HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 27815-06-2025ORDINANCE NO.27815-06-2025
AN ORDINANCE DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING
FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE
CITY OF FORT WORTH; PROVIDING FOR FULL -PURPOSE
ANNEXATION OF A CERTAIN 169.243 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
OUT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE G H & H R RR CO SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 623, THE DAN H DIXON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
442, AND THE HEIRS OF NATHAN PROCTOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO. 1229, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF
A 516.831-ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING COMPRISED OF A
PORTION OF THOSE TRACTS OF LAND DESCRIBED TO PMB I-20
LAND LP BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO.
D221321297, AND TO PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC BY DEED
RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D221321298, AND TO
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP BY DEEDS RECORDED IN COUNTY
CLERK FILE NO. D223062320 AND D223062321 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND
APPROXIMATELY 20.764 ACREAS OF ROAD AND RAILWAY
RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN THE DAN H DIXON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
442 AND THE HEIRS OF NATHAN PROCTOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO. 1229; G H & H R RR CO SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 623;
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, (CASE NO. AX-23-011) WHICH SAID
TERRITORY LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT
CORPORATE BOUNDARY LIMITS OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL AMEND EVERY
PRIOR ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL PRIOR
ORDINANCES NOT IN DIRECT CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND NAMING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth ("City") has received a petition in writing from
PMB 120 Land LP, a Texas limited partnership; PMB Team Ranch Devco LLC, a Texas
limited liability company; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a Delaware limited partnership;
Rockbrook 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; M14RE 120 TIC LLC, a Texas
limited liability company; Maple 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; TM Baird
120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; Tres M 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited
liability company; P6 Family 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; MGM 120 TIC
LLC, a Texas limited liability company; Baird 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability
company; Pincoffs 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; and PMB 120 Land GP
LLC, a Texas limited liability company (collectively, "Owners"), requesting the full -purpose
annexation of 169.243 acres of land as described in Section 1, below (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described Property is in the City's exclusive
extraterritorial jurisdiction and is adjacent to and adjoins the City; and
WHEREAS, Subchapter C-3 of the Texas Local Government Code permits the City
to annex an area if each owner of land in an area requests the annexation; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 43, Subchapter C-3, Section 43.0672, of the
Texas Local Government Code, the Owners and the City negotiated and entered into a written
agreement, City Secretary Contract No. 63619, for the provisions of municipal services in the
area; and
WHEREAS, the Property abuts 20.764 acres of county roads and railway rights -of -
way; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 43.106 of the Texas Local Government Code,
the City must annex the entire width of the county roads and adjacent right-of-way on both
sides of the county road when annexing any portion of territory that abuts the county road and
adjacent right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 43.1056 of the Texas Local Government
Code, the City may also annex with the Property the right-of-way of a street, highway alley or
other public way or of a railway line, spur or roadbed that is contiguous to the area being
annexed if written notice is provided to the owner of the right-of-way and no written objection
to the annexation is submitted to the City before the date of the annexation; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted one public hearing at which members of the public
who wish to present testimony or evidence regarding the Municipal Service Agreement and
Full -Purpose Annexation were given the opportunity to do so, in accordance with the
procedural requirements of Section 43.0673 of the Texas Local Government Code on April 22,
2025, at 10:00 a.m., at the City Council Chamber; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that annexation of the Property
hereinafter described is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Fort Worth and the
owners and residents of the area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That all portions of the Property, comprising approximately 169.243 acres of land, are
hereby annexed to the City of Fort Worth as a part of the city for all municipal purposes, and
the city limits are extended to include such Property being all that certain land particularly
described below and depicted as on Exhibit "A" attached to and incorporated in this ordinance
for all purposes:
BEING A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE G H & H R RR CO SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 623, THE DAN H DIXON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 442, AND THE
HEIRS OF NATHAN PROCTOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1229, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF A 516.831-ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING
COMPRISED OF A PORTION OF THOSE TRACTS OF LAND DESCRIBED TO PMB I-
20 LAND LP BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D221321297, AND
TO PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE
NO. D221321298, AND TO WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP BY DEEDS RECORDED IN
AX23-011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D223062320 AND D223062321 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD STAMPED "LJA SURVEYING"
(HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS A "5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD") FOUND FOR
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 516.831-ACRE TRACT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF ALEDO ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY), FROM WHICH THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, SKYLINE RANCH ADDITION, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS
SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D218066627, PLAT
RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEARS SOUTH 60°51' 10" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 374.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"17'50" WEST, WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID 516.831-
ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 50.38 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD
FOUND;
THENCE SOUTH 89"52'50" WEST, OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A
DISTANCE OF 232.52 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
FARM TO MARKET ROAD NO. 2871;
THENCE NORTH 41012'58" WEST, WITH SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 151.04 FEET TO A 3-INCH METAL POST FOUND ON THE EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FARM TO MARKET ROAD NO.2871 (A VARIABLE WIDTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE NORTH 00"20' 10" WEST, WITH SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 452.00 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED TO FORT WORTH
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERKS
FILE NO. D219293163, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE WITH THE BOUNDS OF SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT TRACT THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
NORTH 89039'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 653.00 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 00020'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,000.00 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
SOUTH 89039'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 653.00 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND ON SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE;
THENCE NORTH 00020'10" WEST, WITH SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 1,445.65 FEET; THENCE OVER AND ACROSS SAID 516.831-ACRE
TRACT THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
AX23-011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,570.73 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -
TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 460.00 FEET AND A
CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 88021'29" EAST, 26.36 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
3°17'00", AN ARC -DISTANCE OF 26.36 FEET;
NORTH 81 °56'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 76.60 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 460.00 FEET AND A
CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 70021' 11" EAST, 109.12 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°37'24", AN
ARC -DISTANCE OF 109.38 FEET;
NORTH 17052'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
NORTH 28036'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 34.78 FEET;
NORTH 28035'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.52 FEET;
NORTH 61023'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET;
SOUTH 28036'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 45.33 FEET;
SOUTH 71051' 11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
NORTH 61028'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF
A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET
AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 28031'33" EAST, 80.00 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
253044'23", AN ARC -DISTANCE OF 221.43 FEET;
SOUTH 61 °2827" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.28 FEET;
SOUTH 16028'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
SOUTH 27045'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.45 FEET;
SOUTH 61024'49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 79.27 FEET;
NORTH 29017'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 15.63 FEET;
NORTH 72023'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING
OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 540.00
FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 76035'00" WEST, 250.59 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
26050'00", AN ARC -DISTANCE OF 252.90 FEET;
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 94.17 FEET;
SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 0.72 FEET;
AX23011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
SOUTH 27°44'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 629.89 FEET;
SOUTH 40°30'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 366.43 FEET;
SOUTH 29059'53" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 428.04 FEET;
SOUTH 44"06'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 375.47 FEET;
SOUTH 20°33'48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 405.11 FEET;
SOUTH 29"35'23" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 577.14 FEET;
SOUTH 35"58'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 171.42 FEET;
SOUTH 08"11'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 255.96 FEET;
SOUTH 55°36'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 247.26 FEET;
SOUTH 52°40'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.40 FEET;
SOUTH 51017'40" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 264.68 FEET;
SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 96.87 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD
FOUND WITHIN SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ALEDO ROAD FROM WHICH THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 122, BLOCK 4, SKYLINE RANCH ADDITION,
AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 11740 OF SAID PLAT
RECORDS BEARS SOUTH 62042'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 313.53 FEET;
THENCE WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 516.831-ACRE TRACT, AND
GENERALLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID ALEDO ROAD THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
SOUTH 89016'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED
IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 88028'59" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 86028'59" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 84028'59" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 82058'59" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH
CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 82043'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,661.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING AND CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 169.243 ACRES
(7,372,209 SQ. FEET) OF LAND, SAVE AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT LYING WITHIN THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.
AX23011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
BASIS OF BEARING IS GRID NORTH, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE
SYSTEM, NORTH CENTRAL ZONE, NAD83 (2011) EPOCH 2O10, AS DETERMINED
BY GPS OBSERVATIONS.
SECTION 2.
The above, described territory is shown on Map Exhibit A attached hereto and
expressly incorporated herein by reference for the purpose of depicting the location of the
hereinabove described territory.
SECTION 3.
That all portions of the roads and railway rights -of -way, collectively comprising
approximately 20.764 acres of land, are hereby annexed to the City of Fort Worth as a part of
the city for all municipal purposes, and the city limits are extended to include such roads and
railway rights -of -way being all that certain land particularly described below and depicted as
on Exhibits `B" and "C" attached to and incorporated in this ordinance for all purposes.
SECTION 4.
That the above described territory in sections 1 through 3 are hereby annexed shall be
part of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the property so added hereby shall bear its pro rata
part of the taxes levied by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the inhabitants thereof shall be
entitled to all of the rights and privileges of all the citizens in accordance with the Municipal
Services Agreement and shall be bound by the acts, ordinances, resolutions and regulations of
the City of Fort Worth, Texas.
SECTION 5.
That the Municipal Services Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "D" is approved and
incorporated into this ordinance for all purposes.
SECTION 6.
CUMULATIVE CLAUSE
This ordinance amends every prior ordinance in conflict herewith, but as to all other
ordinances or sections of ordinances not in direct conflict, this ordinance shall be, and the same
is hereby made cumulative.
SECTION 7.
SEVERABILITY LAUSE
It is hereby declared to be the intent of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid
judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this
AX23-011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section.
SECTION 8.
SAVING CLAUSE
The City Council hereby declares it to be its purpose to annex to the City of Fort Worth
every part of the area described in Section 1 of this ordinance, regardless of whether any part
of such described area is hereby not effectively annexed to the City. Should this ordinance for
any reason be ineffective as to any part or parts of the area hereby annexed to the City of Fort
Worth for full purposes, the ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any such part or parts shall
not affect the effectiveness of this ordinance as to the remainder of such area.
SECTION 9.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption.
APPROVED ED AS TO RM AND LEGALITY:
r ,:r r I Jannette S. Goodall
ANIL 4�linda Ramos U
Deputy City Attorney City Secretary
h<�pRT00 0 0d
0. '0 A0a
agof-o oso
ADOPTED AND EFFECTIVE: June 24, 2025 o o
0 o cy
Pd * 0000000000�
AX23011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
EXHIBIT A
IIL 0*0•
G M i
�1 \
(REMAINDER OF)
TRACT 4
PMB 120 LAND LP
\ C.C./ D221321297 0 gyp rpp
O.P.R.T.C.T.
n
n
EAST 1s70.73 C W ~ O1
�
REMAINDER OF) aGoto ay y�``` N a
of 1 TRACT 4G� >nd
i rMB 120 LAND LPylQ' x �C
3 C.0D221321297 .` ►e <
I.P.R.T.C.T.
o
w = p & * WAL-MART STORES g APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CIT
TRACT 2 EAST LP °i OF FORT WORTH CITY LIMITS
< - PMB 120 LAND LP S ;d l/ (CANNOT BE LOCATED BY
3 o / tip C.C./ D223062321
x x C.C.} D221321297 )
c O.P.R.T.C.T. OA p clfP� Sr O.P.R.T.C.T.
,p —
3 • APPROXIMATE
Wm NE •L? /�9� (sae SU
Le APPROXIMATE SURVEY LINE 1
W r 1159.243 ACRES G� H p17(ON
g I (Y.372.209 So. FM) gURVET 442 H V LUDIE T
'� ApgTRACT N° RTNERSHIP LTD
w O o a APP09MAT SURVEY UIRL I C .j D207134957
(REMAINDER OF) O.P.R.T.C.T.
PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC AL -MART STORE
C.C.//b.D221321295 C.C./E D223 AST. LP 62340 c z°
� " P.R.T.C.T.
rt — O.P.R.T.C.T. 3
TRACT 1 �'1Y�'' w W W �' � w
PMB 120 LAND LP OF q,1i %s =� „ ~
3"STEEL C.C./ D22132129 N°' x I I W m
ENCE POSTO.P.R.T.C.T. v rc�
1�' x d�
Ll XL
POINT OF (PRfALEDOVROAD SEE PAGE 5 FOR NOTE
N- BEOINNINO 3'e9"W eei �, R.O.W.) CONCERNING ALEDO ROAD <MW -
S60'51'10"E NW CORNER
374.02' LOT 1. BLOCK 4 Liu L;lb (,);j L:ie Lift R,O.W •)
L SKYLINE RANCH
(150'
C.C.*D21BUSS27 S62'42'50"E
NE CORNER
P.R.T.C.T 313.53' LOT 122,
LEGEND SKYLINE RANCH BLOCK 4
C.C.#D2120e2321 SKYLINE RANCH ADDITION
s/e" CAPPED IRON ROD P.R.T.C.T CAB. A. SLIDE 11740
• STAMPED "UA SURVEYING" P.R.T.C.T
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
s ' C.C. COUNTY CLERK FILE No.
O.P.L.C.T. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. SEE PAGE S
TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS FOR LINE TABLES
P.R.T.C.T. PUT RECORDS. TARRANT
COUNTY. TEXAS (REVISED 12/1Y1.%1024)
DATE: li2
9/2G23 — 11 EXHIBIT "A" 1006
PAGE 4 �DRVM BY: SAT. AA
ANNEXATION EXHIBIT tt7 I
OF 5CHKDBY: A.C.B.■TNYI■NIRCDMMM.11SIMCFNLSMTIIONIYm RWAL
IIiINOML4QMDTMI CFNAWNM PFaUMf11N11'. III RT_1NO TLl1.lIr Ik 101�di
PROJ NO. 0170„ ANTMILTAL I=■ TAlSWULNm,,a.
AX23-011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
EXHIBIT A (continued)
I
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
I I LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
I
LI
N00'17'50"W
50.38'
I I L21
WEST
94.17'
L2
N41'12'58"W
151.04'
I L22
SOUTH
0.72'
L3
N00'20'lO"W
452.00'
I L23
S2T44'55"E
629.89'
I
L4
NSW39'50"E
653.00'
I I L24
S40'30'31"E
366.43'
I
L5
NOO'2O'10"W
1000.00,
I I L25
S29'59'53"E
428.04' I
I
L6
S89'39'50'W
653.00'
I I L26
S44'06'58"E
375.47' I
I
L7
N81'56'26'E
76.60'
I ! L27
S20'33'48"E
405.11' I
I
L.8
N1752'44"E
10.00'
I I L28
S29'35'23"E
577.14' I
I
L9
N2W36'48"W
34.78'
I I L29
S35'S8'45"E
171.42' I
I
L10
N28'35'13"W
10.52'
I I L30
SWI1'50"E
255.96' I
I
Lll
N61'23'34'E
80.00'
I I L31
S55'36'39"E
247.26' f
1
L12
S2W36'26"E
45.33'
1 1 L32
S52'40'S4"E
370.40' 1
I
L13
S71'51'11"E
10.00'
I f L33
S51'17'40"E
264.68' I
I
L14
N61'28'27"E
27.51'
I f L34 I
SOUTH
96.87' I
L15
S61'28'27'W
27.28'
I I L35
S89'16'01'W
199.79' I
L16
516'28'45'W
10.00'
I I L36
N88'26'59'W
199.79' I
I
L17
S27'45'24"E
15.45'
I I L37 f
N86'26'59"W
199.79' I
I
L18
S61'24'49"W
79.27'
I I L38
N8428'59'W
1 I
L19
N29'17'57"W
15.63'
L39
N2*5659W
79''
199.7
L20
N72'23'35"W
10.00'
I
I CURVE
CENTRAL ANGLE
RADIUS
CHORD BEARING
CHORD LENGTH
ARC LENGTH I
I Cl
3'17'00"
460.00'
N88'21'29'E
26.36'
26.36' I
I C2
13'37'24"
460.00'
N70'21'11"E
109.12'
109.38' I
I C3
253'44'23'
50.00'
528'31'33'E
80.00'
221.43' I
I C4
26'50'00"
540.00' I
S76'35'00'W
250.59'
252.90' I
ALEDO ROAD
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SUBJECT TRACT APPEARS TO BE CON11000US WITH THE NORTHERLY LIM
OF AN EXISTING RAILROAD IMIT-OF-WAY, EITHER BY INTENT OR IN FACT. THE ENTIRE EXISTING
PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ALEDO ROAD APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN THE DEEDED BOUNDS OF
THE SUBJECT TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON AND WITHN THE UNRECORDED BOUNDS OF SAID RAILROAD
IBGNT-OF-WAY.
I�DATF: IS/26/]029
PAGES jDA ,: sAr.
5 ICHKD Br. A.0 B.
OF IPROINO. 0170
[ REV15 F P 12 /02/2 D2A j
EXHIBIT "A"
` `` a
MIT ANNEXATION EXHIBIT IT NNs 517SN.INNi
NIX[QIiXIN10DYMT,Ni1MOItQk7MGNNOmlANlYkt. �M
lMlT 1QNa1Q-TlNIM0FINON PlW=lww, M1NN4TmIMW T"F-m FM Na 10
�inrrcT N. Qs N vlNiillrmtNN1. Tow
AX23-011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
Exhibit B
Roads and Rights -of -Way
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
TRACT 1
BEING ATRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE DAN H DIXON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.442 AND THE HEIRS OF
NATHAN PROCTOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO-1229, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF
FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871 (ALSO CALLED R.M. HIGHWAY NO. 2871) AS SHOWN BY RIGHT-OF-
WAY MAPS ON FILE WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VENTANA PUMP STATION ADDITION, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN
COUNTY CLERK FILE No. D217023262, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE NORTH 38'36'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 331.24 FEETTO A 3" STEEL FENCE POST FOUND FOR
THE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID FARM TO MARKET ROAD No.
2871,
THENCE SOUTH 89'52'50" WEST, OVER AND ACROSS SAID FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871, A
DISTANCE OF 232.52 FEETTO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAME ROAD;
THENCE NORTH 00'07'10" WEST, WITH SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 451.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89'39'50" EAST, OVER AND ACROSS SAID FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871, A
DISTANCE OF 230.82 FEETTO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD STAMPED "UA SURVEYING" FOUND FOR
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ATRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED TO FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE No. D219293163 OF SAID OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS;
THENCE SOUTH 00'20'10" EAST, WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID FARM TO MARKET ROAD
No. 2871, A DISTANCE OF 452.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING A CALCULATED
AREA OF 2.402 ACRES (104,613 SQ. FEET) OF LAND.
TRACT 2
BEING A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE G. H. & H. R. RR. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.623, TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871 (ALSO CALLED R.M.
HIGHWAY NO. 2871) AS SHOWN BY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPS ON FILE WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING ATTHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, VENTANA PUMPSTATION ADDITION, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN
COUNTY CLERK FILE No. D217023262, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE NORTH 38'36'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 331.24 FEETTO A 3" STEEL FENCE POST FOUND ON THE
EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871;
THENCE NORTH 00'20'10" WEST, WITH SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1452.00 FEETTO
A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD STAMPED "UASURVEYING" FOUND FORTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED TO FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED IN
COUNTY CLERK FILE No. D219293163 OF SAID OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS AND BEING THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Page i of S
AX23-011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
Exhibit B
Roads and Rights -of -Way
(continued)
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
THENCE SOUTH 89'39'50" WEST, OVER AND ACROSS SAID FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871, A
DISTANCE OF 179.85 FEETTO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OFSAME ROAD;
THENCE WITH SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
NORTH 07'35'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 143.88 FEET,
NORTH 00'20'10' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 413.00 FEET,
NORTH 00'30'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 891.11 FEET,'
THENCE EAST, OVER AND ACROSS SAID FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871, A DISTANCE OF 162.68 FEET
TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAME ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 00'20'10" EAST, WITH SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 144S.65 FEETTO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 5.371 ACRES (233,977 SOL FEET)
OF LAND.
TRACT 3
BEING A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE DAN H DIXON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. "2, AND THE HEIRS OF
NATHAN PROCTOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1229, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF A
150-FOOT WIDE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, TARRANTCOUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD STAMPED "UA SURVEYING" FOUND (HEREINAFTER
REFERRED TO AS A "CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND") FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ATRACT OF LAND
DESCRIBED TO PMB 1-20 LAND LP BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D221321297, OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ALEDO ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY), FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, SKYLINE RANCH, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEARS SOUTH 60'51'10" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 374.02 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 82'43'59" EAST, WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PMB 1-20 LAND TRACT AND THE SOUTH
LINE OF ATRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED TO PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY
CLERK FILE NO. D221321298 OF SAID OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, A DISTANCE OF 2661.42 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCOTRACT,THE
FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
SOUTH 82'S8'S9" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TOA CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
SOUTH 84'28'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEETTO A CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
SOUTH 86'28'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEETTO A CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
SOUTH 88'28'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 89'16'01- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TOA CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAME TRACT,•
THENCE SOUTH, OVER AND ACROSS SAID UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF
160.03 FEET;
THENCE WITH THE SOUTHERLY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, THE FOLLOWING
COURSES AND DISTANCES:
Page 2 of 5
AX23011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
Exhibit B
Roads and Rights -of -Way
(continued)
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
SOUTH 88-21'14- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 84.70 FEET;
SOUTH 89'25'14" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.31 FEET;
NORTH 89'38'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.26 FEET,
NORTH 88'3846" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.33 FEET,'
NORTH 87'3646" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.30 FEET,
NORTH 86'3946- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.27 FEET,
NORTH 85'39'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.30 FEET;
NORTH 84'3946" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.30 FEET,
NORTH 83'39'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.21 FEET;
NORTH 82'48'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.96 FEET;
NORTH 82'11'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.46 FEET,
NORTH 82'06'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 271.13 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SKYLINE RANCH ADDITION;
NORTH 82'03'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1966.73 FEET,
NORTH 82-03'5S- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 329.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00'17'50" WEST, DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, OVER AND ACROSS
SAID UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 136.74 FEETTO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING AND CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 12.991 ACRES (565,887 SO, FEET) OF LAND, SAVE
AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT LYING WITHIN THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.
BASIS OF BEARING IS GRID NORTH, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH CENTRAL ZONE,
NAD83 (2011) EPOCH 2O10, AS DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED UNDER 22 TAC §663.21, DOES NOT REFLECTTHE RESULTS OF AN ON
THE GROUND SURVEY, AND IS NOTTO BE USED TO CONVEY OR ESTABLISH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY
EXCEPTTHOSE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS IMPLIED OR ESTABLISHED BY THE CREATION OR
RECONFIGURATION OF THE BOUNDARY OFTHE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.
Aaron G`Brewt' , R.P.L.S.
Registered Professional Land Surveyor
Texas Registration No. 6702
WA Surveying, Inc.
3017 West r Street, Suite 300
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
817-288-1900
TBPELS Firm No.10194382
Page 3 of 5
(Revised December 2, 2024)
November 28, 2023
AX23011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
Exhibit C
Roads and Rights -of -Way
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
5,371 ACRES ,
(2A277 SO. 1-1, 82.88
C.C.# D223062321
O.P.R.T.C.T.7.C.T
c---e�
(REMAINDER OF)
\
PMB F20 LAND LP
(REMAINDER OF)
>~
C.C.# D221321297 PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC
N 3
O.P.R.T.C.3
C.C.# D221321298
500 0 500 O O� ^ 4 - Yi O.P.R.T.C.T
J M �o
N
ri 0•
3 W
T= 3 I O
PMB L20 LAND LP
N00'2O'10 W 3 w N
b
C.C.#D221321297
O.P.R.T.C.T
413.00—� m
G
gn
NOT35'39"E
POINT OF BEGINNING
143.88'�`� I�+'" (TRACT 2)
_S89'39'50"W
179.83'
a
�
o APPROXIMATE SURVEY
W O
LINE
E
g C.C.++
O.PJLT.P-T.
PJLT.C.T.
PAGE 4•
OF 5
�E1 615:,'7
o
J ir
O< NO• o wOoa�
QM� S i�NCt N8739'50"E o rc i u d APPROXIMATE SURVEY INiE
� � u
• o F-
¢
2.402 ACRES
o
z o
(104,613 50. FEET)\
C4
8 PMB �-20 LAND LP
o �
a C.C.# D221321297
N
b
•
b'vPOINT OF o.p.R.rc.r
BEGINNING (TRACT
589'52'50'W
3"STEEL FENCE
POST
LOT 2, BLOCK 1 -
VENT
ANA PUMP
STATION ADDITION
C.C.# D217023202
P.R.7.C.T.
LEGEND
7 rV I&'4-nfj'f/j' /r
,y'S, 115n RICNT` AMN't
I OF -WAY)
p'100%
F N qV-1
ZEDO
AROAD
(PRESCRIPTIVE I, O.W,)
)— �'L
51C CAPPED IRON ROD
STAMPED "LJA SURVEYING"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
COUNTY CLERK FILE No.
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS,
TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS
PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT
REVISED 12/02/20.24)
COUNTY, TEXAS
DArE:
111/2 /2023
—
EXHIBIT "A"
-�r�1 - -
IJAy�I�('Ine. �-^_
DRWN BY:
SA.T. I
ANNEXATION EXHIBIT
/(/(J�`
n eel Pnme 817289 i`Y.
CHKD BY:
A.C.B. I
w7IE UMNOE0117UNet.AE111M.711a W,TlIWO: M7/1M
Ski
PROJ NO.
0170 I
1�CIOIIAIMY,ANNACT
ft 17D,AM7W" A K&IR MAWY,
AeWnrtmwTAWWaMM,,mw
Fad WadR Tour 761m �p 1019dB2
AX23011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
�C
(REMAINDER OF)
i I-20 LAN
"' APPROXIMATE SURVEY LINE C.C./ D221321297
W o Mm O.P.R.T.C.T
yaj F M H DAN H DIXON SURVEY
< n1^ABSTRACT No. 442
3 z c F WAL-MART STORES
�_ EAST. LP
n o c 0 APPROXIMATE SURVEY UWE C.C.+ D223062321
3 0 0 o OE NVR P.R.T.C.T. 500 0 500
i x �pRO tCR No' ,229
O.WAL-MART STORES
xEAST, LIP
; P,istaa C.C./ D223 62320
PMB 1-20 LAND LP (REMAINDER OF) O.P.R.T.C.T.
jg 3"STEEL C.C. D221321297 PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC
A FENCE POST O.P.R.T.C.T CC.t D221321299
> POINT OF O.P.R.T.C.T.
BEGINNING
(TRACT 3)
L21 ALEDO
(PRESCRIPTIVROAD
E RO,q,� 12.291 ACRES
(51115,887 SO. FEET) .
1 HT -OF -WAY
NW CORNER ma
LOT 1. BLOCK 4 03 33 W 1966NRA CH.730
CAL(CHHEE LAND.)LLC C.0 #D2E8066627 Li 1 1 1 1
VOL 14397, PG, 78 P.R.T.C.T SKYLINE RANCH 1 L15 1 L11 19111 L
O.P.R.T.C.T C.C.*021262321 SKYLINE RANCH
P.R.T.C.T CAB. A. SLIDE 11740
P.R.T.C.T.
LINE BEARING DISTANCE I LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DIS ANCE
L1 S82156i'59"E 199.79' 1 L9 N89'38'46"W 101.26' L17 N82'11'46"W 100.46'
I L2 S8428'59"E 199.79' I L10 N88'38'46"W 101.33, L18 N82'06'46'W 271.13'
I L3 S86'28'59"E 199.79' I L11 N8T36'46'W 101.30' L19 N8703'55"W 329.10'
I L4 S88'28'59"E 199.79' I L12 N86'39'46"W 101.27' L20 NOW 17'50"W 136.74'
I L5 N89'16'01"E 199.79' I L13 N85'39'46"W 101.30' L21 NOO'17'50"W 50.38'
LB SOUTH 160.03, L14 N84.39'46"W 101.30: L22 N41'12'58"W 151.04'
L7 SOW21'14"W 84.70' L15 N8339'46"W 101.21L23 560'51'10"E 374.02'
L8 S89'25'14"W 101.31' L16 N82'48'46"W 100.96'
1JdiEt>Q
5/8- CAPPED NON ROD
STAMPED RJA SURVEYING"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TDTE: 12/02/2024
COUNTY CLERK FILE MO. EXHIBIT ' A " UA ,,,�
O.PJLT.C.T. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. PAGESRWN BY: SA.T. ANNEXATION EXHIBIT 3017 e. PMe 817268�TARRANT COUNTY. TDUS KD BY: A.C.B. PULT.C.T. PLAT RECORDS, OF 5 NO,1lMEWCFMT11MN10CMAMVtYNfItKr11".Im TARRANTCOUNTY. TEXAS OJNO. 0170 wTAwYMTmU1FIY,RIW Fw1Walh,Tes78107 TBPE.LSFlnnNo1019[1B2
Exhibit D
Municipal Services Agreement
to be inserted upon full execution
AX23-011 Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
CSC No. 63619
MUNICIPAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
AND
PMB I20 LAND LP; PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC; WAL-MART STORES EAST,
LP; ROCKBROOK I20 TIC LLC; MHRE I20 TIC LLC; MAPLE I20 TIC LLC; TM
BAIRD I20 TIC LLC; TRES M I20 TIC LLC; P6 FAMILY I20 TIC LLC; MGM 120 TIC
LLC; BAIRD I20 TIC LLC; PINCOFFS I20 TIC LLC; AND PMB I20 LAND GP LLC
This Municipal Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into on 24th day of June,
2025 by and between the City of Fort Worth, Texas, a home -rule municipality of the State of
Texas, ("City") and PMB 120 Land LP, a Texas limited partnership; PMB Team Ranch Devco
LLC, a Texas limited liability company; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a Delaware limited
partnership; Rockbrook I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; MHRE 120 TIC LLC, a
Texas limited liability company; Maple I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; TM
Baird I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; Tres M 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited
liability company; P6 Family I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; MGM I20 TIC
LLC, a Texas limited liability company; Baird I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company;
Pincoffs 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company; and PMB I20 Land GP LLC, a Texas
limited liability company (collectively, "Owner").
RECITALS
The parties agree that the following recitals are true and correct and form the basis
upon which the parties have entered into this Agreement,
WHEREAS, Section 43.0671 of the LGC permits the City to annex an area if each owner
of land in an area requests the annexation;
WHEREAS, where the City elects to annex such an area, the City is required to enter into
a written agreement with the property owner(s) that sets forth the City services to be provided for
the Property on or after the effective date of annexation (the "Effective Date');
WHEREAS, Owner owns certain parce)s of land situated in TARRANT County,
Texas, which consists of approximately 169.243 acres of land in the City's extraterritorial
jurisdiction, such property being more particularly described and set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached and incorporated herein by reference ("Property");
WHEREAS, Owner has filed a written request with the City for fiill-purpose annexation
of the Property, identified as Annexation Case No. AX-23-011 ("Annexation Case");
WHEREAS, City and Owner desire to set out the City services to be provided for the
Property on or after the effective date of annexation;
WHEREAS, the Annexation Case and execution of this Agreement are subject to approval
by the Fort Worth City Council; and
Owner-rni iMd Amexation seniee Agtoemmt 1 of 24
NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for the mutual covenants, conditions and promises
contained herein, City and Owner agree as follows:
1. PROPERTY. This Agreement is only applicable to the Property, which is the subject of the
Annexation Case.
2. INTENT. It is the intent of the City that this Agreement provide for the delivery of full,
available municipal services to the Property in accordance with state law, which may be
accomplished through any means permitted by law. For purposes of this Agreement, "full
municipal services" means all services provided by the City within its full -purpose boundaries,
including water and wastewater services and excluding gas or electrical service.
3. MUNICIPAL SERVICES.
a. Commencing on the Effective Date, the City will provide the municipal services
set forth below. As used in this Agreement, "providing services" includes having
services provided by any method or means by which the City may extend municipal
services to any other area of the City, including the City's infrastructure extension
policies and developer or property owner participation in accordance with
applicable city ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies.
i. Fire — The City's Fire Department will provide emergency and fire protection
services comparable with the provision of services available in other parts of the
municipality with topography, land use and population density similar to the
level of service contemplated or projected in the area.
I Police — The City's Police Department will provide protection and law
enforcement services.
iii. Emerecncv Medical Services - The City's Fire Department and MedStar (or
other entity engaged by the City after the Effective Date) will provide emergency
medical services.
iv. Plannina and Zonine — The City's Development Services Department will
provide comprehensive planning, land development, land use, and building
review and inspection services in accordance with all applicable laws, rules,
and regulations.
v. Parks and Recreational Facilities — Residents of the Property will be permitted
to utilize all existing publicly -owned parks and recreational facilities and all such
facilities acquired or constructed after the Effective Date (including community
service facilities, libraries, swimming pools, etc.), throughout the City. Any
private parks, facilities, and buildings will be unaffected by the annexation;
provided, however, that the City will provide for maintenance and operation of
the same upon acceptance of legal title thereto by the City and appropriations
therefor. In the event the City acquires any other parks, facilities, or buildings
necessary for City services within the Property, the appropriate City department
will provide maintenance and operations of the same.
vi. Other Publiclv Owned Buildings — Residents of the Property will be permitted
to use all other publicly owned buildings and facilities where the public is
granted access.
vii. Stormwater Utilitv Services — The Property will be included in the City's
Owner -Initialed Annomion Service Agreement 2 of 24
Stormwater Utility service area and will be assessed a monthly fee based on the
amount of impervious surface. The fees will cover the direct and indirect costs
of stormwater management services.
viii. Roads and Streets (including Street liahtinel — The City's Transportation and
Public Works Department will maintain the public streets and streetlights over
which the City has jurisdiction. The City will provide regulatory signage
services in accordance with the City policies and procedures and applicable
laws.
ix. Water and Wastewater to Existin¢ Structures — Occupied structures that are
using water -well and on -site sewer facilities on the Effective Date may continue
to use the same. If a property owner desires to connect an existing structure to
the City water and sewer system, then the owner may request a connection and
receive up to 200 linear feet of water and sewer extension at the City's cost for
each occupied lot or tract in accordance with the City's "Policy for the
Installation of Community Facilities" and applicable law. Once connected to
the City's water and sanitary sewer mains, the water and sanitary sewage
service will be provided by the City at rates established by City ordinances for
such service.
x. Solid Waste Services — The City will provide solid waste collection services in
accordance with existing City ordinances and policies, except where prohibited
by law.
xi. Code Comoliance -- The City's Code Department will provide education,
enforcement, and abatement relating to code violations within the Property.
xii. Full Municipal Services — Commencing on the Effective Date, the City will
provide to the Property all services provided by the City within its full -purpose
boundaries and not otherwise listed above, except as provided in Section 3(b).
b. The City will provide water service and wastewater treatment service to developments
established after the Effective Date in accordance with, and on the schedule
determined by, the City's extension policies and applicable law and at rates
established by City ordinances for such services.
c. It is understood and agreed that the City is not required to provide a service that is
not included in this Agreement.
d. Owner understands and acknowledges that the City departments listed above may
change names or be re --organized by the City Manager. Any reference to a specific
department also includes any subsequent City department that will provide the same
or similar services.
4. SERVICE LEVEL. The City will provide the Property with a level of services, infrastructure,
and infrastructure maintenance that is comparable to the level of services, infrastructure, and
infrastructure maintenance available in other parts of the City with topography, land use, and
population density similar to those reasonably contemplated or projected for the Property.
S. AUTHORITY. City and Owner represent that they have full power, authority and legal right
to execute, deliver and perform their obligations pursuant to this Agreement. Owner
acknowledges that approval of the Annexation Case is within the sole jurisdiction of the City
Owner -Initiated Annexation Savficc Agtoement 3 of 24
Council. Nothing in this Agreement guarantees favorable decisions by the City Council.
b. SEVERABILITY. If any part, term, or provision of this Agreement is held by the courts to
be illegal, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity, or unenforceability
will not affect the validity of any other part, term or provision, and the rights of the parties will
be construed as if the part, term, or provision was never part of the Agreement.
7. INTERPRETATION. The parties to this Agreement covenant and agree that in any litigation
relating to this Agreement, the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be interpreted
according to the laws of the State of Texas. The patties acknowledge that they are of equal
bargaining power and that each of them was represented by legal counsel in the negotiation
and drafting of this Agreement.
8. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. Venue shall be in the state courts located in Tarrant
County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort
Worth Division and construed in conformity with the provisions of Texas Local Government
Code Chapter 43.
9. NO WAIVER. The failure of either party to insist upon the performance of any term or
provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right granted hereunder shall not constitute a
waiver of that party's right to insist upon appropriate performance or to assert any such right
on any future occasion.
10. GOVERNMENTAL POWERS. It is understood that by execution of this Agreement, the
City does not waive or surrender any of its governmental powers or immunities.
11. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original and constitute one and the same instrument.
12. CAPTIONS. The captions to the various clauses of this Agreement are for informational
purposes only and shall not alter the substance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. AGREEMENT BINDS AND BENEFITS SUCCESSORS AND RUNS WITH THE
LAND. This Agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the patties, their successors,
and assigns. The term of this Agreement constitutes covenants running with the land
comprising the Property, is binding on the Owner and the City, and is enforceable by any
current or future owner of any portion of the Properly.
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements between said parties, This
Agreement shall not be amended unless executed in writing by both parties.
Executed as of the day and year first above written to be effective on the effective date of
annexation of the Properly.
0-4nitiakd Annexation Service Agteema t 4 of 24
Owner-InidOW Amexathm Service Agm mat S of 24
CITY OF FO WORTH
� J
Jesica L. McEachern
Assistant City Manager
Approved as to Form and Legality:
Me inda Ramos
Deputy City Attorney
t44Mt.,- A AZM-Q�
Jannette S. Goodall, City Secretary
Stephen Murray, Contract Manager
Approvals:
M&C: 25-0316
Ordinance No. 27815-06-2025
State of Texas §
County of Tarrant §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 3rd day of July , 2025,
by Jesica L. McEachem, Assistant City Manager of the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
/y�'�arx�. r3acs.4
By: r�?
Notary Public, State of Texas TIFFANY
N
STATE OF WNIS
149" ID. 128MIS50
Owner -Initiated Annexation Senioe Aaneroent 6 of 2d
PMB 120 LAND, LP
By: PMB I20 Land GP LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its General Partner
By:
Name: K. Taylor Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the a day of EtAjtkAJIj 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB I20 Land GP LLC, a Texas limited liability company, the
General Partner of PMB I20 Land LP, a Texas limited partnership, on behalf of said entities.
B
��►u►►unn�uJJ.
Notary Public, State of Texas
ICIC 'r��
�� •,Q,`p,FtY P�• � �I
F�O J�OF 3� �.
-} • . 896,
Owner-InitiWd Annexation Service Agreemat 7 of 24
PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB Team Ranch Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Manager
By: CVO
Name: . Tayld
Title: Manager
State of Texas
County of Dallas
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the CRL day of qrLkO,-r 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB Team Ranch Manager LLC, a Texas Whited liability company,
the Manager of PMB Team Ranch Devco LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said
entities.
Notary Public, State of Texas
\`01IuunJI11"I�
K cc���`''%
Q }
Ownev4nitiakd Annexation service ASroerocot 8 of 24
WAL- /RT STORES EAST, LP
By: . (
Name: (7a61G
Title: V f &c yr
State of ti'Yakt ltf §
County of mpnkyNao §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _2L day of 2025,
by _E1 dbyi P Q i Y P c*x,- , on behalf of
WAL-MART STORES EAST. LP.
BY�
Notary Public, State of A S
P.MBE�i H
WOW Publie-A+krn=Os
Benton County 09.2W :.
MY cof+tnission ExP+tos Q3
09�
corntoission f1 127
0%7mr-Initialed Annexation Senioe Agreement 9 of 14
ROCKBROOK 120 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB 120 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Man a er
By:--���
Name: .Taylor Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas
County of Dallas
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the LL day of FC1r UV j fi,025, by
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC, a Texas limited liability comany, the
Manager of Rockbrook 120 TIC. LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
B • q,�it t� � 1
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner -initialed Annexation Service Agmemtat 10 of 24
MHRE I20 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Manager
By: �Name: K. Taylor Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 2L day of "ro-&-vj, 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC, a Texas limited liability company, the
Manager of MHRE 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner4aWaW Amna ion Saviae Ar=nmt 11 of 24
MAPLE 120 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB 120 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Manager
By:
Name: K. Taylor aird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the eu_ day offfj)YkL..rT 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC, a Texas limited liability company, the
Manager of Maple I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner4nitiaeed Annexation Service Agreement 12 of 24
TM BAIRD 120 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Manag r
By:
Name: K. aylor Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the a l day of Rd N-C� 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird as Manager of PMB 120 TIC Manager LLC a Texas limited liabili cop an the
Y g � tY P Y,
Manager of TM Baird I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
Notary Public, State of Texas
pK111111IHll 1
a P L.
�PRY.PGm O
ISO
04t 20`Z�````�.
OwmalniQ ted AmacaWn Savice Ageemew u or24
TRES M 120 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB 120 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Manager
By:
Name: K. Taylor $aird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the_ day of 1T �UrI,IC� f 2025, by
a co an the
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PUB 120 TIC Manager LLC, a Texas limited liability p y,
Manager of Tres M 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
B
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner-WWO d Ammadon Sem= Agme=VA 14 of 24
P6 FAMILY I20 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Man I
r
By:
Name: K. Taylor Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 21 day of h(L,-D -1'� 2025, by
C Manager LLC a Texas limited liability coihpany, the
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB I20 TIC anag ,
Manager of P6 Family 120 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
B:All
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner -Initiated Annexation Service Agreement 15 of 24
MGM 120 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Mana�r
By: .�5� -.,e
Name: K. -Taylor aird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 4� I day of , 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC, a Texas limited liability co parry, the
Manager of MGM I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
Notary Public, State of Texas
`�►�pnu►uuua
.�`�` S
~�Q2oPpY P.je`�i`Z _
prF OF SF'e;
E� ,y ;
04120 ZO�
owner -Initiated AnrmmuWoo Service Agreement 16 of 24
BAIRD 120 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Manapr
By:
� t�
Name: K. Taylor Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the AL day of , 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB I20 TIC Manager LLC, a Texas limited liability co pany, the
Manager of Baird I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owner-laiduoed Annexation service Agreement 17 of 24
PINCOFFS 120 TIC LLC,
a Texas limited liability company
By: PMB 120 TIC Manager LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
its Manager
By:
Name: K. Taylor Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas §
County of Dallas §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the 2L day of Ft1rkO',r 2025, by
K- Taylor Baird, as Manager of PMB 120 TIC Manager LLC, a Texas limited liability co parry, the
Manager of Pincoffs I20 TIC LLC, a Texas limited liability company, on behalf of said entities.
$jk�
Notary Public, State of Texas
`�tttunuirrrrii�
PFY PGd
.O FOPjjjjj��Q
Owner-InkWed AwxxiWon 5ervix Agreement 18 of 24
PMB I20 LAND GP LLC,
a. Texas limited liability company
Ely: L'`�_e
Name: P.Tqyy�lr)Baird
Title: Manager
State of Texas
County of Dallas
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of FdVLtl,1' , 2025, by
K. Taylor Baird as Manager of PMB 120 Land GP LLC a Texas limited liability company, ' on behalf
y � ri p y>
Notary Public, State of Texas
Owncr-Ioitided Awwmfion Service ABrecoml 19 of 24
EXHIBIT A
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
BEING A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE G H & H RR CO SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.623, THE DAN H
DIXON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.442, AND THE HEIRS OF NATHAN PROCTOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1229,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF A 516.831-ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING
COMPRISED OF A PORTION OF THOSE TRACTS OF LAND DESCRIBED TO PMB 1-20 LAND LP BY DEED
RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D221321297, AND TO PMB TEAM RANCH DEVCO LLC BY DEED
RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D221321298, AND TO WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP BY DEEDS
RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO. D223062320 AND D223062321 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND
BOUNDS A5 FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD STAMPED "LJA SURVEYING" (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO
AS A "5/8.1NCH CAPPED IRON ROD-) FOUND FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 516.831-ACRE
TRACT IN THE RIGHT-DF-WAY OF ALEDO ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY), FROM WHICH THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, SKYLINE RANCH ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERK FILE NO.
D218066627, PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEARS SOUTH W'51'10" EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 374.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00'17'50" WEST, WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID 516.831-ACRE TRACT, A DISTANCE
OF 50.38 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
THENCE SOUTH 89'52'50" WEST, OVER AND ACROSS SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 23252 FEET
TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID FARM TO MARKET ROAD No. 2871;
THENCE NORTH 41*12-58" WEST, WITH SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE Of 151.04 FEET
TO A 3-INCH METAL POST FOUND ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FARM TO MARKET ROAD NO.
2871(A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE NORTH 00'20'10" WEST, WITH SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 452.00 FEET TO A
5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED TO
FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED IN COUNTY CLERKS FILE NO.
0219293163, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,
THENCE WITH THE BOUNDS OF SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT TRACT THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND
DISTANCES:
NORTH 89'39'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 653.00 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 00'20'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,000.00 FEET TO A 5/6-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD
FOUND;
SOUTH 89'39'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 653.00 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND
ON SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE;
THENCE NORTH 00'20'10" WEST, WITH SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1445.65 FEET;
THENCE OVER AND ACROSS SAID 516.831-ACRE TRACT THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,570.73 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 460.00 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 88'21'29" EAST,
26.36 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3.17.OD , AN ARC -DISTANCE OF
26.36 FEET;
Page 1 of S
Owner -Initiated Annexation Savioe Agreem itt 20 of 24
EXHIBIT A
Continued
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
NORTH 81'56'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 76.60 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT
CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 460.00 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS
NORTH 70'21'11" EAST, 109.12 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13.37'24 , AN ARC -DISTANCE
OF 109.33 FEET;
NORTH 17*52*44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
NORTH 28'36'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 34.78 FEET;
NORTH 28'35'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.52 FEET;
NORTH 61'23'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET;
SOUTH 28'3626' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 45.33 FEET;
SOUTH 71'51'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
NORTH 61'28'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT
CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 28-31'33" EAST, 80.D0 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 253-44'23", AN ARC -
DISTANCE OF 221.43 FEET;
SOUTH 61'28'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 27.28 FEET;
SOUTH 16'28'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET;
SOUTH 27'45'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.45 FEET;
SOUTH 61'2449` WEST, A DISTANCE OF 79.27 FEET;
NORTH 29'17'57' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 15.63 FEET;
NORTH 72-23'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT
CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 540.00 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS
SOUTH 76'35'00" WEST, 250.59 FEET;
WITH SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26*50*00", AN ARC -DISTANCE
OF 252.90 FEET;
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 94.17 FEET;
SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 0.72 FEET;
SOUTH 27'44'SS" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 629.89 FEET,
SOUTH 40'30'31" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 366.43 FEET;
SOUTH 29*5953" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 428.04 FEET,
SOUTH 44.06'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 375.47 FEET;
SOUTH 20*33*48' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 405.11 FEET;
SOUTH 29*35*23' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 577.14 FEET;
SOUTH 3S'58'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 171A2 FEET;
SOUTH 08'11'S0" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 255.96 FEET;
Page 2 of S
O-er-laiiiaecd AmMatiaa Services Agreement 21, of24
EXHIBIT A
Continued
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION
SOUTH SS'36'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 247.26 FEET;
SOUTH 52-40'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.40 FEET;
SOUTH 51'17'40" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 264.68 FEET;
SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 96.87 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND WITHIN SAID
RIGHT OF -WAY OF ALEDO ROAD FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 122, BLOCK 4,
SKYLINE RANCH ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN CABINETA, SLIDE 12740OF SAID PLAT RECORDS BEARS
SOUTH 62'42'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 313.53 FEET;
THENCE WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 516,831-ACRE TRACT, AND GENERALLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF SAID ALEDO ROAD THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES:
SOUTH 89'16-01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 88'28'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 86'28'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 84'28'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-INCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 82'58'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 199.79 FEET TO A 5/8-tNCH CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND;
NORTH 8I'43'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,661.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND
CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 169.243 ACRES (7,372,209 SQ. FEET) OF LAND, SAVE AND
EXCEPT ANY PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT LYING WITHIN THE EXISTING CITY
LIMITS OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS,
BASIS OF BEARING 15 GRID NORTH, TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH CENTRAL ZONE,
W83 (2011) EPOCH 2O10, AS DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED UNDER 22 TAC §663.21, DOES NOT REFLECT THE RESULTS OF AN ON
THE GROUND SURVEY, AND IS NOT TO BE USED TO CONVEY OR ESTABLISH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY
EXCEPT THOSE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS IMPLIED OR ESTABLISHED BY THE CREATION OR
RECONFIGURATION OF THE BOUNDARY OF THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED.
Aarond
oKa.Et-Pt. .
Registered Professional Land Surveyor
Texas Registration No. 6702
WA Surveying, Inc.
3017 West "Street, Suite 300
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
817-2$B MO
TBPEL.S Firm No. 10194382
Page 3 of S
(Revised December 2.2024)
November 28, 2023
C.
6702 ml
Owner4nitiatedAnnexation Service Agreement 22 of24
EXHIBIT A
Continued
b (EM l DER Fi
TRACT 4
PM9 120 LAND LP
C.C./ 0211'.i21297 r0r 25C TOO
O.P.R.T.C.T.
EAST 1570. 33 C1 v ri�i11 W�.�►-
L22 1� c'�` �r+�
,. a (REVRACT AAINDER ) vlt �� r�i o d
'-PV0 120 LAND LP
3 1 C.C.¢ D221321297 r0 6 v
4 1 O.P.R.T.C.T. I
O ..
WAI�ILtRT STORES • AP►ROKCf1ATC LOURON OF CITY
r TRACT 2 A �y EAST. LP g a fora �0RTN Cm UWrS
c & N PYB 120 LAND LP Cy' �Y° C.C.# D2230622121 (CANNOT of U)CA7CD NY
e_ C.C.f 0221321267 ,� ? C,, DESCI PTION —
!iZ O.P.R.T.C.T. o� ° o cJ o O.P.R.T.C.T. _
1 ''Pp?J4-y�J 1 APPaOxIyATE
� G 1 _sac
a K ! �� a �_F
L6 APPROXIMATE SURVEY LINE
n _ •r
u 1
ra. a 169.243 ACRES �-+ per; 11
(7,772.30/ 10. FVM %IV Y I H V LUOE T
A42
3�u '3 TAT • P MRSHIP LTD
p a APP x1UAIV SUIIVEY I V06 �85 Cx # 0207134957
EC3g ao RENWNDfR OF) l O.P.R.T.C.T.
e z s ( WAL-MART STORE
`L� PMO TEAM RANCH 0EVCO LLC "' C.C.S 0221321 Z!6 EAST. LP
o
L` C.C.#I D2230525�0 =
O.P.R.T.C.T. 1_ O.P.R.T.C.T.
TRACT 1 T00,
PYB 120 LAND LP ".�r, OF �y+ ��� {,
+' S-STELL C.0 E D22132129 10Ito•
CE POSTO P.R.T.C.T.'
`t <? L1 •� H? • 1
POINT OF PRE ALWO
RAD
BEG NNING Nar4s 59"W 266t.s2' COw.� �CO�cE ARrgnG ALEDO^ROAD �► ! !
< N
560 51'f 0'[ SW CONSER
374.02' LOT I. /LOCK 4 �_L36 L57 6 I \ I U (s0 RA .)
SKYUNE RANCH + yyyy
C.C./D216065627 S62'42'50'E---r NE CORNER
LEGEND P.R.7 C.T UWNE RANCH313.53' LOOCK2i' I
C.C.021 nU321 SKYLINE RANCN ADDIMN
5/6' CAPPED IRON ROD P.R.T.CT CU. A. SLIDE 117AD
A STAMPED 'UA SURVEYING` P.R.T.C.T
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
C.C.* COUNTY CLERK FILE No.
O,PRT.CT. OFMAL PUBLIC RECORDS. SEE PAGE S I
TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS FOR UNE TABLES
PJLT.C.T. PLAT RECORDS. TARRANT
COUNTT. TEXAS (REVISED 1210212074)
DATE: - .. 1 II2y/zaz3 _ 1 _ _•EXHIBIT — ,. "A"
PAGE 4. I
DRYti7ti 8Y: sa.T. ANNTXATION rXH1617ZLQ
�� �"'"",.a
� afvAr" P'A3D I
C iCHKD BY: A.C.B. hihlQMAhRIlCai9li�►,AAt:ACite fT�t.N (41M,7gv�AU41f1, ly��
OF .% Afsrb+:,w.quat10111M�fC'jWxMfR7CT'G�wiY[r. tU•r�Tw+Nt3/ 1A'&JLs.9n►wT31%3P
;PROJ NO, 000 A1ST.A:. W 1tt7111AV4RNLCIY?.Y,itxAS - -
Owmer-Inititoed Mnex��tion Ssrvice Airermcnl 23 Of 24
EXHIM A
Continued
LIRE
BEARING
DISTANCE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
Lt
NOO'17'50'W
50.36'
L21
WEST
94.17'
L2
N41'12'58"W
151.09'
L22
SOUTH
0.72'
63
NOO'20'10"W
452.00'
L23
S27'44'55"[
629.52'
L4
N89'39'50'E
653.00'
L24
S40'30'31"E
366.43'
L5
NOO'20'10'W
1000.00'
L25
S29'591531E
A28.04'
L6
S89139'50'W
653.00'
M L26
544'06'58"E
.575,47'
L7
N81'56'26'E
76.60'
L27
S20'33'4E"E
405A V
LB
N1752*44"E
10.00'
1-28
S29'35'23E
577,14'
L9
N28'36'48"W
1 34.78'
L29
SSW58'45"E
171,42'
LID
N2W35'13-W
1 10.52'
L30
$081111501E
255.96'
L11
N51'23'34"E
1 80.00'
L31
555'36'39"E
247.26"
02
1 S28-36.26"E
45.33-
L32
SS2.40'54"C
370.40'
U3
1 S71'51'11'E
10.00'
L33
S51'37,4O"f
264,68'
Lt 4
N61'28'27'E
27.51'
L34
SOUTH
26.87'
L15
I S61.28'27.
27.28'
L35
$89'16*01"W
199.79'
LIS
S16'28`4S'
10.00.
L36 1
NIIII'28'59"W
199.79'
Lt7
S27'45'2t"E
15.45'
L37 I
N86'28'54'W
199.79,
L19
1 NS29'2%4Z'tg'W
15.63'
M L39 I
N82'5II59"W 1
199.79'
L2D
1172'2S 3"W
10.00'
CURVE
CENTRAL ANGLE
RADIUS-
C14ORD &CAR!t1G
MORD LENGTH
ARC LEN:.TM
CI
3.17'00"
460,00'
NBW21'29"f
26.36'
26
C2
13'37'24'
460.00'
N70'21'11"E
109.12'
1098'
C3
25 '44'23"
50.00'
S28'31'33'E
80.00'
221.43'
C4
2 150'00-
540.00'
S76'35'00'W
250.59'
252.90'
ALEDO ROAD
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SUBJECT TRACT APPEARS TO BE CONTIGUOUS WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE
OF AN EXISTING RAR.ROAD RICHT-OF-WAY, EITHER BY INTENT OR IN FACT. THE ENTIRE EXISTING
PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ALEDO ROAD APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN THE DEEDED SOUNDS OF
THE SUBJECT TRACT AS SHOWN HEREON AND WITHIN THE UNRECORDED BOUNDS OF SAID RAILROAD
RICNT-OF-WAY.
(UMSED 171070024)
I7xTt:
FACIE mww
1X1zx�iCr�
EXHIBIT "A"
u1► �
sy.
SA,T.
ANNEXATION EXHIGIT
= IOrf� Rp.� MIA110)
CHID NY'
AC.6
wMQ�R►a1 tOLtIM,�iT'1{L'T►p OIL w' CA%X0u01{W4%".
Sub
OF aRO., No.
I bOar. J4catt1an*tMtIGC+MOLUM&fc*%~.
Un*U %TCQpM..ftw
; w
�++.Ttq+1f't/ L6a31.tse�W ir>•.'!:
Ow►+erdniliated Ammmation Saviae Agreement 24 of 24
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and council communication
DATE: 042225 M&C FILE NUMBER: M&C 25-0316
LOG NAME: 06AX-23-011 ROCKBROOK P2 —OWNER INITITATED
SUBJECT
(Future CD 3) Conduct a Public Hearing, Authorize Execution of a Municipal Services Agreement, and Consider Adopting an Ordinance for the
Proposed Owner -Initiated Annexation of Approximately 169.243 Acres of Land, 7.773 Acres of Chapin School Road and 12.991 Acres of Union
Pacific Railroad Right -of -Way in Tarrant County, Known as Rockbrook P2, Located Northeast of the Aledo Road and Chapin School Road
Intersection, in the Far West Planning Sector, AX-23-011 (Continued from a Previous Meeting)
(PUBLIC HEARING - a. Staff Available for Questions: Derek Hull; b. Public Comment; c. Council Action: Close Public Hearing and Acton the
M&C)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing for the proposed owner -initiated annexation of approximately 169.243 acres of land, 7.773 acres of Chapin School
Road and 12.991 acres of Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way in Tarrant County, known as Rockbrook P2, located northeast of the Aledo
Road and Chapin School Road intersection, as shown on Exhibit A;
2. Authorize execution of a Municipal Services Agreement between the City of Fort Worth and property owners, PMB 120 Land LP, a Texas
Limited Partnership; PMB Team Ranch Devco LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a Delaware Limited
Partnership; Rockbrook 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; MHRE 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Maple
120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; TM Baird 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Tres M 120 TIC LLC, a Texas
Limited Liability Company; P6 Family 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; MGM 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability
Company; Baird 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Pincoffs 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; and PMB 120
Land GP LLC, a Texas Limited liability Company; and
3. Adopt an ordinance annexing AX-23-011 for full purposes.
DIACUSSION•
On December 1, 2023, representatives for the property owners, PMB 120 Land LP, a Texas limited partnership; PMB Team Ranch Devco LLC, a
Texas Limited Liability Company; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership; Rockbrook 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability
Company; MHRE 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Maple 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; TM Baird 120 TIC
LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Tres M 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; P6 Famiy 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited
Liability Company; MGM 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Baird 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; PincoHs 120
TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; and PMB 120 Land GP LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (collectively, "Owner"), submitted a
request for full -purpose annexation of the property shown on Exhibit A into the City of Fort Worth (City). The subject property is located entirely in
that portion of the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction which is in Tarrant County. The site is located northeast of the Aledo Road and Chapin School
Road Intersection. The owner -initiated annexation, which is approximately 190.007 acres, is consistent with the urban development annexation
criteria as established by the City's Annexation Policy.
Under Section 43.1056, of The Texas Local Government Code, the municipality that is annexing an area under Subchapter C-3, C-4, C-5, or D
may also annex with the area the right-of-way of a street, highway. alley, or other public way or of a railway One, spur, or roadbed, that is: (1)
contiguous and nuns parallel to the municipality's boundaries; and (2) oDnbguous to the area being annexed under Subchapter C-3, C-4, C-0, or
D. In order to annex, the municipality must provide written notice of the annexation, through the owner's registered agent not later than the 61 st day
before the date of the proposed annexation. Notice of this pending annexation was sent by certified mail on January 14, 2026.
The area identified in this annexation request is included in the Veale Ranch Development Agreement, City Secretary Office (CSO) Contract
59003. City Council approved the agreement on March 8, 2023. The 5,200 acres described as Veale Ranch consists of parcels known as the
Veale Ranch, RockbrooktTeam Ranch, Rolling V South and Ventana South (phases 6-8), coilectivety. In accordance with Section 6,1 of the
Development Agreement, "At such time as an Owner submits to the City a Preliminary plat for a portion of the ETJ Property, it shall submit a
petition to the City to voluntarily annex its land located within the preliminary plat into the corporate limits of the City." Preliminary plat PP-23-056
was submitted on December4, 2023 and approved on June 17, 2024.
The subject area is currently agricultural and vacant land. The properly owner proposes the site for industrial development The 2023
Comprehensive Plan identifies the future land use for this site as Industrial Growth Center. The proposed development is compatible with current
surrounding land uses and is consistent with the future land use. Per Subdivision Ordinance, Section 31-2(b)(1), the City Plan Commission is
required to study and make a recommendation only on proposals for voluntary annexations that are Inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As
such, this proposal was not heard by the City Plan Commission.
There is no companion zoning case to this request for annexation. The property will default to "AG" Agricultural zoning. The property owner plans
to submit for a rezoning post -annexation.
Subchapter C-3 of Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code (LGC) provides for the process of annexation of an area upon a request of an
owner of land. Section 43.0672 of the LGC requires a municipality that elects to annex an area upon the request of an owner first negotiate and
enter into a written agreement with the owners of land in the area for the provision of municipal services.
The agreement must include:
1. A list of each service the municipality will provide on the effective date of the annexation; and
2. A schedule that includes the period within which the municipality will provide each service that is not provided on the effective date of the
annexation.
The municipal services agreement includes these provisions in accordance with state law.
Emergency services will be provided through the City of Fort Worth. The City's Fire Department will provide emergency and fire protection
services comparable with the provision of services available in other parts of the municipality with topography, land use and population density
similar to be the level of service contemplated or projected in the area. Emergency medical services will be provided by City's Fire Department
and MedStar or other entity engaged by the City. The City's Police Department will provide protection and law enforcement services.
The proposed uses were considered while assessing the financial impact to the General Fund. A fiscal impact analysis was prepared by the Fort
Worth Lab (FWLab) with the assistance of other City Departments. The FWLab has calculated that annual impacts on the General Fund are
expected to be positive following construction, based on the information provided by departments and the developer. Due to the ability of the area
to meet the City's criteria for full -purpose annexation, staff recommends that the Rockbrook P2 site be considered for annexation at this time.
The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed annexation. The public hearing is an opportunity for persons interested in the
annexation to be heard. Once the City Council has conducted the required public hearing, Council may dose the hearing and vote on annexing AX-
23-011 for full pu rposes.
If annexed, this property will beoome part of COUNCIL DISTRICT 3.
FISCAL INFORMATION J CERTIFICATION:
The Director of Finance certifies that based upon approval of the above recommendations and adoption of the attached ordinance, the
annexation will have a long term positive impact to the General Fund.
Submitted for City Manager's Office by- Jesica McEachem 5804
Originating Business UnitD.J. Harrel 8032
Additional Information Contact: Derek Hull 2412
Leo Valencia 2497
February 26, 2025
Owner -Initiated Annexation Request
Case # AX-23-011
Rockbrook
Approximately 169.243 Acres
Staff Report on Fiscal Sustainability Impact
Prepared for City Council by The FWLab
N
AX-23-011 Rockbrook o<4-
0 0.040.09 0.17 Miles �
I i l i l O RodOrw -Update
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RECOMMENDATION HIGHLIGHTS ................................................................................................................ 3
ExistingConditions ............................................................................................................................................
5
Comprehensive Plan Consistency —_—'----..---''_--..----.--_.----.----.----'-----b
WATERDBeARruEmr........................................................................................................................................
7
TRANSPORTATION AND PDBLICWOIUKS—Stroot ------------.—_--'_--_----.---_'8
Transportation and Public Works Stozruputcz...............................................................................................
9
Police Department _--'---.-'.—.-------_---__---'-_---.—.-------------'-_-------1O
Fire Department ---'--.'----'_—_-----'----_- ------'-.--'1l
EmergencyMedical Services ..........................................................................................................................
13
Public Safety Radio Communications -----.----------..--~—_—._—_.-----_-._----15
Code Compliance ' Code Enforcement ..........................................................................................................
17
CodeCompliance -Aniozu -----------_'--._-_.---'-----'--------'-'-18
Code Compliance - Solid Waste Services ......................................................................................................
3O
Code Compliance - Environmental Quality .-----.------_-------------'''---_------'21
Parkand Recreation .........................................................................................................................................
23
Library--.-----.----------'-----_-------.-------_.__._.__._.
4,
RECOMMENDATION HIGHLIGHTS
Expenditures:
Typical annexation -related costs to the City include construction, maintenance, and reconstruction of public
streets; parkland operations costs; stormwater management; emergency services; environmental quality;
animal control; and Water Department facilities and line extensions.
The Transportation and Public Works Department has calculated estimates for the cost per lane mile and
maintenance expenses based on general street type. Collaborative efforts led by the FWLab and various
departments aim to refine cost estimates, providing enhanced clarity for future fiscal impact assessments.
The table below summarizes estimated revenue and expenditures to be generated by the proposed
annexation and its development, not including any Water Department cost participation in oversizing lines
or, in this case, public street construction, maintenance, and reconstruction. All costs are expected to
increase with development and infrastructure aging, impacting annual revenue requirements to maintain
infrastructure and provide City services.
Estimate Year Total Revenue Total Cumulative Total
Expenditures Net
Year 5 $14,956,787 $7,086,026 $7,870,761
Year 10 $29,913,575 $14,338,800 $15,574,775
Year 15 $44,870,347 $7,926,754 $36,943,593
Year 20 $59,827,094 $9,742,756 $50,084,338
Year 40 $119,653,834 $21,464,749 $98,189,084
Note that City cost participation for water and sewer line upsizing, if necessary, are not factored into these
calculations.
Expenditures:
Anticipated future City expenditures include maintenance and reconstruction of public streets, parkland
operational costs, stormwater management, emergency services, environmental quality, and animal
control operations. Note that Water Department revenues and City cost participation for Water
Department extensions are not factored into these calculations. The costs are expected to increase with
development and infrastructure aging, impacting annual revenue requirements to maintain infrastructure
and provide City services.
Revenues:
After completing the proposed development project, the City anticipates an estimated annual property &
sales tax revenue reaching a cumulative total of $98,189,084 within forty years, assuming the proposed
development is constructed as described by the annexation applicant, and no changes in value or tax rates.
Applicable Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies:
3
The proposed annexation and development is consistent with several Comprehensive Plan policies,
emphasizing industrial development in specific growth areas, locating large industrial uses strategically,
and protecting significant industrial districts. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies include:
1. Locate large industrial uses along freight rail lines, highways, or airports within industrial growth
centers and other appropriate locations.
2. Protect industrial areas from encroachment. Through zoning, ensure that existing and planned
major employment nodes and districts are protected from incompatible land uses and development.
Land Use Recommendation:
The proposed Industrial land use is consistent with the adopted Industrial Growth Center Future Land Use
designation.
Overall Recommendation:
Annual impacts on the General Fund are expected to be positive following construction, based on the
information provided by departments and the developer. Due to the ability of the area to meet the City's
criteria for full -purpose annexation, staff recommends that the Rockbrook site be considered for annexation
at this time.
0
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Description
Request type
Development Agreement
Council District
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Floodplain
Existing Land Use
Included in Planned Service Area
Enclave
Planning Sector
ROW
Concept Plan
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Independent School District
Approximately 169.243 acres of land for project site and
7.773 acres for right-of-way west of Rockbrook and north
of Aledo Road. Property is located in Tarrant County and
is adiacent to FM 2871 (Chapin School Road).
Full Purpose Annexation
Yes — CSO #59003
3
The 2023 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use
designation on the property is Industrial Growth Center,
and Vacant, Undeveloped, Agriculture, on vacant
floodplain property.
Yes — Approximately 11.7 acres in the southeast portion
of the property
Vacant
Yes — Walsh Ranch South/Veale Ranch
No
Far West
Yes — 7.773 acres of Chapin School Road and 12..991
acres of Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-way
Veale Ranch Concept Plan
MM
No
Fort Worth ISD
5
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY
The adopted 2023 Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed annexation area as an Industrial Growth
Center on the City's Future Land Use Map. The annexation application, land plan, and associated
development agreement propose Heavy Industrial use (169 acres, K zoning).
The proposed Industrial use within the annexation area is consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan
and the adopted Future Land Use Map. The annexation proposal retains the industrial land uses identified
in the Comprehensive Plan. Given its proximity to Interstate 20, along with the proposed Heavy Industrial
use and the Future Land Use Map designation as an Industrial Growth Center, the annexation concept
plan is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. The site's proximity to Interstate 20 further ensures its
suitability for the proposed industrial purposes and its alignment with the objectives of the Industrial
Growth Center as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan.
Should there be any future deviations from the current concept plan or changes in the proposed land uses
within this annexation area, a review and potential revision of the Future Land Use Map may be required.
Adopted Future Land Use:
■ Industrial Growth Center Vacant, Undeveloped, Agricultural (floodplain)
Subject Property Master Thoroughfare Plan
I
WATER DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
The proposed annexation area obtained an accepted water and sewer study in January 2023 (WSS-2022-
2074) and obtain an accepted revised water and sewer study in May 2023 (WSS-2023-2483). Revenues
and expenditures listed below are based on data provided in the May 2023 study revisions.
Based on the accepted water and sewer study for the proposed annexation, it is anticipated that
approximately 11,600 linear feet of water and 10,500 linear feet of sewer public infrastructure will be
constructed as part of this development.
Water Department is coordinating with the developer of this proposed annexation to oversize water and
sewer extensions along Aledo for regional needs. The water and sewer capacity of the proposed
annexation area is not contingent upon the oversizing of said water and sewer extensions; therefore, the
cost is not attributable to this development.
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Proposal aligns with Veale Ranch development agreement (City Secretary
Contract Number 59003) as well as the City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed annexation aligns with
the Water Department Water and Sewer Master Plans regarding land use.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? This annexation is not expected to
significantly impact KPIs for the maintenance of water and sewer assets. The cumulative impacts of all
annexations on maintenance -related KPIs over time will be more significant. Utility management does
not anticipate a need for additional water/sewer capital improvements in this annexation area for the
foreseeable future.
3. Department Recommendation: Water Department supports annexation request.
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years
Operations $168,346 $363,506 $620,535 $882,813 $2,421,670
{ Capital - - - -
Personnel - - - - -
Maintenance - - - -
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures: The Water Department will cost participate
with the developer to oversize water and sewer extensions along Aledo Rd (in two phases) for
regional needs.
Departmental Review Comments
Revenues:
II
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS
Review Comments: FM2871 is maintained by TxDOT. Aledo Road is listed on the master thoroughfare
plan as a five -lane neighborhood connector. The road is currently an asphalt county road adjacent to the
railroad with significant drainage. Even with developer participation bringing Aledo Road up to city
standards will be difficult and costly. Furthermore, the TxDOT construction of the above grade crossing
could affect and/or remove the intersection of Aledo Road and FM2871.
5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years I
Capital $7,000,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $11,000,000.00 1
(Maintenance $100,000.00 $150,000.00
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures:
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Aledo Road is part of the Master Thoroughfare Plan
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? Diverting money and resources for
the maintenance and construction of Aledo Road could delay other projects with more traffic.
3. Department Recommendation: Support Annexation (consider if Aledo Road can be left out of
annexation)
Reviewer(s): Armond Bryant & Mary Hanna
:
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Based on the high-level information provided, Stormwater estimates that about 60,983 linear feet of storm
sewer pipes and 237 new storm inlets will be installed as part of this proposed Industrial Growth Center
development. Due to the limited development and design information available, a need for other
infrastructure, such as detention/retention facilities, drainage channels, is not included in this analysis.
The table below provides the estimated cumulative maintenance expenditures for the proposed drainage
infrastructure from the best information currently available. Future expenses will be highly dependent on
the actual development of the area as permitted by the City's Development Services Department. Since
the southern portion of the property is in a floodplain, there will be areas of potential high water that
should be considered during development to prevent hazardous roadway overtopping and flooding.
How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies?
The annexation will increase future maintenance costs and staff time required for the estimated storm
system infrastructure associated with this development. Additional staff may be required to maintain
existing service levels when the cumulative impacts of all annexations are considered.
How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?
The storm system infrastructure from this particular annexation is not expected to significantly impact KPIs.
However, the cumulative impacts of all annexations on maintenance -related KPIs may be more
significant. Stormwater management does not anticipate a need for stormwater capital improvements in
this annexation area for the foreseeable future. Therefore, no impact to our capital delivery key performance
indicators is expected at this time.
Recommendation:
Stormwater supports the annexation since the revenue is expected to be higher than the anticipated
combined capital expenses and maintenance expenses, assuming that the new development will be built
per the City's standards and FEMA's drainage regulations and standards.
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
Infrastructure
Operation & 5 Years 10 Years
Maintenance
237 Inlets and 60,983
Linear Feet of Pipe $34,975 $74,513
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures:
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues:
0A
15 Years 20 Years
$118,612 $167,274
40 Years
$ 229,347
POLICE DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
The Police Department has projected demand for service based on the best information currently available.
Future expenses are highly dependent on the expected uses, density level, transportation infrastructure, and
timing of development. Operational, Capital, and Personnel expenses are unknown at this time and are
dependent on if a new patrol division, additional personnel (patrol officers, neighborhood police officers,
communications staff, etc.), or a new facility is necessary.
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Additional calls for service will increase operational needs for the Police
Department. As the land is developed, the Police Department will continue to evaluate call loads to
determine whether a new patrol division, additional personnel (patrol officers, neighborhood police officers,
communications staff, etc.), or a new facility is necessary.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? Once the property is fully developed,
Priority 1, 2, and 3 response times could increase for West Division, Police Beat L17, Police Reporting
Area V 140 depending on the expected uses, density level, transportation infrastructure, and timing of
development.
3. Department Recommendation: Support Annexation
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
Costs per call 5 Years 10 Years
Industrial $8,231 $9,542
15 Years 20 Years
$11,062 $12,823
40 Years
$23,160
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures: Once the property is fully developed as
industrial, as indicated on the annexation application, call load is estimated to be approximately 5 calls
a year. The average cost per call is $710 per officer. Based on the assumption that at least two officers
will respond to a call, $1,420 per call is used to calculate the cost of service. The average annual cost
of service for this development is estimated to be $7,100 for industrial. Estimated expenditures assume
that there are 5 calls per year and two officers responding to each call. An inflation rate of 3% was
used to calculate the expenditures. Expenditures are rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues:
10
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Fire and EMS first responder services will be dispatched from existing Fire Station 23, located at
3201 Portales Dr, to the proposed annexation area. Current Fire Department response time goal
is to arrive on the scene of emergencies within five minutes from the time of dispatch at least
75% of the time. Based on the existing fire stations located close to this proposed annexation
area, the Fire Department will not be able to meet this response time goal.
Basic Life Support (BLS) emergency medical services by existing personnel and equipment of
the Fort Worth Fire Department will be provided to the annexation area commencing on the
effective date of the annexation. The Fort Worth Fire Department serves as the first responder on
life threatening medical emergencies as a part of the MedStar system. All Fort Worth Fire
Department personnel are certified as Emergency Medical Technician basic level or higher. All
engines, trucks, and rescue units carry Automated External Defibrillators for use with victims
who are in cardiac arrest.
Fire Data Analysis:
These estimated response times were calculated using GIS software; traffic congestion, road conditions,
time of day, and weather conditions have not been factored in.
l' Due Company
FIRE STATION
Fire Station 23
3201 Portales Dr
Fire Station 30
2nd Due Company
4416 Southwest Blvd
Fire Station 43
Yd Due Company
13300 Highland Hills Dr
Fire Station 32
4' Due Company
10201 White Settlement Rd
Fire Station 23
11 Aerial
3201 Portales Dr
Fire Platting:
ESTIMATED RESPONSE TIME
9.4 minutes
11.0 minutes
11.3 minutes
11.9 minutes
9.4 minutes
Gas wells are present that may impact building permits. Access on Aledo Road from the east limited to
east bound service road due to railroad tracks and lack of westbound freeway exit. Access from the east,
along Aledo Road, may also be limited by floodplain. Secondary access is not required for commercial
projects. Primary access from RM Rd 2871 is acceptable, however a railroad crossing south of Aledo
11
Road is present. This crossing should have very little bearing on Fort Worth Fire responses but may be a
factor on ambulance responses and/or mutual aid from south of Aledo Road. According to NFPA 1710,
the proposed area is Geographically Isolated (80% of area is outside of the 10-minute travel time for 2"
due company) but not Geographically Restricted (condition, measure, or infrastructure design that
predictably limits response to the area). RM Rd 2871 will also serve as a primary response route to
Ventana and future Veale Ranch projects. Other than existing long response times, there are no road
conditions that appear to pose additional response delays.
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Not Provided.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? Not provided
3. Department Recommendation: Not Provided
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
2023 produced 25 incidents for the area within one half mile of the proposed annexation area (not
including the area of the proposed annexation itself). Based on a comparison of the area of the buffer to
the area of the annexation, the estimated annual count of incidents in the annexation area is 5.
The estimated cost of an additional incident is $968. Multiplied by 5 incidents, the total additional annual
cost of responding to the annexation is estimated to be $4,840. However, once the area becomes more
fully developed or if zoning for the area changes, this number will need to be adjusted.
Reviewer(s): Doug Zedler & Donna York
12
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): MedStar's city-wide response times as of December 2023 are shown below.
This proposed annexation area will be typically served by ambulance posting locations at either 10200
West Freeway (Chapel Creek @ I-30), 2712 Las Vegas Trail (Las Vegas Trail @ I-30), or 3700 Raven
Trail, Aledo (next to Cook Children's Urgent Care off of Walsh Ranch Parkway.
s
W157
if
0
s
S IR51/lw �
�, wusMam )
vr-.y
wtsrtw
j
(Average
(Priority 1 (Priority 2 ,Priority 3 ,Priority 4
Priority 5 (Priority 7
f Priority 8 1
Oct-23
0:07:38 0:08:08 0:09:00 0:07:43
0:10:19 0:11:20
0:10:54
Nov-23
0:07:33 0:08:11 0:08:54 0:07:46
0:10:17 0:11:42
0:10:56
Dec-23
0:07:49 0:08:15 0:08:27 0:07:41
0:10:14 0:11:37
0:10:59
MedStar's goal is to meet or exceed the needs of Fort Worth growth through annexation. These costs and
potential revenues are based on the current Citywide expenses per capita, multiplied by the population
projected when the annexation is fully developed and populated.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? It is anticipated that costs for
providing services to this area, at the 2023 service level, will exceed revenues generated from patient
13
service fees by and estimated $2.33 per capita, and may require alternate funding sources to meet
expenses related to the desired service level for this annexed area.
3. Department Recommendation: Proceed with Annexation if it meets the growth objectives of the City
of Fort Worth, with the knowledge that EMS funding sources, beyond patient services fees, may be
required to maintain desired service levels.
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years
10 Years
15 Years
20 Years
40 Years
Operations
$17,682
$38,900
$63,654
$91,945
$198,035
Capital
$6,055
$13,321
$21,798
$31,487
$67,817
Personnel
$49,479
$108,854
$178,125
$257,292
$554,166
Maintenance
$3,491
$7,681
$12,569
$18,155
$39,104
Departmental Review
Comments
— Expenditures:
Projections included
a 3% revenue escalator
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues: Projections include a 3% revenue escalator.
Reviewer(s): Matt Zavadsky
14
PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Assessing the proposed population growth from the annexation on public safety radio communications
will be necessary. The exponential increase in population size heightens demands on emergency services
and law enforcement, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation of our current communication
infrastructure. As the population expands, so does the potential for emergencies and public safety
incidents, highlighting the critical importance of a robust and scalable radio communication system. To
ensure the efficacy of public safety efforts, strategic investments and enhancements to the radio
communication technology will be continuously reviewed.
Radio coverage in the proposed area has 76% coverage with existing communication infrastructure and
will require a significant investment to improve Public Safety communication in this area. The costs to
improve the coverage would require building a new tower in the Southwest area, which has been quoted
at $6.6M for acquiring property, feasibility studies, FCC licensing, and the tower's construction. Mobile
repeaters can improve coverage on a limited basis and must be purchased for responding Police, Fire,
EMS, or Public Works units in the area. These have been priced at $18K each and would provide local
communications but not provide communications back to dispatch, risking responders' safety. Additional
operational costs will be required due to communication upgrades and servicing.
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): The proposal aligns with the department's existing plans to improve coverage
in this area, through new towers in both the Northwest and Southwest. The department has implemented
use of the LTE (FirstNet) to expand radio coverage, however, use long term of this solution would be a
less cost-effective approach due to subscription costs, that would exceed the purchase and build out of the
communication towers.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? The proposal will impact the
availability of radio communications in the area, as users will experience "BONKS" and an inability to
communicate with one another or dispatch.
3. Department Recommendation: Without the construction of a new communication tower, this area is
severely under supported by the current infrastructure.
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years
10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years
Operations
$66,035
$76,737 $89,305 $103,243 $170,909
Capital
$6,600,000
- - - -
Personnel
-
- - - -
Maintenance
$11,231
$15,226 $19,507 $25,731 $34,741
Departmental Review Comments —
Expenditures: Expenditure forecasts assume 3% annual
inflation.
15
Departmental Review Comments — Revenue forecasts do not account for any fee increases.
Reviewer(s): Larry Crockett
16
CODE COMPLIANCE - CODE ENFORCEMENT
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc: This is in -line with Code Compliance initiative to protect occupants and the
community from substandard and hazardous buildings and preserve and enhance public health, welfare
and safety through services that focus on education, prevention, compliance, and community partnerships.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? This proposal will not affect Code
Enforcements KPIs.
3. Department Recommendation: Proceed as planned.
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
Operations
Capital
Personnel
Maintenance
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures: We anticipate that as the neighborhood
ages, we will get approximately 20-30 complaints a year or roughly 10% of the total number of
houses, the average cost to complete an inspection is $50 dollars. As the neighborhood ages we
anticipate more complaints for high grass & weeds and minor substandard conditions on
tenant occupied structures.
,..... I I ---- --
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues: The majority of the planned development arej
going to be single family homes instead of multi -family complexes, so no revenue is expected.
17
CODE COMPLIANCE - ANIMAL CONTROL
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.):
Fort Worth Animal Care & Control may become involved to address concerns related to the displacement
or potential conflicts with wild animals such as fox, coyotes, raccoons and opossums. The involvement of
Animal Control in such situations can vary based on the nature of the construction project; be it residential
or commercial. The current lack of housing/business in the area would not adversely or immediately impact
Animal Control and be of little burden.
Concerned current residents that reside near construction zones may report abandoned or displaced nests,
injured or orphaned animals, and other wildlife -related issues. As natural habitats are disrupted, wildlife
may venture into developed areas in search of food, water, or shelter. This can result in conflicts with
humans, such as encounters with larger mammals, reptiles, or birds.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?
Animal Control Officers will dispatch out of the North Animal Campus to service the area. Travel distance
would be 26 miles with an estimated response time of 35 minutes if an Animal Control Officer wasn't
already in the area. Once construction is initiated on residential or commercial property, calls for service
would be expected to be minimal. The initial impact will most likely be for wildlife calls due to
displacement. Commercial zoning would most likely see a very slight increase of stray animals left by
citizens.
3. Department Recommendation:
A review study after significant construction on residential homes/businesses have started. Revenue from
Animal Control will be minimal at best until substantial housing is in place. Revenue would be collected
by impound fee's, reclamation fees and other services provided.
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years
Operations $1000 $1500
Capital -
Personnel
Maintenance
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures: Current area/neighborhood is unoccupied,
and no significant building/construction has occurred. Until that happens, calls for service in
this area will be unlikely.
Revenue
iR]
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues: Animal Control would not generate any revenue
as we are a service to citizens. The area would need to see a significant residential increase. Once
neighborhoods or business is established, some revenue can be generated by impound fees of lost
or stray animals, adoption fees or microchips. Citations for City Ordinance violations would also
start to generate a small amount of revenue.
RV•i
CODE COMPLIANCE - SOLID WASTE SERVICES
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Not provided
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? Not provided
3. Department Recommendation: There will be no impact to Solid Waste since this will be heavy
industrial with no new single-family houses
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years
Operations
capital
Personnel
Maintenance
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures: N/A
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues: N/A
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Not provided
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? Not provided
3. Department Recommendation: There will be no impact to Solid Waste since this will be heavy
industrial with no new single-family houses
20
CODE COMPLIANCE - ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.):
The proposed industrial and undeveloped land use is expected to have a moderate service need from
our division. Grading and land disturbance will be subject to the grading permitting process and
subsequent inspections. After development, the industrial nature of the proposed development will
require regular stormwater inspections. However, current staffing is sufficient to complete these
duties. Both inspection types are documented in Chapter 4 of the Environmental Master Plan.
Any illegal dumping and other nuisances that impacts public rights -of -way will be abated by
Environmental Services -Solid Waste staff. Current staffing is sufficient to complete these duties. All
abatement and sweeping services support Chapter 6 of the Environmental Master Plan.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators?
Once development starts, the number of routine investigations for the Water Quality team included in
KPI CC.5.2 would increase. However, current staffing is sufficient to complete these during
authorized timelines. Therefore, this proposal is not expected to negatively impact this key
performance indicator.
The portions of Aledo Rd and RM 2871 added in this proposal will add route mileage for litter
abatement and potentially street sweeping. These services are included in an existing contract, which
may help Solid Waste achieve KPI CC.3.3. However, due to the low mileage, this impact is expected
to be negligible.
3. Department Recommendation: Approve Annexation
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years
10 Years
15 Years 20 Years 40 Years
Operations $5,349.19
$7,256.40
$9,726.29 $12,659.75 $31,033.23
Capital $72.16
' $169.18
$299.02 $453.24 $1,419.17
Personnel $2,875.57
$6,518.77
$11,140.47 $16,629.61 $51,010.35
Maintenance $360.81
j $845.88
$1,495.12 $2,266.20 $7,095.83
Departmental Review Comments
— Expenditures:
Prediction that expenditures will be greater
than revenues assume surrounding undeveloped land remains undeveloped. New development would
reduce litter and illegal dumping abatement costs, as undeveloped land experiences a higher rate of
these infractions.
21
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues: As noted above, expenses exceed revenues during;
additional revenue sources through development or fee increases will impact these projections.
22
PARK AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): Not Provided
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? Not Provided
3. Department Recommendation: Not Provided
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years
Operations
Capital
Personnel
Maintenance $11,843.17 $13,729.36 ,L- $15,926.22 $18,484.56 $33,741.74
Departmental Review Comments — Expenditures:
PARD Forestry: Current conditions result in average annual maintenance costs of $5,282 for Aledo
Rd ROW. No calculations made for FM 2871 as it is state-controlled. A municipal maintenance
agreement or similar for the annexed portion of FM 2871 would yield an additional annual
maintenance cost of $1,585. The addition of 934 homes as proposed would yield an additional
estimated annual maintenance cost of $12,020.
PARD ROW: Current conditions result in $4,940 annually for 7-day mow/litter maintenance cycle
on east side of Chapin School Rd & north side of Aledo Rd ROW until future build -out.
PARD PRM Parks:
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues:
Reviewer(s): [add name(s)]
23
LIBRARY
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): The proposal aligns with the department's existing plans to improve library
services in this area, through the building of a new library.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? This proposal will not impact the
library's key performance measures.
3. Department Recommendation: Proceed as planned.
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
5 Years
Operations
Capital
Personnel
Maintenance
Departmental Review Comments
10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 40 Years
i
Expenditures: No expenditures at this time.
Departmental Review Comments — Revenues: No revenues at this time.
1. How does this proposal align with your department's plans and policies? List policies from
department's plan that this annexation proposal supports (Strategic Plan, Master Plan,
Neighborhood Plan, etc.): The proposal aligns with the department's existing plans to improve library
services in this area, through the building of a new library.
2. How will this proposal affect your key performance indicators? This proposal will not impact the
library's key performance measures.
3. Department Recommendation: Proceed as planned.
Reviewer(s): Marilyn Marvin
921
SUMMARY AND OVERALL RECOMMENDATION
Expenditures:
Typical annexation -related costs to the City include construction, maintenance, and reconstruction of public
streets; parkland operations costs; stormwater management; emergency services; environmental quality;
animal control; and Water Department facilities and line extensions.
The Transportation and Public Works Department has estimated costs for service and infrastructure,
including long-term street maintenance and reconstruction costs. However, the developer's annexation
application indicates that no public street infrastructure will be provided within the 169-acre annexation
area, so City costs for public street infrastructure are not included here.
The table below summarizes estimated revenue and expenditures to be generated by the proposed
annexation and its development, not including any Water Department cost participation for oversizing lines
or, in this case, public street construction, maintenance, and reconstruction.
All costs are expected to increase with development and infrastructure aging, impacting annual revenue
requirements to maintain infrastructure and provide City services. Depending on the development's tax
generation over time, the annual revenue needed to maintain infrastructure and services to the development
may be strained to cover costs associated with the development.
Estimate Year Total Revenue Total Expenditures Cumulative Total Net
Year 5
$14,956,787
$7,086,026
$7,870,761
Year 10
$29,913,575
$14,338,800
$15,574,775
Year 15
$44,870,347
$7,926,754
$36,943,593
Year 20
$59,827,094
$9,742,756
$50,084,338
Year40
$119,653,834
$21,464,749
$98,189,084
Note that City cost participation for water and sewer line upsizing, if necessary, are not factored into these
calculations.
Revenues:
After completing the proposed development project, the City anticipates an estimated annual property &
sales tax revenue reaching a cumulative total of $119,653,834 within forty years, assuming the proposed
development is constructed as described by the annexation applicant, and no changes in value or tax rates.
Applicable Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies:
The proposed annexation and development is consistent with several Comprehensive Plan policies,
emphasizing industrial development in specific growth areas, locating large industrial uses strategically,
and protecting significant industrial districts. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies include:
25
1. Locate large industrial uses along freight rail lines, highways, or airports within industrial growth
centers and other appropriate locations.
2. Protect industrial areas from encroachment. Through zoning, ensure that existing and planned
major employment nodes and districts are protected from incompatible land uses and development.
Land Use Recommendation:
The proposed Industrial land use is consistent with the adopted Industrial Growth Center Future Land Use
designation. Assuming the proposed industrial development is constructed, no amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use map are anticipated.
Overall Recommendation:
Annual impacts on the General Fund are expected to be positive following construction, based on the
information provided by departments and the developer. Due to the ability of the area to meet the City's
criteria for full -purpose annexation, staff recommends that the Rockbrook site be considered for annexation
at this time.
M
Rockbrook P2 Exhibit A
Approximately 190.007 Acres Adjacent Council District 3
N1
qs�
0
1,500 3,000 Feet
FORT NORTH. DevelopmentServlces Department
1:24.000
12/1112024
Fort worth
Full Purpose
�]
County Boundaries
COPYRIGHT 2024 CITY OF FORT WORTH UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION IS A
VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAWS. THIS DATA IS TO BE USED FOR A GRAPHICAL.
Limited Purpose
r—�
Adjacent Cities
REPRESENTATION ONLY. THE ACCURACY IS NOT TO BE TAKEN / USED AS DATA
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Subject Property N
PRODUCED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES OR BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR, THE CITY OF FORT WORTH ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR
THE ACCURACY OF SAID DATA,
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
DATE: 04/22/25 M&C FILE NUMBER: M&C 25-0316
LOG NAME: 06AX-23-011 ROCKBROOK P2 — OWNER INITITATED
SUBJECT
(Future CD 3) Conduct a Public Hearing, Authorize Execution of a Municipal Services Agreement, and Consider Adopting an Ordinance for the
Proposed Owner -Initiated Annexation of Approximately 169.243 Acres of Land, 7.773 Acres of Chapin School Road and 12.991 Acres of Union
Pacific Railroad Right -of -Way in Tarrant County, Known as Rockbrook P2, Located Northeast of the Aledo Road and Chapin School Road
Intersection, in the Far West Planning Sector, AX-23-011 (Continued from a Previous Meeting)
(PUBLIC HEARING - a. Staff Available for Questions: Derek Hull; b. Public Comment; c. Council Action: Close Public Hearing and Act on the
M&C)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing for the proposed owner -initiated annexation of approximately 169.243 acres of land, 7.773 acres of Chapin School
Road and 12.991 acres of Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way in Tarrant County, known as Rockbrook P2, located northeast of the Aledo
Road and Chapin School Road intersection, as shown on Exhibit A;
2. Authorize execution of a Municipal Services Agreement between the City of Fort Worth and property owners, PMB 120 Land LP, a Texas
Limited Partnership; PMB Team Ranch Devco LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a Delaware Limited
Partnership; Rockbrook 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; MHRE 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Maple
120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; TM Baird 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Tres M 120 TIC LLC, a Texas
Limited Liability Company; P6 Family 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; MGM 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability
Company; Baird 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Pincoffs 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; and PMB 120
Land GP LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; and
3. Adopt an ordinance annexing AX-23-011 for full purposes.
DISCUSSION:
On December 1, 2023, representatives for the property owners, PMB 120 Land LP, a Texas limited partnership; PMB Team Ranch Devco LLC, a
Texas Limited Liability Company; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership; Rockbrook 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability
Company; MHRE 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Maple 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; TM Baird 120 TIC
LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Tres M 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; P6 Family 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited
Liability Company; MGM 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Baird 120 TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; Pincoffs 120
TIC LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; and PMB 120 Land GP LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (collectively, "Owner"), submitted a
request for full -purpose annexation of the property shown on Exhibit A into the City of Fort Worth (City). The subject property is located entirely in
that portion of the City s extraterritorial jurisdiction which is in Tarrant County. The site is located northeast of the Aledo Road and Chapin School
Road intersection. The owner -initiated annexation, which is approximately 190.007 acres, is consistent with the urban development annexation
criteria as established by the City's Annexation Policy.
Under Section 43.1056, of The Texas Local Government Code, the municipality that is annexing an area under Subchapter C-3, C-4, C-5, or D
may also annex with the area the right-of-way of a street, highway, alley, or other public way or of a railway line, spur, or roadbed, that is: (1)
contiguous and runs parallel to the municipality's boundaries; and (2) contiguous to the area being annexed under Subchapter C-3, C-4, C-5, or
D. In order to annex, the municipality must provide written notice of the annexation, through the owner's registered agent not later than the 61 st day
before the date of the proposed annexation. Notice of this pending annexation was sent by certified mail on January 14, 2025.
The area identified in this annexation request is included in the Veale Ranch Development Agreement, City Secretary Office (CSO) Contract
59003. City Council approved the agreement on March 8, 2023. The 5,200 acres described as Veale Ranch consists of parcels known as the
Veale Ranch, Rockbrook/Team Ranch, Rolling V South and Ventana South (phases 6-8), collectively. In accordance with Section 6.1 of the
Development Agreement, "At such time as an Owner submits to the City a Preliminary plat for a portion of the ETJ Property, it shall submit a
petition to the City to voluntarily annex its land located within the preliminary plat into the corporate limits of the City." Preliminary plat PP-23-056
was submitted on December 4, 2023 and approved on June 17, 2024.
The subject area is currently agricultural and vacant land. The property owner proposes the site for industrial development. The 2023
Comprehensive Plan identifies the future land use for this site as Industrial Growth Center. The proposed development is compatible with current
surrounding land uses and is consistent with the future land use. Per Subdivision Ordinance, Section 31-2(b)(1), the City Plan Commission is
required to study and make a recommendation only on proposals for voluntary annexations that are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As
such, this proposal was not heard by the City Plan Commission.
There is no companion zoning case to this request for annexation. The property will default to "AG" Agricultural zoning. The property owner plans
to submit for a rezoning post -annexation.
Subchapter C-3 of Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code (LGC) provides for the process of annexation of an area upon a request of an
owner of land. Section 43.0672 of the LGC requires a municipality that elects to annex an area upon the request of an owner first negotiate and
enter into a written agreement with the owners of land in the area for the provision of municipal services.
The agreement must include:
1. A list of each service the municipality will provide on the effective date of the annexation; and
2. A schedule that includes the period within which the municipality will provide each service that is not provided on the effective date of the
annexation.
The municipal services agreement includes these provisions in accordance with state law.
Emergency services will be provided through the City of Fort Worth. The City's Fire Department will provide emergency and fire protection
services comparable with the provision of services available in other parts of the municipality with topography, land use and population density
similar to be the level of service contemplated or projected in the area. Emergency medical services will be provided by City's Fire Department
and MedStar or other entity engaged by the City. The City's Police Department will provide protection and law enforcement services.
The proposed uses were considered while assessing the financial impact to the General Fund. A fiscal impact analysis was prepared by the Fort
Worth Lab (FWLab) with the assistance of other City Departments. The FWLab has calculated that annual impacts on the General Fund are
expected to be positive following construction, based on the information provided by departments and the developer. Due to the ability of the area
to meet the City's criteria for full -purpose annexation, staff recommends that the Rockbrook P2 site be considered for annexation at this time.
The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed annexation. The public hearing is an opportunity for persons interested in the
annexation to be heard. Once the City Council has conducted the required public hearing, Council may close the hearing and vote on annexing AX-
23-011 for full purposes.
If annexed, this property will become part of COUNCIL DISTRICT 3.
FISCAL INFORMATION / CERTIFICATION:
The Director of Finance certifies that based upon approval of the above recommendations and adoption of the attached ordinance, the
annexation will have a long-term positive impact to the General Fund.
Submitted for Citv Manaaer's Office bv: Jesica McEachern 5804
Oriainatina Business Unit Head: D.J. Harrell 8032
Additional Information Contact: Derek Hull 2412
Leo Valencia 2497