HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6143-08-2025A Resolution
NO. 6143-08-2025
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE REVISED EASTSIDE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE:
TRANSIT ROUTE 89 MODE AND EXTENSION AND CROSS -SECTIONS
FOR EAST LANCASTER AVENUE, BRIDGE STREET, AND BRENTWOOD
STAIR ROAD
WHEREAS, as part of the Eastside Transportation Plan, a Locally Preferred Alternative was
supported by City Council on January 23, 2024 through the adoption of Resolution No. 5876-01-2024;
and
WHEREAS, a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) is defined as an alternative
evaluated through the local planning process and will be used in Texas Department of
Transportation's (TxDOT) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process for East
Lancaster Avenue - State Highway 180 (SH-180) and Interstate 30; and
WHEREAS, East Lancaster Avenue (SH-180) is owned and managed by TxDOT and
the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) coordinates regional planning
needs and will decide the final configuration and design of East Lancaster Avenue, Interstate
30, and Fort Worth to Houston High -Speed Rail; and
WHEREAS, the LPA recommended an extension of Trinity Metro's Route 89 transit service to
connect into the future Eastchase Parkway and IH 30 retail area for a connection to Arlington's VIA On -
Demand Service; and
WHEREAS, the LPA-recommended transit mode for Route 89 (Exhibit A) is Tech -Based Rapid
Transit with premium amenities; and
WHEREAS, the recommended LPA cross -sections for East Lancaster Avenue is a
technology -managed corridor consistent with the NCTCOG Metropolitan Transportation
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the recommended LPA cross -sections for East Lancaster Street by
Handley Drive includes a four -lane, two-way road with the existing on -street parking; and
WHEREAS, the LPA was presented for feedback through a series of public open
houses on October 17, 18, and 19, 2023, and displayed in a virtual open house on the project
website for review and comment from October 16 to November 20, 2023; and
WHEREAS, The LPA is being updated to provide more clarity on the East Lancaster
cross sections requested by the public East of Interstate 820
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FORT WORTH, THAT:
The City of Fort Worth supports the revised Locally Preferred Alternatives in the attached
Exhibit A as follows:
1. East Lancaster Avenue as a managed technology corridor consistent with the NCTCOG
Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
2. Bridge Street and Brentwood Stair Road, which include a four -lane, two-way and a two-
lane, two-way road.
3. For Route 89, the Red Route transit alignment extension along East Lancaster Avenue and
Dottie Lynn/Eastchase Parkway; and Tech -Based Rapid Transit with premium transit
features.
4. East Lancaster Avenue east of IH 820 cross section includes a four -lane roadway with
existing on street parking lane.
Adopted this 12th day of August 2025.
ATTEST
Y4,M-L, 4 A�V�
Jannette S. Goodall, City Secretary
i f , 11 I+ ! IF f li � 1
FORT WORTH EASTSIDE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
f�ffflffff rrrrrrrIII
Executive Summar of the Alter s '
y �� l ys s
April 24, 2024
FORT WORTH
This page was intentionally left blank.
Alternatives Analysis Page 1
Alternatives Analysis
After two rounds of extensive community
outreach and analysis, the Fort Worth City Council
adopted the locally preferred alternative (LPA)
cross -sections for East Lancaster Avenue, Bridge
Street, and Brentwood Stair Road, and the LPA
transit mode for Route 89 on January 23, 2024.
The alternatives analysis process used to
determine the LPA is summarized in this memo. It
is important to note that the final roadway
configuration is subject to NCTCOG and TxDOT
design and environmental review. Long-term capacity improvements and needs will be determined by
TxDOT.
Purpose and Need
East Lancaster Avenue has been identified as a corridor for high -capacity frequent and reliable transit
due to current ridership along existing routes, the connectivity the corridor would provide, existing
pedestrian activity and potential for implementation with minimal ROW acquisitions (corner clips at
intersections). The project is needed to provide solutions for increased safety for passenger vehicles
and vulnerable road users as well as create a walkable environment for short trips by providing
adequate space to increase pedestrian comfort.
Relocation of franchise utilities to multi -use duct banks may be required to achieve the space needed
to accommodate safe, high comfort pedestrian elements, and fiber optic cables. This project is needed
to make transit more desirable through improved efficiencies in transit service and by creating
opportunities for a more economically desirable corridor for equitable transit -oriented development
that alleviates barriers to social and economic opportunities.
Alternatives Analysis Page 2
Alternatives Analysis Process
The alternatives analysis in this plan was driven by the objective to select a Locally Preferred
Alternative (LPA) for the following three components:
1. Route 89
2. East Lancaster Avenue
3. Bridge Street and Brentwood Stair Road
For each component, the alternatives analysis followed a five -step process to identify an LPA.
/ 1 2 /00"
3 j 4
Explore ( Evaluate
Opportunities identify Define Alternatives
and Potential Screening Against
Constraints Alternatives Criteria Screening
1 , Criteria
Figure 1: Alternatives Analysis Process
Alternatives Analysis
5
Select
Preferred
Alternatives
Page 3
Route 89
Mode
A screening analysis was completed to select the optimum mode to provide high -capacity transit within
the framework of the purpose and need to the plan. The mode screening analysis compared the
attributes of local bus service, high -capacity bus, Light Rail (LTR), and Streetcar against the mode
alternatives screening criteria to determine the optimum transit mode for the corridor.
Service Justified by
Future Ridership •
Demand & Density
Can Efficiently
Accommodate Future
Ridership Demand
Cost Effectiveness • Q •
Flexibility to Implement
Incrementally
•
•
•
("Future Proofing")
Increases Safety Along
• •
•
•
the Corridor
Accommodates
•
•
•
Regional and Local Tips
Performance Against
Criteria
• High Medium
• Low
0 Not Viable
Alternatives Analysis
Page 4
Locally Preferred Alternative: Tech -Based Rapid Transit
Based on the mode screening, high -capacity bus provides the greatest benefits for Route 89. In
keeping with the goals of the plan to provide a reliable, safe, and comfortable transit service, it is
envisioned that technology can be leveraged to implement high -capacity bus in the form of a Tech -
Based Rapid Transit solution along Route 89 which utilizes managed lanes and transit signal priority to
provide high frequency and higher speed transit service. The service will also include upgraded
shelters and other premium amenities.
Route
A transit route analysis was also conducted to determine the optimum route for a transit connection
between the existing Route 89 and the future express line along IH-30 and Eastchase Retail Area. The
two routes examined include the following:
• Handley Route (Green)
• Dottie Lynn Route (Red)
Fort Wo T ----------
p ..,
VS._ :o-
_ a►C s� aLegend N -
_F,
..0-1) _
_ fmrCbn b Oa.tieMn __ FUY. Cawtivu �. Fii+Yp 11o�1.O ,�� try) .•..••
O G.bd Ssbn WrO fW .twx T—.lw swb. if Nji(M)
Figure 2: Route 89 Alternatives
Locally Preferred Alternative: Dottie Lynn Route (Red)
Based the route analysis, the Dottie Lynn Route is favored due to the ability to provide a more direct
connection to IH-30, available ROW for improvements, and higher development potential along the
route.
Alternatives Analysis
Page 5
East Lancaster Avenue
Upon selection of an LPA for the mode and route for transit service along Route 89, a screening
analysis was conducted to determine the optimal cross section and roadway operations for East
Lancaster Avenue from Main Street to Dottie Lynn Parkway.
Corridor Segments
Like most corridors, East Lancaster Avenue varies in width, cross-section, and ROW. It also has
different land uses developed at different intensities throughout the corridor. The existing land use
and roadway contexts create logical ways to organize the analysis and recommendations. When
considering East Lancaster Avenue, four unique context segments were identified for individual
analysis:
• Main Street to Riverside Drive
• Riverside Drive to IH-820
• Historic Handley
• Chilton Street to Dottie Lynn Parkway
•rQr f Main St to Riverside Dr Historic Handley •
Q 1 Q A a► +,sue»
wamr Kvo
C wunwRs:.
+�•�•• Riverside Dr to IH-820 Chilton St to Dottie Lynn Pkwy M
Figure 3: East Lancaster Avenue — Corridor Segments
Alternatives Analysis
Page 6
Alternative Development and Screening
The alternatives development process generated 158 options across the four corridor segments.
These options were screened for feasibility and reasonableness using ROW and constructability
constraints and performance metrics that align with the goals of the plan. The expectation for a safe,
multi -modal corridor required viable options to accommodate all forms of travel including walking,
biking, driving, freight, and transit. The following elements were among those evaluated in the
alternatives analysis:
• Number of Lanes (4 or 6)
• Transit Lane Dedication (Full, Partial, or Shared)
• Type of Bicycle Facility (On or Off -Street)
• On -Street Parking
• Pedestrian Space
• Medians
Step 1: Universe Step 2: Screened Step 3: Feasible Step 4: Reasonable i, Step 5: Preferred
i
i • � _'
• Every possible • Fits within the available
combination Is on the : right-of-way
table (transit, bikes. peels, . Next Test: What Is
Png'travel lanes) Feasible to Constrict?
• First test: What fits
within the available ROW
Alternatives Analysis
• Fits within the available
• All fit within the ROW, • Final cross sections to lay
ROW and Is Feasible to
Feasible, and achieve
out
Construct
desired outcomes for the
• Next test What are the
corridor
.
desired outcomes for the
corridor?
• Next test: What scores
well with our performance
L PA
measures?
..
Figure 4: Alternatives Screening
Page 7
The alternatives screening criteria resulted in 15 reasonable cross section alternatives for East
Lancaster Avenue. These alternatives were analyzed as groups based on common characteristics such
as number of lanes and lane treatment for transit. The reasonable alternatives were then analyzed as
groups and scored based on performance in safety, traffic operations, and transit service.
6 Vehicle Lanes with Shared •
Transit 0
4-6 Lane Managed Technology
Corridor
(Right -Running Transit)
4 Vehicle Lanes + 2 Transit Lanes •
(Center -Running Dedicated)
Performance Against Criteria • High Medium • Low
Locally Preferred Alternative: Four to Six -Lane Managed Technology Corridor (Right -Running
Transit)
Based on the results of the screening process and input from project partners and stakeholders, the
locally preferred alternative for East Lancaster Avenue from Riverside Drive to IH-820 is a six -lane
managed technology corridor. Due to ROW constraints, the locally preferred alternative for the
segments between Main Street and Riverside Drive and from IH-820 to Dottie Lynn Parkway is four -
lanes with shared transit that incorporates all the other elements of Tech -Based Rapid Transit. The
locally preferred alternatives were selected due to their ability to reduce crashes, maintain acceptable
traffic operations, and accommodate a flexible tech -based rapid transit service. Please note that the
final roadway configuration is subject to NCTCOG and TxDOT design and environmental review.
Long-term capacity improvements and needs will be determined by TxDOT.
Alternatives Analysis Page 8
Main St to
Riverside Dr
• 4 Lanes
• Shared -Use
Path
• Shared Transit
Riverside Dr to IH-
820
• 6 Lanes
• Shared -Use
Path
• Managed
Technology
Corridor
Y
f
nr
U
AM
I
I
1
12' 9' 1' 111 111
111
11' 1'
9'
12'
Shared Use Path Planting Strip Drive Lane Drive Lane
Drive Lane
Drive Lane Transit Shebr Shared Use Path
y
AM
� M
17' Y' 117 17' 11' 1•
=10tlIS11 1'
11' 17'
17' 1'
V 17
UN c PIS Pwft M. Trig Lane' Orl" Lae Orin Lane
Lg� R.Np)
Dve riLene Pine Lane
Toth Lene'
7nmt 9Mr Shred 11r PM
Please note that the final roadway configuration is subject to TxDOT design and environmental review.
Alternatives Analysis
Page 9
Malcom St to Forest Ave
Historic Handley
e 4 Lanes
e Shared -Use
:.i
Path (North
�: �►_ f
Side)
I I I I
e On -Street
'
Parking (North
6' 4' 1' 12' 11' 1' 11' 1' 11' 12' 1' 4' 12'
Sidewalk Drive Lane Drive Lane Median Drive Lane Drive Lane Sidewalk
Side - East of
Segments east of IH 820 are unfunded and require additional study and design by
Forest Ave)
NCTCOG and TxDOT. The cross -sections are illustrative and meant to demonstrate
e Managed
ideas heard from the public.
Technology
Forest Ave to Handley Dr
Corridor
• Safety and
operational
improvements
requested by
stakeholders
1 ---
• Cross -Section
fits within
6' 4' 1' 12' 11' 1' 11' 1' 11' 12' 3' 6' 3' 10'
Sidewalk Drive Lane Drive Lane Median Drive Lane Drive Lane parking Lane: Sidewalk
existing right-
of-way.
Segments east of IH 820 are unfunded and require additional study and design by
NCTCOG and TxDOT. The cross -sections are illustrative and meant to demonstrate
ideas heard from the public.
Alternatives Analysis Page 10
Handley Dr to
Dottie Lynn
Pkwy
� 7
• 4 Lanes
• Shared -Use
Path (North
Side)
6' 4' 1' 12' 11' t' 11' 1' 71' 12' 1' 9' 12'
• Managed Sidewalk Drive Lane Drive Lane Median Drive Lane Drive Lane suffer Sidewalk
Technology Segments east of IH 820 are unfunded and require additional study and design by
Corridor NCTCOG and TxDOT. The cross -sections are illustrative and meant to demonstrate
ideas heard from the public.
Please note that the final roadway configuration is subject to TxDOT design and environmental review.
Alternatives Analysis
Page 11
Bridge Street & Brentwood Stair Road
The final component of the Alternatives Analysis was the exploration of options for improvements to
Brentwood Stair Road and Bridge Street as it pertains to the future TxDOT widening of IH-30. In
order to evaluate the optimal and preferred street configurations, an alternatives analysis was
conducted for these road segments.
Figure 5: Bridge St & Brentwood Stair Rd Study Area
The alternatives analysis evaluated the following four scenarios:
• No -Build: No changes to existing lane configuration, intersection control, or ROW.
• Four Lane/Two-Wav with Direct Ramas: Existing two-way frontage road configuration
with direct ramp improvements.
• One-Wav Frontage Roads: Conversion of existing two-way roadways with one-way
frontage roads and ramp improvements.
• Two Lane/Two-Wav: One-way frontage roads that run parallel to the modified two
lane/two-way collectors of Brentwood Stair Road and Bridge Street, with ramp
improvements.
Alternatives Analysis
Page 12
Each alternative was given a score from 1-4 based on assumptions, pros and cons, and goal
achievement for the study area. 1=Scenario achieves the goal the least and 4=Scenario achieves the
goal the most.
No -Build 1.6
Four Lane/Two-Way with 3.2
Direct Ramps
One -Way Frontage Road 1.8
Two Lane/Two-Way with 3.4
Direct Ramps
Locally Preferred Alternative: Two Lane/Two-Way Road
Based on the results of the Alternatives Analysis, the preferred alternative for Bridge Street &
Brentwood Stair Road is the Two Lane/Two-Way Road scenario. This scenario will maintain existing
connections to local businesses, improve mobility and safety, and promote commercial growth in the
area.
Bridge St
COlkctor Frantow ROW
r
Mainlanes
Frwrm" Road
BY I
OTHERSOMAN
Figure 6. Preferred Alternative - Two Lanelrwo-Way
Brentwood Stair Rd
} Collector +
AM
-0
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
DATE: 08/12/25 M&C FILE NUMBER: M&C 25-0682
LOG NAME: 20EASTSIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN ADOPTION
SUBJECT
(CD 5, CD 8 and CD 11) Conduct Public Hearing, Adopt a Resolution Adopting the Eastside Transportation Plan and Incorporate the Plan into the
Comprehensive Plan, and Adopt a Resolution in Support of the Revised Eastside Transportation Plan Locally Preferred Alternative: Transit Route
89 Mode and Extension and Cross -Sections for East Lancaster Avenue, Bridge Street, and Brentwood Stair Road
(PUBLIC HEARING - a. Staff Available for Questions: Kelly Porter; b. Public Comment; c. Council Action: Close Public Hearing and Act on M&C)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing regarding the Eastside Transportation Plan;
2. Adopt the attached resolution adopting the Eastside Transportation Plan, which provides recommendations for improving enhanced mobility,
safety, and economic development on the City's Eastside with incorporation into the Comprehensive Plan; and
3. Adopt the attached resolution in support of the Revised Eastside Transportation Plan Locally Preferred Alternative: Transit Route 89 Mode
and Extension and Cross -Sections for East Lancaster Avenue, Bridge Street, and Brentwood Stair Road.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this Mayor and Council Communication (M&C) is to adopt the Eastside Transportation Plan (ETP) by reference into the
Comprehensive Plan. The City Council approved M&C 22-0783 to appropriate $1,100,000.00 for the East Lancaster Avenue Corridor and Sub -
Regional Planning Study (retitled the Eastside Transportation Plan) on September 27, 2022. The plan outlines policies and capital projects
necessary to transform East Lancaster Avenue (SH 180), Brentwood Stair Road, Bridge Street, and other parts of the study area into multi -modal,
walkable, mixed -use corridors. The City Council approved M&C 22-1014 to execute a professional services agreement with consultants
from WSP USA, Inc. to oversee and develop the plan. The planning process began in January 2023 and ran until January 2025. The plan includes
existing conditions analysis, locally preferred alternatives, housing and economic development analysis, and the foundation for a set of catalytic
sites with a form -based code. The consultants conducted three rounds of public open houses, a series of neighborhood -specific meetings,
surveys, and maintained a website to keep the public informed and receive input. The survey received over 750 responses. This plan contains
recommendations only. The City Plan Commission recommended the plan for approval on June 11, 2025, after a public hearing.
The Plan contains 10 chapters to guide the City in the overall development of the area:
• Chapter 1: Introduction and Background
• Chapter 2: Plan Process
• Chapter 3: Previous Planning Efforts
• Chapter 4: Plan Engagement
• Chapter 5: Existing Conditions
• Chapter 6: Growth Factors and Forecasted Conditions
• Chapter 7: Alternatives Analysis
• Chapter 8: Thoroughfare Planning
• Chapter 9: Concept Planning
• Chapter 10: Plan Implementation
The City Council adopted Resolution 5876-01-2024 supporting the Locally Preferred Alternatives on January 23, 2024 (listed in chapter 7 of the
attached plan). Once the plan is adopted, City staff will present a form -based code, zoning changes, and Master Thoroughfare Plan amendments
to the City Council for consideration. The plan will be used to guide and support the reconstruction of East Lancaster Avenue (west of Loop 820).
The roadway is currently under design by the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) and is fully funded by the North Central Texas Council
of Governments (NCTCOG). TXDOT is approaching 60% design and includes many of the recommendations shown in the ETP. The proposed
schedule is as follows:
Recommendation
Plan Adoption
Master Thoroughfare Plan Amendment
Form -Based Code Adoption
Zoning Amendments to Match Form -Based
Code
Proposed Schedule
August2025
August2025
Winter 2026
Winter 2026
The TXDOT-led East Lancaster Avenue (west of Loop 820) project is scheduled to break ground in 2027/2028.
This plan is located in COUNCIL DISTRICTS 5,8, and 11
A Form 1295 is not required because: This M&C does not request approval of a contract with a business entity.
FISCAL INFORMATION / CERTIFICATION:
The Director of Finance certifies that approval of this recommendation will have no material effect on City funds.
Submitted for Citv Manaaer's Office by
Oriainatino Business Unit Head
Jesica McEachern 5804
Lauren Prieur 6035
Additional Information Contact: Monty Hall 8662