo latiles Organics; 2003 SVOCs Air 1993 Laboratory Organics ; 1998 SVOCs Organics; 2000 Volati les Organics; 2000 Volati les Organics; 1999 Volati les Organics; 2002 Volati les Air 2005 Laboratory Organics; 2002 Vo latiles Organics; 2002 Volatiles Organics; 2003 SVOCs Organic Prep 1992 lnorganics 2003 Inorganics 1999 Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number HPLC-1 Agilent Technologies 1100 Series G 132 1A / D E33205279; D E332 19455 ; G1315B / G1316A / G1379A D E33234553; JP13210 348 IC Dionex DXSOO 99040750 IC Dionex ICS2000 02090737 IC Dionex ICS2000 02110028 IC Dionex ICS2000 04060060 IC Dionex ICS 3000 06040160 IC Metrohm-Peak IC 18440 12003 147 ICP Thermo Trace 61E Purge 10970 ICP Thermo ICP 6500 Duo I CP-20072601 ICP Thermo ICP 6500 Duo I CP -20074909 ICP-MS Thermo Elemental X-Series ICP-MS X0 180 IR Spec. Buck Scientific HC-404 687 PH Meter-4 Orion 710A 3978 PH Meter-9 Orion 250A 018019 PH Meter-10 YSI JC025 38 PH Meter-12 Thermo Orion 310 140 11 PH-EH Meter-22 Thermo Orion 4 Star SN00742 Operating System Software HP Chemstation Dio nex Peak Net Run Dionex Chrom . Client Di o n ex Chrom. Cli ent Dionex Chrom. Cli ent Dionex Chrom. Cli ent MagIC Net Thermo I CP Manager ITEVA !TEVA Thermo PlasmaLab Non e None None None None None Appendix I V Laboratory , tpment P age 105 of 107 Revisi o n Date: Ma 2010 D a t a Processing Software HP Enviroquant Di onex Peak Net Run Dionex Chrom. Cli ent Dionex Ch rom. Client Di onex Ch rom. Client Di onex Chrom. Client MagIC Net Thermo ICP Manager !TEVA !TEVA Thermo PlasmaLab None None None None None None Location Purchase Organics; 2003 SVOCs In o rgan ic s 1999 Inorganics 2004 Inorga ni cs 2004 In organics 2004 Inorganics 2006 Inorgani cs 2007 Metals 2000 Analysis Metals 2007 A nalysis Metals 2007 A nalysis Meta ls 2003 Analysis Inorganics 19 97 Inorga nic s 19 96 Field Serv. 2007 Field Serv . 2007 In organ ic s 2003 In organic s 2008 LZi t>o ra t c ri f.$ Equipme n t M anu fa cture & D escrip tio n Serial Number PH Meter-23 Thermo Orion Model 310 SN013786 PH Meter-26 Thomas Scientific TS 625 06390411 PH Meter-46 Thermo Orion 4 Star B10299 PH Meter-47 Thermo Orion 4 Star B04869 PH Meter-48 Thermo-Orion 4 Star B05968 SCON Meter YSI-30 ]0183 SCON Meter Amber Science 1056 01020851056-101 SCON Meter Orion 145+ 78035 SCON Meter Oakton 4003 78643 Solvent Horizon SPE-DEX 3000XL 09 -1031 Extractor Solvent Horizon SP EED V AP III 09-0739 Evaporator Sonicator Sonics Vibracell VC 750 31800A Soni ca tor TEKMAR Sonicator 6916 TOC Analyzer Shimadzu 5000 Series A/S system 30825274 T OC Analyzer Shimadzu 5000 Series A/S system 35517409 TOC Analyzer Shimadzu TOC-V CSH H51104435198 CS TOX Analyzer Mitsubishi TOX-10E 75R04185 Operati ng Sys tem Software None None None None None None None None None None None None None Shimad zu TOC Control Shimadzu TOC Control Shimadzu TOC Control N o ne Appendix IV Laboratory ,.-1ip111ent Page 106 of 107 Revision Date: Ma 2010 D ata P rocessing Software None None None None None None None None None None None None None Shimadzu TOC Control Shimadzu TOC Control Shimadzu TOC Control None L ocati o n P u r c h ase Inorganics 2008 Inorganics 2007 In organics 2008 Inorganics 2008 In organics 2008 Inorganics 2004 In organics 2001 Inorganics 2004 lnorganics 2004 lnorganics 2010 Inorganics 2010 Organic Prep 2000 Organic Prep 1997 In organics 2000 Inorganics 1998 In organics 2007 In organics 1996 11f.l~I ~ rJACCUTES"'t L.i t>or a t c rl ~s Equipment Manufacture & Description TOX Analyzer Mitsubishi TOX-100 Turbidimeter HF Scientific ORT 100B UVVIS Spec C Spectronix 20 Genesys UVVIS Spec D Spectronix 20 Genesys UVVIS Spec E Spectronix 20 Genesys UVVIS Spec F Spectronix 20 Genesys UVVIS Spec G Thermo Electron Corp. Genesys 20 UVVIS Spec H Thermo Electron Corp. Genesys 20 UVVIS Spec I Thermo Electron Corp. Genesys 1 OVIS Serial Number A7M 42997 21141 3SGA122034 3SGF170020 3SGD .352011 356329906 3SGJ238001 3SGJ306016 205L110005 Operating System Software None None None None None None None None None Data Processing Software None None None None None None None None None Appendix IV: Laboratory , .pment Page 107 of 107 Revision Date: Ma 2010 Location Purchase In organics 2008 Inorganics 19 87 In organics 2000 Inorganics 2007 Inorganics 2007 In organic s 2007 Inorganics 2007 In organics 2007 lnorganics 2009 Page : 1 of 1 REMIT TO : 2235 Route 130 Dayton, NJ 08810 (732) 329-0200 FAX (732) 329-3499 FE D I D# 22-3654510 Invoice Number : To: City of Fort Worth Environmental Management Dept. 1000 Throckmorton St . Fort Worth, TX 76102 Attn: Roger Grantham Invoice Date : P .O . Number : T4 -26955 07-MAY-10 Account Code : COFWTXFW Term s : NET 30 Lab Project Code : COFWTXFW6247 Pr oject description : Howe l l Instruments QTY MX Cod~ Test Test Description T/A Price Amount Job #: T50783 Proj. #: FWTHHWLOO l Date Rec : 04/13/10 Proj Mgr Roger Gran t ham 6 AQ BTX1005TPHR Texas Total Petroleum Hy 10 35 .00 210 .00 4 AQ HMS Heavy Metals Package 10 75.00 300 .00 7 AQ V8260STD Volati l e Organics 10 70 .00 490 .00 ---------- Job Tota l 1000 .00 ---------- Net 1000.00 #: T50977 Proj . #: FWTHHWL002 04/16/10 Proj Mgr Roger Grantham 1 so %SOL Solids , Total Percent 3 0 .00 0.00 1 so HG Mercury 3 28.00 28 .00 1 so METDIG Metals Digestion 3 8.50 8 .50 1 so PB Lead 3 8 .50 8.50 ---------- Job Total 45 .00 ---------- Net 45 .00 Job #: T51400 Proj . #: FWTHHWL002 Date Rec : 04/23/10 Proj Mgr Roger Grantham 1 so %SOL So lids, Total Percent 3 0 .00 0 .00 1 so HG Mercury 3 28 .00 28 .00 1 so METDIG Metals Di gestion 3 8 .50 8 .50 1 so PB Lead 3 8 .50 8 .50 ---------- Job Total 45.00 ---------- Net 45.00 Total For Invoice T4 -26955 1090.00 ----------..,.,tal Due For Invo ice 1090 .00 BYYl=l Of 1 OOt:>NT Bl NT >(Jf OE:OOYNBf 1 o>OYo Page : 1 of 1 REMIT TO: 2235 Route 130 Dayton , NJ 08810 (732) 329 -0200 FAX (732) 329-3499 FED ID# 22-3654510 PLICATE Invoice Number: To : City of Fort Worth Environmental Management Dept . 1000 Throckmorton St . Fort Worth , TX 76102 Attn : Roger Grantham Invoice Date: P.O. Number: . T4...'.26955 , 07~MAY-s-l0 Terms: NET 30 Account Code : COFWTXFW Lab Project Code : COFWTXFW6247 Project description : Howell Instruments QTY MX Code Test ·Test Descripfion· T/A 'Price Amourit Job # : T50783 Proj . # : FWTHHWLOOl Date Rec : 04/13/10 Proj Mgr Roger Grantham 6 AQ BTX1005TPHR Texas Total Petroleum Hy 10 35 .00 210 .00 4 AQ HMS Heavy Metals Package 10 75 .00 300 .00 7 AQ V8260STD Volatile Organics 10 70 .00 490 .00 ---------- Job Total 1000 .00 ---------- Net 1000 .00 b #: T50977 Proj . #: FWTHHWL002 04/16/10 Proj Mgr Roger Grantham 1 so %SOL Solids , Total Percent 3 0 .00 0 .00 1 so HG Mercury 3 28 .00 28 .00 1 so METDIG Metals Digestion 3 8 .50 8.50 1 so PB Lead 3 8 .50 8.50 ---------- Job Total 45 .00 ---------- Net 45 .00 Job #: T51400 Proj . #: FWTHHWL002 Date Rec : 04/23/10 Proj Mgr Roger ·Grantham 1 so %SOL Solids, Total Percent 3 0 .00 0 .00 1 so HG Mercury 3 28 .00 28 .00 1 so METDIG Metals Digest i on 3 8 .50 8 .50 1 so PB L ead 3 8 .50 8 .5 0 ---------- Job Total 45.00 ---------- Net 45 .00 Total For Invoice T4-2 69 55 1090 .00 ---------- ,,tal Due For Invoice 1090 .00 liJl!I Gu lf Coa st gjACCUTEST. Laboratories ACCUTEST LABO RA TORI ES 1956-2006 e-Hardcopy 2.0 Automated Report ALL lf'.I THE CHEMJSTnY Technical Report for City of Fort Worth Howell Instruments FWTHBWLOOl Accutest Job Number: T48708 Sampling Date: 03/04/10 Report to : City of Fort Worth Environmental Management Dept. 1000 Throckmortt n St. Fort Worth, TX 76102 roger.grantham@fortworthgov.org; rlichau@enercon com; ddlovvom@enercon.com A TIN: Roger Grantham Total number of pages in report: 43 \!I P.CCo~ ,..t-~ . o-. ,:,' "'" ,ffe ~~ 8 · ~ 03/22/10 c( :i: Test results contained within this data package meet the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference and/or state specific certification programs as applicable . Paul Canevaro Laboratory Director Client Service contact: Georgia Jones 713-271-4700 Certifications: TX (T104704220-09C -TX) AR (88-0756) FL (E87628) KS (E-10366) LA (85695/04004) OK (9103) UT(7132714700) This report shall not be reproduced , except in its entirety , without the written approval of Accutest Laboratories . Test results relate only to samples analyzed . Gulf Coast • 10165 Harwin Drive • Suite 150 • Houston , TX 77036 • tel : 713-271-4700 • fax : 713-271 -4770 • http://www .accutest.com Accutest Laboratories is the sole authority for authorizing edits or modifica ti ons to this document. Unauthorized modification of this report is strictly prohibited. filll!t 1 of 43 ·SiACCU I ESt T48708 la b or a tor i c s Sections: Table of Contents -1- Section 1: Sample Summary ................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: Case Narrative/Conformance Summary .............................................................. 4 Section 3: Sample Results ........................................................................................................ 6 3.1: T48708-l: MW-1 .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2: T48708-1A: MW-1 (DISSOLVED) ............................................................................. 11 Section 4: Misc . Forms ........................................................................................................... . 12 4.1: Chain of Custody .......................................................................................................... . 13 4.2: LRC Form ..................................................................................................................... . 16 Section 5: GC/M S V ol a tiles -QC D ata Su m m a r ies ............................................................ .. 20 5.1 : Method Blank Summary ............................................................................................... . 21 5.2 : Blank Spike Summary .................................................................................................. . 24 5 .3: Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary .......................................................... . 27 Se ction 6: G C Semi-volatiles -QC Data Summaries .......................................................... .. 30 6.1 : Method Blank Summary ............................................................................................... . 31 6.2: Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary ............................................................. . 32 6.3 : Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary .......................................................... . 33 Section 7: Metals Analysis -QC Data Summaries .............................................................. .. 34 7.1: Prep QC MPl 1282: Hg ................................................................................................. . 35 7.2: Prep QC MPl 1285: As ,Ba,Cd,Cr,Pb,Se,Ag ................................................................. . 39 I I I II &lll!i 2 of 43 ·gACCUTEST. T48708 la b o ,. a t o r i e s Accutest Laboratories City of Fort Worth Howell Instruments Project No: FWTHHWLOOl Sample Collected Number Date Time By T48708-1 03/04 /10 12 :20 KK T48708 -1A 03/04/10 12:20 KK Sample Summary Matrix Received Code Type 03/05/10 AQ Ground Wat er 03/05/10 AQ Groundwater Filtered Job No: Client Sample ID MW-1 MW-1 (DISSOLVED) I T48708 tlf!I 3 of 43 (dACCU I EST. T48708 L ab o r a t o r i e s l!I l3ACCU I ES"'T: L aboratories SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP CASE NARRATIVE Client: City of Fort Worth Job No T48708 Site: Howell Instruments Report Date 3/22/2010 10 :13 :12 AM 2 Sample(s), 0 Trip Blank(s) and O Field Blank(s) were collected on 03/04/2010 and were received at Accutest on 03/05/2010 properly preserved, at 2.6 Deg. C and intact. These Samples received an Accutestjob number ofT48708. A listing of the Laboratory Sample ID, Client Sample ID and dates of collection are presented in t:J}e Results Summary Section of this report. Except as noted below, all method specified calibrations and quality control performance criteria were met for this job. For more information, please refer to QC summary pages . Volatiles by GCMS By Method SW846 8260B I Matrix AQ Batch ID: VZ2793 " All samples were analyzed within the recommended method holding time . '" All method blanks for this batch meet method specific criteria. " Sample(s) T48731-4MS, T48731-4MSD were used as the QC samples indicated . ., Matrix Spike Recovery(s) for 1,2,3-Trichloropropane are outside control limits . Probable cause due to matrix interference. " RPD(s) for MSD for 1,2,3-Trichloropropane are outside control limits for sample T48731-4MSD. Extractables by GC By Method TNRCC 1005 i Matrix AQ Batch ID: OP14269 "' All samples were extracted within the recommended method holding time . "' All samples were analyzed within the recommended method holding time . '" All method blanks for this batch meet method specific criteria. "' Sample(s) OP14269-MSMSD, T49005-1MS, T49005-1MSD were used as the QC samples indicated . Metals By Method SW846 6010B I Matrix AQ Batch ID: MPl 1285 m All samples were digested within the recommended method holding time . "' All samples were analyzed within the recommended method holding time . ., All method blanks for this batch meet method specific criteria. "' Sample(s) T48840-1DUP, T48840-1MS, T48840-1MSD, T48840-1SDL were used as the QC samples for metals . a RPD(s) for Serial Dilution for Arsenic , Lead, Selenium are outside control limits for sample MPl 1285-SDl. Percent difference acceptable due to low initial sample concentration(< 50 times IDL). Metals By Method SW846 7470A I Matrix AQ Batch ID: MPl 1282 '" All samples were digested within the recommended method holding time . '" All samples were analyzed within the recommended method holding time . "' All method blanks for this batch meet method specific criteria. '" Sample(s) T48732-1DUP, T48732-1MS, T48732-1MSD were used as the QC samples for metals . Monday, March 22, 2010 Page 1 of2 I El!:J 4 ot 43 CiACCU I EST- T4a708 L a b o r a I o r i e s \ '~ --· Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast (ALGC) certifies that this report meets the project requirements for analytical data produced for the samples as received at ALGC and as stated on the COC. ALGC certifies that the data meets the Data QualityObjectives for precision, accuracy and completeness as specified in the ALGC Quality Manual except as noted above. This report is to be used in its entirety. ALGC is not responsible for any assumptions of data quality if partial data packages are used Monday, March 22, 2010 Page 2 of2 I 1111!1 5 of 43 CijACCUTEST. T48708 Labor ;i t o r i e s 1111!1 Gulf Coast riACCU i EST. Laboratories l .t·s ALL J:t< TfH: tHEMl_~-T ~:. ____ ---·--·--·--·-·· ------------~ -------.. ··-· ---. Sample Results Report of Analysis Section 3 &111!'.1 6 of 43 l3ACCUTEST. T48708 L a b o r a t o r i e s Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of 3 Client Sample ID: MW-I Lab Sample ID: T48708 -1 Matrix: Method: Project: Run #1 Run #2 [Rnn #1 Run #2 AQ -Ground Water SW846 8260B Howell Instruments File ID 2007130 .D Purge Volume 5 .0 ml DF 1 VOA 8260 List CASNo. Compound 67 -64 -1 Acetone 71-43-2 Benzene 108-86-1 Bromobenzene 74 -97 -5 Bromochloromethane 75 -27-4 Bromodichloromethane 75-25-2 Bromoform 104-51 -8 n-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 tert-Butylb enzene 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 75-00-3 Chloroethane 67-66-3 Chloroform 95-49 -8 o-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 p-Chlorotoluene 75 -15-0 Carbon disulfide 56-23 -5 Carbon tetrachloride 75-34-3 1 , 1-Dichloroethane 75-35 -4 1 , 1-Dichloroethylene 563 -58-6 1, 1-Dichloropropene Analyzed 03/08/10 Result 4 .7 U 0.50 U 0 .82 U 1.6 U 0.49 U 1.4 U 0 .63 U 0.52 U 1.3 U 0 .56 U 0 .92 U 0.64 U 0 .70 U 0.56 U 0.53 U 0.66 U Q.52 U 0.50 U 0 .78 U 96-12-8 1 , 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.9 U 106-93 -4 1 , 2-Dibromoethane o .55u 107-06-2 1 , 2-Dichloroethane 0 .62 U 78-87-5 1 , 2-Dichloropropane 0.62 U 142-28-9 1, 3-Dichloropropane 0.54 U 594-20-7 2 , 2-Dichloropropane 0 .. 62 u 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0,61 U 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.1u 156-59-2 cis-1 , 2-Dichloroethylene 0 .56 U 10061-01-5 cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene 0.48U 541-73-1 m-Dichlorobenzene J.OU ... 95-50-1 o-Dichlorobenzene 0.69 U 106-46-7 p-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U U = Not detected SDL -Sample Detection Limit MQL = Method Quantitation Limit E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range Date Sampled: 03/04/10 Date Received: 03/05/10 Percent Solids: n/a By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch RR n/a n/a VZ2793 MQL SDL Units Q 50 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.7 ug/1 0.50 ug/1 0 .82 ug/1 1.6 ug/1 0.49 ug/1 1.4 ug/1 0 .63 ug/1 0 .52 ug/1 1.3 ug/1 0 .56 ug/1 0 .92 ug/1 0.64 ug/1 0 .70 ug/1 0.56 ug/1 0 .53 ug/1 0 .66 ug/1 0 .52 ug/1 0 .50 ug/1 0 .78 ug/1 1.9 ug/1 0 .55 ug/1 0.62 ug/1 0.62 ug/1 0.54 ug/1 0 .62 ug/1 0.61 ug/1 1.1 ug/1 0 .56 ug/1 0.48 ug/1 1.0 ug/1 0 .69 ug/1 1.0 ug/1 J = Indicates an estimated value B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound &111!1 7 of 43 UACCUTEST. T48708 ~ .1 b or a tor i e s Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 2 of 3 Client Sample ID: MW-1 Lab Sample ID: T48708-1 Matrix: AQ -Ground Water Method: SW846 8260B Project: Howell Instruments VOA 8260 List CASNo. Compound Result 156-60-5 trans -I , 2-Dichloroethylene 0.45 U 10061-02-6 trans -1, 3-Di chloropropene 0.68 U 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.55 U 591 -78 -6 2-Hexanone 3 .2 U 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 1.3 U 98-82 -8 Isopropylbenzene 0 .51 U 99-87-6 p-Isopropyltoluene 0 .65 U 108-10 -1 4-Methyl-2 -pentanone 9 .9 U 74 -83-9 Methyl bromide 0 .94 U 74 -87-3 Methyl chloride 0 .84 U 74-95-3 Methylene bromide 0.65 U 75 -09-2 Methylene chloride 0.41 U 78-93-3 Methyl ethyl ketone 3.9 U 1634-04-4 Methyl Tert Butyl Ether 0.73 U 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0 .65 U 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0 .57 U 100-42 -5 Styrene 0 .56 U 630-20-6 1 , 1 , 1, 2-Tetrachloroethane 0 .80 U 71-55-6 1 , 1 , I-Trichloroethane 0 .62 U 79-34-5 1, 1 , 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane 1.2 U 79-00-5 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane 0 .98 U 87-61-6 1 ,2 ,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.1 u 96-18-4 1, 2 , 3-Trichloropropane 1.3 U 120-82-1 1 ,2 ,4-Trichlorobenzene 0 .82 U 95-63-6 1, 2 , 4-Trimethylbenzene 0 .65 U 108-67-8 1 , 3 , 5-Trimethylbenzene 0.70 U 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 0 .91 U 108-88-3 Toluene 0.43 U 79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 6 .0 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.2 U 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 1.0 U 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 1.7 U m,p-Xylene 1.1 u 95-47-6 o-Xylene 0.53 U CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries Run# 1 1868-53-7 Dibromofluoromethane 87% 17060-07-0 1, 2-Dichloroethane-D4 84% 2037-26-5 Toluene-DB 94% U = Not detected SDL -Sample Detection Limit MQL = Method Quantitation Limit E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range Date Sampled: 03/04/10 Date Received: 03/05/10 Percent Solids: n/a MQL SDL Units Q 2 .0 0.45 ug/1 2 .0 0.68 ug/1 2 .0 0 .55 ug/1 10 3 .2 ug/1 2 .0 1.3 ug/1 2.0 0 .51 ug/1 2 .0 0 .65 ug/1 10 9 .9 ug/1 2 .0 0.94 ug/1 2.0 0 .84 ug/1 2 .0 0 .65 ug/1 5 .0 0 .4 1 ug/1 10 3.9 ug/1 2 .0 0 .73 ug/l 5 .0 0 .65 ug/1 2 .0 0 .57 ug/1 2 .0 0 .56 ug/1 2 .0 0.80 ug/1 2.0 0 .62 ug/1 2.0 1.2 ug/1 2.0 0 .98 ug/1 2 .0 1.1 ug/l 2 .0 1.3 ug/1 2 .0 0.82 ug/1 2 .0 0 .65 ug/1 2 .0 0 .70 ug/1 2 .0 0 .91 ug/1 2 .0 0.43 ug/1 2 .0 0.52 ug/l 2 .0 1.2 ug/l 2 .0 1.0 ug/1 6.0 1.7 ug/l 4.0 1.1 ug/1 2 .0 0 .53 ug/1 Run#2 Limits 79-122% 75-121% 87 -119% J = Indicates an estimated value B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound ill!I 8 of 4 3 gjACCUTEST. T48708 L a b o r a t o r i e s '-·· Accutest Laboratories Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Method: Project: VOA 8260 List MW-1 T48708-1 AQ -Ground Water SW846 8260B Howell Instruments CASNo. 460-00-4 Surrogate Recoveries 4-Bromofluorobenzene Report of Analysis Run# 1 Run#2 87 % Date Sampled: 03/04/10 Date Received: 03/05/10 Percent Solids: n/a Limits 80-133% Page 3 of 3 U = Not detected SDL -Sample Detection Limit J = Indicates an estimated value MQL = Method Quantitation Limit E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound 1111!1 9 of 43 l'JACCUTEST. T48708 L a b o r a l o r i e s I '"- Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of 1 Client Sample ID: MW -1 Lab Sample ID: T48708-1 Matrix: AQ -Ground Water Method: T NRCC 1005 TX1005 Project: Howell Instruments File ID DF Analyzed Run #1 LL035161.D 1 03/11/10 Run #2 Initial Volume Final Volume Run #1 30 .1 ml 3 .0 ml Run #2 CASNo. Compound Result TPH (C6 -C12) 0.58 U TPH ( > C12-C28) 0 .90 U TPH ( > C28-C 35) 0.90 U TPH (C6 -C35) 0 .58 U CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries Run# 1 84-15-1 o-TerphenyI 101 % 98 -08 -8 aaa-Trifluorotoluene 108 % U = Not detected SDL -Sample Detection Limit MQL = Method Quantitation Limit E = Indicates value exceeds calibration range Date Sampled: 03/04/10 Date Received: 03/05/10 Percent Solids: n/a By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch EM 03 /11/10 OP14269 GLB512 MQL SDL Units Q 2 .5 0 .58 mg/I 2 .5 0 .90 mg/I 2 .5 0 .90 mg/I 2.5 0 .58 mg/I Run#2 Limits 70 -130 % 70-130 % J = Indicates an estimated value B = Indicates analyte found in associated method blank N = Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound 111!1 10 of 43 iaACCUIEST. T48708 L a b o r ;1. t p r i c s Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of 1 Client Sample ID: MW-1 (DISSOLVED) Lab Sample ID: T48708-1A Matrix: AQ -Groundwater Filtered Project: Howell Instruments Dissolved Metals Analysis Analyte Result MQL SOL Units Arsenic 0.0022 B 0.0050 0 .0020 mg/I Barium 0.101 B 0 .20 0 .0027 mg/I Cadmium 0.00030 U 0.0040 0 .00030 mg/I Chromium 0.0019 U 0.010 0.0019 mg/I Lead 0.0038 0 .0030 0.0017 mg/1 Mercury 0.000094 U 0.00020 0.000094mg/I Selenium 0 .0032 U 0.0050 Silver 0.00080 U 0.010 (1) Instrument QC Batch: MA4587 (2) Instrument QC Batch: MA4593 (3) Prep QC Batch: MP11282 (4) Prep QC Batch: MP11285 MQL = Method Quantitation Limit SDL = Sample Detection Limit 0 .0032 mg/1 0 .00080 mg/I DF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Date Sampled: 03/04/10 Date Received: 03/05/10 Percent Solids: n/a Prep Analyzed By Method 03/10/10 03/12/10 NS SWS46 601DB 2 03/10/10 03/12/10 NS SWS46 6010B 2 03/10/10 03/12/10 NS SWS46 6010B 2 03/10/10 03/12/10 NS SWS46 601DB 2 03/10/10 03/12/10 NS SWS46 601DB 2 03/10/10 03/10/10 TW SWS46 7470A 1 03/10/10 03/12/10 NS SWS46 601DB 2 03/10/10 03/12/10 NS SWS46 601DB 2 U = Indicates a result < SDL Prep Method SWS46 3010A 4 SWS46 3010A 4 SWS46 3010A 4 SWS46 3010A 4 SWS46 3010A 4 SWS46 7470A 3 SWS46 3010A 4 SWS46 3010A 4 B = Indicates a result > = SDL but < MQL &111!1 11 of 43 ·(4ACCUTEST. T48708 ~ ab or a lo r i e s riJl!I Gulf Coast l:JACCU i EST. Laborato,·ies IT"S />LL lN Trl ·E CHi:.Ml.ST ,RY Misc. Forms Custody Documents and Other Forms Includes the following where applicable: • Chain of Custody • LRC Fonn Section 4 I fll!I 12 of 43 (jAq::U I EST. T48708 Labo r :i t or i e ~ ··-r!j CHAIN OF CUSTODY !jACCUTEST. . laboratories fl:0.UT~g-, 10165 Harwin, Suite 150-Houston, TX 77036-713-271-4700 fax: 713-271-4770 AccutntOll$1 !m~~~l!'i' ~l~ Client, Reportlnn in ormauon-· ·-==-~ Pro ect Information l'~"Jim1!118 -~~ •. ~.1$~~ CompanyN.lrna CJ~ bf Fa-ct L,Uo'ftl,.., PrnJ•".tJ:~N~ll/l lytRff"l.wlD,...:k. ::~;~::F~ lII_oJ\.~ a.Mall Blll to '1:?rv,n "''i.i:~-HA 1 Same r ;llltl'-' ....... ~ t ... ,. .. V ~ ~~me FJ~ ~(o ~ S • "'1 ~'~Tl( Stale t(q.{O~"• City .... ZJp ~ ~ Ph 'i?L1 ...,..,.3qo--8SGJ:::t"•· Phone No. Fax No. ~ 9~2 1813851 ~ S0mpl11~'• Harno {( ,C vtv\.. kaAY Cllont P11,c.haso Ordot I ::t: \) <:\d Collect on NlNllber , ui eserved bollles a_ ~ ~ Accutesl Field ID I Point or Co?ectlon a ! ! I I \-Sample# #of !il I I Dalo Tomo ... ,"' bolUu i! M W-1 -::,,/<i/,D l-:bo l.?111 9' " ~ / ,,/ / ------.._ ----..... ,_ ---._ - ~~If'!!: Tum, Buslna!sda\l!I\ ~~!;€r~~ rGM~;s=;mt Dala DerMtrahlo lnronmtian ~~~~~--rt:KKJ 10 Doy STANDARD ) Appra"d ByJ 01\0: D Com mordal·A" D StntaForm• SQvi.tJJ/ls c..__J 6 Day RUSH D Conunorcbl "B" D EDD Farmlfl_ c:::J -4 Oily RUSH D RfltucadT1er1 Qolh,r C::::J , Day EMERGENCY D Full Oata Padl1ga ~ 2 D;JY EMERGENCY C::::J 1 Day EMERGENCY Commaretal "A"• Resulbl Only ~Other Commorclal •e• • R.osu llll & Standard QC Real time anatyUcal data aval/able via Lab/ink ~~M:.r-t:4lf©~;t,!ii;:;;; SAMPU; CUSTOCYMUST BE DOCUMENTED BELOW EACH TIME SAMPLES CHAN G P0SS1i:>SION.1NC G COURIER DELIVERY '-' 1Rl~)?I~ 1w1111~: 'r'7Vb,,, b.J..~ fZl)iJJIJ~ wianma: ~/Vil" /fOO 1 , 3/t{//d 1<1111nqll-·,·--•· O,u1llrn,1: Rece ........ ,: '-..) ,1111qu,.,,..., .. 11, V lhtl'llffll: 3 3 4 R•l lnqu .. ,.-....,-. ,. _, ·--··---'I= ll:IIIIJ'-:11• ,.,...,.,..,,.m,raa,....-- 5 5 0 Page 1 ol i BatlhiOfdttCOfltratf ""'"~"•-r L{,'67Dfo -·~~~.,~ l",GF.,.,,it\!ll!tl~ Reaueated -Analvsu --.. n.,a1nx 1..oavs DW0 ~11gWthr GW -OrculldW~btr WW-Wos1nleler SO •SoG lt.·SludQ1 0 1-0II UO•Otill'UQll'd 90t.-otoo-Sord LAB USE ONLY ---~ -r--,__ r----. ~ Conmenls I Ramarb :w~ - lllAo {)(I(. ..f:; /f-RA vi W,~)g"~~:'(.i'fa;v'~.~ /111tJ -;r:; d_ll./i IIClllHI IB1: I 4 ~~ .. , ... , amp. 0 T48708: Chain of Custody Page 1 of 3 I tlll!I 13 of 43 ·(dACCUTEST. T48708 l .i b o r a l o r i e s SAMPLE INSPECTION FORM AccutestJob Number :._:f_.__4_'c-=-~--'--~'o_· ___ Client: C.,+'j o .0 h>M°' "->oA.+"'-Date/Tirne Recelved: __ 3_/_.s_/_,o ___ ci_: _, ~----- # of Coolera Received: ____ ! ___ Thermometer #: __ --'{'-iQ..._. __,(,__ ____ ...:...· Temperature Adjustment Factor:_+_.,_. 't ____ _ Cooler Temps: #1: 1..c.. #2: #3: #4: ____ #5: ____ #6: ____ #7: ____ #8: ---~-- Method of Delivery:. (!ED~ UPS Accutest Courter Greyhound Delivery Other Airb!ll l'{umbers ;. __________ 25_"_7:---3_-_e>~8~t..~?>c...__9..c..·-=-~-=-0=,3'-----------~--------- COOLER INFORMATION §CUetody ecal missing or not Intact Temperature crttcrta not met Wet Ice received 1n cooler · CHAIN OF CUSTODY Chain of Custody not received _Sample D rr unclear or missing Analyses unclear or m!ss1ng COC not properly executed Sumµiary of Discrepancies: SAMPLE INFORMATION Sampie containers received.broken voe Vials have headspace . · Sample labels mlss!ng or tlleglble m· on coc does not match label(s) D/r on COC docs not match:iabcl(a) Sample/Botµes rcvd but no analyi;ls on COC Sample listed on c6c , but not necetved Bottles; mlss1Dg for requested analys1s . Insufllclent volume for ana}Ys!s Sample received Improperly preserved TRIP BLANK INFORMATION §Tt!p Blank on COC bu t not recc!ved· 'It!p Blank received but not on COC 'It!p Blank not Intact . · Received Water Tt!p Blank Recdved SoU TB . · . Number of Encore s? Number of 5035 kits? Number of lab-filtered metals?_~--- ........ ___ . ------------------.... -.... --. _. _____________ .. ______ ...... _ .... _ .. _______ ........ ------· ................. - TECHNICIAN SIGNATURE/DATE: :led a -.)"'-. J-'.3 Is-/.,.. . . . ff2-· • 1· .rJ{/J INFORMATION AND SAMPLE LABELING VERIFIED BY:. _______ , __ I_'------------------ • • + • • + • • + + + CORRECTIVE ACTiONS + + • • .• • • • . + Client Representative Notified: D~: __________ _ By Accutest Representative:;...... ______________ ~-----,Via:· Phone Email Client Instructions: ·----.. --------------------------· ---~----------' . ----. -----------·----------·---·--·---.. --, ,· -------------.. ----------.. -----. ---------------------.. -----------.. -----------------------------------------------------·------~------------·---------------. . . --------· ' . . --. ---. --. ------\-------------------.. ___ .. ___________________ , T48 708 : Chain of Custody Page 2 of 3 I fll!t 14 of 43 ·(jACCUTEST. T48708 L a b o r 3 I o r i e s SAMPLE RECEIPT LOG JOB#: _______ 1....__L-\_it_t_~-=----------DATEmME RECEIVED : __ .... J _,_/..::s_,/,..:..,i> ___ q..:.__·r_o_·------- CLIENT: ('._vbi o-P-..Q,tt.'T i.vo-Q....\-"'-JNJTIALS : __ -''fv'-------------- COOLER# SAMPLE ID FIELD ID DATE MATRIX VOL BOTTLE# I /'AW-[ J}'-f/,o "f~u, Vl[Me.rlt A-1a'1>0 1-'2... I I t.{c,,i..\.,,, 3-5" I I l .(,,-e, '/ :)_ -,Qt{> p, lo.I'\.~ -4 • ....._ /-:2.... ~ ... ~ (p ·/V At' ,j, [!:, / / I ,..,/ / / / / / I/ .... / ' V ./ -PRESERVATIVES: 1: None 2: HCL 3: HN03 4 : H2S04 5 : NAOH 6: DI 7: MeOH 8: OU,er LOCATION: 1: Walk-In #1 (Waler.,) 2: Walk-In #2 (Solis) VR: Volatile Fridge M: Metals SUB: Subcontract EF: Encore Freezer Rev B/13/01 ewp LOCATION PRESERV PH J..-A .I.I 2 3 4 ~ >12 ·5 8 7 8 VA.. 1 a> 3 4 <2 ::,12 5 8 7 a . 1-A-1 Q 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 @ 3 .4 <2 >12 l{(.L 5 8 7 ·a 1 2 3 4 >12 5 8 7 a :::,-- 1 2 Ya <2 >12 5 a .--a I -~8 3 7 8 ·4 -<2 >12 -~-1 2 3 4 <2 >12 8 8 7 8 . 1 2 s 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 s 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 · 8 1 2 ·3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 6 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 -7 . 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 8 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 5 8 7 a· 1 2 3 4 <2 >12 6 8 7 8 -<2 >12 5 6 ,7 8 T48708: Chain of Custody Page 3 of 3 fflJl!I 15 of 43 l;JACCUTEST. T48708 La b or a lo r i e ~ Appendix A Laboratory Data Package Cover Page This data package consists of: Q Q Q Q Q Q Q D This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data : Rl Field chain-of-custody documentation; R2 Sample identification cross-reference; R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes : a) Items consistent with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5.10 b) dilution factors, c) preparation methods , d) cleanup methods, and e) ifrequired for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs). R4 Surrogate recovery data including: a) Calculated recovery (%R), and b) The laboratory's surrogate QC limits. R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples ; R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including: a) LCS spiking amounts, b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and c) The laboratory's LCS QC limits. R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD s) including: a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified, b) MS/MSD spiking amounts, c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples, d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and e) The laboratory's MS/MSD QC limits R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision : a) the amount ofanalyte measured in the duplicate, b) the calculated RPD, and c) the laboratory's QC limits for analytical duplicates . R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix; RIO Other problems or anomalies . The Exception Report for every "No " or "Not Reviewed (NR)" item in laboratory review checklist. Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by the laboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached exception reports. By me signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratory in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data Check, if applicable : [] This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person responding to rule. The official signing the cover page of the rule-required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release statement is true. Paul K Canevaro Name (Printed) Signature RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 Laboratory Director Official Title (printed) 3/22/2010 Date Al I fill!) 16 of 43 ;)ACCUTEST. T48708 L a b o r a t or i e ~ ' ,.___, jAppendix A ( cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast J LRC Date : 3/22/2010 Project Name : HOWELL INSTRUMENT I Laboratory Job Number: T 49162 Reviewer Name : Paul K. Canevaro J Prep Batch Number (s ): VZ2793 ,0P14269, MPI 1285 , MPI 1282 I # 1 I A2 I Description I Yes No NA'~E I I Chain-of-custody (C-0-C) . I /RI or Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? X Were all departures from standard conditions descnbed in an exception report? X R2 or Sample and oualitv control (OC) identification I Are all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers ? X Are all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding OC data? X R3 or Test reports I I Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times ? X _J Other than those results < MOL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? X Were calculations checked bv a peer or SuPervisor? X Were all analvte identifications checked bv a peer or SuPervisor? X Were sample quantitation limits reported for all analytes not detected? X Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a drv weight basis? X Were% moisture (or solids) reoorted for all soil and sediment samples? X I If required for the project, TICs reported? X R4 0 Surro2ate recoverv data Were surro2ates added prior to extraction? X -Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC limits ? X RS or Test re ports/summary forms for blank samples li Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analned? X Were blanks analvzed at the appropriate freouencv? X Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and , if X applicable, cleanup procedures? Were blank concentrations < MOL? X I Laboratory control samples (LCS): Were all COCs included in the LCS? X Was each LCS taken throUl!h the entire analvtical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps ? X Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? X Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X Does the detectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used X to calculate the SOLs? Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits ? X R7 or Matrix spike <MS) and matrix spike duplicate <MSD) data I Were the project/method specified analytes included in the MS and MSD? X J Were MS/MSD analned at the annropriate freauencv? X Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratorv OC limits? X 2 Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? X 2 IRS or Analvtical duplicate data I Were annropriate analvtical duplicates analvzed for each matrix? X Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate freauencv? X IR9 101 Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? X Method ouantitation limits lMOLs): J Are the MQLs for each method analvte included in the laboratory data packa2e? X Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard? X Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data pack32e? X RIO or Other problems/anomalies Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and ER? X Were all necessarv corrective actions performed for the reported data? X ... , . .. . ... . . . . ~~· . . ., .. . . ~ .. 1. Items 1dent1fied by the letter 'R" must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the 1RRP-required report(s). Items irentified by the letter "S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2. = organic analyses ; I= inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, mien applicable); 3. NA= Not applicable ; RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A2 (lf!i 17 of 43 l3ACCUTEST. T 487 08 L J b o r a l o r i e s Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: Ac cutest Laboratories Gulf Coast I LRC Date: 3/22(2010 Project Name: HOWELL INSTRUMENT jLaboratory Job Number: T49162 Reviewer Name: Paul K. Canevaro I Prep Batch Number(s): VZ2793 ,0Pl4269, MP! 1285 , MP! 1282 __ #1 I A' !Description jYe s l~INA'jNR' jER#' or Initial cahbration acAL) 1£·,,···rt· t & '\,E · ;1t-·,, '; SI I I Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within OC limits? IX L_I_L_J Were oercent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? IX I e Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analvtes? i X i L I Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate the curve? IX L_L L_J Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? IX L_I __ 1_S_2 ___ +1-0=1=--}1=&=:=ti=~~e:=~=~'-~=~=~=:in=:wn=~=at=:~;-=-t ~=F=:=~=t!=~:=:~~=;:=~=~~= 1 ;=!=if=~m~· ?=gc~l=~~ an~Y~ 0 =_:=~P~~'-·C,c_~~s~:=cn= 0 ;~~=s=~=:i=c=:rn=. s=1;~ca=dar=lib=d;=· a=ti=o=n --:!-·:~,fi;,ii·°'·_ -~---:,_--,l·z;,r. ·,1~ ·. "'~;1 1-W'-'-=er"--e=pc:.,er-=c:..oen'-t'-d=ifli=e=-<r=en""c,c_es=-cfo=rc..:e=ac=h=an-==-al=v:te"'w=i=th~in=thi:e:.::cm=e'-"th-'-0-d--r-eQ-u-ir-e-d-Q-,C-linl-its-?--------,I: X~ ILLI I I I Was the ICAL curve verified for each analvte? . . . . . . Was the absolute value of the analvte concentration in the inornanic CCB < MDL? S8 S9 S10 Sll S12 Was the laboratorv's oerformance acceotable on the aoolicable oroficiencv tests or evaluation studies? lK._ L_ I or Standards documentation l ~~f~~W~ ;)11}}%~~ S13 Are all standards used in the analvses NIST-traceable or obtained from other aoorooriate sources? lK.J I I or Comoound/analvte identification orocedures l~~'i\Wii .. JMrif·;,~f~~ S14 I Are the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? lK._.,.,,1 ==""I ==·l~=-a=~ I or I Demonstration ofanalyst competency (DOC) J~l~~r~l~~~W!J:~ I Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chanter SC or ISO/IEC 4? IX LL_1l_ --+---l Is documentation of the analvst's comoetencv uo-to-date and on file? IX I I I S15 IOI I Verification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5) ~~~t~I &~~ ,__ ___ ,LI Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, where applicable? IX I I L_ or Laboratorv standard ooeratine: orocedures (SOPs): ~;;~'iit:i,l:];~1;;i;;l~g, S16 Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? J X I I LJ_ Items identified by the letter 'R" should be included in the laboratory data package submitted to the TCEQ in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by the letter ''S" should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. 2 0 = organic analyses; I= inorganic analyses (and general chemistry, mien applicable). 3 NA= Not applicable. RG-366/fRRP-13 December 2002 A3 I ll!l!'j 18 of 43 g'jACCUTEST. T 48708 L ,l b o r a t o r i e s I · . .__. Appendix A (cont'd): Laboratory Review CheckJist: Exception Reports Laboratory Name : Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast LRC Date: 3/22/2010 Project Name : HOWELL INSTRUMENT Laboratory Job Number : T49162 Reviewer Name : Paul K. Canevaro Prep Batch Number: VZ2793 ,0P14269, MPl 1285 , MPl 1282 I DESCR IPTION 1 For reporting purposes, the MQL is defined in the report as the RL. The unadjusted MQURL is reported in the 2 method blank. The SOL/MDL is defined in the reoort as the MDL. All anomalies are discussed in the case narrative ER# = Exception Report identification number ( an Exception Report should be completed for an item if "NR" or "No" is checked on the LRC) RG-366/TRRP-13 December 2002 A4 1111!1 19 of 43 g:jACCUTEST. T48708 L .1 b o,. .i t ori .e s liJl!i Gulf Coast ltiACCU i EST. L a b oratories ------------...-----¥• i 0 SALL 1N TH .C .CHEMI.S.TRY GC/MS Volatiles QC Data Summaries Includes the following where applicable: • Method Blank Summaries • Blank Spike Summaries • Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries Section 5 ml~ 20 of 4 3 ·(dACCUTEST. T 48708 ~ a b o r .i t o r i e s Method Blank Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample VZ2793-MB File ID DF 2007116.D 1 Analyzed By 03/08/10 RR The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 CASNo. Compound Result RL 67-64-1 Acetone ND 50 71-43-2 Benzene ND 2 .0 108-86-1 Bromobenzene ND 2 .0 74-97-5 Bromochloromethane ND 2.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane ND 2.0 75-25-2 Bromoform ND 2 .0 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene ND · 2.0 135-98 -8 sec-Butylbenzene ND 2 .0 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene ND 2.0 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene ND 2.0 75-00-3 Chloroethane ND 2.0 67-66-3 Chloroform ND 2.0 95-49-8 o-Chlorotoluene ND 2.0 106-43-4 p-Chlorotoluene ND 2 .0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide ND 2 .0 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride ND 2.0 75-34-3 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND 2.0 75-35-4 1, 1-Dichloroethylene ND 2.0 563-58-6 1, 1-Dichloropropene ND 2.0 96-12-8 1, 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 2.0 106-93-4 1 ,2-Dibromoethane ND 2 .0 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 2.0 78-87-5 1 , 2-Dichloropropane ND 2.0 142-28-9 1, 3-Dichloropropane ND 2.0 594-20-7 2, 2-Dichloropropane ND 2.0 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane ND 2.0 75 -71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 2.0 156-59-2 cis-1, 2-Dichloroethylene ND 2.0 10061-01-5 cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene ND 2.0 541-73-1 m-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.0 95-50-1 o-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.0 106-46-7 p-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.0 156-60-5 trans-I, 2-Dichloroethylene ND 2.0 10061-02-6 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ND 2.0 100-41-4 Ethyl benzene ND 2.0 591-78-6 2-Hexanone ND 10 Prep Date n/a MDL Units 4.7 ug/1 0 .50 ug/l 0 .82 ug/1 1.6 ug/1 0.49 ug/1 1.4 ug/1 0.63 ug/1 0 .52 ug/l 1.3 ug/l 0 .56 ug/1 0.92 ug/l 0.64 ug/1 0 .70 ug/1 0.56 ug/l 0.53 ug/l 0.66 ug/l 0 .52 ug/1 0.50 ug/1 0.78 ug/1 1.9 ug/1 0.55 ug/l 0.62 ug/1 0.62 ug/1 0.54 ug/1 0.62 ug/1 0.61 ug/1 1.1 ug/1 0.56 ug/1 0.48 ug/1 1.0 ug/1 0 .69 ug/1 1.0 ug/1 0.45 ug/1 0.68 ug/1 0.55 ug/1 3.2 ug/1 Page 1 of 3 Prep Batch Analytical Batch n/a VZ2793 Method: SW846 8260B Q fll!I 21 of 43 l:iACCUTEST. T 48708 L a b o r a t o r i e ~ Method Blank Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample VZ2793-MB File ID DF 2007116.D 1 Analyzed By 03/08/10 RR Prep Date n/a The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 CASNo. Compound Result RL MDL Units 87 -68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 2.0 1.3 ug/1 98-82-8 Isopropylbenzene ND 2 .0 0.51 ug/1 99-87-6 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 2.0 0.65 ug/1 108-10-1 4-Methyl -2-pentanone ND 10 9.9 ugn 74-83 -9 Methyl bromide ND 2 .0 0 .94 ug/1 74 -87-3 Methyl chloride ND 2 .0 0 .84 ug/1 74 -95-3 Methylene bromide ND 2 .0 0.65 ug/1 75-09-2 Methylene chloride ND 5.0 0.41 ug/1 78 -93-3 Methyl ethyl ketone ND 10 3.9 ug/1 1634 -04 -4 Methyl Tert Butyl Ether ND 2.0 0.73 ug/1 91-20-3 Naphthalene ND 5 .0 0 .65 ug/1 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene ND 2.0 0 .57 ug/1 100-42-5 Styrene ND 2.0 0 .56 ug/1 630-20-6 1, 1, l , 2-Tetrachloroethane ND 2 .0 0.80 ugn 71-55-6 1, 1, I-Trichloroethane ND 2 .0 0 .62 ug/1 79 -34-5 1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ND 2.0 1.2 ug/1 79-00 -5 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ND 2.0 0.98 ug/1 87-61-6 1, 2, 3-Trichlorobenzene ND 2.0 1.1 ug/1 96-18-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 2 .0 1.3 ugn 120-82-1 1, 2, 4-Trichlorobenzene ND 2.0 0.82 ug/1 95 -63-6 1, 2, 4-Trimethylbenzene ND 2.0 0.65 ug/1 108-67-8 1, 3, 5-Trimethylbenzene ND 2 .0 0.70 ug/1 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene ND 2.0 0.91 ug/1 108-88-3 Toluene ND 2.0 0.43 ug/1 79-01-6 Trichloroethylene ND 2.0 0 .52 ug/1 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 2.0 1.2 ugn 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride ND 2.0 1.0 ug/1 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) ND 6 .0 1.7 ugn m,p-Xylene ND 4.0 1.1 ug/1 95-47-6 o-Xylene ND 2.0 0 .53 ug/1 CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries Limits 1868-53-7 Dibromofluoromethane 99% 79-122% 17060-07-0 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 101% 75-121 % Page 2 of 3 Prep Batch Analytical Batch n/a VZ2793 Method: SW846 8260B Q 111!.1 22 of 43 •(ifACCUTEST. T48708 La b o rat or i c s Method Blank Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: How ell Instrum ents Sample VZ2793 -MB File ID DF 2007116 .D 1 Analyzed By 03/08/10 RR The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 CAS No . Surrogate Recoveries 2037-26-5 Toluene-DB 460 -00 -4 4-Bromofluorobenz ene 110 % 100% Limits 87-119 % 80 -133 % Prep Date n/a Prep Batch n/a Page 3 of 3 Analytical Batch VZ2793 Method: SW846 8260B 1111!:j 23 of 43 iaACCUTEST. T48708 L a b o,. a I 9 r i e s Blank Spike Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample File ID DF Analyzed VZ2793 -BS 2007114 .D 1 03/08/10 The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 Spike BSP CASNo. Compound ug/1 ug/1 67-64 -1 Acetone 125 109 71 -43-2 Benzene 25 26.4 108-86-1 Bromobenzene 25 23.9 74-97-5 Bromochloromethane 25 23.8 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 25 25.6 75-25-2 Bromoform 25 18 .6 104-51 -8 n-Butylbenzene 25 23 .9 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 25 24 .1 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 25 23.1 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 25 23 .5 75-00-3 Chloroethane 25 29 .5 67-66-3 Chloroform 25 25 .1 95-49-8 o-Chlorotoluene 25 25 .5 106-43-4 p-Chlorotoluene 25 23.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 25 26.5 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 25 27 .3 75-34-3 1, 1-Dichloroethane 25 24.6 75-35 -4 1, 1-Dichloroethylene 25 27.0 563-58 -6 1 , 1-Dichloropropene 25 27 .3 96-12-8 1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 25 17 .5 106-93-4 1 ,2-Dibromoethane 25 21.3 107-06-2 1, 2-Dichloroethane 25 24.0 78-87-5 1, 2-Dichloropropane 25 25.4 142-28-9 1 , 3-Dichloropropane 25 22.5 594-20-7 2 ,2-Dichloropropane 25 29.6 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 25 22.1 75 -71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 24.5 156-59-2 cis-1, 2-Dichloroethylene 25 25.4 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 25 21.8 541-73-1 m-Dichlorobenzene 25 23 .9 95-50-1 o-Dichlorobenzene 25 23 .3 106-46-7 p-Dichlorobenzene 25 22.8 156-60-5 trans-I , 2-Dichloroethylene 25 24.2 10061-02-6 trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene 25 20.5 100-41 -4 Ethylbenzene 25 25.3 591-78-6 2-Hexanone 125 85.8 By RR BSP % 87 106 96 95 102 74 96 96 92 94 118 100 102 92 106 109 98 108 109 70 85 96 102 90 118 88 98 102 87 96 93 91 97 82 101 69 Prep Date n/a Limits 62 -124 76 -118 72-110 69-110 68-107 64-103 74-114 76-118 72-116 74-111 75-135 75-117 74 -113 72-114 57-126 75-125 76-121 71-128 76-122 55-121 69-106 70-111 71-113 69-106 68-130 69-104 28-120 68-113 71-111 74-110 72-108 74-110 70-125 75-111 75-112 60 -113 Page 1 of 3 Prep Batch Analytical Batch n/a VZ2793 CJ1 ?'> .... Method: SW846 8260B £11!1 24 of 43 (dACCUTEST. T 48708 L ., b o r .t t p r i e s Blank Spike Summary Page 2 of 3 Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch VZ2793-BS Z007114.D 1 03/08/10 RR n/a n/a VZ2793 ~ I',) _,. The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: SW846 8260B T48708-1 Spike BSP BSP CASNo. Compound ug/1 ug/1 % Limits 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 25 25 .5 102 72-123 98-82-8 Isopropylbenzene 25 23.3 93 75 -123 99 -87-6 p-Isopropyltoluene 25 23 .8 95 76 -116 108-10-1 4-Methyl -2-pentanone 125 93 .9 75 63-115 74-83-9 Methyl bromide 25 27 .3 109 59-132 74 -87-3 Methyl chloride 25 25 .1 100 56-150 74 -95-3 Methylene bromide 25 23 .9 96 68-114 75 -09 -2 Methylene chloride 25 25.3 101 70-113 78-93-3 Methyl ethyl ketone 125 98.4 79 62-117 1634-04 -4 Methyl Tert Butyl Ether 25 20 .7 83 65-113 91-20-3 Naphthalene 25 16.5 66 53-127 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 25 23.7 95 74-115 100-42-5 Styrene 25 22 .8 91 66-100 630-20-6 1 , 1 , 1, 2-Tetrachloroethane 25 23.9 96 72-108 71-55-6 1, 1 , I-Trichloroethane 25 27.4 110 76-125 79-34-5 1, 1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane 25 19 .8 79 67-110 79-00-5 1 , 1, 2-Trichloroethane 25 22 .3 89 69 -107 87-61 -6 1,2 ,3-Trichlorobenzene 25 21.6 86 51-128 96-18-4 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane 25 20 .3 81 55 -116 120-82-1 1 , 2, 4-Trichlorobenzene 25 22.2 89 63-114 95-63-6 1 ,2, 4-Trimethylbenzene 25 23 .3 93 73-111 108-67-8 1 , 3, 5-Trimethylbenzene 25 23 .3 93 74 -115 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 25 23.6 94 77-120 108-88-3 Toluene 25 25.2 101 77 -114 79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 25 25.4 102 74-117 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 25 27.2 109 64-132 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 25 30.3 121 64-121 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 75 74 .5 99 75 -111 m,p-Xylene 50 51.8 104 75-112 95-47-6 o-Xylene 25 22 .7 91 74-110 CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries BSP Limits 1868-53-7 Dibromofluoromethane 101% 79 -122% 17060-07-0 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 99% 75-121 % '~ - fll!j 25 of 43 (jACCUTEST. T48708 l a bor :t lo r i es Blank Spike Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample VZ2793-BS File ID DF 2007114 .D 1 Analyzed By 03/08/10 RR The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries 2037-26-5 Toluene-D8 460-00 -4 4-Bromofluorobenzene BSP 103 % 98 % Limits 87-119 % 80-133 % Prep Date n/a Page 3 of 3 Prep Batch Analytical Batch n/a VZ2793 Method: SW846 8260B fll!I 26 of 43 g'iACCUTEST. T48708 .L .i b o r a t or i e s Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Page 1 of 3 Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch T48731 -4MS 2007127 .D 1 03/08/10 RR n/a n/a VZ2793 T48731 -4 MSD 2007128 .D 1 03/08/10 RR n/a n/a VZ2793 !J1 T48731-4 2007126.D 1 03/08/10 RR n/a n/a VZ2793 ~ """ The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: SW846 8260B \ T48708-l T48731-4 Spike MS MS MSD MSD Limits CASNo. Compound ug/1 Q ug/1 ug/1 % ug/1 % RPD Rec/RPD 67 -64-1 Acetone 18 .1 J 125 96 .2 62 95.4 62 1 62-12 4/21 71 -43-2 Benzene ND 25 26 .2 105 25 .3 101 3 76 -11 8/16 108-86-1 Bromobenzene ND 25 23.7 95 23.7 95 0 72 -110 /12 74-97-5 Bromochloromethane ND 25 23.3 93 22 .6 90 3 69 -110/12 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane ND 25 24.7 99 24 .3 97 2 68-107/12 75-25-2 Bromoform ND 25 17 .1 68 16 .9 68 1 64 -10 3/14 104-51 -8 n-Butylbenzene ND 25 23 .3 93 22 .6 90 3 74 -11 4/12 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene ND 25 24.2 97 23 .9 96 1 76 -118/12 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene ND 25 23 .9 96 23 .6 94 1 72-116/14 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene ND 25 23 .5 94 23 .2 93 1 74 -111/11 75-00-3 Chloroethane ND 25 25 .3 101 23 .8 95 6 75-135/15 67-66-3 Chloroform ND 25 25.4 102 24 .8 99 2 75-117/12 95-49-8 o-Chlorotoluene ND 25 25 .8 103 25 .5 102 1 74 -113/12 106-43-4 p-Chlorotoluene ND 25 24 .3 97 24.1 96 1 72-114/12 75-15 -0 Carbon disulfide ND 25 25 .8 103 24 .2 97 6 57-126/13 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride ND 25 26.4 106 25.0 100 5 75 -12 5/12 75-34-3 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND 25 25 .2 101 24 .5 98 3 76-121/13 75-35 -4 1 , 1-Dichloroethylene ND 25 26 .2 105 24 .5 98 7 71-128/19 563-58-6 1 , 1-Dichloropropene ND 25 26.5 106 25 .9 104 2 76 -122/12 96-12-8 1, 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 25 18 .2 73 18.5 74 2 55 -121/33 106-93-4 1 ,2-Dibromoethane ND 25 21.1 84 20.7 83 2 69-106/13 107-06-2 1 , 2-Dichloroethane ND 25 23.4 94 22.2 89 5 70-111/14 78-87-5 1 ,2-Dichloropropane ND 25 25 .6 102 25 .8 103 1 71 -113/12 142-28-9 1 , 3-Dichloropropane ND 25 22.4 90 21.7 87 3 69 -106/12 594-20-7 2 ,2-Dichloropropane ND 25 28 .3 113 27 .7 111 2 68-130/14 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane ND 25 22 .1 88 21.7 87 2 69-104/12 75-71-8 Djchlorodifluoromethane ND 25 21.2 85 19.3 77 9 28-120/21 156-59-2 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene ND 25 26.5 106 . 26.5 106 0 68-113/13 10061-01-5 cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene ND 25 23 .1 92 22.9 92 1 71-111/12 541-73-1 m-Dichlorobenzene ND 25 23 .8 95 23.8 95 0 74-110/12 95-50-1 o-Dichlorobenzene ND 25 23.6 .94 23.5 94 0 72-108/12 106-46-7 p-Dichlorobenzene ND 25 22.4 90 22.3 89 0 74 -110/12 156-60-5 trans-I, 2-Dichloroethylene ND 25 25.3 101 25 .8 103 2 70-125/14 10061-02-6 trans-I , 3-Dichloropropene ND 25 22 .1 88 22.1 88 0 75-111/12 100-41-4 Ethyl benzene ND 25 25.2 101 24.4 98 3 75-112/12 591-78-6 2-Hexanone ND 125 90.9 73 84.6 68 7 60-113/18 -· fll!I 27 of 43 (iACCUTEST. T48708 Labor al o r i es Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date T48731-4MS Z007127 .D 1 03/08/10 RR n/a T48731-4MSD Z007128 .D 1 03/08/10 RR n/a T48731-4 Z007126.D 1 03/08/10 RR n/a The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 T48731-4 Spike MS MS CASNo. Compound ug/1 Q ug/1 ug/1 % 87-68 -3 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 25 29.4 118 98 -82 -8 Isopropylbenzene ND 25 28 .7 115 99-87 -6 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 25 23 .0 92 108-10-1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 125 94 .2 75 74-83-9 Methyl bromide ND 25 25.2 101 74-87-3 Methyl chloride ND 25 22.4 90 74-95-3 Methylene bromide ND 25 22.7 91 75-09-2 Methylene chloride ND 25 24 .9 100 78-93 -3 Methyl ethyl ketone ND 125 83.5 67 1634-04-4 Methyl Tert Butyl Ether ND 25 20 .0 80 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0 .80 J 25 22 .3 86 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene ND 25 24.0 96 100-42-5 Styrene ND 25 21.9 88 630-20-6 1 , 1, 1, 2-Tetrachloroethane ND 25 24.4 98 71-55 -6 1, 1 , 1-Trichloroethane ND 25 27.4 110 79-34-5 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 25 21.5 86 79-00-5 1, 1 ,2-Trichloroethane ND 25 22 .0 88 87-61-6 1 , 2, 3-Trichlorobenzene ND 25 21.8 87 96-18-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 25 1.8 7* 120-82-1 1, 2, 4-Trichlorobenzene ND 25 23.2 93 95-63-6 1 , 2, 4-Trimethylbenzene ND 25 23 .1 92 108 -67-8 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 25 23 .1 92 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene ND 25 23 .6 94 108-88-3 Toluene ND 25 25 .9 104 79-01-6 Trichloroethylene ND 25 25 .1 100 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 25 23.8 95 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride ND 25 26 .6 106 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) ND 75 74 .3 99 m,p-Xylene ND 50 50.8 102 95-47-6 o-Xylene ND 25 23.5 94 CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries MS MSD T48731-4 1868-53-7 Dibromofluoromethane 89% 90% 92% 17060-07-0 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 83% 82% 89% Page 2 of 3 Prep Batch Analytical Batch n/a VZ2793 n/a VZ2793 ~ n/a VZ2793 s,.> .... Method: SW846 8260B MSD MSD ug/1 % 28 .2 113 29.0 116 22.9 92 94 .8 76 23 .2 93 21.3 85 22.2 89 24 .1 96 83.6 67 19.3 77 22.4 86 23.4 94 21.9 88 23 .3 93 26.1 104 21.3 85 21.4 86 21.6 86 18.6 74 22.9 92 23 .0 92 23 .0 92 23.3 93 25.4 102 24.8 99 21.6 86 24.4 98 73.4 98 50.6 101 22.8 91 Limits 79-122% 75-121 % Limits RPD Rec/RPD 4 72-123/17 1 75-123/12 0 76-116/12 1 63-115/21 8 59-132/15 5 56-150/17 2 68-114/13 3 70-113/13 0 62 -117/21 4 65 -113/13 0 53-127/34 3 74-115/12 0 66-100/11 5 72-108/11 5 76-125/11 1 67-110/20 3 69 -107/14 1 51-128/31 165* 55-116/27 1 0 0 1 2 1 10 9 1 0 3 63-114/21 73-111/13 74-115/12 77-120/13 77-114/12 74-117/12 64-132/18 64-121/19 75-111/12 75-112/12 74-110/11 ffllr!t 28 of 43 rdACCUTEST. T48708 lab -oratories Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample T48731 -4MS T48731 -4MSD T48731 -4 File ID DF Z007127 .D 1 Z007128 .D 1 Z007126.D 1 Analyzed 03/08/10 03/08/10 03/08/10 By RR RR RR The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries 2037 -26 -5 Toluene-D8 460-00-4 4-Bromofluorobenzene MS 95 % 94 % MSD 98 % 97 % Prep Date n/a n/a n/a Prep Batch n/a n/a n/a Page 3 of 3 Analytical Batch VZ2793 VZ2793 VZ2793 Method: SW846 8260B I T48731-4 Limits 102 % 95 % 87-119 % 80 -133 % 111!1 29 of 43 ;aACCUTEST. T48708 lab o rat or i e s Ill~ Gulf Co ast ~ACCUTES"T: Laboratories -·--·-----·-··--~ 0 -··--· .. -.. ··--·-· ----·-----· ------j ·---------- 11"5 A .L L lN THc CHEf-1.iST .llY GC Semi-volatiles QC Data Summaries Includes the following where applicable: • Method Blank Summaries • Blank Spike Summaries • Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries Section 6 ·---------------- fll!J 30 of 43 (dACCUTEST. T48708 l a b o r 3 tor i e s Method Blank Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample OP14269-MB File ID DF LL035I56 .D 1 Analyzed By 03/11/10 EM Prep Date 03/11/10 The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 CASNo. Compound Result RL MDL Units TPH (C6-CI2) ND 2.5 0.59 mg/I TPH ( > C 12-C28) ND 2 .5 0 .90 mg/I TPH ( > C28 -C35) ND 2 .5 0.90 mg/I TPH (C6-C35) ND 2 .5 0.5 9 mg/I CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries Limits 84-15-1 o-TerphenyI 104% 70-130 % 98-08-8 aaa-Trifluorotoiuene 104% 70-130 % Page 1 of 1 Prep Batch Analytical Batch OPI4269 GLF512 Method: TNRCC 1005 Q 1111!1 31 of 43 gA~UTEST. T48708 l a b o r a t o r i es Blank Spike/Blank Spike Duplicate Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample OP14269-BS OP14269-BSD File ID DF LL035157 .D 1 LL035158.D 1 Analyz.ed 03/11/10 03/11/10 The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-l Spike BSP CASNo. Compound mg/1 mg/1 TPH (C6-Cl2) 49.9 50.3 TPH ( > C12-C28) 49.9 56.1 TPH (C6-C35) 106 By EM EM CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries BSP BSD BSP % 101 112 84-15-1 o-Terphenyl 97% 105% 98-08-8 aaa-Trifluorotoluene 103% 96% Prep Date 03/11/10 03/11/10 Prep Batch OP14269 OP14269 Page 1 of 1 Analytical Batch GLB512 GLF512 Method: TNRCC 1005 BSD BSD mg/1 % 50.4 101 52 .5 105 103 Limits 70-130% 70-130% RPD 0 7 3 Limits Rec/RPD 75-125/25 75-125/25 75-125/30 1111!1 32 of 43 li3ACCUTEST. T 48708 L a b o r a t o r i c s Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Job Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments Sample OP14269-MS OP14269-MSD T49005-1 File ID DF LL035159.D 1 LL035160 .D 1 LL035164.D 1 Analyzed By 03/11/10 EM 03/11/10 EM 03/11/10 EM The QC reported here applies to the following samples: T48708-1 T49005-1 Spike CASNo. Compound mg/1 Q mg/1 TPH (C6-C12) ND 49.8 TPH ( > C 12 -C28) ND 49.8 TPH (C6 -C35) ND CASNo. Surrogate Recoveries MS MSD 84-15-1 o-Terphenyl 110% 102% 98-08-8 aaa-Trifluorotoluene 102 % 94% Prep Date 03/11/10 03/11/10 03/11/10 MS MS mg/I % 55 .6 112 60 .8 122 116 T49005-1 98% 95% Prep Batch OP14269 OP14269 OP14269 Page I of I Analytical Batch GLB512 GLF512 GLF512 Method: TNRCC 1005 .... MSD MSD mg/I % 50.2 102 49.9 101 100 Limits 70-130% 70 -130% Limits RPD Rec/RPD 10 20 15 75-125/25 75 -125/25 75-125/25 &11!1 33 of 43 ·rJACCUTEST. T48708 L ab o r a t o r ; e s .- l!ill!I Gulf Coast l3ACCUTEST. Labora t ories Metals Analysis QC Data Summaries Includes the following where applicable : • Method Blank Summaries • Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries • Blank Spike and Lab Control Sample Summaries • Serial Dilution Summaries Sectio n 7 I 111!1 34 of 43 l3ACCUTEST. T48708 L a b o r a t o r i e s QC Batch ID: MP11282 Matrix Type: AQUEOUS Prep Date: !Metal RL Mercury 0.20 IDL .049 BLANK RESULTS SUMMARY Part 2 -Method Blanks Login Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments MB MDL raw .094 0.0030 03/10/10 final <0.20 Methods: SW846 7470A Units: ug/1 Associated samples MP11282: T48708-1A Results< IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested Page 1 II llll!I 35 of 43 (\fACCUTEST. T4 8708 L ,1 b o r a l or i e ~ MATRIX SPIKE AND DUPLICATE RESULTS SUMMARY Login Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments QC Batch ID: MP11282 Matrix Type: AQUEOUS Prep Date: T48732 -l Metal Original 03/10/10 DUP RPD QC Limits T48732-l Original MS Methods: SW846 7470A Units: ug/1 03/10/10 Spikelot HGTXAQ40 % Rec NC Associated samples MP11282: T48708-1A Mercury 0.0 0.0 0-6.6 0.0 3.5 3 116. 7 Results< IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (N) Matrix Spike Rec. outside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested Page 1 QC Limits 78-118 II fll!:I 36 of 43 ~ACCUTEST. T48708 L .l b orator i e s MATRIX SPIKE AND DUPLICATE RESULTS SUMMARY Login Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments QC Batch ID: MP11282 Matrix Type: AQUEOUS Prep Date: Metal Mercury T48732~1 Original MSD 0 .0 3 .5 Spikelot HGTXAQ40 % Rec 3 116. 7 Associated samples MP11282: T48708-1A 03/10/10 MSD RPD 0.0 Results < IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (N) Matrix Spike Rec. outside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested Page 2 Methods: SW846 7470A Uni ts: ug/1 QC Limit II (lll!j 37 of 43 l;iACCUTEST. T48708 Labor ;it o r i e s ···- SPIKE BLANK AND LAB CONTROL SAMPLE SUMMARY Login Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project: Howe l l Instruments QC Batch ID : Matrix Type: Prep Date: Metal Mercury MP11282 AQUEOUS BSP Result 3.2 03/10/10 Spikelot HGTXAQ40 % Rec 3 106.7 Associated samples MP11282: T48708 -1A QC Limits 80-120 Resul ts< IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested Page 1 Methods: SW846 7470A Units: ug/1 I illl!'J 38 of 43 [dACCU I EST. T48708 l ab o r a t o r i e s BLANK RESULTS SUMMARY Part 2 -Method Blanks Login Nwnber: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments QC Batch ID: MP11285 Methods: Matrix Type: AQUEOUS Units: Prep Date: 03/10/10 !Metal MB RL IDL MDL raw final Aluminum 200 16 17 Antimony 5.0 2.3 3 Arsenic 5.0 1. 8 2 0.34 <5.0 Bari urn 200 .14 2.7 0.040 <200 Beryllium 5.0 .11 . 2 Boron 100 1.1 2.1 Cadmium 4 .0 .25 . 3 -0.10 <4.0 Calcium 5000 5.4 35 Chromium 10 1.1 1. 9 -5.6 <10 Cobalt 50 .5 .8 Copper 25 .58 5.9 Iron 100 13 13 Lead 3.0 1. 6 1. 7 o. 71 <3.0 Magnesium 5000 6 .7 7.8 Manganese 15 . 2 7.6 Molybdenum 10 .96 1. 3 Nickel 40 .95 3.2 Potassium 5000 53 53 Selenium 5.0 3.2 3.2 0.060 <5.0 Silver 10 .85 .8 -0.37 <10 Sodium 5000 130 130 Strontium 20 .17 . 4 Thallium 10 3 .2 2.6 Tin 20 1. 8 2.9 Titanium 20 .3 .3 Vanadium 50 . 6 .6 Zinc 20 .49 4.1 Associated samples MP11285: T48708 -1A Results< IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested Page 1 SW846 60106 ug/1 --I !'-> .... II flll!I 39 of 4 3 l:iACCUTEST. T48708 la b o r a t 9 r i e s MATRIX SPIKE AND DUPLICATE RESULTS SUMMARY Login Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Proj ect: Howell Instruments QC Batch ID: MP11285 Methods: SW846 Matrix Ty pe: AQU EOUS Units: ug/1 Prep Date: 03/10/10 T48840-l QC T48840 -l Spikelot Metal Original DUP RPD Limits Original MS MPTW4 Aluminum Antimony anr Ars enic 17 .6 17.9 1. 7 0-20 17.6 430 400 Barium 99.7 98.7 1. 0 0-20 99 .7 540 400 Beryllium Boron Cadmium 0.0 0.0 NC 0-20 0.0 411 400 Calcium Chromium 0.0 0 .0 NC 0 -20 0.0 410 400 Cobalt anr Copper anr Iron Lead 2.9 2. 4 18 .9 0 -20 2 .9 411 400 Magnes ium Man ganese Molybdenum Nickel anr Potassium Selenium 8.6 9 .5 9.9 0 -20 8.6 411 400 Silver 0 .0 0.0 NC 0 -20 0.0 433 400 Sodium Strontium Tha llium Tin anr Titanium anr Vanadium a n r Zinc anr Associated samples MP 11 285 : T48708-1A Resul t s < IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (N) Matrix Spike Rec. outside of QC limits (anr) Ana l yte not requested Page 1 6010B 03/10/10 QC % Rec Limits 103.1 80-120 110.1 80 -120 102 .8 80-120 102.5 80-120 102.0 80-120 100.6 80 -120 108.3 80 -1 20 "'-I !--> I\J I tlll!I 4 0 of 43 .~ACCUTEST. T48708 L :i b o r a t or i e s MATRIX SPIKE AND DUPLICATE RESULTS SUMMARY Login Number : T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project : Howell Instruments QC Batch ID: MP 11 285 Methods: Matrix Type: AQUEOUS Prep Date: 03/10/10 T48840-1 Spikelot MSD Metal Original MSD MPTW4 % Rec RPD Aluminum Antimony anr Arsenic 17.6 433 400 103.9 0.7 Barium 99.7 540 400 110.1 0.0 Beryllium Boron Cadmium 0.0 411 400 102 .8 0.0 Calcium Chromium 0.0 410 400 102 .5 0.0 Cobalt anr Copper anr Iron Lead 2.9 413 400 102.5 0 .5 Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel anr Potassium Selenium 8.6 410 400 100.4 0.2 Silver 0 .0 433 400 108.3 0.0 Sodium Strontium Thallium Tin anr Titanium anr Vanadium anr Zinc anr Associated samples MP11285: T48708-1A Results< IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (N) Matrix Spike Rec. o utside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested Page 2 Units: QC Limit 20 20 20 2 0 20 20 20 SW846 ug/1 6010B ...... ..., ..., I Ill~ 41 of 43 l::iACCUTEST. T48708 L,1bor;\tories SPIKE BLANK AND LAB CONTROL SAMPLE SUMMARY Login Number: T48708 Account: COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments QC Batch ID: MP11285 Matrix Type: AQUEOUS Prep Date: Metal Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Strontium Thallium BSP Result anr 398 403 401 anr anr 400 anr 387 412 Tin anr Titanium anr Vanadium anr Zinc anr Spikelot MPTW4 400 400 400 400 400 400 03/10/10 % Rec 99.5 100.8 100.3 100.0 96.8 103.0 Associated samples MP11285: T48708-1A QC Limits 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 80-120 Results< IDL are shown as zero for calcul ation p u rposes (*) Outside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested Page 1 Methods: SW846 6010B Units: ug/1 ...... ;,., w I 11)(!1 42 of 4 3 CiACCUTEST. T48708 L.1 b or ;i t or i e i QC Batch ID: MP11285 Matrix Type: AQUEOUS Prep Date: Metal Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Ni ckel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Strontium Thallium T48840-l Original anr 17. 6 99.7 0.00 0 .00 anr anr 2.93 anr 8 .57 0.00 Tin anr Titanium anr Vanadium anr Zinc anr SDL 1:5 15.0 100 0.00 0.00 9.51 0.00 0.00 SERIAL DILUTION RESULTS SUMMARY Login Number: T48708 Account : COFWTXFW -City of Fort Worth Project: Howell Instruments 03/10/10 QC %DIF Limits 14.6 (a) 0-1 0 0.8 0-10 NC 0-10 NC 0-10 224.6(al 0-10 100.0(a) 0-10 NC 0-1 0 Methods: SW846 60106 Units: ug/1 Associated samples MP11285: T48708-1A Result.s < IDL are shown as zero for calculation purposes (*) Outside of QC limits (anr) Analyte not requested (a) Percent difference acceptable due to low initial sample concentration (< 50 times IDL). Page 1 ...... "3 ~ I 111!1 43 of 43 ~ACCUTEST. T48708 L J. b o r 3 l o r i e s [!j ACCUTES1f: CHAIN OF CUSTODY L aboratories 10165 Harwin, Suite 150 -Houston, TX 77036 -713-271-4700 fax: 713-271-4770 Client/ Reoortina Information Company Name Citv of Fort Worth EMO Project Contact Roaer Grantham Address 908 Monroe Street, 7th Floor City State Fort Worth TX Phone No . 817-392-5453 Samplers's Name Accutest Sample# Fiel d ID / Point of Collecti on Turnaround Time ( Business days) I._ __ ......Jl10 Day STANDARD l I 7 Day 1::::==~l 4 Day RUSH Li ___ _,! 3 Day EMERGENCY ... I ___ _,! 2 Day EMERGENCY r._ __ ___.l 1 Day EMERGENCY i.,; ', ,'.; ." ., ;;;.·• ' .·, I Project Name / No. Former Fort Worth Rifle/P istol Club (FWTHRPC006) E-Mail B i ll to Invoice Attn . Address Zip City State Zip 76102 Fax No. Phone No. Fax No. Client Purchase Order# Collection Number of preserved bottles Date Time #of Matrix bott les ~ ~ § ~ § ~ @ z~ z J: I ffi ~ :i!: ' ,. Approved By:/ Date: ' i Data De liverable In form ation I.J D Commercial "A" D Commercial "B" D Reduced Tier 1 D Full Data Package D TRRP-13 D EDD Format. ___ _ D Other. _____ _ Commercial "A" = Results Only l I Other Commercial "B" = Results & Standard QC Real time analytical data available via Lab/ink FED-EX Tracking# Accutest Quote # , ,;, ''' ··· ,, ,.,.,' , ·, ·''-I SAMPLE CUSTODY MUST BE DOCUMENTED BELOW EACH TIME SAMPLES CHANGE POSSESSION , INCLUDING COURIER DELIVERY Relinquished by Sampler: Date Time: Rec ei ved By : Relinquished By : Date Time : 1 1 2 Relinquished by : Date Time: Received By : Re linqu ished By : Date Time: 3 3 4 Relinquished by: Dat e Time: Received By: Custody Seal# Preserved where applicable " J -~ " D ---i-- Bottle Order Control # Accutest Job # Reauested Analvses Comm ents I Rem arks Received By : 2 Received By: 4 On Ice D Cc Matrix 1,;odes OW -Dri nki ng W ater GW -Ground Water WW -Wastewate r SO -Soil SL -Sludge 01-0il LIQ -Liquid SOL -Oth er Solid LAB USE ONLY "] Method: lnstrument(s): Analyst: Cmpd./Element/Parm. Name 4-Chloroan il ine Carbazole Chrysene bis (2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether bis(Chloromethyl)ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl )ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1,2-Dichloro ben zene 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 1, 3-D ichloroben zene 1,4-D ichlorobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-D initrotoluene 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 7 , 12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene Dibenz(a ,h)acridine Dibenzo(a,hlanthracene Dibenzofuran Diphenylam ine Di -n-butvl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate Diethyl ph thalate Dimethyl phthalate 1,4-Dioxane bis(2-Ethylhexyl )phthalate Fluoranthene Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexach lorobutadiene Hexach lo rocyclopentad iene Hexachloroethane lndene lndeno(1,2,3-cd )pyrene lsophorone 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylnaohtha lene 6-Methvl Chrvsene 2-Nitroaniline FALSF SW846 8270C (AB8270) GCMSH, GCMSJ , GCMSP , Pooled Analysis Spike R1 Date ug/kg ug/kg 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 193.64 7-Jan-09 166.6665 132.89 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 137 .76 5-Jan -09 166.6665 93.78 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 94 .70 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 82.43 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 91 .52 6-Jan-09 166.6665 130 .54 6-Jan-09 166.6665 109.73 5-Jan-09 166.6665 101 .64 7-Jan-09 166.6665 110.02 5-Jan-09 166.6665 109 .64 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 90 .72 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 85 .31 5-Jan-09 166.6665 129 .05 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 70.49 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 73.14 7-Jan -09 166.6665 101 .83 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 118.61 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 171 .25 6-Jan-09 166.6665 149.82 6-Jan -09 166.6665 96 .54 6-Jan-09 166.6665 11 9.86 5-Jan-09 166.6665 100 .79 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 133.47 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 156.45 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 137.43 6-Jan-09 166.6665 118.45 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 133.17 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 110 .08 14-Jan-09 833 .3325 397.67 5-Jan-0 9 166.666 5 116.5 1 7-Jan-0 9 166.6665 1494.53 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 B0 .91 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 106 .99 5-Jan-09 166.6665 112.46 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 103.53 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 136 .57 5-Jan-09 166.6665 65.05 R2 ug/kg 170.69 153 .94 163.15 110.33 9 1.59 126.91 126.73 167 .50 129.30 131 .15 130.03 128.12 121 .83 118.31 136.47 74 .11 81.13 35 .94 152.64 198.98 188 .05 133.44 154 .95 131 .24 156 .20 173.50 165.98 154.83 172.43 134 .05 508 .12 126.26 1525.41 126.31 133.73 119.86 135.76 146.83 99 .12 Replicate Spikes R3 R4 R5 RS ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 142.69 73 .54 167.86 160.50 142.08 154.94 129.91 149.01 132.16 152.06 142 .13 145 .21 109 .27 115.90 111.47 87 .09 96.45 100.27 110.78 78.47 117.32 119.95 110.27 99.48 121 .6 1 117 .82 124.71 86.56 152.46 163.49 139 .25 130.15 125.94 127.29 118.55 106.51 11 8 .06 120 .55 97 .76 92 .39 125.49 125.77 116.30 104.10 119.98 156.57 115 .76 91.63 118.48 123.91 104 .67 107 .67 110 .02 126.65 97.09 95.91 106.14 177 .15 117.81 142 .97 85.56 90 .50 89.46 73 .22 82 .03 37 .4 1 92 .53 88 .60 92.86 58.08 60.65 77 .70 142 .00 151 .09 128.41 119.74 193.52 202 .67 178.44 170 .33 162.43 176.11 149.37 172.65 107.13 120.82 103.04 119.38 139.44 150.94 123.75 130.34 123.74 135 .34 113.00 93 .72 130 .26 134.47 117 .92 119.87 2 14.96 186.75 2 13 .79 166.49 148.71 160.65 137.66 155 .79 141 .53 150.78 126.26 120.24 151 .59 166.46 136.25 134 .86 119 .67 128 .04 126.20 B9 .8B 4 7 1.04 665 .64 552 .23 498.44 105 .66 136.80 130.09 106.50 21 53 .68 1970 .78 1810.09 1671 .73 78 .6 1 119.72 66 .21 105.66 123.99 133.22 114 .89 105.50 132 .17 122.81 120.60 92.44 108 .00 139 .36 114 .97 . 93 .66 197.70 176.75 156.94 150.17 120.25 BB .72 84 .30 91 .08 Matrix: Quant Factor: Study Period: R7 X-Bar X-Bar ug/kg ug/kg %Recov. 146.48 150.77 90.46 140.60 143.34 86 .00 129.94 143.20 85.92 93 .63 103.07 61 .84 73 .85 92 .30 55.38 111.44 109.69 65.81 127.97 113.85 68.31 146.00 147.06 88.23 116.39 119.10 71.46 112.90 110.63 66.38 118.34 118.58 71.15 121 .55 120.47 72.28 110.78 111 .15 66.69 102 .03 105 .05 63 .03 120.20 132.83 79.70 81.19 80.65 48 .39 103.57 79 .77 47.86 116.32 77.63 46.58 135 .75 135.46 81 .28 179.30 184 .93 110.96 159.32 165.39 99 .24 108.79 112.73 67.64 133.86 136.16 81 .70 115 .10 116.13 69.68 133.79 132.28 79.37 189 .02 185 .85 111 .51 147.03 150.46 90 .28 134.17 135.18 B1 .11 147.57 149.19 89.51 122 .55 118.92 71 .35 429.15 503 .21 60.39 100 .93 117.53 70.52 2050 .36 1810.94 1066.57 93.49 98 .70 59 .22 116.60 119 .27 71 .56 111.93 116.04 69.62 112.16 115.35 69.21 165.67 161 .52 96.91 120.29 95 .54 57.33 so 33 .33 January,2009 STD.Dev. ug/kg 38.0 1 9.81 11 .61 11 .23 12.65 1~9:'11'$1 14 .78 17.33 14.93 8.87 13.90 9 .30 19.72 .;wtJit'i §f,.Qft 11.56 14 .22 23.07 '¥,f:'Hi7 2.4§'. 8.17 21 .03 28 .06 13.92 c::~)ta.lle: 13.29 14 .29 12.53 13,17 15.29 12.55 22.48 10 .97 14.45 15.43 14 .91 87.98 1 3. 01 1&t1iii{Jr.i!:~1i11; '"T·-1 18.96 11 .49 12.44 16.68 .;!! 20.6o mWt17ifl;isa''7 5'1 19.B2 l'I1\ti,~)I/3~,:3fi] Spike/MDL Ratio 1.40 5.41 4 .57 4 .72 4.19 3.59 3.06 3 .55 5 .98 3 .82 5 .70 2 .69 4.59 3.73 2 .30 6.49 2 .52 1.89 3.81 3.99 3.71 4 .23 4 .03 3.47 4 .23 2 .36 4 .84 3 .67 3 .44 3 .56 3.01 3 .84 0.21 2 .80 4 .61 4 .26 3.18 2 .57 2.68 Method: lnstrument(s): Analyst: Cmpd./Element/Parm. Name 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline Naphthalene Nitrobenzene n-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine N-N itrosodiethylamine N-N itrosodiphenylamine 2-P icoline Pentachlorobenzene Phenan threne Pyrene Pyridine Quinoline 1,2,4 ,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene FALS' SW846 8270C (AB827Q.) GCMSH, GCMSJ , GCMSP, Pooled Analysis Spike R1 Date ug/kg ug/kg 5-Jan-09 166.6665 81.84 5-Jan-09 166.6665 102.92 5-Jan-09 166.6665 109.64 7-Jan-09 166.6665 106 .02 5-Jan-09 166.6665 38 .02 5-Jan-09 166.6665 99.97 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 115 .31 5-Jan-09 166.6665 102.54 6-Jan-09 166.6665 17 1.25 7-Jan-09 166.6665 37 .16 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 118.12 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 116.89 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 119.21 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 34.92 7-Jan-09 166.6665 17.17 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 114.68 5-Jan-09 166.6665 97 .96 Replicate Spikes R2 R3 R4 RS ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 115.40 112.54 115.34 139.99 150 .81 118.99 164.94 107.60 121 .62 119.50 125 .99 115.58 124.28 121.84 122.04 112 .51 46.14 27 .34 25.28 41.08 93 .14 123.45 118.41 95 .82 149.40 107 .79 . 132.25 121 .52 89 .05 96 .38 119.48 89 .29 198.98 193.52 202 .67 178.44 47.86 39 .74 63.91 26 .59 151 .05 137.84 144.19 129.36 144.51 120.04 148.69 111 .44 149 .56 130.12 141 .00 128.06 17 .30 15.89 30.22 10.36 22 .70 18 .87 9.73 17.47 140.61 133.93 136.51 123.20 132.79 120.88 126.88 127.66 Matrix: Quant Factor: Study Period: RS R7 X-Bar X-Bar ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg %Recov. 80.39 94.76 105.75 63.45 162.93 165.35 139.08 83.45 93.82 110.75 113.85 68.31 101 .77 114.31 114 .68 68 .81 59.54 40.88 39.75 23 .85 91 .30 114.21 105.18 63 .11 87 .33 131.34 120.71 72.42 93.31 83.26 96 .19 57 .71 170.33 179.30 184.93 110.96 37 .55 53.40 43.74 26 .25 113.44 134.37 132.63 79.58 121 .30 125.12 126.86 76 .11 141 .36 129.52 134.12 80.47 24.93 30 .78 23.49 14.09 23.12 34.58 20.52 12.31 112.28 128 .93 127.16 76.30 100.69 121 .57 118.35 71 .01 so 33 .33 January,2009 STD.Dev .• Spike/MDL ug/kg Ratio $-ii\.~ 21 .37 S~'ff/f6o~1:§. 2.48 28.19 1J,fitf 8at ~1r 1.88 10.58 ,3;:i ~ 5.01 8.60 6 .16 11 .56 4 .59 13.18 4 .02 19.92 ~P,J\'$;,i,!3~/5~ 2 .66 11 .95 4.44 13.29 3.99 12.31 4 .31 13.50 -3.93 14.18 J\1-'1?11AW.~s 3 .74 10.29 ,;.\?~3~,:~), 5.16 9.12 5.81 7 .62 6.96 10.88 .:'fh~lf ~~;i,~ 4.87 13.62 3.89 ·t\!\(i}~,;~}i f/?,;;,~~f:i$"f/; ~,t.~fiif~ ) / Method: lnstrument(s): Analyst: Cmpd./Element/Parm. Name Benzenethiol Benzoic acid 2-Chlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol 2 ,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4 ,6-D initro-o-cresol 2-Methylphenol 3&4-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 2 ,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2 ,4 ,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4 ,6-Trichlorophenol Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Acetophenone Aniline Anthracene Atrazine Benzaldehyde Benzo(a)anthracene Ben zo(a)pyrene Benzo(b )fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butvl benzyl ohthalate Benzyl Alcohol 1 , 1 '-Biphenyl Caprolactam 2-Chloronaphthalene FALSF Accutest Laboratories Annual Method Detection Limit Determination Houston, Tx Facility SW846 8270C (AB8270) GCMSH , GCMSJ , GCMSP, Pooled Analysis Spike R1 Date ug/kg ug/kg 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 59.02 7-Jan-09 166.6665 179.04 5-Jan-09 166.6665 83 .89 6-Jan-09 166.6665 81 .15 5-Jan-09 166.6665 85 .55 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 86.66 20-Jan-09 833 .3325 1112.64 6-Jan-09 166.6665 93.38 7-Jan-09 166.6665 110.03 7-Jan-09 333.333 228.09 7-Jan-09 333 .333 228 .09 5-Jan-09 166.6665 87.01 20-Jan-09 833 .3325 1180.53 6 -Jan-09 166.6665 90.54 7-Jan-09 166.6665 103.98 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 90 .89 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 101 .58 5-Jan-09 166 .6665 80.71 5-Jan-09 166.6665 101 .67 5-Jan-09 166.6665 89.54 7-Jan-09 166.6665 98 .69 7-Jan-09 166.6665 81 .29 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 117.16 20-Jan-09 833 .3325 15494.19 5-Jan-09 166.6665 72.98 7-Jan-09 166.6665 155.44 5-Jan-09 166.6665 83.66 5-Jan-09 166.6665 112.28 7-Jan-09 166.6665 81 .63 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 139.24 6-Jan-09 166.6665 122.78 6-Jan-09 166 .6665 122.22 7-Jan-09 166 .6665 72.34 7-Jan-09 166.6665 122.99 5-Jan-09 166.6665 75.82 5-Jan-09 166.6665 92.12 R2 ug/kg 11.49 219.73 95.08 109.82 105.86 84 .94 1247.48 122.85 90.11 225.29 225.29 110.91 1291 .61 137 .65 124 .96 139.76 133 .95 110 .99 135 .91 109.22 118.95 24.45 144.61 17 101 .15 94.43 141 .08 104.68 142.59 102.61 162.18 159 .22 164.22 103 .17 151 .64 132 .36 116.10 Replicate Spikes R3 R4 R5 RG R7 ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg 34.65 26 .22 35.94 44.64 33.67 220.01 232.65 191.47 187.76 200.96 107.84 110.03 85.32 85.53 67.77 102.21 108.40 89.99 82.46 94.13 105.55 110.41 111 .80 78.42 97.34 69.02 77.29 74.19 88 .01 63.21 1126.46 1335.95 1145.89 1214.47 915.48 148.49 160.41 128.10 132.94 125.37 121 .35 111 .90 118.05 107.27 110.02 310.48 259.60 252.57 246.83 278.76 310.48 259 .60 252.57 246.83 278.76 87.16 98 .81 94 .72 74.18 80.50 1122.19 1390 .62 1125.65 1183.90 979 .26 150.76 157.17 125.11 132.75 128.91 118.68 121 .92 109.59 99.52 113.24 95.24 114.1 7 86 .09 73.63 102.45 124 .89 132.13 110.36 101 .01 121 .19 101.46 118 .68 78.66 77.36 93 .72 108 .76 133.44 107.45 100 .74 120.81 99 .50 118 .29 96.48 80 .56 93 .11 112.82 116.36 103.80 96.49 109.05 17.60 180.07 38 .99 48.37 24.47 133.50 143.91 124.17 125.58 130.26 16425.04 17692.15 16304.05 16009.50 15085.78 94 .69 150.32 97.85 108.85 105.14 195.10 158.49 167.89 139.40 180.54 104 .31 110.12 96.66 99.75 99.65 103.70 124.76 110 .74 115.89 108.95 97 .04 100.52 87 .65 108.68 73.82 141 .82 161 .80 139.03 147.53 150.15 142.46 156.20 133 .14 123.56 140.34 134.14 145.99 126 .20 148.10 135.04 98 .86 110.26 85 .60 73.15 88 .73 141 .27 148.68 130.40 119.08 136.65 93 .59 89.49 78.65 66.06 57.81 99 .18 116.14 92.46 88.88 107.49 Matrix: Quant Factor: Study Period: X-Bar X-Bar ug/kg %Recov. 35.09 21 .05 204.52 122.71 90.78 54.47 95.45 57.27 99.27 59.57 77.62 46.57 1156.91 138.83 130.22 78.13 109.82 65.89 257 .37 77.21 257.37 77 .21 90.47 54.28 1181 .97 141 .84 131 .84 79:11 113.13 67.88 100.32 60.19 117.87 70.72 94 .51 56.71 115.54 69.32 98 .10 58.86 108.02 64.81 59.32 35.59 131 .31 78.79 16301 .70 1956 .21 103.47 62.08 162.56 97.54 99.83 59.90 116.99 70.19 93 .13 55 .88 148.82 89.29 139.67 83.80 139.42 83 .65 90.30 54 .18 135.82 81 .49 84 .82 50 .89 101 .77 61 .06 so 33.33 January,2009 STD.Dev .• Spike/MDL ug/kg Ratio ;' !~~/lf-@"~ ::::r~~I 3 .60 2 .67 3 .58 11 .72 4 .52 12.85 ' 4.13 9.46 • 5.61 132.21 li~1~t,!1.5;:4 8; 2 .01 21 .18 2.50 10.00 5.30 29.73 3.57 29.73 3.57 12.20 r~fil\;3:if:~iiJ 4 .35 131 .28 2 .02 21 .58 2 .46 9.39 i>aM,2s;$,~ 5.65 21.53 2 .46 13.71 3 .87 16.54 3 .21 14.64 3.62 12.53 4.23 8 .67 6 .12 57.40 iwt~.~1ap::3_ii:1 0 .92 10.21 l;il/t,/ql0Ji 3,?Jrf!!1 5 .19 894.76 : 0.30 23.62 2 .25 20.31 2 .61 8 .38 6.33 13.04 4 .07 12.50 4.24 9.89 ? 5.36 14.44 ; 3.67 14.44 8, 3 .67 ,. 14.60 3 .63 12.39 ;,;,}'{%-:;~3!3')'.9~ 4 .28 24.36l,(,J)'JJZ;s tR$ 2 .18 11.53 l&:i~ji"3QJ22: 4 .60 Method: lnstrument(s): Analyst: Cmpd./Element/Parm. Name Benzenethiol Benzoic Acid 2-Chlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 2-Methvlohenol 3&4-Methvlphenol 4-Methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Acetophenone Aniline Anthracene Atrazine Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(alpvrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i)oervlene Benzo(klfluoranthene 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butyl benzyl phthalate Benzaldehyde Benzyl Alcohol 1, 1 '-Biphenyl Caprolactam 2-Chloronaohthalene FALSF Accutest Laboratories Annual Method Detection Limit Determination Houston, Tx Facility SW846 8270C (AB8270) GCMSH, GCMSJ, GCMSP Pooled Analysis Spike R1 Date ug/1 ug/1 6-Jan-09 5 2.27 19-Jan-09 25 6.26 5-Jan-09 5 3.36 5-Jan-09 5 3.05 5-Jan-09 5 4.28 6-Jan-09 5 3.59 19-Jan-09 25 11.87 6-Jan-09 5 3.16 7-Jan-09 5 2.81 6-Jan-09 10 5.19 6-Jan-09 10 5.19 5-Jan-09 5 3.71 19-Jan-09 25 8.60 19-Jan-09 25 18.79 5-Jan-09 5 0.98 5-Jan-09 5 2.73 5-Jan-09 5 2.75 5-Jan-09 5 3.23 5-Jan-09 5 3.93 5-Jan-09 5 2.91 5-Jan-09 5 3.54 6-Jan-09 5 4.85 6-Jan-09 5 4.04 19-Jan-09 25 71.31 6-Jan-09 5 4.97 6-Jan-09 5 4.06 6-Jan-09 5 4.31 6-Jan-09 5 4.19 6-Jan-09 5 4.50 6-Jan-09 5 4.22 6-Jan-09 5 4.76 5-Jan-09 5 5.76 5-Jan-09 5 1.98 6-Jan-09 5 3.83 5-Jan-09 5 1.45 6-Jan-09 5 3.87 R2 ug/1 2.92 9.47 2.49 2.39 2.26 2.73 22.33 2.71 3.20 4.90 4.90 2.14 10.13 28.20 0.73 2.05 2.13 2.47 2.72 2.09 2.70 4.63 3.25 70.98 4.63 3.46 4.30 3.35 4.98 3.24 4.86 4.38 1.41 2.91 1.06 2.94 Replicate Spikes R3 R4 RS RS R7 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 2.42 2.09 2.14 1.63 2.64 10.72 8.73 9.82 9.78 11.03 2.91 2.94 3.00 2.19 3.00 2.69 2.61 2.90 1.98 2.92 3.45 2.49 2.92 2.45 3.05 2.86 2.71 2.63 2.26 2.93 24.70 19.73 24.02 21.20 26.48 2.68 2.33 2.08 1.90 2.76 3.13 3.27 2.51 2.95 3.13 5.62 5.95 4.69 5.47 6.00 5.62 5.95 4.69 5.47 6.00 2.06 2.64 2.47 1.91 3.01 8.00 14.38 9.22 9.17 10.82 29.91 25.78 29.68 27.27 31.45 1.00 1.23 1.34 0.68 0.95 2.55 1.97 2.44 2.09 2.n 2.51 2.49 2.77 1.79 2.73 2.88 2.81 3.06 2.17 2.98 3.22 2.85 3.35 2.45 3.42 2.80 2.65 2.67 1.89 2.69 3.09 3.07 3.21 2.35 3.20 5.29 5.13 4.32 1.05 4.33 3.69 3.35 3.63 3.00 3.74 78.11 77.74 80.75 72.28 82.80 4.65 5.06 4.14 4.74 4.24 3.88 4.34 3.61 3.41 3.60 4.09 4.46 3.67 4.10 3.85 4.25 3.27 3.19 2.85 3.74 4.57 4.67 4.05 4.53 4.04 3.68 3.40 3.59 2.84 3.79 4.75 5.79 4.02 4.70 4.67 5.08 5.03 5.20 3.84 5.29 1.71 1.89 2.13 0.95 2.00 3.39 3.23 3.32 2.47 3.39 1.57 2.25 1.64 1.64 1.73 3.40 3.24 3.29 2.45 3.43 Matrix: Quant Factor: Study Period: X-Bar X-Bar ug/1 %Recov. 2.30 46.04 9.40 37.61 2.84 56.82 2.65 52.99 2.99 59.71 2.82 56.34 21.48 85.90 2.52 50.37 3.00 60.01 5.40 54.04 5.40 54.04 2.56 51.25 10.05 40.19 27.30 109.19 0.98 19.70 2.37 47.41 2.45 49.09 2.80 56.03 3.13 62.67 2.53 50.59 3.02 60.47 4.23 84.54 3.53 70.61 76.28 305.12 4.63 92.64 3.77 75.33 4.11 82.24 3.55 70.93 4.48 89.54 3.54 70.74 4.79 95.88 4.94 98.78 1.73 34.51 3.22 64.41 1.62 32.45 3.23 64.61 AQ 1.00 January,2009 STD.Dev. 111~& ug/1 ~,1~~.;P, 0.41 Val~ii~Jt 1.58 ,;~~,.~4.)f~. 0.38 f&~tt~{~Q~ 0.37 i~,r~:~:§' 0.70 .~_§:1,i'?;[.2'.1J 0.40 t'~~tttt;;t1I~;:J 4.80 1'1tiiJ:§1·5.t0j 0.44 E~J~11~l{''.~ 0.27 ltftft~)';cts~~~ 0.50 !ilit~~~~~a: 0.50 ~:i'J!!.\i.\i&k1f[i} 0.63 i~t:ir~~Jr 2.12 0~,j':~JJt?J3.:e% 4.19 ·3~~01::3.!t~~ 0.24 $l?\;}itiiGXlQ. 0.33 ';~$14tfltQS.: 0.37 ~~i;i1Il!~Ji'. 0.36 ~~~Jd~'-tt;lf'~: 0.50 Jl·t{~J~~t]j$.~6! 0.39 n~~t,WJii:i:if 0.39 :1\ti~ift1~ffi1 1.45 ;~l;]jt~J,5~ 0.35 ii1r@tt~i1.·:u,~· 4.77 \Ki'£%1Eii~.tG!)'. 0.34 ::.\'~i:'i,1{~0~; 0.34 (~1r,1/\1!1,i)llzob; 0.28 ff%_ii4'$\)'.p'Jl.zi 0.53 ~Wl&Si;i'~tt!~l6·6; 0.34 ;;;,;\i)ji,t)f~\Q~'. 0.44 ·{t1~Y~~)fif~·~i%ij1a! 0.52 ,<!1\Wt%-~~g~]'. 0.63 t¥,;l~l'4li'il:S 0.41 !1~41!zr:1;;cstr 0.43 'J&\~j;i$~!~.~! 0.36 ,1'ir.~!.\\/i;~~Ji;2'. 0.44 t;Jk-i::\ti® Spike/MDL Ratio 3.84 5.02 4.15 4.32 2.26 3.93 1.66 3.66 6.00 6.32 6.32 2.52 3.75 1.90 6.65 4.76 4.31 4.37 3.20 4.13 4.13 1.10 4.55 1.67 4.63 4.65 5.76 3.01 4.72 3.63 3.06 2.51 3.84 3.72 4.48 3.59 / Method: SW846 8270C (AB8270) Matrix: AQ lnstrument(s): GCMSH, GCMSJ, GCMSP Quant Factor:-1.00 Analyst: Pooled Study Period: January,2009 Replicate Spikes Analysis Spike R1 R2 R3 R4 RS R6 R7 X-Bar X-Bar STD.Dev. ll'~~O(*f@I Spike/MDL Cmpd./ElemenUParm. Name Date ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 %Recov. ug/1 ~:~i~iito\W, Ratio 4-Chloroaniline 6-Jan-09 5 8-13 6.80 7.38 7.00 6.70 3.79 6.64 6.64 132.72 1.36 i~J~·i1f~~'1:2~ 1.17 Carbazole 5-Jan-09 5 3.81 2.55 3.28 2.66 2.86 2.47 3_09 2.96 59.19 0.47 '.'i&~·tMI;,i!l· 3.36 Chrysene 6-Jan-09 5 4.72 5.09 4.43 4.85 4.18 4.58 4.34 4.60 91.98 0.31 ;Ji:1~;i;.~~~;o;~J;J1 5.09 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 5-Jan-09 5 3.45 2.30 2.81 2.58 2.75 2.20 2_66 2.68 53.58 0.41 ti!itt:a11;~~~ 3.88 bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 5-Jan-09 5 3.69 2.79 3.23 3.23 3.32 2.42 3.29 3.14 62.75 0.41 ~~t?.f:?t1:.,a~q 3.85 bis(Chloromethyl}ether 6-Jan-09 5 3.35 2.45 3.00 3.05 2.95 2.04 2.89 2.82 56.37 0.44 ~,.};rt,'.~itt1}7i 3.66 bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 5-Jan-09 5 4.05 2.63 2.83 3.25 2.3i 2.33 2.44 2.83 56.68 0.63 · ::~~I{ if'f:i$~1 2.52 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 5-Jan-09 5 3.41 2.64 3.27 3.11 3.24 2.25 3.20 3_02 60.36 0.42 ~l;)fJJ!'likf~ 1i 3.81 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 7-Jan-09 5 3.78 4.25 4.14 4.29 3.31 3.42 3.71 3_84 76.86 0.40 :;1&'!1:&P'il{1_~ 4.02 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 6-Jan-09 5 4.28 3.36 3.74 3.54 3.71 2.87 3_82 3.62 72.31 0.44 ~ggw~~~f~tz~~ 3.65 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 7-Jan-09 5 3.71 4.11 3.95 4.18 3.19 3.26 3.55 3.71 74.13 0.40 :1:.,1~Mi,tctf1.2~ 4.01 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5-Jan-09 5 3.00 2.41 2.63 3.21 3.18 2.27 3.27 2.85 57.05 0.41 fr~eiftJ§hi;:tv.~~. 3.88 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5-Jan-09 5 2.78 1.82 2.21 2.56 2.07 1.49 2.54 2.21 44.20 0.46 f';~J~~!~ 3.49 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 5-Jan-09 5 3.01 2.34 2.72 1.91 2.40 1.91 2.75 2.44 48.72 0.42 W!~~ii~11~;~ 3.76 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 19-Jan-09 25 24.80 24.39 23.14 26.31 24.56 23_52 24.46 24.45 97.82 1.01 rg,\ifit !R:r,:,~_:J ff 7.84 7, 12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene 6-Jan-09 5 3.92 3.14 2.15 2.22 1.80 1.65 1.39 2_32 46.47 0.90 r~t~tf2r~::{ 1.77 Dibenz(a,h)acridine 7-Jan-09 5 3.57 3.72 3.58 4.35 2.89 3.36 1.90 3.34 66.74 0.77 tilt(~;~19~{42 2.07 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 5-Jan-09 5 2.98 2.35 3.29 1.95 2.13 2.58 2.13 2.49 49.70 0.49 i}i~'.Jfft]'J!~~I 3.22 Dibenzofuran 5-Jan-09 5 3.69 2.71 3.27 2.88 3.15 2.38 3.16 3.03 60.66 0.42 t~~%i1t:;1~.;~i1: 3.75 DiPhenylamine 6-Jan-09 5 5.46 4.38 4.83 4.41 4.68 3.71 4.78 4.61 92.16 0.53 Jf(t~tfi?~t 2.99 Di-n-butyl phthalate 6-Jan-09 5 5.56 5.64 5.61 6.02 4.96 5.52 5.32 5.52 110.41 0.32 :~mr~i~;Jiftl2; 4.90 Di-n-octyl phthalate 6-Jan-09 5 4.15 4.23 4.13 4.97 3.58 4.17 3.96 4.17 83.41 0.42 ;'i\ff.j,,f;t~~":~ii; 3.83 Diethyl phthalate 6-Jan-09 5 4.74 4.89 4.75 5.01 4.12 4.75 4.20 4.64 92.76 0.34 :it~%f§f~jt~~ 4.67 Dimethyl phthalate 6-Jan-09 5 4.77 5.10 . 5.02 5.31 4.28 4.88 4.68 4.86 97.28 0.33 ¥1~~~;\;.1,/p's 4.76 1 ,4-Dioxane 6-Jan-09 5 2.69 2.18 2.61 2.52 2.69 2.08 2.46 2.46 49.24 0.24 f!J§;Ji/!;~rf.ll~ 6.55 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 6-Jan-09 5 5.61 5.51 5.37 6.54 4.64 5.34 5.37 5.48 109.68 0.56 0it'/!ti,'.:l~;i}[eil 2.84 Fluoranthene 6-Jan-09 5 4.56 4.40 4.43 4.46 3.72 4.35 3.97 4.27 85.40 0.31 ;·~1~~7f 5.16 Fluorene 5-Jan-09 5 3.80 2.70 3.28 3.14 3.29 2.48 3.11 3.11 62.27 0.43 jf fit~~)(~~~J~ 3.72 Hexachlorobenzene 5-Jan-09 5 3.92 2.92 3.43 3.36 3.07 2.65 2.90 3.18 63.54 0.43 ~:y-fili'.'f:'.M1 3.74 Hexachlorobutadiene 5-Jan-09 5 2.78 1.69 2.35 2.34 2.34 2.04 2.56 2.30 45.99 0.35 ff~{1~$~111~)4~~~1 4.53 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 19-Jan-09 25 6.75 5.20 7.02 4.40 5.25 8.07 8.89 6.51 26.04 1.64 (S~~~.~;7; 4.84 Hexachloroethane 5-Jan-09 5 2.58 1.90 2.46 2.25 2_35 1.72 2.31 2.22 44.45 0.31 ~ti~tmct~:n 5.15 lndene 7-Jan-09 5 22_33 25.01 22.52 22.43 22.88 21.30 19.37 22.26 445.25 1.70 k,)}f:i!t~~f?ii 0.94 lndeno(1,2,3-cd}pyrene 5-Jan-09 5 3.41 2.93 3.77 2.33 2.38 2.50 3.39 2.96 59.18 0.58 ~;J1t-1~1e~t1 2.76 lsophorone 5-Jan-09 5 2.97 2.35 3.02 3.01 3.22 2.20 2.91 2.81 56.27 0.38 ~~J;;~~t::11~21?, 4.17 1-Methylnaphthalene 6-Jan-09 5 4.17 4.49 4.42 4.57 3.65 3.84 4.02 4.17 83.35 0.35 \it'lf.lfift1Z'Q~: 4.58 2-Methylnaphthalene 5-Jan-09 5 3.81 2.94 3.39 3.29 3.42 2.55 3.45 3.27 65.30 0.41 tt1l\r~wiih~a 3.92 6-Methvl Chrvsene 6-Jan-09 5 5.76 5.03 4.93 5.18 4.18 4.78 4.59 4.92 98.43 0.49 l)iWit~t:ts: 3.23 2-Nitroaniline 5-Jan-09 5 2.95 2.62 2.72 2.43 2.40 1.52 2.50 2.45 48.99 0.45 ,~~I/;l'i;it '!!ft 3.51 FALSE' _..,•' Method: lnstrument(s): Analyst: Cmpd./Element/Parm. Name 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline Naohthalene Nitrobenzene n-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine N-Nitrosodiethylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 2-Picoline Pentachlorobenzene Phenanthrene Pyrene Pvridine Quinoline 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene FALS• SW846 8270C (AB8270) GCMSH, GCMSJ, GCMSP Pooled Analysis Spike R1 Date ug/1 ug/1 6-Jan-09 5 6.40 6-Jan-09 5 6.77 7-Jan-09 5 4.06 5-Jan-09 5 4.20 6-Jan-09 5 2.36 5-Jan-09 5 3.30 5-Jan-09 5 3.62 5-Jan-09 5 2.42 6-Jan-09 5 5.46 19-Jan-09 25 10.62 6-Jan-09 5 3.62 7-Jan-09 5 4.97 6-Jan-09 5 4.81 7-Jan-09 5 0.75 6-Jan-09 5 3.87 6-Jan-09 5 3.18 5-Jan-09 5 3.37 Re olicate Spikes R2 R3 R4 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 5.88 6.37 5.88 5.81 6.43 4.86 4.44 4.39 4.63 2.80 3.44 3.76 1.81 2.03 1.98 2.52 3.40 2.96 2.82 3.18 3.04 1.81 2.57 2.34 4.38 4.83 4.41 11.71 12.11 11.82 2.86 3.35 3.13 5.09 5.22 5.39 4.91 4.80 5.85 0.36 0.84 1.08 3.94 4.11 4.49 2.38 2.84 2.75 2.27 2.38 2.92 Matrix: Quant Factor: Study Period: R5 R6 R7 X-Bar X-Bar ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 ug/1 %Recov. 5.59 3.35 5.04 5.50 110.01 6.05 4.81 5.57 5.76 115.12 3.69 3.76 3.98 4.14 82.74 3.31 2.57 3.29 3.34 66.78 1.94 1.33 1.98 1.92 38.38 3.16 2.14 3.02 2.93 58,56 3.36 2.40 3.30 3.10 62.07 3.20 2.39 2.86 2.51 50.28 4.68 3.71 4.78 4.61 92.16 11.98 13.20 13.12 12.08 48.31 3.26 2.40 3.25 3.12 62.50 4.46 4.89 4.73 4.96 99.28 4.05 4.81 4.68 4.85 96.90 0.30 0.34 0.90 0.65 13.04 3.01 3.36 3.96 3.82 76.43 2.78 2.04 2.84 2.69 53.70 2.64 2.25 2.53 2.62 52.44 AQ 1.00 January,2009 STD.Dev. ~JilMOl/i11il ug/1 J;::t~i\~~~tM{tf;'@/'\{ 'it1\'f~,:-:-:f?~}\~;.~ ~fi:.'jf:ifiii;J#;~:lf.t 1.06 :~~';~~_;;;3] 0.74 ~-,M, ;2'.3~' 0.36 Jf~f(;{f~1)f~ 0.55 &11\~;;~,tt~ 0.31 11-i-~ 1.:"'lti!J,: 0.45 Jft!~tf~.2 0.40 i11~f'iff~4it!~6i 0.44 i~tifZ .. tdi'.eJ 0.53 w.t~·t,Jt~t111t51~ 0.88 11i!I~1;;22i~. 0.39 zii10!~t}2@: 0.31 ~{~ir1)t0i~?.~ 0.53 ~(¥.i:?t',Jll§.(3; 0.32 1~).~Jti.$.ll' 0.49 ff~~Yff~f 0.37 ~ftf}t~irl-~ 0.40 :~i~~!~t1ri~ ,~ii~~<i\i ~f{'.(0J\~l?J. !)ti'f·,~Irii~; 'lfdti:~:1.:t~f~f-~~lc.i,,;;/l(i;i '.~}]j(:ff~ti ~~:!~l{if~~~ ~~J;f~~tB~ ~?ili/.lJi&~t~~ ,J., Spike/MDL Ratio 1.51 2.14 4.43 2.88 5.14 3.53 3.97 3.63 2.99 8.99 4.05 5.15 3.01 5.03 3.25 4.33 3.94 .I AGCU I !::ST LABS GULF COAST SOIL/Water MDL STUDY -3050B/6010B TJA TRACE 1 2009 mg/I 0 .1571 0 .01887 0 .01057 0 .0064 0 .00093 0.02411 0 .00202 0 .16808 0 .00561 0.00397 0.00448 0 .16631 0.00677 mg/I 0 .15213 0 .01745 0 .00988 0 .00637 0 .0009 0 .0226 0 .00196 0 .13837 0 .00608 0 .00609 0 .0034 0 .00462 0.15908 mg/I 0 .1462 0 .0183 0 .00966 0 .00624 0 .0009 0 .02166 0 .00196 0 .15041 0 .00575 0 .00391 0 .00456 0 .15895 mg/I 0.1598 0 .01915 0 .0093 0 .00615 0 .00085 0 .02117 0 .00184 0 .13793 0 .00519 0 .00315 0 .00422 0.15407 mg/I 0 .14845 0 .0176 0 .00899 0 .00585 0 .00078 0.02118 0 .00175 0 .127 0 .00557 0 .00337 0 .004 0 .14893 0 .00397 0 .00451 0.16768 mg/I 0 .17905 0.01947 0.01033 0 .00642 0 .00083 0 .0223 0 .00205 0 .14816 0 .00608 0.00725 T25253-2 Spike Amt in mg/I 0.15 0.02 0 .01 0 .004 0 .001 0 .02 0.002 0.15 0 .005 0.004 0 .005 0 .15 0 .005 RL in mg/I 0.2 0 .01 0 .01 0.2 0 .005 0 .1 0 .005 5 0.01 0 .05 0 .025 0 .1 0 .01 Spike in mg/kg 15 .00 2 .00 1 .00 0.40 0 .10 2 .00 0 .20 15.00 0 .50 0.40 0 .50 15.00 0.50 iif~li~it11 :.M;;,tiifg:t~, ~i}i20 :<ii0WJ!ii l~t'\liii~;;Cild:~: f\L,..;i~I;~ll.drll'.';i"'?> /&~2©':@.<'@Tu\~. ~;;~_:1ffl'35@f:ffi ·'i. ,.Til@Jtlb '•~i ,~t·.~0·:s'tl7P~ · ·1,.so{Jt'o:&f' ®:J'J ~U.Of'~' w!t.l,5:(i)f>$il ""'<il!,12,;5of.lr] ,~ii'o -00_.},1:1 ~ ;,~.·1100 ~ 'T, ;.....,_, a,',J •M,~v>~::,, 'I., :..'•'}), %,~ -;( ·, ,.,.>(~ '.~.f.!,1;_{;1,},1?.,0~ • ....,,.,.M'J< :c;:;• • ~/1, "'.'(~ · .;;1,--,• .• ~-ff·. ),«'{~ I -,, , , ,"°i ·::;",. , .J.~•-• -~~/1.g{j, . ;i\>G;:i:l _:r"-" "M{{l \'x;:',... ~ • •», ,..,._,..,,_. '¥?.r 1,r "t<·µ,,t1~s'%-r..,, i' , ~d,.':iJ.J.~ ~,>-.· ,_,.,, ' ~ 'U""'' ,-,,,.,. ~,); . ..,/.fy;'i',i_ ~&,:;; • .,.O.,.e-.'l'.>~ MDL in mg/kg 8 .54 0 .26 0 .17 0 .07 0 .02 1 .69 0 .03 19.16 0 .10 0 .12 0.08 2.06 0.40 0 .0024 0.00544 0 .00973 1.31 0 .39163 0.00232 0 .00512 0.00872 0.94921 0 .01952 0 .0051 0.8707 0 .01172 0.00462 0 .0051'8 0 .01252 0.0136 0 .38545 0 .00239 0 .00481 0 .00936 0.93353 0 .01891 0 .00603 0.9486 0.01309 0 .00471 0.00474 0.01229 0 .0133 0 .38269 0.00246 0 .00519 0.00896 0 .9506 0 .01924 0 .00546 0 .8085 0 .0 132 0 .00423 0 .00425 0.01299 0 .0132 0 .37811 0.00226 0 .00462 0 .00935 0.93798 0 .01814 0 .00512 0 .7378 0 .01228 0.00409 0 .00469 0.01188 0.013 0 .35779 0 .00223 0 .00496 0 .94993 0.01779 0.00515 0 .7176 0.00905 0 .004 0 .00416 0 .01371 0.0123 0.0176 0..00575 0.8276 0.01368 0.00448 0.00558 0.01351 13-MAY-09 T25253-2 K 14-SEPT-09 0 .0339 0 .0358 0 .035 0.0345 0.032 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals 2.5 SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION AND QUALIFICATIONS For each subcontractor to be used for services under this contract (including any branch locations of the prime contractor if anticipated to be utilized), provide the information requested in Table 1 below and include the following information with the proposal : a) Subcontractor experience and qualifications (as detailed in Section 2.2 A and B of the RFP) pertinent to the services to be provided under the contract. b) Proof of current NELAP Accreditation for the analyses to be performed by the subcontractor Table 1: Subcontractor information. Accutest Southeast 4405 Vineland Road Orlando, FL 32811 Accutest Corporate 2235 Route 130 Dayton, NJ 0881 O TALEM , Inc . 610 S. Jennings Ave Fort Worth, TX 76104 Columbia Analytical 1317 S. 13th Ave Services Kelso , WA 98626 407-425-6700 732-329-0200 817-335-1186 360-577-7222 Back up Network Lab , Herbicides Back up Network Lab , Non-Certifiable Biolog ical Tissues Short Hold Analyses-E coli, Fecal Coliforms Biological Tissues, Carbary!, Diazinon, Trihalomet hanes , PCB Congeners IJ= NECESSARY, PROVIDE MORE SHEETS TO DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL SUBCONTRACTORS. INCLUDE A COPY OF THE SUBCONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS FOLLOWING THIS PAGE BOUND WITHIN THE PROPOSAL PACKAGE DEM 10-09: LAB July 22 , 2010 2-8 Subcontractor Information • Accutest Corporate-Please see Corporate SQQ in Provider's Experience Section 2 .2 . Equipment List for Laboratory attached. • Accutest Southeast-Please see Corporate SQQ in Provider's Experience Section 2 .2 . Equipment List for Laboratory attached . • TALEM, Inc-Please see attached SQQ • Columbia Analytical Services-Please see attached SQQ ' , __ ~l!!t !3ACCUTES"T: Appendix Ill Equipment List Appendices Page 86 of 90 Revision Date: May 2009 V ~r!t ~ACCUTEST.: Organics Instrument Model GC/MS Agilent 5975C MS0/01 4551/4660 GC/MS Agilent 5975N MSO/Agilent 7683 AS GC/MS Aqilent 5975N MSO/Aqilent 7683 AS GC/MS Aqilent 5975N MSO/Agilent 7683 AS GC/MS Agilent 5973 MS0/01 4660/4552 Archon GC/MS Aqilent 5973 MS0/01 4660/4552 Archon GC/MS Aqilent 5973 MS0/01 4560/4552 Archon GC/MS Agilent 5973 MS0/01 4560/4552 Archon GC/MS Agilent 5973 MS0/01 4660/4552 Archon GC/MS Agilent 5973 MS0/01 4560/4552 Archon GC/MS Aqilent 5973 MSO/Agilent 7683 AS GC/MS Aqilent 5973 MSO/Aqilent 7683 AS GC/MS Hewlett-Packard 5970 MS0/01 4560/4552 Archon GC/MS Hewlett-Packard 5970 MS0/01 4560/4552 Archon GC/MS Hewlett-Packard 5970 MS0/01 4560/4552 Archon GC Agilent 7890A/Oual EC0/7683B AS GC Aqilent 6890/NPO-FP0/7683B AS GC Agilent 6890/0ual FI0/7683B AS GC Agilent 6890/0ual EC0/7683B AS GC Agilent 6890/0ual EC0/7683B AS GC Agilent 6890/PIO/PIO/OI 4560/4552 Archon GC Agilent 6890/PIO/FIO/ENTECH 7032A-LB GC Agilent 6890N/Oual FIO/HP 7683 AS GC Aqilent 6890N/Oual ECO/HP 7683 AS GC Agilent 6890/0ual ECO/HP 7683 AS GC Agilent 6890/0ual ECO/HP 7683 AS GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/0ual FIO/HP 7673 AS GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/PIO/FIO/ 01 4560/4552 Archon GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/0ual FIO/HP 7673 AS GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/PIO/FIO/ 01 4560/4552 Archon GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/PIO/ELCO/OI 4560/4552 Archon GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/0ual FIO/HP 7673 AS GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/0ual ECO/HP 7673 AS GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/PIO/FIO/ dual MPM 16 GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/FIO GC Hewlett-Packard 5890/0ual ECO/HP 7673 AS Appendices Page 87 of 90 Revision Date : May 2009 Serial# Year US83120965 2008 US82311290 2007 US62724401 2006 US53921303 2005 US41746628 2004 US41746633 2004 US21843765 2002 US21844034 2002 US02440350 2000 US94240108 1999 US82311290 I 1998 US81211109 1998 3034A12782 1989 2905A11904 1987 2716A 10454 1987 CN10842133 2008 US10643024 2006 CN10641049 2006 CN10641081 2006 US10613003 2006 CN10421047 2004 US10239007 2002 CN10425061 2004 US10333015 2003 US00036916 2000 US00028304 1999 3336A61096 1995 3336A60617 1995 3336A59489 1995 3336A51045 1995 3203A41646 1992 3126A51085 1991 2921A24618 1990 3029A29748 1990 2843A20183 1988 2728A14096 1987 jmm)Fftl lliili.11.'.:.:1 riACCUTEST. Organics HPLC Aqilent 1100 Automated LC System HPLC Agilent 1100 Automated LC System HPLC Agilent 1100 Automated LC System HPLC Aqilent 1100 Automated LC System HPLC Aqilent 1100 Automated LC System 0-Prep ESSA LM2-P Rinq and Puck mill 0-Prep TurboVap 4 units 0-Prep TurboVap 3 units 0-Prep TurboVap 1 unit 0-Prep Sonicator 2 units 0-Prep Sonicator 3 units 0-Prep Midi-Vap 2000 Kontes Data System Hew lett-Packard/MS ChemStation lnorganics Ins trument Model ICP T JA EnviroTrace 61 E Simultaneous ICP T JA Enviro Trace 61 E Simultaneous Mercury Analyzer Leeman Hydra AA Mercury Analyzer Leeman Hydra AA TOG Analyzer Shimadzu IC Dionex DX-500 IC Dionex Digestion block DigiPrep Centrifuge CentraCL2 Spectrophotometer Milton-Roy Spectronic 200 MicroDistillation Block Lachat Auto Analyzer QuickChem 8500 LIMS ,. . · .· ·' . .. Instrument . ·•·. Model ,· LIMS HP True 64 Appendices Page 88 of 90 Revision Date : May 2009 DE91606857 1999 DE83700740 1998 DE01608404 2000 DE40522115 2004 DE03000863 2003 215090-004 2008 2001 2004 2007 2004 2007 4 79200-2000 2000 1999 Ser:ia l # Year 348490 1994 470790 1997 HA-2022 2002 HA-6007 2005 H51404235007 2004 99030664 1999 04070250 2004 3 units 2005 42613052 2003 2000 2 units 2005 050500000130 2005 . , . . . . ··-Year 1999 mmll!RI lliilill!;,,ll !3ACCUTES"T: Appendix IV Certification Summary Appendices Page 89 of 90 Revis ion Date : May 2009 ~~ !3ACCUTES"T: Certifvina Authoritv Arkansas California (NELAP) Florida (NELAP) Georgia Georgia Iowa Kansas (NELAP) Kentucky Louisiana (NELAP) Massachusetts Mississippi Nevada New Jersey (NELAP) North Carolina Oklahoma South Carolina Texas (NELAP) US Army Corps of Eng. US Dept. of Agriculture US Navy NFESC Utah (NELAP) Washington Texas (NELAP) Wisconsin Appendices Page 90 of 90 Revision Date : May 2009 Certification Proaram Reaistration No. Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water 88-0620 Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste 04226CA Potable, Non-Potable, Solid Waste, UST, Air Toxics E83510 Potable Water 934 Solid/Hazardous Wastes Not Applicable UST, Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water IA366 Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water E-10327 Underqround Storaqe Tank Program 0065 Solid/Hazardous Wastes 38582 Non-Potable Water M-FL946 Potable Water Not Applicable Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Wastes FL009462008A Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water FL002 Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water 573 Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste 9959 Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water 96038001 Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste T104 704040-08- TX HTRW, Solid/Hazardous Waste Not Applicable Foreign Soils Permit S-56027 NFESC Validated Solid/Hazardous Waste Not Applicable Potable, Non-Potable, Solid/Chemical Materials FL009462008A Potable, Non-Potable, Solid/Chemical Materials, Air C2046 Non-Potable Water, Solid/Hazardous Waste, Air T104704234-08- Toxics TX Solid/Hazardous Wastes, Non-Potable Water 399043370 ~~ffi.· ·Ir . ~ACClJTES'Ta Appendix IV Laboratory Equipment Appendix I V Laboratory Equipment Page 1 of 13 Revi sion D ate : March 2009 L di ii' o r d r c 1· i e s Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number HPLC-1 Agilent Technologies 1100Series DE33205279; G1321A, G1315B, G1316A, G1379A DE33219455; DE33234553;JP13210348 GC/MS-S Hewlett-Packard 6890/5973 MSD/01 US00024322/ US82311313 4552/4660 ARCHON GC/MS-T Hewlett-Packard 6890/5973 MSD/01 US00024323/ US82311482 4551A/4660 P&T GC/MS-F Hewlett-Packard 6890/5973 MSD/HP US00034179 / US82601551 7683 AS GC/MS-R Hewlett-Packard 6890/5973 MSD/HP US00021820 / US81501001 7683 AS GC/MS-B Hewlett-Packard 5890ll+ /5972 3336A61054/ 3524A03106 MSD/Agilent 7673 GC/MS-H Hewlett-Packard 5890ll+ /5972 3336A58190 / 3501A02356 MSD/HP 7673 AS GC/MS-Q Hewlett-Packard 5890ll/5971 3033A31092 / 3188A02934 MSD /En tech Air Samp 7000 GC/MS-L Hewlett-Packard 5890/5970 MSD/01 2921A22898 / 2623A01291 4551/4560 P&T GC/MS-J Hewlett-Packard 5890/5970 MSD /01 2643A11557 / 2716A10379 4552/ 4560 P&T GC/MS-K Hewlett-Packard 5890ll/ 5970 MSD/01 2750Al 16838 / 2905Al 1628 4551/4560 P&T Operating System Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation Appendix IV uboratory , ,ipment Page 2 of 13 Revision Date: March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase HP Semi-2003 Enviroquant Volatiles Annex HP Organics -2000 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2000 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1998 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1998 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1996 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1995 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Air 1993 Enviroquant Laboratory HP Organics -1992 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1990 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1990 Enviroquant Volatiles /' ~ ~ACCUTES"t t ;,r,c,r.:i t c ri t~ Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number GC/MS-C Hewlett-Packard 5890 /5970 MSD /HP 2623A08318 / 2807A1146 or 4552/4560 GC/MS-G Hewlett-Packard 589011/5970 MSD /01 2905Al 1905 / 2 807Al 1004 4552/4660 GC /MS -M Hewlett-Packard 6890 /5973 MSD /HP US00021 813 / 7683 AS US802111003 GC/MS-A Hewlett-Packard 6890 /5973 MSD /01 US00033272 / U S94212183 4552/ 4560 ARCH ON GC/MS-E Hewlett-Packard 6890 /5973 MSD /01 US00031161 / U S93112044 4551/4560 P&T GC/MS-N Hewlett-Packard 5890/5970 2750A1708 8/ 2716A10218 MSD/Tekmar 2000 /2032 P&T GC/MS-I Hewlett-Packard 5890 /5970 MSD /01 2643 A 10503 / 263 7A0168 7 4551/4560 GC/MS-D Hewlett-Packard 6890 /59 73 MSD /01 US00030551 / U S9312 28 43 4551/4560 P&T GC/MS-V Agilent Technologies 5973/6890N AS U S 101490 85 /U S 1044191 7 4552/4560 GC/MS-W Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS US44621455 /CN10 517032 Entech 7016CA GC/MS-X Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS US21 843 88 9 / 4552/4660 U S102390 7 1 GC/MS-Y Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS US10240013 / U S21 844012 4552/4560 Operating System Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstatio n HP Chem station HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chem station HP Ch em station HP Chemstation A ppen dix I V-Laboratory -,,,ipment Page 3 o f 13 Revi sion Date: March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase HP Organics -1990 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1989 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1999 E nviroqu ant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -2000 E nviroquant V o latiles HP Organics -2001 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1988 E nviroqu ant Volatiles HP Organics -1986 E nviroquant V olatiles HP Organic s -2001 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2002 E nviroquant Vol atiles HP Air 2005 E nviroqu ant Laboratory HP Organics -2002 E nviroquant V olatiles HP Organics -2002 Enviroquant Volatile s ,I La i}o;~t C l'i %S Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number GC/MS-P Agilent Technologies 5973/6890N AS US10251064 / US21844596 4552/4560 GC/MS-Z Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS US10251028 / US21844586 4552/4560 GC/MS-U Hewlett-Packard 6890 /5973 MSD /HP US00032623 / U S9 4212183 4551A/4660 GC/MS-1A Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS CN10314026 / U S30945331 4551A/4660 GC /MS-1B Agilent Technologies 7890A /5975C CN10845177 /US83111119 Teledyne/Tekmar AquaTek AS GC/MS-2A Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS CN10314028 / US30945325 Tekmar Solatek 72 GC/MS-3A Agilent Technologies 59 73 /6890N AS CN10432042 /US43146 77 6 4551A/4660 GC/MS-lC Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS CN104250 85 / 4551/4560 us 41 74666 7 - GC/MS-2D Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS CN 10432038 / 4552/4560 us 43146 77 1 GC/MS-2W Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS CN10413022 / Entech 7016CA US40646500 GC/MS-2B Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS CN104410 33 / U S 4551A/4660 43146954 GC/MS-2C Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N AS CN10441035 / U S 4551A/4560 43146953 Operating System Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chem stati o n HP Ch emstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Ch emstation HP Chemstation HP Chem station Appendix I V Laboratory , ,tpment Pag e 4 of 13 Revisio n Da te: March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase HP Organics -2003 E nviroquant Semi- Volatile s HP Organics -2003 E nviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1999 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2003 Enviroquant Volatile s HP Organics -2008 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2003 E nviroquant Volatile s HP Organics -2004 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2004 E nviroqu ant Volatiles HP Organics -2004 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Air 2004 E nviroquant Laboratory HP Org anics -2004 E nviroqu ant Volatile s HP Organics -2004 E nviroquant Volatiles ,I L a O c:, r .~ 1 •: I' i ~ ~ Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number GC/MS-3B Agilent Technologies 6890 /5973 / 01 US10240044 / US21844015 4551A/4660 GC/MS-3C Agilent Technologies 5973/6890N AS CN10517038 / US44621480 4555 lA/ 4660 GC/MS-3D Agilent Technologies 5975B/6890N AS CN10637120 / 4551A/4660 U S62724193 GC/MS-2E Agilent Technologies 5975/6890N AS CN10612046 / 4551A/4660 US60532596 GC/MS-3E Agilent Technologies 5975 /6890N CN10614011 / Agilent 7683 US61332852 GC/MS-2M Agilent Technologies 5973/6890N AS CN10612028 / 4552/12720 US605325 7 8 GC/MS-3W Agilent Technologies 5973 /6890N CN10425086 / Entech 7016A US41746669 GC/MS-3M Agilent Technologies 5975B /6890N US6512510 7 / CN10703029 GC/MS-4M Agilent Technologies 5975C/7890A US73317574 / Agilent 7683B CN1074251 GC-AB Hewlett-Packard 5890/Dual ECD/HP 2413A03 7 19 7673 AS GC -XX Hewlett-Packard 6890/Dual ECD/HP US00022968 7683 AS Operating System Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chem.station HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation Appendix IV Laboratory , .ipm en t Page 5 of 13 Revision Date: March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase HP Organics -2002 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2005 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2006 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2006 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2006 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -2006 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Air 2007 E nviroquant Laboratory HP Organics -2007 E nviroquant Semi - Volatiles HP Organics-11 /2007 Enviroquan t Semi Volatiles HP Organics -1990 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1998 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles II / ~ t;)ACCUTE-S1: Equipment Manufacture & Description GC-2Y2Z Agilent Technologies 6890N & N10149 GC-YZ/ZZ Hewlett-P ackard 6890 /PID/FID /OI HP GC System Injector GC-AA Agilent 7890A As 7683B GC-LM Hewlett-Packard 6890 /PID /FID /OI 4551/4560 P&T GC-WW Hewlett-Packard 6890 /Dual ECD /HP 7673 AS GC-ST Hewlett-Packard 5890 /FID /NPD/HP 767 3 AS/Tek GC-UV Hewlett-Packard 5890/Dual FID/ OI 4551/4560 GC-NP Hewlett-Packard 5890/PID/FID/Tekmar so latek 72 GC-CD Hewlett-Packard 5890/Dual ECD /HP 7673 AS GC-JK Hewlett-Packard 5890 /PID /Hall / 4552 / 4560ARCHON GC-QR Hewlett Packard 5890/PID/FID/Entech AutoAir7000 Serial Number CN10407032/ CN40327643 USOOOl 1065 US83806744 CN10832133 US08232002 US00008927 US00010037 3140A3887 1 2921A23322 3336A58858 3336A58788 3336A51043 3336A51044 Operating System Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstatio n HP Ch ems tatio n HP Chemstation HP Ch emstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Ch emstation HP Chemstation Appendix IV Laboratory , .ipment Page 6 o f 13 Revi sion D ate: Marc h 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase HP Organics -2004 Enviroqu ant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -199 8 Enviroquant Semi- Volatil es HP Organics -2008 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1998 E nvir oqua nt Volatiles HP Organics -199 7 E nviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1996 E nviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1996 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1995 Enviroquant Volatil es HP Orga nic s -1995 Enviroqu ant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1994 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Air 199 3 Enviro quant Laboratory L .:'I f.i O r .:, t ~ I' i -2 f Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number GC-EF Hewlett-Packard 5890/Dual ECD/HP 2541A06786 7673 AS GC-II Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II 3203A40375 GC-GH Hewlett-Packard 5890/Dual ECD/HP 2938A25059 7673 AS GC-2G (I) Agilent Technologies 6890N /7 683 CN10450110 GC-3G CJ) Agilent Technologies 6890N/7683 CN10450109 GC-SC Hewlett-Packard 5890/ 2443A03797 FID/OI4551/4560 GC-QT Agilent Technologies 6890N US 10235024 GC-OA/OB Agilent Technologies 6890N US10240 147 GC-G1/1H Agilent Technologies 6890N/7683 US10322012 / CN3203089 GC-3Y/3Z Agilent Technologies 7890A/7683B CN10735014/ Dual FID CN73345070 Operating System Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstation Appendix IV Laboratory _ tpment Page 7 of 13 Revision Date: March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase HP Organics -1992 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -1994 E nviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1990 E nviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -2005 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -2005 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -1990 Enviroquant Volatiles HP Organics -2002 E nviroquant Serni- Volatiles HP Organics -2002 Enviroquant Semi-Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -2003 Enviroquant Semi- Volatiles HP Organics -2007 Enviroguant Semi- Volatiles L a t, c:, i" .1 l C I' i '2i ~ Equipment Manufacture & Description GC-SR Hewlett-Packard 5890/FID/Tekmar 7000 GC-SV Hewlett-Packard 5890/FID/ 014551/4560 GC-SY Hewlett-Packard 5890 /FID / OI4551A/4560 GPC4 Waters 717 ASE Dionex ASE 200 ASE Dionex ASE 200 ASE Dionex ASE 200 ASE Dionex ASE 200 Sonicator Sonics Vibracell VC 750 Sonicator TEKMAR Sonicator ICP-MS Thermo Elemental X series ICP-MS ICP TJA Enivro Trace 61E Simultaneous ICP Thermo ICAP 6500 (6500) ICP Thermo ICP 6500 Duo Serial Number 2612A07448 LR47-359C / N244460743 2643A10503 717 -000152 99040595 99040603 03040695 990303 75 31800A 6916 X0180 10970 ICP-200 72 001 ICP-200 74989 Operating System Software HP Chemstation HP Chemstation HP Chemstatio n None None None None None None None Thermo PlasmaLab Thermo ICP Manager ITEVA ITE VA Appendix IV Laboratory • 4>m ent Page 8 of 13 Revision Date: March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase HP Organics -1992 Enviroquant Screening HP Organics -1996 Enviroquant Screening HP Organics -1990 Enviroquant Screening N /A Organic 1992 Prep N /A Organic 1999 Prep N /A Organic 1999 Prep N /A Organic 2005 Prep N /A Organic 1999 Prep N /A Organic 2000 Prep N /A Organic 199 7 Prep Thermo Metals 2003 PlasmaLab Laboratory Thermo ICP Metals 2000 Manager Laboratory ITEVA Metals 2007 Laborato1y ITEVA Metals 2007 Laboratory L a o c, r .1 1 c 1· i .a s Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number Hg Analyzer Leeman Mercury A n alyzer HYDRAA HA-3011 Hg Analyzer Leeman Mercury Analyzer PS200II Hg6037 A uto Anal. Lachat Quikchem 8000 A83000-2273 Auto Anal. Lachat Quikchem 8000 A83000-1402 TOC A nal. Shimadzu 5000 Series A/S system 30825274 TOC Anal. Shimadzu 5000 Series A/S system 35517409 TOC A nal Shimadzu TOC-V CSH H51104435198 CS TOXAnal. MitsubishiTOX-10E 75R04185 TOXAnal Mitsubishi TOX-100 A7M 42997 IR Spec. Buck Scientific HC-404 68 7 DO Meter YSI -50B 91L034801 DO Meter YS I-51B 92A0358 18 DO Meter YSI-55/12ft OOC0598BG Turbidimeter HF Scientific DRT 100B 21141 Flashpoint Fisher Scientific P en sky -Martin 40300010 fpH Meter Orion 250A 018019 fpH10 YSI JC02538 Operating System Software WIN Hg Runner Leeman PS #150-00052 OMNION FIA OMNION F IA Shimadzu TOC Co ntrol Shimadz u TOC Control Shima d zu TOC Control None None None None None None None None None None Appendix IV Laboratory •. tpment Page 9 of 13 Revision Date: March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase WIN Hg Wet Chem 2003 Runner Leeman PS Wet Chem 1999 #150-00052 OMNION Wet Chem 2004 F IA OMNION Wet Ch em 1999 FIA Shimad zu Wet Chem 2000 TOC Control Shimadzu Wet Chem 1998 TOC Control Shimadzu Wet Chem 2007 TOC Control N /A Wet Chem 1996 N /A Wet Ch em 2008 N /A Wet Ch em 1997 N/A Wet Ch em 1988 N /A Wet Ch em 1998 N /A Wet Chem 2000 N /A Wet Chem 1987 N /A Wet Chem 1996 N /A field 2007 N /A field 2007 I. d b O r ~ t ~~ I' i t S Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number pH Meter-4 Orion 710A General chem, (pH 4) 3978 PH Meter-11 Fisher Scientific (pH 3) 1505104 PH Meter-12 Thermo Orion 310 (pH12) 14011 pH Meter 26 Thomas Scientific TS 625 06390411 PH Meter 46 Thermo Orion 4 Star B10299 PH Meter-47 Thermo Orion 4 Star B04869 PH/EH Thermo Orion 4 Star SN00742 Meter-22 PH Meter -Thermo Orion Model 310 SN013786 23 Cond, Meter YSI-30 ]0183 Cond, Meter Amber Science 1056 01020851056-101 Cond. Meter Orion 145+ 78035 Cond. Meter Oakton 4003 78643 UVVIS Spec C Spectronix 20 Gensys 3SGA122034 UVVIS Spec F Spectronix 20 Gensys (4001 /4) 356329906 UVVIS Spec G Thermo Electron Corp Genesys 20 3SGJ238001 UVVIS Spec H Thermo Electron Corp Genesys 20 3SGJ306016 UVVIS Spec D Spectronix 20 Gensys ( 4001 / 4) 3SGF170020 UVVIS Spec E Spectronix 20 Gensys (4001/4) 3SGD.352011 Calorimeter PARR 1261EA; no software used 1499 Ion Chrom. Dionex DX500 99040750 Ion Chrom. Dionex ICS2000 02090737 O perating System Software None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Dionex Peak Net Run Dionex Chromeleon Client Appendix IT/: Laboratory • ,tpme nt Page 10 o f 13 Revision Date: March 2009 D ata Processing Software Location Purchase N /A Wet Chem 1996 N /A Wet Chem 2003 N /A Wet Chem 2003 N/A Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 2008 N /A Wet Chem 2008 N /A Wet Chem 2008 N /A Wet Chem 2008 N /A Wet Chem 2004 N /A Wet Chem 2001 N /A Wet Chem 2004 N /A Wet Chem 2004 N/A Wet Chem 2000 N /A Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 1996 Dionex Peak Wet Chem 1999 Net Run Dionex Wet Chem 2004 Chromeleon Client L di)O r .~t C l'i ~~ Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number Ion Chrom. Dionex ICS2000 02110028 Ion Chrom. Dionex ICS2000 04060060 Ion Chrom. Dionex ICS3000 06040160 Ion Chrom. Metrohm-Peak IC 1844012003147 ASE Extract Dionex Accelerated Solvent E xtractor 99030375 Analytical Mettler AE 160 (B-5) C11620 Balance Analytical ACCU LA 110 (B -10) 70405919 Balance Analytical Ohaus Adventurer (B -24) 1225032523P Balance Top Load Ohaus TS400D (B-3) 1330 Balance Top Load Ohaus Scout (B -4) BJ046417 Balance Top Load Ohaus E400 (B-6) 8714 Balance Top Load Ohaus Navigator (B-7) 11213 70265 Balance Top Load Ohaus CT200S (B -8) 17872 Balance Top Load Ohaus TS400S (B -9) 2475 Balance Operating System Software Dionex Chromeleon Client Dionex Chromeleon Client Dio nex Chromeleon Client MagIC Net None None None None None None None None None None Appen dix IV Laboratory • ,tpment Page 11 of 13 Revision D ate : March 2009 Data Processing Software Location Purchase Dionex Wet Chem 2004 Chromeleon Client Dionex Wet Chem 2004 Chromeleon Client Dionex Wet Chem 2006 Chromeleon Client Ma gIC Net Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 1999 N /A Wet Chem 1999 N /A Wet Chem 2001 N /A Wet Chem 2004 N /A Wet Chem Prior to 2000 N/A Wet Chem 2001 N /A Wet Chem Prior to 2000 N /A Wet Chem 2002 N /A W e t Chem 2000 N /A Wet Chem 2000 L a !> c:, 1· .:1 t ,:; I' i .;.i; ~ Equipment Manufacture & Description Top Load Ohaus GT4100 (B-11) Balance Top Load Sartorious B4100 (B-13) Balance Top Load Denver Inst. Co. XL500 (B-14) Balance Top Load Ohaus Navigator (B-15) Balance Top Load Ohaus Explorer (B-16) Balance Top Load Ohaus Navigator (B-17) Balance Top Load Ohaus Navigator (B-18) Balance Top Load Ohaus Scout II (B-19) Balance Top Load Ohaus Scout II (B-20) Balance Top Load Ohaus Adventurer (B-21) Balance Top Load Accu Lab V -3mg (B-23) Balance Top Load Ohaus Scout II (B -25) Balance Top Load Ohaus Adventurer -AR3130 (B -26) Balance Top Load Ohaus Adventurer AV412 (B-27 ) Balance Top Load Ohaus Sport (B-28) Serial Number 3202 38080035 B045530 1213702 73 E 15811192121 7 1 11192639994 1119323138 BJ5147 83 BJ3 20905 E102121 8270448 9891BL3 74 BJ514 77 0 1240 -P 8026251106 712423051 8 Operating System Software None None None None None N one None None None None None N o ne N one N o n e None Appendix IV Laboratory , .ipment Page 12 of 13 Revi sion Date: March 20 09 Data Processing Software Location Purchase N /A Wet Chem Prior to 2000 N /A Wet Chem Prior to 2000 N /A Wet Chem Prior to 2000 N /A Wet Chem 2002 N /A Wet Chem 2001 N /A Wet Chem 2001 N /A Wet Chem 2001 N /A Wet Chem 2002 N /A Wet Chem 2002 N /A Wet Chem 2001 N /A Wet Chem 2004 N /A Wet Chem 2004 N /A We t Chem 2004 N /A Wet Chem 2005 N /A Wet Ch em 2005 ,- L .:J t o r~t c ri t:.s Equipment Manufacture & Description Serial Number Balance Top Load Ohaus Adventurer AV 412 (B -29) 8026391019 Balance Top Load Ohaus Adventurer AV412 (B -30) 8026391160 Balance Top Load Ohaus Adventurer AV412 (B-31) 8028041080 Balance TOP Load Sartorius TE31025 (B -32) 219502 73 Balance TOP Load Ohaus Adventure AV412 (B-33) 8028391184 Balance TOP Load Ohaus Adventure AV 412 (B -34) 8028391117 Balance TOP Load Ohaus Adventure AV212 (B-35) 8029171184 Balance TOP Load Ohaus Adventure AV212 (B-36) 8029131104 Balance TOP Load Ohaus Adventure AV412 (B -37) 802916112 Balance Operating System Software None None None None None None None None None A ppen dix I V: Laboratory pment Data Processing Page 13 of 13 Revision Date: March 2009 Software Location Purchase N /A Wet Chem 2005 N /A Wet Chem 2005 N /A Wet Chem 2007 N /A Wet Chem 200 7 N /A Sa mpl e 200 7 Ma na gement N /A Organic 2007 H o od N /A Ex tra 2008 N /A extra 2008 N /A extra 2008 ' ,_ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to. verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method EPA 1010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID lgnitability FL 1780 10116606 Method EPA 120.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Conductivity FL 1610 10006403 Method EPA 1664 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID n-Hexane Extractable Material (O&G) FL 1803 10127409 Method EPA 180.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Turbidity FL 2055 10011606 Method EPA 200.7 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum FL 1000 10013806 Antimony FL 1005 . 10013806 Arsenic FL JOJO 10013806 Barium FL 1015 10013806 Beryllium FL 1020 10013806 Cadmium FL 1030 10013806 Calcium FL 1035 10013806 Chromium FL 1040 10013806 Cobalt FL 1050 10013806 Copper FL 1055 10013806 Iron FL 1070 10013806 Lead FL 1075 10013806 Magnesium FL 1085 10013806 Manganese FL 1090 10013806 Molybdenum FL 1100 10013806 Nickel FL 1105 10013806 Potassium FL 1125 10013806 Page 1 of37 ' - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Selenium FL 1140 10013806 Silver FL 1150 10013806 Sodium FL 1155 10013806 Thallium FL 1165 10013806 Tin FL 1175 10013806 Vanadium FL 1185 10013806 Zinc FL 1190 10013806 Method EPA 245.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Mercury FL 1095 10036609 Method EPA 300.0 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Bromide FL 1540 10053006 Chloride FL 1575 10053006 Fluoride FL 1730 10053006 Nitrate as N FL 1810 10053006 Nitrate-nitrite FL 1820 10053006 Nitrite as N FL 1840 10053006 Sulfate FL 2000 10053006 Method EPA 314.0 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Perchlorate FL 1895 10055400 Method EPA 335.4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total cyanid~ FL 1645 10061402 Method EPA 350.1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Ammonia as N FL 1515 10063408 Method EPA 351.2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Kjeldahl nitrogen -total FL 1795 10065200 Page2 of37 --· Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method EPA 365.3 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Orthophosphate as P FL 1870 10070801 Phosphorus, total FL 1910 10070801 Method EPA 420.4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total phenolics FL 1905 10080203 Method EPA 6010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum FL 1000 10155201 Antimony FL 1005 10155201 Arsenic FL 1010 10155201 Barium FL 1015 10155201 Beryllium FL 1020 10155201 Cadmium FL 1030 10155201 Calcium FL 1035 10155201 Chromium FL 1040 10155201 Cobalt FL 1050 10155201 Copper FL 1055 10155201 Iron FL 1070 10155201 Lead FL 1075 10155201 Magnesium FL 1085 10155201 Manganese FL 1090 10155201 Molybdenum FL 1100 10155201 Nickel FL 1105 10155201 Potassium FL I 125 10155201 Selenium FL 1140 10155201 Silver FL 1150 10155201 Sodium FL 1155 10155201 Thallium FL 1165 10155201 Tin FL 1175 10155201 Page 3of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: ~~ f~ • T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 · These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Vanadium FL 1185 10155201 Zinc FL 1190 10155201 Method EPA 602 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10102202 1,3-Dichlorobenzene FL 4615 10102202 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10102202 Benzene FL 4375 10102202 Chlorobenzene FL 4475 10102202 Ethylbenzene Fl 4765 10102202 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) FL 5000 10102202 Toluene FL 5140 10102202 Xylene (total) FL 5260 10102202 Method EPA 608 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 4,4'-DDD FL 7355 10103603 4,4'-DDE FL 7360 10103603 4,4'-DDT FL 7365 10103603 Aldrin FL 7025 10103603 alpha-BHC (alpha-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7110 10103603 Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016) FL 8880 10103603 Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221) FL 8885 10103603 Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232) FL 8890 10103603 Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242) FL 8895 10103603 Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248) FL 8900 10103603 Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254) FL 8905 10103603 Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260) FL 8910 10103603 beta-BHC (beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7115 10103603 Chlordane (tech .) FL · 7250 10103603 delta-BHC (delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7105 10103603 Dieldrin FL 7470 10103603 Page4of37 - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Certificate: Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. Expiration Date: 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Issue Date: Orlando, FL 32811-5803 T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Endosulfan I FL 7510 10103603 Endosulfan II FL 7515 10103603 Endosulfan sulfate FL 7520 10103603 Endrin FL 7540 10103603 Endrin aldehyde FL 7530 10103603 gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane) Fl 7120 10103603 Heptachlor FL 7685 10103603 Heptachlor epoxide FL 7690 10103603 Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene) FL 8250 10103603 Method EPA 610 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Acenaphthene FL 5500 10104402 Acenaphthylene FL 5505 10104402 Anthracene FL 5555 10104402 Benzo( a )a nth racene FL 5575 10104402 Benzo(a)pyrene Fl 5580 10104402 Benzo(b )fluoranthene FL 5585 10104402 Benzo(g ,h, i)perylene FL 5590 10104402 Benzo(k)fluoranthene Fl 5600 10104402 Chrysene FL 5855 10104402 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene FL 5895 10104402 Fluoranthene FL 6265 10104402 Fluorene FL 6270 10104402 lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene FL 6315 10104402 Naphthalene FL 5005 10104402 Phenanthrene FL 6615 10104402 Pyrene FL 6665 10104402 Method EPA 624 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane FL 5160 10107207 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane FL 5110 10107207 Page 5of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: 1104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane FL 5165 10107207 1, 1-Dichloroethane FL 4630 10107207 1, 1-Dichloroethylene (1, 1-Dichloroethene) FL 4640 10107207 1,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10107207 1,2-Dichloroethane FL 4635 10107207 1,2-Dichloropropane FL 4655 10107207 1,3-Dichlorobenzene FL 4615 10107207 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10107207 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether FL 4500 10107207 Acrolein (Propenal) FL 4325 10107207 Acrylonitrile FL 4340 10107207 Benzene FL 4375 10107207 Bromodichloromethane FL 4395 10107207 Bromoform FL 4400 10107207 Bromomethane (Methyl bromide) FL 4950 10107207 Carbon tetrachloride FL 4455 10107207 Chlorobenzene Fl 4475 10107207 Chloroethane FL 4485 10107207 Chloroform FL 4505 10107207 Chloromethane (Methyl chloride) Fl 4960 10107207 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene FL 4680 10107207 Dibromochloromethane FL 4575 10107207 Ethyl benzene Fl 4765 10107207 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) FL 5000 10107207 Methylene chloride FL 4975 10107207 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) Fl 5115 10107207 Toluene FL 5140 10107207 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene FL 4700 10107207 trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene FL 4685 10107207 Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) FL 5170 10107207 Page 6 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory·s current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water T rich lorofluoromethane FL 5175 10107207 Vinyl chlor ide FL 5235 10107207 Xylene (total) FL 5260 10107207 Method EPA 625 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene FL 5155 IOI 07401 1, 2-Dich lorobenzene FL 4610 10107401 1,3-Dichlorobenzene FL 4615 10107401 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10107401 2,4 ,6-T richlorophenol FL 6840 10107401 2,4-Dichlorophenol FL 6000 10107401 2,4-Dimethylphenol FL 6130 10107401 2,4-Dinitrophenol FL 6175 10107401 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) FL 6185 10107401 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) FL 6190 10107401 2-Chloronaphthalene FL 5795 10107401 2-Chlorophenol FL 5800 10107401 2-Methyl-4 ,6-dinitrophenol FL 6360 10107401 2-Nitrophenol FL 6490 10107401 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine FL 5945 10107401 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether FL 5660 10107401 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol FL 5700 10107401 4-Chlorophenyl phenylether FL 5825 10107401 4-Nitrophenol FL 6500 10107401 Acenaphthene FL 5500 10107401 Acenaphthylene FL 5505 10107401 Anthracene FL 5555 10107401 Benzidine FL 5595 10107401 Benzo(a)anthracene FL 5575 10107401 Benzo(a)pyrene FL 5580 10107401 Benzo(b )fluoranthene FL 5585 10107401 Page 7 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Benzo(g,h ,i)peryiene FL 5590 10107401 Benzo(k)fluoranthene FL 5600 10107401 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane FL 5760 10107401 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether FL 5765 10107401 bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether FL 5780 10107401 bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) FL 6255 10107401 Butyl benzyl phthalate FL 5670 10!07401 Chrysene FL 5855 10107401 Dibenz(a ,h) anthracene FL 5895 10107401 Diethyl phthalate FL 6070 10107401 Dimethyl phthalate FL 6135 10107401 Di-n-butyl phthalate FL 5925 10107401 Di-n-octyl phthalate FL 6200 10107401 Fluoranthene FL 6265 10107401 Fluorene FL 6270 10107401 Hexachlorobenzene FL 6275 10107401 Hexachlorobutadiene FL 4835 10107401 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene FL 6285 10107401 Hexachloroethane FL 4840 10107401 lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene FL 6315 10107401 lsophorone FL 6320 10107401 Naphthalene FL 5005 10107401 Nitrobenzene FL 5015 10107401 n-Nitrosodimethylamine FL 6530 10107401 n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine FL 6545 10107401 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine FL 6535 10107401 Pentachlorophenol FL 6605 10107401 Phenanthrene FL 6615 10107401 Phenol FL 6625 10107401 Pyrene FL 6665 10107401 Page 8 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method EPA 7196 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chromium VI FL 1045 10162206 Method EPA 7470 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Mercury FL 1095 10165603 Method EPA 8011 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) FL 4570 10173009 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB, Ethylene dibromide) FL 4585 10173009 Method EPA 8015 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2-Propanol (lsopropyl alcohol) FL 4895 10173203 Diesel range organics (ORO) FL 9369 10173203 Ethanol FL 4750 10173203 Gasoline range organics (GRO) FL 9408 10173203 lsobutyl alcohol. (2-Methyl-1-propanol) FL 4875 10173203 Methanol FL 4930 10173203 n-Butyl alcohol FL 4425 10173203 n-Propanol FL 5055 10173203 Method EPA 8021 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10174400 1,3-Dichlorobenzene FL 4615 10174400 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10174400 Benzene FL 4375 10174400 Chlorobenzene FL 4475 10174400 Ethylbenzene FL 4765 10174400 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) FL 5000 10174400 Toluene FL 5140 10174400 Xylene (total) FL 5260 10174400 Page 9of 37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 i, ..... Certificate~ Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method EPA 8081 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 4,4'-000 FL 7355 10178402 4,4'-0DE FL 7360 10178402 4,4'-00T FL 7365 10178402 Aldrin FL 7025 10178402 alpha-BHC (alpha-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7110 10178402 alpha-Chlordane FL 7240 10178402 beta-BHC (beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7115 10178402 Chlordane (tech.) FL 7250 10178402 delta-BHC (delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7105 10178402 Oieldrin FL 7470 10178402 Endosulfan I FL 7510 10178402 Endosulfan II FL 7515 10178402 Endosulfan sulfate FL 7520 10178402 Endrin FL 7540 10178402 Endrin aldehyde FL 7530 10178402 Endrin ketone FL 7535 10178402 gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7120 10178402 gamma-Chlordane FL 7245 10178402 Heptachlor FL 7685 10178402 Heptachlor epoxide FL 7690 10178402 Methoxychlor FL 7810 10178402 Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene) FL 8250 10178402 Method EPA 8082 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016) FL 8880 10179007 Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221 } FL 8885 10179007 Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232) FL 8890 10179007 Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242) FL 8895 10179007 Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248) FL 8900 10179007 Page 10 of37 ·~ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Certificate: Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. Expiration Date: 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Issue Date : Orlando, FL 32811 -5803 T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254) FL 8905 10179007 Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260) FL 8910 10179007 Method EPA 8091 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) FL 6185 10179803 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) FL 6190 10179803 Method EPA 8141 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) FL 7075 10181803 Bolstar (Sulprofos) FL 7125 10181803 Carbophenothion FL 7220 10181803 Chlorpyrifos FL 7300 10181803 Coumaphos FL 7315 10181803 Demeton-o FL 7395 10181803 Demeton-s FL 7385 10181803 Diazinon FL 7410 10181803 Dichlorovos (DDVP, Dichlorvos) FL 8610 10181803 Dimethoate FL 7475 10181803 Disulfoton FL 8625 10181803 EPN FL 7550 10181803 Ethion FL 7565 10181803 Ethoprop FL 7570 10181803 Famphur FL 7580 10181803 Fenthion FL 7605 10181803 Malathion FL 7770 10181803 Merphos FL 7785 10181803 Mevinphos FL 7850 10181803 Naled FL 7905 10181803 Parathion, ethyl FL 7955 10181803 Parathion, methyl (Methyl parathion) FL 7825 10181803 Phorate FL 7985 10181803 Page 11 of37 , ... _ ... Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Ronne! FL 8110 10181803 Stirophos (Tetrachlorvinphos) FL 8200 10181803 Sulfotepp FL 8155 10181803 Tetraethyl pyrophosphate (TEPP) FL 8210 10181803 Thionazin (Zinophos) FL 8235 10181803 Tokuthion (Prothiophos) FL 8245 10181803 Trichloronate FL 8275 10181803 Method EPA 8151 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2,4,5-T FL 8655 10183003 2,4-D FL 8545 10183003 2,4-DB FL 8560 10183003 Dalapon FL 8555 10183003 Dicamba FL 8595 10183003 Dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol, DNBP) FL 8620 10183003 MCPA FL 7775 10183003 MCPP FL 7780 10183003 Pentachlorophenol FL 6605 10183003 Silvex (2,4,5-TP) FL 8650 10183003 Method EPA 8260 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane FL 5105 10184404 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane FL 5160 10184404 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane FL 5110 10184404 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane FL 5165 10184404 1, 1-Dichloroethane FL 4630 10184404 1, 1-Dichloroethylene (1, 1-Dichloroethene) FL 4640 10184404 1, 1-Dichloropropene FL 4670 10184404 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene FL 5150 10184404 1,2,3-Trichloropropane FL 5180 10184404 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene FL 5155 10184404 Page 12 of 37 -:, -:: \ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene FL 5210 10184404 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) FL 4570 10184404 1 ,2-Dibromoethane (EDB, Ethylene dibromide) FL 4585 10184404 1,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10184404 1,2-Dichloroethane FL 4635 10184404 1,2-Dichloropropane FL 4655 10184404 1,3 ,5-Trimethylbenzene FL 5215 10184404 1,3-Dichlorobenzene FL 4615 10184404 1,3-Dichloropropane FL 4660 10184404 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10184404 1,4-Dioxane {1 ,4-Diethyleneoxide) FL 4735 10184404 1-Chlorohexane FL 4510 10184404 2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone, MEK) FL 4410 10184404 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether FL 4500 10184404 2-Chlorotoluene FL 4535 10184404 2-Hexanone FL 4860 10184404 2-Nitropropane FL 5020 10184404 4-Chlorotoluene FL 4540 10184404 4-lsopropyltoluene FL 4915 10184404 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) FL 4995 10184404 Acetone FL 4315 10184404 Acetonitrile FL 4320 10184404 Acrolein (Propenal) FL 4325 10184404 Acrylonitrile FL 4340 10184404 Benzene FL 4375 10184404 Bromobenzene FL 4385 10184404 Bromochloromethane FL 4390 10184404 Bromodichloromethane FL 4395 10184404 Bromoform FL 4400 10184404 Bromomethane (Methyl bromide) FL 4950 10184404 Page 13 of 37 ::, .., -~- Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Carbon disulfide FL 4450 10184404 Carbon tetrachloride FL 4455 10184404 Chlorobenzene FL 4475 10184404 Chloroethane FL 4485 10184404 Chloroform FL 4505 10184404 Chloromethane (Methyl chloride) FL 4960 10184404 Chloroprene FL 4525 10184404 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene FL 4645 10184404 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene FL 4680 10184404 Dibromochloromethane FL 4575 10184404 Dibromomethane FL 4595 10184404 Dichlorodifluoromethane FL 4625 10184404 Diethyl ether FL 4725 10184404 Ethanol FL 4750 10184404 Ethyl acetate FL 4755 10184404 Ethyl methacrylate FL 4810 10184404 Ethylbenzene FL 4765 10184404 Ethyl-t-butylether (ETBE) FL 4770 10184404 Hexachlorobutadiene FL 4835 10184404 lodomethane (Methyl iodide) FL 4870 10184404 lsobutyl alcohol (2-Methyl-1-propanol) FL 4875 10184404 lsopropyl ether FL 4905 10184404 lsopropylbenzene FL 4900 10184404 Methacrylonitrile FL 4925 10184404 Methyl methacrylate FL 4990 10184404 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) FL 5000 10184404 Methylene chloride FL 4975 10184404 Naphthalene FL 5005 10184404 n-Butylbenzene FL 4435 10184404 n-Propylbenzene FL 5090 10184404 Page 14 of37 = Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Pentachloroethane FL 5035 10184404 Propionitrile (Ethyl cyanide) FL 5080 10184404 sec-Butyl benzene FL 4440 10184404 Styrene FL 5100 10184404 T-amylmethylether (TAME) FL 4370 10184404 tert-Butyl alcohol FL 4420 10184404 tert-Butylbenzene FL 4445 10184404 Tetrachloroethylene ( Perch loroethylene) FL 5115 10184404 Toluene FL 5140 10184404 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene FL 4700 10184404 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropylene FL 4685 10184404 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene FL 4605 10184404 T rich loroethene (T rich loroethylene) FL 5170 10184404 Trichlorofluoromethane FL 5175 10184404 Vinyl acetate FL 5225 10184404 Vinyl chloride FL 5235 10184404 Xylene (total) FL 5260 10184404 Method EPA 8270 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene FL 6715 10185203 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene FL 5155 10185203 1,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10185203 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine FL 6220 10185203 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB) FL 6885 10185203 1,3-Dichlorobenzene . FL 4615 10185203 1,3-Dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) FL 6160 10185203 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10185203 1,4-Naphthoquinone FL 6420 10185203 1,4-Phenylenediamine FL 6630 10185203 1-Ch loronaphthalene FL 5790 10185203 1-Naphthylamine FL 6425 10185203 Page 15 of37 I, ' Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Certificate: Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. Expiration Date: 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Issue Date: Orlando, FL 32811-5803 T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol FL 6835 10185203 2,4 ,6-Trichlorophenol FL 6840 10185203 2 ,4-Dichlorophenol FL 6000 10185203 2,4-Dimethylphenol FL 6130 10185203 2,4-Dinitrophenol FL 6175 10185203 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) FL 6185 10185203 2, 6-Dich lorophenol FL 6005 10185203 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) FL 6190 10185203 2-Acetylaminofluorene FL 5515 10185203 2-Chloronaphthalene FL 5795 10185203 2-Chlorophenol FL 5800 10185203 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol FL 6360 10185203 2-Methylnaphthalene FL 6385 10185203 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) FL 6400 10185203 2-Naphthylamine FL 6430 10185203 2-Nitroaniline FL 6460 10185203 2-Nitrophenol FL 6490 10185203 2-Picoline (2-Methylpyridine) FL 5050 10185203 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine FL 5945 10185203 3 ,3'-Dimethylbenzidine FL 6120 10185203 3-Methylcholanthrene FL 6355 10185203 3-Methylphenol (m-Cresol) FL 6405 10185203 3-Nitroaniline FL 6465 10185203 4-Aminobiphenyl FL 5540 10185203 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether FL 5660 10185203 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol FL 5700 10185203 4-Chloroaniline FL 5745 10185203 4-Chlorophenyl phenylether FL 5825 10185203 4-Dimethyl aminoazobenzene FL 6105 10185203 4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol) FL 6410 10185203 Page 16of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses . Matrix: Non Potable Water 4-Nitroaniline FL 6470 10185203 4-Nitrophenol FL 6500 10185203 5-Nitro-o-toluidine FL 6570 10185203 7, 12 -Dimethylbenz(a) anthracene FL 6115 10185203 a-a-Dimethylphenethylamine FL 6125 10185203 Acenaphthene FL 5500 10185203 Acenaphthylene FL 5505 10185203 Acetophenone FL 5510 10185203 Aniline FL 5545 10185203 Anthracene FL 5555 10185203 Aramite FL 5560 10185203 Benzidine FL 5595 10185203 Benzo(a)anthracene FL 5575 10185203 Benzo(a)pyrene FL 5580 10185203 Benzo(b )fluoranthene FL 5585 10185203 Benzo(g. h, i)perylene FL 5590 10185203 Benzo(k)fluoranthene FL 5600 10185203 Benzoic acid FL 5610 10185203 Benzyl alcohol FL 5630 10185203 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane FL 5760 10185203 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether FL 5765 10185203 bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether FL 5780 10185203 bis(2 -Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) FL 6255 10 185203 Butyl benzyl phthalate FL 5670 10185203 Carbazole FL 5680 10185203 Chlorobenzilate FL 7260 10185203 Chrysene FL 5855 10185203 Diallate FL 7405 10185203 Dibenz(a, j) acridine FL 5900 10185203 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene FL 5895 10185203 Page 17of37 ~-- Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Dibenzofuran FL 5905 10185203 Diethyl phthalate FL 6070 10185203 Dimethoate FL 7475 10185203 Dimethyl phthalate FL 6135 10185203 Di-n-butyl phthalate FL 5925 10185203 Di-n-octyl phthalate FL 6200 10185203 Diphenylamine FL 6205 10185203 Disulfoton FL 8625 10185203 Ethyl methanesulfonate FL 6260 10185203 Famphur FL 7580 10185203 Fluoranthene FL 6265 10185203 Fluorene FL 6270 10185203 Hexachlorobenzene FL 6275 10185203 Hexachlorobutadiene FL 4835 10185203 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene FL 6285 10185203 Hexachloroethane FL 4840 10185203 Hexachlorophene FL 6290 10185203 Hexachloropropene FL 6295 10185203 lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene FL 6315 10185203 lsodrin FL 7725 10185203 lsophorone FL 6320 10185203 lsosafrole FL 6325 10185203 Kepone FL 7740 10185203 Methapyrilene FL 6345 10185203 Methyl methanesulfonate FL 6375 10185203 Naphthalene FL 5005 10185203 Nitrobenzene FL 5015 10185203 Nitroquinoline-1-oxide FL 6515 10185203 n-Nitrosodiethylamine FL 6525 10185203 n-Nitrosodimethylamine FL 6530 10185203 Page 18 of 37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water n-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine FL 5025 10185203 n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine FL 6545 10185203 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine FL 6535 10185203 n-Nitrosomethylethylamine FL 6550 10185203 n-Nitrosomorpholine FL 6555 10185203 n-Nitrosopiperidine FL 6560 10185203 n-Nitrosopyrrolidine FL 6565 10185203 o,o,o-Triethyl phosphorothioate FL 8290 10185203 o-Toluidine FL 5145 10185203 Parathion, ethyl FL 7955 10185203 Parathion, methyl (Methyl parathion) FL 7825 10185203 Pentachlorobenzene FL 6590 10185203 Pentach loron itrobenzene FL 6600 10185203 Pentachlorophenol FL 6605 10185203 Phenacetin FL 6610 10185203 Phenanthrene FL 6615 10185203 Phenol FL 6625 10185203 Phorate FL 7985 10185203 Pronamide (Kerb) FL 6650 10185203 Pyrene FL 6665 10185203 Pyridine FL 5095 10185203 Quinoline FL 6670 10185203 Safrole FL 6685 10185203 Sulfotepp FL 8155 10185203 Thionazin (Zinophos) FL 8235 10185203 Thionazin (Zinophos) FL 8235 10185601 Thiophenol (Benzenethiol) FL 6750 10186002 Method EPA 8310 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Acenaphthene FL 5500 10187607 Acenaphthylene FL 5505 10187607 Page 19of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Anthracene FL 5555 10187607 Benzo( a )a nth racene FL 5575 10187607 Benzo(a)pyrene FL 5580 10187607 Benzo(b )fluoranthene FL 5585 10187607 Benzo(g,h, i)perylene FL 5590 10187607 Benzo(k)fluoranthene FL 5600 10187607 Chrysene FL 5855 10187607 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene FL 5895 10187607 Fluoranthene FL 6265 10187607 Fluorene FL 6270 10187607 lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene FL 6315 10187607 Naphthalene FL 5005 10187607 Phenanthrene FL 6615 10187607 Pyrene FL 6665 10187607 Method EPA 8330 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene (1,3,5-TNB) FL 6885 10189807 1,3-Dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) FL 6160 10189807 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (2,4 ,6-TNT) FL 9651 10189807 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) FL 6185 10189807 2 ,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) FL 6190 10189807 2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene (2-am-dnt) FL 9303 10189807 2-Nitrotoluene FL 9507 10189807 3-Nitrotoluene FL 9510 10189807 4-Amino-2 ,6-dinitrotoluene (4-am-dnt) FL 9306 10189807 4-Nitrotoluene FL 9513 10189807 Nitrobenzene FL 5015 10189807 Nitroglycerin FL 6485 10189807 Octahydro-1,3,5, 7-tetranitro-1,3,5, 7-tetrazocine (HMX) FL 9522 10189807 Pentaerythritoltetranitrate FL 9558 10189807 ROX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) FL 9432 10189807 Page 20of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water T etryl (methyl-2 ,4 , 6-trinitrophenylnitramine) FL 9633 10189807 Method EPA 8332 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Nitroglycerin FL 6485 10190406 Method EPA 9012 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total cyanide FL 1645 10193405 Method EPA 9040 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID pH FL 1900 10196802 Method EPA 9056 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Bromide FL 1540 10199209 Chloride FL 1575 10199209 Fluoride FL 1730 10199209 Nitrate as N FL 1810 10199209 Nitrate-nitrite FL 1820 10199209 Nitrite as N FL 1840 10199209 Sulfate FL 2000 10199209 Method EPA 9060 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total organic carbon FL 2040 10200201 Method Iowa OA-1; GRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons FL 10330 90016403 Method Iowa OA-2; DRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons FL 10331 90016607 Method RSK 175 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Ethane FL 4747 RSK 175 Page 21 of37 \ ~ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date : T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses . Matrix: Non Potable Water Ethylene FL 4752 RSK 17 5 Methane FL 4926 RSK 175 Propane FL 5029 RSK 175 Method SM 2120 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Color FL 1605 2000180 3 Method SM 2320 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Alkalinity as CaC03 FL 1505 20 003003 Method SM 2340 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total hardness as CaC03 FL 1755 20003401 Method SM 2540 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-total FL 1950 20004608 Method SM 2540 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-filterable (TDS) FL 1955 20004404 Method SM 2540 D Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-nonfilterable (TSS) FL 1960 2000 4802 Method SM 4500 Cl-C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chloride FL 1575 2008 4804 Method SM 4500 H+ B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID pH FL 1900 20016404 Method SM 4500 N02 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Nitrite as N FL 1840 2002 4004 Method SM 4500 N03 E Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Page 22 of37 ' '- Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Nitrate as N FL 1810 20017601 Nitrate-nitrite FL 1820 20017601 Method SM 4500 S2-F Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfide FL 2005 20126209 Method SM 5210 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Biochemical oxygen demand FL 1530 20027401 Carbonaceous BOD, CBOD FL 1555 20027401 Method SM 5220 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chemical oxygen demand FL 1565 20027605 Method SM 5310 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total organic carbon FL 2040 20028006 Method SM 5540 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Surfactants -MBA$ FL 2025 20029009 Method Tennessee EPH Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons FL 10331 Tennessee EPH Method Tennessee GRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Gasoline range organics (GRO) FL 9408 Tennessee GRO Page 23 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Method EPA 1010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID lgnitability FL 1780 10116606 Method EPA 1311 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID TCLP FL 849 10118806 Method EPA 1312 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID SPLP FL 850 10119003 Method EPA 350 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Ammonia as N FL 1515 10063 408 Method EPA 365 .3 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Phosphorus, total FL 1910 10070801 Method EPA 6010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum FL 1000 10155201 Antimony FL 1005 10155201 Arsenic FL 1010 10155201 Barium FL 1015 10155201 Beryllium FL 1020 10155201 Cadmium FL 1030 10155201 Calcium FL 1035 10155201 Chromium FL 1040 10155201 Cobalt FL 1050 10155201 Copper FL 1055 10155201 Iron FL 1070 10155201 Lead FL 1075 10155201 Magnesium FL 1085 10155201 Manganese FL 1090 10155201 Page24 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Molybdenum FL 1100 10155201 Nickel FL 1105 10155201 Potassium FL 1125 10155201 Selenium FL 1140 10155201 Silver FL 1150 10155201 Sodium FL 1155 10155201 Thallium FL 1165 10155201 Tin FL 1175 10155201 Vanadium FL 1185 10155201 Zinc FL 1190 10155201 Method EPA 7196 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chromium VI FL 1045 10162206 Method EPA 7471 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Mercury FL 1095 10166004 Method EPA 8011 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) FL 4570 10173009 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDS, Ethylene dibromide) FL 4585 10173009 Method EPA 8015 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2-Propanol (lsopropyl alcohol) FL 4895 10173203 Diesel range organics (ORO) FL 9369 10173203 Ethanol FL 4750 10173203 Gasoline range organics (GRO) FL 9408 10173203 lsobutyl alcohol (2-Methyl-1-propanol) FL 4875 10173203 Methanol FL 4930 10173203 n-Butyl alcohol FL 4425 10173203 n-Propanol FL 5055 10173203 Page25of 37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses . Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Method EPA 8081 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 4,4'-DDD FL 7355 10178402 4,4'-DDE FL 7360 10178402 4,4'-DDT FL 7365 10178402 Aldrin FL 7025 10178402 alpha-BHC (alpha-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7110 10178402 alpha-Chlordane FL 7240 10178402 beta-BHC (beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7115 10178402 Chlordane (tech.) FL 7250 10178402 delta-BHC (delta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7105 10178402 Dieldrin FL 7470 10178402 Endosulfan I FL 7510 10178402 Endosulfan II FL 7515 10178402 Endosulfan sulfate Fl 7520 10178402 Endrin FL 7540 10178402 Endrin aldehyde Fl 7530 10178402 Endrin ketone FL 7535 10178402 gamma-BHC (Lindane , gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7120 10178402 gamma-Chlordane FL 7245 10178402 Heptachlor FL 7685 10178402 Heptachlor epoxide FL 7690 10178402 Methoxychlor Fl 7810 10178402 Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene) FL 8250 10178402 Method EPA 8082 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016) Fl 8880 10179007 Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221) Fl 8885 10179007 Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232) Fl 8890 10179007 Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242) Fl 8895 10179007 Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248) Fl 8900 10179007 Page26of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254) FL 8905 10179007 Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260) FL 8910 10179007 Method EPA 8141 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) FL 7075 10181803 Bolstar (Sulprofos) FL 7125 10181803 Carbophenothion FL 7220 10181803 Chlorpyrifos FL 7300 10181803 Coumaphos FL 7315 10181803 Demeton-o FL 7395 10181803 Demeton-s FL 7385 10181803 Diazinon FL 7410 10181803 Dichlorovos (DDVP, Dichlorvos) FL 8610 10181803 Dimethoate FL 7475 10181803 Disulfoton FL 8625 10181803 EPN FL 7550 10181803 Ethion FL 7565 10181803 Ethoprop FL 7570 10181803 Famphur FL 7580 10181803 Fensulfothion FL 7600 10181803 Fenthion FL 7605 10181803 Malathion FL 7770 10181803 Merphos FL 7785 10181803 Mevinphos FL 7850 10181803 Monocrotophos FL 7880 10181803 Naled FL 7905 10181803 Parathion, ethyl FL 7955 10181803 Parathion , methyl (Methyl parathion) FL 7825 10182000 Phorate FL 7985 10181803 Ronnel FL 8110 10181803 Stirophos (Tetrachlorvinphos) FL 8200 10181803 Page 27of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Sulfotepp FL 8155 10181803 Tetraethyl pyrophosphate (TEPP) FL 8210 10181803 Thionazin (Zinophos) FL 8235 10181803 Tokuthion (Prothiophos) FL 8245 10181803 Trichloronate FL 8275 10181803 Method EPA 8151 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2,4,5-T FL 8655 10183003 2,4-0 FL 8545 10183003 2,4-DB FL 8560 10183003 Dalapon FL 8555 10183003 Dicamba FL 8595 10183003 Dichloroprop (Dichlorprop) FL 8605 10183003 Dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol, DNBP) FL 8620 10183003 MCPA FL 7775 10183003 MCPP FL 7780 10183003 Pentachlorophenol FL 6605 10183003 Silvex (2,4,5-TP) FL 8650 10183003 Method EPA 8260 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane FL 5105 10184404 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane FL 5160 10184404 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane FL 5110 10184404 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane FL 5165 10184404 1, 1-Dichloroethane FL 4630 10184404 1, 1-Dichloroethylene (1, 1-Dichloroethene} FL 4640 10184404 1, 1-Dichloropropene FL 4670 10184404 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene FL 5150 10184404 1,2,3-Trichloropropane FL 5180 10184404 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Fl 5155 10184404 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene FL 5210 10184404 Page28of37 ' Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) FL 4570 10184404 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB , Ethy lene dibromide) FL 4585 10184404 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10184404 1,2-Dichloroethane FL 4635 10184404 1,2-Dichloropropane FL 4655 10184404 1,3 ,5-Trimethylbenzene FL 5215 10184404 1, 3-Dich lorobenzene FL 4615 10184404 1,3-Dichloropropane FL 4660 10184404 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10184404 1 ,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide) FL 4735 10184404 1-Chlorohexane Fl 4510 10184404 2 ,2-Dich loropropane FL 4665 10184404 2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone, MEK) FL 4410 10184404 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether FL 4500 10184404 2-Chlorotoluene FL 4535 10184404 2-Hexanone FL 4860 10184404 2-Nitropropane FL 5020 10184404 4-Chlorotoluene FL 4540 10184404 4-lsopropyltoluene FL 4915 10184404 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) FL 4995 10184404 Acetone FL 4315 10184404 Acetonitrile FL 4320 10184404 Acrolein (Propenal) FL 4325 10184404 Acrylonitrile FL 4340 10184404 Ally! chloride (3-Chloropropene) FL 4355 10184404 Benzene Fl 4375 10184404 Bromobenzene Fl 4385 10184404 Bromochloromethane FL 4390 10184404 Bromodichloromethane FL 4395 10184404 Bromoform Fl 4400 10184404 Page 29of37 '-· Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: -l:' , .. \" 1,, 0,,. T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Bromomethane (Methyl bromide) FL 4950 10184404 Carbon disulfide FL 4450 10184404 Carbon tetrachloride FL 4455 10184404 Chlorobenzene FL 4475 10184404 Chloroethane FL 4485 10184404 Chloroform FL 4505 10184404 Chloromethane (Methyl chloride) FL 4960 10184404 Chloroprene FL 4525 10184404 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene FL 4645 10184404 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene FL 4680 10184404 Dibromoch loromethane FL 4575 10184404 Dibromomethane FL 4595 10184404 Dichlorodifluoromethane FL 4625 10184404 Diethyl ether FL 4725 10184404 Ethyl acetate FL 4755 10184404 Ethyl methacrylate FL 4810 10184404 Ethylbenzene FL 4765 10184404 Hexachlorobutadiene FL 4835 10184404 lodomethane (Methyl iodide) FL 4870 10184404 lsobutyl alcohol (2-Methyl-1-propanol) FL 4875 10184404 lsopropylbenzene FL 4900 10184404 Methyl methacrylate FL 4990 10184404 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) FL 5000 10184404 Methylene chloride Fl 4975 10184404 Naphthalene FL 5005 10184404 n-Butylbenzene FL 4435 10184404 n-Propylbenzene FL 5090 10184404 Pentach loroethane FL 5035 10184404 sec-Butylbenzene FL 4440 10184404 Styrene FL 5100 10184404 Page 30 of37 \ -~ Texas Commission on ~nvironmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/3112011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material tert-Butyl alcohol FL 4420 10184404 tert-Butylbenzene FL 4445 10184404 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) FL 5115 10184404 Toluene FL 5140 10184404 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene FL 4700 10184404 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropylene FL 4685 10184404 Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) FL 5170 10184404 Trichlorofluoromethane FL 5175 10184404 Vinyl acetate FL 5225 10184404 Vinyl chloride FL 5235 10184404 Xylene (total) FL 5260 10184404 Method EPA 8270 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene FL 6715 10185203 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene FL 5155 10185203 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10185203 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine FL 6220 10185203 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene (1,3 ,5-TNB) FL 6885 10185203 1,3-Dichlorobenzene FL 4615 10185203 1,3-Dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) FL 6160 10185203 1,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10185203 1,4-Naphthoquinone FL 6420 10185203 1,4-Phenylenediamine FL 6630 10185203 1-Chloronaphthalene FL 5790 10185203 1-Naphthylamine FL 6425 10185203 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol FL 6835 10185203 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol FL 6840 10185203 2,4-Dichlorophenol FL 6000 10185203 2,4-Dimethylphenol FL 6130 10185203 2,4-Dinitrophenol FL 6175 10185203 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) FL 6185 10185203 Page 31 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material 2, 6-Dich lorophenol FL 6005 10185203 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (2 ,6-DNT) FL 6190 10185203 2-Acetylaminofluorene FL 5515 10185203 2-Chloronaphthalene FL 5795 10185203 2-Chlorophenol FL 5800 10185203 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol FL 6360 10185203 2-Methylnaphthalene FL 6385 10185203 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) FL 6400 10185203 2-Naphthylamine FL 6430 10185203 2-Nitroaniline FL 6460 10185203 2-Nitrophenol FL 6490 10185203 2-Picoline (2-Methylpyridine) FL 5050 10185203 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine FL 5945 10185203 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine FL 6120 10185203 3-Methylcholanthrene FL 6355 10185203 3-Nitroaniline FL 6465 10185203 4-Aminobiphenyl FL 5540 10185203 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether FL 5660 10185203 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol FL 5700 10185203 4-Chloroaniline FL 5745 10185203 4-Chlorophenyl phenylether FL 5825 10185203 4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol) FL 6410 10185203 4-Nitroaniline FL 6470 10185203 4-Nitrophenol FL 6500 10185203 5-Nitro-o-toluidine FL 6570 10185203 7, 12-Dimethylbenz(a) anthracene FL 6115 10185203 a-a-Dimethylphenethylamine FL 6125 10185203 Acenaphthene FL 5500 10185203 Acenaphthylene FL 5505 10185203 Acetophenone FL 5510 10185203 Page 32 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date : Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Aniline FL 5545 10185203 Anthracene Fl 5555 10185203 Aramite FL 5560 10185203 Benzidine FL 5595 10185203 Benzo(a}anthracene Fl 5575 10185203 Benzo( a }pyrene Fl 5580 10185203 Benzo(b }fluoranthene FL 5585 10185203 Benzo(g, h , i)perylene Fl 5590 10185203 Benzo(k)fluoranthene Fl 5600 10185203 Benzoic acid FL 5610 10185203 Benzyl alcohol FL 5630 10185203 bis(2-Chloroethoxy}methane Fl 5760 10185203 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether FL 5765 10185203 bis(2-Chloroisopropyl} ether FL 5780 10185203 bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) FL 6255 10185203 Butyl benzyl phthalate FL 5670 10185203 Carbazole FL 5680 10185203 Chlorobenzilate FL 7260 10185203 Chrysene FL 5855 10185203 Diallate FL 7405 10185203 Dibenz(a, j) acridine FL 5900 10185203 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene FL 5895 10185203 Dibenzofuran FL 5905 10185203 Diethyl phthalate FL 6070 10185203 Dimethoate FL 7475 10185203 Dimethyl phthalate FL 6135 10185203 Di-n-butyl phthalate FL 5925 10185203 Di-n-octyl phthalate FL 6200 10185203 Diphenylamine FL 6205 10185203 Disulfoton FL 8625 10185203 Page 33 of37 \ Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 513112011 61112010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses . Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Ethyl methanesulfonate FL 6260 10185203 Famphur FL 7580 10185203 Fluoranthene FL 6265 10185203 Fluorene FL 6270 10185203 Hexachlorobenzene FL 6275 10185203 Hexachlorobutadiene FL 4835 10185203 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene FL 6285 10185203 Hexachloroethane FL 4840 10185203 Hexachlorophene FL 6290 10185203 Hexachloropropene FL 6295 10185203 lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene FL 6315 10185203 · lsodrin FL 7725 10185203 lsophorone FL 6320 10185203 lsosafrole FL 6325 10185203 Kepone FL 7740 10185203 Methapyrilene FL 6345 10185203 Methyl methanesulfonate FL 6375 10185203 Naphthalene FL 5005 10185203 Nitro benzene FL 5015 10185203 Nitroquinoline-1-oxide FL 6515 10185203 n-Nitrosodiethylamine FL 6525 10185203 n-Nitrosodimethylamine FL 6530 10185203 n-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine FL 5025 10185203 n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine FL 6545 10185203 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine FL 6535 10185203 n-Nitrosomethylethylamine FL 6550 10185203 n-Nitrosomorpholine FL 6555 10185203 n-Nitrosopiperidine FL 6560 10185203 n-N itrosopyrrolidine FL 6565 10185203 o,o,o-Triethyl phosphorothioate FL 8290 10185203 Page 34 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material o-Toluidine FL 5145 10185203 Parathion, ethyl FL 7955 10185203 Parathion , methyl (Methyl parathion) FL 7825 10185203 Pentachlorobenzene FL 6590 10185203 Pentachloronitrobenzene FL 6600 10185203 Pentachlorophenol FL 6605 10185203 Phenacetin FL 6610 10185203 Phenanthrene FL 6615 10185203 Phenol FL 6625 10185203 Phorate FL 7985 10185203 Pronamide (Kerb) FL 6650 10185203 Pyrene FL 6665 10185203 Pyridine FL 5095 10185203 Quinoline FL 6670 10186002 Safrole FL 6685 10185203 Sulfotepp FL 8155 10185203 Thionazin (Zinophos) FL 8235 10185203 Th iophenol (Benzenethiol) FL 6750 10185203 Method EPA 8310 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Acenaphthene FL 5500 10187607 Acenaphthylene FL 5505 10187607 Anthracene FL 5555 10187607 Benzo(a)anthracene FL 5575 10187607 Benzo(a)pyrene FL 5580 10187607 Benzo(b )fluoranthene FL 5585 10187607 Benzo(g, h, i)perylene FL 5590 10187607 Benzo(k)fluoranthene FL 5600 10187607 Chrysene FL 5855 10187607 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene FL 5895 10187607 Fluoranthene FL 6265 10187607 Page 35 of37 = Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Fluorene FL 6270 10187607 lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene 'FL 6315 10187607 Naphthalene FL 5005 10187607 Phenanthrene FL 6615 10187607 Pyrene FL 6665 10187607 Method EPA 8330 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene (1,3 ,5-TNB) FL 6885 10189807 1 ,3-Dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) FL 6160 10189807 2 ,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (2 ,4,6-TNT) FL 9651 10189807 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) FL 6185 10189807 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) FL 6190 10189807 2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene (2-am-dnt) FL 9303 10189807 2-Nitrotoluene Fl 9507 10189807 3-Nitrotoluene FL 9510 10189807 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene (4-am-dnt) FL 9306 10189807 4-Nitrotoluene Fl 9513 10189807 Nitrobenzene FL 5015 10189807 Nitroglycerin FL 6485 10189807 Octahydro-1 ,3,5 ,7-tetranitro-1 ,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) FL 9522 10189807 Pentaerythritoltetranitrate FL 9558 10189807 RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) FL 9432 10189807 Tetryl (methyl-2,4,6-trinitrophenylnitramine) FL 9633 10189807 Method EPA 8332 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Nitroglycerin FL 6485 10190406 Method EPA 9012 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total Cyanide FL 1635 10193201 Method EPA 9045 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Page 36 of37 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Accutest Laboratories Southeast, Inc. 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-15 Orlando, FL 32811-5803 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704404-10-1 5/31/2011 6/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material pH Fl 1900 10197805 Method EPA 9056 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Bromide Fl 1540 10199209 Chloride Fl 1575 10199209 Fluoride Fl 1730 10199209 Nitrate as N Fl 1810 10199209 Nitrate-nitrite Fl 1820 10199209 Nitrite as N Fl 1840 10199209 Sulfate Fl 2000 10199209 Method EPA 9060 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total organic carbon Fl 2040 10200201 Method EPA 9071 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID n-Hexane Extractable Material (O&G) FL 1803 10201204 Silica Gel Treated n-Hexane Extractable Material FL 10220 10201204 Method Iowa OA-1 ; GRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons Fl 10330 90016403 Method Iowa OA-2; DRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons FL 10331 90016607 Method Tennessee EPH Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) Fl 2050 Tennessee EPH Method Tennessee GRO Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) FL 2050 Tennessee GRO Page 37 of37 I I 610 S. Jennings Avenue Fort Worth , Texas 76104 TEL 817 -335-1186 FAX 817-335-9830 www.TALEM.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 CORPORATE OVERVIEW SECTION 2 COMPANY HISTORY SECTION 3 ORGANIZATION SECTION 4 CORPORATE OFFICES & LABORATORY FACILITIES SECTION 5 OPERATIONS SECTION 6 CUSTOMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM SECTION 7 OPERATIONS TEAM SECTION 8 CERTIFICATIONS & ACCREDITATIONS TALEM, Inc. Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 1.0 CORPORATE OVERVIEW J. R. Coolidge incorporated TALEM as a Texas corporation in 1976 with 2 employees and $5,000 in capital. In 32 years the company has evolved into an integrated, full service environmental chemistry laboratory providing field-testing services, sample collection and transport services, and laboratory testing services . TALEM currently employs 20 environmental professionals in 2 locations, and generates annual revenues in excess of $2 .0 million. As part of Mr. Coolidge's succession plan, Jennifer Carter, his daughter, purchased majority ownership in the company and became President/CEO in 2001 . TALEM is certified as a Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) by the Texas Building and Procurement Commission and as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) by the North Central Texas Regional Certification Agency. (See certification certificates at the end of this document.) From both its Fort Worth and San Angelo locations , TALEM serves a diverse client base of more than 500 clients consisting of industries , local , State, and Federal government agencies, public utilities, environmental consultants, engineers and contractors, as well as other laboratories. TALEM provides professional environmental sample collection and testing services and solutions for a wide variety of client projects including but not limited to environmental site assessments, compliance monitoring and reporting as well as clean up and remediation projects . TALEM is an experienced partner in supporting our customers in the areas of surface and subsurface soil and groundwater investigations, industrial and municipal storm water, wastewater assessment and monitoring, public and private drinking water assessment, hazardous materials reduction, management and disposal as well as litigation support . TALEM's breadth of service coupled with more than 100 years of cumulative management experience in the environmental services industry along with its status as a Minority/Woman-owned Business makes TALEM a valuable environmental partner. 1 TALEM, Inc. Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 2.0 COMPANY HISTORY ' TALEM, Inc. is an environmental services company located in Fort Worth, Texas providing environmental chemistry, sample collection and field-testing services. TALEM began operations in 1976 as the first environmental testing laboratory in Texas. In the beginning, the only services performed were sample collection and a narrow range of wastewater testing services for municipal sewage treatment plants regulated under the EPA's Clean Water Act. Today, TALEM performs a wide array of environmental testing services in response to the following federal, state and local environmental programs. • Municipal and industrial wastewater and storm water under the federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) and the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Program. • Public and private drinking water under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SOWA) program . • Public and private hazardous waste and groundwater under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program • Soils under the state Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Program • Soils, groundwater and wastes under the Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) As a learning organization, TALEM is always striving to improve its business and management processes. In 1987, the company adopted and implemented the Philip Crosby Total Quality Management System. In 1996, the company partnered with the Hogan Center for Performance Excellence and in 1998 completed a two-year program to implement business, management and total quality processes based on the Texas Quality Award and Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria for performance excellence . In 1999 , TALEM took another step forward as one of only a handful of laboratories in the State of Texas accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA). This prestigious accreditation was largely responsible for TALEM's reputation for quality and accuracy. TALEM has never lost a challenge to the integrity of its data in its nearly 33 years of operation. With the TCEQ's selection of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) as the laboratory certification program in the State of Texas, TALEM has completed its certification under NELAC. In 2007, TALEM expanded its operations by purchasing a laboratory in San Angelo, Texas . Management saw the need for quality environmental chemistry in the West Texas region and worked diligently to fill that need . From this office, TALEM is currently serving over 100 clients and this number is forecasted to grow significantly by the end of 2010. 2 TALEM, Inc. Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 3.0 ORGANIZATION TALEM is organized into three business groups : Operations, Administration, and Quality Assurance . The Operations Group consists of the Customer Service Team providing personal service and account management for all of our clients, Information Technology Services, and two revenue-producing divisions: Laboratory Services which provides in-house testing services and Field Services, which provides a wide range of sample collection services and on-site analyses. The Administrative Group includes Personnel and Business Administration. The Quality Assurance Administrator reports directly to the President. 3.1 OWNERSHIP Jennifer G. Carter, TALEM 's President , and J. R. Coolidge, Senior Vice President, are the major owners of TALEM, Inc. with other equity positions held by a small group of private investors in the form of common stock. 3.2 MANAGEMENT The current management staff more than 120 years of cumulative experience with close to 100 cumulative years of management experience at TALEM, Inc . Each member brings a unique combination of skills to the management team and is a reputable member of the environmental industry. Under this management team, TALEM has created a system for monitoring and managing our business that tracks strategic business indicators such as on-time delivery , error-free products, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, waste minimization and the accomplishment of strategic business goals. Corporate Management Team YEARS WITH Total Years NAME TITLE TALEM Experience J.G. Carter President, CEO 9 17 J. R. Coolidge Senior Vice President -Lab Director 34 40 B. S. Wiles Laboratory Director 24 30 M. R. Thrasher Quality Assurance Administrator 8 15 (QAA) Tammy Roschetzky Busi.ness Manager 24 24 3 TALEM , Inc. I ADMINISTRATION ' SAN ANGELO LAB STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS CORPORATE Organization Chart PRESIDENT I QUALITY ...... OPERATIONS ASSURANCE L ABORATORY FIELD SERVICES SERVICES Organic Chemistry Wet Chemist ry/ Services Inorgan ic Services Housekeeping/ Glassware Services 4 R e vis i on 2010 CUSTOMER SERVICES TALEM, Inc. Revision 201 O STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 5.0 OPERATIONS Laboratory Services and Field Services are the two ma in production groups that comprise TALEM , Inc . Laboratory Services is TALEM's primary revenue source, accounting for approximately 85% of all revenues. Field Services is a natural extension of TALEM's laboratory operations , and is well within corporate expertise. TALEM not only benefits from added revenues provided by this group, it also gains stability through diversification of services. 5.1 LABORATORY TESTING OPERATIONS & SERVICES TALEM performs a wide variety of testing procedures according to EPA-approved methods and protocols . Analytical services are primarily performed in response to environmental monitoring and remediation projects . The scope of primary testing services which TALEM currently provides include , but are not limited to : . EPA Conventional Pollutants BTEXITPH for PST Projects . EPA Priority Pollutants . Hazardous Waste Parameters . EPA Heavy Metals . NPDES & TPDES Parameters . EPA Toxic Organics . RCRA Site Remediation Parameters . DMR-QA Parameters . SDWA Parameters . Landfill Groundwater Parameters . Storm Water Parameters . Volatile Organic Compounds All services for Federal , State and local regulatory compl iance projects are performed in st rict accordance with approved methodologies , Quality Control requirements and TALEM 's Qua lity Assurance Program . TALEM also offers non-regulatory testing services with varying degrees of Quality Control tailored to each customer's needs. TALEM's safety program is designed to prevent accidents and, in accordance with TALEM's Quality Management System , to prevent cross contamination of client samples . TALEM conducts laboratory operations in over 14,000 square feet of laboratory space distributed among 26 different rooms . The laboratory is equipped with state of the art instrumentation, a regulated power supply, localized HVAC and a de-ionized water system. The facility also features a 512 cubic foot, climate controlled, walk-in refrigeration space for sample storage with 2 separate refrigerators/freezers for volatile samples and 5 smaller refrigerators for extracts and standards, and 6 fume hoods. 5 TALEM, Inc. Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS LABORATORY INSTRUMENTATION LIST EQUIPMENT MFG. MODEL GC/MS-2 Gas Chromatograph Agilent Technologies 6890N Mass Spec. Detector 5973 Purge and Trap Tekmar Stratum PTC Auto Sampler Varian Archon GC/MS-4 Gas Chromatograph Agilent Technologies 6890N Mass Spec . Detector 5973 Purge and Trap Tekmar LSC 2000 Auto Sampler Tekmar ALS 2016 ICAP-1 Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Spectro Analytics Ciros CCD Atomic Emission Spectrometer Peristaltic Pump Autosampler Integral AA Atomic Absorption Varian Instruments SpectrAA-800 Peristaltic Pump Graphite Furnace + Autosampler Integral CVAA Mercury Analyzer Leeman Labs Hydra AA Ultraviolet Autosampler TOC Total Organic Tekmar/Dohrman Phoenix 8000 Carbon Analyzer WET CHEM AUTO ANALYZERS Automated Spectrophotometer Thermo Electron Corp . Konelab 20 Flow Injection Analyzer Lachat Instruments QuickChem FIA+ 8000 Series 6 TALEM, Inc . STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 5.2 FIELD SERVICES Field Services provides sample collection, field testing and sample transportation services for clients who wish to contract professional environmental sample collection expertise. With a fleet of 4 specially equipped vehicles and an extensive inventory of sampling and field monitoring equipment, TALEM is ready to support a wide array of sample collection and environmental monitoring needs for both routine monitoring and emergency projects . Our capabilities include grab and composite sampling of water, wastewater, ground water, storm water, surface and subsurface so i ls, and drummed wastes . TALEM also offers on-site testing services for selected analyses. Each one of TALEM's Field Service staff holds a license in water and/or wastewater plant operations and we can provide interim plant operations if needed . Water & Wastewater Services Revision 2010 • NPDES/TPDES industrial and municipal wastewater permit monitoring using time- weighted and flow-weighted composite sampling techniques for conventional and toxic pollutants as well as bio-monitoring requirements . • Flow measurement and real-time, on-site pH, Dissolved Oxygen , Conductivity, Temperature and (ORP) logging services for single point or multi-point proj ects . • Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) preparation, TPDES permit renewal application assistance and wastewater noncompliance and NOV trouble-shooting assistance. • Drinking water sampling techniques for low-level contamination. Soil, Groundwater & Storm Water Services • Surface and subsurface soil sampling using grab and composite techniques on individual and statistical basis in support of Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) and Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Program soil and groundwater projects . • Storm water program assistance, permanent storm water sampler installations , storm water event sampling , quarterly storm water inspections, and trouble-shooting for noncompliance and NOV resolution. • Monitor well sampling for a variety of environmental programs using both low-flow and traditional bailer techniques . TALEM also performs class II & Ill pump tests for groundwater classification . Other Field Services • Municipal and industrial wastewater treatment system evaluations and plant operation and maintenance. • Specialized on-site training for field analyses, sample collection, hazardous materials handling, and emergency response . 7 TALEM, Inc . Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 5.3 OTHER SERVICES TALEM's Team of environmental professionals provides many other services to assist our clients in meeting their regulatory compliance obligations . Data Validation Assistance TALEM provides data validation services for confirmation of data quality of third party test results. Using its LIMS software, TALEM can cost effectively perform detailed validation of large volumes of third party data . TALEM has performed this service for the U .S. Department of Energy on data supplied by an EPA-approved CLP Laboratory and other projects . Sampling Plan Assistance Data quality begins with sample collection. TALEM takes the confusion out of the sampling requirements by assisting our clients in developing sound project sampling plans and protocols that assure defensible data and will provide the best information on which to base project decisions. Analytical Plans for Environmental Compliance & Permitting T ALEM assists customers in determining the proper analytical plans to meet compliance and permitting requirements in the most economical manner. Environmental Reporting Assistance TALEM routinely assists customers in meeting their reporting requirements first by assuring that the data provided meets their particular reporting requ i rement and second by assisting cl ients in properly completing required regulatory reporting forms . Expert Witness Testimony TALEM provides expert witness testimony for both prosecution and defense regarding validity of analytical test data and various other environmental compliance issues. Regulatory Negotiation & Representation TALEM represents clients before the US EPA, state environmental agencies and municipal governments during permitting , investigation, enforcement and prosecution proceedings. Regulatory Negotiation Services include , but are not limited to, permits negotiation, dispute resolution , plus representation during investigation, defense, and penalty assessment, and for fine reduction and/or abatement. · Waste Disposal Assistance TALEM routinely assists customers in determining the proper analyses to meet their particular waste handling, documentation and disposal needs. 8 TALEM , Inc . Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 5.4 QUALITY TALEM , Inc . recognizes that the fundamental responsibility of an environmental laboratory is to provide defensible, reliable analytical data, suited to each cl ient's needs. It is TALEM's policy to provide analytical test results that routinely fulfill or exceed the quality expectations of all our clients TALEM is committed to producing consistently useful and defensible analytical test results . To this end , we employ the strategy of a strong Quality Assurance program that incorporates rigorous Quality Control actions into all analytical measurement processes . Quality Assurance Manual In accordance with ISO Guide 25 , ISO Standard 17025 and NELAC 2003 Standard, TALEM maintains a current Quality Assurance Manual documenting our quality processes and procedures to assure the precision , accuracy and defensibility of the laboratory data provided to our clients. This document is available for review by our customers upon request. Laboratory Audits Standard Operating Procedures In accordance with ISO Guide 25 , ISO Standard 17025 and NELAC 2003 Standard , TALEM maintains current Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) documenting our processes and procedures for each analytical method and key business process . SOP documents are available for review by our customers upon request. Performance Testing In accordance with ISO Guide 25 , ISO Standard 17025 and NELAC 2003 Standard, TALEM routinely analyzes internal and external Performance Testing (PT) samples for key analytical methods to assure the precision, accuracy and defensibility of the laboratory data. TALEM 's performances on these PT study samples are available for review by our customers upon request. As a NELAP accredited laboratory, TALEM follows internal and external audits in accordance with NELAC standards. TALEM also participates in various other public and private audits to insure the precision, accuracy and defensib ility of the laboratory data provided to our clients. The findings of these audits and TALEM 's responses to audit issues are available for review by our customers upon request. 9 TALEM , Inc. Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 6.0 MANAGEMENT TEAM TALEM is committed to providing customers with quality service from the initial contact through the final report. TALEM's staff contains seasoned professionals with demonstrated track records of service who understand and are experienced in various EPA and TCEQ program protocols, procedures and expectations. Following are professional profiles detailing the expertise of our management team . PRESIDENT/ CEO Jennifer G. Carter Ms. Carter received a B.A. in Journalism/Public Relations from The University of Texas at Austin in 1993. Ms . Carter became majority owner and President/ CEO of TALEM , Inc. in March 2001. Ms. Carter's professional experience includes various sales and marketing positions with Texas Steel , Barnes and Noble , and Nokia Telecommunications . She brings 9 years of experience in corporate management, international sales and marketing , public relations, and process development, improvement and documentation according to ISO 9001 criteria with various organizations including a Fortune 500 company. She has experience in acquiring and managing federal and state procurement contracts for projects ranging from $1 million to $30 million . Ms . Carter serves as Contract Administrator for all major laboratory contracts and is respons ible for negotiation and resolution of all contract and administrative issues . SR.VICE PRESIDENT, OPERATIONS J.R."Tag" Coolidge Mr. Coolidge received a B .A. in Biology/Chemistry from The University of Texas in 1968. In 1977 , Mr. Coolidge received his M.S. in Environmental Science from Texas Christian University. As Sr. Vice President of Operations, he manages the company 's Laboratory, Technical and Customer Service operations. Mr. Coolidge serves as one of the company 's primary techn ical experts in support of all customer contracts and projects . He is an authority on all major pieces of environmental legislation and in regulatory negotiations. Mr. Coolidge's areas of expertise include industrial environmental site assessments , waste characterizations, soil contamination studies, as well as air and wastewater quality investigations. His experience includes herbicide research , water and wastewater treatment, quantitative chemical analyses, plus management of hazardous waste and EPA Superfund remediation projects. Mr. Coolidge has managed, supervised, and provided hands-on work for projects encompassing many types and levels of environmental problems from residential and commercial to heavy industrial sites. He has conducted projects for various law firms to substantiate litigation cla ims. He has performed multi-site environmental compliance and liability investigations for financial institutions and companies conducting property transactions. Mr. Coolidge has also managed large-scale assessment and remediation of chemical accident sites such as train derailments and plant fires . Due to his extensive experience, Mr. Coolidge is especially valuable in legal and regulatory negotiations as well as media communications connected with sensitive environmental projects. 10 TALEM, Inc . Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS LABORATORY DIRECTOR Brenda S. Wiles Ms . Wiles ' environmental chemistry experience began in 1980 as a participant on a USDA herbicide research team. Joining TALEM in 1986, Brenda has demonstrated proficiency in all aspects of laboratory procedure and protocol. She has hands on experience in all TALEM wet chemistry analyses as well as instrumental analysis for metals including ICAP atomic emission spectrometry as well as graphite furnace, flame, and cold vapor atomic absorption techniques. She is familiar with EPA requirements for collection, preservation, preparation and analysis of soil, water, sludge, and hazardous materials. Ms . Wiles served as Quality Assurance Administrator (QAA) from 2003 until 2007 before taking over all laboratory operations in August of 2007 . Ms . Wiles holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology from the University of Arizona , Tucson . QUALITY ASSURANCE Mary Thrasher Ms. Thrasher joined TALEM 's Organics Team in 1998 as the team supervisor. Ms . Thrasher holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry from the University of South Alabama . She held positions as a GC/MS analyst, semi-volatiles GC supervisor and as a QC coordinator prior to joining TALEM . Her proven management and organizational skills made Ms. Thrasher an excellent match for TALEM's need for a Quality Assurance Administrator in 2007 . Since taking over that position , Ms. Thrasher has lead TALEM through 2 successful NELAC audits and continues to improve upon the company 's processes and procedures. 1 1 TALEM , Inc. Revision 2010 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 7.0 OPERATIONS TEAM In order to facilitate an efficient work place , every employee is given a defined job description indicating the functions that person is authorized to perform . Job descriptions are based on experience and training and define in detail each employee's sphere of capability and responsibil ity . Along with job descriptions , measures of performance are defined for each employee. Measures of performance include quality standards for the performance of each job . They are based on corporate and departmental objectives and include quality as well as production requirements . Each employee undergoes an annual performance evaluation. During these evaluations each employee is encouraged to make recommendations to improve his or her area of operations and to enhance the quality process . Supervisors have primary respons ib ility for training new employees . Most formal training is performed using an apprenticeship , on-the-job t raining (OJT) style . Outside training courses are periodically used to obtain expertise not currently available in-house . TALEM policy requires all train ing events to be documented. Training records for each employee are stored and updated in our company personnel files . In the labor intensive and competitive growth industry of environmental services , qualified employees are in great demand . The impact of personnel turnover on production , cost and quality 12 can be tremendous . TALEM accordingly recognizes the need to provide specialized training and to acquire and maintain equ i pment that meets the needs of our pe rsonnel. In addition to their primary training , TALEM employees are cross-trained and certified to insure that we have backup in every position and every capabi l ity. On the following page is a summary table of TALEM 's current technical staff. TALEM, Inc . Revision 201 O STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS PERSONNEL SUMMARY TABLE EMPLOYEE POSITION EDUCATION / TRAINING DATE EMPLOYED Jennifer Carter President BA Journalism 2001 I-J.R. Tag Coolidge Sr. Vice President BA Biology 1976 z MS Environmental Science w ~ w Brenda Wiles Laboratory Director BS Biology 1986 (.!) <( z Quality Assurance <( Mary Thrasher BS Chemistry 1998 ~ Administrator Tammy Roschetzky Business Manager High School 1986 Gabe Ornelas Analyst BS Chemistry 2006 >-..J Coridon Laws Analyst BS Biology 2009 0:: w Oz I-z ~o LaTreska Baker Analyst BS Interdisciplinary Studies 2006 0 U) Ill 0:: Deanna Lytle Chemist BS Biology 2007 <( w ..J a. Heather Thompson Analyst BS Environmental Sciences 2006 I-Lane Carlisle Account Manager College Hours TCC 2006 (.) I-wz -, w 0~ 0:: w a. (.!) Elaine Diaz Client Services Administrator BS Environmenta l Science 2009 I-<( zz w <( :J ~ Gilbert Velez West Texas Project Manager College Hours ASU 2008 (.) BS Environmental Science/ U) Joey Jenkins Field Supervisor Class D Wastewater License 2007 w (.) > Tommy Cotten Environmental Technician High School + Some College 2006 0:: Class D Waste Water License w U) High School / Class C Waste C Nick Walker Environmental Technician 2004 ..J Water License w u::: Willie Roschetzky Environmental Technician Associates Degree I Class D 2008 Waste Water License 13 TALEM , Inc . STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATIONS & ACCREDITATION Hi!t~!~n~fm!de!~!. Certification and Compliance Program The Te:cM Building & Procu,cment Commission (TBPC), hereby certifies that TA LE M, INC . hi.S succa:;.3'..;l:Y ma: 1:-4 as:ah~shad :cquite :r..;;n:s cf 1:-..; Slate of Texas Historically UoderuiilizP.d BusinElss (HUB) Certilicalion and Compli3nco Program lo bo recognized as a HUB. , .. -· ....... '-'IIJVl..·~~JCl. ----· -"11'*--·--,.~-.,., ... Tlil'C'1-c., . ....,_....ic"~·"'"-, __ .,,.,._.,,.,,.,..,.,.,,.,..-...._i;., . .,.._,,...._._ __ __,_..,,,._, ... ~---"oN.1-............ ,.,.,.. .. -b,_,, ............. ~.?"-nl~1;o.ldo-1 i11 ... --oll!>otM .... ll"_!,_t4 ..... ~-ffl.%a:io,, ... NCTRCA Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Certification TALEM, Inc. 541:la0.S4tG20; Tc1'*\'.)labw"'.cn()..:~Cor~Senou:, • R e v i s i o n 2010 HUS.p,,N-~f-•ctq., ...... ""'9":fOOUf""TVf'C'lk\J.P,c,;tUft~ .. .....,. T'l,f c..__..,...,,,.-. .. ,..t<)l,lt0<N,...,,a,,.,._r,1. ...... _.,_i:,-:,,.,....,~-....,..:.:,. Hll9 .. ~ ...... t. ... q:---~-"',....."-~-1'11t1 C'.crdflu1l,11 H ... 11c11><~•lns~-"-'-' __ adhptrMd"sar,.tUtndMwlhl1,ot prtt'l<tul7 bwr<I. Tiil1 trrrifkul<t• nuut lie "pd~••• HH1!1y by ,~llmtnlo• ,., a ·""••ul Op,1•11 .\ITI<l:o,·k. ,\!any llmt llltN h • u 1re-, ill _,..11i9 er <Hlrol er Ule lb,,,, HllllarlM -J.f ti. m:adt l111M<dll1<1)' •• IM Nertll CH!n.l Ten.o K..:Nla:al Cr nlllc1rl•• .>,crno)' o,r u TUCl'«nlt)'>II& ••Ill y • .. ~ ... ---·1"•"""'"""' .... , fllel\l1nc1,>1I""""°': i;,13.; "'491.,...,o...,; n ... -11..ffll b,"W~lionOII,: 21-Jl..'l.-lOII ..... .i.~~ HI.Jllc.t'.ilic..iiool,.("~l,lan.,s. .... re .... lkaJin;l ,P.<>.....-:eo.nt>'"""' (Sl:!)30!,!t61• ·-'""'"""*SO.U~-.............. .,""""'-~-.. ,-.. -i .. n.. ..... 11,.,,,.....,~~. --.. ... ,,uo·""''"'·..i•·-•1•,... . .,._ ... ~,..,n,....,--.,.,,...• .,..~-• --... --····~•>IJO....._~"'""""" ..... *"""""'t'"' .... ...., ... _._1,e1,;•-·.o.1:pe,.wo.1<.t<1fo<..,<.,..,.,~,..,Ol":"atlUIJ~lftd~l'lro-• rll9,l!WJW1;1..,:~"Z)"6.l!l7i. TALEM, Inc. 61 O South Jennings Fort Worth, T X 76104-3209 in 1ccu,d1nce wilh loH Wiler Code Chaptef' 5, Subchapter R, Till• 30 T •xas A<jmir:iiL"31lv9 Coda Chi'lpler 25, i?nd the lfatiooal El'l"lifonrm1rt~ L1t:ora~ ,\~rc,dilalioo Program. Tt1e~ .. looT'&o:cup,1 uf'OIXlud~,1ll<1n inc:lu:Jn11,•r.1:d1ol1ce<t-dlaUonth.:it Geo:ornpaoylhlsr,:,,1<bt1.1":M!inuf!,l ll('t'~..,,.,11,c;n6t~ ''fl<""' ~IIIJ'lt""''~ l'll()O<"!J pa:tldpalloti fn Ill.I P'"')l:lm. 1M TtQS eo,,.,1t11 ...... , DII E11vir11•-ma•C.11alolf Wl)ff CUll~r:1 W wr1ify Iha bbora!Pl'y':i 01:m:m •':l'f"1fJ•lion IIIMUJ IOI p1utiaAr me!h,:x;1 .~ ;anlly&IL C.llk.lM-T'IM10U t1-lt-1 "llocllnO..o:Vll:011 C.,1)11.otlrl<,Dotr. 1/Jl/2011 ··-·----·--···----····-····--·-···--------- 14 Quality Manual Appendix II LABORATORY INSTRUMENTATION LIST EQUIPMENT GC/MS -VOC2 Gas Chromatograph Mass Spec . Detector Purge and Trap Auto Sampler GC - 3 Gas Chromatograph Autosampler Tray Autosampler Injector PIO & FID Detectors ICAP -1 Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometer Peristaltic Pump Autosampler AA Atomic Absorption Atomic Emission Spectrometer Peristaltic Pump Graphite Furnace+ Autosampler CVAA Mercury Analyzer Autosampler TOC Total Organ ic Carbon Ana l yzer Discreet Autoanalyzer Flow Injection Analyzer MFG . Agilent Technologies Tekmar Varian HP HP HP MODEL 6890N Stratum Archon 5890-Series II 18596C 6890 or Analytical S3349 Spectro Varian Leeman Leeman Tekmar/Dohrma Ciros CCD I n t egral SpectrAA-800 Integral Hydra AA nn Phoe nix 8000 Kone lab Konelab 20 QuickChem Lachat 8000 SERIAL# US10220090 US10442855 US08197002 15335 3336A61410 US84204915 US83208189 10979 E96072006 EL96103053 3003 US02296002 P0718716 A83000 -1811 ACQUIRED/ DATE LEASED 2002 Renting Renting OWNED 1996 OWNED 1999 OWNED 1998 OWNED 2003 OWNED 1999 OWNED 2007 OWNED 2003 OWNED 2000 Page II-1 of 2 Quality Manual LABORATORY INSTRUMENTATION LIST -Continued EQUIPMENT OTHER MINOR EQUIPMENT Automated Cyanide Distillation Unit UV/VIS Spectrophotometer Distillation Unit Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) meter ISE meter ISE me ter ISE meter Analytical Balance Analytical Balance Balance Balance Conductivity Meter Turbidity Meter MFG. Lachat Microdist Spectronics LabConCo Orion Orion Orion Orion Mettler Toledo Sartorius OHaus OHaus Orion HF Instruments MODEL A2000 -666 Genesis 4001 Rapid Still II 310 720 370 710A AB 1 04-S 160 DRTlOOB 20012 SERIAL# CA5023 35GB026037 004985 T516A 004211 00 1 458 1120 1 4230 4 39060042 1940 3130 73637032 805070 ACQUIRED/ DATE OWNED 2002 OWNED 1999 OWNED 1995 OWNED 1999 OWNED 1986 OWNED 1994 OWNED 1994 OWNED 2002 OWNED 2002 OWNED 1999 OWNED 1999 OWNED 2003 OWNED 1999 Page II-2 of 2 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP-Recognized Laboratory Accreditation is hereby awarded to TALEM, Inc. 61 O South Jennings Fort Worth, TX 76104-3209 I in accordance with Texas Water Code Chapter 5, Subchapter R, Title 30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 25, and the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program . · I i The laboratory's scope of accreditation includes the fields of accreditation that accompany this certificate. Continued accreditation depen~s upon successful ongoing participation in the program. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the I laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. I Certificate Number: T104704207-10-1 Effective Date: 21112010 Expiration Date: 1/31/2011 I I MJU' ··--------------·--------·--·-·····--··-----·-·--·--· ·-·--···· ---··--····-···--···-··-· ·-· -····· -·---.. i Executive Director Texas C 1ssion on Environmental Quality I I ! ·········------····---·-·--····-----····--·····--·--·--···---··-··---------·--··--··--··--··--------·-·-···---·-···-·----···--··-···-····---··-··-·-··-·--·· I·-········ ' Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation TALEM, Inc. 610 South Jennings Avenue Fort Worth, TX 76104-3209 Certificate: Expiration Date : Issue Date: T104704207-10-2 1/31/2011 7/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commi ssion on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Drinking Water Method SM 9222 A, B, C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total coli forms TX 2500 20036800 Method SM 9222 D Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Fecal coliforms TX 2530 20037405 Method SM 9223 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total coliforms TX 2500 20037609 ··-~hod SM 9223 B nalyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Esche richia coli TX 2525 202 11205 Page 1 of 16 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation TALEM, Inc. 610 South Jennings Avenue Fort Worth, TX 76104-3209 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704207-10-2 1/31/2011 7/30/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commiss i on on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Non Potable Water Method ASTM D516 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Sulfate TX 2000 30002201 Method Colilert® Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Escherichia coli TX 2525 60002600 Method EPA 1020 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID lgnitability TX 1780 10116800 --~hod EPA 1110 nalyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Corrosivity TX 1615 10118000 Method EPA 1311 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID TCLP TX 849 10118806 Method EPA 1312 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID SPLP TX 850 10119003 Method EPA 160.4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-volatile TX 1970 10010409 Method EPA 1664 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID n-Hexane Extractable Material (O&G) TX 1803 10127409 Silica Gel Treated n-Hexane Extractable Material TX 10220 10127409 Method EPA 200 .7 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum TX 1000 10013806 Antimony TX 1005 10013806 \rsenic TX 1010 10013806 Barium TX 1015 10013806 Page 2 of 16 /;:( Columbia ~~ Analytical Services"" TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL LOCATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS CERTIFICATIONS CLIENT SUPPORT SERVICES FIELD PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ANALYTICAL PROGRAMS DATA MANAGEMENT Page 1 of 24 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 2 3 9 9 12 13 16 22 ,/;;,( Columbia ~ Analytical ServicesK STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 INTRODUCTION Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., established in 1986 and headquartered in Kelso, Washington , is a full-service analytical laboratory network . In 1997, Columbia Analytical became an employee-owned company. Our network is comprised of fixed laboratories , mobile laboratories and service centers located in Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, Texas and Washington . Our areas of expertise and services include: ,. Environmental testing of air, water, wastewater, soil, sludge, solids, waste oil , solvents , hazardous waste , sediments and tissues; a Micro-elemental analyses including those for C, H, N, 0, S, metals and halogens on a wide variety of matrices; .. Process and quality control testing for many industries including pulp and paper, electronics , pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries; 11 Analytical method development; '" Sampling, field and mobile laboratory services; "' Technical consulting; a Program management; and 11 Data management. Our staff consists of more than 400 employees, including chemists, biologists, computer scientists, technicians and support personnel. The diverse educational backgrounds and experience of our employees provide Columbia Analytical the comprehensive skills required by a modern analytical laboratory network. We take pride in our experience and professional dedication and are committed to providing the necessary resources to maintain and further develop our expertise to meet our customers' needs. Columbia Analytical provides analytical services to many different industries, including : II Aerospace • Forest products • Pharmaceutical II Automotive II Manufacturers • Ports and Harbors • Chemical • Microelectronics , • Pulp and paper • Commercial/Solid Waste semiconductor • Transportation • Electronics • Mining • Utilities • Environmental & • Municipalities • Water Industries • Construction engineering II Nutraceutical • Waste management • Federal government • Petrochemical agencies (DOD, EPA, • Petroleum, oil, gas, NOAA) coal Page 2 of 24 &.< Columbia l:::.~ Analytical ServicesK COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL LOCATIONS STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical features over 125 ,000 combined square feet of facilities equipped with sophisticated analytical instrumentation . Each laboratory is designed and constructed to provide safeguards against cross-contamination of samples and is arranged by work function to enhance the efficiency of analytical operations. In addition, specialized areas are designed for efficient and safe handling of a variety of sample types . These include a sample receiving and shipping area, sample container preparation area, and refrigerated storage for samples, chemicals and standards . All Columbia Analytical locations offer either internal or contract courier/delivery services to deliver sampling kits and to receive samples . Deliveries outside of normal working hours, including weekends, are easily arranged . Columbia Analytical also serves international cl ients, having the necessary permits in place to accept foreign soils, water samples and tissue samples of both plants and animals . Columbia Analytical laboratory locations are described below . A location map, including addresses and phone numbers, is provided on pages eight and nine of this section . Columb ia Analytical/Kelso , Washington is the largest laboratory in the network with over 46,000 square feet of laboratory and support sta ff space . The size of the laboratory, combined with its equipment and highly trained personnel allow this facility to provide enhanced services, for example, complex projects requiring analysis of large numbers of samples, those of difficult matrices, or those requiring low levels of detection. Columbia Analytical/Kelso specializes in non-routine , complex analyses requiring a high degree of technical expertise. These special capabilities have allowed Columbia Analytical/Kelso to take part in a number of method development studies for the U.S. EPA and various state and industrial agencies. They have also held a number of direct EPA contracts under the U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). Services are provided to a number of other federal government entities including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Navy and Air Force. Included among the specialized procedures performed at the Kelso laboratory, are techniques that allow the ultra-trace determination of various constituents in difficult sample matrices. Investments have been made to develop systems for the preparation and analysis of sediment and tissue (i.e., plant and animal), as well as routine aqueous and soil samples. Much of the analytical chemistry performed at the Kelso laboratory is in Page 3 of 24 C.< Columbia ~.l Analytical Services K STATEMENT OF Q UAL/FICA TIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 direct support of risk-based studies where routine environmental procedures are often insufficient to meet the project objectives. Kelso has a dedicated Drinking Water laboratory , which was developed in order to service the growing need for clean water and the associated testing required to verify purity . Columbia Analytical has been performing drinking water testing since 1989 for inorganic and volatile organic compounds . The expansion into full service testing, including all of the regulated and unregulated compounds of concern allows Kelso to support clients nationwide . A few of the more advanced environmental analytical techniques employed at Columbia Analytical/Kelso include spec ialized sample preparation, ultra-trace PAHs and alkylated homologs analyses, GC/ECD analysis for individual PCB congeners , isotope dilution for volatile and semivola tile organics, ultra-trace organotin speciation , pore water samp le preparations and analyses, clean room techniques for ult ra-trace metals , advanced chemical separations for ul t ra-trace metals, purge and trap atomic fluorescence for ultra- trace mercury, specialized inorganic testing (e.g., chromium reducible su lfur , microbially reducible iron , etc .), explosives tes t ing, and numerous other procedures which have been developed for specific applicat ions and projects. Columbia Analytical/Kelso can perform low-level tests for endocrine disrupti ng compounds and pharmaceutical and personal ca re product res idues such as st eroids , st imulants , an tib ioti cs , an timicrobials , prescription and non-p rescr iption drugs, insecticides , de tergents, plast icizers , and fire retardants. Columbia Analytical/Kelso is also FDA regis tered and provides the following services to the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical indust ries: monograph tes t ing , process val idation and engineering studies , analytical support for stability testing and method development and validation . Col umbia A nalyt ical/Simi Va lle y , Ca li fo rn ia is a nationally recognized, 20,000 square foot , air-testing laboratory that specializes in the analysis of ambient and indoor air pollution , stationary source emissions , process gas and industrial hygiene samples . The laboratory has performed testing on projects for clients in all the U.S . States, Puerto Rico, Guam and several other countries. In addition, Columbia Analytical/Simi Valley has provided analytical support to colleges and universities located throughout the United States. Columbia Analytical/Simi Valley is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association . Page 4 of 24 /;( Colum~ia . e..~ Analytical Services~ STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Routine air tests performed by the laboratory include : analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), speciated hydrocarbons and atmospheric gases in SUMMAO canisters, Tedlar bags and solid adsorbent media; analysis of speciated reduced sulfur compounds; analysis of carbonyl compounds (formaldehyde and other aldehydes) sampled with DNPH tubes and impingers; analysis of pesticides , PCBs, PAHs and other semivolatile compounds, collected using high volume and low volume polyurethane foam (PUF) and PUF/XAD-2 traps; analysis of phenols and cresols by HPLC ; and determination of BTU heat content. The laboratory maintains an inventory of over 4,000 passivated stainless steel canisters of various sizes, low volume flow controllers, vacuum gauges, and a wide assortment of sampling media. Columbia Analytical/Simi Valley performs a wide variety of specialized tests including the analysis of by-products of natural attenuation/intrinsic bioremediation ; compliance testing for the pulp and paper industry; measurement of thermal decomposition products from aviat ion and hydraulic fluids for the aerospace industry; landfill compliance tests and material off-gas testing of building materials , commercial and consumer products. The la boratory also conducts product evaluat ions in a 1000 cubic foot testing room. Our air laboratory maintains a separate offsite extraction laboratory. The purpose of this fac ility is to minimize the use of volatile solvents and other chemicals at the analytical laboratory facility, thereby enabling the laboratory to achieve low parts per billion or parts per trillion detection of volatile organic compounds in a contaminan t-free environment. Columbia Analytical/Tucson , Arizona has project management services, and offers fuels analyses, short holding time general chemistry parameters, and performs micro- analytical analyses (CHN, oxygen , sulfur, metals and halogens) on a wide variety of matrices for the pharmaceutical , electronic, chemical, and contract laboratory industries and for academic research. They specialize in working with difficult matrices such as those containing air-sensitive compounds or samples of very limited volume. Col umbia An alytical/Houston, Texas is a laboratory dedicated to high resolution analyses for analytes such as dioxin, furans and PCB congeners with five high-resolution gas chromatographs/high-resolution mass spectrometers (HRGC/HRMS). Houston performs these analyses on a variety of sample matrices: food products, food additives, PUF cartridges, XAD resins/filters, household dust, wipe samples, sediments , animal/marine tissues, paper, incinerator ash, soil, waste water, drinking water, and solid waste . Methodologies employed by Columb ia Analytical/Houston include: EPA 8290, EPA 8280A, EPA 1668 (PCB congeners), EPA 16138, EPA T09 (ambient air), EPA 23 (stack Page 5 of 24 ,/;.( Colum~ia . a=~ Analytical Serv1cesK STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 testing). Technical consulting on dioxin and other recalcitrant compounds is also available . New strides are being made with the addition of method CARB 429 for very low levels of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the analysis for polybrominated fire retardant chemicals like the polybrom inated diphenyl ethers (PDBEs). Co lumbia A nal ytic al/J acks o nv ille, Flor ida is a full service analytical laboratory providing testing for many industrial , government and consulting firms in the southeastern United States . The laboratory, as othe rs in the network, also serves international clients , having the necessary permits to accept foreign water and soils into the country for analysis . The laboratory's technical expertise includes the analysis of routine env ironmental samples, landfill samples, DOD projects and waste stream characte rizat ion. They also perform industry specific testing for pulp and pape r manufacturers. Columbia Analytical/Jacksonville offers field sampling and local cour ier serv ice . They provide a variety of custo mized reports , including electronic data deliverables and full CLP-like packages. Co lumb ia Analytical /Ro chester , New York is a full service environmental laboratory . It ca rri es certi fi cations in mos t eastern and southeastern states. It has been NELAC cert ified in New Yo rk since the inception of the national approval program. In addi t ion , Colum bia An alyti ca l/Rochester pa rt icipates and has approval in various industrial company a ud it programs. Columb ia Analyt ical/Rocheste r prov ides routine and special analytical and field services to many large i ndustr ial and government clients. New York's Watershed Assessment Bureau has contracted with this f acility for years to provide low-level nutrient and other wa ter quality analysis on lakes and reservoirs around the state, includ ing much of the wate rshed serving New York City. For this work, which also serves the data needs of the USGS and their network of water quality monitoring stations , the Rochester laboratory part icipates in the USGS semi-annual proficiency evaluation program. Through the addition of specialty tests, like the low-level method fo r perchlorate and many industry specific methods, Columbia Analytical/Rochester keeps evolving to meet the needs of their clients. Nearly half of the testing in this facility is performed according to full CLP-like methodologies and reporting. The laboratory is certified in the rigorous state of New York ASP approval program. EDDs can also be supplied in many different formats. Page 6 of 24 #f Columbia . ~ Analytical Services· STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Special turn-around requirements are also met at a higher frequency for repeat clients by reserving resources for this service. Field services are available for most routine collections and measurements. Columbia Analytical/Rochester operates a service center in Fishkill, New York , where they manage a client's internal laboratory. Service Centers: Columbia Analytical maintains client service centers in select geographic areas to support our clients' operations. The service centers provide sampling supplies, courier service, project management and other client services. Columbia Analytical currently has service centers in the Ormond Beach, Florida; Honolulu, Hawaii; Boston, Massachusetts; and Fishkill, New York areas. Page 7 of 24 &,( Columbia e:.~ Analytical ServicesK STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 * Laboratory t> Service Center a Headquarters ••Kelso •Rochester •Hopewell Jct . '#-Simi Valley -Air Quality lab Jrl,. Tucson -Micro -Elemental I Honolu lu F ULL S E RV ICE LA BO RA TORIES Flori d a 9143 Philips Highway, Ste 200 Jacksonville , FL 32256 TEL 904 .739 .2277 FAX 904 .739 .2011 Washington 1317 South 131h Avenue Kelso , WA 98626 TEL 360 .577 .7222 FAX 360 .636 .1068 New York 1 Mustard Street , Ste . 250 Rochester , NY 14609 TEL 585 .288 .5380 FAX 585 .288.8475 • Jacksonville )f. Hous ton -HR/M S lab SPECIALT Y CLI ENT S ERVICE LABO RA TO RIES CEN TE RS T e xas (High R.esolution) Boston , MA 194 08 Park Row , Ste . 320 TEL 978 .501 .2735 Houston , TX 77042 FAX 978 .742 .9897 TEL 713 .266 .1599 FAX 713 .266 .01 30 Fishkill, NY TEL 845 .894 .8544 California (Air Quality) FAX 845 .98 2 .6 167 2655 Park Center Dr ., Ste . A S imi Valley , CA 93065 Honolulu, HI TEL 805 .526 .7161 TEL 808 .682 .1564 FAX 805 .526 .7270 FAX 808 .682 .1768 Arizona (Micro-Elemental & Ormond Beach, FL Other Specialties) TEL 386 .672 .3539 3860 S . Palo Verde Rd, Ste. FAX 321 .985 .0345 302 Tucson , AZ 85714 TEL 520 .573 .1061 FAX 520 .573 .1063 Page 8 of 24 .&.( Columbia e:~ Analytical Services-- Q UA LITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM STATEMENT OF QUALi FiCA TIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical's comprehensive quality assurance program ensures that the quality of the data produced by Columbia Analytical laboratories will be known and documented and that the data will be scientifically sound and legally defensible . Whether work is carried out in the laboratory or in the field , Columbia Analytical requires compliance with its written quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) protocols and Standard Operat ing Procedures (SOPs). Each activity in the analytical process, including sampling , sample handling , analysis, data review , report production, and report delivery follow wr itten SOPs and is critical to production of quality data. Columbia Analytical 's Corporate Qua lity Officer and each laboratory's Quality Assurance Program Manager , have responsibility for Colu mbia Ana lytical 's QA program . Their responsibilities include ensu ri ng that sampling and analytical procedures are properly executed , sample custodial protocols are complete , QC procedures are implemented and recorded , and that only data of known and documented quality a re reported. Each laboratory's QA program is described in its corresponding Quality Assurance (QA) Manual. QA Manuals are av ai la b le for rev iew upon request. CERTIFICATIONS Columb ia An alytical main tains a variety of ce rtifications , accred it atio ns , and approv als with federal and state agencies a nd with other regulatory programs. With seven labora tories located throughout the United States , Columb ia Ana lytical is certified o r accredited to perform e nvironmental testing services in most states for ai r, drinking water, wastewate r, groundwater, solid, hazardous waste, sediment and underground storage tank programs. Certificates are available upon request. N ationa l Envi ro nmental Laborato ry A c creditation Program (NE LAP ) The NELAC Institute (TNI), formed in 2006 combined the National Environmental Laborato ry Accreditation Council (NELAC) and the Institute for National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation (INELA) to create a national accreditation program and a consensus organization to develop accreditation standards. This entity is made up indiv iduals and organizations throughout the environmental monitoring community , including both government and private sectors . The standards development activities undertaken by TNI are the development of consensus authoritative standards that may be used for the purposes of laboratory accreditation. The standards are prepared and regularly revised entirely or in part by Pag e 9 of 24 &.< Columbia ~~ Analytical Services· STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 committees of experts in chemistry, microbiology, toxicity, radiochemistry and engineering and other appropriately qualified individuals. The process used to develop these standards meets the requirements described in the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) Circular A 119 for a developer of voluntary consensus standards incorporating the principles of openness, balance, due process, and consensus. The approach used for developing standards is described in Policies Governing Standards Development. The National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) is the program that implements TNI standards. State and federal agencies serve as Accrediting Authorities, with coordination facilitated by EPA to assure uniformity. Accreditation by one NELAP Accrediting Authority is mutually recognized by the other state and federal Accrediting Authorities approved under NELAP . For a laboratory to be NELAP accredited, the laboratory must complete an application, pass an onsite inspection, demonstrate qualifications of analysts, and acceptably analyze two NELAP-recognized single-blind proficiency test studies per year for each field of testing for which the laboratory is accredited. All Columbia Analytical laboratories are currently NELAP accredited, with the exception of the Tucson laboratory. The Tucson laboratory's analytical capabilities are not covered under NELAP .. Our current certifications maybe found on our website: http://www.caslab.com/Certifications Page 10 of 24 £..( Columbia e:,~ Analytical ServicesK -- Performa 11 ce A udits STATEMENT OF QUALIFICA T/ONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical laboratories regularly part icipate in the analysis of inter-laboratory profic iency testing (PT) samples . PTs are samples of unknown concentration provided by an external accredited PT provider. Air PT samples are provided by American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). PT studies are designed to evaluate all analytical areas of the laboratory. PT samples are analyzed for the following programs: s Water supply (WS) samples for the SOWA 11 Water pollution (WP) samples for the CWA I] Soil samples for the RCRA and CERCLA .. Water and soil samples for the UST prog ram :1 Other client and program specific PT studies Scores for t hese various PT stud ies are available upon request. Audits Each Columbia Analytical labora to ry is audited by the various federal and state regulatory agencies that ce rtify, accredit and approve t he laboratory. Our clients and third-party evaluators frequently audit our laboratories as well. The labo ratory performs correct ive actions to any audit findings. Columbia Analytical welcomes external audits as an opportunity to showcase the QA program. Additionally , Columbia Analytical has an internal audit program . System and data audits are routinely performed by the Chief Quality Officer and by each laboratory's QA Program Manager. Appropriate corrective actions are performed to any audit findings. Page 11 of24 .&,,( Columbia l!!:b Analytical ServicesK CLIENT SUPPORT SERVICES STATEMENT OF QUALi FiCA TIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical serves clients with a broad, in-depth range of management and technical support capabilities. This section describes our client support services including, project management, program management and technical serv ices . Project Management All projects are assigned to a senior-level , non-line project chemist. Each project chemist is responsible for coordinating all phases of that project and has the authority to commit the necessary resources to meet project objectives and requirements . The project chemist ensures that technical, financial and scheduling objectives are met. The Columbia Analytical project chemist is the direct liaison with the client's project manager, and is the major contact for current as well as future projects. Their duties encompass many aspects of our work including: " Client communication .. Technical project set-up !ll Bottle order and delivery .. Courier services .. Data report review !I Report delivery .. Technical interpretation Program Management Columbia Analytical provides program management services for a number of clients who have regional or national geographic presence. These services allow for organization of our clients ' inter and intra-laboratory work and provide a structured approach to managing our client's analytical program. Columbia Analyt ical 's program management services include business, administrative, technical and operational support. These services are tailored to meet our client needs . In some cases, we have provided the framework to allow our clients to easily order services for a specific regulatory program. This allows different client locations to take advantage of economies of scale and ensures each location a uniform , dependable level of service designed to meet specific regulatory state and local agency requirements. In other cases , we have actually taken on all Page 12 of 24 C.{ Colum~ia . e~ Analytical Serv1cesK STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 management aspects of a client's analytical program, including personnel, equipment and materials. The following are examples of our program management services: Client #1: Since 1992 Columbia Analytical had been providing analytical and sampling services for a large electronics client. In 1998, we began providing these services nationally, using a national program manager to manage the account with assistance from designated laboratory project managers. These services expanded as we entered into a Strategic Relationship Agreement with this client that allows our laboratories to work with their clients and partners. In 2000 an extension of our working relationship began when we entered an agreement to manage this client's employees at one of their internal laboratories. C lien t #2: Columbia Analytical has long been recognized for its technical expertise in providing services to a number of specific industries, one of which is the pulp and paper industry. We were among the first laboratories in the nation to develop the methods required for testing organic compounds under the Cluster Rule regulations and participated in the method validation studies for those methods as well as many others over the years. In 2001, as a result this commitment to this industry , we were awarded a contract to provide testing services for the Cluster Rule regulations to all locations of a large pulp and paper company. Upon review of our client's permits, our knowledge of the Cluster Rule regulations allowed us to make suggestions for lowering costs. Due to the number of locations involved, we were also able to pass on volume discounts. As part of our services for this contract we have facilitated the exchange of information between various state regulatory agencies and the state laboratory certification agencies to ensure that the results of these tests are compliant with regulatory agency requirements. As a result of our efforts on behalf of this client we were awarded an additional national contract for all of the analytical work in support of this client's remediation projects throughout the United States. FIELD PROD UCTS AND SERVICES In response to clients' needs, each Columbia Analytical location has developed varying levels of field sampling and field chemistry capabilities. This flexibility allows us to offer a complete service package, from sampling to data delivery. Both in-house and contracted sampling crews are fully trained and OSHA certified for work on hazardous waste sites. Specialties include groundwater monitoring, soil coring to depths of 6 feet and automated effluent sampling. Page 13 of 24 /;,_( Co lumbia ~~ Analytical ServicesK Field P rod ucts STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Pass ive Diffusion Bag (PDB) Samplers for the Collection of Groundwater Samples for Volatile Organics Analysis Columbia Analytical has been granted a license to manufacture , use and provide t he bags by the US Geological Survey (USGS) and The General Electric Company (GE), both co-patent holders on the product (US #5 ,804,743). The downhole passive water sampler and method of sampling was invented by Don Vroblesky (USGS) and Thomas Hyde (GE). PDB Samplers are made of low-density polyethylene (LOPE), which acts as a semipermeable membrane. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC's), excluding certain ketones , ethers and alcohols diffuse readily through the membrane. Equilibrium is established between the VOCs in the bag and those in the groundwater. The PDB Sampler, in t he shape o f a long cylindrical tube, is filled with analyte-free water. It's available in both field-ready and field-filled versions. It is simple to deploy, eliminates the collection and disposal of pu rged water and significantly reduces the cost of sampling. Upon retr ieva l , usually 14 days after deployment, bags are opened t o fill vials and returned to the laboratory for analysis . POB and hanging assembly Page 14 of 24 &.( Columbia e ~ Analytical ServicesM STATEMENT OF QUALIF/CA TIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Rigid Porous Polyethylene Samplers (RPPs) for the Collection of Groundwater Samples for Water Soluble Analyte Analysis Columbia Analytical also manufactures another passive sampler based on the design and research of Don Vroblesky of the USGS . The Rigid Porous Polyethylene sampler (RPPs) is made of thin sheets of foam-like porous polyethylene with pore sizes of 6- 20 microns. When completely filled with water the pores allow a water-water interface, facilitating the equilibrium of water-soluble analytes in the aquifer adjacent to the well screen with the deionized water of the RPP. Primary sampling applications for the RPPS are for all water soluble analytes, like inorganic anions and cations, metals, MEE parameters, 1,4-dioxane, MTBE, hexavalent chromium, explosives, perchlorate and dissolved gases. They are also very useful in deep wells where submersible pumps may not function Like the PDB, the RPP is simple to deploy, eliminates the collection and disposal of purged water and significantly reduces the cost of sampling. RPP ready for deployment and package in disposable water-filled sleeve for shipping Additional information about both of these samplers and passive sampling in general may be found on the Interstate Technical Regulatory Council's (ITRC) web site at www.lTRCweb.org. Field Services Columbia Analytical performs field sampling services in the Northeast, Southeast and Southwest. Field sampling capabilities include groundwater monitoring, clean sampling techniques, soil coring and automated effluent sampling. Page 15 of 24 £( Columbia L~ Analytical ServicesK ANALYTICA L PROGRAMS A nalytical Services STATEMENT OF QUAL/FICA TIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical 's core business is analytical services , representing a variety of industries . We provide routine and specialty testing for the environmental industry and assist our manufacturing clients with process and product testing services. Throughout the years , our chemists have gained valuable experience working on projects related to the aerospace, chemical, electronics, pulp and paper, petroleum, marine , transportation and waste management industries. Our comprehensive services cover routine analyses and specialty testing services such as : low-level environmental analysis of air, water, soil, sed iment , tissue; indoor air, landfill gas and source testing determinations; microbiology; industrial hygiene ; and biological toxicity screening. Our laboratories perform work under multiple federal and state certification programs and national accreditation programs. Air Quality Testing: Columbia Analytical provides air qua li ty testing and industrial hygiene services for a wide range of clients and industries through its dedicated A ir Quality laboratory. The lab is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) for the analysis of organic compounds and participates in the quarterly Proficiency Analytical Testing (PAT) program administered by the AIHA. The Air Quality laboratory specializes in the analysis of volatile and semi-volatile compounds in samples such as ambient air , landfill gas, soil gas , industrial source emissions, odor analyses and indoor air quality investigations . This facility analyzes whole air samples, as well as those requiring solvent or thermal desorption. Other services available include material emission/off-gassing studies and product evaluations. The laboratory has a 1000-cubic foot testing room and one-liter simulated environmental chambers available for product testing. Recent projects have included evaluations of the performance of residential air purifiers, monitoring of workplace exposures and IAQ/odor evaluations. Page 16 of 24 &.( Columbia ~~ Analytical Services" STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 CERCLA and Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Studies (RIFS): Since 1986, Columbia Analytical has performed chemical analyses in support of remedial investigation and feasibility studies (RI/FS), risk assessment, natural resource damage assessments, remedial activities for Superfund sites and related programs . Many of these programs have required CLP methodologies and deliverables for both organic and inorganic parameters on large numbers of air, water, soil and sediment samples . Analytical parameters have included a wide spectrum of methodologies. In some cases , standard operating procedures were written as part of the quality assurance project plan , which outlines project organization and responsibilities, data quality and sample management objectives, stringent quality control , and performance and system audit procedures. Columbia Analytical has developed special protocols for analytical, quality control, and sampl ing procedures for spec ialized methodology of non-routine matrices needed to support project goals. Columbia Analytical can complement the site project team by participating early in the planning stages and by providing technical advice to all involved including the consultants , potentially liable parties, and governing agencies. Clean Water Act: Columbia Analytical performs regular monthly National Pollution Discharge Eliminat ion System (NPDES) monitoring for a number of municipalities, counties, and government entities, as well as for industrial and mining clients. Due to intense regulatory scrutiny, these projects have required close attention to monthly trends so clients are alerted to any change that might affect them. The deadlines imposed by the permit agency requi re timely delivery of data to avoid fines and penalties. Most Columbia Analytical laboratories perform drinking water tests, primarily for the local areas and states surrounding each laboratory location. We have a dedicated drinking water laboratory department at our Kelso facility with multiple states certifications that can provide full service drinking water testing including regulated and unregulated compounds and UCMR 2 analyses. We also provide the items necessary to take samples . Columbia Analytical can provide the items required for storm water analysis in a convenient shipping container, which includes the bottles, ice packs, sampling instructions, chain of custody · and shipping documentation. Page 17 of 24 £( Columbia ·~ Analytical Services- Government Projects: STATEMENT OF QUAL/FICA T/ONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical has worked for many Department of Defense (DOD) branches as well as other federal and state government agencies both directly and indirectly . Laboratory procedures have covered the full analytical spectrum, including trace metals, toxicity, trace organics and classical wet chemistry techniques. Our services have included the development of specialized techniques for petroleum products , ultra-trace determinations of metals using ICP-MS instrumentation, ultra-trace determinations of hazardous organics in sediments using GC/MS Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM), ordnance testing. We have assisted with development , specification and implementation of electronic data delivery with adherence to reporting requirements of the ACOE, Navy (NFESC), Air Force (AFCEE), and thei r contractors, including adherence to the most current version of the Quality Systems Manual for Environmental Laboratories (QSM) and the DOD Perchlorate Handbook. All of our laboratories are DOD certified, except for our Tucson Laboratory. Columbia Analytical became a participant in the U.S. EPA's Contract Laboratory Program's (CLP), Regular Analytical Services (RAS) and the Special Analytical Services (SAS) in 1988 . One contract involved analyzing water, soil, and waste samples from a wide va riety of U.S. EPA Superfund sites throughout the United States for CLP metals and cyanide. The services under the SAS contracts included the following: method development, round-robin method validation, special low-level techniques, difficult matrix analyses, rapid turnaround response , and other areas not routinely included in the RAS CLP. The RAS and SAS contracts required meticulous adherence to quality assurance/quality control as well as strict data documentation and reporting procedures, which have been adapted for usage for all analytical work performed at Columbia Analytical. Data package deliverables include special hardcopy and electronic reporting formats to meet EPA requirements. Low Level Sediment and Tissue Analyses: Columbia Analytical routinely performs chemical analyses in support of sediment and dredge disposal projects. These studies include the analysis of hundreds of sediment, tissue and water samples for a variety of trace metals, organics, and conventional chemicals of concern. Project work involves the development and validation of specialized analytical techniques in order to meet the low-level detection limits and difficult matrix requirements of sediment analysis. All data generated under these projects must meet specific quality control and stringent data deliverable requirements. Data is reported with Page 18 of 24 /;( Colu mbia ~~ Analytical Services K STATEMENT OF QUALIFICA T/ONS REVISED JUNE 2010 both hard copy and diskette deliverables, and in some cases , include formats required by the EPA CLP prog ram . Pulp and Paper Industry Test ing : Columbia Analytical has extensive experience related to the pulp and paper industry. Some of our technical staff, prior to joining Columb ia Analytical , have direct industry experience related to product, process and environmental applications . We provide FDA paper testing services in our Jacksonville laboratory . Our Kelso laboratory was one of five laboratories that contributed to the method validation stud ies for Cluster Rule Procedu res. These studies were sponsored by the EPA and NCASI (Nationa l Counc il of the Paper Industry for Ai r and Stream Development , Inc.). Columbia Analyt ical is one of the few labora tories performing the NCASI Method 99 .02 , lmp inger/Canister So u rce Sampling Method for Selected HAPs at Wood Products Facilities . We continue to work wi t h NCASI to develop other industry specific ana lytical procedures . RCRA Ch aracte ris tic Tes ti ng and Waste Profiles: W as te designation test in g has been performed fo r numero us industrial clients concerned abo ut proper classi fi ca t io n and disposa l of indus trial was te. Using federal and state spec ific procedures , was te classification testing includes extraction procedure toxicity, toxicity character istic leaching procedure (TCLP), ign itabili ty, co rros ivi ty, reac tivity , PCBs, organic halogens , F-list solvent scans , and persistent hazardous materials. Dioxin and other high resolution testing : Columbia Analytical/Houston features over 5 ,000 square feet equipped with five sophisticated high resolution mass spectrometers (HRMS) to perform dioxin and furan testing on a variety of matrices including (but not limited to): food products , sediments , animal tissues, water, soil, air, wast e, household dust, and building products . With the addition of two new Waters Micromass AutoSpec-Ultima HRMS , cons idered to be the optimal choice for ultra low-level trace detection applications such as the analysis of dioxins, furans, PCB congeners and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), Columbia Analytical/Houston is achieving detection limits of 10-100 times lower than with the older instruments and are among the lowest in the industry . Page 19 of 24 .&,( Columbia (:!:::.) Analytical Services"' Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Testing: STATEMENT OF QUAL/FICA TIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical provides analytical testing services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and environmental industries. To ensure regulatory compliance, Columbia Analytical/Kelso facility is FDA registered and cGMP compliant. Columbia Analytical's comprehensive quality assurance and ethics programs ensure that the data produced by all Columbia Analytical laboratories will be of known quality, scientifically sound , legally defensible and accurately documented . Our expertise and services include the following: 11 Monograph Testing: USP/NF , EP, JP , BP , AOAC , and ACS monograph testing. This includes raw material and final product testing. Examples of this include Organic Volatile Impurities testing by USP <467>, Heavy Metals by USP <231>, and Water Determination by USP <921 >. Columbia Analytical can also complete testing using client supplied methodology. " Method Development and Validation: Our professional scientists have extensive experience in analytical chemistry and can provide method development and validation for pharmaceutical testing. Methods are valida te d to current ICH guidelines. 13 Engineering Studies/Process Validation : Columbia Analytical scientists are accustomed to non-routine testing and have the knowledge and resources to solve your analyt ical problems. Examples of this may include analyt ical su p port for cleaning studies or manufacturing processes . 0 Stability Testing -Columbia Analytical provides analytical support to your stability study testing. This may include assay testing, physical testing, and impurity and degradation product monitoring . This also includes development and validation of stability indicating assays. UST/AST Programs & Forensics: Columbia Analytical performs analyses of samples collected around underground and aboveground storage tanks for solvent content and for identification of petroleum hydrocarbons under the regulations of various state and federal agencies. We have also analyzed underlying soils to assess tank leakage and performed soil gas investigations to pinpoint the extent of product release. Columbia Analytical has senior chemists trained in the aspects of petroleum hydrocarbon forensics. In addition to overseeing specific Page 20 of 24 &,( Columbia e..~ Analytical Services- STATEMENT OF QUALIFICA TJONS REVISED JUNE 2010 forensics testing procedures, our chemists also provide technical consulting and litigation support services. We are currently providing specialized services to those working on the gulf oil spill, including analysis for the dispersants used and forensic analyses of o ily samples of tissue, water, air and soil. Technical Services Columbia Analytical offers a variety of technical services to support our clients' needs. These include method development, analytical scope consulting, forensics, litigation support and electronic data management support. Our Technical Services Group is comprised of an interdisciplinary team of specialists, experts in fields such as: air testing services, forensics, electronics industry, pulp and paper industry, marine toxicology , risk assessment, and information technology . Technical Consulting The experience and technical depth of our laboratory personnel enables Columbia Analytical to offer our clients a variety of technical consulting services . Our chemists are routinely asked to review historical data sets to provide a technical evaluation . We also assist in the development of sampling, analytical and quality assurance project plans . Some of our senior technical staff are available to provide litigation support and expert witness services. Our operations are able to provide on-site laboratory services when necessary, which can include laboratory design consulting and recommendations. Technology Development Columbia Analytical is very active in technical development, exploring innovative business approaches and technologies that will lead Columbia Analytical and our clients into the future. This program includes our information technology group, which focuses on the automation of laboratory systems and information delivery to its customers. Columbia Analytical prepares and conducts seminars and technical presentations on subjects covering many areas for which professional continuing education credits are available. Client-specific seminars are also available upon request. Page 21 of 24 fl.$. Colum~ia . ~~ Analytical Serv1cesK DATA MANAGEMENT STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Columbia Analytical has successfully met the data management requ irements of a wide variety of projects for both government and private sector clients. Included in this section is a description of our information system platform and electronic data deliverables . System Pl atfo rm All Columbia Analytical laboratories operate in a server/local area network (LAN) configuration. Columbia Analytical has standardized on Microsoft ® (MS) Windows ® applications (i.e., Word ®, Excel ®, Access ®, and MS Exchange ®). La boratory Info rmation Management System (LIMS) All Columbia Analytical facili t ies are in various stages of implementing and being linked via a laboratory informat ion management system (LIMS) that ut ilizes an Oracle® database environmen t to track our samples from time of receipt and allow track ing across the Columbia An al yt ical Laboratory Network. Samp les a re logged into t he Lll'v1S from t he information provid ed on t he Chain of Custody , inclu d ing holding time information , project turnaround time , required QA/QC , report due dates , etc. Client specific info rmation can be pulled up during login and associa ted to spec ific projects for that client. Info rma tio n fo r the job is passe d onto the laboratory department electronically and provides a header set of informa t ion for analyses and reporting. As each laboratory completes the analyses of samples on any project , the information is entered in to the LI MS , updating its status. Each day, reports are generated for the individual department within the laboratory . The reports keep everyone apprised of the status of all samples and projects in-house . The LIMS system has the capabil ity of moni toring multiple due da tes . Data A cq u isi t io n Analytical instruments at Columbia Analytical produce files that are imported into various data reduction and validation tools , e.g. Stealth, MARRS, and others . This data is then passed on via a "superset" file to Columbia Analytical's proprietary program called EDDGE (Electronic Data Deliverable Generator). The EDDGE program normalizes the data and translates necessary Columbia Analytical internal valid values into Client specific valid values . Page 22 of 24 /;,( Columbia ~~ Analytical ServicesN STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 As described above , all Columbia Analytical's laboratory data is acquired direct ly to a local area network disk or locally and then transferred to a centralized acquisition server from which all reporting takes place . There are few tests that require manual entering of data because the test itself cannot be automated , i.e. % moisture . Once all data is gathered, the hardcopy report is generated, after which an electronic data deliverable (EDD) generating superset database is produced; the EDD is then generated, so strictly speaking, both the EDD and the hard copy reports are generated from the same data source. However, if there are specific fields required in the EDD or variations required by the client that are not part of the hardcopy report , t hose fields are added after the hardcopy report is generated. Currently , there are some fields required in certain EDDs that are not presently part of our central database . These include COC numbers and , in some labs , "sample prep t ime " or "time-extracted ". Until these fields can be added to our central database, they must be entered manually. In all cases the hardcopy report and EDD are rev iewed against each other acco rd ing to a strict written protocol wh ich is avai lable to ou r clients. Data Archiv ing Columb ia Analytical's laboratory data is acquired di rect ly o r locally and t hen t ransferred to t he centralized acquisition server. All data is even t ua ll y moved to t he cent ralized da ta acquisition server for reporti ng and archiving . Differential Backups are performed once pe r day,· with full backups perfo rmed once per week. Every other w eek, a full backup is archived, alternating on and off site. El e ctron ic Data Del ive rables (EDDs ) Columbia Analytical offers a range of EDDs . We generate a number of DOD (Army , Navy, and Air Force) deliverable formats to support data transfer into large relational database management systems. In these cases , the data structures and fields are rigidly specified. We also work closely with our commercial clients to produce electronic data formats compatible with the ir systems . Columbia Analytical currently supports more than 150 different EDD formats. Utilizing a number of proprietary and other database tools , such as MS Access®, FoxPro®, Excel ®, and Visual Basic®, our data management specialists are able to easily produce both EDDs and hard-copy reports. Included below are some of the EDD formats Columbia Analytical supports: Page 23 of 24 &.( Columbia a=~ Ana lytical Services ~ A daPT Florida A DAPT/AD R (6.2 & 8.1 ) ADEQ ERPIMS ERPIMS Enhanced A ZDEQ COEL T 1.2/EDCC 1 .2i EPA/U SACE S ED D EP A Region (Reg ions 3, 4 , & 5) ERPIMS ER PT ool s EQU IS Ea rt hsof t F lor i d a D E P G eoTracker/SWRCB GIS Key N av y Cl ea n NEDD NI RIS N EDT S NJD EP NYS DE P S EDD 2A SED QUAL SWFWMD TCE Q WAEIM W ADOH-DW E -m a il an d Data T ransfer STATEMENT OF QUAL/FICA TIONS REVISED JUNE 2010 Automated Data Processing Tool (Laboratory Data Consultants) for the State of Flor ida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Automated Data Processing Tool (Laboratory Data Consultants) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Env ironmental Resources Program Info Environmental Resources Program Info Arizona Department of Env ironmental Quality U.S . Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) data loading too l Staged Electronic Data Deliverable (US Army Corps of Engineers) Env ironmental Protection Agency Environmental Resources Program Information Man agemen t System Deve loped by AFCEE Earthsoft Env ironmental Quali ty Information System ITEMS Florida De partment of Environmental Protect ions St ate Water Resources Control Board/Californ ia Envi ronmental Protection Agency GIS/Solutions Comprehensive Long Term Environmental Action Navy Naval Elect ronic Data Del iverable Naval Installat ion Restoration Information Solution Navy Environmental Data Tran sfer Standard Ne w Jersey Department of Environmental Protect ion New York State Department of Env ironmental Conservat ion Stag e d Electronic Data Deliverable Generator Tool Sediment Qual ity Information System ( Washington State Dept of Ecology) Sou t hwest Florida Water Management D istrict Texas National Commiss ion . Of Environmental Quality Washington Environmental Information Management System Wash ington State Department of Health (DOH) All Columbia Analytical facilities are linked via Microsoft Exchange. Our data can be electronically transferred via diskette, direct modem transfer to our client's host, or through the Internet. Page 24 of 24 I. Introduction Since 1986, Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. (CAS) has been actively involved in the analysis of marine and freshwater sediment, water and tissue samples. Much of our analytical work is in support of dredging, remedial investigation , feasibility studies and risk assessment, which, in many cases, require extremely low-level detection limits. These types of samples present unique challenges to the laboratory due to analytical interferences caused by the matrices. CAS has developed and implemented cleanup procedures and method modifications to specifically deal with these types of matrices . We have also developed the expertise necessary to perform complex ultra-trace analyses. These low-level analyses of sediment, tissue and water use advanced specialized instrumentation . This instrumentation includes Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP/MS), purge and trap cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry , High-Resolution Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy (HRGC/MS), and High-Resolution Gas Chromatography/High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS). CAS, headquartered in Kelso, Washington, is a certified , full-service chemical and biological analytical laboratory network. Our network is comprised of eight fixed laboratories and four service centers in Arizona , California , Florida, Hawaii , New York, Texas and Washington. In addition to supporting marine and freshwater aquatic sample analyses throughout the United States, our laboratories also possess the necessary permits to accept samples from foreign countries . This Statement of Qualification provides a general description of CAS analytical protocols for determining trace analytes in marine and freshwater environmental samples . Detection limits for these analytes are also included. The analytes discussed in this SOQ are those typically requested for marine and freshwater projects. Also included in this SOQ, is a s~ction discussing CAS' relevant experience that provides project references and a project experience matrix. O:\marketing\soq\marine\ soq 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM II. Sample Preparation Pore Water Extraction Pore water extractions are performed according to the latest Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) interim protocol. CAS actively attends meetings and provides recommendations for the development of the procedures. Sample manipulations are performed in a glove box under anaerobic conditions . Double centrifuging is performed in a refrigerated centrifuge , maintaining anaerobic conditions within the sample containers . Filtration is optional , depending on project objectives. If required, filtration is performed using a silver membrane or polycarbonate filter media to prevent loss of butyltin compounds to adsorption. The analysis of pore water is performed using the procedures listed in the "Seawater" section of each constituent's analytical protocol. Freeze-Drying CAS incorporates the use of freeze-drying of sediment and tissue samples for environmental analysis . Freeze -drying of sediment and tissue samples is performed prior to extraction and analysis for Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), Pesticides , Dioxins , and Metals . The use of freeze-drying eliminates or reduces the undesirable effects of water. The most significant benefits are lower detection limits and more quantitative determinations. In addition to lower detection limits and better recoveries , freeze- drying of samples allows for complete homogenization of the sample matrices . Thus , improved prec ision is realized. This is particularly significant when analyzing heterogeneous samples (e .g . high organic sediments , whole-body tissues , etc.). Tissue Homogenization All tissue samples are subjected to homogenization techniques prior to analysis , which are designed to assure representative sub-sampling for each analytical parameter. The procedures used within CAS for homogenization vary significantly depending on the tissue type and the technical specifications for the project. Our laboratory is equipped to handle a wide variety of tissue preparations . These range from relatively simple whole body homogenization of juvenile fish , to more involved applications where small rodents require radiation treatment for destruction of biological hazards (e.g. Hantavirus, rabies, etc.) and subsequent dissection for analysis of individual organs. Total Solids Total solids values are derived from freeze-dried tissues. The determination is performed on a pre-homogenized wet sample . The dry solids from the freeze- drying determination are then further homogenized and used for the metals analysis (except mercury) as described in the metals section of this document. Freeze-drying is performed to avoid degradation and associated chemical changes that occur when the sample is dried at elevated temperatures . O:\marketing\soq\marine\ soq 2 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM III. Analytical Protocol A brief description of the procedures CAS typically employs for the analysis of sediment, tissue, seawater and freshwater matrices in support of marine and freshwater studies is provided in the following sub-sections. Due to the complexity of analyzing these matrices for low-level constituents , specialized procedures beyond the scope of EPA SW 846, EPA-CLP and other routine methods are often required. Seawater presents no particular challenges when determining organic constituents. However, trace metals analysis in the presence of high dissolved solids requires relatively involved techniques to reach the levels of detection typically required to meet project objectives. CAS has been active in research and development of procedures for preparation and analyses of sediment, tissue and water samples. Our laboratory specializes in the analysis of tissue and sediment for low-level chemical constituents and has developed procedures for providing data of high technical quality that meets standard validation criteria. A summary of some of our experience over the last ten years may be found in Section IV. A. Po/yaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Base Neutral Acid Compounds (BNAs) Seawater and Pore Water Sample preparations generally follow traditional solvent extraction techniques; continuous liquid/liquid or separatory funnel. These extracts rarely require cleanup procedures before instrumental analysis, and can be concentrated to smaller final volumes to gain sensitivity. For PAHs, instrumental analysis is performed using Gas Chromatograph /Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) operated in the Selective Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode to maximize sensitivity. In addition to the standard list of PAHs typically analyzed, the associated alkylated homologs are also available. Detection limit information for the complete list of PAH compounds, including the alkylated homologs , is listed in the · tables following page 13. For low-level semivolatile organic analysis conventional GC/MS techniques are used in conjunction with a Large Volume Injector (LVI) system. The LVI allows for a greater quantity of analyte to be introduced into the GC/MS. Detection limits for low-level semivolatile analytes are listed in the tables following page 13. Sediments Sample preparations are generally initiated using traditional solvent extraction techniques, usually soxhlet, and, occasionally, sonication. Prior to instrumental analysis, extracts are put through Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) cleanup and usually silica gel clean up. For PAHs, instrumental analysis is performed using Gas Chromatogr~ph /Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) operated in the Selective Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode to maximize sensitivity . In addition to the standard list of PAHs typically analyzed, the associated alkylated homologs are alsq available. Detection limit information for the complete list of PAH compounds, including the alkylated homologs, is listed in the tables following page 13. For low-level semi- volatile organic analysis conventional GC/MS techniques are used in conjunction with a Large Volume Injector (LVI) system. The LVI allows for a gr~ater quantity of analyte to be introduced into the GC/MS than standard injection systems. O :\marketing\soq\marine\ soq 3 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM Detection limits for low-level semi-volatile analytes are listed in the tables following page 13. Tissue All Tissue samples are subjected to homogenization before analysis. This preparation insures representative sub-sampling for each analytical parameter. Conventional solvent extraction techniques such as soxhelt and sonication are usually employed for extracting the samples . Prior to instrumental analysis, extracts are put through Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) cleanup and silica gel cleanup. Removal of lipids is of particular concern during the cleanup process. The instrumental analysis is performed using GC/MS operated in SIM mode to maximize sensitivity . In addition to the standard list of PAHs typically analyzed, the associated alkylated homologs are also available. Detection limit information for the complete list of PAH compounds, including the alkylated homologs , is listed in the tables following page 13. 8. Pesticides/PCB Aroclors Seawater and Pore Water The pesticide and PCB Aroclor analyses are performed by following EPA Methods 8081 and 8082. Prior to instrumental analysis for pesticides, extracts are generally not put through any cleanup process . The PCB Aroclor fraction receives an acid cleanup prior to Gas Chromatograph/Electron Capture Detector (GC/ECD) analysis. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. For ultra low- level Aroclor analysis a Large Volume Injector (LVI) system is used in conjunction with GC/ECD. Sediments To obtain the low level detection limits required when analyzing marine sediments, the pesticide and PCB Aroclor analyses are performed by following EPA Methods 8081 and 8082 with slight modifications to the sample mass, final extract volume, and cleanup procedures. To accommodate the relatively large sample mass required to reach the low level detection limits, the samples are extracted using a sonication technique. The extracts are put through Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) cleanup and mercury cleanup procedures prior to splitting for Aroclor and pesticide analyses. The pesticide fraction generally goes directly to the Gas Chromatograph/Electron Capture Detector (GC/ECD) for analysis. The PCB Aroclor fraction receives an acid cleanup prior to GC/ECD analysis . Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. O:\markeling\soq\marine\ seq 4 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM Tissue To obtain the low level detection limits required when analyzing biological tissues, the pesticide and PCB Aroclor analyses are performed by following EPA Methods 8081 and 8082 with slight modifications to the sample mass, final extract volume , and cleanup procedures. In order to assure representative sub-sampling for each analytical parameter, all tissue samples are subject to homogenization prior to analysis. To accommodate the relatively large sample mass required to reach the low level detection limits, the samples are extracted using a sonication technique . The extracts are put through GPC and Florisil ® cleanups prior to splitting for PCB Aroclor and pesticide analyses. The pesticide fraction generally goes directly to the GC/ECD for analysis. The PCB Aroclor fraction receives an acid cleanup prior to GC/ECD analysis. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. For ultra low-level Aroclor analysis a Large Volume Injector (LVI) system is used in conjunction with GC/ECD. C. PCB Congeners Seawater and Pore Water The PCB congener analysis is performed by following EPA Method 8082 with slight modifications . The extracts are subjected to acid and permanganate cleanups prior to GC/ECD analysis. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. Sediments To obtain the low level detection limits required when analyzing marine sediments, the PCB congener analysis is performed by following EPA Method 8082 with slight modifications to the sample mass, final extract volume, and cleanup procedures. To accommodate the relatively large sample mass required to reach the low level detection limits, the samples are extracted using a sonication technique. The extracts are subjected to GPC, mercury, silica gel, acid, and permanganate cleanups prior to GC/ECD analysis. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. Tissue To obtain the low level detection limits required when analyzing biological tissues, the PCB congener analysis is performed by following EPA Method 8082 with slight modifications to the sample mass, final extract volume, and cleanup procedures . In order to assure representative sub-sampling for each analytical parameter, all tissue samples are subject to homogenization prior to analysis. To accommodate the relatively large sample mass required to reach the low level detection limits, the samples are extracted using a sonication technique . The extracts are subjected to GPC, silica gel, acid, and permanganate cleanups prior to GC/ECD analysis. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. O:\marketing\soq\marine\ soq 5 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM D. Organotin Seawater and Pore Water Aqueous samples are analyzed using solvent extraction, derivatization, and a Gas Chromatography Flame Photometric Detector (GC/FPD). Following the addition of surrogate compounds (tripropyltin chloride and tripentyltin chloride), aqueous samples are extracted with hexane that contains 0.2% (wt./vol.) tropolone. Extracts are derivatized with hexylmagnesium bromide in ether via a Grignard reaction. The Grignard reagent is synthesized by CAS ( commercially available reagent is not used due to unacceptable purity). Extracts are cleaned by elution through alumina and silica gel columns. The extracts are analyzed by GC/FPD with a 610 nm filter. A minimum (10%) of analyte hits are confirmed by secondary column GC/FPD or GC/MS analysis . All detectable values are confirmed if the samples originated from an uncharacterized site (i.e. no historical data to suggest the likelihood of the presence of organotin). Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. Sediments Bulk sediment samples are analyzed using solvent extraction, derivatization, and a GC/FPD. Samples are dried with muffled, anhydrous sodium sulfate. Following the addition of surrogate compounds (tripropyltin chloride and tripentyltin chloride), sediments are extracted with methylene chloride that contains 0.1 % (wt./vol.) tropolone. After solvent exchange into hexane, extracts are derivatized with hexylmagnesium bromide in ether via a Grignard reaction. The Grignard reagent is synthesized by CAS (commercially available reagent is not used due to unacceptable purity). Sediment extracts are cleaned by elution through alumina and silica gel columns. The extracts are analyzed by GC/FPD with a 610 nm filter. A minimum (10%) of analyte hits are confirmed by secondary column GC/FPD or GC/MS analysis. All detectable values are confirmed if the samples originated from an uncharacterized site (i.e. no historical data to suggest the likelihood of the presence of organotin). Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. Tissue Tissue samples are analyzed using solvent extraction, derivatization, and GC/FPD. Samples are dried with muffled, anhydrous sodium sulfate. Following the addition of surrogate compounds (tripropyltin chloride and tripentyltin chloride), tissues are extracted with methylene chloride that contains 0.1 % (wt./vol.) tropolone. After solvent exchange into hexane, extracts are derivatized with hexylmagnesium bromide in ether via a Grignard reaction . The Grignard reagent is synthesized by CAS (commercially available reagent is not used due to unacceptable purity). Tissue extracts are cleaned by elution through Florisil® columns. The extracts are analyzed by GC/FPD with a 610 nm filter. A minimum (10%) of analyte hits are confirmed by a secondary column GC/FPD or GC/MS analysis. All detectable values are confirmed if the samples originated from an uncharacterized site (i.e. no historical data to suggest the likelihood of the presence of organotin). Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. O:\marketing\soq\marine\ soq 6 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM E. Metals Seawater and Pore Water Several procedures have been used at CAS for the analysis of seawater , but the most universal technique with the best overall performance for a relatively wide range of elements is the reductive precipitation technique . The procedure incorporates a chemical separation to remove interfering matrix components so final analysis can be performed using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). The separation utilizes reduction of certain target analytes to the elemental state and precipitation of others as the boride depending on reduction potentials and/or boride solubility. The precipitation is facilitated using elemental palladium and iron boride as carriers. Once separated from the seawater matrix via centrifugation, the precipitate is re-dissolved and analyzed using ICP-MS. Typically, this procedure is performed with the intention of including arsenic and chromium in the analyses . When these elements are not of concern, some improvement of sensitivity can be achieved by altering the dissolution acid used in the procedure . Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. Mercury determinations are generally performed using EPA Method 1631, purge and trap atomic fluorescence. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. Sediments Sediment samples are prepared for analysis using one of two approaches. One procedure incorporates the use of hydrofluoric acid to assure dissolution of refractory compounds and/or refractory compounds containing heavy metals (i.e . contained within the crystalline structure). In recent years , this approach has almost been eliminated for marine studies conducted for environmental applications. Currently, the digestion procedure most commonly required consists of a more traditional nitric/peroxide dissolution essentially equivalent to the EPA soil procedures. CAS performs both procedures. The analysis of the digestate for trace constituents is typically performed using ICP-MS. Major components are analyzed using ICP-Optical Emission Spectrometry (OES). Sediment samples generally present no analytical difficulties with regard to uncorrectable interferences. Occasionally, Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (GFAAS) is needed for confirmation of some elements. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. For mercury, a larger aliquot of the wet sample is digested than is usually done for routine analyses of solid and semi-solid materials. This allows representative sub- sampling of sediments and provides the additional sensitivity typically required. The digestion procedure incorporates similar ratios of digesting/oxidizing reagents as standard EPA procedures. Additional concentrated nitric is added to facilitate the digestion of the high organic content. Standard Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (CVAAS) technique is used for the analysis of the digestate . Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. O :\marketing\soq\marine\ soq 7 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM Tissue The digestion procedure for all elements except mercury consists of an acid digestion-oxidation under elevated temperature and pressure in a closed system . The procedure is generally preferred over modifications to conventional EPA soil digestions for several reasons. By freeze-drying the sample and grinding it to a homogenous meal, a representative sample is easily obtained . This is especially significant when analyzing whole-body samples where bone, gristle, and skin are difficult to disperse uniformly throughout the sample . This is also true for portions of bivalve samples that are very difficult to homogenize when wet. Besides helping homogeneity, the absence of water in freeze-drying facilitates the digestion/oxidation of organic material by the oxidants added. Performing the digestion in a closed Teflon vessel under elevated temperature and pressure also increases the completeness of digestion and minimizes loss of target analytes during the procedure (i.e. superior matrix spike recoveries are attained). For mercury, our laboratory digests a larger aliquot of the wet sample than is typically done for routine analyses of solid and semi-solid materials. This allows representative sub-sampling of tissues. The digestion procedure incorporates similar ratios of digesting/oxidizing reagents as standard EPA procedures. Additional concentrated nitric is added to facilitate the digestion of the high organic content. The digestates are analyzed using a combination of ICP-MS, ICP-OES, GFAAS, and CVAAS. Selenium is typically analyzed using GFAAS because of uncorrectable isobaric interferences when using ICP-MS. Mercury is analyzed in tissue using standard cold vapor techniques. Our laboratory does perform ultra trace mercury determinations using purge and trap cold vapor atomic fluorescence techniques , but generally does not need the added sensitivity to obtain the required detection limits to meet most project objectives. All other elements are analyzed using ICP-MS or ICP-OES, depending on the required sensitivity. Detection limit information is listed in the tables following page 13. F. Dioxins/Furans Seawater and Pore Water The polychlorinated dioxins/furans analyses are performed by EPA Methods 8290 and 1613 to meet part per quadrillion detection limits usually specified for this work. The typical reporting limits are listed in the tables following page 13. In order to reach these ultra-low detection limits, extensive procedures were developed to minimize contamination. These procedures minimize sample transfer and use disposable glassware where feasible. O :\marketing\soq\marine\ soq 8 6/16/2004 11:03 AM Sediments CAS follows EPA Methods 8280, 8290, and 1613 to perform dioxin/furan analyses. EPA Methods 8290 and 1613 require high resolution gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS) techniques to meet the parts per trillion (sediment) detection limits typically requested . The reporting limits are listed in the tables following page 13. In order to reach these ultra-low detection limits, extensive procedures were developed to minimize contamination. These procedures minimize sample transfer and use disposable glassware where feasible. Special clean-up techniques have been specifically developed for sediment to minimize matrix interferences . Tissue Analysis is performed by EPA Methods 8280, 8290, and 1613 on biological tissue samples. Special clean-up techniques were developed for dealing with tissue samples verses sediment samples to remove biologically active components that could interfere with the analysis . Instrumental analysis is performed by HRGC/HRMS techniques to meet the one part-per-trillion detection limit often requested for tissue samples. Typical reporting limits are listed in the tables following page 13 . Dioxin/Furan Screening CAS provides full service dioxin testing. In our Houston laboratory both high and low resolution GCMS methodologies are performed on a variety of sample matrices : XAD resins/filters , sediments, tissues, paper, ash, soil, water, and waste. Methodologies employed by GAS/Houston include: EPA 8290, EPA 8280, EPA 613 , EPA 1613, and NCASI 551. O :\markeling\soq\marine\ soq 9 6/16/2004 11 :03 AM /;,( Columbia I\JICOLE BROWN if:'\) Analytical Services "" 007 TO PRESENT Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., 19408 Park Row, Ste. 320, Houston, TX 77084 800.434.6946 Current Position Project Chemist -2010 to Present Responsibilities Assure project details are understood by techn ical and adm inist rative staff and that ana lytica l reports and EDDs comply with establ ished project requ irements. Manage GC/HRMS proj ects requiring a wide- range of requirements including US EPA CLP, AFCEE , ACOE , NFESC, RCRA , CWA, SDWA, EU and CAA. Experience Education Documentation of Demonstration of Capabilities is available for review. Scientist I, Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., Houston, Texas , 2008 . Oversee operat ions in Extraction Laboratory and SMO. Primary responsibilities include sample login , ext ract ion, cleanup , and final concentration. Schedule daily tasks for extraction analysts . Run Methods 1668A, 1613B, 8280 , 8290, T0-9A and 23 . Aid in continuous improvement of ex isting methods and development of new methods. Perform non-routine and complex technical assignments . Analyst Ill , Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., Houston, Texas , 2007-08. Run Methods 1668A, 1613B , 8280, 8290 , T0-9A and 23 . Perform extractions , sulfuric acid clean up , silica gel co lumn clean up , and blow downs/transfers . Receive and log arriving samples into CAS LIMS . Prepare and sh ip client bottle kit orders . Research Technician, Baylor College of Medicine Human Genome Sequencing Center, 2007. Assist in development of DNA sequencing technology using PCR and micro-titer plate technology . BS, Biology, University of Houston, Victoria , Texas , 2007. AS, Biology/Chemistry, Houston Community College, Houston, Texas, 2004. Rev ised : 2/26/2008 NDREW BIDDLE 2006 TO PRESENT ,\nfn11llfl\oo-Owncd Q111111.1n1 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., 19408 Park Row, Suite 320, Houston, TX 77084 (713) 266-1599 Current Position Quality Assurance Program Manager -2008 to Present Responsibili ties As Quality Assurance Program Manager, lead CAS/Houston's Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program . Experience Education Affiliations Responsible for reviewing, approving and controlling the quality systems of Columbia Analytical Services' HRMS laboratory. Facilitate the review and changes to laboratory SOPs and the QA Manual. Document training through DoCs and attestations. Manage PE samples and document adherence to standard operating procedures. Review analytical data, perform internal audits and assure compliance with external audit findings. Maintain state and federal certifications. Facilitate Quality Assurance and Ethics training. Prepare quarterly and annual quality reports to senior management. Facilitate managerial review of the Houston laboratory's Quality Assurance Program. As Environmental Health and Safety Officer, perform safety inspections and hold safety committee meeti ngs, maintain EH&S records, manage disposal of hazardous waste , and maintain EH&S Manual. Also act as Facilities Manager. Scien tist II , Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. Houston, Texas, 2008 . Extractions Supervisor. Duties primarily as listed below. Scientist I , Columbia Analytical Services, Inc . Houston, Texas, 2007-2008 . Extractions Supervisor. Oversee operations in Extraction Laboratory and SMO. Primary responsibilities include sample login, extraction, cleanup, and final concentration . Aid in continuous improvement of existing methods and development of new methods. Perform non-routine and complex technical assignments. Ensure compliance with NELAC (and other accrediting authorities). Analyst III, Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. Houston, Texas, 2006-2007 . Extractions . Primary responsibilities include sample log in, extraction, clean up, and final concentration. BS, Astrop hysics, Rice University, Houston, TX, 2006. Member, American Society for Quali ty F:\COFW\S ubs\CASBIDDLE.DOC Revised: 5/22/2003 JEFFERY A. GRINDSTAFF Columbia Analytical Services ·N< . q91 TO PRESENT Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., 1317 South 1:fh Ave., Kelso, WA 98626 360.577.7222 Current Position LABORATORY DIRECTOR, KELSO LABORATORY -2010-to Present. Responsibilities Responsible for all phases of laboratory operations at the Kelso (WA) facility, including project planning, budgeting , and quality assurance. Primary duties include the direct management of the Kelso laboratory Experience Education Publications/ Presentations Affiliations Documentation of Demonstration of Capabilities is available for review. Technical Manager Ill, Pharmaceutical, GC/MS VOA And Semi-VOA Laboratories, Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., Kelso, Washington -1997-201 O Primary responsibilities include leadership of the Pharmaceutical , GC/MS VOA and Semi-VOA staff, management of method development, train ing , data review, tracking department workload, scheduling analyses . Responsible for ensuring data quality and timeliness . Also responsible for project management and coordination for pharmaceutical clients. Manager, GC/MS VOA Laboratory, Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., Kelso, Washington , 1994-1997. Responsible for supervision of GC/MS VOA staff, method development, tra ining, data review, tracking department workload, scheduling analyses, and general maintenance and troubleshooting of GC/MS systems . Scientist Ill, GC/MS VOA Laboratory, Columbia Analytical Services, Inc., Kelso, Washington, 1991- 1994. Responsibilities included schedul ing workload, data review, in strument maintenance and troubleshooting, and personnel training and evaluation. Also responsible for supervision of extraction personnel and instrument analysts. Additional supervisory duties included report generation and data review for GC analyses. Responsibilities also included project management and customer service. Chemist, Enseco-CRL, Ventura, California, 1990-1991 . Established GC/MS department including inventory maintenance , preparation of state certification data packages , method development, SOPs, and extended data programs . Performed daily maintenance and troubleshooting of GC and GC/MS instrumentation. Scheduled and performed routine and non-routine VOA analyses. GC/MS Chemist, VOA Laboratory Coast-to-Coast Analytical Service, San Luis Obispo, California, 1990-1991 . Responsible for standard preparation for VOA analyses, instrument calibration, tuning , and maintenance . Also implemented and further developed EPA methods for quantitative analysis of pesticides and priority pollutants . Sampling and Testing of Raw Materials, PT/ International, 2004. Leadership Training, Richard Rogers Group, 1996 Mass Selective Detector Maintenance, Hewlett Packard Education Center, 1993 Interpretation of Mass Spectra I, Hewlett-Packard Analytical Education Center, 1992. B.S., Chemistry, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, 1989. A.A., Liberal Arts, Allan Hancock College, Santa Maria, California. 1986 Mr. Grindstaff has a number of publications and presentations. For a list of these publications and presentations, please contact GAS. American Chemical Society. 1989 Revised: 8/10/10 Ma nu fact urer Maintained or Laboratory Number of Year Maintained trained E ui me nt Machine ID Purchased MMorLM o erators HRMS Systems (5): • Waters Autospec Ultima HRMS E -HRMS-01 w/Opus Quan data system 2004 MM 4 • Waters Autospec Ultima HRMS E-HRMS-02 w/Opus Quan data system 2004 MM 4 • VG Analytical HRMS 70S w/Opus E-HRMS-70 Quan data system 2002 LM 4 • Waters Autospec Premier HRMS E -HRMS-03 w/Opus Quan data system 2008 MM 4 • Waters Autospec Premier HRMS E -HRMS-04 w/Opus Quan data system 2008 MM 4 Extraction Lab: Dionex ASE200 Accelerated Solvent 2003 MM/LM 4 Extractor Eberbach Shaker 2007 LM 4 Rotavap Buchi R-200 1999 LM 4 Rotavap Buchi R-210 2009 LM 4 Rotavap Buchi R-210 2009 LM 4 Evaporator NV APIIII 1999 LM 2 GS Drying Ovens 2002 LM 4 Mettler PG603 -S Balance 2004 LM 4 Clay Adams Centrifuge 1999 LM 4 Branson Ultrasonic Cleaner 2008 LM 8 Mettler AJ 100 Balance 1999 LM 4 Denver Instruments XE300 Balance 1999 LM 4 Tumbler 1999 LM 4 VWR Dryi ng Oven 1999 LM 4 Glas-col Combination Mantle ( 4) 2008 LM 4 Equipment Description Year Acquired Analy tical Balance -Mettler AT 250 19 89 Chromatography Data Systems (12) HP Enviroquant (8) 1994-2002 Thruput Target (4) 1998-2000 Gas Chromatographs (11): Hewlett-Packard 5890 GC with HP 7673 1990 -1995 Autosampler and Dual ECD Detectors (4) Hewlett-Packard 5890 GC with HP 7673 1991 Autosampler and Dual FPD Detectors Agilent 6890 GC with Agilent 7683 2001 ,2005 ,2007 Autosampler and Dual ECD Detectors (5) Agilent 6890 GC with Agilent 7683 2003 Autosampler and Dual FPD Detectors Agilent 7890A Dual ECD D etectors 2008 Agilent 7 683B autosampler Revision 19 Appendix C 10/19/09 Page C6 Manufacturer or Laboratory Maintained (MM/LM) MM LM LM LM LM LM LM LM # of Trained Operators 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 '.'.lJ'·;;;zt!1¥;~,'f'1{L,;'.f'.~;~~1x,:\'·~~;,:{0J¢t1tyts;,$.~Ml£S?P~.flI?l I<t.«~&~,lQ§fJ~~t«~M~'2~]~1AK~@J{Ai@~¥)1i,2f\;'.A:Z7,.XJ~ Manufacturer or # of Trained Equipment Description Year Acquired Laboratory Maintained Operators Accelerated Solvent Extractor -Dionex ASE 200 HP Enviroquant Chromatography Data Systems (9) Gas Chromatograph: Hewlett-Packard 5890 with HP 7673 autosampler and FID Detector Semivolatile GC/MS Systems (9): Agilent 6890/5973 with ATAS Optic2 LVI and HP 7673 Autosampler (2) Agilent 5890/5970 and HP 7673 Autosampler Agilent 5890/5970 with ATAS Optic2 LVI and HP 7673 Autosampler Agilent 5890/5972 with AT AS Optic2 L VI and HP 7673 Autosampler (3) Agilent 6890/5973 with AT AS Optic3 L VI and 7683 Autosampler Agilent 6890/5973 with Agilent PTV Injector and 7683 Autosampler Semivolatile GC/MS/MS - Waters Quattro Micro GC Micromass with Agilent 6890, Agilent PTV Injector, 7683B Autosampler 1996 1994-2002 1994 1997,2001 1990 1994 1993, 1994, 1998 2004 2007 2008 (MM/LM) LM LM LM LM LM LM LM LM LM MM 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 Revision 19 Appendix C 10/19/09 Page C7 1,:1?.\·i:}~if\!.iii>:·"-)?:io.t:.i ... > '..: ,, . ::/J;',~T~9~~R1*'{itfftp~{/t~~~lif§!{~~R~!lfit~{~~~:Q~,~R.X? .:: i1f't.,~~}~.\! < / ,:i;,/:·;-.,: ; Manufacturer or # of Trained Equipment Description Year Acquired Laboratory Maintained Operators (MM/LM) Analytical Balance -Mettler BB240 1994 MM 6 Aspirator pump -GAST 2004 LM 6 Drying Oven -Fisher Model 630F 1991 LM 6 Evaporator -Organomation N-Evap 1990 LM 6 HP Enviroquant Chromatography Data Systems (8) 1994-2002 LM 6 Gas Chromatographs (6): Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II with PID/PID/FID(2) 1991 LM 4 EST-EN CON Purge and Trap Concentrator 1991 LM 4 Dyna tech Archon 5100 Autosampler 1992 LM 4 Hewlett-Packard 5890 GC with HP 7673 1995 LM 4 Autosampler and FID Detector Agilent 6890 with Dual FID Detectors and 2001, 2005 LM 4 Agilent 7873 Autosampler (3) High-Performance Liquid Chromatographs (2): HP 1090M Series 11 with Diode Array UV Detector 1999 LM 4 HP 1050/1100 Series with Fluorescence & Diode Array 2004 LM 4 UV Detectors High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph/Mass(2) Spectrometer -Thenno Electron TSQ Quantum 2005 MM 2 LC/MS/MS and Autosampler API 5000 LC/MS/MS and SIL-20AC Autosampler 2008 MM 2 Revision 19 Appendix C 10/19/09 Page CS }\:di·" ,,,::t"'l1:t2,trt' . . . ', .. ~ ·,-::'• ·: ./ ·.-,._, ·y9tA.:r1.ut oR~~fy 1~s:LA~ofilto~x : :,.· Jl:~_::,: :\:;, ,}-Jt\ · ::, /: ,,s\~: \): 1•,xcs, ... :-01;':··c 'f: ·-.,·\' .. ' .. .. ' .... -',. Manufacturer or # of Trained Equipment Description Year Acquired Laboratory Maintained Operators (MM/LM) Analytical Balance -Mettler P E 160 1989 MM 5 Fisher Vortex Mixer 1989 LM 5 HP Enviroquant Chromatography Data Systems (10) 1994-2002 LM 5 Drying Ovens (2): Narco 420 1989 LM 5 VWR 1305 U 1991 LM 5 Sonic Water Bath -Branson Model 2200 1989 LM 5 Volatile GC/MS Systems (7): Agilent 5890/5970 1989 LM 5 Tekmar 3000 Purge and Trap Concentrator 1995 LM 5 Dynatech ARCH ON 5100 Autosampler 1996 LM 5 Agilent 5890/5971 1991 LM 5 Tekmar 3000 Purge and Trap Concentrator 2001 LM 5 Dynatech ARCHON 5100 Autosampler 1995 LM 5 Agilent 5890/5972A 1993 LM 5 Tekmar 3000 Purge and Trap Concentrator 1995 LM 5 Dynatech ARCH ON 5100 Autosampler 1996 LM 5 Agilent 6890/5973 2001 LM 5 Tekmar 3100 Purge and Trap Concentrator 2001 LM 5 V arian Archon Autosampler 2001 LM 5 Agilent 6890/5973 2005 LM 5 Tekmar Velocity Purge and Trap Concentrator 2005 LM 5 Tekmar Aquatech Autosampler 2005 LM 5 Agilent 6890/5973 (2) 2007 LM 5 Tekmar 3000 Purge and Trap Concentrator 2007 LM 5 Varian Archon 5100 Autosampler 2007 LM 5 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Columbia Analytical Services , Inc. -Kelso, Washington 1317 South 13th Avenue Kelso , WA 98626-2845 Certificate : Expiration Date : Issue Date : T104704427-09-1 9/30/2010 10/1/2009 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Envi ronmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Potable Water Method EPA 335 .4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID T otal Cyan ide FL 1635 10061402 Method EPA 353 .2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Ni t ra t e as N FL 1810 10067604 Nitrite as N FL 1840 10067604 Method EPA 50 4 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP ) FL 4570 10082801 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB , Ethyle ne dibromide ) FL 4585 10082801 Method EPA 508 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Chlordane (tech .) FL 7250 10086405 Endrin FL 7540 10086405 gamma-BHC (Lindane , gamma-HexachlorocyclohexanE) FL 7 120 1008640 5 Hept achlor FL 7685 10086405 Hept achlor epoxide FL 7690 10086405 Methoxychlor FL 7810 10 0 864 0 5 PCBs FL 8870 10086405 Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene ) FL 8250 10086405 Method EPA 515 .4 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2,4-D FL 8545 10088503 Dalapon FL 8555 100885 0 3 Dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4 ,6-dinitrophenol , DNBP) FL 8620 100885 0 3 Pentachlorophenol FL 66 05 100 88 50 3 Picloram FL 8645 10 0 88 50 3 Silvex (2,4,5-TP) FL 8650 100 88 503 hod EPA 524 .2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Pag e 28 of 50 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. -Kelso, Washington 1317 South 13th Avenue Kelso, WA 98626-2845 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704427-09-1 9/30/2010 10/1/2009 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Potable Water 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane FL 5160 10089006 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane FL 5165 10089006 1, 1-Dichloroethylene (1, 1-Dichloroethene) FL 4640 10089006 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene FL 5155 10089006 1,2-Dichlorobenzene FL 4610 10089006 1,2-Dichloroethane FL 4635 10089006 1,2-Dichloropropane FL 4655 10089006 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene FL 4620 10089006 Benzene FL 4375 10089006 Carbon tetrachloride FL 4455 10089006 hlorobenzene FL 4475 10089006 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene FL 4645 10089006 Dichloromethane (DCM, Methylene chloride) FL 4650 10089006 Ethylbenzene FL 4765 10089006 Styrene FL 5100 10089006 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) FL 5115 10089006 Toluene FL 5140 10089006 Total trihalomethanes FL 5205 10089006 trans-1,2-Dicloroethylene FL 4700 10089006 Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) FL 5170 10089006 Vinyl chloride FL 5235 10089006 Xylene (total) FL 5260 10089006 Method EPA 525.2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Alachlor FL 7005 10090003 Atrazine FL 7065 10090003 Benzo(a)pyrene FL 5580 10090003 Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Adipate FL 6062 10090003 Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate FL 6065 10090003 cndrin FL 7540 10090003 gamma-BHC (Lindane, gamma-HexachlorocyclohexanE) FL 7120 10090003 Page 29 of 50 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. -Kelso, Washington 1317 South 13th Avenue Kelso, WA 98626-2845 Certificate : Expirati on Date: Issue Date: T104 704427-09 -1 9/30/2010 10/1/2009 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Env ironmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Potable Water Heptachlor FL 7685 10090003 Heptachlor epoxide FL 7690 10090003 Hexachlorobenzene FL 6275 10090003 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene FL 6285 10090003 Me thoxychlo r FL 7810 10090003 Pentachlorophenol FL 6605 10090003 Simazine FL 8125 10090003 Method EPA 531 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aldicarb (Temik) FL 7010 10091006 Aldicarb sulfone FL 7015 1009 1006 Aldica r b sulfoxide FL 7020 10091006 Carbofuran (Furaden) FL 7205 10091006 Oxamyl FL 7940 1009 1006 Method EPA 54 7 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Glyphosate FL 9411 10092 009 Method EPA 548 .1 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Endothall FL 7525 10092805 Method EPA 549 .2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Diquat FL 9390 10 093400 Method EPA 552 .2 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Total haloacetic acids FL 94 14 100958 04 Method SM 2510 B Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Conductivity TX 16 10 20 0038 09 10d SM 2540 C Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Residue-filterable (TDS) TX 1955 20 00 44 04 Page 30 of 50 -... Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. -Kelso, Washington 1317 South 13th Avenue Kelso, WA 98626-2845 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704427-09-1 9/30/2010 10/1/2009 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Tissue Method EPA 6010 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum FL 1000 10155201 Antimony FL 1005 10155201 Arsenic FL 1010 10155201 Barium FL 1015 10155201 Beryllium FL 1020 10155201 Boron FL 1025 10155201 Cadmium FL 1030 10155201 Chromium FL 1040 10155201 Cobalt FL 1050 10155201 Copper FL 1055 10155201 Iron FL 1070 10155201 Lead FL 1075 10155201 Manganese FL 1090 10155201 Molybdenum FL 1100 10155201 Nickel FL 1105 10155201 Selenium FL 1140 10155201 Silver FL 1150 10155201 Tin FL 1175 10155201 Vanadium FL 1185 10155201 Zinc FL 1190 10155201 Method EPA 6020 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aluminum FL 1000 10156204 Antimony FL 1005 10156204 Arsenic FL 1010 10156204 Barium FL 1015 10156204 Beryllium FL 1020 10156204 Cadmium FL 1030 10156204 Chromium FL 1040 10156204 Page 48 of 50 ·Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. -Kelso, Washington 1317 South 13th Avenue Kelso, WA 98626-2845 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704427-09-1 9/30/2010 10/1/2009 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fiel(ls. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. · Matrix: Tissue Cobalt FL 1050 10156204 Copper FL 1055 10156204 Lead FL 1075 10156204 Manganese FL 1090 10156204 Nickel FL 1105 10156204 Selenium FL 1140 10156204 S ilver FL 1150 10156204 Thallium FL 1165 10156204 Vanadium FL 1185 10156204 Zinc FL 1190 10156204 ethod EPA 7471 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Mercury FL 1095 10166004 Method EPA 77 42 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Selenium FL 1140 10169207 Method EPA 8081 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 4,4'-DDD FL 7355 10178402 4 ,4'-DDE FL 7360 10178402 4 ,4'-DDT FL 7365 10178402 Aldrin FL 7025 10178402 alpha-8 HC ( alpha-Hexach lorocyclohexane) FL 7110 10178402 beta-BHC (beta-Hexachlorocyclohexane) FL 7115 10178402 Chlordane (tech.) FL 7250 10178402 delta-BHC FL 7105 10178402 Dieldrin FL 7470 10178402 gammc;i-BHC (Lindane, gamma-HexachlorocyclohexanE) FL 7120 10178402 Heptachlor FL 7685 10178402 Heptachlor epoxide FL 7690 10178402 Toxaphene (Chlorinated camphene) FL 8250 10178402 Page 49 of 50 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. -Kelso, Washington 1317 South 13th Avenue Kelso, WA 98626-2845 Certificate: Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704427-09-1 9/30/2010 10/1/2009 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields. The Texas Comm ission on Environmental Quality urges customers to verify the laboratory's current accred itation status for particular met hods and analyses. Matrix: Tissue Method EPA 8082 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016) FL 8880 10179007 Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221) FL 8885 10179007 Aroclor-1 232 (PCB-1232) FL 8890 10179007 Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242) FL 8895 101 79007 Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248) FL 8900 10179007 Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254) FL 8905 101 79007 Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260) FL 8910 101 7900 7 i ethod EPA 8270 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) TX 6400 10185203 4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol) TX 6410 10185203 Benzo(a)anthracene FL 55 75 10185203 Benzo(a)pyrene FL 5580 10 1852 03 Chrysene TX 5855 101 852 03 Hexachlorobenzene TX 62 75 1018 52 03 Hexachlorobutadiene FL 4835 10 18 5203 Hexach lorocyclopentadiene TX 6285 10185203 Hexachloroethane FL 4840 1018 52 03 Pentach lorophenol TX 6605 10185203 Pyridine FL 5095 101852 03 Page 50 of 50 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality NELAP -Recognized Laboratory Fields of Accreditation Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. -Houston 19408 Park Row, Suite 320 Houston, TX 77084-4949 Certificate : Expiration Date: Issue Date: T104704216-10-1 6/30/2011 7/1/2010 These fields of accreditation supercedeall previous fields . The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality urges c u stom ers to verify the laboratory's current accreditation status for particular methods and analyses. Matrix: Solid & Hazardous Material Method EPA 1668 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID Decachlorob iphenyl TX 9105 10129609 D ichlorobiphenyls TX 464 10129609 Heptachlorob iphenyls TX 486 10129609 Hexachlorobiphenyls TX 487 10129609 Monochlorobiphenyls TX 501 10129609 Nonachlorobiphenyls TX 507 10129609 Octachlorobiphenyls TX 508 10129609 Pentachlorobiphenyls TX 515 10129609 r etrachlorobiphenyls TX 528 10129609 T richlorob iphenyls TX 541 10129609 Method EPA 8280 Analyte AB Analyte ID Method ID 1 ,2 ,3 ,4,6 ,7 ,8,9-0ctachlorod ibe nzofuran (OCDF ) TX 9516 10186808 1 ,2 ,3 ,4,6 ,7 ,8 ,9-0ctachlorodiben z o-p-d iox in (OCDD ) TX 95 19 10186808 1 ,2 ,3,4 ,6 ,7 ,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran (1 ,2 ,3,4 ,6 , 7 ,8-hpcdf) TX 9420 101868 08 1 ,2 ,3,4 ,6 , 7 ,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-d ioxin (1,2 ,3 ,4,6 , 7 ,8-hpcdd) TX 9426 10186808 1 ,2 ,3,4 , 7 ,8 ,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran (1 ,2 ,3 ,4, 7 ,8 ,9-hpcdf) TX 9423 101868 08 1 ,2 ,3,4 , 7 ,8-Hxcdd TX 9453 10186808 1 ,2 ,3 ,4,7 ,8-Hxcdf TX 9471 10186808 1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ,8-Hxcdd TX 9456 101868 08 1 ,2 ,3 ,6 , 7 ,8-Hxcdf TX 9474 101868 08 1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ,8 ,9-Hxcdd TX 9459 101 868 08 1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ,8 ,9-Hxcdf TX 9477 10 1868 08 1 ,2,3 ,7,8-Pecdd TX 954 0 10 1868 08 1 ,2 ,3 , 7 ,8-Pecdf TX 9543 101 868 08 2 ,3,4,6 ,7 ,8-Hxcdf TX 9480 101868 08 ".3,4, 7,8-Pecdf TX 9549 101 86808 ,3,7 ,8-TCDD TX 9606 10 1868 08 2 ,3 ,7 ,8-TCDF TX 96 12 101 86808 Page 5 of 7 \ City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals 2.6 COST Laboratories shall provide a cost per test for each type of analysis included in Table 2 below . Place a "D" in the Digestion/Filtration column next to each analysis for which a d igestion or extraction charge will apply and i ndicate the digestion cost in Item 63 (Item 118 for biological tissue). Place an "F" in the Digestion/Filtration column next to each analysis for which an aqueous sample filtration will apply and indicate the filtration cost in Item 109. If these notations are not provided it will be assumed the charges are included in the line item costs or are not required and will not be charged . If the laboratory uses an alternate test method , type the method used in the Test and Method column . All TCLP/SPLP extraction charges must be included in the TCLP/SPLP line items. Laboratory will provide pickup and delivery service and all sample containers , preservatives, and shipping containers at no additional charge to the City . Addit ionally , the laboratory shall attach their Standard Price List at the end of this section along with any applicable discount rate (percentage off standard) that applies to City of Fort Worth projects. Table 2 Test and Method 2 3 33 46 58 4 33 46 58 5 75 105 131 6 25 35 44 7 25 35 44 8 35 49 61 9 TPH TX 1006 150 210 263 10 TPH EPA 8015 DRO/GRO 50 70 88 11 PAH EPA 8310 90 126 158 12 PAH EPA8270 90 126 158 13 TCLP/SPLP PAH 115 161 201 14 40 56 70 15 PCBs in oil EPA 8082 40 56 70 16 PCBs in soil/water EPA 8082 40 56 70 17 TCLP/SPLP Benzene EPA 1311/1312/8020 55 77 96 18 TCLP/SPLP Benzene EPA 1311/1312/8260 55 77 96 DEM 10-09: LAB 2-9 July 22 , 2010 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals Item Test and Method Digestion/ Unit Price Number F;itrat;:;,, .7~~,Y~ ~~lrlinr~(';,.~ i . :·'~'?< :;)' ' . . . .. . 19 Pesticides, Chlorinated (EPA 8081) 90 126 158 20 TCLP/SPLP Pesticides (EPA 1311/1312/8081) 115 161 201 21 Pesticides , Oraanoohosohorus (EPA 8141) 100 140 175 22 Herbicides (EPA 8151) 100 140 175 23 Volatiles , voes <EPA 82608) 65 91 114 24 TCLP/SPLP voes (EPA 1311/1312/82608) 90 126 158 25 Semi Volatiles , SVOCs (EPA 8270) 145 203 254 26 TCLP/SPLP SVOCs EPA (1311/1312/8270) 170 238 298 TCLP/SPLP Full (pesticides, herbicides , voe, SVOC, 515 27 & Metals) 721 901 28 Acid Extractable (EPA 625/8270C) 90 126 158 29 Base/Neutral Extractable (EPA 625/8270C) 90 126 158 .-. --~-::'':.,? "' ·r ---_ .,a; ··-. :~ .• ·-_._o_,_ c·-:·· _ 1.p··. ·-· "· -·. ---~ -~~--·.· .:";;". _ · -; ~_._.,.. ~ __ ;,;., ··l\ll~!a1~J!;p~cift ~_Oj O or. §fr~9tif ~~6.t_~ aVailal)le i p~~!i(I~ 'c_gs( CJ! eactl-1 :if-c!!ff~t&n!),. TCLP/SPLP 8 RCRA Metals 90 126 158 30 (EPA 1311/1312/60108/6020) TCLP/SPLP 13 PP Metals (EPA 110 154 193 31 1311/1312/60108/6020) 32 TCLP/SPLP , one metal (EPA 1311/1312/60108/6020) 37 52 65 33 Total 8 RCRA Metals (EPA 60108/6020) 65 91 114 34 Total 13 PP Metals (EPA6010/ 6020) 85 119 149 35 Aluminum (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 36 Antimony (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 37 Arsenic (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 38 Barium (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 39 Bervllium «EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 40 Boron (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 41 Cadmium (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 42 Calcium (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 43 Chromium (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 44 Chromium VI (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 45 Cobalt (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 46 Copper (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 47 Iron (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 48 Lead (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 49 Maanesium (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 50 Manqanese (EPA 6010/6020) D 6 8 11 51 Mercurv (EPA 7470/7471) 20 28 35 ·'--· DEM 10-09: LAB -~ Diie-5>Hcn on\~ cha.(ie.c\ once ·~r Sarryp\-e_ -~< Ju1y 22, 2010 «l-t-\-Ct.\s (~+"'"I). 2-10 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals Item Test and Method Digestion/ Unit Price Number Filtration 7 da 3 da 24 Hour 52 Mol bdenum EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 53 Nickel EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 54 Potass ium EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 55 Selenium EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 56 Silver EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 57 Sodium EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 58 Thallium EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 59 Tin EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 60 Titanium EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 61 Vanadium EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 62 Zinc EPA 6010/6020 D 6 8 11 Metal Digestion per requ ired digestion (EPA 3010 , 1050 65 70 123 66 Corrosive , Steel EPA 1110 20 28 35 67 5 7 9 68 25 35 44 69 20 28 35 70 5 7 9 71 SW 1010 15 21 26 72 15 21 26 73 BTU 15 76 BOD EPA 405 / Std Meth 52108 20 28 35 77 Chloride EPA 300 .0 or Std Method 4500CIB 15 21 26 78 COD EPA 410.4 20 28 35 79 5 7 9 80 222 388 444 81 Diaz inon EPA 1657 217 380 434 82 E coli , MPN 35 49 61 83 Fecal Coliform Std Method 9221 E 35 49 61 84 Fecal Stre tococcus Std Method 9230 C 3 49 61 85 Hardness , Total as CaC03 Std Method 2340 B or C 1 21 26 DEM 10-09: LAB ~ h aJ 'She.p ha.,s ~ ~ hr h eld ~\me a nd -+here. i S 11 ~ 2-11 July22,2010 o..e.h\o °\\)Ci\\ed l f\ u/F1..v ·+h ~+-,~ c-e.r tih~ct +k \t ... 1A· h c\.s .\-t) be -::,e vt\--tc Hc\A.%1'1 . \ ·--- City of Fort Worth Item Number 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 111 112 113 114 115 116 Nitro en, Ammonia EPA 350 .2 Phos horus , Dissolved EPA 365.2 Solids, Total Dissolved -TDS EPA 160.1 Solids, Total Sus ended -TSS EPA 160.2 Solids, Total EPA 160 .3 Sulfate EPA 375 .2 or 300.0 Trihalomethanes, Total EPA 501 Turbidit EPA 180.1 Aluminum EPA 200 .7/200.8 Arsenic EPA 200.7/200.8 Cadmium EPA 200.7/200 .8 Chromium EPA 200 .7/200.8 Co er EPA 200.7/200.8 Iron EPA 200 .7/200.8 Lead EPA 200.7/200 .8 Man anese EPA 200.7/200.8 EPA 245.1 Chlorinated Pesticides EPA 8081 B PCB Aroclors EPA 8082 PCB Con eners EPA 1668A Volatiles, VOCs EPA 8260 Semi Volatiles, SVOCs EPA 8270 Request for Proposals 20 25 35 44 25 35 44 20 28 35 25 35 44 30 42 53 10 14 18 10 14 18 10 14 18 20 28 35 EPA 524 102 178 204 10 14 18 D 6 8 11 D 6 8 11 D 6 8 11 D 6 8 11 D 6 8 11 D 6 8 11 D 6 8 11 D 6 8 11 20 28 35 6 8 11 8 11 126 164 N/A 126 164 NIA NC 894 1788 N/A NC 80 112 N/A . 290 377 N/A NC 45 63 N/A 117 Sam le homo enate re aration char e 25 35 N/A 118 Other sam le di estion/extraction char e 25 35 N/A * fu-t ~-€.:S·t-\D<"l ~e.( .~V'r"-f.>~ -~ VN.-kl~. (To-\-.\ ' ~ ~\ \-\-cc-.ho(\ cV\o..·a;;J-wy c;..Wl'f OV\.\'[ :° ~s-s~\-..J'td v'Y\..t~b 1 \.f' rei~ ~Jed . * '2-L\ fu ,\1\-r V\m-'"PU~I We.. t)n_ ·&'bl~'fS'C.Jl \ 1°"6S\.\.Q. du..~ 'Ti:> r<~e(ct)Qf\ of DEM 10-09: LAB c~::,cl . .vv,_~,e_ · July 22, 201 O 2-12 '··--· ~~ ~~ 8/12/2010 li3ACCUTES'1: *Take 20% Discount off of List Price* Ldb o r c1 lu rie!> Accutest Laboratories Gulf Coast, Inc. Schedule of Services for City of Fort Worth Contact: Stephanie Winquest or Georgia Jones (PM) 713-271-4700 Laboratory Test Description Method Aqueous 1111111:o,,; ~;: .... :r. ,r. , ••• -• I~-•ol~UTJ! :r.111• 00: ,,a ....... :.. "'" Volatiles-MS 624/82606 $85 .00 Semivolatiles -MS 625/8270C $185.00 Organochlorine Pesticides 608/8081A $115.00 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 608/8082 $50.00 BTEX Only 624/8260 $40.00 BTEX/MTBE Only 624/8260 $45.00 TPH -1005 TCEQ-1005 $45.00 TPH -1006 TCEQ -1006 $190.00 Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) 8015 $35.00 Diesel Range Organics (ORO) 8015 $70.00 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons 8270 $120.00 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons 8270-SIM $120 .00 Herbicides 8151 $120.00 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons 8310 $120.00 Ethylene Dibromide 8011 $55.00 T IC's Scan (Top 10) 8260/8270 $30.00 Individual Metal by ICP $9.00 Individual Metal by GFAA $11 .00 RCRA Metals (8) -inc . di estion $85.00 Chromium , Hexavalent $35.00 Mercury (includes digestion) 245.1/7470/7471 $25.00 PPL 13 Metals EPA/SW-846 $110.00 T AL 23 Metals SW-846 $150.00 Metals Digestion EPA/SW-846 $10.00 • e Soil ,. 1111iilliil - $85.00 $185 .00 $115 .00 $50 .00 $40.00 $45 .00 $45 .00 $190.00 $35.00 $70.00 $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 $120 .00 $55 .00 $30.00 $9 .00 $11 .00 $85 .00 $80 .00 $25.00 $110 .00 $150 .00 $10.00 ,,..,,,=,,.""·,·-~=?'77=-"''=-·"',~B7:s'~E'f"""'""''''"'"~,-,~,-~""""=~==-~:, .. -·--..e ·~"~;.;~i~-::~"1:, .... :-)'i~~""?"'\;:::){--"°I,,t..,\~z _"F.,,.. ~ , arameters ~;,;.,;~',.t\:.--,::'2~ .. r:}f~"'· .. ~,-'~·-2:--. -~~~....,....,. ~~~=~~ -·~ Full TCLP/SPLP Pkg (inc . ex) SW-846 $650.00 $660 .00 TCLP/SPLP (MetalsNOCs/SVOCs) SW-846 $415.00 $425 .00 TCLP/SPLP Extraction only 1311/1312 $30.00 $35 .00 TCLP/SPLP ZHE Extraction only 1311/1312 $30.00 $35 .00 TCLP/SPLP voes (w/o extraction) 82606 $85.00 $85.00 TCLP/SPLP SVOCs (w/o extraction) 8270C $185.00 $185.00 TCLP/SPLP Pesticides (w/o extraction) 8081A $115.00 $115 .00 TCLP/SPLP Herbicides (w/o extraction) 8151A $120.00 $120.00 TCLP/SPLP Metals (w/o extraction) 60106/7 470A $85.00 $85.00 ~-;''.~--: __ \~-.-,:;' ':'°' =~""/ -~·:.::~(!AJ~li~.£!~!:!~J!~~-.:__._~--~':"': ___ : · ~=---':~""'_.] Reactive Cyanide SW-846 $32 .00 $32 .00 Reactive Sulfide SW-846 $30.00 $30 .00 Corrosivity SW-846 $25.00 $25 .00 lgnitability SW-846 $25.00 $25.00 Page 1 V8260TCL , A68270TCI P8081PEs· P8082PC6 V82606TX V82606TXI 6TX1005TF 6TX1006TF V8015GRO 68015DRO B8270PAH 68270SIMF H8151FL LC8310PAI V8011ED6 V8260+/AB xx xx HM8 XCR HG PM13 MTAL METDIG TCLPFULL see quote TCLPE ZHE V8260TCLF A68270TCI P8081TCLF H8151TCLI TCLPM CREAC SREAC CORR IGN --.. . , .. :.JII ....... , . -. Acidity 305 .1 $24 .00 Alkalinity 310.1 $25 .00 Biocarbonate SM18-4500 $40 .00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 405 .1 $30 .00 Chloride 325 .3/9252 $25 .00 Chlorine, Residual 330.5/9076 $20 .00 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 410.1 $26 .00 Color, Apparent 110.2 $20 .00 Conductance, Specific 120.1 $20 .00 Cyanide , Amenable 335 .1/9020 $45 .00 Cyanide, Total 335.2/9010 $45 .00 Fluoride 340 .2 $30 .00 Hardness, Total 130.2 $40.00 Nitrogen, Ammonia 350.1 $30 .00 Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl 351 .2 $40 .00 Nitrogen , Total Organic SM 18 4500NM $45 .00 Nitrogen, Nitrate 353.2 $32 .00 Nitrogen, Nitrite 354.1 $25 .00 Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite 353 .2 $35.00 Oil & Grease 1664/9071 $50 .00 pH 150 .1 $10 .00 Phenolics , Total 420.1/9066 $40 .00 Phosphate, Ortho 365.2 $35 .00 Phosphorus , Total 365.3 $35 .00 Silica , Dissolved 370 .1 $35 .00 Solids , Total 160 .3 $15 .00 Solids, Total Dissolved 160 .1 $15 .00 Solids , Total Suspended 160 .2 $15 .00 Solids, Total Volatile 160.4 $25 .00 Sulfate 375.4/9038 $30 .00 Sulfide 376.1 $25 .00 TOC 415 .1/9060 $30 .00 Total Organic Halides 9020 $110 .00 Turbidity 180.1 $15.00 24 Hour TAT 75% 48 Hour TAT 60% 3 Day TAT 40% 5 Day TAT 15% 7 Day TAT 0% Above Prices reflect a 7 Business day turnaround Rush turnaround may not be possible for some parameters (particularly some TCLP parameters.surcharges vary) On-line data access available via LabLink (password required) Electronic deliverables available upon request @ no additional charge $24 .00 $25.00 $45.00 NA $25.00 N/A $36.00 N/A $20 .00 $50 .00 $50.00 $30.00 $45 .00 $35 .00 $45 .00 $50 .00 $32 .00 $25 .00 $40 .00 $50 .00 $10 .00 $45 .00 $40 .00 $40 .00 N/A N/A N/A N/A $30 .00 $35 .00 $30 .00 $35 .00 $115 .00 NIA All TRRP deliverables & requirements provided@ no additional charge wl the exception of Full Tier-Level IV QA/QC (add 10%) Percent moisture determination & associated dry-weight corrected soil results are provided at no additional charge Accutest Laborat ories Gulf Coast, Inc. 10165 Harwin , Suite 150 Houston, TX 77036 phone : (713) 271-4700 fax : (713) 271-4770 Page2 . . ACD ALK BIC BOD CHL TRC COD COLOR SCON CNA CN F HRD AMN TKN TON XN030 N02 N032 OG1664 PH PN OP04 TP04 SIC TS TDS TSS TVS S04 s TOC TOX TURB '· City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals 2.7 FINANCIAL STATEMENT Providers must provide a current certified or compilation financial statement within this section of the proposal. The financial statement shall be no more than six months old . DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 INCLUDE A COPY OF THE STATEMENT FOLLOWING THIS PAGE BOUND WITHIN THE PROPOSAL PACKAGE 2-13 From: Reed, Clarence [mailto:Clarence.Reed@fortworthgov.org] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 3:05 PM To: Chad Tate Subject: RE: Accutest 2009 Financial Statement This reply is to confirm receipt of financial statement. Clarence W. Reed Environmental Program Manager City of Fort Worth . -~-=-····----------·----- From: Chad Tate [mailto:chadt@accutest.com] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:02 PM To: Reed, Clarence Subject: Accutest 2009 Financial Statement Clarence, Per instruction form Stephanie Winquest please find attached the 2009 Accutest Financial Statement. Regards , Chad «Accutest 2009 Financial Statement_0001.pdf>> Chad Tate Chief Accounting Officer Accutest Laboratories 2235 US Highway 130 Dayton, NJ 08810 732-329-0200 732-392-8915 Fax chadt@accutest.com www.accutest.com City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals 2.8 INSURANCE CERTIFICATES The successful provider will be required by the contract to have insurance coverage as detailed below. Prior to commencing work, the provider shall deliver to Fort Worth cert ificates documenting this coverage. The City may elect to have the provider submit its entire policy for inspection . a) Insurance coverage and limits : Provider shall provide to the City certificate(s) of insurance documenting policies of the following coverage at minimum limits that are to be in effect prior to commencement of work on the contract: 1 . Commercial General Liability o $1 ,000 ,000 each occurrence o $2 ,000 ,000 aggregate Coverage shall include but not be limited to the following : premises/operations , independent contractors, products/ completed operations , personal injury , and contractual liab ility . Insurance shall be provided on an occurrence basis, and as comprehensive as the current Insurance Services Office (ISO) policy . 2. Automobile Liability 3 . DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 o $1,000 ,000 each acc ident on a combined single limit basis Split limits are acceptable if limits are at least: o $250 ,000 Bod ily Injury per person I o $500,000 Bodily Injury per accident I o $100 ,000 Property Damage A commercial business auto policy shall provide coverage on "any auto ," defined as autos owned , hired and non-owned during the course of this project. The named insured and employees of contractor shall be covered under this policy . The City of Fort Worth shall be named an Additional insured on Endorsement TE 9901 or equivalent, as its interests may appear. Liability for damage occurring while loading , unloading and transporting materials collected under the contract shall be included under this policy . Worker's Compensation Statutory limits Employer's liability o $100 ,000 each accidenVoccurrence o $100 ,000 Disease -each employee o $500,000 Disease -policy limit Workers ' Compensation and Employers' Liability coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers' Compensation Act (Art. 8308 -1.01 et seq. Tex. Rev. Civ . Stat.), and minimum policy limits for Employers ' Liabi lity of $100 ,000 each accidenVoccurrence, $500 ,000 bod ily injury disease policy limit and $100 ,000 per disease per employee . 2-14 City of Fort Worth 4 . 5. Request for Proposals Professional Liability o $1,000,000 each claim o $2,000,000 aggregate Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a project specific basis. The retroactive date shall be coincident with or prior to the date of this contract and the certificate of insurance shall state that the coverage is claims-made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall be maintained for the duration of this contract and for five (5) years following completion of the contract (Tail Coverage). An annual certificate of insurance shall be submitted to the City for each year following completion of this contract. Environmental Impairment Liability and/or Pollution Liability o $2,000,000 per occurrence. Ell coverage(s) must be included in policies listed in items 1 and 4 above; or, such insurance shall be provided under a separate policy or policies. Liability for damage occurring while loading, unloading and transporting materials collected under the contract project shall be included under the Automobile Liability insurance or other policy(s). b) Certificates of insurance evidencing that the provider has obtained all required insurance shall be delivered to the City prior to provider proceeding with the contract. 1 . The certificate of insurance shall document the City of Fort Worth, its' Officers, Employees and Volunteers as an "Additional Insured" on all liability policies . Exception ... the additional insured requirement does not apply to Workers' Compensation policies 2. The certificate of insurance shall provide thirty days (30) notice of 3. 4. 5. DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 cancellation or non-renewal. Example: "This insurance shall not be canceled, limited in scope or coverage, cancelled or non-renewed, until after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City of Fort Worth . The certificate shall be signed by an agent authorized to bond coverage on behalf of the insured, be complete in its entirety, and show complete insurance carrier names as listed in the current A.M. Best Property & Casualty Guide All policies shall include a Waiver of Subrogation (Rights of Recovery) in favor of the City of Fort Worth. The insurers for all policies must be licensed and/or approved to do business in the State of Texas. Except for workers' compensation, all insurers must have a minimum rating of A-: VII in the current A. M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. If the rating is below that required, written approval of Risk Management is required . 2-15 City of Fort Worth 6 . 7 . 8 . 9. 10 . 11 . 12. DEM 10-09: LAB July 22 , 2010 Request for Proposals If insurance policies are not written for specified coverage limits , an Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance for any differences is required . Excess Liability shall follow form of the primary coverage . "Unless otherwise stated , all required insurance shall be written on the "occurrence basis". If coverage is underwritten on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall be coincident with or prior to the date of the contractual agreement and the certificate of insurance shall state that the coverage is claims-made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall be maintained for the duration of the contractual agreement and for five (5) years following completion of the service provided under the contractual agreement or for the warranty period, whichever is longer. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall evidence such insurance coverage . Policies shall have no exclusions by endorsements , which nullify the required lines of coverage , nor decrease the limits of said coverages unless such endorsements are approved in writing by the City . In the event a contract has been bid or executed and the exclusions are determined to be unacceptable or the City desires additional insurance coverage , and the City desires the contractor/engineer to obtain such coverage , the contract price shall be adjusted by the cost of the premium for such additional coverage plus 10%. Any self-insured retention (SIR), in excess of $25,000.00, affecting required insurance coverage shall be acceptable to and approved by the Risk Management Division of the City of Fort Worth in regards to asset value and stockholders' equity. In lieu of traditional insurance , alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups, must also be approved by Risk Management. Any deductible in excess of $5,000 .00 , for any policy that does not provide coverage on a first-dollar basis, must be acceptable to and approved by the City 's Risk Management Division The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to review the insurance requirements and to make reasonable adjustments to insurance coverages and their limits when deemed necessary and prudent by the City based upon changes in statutory law, court decision or the claims history of the industry as well as of the contracting party to the City of Fort Worth. The City shall be required to provide prior notice of ninety (90) days . The City shall be entitled, upon request and without expense, to receive copies of policies and endorsements thereto and may make any reasonable requests for deletion or revision or modifications of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions necessary to conform the policy and endorsements to the requirements of this contract. Deletions , revisions, or modifications shall not be required where policy provisions are established by law or regulations binding upon either of 2-16 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals party or the underwriter on any such policies . 13. Any failure on part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements. 14. The City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any insurance premiums required by the contract. It is understood that insurance cost is an allowable component of provider's overhead . Subcontractors to the provider shall be required by the provider to maintain the same or reasonably equivalent insurance coverage as required for the provider. When subcontractors maintain insurance coverage , provider shall provide City with documentation thereof on a certificate of insurance . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in the event a subcontractor's insurance coverage is canceled or terminated , such cancellation or termination shall not constitute a breach by provider of the contract . FOR PURPOSES OF EVALUATING THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF YOUR CURRENT INSURANCE CERTIFICATE(S) FOLLOWING THIS PAGE AND BOUND WITHIN THE PROPOSAL PACKAGE. DEM 10-09: LAB July 22 , 2010 2-17 . City of Fort Worth Request fo r Proposals 2 .9 PROVIDER 'S LEGAL AND COMPLIANCE HISTORY Provider's legal and compliance history is a critical component of this Request for Proposals. Read this section with care and respond accordingly. Failure of the provider to provide all the information requested and to certify the report , will result in the provider's submittal being declared non-responsive. Provider shall attach a written report of legal action brought against provider, provider's officers, provider's employees, AND provider's proposed subcontractors relating to the protection of the environment. The terms "legal action " and "relating to the protection of the environment" are defined below. The report shall include all legal action brought w ithin five (5) years of the closing date of this Request for Proposals . The report shall deta il the substance, status , and outcome of such legal action. This includes without limitation the names of the agency and/or persons bringing the action , all relevant dates, and all fines , judgments , and/or settlements . Include the following information for each case at a minimum : • Style of Case ( X vs . Y ) • Settlement Information (as appropriate) • Cause Number • Names / Addresses of all parties named • Court • Counsel List and phone numbe rs • Date of Disposition • Judgment and Order of Judgment "LEGAL ACTION" means : ANY enforcement action by the United States Environmental Protection Agency , the Occupational Safety and Health Administration , any other federal agency, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (including its predecessor agency the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission), the Texas Department of State Health Services (including its predecessor agency the Texas Department of Health), and any other state agency, commission or department, whether in Texas or elsewhere , when such enforcement action is a result of violations, real or alleged, of any laws , licenses, permits, judicial orders , or administrative orders, relating to the protection of the environment. In this context, enforcement action shall include without lim itation , written > warnings, notices of violation, consent orders or agreements, compliance orders, administrative hearings, civil litigation and criminal prosecution . Legal action also means any civil litigation brought by any person relating to the protection of the environment. "RELATING TO THE PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT" means: requirements pertaining to the manufacture, processing , distribution , use, handling , storage, transportation , reporting , records keeping, permitting, licensing , treatment, disposal , emission , discharge , spill , release, or threatened release of hazardous materials , hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, petroleum , industrial waste, solid waste, pollutants or contaminants into or onto the air, surface water, drinking water, groundwater, storm water, publicly owned treatment works , or land . THE REPORT SHALL BE SIGNED AND CERTIFIED by an authorized representative of the provider, using the form on the following page. The top portion of the form is to be completed if a report of legal action is attached . The bottom portion of the form is to be completed if provider has no legal action to report. Make certain that the appropriate portion of the form is filled out and signed. AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROVIDER shall mean: DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 2-18 City of Fort Worth (1) (2) (3) Request for Proposals if the provider is a corporation : the president, secretary, or treasurer, or a vice president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function , or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation ; if the provider is a partnership , a general partner; and If the provider is a sole proprietorship, the sole proprietor. INCLUDE A COPY OF THE REPORT OF LEGAL ACTION FOLLOWING THE CERTIFICATION PAGE AND BOUND WITHIN THE PROPOSAL DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 2-19 City of Fort Worth Request for Proposals Certification of Provider's Legal and Compliance History Complete ONE of the Following Certifications: Certification of Lega/Action Report I certify under penalty of law that the attached Legal Act ion Report detailing provider's, provider's officers, provider's employees, and provider's proposed subcontractors legal and compliance history relating to the protecti on of the environment was prepared under my directi on or supervision in accordance with a system des igned to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted . Based on my Inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true , accurate, and complete . I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information , including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. PROVIDER: (Company Name) BY : __ __, _______ _ (signat ure) (print or type name of signatory) (title) (date) Certification of NO Legal Action I certify under penalty of law that the legal and compliance history of provider, provider's officers, provider's employees, and provider's proposed subcontractors was researched under my direction or supeNis ion In accordance with a system des igned to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system , or those persons directly responsible for gathering the Information, I hereby certify that no legal action relating to the protection of the environment was brought against provider, provider's officers, provider's emp loyees, or provider's proposed subcontractors within the preceding five years . To the best of my knowledge and belief, this statement is true, accurate, and complete . I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the posslbility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations . Accutest Laboratories (Co"2pany Name) BY: -:I.~ ,f-,i J./-C).'-7'~=--t:oo--===:;:..._-- VP Operations (title) DEM 10-09: LAB July 22, 2010 ,-----· .. --··· Harry Behzadi (print or type name of signatory) 8-12-10 {date) 2-20