HomeMy WebLinkAbout063869-PM1 - Construction-Related - Contract - Rocky Creek Crossing, LTD and Conatser Construction TX, LPPROJECT MANUAL
FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF
WATER, SEWER, PAVING, DRAINAGE, & STREET LIGHT
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
IPRC Record No. IPRC24-0135
City Project No. 105576
FID No. 30114-0200431-105576-E07685
File No. W-3058
X File No. X-28208
Mattie Parker David Cooke
Mayor City Manager
Christopher P. Harder, P.E.
Water Department
Lauren Prieur, P.E.
Director, Transportation and Public Works Department
Prepared for
The City of Fort Worth
May 2025
TEXAS REGISTRATION F-1386
3017 West 7th Street, Suite 300
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
September 2025
9/22/2025
CSC No. 63869-PM1
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
SECTION 00 00 10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Division 00 - General Conditions Last Revised
00 11 13 Invitation to Bidders 03/20/2020
00 21 13 Instructions to Bidders 03/20/2020
00 41 00 Bid Form 04/02/2014
00 42 43 Proposal Form Unit Price 05/22/2019
00 43 13 Bid Bond 04/02/2014
00 45 11 Bidders Prequalification’s 04/02/2014
00 45 12 Prequalification Statement 09/01/2015
00 45 13 Bidder Prequalification Application 03/09/2020
00 45 26 Contractor Compliance with Workers' Compensation Law 04/02/2014
00 45 40 Minority Business Enterprise Goal 08/21/2018
00 52 43 Agreement 06/16/2016
00 61 25 Certificate of Insurance 07/01/2011
00 62 13 Performance Bond 01/31/2012
00 62 14 Payment Bond 01/31/2012
00 62 19 Maintenance Bond 01/31/2012
00 72 00 General Conditions 11/15/2017
00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions 07/01/2011
00 73 10 Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer
Awarded Projects 01/10/2013
Division 01 - General Requirements Last Revised
01 11 00 Summary of Work 12/20/2012
01 25 00 Substitution Procedures 08/30/2013
01 31 19 Preconstruction Meeting 08/30/2013
01 31 20 Project Meetings 07/01/2011
01 32 33 Preconstruction Video 08/30/2013
01 33 00 Submittals 08/30/2013
01 35 13 Special Project Procedures 08/30/2013
01 45 23 Testing and Inspection Services 03/20/2020
01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls 07/01/2011
01 55 26 Street Use Permit and Modifications to Traffic Control 07/01/2011
01 58 13 Temporary Project Signage 04/07/2014
01 60 00 Product Requirements 03/20/2020
01 66 00 Product Storage and Handling Requirements 04/07/2014
01 70 00 Mobilization and Remobilization 04/07/2014
01 71 23 Construction Staking 02/14/2018
01 74 23 Cleaning 04/07/2014
01 77 19 Closeout Requirements 04/07/2014
01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data 04/07/2014
01 78 39 Project Record Documents 04/07/2014
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
Technical Specifications which have been modified by the Engineer specifically for this
Project; hard copies are included in the Project’s Contract Documents
Division 02 - Existing Conditions
Date
Modified
02 41 13 Selective Site Demolition
02 41 14 Utility Removal/Abandonment
02 41 15 Paving Removal
Division 03 - Concrete
03 30 00 Cast-In-Place Concrete
03 34 13 Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM)
03 34 16 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair
03 80 00 Modifications to Existing Concrete Structures
Division 26 - Electrical
26 05 00 Common Work Results for Electrical
26 05 10 Demolition for Electrical Systems
26 05 33 Raceways and Boxes for Electrical Systems
26 05 43 Underground Ducts and Raceways for Electrical Systems
26 05 50 Communications Multi-Duct Conduit
Division 31 - Earthwork
31 10 00 Site Clearing
31 23 16 Unclassified Excavation
31 23 23 Borrow
31 24 00 Embankments
31 25 00 Erosion and Sediment Control
31 36 00 Gabions
31 37 00 Riprap
Division 32 - Exterior Improvements
32 01 17 Permanent Asphalt Paving Repair
32 01 18 Temporary Asphalt Paving Repair
32 01 29 Concrete Paving Repair
32 11 23 Flexible Base Courses
32 11 29 Lime Treated Base Courses
32 11 33 Cement Treated Base Courses
32 11 37 Liquid Treated Soil Stabilizer
32 12 16 Asphalt Paving
32 12 73 Asphalt Paving Crack Sealants
32 13 13 Concrete Paving
32 13 20 Concrete Sidewalks, Driveways and Barrier Free Ramps
32 13 73 Concrete Paving Joint Sealants
32 14 16 Brick Unit Paving
32 16 13 Concrete Curb and Gutters and Valley Gutters
32 17 23 Pavement Markings
32 17 25 Curb Address Painting
32 31 13 Chain Fences and Gates
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
32 31 26 Wire Fences and Gates
32 31 29 Wood Fences and Gates
32 32 13 Cast-in-Place Concrete Retaining Walls
32 91 19 Topsoil Placement and Finishing of Parkways
32 92 13 Hydro-Mulching, Seeding, and Sodding
32 93 43 Trees and Shrubs
Division 33 - Utilities
33 01 30 Sewer and Manhole Testing
33 01 31 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection
33 03 10 Bypass Pumping of Existing Sewer Systems
33 04 10 Joint Bonding and Electrical Isolation
33 04 11 Corrosion Control Test Stations
33 04 12 Magnesium Anode Cathodic Protection System
33 04 30 Temporary Water Services
33 04 40 Cleaning and Acceptance Testing of Water Mains
33 04 50 Cleaning of Sewer Mains
33 05 10 Utility Trench Excavation, Embedment, and Backfill
33 05 12 Water Line Lowering
33 05 13 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings - Cast Iron
33 05 13.10 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings - Composite
33 05 14 Adjusting Manholes, Inlets, Valve Boxes, and Other Structures to
Grade
33 05 16 Concrete Water Vaults
33 05 17 Concrete Collars
33 05 20 Auger Boring
33 05 21 Tunnel Liner Plate
33 05 22 Steel Casing Pipe
33 05 23 Hand Tunneling
33 05 24 Installation of Carrier Pipe in Casing or Tunnel Liner Plate
33 05 26 Utility Markers/Locators
33 05 30 Location of Existing Utilities
33 11 05 Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets
33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe
33 11 11 Ductile Iron Fittings
33 11 12 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe
33 11 13 Concrete Pressure Pipe, Bar-Wrapped, Steel Cylinder Type
33 11 14 Buried Steel Pipe and Fittings
33 11 15 Pre-Stressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
33 12 10 Water Services 1-inch to 2-inch
33 12 11 Large Water Meters
33 12 20 Resilient Seated Gate Valve
33 12 21 AWWA Rubber-Seated Butterfly Valves
33 12 25 Connection to Existing Water Mains
33 12 30 Combination Air Valve Assemblies for Potable Water Systems
33 12 40 Fire Hydrants
33 12 50 Water Sample Stations
33 12 60 Standard Blow-off Valve Assembly
33 31 12 Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP)
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
33 31 13 Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe for Gravity Sanitary Sewers
33 31 15 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Sanitary Sewer
33 31 20 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe
33 31 21 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Closed Profile Gravity Sanitary Sewer
Pipe
33 31 22 Sanitary Sewer Slip Lining
33 31 23 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Enlargement
33 31 50 Sanitary Sewer Service Connections and Service Line
33 31 70 Combination Air Valve for Sanitary Sewer Force Mains
33 39 10 Cast-in-Place Concrete Manholes
33 39 20 Precast Concrete Manholes
33 39 30 Fiberglass Manholes
33 39 40 Wastewater Access Chamber (WAC)
33 39 60 Epoxy Liners for Sanitary Sewer Structures
33 41 10 Reinforced Concrete Storm Sewer Pipe/Culverts
33 41 11 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Storm Drain
33 41 12 Reinforced Polyethlene (SRPE) Pipe
33 46 00 Subdrainage
33 46 01 Slotted Storm Drains
33 46 02 Trench Drains
33 49 10 Cast-in-Place Manholes and Junction Boxes
33 49 20 Curb and Drop Inlets
33 49 40 Storm Drainage Headwalls and Wingwalls
Division 34 - Transportation
34 41 10 Traffic Signals
34 41 10.01 Attachment A – Controller Cabinet
34 41 10.02 Attachment B – Controller Specification
34 41 10.03 Attachment C – Software Specification
34 41 11 Temporary Traffic Signals
34 41 13 Removing Traffic Signals
34 41 15 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
34 41 16 Pedestrian Hybrid Signal
34 41 20 Roadway Illumination Assemblies
34 41 20.01 Arterial LED Roadway Luminaires
34 41 20.02 Freeway LED Roadway Luminaires
34 41 20.03 Residential LED Roadway Luminaires
34 41 30 Aluminum Signs
34 41 50 Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable
34 71 13 Traffic Control
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
Technical Specifications listed below are included for this Project by reference and can be
viewed/downloaded from the City’s website at:
http://fortworthtexas.gov/tpw/contractors/
or
https://apps.fortworthtexas.gov/ProjectResources/
Division 02 - Existing Conditions Last Revised
02 41 13 Selective Site Demolition 12/20/2012
02 41 14 Utility Removal/Abandonment 12/20/2012
02 41 15 Paving Removal 02/02/2016
Division 03 - Concrete
03 30 00 Cast-In-Place Concrete 12/20/2012
03 34 13 Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) 12/20/2012
03 34 16 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 12/20/2012
03 80 00 Modifications to Existing Concrete Structures 12/20/2012
Division 26 - Electrical
26 05 00 Common Work Results for Electrical 11/22/2013
26 05 10 Demolition for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012
26 05 33 Raceways and Boxes for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012
26 05 43 Underground Ducts and Raceways for Electrical Systems 07/01/2011
26 05 50 Communications Multi-Duct Conduit 02/26/2016
Division 31 - Earthwork
31 10 00 Site Clearing 12/20/2012
31 23 16 Unclassified Excavation 01/28/2013
31 23 23 Borrow 01/28/2013
31 24 00 Embankments 01/28/2013
31 25 00 Erosion and Sediment Control 12/20/2012
31 36 00 Gabions 12/20/2012
31 37 00 Riprap 12/20/2012
Division 32 - Exterior Improvements
32 01 17 Permanent Asphalt Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 01 18 Temporary Asphalt Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 01 29 Concrete Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 11 23 Flexible Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 29 Lime Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 33 Cement Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 37 Liquid Treated Soil Stabilizer 08/21/2015
32 12 16 Asphalt Paving 12/20/2012
32 12 73 Asphalt Paving Crack Sealants 12/20/2012
32 13 13 Concrete Paving 12/20/2012
32 13 20 Concrete Sidewalks, Driveways and Barrier Free Ramps 06/05/2018
32 13 73 Concrete Paving Joint Sealants 12/20/2012
32 14 16 Brick Unit Paving 12/20/2012
32 16 13 Concrete Curb and Gutters and Valley Gutters 10/05/2016
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
32 17 23 Pavement Markings 11/22/2013
32 17 25 Curb Address Painting 11/04/2013
32 31 13 Chain Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 31 26 Wire Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 31 29 Wood Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 32 13 Cast-in-Place Concrete Retaining Walls 06/05/2018
32 91 19 Topsoil Placement and Finishing of Parkways 12/20/2012
32 92 13 Hydro-Mulching, Seeding, and Sodding 12/20/2012
32 93 43 Trees and Shrubs 12/20/2012
Division 33 - Utilities
33 01 30 Sewer and Manhole Testing 12/20/2012
33 01 31 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection 03/03/2016
33 03 10 Bypass Pumping of Existing Sewer Systems 12/20/2012
33 04 10 Joint Bonding and Electrical Isolation 12/20/2012
33 04 11 Corrosion Control Test Stations 12/20/2012
33 04 12 Magnesium Anode Cathodic Protection System 12/20/2012
33 04 30 Temporary Water Services 07/01/2011
33 04 40 Cleaning and Acceptance Testing of Water Mains 02/06/2013
33 04 50 Cleaning of Sewer Mains 12/20/2012
33 05 10 Utility Trench Excavation, Embedment, and Backfill 12/12/2016
33 05 12 Water Line Lowering 12/20/2012
33 05 13 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings – Cast Iron 01/22/2016
33 05 13.10 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings – Composite 01/22/2016
33 05 14 Adjusting Manholes, Inlets, Valve Boxes, and Other Structures to
Grade 12/20/2012
33 05 16 Concrete Water Vaults 12/20/2012
33 05 17 Concrete Collars 12/20/2012
33 05 20 Auger Boring 12/20/2012
33 05 21 Tunnel Liner Plate 12/20/2012
33 05 22 Steel Casing Pipe 12/20/2012
33 05 23 Hand Tunneling 12/20/2012
33 05 24 Installation of Carrier Pipe in Casing or Tunnel Liner Plate 06/19/2013
33 05 26 Utility Markers/Locators 12/20/2012
33 05 30 Location of Existing Utilities 12/20/2012
33 11 05 Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 12/20/2012
33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe 12/20/2012
33 11 11 Ductile Iron Fittings 12/20/2012
33 11 12 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe 11/16/2018
33 11 13 Concrete Pressure Pipe, Bar-Wrapped, Steel Cylinder Type 12/20/2012
33 11 14 Buried Steel Pipe and Fittings 12/20/2012
33 11 15 Pre Stressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
33 12 10 Water Services 1-inch to 2-inch 02/14/2017
33 12 11 Large Water Meters 12/20/2012
33 12 20 Resilient Seated Gate Valve 12/20/2012
33 12 21 AWWA Rubber-Seated Butterfly Valves 12/20/2012
33 12 25 Connection to Existing Water Mains 02/06/2013
33 12 30 Combination Air Valve Assemblies for Potable Water Systems 12/20/2012
33 12 40 Fire Hydrants 01/03/2014
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
33 12 50 Water Sample Stations 12/20/2012
33 12 60 Standard Blow-off Valve Assembly 06/19/2013
33 31 12 Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) 12/20/2012
33 31 13 Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe for Gravity Sanitary Sewers 12/20/2012
33 31 15 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Sanitary Sewer 12/20/2012
33 31 20 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe 06/19/2013
33 31 21 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Closed Profile Gravity Sanitary Sewer
Pipe 12/20/2012
33 31 22 Sanitary Sewer Slip Lining 12/20/2012
33 31 23 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Enlargement 12/20/2012
33 31 50 Sanitary Sewer Service Connections and Service Line 04/26/2013
33 31 70 Combination Air Valve for Sanitary Sewer Force Mains 12/20/2012
33 39 10 Cast-in-Place Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 20 Precast Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 30 Fiberglass Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 40 Wastewater Access Chamber (WAC) 12/20/2012
33 39 60 Epoxy Liners for Sanitary Sewer Structures 12/20/2012
33 41 10 Reinforced Concrete Storm Sewer Pipe/Culverts 07/01/2011
33 41 11 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Storm Drain 12/20/2012
33 41 12 Reinforced Polyethlene (SRPE) Pipe 11/13/2015
33 46 00 Subdrainage 12/20/2012
33 46 01 Slotted Storm Drains 07/01/2011
33 46 02 Trench Drains 07/01/2011
33 49 10 Cast-in-Place Manholes and Junction Boxes 12/20/2012
33 49 20 Curb and Drop Inlets 12/20/2012
33 49 40 Storm Drainage Headwalls and Wingwalls 07/01/2011
Division 34 - Transportation
34 41 10 Traffic Signals 10/12/2015
34 41 10.01 Attachment A – Controller Cabinet 12/18/2015
34 41 10.02 Attachment B – Controller Specification 02/2012
34 41 10.03 Attachment C – Software Specification 01/2012
34 41 11 Temporary Traffic Signals 11/22/2013
34 41 13 Removing Traffic Signals 12/20/2012
34 41 15 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon 11/22/2013
34 41 16 Pedestrian Hybrid Signal 11/22/2013
34 41 20 Roadway Illumination Assemblies 12/20/2012
34 41 20.01 Arterial LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 20.02 Freeway LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 20.03 Residential LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 30 Aluminum Signs 11/12/2013
34 41 50 Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable 02/26/2016
34 71 13 Traffic Control 11/22/2013
00 00 10
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
Appendix
GC-4.01 Availability of Lands
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
GC-4.04 Underground Facilities
GC-4.06 Hazardous Environmental Condition at Site
GC-6.06.D Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance
GC-6.07 Wage Rates
GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities
GC-6.24 Nondiscrimination
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
END OF SECTION
WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE,
PAVING & STREET NAME SIGNS
IMPROVEMENTS
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
UNIT PRICE BID
Project Item Information
Bidlist Iteml
No.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Description
00 42 43
DAP-BIDPROPOSAL
Page 1 of 5
Bidder's Application
Specification I Unit of I Bid
Section No. f Measure Quantity
UNIT I: WATER IMPROVEMEN"S
3305.0003 8" Waterline Lowerin❑ 33 05 12 EA 16
0241.1015 Remove 12" Water Line 02 41 14 LF 437
3305.0109 Trench Safetv 33 05 10 LF 14,155
3311.0001 Ductile Iron Water Fittinqs w/ Restraint 33 11 11 TON 6.33
3311.0251 8" DIP Water 33 11 10 LF 334
3311.0261 8" PVC Water Pipe 33 11 12 LF 13.384
3311.0441 12" P.V.C. Water Pipe 33 11 10, 33 11
12 �F 183
3311.0451 12" DIP Water 33 11 10 LF 4
3311.0457 12" DIP Water, CLSM Backfill 33 11 10 LF 250
3312.0001 Fire Hydrant 33 12 40 EA 13
3312.0117 Connect to Existing 4"-12" Water Line 33 12 25 EA 5
3312.2003 1" Water Service 33 12 10 EA 267
3312.3003 8" Gate Valve 33 12 20 EA 45
9999.0001 20" Steel Encasement & CLSM Backfill 00 00 00 LF 230
9999.0002 1" Irrigation Service 00 00 00 EA 5
9999.0003 4" Irrigation Sleeve 00 00 00 LF 940
9999.0004 12" Cut in Sleeve & Valve 00 00 00 EA 4
TOTAL UNIT I: WATER IMPROVEMENTS
Bidder's Proposal
Unit Price I Bid Value
$5, 500.00
$30.00
$2.00
$9, 500.00
$70.00
$60.00
$102.00
$112.00
$132.00
$6, 500.00
$2.500.00
$1.400.00
$2,500.00
$340.00
$1,500.00
$24.00
$8, 500.00
$88, 000.001
$13,110.001
$28, 310.00 j
$60,135.001
$23, 380.00�
$803,040.00�
$18 666.00
�448.00I
$33, 000.00 �
$84, 500.00�
$12, 500.00�
$373, 800.00
$112, 500.00�
$78, 200.00
$7, 500.00
$22, 560.00
$34, 000.00
$1,793,649.00
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCLJMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Fomi Version May 22, 2019 Rocky Creek Phase 2A Bid Proposal
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
UNIT PRICE BID
Project Item Information
IBidlist Item
No.
�
� �
` 2
j 3
� 4
� 5
f 6
� 7
8
9
10
I 11
12
I 13
00 42 43
DAP-BIDPROPOSAL
Page 2 of 5
Bidder's Application
Description I Specification Unit of Bid
Section No. Measure Quantiry
UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
3301.0002 Post-CCN Inspection 33 01 31 LF 11731
3301.0101 Manhole Vacuum Testinq 33 01 30 EA 51
3305.0107 Manhole Adjustment, Minor 33 05 14 EA 1
3305.0109 Trench Safety 33 01 31 LF 11731
3305.0112 Concrete Collar for Manhole 33 05 17 EA 4
3305.0113 Trench Water Stops 33 05 15 EA 23
3331.3101 4" Sewer Service 33 31 50 EA 267
3331.4115 8" Sewer Pipe 33 11 10, 33 31
12, 33 31 20 LF
10410
3331.4116 8" Sewer Pipe, CSS Backfill 34 11 10, 33 31
12 33 31 20 �F 484
3339.0001 Epoxy Manhole Liner 33 39 60 VF g6.4
33 39 10, 33 39
3339.1001 4' Manhole 20 � 49
33 39 10, 33 39
3339.1003 4' Extra Depth Manhole 20 UF 172
9999.0006 8" DIP w/ Epoxy Coatinq , 00 00 00 LF �73
14 9999 0007 8" DIP w/ Epoxy Coatinp & CSS Backfill 00 00 00 LF 64
15 9999•0008 Connect to Existing 4' Diameter Manhole w/ 00 00 00 EA
External Drop Connection 2
16 9999.0009 Connect to Existing 4' Diameter Manhole 00 00 00 EA 1
17 9999.0010 Split Steel Encasement 00 00 00 LF 20
18 9999.0011 4' Manhole Over Existing 15"-21" Line 00 00 00 EA 2
19 9999.0012 20" Steel Encasement w/ CSS Backfill 00 00 00 LF 102
TOTAL UNIT II: SANITARY SEWE t IMPROVEMENTS
Bidder's Proposal
Unit Price I Bid Value
$4.00
$200.00
$1, 500.00
$2.00
$1, 000.00
$500.00
$850.00
�
$46,924.00�
$10,200.00
$1,500.00
$23,462.00
$4,000.00
$11, 500.00
$226,950.001
$72.00
$102.00
$485.00
$4, 500.00
$225.00
$112.00
$132.00
$5, 500.00
$4, 500.00
$420.00
$7, 500.00
$350.00
�749.520.00
$49,368.00
$41,904.001
$220,500.00
$38,700.00
$86,576.00
$8,448.00
$11,000.00
$4, 500.00
$8,400.00
$15.000.00
$35.700.00
$1,594,152.00
CTTY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCLTMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Vers�on May 22, 2019 Rocky Creek Phase 2A Bid Proposal
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
UNIT PRICE BID
Project Item Information
Bidlist Itemf
No. �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Description I Specification I Unit of
Section No. Measure
UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMEVTS
0000.3305 Trench Safety 33 05 10 LF
3301.0002 Post-CCN Inspection 33 01 31 LF
3341.0201 21" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
3341.0205 24" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
3341.0208 27" RCP, Ciass III 33 41 10 LF
3341.0309 36" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
3341.0402 42" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
3341.0409 48" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
3341.1103 4x4 Box Culvert 33 41 10 LF
3341.1502 8x5 Box Culvert 33 41 10 LF
3341.1503 8x6 Box Culvert 33 41 10 LF
3341.1605 9x8 Box Culvert 33 41 10 LF
3341.2002 10x5 Box Culvert 33 49 10 EA
3349.0001 4' Storm Junction Box 33 4910 EA
3349.0002 5' Storm Junction Box 33 49 10 EA
3349.Q102 4' Manhole Riser 33 49 10 EA
3349.5001 10' Curb Inlet 33 49 20 EA
3349.5002 15' Curb Inlet 34 49 20 EA
3349.5003 20' Curb Inlet 34 49 20 EA
3349.7001 4' Drop Inlet 33 49 20 EA
9999.0013 12" Rock RipRap 31 37 00 SY
9999.0014 15" Rock RipRap 00 00 00 SY
9999.0015 Concrete RipRap 00 00 00 SY
9999.0016 21" 4:1 Sloped End Headwall 00 00 00 EA
9999.0017 24" 4:1 Sloped End Headwall 00 00 00 EA
9999.0018 36" 4:1 Sloped End Headwall 00 00 00 EA
9999.0019 4' SW-0 4:1 Wingwall (SD-9) 00 00 00 EA
9999.0020 5' SW-0 4:1 Wingwall (SD-11) 00 00 00 EA
9999.0021 5' SW-0 4:1 Wingwall (SD-15) 00 00 00 EA
9999.0022 5' FW-0 4:1 Wingwall (SD-15) 00 00 00 EA
9999.0023 36" 4:1 CH-FW-O Headwall 00 00 00 EA
9999.0024 FW-0 4:1 Wingwall w/ 1.0' Extended Curb 00 00 00 EA
[Culvert East1
9999.0025 FW-0 4:1 Wingwall w/ 5.0' Extended Curb
(Culvert West)
9999.0026 PW-1 Parallel Wingwall w/ 1.0' Extended
CrbCl rtE t
00 00 00 �
00 00 00
EA
.,
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 3 of 5
Bidder's Application
Bid
Quantity
3852
3852
355
350
234
276
475
981
203
504
160
80
234
2
5
1
17
3
5
1
310
231
707
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
Bidder's Proposal
Unit Price I Bid Value
$2.00
$4.00
$78.00
$85.00
$105.00
$145.00
$175.00
$205.00
$325.00
$650.00
$700.00
$860.00
$975.00
$6, 000.00
$7,000.00
$4, 500.00
$3, 800.00
$4, 800.00
$5.800.00
$4.500.00
$135.00
$145.00
$155.00
$3, 000.00
$3,500.00
$6, 000.00
$6, 500.00
$8, 500.00
$10, 500.00
$10, 500.00
$6, 000.00
�
$7,704.00 �
$15,408.00�
$27,690.00�
$29,750.00�
$24,570.00�
$ao,ozo.00l
$83,125.00 �
$201,105.00�
$65.975.00 �
$327,600.00�
$112,000.00�
$68.800.00
$228,150.00
$12.000.00
$35.000.00!
$4,500.00�
$64,600.00�
$14,400.00
$29, 000.00
$4, 500.00
$41, 850.00
$33,495.00
$109,585.00
$6.000.00
$7.000.00
$12,000.00�
$6, 500.00
$17,000.00
$10, 500.00
$10,500.00�
$s.000.00i
$34, 500.001
1 $34, 500.00
2 $46, 500.00
u ( uve as) �
35 9999.0027 Emergency OverFlow Fiume 00 00 00 LF 185
36 9999.0028 Convert Drop Inlet to Storm Drain Manhole 00 00 00 EA 1
37 9999.0029 30" Manhole Riser 00 00 00 EA 3
38 9999.0030 4' Stacked Storm Manhole 00 00 00 EA 1
39 9999.0031 Concrete Collar 00 00 00 EA 2
TOTAL UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCLiMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECfS
Form Version May 22, 2019
$93, 000.00
$51,500.00 $51,500.00
$60.00 $11,100.00�
$4.500.00 $4.500.00I
$6,500.00 $19,500.00
$3,500.00 $3.500.00
$2,500.00 $5,000.00
$1,878,927.00
Rocky Creek Phase 2A Bid Proposal
SECTION 00 42 43
DeveloperAwarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
UNIT PRICE BID
Project Item Information
Bidlist Iteml i Specification � Unit of
No. Description ! Section No. Measure
UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
� 1 0241.1100 Remove Asphalt Pvmt 02 41 15 SY
�2 3213.0101 6" Conc Pvmt 32 13 13 SY
3 3211.0501 6" Lime Treatment f30#/SY] 32 11 29 SY
� 4 3211.�502 8" Lime Treatment {36#/SY� 32 11 29 SY
f 5 3211.0400 Hydrated Lime (30#/Sl� 32 11 29 TON
� 6 3211.0400 Hydrated Lime (36#/SY) 32 11 29 TON
� 7 3213.0302 5' Conc Sidewaik 32 13 20 SF
� 8 3213.0303 6' Conc Sidewalk 32 13 20 SF
� 9 3213.0501 Barrier Free Ramp, Type R-1 32 13 20 EA
� 10 3213.0506 Barrier Free Ramp, Type P-1 32 13 20 EA
� 11 3213.0503 Barrier Free Ramp, Type M-1 32 13 20 EA
I 3217.0502 Preformed Thermoplastic Contrast Markings
12 - 24" Crosswalk 32 17 23 LF
� 3217 0504 Preformed Thermoplastic Contrast
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
00 42 43
DAP-BIDPROPOSAL
Page 4 of 5
Bidder's Application
Bid
Quantity
766
40852
43534
7687
653.01
138.37
29071
27756
12
28
2
153
Markings - 24" Stop Bars 32 17 23 LF 153
3290.0100 Topsoil 32 91 19 CY 934
3292.0400 Sodding 32 92 13 SY 5604
9999.0032 Remove Existing W1-1aR Sign & Post 00 00 00 EA 1
9999.0033 Stop Sinn {R1-1 } 00 00 00 EA 19
9999.0034 Street Name Blade 00 00 00 EA 54
9999.0035 Stop Sign (R1-3P) 00 00 00 EA 4
9999.0036 6" Double Yellow Line Marking w/ RPMS 00 00 00 LF 1635
9999.0037 Pavement Header (29') 00 00 00 EA 7
9999.0038 Install EOR Barricade 00 00 00 EA 7
9999.0039 Remove Barricade & Connect to Existing 00 00 00 EA
Header 3
9999.0040 Speed Limit Sign (R2- 1) 00 00 00 EA 3
9999.0041 7.5" Conc Pvmt 00 00 00 SY 7285
9999.0042 Pedestrian Rail 00 00 00 LF 402
TOTAL UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
Bidder's Proposal
Unit Price I Bid Value
$20.00 $15,320.00
$60.00 $2,451,120.00
$3.50 $152,369.00
$4.00 $30,748.00
$275.00 $179,577.75
$275.00 $38,051.75
$4.50 $130,819.50
$4.50 $124,902.00
$3,200.00 $38,400.00
$3.400.00 $95.200.00
$3,600.00 $7,200.00
$20.00
$20.00
$28.00
$8.00
$500.00
$850.00
$750.00
$850.00
$6.00
$1,000.00
$850.00
$3,060.00
$3, 060.00
$26,152.00
$44, 832.00
$500.00
$16,150.00
$40, 500.00
$3.400.00
$9.810.00
$7, 000.00
$5, 950.00
$500.00
$750.00
$74.00
$140.00
$1, 500.00
$2, 250.00
$539, 090.00
$56,280.00
$4,023,242.00
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CON5IRUCTION SPECIFICATION ➢OCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Fortn Version May 22, 20] 9 Rocky Creek Phase 2A Bid Proposal
UNIT PRICE BID
IBidlist Iteml
No.
Description I Specification
Section No.
Bid Summary
UNIT I: WATER IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT Iil: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT VI: TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
This Bid is submitted by the entity named below:
BIDDER:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
5327 Wichita Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
Contractor agrees to complete WORK for FINAL ACCEPTANCE within
CON1'RACT commences to run as provided in the General Conditions.
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Foan Version May 22, 2019
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Project Item Information
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 5 of 5
Bidder's Application
Bidder's Proposal
Unit of B�d Unit Price Bid Value
Measure Quantity
Total Construction Bid
$1,793,649.00
$1,594,152.00
$1,878,927.00
$4,023,242.00
N/A
N/A
$9,289,970.00
BY: Brock uggins
TITLE: President
DATE:
280 working days aiter the date when the
Rocky Creek Phase 2A Bid Proposal .
0o as t2
DAP PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Page 1 of I
SECTION 00 4512
DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Each Bidder is required to complete the information below by identifying the prequalified contractors
and/or subcontractors whom they intend to utilize for the major work type(s) listed. In the "Maior Work
Tvne" box nrovide the comnlete maior work tvne and actual descrivtion as nrovided bv the Water
DeDartment for water and sewer and TPW for pavine.
Major Work Type
Water Distribution System -
New Construction, All Sizes
Sewer Collection System -
New Construction, All Sizes
Concrete Paving Construction
- Unlimited Area
Roadway & Pedestrian
Lighting
Sanitary Sewer
Manhole/Structure Interior
Lining - Warren ar Chesterton Coating
Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
Conatser Construction TX, L.P
Conatser Construction TX, L.P
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
ACE Pipe Cleaning lnc.
Prequalification
Expiration Date
4/30/26
4/30/26
11/30/26
1/31/26
2/28/26
The undersigned hereby certifies that the contractors and/or subcontractors described in the table above
are currently prequalified for the work types listed.
BIDDER:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
5327 Wichita Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCfION PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
BY: Brock Huggins
.
ignature)
TITLE: President
DATE:
END OF SECTION
00 45 12_ 1 Prequalification Statement 2015_DAP
Form Version September 1, 2015
00 45 26 - 1
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW
Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
SECTION 00 45 26
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW
Pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 406.096(a), as amended, Contractor certifies that it
provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City
Project No. 105576. Contractor further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code, Section
406.096(b), as amended, it will provide to City its subcontractor's certificates of compliance with
worker's compensation coverage.
CONTRACTOR:
Conatser Construction TX. L.P.
Company
5327 Wichita Street
Address
Fort Worth. Texas 76119
City/State/Zip
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
�
§
By: Brock Hu�ins —
(Please Print)
Signature:
Title: President
(Please Print)
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared
��UC.k f�'l.��Gl �i S , known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the forego ng instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same as
the act and deed of �� 1 r'� .�_ , P for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this �} day of
Fj�J� � 1 .20�-5
,��RYPf/ KATHERINE ROSE
� � NOFARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TE7(AS
ry ios 133467933
���or�*` COMM.EXP. 11-30-2025
�� ���
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised April 2, 2014
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
Ciry Project No. l05576
9/16/2025
0{75?a3-2
]k� eloFkr .lt+ardad i'rujoct .-1��rc,;mzut
Pa��e � of�[
;S Article �3. CONTRACT PRICE
39 Dc�clo�cr agrees to pa� Contractor for perfon�iancc ofthe Wo��k in accordv�ce t�ith the Contract
�U DOCLll11C[1tS �il] 1ll1013lif 1[1 Cl1I�Cl:llt �LII1C�5 Of N111C �'I1I�1011 T�1'O HlI11CICCCI EL��iT�'-Nlllf; TI10UStllld
�1 Niiie Hundred Scletit� Dollars and,�ero Cents t$�.?89.970.001.
�2 Article 5. COI�'I'RACT DOCUNlEN7'S
�3 �.1 CONTENTS:
��
��
-�E,
-�7
�S
��l
�U
�1
S2
�;
��
»
�6
�7
�8
�9
GO
61
C�
6�
G�
6�
G6
t7
6�
69
70
7l
72
73
7-1
7�
7C,
A. T�ie Contract Documents nhich cornprise the entirc agrccmcnt bct��een De�cloper aud
ConEractor conce�iii�lg the ��Vark consisi of the follo« ing:
L Ti�is Agreen�cnt.
2. Attachitlents to this Agrccmcnt:
a. Bid Foi7n (As pro�-ided b�� Dc�cio��er)
1) Proposal Fonn (DAP Vcrsiou)
2) Pr�qEialificatio►� Statcmcnt
�) State and Fcdcr�l documents (pt�qjecl specifrc)
b. li�surance ACOKD Form{s)
c. Pa��mc��t Bond (D�P Vcrsian}
d. i'crFom�ance Bond (DAP Vcrsion)
e. hlainte��ancc Boud (DAP Version)
f. Po«er ofAttonie�� for d�e Bonds
g. 'L�'orkcrs Compcnsation Affid:�� it
il. Nf BE �u�dlor 5�3E Commitment Fonii (If rcquircd)
3. Staudar�i Cit. General Conditions of the Const«lction Contract for Dc� cloper
A�� arded Arojccts.
d. Supplcme�ltan� Co�iditions.
�. Spccifications sp�citicall� ���ade a part of thc Contract Docim�cnts b� attachmcnt
or_ if not attachcd_ as incnr�3orated b�� ecfcrence and dcscribcd iii tho Tavle of
Contcnts of the. Projcct�s Contract Documcnts.
6. Dran ings.
7. Addenda.
8. Docunicntatio�i submitted b� Contractor p►-io�� to 1�otice of A��ard.
9. Tl�c follo���in� «l�ich ma�� be deli��ercd or issued aftc�' t��e Effecti��c D�tu of tl�e
A�rc�ment �u�d_ if issl�cd_ becomc an incoiporated part of thc Coi3tract Documc��ts:
a. Noticc to P,-ocecd.
b. Field O�dcrs.
c. Cha�i�e Ordcrs.
d. Letter of Fi��al Acceptancc.
Cl1 �" ol� PC)It�C ��-c)IZ�CI[ Kr�r.'A"} c'f;1:F_h"CRC�c�I��(�. f�Il.-��E1.,`
S"G1Sll:1RDC0\SI�I21�C"I�fOV�SPECIF[C-17�I0\D(x[�\I1�,�"[ti Dl:l"IsI.OPl�7t:�11"_VZllGllPKOIk:C"CS l�i?�'6
Ita`'ik;d .li�n.: lG. �Ul[
[,i0 i? .� � - 3
[a;�:.lup�r _1lcardad ['roj�el :lsreai�a��it
Pa�e 3 ofd
77
78
7�1
80
S1
82
8�
��
S�
8G
87
88
89
9(3
91
�z
93
9�
�);
9G
97
9R
Article 6. Ii�bEMNIF[CAT[ON
6.l Contractor coveuants �nd agrees to i��demriify, hold harmless and ciefertd, at its o�vn
expense, t4ie city, its officers, servants and employees, fror�a and against an,y and all
claims ��'ising out of, or �lleged to �rise out of, the riark and services to be pe��formed
by t1�e cor�tractor, its ofrce��s, agents, e�nployees, subcontractors, licenses o�- invitees
under tliis canti'act. Tliis indenu�ificaiion urovision is sUeciticallv inteiideci ko operate
a�id be effective eve�i if it is aiten�ed o�• nra�en that all o�• some of tlie da�na�es bein�
sou2ht �vere caused, in �vhole or i�i n:u-t, bv anv act, omissioa� oz- i�effli�ence of the city.
This i��dcmnity �rovision is intended to include, withoi�t limit�tiar�, indemnity for
costs, expenses and leg�l fees incu�•red by the city i�� defending against such cl�ims and
c�uses of actions.
6.2 Cont�•actor cove��ants ancf agrees to indemnify= and tnold liarmless, �t its own expense,
the c;ty, iks oTficers, serv�nts and e���plo_yees, from and agaiz►sk nny and all lass, damage
or destructian of propert,y of the city, arising out of, or allegecl to arise out of, tl�e work
and services to be performed by tlie cont�•actor, its of�cers, agents, emplo,yees,
subcontr�Ctors, licensees or invitees �u�der ttus conti•act. This inde�nni�cltion
nrovision is snecificallv intended to ouernte �nd be effective e��eu if it is alleQed or
n�•oven that ail or san�e of tl�e damages beiit� sou�l�t were caused, iii wlaole o�- in t�a�•tt
b� �nv act, omission oz� negli�ence of tlie citv.
Article 7. N11SCEl,Lr\NEOUS
99 7.1 Ter�Tls.
100
101
102
1[r;
1f1�
Tei�ms used in this Agrceu�ei�t arc dcfined in Article 1 of the StaEic�ard Cit�� Co�iditioi�s of
the Constnictio�� Contract for De�cloper A��arded Projects.
72 Assignmcnf of Co»tract.
This Agrccment, includin� all of tl�� C'ontr�ct Docitincnts ma� not bc assigncd b� the
Contractor n itfiout thc ad� anccd c�press «rittcn consciit of tlic De� eloper.
lU� 7. � Succ�ssors anc{ Assigils.
lOG Dc� clo�cr and Co�itractor cackl biiids itself. its pa��tn�rs_ successors, assigns ai�d lc�al
I[)7 rcprescntati� cs to tl�e other part� hercta_ in respect to all corenlnts, agrce�ne��ts and
10g obligations contained in thc CoiitracE Docwncnts.
109 7.�4 Sc� crabilit� .
11U An� pro� ision or part af tl�e Contract Dociunents hcld to be unco�istit��tional. � oid or
111 tinenforecablc b�� a co�ut of com���tcnt jurisdictian sl�all be c�eciued strickc»_ and all
l I Z rcmainiii� pro� isions shall contin�ie to be � afid �I]C� 1]]I1CIll1� upoa� DE��E�.OPEFZ and
I l � CONTRACTOR.
1]� 7.� Go�e�l�ing La�� and �'cnuc.
I1� Tl�is A�I�CIl1C11I. kRCIl1C{lll� all of thc C:ontrlct Documcnts is perFo�»}able i�l dl� Statc of
11G �'c�as. VeiitEc sliall be Ta�raeit t:ounh. Tc�as, or tfie Unitccl States DISII"ICt COLICC fUi" C�lf;
l 17 Noi�thc��n Distnct of Te�as_ Fort Worth Di� isian.
ClTl' OP l�Olt C �[�OR"CI! Jf!7C'Ki"CFlEEfi CI?U.SSI.�'G. 1'N. �SF_' l.�
SI:�\])_1RUCO\S'fltl'C"C[(7\Sl�i:CIF[C':1170\'[xX;[ \[I;\75 DI:��I�:LOYk(lt.-111":1Kll1�:l)k�[tO1F..C�CS �r1;�'�
€2���is.:J .iuna L6. 2016
9/16/2025 9/16/2025
16 September 25
16 September
25
16 September 25
16
September 25
16 September 25
0
1
�
3
4
0062 ]9-2
MAIN1'EVANCE BO�lll
Pa�e2 of3
WHEREAS, Principal binds itselfto repair or reconstruct the Work in whole or in part
upon receiving notice from the Developer and/or City of the need thereof at any time within the
Maintenance Period.
5
6 NOW THEREFORE, the condition ofthis obligation is such that if Principal shall
7 remedy any defective Work, for wilich timety notice was provided by Developer or City, to a
S completion satisfactory fio the Ciry, then this obligation sha(1 become null and void; otherwise t�
9 remain in full force and et�ect.
JO
1 I PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principal shall fait so to repair or reconstruct any timely
t2 noticed defective Work, it is agreed that the Developer or Cit� may cause any and all such
13 defective Work to be repaired andlor reconstructec! with all associated costs thereof being borne
►4 by the Principal and the Surety under this Maintenance Bond; and
15
16 PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any (egal action be filed on this Bond, venue sha(1 lie in
17 Tarrant County, Texas or the Unit�d 5tates District Court for the Northern District of Te�:as, Fort
18 Wot�th Division; and
19
20 PROVIDED FURTHER, that this obligation shall be continuous in nature and
21 successive recoveries may be had hereon for successive breaches.
�2
23
��
CI7'Y OP FORT' VI�ORTH
STANDARD C1TY COhDIT(UNS — DY.:Vf:LOPGR AWARDED PROJECTS
Re�•ised Januan� 31, �012
ROC��'C�H�t�h c'koss�i.4r, t�Has�' �.�
CIh� Pruject :�b. IOS.i76
16 September
25
�
�
�
a�
x
� �
,� ._
� �
� �
� .�
� a�
� �
� �
� �
r. �
J
� �
� �
a �,
� �
o a�i
> �
� �
•� o
�, �
� a
� o
o.
y v
� �
w
o �
�. �
3 ""
o �
� o
� �
c�
,�' U
� W
. 's.
a�i �
��
�
0
,� °4
.� �
.; �
� 3
a�
� �
U 5"'
a
-°� �
� ...
b
� �
`�' o
o �,
o .x
��, U
�
� �
� �
� �
0
� '�
o �
U O
� .n
� �
o ,�
a. �
� ...
�. �
'�° o
N �
o �
� a�
� �
� �
�
� �
d �
� o
�: �s
� �
� �
� �
� U
a�
� �
POWER OF ATTORNEY
BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE
No. BI-72801
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Company"), a corporation duly
organized and existing under tl�e laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal office in Greenwich, CT, has made, constituted
and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint: Ricardo J. Reyna; Don E. Carnell; Sophinie Hunter;
Robbi Morales; Kelly A. Westbroolc; Tina McEwan; Joshua Saunders; Tanie Petranek; or Mikaela Peppers of Aon Risk
Services Souihwest, Inc. of Dallas, TX its true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact, to sign its name as surety only as delineated below
and to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds and undertakings, with the exception of Financial Guaranty
Insurance, providing that no single obligation shall exceed Fifty Million and 00/100 U.S. Dollars (U.S.$50,000,000.00), to tt�e
saine extent as if such bonds had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected o�cers of the Company at its
principal ofFce in their owu proper persons.
This Power of Attorney shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware,
without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereo£ This Power of Attorney is granted pursuant to the following
resolutions which were duly and validly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on January 25, 2010:
RESOLVED, that, with respect to the Surety business written by Berkley Surety, the Chainnan of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer, President or any Vice President of the Company, in conjunction with the Secretary or any Assistant
Secretary are hereby authorized to execute powers of attorney authorizing and qualifying the attomey-in-fact named therein
to execute bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or otl�er suretyship obligations on behalf of tl�e Company, and to affix the
corporate seal of the Company to powers of attomey executed pursuant hereto; and said officers may remove any such
attoniey-ui-fact and revoke any power of attomey previously granted; and further
RESOLVED, that such power of atton�ey limits tl�e acts of those named tl�erein to the bonds, undertakings, recogniza.uces,
or other suretyship obligations s�ecifically named therein, and they have no autl�ority to bind the Company except in the
manner and to the extent therein stated; and fiirther
RESOLVED, that such power of attorney revokes all previous powers issued on behalf of the attomey-in-fact nained; and
further
RESOLVED, that tl�e signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to auy
power of attomey or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or
other suretyship obligation of the Coinpany; and such signature and seal when so used shall have tl�e same force and effect as
d�ough manually affixed. Tl�e Company may continue to use for tl�e purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any
person or persons who shall l�ave beeii such officer or officers of the Company, notwithstanding tl�e fact that they may have
ceased to be such at the time when such instruments shall be issued.
IN WITr1ESS WIIEREOF, the Compairy has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its
corporate seal hereunto affixed this 2"d day of Mav , 2024 .
Attest: Berkley Iusurance Company
(Seal} By ti� ���-. r�l a�n 7��,`j By �
Phili 5`'�71Teit Je M�� u
P �
Execuuve Vice President � Secr�etary Senior ti ice. President
ST:�TE OF CONNEGI'ICL"i )
) ss:
C�L�Zi' OF F.4IltFIELD )
S��rorn to before me, a Notary Public in the State of Canneeticut, tius 2� day af Ma�' ZO?4 , by Plulip S. VJelt and
3effrey Nf_ Hafter .�ho are s��om to me to be t�e Executi�*e. Vice President and Secretary, and the �enior Vice President,
respectiy e1y, of $erkl�� Iusurance. Company. �
/ �.. I
WIRlA G. RUNpBNGEAI � i'�'',�I'� ; � �,.� � l� ,'�` • I� ,,.-..
tiOTAt�Y i'UBI.�G Notary Public, State of C onnecticut
CSONNECTICLlT
IY11r001�IMISSION DWJFi� W-3a-202Y CEATiFICATE
I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of BERKLEY INSURATfC:E COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIF'Y that the foregoing is a
tcue, correct and complete copy of the original Power afAttorney; that said Power of Attorne}* has nat be�n rei�oked orrescinded
and ti�at tlie- authorFty of tlie Aitamey-in-Fact set fordi therein, �aho e.xecuted the boud or undertaking to which dus Power of
Attorney is attached, is ia full force au� effect as af fhis date..
Given under my hand aud seal of the Company, tbis day of - > _
(Sea1) --^,1.-r� -; k`. :
. � .r{v.i �.,�_* ;�5� �'r--
Viacent P. Forte
1MPORTANT NOTICE
To vbtain infonnatian or make a compiaint:
You may c�il Berktey Surety Grou�, LLC �nd its affiliates by
#elephone for infarrnation or to make a campiaint:
BERK�EY SURETY GROUP, LLC
Please send a[i notices ofi cta�m on this bond fo:
Berkiey Surety Group, LLC
(86�} 768-3534
4'12 Mount Kembie Avenue, Suite 31QN
Mvrristov►rn, NJ G?960
A#tn: Surety Claims �epartment
You may contact the Texas Departmen# ofi Insurance �o obtain
informaiion on companies, coverages, ri�h#s or camplaints at:
7 -80D-252-3439
You may write the Texas Department of lnsurance:
P. O. Box 149104
Austin, TX 7'87'14-91d4
Fax: ��'12� 475-7 771
Web: hitp:t/www.idi.state.tx.us
E-maii: ConsumerProtectionC�?tdi.state,tx.us
PREMIUM OR CLAIM DISPUTES:
Should you have a dispute concerning your premium or abo�t a claim
you should ct�ntact yaur agent ar Berktey Surety Group, LLC �rst, l#
the dispute is not resolved, you may contact #he Te�xas Department of
Insurance.
ATTACH THIS NUTfCE TO YtJUR BOND:
This notice is for information only and does not became a part or
conditian of the attached document �nd is given to cvmp{y with Texas
tegai and reguiatory requirements.
STREET LIGHT
IMPROVEMENTS
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
UNIT PRICE BID
Project Item Information
00 42 43 (2)
DAP - B]D PROPOSAL
Page 1 of 2
Bidder's Application
Bidders Proposal
f Bidlist Iteml Description I Specification I Unit of f B�d Unit Price I Bid Value
I No. SectionNo. Measure I Quantiry
� UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVF�JIAENTS
1 2605.3015 2" CONDT PVC SCH 80 (� 26 05 33 LF 6036 $1.5.00 $90 540.00
2 3441.1402 NO 6 Duplex OH insulated Elec Condr 34 41 10 LF �8742,60 $3.00 $26�227,80,
3 3441.1408 NO 6 Insulated Elec Condr 34 41 10 � LF 18108 $2,00 $36 216.00
4 3441.1638 Type 336 Street Light Arm 34 41 20 �EA 74 $850.00 $62,900.00
5 3441.3301 Type 11 Street Light Foundation 34 41 2� � EA 74 $1,200.00 $88,800.00
6 3441.3323 Furnish/lnstall 8' Wood Light Pole Arm 34 41 20 �EA � 20 $850.00 _� $17 000.00
7 3441.3341 Type 11 Street Light Pole 35 41 20 EA 74 _$3.�OOOAO _,$222 O,e 00.00
8 9999.4042 Type R2 Street Light DO 00 00 EA 67 $750.00 ____ $50,250�00
9 9999.0043 Type R4 Street Light 00 00 00 EA 7�$950�00 ,�� $6,650,; 00
10 9999.0044 ATBO P303 MVOLT R2 Street Light 00 00 OD �� EA 20 �$750:00 ..._ �15,000�00
11 9999.0045 Install 120/240V Meter Pedestal � 00 00 OD EA� 1 $11,500�00 $11_ 500F00
12 9999.0046 CFW SL Riser ��� 00 00 00 EA 2 5650.00 $1,300.00
� TOTAL UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS $628,383.80
CITY OF FORT WOR7H
SiANDARD CONSIRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Fortn Version May 22, 2019
Rceky Creek Phase 2A Bid Proposal
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
UNIT PRICE BID
00 42 43 (2)
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 2 of 2
Bidder's Application
IProject Item infonnation Bidder's Proposal
IBidlist Itemi Specificarion I Unit of 1 Bid I
Description Unit Price Bid Value
No. I SectionNo. Measure I Quantity
Bid Summary
UNIT I: WATER IMPROVEMENTS � N/AI
UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS � N/A
UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS i N/A
UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS N/A
UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS $628,383.80
UNIT VI: TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS N/A
Total Construction Bid $628,383.80�
This Bid is submitted by the entity named below:
BIDDER:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P
5327 Wichita SVeet
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
Cmtractor agrees to complete WORK far FINAL ACCEPTANCE within
CONTRACT coromences to run as provided in the General CondiHons.
BY: BrockHuggins
�
TITLE: esident
DATE:
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCT[ON SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEV ELOPER AWARDED PROIECTS
Fonn Version May 22, 2019
40 woridng days after the date wheu the
Roc1.y Creek Phase 2A Bid Proposal
00 45 l2
DAP PREQUALIF[CAT[ON STATEMENT
Page 1 of 1
SECTION 00 45 12
DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Each Bidder is required to complete the information below by identifying the prequalified contractors
and/or subcontractors whom they intend to utilize for the major work type(s) listed. In the "Maior Work
Tvne" box nrovide the comvlete maior work tvne and actual descriqtion as �rovided bv the Water.
Deoartment for water and sewer and TPW for navin�.
Major Work Type
Water Distribution System -
New Construction, All Sizes
Sewer Collection System -
New Construction, All Sizes
Concrete Paving Construction
- Unlimited Area
Roadway & Pedestrian
Lighting
Sanitary Sewer
Manhole/Structure Interior
Lining - Warren or Chesterton Coating
Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name Prequalification
Expiration Date
Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 4/30/26
Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 4/30/26
Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 11/30/26
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
ACE Pipe Cleaning Inc.
1/31/26
2/28/26
The undersigned hereby certifes that the contractors and/or subcontractors described in the table above
are currently prequalified for the work types listed.
BIDDER:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
5327 Wichita Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
BY: Brock Huggins
.
(Signature)
TITLE: President
DATE:
CIN OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCfION PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
END OF SECTION
0� 45 12_ 1 Prequalification Statement 2015_DAP
Form Version September 1, 2015
0o as 26 - i
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW
Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
SECTION 00 45 26
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW
Pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 406.096(a), as amended, Contractor certifies that it
provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City
Project No. 105576. Contractar further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code, Section
406.096(b), as amended, it will provide to City its subcontractor's certificates of compliance with
worker's compensation coverage.
CONTRACTOR:
Conatser Construction TX. L.P
Company
5327 Wichita Street
Address
Fort Worth. Texas 76119
City/State/Zip
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OFTARRANT
By: Brock Hueeins
(Please Print)
a
Signature:
Title: President
(Please Print)
§
§
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared
�. j"�(, 1$ , known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same as
the act and deed of ��. i.,• �. for the purposes and
consideration therein expressed and in�the capacity therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this �� day of
FI��b-7 � .2��
�r
O�/�Y��Pf18 KATHERINE ROSE
a/,�(��o NOTpRYPUBLIC,STATEDFTEXAS
�xT�°� inu � 33467933
'�oy�' COHM. EXP. i�-30-2025
jc� L �.� i��.�
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised April 2, 2014
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
Ciry Project No. 105576
9/16/2025
{}p5?�;_�
lk:tieluFxr,Iti�n��dtd Prnj�ct .-1�!rz�incnt
Pa�?� ? uf -1
;� Article 4. CONTRACT Pk210E
;9 De� cloper agrees ta p1}� Contractar for perForivanci; of thc 1Vork in accardance �� it[1 tiie Contract
�U DOCIII]iC17T5 �lil 1EtlO�llit 111 CLliiCl]T flll]CiS Of Sl\ Hundred T«c��t� -Ei�Eit Tkious�utd Tl�ree H�u�dreci
-� I Ei�,�tt� = I'hree Dollars and Ei�ht� Cents (�6�8_ �83.501.
-t2 Article 5. COnTRACT DOCUNIENTS
�.; ?. � CONTENTS:
-1� A. T1�e COflt['10E DOCIII]leilt5 \\IlIC�I C0111�I'l5� thc cntire agrecm�nt bet��een Do�cloper and
�� Co��tractor co��ccrning the «"ork co��sist of the follo�� ing:
-1fi !. 7'ftis Agree�ttc��t.
�7
�8
-�9
�U
S1
;2
53
i-�
i;
;C
>7
�8
�9
60
61
62
63
fi-�
G�
CG
C�7
G8
{,y
7U
71
72
T
7-4
7i
76
2. Attacl7mcnts to ihis A�rccmeut:
a. Bid Foml (As �ro� ided b�� Developer)
I) Proposal Foni� (DAP Version)
2) Prequaliftcation Statement
3) State and Federal documc��ts (pl�nject specifrc�
b. Ius�u�ance ACORD Forni(s)
c. Pa�ment Bo�id (DAP Vcrsion)
d. Pe��omiauce Bo�fd {DAP Versio��)
c. Maii�tenancc Bond {DAP Vcrsio��)
f. Po���er of Attome�� For the Bonds
g. ��4'orkcr�s Campc�}satioii Affida� it
h. MRE aitdlor SRF Cotun�itmcnt Fonn (If requircd)
3. Standard Cic� General Conditions of tl�e Co»struction Contract for De�elo�er
Ar�-arded Projccts.
4. 5upplcme�ita��� Conditions.
�. Spccifications spccificall�� ivadc a part of thc CO[ltl"�3CC DOCUIi1CIltS b� attachmcnt
or, if not attacl�cd_ as i��corparatcd b�� rcfcrcncc and dcsc��ibcd in th� Tablc of
C:o�itents of the Prajcct�s Contract Docucuents.
G. Dra�� ings.
7. Acidenda.
R. Documcntatioii submittcd b� Contractor prior !o I�otic� of A«ard.
9. Tl}e follo�s ing r�l�iel� ma�� be dcii��ered or issucd after thc Effcctirc Dat� of the
Agrccment and, if issued. become a�l i�icoi��oratcd pa��t of ih� CO]liC1Ct DOCilI]7G]1TS:
a. Noticc to Procecd.
b. Field Ordcrs.
c. Chan�c Ord�rs.
d. Letter of Final Acceptancc.
CI'll� O1� EORT ICOK"1 E l It(X. h�F c'fL{f-.:�; C Y,O.CSI1"i�. I'fL i.57:' 2. ?
SC.1\D.IRDCU\SCRI"CT10\ SY];Cl] 1C_1"CIO\' [xX'C"\[G\7S- [)I;l'F,LOPLR.I�l:lltl)1{UP1tC)TEC'Iti /q5S'�
]Zz��ik;� liizi� ]h. Z01G
U(1 i? -I� - i
Lk;� �loper :1ti�.�rded E3nject :1�re�m�ni
Pn�e 3 ��f �S
77 Article 6. INDEVII�IFICATION
78
7 �)
xu
si
x?
ti�
�.
�-4
Si
XC,
87
�8
89
90
91
��z
y;
9-1
<) �
�)b
97
gg
6.1 Conti-artar covenants and agi�ees t❑ indemnif_y, hold t�armless and defend, at its own
expense, the citv, its offcers, servants �nd em�lo_yees, front and against any and all
clait��s arising out of, or alleged to lrise oat of, tl�e work and services to be perfarmed
by� tlie cor�tr�cto�•, its af�cers, agents, e�3�ployees, subcoi�tr�cto�•s, licenses or invitees
under this cantrack. This indeninification uI•ovision is specificnllv iute�ided to ouerate
�nd be effective even if it is alle�ed or �roven thnt �II o�• soine of the dama�es bein�
soEi�ht we�•e causecf, in whoie or i�i Aart, �iv anv act, amission or ne�li�ei�ce of t�e citv.
This inciemnity provision is i��tended to i��clude, witt�out limit�tion, inciemnity for
costs, expenses aiid legal fees incurred by t��e cit,y in defencliiig R��IIlSt SUCII CiT1I1lS ilEl(�
cailses of actio��s.
G.2 Contractor covenants and agrees to indeainify �nd liold hnr�ziless, at its own expense,
the eity, its officers, servants xnd eniployees, froin and a�ainst any and Rll loss, d.un�ge
or destructiaEl of propertv of the cit_y, arising out of, or alIeged to nz�ise out of, t��e �ror�:
a�id services to be perfoi•med by the cor�ti•actor, its of�cers, age;its, employees,
subcontrnctors, licensees or invitees under this contract. Tliis indenu�i�cation
nrovisiou is sneci�cally intended to onerate �nd be effective even if it IS alle�ed or
nroveii th�t all o�• sooie of the dama2es bein� sou�ht rve�-e caused, in �vhole or in part,
bv anv act, oniission or negl�er�ce af the citv.
A��tiele 7. iVIISCELLANEOUS
�)9 7.1 Tenns.
100 Te��ms uscd i�7 tliis Agreen�cnt arc dcfined in A�tic�c 1 of the Standard Cit� Coitditioits of
lUl the Const��iction Contract for Dc�cloper A��arded Projects.
1O2 7.2 Assi�nmcnt of Co�itract.
1('13 This AgreeEnent, i»cl�iding all of the Conh�lct Documeuts ma�� not bc assigned ��� the
ll�� Contractor �� itho�it tl�e ad� auccd espress �� i�itten consent of the lle� eEope��.
lU� 7.3 Successors and Assigus.
lOG De�c;ioper and Cont��actor each binds itself. its partucrs, successors. assigns a�id ]egal
t117 rcpresentati�cs to tlae otllc� pa��t� I�crcto_ in i�espect to all co�enants, agreem�nts and
104 obligations contain�d i�i thc Contract Documents.
Ic)9 7.�4 Se�er�bifit��.
110 A�i.� pro�°ision o�� j�a�t of tl�c Contr�ct Documciits hcld to be wlco��stitutio�ia!_ �oid or
111 ui�enforccablc b� a court of cotnpc;tettt �urisdiction shall �e deemed sh-ickcn_ and all
11� re;niaini��� pro�isians shall COIIII[lllE', to be �alid and binding upon DEVELOPER anci
1 1 � CONTRACTOR.
� �-� �.� �10�'�E71111� �..11� 1ttC� ���RLiC.
I I� 'l�l�is Agrcement. includiii� ail of the Contract Doc�mients is p���fornlablc in tl�e Staiu of
l lG Tc.�as. �`cuuc sh�ll b� Tarrt�nt Count�_ `T�c�as. or thc Unitcd States District Court for the
l l7 NorthcE-n District of Tc�as. Fort �'Voc�th Di��ision.
Cl I i' OI l�Oftl� �1"c)R 17I IZlI� "1�"} ��Rl:7:7: c'1(<15:�I.1�f;. f'fI. I.�I: 3 1
ST.-1\D:1KI)CO\tiI7tl'C77O\ SPI;C[FiC:�"Cl0\ IX7Cl \1Ei\'fS 1)i;l E:].OPLK:1�1.1R1)I�.11l'IZO.i1;CTS I�155'6
R�cik:d June Ifi. �l(]LG
9/16/2025 9/16/2025
16 September 25
16
September 25
16 September 25
16
September 25
16 September 25
(70 b2 I 9 - :
MAIN"I'f:NANCk: BC)Nll
Yage 2 03� 3
] WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to repair or reconstruct the Work in whole or in part
2 upon receiving notice fram the Developer and/or City of the need thereof at any time within the
3 Maintenanee Period.
�
5 NOW THERE�ORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if Principal sl�al[
6 remedy any defective Work, for which timely notice was provided by Developer or City. to a
7 cc�mptetion satisfactory to the City, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise to
8 remain in full force and effect.
9
10 PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principa] shall fail so to repair or reconstruct any timely
i t noticed defective Work, it is agreed that the Developer or City may cause any and all such
12 def'ective Work to be repaired and/or reconstructed with all associated costs thereof being borne
13 by the Principal and the Surety under this Maintenance Bond; and
t4
15 PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal actkon be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in
16 Tarrant County, Te�as or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort
l7 Worth Division; and
1$
l9 PROVIDED FURTHER, that this obli�ation shall be continuous in nature and
20 successive recoveries may be had hereon for successive breaches.
��
22
23
CtTY OF FORT 41'OR`i'I1 ROC !i Y" CR&£h' CRO.SS7A'G,1'HASF, �.�
S"fANDARD CITY CONDI"I'IUNS —DEVt:LOPGR AWARbF�p PROJECTS Crtti Projecr .Vn. 105576
Rc�ised Januap• 31 _ �O1 �
16 September
25
b
�
�
� x
� �
� �
� �
a� �
�.
� a�
� �
� �
� �
� �
�
� ^
� �
�
� �
� o a�i
> �-
� �
•� o
�, `.'
� a
� o
o.
Y �
� u
�1--1 �
o �
�. �
3 .�
o �
¢, o
� �
.. e�
� �
H �
. 's;
-o d
� �
� 'b
�
�
o r�n
a. . �
.� E
�
� 3
� �'
� .�
U �"
o Q-
-v �
� ...
� �
c
w �
0 0
O V
�
ti �
y' a�
� �
w �
0
� '�
o �
U O
a �
o �
�. �
a. �
�, ...
-a �
0
N o
� �
0
y �
� �
� �
�
Q �
�
� o
v U
z�
z�
a �'
� U
a�
� Y
POWER OF ATTORNEY
BERKLEY INSURA.NCE COMPANY
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE
No. BI-72801
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Company"), a corporation duly
organized and existing ui�der the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal office in Greenwich, CT, has made, constituted
and appointed, and does by �ese presents make, constitute and appoint: Ricardo J. Reyna; Don E. Cornell; Sophrnie Hunter;
Robbi Morales; Kelly A. Westbrook; Tina McEwan; Joshua Saunders; Tonie Petranek; or Mikaela Peppers of Aon Risk
Services Southwest, Inc. of Dallas, TX its true and lawful Attomey-in-Fact, to sign its name as surety only as delineated below
and to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds and undertakings, with the exception of Financial Guaranty
Insurance, providing ihat no single obligation shall exceed Fifty Million and 00/100 U.S. Dollars (U.S.$50,000,000.00), to the
same extent as if such bonds had been duly executed aud acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its
principal o�ce in their own proper persons.
T'his Power of Attorney shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware,
without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. This Power of Attomey is granted pursuant to the following
resolutions which were duly and validly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Coinpany held on January 25, 2010:
RESOLVED, that, with respect to tl�e Surety business written by Berkley Surety, the Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive O�cer, President or any Vice President of the Company, in conjunction with the Secretary or any Assistant
Secretary are hereby authorized to execute powers of attorney authorizing and qualifying the attorney-in-fact named therein
to execute bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or other suretyship obligations on bel�alf of the Company, and to a�x the
corporate seal of the Company to powers of attomey executed pursuant hereto; and said officers may remove any such
attomey-in-fact and revoke any power of attorney previously granted; and further
RESOLVED, that such power of atton�ey limits tl�e acts of those named thereiii to the bonds, undertakings, recognizances,
or other suretyship obligations specifically nained therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the
manner and to the extent therein stated; and further
RESOLVED, that such power of attorney revokes all previous powers issued on behalf of the attoniey-in-fact named; and
further
RESOLVED, that the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any
power of attomey or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or
other sureryship obligation of the Coinpany; and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as
tl�ough inanually affixed. The Company inay continue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsirnile signature of any
person or persons who shall I�ave been such officer or ofiicers of the Company, notwithstanding the fact that they may have
ceased to be such at the time when such insiruments shall be issued.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its
corporate seal hereunto affixed tlus 2"d day of Ma� . 2024 .
Amest:
(Seai) Sy ��.J�' I�LA�� ��t
Philip S�h�elt
Execuuve Vice President & Secretary
Berkley Iusuranee Company
B� `�" �!i V"
Je . M�aft r � �
Senior Vice. President
STATE OF CONNECiICi"� }
} ss:
C:OL�7�.' OF F_4IRFIELD )
S�*orn to before me, a Notary Public. in the State of Cannecticut tlus 2°d day nf May . i0?4 , by Philip S. Welt aad
3effrey M_ Haftr,r w•ho are sl�onx to nie to be the Executive �.fice President and Secretary, and the Senior Vice President,
respectively, of Berkle._y Iusurance Compauy.
ura
,% �,� n
MARfA C. FiUNDBAlCf7d �'��'.�.r n� ,� ' I... �.,�� * Ir ,Y--_.
liOTARY PUBL�G Notary Public, 5ta1e of C.annecticut
CONN�TiCIlT
M1rCOMMISSK]N DQ�1F� 0�3G-�Q CER'iIFTC �iTE
I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretv-y of BERI�LEY INSLTRANC.E COMP.�IvY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a
true, correct. and complete copy of tFie ariginal Power of Attorney; #hat said Power of At#orney has not been re��oked or resc.ic� ded
and tltat the authority of ti�e 4tt�mey-in-Faci set foi#ii tL�ereixL �•ho executed the bond or undertakin� to m}uch t3ais Power of
Attarne} is attached, is in fult force and effect as �€this c3ate.
Gi� en uader mY hand aud seal of the Gompany, this day of - .
_- '. ." � , �� `� (#��••
�Se3�� Rw;!�f.;•.i '`i '=�h, 'r..
i� incent P. Forte
iMPORT�4NT NOTiCE
Ta obtain rnfonnation or maice a comptaint:
You may c�l! Berlcley Sur�ety Group, L�G and i#s affilia#es by
telephone for infotma#ion or #o maice a comptaint:
BE�tKLEY SURETY GROUI', LLC
Please send ali notices of claim on this bond to:
Berkiey Surety Group, LLC
(866} 768-3534
412 Mount Kemble A�renue, Suite 310N
Morristowr�, NJ 079fi0
At#n: Surety Claims Department
You may contact the TQx�s Depar�men# of Insurance to obtain
ir�formation on companies, coverages, rights or compiaints at:
9 -i317U-252-3439
You may write th� Texas Department c�f lnsurance:
P. O. Box 149104
Austin, TX 78714-9'104
Fax: (51Zj 475-777'1
Web; http:tlwww.tdi.stat+��tx�us
E-mait: CcansumerProtec#ion a�7.tdi.state.tx,us
PREMIUM OR CLAIM �ISPl1TE�:
Should yQu have a dispute concerning your �remium or about a daim
you si�ould c4ntact your agent or Beckiey Surety Group, LLG frst. lf
the dispute is not resolved, you may contact the Texas Departm�nt of
lnsurance.
ATTACH THIS NOTICE TO YflUR BONd:
This no#ice is for information only and daes not becvme a part flr
eondition of the attached documer�t and is given to comply with Texas
tega[ and regutatory requirements.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS
OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Article 1 – Definitions and Terminology .......................................................................................................... 1
1.01 Defined Terms ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.02 Terminology .................................................................................................................................. 5
Article 2 – Preliminary Matters ......................................................................................................................... 6
2.01 Before Starting Construction ........................................................................................................ 6
2.02 Preconstruction Conference .......................................................................................................... 6
2.03 Public Meeting .............................................................................................................................. 6
Article 3 – Contract Documents and Amending ............................................................................................... 6
3.01 Reference Standards ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents .................................................................. 6
Article 4 – Bonds and Insurance ....................................................................................................................... 7
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers ..................................................................................................... 7
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds ........................................................................ 7
4.03 Certificates of Insurance ............................................................................................................... 7
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance .................................................................................................................. 9
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace ........................................................... 12
Article 5 – Contractor’s Responsibilities ........................................................................................................ 12
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent ................................................................................................. 12
5.02 Labor; Working Hours ................................................................................................................ 13
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment ........................................................................................... 13
5.04 Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 14
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals” ....................................................................................................... 14
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors) ..................................... 16
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others ................................................................... 16
5.08 Wage Rates.................................................................................................................................. 18
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties ........................................................................................................... 19
5.10 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................................. 19
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas ....................................................................................................... 19
5.12 Record Documents ...................................................................................................................... 20
5.13 Safety and Protection .................................................................................................................. 21
5.14 Safety Representative ................................................................................................................. 21
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs ............................................................................................. 22
5.16 Submittals .................................................................................................................................... 22
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee .......................................................................... 23
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.18 Indemnification ........................................................................................................................... 24
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services .............................................................................. 24
5.20 Right to Audit: ............................................................................................................................ 25
5.21 Nondiscrimination....................................................................................................................... 25
Article 6 – Other Work at the Site ................................................................................................................... 26
6.01 Related Work at Site ................................................................................................................... 26
Article 7 – City’s Responsibilities................................................................................................................... 26
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals .............................................................................................. 26
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities ....................................................................................... 26
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program ............................................................................................... 27
Article 8 – City’s Observation Status During Construction ........................................................................... 27
8.01 City’s Project Representative ..................................................................................................... 27
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work .................................................................................................. 27
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work .......................................................................................................... 27
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed .......................................................................................... 28
Article 9 – Changes in the Work ..................................................................................................................... 28
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work ............................................................................................... 28
9.02 Notification to Surety .................................................................................................................. 28
Article 10 – Change of Contract Price; Change of Contract Time ................................................................ 28
10.01 Change of Contract Price ............................................................................................................ 28
10.02 Change of Contract Time............................................................................................................ 28
10.03 Delays .......................................................................................................................................... 28
Article 11 – Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal or Acceptance of Defective Work ...................... 29
11.01 Notice of Defects ........................................................................................................................ 29
11.02 Access to Work ........................................................................................................................... 29
11.03 Tests and Inspections .................................................................................................................. 29
11.04 Uncovering Work ....................................................................................................................... 30
11.05 City May Stop the Work ............................................................................................................. 30
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work ................................................................................ 30
11.07 Correction Period ........................................................................................................................ 30
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work ............................................................................................. 31
Article 12 – Completion .................................................................................................................................. 32
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title ................................................................................................... 32
12.02 Partial Utilization ........................................................................................................................ 32
12.03 Final Inspection ........................................................................................................................... 32
12.04 Final Acceptance ......................................................................................................................... 33
Article 13 – Suspension of Work .................................................................................................................... 33
13.01 City May Suspend Work ............................................................................................................ 33
Article 14 – Miscellaneous .............................................................................................................................. 34
14.01 Giving Notice .............................................................................................................................. 34
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.02 Computation of Times ................................................................................................................ 34
14.03 Cumulative Remedies ................................................................................................................. 34
14.04 Survival of Obligations ............................................................................................................... 35
14.05 Headings ...................................................................................................................................... 35
00 73 10- 1
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 1 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 1 – DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
1.01 Defined Terms
A. Wherever used in these General Conditions or in other Contract Documents, the terms listed
below have the meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof,
and words denoting gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter. Said terms are
generally capitalized or written in italics, but not always. When used in a context consistent with
the definition of a listed-defined term, the term shall have a meaning as defined below whether
capitalized or italicized or otherwise. In addition to terms specifically defined, terms with initial
capital letters in the Contract Documents include references to identified articles and paragraphs,
and the titles of other documents or forms.
1. Agreement - The written instrument which is evidence of the agreement between Developer
and Contractor covering the Work
2. Asbestos—Any material that contains more than one percent asbestos and is friable or is
releasing asbestos fibers into the air above current action levels established by the United
States Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3. Business Day – A business day is defined as a day that the City conducts normal business,
generally Monday through Friday, except for federal or state holidays observed by the City.
4. Buzzsaw – City’s on-line, electronic document management and collaboration system.
5. Calendar Day – A day consisting of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight.
6. City— The City of Fort Worth, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, acting by,
its governing body through its City Manager, his designee, or agents authorized pursuant to
its duly authorized charter on his behalf.
7. Community Facilities Agreement (CFA) -–A Contract between the Developer and the City
for the Construction of one or more following public facilities within the City public right-of-
way or easement: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street, Storm Drain, Street Light, and Street Signs.
A CFA may include private facilities within the right-of-way dedicated as private right-of-
way or easement on a recorded plat.
8. Contract—The entire and integrated written document incorporating the Contract
Documents between the Developer, Contractor, and/or City concerning the Work. The
Contract supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or
oral.
9. Contract Documents—Those items that make up the contract and which must include the
Agreement, and it’s attachments such as standard construction specifications, standard City
Conditions, other general conditions of the Developer, including:
a. An Agreement
00 73 10- 2
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 2 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
b. Attachments to the Agreement
i. Bid Form
ii. Vendor Compliance with State Law Non-Resident Bidder
iii. Prequalification Statement
c. Current Prevailing Wage Rates Table (if required by City)
d. Insurance Accord Form
e. Payment Bond
f. Performance Bond
g. Maintenance Bond
h. Power of Attorney for Bonds
i. Workers Compensation Affidavit
j. MWBE Commitment Form( If required by City)
k. General Conditions
l. Supplementary Conditions
m. The Standard City Conditions
n. Specifications specifically made part of the Contract Documents by attachment, if
not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of
the Project’s Contract Documents
o. Drawings
p. Documentation submitted by contractor prior to Notice of Award.
q. The following which may be delivered or issued after the effective date if the
Agreement and, if issued become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents
i. Notice to Proceed
ii. Field Orders
iii. Change Orders
iv. Letters of Final Acceptance
r. Approved Submittals, other Contractor submittals, and the reports and drawings of
subsurface and physical conditions are not Contract Documents.
10. Contractor—The individual or entity with whom Developer has entered into the Agreement.
11. Day or day – A day, unless otherwise defined, shall mean a Calendar Day.
12. Developer – An individual or entity that desires to make certain improvements within the
City of Fort Worth
13. Drawings—That part of the Contract Documents prepared or approved by Engineer which
graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed by
Contractor. Submittals are not Drawings as so defined.
14. Engineer—The licensed professional engineer or engineering firm registered in the State of
Texas performing professional services for the Developer.
15. Final Acceptance – The written notice given by the City to the Developer and/or Contractor
that the Work specified in the Contract Documents has been completed to the satisfaction of
the City.
00 73 10- 3
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 3 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
16. Final Inspection – Inspection carried out by the City to verify that the Contractor has
completed the Work, and each and every part or appurtenance thereof, fully, entirely, and in
conformance with the Contract Documents.
17. General Requirements—A part of the Contract Documents between the Developer and a
Contractor.
18. Laws and Regulations—Any and all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes,
and orders of any and all governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having
jurisdiction.
19. Liens—Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Project funds, real property, or
personal property.
20. Milestone—A principal event specified in the Contract Documents relating to an
intermediate Contract Time prior to Final Acceptance of the Work.
21. Non-Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and reviewed by the
City, which is signed by Contractor, and Developer, and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
22. Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and approved by the City,
which is signed by Contractor, Developer, and City and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
23. Plans – See definition of Drawings.
24. Project Schedule—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, in accordance with
the General Requirements, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising
the Contractor’s plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Time.
25. Project—The Work to be performed under the Contract Documents.
26. Project Representative—The authorized representative of the City who will be assigned to
the Site.
27. Public Meeting – An announced meeting conducted by the Developer to facilitate public
participation and to assist the public in gaining an informed view of the Project.
28. Regular Working Hours – Hours beginning at 7:00 a.m. and ending at 6:00 p.m., Monday
thru Friday (excluding legal holidays).
29. Samples—Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship that are
representative of some portion of the Work and which establish the standards by which such
portion of the Work will be judged.
00 73 10- 4
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 4 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
30. Schedule of Submittals—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, of required
submittals and the time requirements to support scheduled performance of related
construction activities.
31. Site—Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by City or
Developer upon which the Work is to be performed, including rights-of-way, permits, and
easements for access thereto, and such other lands furnished by City or Developer which are
designated for the use of Contractor.
32. Specifications—That part of the Contract Documents consisting of written requirements for
materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship as applied to the Work, and
certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable thereto.
Specifications may be specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or,
if not attached, may be incorporated by reference as indicated in the Table of Contents
(Division 00 00 00) of each Project.
33. Standard City Conditions – That part of the Contract Documents setting forth requirements
of the City.
34. Subcontractor—An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with any
other Subcontractor for the performance of a part of the Work at the Site.
35. Submittals—All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information
which are specifically prepared or assembled by or for Contractor and submitted by
Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work.
36. Superintendent – The representative of the Contractor who is available at all times and able
to receive instructions from the City and/or Developer and to act for the Contractor.
37. Supplementary Conditions—That part of the Contract Documents which amends or
supplements the General Conditions.
38. Supplier—A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having
a direct contract with Contractor or with any Subcontractor to furnish materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work by Contractor or Subcontractor.
39. Underground Facilities—All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires,
manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, or other such facilities or attachments, and any
encasements containing such facilities, including but not limited to, those that convey
electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications,
cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or
other control systems.
40. Weekend Working Hours – Hours beginning at 9:00 a.m. and ending at 5:00 p.m., Saturday,
Sunday or legal holiday, as approved in advance by the City.
00 73 10- 5
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 5 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
41. Work—The entire construction or the various separately identifiable parts thereof required
to be provided under the Contract Documents. Work includes and is the result of performing
or providing all labor, services, and documentation necessary to produce such construction
including any Participating Change Order, Non-Participating Change Order, or Field
Order, and furnishing, installing, and incorporating all materials and equipment into such
construction, all as required by the Contract Documents.
42. Working Day – A working day is defined as a day, not including Saturdays, Sundays, or
legal holidays authorized by the City for contract purposes, in which weather or other
conditions not under the control of the Contractor will permit the performance of the
principal unit of work underway for a continuous period of not less than 7 hours between 7
a.m. and 6 p.m.
1.02 Terminology
A. The words and terms discussed in Paragraph 1.02.B through D are not defined but, when used in
the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning.
B. Defective:
1. The word “defective,” when modifying the word “Work,” refers to Work that is
unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it:
a. does not conform to the Contract Documents; or
b. does not meet the requirements of any applicable inspection, reference standard, test, or
approval referred to in the Contract Documents; or
c. has been damaged prior to City’s written acceptance.
C. Furnish, Install, Perform, Provide:
1. The word “Furnish” or the word “Install” or the word “Perform” or the word “Provide” or
the word “Supply,” or any combination or similar directive or usage thereof, shall mean
furnishing and incorporating in the Work including all necessary labor, materials, equipment,
and everything necessary to perform the Work indicated, unless specifically limited in the
context used.
D. Unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents, words or phrases that have a well-known
technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in
accordance with such recognized meaning.
00 73 10- 6
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 6 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 2 – PRELIMINARY MATTERS
2.01 Before Starting Construction
Baseline Schedules: Submit to City in accordance with the Contract Documents, and prior to starting
the Work. New schedules will be submitted to City when Participating Change Orders or Non-
Participating Change Orders occur.
2.02 Preconstruction Conference
Before any Work at the Site is started, the Contractor shall attend a Preconstruction Conference as
specified in the Contract Documents.
2.03 Public Meeting
Contractor may not mobilize any equipment, materials or resources to the Site prior to Contractor
attending the Public Meeting as scheduled by the City.
ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AMENDING
3.01 Reference Standards
A. Standards, Specifications, Codes, Laws, and Regulations
1. Reference to standards, specifications, manuals, or codes of any technical society,
organization, or association, or to Laws or Regulations, whether such reference be specific or
by implication, shall mean the standard, specification, manual, code, or Laws or Regulations
in effect at the time of opening of Bids (or on the Effective Date of the Agreement if there
were no Bids), except as may be otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents.
2. No provision or instruction shall be effective to assign to City, or any of its officers,
directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors, any duty or
authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work or any duty or authority to
undertake responsibility inconsistent with the provisions of the Contract Documents.
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents
A. The Contract Documents may be amended to provide for additions, deletions, and revisions in
the Work or to modify the terms and conditions thereof by a Participating Change Order or a
Non-Participating Change Order.
B. The requirements of the Contract Documents may be supplemented, and minor variations and
deviations in the Work not involving a change in Contract Price or Contract Time, may be
authorized, by one or more of the following ways:
1. A Field Order;
00 73 10- 7
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 7 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. City’s or Engineer’s review of a Submittal (subject to the provisions of Paragraph 5.16.C); or
2. City’s written interpretation or clarification.
ARTICLE 4 – BONDS AND INSURANCE
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers
All bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents to be purchased and maintained by
Contractor shall be obtained from surety or insurance companies that are duly licensed or authorized
in the State of Texas to issue bonds or insurance policies for the limits and coverage so required.
Such surety and insurance companies shall also meet such additional requirements and qualifications
as may be provided Section 4.04.
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds
A. Contractor shall furnish performance and payment bonds in the name of Developer and City, in
accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2253 or successor statute, each in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security for the faithful performance and payment of all of
Contractor’s obligations under the Contract Documents.
B. Contractor shall furnish maintenance bonds in the name of Developer and City in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security to protect the City against any defects in any portion of the
Work described in the Contract Documents. Maintenance bonds shall remain in effect for two
(2) years after the date of Final Acceptance by the City.
C. All bonds shall be in the form prescribed by the Contract Documents except as provided
otherwise by Laws or Regulations, and shall be executed by such sureties as are named in the list
of “Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and
as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies” as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Financial
Management Service, Surety Bond Branch, U.S. Department of the Treasury. All bonds signed
by an agent or attorney-in-fact must be accompanied by a sealed and dated power of attorney
which shall show that it is effective on the date the agent or attorney-in-fact signed each bond.
D. If the surety on any bond furnished by Contractor is declared bankrupt or becomes insolvent or
its right to do business is terminated in the State of Texas or it ceases to meet the requirements of
Paragraph 4.02.C, Contractor shall promptly notify City and shall, within 30 days after the event
giving rise to such notification, provide another bond and surety, both of which shall comply
with the requirements of Paragraphs 4.01 and 4.02.C.
4.03 Certificates of Insurance
Contractor shall deliver to Developer and City, with copies to each additional insured and loss payee
identified in these Standard City Conditions certificates of insurance (and other evidence of
insurance requested by City or any other additional insured) which Contractor is required to
purchase and maintain.
00 73 10- 8
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 8 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. The certificate of insurance shall document the City, an as “Additional Insured” on all
liability policies.
2. The Contractor’s general liability insurance shall include a, “per project” or “per location”,
endorsement, which shall be identified in the certificate of insurance provided to the City.
3. The certificate shall be signed by an agent authorized to bind coverage on behalf of the
insured, be complete in its entirety, and show complete insurance carrier names as listed in
the current A.M. Best Property & Casualty Guide
4. The insurers for all policies must be licensed and/or approved to do business in the State of
Texas. Except for workers’ compensation, all insurers must have a minimum rating of A-:
VII in the current A. M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial
strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. If the rating is below that
required, written approval of City is required.
5. All applicable policies shall include a Waiver of Subrogation (Rights of Recovery) in favor
of the City. In addition, the Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the
Engineer (if applicable), and each additional insured identified in these Standard City
Conditions. Failure of the City to demand such certificates or other evidence of full
compliance with the insurance requirements or failure of the City to identify a deficiency
from evidence that is provided shall not be construed as a waiver of Contractor’s obligation
to maintain such lines of insurance coverage.
6. If insurance policies are not written for specified coverage limits, an Umbrella or Excess
Liability insurance for any differences is required. Excess Liability shall follow form of the
primary coverage.
7. Unless otherwise stated, all required insurance shall be written on the “occurrence basis”. If
coverage is underwritten on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall be coincident with
or prior to the date of the effective date of the agreement and the certificate of insurance shall
state that the coverage is claims-made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall
be maintained for the duration of the Contract and for three (3) years following Final
Acceptance provided under the Contract Documents or for the warranty period, whichever is
longer. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall evidence such
insurance coverage.
8. Policies shall have no exclusions by endorsements, which, neither nullify or amend, the
required lines of coverage, nor decrease the limits of said coverage unless such endorsements
are approved in writing by the City. In the event a Contract has been bid or executed and the
exclusions are determined to be unacceptable or the City desires additional insurance
coverage, and the City desires the contractor/engineer to obtain such coverage, the contract
price shall be adjusted by the cost of the premium for such additional coverage plus 10%.
9. Any self-insured retention (SIR), in excess of $25,000.00, affecting required insurance
coverage shall be approved by the City in regards to asset value and stockholders' equity. In
00 73 10- 9
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 9 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
lieu of traditional insurance, alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk
retention groups, must also be approved by City.
10. Any deductible in excess of $5,000.00, for any policy that does not provide coverage on a
first-dollar basis, must be acceptable to and approved by the City.
11. City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to review the insurance requirements and to
make reasonable adjustments to insurance coverage’s and their limits when deemed
necessary and prudent by the City based upon changes in statutory law, court decision or the
claims history of the industry as well as of the contracting party to the City. The City shall
be required to provide prior notice of 90 days, and the insurance adjustments shall be
incorporated into the Work by Change Order.
12. City shall be entitled, upon written request and without expense, to receive copies of policies
and endorsements thereto and may make any reasonable requests for deletion or revision or
modifications of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions necessary to
conform the policy and endorsements to the requirements of the Contract. Deletions,
revisions, or modifications shall not be required where policy provisions are established by
law or regulations binding upon either party or the underwriter on any such policies.
13. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for
Contractor’s insurance.
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance
A. Workers Compensation and Employers’ Liability. Contractor shall purchase and maintain such
insurance coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers’
Compensation Act (Texas Labor Code, Ch. 406, as amended), and minimum limits for
Employers’ Liability as is appropriate for the Work being performed and as will provide
protection from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from Contractor’s
performance of the Work and Contractor’s other obligations under the Contract Documents,
whether it is to be performed by Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly
or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts
any of them may be liable:
1. claims under workers’ compensation, disability benefits, and other similar employee benefit
acts;
2. claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of
Contractor’s employees.
3. The limits of liability for the insurance shall provide the following coverages for not less
than the following amounts or greater where required by Laws and Regulations
a. Statutory limits
b. Employer's liability
00 73 10- 10
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 10 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1) $100,000 each accident/occurrence
2) $100,000 Disease - each employee
3) $500,000 Disease - policy limit
B. Commercial General Liability. Coverage shall include but not be limited to covering liability
(bodily injury or property damage) arising from: premises/operations, independent contractors,
products/completed operations, personal injury, and liability under an insured contract. Insurance
shall be provided on an occurrence basis, and as comprehensive as the current Insurance
Services Office (ISO) policy. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to
any other insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the City. The Commercial General
Liability policy, shall have no exclusions by endorsements that would alter of nullify
premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or advertising
injury, which are normally contained with the policy, unless the City approves such exclusions
in writing.
1. For construction projects that present a substantial completed operation exposure, the City
may require the contractor to maintain completed operations coverage for a minimum of no
less than three (3) years following the completion of the project
2. Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section which shall be on a per project basis
covering the Contractor with minimum limits of:
a. $1,000,000 each occurrence
b. $2,000,000 aggregate limit
3. The policy must have an endorsement (Amendment – Aggregate Limits of Insurance)
making the General Aggregate Limits apply separately to each job site.
4. The Commercial General Liability Insurance policies shall provide “X”, “C”, and “U”
coverage’s. Verification of such coverage must be shown in the Remarks Article of the
Certificate of Insurance.
C. Automobile Liability. A commercial business auto policy shall provide coverage on “any auto”,
defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned and provide indemnity for claims for damages
because bodily injury or death of any person and or property damage arising out of the work,
maintenance or use of any motor vehicle by the Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by
anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone
for whose acts any of them may be liable.
1. Automobile Liability, Contractor’s Liability Insurance under this Section, which shall be in
an amount not less than the following amounts:
a. Automobile Liability - a commercial business policy shall provide coverage on "Any
Auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned.
00 73 10- 11
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 11 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1)$1,000,000 each accident on a combined single limit basis. Split limits are
acceptable if limits are at least:
2)$250,000 Bodily Injury per person
3)$500,000 Bodily Injury per accident /
4)$100,000 Property Damage
D.Railroad Protective Liability. If any of the work or any warranty work is within the limits of
railroad right-of-way, the Contractor shall comply with the following requirements:
1.The Contractor’s construction activities will require its employees, agents, subcontractors,
equipment, and material deliveries to cross railroad properties and tracks owned and
operated by: ____________________________________________________________
Write the name of the railroad company. (If none, then write none)
2.The Contractor shall conduct its operations on railroad properties in such a manner as not to
interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the railroad company in any manner whatsoever in the use
or operation of its/their trains or other property. Such operations on railroad properties may
require that Contractor to execute a “Right of Entry Agreement” with the particular railroad
company or companies involved, and to this end the Contractor should satisfy itself as to the
requirements of each railroad company and be prepared to execute the right-of-entry (if any)
required by a railroad company. The requirements specified herein likewise relate to the
Contractor’s use of private and/or construction access roads crossing said railroad company’s
properties.
3.The Contractual Liability coverage required by Paragraph 5.04D of the General Conditions
shall provide coverage for not less than the following amounts, issued by companies
satisfactory to the City and to the Railroad Company for a term that continues for so long as
the Contractor’s operations and work cross, occupy, or touch railroad property:
a.General Aggregate: _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
b.Each Occurrence: : _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
4.With respect to the above outlined insurance requirements, the following shall govern:
a.Where a single railroad company is involved, the Contractor shall provide one insurance
policy in the name of the railroad company. However, if more than one grade separation
or at-grade crossing is affected by the Project at entirely separate locations on the line or
lines of the same railroad company, separate coverage may be required, each in the
amount stated above.
b.Where more than one railroad company is operating on the same right-of-way or where
several railroad companies are involved and operated on their own separate rights-of-
None
None
None
00 73 10- 12
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 12 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
way, the Contractor may be required to provide separate insurance policies in the name
of each railroad company.
c. If, in addition to a grade separation or an at-grade crossing, other work or activity is
proposed on a railroad company’s right-of-way at a location entirely separate from the
grade separation or at-grade crossing, insurance coverage for this work must be included
in the policy covering the grade separation.
d. If no grade separation is involved but other work is proposed on a railroad company’s
right-of-way, all such other work may be covered in a single policy for that railroad, even
though the work may be at two or more separate locations.
5. No work or activities on a railroad company’s property to be performed by the Contractor
shall be commenced until the Contractor has furnished the City with an original policy or
policies of the insurance for each railroad company named, as required above. All such
insurance must be approved by the City and each affected Railroad Company prior to the
Contractor’s beginning work.
6. The insurance specified above must be carried until all Work to be performed on the railroad
right-of-way has been completed and the grade crossing, if any, is no longer used by the
Contractor. In addition, insurance must be carried during all maintenance and/or repair work
performed in the railroad right-of-way. Such insurance must name the railroad company as
the insured, together with any tenant or lessee of the railroad company operating over tracks
involved in the Project.
E. Notification of Policy Cancellation: Contractor shall immediately notify City upon cancellation
or other loss of insurance coverage. Contractor shall stop work until replacement insurance has
been procured. There shall be no time credit for days not worked pursuant to this section.
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace
If City has any objection to the coverage afforded by or other provisions of the bonds or insurance
required to be purchased and maintained by the Contractor in accordance with Article 5 on the basis
of non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the Developer and City shall so notify the
Contractor in writing within 10 Business Days after receipt of the certificates (or other evidence
requested). Contractor shall provide to the City such additional information in respect of insurance
provided as the Developer or City may reasonably request. If Contractor does not purchase or
maintain all of the bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Developer or City
shall notify the Contractor in writing of such failure prior to the start of the Work, or of such failure
to maintain prior to any change in the required coverage.
ARTICLE 5 – CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent
A. Contractor shall supervise, inspect, and direct the Work competently and efficiently, devoting
such attention thereto and applying such skills and expertise as may be necessary to perform the
00 73 10- 13
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 13 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the
means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction.
B. At all times during the progress of the Work, Contractor shall assign a competent, English-
speaking, Superintendent who shall not be replaced without written notice to City. The
Superintendent will be Contractor’s representative at the Site and shall have authority to act on
behalf of Contractor. All communication given to or received from the Superintendent shall be
binding on Contractor.
C. Contractor shall notify the City 24 hours prior to moving areas during the sequence of
construction.
5.02 Labor; Working Hours
A. Contractor shall provide competent, suitably qualified personnel to perform construction as
required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall at all times maintain good discipline and
order at the Site.
B. Except as otherwise required for the safety or protection of persons or the Work or property at
the Site or adjacent thereto, and except as otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, all Work
at the Site shall be performed during Regular Working Hours. Contractor will not permit the
performance of Work beyond Regular Working Hours or for Weekend Working Hours without
City’s written consent (which will not be unreasonably withheld). Written request (by letter or
electronic communication) to perform Work:
1. for beyond Regular Working Hours request must be made by noon at least two (2) Business
Days prior
2. for Weekend Working Hours request must be made by noon of the preceding Thursday
3. for legal holidays request must be made by noon two Business Days prior to the legal
holiday.
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment
A. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall provide and assume full
responsibility for all services, materials, equipment, labor, transportation, construction
equipment and machinery, tools, appliances, fuel, power, light, heat, telephone, water, sanitary
facilities, temporary facilities, and all other facilities and incidentals necessary for the
performance, Contractor required testing, start-up, and completion of the Work.
B. All materials and equipment incorporated into the Work shall be as specified or, if not specified,
shall be of good quality and new, except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. All
special warranties and guarantees required by the Specifications shall expressly run to the benefit
of City. If required by City, Contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence (including reports of
required tests) as to the source, kind, and quality of materials and equipment.
00 73 10- 14
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 14 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. All materials and equipment to be incorporated into the Work shall be stored, applied, installed,
connected, erected, protected, used, cleaned, and conditioned in accordance with instructions of
the applicable Supplier, except as otherwise may be provided in the Contract Documents.
5.04 Project Schedule
A. Contractor shall adhere to the Project Schedule established in accordance with Paragraph 2.01
and the General Requirements as it may be adjusted from time to time as provided below.
1. Contractor shall submit to City for acceptance (to the extent indicated in Paragraph 2.01 and
the General Requirements) proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule.
2. Proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule that will change the Contract Time shall be
submitted in accordance with the requirements of Article 9. Adjustments in Contract Time
for projects with City participation shall be made by participating change orders.
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals”
A. Whenever an item of material or equipment is specified or described in the Contract Documents
by using the name of a proprietary item or the name of a particular Supplier, the specification or
description is intended to establish the type, function, appearance, and quality required. Unless
the specification or description contains or is followed by words reading that no like, equivalent,
or “or-equal” item or no substitution is permitted, other items of material or equipment of other
Suppliers may be submitted to City for review under the circumstances described below.
1. “Or-Equal” Items: If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by
Contractor is functionally equal to that named and sufficiently similar so that no change in
related Work will be required, it may be considered by City as an “or-equal” item, in which
case review and approval of the proposed item may, in City’s sole discretion, be
accomplished without compliance with some or all of the requirements for approval of
proposed substitute items. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5.05.A.1, a proposed item of
material or equipment will be considered functionally equal to an item so named if:
a. City determines that:
1) it is at least equal in materials of construction, quality, durability, appearance,
strength, and design characteristics;
2) it will reliably perform at least equally well the function and achieve the results
imposed by the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole; and
3) it has a proven record of performance and availability of responsive service; and
b. Contractor certifies that, if approved and incorporated into the Work:
1) there will be no increase in cost to the City or increase in Contract Time; and
00 73 10- 15
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 15 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2) it will conform substantially to the detailed requirements of the item named in the
Contract Documents.
2. Substitute Items:
a. If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor does
not qualify as an “or-equal” item under Paragraph 5.05.A.1, it may be submitted as a
proposed substitute item.
b. Contractor shall submit sufficient information as provided below to allow City to
determine if the item of material or equipment proposed is essentially equivalent to that
named and an acceptable substitute therefor. Requests for review of proposed substitute
items of material or equipment will not be accepted by City from anyone other than
Contractor.
c. Contractor shall make written application to City for review of a proposed substitute item
of material or equipment that Contractor seeks to furnish or use. The application shall
comply with Section 01 25 00 and:
1) shall certify that the proposed substitute item will:
i. perform adequately the functions and achieve the results called for by the general
design;
ii. be similar in substance to that specified;
iii. be suited to the same use as that specified; and
2) will state:
i. the extent, if any, to which the use of the proposed substitute item will prejudice
Contractor’s achievement of final completion on time;
ii. whether use of the proposed substitute item in the Work will require a change in
any of the Contract Documents (or in the provisions of any other direct contract
with City for other work on the Project) to adapt the design to the proposed
substitute item;
iii. whether incorporation or use of the proposed substitute item in connection with
the Work is subject to payment of any license fee or royalty; and
3) will identify:
i. all variations of the proposed substitute item from that specified;
ii. available engineering, sales, maintenance, repair, and replacement services; and
00 73 10- 16
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 16 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
4) shall contain an itemized estimate of all costs or credits that will result directly or
indirectly from use of such substitute item, including costs of redesign and Damage
Claims of other contractors affected by any resulting change.
B. Substitute Construction Methods or Procedures: If a specific means, method, technique,
sequence, or procedure of construction is expressly required by the Contract Documents,
Contractor may furnish or utilize a substitute means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure
of construction approved by City. Contractor shall submit sufficient information to allow City, in
City’s sole discretion, to determine that the substitute proposed is equivalent to that expressly
called for by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall make written application to City for
review in the same manner as those provided in Paragraph 5.05.A.2.
C. City’s Evaluation: City will be allowed a reasonable time within which to evaluate each
proposal or submittal made pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A and 5.05.B. City may require
Contractor to furnish additional data about the proposed substitute. City will be the sole judge of
acceptability. No “or-equal” or substitute will be ordered, installed or utilized until City’s review
is complete, which will be evidenced by a Change Order in the case of a substitute and an
accepted Submittal for an “or-equal.” City will advise Contractor in writing of its determination.
D. Special Guarantee: City may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor’s expense a special
performance guarantee, warranty, or other surety with respect to any substitute. Contractor shall
indemnify and hold harmless City and anyone directly or indirectly employed by them from and
against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out
of the use of substituted materials or equipment.
E. City’s Cost Reimbursement: City will record City’s costs in evaluating a substitute proposed or
submitted by Contractor pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A.2 and 5.05.B. Whether or not City
approves a substitute so proposed or submitted by Contractor, Contractor may be required to
reimburse City for evaluating each such proposed substitute. Contractor may also be required to
reimburse City for the charges for making changes in the Contract Documents.
F. Contractor’s Expense: Contractor shall provide all data in support of any proposed substitute or
“or-equal” at Contractor’s expense.
G. Substitute Reimbursement: Costs (savings or charges) attributable to acceptance of a substitute
shall be incorporated to the Contract by Participating Change Order.
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors)
A. The Contractor and any subcontractors are required to be prequalified for the work types
requiring pre-qualification
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others
A. Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance:
00 73 10- 17
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 17 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Required for this Contract.
(Check this box if there is any City Participation)
Not Required for this Contract.
It is City policy to ensure the full and equitable participation by Minority and Women Business
Enterprises (MWBE) in the procurement of goods and services on a contractual basis. If the
Contract Documents provide for a MWBE goal, Contractor is required to comply with the intent
of the City’s MWBE Ordinance (as amended) by the following:
1.Contractor shall, upon request by City, provide complete and accurate information regarding
actual work performed by a MWBE on the Contract and payment therefor.
2.Contractor will not make additions, deletions, or substitutions of accepted MWBE without
written consent of the City. Any unjustified change or deletion shall be a material breach of
Contract and may result in debarment in accordance with the procedures outlined in the
Ordinance.
3.Contractor shall, upon request by City, allow an audit and/or examination of any books,
records, or files in the possession of the Contractor that will substantiate the actual work
performed by an MWBE. Material misrepresentation of any nature will be grounds for
termination of the Contract. Any such misrepresentation may be grounds for disqualification
of Contractor to bid on future contracts with the City for a period of not less than three years.
B.Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the Subcontractors,
Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work just as
Contractor is responsible for Contractor’s own acts and omissions. Nothing in the Contract
Documents:
1.shall create for the benefit of any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity
any contractual relationship between City and any such Subcontractor, Supplier or other
individual or entity; nor
2.shall create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any moneys
due any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity except as may otherwise
be required by Laws and Regulations.
C.Contractor shall be solely responsible for scheduling and coordinating the Work of
Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the
Work under a direct or indirect contract with Contractor.
D.All Subcontractors, Suppliers, and such other individuals or entities performing or furnishing
any of the Work shall communicate with City through Contractor.
E.All Work performed for Contractor by a Subcontractor or Supplier will be pursuant to an
appropriate agreement between Contractor and the Subcontractor or Supplier which specifically
binds the Subcontractor or Supplier to the applicable terms and conditions of these Contract
X
00 73 10- 18
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 18 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents, Contractor shall provide City contract numbers and reference numbers to the
Subcontractors and/or Suppliers.
5.08 Wage Rates
Required for this Contract.
Not Required for this Contract.
A.Duty to pay Prevailing Wage Rates. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of
Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code (as amended), including the payment of not less than the
rates determined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth to be the prevailing wage rates in
accordance with Chapter 2258. Such prevailing wage rates are included in these Contract
Documents.
B.Penalty for Violation. A Contractor or any Subcontractor who does not pay the prevailing wage
shall, upon demand made by the City, pay to the City $60 for each worker employed for each
calendar day or part of the day that the worker is paid less than the prevailing wage rates
stipulated in these contract documents. This penalty shall be retained by the City to offset its
administrative costs, pursuant to Texas Government Code 2258.023.
C.Complaints of Violations and City Determination of Good Cause. On receipt of information,
including a complaint by a worker, concerning an alleged violation of 2258.023, Texas
Government Code, by a Contractor or Subcontractor, the City shall make an initial
determination, before the 31st day after the date the City receives the information, as to whether
good cause exists to believe that the violation occurred. The City shall notify in writing the
Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker of its initial determination. Upon the
City’s determination that there is good cause to believe the Contractor or Subcontractor has
violated Chapter 2258, the City shall retain the full amounts claimed by the claimant or
claimants as the difference between wages paid and wages due under the prevailing wage rates,
such amounts being subtracted from successive progress payments pending a final determination
of the violation.
D.Arbitration Required if Violation Not Resolved. An issue relating to an alleged violation of
Section 2258.023, Texas Government Code, including a penalty owed to the City or an affected
worker, shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the Texas General
Arbitration Act (Article 224 et seq., Revised Statutes) if the Contractor or Subcontractor and any
affected worker does not resolve the issue by agreement before the 15th day after the date the
City makes its initial determination pursuant to Paragraph C above. If the persons required to
arbitrate under this section do not agree on an arbitrator before the 11th day after the date that
arbitration is required, a district court shall appoint an arbitrator on the petition of any of the
persons. The City is not a party in the arbitration. The decision and award of the arbitrator is
final and binding on all parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction.
E.Records to be Maintained. The Contractor and each Subcontractor shall, for a period of three (3)
years following the date of acceptance of the work, maintain records that show (i) the name and
X
00 73 10- 19
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 19 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
occupation of each worker employed by the Contractor in the construction of the Work provided
for in this Contract; and (ii) the actual per diem wages paid to each worker. The records shall be
open at all reasonable hours for inspection by the City. The provisions of Paragraph 6.23, Right
to Audit, shall pertain to this inspection.
F. Progress Payments. With each progress payment or payroll period, whichever is less, the
Contractor shall submit an affidavit stating that the Contractor has complied with the
requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code.
G. Posting of Wage Rates. The Contractor shall post prevailing wage rates in a conspicuous place at
all times.
H. Subcontractor Compliance. The Contractor shall include in its subcontracts and/or shall
otherwise require all of its Subcontractors to comply with Paragraphs A through G above.
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties
A. To the fullest extent permitted by Laws and Regulations, Contractor shall indemnify and hold
harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited
to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court
or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to any infringement of
patent rights or copyrights incident to the use in the performance of the Work or resulting from
the incorporation in the Work of any invention, design, process, product, or device not specified
in the Contract Documents.
5.10 Laws and Regulations
A. Contractor shall give all notices required by and shall comply with all Laws and Regulations
applicable to the performance of the Work. Except where otherwise expressly required by
applicable Laws and Regulations, the City shall not be responsible for monitoring Contractor’s
compliance with any Laws or Regulations.
B. If Contractor performs any Work knowing or having reason to know that it is contrary to Laws
or Regulations, Contractor shall bear all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such Work.
However, it shall not be Contractor’s responsibility to make certain that the Specifications and
Drawings are in accordance with Laws and Regulations, but this shall not relieve Contractor of
Contractor’s obligations under Paragraph 3.01.
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas
A. Limitation on Use of Site and Other Areas:
1. Contractor shall confine construction equipment, the storage of materials and equipment, and
the operations of workers to the Site and other areas permitted by Laws and Regulations, and
shall not unreasonably encumber the Site and other areas with construction equipment or
00 73 10- 20
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 20 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
other materials or equipment. Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any damage to
any such land or area, or to the owner or occupant thereof, or of any adjacent land or areas
resulting from the performance of the Work.
2. At any time when, in the judgment of the City, the Contractor has obstructed or closed or is
carrying on operations in a portion of a street, right-of-way, or easement greater than is
necessary for proper execution of the Work, the City may require the Contractor to finish the
section on which operations are in progress before work is commenced on any additional
area of the Site.
3. Should any Damage Claim be made by any such owner or occupant because of the
performance of the Work, Contractor shall promptly attempt to resolve the Damage Claim.
4. Pursuant to Paragraph 5.18, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and
against all claims, costs, losses, and damages arising out of or relating to any claim or
action, legal or equitable, brought by any such owner or occupant against City.
B. Removal of Debris During Performance of the Work: During the progress of the Work
Contractor shall keep the Site and other areas free from accumulations of waste materials,
rubbish, and other debris. Removal and disposal of such waste materials, rubbish, and other
debris shall conform to applicable Laws and Regulations.
C. Site Maintenance Cleaning: 24 hours after written notice is given to the Contractor that the
clean-up on the job site is proceeding in a manner unsatisfactory to the City or Developer, if the
Contractor fails to correct the unsatisfactory procedure, the City may take such direct action as
the City deems appropriate to correct the clean-up deficiencies cited to the Contractor in the
written notice (by letter or electronic communication), and shall be entitled to recover its cost in
doing so. The City may withhold Final Acceptance until clean-up is complete and cost are
recovered.
D. Final Site Cleaning: Prior to Final Acceptance of the Work Contractor shall clean the Site and
the Work and make it ready for utilization by City or adjacent property owner. At the completion
of the Work Contractor shall remove from the Site all tools, appliances, construction equipment
and machinery, and surplus materials and shall restore to original condition or better all property
disturbed by the Work.
E. Loading Structures: Contractor shall not load nor permit any part of any structure to be loaded
in any manner that will endanger the structure, nor shall Contractor subject any part of the Work
or adjacent property to stresses or pressures that will endanger it.
5.12 Record Documents
A. Contractor shall maintain in a safe place at the Site or in a place designated by the Contractor
and approved by the City, one (1) record copy of all Drawings, Specifications, Addenda, Change
Orders, Field Orders, and written interpretations and clarifications in good order and annotated
to show changes made during construction. These record documents together with all approved
00 73 10- 21
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 21 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Samples and a counterpart of all accepted Submittals will be available to City for reference.
Upon completion of the Work, these record documents, any operation and maintenance manuals,
and Submittals will be delivered to City prior to Final Inspection. Contractor shall include
accurate locations for buried and imbedded items.
5.13 Safety and Protection
A. Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety
precautions and programs in connection with the Work. Such responsibility does not relieve
Subcontractors of their responsibility for the safety of persons or property in the performance of
their work, nor for compliance with applicable safety Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall
take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to
prevent damage, injury or loss to:
1. all persons on the Site or who may be affected by the Work;
2. all the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on
or off the Site; and
3. other property at the Site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, walks,
pavements, roadways, structures, utilities, and Underground Facilities not designated for
removal, relocation, or replacement in the course of construction.
B. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Laws and Regulations relating to the safety of
persons or property, or to the protection of persons or property from damage, injury, or loss; and
shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. Contractor shall
notify owners of adjacent property and of Underground Facilities and other utility owners when
prosecution of the Work may affect them, and shall cooperate with them in the protection,
removal, relocation, and replacement of their property.
C. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of City’s safety programs, if any.
D. Contractor shall inform City of the specific requirements of Contractor’s safety program, if any,
with which City’s employees and representatives must comply while at the Site.
E. All damage, injury, or loss to any property referred to in Paragraph 5.13.A.2 or 5.13.A.3 caused,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by Contractor, any Subcontractor, Supplier, or any
other individual or entity directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the
Work, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, shall be remedied by Contractor.
F. Contractor’s duties and responsibilities for safety and for protection of the Work shall continue
until such time as all the Work is completed and City has accepted the Work.
5.14 Safety Representative
Contractor shall inform City in writing of Contractor’s designated safety representative at the Site.
00 73 10- 22
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 22 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs
Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating any exchange of material safety data sheets or other
hazard communication information required to be made available to or exchanged between or
among employers in accordance with Laws or Regulations.
5.16 Submittals
A. Contractor shall submit required Submittals to City for review and acceptance. Each submittal
will be identified as required by City.
1. Submit number of copies specified in the General Requirements.
2. Data shown on the Submittals will be complete with respect to quantities, dimensions,
specified performance and design criteria, materials, and similar data to show City the
services, materials, and equipment Contractor proposes to provide and to enable City to
review the information for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
3. Submittals submitted as herein provided by Contractor and reviewed by City for
conformance with the design concept shall be executed in conformity with the Contract
Documents unless otherwise required by City.
4. When Submittals are submitted for the purpose of showing the installation in greater detail,
their review shall not excuse Contractor from requirements shown on the Drawings and
Specifications.
5. For-Information-Only submittals upon which the City is not expected to conduct review or
take responsive action may be so identified in the Contract Documents.
6. Submit required number of Samples specified in the Specifications.
7. Clearly identify each Sample as to material, Supplier, pertinent data such as catalog numbers,
the use for which intended and other data as City may require to enable City to review the
submittal for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
B. Where a Submittal is required by the Contract Documents or the Schedule of Submittals, any
related Work performed prior to City’s review and acceptance of the pertinent submittal will be
at the sole expense and responsibility of Contractor.
C. City’s Review:
1. City will provide timely review of required Submittals in accordance with the Schedule of
Submittals acceptable to City. City’s review and acceptance will be only to determine if the
items covered by the submittals will, after installation or incorporation in the Work, conform
to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design
concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract
Documents.
00 73 10- 23
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 23 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2. City’s review and acceptance will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or
procedures of construction (except where a particular means, method, technique, sequence,
or procedure of construction is specifically and expressly called for by the Contract
Documents) or to safety precautions or programs incident thereto. The review and
acceptance of a separate item as such will not indicate approval of the assembly in which the
item functions.
3. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for any
variation from the requirements of the Contract Documents unless Contractor has complied
with the requirements of Section 01 33 00 and City has given written acceptance of each
such variation by specific written notation thereof incorporated in or accompanying the
Submittal. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for
complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee
A. Contractor warrants and guarantees to City that all Work will be in accordance with the Contract
Documents and will not be defective. City and its officers, directors, members, partners,
employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors shall be entitled to rely on representation of
Contractor’s warranty and guarantee.
B. Contractor’s warranty and guarantee hereunder excludes defects or damage caused by:
1. abuse, modification, or improper maintenance or operation by persons other than Contractor,
Subcontractors, Suppliers, or any other individual or entity for whom Contractor is
responsible; or
2. normal wear and tear under normal usage.
C. Contractor’s obligation to perform and complete the Work in accordance with the Contract
Documents shall be absolute. None of the following will constitute an acceptance of Work that is
not in accordance with the Contract Documents or a release of Contractor’s obligation to
perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents:
1. observations by City;
2. recommendation or payment by City or Developer of any progress or final payment;
3. the issuance of a certificate of Final Acceptance by City or any payment related thereto by
City;
4. use or occupancy of the Work or any part thereof by City;
5. any review and acceptance of a Submittal by City;
6. any inspection, test, or approval by others; or
00 73 10- 24
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 24 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7. any correction of defective Work by City.
D. The Contractor shall remedy any defects or damages in the Work and pay for any damage to
other work or property resulting therefrom which shall appear within a period of two (2) years
from the date of Final Acceptance of the Work unless a longer period is specified and shall
furnish a good and sufficient maintenance bond, complying with the requirements of Article
4.02.B. The City will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness.
5.18 Indemnification
A. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the
City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or
alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers,
agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this Contract. THIS
INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE
AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME
OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY
ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. This indemnity provision is
intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by
the City in defending against such claims and causes of actions.
B. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the City, its
officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of
property of the City, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be
performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees
under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY
INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR
PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE
CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF
THE CITY.
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services
A. Contractor will not be required to provide professional design services unless such services are
specifically required by the Contract Documents for a portion of the Work or unless such
services are required to carry out Contractor’s responsibilities for construction means, methods,
techniques, sequences and procedures.
B. If professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems,
materials or equipment are specifically required of Contractor by the Contract Documents, City
will specify all performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. Contractor shall
cause such services or certifications to be provided by a properly licensed professional, whose
signature and seal shall appear on all drawings, calculations, specifications, certifications, and
Submittals prepared by such professional. Submittals related to the Work designed or certified
by such professional, if prepared by others, shall bear such professional’s written approval when
submitted to City.
00 73 10- 25
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 25 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. City shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy, accuracy and completeness of the services,
certifications or approvals performed by such design professionals, provided City has specified
to Contractor performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy.
D. Pursuant to this Paragraph 5.19, City’s review and acceptance of design calculations and design
drawings will be only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with performance
and design criteria given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. City’s
review and acceptance of Submittals (except design calculations and design drawings) will be
only for the purpose stated in Paragraph 5.16.C.
5.20 Right to Audit:
A. The City reserves the right to audit all projects utilizing City funds
B. The Contractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions relating
to this Contract. Contractor agrees that the City shall have access during Regular Working Hours
to all necessary Contractor facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space
in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall
give Contractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
C. Contractor further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that
the subcontractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of such Subcontractor, involving transactions to
the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all
Subcontractor facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to
conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give
Subcontractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
D. Contractor and Subcontractor agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the
City. The City agrees to reimburse Contractor for the cost of the copies as follows at the rate
published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed.
5.21 Nondiscrimination
A. The City is responsible for operating Public Transportation Programs and implementing transit-
related projects, which are funded in part with Federal financial assistance awarded by the U.S.
Department of Transportation and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), without
discriminating against any person in the United States on the basis of race, color, or national
origin.
B. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended: Contractor shall comply with the requirements of
the Act and the Regulations as further defined in the Supplementary Conditions for any project
receiving Federal assistance.
00 73 10- 26
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 26 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 6 – OTHER WORK AT THE SITE
6.01 Related Work at Site
A. City may perform other work related to the Project at the Site with City’s employees, or other
City contractors, or through other direct contracts therefor, or have other work performed by
utility owners. If such other work is not noted in the Contract Documents, then written notice
thereof will be given to Contractor prior to starting any such other work; and
B. Contractor shall afford each other contractor who is a party to such a direct contract, each utility
owner, and City, if City is performing other work with City’s employees or other City
contractors, proper and safe access to the Site, provide a reasonable opportunity for the
introduction and storage of materials and equipment and the execution of such other work, and
properly coordinate the Work with theirs. Contractor shall do all cutting, fitting, and patching of
the Work that may be required to properly connect or otherwise make its several parts come
together and properly integrate with such other work. Contractor shall not endanger any work of
others by cutting, excavating, or otherwise altering such work; provided, however, that
Contractor may cut or alter others' work with the written consent of City and the others whose
work will be affected.
C. If the proper execution or results of any part of Contractor’s Work depends upon work
performed by others under this Article 7, Contractor shall inspect such other work and promptly
report to City in writing any delays, defects, or deficiencies in such other work that render it
unavailable or unsuitable for the proper execution and results of Contractor’s Work. Contractor’s
failure to so report will constitute an acceptance of such other work as fit and proper for
integration with Contractor’s Work except for latent defects in the work provided by others.
ARTICLE 7 – CITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals
City’s responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals is set forth in Paragraph
11.03.
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities
A. The City shall not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, nor be responsible for,
Contractor’s means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety
precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure of Contractor to comply with Laws
and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. City will not be responsible for
Contractor’s failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
B. City will notify the Contractor of applicable safety plans pursuant to Paragraph 5.13.
00 73 10- 27
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 27 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program
While at the Site, City’s employees and representatives shall comply with the specific applicable
requirements of Contractor’s safety programs of which City has been informed pursuant to
Paragraph 5.13.
ARTICLE 8 – CITY’S OBSERVATION STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION
8.01 City’s Project Representative
City will provide one or more Project Representative(s) during the construction period. The duties
and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of City’s representative during construction are
set forth in the Contract Documents.
A. City’s Project Representative will make visits to the Site at intervals appropriate to the various
stages of construction as City deems necessary in order to observe the progress that has been
made and the quality of the various aspects of Contractor’s executed Work. Based on
information obtained during such visits and observations, City’s Project Representative will
determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents.
City’s Project Representative will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections
on the Site to check the quality or quantity of the Work. City’s Project Representative’s efforts
will be directed toward providing City a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work
will conform generally to the Contract Documents.
B. City’s Project Representative’s visits and observations are subject to all the limitations on
authority and responsibility in the Contract Documents.
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work
City’s Project Representative may authorize minor variations in the Work from the requirements of
the Contract Documents which do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract
Time and are compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a Field Order and will be
binding on City Developer, and also on Contractor, who shall perform the Work involved promptly.
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work
City will have authority to reject Work which City’s Project Representative believes to be defective,
or will not produce a completed Project that conforms to the Contract Documents or that will
prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. City will have authority to conduct special inspection or
testing of the Work as provided in Article 11, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or
completed.
00 73 10- 28
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 28 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed
Contractor will determine the actual quantities and classifications of Work performed. City’s Project
Representative will review with Contractor the preliminary determinations on such matters before
rendering a written recommendation. City’s written decision will be final (except as modified to
reflect changed factual conditions or more accurate data).
ARTICLE 9 – CHANGES IN THE WORK
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work
A. Without invalidating the Contract and without notice to any surety, City may, at any time or
from time to time, order Extra Work. Upon notice of such Extra Work, Contractor shall
promptly proceed with the Work involved which will be performed under the applicable
conditions of the Contract Documents (except as otherwise specifically provided). Extra Work
shall be memorialized by a Participating Change Order which may or may not precede an order
of Extra work.
B. For minor changes of Work not requiring changes to Contract Time or Contract Price on a
project with City participation, a Field Order may be issued by the City.
9.02 Notification to Surety
If the provisions of any bond require notice to be given to a surety of any change affecting the
general scope of the Work or the provisions of the Contract Documents (including, but not limited
to, Contract Price or Contract Time), the giving of any such notice will be Contractor’s
responsibility. The amount of each applicable bond will be adjusted by the Contractor to reflect the
effect of any such change.
ARTICLE 10 – CHANGE OF CONTRACT PRICE; CHANGE OF CONTRACT TIME
10.01 Change of Contract Price
A. The Contract Price may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.02 Change of Contract Time
A. The Contract Time may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.03 Delays
A. If Contractor is delayed, City shall not be liable to Contractor for any claims, costs, losses, or
damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and
other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) sustained by
Contractor on or in connection with any other project or anticipated project.
00 73 10- 29
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 29 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 11 – TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL OR ACCEPTANCE OF
DEFECTIVE WORK
11.01 Notice of Defects
Notice of all defective Work of which City has actual knowledge will be given to Contractor.
Defective Work may be rejected, corrected, or accepted as provided in this Article 13.
11.02 Access to Work
City, independent testing laboratories, and governmental agencies with jurisdictional interests will
have access to the Site and the Work at reasonable times for their observation, inspection, and
testing. Contractor shall provide them proper and safe conditions for such access and advise them of
Contractor’s safety procedures and programs so that they may comply therewith as applicable.
11.03 Tests and Inspections
A. Contractor shall give City timely notice of readiness of the Work for all required inspections,
tests, or approvals and shall cooperate with inspection and testing personnel to facilitate required
inspections or tests.
B. If Contract Documents, Laws or Regulations of any public body having jurisdiction require any
of the Work (or part thereof) to be inspected, tested, or approved, Contractor shall assume full
responsibility for arranging and obtaining such independent inspections, tests, retests or
approvals, pay all costs in connection therewith, and furnish City the required certificates of
inspection or approval; excepting, however, those fees specifically identified in the
Supplementary Conditions or any Texas Department of Licensure and Regulation (TDLR)
inspections, which shall be paid as described in the Supplementary Conditions.
C. Contractor shall be responsible for arranging and obtaining and shall pay all costs in connection
with any inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals required for City’s acceptance of materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work; or acceptance of materials, mix designs, or equipment
submitted for approval prior to Contractor’s purchase thereof for incorporation in the Work.
Such inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals shall be performed by organizations approved by
City.
D. City may arrange for the services of an independent testing laboratory (“Testing Lab”) to
perform any inspections or tests (“Testing”) for any part of the Work, as determined solely by
City.
1. City will coordinate such Testing to the extent possible, with Contractor;
2. Should any Testing under this Section 11.03 D result in a “fail”, “did not pass” or other
similar negative result, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying for any and all retests.
Contractor’s cancellation without cause of City initiated Testing shall be deemed a negative
result and require a retest.
00 73 10- 30
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 30 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
3. Any amounts owed for any retest under this Section 11.03 D shall be paid directly to the
Testing Lab by Contractor. City will forward all invoices for retests to
Developer/Contractor.
4. If Contractor fails to pay the Testing Lab, City will not issue a letter of Final Acceptance
until the Testing Lab is Paid
E. If any Work (or the work of others) that is to be inspected, tested, or approved is covered by
Contractor without written concurrence of City, Contractor shall, if requested by City, uncover
such Work for observation.
11.04 Uncovering Work
A. If any Work is covered contrary to the Contract Documents or specific instructions by the City, it
must, if requested by City, be uncovered for City’s observation and replaced at Contractor’s
expense.
11.05 City May Stop the Work
If the Work is defective, or Contractor fails to supply sufficient skilled workers or suitable materials
or equipment, or fails to perform the Work in such a way that the completed Work will conform to
the Contract Documents, City may order Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until
the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, this right of City to stop the Work shall not
give rise to any duty on the part of City to exercise this right for the benefit of Contractor, any
Subcontractor, any Supplier, any other individual or entity, or any surety for, or employee or agent
of any of them.
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work
A. Promptly after receipt of written notice, Contractor shall correct all defective Work pursuant to
an acceptable schedule, whether or not fabricated, installed, or completed, or, if the Work has
been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective.
Contractor shall pay all claims, costs, additional testing, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction
or removal (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others).
Failure to require the removal of any defective Work shall not constitute acceptance of such
Work.
B. When correcting defective Work under the terms of this Paragraph 11.06 or Paragraph 11.07,
Contractor shall take no action that would void or otherwise impair City’s special warranty and
guarantee, if any, on said Work.
11.07 Correction Period
A. If within two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance (or such longer period of time as may
be prescribed by the terms of any applicable special guarantee required by the Contract
00 73 10- 31
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 31 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents), any Work is found to be defective, or if the repair of any damages to the land or
areas made available for Contractor’s use by City or permitted by Laws and Regulations as
contemplated in Paragraph 5.10.A is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without
cost to City and in accordance with City’s written instructions:
1. repair such defective land or areas; or
2. correct such defective Work; or
3. if the defective Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it
with Work that is not defective, and
4. satisfactorily correct or repair or remove and replace any damage to other Work, to the work
of others or other land or areas resulting therefrom.
B. If Contractor does not promptly comply with the terms of City’s written instructions, or in an
emergency where delay would cause serious risk of loss or damage, City may have the defective
Work corrected or repaired or may have the rejected Work removed and replaced. All claims,
costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers,
architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs)
arising out of or relating to such correction or repair or such removal and replacement (including
but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others) will be paid by Contractor.
C. Where defective Work (and damage to other Work resulting therefrom) has been corrected or
removed and replaced under this Paragraph 11.07, the correction period hereunder with respect
to such Work may be required to be extended for an additional period of one year after the end
of the initial correction period. City shall provide 30 days written notice to Contractor and
Developer should such additional warranty coverage be required. Contractor’s obligations under
this Paragraph 11.07 are in addition to any other obligation or warranty. The provisions of this
Paragraph 11.07 shall not be construed as a substitute for, or a waiver of, the provisions of any
applicable statute of limitation or repose.
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work
A. If Contractor fails within a reasonable time after written notice from City to correct defective
Work, or to remove and replace rejected Work as required by City in accordance with Paragraph
11.06.A, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents,
or if Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of the Contract Documents, City may,
after seven (7) days written notice to Contractor and the Developer, correct, or remedy any such
deficiency.
B. In exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09, City shall proceed
expeditiously. In connection with such corrective or remedial action, City may exclude
Contractor from all or part of the Site, take possession of all or part of the Work and suspend
Contractor’s services related thereto, and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment
incorporated in the Work, stored at the Site or for which City has paid Contractor but which are
00 73 10- 32
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 32 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow City, City’s representatives, agents, consultants,
employees, and City’s other contractors, access to the Site to enable City to exercise the rights
and remedies under this Paragraph.
C. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of
engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution
costs) incurred or sustained by City in exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph
13.09 will be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order will be issued incorporating the
necessary revisions in the Contract Documents with respect to the Work; and City shall be
entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price.
D. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Time because of any delay in the
performance of the Work attributable to the exercise of City’s rights and remedies under this
Paragraph 11.09.
ARTICLE 12 – COMPLETION
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title
Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all Work, materials, and equipment covered by any
Application for Payment will pass to City no later than the time of Final Acceptance and shall be
free and clear of all Liens.
12.02 Partial Utilization
A. Prior to Final Acceptance of all the Work, City may use or occupy any substantially completed
part of the Work which has specifically been identified in the Contract Documents, or which
City, determines constitutes a separately functioning and usable part of the Work that can be
used by City for its intended purpose without significant interference with Contractor’s
performance of the remainder of the Work. City at any time may notify Contractor in writing to
permit City to use or occupy any such part of the Work which City determines to be ready for its
intended use, subject to the following conditions:
1. Contractor at any time may notify City in writing that Contractor considers any such part of
the Work ready for its intended use.
2. Within a reasonable time after notification as enumerated in Paragraph 14.05.A.1, City and
Contractor shall make an inspection of that part of the Work to determine its status of
completion. If City does not consider that part of the Work to be substantially complete, City
will notify Contractor in writing giving the reasons therefor.
3. Partial Utilization will not constitute Final Acceptance by City.
12.03 Final Inspection
A. Upon written notice from Contractor that the entire Work is complete in accordance with the
Contract Documents:
00 73 10- 33
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 33 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. within 10 days, City will schedule a Final Inspection with Contractor.
2. City will notify Contractor in writing of all particulars in which this inspection reveals that
the Work is incomplete or defective. Contractor shall immediately take such measures as are
necessary to complete such Work or remedy such deficiencies.
12.04 Final Acceptance
A. Upon completion by Contractor to City’s satisfaction, of any additional Work identified in the
Final Inspection, City will issue to Contractor a letter of Final Acceptance upon the satisfaction
of the following:
1. All documentation called for in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the
evidence of insurance required by Paragraph 5.03;
2. consent of the surety, if any, to Final Acceptance;
3. a list of all pending or released Damage Claims against City that Contractor believes are
unsettled; and
4. affidavits of payments and complete and legally effective releases or waivers (satisfactory to
City) of all Lien rights arising out of or Liens filed in connection with the Work.
5. after all Damage Claims have been resolved:
a. directly by the Contractor or;
b. Contractor provides evidence that the Damage Claim has been reported to Contractor’s
insurance provider for resolution.
6. Issuing Final Acceptance by the City shall not relieve the Contractor of any guarantees or
other requirements of the Contract Documents which specifically continue thereafter.
ARTICLE 13 – SUSPENSION OF WORK
13.01 City May Suspend Work
A. At any time and without cause, City may suspend the Work or any portion thereof by written
notice to Contractor and which may fix the date on which Work will be resumed. Contractor
shall resume the Work on the date so fixed. During temporary suspension of the Work covered
by these Contract Documents, for any reason, the City will stop contract time on City
participation projects.
B. Should the Contractor not be able to complete a portion of the Project due to causes beyond the
control of and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, and should it be determined by
mutual consent of the Contractor and City that a solution to allow construction to proceed is not
00 73 10- 34
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 34 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
available within a reasonable period of time, Contractor may request an extension in Contract
Time, directly attributable to any such suspension.
C. If it should become necessary to suspend the Work for an indefinite period, the Contractor shall
store all materials in such a manner that they will not obstruct or impede the public unnecessarily
nor become damaged in any way, and he shall take every precaution to prevent damage or
deterioration of the work performed; he shall provide suitable drainage about the work, and erect
temporary structures where necessary.
ARTICLE 14 – MISCELLANEOUS
14.01 Giving Notice
A. Whenever any provision of the Contract Documents requires the giving of written notice, it will
be deemed to have been validly given if:
1. delivered in person to the individual or to a member of the firm or to an officer of the
corporation for whom it is intended; or
2. delivered at or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the last business
address known to the giver of the notice.
B. Business address changes must be promptly made in writing to the other party.
C. Whenever the Contract Documents specifies giving notice by electronic means such electronic
notice shall be deemed sufficient upon confirmation of receipt by the receiving party.
14.02 Computation of Times
When any period of time is referred to in the Contract Documents by days, it will be computed to
exclude the first and include the last day of such period. If the last day of any such period falls on a
Saturday or Sunday or on a day made a legal holiday the next Working Day shall become the last
day of the period.
14.03 Cumulative Remedies
The duties and obligations imposed by these General Conditions and the rights and remedies
available hereunder to the parties hereto are in addition to, and are not to be construed in any way as
a limitation of, any rights and remedies available to any or all of them which are otherwise imposed
or available by Laws or Regulations, by special warranty or guarantee, or by other provisions of the
Contract Documents. The provisions of this Paragraph will be as effective as if repeated specifically
in the Contract Documents in connection with each particular duty, obligation, right, and remedy to
which they apply.
00 73 10- 35
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 35 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.04 Survival of Obligations
All representations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in
accordance with the Contract Documents, as well as all continuing obligations indicated in the
Contract Documents, will survive final payment, completion, and acceptance of the Work or
termination or completion of the Contract or termination of the services of Contractor.
14.05 Headings
Article and paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute parts of these
General Conditions.
01 11 00 - 1
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects
Revised December 20, 2012
SECTION 01 11 00 1
SUMMARY OF WORK 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A.Section Includes:5
1.Summary of Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents6
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification7
1.None.8
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:9
1.Division 0 - Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and Conditions of the Contract10
2.Division 1 - General Requirements11
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 12
A.Measurement and Payment13
1.Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.14
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.15
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 16
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 17
A.Work Covered by Contract Documents18
1.Work is to include furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing19
all Work necessary for this construction project as detailed in the Drawings and20
Specifications.21
B.Subsidiary Work22
1.Any and all Work specifically governed by documentary requirements for the23
project, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or Contract Documents in24
which no specific item for bid has been provided for in the Proposal and the item is25
not a typical unit bid item included on the standard bid item list, then the item shall26
be considered as a subsidiary item of Work, the cost of which shall be included in27
the price bid in the Proposal for various bid items.28
C.Use of Premises29
1.Coordinate uses of premises under direction of the City.30
2.Assume full responsibility for protection and safekeeping of materials and31
equipment stored on the Site.32
3.Use and occupy only portions of the public streets and alleys, or other public places33
or other rights-of-way as provided for in the ordinances of the City, as shown in the34
Contract Documents, or as may be specifically authorized in writing by the City.35
a.A reasonable amount of tools, materials, and equipment for construction36
purposes may be stored in such space, but no more than is necessary to avoid37
delay in the construction operations.38
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 11 00 - 2
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects
Revised December 20, 2012
b.Excavated and waste materials shall be stored in such a way as not to interfere 1
with the use of spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed 2
and so as not to inconvenience occupants of adjacent property. 3
c.If the street is occupied by railroad tracks, the Work shall be carried on in such4
manner as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad.5
1)All Work shall be in accordance with railroad requirements set forth in6
Division 0 as well as the railroad permit.7
D.Work within Easements8
1.Do not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously9
obtained permission from the owner of such property.10
2.Do not store equipment or material on private property unless and until the11
specified approval of the property owner has been secured in writing by the12
Contractor and a copy furnished to the City.13
3.Unless specifically provided otherwise, clear all rights-of-way or easements of14
obstructions which must be removed to make possible proper prosecution of the15
Work as a part of the project construction operations.16
4.Preserve and use every precaution to prevent damage to, all trees, shrubbery, plants,17
lawns, fences, culverts, curbing, and all other types of structures or improvements,18
to all water, sewer, and gas lines, to all conduits, overhead pole lines, or19
appurtenances thereof, including the construction of temporary fences and to all20
other public or private property adjacent to the Work.21
5.Notify the proper representatives of the owners or occupants of the public or private22
lands of interest in lands which might be affected by the Work.23
a.Such notice shall be made at least 48 hours in advance of the beginning of the24
Work.25
b.Notices shall be applicable to both public and private utility companies and any26
corporation, company, individual, or other, either as owners or occupants,27
whose land or interest in land might be affected by the Work.28
c.Be responsible for all damage or injury to property of any character resulting29
from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in the manner or method or30
execution of the Work, or at any time due to defective work, material, or31
equipment.32
6.Fence33
a.Restore all fences encountered and removed during construction of the Project34
to the original or a better than original condition.35
b.Erect temporary fencing in place of the fencing removed whenever the Work is36
not in progress and when the site is vacated overnight, and/or at all times to37
provide site security.38
c.The cost for all fence work within easements, including removal, temporary39
closures and replacement, shall be subsidiary to the various items bid in the40
project proposal, unless a bid item is specifically provided in the proposal.41
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 11 00 - 3
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects
Revised December 20, 2012
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 3
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 4
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 5
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 6
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 7
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 8
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 9
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 10
END OF SECTION 11
12
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
13
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 25 00 - 1
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 25 00
SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A.Section Includes:
1. The procedure for requesting the approval of substitution of a product that is not
equivalent to a product which is specified by descriptive or performance criteria or
defined by reference to 1 or more of the following:
a.Name of manufacturer
b. Name of vendor
c.Trade name
d. Catalog number
2.Substitutions are not "or-equals".
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2.Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A.Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No
separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A.Request for Substitution - General
1.Within 30 days after award of Contract (unless noted otherwise), the City will
consider formal requests from Contractor for substitution of products in place of
those specified.
2. Certain types of equipment and kinds of material are described in Specifications by
means of references to names of manufacturers and vendors, trade names, or catalog
numbers.
a.When this method of specifying is used, it is not intended to exclude from
consideration other products bearing other manufacturer's or vendor's names,
trade names, or catalog numbers, provided said products are "or-equals," as
determined by City.
3. Other types of equipment and kinds of material may be acceptable substitutions
under the following conditions:
a.Or-equals are unavailable due to strike, discontinued production of products
meeting specified requirements, or other factors beyond control of Contractor;
or,
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 25 00 - 2
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
b. Contractor proposes a cost and/or time reduction incentive to the City.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A.See Request for Substitution Form (attached)
B.Procedure for Requesting Substitution
1. Substitution shall be considered only:
a.After award of Contract
b. Under the conditions stated herein
2.Submit 3 copies of each written request for substitution, including:
a.Documentation
1)Complete data substantiating compliance of proposed substitution with
Contract Documents
2) Data relating to changes in construction schedule, when a reduction is
proposed
3) Data relating to changes in cost
b. For products
1) Product identification
a)Manufacturer's name
b) Telephone number and representative contact name
c)Specification Section or Drawing reference of originally specified
product, including discrete name or tag number assigned to original
product in the Contract Documents
2) Manufacturer's literature clearly marked to show compliance of proposed
product with Contract Documents
3) Itemized comparison of original and proposed product addressing product
characteristics including, but not necessarily limited to:
a)Size
b) Composition or materials of construction
c)Weight
d) Electrical or mechanical requirements
4) Product experience
a)Location of past projects utilizing product
b) Name and telephone number of persons associated with referenced
projects knowledgeable concerning proposed product
c)Available field data and reports associated with proposed product
5)Samples
a)Provide at request of City.
b) Samples become the property of the City.
c.For construction methods:
1) Detailed description of proposed method
2) Illustration drawings
C.Approval or Rejection
1. Written approval or rejection of substitution given by the City
2. City reserves the right to require proposed product to comply with color and pattern
of specified product if necessary to secure design intent.
3. In the event the substitution is approved, if a reduction in cost or time results, it will
be documented by Change Order.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 25 00 - 3
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
4. Substitution will be rejected if:
a.Submittal is not through the Contractor with his stamp of approval
b. Request is not made in accordance with this Specification Section
c.In the Developer’s opinion, acceptance will require substantial revision of the
original design
d. In the City’s or Developer’s opinion, substitution will not perform adequately
the function consistent with the design intent
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A.In making request for substitution or in using an approved product, the Contractor
represents that the Contractor:
1. Has investigated proposed product, and has determined that it is adequate or
superior in all respects to that specified, and that it will perform function for which it
is intended
2. Will provide same guarantee for substitute item as for product specified
3. Will coordinate installation of accepted substitution into Work, to include building
modifications if necessary, making such changes as may be required for Work to be
complete in all respects
4. Waives all claims for additional costs related to substitution which subsequently
arise
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 25 00 - 4
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION FORM:
TO:
PROJECT: DATE:
We hereby submit for your consideration the following product instead of the specified item for
the above project:
SECTION PARAGRAPH SPECIFIED ITEM
Proposed Substitution:
Reason for Substitution:
Include complete information on changes to Drawings and/or Specifications which proposed
substitution will require for its proper installation.
Fill in Blanks Below:
A.Will the undersigned contractor pay for changes to the building design, including engineering
and detailing costs caused by the requested substitution?
B.What effect does substitution have on other trades?
C.Differences between proposed substitution and specified item?
D.Differences in product cost or product delivery time?
E.Manufacturer's guarantees of the proposed and specified items are:
Equal Better (explain on attachment)
The undersigned states that the function, appearance and quality are equivalent or superior to the
specified item.
Submitted By: For Use by City
Signature Recommended Recommended
as noted
Firm Not recommended Received late
Address By
Date
Date Remarks
Telephone
For Use by City:
Approved Rejected
City Date
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 31 19 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 1 of 3
1 SECTION 01 31 19
2 PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. Provisions for the preconstruction meeting to be held prior to the start of Work to
7 clarify construction contract administration procedures
8 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
9 1. No construction schedule required unless requested by the City.
10 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
11 1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
12 2. Division 1 – General Requirements
13 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
14 A. Measurement and Payment
15 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
16 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
17 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
18 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
19 A.Coordination
20 1. Attend preconstruction meeting.
21 2. Representatives of Contractor, subcontractors and suppliers attending meetings
22 shall be qualified and authorized to act on behalf of the entity each represents.
23 3. Meeting administered by City may be tape recorded.
24 a.If recorded, tapes will be used to prepare minutes and retained by City for
25 future reference.
26 B. Preconstruction Meeting
27 1. A preconstruction meeting will be held within 14 days after the delivery of the
28 distribution package to the City.
29 a.The meeting will be scheduled and administered by the City.
30 2. The Project Representative will preside at the meeting, prepare the notes of the
31 meeting and distribute copies of same to all participants who so request by fully
32 completing the attendance form to be circulated at the beginning of the meeting.
33 3. Attendance shall include:
34 a.Developer and Consultant
35 b. Contractor's project manager
36 c.Contractor's superintendent
37 d. Any subcontractor or supplier representatives whom the Contractor may desire
38 to invite or the City may request
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
1 e.Other City representatives
2 f.Others as appropriate
3 4. Preliminary Agenda may include:
01 31 19 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 2 of 3
4 a.Introduction of Project Personnel
5 b.General Description of Project
6 c.Status of right-of-way, utility clearances, easements or other pertinent permits
7 d.Contractor’s work plan and schedule
8 e.Contract Time
9 f.Notice to Proceed
10 g.Construction Staking
11 h.Progress Payments
12 i.Extra Work and Change Order Procedures
13 j.Field Orders
14 k.Disposal Site Letter for Waste Material
15 l.Insurance Renewals
16 m.Payroll Certification
17 n.Material Certifications and Quality Control Testing
18 o.Public Safety and Convenience
19 p.Documentation of Pre-Construction Conditions
20 q.Weekend Work Notification
21 r.Legal Holidays
22 s.Trench Safety Plans
23 t.Confined Space Entry Standards
24 u.Coordination with the City’s representative for operations of existing water
25 systems
26 v.Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
27 w.Coordination with other Contractors
28 x.Early Warning System
29 y.Contractor Evaluation
30 z.Special Conditions applicable to the project
31 aa. Damages Claims
32 bb. Submittal Procedures
33 cc.Substitution Procedures
34 dd.Correspondence Routing
35 ee. Record Drawings
36 ff. Temporary construction facilities
37 gg. MBE/SBE procedures
38 hh. Final Acceptance
39 ii.Final Payment
40 jj. Questions or Comments
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 31 19 - 3
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 3 of 3
1 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
2 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
3 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
4 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
5 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
6 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
7 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
8 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
9 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
10 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
11 END OF SECTION
12
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
13
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 32 33 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 32 33
PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A.Section Includes:
1. Administrative and procedural requirements for:
a.Preconstruction Videos
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. Though not mandatory, it is highly recommended on infill developer projects.
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A.Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A.Preconstruction Video
1. Produce a preconstruction video of the site/alignment, including all areas in the
vicinity of and to be affected by construction.
a.Provide digital copy of video upon request by the City.
2. Retain a copy of the preconstruction video until the end of the maintenance surety
period.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 32 33 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2ACity Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 1
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 33 00 1
DAP SUBMITTALS 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A.Section Includes:5
1.General methods and requirements of submissions applicable to the following6
Work-related submittals:7
a.Shop Drawings8
b.Product Data (including Standard Product List submittals)9
c.Samples10
d.Mock Ups11
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification12
1.None.13
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:14
1.Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract15
2.Division 1 – General Requirements16
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 17
A.Measurement and Payment18
1.Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.19
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.20
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 21
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 22
A.Coordination23
1.Notify the City in writing, at the time of submittal, of any deviations in the24
submittals from the requirements of the Contract Documents.25
2.Coordination of Submittal Times26
a.Prepare, prioritize and transmit each submittal sufficiently in advance of27
performing the related Work or other applicable activities, or within the time28
specified in the individual Work Sections, of the Specifications.29
b.Contractor is responsible such that the installation will not be delayed by30
processing times including, but not limited to:31
a)Disapproval and resubmittal (if required)32
b)Coordination with other submittals33
c)Testing34
d)Purchasing35
e)Fabrication36
f)Delivery37
g)Similar sequenced activities38
c.No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to39
transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the Work.40
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2ACity Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 2
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
d.Make submittals promptly in accordance with approved schedule, and in such 1
sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the work of any other 2
contractor. 3
B.Submittal Numbering4
1.When submitting shop drawings or samples, utilize a 9-character submittal cross-5
reference identification numbering system in the following manner:6
a.Use the first 6 digits of the applicable Specification Section Number.7
b.For the next 2 digits number use numbers 01-99 to sequentially number each8
initial separate item or drawing submitted under each specific Section number.9
c.Last use a letter, A-Z, indicating the resubmission of the same drawing (i.e.10
A=2nd submission, B=3rd submission, C=4th submission, etc.). A typical11
submittal number would be as follows:12
13
03 30 00-08-B 14
15
1)03 30 00 is the Specification Section for Concrete16
2)08 is the eighth initial submittal under this Specification Section17
3)B is the third submission (second resubmission) of that particular shop18
drawing19
C.Contractor Certification20
1.Review shop drawings, product data and samples, including those by21
subcontractors, prior to submission to determine and verify the following:22
a.Field measurements23
b.Field construction criteria24
c.Catalog numbers and similar data25
d.Conformance with the Contract Documents26
2.Provide each shop drawing, sample and product data submitted by the Contractor27
with a Certification Statement affixed including:28
a.The Contractor's Company name29
b.Signature of submittal reviewer30
c.Certification Statement31
1)“By this submittal, I hereby represent that I have determined and verified32
field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions,33
catalog numbers and similar data and I have checked and coordinated each34
item with other applicable approved shop drawings."35
D.Submittal Format36
1.Fold shop drawings larger than 8 ½ inches x 11 inches to 8 ½ inches x 11inches.37
2.Bind shop drawings and product data sheets together.38
3.Order39
a.Cover Sheet40
1)Description of Packet41
2)Contractor Certification42
b.List of items / Table of Contents43
c.Product Data /Shop Drawings/Samples /Calculations44
E.Submittal Content45
1.The date of submission and the dates of any previous submissions46
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 3
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
2.The Project title and number1
3.Contractor identification2
4.The names of:3
a.Contractor4
b.Supplier5
c.Manufacturer6
5.Identification of the product, with the Specification Section number, page and7
paragraph(s)8
6.Field dimensions, clearly identified as such9
7.Relation to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials10
8.Applicable standards, such as ASTM or Federal Specification numbers11
9.Identification by highlighting of deviations from Contract Documents12
10.Identification by highlighting of revisions on resubmittals13
11.An 8-inch x 3-inch blank space for Contractor and City stamps14
F.Shop Drawings15
1.As specified in individual Work Sections includes, but is not necessarily limited to:16
a.Custom-prepared data such as fabrication and erection/installation (working)17
drawings18
b.Scheduled information19
c.Setting diagrams20
d.Actual shopwork manufacturing instructions21
e.Custom templates22
f.Special wiring diagrams23
g.Coordination drawings24
h.Individual system or equipment inspection and test reports including:25
1)Performance curves and certifications26
i.As applicable to the Work27
2.Details28
a.Relation of the various parts to the main members and lines of the structure29
b.Where correct fabrication of the Work depends upon field measurements30
1)Provide such measurements and note on the drawings prior to submitting31
for approval.32
G.Product Data33
1.For submittals of product data for products included on the City’s Standard Product34
List, clearly identify each item selected for use on the Project.35
2.For submittals of product data for products not included on the City’s Standard36
Product List, submittal data may include, but is not necessarily limited to:37
a.Standard prepared data for manufactured products (sometimes referred to as38
catalog data)39
1)Such as the manufacturer's product specification and installation40
instructions41
2)Availability of colors and patterns42
3)Manufacturer's printed statements of compliances and applicability43
4)Roughing-in diagrams and templates44
5)Catalog cuts45
6)Product photographs46
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 4
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised August 30, 2013
7)Standard wiring diagrams1
8)Printed performance curves and operational-range diagrams2
9)Production or quality control inspection and test reports and certifications3
10)Mill reports4
11)Product operating and maintenance instructions and recommended5
spare-parts listing and printed product warranties6
12)As applicable to the Work7
H.Samples8
1.As specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to:9
a.Physical examples of the Work such as:10
1)Sections of manufactured or fabricated Work11
2)Small cuts or containers of materials12
3)Complete units of repetitively used products color/texture/pattern swatches13
and range sets14
4)Specimens for coordination of visual effect15
5)Graphic symbols and units of Work to be used by the City for independent16
inspection and testing, as applicable to the Work17
I.Do not start Work requiring a shop drawing, sample or product data nor any material to18
be fabricated or installed prior to the approval or qualified approval of such item.19
1.Fabrication performed, materials purchased or on-site construction accomplished20
which does not conform to approved shop drawings and data is at the Contractor's21
risk.22
2.The City will not be liable for any expense or delay due to corrections or remedies23
required to accomplish conformity.24
3.Complete project Work, materials, fabrication, and installations in conformance25
with approved shop drawings, applicable samples, and product data.26
J.Submittal Distribution27
1.Electronic Distribution28
a.Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be29
uploaded to City’s Buzzsaw site, or another external FTP site approved by the30
City.31
b.Shop Drawings32
1)Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate33
City representatives via email of submittal posting.34
2)Hard Copies35
a)3 copies for all submittals36
b)If Contractor requires more than 1 hard copy of Shop Drawings37
returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed38
above.39
c.Product Data40
1)Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate41
City representatives via email of submittal posting.42
2)Hard Copies43
a)3 copies for all submittals44
d.Samples45
1)Distributed to the Project Representative46
2.Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)47
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 5
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised August 30, 2013
a.Shop Drawings1
1)Distributed to the City2
2)Copies3
a)8 copies for mechanical submittals4
b)7 copies for all other submittals5
c)If Contractor requires more than 3 copies of Shop Drawings returned,6
Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed above.7
b.Product Data8
1)Distributed to the City9
2)Copies10
a)4 copies11
c.Samples12
1)Distributed to the Project Representative13
2)Copies14
a)Submit the number stated in the respective Specification Sections.15
3.Distribute reproductions of approved shop drawings and copies of approved16
product data and samples, where required, to the job site file and elsewhere as17
directed by the City.18
a.Provide number of copies as directed by the City but not exceeding the number19
previously specified.20
K.Submittal Review21
1.The review of shop drawings, data and samples will be for general conformance22
with the design concept and Contract Documents. This is not to be construed as:23
a.Permitting any departure from the Contract requirements24
b.Relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including details,25
dimensions, and materials26
c.Approving departures from details furnished by the City, except as otherwise27
provided herein28
2.The review and approval of shop drawings, samples or product data by the City29
does not relieve the Contractor from his/her responsibility with regard to the30
fulfillment of the terms of the Contract.31
a.All risks of error and omission are assumed by the Contractor, and the City will32
have no responsibility therefore.33
3.The Contractor remains responsible for details and accuracy, for coordinating the34
Work with all other associated work and trades, for selecting fabrication processes,35
for techniques of assembly and for performing Work in a safe manner.36
4.If the shop drawings, data or samples as submitted describe variations and show a37
departure from the Contract requirements which City finds to be in the interest of38
the City and to be so minor as not to involve a change in Contract Price or time for39
performance, the City may return the reviewed drawings without noting an40
exception.41
5.Submittals will be returned to the Contractor under 1 of the following codes:42
a.Code 143
1)"NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" is assigned when there are no notations or44
comments on the submittal.45
a)When returned under this code the Contractor may release the46
equipment and/or material for manufacture.47
b.Code 248
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 6
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
1)"EXCEPTIONS NOTED". This code is assigned when a confirmation of 1
the notations and comments IS NOT required by the Contractor. 2
a)The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;3
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the4
final product.5
c.Code 36
1)"EXCEPTIONS NOTED/RESUBMIT". This combination of codes is7
assigned when notations and comments are extensive enough to require a8
resubmittal of the package.9
a)The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;10
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the11
final product.12
b)This resubmittal is to address all comments, omissions and13
non-conforming items that were noted.14
c)Resubmittal is to be received by the City within 15 Calendar Days of15
the date of the City's transmittal requiring the resubmittal.16
d.Code 417
1)"NOT APPROVED" is assigned when the submittal does not meet the18
intent of the Contract Documents.19
a)The Contractor must resubmit the entire package revised to bring the20
submittal into conformance.21
b)It may be necessary to resubmit using a different manufacturer/vendor22
to meet the Contract Documents.23
6.Resubmittals24
a.Handled in the same manner as first submittals25
1)Corrections other than requested by the City26
2)Marked with revision triangle or other similar method27
a)At Contractor’s risk if not marked28
b.Submittals for each item will be reviewed no more than twice at the City’s29
expense.30
1)All subsequent reviews will be performed at times convenient to the City31
and at the Contractor's expense, based on the City's or City32
Representative’s then prevailing rates.33
2)Provide Contractor reimbursement to the City within 30 Calendar Days for34
all such fees invoiced by the City.35
c.The need for more than 1 resubmission or any other delay in obtaining City's36
review of submittals, will not entitle the Contractor to an extension of Contract37
Time.38
7.Partial Submittals39
a.City reserves the right to not review submittals deemed partial, at the City’s40
discretion.41
b.Submittals deemed by the City to be not complete will be returned to the42
Contractor, and will be considered "Not Approved" until resubmitted.43
c.The City may at its option provide a list or mark the submittal directing the44
Contractor to the areas that are incomplete.45
8.If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the shop drawings to46
constitute a change to the Contract Documents, then written notice must be47
provided thereof to the Developer at least 7 Calendar Days prior to release for48
manufacture.49
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 7
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
9.When the shop drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the 1
Contractor may carry out the construction in accordance therewith and no further 2
changes therein except upon written instructions from the City. 3
10.Each submittal, appropriately coded, will be returned within 30 Calendar Days4
following receipt of submittal by the City.5
L.Mock ups6
1.Mock Up units as specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily7
limited to, complete units of the standard of acceptance for that type of Work to be8
used on the Project. Remove at the completion of the Work or when directed.9
M.Qualifications10
1.If specifically required in other Sections of these Specifications, submit a P.E.11
Certification for each item required.12
N.Request for Information (RFI)13
1.Contractor Request for additional information14
a.Clarification or interpretation of the contract documents15
b.When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between Contract Documents16
c.When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between the Drawings and17
Specifications18
1)Identify the conflict and request clarification19
2.Sufficient information shall be attached to permit a written response without further20
information.21
22
23
24
25
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 26
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 29
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 30
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 31
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 32
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 33
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 33 00 - 8
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised August 30, 2013
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 1
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 2
END OF SECTION 3
4
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
12/20/2012 D. Johnson 1.4.K.8. Working Days modified to Calendar Days
5
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 35 13 - 1
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August, 30, 2013
1 SECTION 01 35 13
2 SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. The procedures for special project circumstances that includes, but is not limited to:
8 a.Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation
9 b.Work near High Voltage Lines
10 c.Confined Space Entry Program
11 d.Air Pollution Watch Days
12 e.Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc.
13 f.Water Department Notification
14 g.Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction
15 h.Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers
16 i.Coordination within Railroad permits areas
17 j.Dust Control
18 k.Employee Parking
19
20
21 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
22 1.None.
23 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
24 1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
25 2. Division 1 – General Requirements
26 3. Section 33 12 25 – Connection to Existing Water Mains
27
28 1.2 REFERENCES
29 A. Reference Standards
30 1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference
31 standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
32 Specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
33 2. Health and Safety Code, Title 9. Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752.
34 High Voltage Overhead Lines.
35 3. North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) – Clean Construction
36 Specification
37 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
38 A. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation
39 1. When work in the right-of-way which is under the jurisdiction of the Texas
40 Department of Transportation (TxDOT):
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August, 30, 2013
01 35 13 - 2
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 7
1 a.Notify the Texas Department of Transportation prior to commencing any work
2 therein in accordance with the provisions of the permit
3 b. All work performed in the TxDOT right-of-way shall be performed in
4 compliance with and subject to approval from the Texas Department of
5 Transportation
6 B. Work near High Voltage Lines
7 1. Regulatory Requirements
8 a.All Work near High Voltage Lines (more than 600 volts measured between
9 conductors or between a conductor and the ground) shall be in accordance with
10 Health and Safety Code, Title 9, Subtitle A, Chapter 752.
11 2. Warning sign
12 a.Provide sign of sufficient size meeting all OSHA requirements.
13 3. Equipment operating within 10 feet of high voltage lines will require the following
14 safety features
15 a.Insulating cage-type of guard about the boom or arm
16 b. Insulator links on the lift hook connections for back hoes or dippers
17 c.Equipment must meet the safety requirements as set forth by OSHA and the
18 safety requirements of the owner of the high voltage lines
19 4. Work within 6 feet of high voltage electric lines
20 a.Notification shall be given to:
21 1) The power company (example: ONCOR)
22 a) Maintain an accurate log of all such calls to power company and record
23 action taken in each case.
24 b. Coordination with power company
25 1) After notification coordinate with the power company to:
26 a) Erect temporary mechanical barriers, de-energize the lines, or raise or
27 lower the lines
28 c.No personnel may work within 6 feet of a high voltage line before the above
29 requirements have been met.
30 C. Confined Space Entry Program
31 1. Provide and follow approved Confined Space Entry Program in accordance with
32 OSHA requirements.
33 2. Confined Spaces include:
34 a.Manholes
35 b. All other confined spaces in accordance with OSHA’s Permit Required for
36 Confined Spaces
37 D. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc.
38 1. When Contract Documents permit on the project the following will apply:
39 a.Public Notification
40 1) Submit notice to City and proof of adequate insurance coverage, 24 hours
41 prior to commencing.
42 2) Minimum 24 hour public notification in accordance with Section 01 31 13
43 E. Water Department Coordination
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August, 30, 2013
01 35 13 - 3
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 7
1 1. During the construction of this project, it will be necessary to deactivate, for a
2 period of time, existing lines. The Contractor shall be required to coordinate with
3 the Water Department to determine the best times for deactivating and activating
4 those lines.
5 2. Coordinate any event that will require connecting to or the operation of an existing
6 City water line system with the City’s representative.
7 a.Coordination shall be in accordance with Section 33 12 25.
8 b. If needed, obtain a hydrant water meter from the Water Department for use
9 during the life of named project.
10 c.In the event that a water valve on an existing live system be turned off and on
11 to accommodate the construction of the project is required, coordinate this
12 activity through the appropriate City representative.
13 1) Do not operate water line valves of existing water system.
14 a) Failure to comply will render the Contractor in violation of Texas Penal
15 Code Title 7, Chapter 28.03 (Criminal Mischief) and the Contractor
16 will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
17 b) In addition, the Contractor will assume all liabilities and
18 responsibilities as a result of these actions.
19 F. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction
20 1. Prior to beginning construction on any block in the project, on a block by block
21 basis, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of the pending construction to the front
22 door of each residence or business that will be impacted by construction. The notice
23 shall be prepared as follows:
24 a.Post notice or flyer 7 days prior to beginning any construction activity on each
25 block in the project area.
26 1) Prepare flyer on the Contractor’s letterhead and include the following
27 information:
28 a) Name of Project
29 b) City Project No (CPN)
30 c) Scope of Project (i.e. type of construction activity)
31 d) Actual construction duration within the block
32 e) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number
33 f)Name of the City’s inspector and phone number
34 g) City’s after-hours phone number
35 2) A sample of the ‘pre-construction notification’ flyer is attached as Exhibit
36 A.
37 3) Submit schedule showing the construction start and finish time for each
38 block of the project to the inspector.
39 4) Deliver flyer to the City Inspector for review prior to distribution.
40 b. No construction will be allowed to begin on any block until the flyer is
41 delivered to all residents of the block.
42 G. Public Notification of Temporary Water Service Interruption during Construction
43 1. In the event it becomes necessary to temporarily shut down water service to
44 residents or businesses during construction, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of
45 the pending interruption to the front door of each affected resident.
46 2. Prepared notice as follows:
47 a.The notification or flyer shall be posted 24 hours prior to the temporary
48 interruption.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August, 30, 2013
01 35 13 - 4
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 7
1 b. Prepare flyer on the contractor’s letterhead and include the following
2 information:
3 1) Name of the project
4 2) City Project Number
5 3) Date of the interruption of service
6 4) Period the interruption will take place
7 5) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number
8 6) Name of the City’s inspector and phone number
9 c.A sample of the temporary water service interruption notification is attached as
10 Exhibit B.
11 d. Deliver a copy of the temporary interruption notification to the City inspector
12 for review prior to being distributed.
13 e.No interruption of water service can occur until the flyer has been delivered to
14 all affected residents and businesses.
15 f.Electronic versions of the sample flyers can be obtained from the Project
16 Construction Inspector.
17 H. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
18 1. At locations in the Project where construction activities occur in areas where
19 USACE permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated
20 permit.
21 I.Coordination within Railroad Permit Areas
22 1. At locations in the project where construction activities occur in areas where
23 railroad permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated
24 railroad permit. This includes, but is not limited to, provisions for:
25 a.Flagmen
26 b.Inspectors
27 c.Safety training
28 d. Additional insurance
29 e.Insurance certificates
30 f.Other employees required to protect the right-of-way and property of the
31 Railroad Company from damage arising out of and/or from the construction of
32 the project. Proper utility clearance procedures shall be used in accordance
33 with the permit guidelines.
34 2. Obtain any supplemental information needed to comply with the railroad’s
35 requirements.
36 J.Dust Control
37 1. Use acceptable measures to control dust at the Site.
38 a.If water is used to control dust, capture and properly dispose of waste water.
39 b. If wet saw cutting is performed, capture and properly dispose of slurry.
40 K. Employee Parking
41 1. Provide parking for employees at locations approved by the City.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August, 30, 2013
01 35 13 - 5
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 5 of 7
1 1.4 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
2 1.5 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
3 1.6 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
4 1.7 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
5 1.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
6 1.9 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
7 1.10 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
8 1.11 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
9 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
10 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
11 END OF SECTION
12
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson
1.3.B – Added requirement of compliance with Health and Safety Code, Title 9.
Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752. High Voltage Overhead Lines.
13
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August, 30, 2013
01 35 13 - 6
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 6 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6 Date:
7
EXHIBIT A
(To be printed on Contractor’s Letterhead)
8 CPN No.:
9 Project Name:
10 Mapsco Location:
11 Limits of Construction:
12
13
14
15
16
17 THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT UNDER A CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF FORT
18 WORTH, OUR COMPANY WILL WORK ON UTILITY LINES ON OR AROUND YOUR
19 PROPERTY.
20
21 CONSTRUCTION WILL BEGIN APPROXIMATELY SEVEN DAYS FROM THE DATE
22 OF THIS NOTICE.
23
24 IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESS, SECURITY, SAFETY OR ANY OTHER
25 ISSUE, PLEASE CALL:
26
27
28 Mr. <CONTRACTOR’S SUPERINTENDENT> AT <TELEPHONE NO.>
29
30 OR
31
32 Mr. <CITY INSPECTOR> AT < TELEPHONE NO.>
33
34 AFTER 4:30 PM OR ON WEEKENDS, PLEASE CALL (817) 392 8306
35
36 PLEASE KEEP THIS FLYER HANDY WHEN YOU CALL
37
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August, 30, 2013
01 35 13 - 7
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 7 of 7
1 EXHIBIT B
2
3
4
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 45 23
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised March 20, 2020
SECTION 01 45 23
TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A.Section Includes:
1. Testing and inspection services procedures and coordination
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A.Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
a.Contractor is responsible for performing, coordinating, and payment of all
Quality Control testing.
b. City is responsible for performing and payment for first set of Quality
Assurance testing.
1) If the first Quality Assurance test performed by the City fails, the
Contractor is responsible for payment of subsequent Quality Assurance
testing until a passing test occurs.
a)Final acceptance will not be issued by City until all required payments
for testing by Contractor have been paid in full.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A.Testing
1. Complete testing in accordance with the Contract Documents.
2. Coordination
a.When testing is required to be performed by the City, notify City, sufficiently
in advance, when testing is needed.
b. When testing is required to be completed by the Contractor, notify City,
sufficiently in advance, that testing will be performed.
3. Distribution of Testing Reports
a.Electronic Distribution
1) Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be
uploaded to the City’s document management system, or another form of
distribution approved by the City.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 45 23
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised March 20, 2020
2) Upload test reports to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
3) Hard Copies
a)1 copy for all submittals submitted to the Project Representative
b. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)
1) Tests performed by City
a)Distribute 1 hard copy to the Contractor
2) Tests performed by the Contractor
a)Distribute 3 hard copies to City’s Project Representative
4.Provide City’s Project Representative with trip tickets for each delivered load of
Concrete or Lime material including the following information:
a.Name of pit
b. Date of delivery
c.Material delivered
B.Inspection
1. Inspection or lack of inspection does not relieve the Contractor from obligation to
perform work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
03/20/2020 D.V. Magaña Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that electronic submittals be uploaded
through the City’s document management system.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
01 50 00 - 1
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 1 of 4
1 SECTION 01 50 00
2 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. Provide temporary facilities and controls needed for the Work including, but not
7 necessarily limited to:
8 a.Temporary utilities
9 b. Sanitary facilities
10 c.Storage Sheds and Buildings
11 d. Dust control
12 e.Temporary fencing of the construction site
13 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
14 1.None.
15 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
16 1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
17 2. Division 1 – General Requirements
18 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
19 A. Measurement and Payment
20 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
21 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
22 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
23 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
24 A. Temporary Utilities
25 1. Obtaining Temporary Service
26 a.Make arrangements with utility service companies for temporary services.
27 b. Abide by rules and regulations of utility service companies or authorities
28 having jurisdiction.
29 c.Be responsible for utility service costs until Work is approved for Final
30 Acceptance.
31 1) Included are fuel, power, light, heat and other utility services necessary for
32 execution, completion, testing and initial operation of Work.
33 2.Water
34 a.Contractor to provide water required for and in connection with Work to be
35 performed and for specified tests of piping, equipment, devices or other use as
36 required for the completion of the Work.
37 b. Provide and maintain adequate supply of potable water for domestic
38 consumption by Contractor personnel and City’s Project Representatives.
39 c.Coordination
40 1) Contact City 1 week before water for construction is desired
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
01 50 00 - 2
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 2 of 4
1 d. Contractor Payment for Construction Water
2 1) Obtain construction water meter from City for payment as billed by City’s
3 established rates.
4 3. Electricity and Lighting
5 a.Provide and pay for electric powered service as required for Work, including
6 testing of Work.
7 1) Provide power for lighting, operation of equipment, or other use.
8 b. Electric power service includes temporary power service or generator to
9 maintain operations during scheduled shutdown.
10 4.Telephone
11 a.Provide emergency telephone service at Site for use by Contractor personnel
12 and others performing work or furnishing services at Site.
13 5. Temporary Heat and Ventilation
14 a.Provide temporary heat as necessary for protection or completion of Work.
15 b. Provide temporary heat and ventilation to assure safe working conditions.
16 B. Sanitary Facilities
17 1. Provide and maintain sanitary facilities for persons on Site.
18 a.Comply with regulations of State and local departments of health.
19 2. Enforce use of sanitary facilities by construction personnel at job site.
20 a.Enclose and anchor sanitary facilities.
21 b. No discharge will be allowed from these facilities.
22 c.Collect and store sewage and waste so as not to cause nuisance or health
23 problem.
24 d. Haul sewage and waste off-site at no less than weekly intervals and properly
25 dispose in accordance with applicable regulation.
26 3. Locate facilities near Work Site and keep clean and maintained throughout Project.
27 4. Remove facilities at completion of Project
28 C. Storage Sheds and Buildings
29 1. Provide adequately ventilated, watertight, weatherproof storage facilities with floor
30 above ground level for materials and equipment susceptible to weather damage.
31 2. Storage of materials not susceptible to weather damage may be on blocks off
32 ground.
33 3. Store materials in a neat and orderly manner.
34 a.Place materials and equipment to permit easy access for identification,
35 inspection and inventory.
36 4. Equip building with lockable doors and lighting, and provide electrical service for
37 equipment space heaters and heating or ventilation as necessary to provide storage
38 environments acceptable to specified manufacturers.
39 5. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage away from
40 temporary and existing buildings.
41 6. Remove building from site prior to Final Acceptance.
42 D. Temporary Fencing
43 1. Provide and maintain for the duration or construction when required in contract
44 documents
45 E. Dust Control
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
01 50 00 - 3
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 3 of 4
1 1. Contractor is responsible for maintaining dust control through the duration of the
2 project.
3 a.Contractor remains on-call at all times
4 b. Must respond in a timely manner
5 F. Temporary Protection of Construction
6 1. Contractor or subcontractors are responsible for protecting Work from damage due
7 to weather.
8 1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
9 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
10 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
11 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
12 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
13 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
14 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
15 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
16 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
17 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
18 3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
19 3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
20 3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
21 3.4 INSTALLATION
22 A.Temporary Facilities
23 1. Maintain all temporary facilities for duration of construction activities as needed.
24 3.5 [REPAIR] / [RESTORATION]
25 3.6 RE-INSTALLATION
26 3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
27 3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
28 3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
29 3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
30 3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES
31 A. Temporary Facilities
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
01 50 00 - 4
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 4 of 4
1 1. Remove all temporary facilities and restore area after completion of the Work, to a
2 condition equal to or better than prior to start of Work.
3 3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
4 3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
5 3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
6 END OF SECTION
7
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 55 26 - 1
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised July 1, 2011
SECTION 01 55 26 1
STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A.Section Includes:5
1.Administrative procedures for:6
a.Street Use Permit7
b.Modification of approved traffic control8
c.Removal of Street Signs9
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification10
1.None.11
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:12
1.Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract13
2.Division 1 – General Requirements14
3.Section 34 71 13 – Traffic Control15
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 16
A.Measurement and Payment17
1.Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.18
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.19
1.3 REFERENCES 20
A.Reference Standards21
1.Reference standards cited in this specification refer to the current reference standard22
published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this23
specification, unless a date is specifically cited.24
2.Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD).25
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 26
A.Traffic Control27
1.General28
a.When traffic control plans are included in the Drawings, provide Traffic29
Control in accordance with Drawings and Section 34 71 13.30
b.When traffic control plans are not included in the Drawings, prepare traffic31
control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13 and submit to City for32
review.33
1)Allow minimum 10 working days for review of proposed Traffic Control.34
B.Street Use Permit35
1.Prior to installation of Traffic Control, a City Street Use Permit is required.36
a.To obtain Street Use Permit, submit Traffic Control Plans to City37
Transportation and Public Works Department.38
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 55 26 - 2
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised July 1, 2011
1)Allow a minimum of 5 working days for permit review. 1
2)Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control plans for2
Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed.3
C.Modification to Approved Traffic Control4
1.Prior to installation traffic control:5
a.Submit revised traffic control plans to City Department Transportation and6
Public Works Department.7
1)Revise Traffic Control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13.8
2)Allow minimum 5 working days for review of revised Traffic Control.9
3)It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control10
plans for Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed.11
D.Removal of Street Sign12
1.If it is determined that a street sign must be removed for construction, then contact13
City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs and Markings Division to14
remove the sign.15
E.Temporary Signage16
1.In the case of regulatory signs, replace permanent sign with temporary sign meeting17
requirements of the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control18
Devices (MUTCD).19
2.Install temporary sign before the removal of permanent sign.20
3.When construction is complete, to the extent that the permanent sign can be21
reinstalled, contact the City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs22
and Markings Division, to reinstall the permanent sign.23
F.Traffic Control Standards24
1.Traffic Control Standards can be found on the City’s Buzzsaw website.25
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 26
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 29
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 30
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 31
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 32
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 33
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 34
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 35
END OF SECTION 36
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 55 26 - 3
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised July 1, 2011
1
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
2
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576 PROJECTS
01 58 13 - 1
DAP TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 58 13
TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A.Section Includes:
1. Temporary Project Signage Requirements
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A.Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED]
2.2 EQUIPMENT, PRODUCT TYPES, AND MATERIALS
A.Design Criteria
1. Provide free standing Project Designation Sign in accordance with City’s Standard
Details for project signs.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 58 13 - 2
DAP TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
B.Materials
1. Sign
a.Constructed of ¾-inch fir plywood, grade A-C (exterior) or better
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 INSTALLATION
A.General
1. Provide vertical installation at extents of project.
2. Relocate sign as needed, upon request of the City.
B.Mounting options
a.Skids
b. Posts
c.Barricade
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE
A.General
1. Maintenance will include painting and repairs as needed or directed by the City.
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 58 13 - 3
DAP TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M. Domenech Revised for DAP application
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 60 00
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised March 20, 2020
SECTION 01 60 00
PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A.Section Includes:
1. References for Product Requirements and City Standard Products List
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES [NOT USED]
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A list of City approved products for use is available through the City’s website at:
https://apps.fortworthtexas.gov/ProjectResources/ and following the directory
path: 02 - Construction Documents\Standard Products List
A.Only products specifically included on City’s Standard Product List in these Contract
Documents shall be allowed for use on the Project.
1. Any subsequently approved products will only be allowed for use upon specific
approval by the City.
B.Any specific product requirements in the Contract Documents supersede similar
products included on the City’s Standard Product List.
1. The City reserves the right to not allow products to be used for certain projects even
though the product is listed on the City’s Standard Product List.
C.Although a specific product is included on City’s Standard Product List, not all
products from that manufacturer are approved for use, including but not limited to, that
manufacturer’s standard product.
D.See Section 01 33 00 for submittal requirements of Product Data included on City’s
Standard Product List.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 60 00
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised March 20, 2020
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
10/12/12 D. Johnson Modified Location of City’s Standard Product List
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
03/20/2020 D.V. Magaña Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that the City approved products list is
accessible through the City’s website.
01 66 00 - 1
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 66 00 1
PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A.Section Includes:5
1.Scheduling of product delivery6
2.Packaging of products for delivery7
3.Protection of products against damage from:8
a.Handling9
b.Exposure to elements or harsh environments10
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification11
1.None.12
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:13
1.Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract14
2.Division 1 – General Requirements15
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 16
A.Measurement and Payment17
1.Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.18
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.19
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 20
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 21
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 22
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 23
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 24
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 25
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 26
1.10 DELIVERY AND HANDLING 27
A.Delivery Requirements28
1.Schedule delivery of products or equipment as required to allow timely installation29
and to avoid prolonged storage.30
2.Provide appropriate personnel and equipment to receive deliveries.31
3.Delivery trucks will not be permitted to wait extended periods of time on the Site32
for personnel or equipment to receive the delivery.33
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 66 00 - 2
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised April 7, 2014
4.Deliver products or equipment in manufacturer's original unbroken cartons or other 1
containers designed and constructed to protect the contents from physical or 2
environmental damage. 3
5.Clearly and fully mark and identify as to manufacturer, item and installation4
location.5
6.Provide manufacturer's instructions for storage and handling.6
B.Handling Requirements7
1.Handle products or equipment in accordance with these Contract Documents and8
manufacturer’s recommendations and instructions.9
C.Storage Requirements10
1.Store materials in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations and11
requirements of these Specifications.12
2.Make necessary provisions for safe storage of materials and equipment.13
a.Place loose soil materials and materials to be incorporated into Work to prevent14
damage to any part of Work or existing facilities and to maintain free access at15
all times to all parts of Work and to utility service company installations in16
vicinity of Work.17
3.Keep materials and equipment neatly and compactly stored in locations that will18
cause minimum inconvenience to other contractors, public travel, adjoining owners,19
tenants and occupants.20
a.Arrange storage to provide easy access for inspection.21
4.Restrict storage to areas available on construction site for storage of material and22
equipment as shown on Drawings, or approved by City’s Project Representative.23
5.Provide off-site storage and protection when on-site storage is not adequate.24
a.Provide addresses of and access to off-site storage locations for inspection by25
City’s Project Representative.26
6.Do not use lawns, grass plots or other private property for storage purposes without27
written permission of owner or other person in possession or control of premises.28
7.Store in manufacturers’ unopened containers.29
8.Neatly, safely and compactly stack materials delivered and stored along line of30
Work to avoid inconvenience and damage to property owners and general public31
and maintain at least 3 feet from fire hydrant.32
9.Keep public and private driveways and street crossings open.33
10.Repair or replace damaged lawns, sidewalks, streets or other improvements to34
satisfaction of City’s Project Representative.35
a.Total length which materials may be distributed along route of construction at36
one time is 1,000 linear feet, unless otherwise approved in writing by City’s37
Project Representative.38
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 66 00 - 3
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised April 7, 2014
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 2
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 3
PART 3 - EXECUTION 4
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 5
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 6
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 7
3.4 ERECTION [NOT USED] 8
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 9
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 10
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL 11
A.Tests and Inspections12
1.Inspect all products or equipment delivered to the site prior to unloading.13
B.Non-Conforming Work14
1.Reject all products or equipment that are damaged, used or in any other way15
unsatisfactory for use on the project.16
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 17
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 18
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 19
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 20
3.12 PROTECTION 21
A.Protect all products or equipment in accordance with manufacturer's written directions.22
B.Store products or equipment in location to avoid physical damage to items while in23
storage.24
C.Protect equipment from exposure to elements and keep thoroughly dry if required by25
the manufacturer.26
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 27
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 28
END OF SECTION 29
30
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 66 00 - 4
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS 103149
Revised April 7, 2014
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
1
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 70 00 - 1
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 70 00
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A.Section Includes:
1. Mobilization and Demobilization
a.Mobilization
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies
to the Site
2)Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation
at the Site
3) Premiums paid for performance and payment bonds
4)Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies
to another location within the designated Site
5) Relocation of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation
from 1 location to another location on the Site.
b. Demobilization
1)Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies
away from the Site including disassembly
2) Site Clean-up
3) Removal of all buildings and/or other facilities assembled at the Site for this
Contract
c.Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of
work that are for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract.
2. Remobilization
a.Remobilization for Suspension of Work specifically required in the Contract
Documents or as required by City includes:
1) Demobilization
a)Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies from the Site including disassembly or temporarily securing
equipment, supplies, and other facilities as designated by the Contract
Documents necessary to suspend the Work.
b) Site Clean-up as designated in the Contract Documents
2) Remobilization
a)Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to the Site necessary to resume the Work.
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s
operation at the Site necessary to resume the Work.
3) No Payments will be made for:
a)Mobilization and Demobilization from one location to another on the
Site in the normal progress of performing the Work.
b) Stand-by or idle time
c)Lost profits
3. Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects
a.Mobilization and Demobilization
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 70 00 - 2
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
1) Mobilization shall consist of the activities and cost on a Work Order basis
necessary for:
a)Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to the Site for the issued Work Order.
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s
operation at the Site for the issued Work Order
2) Demobilization shall consist of the activities and cost necessary for:
a)Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies from the Site including disassembly for each issued Work
Order
b) Site Clean-up for each issued Work Order
c)Removal of all buildings or other facilities assembled at the Site for
each Work Oder
b. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of
work for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract.
4. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects
a.A Mobilization for Miscellaneous Projects when directed by the City and the
mobilization occurs within 24 hours of the issuance of the Work Order.
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2.Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A.Measurement and Payment
1. Mobilization and Demobilization
a.Measure
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
b. Payment
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be
allowed.
2. Remobilization for suspension of Work as specifically required in the Contract
Documents
a.Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be per each remobilization performed.
b. Payment
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Specified Remobilization” in accordance with Contract
Documents.
c.The price shall include:
1) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.1)
2) Remobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 70 00 - 3
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
3. Remobilization for suspension of Work as required by City
a.Measurement and Payment
1) This shall be submitted as a Contract Claim in accordance with Article 10
of Section 00 72 00.
2) No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated
with this Item.
4. Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects
a.Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents
b. Payment
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Work Order Mobilization” in accordance with Contract
Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to mobilization
and shall not be paid for separately.
c.The price shall include:
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.1)
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
5. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects
a.Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents
b. Payment
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Work Order Emergency Mobilization” in accordance with
Contract Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to
mobilization and shall not be paid for separately.
c.The price shall include
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.4.a)
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 70 00 - 4
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 71 23 - 1
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
SECTION 01 71 23 1
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes:5
1. Requirements for construction staking and construction survey6
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification7
1. See Changes (Highlighted in Yellow).8
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:9
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract10
2. Division 1 – General Requirements11
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 12
A. Measurement and Payment13
1. Construction Staking14
a. Measurement15
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.16
b. Payment17
1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this18
Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will19
be allowed.20
2. Construction Survey21
a. Measurement22
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.23
b. Payment24
1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this25
Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be26
allowed.27
3. As-Built Survey28
a. Measurement29
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.30
b. Payment31
1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this32
Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be33
allowed.34
35
36
37
38
39
40
01 71 23 - 2
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
1.3 REFERENCES 1
A. Definitions2
1. Construction Survey - The survey measurements made prior to or while3
construction is in progress to control elevation, horizontal position, dimensions and4
configuration of structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings.5
2. As-built Survey –The measurements made after the construction of the6
improvement features are complete to provide position coordinates for the features7
of a project.8
3. Construction Staking – The placement of stakes and markings to provide offsets9
and elevations to cut and fill in order to locate on the ground the designed10
structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings. Construction staking11
shall include staking easements and/or right of way if indicated on the plans.12
4. Survey “Field Checks” – Measurements made after construction staking is13
completed and before construction work begins to ensure that structures marked on14
the ground are accurately located per Project Drawings.15
B. Technical References16
1. City of Fort Worth – Construction Staking Standards (available on City’s Buzzsaw17
website) – 01 71 23.16.01_ Attachment A_Survey Staking Standards18
2. City of Fort Worth - Standard Survey Data Collector Library (fxl) files (available19
on City’s Buzzsaw website).20
3. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Survey Manual, latest revision21
4. Texas Society of Professional Land Surveyors (TSPS), Manual of Practice for Land22
Surveying in the State of Texas, Category 523
24
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 25
A. The Contractor’s selection of a surveyor must comply with Texas Government26
Code 2254 (qualifications based selection) for this project.27
1.5 SUBMITTALS 28
A. Submittals, if required, shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00.29
B. All submittals shall be received and reviewed by the City prior to delivery of work.30
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS 31
A. Field Quality Control Submittals32
1. Documentation verifying accuracy of field engineering work, including coordinate33
conversions if plans do not indicate grid or ground coordinates.34
2. Submit “Cut-Sheets” conforming to the standard template provided by the City35
(refer to 01 71 23.16.01 – Attachment A – Survey Staking Standards).36
37
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS 38
B. As-built Redline Drawing Submittal39
01 71 23 - 3
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
1. Submit As-Built Survey Redline Drawings documenting the locations/elevations of 1
constructed improvements signed and sealed by Registered Professional Land 2
Surveyor (RPLS) responsible for the work (refer to 01 71 23.16.01 – Attachment A 3
– Survey Staking Standards) .4
2. Contractor shall submit the proposed as-built and completed redline drawing5
submittal one (1) week prior to scheduling the project final inspection for City6
review and comment. Revisions, if necessary, shall be made to the as-built redline7
drawings and resubmitted to the City prior to scheduling the construction final8
inspection.9
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 10
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 11
A. Construction Staking12
1. Construction staking will be performed by the Contractor.13
2. Coordination14
a. Contact City and Developer’s Project Representative at least one week in15
advance notifying the City of when Construction Staking is scheduled.16
b. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate staking such that17
construction activities are not delayed or negatively impacted.18
3. General19
a. Contractor is responsible for preserving and maintaining stakes. If City20
surveyors or Developer’s Project Representative are required to re-stake for21
any reason, the Contractor will be responsible for costs to perform staking. If22
in the opinion of the City, a sufficient number of stakes or markings have been23
lost, destroyed disturbed or omitted that the contracted Work cannot take place24
then the Contractor will be required to stake or re-stake the deficient areas.25
B. Construction Survey26
1. Construction Survey will be performed by the Contractor.27
2. Coordination28
a. Contractor to verify that horizontal and vertical control data established in the29
design survey and required for construction survey is available and in place.30
3. General31
a. Construction survey will be performed in order to construct the work shown32
on the Construction Drawings and specified in the Contract Documents.33
b. For construction methods other than open cut, the Contractor shall perform34
construction survey and verify control data including, but not limited to, the35
following:36
1) Verification that established benchmarks and control are accurate.37
2) Use of Benchmarks to furnish and maintain all reference lines and grades38
for tunneling.39
3) Use of line and grades to establish the location of the pipe.40
4) Submit to the City copies of field notes used to establish all lines and41
grades, if requested, and allow the City to check guidance system setup prior42
to beginning each tunneling drive.43
5) Provide access for the City, if requested, to verify the guidance system and44
the line and grade of the carrier pipe.45
01 71 23 - 4
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
6) The Contractor remains fully responsible for the accuracy of the work and 1
correction of it, as required.2
7) Monitor line and grade continuously during construction.3
8) Record deviation with respect to design line and grade once at each pipe4
joint and submit daily records to the City.5
9) If the installation does not meet the specified tolerances (as outlined in6
Sections 33 05 23 and/or 33 05 24), immediately notify the City and correct7
the installation in accordance with the Contract Documents.8
C. As-Built Survey9
1. Required As-Built Survey will be performed by the Contractor.10
2. Coordination11
a. Contractor is to coordinate with City to confirm which features require as-12
built surveying.13
b. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate the as-built survey and14
required measurements for items that are to be buried such that construction15
activities are not delayed or negatively impacted.16
c. For sewer mains and water mains 12” and under in diameter, it is acceptable17
to physically measure depth and mark the location during the progress of18
construction and take as-built survey after the facility has been buried. The19
Contractor is responsible for the quality control needed to ensure accuracy.20
3. General21
a. The Contractor shall provide as-built survey including the elevation and22
location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction23
features during the progress of the construction including the following:24
1) Water Lines25
a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for waterlines at the following26
locations:27
(1) Minimum every 250 linear feet, including28
(2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature,29
etc.30
(3) Fire line tee31
(4) Plugs, stub-outs, dead-end lines32
(5) Casing pipe (each end) and all buried fittings33
2) Sanitary Sewer34
a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for force mains and siphon35
sanitary sewer lines (non-gravity facilities) at the following locations:36
(1) Minimum every 250 linear feet and any buried fittings37
(2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature,38
etc.39
3) Stormwater – Not Applicable40
b. The Contractor shall provide as-built survey including the elevation and41
location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction42
features after the construction is completed including the following:43
1) Manholes44
a) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each manhole45
2) Water Lines46
a) Cathodic protection test stations47
b) Sampling stations48
c) Meter boxes/vaults (All sizes)49
01 71 23 - 5
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
d) Fire hydrants1
e) Valves (gate, butterfly, etc.)2
f) Air Release valves (Manhole rim and vent pipe)3
g) Blow off valves (Manhole rim and valve lid)4
h) Pressure plane valves5
i) Underground Vaults6
(1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each7
Underground Vault.8
3) Sanitary Sewer9
a) Cleanouts10
(1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each11
b) Manholes and Junction Structures12
(1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each13
manhole and junction structure.14
4) Stormwater – Not Applicable15
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 16
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 17
1.12 WARRANTY 18
PART 2 - PRODUCTS 19
A. A construction survey will produce, but will not be limited to:20
1. Recovery of relevant control points, points of curvature and points of intersection.21
2. Establish temporary horizontal and vertical control elevations (benchmarks)22
sufficiently permanent and located in a manner to be used throughout construction.23
3. The location of planned facilities, easements and improvements.24
a. Establishing final line and grade stakes for piers, floors, grade beams, parking25
areas, utilities, streets, highways, tunnels, and other construction.26
b. A record of revisions or corrections noted in an orderly manner for reference.27
c. A drawing, when required by the client, indicating the horizontal and vertical28
location of facilities, easements and improvements, as built.29
4. Cut sheets shall be provided to the City inspector and Survey Superintendent for all30
construction staking projects. These cut sheets shall be on the standard city template31
which can be obtained from the Survey Superintendent (817-392-7925).32
5. Digital survey files in the following formats shall be acceptable:33
a. AutoCAD (.dwg)34
b. ESRI Shapefile (.shp)35
c. CSV file (.csv), formatted with X and Y coordinates in separate columns (use36
standard templates, if available)37
6. Survey files shall include vertical and horizontal data tied to original project38
control and benchmarks, and shall include feature descriptions39
PART 3 - EXECUTION 40
3.1 INSTALLERS 41
01 71 23 - 6
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
A. Tolerances:1
1. The staked location of any improvement or facility should be as accurate as2
practical and necessary. The degree of precision required is dependent on many3
factors all of which must remain judgmental. The tolerances listed hereafter are4
based on generalities and, under certain circumstances, shall yield to specific5
requirements. The surveyor shall assess any situation by review of the overall plans6
and through consultation with responsible parties as to the need for specific7
tolerances.8
a. Earthwork: Grades for earthwork or rough cut should not exceed 0.1 ft. vertical9
tolerance. Horizontal alignment for earthwork and rough cut should not exceed10
1.0 ft. tolerance.11
b. Horizontal alignment on a structure shall be within .0.1ft tolerance.12
c. Paving or concrete for streets, curbs, gutters, parking areas, drives, alleys and13
walkways shall be located within the confines of the site boundaries and,14
occasionally, along a boundary or any other restrictive line. Away from any15
restrictive line, these facilities should be staked with an accuracy producing no16
more than 0.05ft. tolerance from their specified locations.17
d. Underground and overhead utilities, such as sewers, gas, water, telephone and18
electric lines, shall be located horizontally within their prescribed areas or19
easements. Within assigned areas, these utilities should be staked with an20
accuracy producing no more than 0.1 ft tolerance from a specified location.21
e. The accuracy required for the vertical location of utilities varies widely. Many22
underground utilities require only a minimum cover and a tolerance of 0.1 ft.23
should be maintained. Underground and overhead utilities on planned profile,24
but not depending on gravity flow for performance, should not exceed 0.1 ft.25
tolerance.26
B. Surveying instruments shall be kept in close adjustment according to manufacturer’s27
specifications or in compliance to standards. The City reserves the right to request a28
calibration report at any time and recommends regular maintenance schedule be29
performed by a certified technician every 6 months.30
1. Field measurements of angles and distances shall be done in such fashion as to31
satisfy the closures and tolerances expressed in Part 3.1.A.32
2. Vertical locations shall be established from a pre-established benchmark and33
checked by closing to a different bench mark on the same datum.34
3. Construction survey field work shall correspond to the client’s plans. Irregularities35
or conflicts found shall be reported promptly to the City.36
4. Revisions, corrections and other pertinent data shall be logged for future reference.37
38
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 39
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 40
3.4 APPLICATION 41
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION 42
A. If the Contractor’s work damages or destroys one or more of the control43
monuments/points set by the City or Developer’s Project Representative, the monuments44
shall be adequately referenced for expedient restoration.45
01 71 23 - 7
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
1. Notify City or Developer’s Project Representative if any control data needs to be 1
restored or replaced due to damage caused during construction operations. 2
a. Contractor shall perform replacements and/or restorations.3
b. The City or Developer’s Project Representative may require at any time a4
survey “Field Check” of any monument or benchmarks that are set be verified5
by the City surveyors or Developer’s Project Representative before further6
associated work can move forward.7
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 8
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL 9
A. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to maintain all stakes and control data placed by the10
City or Developer’s Project Representative in accordance with this Specification. This11
includes easements and right of way, if noted on the plans.12
B. Do not change or relocate stakes or control data without approval from the City.13
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP 14
A. Survey Checks15
1. The City reserves the right to perform a Survey Check at any time deemed16
necessary.17
2. Checks by City personnel or 3
rd party contracted surveyor are not intended to18
relieve the contractor of his/her responsibility for accuracy.19
20
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 21
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 22
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 23
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 24
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 25
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 26
END OF SECTION 27
28
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson
8/31/2017 M. Owen
Added instruction and modified measurement & payment under 1.2; added
definitions and references under 1.3; modified 1.6; added 1.7 closeout submittal
requirements; modified 1.9 Quality Assurance; added PART 2 – PRODUCTS ;
Added 3.1 Installers; added 3.5 Repair/Restoration; and added 3.8 System Startup.
2/14/2018 M Owen
Removed “blue text”; revised measurement and payment sections for Construction
Staking and As-Built Survey; added reference to selection compliance with TGC
2254; revised action and Closeout submittal requirements; added acceptable depth
01 71 23 - 8
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
Revised February 14, 2018
measurement criteria; revised list of items requiring as-built survey “during” and
“after” construction; and revised acceptable digital survey file format
1
01 74 23 - 1
DAP CLEANING
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 74 23 1
CLEANING 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A.Section Includes:5
1.Intermediate and final cleaning for Work not including special cleaning of closed6
systems specified elsewhere7
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification8
1.None.9
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:10
1.Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract11
2.Division 1 – General Requirements12
3.Section 32 92 13 – Hydro-Mulching, Seeding and Sodding13
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 14
A.Measurement and Payment15
1.Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.16
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.17
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 18
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 19
A.Scheduling20
1.Schedule cleaning operations so that dust and other contaminants disturbed by21
cleaning process will not fall on newly painted surfaces.22
2.Schedule final cleaning upon completion of Work and immediately prior to final23
inspection.24
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 25
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 26
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 29
1.10 STORAGE, AND HANDLING 30
A.Storage and Handling Requirements31
1.Store cleaning products and cleaning wastes in containers specifically designed for32
those materials.33
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 74 23 - 2
DAP CLEANING
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 1
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 2
PART 2 - PRODUCTS 3
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED] 4
2.2 MATERIALS 5
A.Cleaning Agents6
1.Compatible with surface being cleaned7
2.New and uncontaminated8
3.For manufactured surfaces9
a.Material recommended by manufacturer10
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED] 11
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 12
PART 3 - EXECUTION 13
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 14
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 15
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 16
3.4 APPLICATION [NOT USED] 17
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 18
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 19
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 20
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 21
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 22
3.10 CLEANING 23
A.General24
1.Prevent accumulation of wastes that create hazardous conditions.25
2.Conduct cleaning and disposal operations to comply with laws and safety orders of26
governing authorities.27
3.Do not dispose of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits, oil or paint thinner in28
storm or sanitary drains or sewers.29
4.Dispose of degradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site.30
5.Dispose of nondegradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site or in an31
alternate manner approved by City and regulatory agencies.32
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 74 23 - 3
DAP CLEANING
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
6.Handle materials in a controlled manner with as few handlings as possible. 1
7.Thoroughly clean, sweep, wash and polish all Work and equipment associated with2
this project.3
8.Remove all signs of temporary construction and activities incidental to construction4
of required permanent Work.5
9.If project is not cleaned to the satisfaction of the City, the City reserves the right to6
have the cleaning completed at the expense of the Contractor.7
10.Do not burn on-site.8
B.Intermediate Cleaning during Construction9
1.Keep Work areas clean so as not to hinder health, safety or convenience of10
personnel in existing facility operations.11
2.At maximum weekly intervals, dispose of waste materials, debris and rubbish.12
3.Confine construction debris daily in strategically located container(s):13
a.Cover to prevent blowing by wind14
b.Store debris away from construction or operational activities15
c.Haul from site at a minimum of once per week16
4.Vacuum clean interior areas when ready to receive finish painting.17
a.Continue vacuum cleaning on an as-needed basis, until Final Acceptance.18
5.Prior to storm events, thoroughly clean site of all loose or unsecured items, which19
may become airborne or transported by flowing water during the storm.20
C.Exterior (Site or Right of Way) Final Cleaning21
1.Remove trash and debris containers from site.22
a.Re-seed areas disturbed by location of trash and debris containers in accordance23
with Section 32 92 13.24
2.Sweep roadway to remove all rocks, pieces of asphalt, concrete or any other object25
that may hinder or disrupt the flow of traffic along the roadway.26
3.Clean any interior areas including, but not limited to, vaults, manholes, structures,27
junction boxes and inlets.28
4.If no longer required for maintenance of erosion facilities, and upon approval by29
City, remove erosion control from site.30
5.Clean signs, lights, signals, etc.31
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 32
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 33
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 34
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 35
36
37
38
39
40
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 74 23 - 4
DAP CLEANING
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
END OF SECTION 1
2
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
3
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 77 19 - 1
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 77 19 1
CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A.Section Includes:5
1.The procedure for closing out a contract6
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification7
1.None.8
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:9
1.Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract10
2.Division 1 – General Requirements11
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 12
A.Measurement and Payment13
1.Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.14
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.15
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 16
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 17
A.Guarantees, Bonds and Affidavits18
1.No application for final payment will be accepted until all guarantees, bonds,19
certificates, licenses and affidavits required for Work or equipment as specified are20
satisfactorily filed with the City.21
B.Release of Liens or Claims22
1.No application for final payment will be accepted until satisfactory evidence of23
release of liens has been submitted to the City.24
1.5 SUBMITTALS 25
A.Submit all required documentation to City’s Project Representative.26
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 77 19 - 2
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 3
PART 3 - EXECUTION 4
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 5
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 6
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 7
3.4 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURE 8
A.Prior to requesting Final Inspection, submit:9
1.Project Record Documents in accordance with Section 01 78 3910
2.Operation and Maintenance Data, if required, in accordance with Section 01 78 2311
B.Prior to requesting Final Inspection, perform final cleaning in accordance with Section12
01 74 23.13
C.Final Inspection14
1.After final cleaning, provide notice to the City Project Representative that the Work15
is completed.16
a.The City will make an initial Final Inspection with the Contractor present.17
b.Upon completion of this inspection, the City will notify the Contractor, in18
writing within 10 business days, of any particulars in which this inspection19
reveals that the Work is defective or incomplete.20
2.Upon receiving written notice from the City, immediately undertake the Work21
required to remedy deficiencies and complete the Work to the satisfaction of the22
City.23
3.Upon completion of Work associated with the items listed in the City's written24
notice, inform the City, that the required Work has been completed. Upon receipt25
of this notice, the City, in the presence of the Contractor, will make a subsequent26
Final Inspection of the project.27
4.Provide all special accessories required to place each item of equipment in full28
operation. These special accessory items include, but are not limited to:29
a.Specified spare parts30
b.Adequate oil and grease as required for the first lubrication of the equipment31
c.Initial fill up of all chemical tanks and fuel tanks32
d.Light bulbs33
e.Fuses34
f.Vault keys35
g.Handwheels36
h.Other expendable items as required for initial start-up and operation of all37
equipment38
D.Notice of Project Completion39
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 77 19 - 3
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
1.Once the City Project Representative finds the Work subsequent to Final Inspection 1
to be satisfactory, the City will issue a Notice of Project Completion (Green Sheet). 2
E.Supporting Documentation3
1.Coordinate with the City Project Representative to complete the following4
additional forms:5
a.Final Payment Request6
b.Statement of Contract Time7
c.Affidavit of Payment and Release of Liens8
d.Consent of Surety to Final Payment9
e.Pipe Report (if required)10
f.Contractor’s Evaluation of City11
g.Performance Evaluation of Contractor12
F.Letter of Final Acceptance13
1.Upon review and acceptance of Notice of Project Completion and Supporting14
Documentation, in accordance with General Conditions, City will issue Letter of15
Final Acceptance and release the Final Payment Request for payment.16
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 17
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 18
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 19
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 20
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 21
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 22
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 23
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 24
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 25
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 26
END OF SECTION 27
28
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
29
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 78 23 - 1
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 1 of 5
1 SECTION 01 78 23
2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
3 PART 1 - GENERAL
4 1.1 SUMMARY
5 A. Section Includes:
6 1. Product data and related information appropriate for City's maintenance and
7 operation of products furnished under Contract
8 2. Such products may include, but are not limited to:
9 a.Traffic Controllers
10 b. Irrigation Controllers (to be operated by the City)
11 c.Butterfly Valves
12 B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
13 1.None.
14 C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
15 1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
16 2. Division 1 – General Requirements
17 1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
18 A. Measurement and Payment
19 1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
20 No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
21 1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
22 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
23 A. Schedule
24 1. Submit manuals in final form to the City within 30 calendar days of product
25 shipment to the project site.
26 1.5 SUBMITTALS
27 A. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00. All submittals shall be
28 approved by the City prior to delivery.
29 1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS
30 A. Submittal Form
31 1. Prepare data in form of an instructional manual for use by City personnel.
32 2.Format
33 a.Size: 8 ½ inches x 11 inches
34 b.Paper
35 1) 40 pound minimum, white, for typed pages
36 2) Holes reinforced with plastic, cloth or metal
37 c.Text: Manufacturer’s printed data, or neatly typewritten
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
1 d.Drawings
01 78 23 - 2
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 2 of 5
2 1) Provide reinforced punched binder tab, bind in with text
3 2) Reduce larger drawings and fold to size of text pages.
4 e.Provide fly-leaf for each separate product, or each piece of operating
5 equipment.
6 1) Provide typed description of product, and major component parts of
7 equipment.
8 2) Provide indexed tabs.
9 f.Cover
10 1) Identify each volume with typed or printed title "OPERATING AND
11 MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS".
12 2)List:
13 a) Title of Project
14 b) Identity of separate structure as applicable
15 c) Identity of general subject matter covered in the manual
16 3.Binders
17 a.Commercial quality 3-ring binders with durable and cleanable plastic covers
18 b. When multiple binders are used, correlate the data into related consistent
19 groupings.
20 4. If available, provide an electronic form of the O&M Manual.
21 B. Manual Content
22 1. Neatly typewritten table of contents for each volume, arranged in systematic order
23 a.Contractor, name of responsible principal, address and telephone number
24 b. A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume
25 c.List, with each product:
26 1) The name, address and telephone number of the subcontractor or installer
27 2) A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the
28 volume
29 3) Identify area of responsibility of each
30 4) Local source of supply for parts and replacement
31 d. Identify each product by product name and other identifying symbols as set
32 forth in Contract Documents.
33 2. Product Data
34 a.Include only those sheets which are pertinent to the specific product.
35 b. Annotate each sheet to:
36 1) Clearly identify specific product or part installed
37 2) Clearly identify data applicable to installation
38 3) Delete references to inapplicable information
39 3.Drawings
40 a.Supplement product data with drawings as necessary to clearly illustrate:
41 1) Relations of component parts of equipment and systems
42 2) Control and flow diagrams
43 b. Coordinate drawings with information in Project Record Documents to assure
44 correct illustration of completed installation.
45 c.Do not use Project Record Drawings as maintenance drawings.
46 4. Written text, as required to supplement product data for the particular installation:
47 a.Organize in consistent format under separate headings for different procedures.
48 b. Provide logical sequence of instructions of each procedure.
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 78 23 - 3
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 3 of 5
1 5. Copy of each warranty, bond and service contract issued
2 a.Provide information sheet for City personnel giving:
3 1) Proper procedures in event of failure
4 2) Instances which might affect validity of warranties or bonds
5 C. Manual for Materials and Finishes
6 1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
7 2. Content, for architectural products, applied materials and finishes:
8 a.Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
9 1) Catalog number, size, composition
10 2) Color and texture designations
11 3) Information required for reordering special manufactured products
12 b. Instructions for care and maintenance
13 1) Manufacturer's recommendation for types of cleaning agents and methods
14 2)Cautions against cleaning agents and methods which are detrimental to
15 product
16 3) Recommended schedule for cleaning and maintenance
17 3. Content, for moisture protection and weather exposure products:
18 a.Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
19 1) Applicable standards
20 2) Chemical composition
21 3) Details of installation
22 b. Instructions for inspection, maintenance and repair
23 D. Manual for Equipment and Systems
24 1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
25 2. Content, for each unit of equipment and system, as appropriate:
26 a.Description of unit and component parts
27 1) Function, normal operating characteristics and limiting conditions
28 2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
29 3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
30 b. Operating procedures
31 1) Start-up, break-in, routine and normal operating instructions
32 2) Regulation, control, stopping, shut-down and emergency instructions
33 3) Summer and winter operating instructions
34 4) Special operating instructions
35 c.Maintenance procedures
36 1) Routine operations
37 2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
38 3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
39 4) Alignment, adjusting and checking
40 d. Servicing and lubrication schedule
41 1) List of lubricants required
42 e.Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
43 f.Description of sequence of operation by control manufacturer
44 1) Predicted life of parts subject to wear
45 2) Items recommended to be stocked as spare parts
46 g. As installed control diagrams by controls manufacturer
47 h. Each contractor's coordination drawings
48 1) As installed color coded piping diagrams
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 78 23 - 4
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 4 of 5
1 i.Charts of valve tag numbers, with location and function of each valve
2 j.List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
3 recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
4 k. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
5 3. Content, for each electric and electronic system, as appropriate:
6 a.Description of system and component parts
7 1) Function, normal operating characteristics, and limiting conditions
8 2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
9 3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
10 b. Circuit directories of panelboards
11 1) Electrical service
12 2)Controls
13 3)Communications
14 c.As installed color coded wiring diagrams
15 d. Operating procedures
16 1) Routine and normal operating instructions
17 2) Sequences required
18 3)Special operating instructions
19 e.Maintenance procedures
20 1) Routine operations
21 2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
22 3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
23 4) Adjustment and checking
24 f.Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
25 g. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
26 recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
27 h. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
28 4. Prepare and include additional data when the need for such data becomes apparent
29 during instruction of City's personnel.
30 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
31 1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
32 1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
33 A. Provide operation and maintenance data by personnel with the following criteria:
34 1. Trained and experienced in maintenance and operation of described products
35 2. Skilled as technical writer to the extent required to communicate essential data
36 3. Skilled as draftsman competent to prepare required drawings
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 78 23 - 5
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 5 of 5
1 1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
2 1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
3 1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
4 PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
5 PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
6 END OF SECTION
7
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson 1.5.A.1 – title of section removed
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
8
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576
01 78 39 - 1
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 78 39 1
PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A.Section Includes:5
1.Work associated with the documenting the project and recording changes to project6
documents, including:7
a.Record Drawings8
b.Water Meter Service Reports9
c.Sanitary Sewer Service Reports10
d.Large Water Meter Reports11
B.Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification12
1.None.13
C.Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:14
1.Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract15
2.Division 1 – General Requirements16
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 17
A.Measurement and Payment18
1.Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.19
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.20
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 21
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 22
1.5 SUBMITTALS 23
A.Prior to submitting a request for Final Inspection, deliver Project Record Documents to24
City’s Project Representative.25
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 26
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 27
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 28
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 29
A.Accuracy of Records30
1.Thoroughly coordinate changes within the Record Documents, making adequate31
and proper entries on each page of Specifications and each sheet of Drawings and32
other Documents where such entry is required to show the change properly.33
2.Accuracy of records shall be such that future search for items shown in the Contract34
Documents may rely reasonably on information obtained from the approved Project35
Record Documents.36
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 78 39 - 2
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
3.To facilitate accuracy of records, make entries within 24 hours after receipt of 1
information that the change has occurred.2
4.Provide factual information regarding all aspects of the Work, both concealed and3
visible, to enable future modification of the Work to proceed without lengthy and4
expensive site measurement, investigation and examination.5
1.10 STORAGE AND HANDLING 6
A.Storage and Handling Requirements7
1.Maintain the job set of Record Documents completely protected from deterioration8
and from loss and damage until completion of the Work and transfer of all recorded9
data to the final Project Record Documents.10
2.In the event of loss of recorded data, use means necessary to again secure the data11
to the City's approval.12
a.In such case, provide replacements to the standards originally required by the13
Contract Documents.14
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 15
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 16
PART 2 - PRODUCTS 17
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIED PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 18
2.2 RECORD DOCUMENTS 19
A.Job set20
1.Promptly following receipt of the Notice to Proceed, secure from the City, at no21
charge to the Contractor, 1 complete set of all Documents comprising the Contract.22
B.Final Record Documents23
1.At a time nearing the completion of the Work and prior to Final Inspection, provide24
the City 1 complete set of all Final Record Drawings in the Contract.25
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED] 26
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 27
PART 3 - EXECUTION 28
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 29
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 30
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED] 31
3.4 MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS 32
A.Maintenance of Job Set33
1.Immediately upon receipt of the job set, identify each of the Documents with the34
title, "RECORD DOCUMENTS - JOB SET".35
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 78 39 - 3
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
2.Preservation1
a.Considering the Contract completion time, the probable number of occasions2
upon which the job set must be taken out for new entries and for examination,3
and the conditions under which these activities will be performed, devise a4
suitable method for protecting the job set.5
b.Do not use the job set for any purpose except entry of new data and for review6
by the City, until start of transfer of data to final Project Record Documents.7
c.Maintain the job set at the site of work.8
3.Coordination with Construction Survey9
a.At a minimum clearly mark any deviations from Contract Documents10
associated with installation of the infrastructure.11
4.Making entries on Drawings12
a.Record any deviations from Contract Documents.13
b.Use an erasable colored pencil (not ink or indelible pencil), clearly describe the14
change by graphic line and note as required.15
c.Date all entries.16
d.Call attention to the entry by a "cloud" drawn around the area or areas affected.17
e.In the event of overlapping changes, use different colors for the overlapping18
changes.19
5.Conversion of schematic layouts20
a.In some cases on the Drawings, arrangements of conduits, circuits, piping,21
ducts, and similar items, are shown schematically and are not intended to22
portray precise physical layout.23
1)Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the24
City's approval.25
2)However, design of future modifications of the facility may require26
accurate information as to the final physical layout of items which are27
shown only schematically on the Drawings.28
b.Show on the job set of Record Drawings, by dimension accurate to within 129
inch, the centerline of each run of items.30
1)Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the31
City's approval.32
2)Show, by symbol or note, the vertical location of the Item ("under slab", "in33
ceiling plenum", "exposed", and the like).34
3)Make all identification sufficiently descriptive that it may be related35
reliably to the Specifications.36
c.The City may waive the requirements for conversion of schematic layouts37
where, in the City's judgment, conversion serves no useful purpose. However,38
do not rely upon waivers being issued except as specifically issued in writing39
by the City.40
B.Final Project Record Documents41
1.Transfer of data to Drawings42
a.Carefully transfer change data shown on the job set of Record Drawings to the43
corresponding final documents, coordinating the changes as required.44
b.Clearly indicate at each affected detail and other Drawing a full description of45
changes made during construction, and the actual location of items.46
c.Call attention to each entry by drawing a "cloud" around the area or areas47
affected.48
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
01 78 39 - 4
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
d.Make changes neatly, consistently and with the proper media to assure 1
longevity and clear reproduction.2
2.Transfer of data to other Documents3
a.If the Documents, other than Drawings, have been kept clean during progress of4
the Work, and if entries thereon have been orderly to the approval of the City,5
the job set of those Documents, other than Drawings, will be accepted as final6
Record Documents.7
b.If any such Document is not so approved by the City, secure a new copy of that8
Document from the City at the City's usual charge for reproduction and9
handling, and carefully transfer the change data to the new copy to the approval10
of the City.11
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED] 12
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED] 13
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 14
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED] 15
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED] 16
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED] 17
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED] 18
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED] 19
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED] 20
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 21
END OF SECTION 22
23
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
24
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
City Project No. 105576PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised July 1, 2011
APPENDIX
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised July 1, 2011
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASES 1 AND 2
Off Old Granbury Road and McPherson Boulevard
Fort Worth, Texas
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
July 15, 2022
Prepared for:
ACADEMY DEVELOPMENT
10410 Windermere Lakes Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77065
Attention: Mr. Bob Devillier
Prepared By:
Dallas • Fort Worth • Houston • San Antonio
Geotechnical
Construction Materials
Environmental
TBPELS Firm No. 813
5058 Brush Creek Road
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
TEL: 817.496.5600
Fax: 817.496.5608
www.alphatesting.com
July 15, 2022
Academy Development
10410 Windermere Lakes Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77065
Attention: Mr. Bob Devillier
Re: Geotechnical Exploration
Rocky Creek Crossing, Phases 1 and 2
Off Old Granbury Road and McPherson Boulevard
Fort Worth, Texas
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
Attached is the report of the geotechnical exploration performed for the project referenced above.
This study was authorized by Mr. Louis Trapolino on February 16, 2022 and performed in
accordance with ALPHA Proposal No. 88041 dated December 8, 2021.
The purpose of this revision is to provide an updated zone map for the lots that were previously
excluded due to deep cuts requiring deeper borings. Borings 24, 27, 35, and 45 were deepened to
depths of about 25 ft to 30 ft to account for the deep cuts. Also, foundation recommendations for
a weir structure located near Lot 2X and general design recommendations for site retaining walls
are provided. Boring 186 was drilled to a depth of 20 ft for the weir structure. This additional
work was authorized by Mr. Max Miller on June 8, 2022 and performed in accordance with
ALPHA Proposal No. 88041-1 dated June 7, 2022.
This report contains results of field explorations and laboratory testing and an engineering
interpretation of these with respect to available project characteristics. The results and analyses
were used to develop recommendations to aid design and construction of residential foundations
and weir structure.
ALPHA TESTING, LLC appreciates the opportunity to be of service on this project. If we can be
of further assistance, such as providing materials testing services during construction, please
contact our office.
Sincerely,
ALPHA TESTING, LLC
July 15, 2022
Karina Cohuo Brian J. Hoyt, P.E.
Geotechnical Project Manager Regional Manager
KC/GSF-BJH/en
Copies: (1-PDF) Client
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ALPHA REPORT NO. W220545-REV1
PURPOSE AND SCOPE .................................................................................................... 1
PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................................................... 1
FIELD EXPLORATION .................................................................................................... 2
LABORATORY TESTS .................................................................................................... 2
GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................... 2
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................... 3
6.1 Existing Pond Backfill and Possible Existing Fill .................................................. 3
6.2 Slab-on-Grade Foundations .................................................................................... 4
6.2.1 Subgrade Improvement Using Moisture Conditioning in
Zones II, III, and IV .................................................................................... 6
6.2.2 Alternative Subgrade Improvement Using Low Plasticity
Index (PI) Soil ............................................................................................. 7
6.3 Post-Tensioning Institute, Design of Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Grade .................... 7
6.4 Weir Structure and Site Retaining Walls ................................................................ 7
6.4.1 Weir Footings and Site Retaining Wall Footings ....................................... 8
6.4.2 Lateral Earth Pressures ................................................................................ 9
6.5 Drainage and Other Considerations ...................................................................... 10
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES........................... 11
7.1 Site Preparation and Grading ................................................................................ 11
7.2 Foundation Excavations ........................................................................................ 13
7.3 Fill Compaction .................................................................................................... 13
7.4 Utilities .................................................................................................................. 14
7.5 Groundwater ......................................................................................................... 14
LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................. 14
APPENDIX
A-1 Methods of Field Exploration
Boring Location Plan – Figures 1A and 1B
B-1 Methods of Laboratory Testing
Logs of Borings
Key to Soil Symbols and Classifications
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
1
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this geotechnical exploration is for ALPHA TESTING, LLC (ALPHA) to evaluate
for Academy Development (Client) some of the physical and engineering properties of subsurface
materials at selected locations on the subject site with respect to formulation of geotechnical design
parameters for the subject construction. The field exploration was accomplished by securing
subsurface samples from widely spaced test borings performed across the project site. Engineering
analyses were performed from results of the field exploration and laboratory tests performed on
representative samples. In addition, results of a Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration performed
at the site (Alpha Report No. W201823 dated August 25, 2020) were reviewed and incorporated
into this current study.
Also included are general comments pertaining to reasonably anticipated construction problems
and recommendations concerning earthwork and quality control testing during construction. This
information can be used to evaluate subsurface conditions and to aid in ascertaining construction
meets project specifications.
Recommendations provided in this report were developed from information obtained in test
borings depicting subsurface conditions only at the specific boring locations and at the particular
time designated on the logs. Subsurface conditions at other locations may differ from those
observed at the boring locations, and subsurface conditions at boring locations may vary at
different times of the year. The scope of work may not fully define the variability of subsurface
materials and conditions that are present on the site.
The nature and extent of variations between borings may not become evident until construction.
If significant variations then appear evident, our office should be contacted to re-evaluate our
recommendations after performing on-site observations and possibly other tests
PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
It is proposed to develop a residential subdivision (Rocky Creek Crossing, Phases 1 and 2) on a
tract of land located on the west side of Old Granbury Road about 350 ft south of McPherson
Boulevard in Fort Worth, Texas. In addition, a weir with an opening height of 4.7 ft and width of
32 inches is planned on the west side of a detention pond planned on the west side of the site (near
Lot 2X). A site plan illustrating the subject site is provided as Figures 1A and 1B, the Boring
Location Plan, in the Appendix.
At the time the field exploration was performed, the site consisted of a vacant tract of land with
scattered trees. Review of historical aerial images available from Google Earth indicate a pond is
located in the vicinity of Boring 146 and a seasonal pond is near Boring 46. In addition, the
historical aerial images indicate abandoned gas well pads are present near Borings 19 and 170. No
other information regarding previous development of the site was provides to us.
Grading plans prepared by LJA Engineering, Inc. (LJA Project ID: NT010-0073, Phase 1 Sheets
53 through 62 dated February 2022 and Phase 2 Sheets 1 through 22 with no date) indicate Phase
1 slopes down towards the west about 57 ft (approximate elevation 827 ft to 770 ft) and Phase 2
slopes down towards the west about 50 ft (approximate elevation 810 ft to 760 ft). These grading
plans also indicate cuts of up to about 14 ft and fills of up to about 12 ft will be required to achieve
final grade in the building pad areas. The top of the weir will be at an elevation of 772.2 ft. We
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
2
understand the normal water and 100-year surface elevations are expected to be 767.5 ft and 771.7
ft, respectively.
Present plans provide for the construction of new residential buildings. The new structures are
expected to create light loads to be carried by the foundations. We understand the new structures
will be supported using post-tensioned slab-on-grade foundations designed for potential seasonal
movements of 4½ inches or less. No below grade slabs are planned.
FIELD EXPLORATION
Subsurface conditions on the site were explored by drilling a total of 186 test borings. Ninety (90)
borings were drilled to a depth of about 15 ft, ninety-two (92) borings were drilled to a depth of
about 20 ft, two (2) borings were drilled to a depth of about 25 ft, and two (2) borings were drilled
to a depth of about 30 ft. In addition, borings previously drilled for the referenced Preliminary
Geotechnical Study (Alpha Report No. W201823 dated August 25, 2020) were reviewed and
incorporated into this current study. The borings were drilled in general accordance with ASTM
Standard D 420 using standard rotary drilling equipment. The approximate location of each test
boring is shown on the Boring Location Plan, Figures 1A and 1B, enclosed in the Appendix.
Details of drilling and sampling operations are briefly summarized in Methods of Field
Exploration, Section A-1 of the Appendix.
Subsurface types encountered during the field exploration are presented on the Log of Boring
sheets (boring logs) included in the Appendix. The boring logs contain our Field Technician's and
Engineer's interpretation of conditions believed to exist between actual samples retrieved.
Therefore, the boring logs contain both factual and interpretive information. Lines delineating
subsurface strata on the boring logs are approximate and the actual transition between strata may
be gradual.
LABORATORY TESTS
Selected samples of the subsurface materials were tested in the laboratory to evaluate their
engineering properties as a basis in providing recommendations for residential foundation design
and earthwork construction. A brief description of testing procedures used in the laboratory can
be found in Methods of Laboratory Testing, Section B-1 of the Appendix. Individual test results
are presented on the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix.
GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Based on geological atlas maps available from the Bureau of Economic Geology, published by the
University of Texas at Austin, the project site lies within the undivided Washita Group formation.
The undivided Washita Group formation generally consists of interbedded limestone and shale.
Residual overburden soils associated with these formations generally consist of clay soils with
moderate to very high shrink/swell potential.
Subsurface conditions encountered in about one-half of the borings generally consisted of clay,
sandy clay, and shaly clay to depths of about 2 ft to 20 ft below the ground surface underlain by
limestone extending to the termination depth of the borings (15 ft to 25 ft). Subsurface conditions
encountered in the remaining borings generally consisted of clay, sandy clay, and/or shaly clay
extending to the termination depth of the borings (15 ft to 20 ft). Subsurface conditions
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
3
encountered in Borings 35, 64, 73, and 163 generally consisted of limestone to depths of about 8
ft to 12 ft below the ground surface underlain by shaly clay and/or clay extending to the termination
depth of the borings (15 ft to 20 ft). Subsurface conditions encountered in Borings 27, 35, 45, 55
and 94 generally consisted of alternating layers of limestone, sandy clay, and clay extending to the
termination depth of the borings (15 ft to 30 ft). Subsurface conditions encountered in Borings 95,
98, 109, 164, 168, 174, 175, and 177 generally consisted of limestone extending to the termination
depth of the borings (15 ft to 20 ft). Layers of limestone about 2 ft to 10 ft thick were encountered
between the clay layers in Borings 2, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16,, 17, 20, 24, 25, 33, 34, 41, 43, 53, 54, 57, 61,
62, 63, 71, 72, 80, 81, 89, 90, 91, 106, 116, 117, 119, 120, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 133, 140,
141, 142, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 154, 155, 156, 157, 162, 165, 166, and 173 at depths of about
1 ft to 18 ft below the ground surface. More detailed stratigraphic information is presented on the
attached Log of Boring sheets.
Most of the materials encountered in the borings are considered relatively impermeable and are
anticipated to have a relatively slow response to water movement. Therefore, several days of
observation would be required to evaluate actual groundwater levels within the depths explored.
Also, the groundwater level at the subject site is anticipated to fluctuate seasonally depending on
the amount of rainfall, prevailing weather conditions, and subsurface drainage characteristics.
Free groundwater was not encountered in the borings. However, it is common to encounter
seasonal groundwater from natural fractures within the clayey matrix, at the soil/rock (limestone)
interface or from fractures in the rock (limestone), particularly during or after periods of
precipitation. If more detailed groundwater information is required, monitoring wells or
piezometers can be installed.
Further details concerning subsurface materials and conditions encountered can be obtained from
the boring logs provided in the Appendix.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
The following design recommendations were developed on the basis of the previously described
Project Characteristics (Section 2.0) and General Subsurface Conditions (Section 5.0). Should the
project criteria change, our office should conduct a review to determine if modifications to the
recommendations are required. Further, it is recommended our office be provided with a copy of
the final building plans and specifications for review prior to construction.
The following design recommendations were evaluated based on final grades as indicated on the
referenced grading plans and discussed in Section 2.0. Cutting and filling on the site other than
depicted on the referenced grading plans can alter the recommended foundation design parameters.
Therefore, it is recommended our office be contacted before performing other cutting and filling
on site to verify appropriate design parameters are utilized for final foundation design. Also, our
office should be provided with final grading plans to verify our recommendations.
6.1 Existing Pond Backfill and Possible Existing Fill
Existing Pond Backfill
Based on the reference grading plans, we understand the existing ponds observed in the vicinity
of Borings 46 and 146 will be backfilled and building pads constructed in their place. The ponds
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
4
should be thoroughly dewatered and any soft and/or organic material be de-mucked out to expose
a firm subgrade prior to backfilling.
The depths of the ponds are not known. Even if fill is properly compacted as recommended in
Section 7.3, fills in excess of about 10 ft are still subject to settlements over time of up to about 1
to 2 percent of the total fill thickness. This should be considered when backfilling the ponds. Our
office should be contacted if the depth of pond backfill will exceed 15 ft.
Possible Existing Fill
In addition, it also appears gas well pads were abandoned in the vicinity of Borings 19 and 170.
Although not encountered in the borings, existing fill material may be present in these areas and
other areas that were not explored. If compaction records for existing fill cannot be obtained, the
existing fill should be considered as uncontrolled fill. Uncontrolled fill is generally not considered
suitable for support of foundations due to the risk of under-compacted zones resulting in failures
of weak soil and/or indeterminate levels of settlement. Any existing uncontrolled fill should be
removed from the building pad area and replaced with engineered fill as recommended in Section
7.3. The excavated materials may be suitable for reuse as engineered fill provided they are free of
organics, boulders, rubble, and other debris.
The lateral extent, depth and nature of existing fill are not known. Test pits could be performed
prior to construction to verify the presence, lateral extent, depth, and nature of the existing fill
materials. ALPHA would be pleased to provide this service if desired.
6.2 Slab-on-Grade Foundations
Slab-on-grade foundations should be designed with exterior and interior grade beams adequate to
provide sufficient rigidity to the foundation system. A net allowable bearing pressure of 1.5 kips
per sq ft should be used for all grade beams bearing on undisturbed cuts in native soils, on general
fill placed as recommended in Section 7.3, on moisture improved soil placed as recommended in
Section 6.2.1 or on limestone. Grade beams should bear a minimum depth of 12 inches below
final grade and should have a minimum width of 10 inches considering the recommended bearing
capacity.
To reduce cracking as normal movements occur in foundation soils, all grade beams and slab
foundations should be adequately reinforced with steel (conventional reinforcing steel and/or post-
tensioned reinforcement). It is common to experience some minor cosmetic distress to structures
with slab-on-grade foundation systems due to normal ground movements. A properly designed
and constructed moisture barrier should be placed between the slabs and subgrade soils to retard
moisture migration through the slabs.
Conditions encountered in the test borings, the planned cut/fill within the building pads and results
of the laboratory tests reveal variations in highly expansive clay thickness and expansive properties
across the site. Such variations in clay thickness and expansive properties will directly affect
design parameters used for slab-on-grade foundations. Therefore, lots with apparently common
average clay thickness, similar expansive clay properties and similar corresponding estimated
potential movements have been grouped into Zones I through IV and delineated on the Boring
Location Plan, Figures 1A and 1B.
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
5
Subgrade improvement in the respective Zones (see Figures 1A and 1B) should be performed
using the information summarized in Table A.
TABLE A
Estimates of Potential Seasonal Movements and Required Subgrade Improvement
ZONE ESTIMATED POTENTIAL
MOVEMENT, INCHES
IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED TO REDUCE
MOVEMENTS TO 4½ INCHES
I Up to 4½ No Improvement Required
II Up to about 6 4 ft of Moisture Conditioning
III Up to about 7 6 ft of Moisture Conditioning
IV More than 7 8 ft of Moisture Conditioning
Potential seasonal movements were estimated using results from absorption swell tests, in general
accordance with methods outlined by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Test
Method Tex-124-E and engineering judgment and experience. Estimated movements were
calculated assuming the moisture content of the in-situ soil within the normal zone of seasonal
moisture content change varies between a "dry" condition and a "wet" condition as defined by
Tex-124-E. Also, it was assumed a 1 psi surcharge load from the floor slab acts on the subgrade
soils. Movements exceeding our estimates could occur if positive drainage of surface water is not
maintained or if soils are subject to an outside water source, such as leakage from a utility line or
subsurface moisture migration from off-site locations.
Potential seasonal movements were estimated assuming fill material used to raise the grade will
consist of onsite or similar material with a plasticity index of 50 or less. If the plasticity index of
material used to raise the grade is higher than 50, potential movements could be higher than our
estimates.
Potential movements estimated for slab foundations in Zones II, III, and IV (see Figures 1A and
1B for delineation of Zones) are considered outside normal design tolerances. Movement of slab
foundations in Zones II, III, and IV could be reduced to not more than 4½ inches if the upper 4
ft to 8 ft of soil below final grade, as summarized in Table A, are moisture conditioned and then
covered with an impermeable plastic barrier (polyethylene sheeting). Moisture conditioning
recommendations are provided in Section 6.2.1.
In choosing moisture conditioning as a method of slab movement reduction, the Client is accepting
some post construction movement of slabs (about 4½ inches). Therefore, the Client understands
and acknowledges that in the geographical region covered by this report, a potential movement of
4½ inches is considered a reasonable compromise between foundation design and construction
cost and the amount of allowable movement of the foundation.
Please note, improvement of the existing soils using moisture conditioning with plastic sheeting is
intended only for the designated building pad areas plus 5 ft beyond the building pad limits, and
not the entire residential lot. Accordingly, planned residences must be exclusively constructed
within 1 ft of the placed plastic barrier and within the building pad designated on the reference
project grading plans. The purpose of the plastic sheeting is to maintain the moisture of the
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
6
underlying soils relatively the same from the time the plastic sheeting is placed through the time
the foundation is placed. This plastic sheeting is not intended as a moisture barrier component
for the actual foundation. Any such requirements should be addressed by the designer of the
foundation, and should be followed by the builder. Prior to building on the improved designated
building pad area, a surveyor should verify the lateral extent of the plastic sheeting and to confirm
that no portion of the new residences will extend beyond the limits of the designated building pad.
If any part of the slab footprint extends beyond the designated building pad, ALPHA should be
contacted for additional design recommendations.
6.2.1 Subgrade Improvement Using Moisture Conditioning in
Zones II, III, and IV
Estimated potential movements of slab foundations in Zones II, III, and IV could be
reduced to about 4½ inches by moisture-conditioning the uppermost 4 ft to 8 ft of soil
below final grade as recommended in Table A.
Limestone could be encountered within the recommended depth of moisture conditioning,
particularly near zone boundaries. In some cases, over-excavation of shallow and
relatively thin (less than 3 ft thick) limestone layers could be required. However, if
limestone is at least 3 ft thick, sufficiently strong, and is present over the entire extents of
the building pad; it is not required to over-excavate limestone to install moisture
conditioned soils. Test pits should be performed to verify the nature of limestone prior to
terminating moisture conditioning at depths shallower than recommended. ALPHA should
be retained to observe the test pits.
Moisture-conditioning consists of over-excavating (where necessary) and/or filling with
on-site soil that is compacted at a “target” moisture content at least 5 percentage points
above the material’s optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor
method (ASTM D 698). The moisture-conditioned soil should be compacted to a dry
density between 93 and 98 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density. Moisture-
conditioning with on-site soil should extend throughout the entire building pad area and at
least 5 ft beyond the perimeter of the designated building pad (as indicated on the
referenced project grading plans). Plastic sheeting (6 to 8 mil thickness) should be placed
above the moisture-conditioned soil for long-term maintenance of the moisture content of
the conditioned soil. This sheeting should be placed 8 to 12 inches below final grade and
should also extend at least 5 ft beyond the perimeter of the building pad. Following
completion of moisture-conditioning and placement of the plastic sheeting, estimated
movements in Zones II, III, and IV should not exceed about 4½ inches.
The purpose of moisture-conditioning is to reduce the free swell of the moisture-
conditioned soils to 1 percent or less. Additional laboratory tests (i.e., standard Proctors,
absorption swell tests, etc.) should be conducted during construction to verify that the
“target” moisture content for moisture-conditioning (estimated at 5 percentage points
above the material’s optimum moisture content as defined by ASTM D 698) is sufficient
to reduce the free swell potential of the processed soil to 1 percent or less.
Moisture conditioning should be observed and tested on a full time basis by a representative
of ALPHA to verify the moisture conditioned clays are placed with the proper lift
thickness, moisture content, and density.
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
7
6.2.2 Alternative Subgrade Improvement Using Low Plasticity Index (PI) Soil
Due to the presence of shallow limestone across some areas of the site, we expect some of
the fill material generated from site grading will consist of processed limestone and/or lean
clay and limestone mixtures.
As an alternative to moisture conditioning with plastic sheeting, potential seasonal
movements in Zones II, III, and IV could be reduced to about 4½ inches by substituting
low PI material for moisture conditioning to the equivalent depth below final grade
recommended for moisture conditioning. Low PI material could consist of processed
limestone and/or lean clay with a plasticity index of 20 or less.
Routine testing of low PI material will be required to verify it has a plasticity index of no
more than 20.
6.3 Post-Tensioning Institute, Design of Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Grade
Table B contains information for design of the post-tensioned, slab-on-grade foundations. Design
parameters were evaluated based on the conditions encountered in the borings and using
information and correlations published by PTI Third Edition and VOLFLO 1.5 computer program
provided by Geostructural Tool Kit, Inc. (GTI).
TABLE B
PTI Design Parameters Potential Seasonal Movement = 4½ inches
In Zone I and after subgrade improvement in Zones II, III, and IV as recommended in Section 6.2
Edge Lift Center Lift
Edge Moisture Distance (em), ft 4.3 8.5
Differential Soil Movement (ym), inches 2.2 (swell) 1.6 (Shrink)
6.4 Weir Structure and Site Retaining Walls
We understand the top of the weir will be at elevation 772.2 ft and the bottom of the weir footing
will bear at elevation 765.2 ft. The key will extend to elevation 764.45 ft. Limestone was
encountered at a depth of about 2 ft below the ground surface in Boring 186 (approximate elevation
766 ft). Therefore, we expect the weir will bear on limestone.
Based on the remaining borings, site retaining walls will likely bear on native clay or on limestone.
The subsurface conditions encountered during construction could be different from those
encountered in the boring. The proposed weir could be supported on footing foundations bearing
in limestone.
Allowable bearing pressure and lateral earth pressure recommendations are provided herein for
the weir and site retaining walls. Global stability, seepage and scour analyses are not included for
the weir or site walls.
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
8
6.4.1 Weir Footings and Site Retaining Wall Footings
Weirs and site retaining wall footings can be supported using continuous footings
foundations bearing in limestone or undisturbed cuts in native clays. The net allowable
bearing pressures are provided in Table C. The allowable bearing pressures contain a factor
of safety of 3 with regard to shear failure.
TABLE C
Allowable Bearing Pressure
Bearing Material Allowable Bearing Pressure, ksf
Undisturbed cuts in native clay 2.0
On competent limestone 4.0
The bearing pressure is applicable for footings bearing at least 2 ft below the final ground
surface as measured at the toe of the wall. In using net pressure, the weight of the footing
and backfill over the footing need not be considered. The recommended footing depths are
for bearing purposes only, the structural engineer should review the recommended bearing
depths to insure the weir is sufficiently designed to resist sliding, overturning, etc.
Weir and wall footings should have a least dimension of 18 inches for bearing capacity
considerations. Footing subject to lateral forces or overturning should be proportioned
such that the soil/rock reaction force on the base of the footing lies within the middle one-
third of the footing width.
Potential movement of the weir due to active soils is estimated to be negligible for the weir
berating on limestone. Site retaining walls are subject to similar potential movements as
slab foundations (more than 7 inches). If this level of movement is not acceptable, our
office should be contacted for further evaluation.
Resistance to sliding will be developed by friction along the base of the footings and by
passive earth pressure acting on a portion of the footing and on any key installed in the
base of the footing. We recommend a coefficient of base friction of 0.35 along the bottom
of footings for footings bearing in limestone and 0.30 for footings bearing on undisturbed
cuts in native clay. The available passive earth resistance on the footing and key may be
calculated using an allowable uniform passive earth pressure of 500 psf for footings bearing
against undisturbed cuts in native clay or against clayey fill placed in accordance with
Section 7.3. An increased passive resistance of 1000 psf can be used for footings bearing
against vertical cuts in competent limestone. The available passive earth resistance on the
vertical face of the footing should be neglected for any portion of the footing within 2 ft of
the final site grade.
The construction testing laboratory should monitor all foundation excavations to locate any
pockets or seams of unsuitable materials (organic material, wet, soft, or loose soil), which
might be encountered in excavations for footings. Unsuitable materials encountered at the
foundation bearing level should be removed and replaced with lean concrete (at least 200
psi strength at 28 days).
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
9
6.4.2 Lateral Earth Pressures
Weir and site walls should be designed to resist the expected lateral earth pressures. The
magnitude of lateral earth pressure against walls is dependent on the method of backfill
placement, type of backfill soil, drainage provisions, and type of wall (rigid or yielding)
after placement of the backfill. Experience demonstrates when a wall is held rigidly against
horizontal movement (restrained at the top), the lateral pressure (at-rest lateral earth
pressure) against the wall is greater than the normally assumed active pressure. Yielding
walls (rotation at the top of at least 0.1 % of the wall height) and walls not sensitive to
some movements can be designed for active earth pressures (ka). Rigid walls should be
designed using the higher at-rest lateral earth pressures (ko). Walls should be designed
using the equivalent fluid pressures provided in Table D, considering a triangular
distribution and assuming a horizontal ground surface extending backward from the top of
the wall. The equivalent fluid pressures provided do not include a factor of safety.
TABLE D
Lateral Earth Pressures
Horizontal Ground Surface Extending Backward from the Top of Wall
Material Condition Equivalent Fluid Pressure, pcf
Drained Undrained
Free Draining Granular Soil
Ф=35˚, ϒт =125 pcf
At-Rest, ko=0.42 53 89
Active, ka=0.27 34 79
On-Site Clayey Soil
Ф=15˚, ϒт =120 pcf
At-Rest, ko=0.74 -- 105
Active, ka=0.59 -- 96
Ф – Internal friction and ϒт – Effective Total Unit Weight
Free draining granular backfill should consist of a clean, non-plastic, relatively well-graded
granular soil consisting of sand, or a sand and gravel mixture, with less than 5 percent finer
than the No. 200 sieve size. To reduce surface water seepage into the free draining backfill,
the top 1-ft of the backfill should consist of on-site clay soil with a plasticity index of at
least 25.
If drained pressures are used, the free draining granular backfill (if used) should extend
outward at least 2 ft from the base of the wall and then extend upward on a 1 horizontal to
2 vertical slope. The free draining granular backfill should be separated from the adjacent
native soils using a filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, or equivalent) to prevent intrusion of native
soils into the free draining granular backfill.
Complete drainage of the free draining granular backfill could be provided to prevent the
development of hydrostatic pressures behind the wall. A typical drainage system could
consist of perforated PVC pipes placed in filter trenches excavated parallel to the base of
the walls for their entire length. The drain pipes should be positioned at a depth lower than
the bottom elevation of the wall and should also be wrapped with filter fabric (Mirafi 140N,
or equivalent). A drainage system is beneficial regardless of the type of backfill used
behind the wall. For cohesive wall backfill, a vertical drainage layer immediately behind
the wall (such as free-draining sand or gravel, or a manufactured drainage medium) could
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
10
be utilized, however, undrained pressures must still be used for design in this case. As a
minimum weep holes should be provided for freestanding walls, although weep holes by
themselves will likely not be adequate to provide sufficient drainage to prevent occasional
buildup of hydrostatic pressure.
Lightweight, hand-controlled vibrating plate compactors are recommended for compaction
of backfill adjacent to walls to reduce the possibility of increases in lateral pressures due
to over-compaction. Heavy compaction equipment should not be operated near the walls.
Also, compaction of backfill soils behind walls should not exceed 100 percent standard
Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) to further limit lateral earth pressures against
walls. The lateral earth pressures do not include the effects of surcharge loading on the
wall. Surcharge loads should be multiplied by the appropriate lateral earth pressure
coefficient from Table D and applied as a uniform lateral load over the full height of the
wall.
6.5 Drainage and Other Considerations
Adequate drainage should be provided to reduce seasonal variations in the moisture content of
foundation soils. All pavement and sidewalks within 5 ft of the residences should be sloped away
from the structures to prevent ponding of water around the foundations. Final grades within 5 ft
of the structures should be adjusted to slope away from the structures at a minimum slope of 2
percent. Maintaining positive surface drainage throughout the life of the structures is
essential.
In areas with pavement or sidewalks adjacent to the new residences, a positive seal must be
maintained between the structure and the pavement or sidewalk to minimize seepage of water into
the underlying supporting soils. Post-construction movement of pavement and flatwork is
common. Normal maintenance should include inspection of all joints in paving and sidewalks,
etc. as well as resealing where necessary.
Several factors relate to civil and architectural design and/or maintenance, which can significantly
affect future movements of the foundation and floor slab systems:
Preferably, a complete system of gutters and downspouts should carry runoff water a
minimum of 5 ft from the completed structures.
Large trees and shrubs should not be allowed closer to the foundation than a horizontal
distance equal to roughly one-half of their mature height due to their significant moisture
demand upon maturing.
Moisture conditions should be maintained “constant” around the edge of the slab. Ponding
of water in planters, in unpaved areas, and around joints in paving and sidewalks can cause
slab movements beyond those predicted in this report.
Planter box structures placed adjacent to building should be provided with a means to
assure concentrations of water are not available to the subsoil stratigraphy.
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
11
Architectural design of the floor slabs should avoid additional features such as wing walls
as extensions of the slab.
The root systems from existing trees at this site will have dried and desiccated the
surrounding clay soils, resulting in soil with near-maximum swell potential. Clay soils
surrounding tree root mats in areas to be covered with grade slabs (including but not limited
to foundations, driveways, patios and sidewalks) should be removed to a minimum depth
of 1 ft below the root ball and compacted in-place with moisture and density control as
described in Section 7.3.
Positive drainage away from walls should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. The
base of walls should be protected from erosion/scour.
Trench backfill for utilities should be properly placed and compacted as outlined in Section 7.4
and in accordance with requirements of local City standards. Since granular bedding backfill is
used for most utility lines, the backfilled trench should not become a conduit and allow access for
surface or subsurface water to travel toward the new structures. Concrete cut-off collars or clay
plugs should be provided where utility lines cross building lines to prevent water from traveling in
the trench backfill and entering beneath the structure.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES
Variations in subsurface conditions could be encountered during construction. To permit
correlation between test boring data and actual subsurface conditions encountered during
construction, it is recommended a registered Professional Engineering firm be retained to observe
construction procedures and materials.
Some construction problems, particularly degree or magnitude, cannot be reasonably anticipated
until the course of construction. The recommendations offered in the following paragraphs are
intended not to limit or preclude other conceivable solutions, but rather to provide our observations
based on our experience and understanding of the project characteristics and subsurface conditions
encountered in the borings.
7.1 Site Preparation and Grading
Limestone was encountered within 4 ft of the ground surface in several of the borings and will
likely be encountered during general excavation and grading at this site. From our experience, this
limestone can be hard and difficult to excavate. Rock excavation methods (including, but not
limited to rock teeth, rippers, jack hammers, or sawcutting) may be required to remove the
limestone. Crushing equipment may be required to process this limestone if it is desired to use
this material as compacted fill on the site. The contractor selected should have experience with
excavation in hard limestone.
All areas supporting slab foundations, weir and wall footings, flatwork or areas to receive new fill
should be properly prepared.
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
12
After completion of the necessary stripping, clearing, and excavating and prior to placing
any required fill, the exposed subgrade should be carefully evaluated by probing and
testing. Any undesirable material (organic material, wet, soft, or loose soil) still in place
should be removed.
The exposed subgrade should be further evaluated by proof-rolling with a heavy pneumatic
tired roller, loaded dump truck or similar equipment weighing approximately 10 tons to
check for pockets of soft or loose material hidden beneath a thin crust of possibly better
soil.
Proof-rolling procedures should be observed routinely by a Professional Engineer or his
designated representative. Any undesirable material (organic material, wet, soft, or loose
soil) exposed from the proof roll should be removed and replaced with well-compacted
material as outlined in Section 7.3.
Prior to placement of any fill, the exposed subgrade should then be scarified to a minimum
depth of 6 inches and recompacted as outlined in Section 7.3.
If fill is to be placed on existing slopes (natural or constructed) steeper than six horizontal to one
vertical (6:1), the fill materials should be benched into the existing slopes in such a manner as to
provide a minimum bench width of five (5) ft. This should provide a good contact between the
existing soils and new fill materials, reduce potential sliding planes, and allow relatively horizontal
lift placements.
Even if fill is properly compacted as recommended in Section 7.3, fills in excess of about 10 ft are
still subject to settlements over time of up to about 1 to 2 percent of the total fill thickness. This
should be considered when planning or placing deep fills.
Slope stability analysis of embankments (natural or constructed) and global stability analysis for
retaining walls was not within the scope of this study.
The contractor is responsible for designing any excavation slopes, temporary sheeting or shoring.
Design of these structures should include any imposed surface surcharges. Construction site safety
is the sole responsibility of the contractor, who shall also be solely responsible for the means,
methods and sequencing of construction operations. The contractor should also be aware that
slope height, slope inclination or excavation depths (including utility trench excavations) should
in no case exceed those specified in local, state and/or federal safety regulations, such as OSHA
Health and Safety Standard for Excavations, 29 CFR Part 1926, or successor regulations.
Stockpiles should be place well away from the edge of the excavation and their heights should be
controlled so they do not surcharge the sides of the excavation. Surface drainage should be
carefully controlled to prevent flow of water over the slopes and/or into the excavations.
Construction slopes should be closely observed for signs of mass movement, including tension
cracks near the crest or bulging at the toe. If potential stability problems are observed, a
geotechnical engineer should be contacted immediately. Shoring, bracing or underpinning
required for the project (if any) should be designed by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Texas.
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
13
Due to the nature of the clay soils found near the surface at the borings, traffic of heavy equipment
(including heavy compaction equipment) may create pumping and general deterioration of shallow
soils. Therefore, some construction difficulties should be anticipated during periods when these
soils are saturated.
7.2 Foundation Excavations
All foundation excavations should be properly monitored to verify loose, soft, or otherwise
undesirable materials are removed and foundations will bear on satisfactory material. Soil exposed
in the base of all foundation (grade beam) excavations should be protected against detrimental
change in condition, such as surface sloughing or side disturbance, rain, or excessive drying.
Surface runoff should be drained away from excavations and not allowed to pond in the bottom of
the excavation. Concrete for foundations should be placed as soon as practical after the excavation
is made. That is, the exposed foundation soils should not be allowed to become excessively dry
or wet before placement of concrete.
7.3 Fill Compaction
The following are recommendations pertaining to general fill compaction. Moisture conditioned
soil should conform to the recommendations provided in Section 6.2.
Clay soils with a plasticity index equal to or greater than 25 should be compacted to a dry density
between 93 and 98 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). The
compacted moisture content of the clays during placement should be within the range of 2 to 6
percentage points above optimum.
Clay soils with a plasticity index less than 25 should be compacted to a dry density of at least 95
percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and within the range of 1
percentage point below to 3 percentage points above the material's optimum moisture content.
Clayey materials used as fill should be processed and the largest particle or clod should be less
than 6 inches prior to compaction.
Processed limestone used as fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor
maximum dry density. The compacted moisture content of the processed limestone is not
considered crucial to proper performance. However, if the material's moisture content during
placement is within 3 percentage points of optimum, the compactive effort required to achieve the
minimum compaction criteria may be minimized. Individual rock pieces larger than 6 inches in
dimension should not be used as fill. However, if rock fill is utilized within 3 ft below the bottom
of floor slabs, the maximum allowable size of individual rock pieces should be reduced to 3 inches.
Processed limestone used as fill should incorporate sufficient fines to prevent the presence of voids
around larger diameter rock pieces. A gradation of at least 40 percent passing a standard No. 4
sieve is recommended. Processed limestone used a low PI fill should have a plasticity index of 20
or less.
Where mass fills are deeper than 10 ft, the fill/backfill below 10 ft should be compacted to at least
100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-698) and within 2 percentage
points of the material's optimum moisture content. The portion of the fill/backfill shallower than
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
14
10 ft should be compacted as outlined herein.
Compaction should be accomplished by placing fill in about 8-inch thick loose lifts and
compacting each lift to at least the specified minimum dry density. Field density and moisture
content tests should be performed on each lift.
7.4 Utilities
Where utility lines are deeper than 10 ft, the fill/backfill below 10 ft should be compacted to at
least 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and within –2 to +2
percentage points of the material's optimum moisture content. The portion of the fill/backfill
shallower than 10 ft should be compacted as previously outlined. Density tests should be
performed on each lift (maximum 12-inch thick) and should be performed as the trench is being
backfilled.
Even if fill is properly compacted, fills in excess of about 10 ft are still subject to settlements over
time of up to about 1 to 2 percent of the total fill thickness. This should be considered when
designing pavement over utility lines and/or other areas with deep fill.
If utility trenches or other excavations extend to or beyond a depth of 5 ft below construction grade,
the contractor or others shall be required to develop an excavation safety plan to protect personnel
entering the excavation or excavation vicinity. The collection of specific geotechnical data and
the development of such a plan, which could include designs for sloping and benching or various
types of temporary shoring, is beyond the scope of this study. Any such designs and safety plans
shall be developed in accordance with current OSHA guidelines and other applicable industry
standards.
7.5 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered in the borings. However, from our experience, shallow
groundwater seepage could be encountered from the subsurface stratigraphy in excavations for
pavement, utilities and other general excavations at this site. The risk of seepage increases with
depth of excavation and during or after periods of precipitation. Standard sump pits and pumping
may be adequate to control seepage on a local basis.
In any areas where cuts are made, attention should be given to possible seasonal water seepage
that could occur through natural cracks and fissures in the newly exposed stratigraphy. Also, the
risk of seepage is increased where limestone is exposed in excavations and slopes or is near final
grade. In these areas subsurface drains may be required to intercept seasonal groundwater seepage.
The need for these or other dewatering devices should be carefully addressed during construction.
Our office could be contacted to visually observe final grades to evaluate the need for such drains.
LIMITATIONS
Professional services provided in this geotechnical exploration were performed, findings obtained,
and recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering
principles and practices. The scope of services provided herein does not include an environmental
assessment of the site or investigation for the presence or absence of hazardous materials in the
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
15
soil, surface water or groundwater. ALPHA, upon written request, can be retained to provide these
services.
ALPHA is not responsible for conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based
on this data. Information contained in this report is intended for the exclusive use of the Client
(and their designated design representatives), and is related solely to design of the specific
structures outlined in Section 2.0. No party other than the Client (and their designated design
representatives) shall use or rely upon this report in any manner whatsoever unless such party shall
have obtained ALPHA’s written acceptance of such intended use. Any such third party using this
report after obtaining ALPHA’s written acceptance shall be bound by the limitations and
limitations of liability contained herein, including ALPHA’s liability being limited to the fee paid
to it for this report. Recommendations presented in this report should not be used for design of
any other structures except those specifically described in this report. In all areas of this report in
which ALPHA may provide additional services if requested to do so in writing, it is presumed that
such requests have not been made if not evidenced by a written document accepted by ALPHA.
Further, subsurface conditions can change with passage of time. Recommendations contained
herein are not considered applicable for an extended period of time after the completion date of
this report. It is recommended our office be contacted for a review of the contents of this report
for construction commencing more than one (1) year after completion of this report. Non-
compliance with any of these requirements by the Client or anyone else shall release ALPHA from
any liability resulting from the use of, or reliance upon, this report.
Recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of information provided
by the Client about characteristics of the project. If the Client notes any deviation from the facts
about project characteristics, our office should be contacted immediately since this may materially
alter the recommendations. Further, ALPHA is not responsible for damages resulting from
workmanship of designers or contractors. It is recommended the Owner retain qualified personnel,
such as a Geotechnical Engineering firm, to verify construction is performed in accordance with
plans and specifications.
APPENDIX
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
A-1 METHODS OF FIELD EXPLORATION
Using standard rotary drilling equipment, a total of 186 test borings were performed for this
geotechnical exploration. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Boring
Location Plan, Figures 1A and 1B. The test boring locations were staked using a handheld GPS
unit or by pacing/taping and estimating right angles from landmarks which could be identified in
the field and as shown on the site plan provided during this study. The locations of test borings
shown on the Boring Location Plan are considered accurate only to the degree implied by the
methods used to define them.
Relatively undisturbed samples of the cohesive subsurface materials were obtained by
hydraulically pressing 3-inch O.D. thin-wall sampling tubes into the underlying soils at selected
depths (ASTM D 1587). These samples were removed from the sampling tubes in the field and
evaluated visually. One representative portion of each sample was sealed in a plastic bag for use
in future visual evaluation and possible testing in the laboratory.
The Texas Cone Penetration (TCP) test was completed in the field to determine the apparent in-
place strength characteristics of the rock type materials. A 3-inch diameter steel cone driven by a
170-pound hammer dropped 24 inches is the basis for TxDOT strength correlations. Depending
on the resistance (strength) of the materials, either the number of blows of the hammer required to
provide 12 inches of penetration, or the inches of penetration of the cone due to 100 blows of the
hammer are recorded on the field log and are shown on the Log of Boring sheets as “TX Cone”
(reference TxDOT Test Method TEX 132-E, as modified).
Logs of the borings are included in the Appendix. The logs show visual descriptions of subsurface
strata encountered using the Unified Soil Classification System. Sampling information, pertinent
field data, and field observations are also included. Samples not consumed by testing will be
retained in our laboratory for at least 14 days and then discarded unless the Client requests
otherwise.
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
ROCKY CREEK CROSSING,
PHASES 1 AND 2
OFF OLD GRANBURY ROAD AND
MCPHERSON BOULEVARD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W220545-rev1 BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 1A
P-3
P-8
B-40B-39B-38B-37B-36
B-35B-34B-32
B-50B-49B-48B-47B-46
B-45B-44B-42 B-43B-41
B-60B-59B-58B-57B-56
B-55B-54B-52 B-53B-51
B-33
B-70B-69B-68B-67B-66B-65
B-64B-62 B-63
B-61
B-80B-79B-78B-77B-76B-75B-74
B-72 B-73B-71
B-81
B-16B-15B-14B-12B-11 B-10
B-9
P-2 P-1
B-8 B-7 B-6 B-4
P-4
P-5
P-7
B-31
B-17
B-18 B-21 B-26
B-28 B-29
B-25B-24B-23B-22B-20B-19
P-9
P-6
B-27
P-10
B-30
B-5
B-13
B-1 B-2 B-3
B-186
SEE FIGURE 1B
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
II
II
II
II II
II
II II
II
II
II
II II
II
II
II
II II
II II II
II
II
II
II
II II
II
II
II II
II
II II II
III
III
III
III IV IV IV
IV
IV IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV IV IV IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV IV
IV IV IV
IV
IV
IV
IV IV IV IV
IV IV
IV IV
IV
IV
I
II
II
II
III
III
N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
ZONE II
I ZONE I
II
ZONE III III
ZONE IV IV
APPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY
BORING LOCATION (W201823)
FIGURE 1A BORDER
BORING LOCATION PLANFIGURE 1BP-11P-13P-12P-14P-15P-16 P-18 P-17 B-180B-179B-178B-177B-176B-175B-174B-185B-184B-182B-183B-181B-140B-139B-138B-137B-136B-135B-134B-132B-131B-150B-149B-148B-147B-146B-145B-144B-142B-143B-141B-160B-159B-158B-157B-156B-155B-154B-152B-153B-151B-133B-170B-169B-168B-167B-166B-165B-164B-162B-163B-161B-172B-173B-171B-90B-89B-88B-87B-86B-85B-84B-82B-83B-81B-100B-99B-98B-97B-96B-95B-94B-92B-93B-91B-110B-109B-108B-107B-106B-105B-104B-102B-103B-101B-120B-119B-118B-117B-116B-115B-114B-112B-113B-111B-130B-129B-128B-127B-126B-125B-124B-122B-123B-121 OLD GRANBURY ROAD SEE FIGURE 1AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVOLD GRANBURY ROADP-11P-13P-12P-14P-15P-16 P-18 P-17 B-180B-179B-178B-177B-176B-175B-174B-185B-184B-182B-183B-181B-140B-139B-138B-137B-136B-135B-134B-132B-131B-150B-149B-148B-147B-146B-145B-144B-142B-143B-141B-160B-159B-158B-157B-156B-155B-154B-152B-153B-151B-133B-170B-169B-168B-167B-166B-165B-164B-162B-163B-161B-172B-173B-171B-90B-89B-88B-87B-86B-85B-84B-82B-83B-81B-100B-99B-98B-97B-96B-95B-94B-92B-93B-91B-110B-109B-108B-107B-106B-105B-104B-102B-103B-101B-120B-119B-118B-117B-116B-115B-114B-112B-113B-111B-130B-129B-128B-127B-126B-125B-124B-122B-123B-121 OLD GRANBURY ROAD SEE FIGURE 1AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVIVOLD GRANBURY ROADNAPPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONZONE II I ZONE I II ZONE III III ZONE IV IV APPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY BORING LOCATION (W201823)FIGURE 1B BORDERGEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATIONROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASES 1 AND 2OFF OLD GRANBURY ROAD AND MCPHERSON BOULEVARDFORT WORTH, TEXASALPHA PROJECT NO. W220545
ALPHA Report No. W220545-rev1
B-1 METHODS OF LABORATORY TESTING
Representative samples were evaluated and classified by a qualified member of the Geotechnical
Division and the boring logs were edited as necessary. To aid in classifying the subsurface
materials and to determine the general engineering characteristics, natural moisture content tests
(ASTM D 2216), Atterberg-limit tests (ASTM D 4318), and percent passing the No. 200 sieve
tests (ASTM D 1140) were performed on selected samples. In addition, unconfined compressive
strength tests (ASTM D 2166) and pocket-penetrometer tests were conducted on selected soil
samples to evaluate the soil shear strength. Results of these laboratory tests are provided on the
Log of Boring sheets.
In addition to the Atterberg-limit tests, the expansive properties of the clayey soils were further
analyzed by absorption swell tests in general accordance with ASTM D 4546. The swell test is
performed by placing a selected sample in a consolidation machine and applying either the
approximate current or expected overburden pressure and then allowing the sample to absorb
water. When the sample exhibits very little tendency for further expansion, the height increase is
recorded and the percent free swell and total moisture gain calculated. Results of these laboratory
tests are provided on the Log of Boring sheets.
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
1
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY with limestone
fragments
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+21 66 23 43
100/1.5"
100/3.25"
100/1.0"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
2
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and limestone
fragments
6.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY with calcareous
deposits and limestone fragments
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 17
4.5+13 56 18 38
4.5+15 63 21 42 1.2
4.5+22
4.0 232.5 11 64 23 41 2.3
3.5 25
86/10.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
3
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Brown and Gray CLAY with calcareous deposits
8.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY with limestone
fragments
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+18
4.5+16 66 21 45 5.3
4.5+8 39 20 19
4.5+22
4.5+24 66 23 43 0.0
100/1.875"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
4
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
-with limestone fragments 2 ft to 4 ft
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+18 63 22 41
4.5+12
4.5+16 33 17 16 0.0
100/1.5"
100/1.0"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
5
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and limestone
fragments
6.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15 46 19 27
4.5+15
4.5+16 43 18 25 1.7
4.5+20
4.5+24 64 23 41 2.3
100/2.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
6
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.25 29
4.5+22 65 23 42
4.5+11 41 17 24 2.8
100/0.25"
100/1.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
7
W201823
Crowley, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
8.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
12.0
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
18.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 22
4.5+20 61 22 39
4.5+20 64 23 41 0.8
4.5+20
4.5+18 47 20 27 0.0
4.5+15 53 17 36 0.0
4.5+19
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
8
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY
4.0
-with limestone fragments 2 ft to 4 ft
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments 5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.75 31
4.5+19 62 20 42 2.8
3.0 14 43 14 29 0.0
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
9
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and limestone
fragments
7.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 25
1.75 36
4.5+16 54 17 37 0.7
4.5+14 42 18 24 0.0
100/1.5"
100/2.0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
10
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
4.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+12 43 16 27 0.4
3.75 24
4.5+20 62 20 42 5.5
4.5+22
100/4.0"
100/2.0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
11
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+20 70 23 47
4.5+12 28 13 15 0.0
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
12
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY with limestone
fragments
6.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
12.0
Brown SHALY CLAY
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+23
4.5+218.3 103 74 24 50 2.7
4.5+13
4.5+9 36 16 20 0.0
4.5+17 40 18 22 0.0
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
13
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18 57 21 36
100/1.0"
100/1.0"
100/2.75"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
14
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+15 61 21 40
4.5+8
4.5+16 64 21 43 3.9
4.5 16
100/1.0"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
15
W201823
Crowley, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
6.0
Brown SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+26
4.5+13
4.5+14 40 18 22 0.0
3.5 22
3.5 22 63 21 42 2.7
4.5+22 65 23 42 0.5
4.5+22
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
16
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+22 75 26 49
100/3.0"
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
100/1.0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
17
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23 72 24 48
100/0.5"
100/2.0"
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
18
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
6.0
Brown SHALY CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+16
4.5+174.2 111 59 19 40 3.7
4.5+17
4.5+23 63 22 41 2.3
100/2.5"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
1
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
3.75 24
4.5+18
4.5+17 46 20 26 0.0
4.5+13
4.5 26
4.5+18
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
2
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.5+16
4.0 20
4.5 22 70 23 47
4.5+22
4.5+23
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
3
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+24
4.5+1669 68 21 47
3.5 19
4.5 18
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
4
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+9
3.0 6 27 14 13
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
5
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown and Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+29
4.5+21
4.5+20
4.5+11 52 18 34 1.1
4.5+20
3.0 20
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
6
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+16
4.5+21
4.5+18
4.5+19 68 22 46
4.5+24
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
7
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+15
4.5+10 43 17 26
4.5+19
4.5+17
4.5+17
4.5+18
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
8
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan and Gray CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.5+17 56 20 36 2.7
3.5 17
4.5+22
4.5+21
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
9
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
12.0
Tan and Gray CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+18 66 22 44
4.5+14
4.5+18
4.0 20
4.5+19
4.5+20
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
10
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 27
2.75 29 71 24 47
3.0 22
4.5+12 56 19 37 0.8
100/1"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
11
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+24
4.5+10
4.5+125.0 119 29 15 14
100/1"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
12
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24
4.5+16
4.5+14 40 18 22 0.0
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
13
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+25
4.5+10 60 22 38
4.5+9
4.5+12
4.5+20
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
14
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+9
4.5+9
4.5+11
4.5+20 66 23 43 6.1
4.5+22
4.5+24
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
15
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.25 24 74 25 49
4.5+14
4.5+17
4.5+20
4.5+21
4.5+21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
16
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
18.0
Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+25
4.5+13
4.5+12 59 18 41 4.9
4.5+20
4.5+24
4.5+16
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/3/2022 3/3/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
17
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
10
4.5+20 54 23 31
100/1"
100/1"
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/2/2022 3/2/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
18
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+27
4.5+21 76 25 51
3.0 28
3.0 271.8 97
3.0 26 53 21 32 0.1
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
19
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
1.5 13
4.0 23
3.0 17
4.0 24 73 24 49 0.5
3.5 24
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
20
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 20
4.0 14
100/1.75"
100/1"
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
21
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+20
4.5+9
100/1.75"
100/1"
100/1"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
22
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+27
4.5+21 72 25 47
4.5+21
4.5+17 54 22 32 5.1
4.5+16
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
23
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+27
4.5+18
4.5+175.9 111 42 21 21
4.5+24
4.0 20
4.5+17
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
6/20/2022 6/20/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
24
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
25
30
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments 1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
16.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
25.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 25 FT
4.5+11 64 21 43
4.5+16
4.25 25 62 23 39 2.9
4.0 23 44 20 24 2.3
38
15
100/2.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
25
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+21
4.5+8
4.5+19 48 23 25
4.5+18
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/4/2022 3/4/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
26
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+6
4.5+12 46 20 26
4.5+14
4.5+5
100/1.5"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
6/20/2022 6/20/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
27
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
25
30
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
25.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
30.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 30 FT
4.5+20
3.0 28
4.5+18 55 23 32 4.0
29
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
28
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
1.75 33
4.0 26
4.0 23 67 23 44 6.4
100/1.25"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/2/2022 3/2/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
29
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5 29
4.5+25
4.5+21 77 25 52
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
30
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.5+20
4.5+16
4.5+16 46 20 26 3.1
4.5+18
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/14/2022 3/14/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
31
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+18
4.5+18
4.5+19
4.5+19
4.5+22
4.5+17
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
32
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
16.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.5+16
4.5+16
4.5+18 65 23 42 6.5
4.5+18
4.25 24
4.5+21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
33
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+15 56 20 36
4.25 18
3.0 23
4.5+17
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
34
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.0 9
4.5+12 38 16 22 2.0
4.5+20
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
6/20/2022 6/20/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
35
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
25
30
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
25.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
30.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 30 FT
4.5+23
4.5+24
4.5+20 55 22 33 3.2
32
100/0.5"
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
36
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 23 67 22 45
4.5+21
4.5+9 54 18 36 4.5
100/1"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
37
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+26
4.5+21
4.5+218.5 106 76 25 51
4.5+13
4.25 18
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/2/2022 3/2/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
38
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
4.5+13 40 19 21
1.5 9
1.0 13 48 20 28
100/1.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
39
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+20
4.5+15
4.5+9
4.5+16
4.25 18
4.5+17
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
40
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+16 64 20 44
4.5+14
4.5+9
4.5+11
4.5 18
4.25 18
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
41
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.25 22
4.5+914.9 121 41 19 22
4.5+13
4.5+15 56 19 37 3.7
4.5+16
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
42
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan and Gray CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+6
4.0 12
4.5+145.4 114 52 21 31
4.5+17
4.25 22
4.5+18
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
43
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.25 21
4.5+13 61 23 38
4.5+9
3.25 11
3.0 18
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
44
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 20
4.5+9
4.5+9
4.5+8
4.5+18
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
6/20/2022 6/20/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
45
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
25
30
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Brown and Tan CLAY
20.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
25.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 25 FT
4.5+20 59 22 37
4.5+22
36
100/0.5"
100/3.25"
100/2.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
46
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.25 22
4.5+17
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
47
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+27
4.5+12
4.5+9 40 18 22 2.1
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
48
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20 71 23 48
4.5+20
4.5+12
4.25 9
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/2/2022 3/2/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
49
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5 25
4.5+22
4.5+20 71 24 47 7.1
100/1.75"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
50
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
4.5+15
4.5+9
4.5+17
4.5+14
4.5+20
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
51
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+21
4.5+22
4.5+21
4.5+12 33 16 17 0.7
4.5+19
4.0 16
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
52
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+30
4.5+18
4.0 17
4.0 16 41 18 23
4.5+14
3.5 25
4.5+24
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
53
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+19 63 21 42
3.75 25
4.5+19
100/1.5"
100/0.75"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
54
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
4.5+18
4.5+24
4.25 19 55 21 34
3.0 26
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/7/2022 3/7/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
55
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+163.7 110 45 22 23
4.5 16
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
56
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24
4.5+19 78 25 53
4.5 10
4.5+13
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
57
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+20
4.5+1774 60 22 38
4.5+13
4.5+15 55 19 36 5.7
4.5+9
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
58
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 27
4.5+20
4.5+11
4.5+14
4.5+17
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
59
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+19
4.5+21
4.5+22 75 24 51 2.5
4.5+12
4.5+17 37 19 18 0.1
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/15/2022 3/15/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
60
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 28
4.5+21
4.5+19
4.5+89.2 126 0.7
4.5+16
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
61
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+23
4.5+15 58 22 36
4.5+16
4.5+17
4.5+18
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
62
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+8
4.0 19
4.5+19 53 23 30
3.75 24
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2002 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
63
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+13
4.5+12
4.5+18
4.5+15 46 21 25 3.2
4.5+19
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/7/2022 3/7/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
64
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+20
100/0.25"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
65
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5 24
4.5+20
4.5+7
4.5+117.0 117 31 15 16
100/0.5"
100/0
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
66
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 27
4.5+21 70 23 47
4.5+8
4.5+11
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
67
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+21
4.5+21
4.5+19
4.5+13 40 18 22 0.4
4.5+14
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
68
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 24
4.5+19
4.5+1066 44 19 25
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
69
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5 25
4.5+17
4.5+19
4.5+14
4.5+14
4.5+21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
70
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+16
4.5+16
4.5+15
4.5+18 56 20 36
4.25 24
4.5 21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
71
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown and Tan SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+11
4.5+6
4.25 23
3.5 252.9 103 60 21 39
4.5+19
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
72
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+12 62 23 39
4.5+19
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/7/2022 3/7/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
73
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+25
4.0 16
100/1"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
74
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.75 30
4.5+18 75 26 49
100/1.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
75
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+25
4.5+1613.5 111
4.5+10 37 18 19
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
76
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
4.5+9
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
77
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.25 27
4.5+18 82 27 55
4.5+8
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
78
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
4.5+15
4.5+11
4.5+13
4.5+9
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/14/2022 3/14/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
79
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+18
4.5+20
4.5+18
4.5+18
4.5+20 65 22 43 4.8
4.5+18
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
80
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+11
4.5+163.9 111 43 21 22
4.5+21
4.5+17
4.5+15
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
81
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+13 45 22 23
4.5+13
3.5 23
3.5 24
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
82
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+11
100/1.25"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
83
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+15 57 19 38
100/1.25"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
84
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
85
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+23
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
86
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+29
4.5+13 34 17 17
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
87
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+28
4.5+14
4.5+21
100/1"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
88
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+18
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
89
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+22
4.5+19
4.5+13 47 17 30 3.6
3.5 26 62 21 41
4.5+22
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
90
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+19
4.5+6
4.0 21
4.5+20
4.5+14
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
91
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.0 29
4.5+16 65 23 42
4.5+22
4.0 20 66 23 43
4.5+16
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/9/2022 3/9/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
92
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.75 25
4.5+16
4.5+16
4.5+21 58 22 36
4.5+23
4.5+21
4.5+18
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
93
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+21
4.5+9
4.5+14 38 17 21
4.5+15 1.9
4.25 16
3.75 18
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
94
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+10
4.5+20 63 21 42
4.5+20
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/1"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
95
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
100/1.75"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
96
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13 46 21 25
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
97
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
100/2"
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
98
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+19
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
99
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+24
4.5+2365 73 24 49
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
100
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 23
4.5+20
4.5+15
4.5+15 58 22 36 1.3
4.5+17
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/16/2022 3/16/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
101
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.0 26
4.5+16
4.5+17 41 20 21 2.7
4.5+15
4.5+20
4.5+20
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
102
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.5+11
4.5+10
4.5+1394 60 23 37
4.5 14
3.5 15
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/14/2022 3/14/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
103
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+21
4.25 21
4.5+23
4.0 21
4.5+21
4.5+19
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/14/2022 3/14/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
104
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 25
4.5+21
4.5+17
4.5+15
4.25 20 68 23 45 1.2
4.25 22
4.25 23
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
105
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+24
4.5+16
4.5+15 48 17 31 2.9
4.5+19
3.5 18 56 18 38
3.5 17
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/8/2022 3/8/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
106
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+14
4.5+10
4.25 17
4.5+14
10
4.0 19
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
107
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+22 67 23 44
100/0.25"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
108
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+12
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
109
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/0"
100/0.25"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
110
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+7 37 17 20
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
111
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+1653 55 19 36
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
112
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+10
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
113
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+15
4.5+1611.4 115 57 20 37
4.5+15
4.5+17
4.5+22 68 23 45 3.5
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
114
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan and Gray SANDY CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+14
4.5+8
4.5+11
4.5+23
4.5+116.0 117 38 17 21
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
115
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+18
4.5+12
4.5+17 71 23 48
4.5+20
4.25 19
4.0 23
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
116
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
12
4.5+16
4.5+20 62 21 41 3.5
4.5+17
100/1.5"
100/1.25
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
117
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+10
4.5+12
4.5+14
4.5+21
4.5+21
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/18/2022 3/18/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
118
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.5+18 69 23 46
4.5+13
4.5+19 58 20 38 6.7
4.5+16
4.5+20
4.5+21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
119
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+17
4.5+7
3.0 182.1 109 40 17 23
4.5 19
4.5+18
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/17/2022 3/17/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
120
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan and Gray SANDY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+13 42 18 24
4.5+21
4.5+12
100/0.25"
100/1"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
121
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.0 23
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0.5"
100/0.75"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
122
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 22 65 22 43
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
123
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+23
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
124
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 20 61 21 40
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
125
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.0 21
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
126
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+16 57 20 37 1.5
100/0.5"
100/2"
100/1.75"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
127
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+20
4.5+15
100/0.25"
100/2"
100/2"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
128
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 24
4.5+8 37 16 21
4.5+17 66 20 46
4.5+19
4.0 18
100/1.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/24/2022 3/24/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
129
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.25 21 67 22 45
4.5+7
4.5+17
4.5+21
4.5+19
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/25/2022 3/25/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
130
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 24 68 23 45
4.5+15
4.5+15
4.5+23
4.0 25
100/2"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/25/2022 3/25/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
131
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
3.0 33
4.0 32
4.5+20
4.5+14
2.0 27 62 20 42
4.5+16
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
132
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 18
4.5+16 48 19 29
4.5+10
4.5+12
4.5+13
100/0.25"
100/0
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
133
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+26
4.5+17
4.5+14 56 18 38 2.7
4.5+174.1 106 39 19 20
4.5+17
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
134
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+24
100/0.75"
100/0
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
135
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+22
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
136
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15 58 20 38
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0
100/0"
100/0
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
137
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+21
4.5+22
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
138
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 20 56 21 35
4.5+21
4.5+19
4.5+16 45 19 26 3.3
100/1.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
139
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+19
4.5+18
4.5+10
4.5+12
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
140
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+22
4.25 11
100/1"
100/0.50"
100/0.25"
100/0.00"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
141
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+20
4.5+15 62 22 40
4.5+134.9 114 43 17 26
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/28/2022 3/28/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
142
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+11
4.5+23
4.5+18
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/28/2022 3/28/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
143
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.0 30
4.5+22
4.5+21 71 24 47 1.7
2.25 242.5 101 57 19 38
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/25/2022 3/25/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
144
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 28
4.5+22
4.5+12 59 20 39 3.1
4.5+9
4.5+20 63 22 41
4.5+22
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/25/2022 3/25/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
145
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+25
3.5 20 46 18 28
3.0 20
4.5+14
3.25 23
4.25 27
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/25/2022 3/25/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
146
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan SANDY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.0 24
3.0 26
3.0 16
4.5+132.4 118 39 18 21 0.0
4.5+18
4.5+22
15
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
147
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.0 23
4.5+17
3.0 15
100/0.5"
100/1.75"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
148
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 24
4.5+23
4.5+13
4.5+18
3.5 25
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
149
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+23
4.5+20 63 21 42
4.5+15
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
150
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 27
4.5+20
4.5+16
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
151
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+21
4.5+19
4.5+17
100/0.75"
100/0.75"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/29/2022 3/29/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
152
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 29
4.5+24
4.5+21
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
153
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5 26
4.5+18
4.5+19 62 23 39
4.5+11
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
154
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 24
3.0 31
4.0 27
4.5+17
3.0 25 58 19 39
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/28/2022 3/28/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
155
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.0 25
4.25 24
4.5+17
4.25 26
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/28/2022 3/28/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
156
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 25
4.5+15
4.5+16
4.5+14
4.5+21
2.5 22
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/28/2022 3/28/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
157
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.25 22 62 22 40
4.5+18
3.0 23
4.5+16
100/0.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
158
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24
4.5+18
100/0.75"
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
159
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+26
4.5+19 62 20 42
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
160
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+21
4.5+18
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
161
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+23
4.5+17
4.5+9 36 18 18
100/0.25"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
162
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.0 29
4.5+7
4.5+12 38 18 20 0.0
100/1"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
163
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+17 48 20 28
3.5 21
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
164
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
165
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
2.5 33
4.5+25
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
166
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Tan CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.5 29
4.0 25
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
167
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
2.5 26 46 21 25
100/1"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
168
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
169
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+19
4.5+17
4.5+20 71 24 47 4.9
4.5+17
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
170
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
171
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+18
100/1.75"
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
172
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+9
100/1.5"
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
173
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
6.0
Tan CLAY
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5 21 53 22 31
4.5+14
4.5+193.7 109
4.5+14 33 16 17
100/2"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
174
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
100/0"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
175
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
176
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20 59 22 37
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
177
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
100/1"
100/1"
100/1"
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
178
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 21
100/1"
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/30/2022 3/30/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
179
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
3.75 30
100/1"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
180
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 31
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
181
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
4.5+23 71 25 46
100/0.5"
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
182
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
3.75 18
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
183
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown SANDY CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
3.5 26
4.0 14 35 17 18
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
184
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
100/1.5"
100/1.75"
100/0.75"
100/0"
100/0"
100/0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
3/31/2022 3/31/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
185
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 15 FT
3.5 20
4.5+13
4.5+18 60 21 39 5.6
4.5+19
4.5+12
4.5+15 52 18 34
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Academy Development
Rocky Creek Crossing
6/20/2022 6/20/2022
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
186
W220545
Fort Worth, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22 72 24 48
100/5.5"
100/3.75"
100/1"
100/1"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
TEXAS CONE PENETRATION
FILL
LIMESTONE
(MH), Elastic SILT
SANDSTONE
(GP), Poorly Graded GRAVEL
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
VERY HIGH
4 TO 15
16 TO 25
26 TO 35
OVER 35
SAMPLING SYMBOLS
(OL), ORGANIC SILT
(OH), ORGANIC CLAY
8.0" OR LARGER
3.0" TO 8.0"
0.75" TO 3.0"
5.0 mm TO 3.0"
2.0 mm TO 5.0 mm
0.4 mm TO 5.0 mm
0.07 mm TO 0.4 mm
0.002 mm TO 0.07 mm
LESS THAN 0.002 mm
SOIL & ROCK SYMBOLS
KEY TO SOIL SYMBOLS
AND CLASSIFICATIONS
(CH), High Plasticity CLAY VERY LOOSE
LOOSE
MEDIUM
DENSE
VERY DENSE
RELATIVE DENSITY OF COHESIONLESS SOILS (blows/ft)
0 TO 4
5 TO 10
11 TO 30
31 TO 50
OVER 50
SHELBY TUBE (3" OD except where
noted otherwise)
SPLIT SPOON (2" OD except where
noted otherwise)
AUGER SAMPLE
ROCK CORE (2" ID except where
noted otherwise)
PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION (DIAMETER)
(CL), Low Plasticity CLAY
(SP), Poorly Graded SAND
(GW), Well Graded GRAVEL
(GC), CLAYEY GRAVEL
(GM), SILTY GRAVEL
BOULDERS
COBBLES
COARSE GRAVEL
FINE GRAVEL
COURSE SAND
MEDIUM SAND
FINE SAND
SILT
CLAY
TRACE
LITTLE
SOME
AND
1 TO 10
11 TO 20
21 TO 35
36 TO 50
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS (%)
VERY SOFT
SOFT
FIRM
STIFF
VERY STIFF
HARD
LESS THAN 0.25
0.25 TO 0.50
0.50 TO 1.00
1.00 TO 2.00
2.00 TO 4.00
OVER 4.00
SHEAR STRENGTH OF COHESIVE SOILS (tsf)
RELATIVE DEGREE OF PLASTICITY (PI)SHALE / MARL
(SC), CLAYEY SAND
(SW), Well Graded SAND
(SM), SILTY SAND
(ML), SILT
Dallas • Fort Worth • Houston • San Antonio
Geotechnical
Construction Materials
Environmental
TBPE Firm No. 813
5058 Brush Creek Road
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
Tel: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
April 4, 2022
Academy Development
10410 Windermere Lakes Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77065
Attention: Mr. Bob Devillier
Re: Pavement Recommendations
Rocky Creek Crossing
Off Old Granbury Road and McPherson Boulevard
Fort Worth, Texas
ALPHA Report No. W220545-A
Submitted herein are the recommended pavement sections for the proposed subdivision (Rocky
Creek Crossing). The proposed subdivision is generally located on the west side of Old
Granbury Road about 350 ft south of McPherson Boulevard in Fort Worth, Texas. This study
was authorized by Mr. Louis Trapolino on February 16, 2022 and performed in accordance with
ALPHA Proposal No. 88041 dated December 8, 2021. This report is an extension of ALPHA
Report No. W201823 dated August 25, 2020, Fraser Ranch, containing Preliminary Geotechnical
recommendations for residential foundations. Final geotechnical recommendations for
foundations will be issued in a separate report.
The purpose of this study is to develop pavement sections for the planned streets in the subject
subdivision in accordance with the City of Fort Worth Pavement Design Manual (January 2015).
We understand the proposed streets within the subdivision could be classified as “Residential -
Urban”, “Collector” or “Arterial”, as described in the referenced manual.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this geotechnical exploration is for ALPHA TESTING, LLC (ALPHA) to
evaluate for Academy Development (Client) some of the physical and engineering properties of
subsurface materials at selected locations on the subject site with respect to formulation of
appropriate geotechnical design parameters for the proposed pavement. The field exploration
was accomplished by securing subsurface samples from widely spaced test borings performed
across the expanse of the site. Engineering analyses were performed from results of the field
exploration and results of laboratory tests performed on representative samples.
Also included are general comments pertaining to reasonably anticipated construction problems
and recommendations concerning earthwork and quality control testing during construction.
This information can be used to evaluate subsurface conditions and to aid in ascertaining
construction meets project specifications.
Recommendations provided in this report were developed from information obtained in test
borings depicting subsurface conditions only at the specific boring locations and at the particular
time designated on the logs. Subsurface conditions at other locations may differ from those
observed at the boring locations, and subsurface conditions at boring locations may vary at
different times of the year. The scope of work may not fully define the variability of subsurface
materials and conditions that are present on the site.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
2
The nature and extent of variations between borings may not become evident until construction.
If significant variations then appear evident, our office should be contacted to re-evaluate our
recommendations after performing on-site observations and possibly other tests.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Table A contains a summary of pavement section requirements for proposed streets at the subject
project.
TABLE A
Summary of Pavement Section Requirements
Street Classification Residential -Urban Collector Arterial
PCC Pavement Thickness(in) placed
on lime stabilized subgrade soil 6 7½ 10
28-day Concrete Compressive
Strength (psi) 3,600 3,600 3,600
Subgrade Treatment 6 inches Lime 8 inches Lime 8 inches Lime
Application Rate (lbs per sq yd) 30 36 36
Reinforcing Bar No. 3 3 4
Reinforcing Bar Spacing (in) 18 18 18
Further recommendations and analyses used to develop the summary in Table A are provided
further in this report.
FIELD EXPLORATION
Subsurface conditions on the site were explored by drilling a total of 18 widely spaced test
borings to a depth of about 20 ft. The test borings were performed in general accordance with
ASTM D 420 using standard rotary drilling equipment. The approximate location of each boring
is shown on the attached Boring Location Plan, Figure 1.
Subsurface types encountered during the field exploration are presented on the attached Log of
Boring sheets (boring logs). These boring logs contain our Field Technician's and Engineer's
interpretation of conditions believed to exist between actual samples retrieved. Therefore, the
boring logs contain both factual and interpretive information. Lines delineating subsurface strata
on the boring logs are approximate and the actual transition between strata may be gradual.
LABORATORY TESTS
Selected samples of the subsurface materials were tested in the laboratory to evaluate their
engineering properties as a basis in providing recommendations for pavement sections design
and earthwork construction. The following laboratory tests were performed to facilitate
pavement section recommendations:
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
3
• Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216)
• Atterberg-Limits (ASTM D 4318)
• Unconfined Compressive Strength (ASTM D 2166)
In addition to conventional laboratory testing to assess engineering properties of the soils
obtained, bulk samples were obtained from the site for moisture-density relationship testing
(standard Proctor, ASTM D 698), California Bearing Ratio testing (CBR, ASTM D 1183),
Sulfate Content (TX-145-E Part II), and Lime Series (Plasticity Index vs. Lime Content).
Individual test results are presented on the attached Log of Boring or summary data sheets.
GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Based on geological atlas maps available from the Bureau of Economic Geology, published by
the University of Texas at Austin, the project site lies within the undivided Washita Group
formation. The undivided Washita Group formation generally consists of interbedded limestone
and shale. Residual overburden soils associated with these formations generally consist of clay
soils with moderate to very high shrink/swell potential.
Subsurface conditions encountered in most the borings generally consisted of clay and shaly clay
to depths of about 1 ft to 18 ft below the ground surface underlain by limestone extending to the
20 ft termination depth of the borings. Subsurface conditions encountered in 7 and 15 generally
consisted of clay and shaly clay extending to the 20 ft termination depth of the borings. More
detailed stratigraphic information is presented on the attached Log of Boring sheets.
Most of the materials encountered in the borings are considered relatively impermeable and are
expected to have a relatively slow response to water movement. Therefore, several days of
observation would be required to evaluate actual groundwater levels within the depths explored.
Also, the groundwater level at the site is anticipated to fluctuate seasonally depending on the
amount of rainfall, prevailing weather conditions and subsurface drainage characteristics.
No free groundwater was encountered in the borings. However, it is common to encounter
seasonal groundwater from fractures within the clayey matrix, at the soil/rock (limestone)
interface and from fractures within the rock (limestone), particularly during or after periods of
precipitation. If more detailed groundwater information is required, monitoring wells or
piezometers can be installed.
Further details concerning subsurface materials and conditions encountered can be obtained from
the attached Log of Boring sheets.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMENDATIONS
Calculations used to determine the required pavement thickness are based only on the physical
and engineering properties of the materials and conventional thickness determination procedures.
Related civil design factors such as subgrade drainage, shoulder support, cross-sectional
configurations, surface elevations, joint design and environmental factors will significantly affect
the service life and must be included in preparation of the construction drawings and
specifications but were not included in the scope of this study. Normal periodic maintenance
will be required for all pavement to achieve the design life of the pavement system.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
4
Pavement Subgrade Preparation
Based on review of the borings, we expect the pavement subgrade could consist of clay soils or
similar onsite materials used for grading the site. The pavement subgrade could also consist of
limestone in some areas depending on the given location along the alignment and grading
requirements. Since the subgrade conditions and required treatments could vary along the
proposed road alignment, ALPHA should be retained to observe construction to verify
conditions are as expected. Also, we should be provided with the final grading plan for review
prior to construction to verify or modify in writing the recommendations contained in this report.
The exposed clayey surface soils should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches and 8 inches for
Residential Urban and Collector/Arterial streets, respectively, and mixed with a minimum 30 and
36 lbs per sq yard of hydrated lime (by dry soil weight) in conformance with TxDOT Standard
Specifications Item 260. The application rate for Residential Urban Streets is the minimum rate
required by the City of Fort Worth. The application rate for Collector/Arterial streets equates to
about 6 percent lime based on a dry soil unit weight of 100 pcf. The results of lime series tests
performed on representative clay samples are attached (Figure 4).
We recommend lime stabilization procedures extend at least 1 ft beyond the edge of the
pavement to reduce effects of seasonal shrinking and swelling upon the extreme edges of
pavement. The soil-lime mixture should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor
maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and within the range of 0 to 4 percentage points above the
mixture's optimum moisture content. In all areas where hydrated lime is used to stabilize
subgrade soil, routine Atterberg-limit tests should be performed to verify the resulting plasticity
index of the soil-lime mixture is at/or below 15.
Mechanical lime stabilization of the pavement subgrade soil will not prevent normal seasonal
movement of the underlying untreated materials. Pavement and other flatwork constructed at
final grades as could experience soil-related potential seasonal movements of up to about 8
inches depending on the depth of limestone from final grade. Potential seasonal movements are
discussed in more detail in ALPHA Report No. W201823 performed for the residential
foundations to be constructed at the site.
Lime stabilization of the pavement subgrade is not required where the pavement subgrade
consists of limestone. In pavement areas where limestone is exposed after final subgrade
elevation is achieved, on-site lime stabilized clay cuttings, on-site processed limestone cuttings,
or flexible base material could be used as a leveling course (as needed) to provide a smooth
surface for placement of the pavement.
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests performed for this project indicate the CBR values for the
natural clay soil tested could be about 1.4 to 2.8 (Figures 3A and 3B). Following improvement
with lime, the CBR value for the lime stabilized clayey soils is expected to be at least 10.
Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Section
Using the 1993 AASHTO pavement design procedures (WinPAS computer program distributed
by American Concrete Pavement Association), the following design parameters were used in
analyses of the PCC pavement section.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
5
• Compressive strength of concrete 3,600 psi at 28 days
• Modulus of Elasticity 4,000,000 psi
• Modulus of Rupture 620 psi
• Modulus of Subgrade Reaction* 280 pci
• Load Transfer Co-efficient 3.0
• Drainage Coefficient 1.0
• Initial PSI 4.5
• Terminal PSI for 2.0 (Residential Urban)
2.25 (Collector)
2.5 (Arterial)
• Standard Deviation 0.39
• Reliability 85 percent
*Subgrade prepared with lime stabilization or graded limestone as discussed in the previous
section.
Using the Street Classification of “Residential-Urban” as described in the referenced Fort Worth
Pavement Design Manual, it is estimated annual traffic volume will be about 35,000 Equivalent
Single Axle Loads (ESALs) in one direction over a 25-year design life with 0.5 percent annual
traffic growth. Based on this, we estimate the cumulative ESALs over the design life of the
Residential Urban street pavement to be about 930,000.
Using the Street Classification of “Collector” as described in the referenced Fort Worth
Pavement Design Manual, the annual traffic volume will be about 100,000 Equivalent Single
Axle Loads (ESALs) in one direction over a 25-year design life with 1.5 percent annual traffic
growth. Based on this, we estimate the cumulative ESALs over the design life of the pavement
to be about 3,000,000.
Using the Street Classification of “Arterial” as described in the referenced Fort Worth Pavement
Design Manual, the annual traffic volume will be about 300,000 Equivalent Single Axle Loads
(ESALs) in one direction over a 30-year design life with 2.5 percent annual traffic growth.
Based on this, we estimate the cumulative ESALs over the design life of the pavement to be
about 13,000,000.
If the actual expected traffic volume is different than used for our analysis herein, our office
should be provided with the actual expected traffic volume so that we can re-evaluate our
recommendations.
Based on the subgrade preparations recommended herein, the projected traffic volume and stated
design parameters, a minimum 6-inch section of portland cement concrete is required for
Residential Urban classified streets, a minimum 7½-inch section of portland cement concrete is
required for Collector classified streets, and a minimum 10-inch section of portland cement
concrete is required for Arterial classified streets at this project.
PCC should have a minimum 3,600 psi compressive strength at 28 days. The concrete section
should be placed over a properly prepared subgrade as discussed herein. Concrete should be
designed with 4.5 ± 1.5 percent entrained air. Reinforcing steel for concrete pavement should be
in accordance with Table 4.1 of the referenced Pavement Design Manual. Joints and saw-cutting
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
6
in concrete should be in accordance with Section Four of the referenced Pavement Design
Manual.
Drainage and Maintenance
Routine maintenance, including sealing of cracks and joints should be performed over the life of
the pavement. Adequate drainage should be provided to reduce seasonal variations in the
moisture content of subgrade soils. Maintaining positive surface drainage throughout the life
of the pavement is essential.
Soluble Sulfates
A total of six (6) bulk samples obtained from site were tested for soluble sulfate concentrations.
Results of the laboratory testing (TxDOT Test Method TEX-145-E Part II) are summarized in
Table B.
Table B
Soluble Sulfates
Sample
No.
Depth,
ft Material Type Soluble Sulfate, mg/Kg (ppm)
1 0-1 Brown CLAY 62
2 0-1 Brown CLAY 51
3 0-1 Brown CLAY 59
4 0-1 Brown CLAY 44
5 0-1 Brown CLAY 57
6 0-1 Brown CLAY 44
Based on the results of laboratory testing, the soluble sulfate content measured in the samples
tested is considered relatively low (<3,000 ppm). It should be noted that concentrations of
soluble sulfates in soil are typically very localized and concentrations in other areas of the site
could vary significantly. Therefore, it is recommended sulfate sampling/testing be performed
along the pavement subgrade during construction. During construction, experienced
geotechnical personnel should make close observations for possible sulfate reactions.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Variations in subsurface conditions could be encountered during construction. To permit
correlation between test boring data and actual subsurface conditions encountered during
construction, it is recommended a registered Professional Engineering firm be retained to
observe construction procedures and materials.
Some construction problems, particularly degree or magnitude, cannot be reasonably anticipated
until the course of construction. The recommendations offered in the following paragraphs are
intended not to limit or preclude other conceivable solutions, but rather to provide our
observations based on our experience and understanding of the project characteristics and
subsurface conditions encountered in the borings.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
7
Site Preparation and Grading
Limestone was encountered within 4 ft of existing ground surface in several of the borings. We
expect limestone will be encountered during general excavation at this site. From our
experience, this limestone can be hard and may be difficult to excavate. Rock excavation
methods (including, but not limited to rock teeth, rippers, jack hammers, or sawcutting) may be
required to remove the limestone. Crushing equipment may be required to process this limestone
if it is desired to use this material as compacted fill on the site. The contractor selected should
have experience with excavation in hard limestone.
All areas supporting pavement or areas to receive new fill should be properly prepared.
• After completion of the necessary stripping, clearing, and excavating and prior to placing
any required fill, the exposed subgrade should be carefully evaluated by probing and
testing. Any undesirable material (organic material, wet, soft, or loose soil) still in place
should be removed.
• The exposed subgrade should be further evaluated by proof-rolling with a heavy
pneumatic tired roller, loaded dump truck or similar equipment weighing approximately
25 tons to check for pockets of soft or loose material hidden beneath a thin crust of
possibly better soil. Proof-rolling procedures should be observed routinely by a
Professional Engineer or his designated representative. Any undesirable material
(organic material, wet, soft, or loose soil) exposed from the proof-roll should be removed
and replaced with well-compacted material as outlined in the Fill Compaction section.
• Prior to placement of any fill, the exposed subgrade should then be scarified to a
minimum depth of 6 inches and recompacted as outlined in the Fill Compaction section.
If fill is to be placed on existing slopes (natural or constructed) steeper than six horizontal to one
vertical (6:1), the fill materials should be benched into the existing slopes in such a manner as to
provide a minimum bench width of five (5) ft. This should provide a good contact between the
existing soils and new fill materials, reduce potential sliding planes, and allow relatively
horizontal lift placements.
Even if fill is properly compacted as recommended in the Fill Compaction section, fills in excess
of about 10 ft are still subject to settlements over time of up to about 1 to 2 percent of the total
fill thickness. This should be considered when planning or placing deep fills.
Slope stability analysis of embankments (natural or constructed) and global stability analysis for
retaining walls was not within the scope of this study.
The contractor is responsible for designing any excavation slopes, temporary sheeting or shoring.
Design of these structures should include any imposed surface surcharges. Construction site
safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor, who shall also be solely responsible for the
means, methods and sequencing of construction operations. The contractor should also be aware
that slope height, slope inclination or excavation depths (including utility trench excavations)
should in no case exceed those specified in local, state and/or federal safety regulations, such as
OSHA Health and Safety Standard for Excavations, 29 CFR Part 1926, or successor regulations.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
8
Stockpiles should be place well away from the edge of the excavation and their heights should be
controlled so they do not surcharge the sides of the excavation. Surface drainage should be
carefully controlled to prevent flow of water over the slopes and/or into the excavations.
Construction slopes should be closely observed for signs of mass movement, including tension
cracks near the crest or bulging at the toe. If potential stability problems are observed, a
geotechnical engineer should be contacted immediately. Shoring, bracing or underpinning
required for the project (if any) should be designed by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Texas.
Due to the nature of the clay soils found near the surface at most of the borings, traffic of heavy
equipment (including heavy compaction equipment) may create pumping and general
deterioration of shallow soils. Therefore, some construction difficulties should be anticipated
during periods when these soils are saturated.
Fill Compaction
The following compaction recommendations pertain to general filling and site grading. The
pavement subgrade should be prepared as discussed in the Pavement Subgrade Preparation
section.
Clay with a plasticity index equal to or greater than 25 should be compacted to a dry density
between 95 and 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). The
compacted moisture content of the clays during placement should be within the range of 2 to 5
percentage points above optimum.
Clay with a plasticity index less than 25 should be compacted to a dry density of at least 95
percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and within the range of 1
percentage point below to 3 percentage points above the material's optimum moisture content.
Clayey soils used as fill should be processed and the largest particle or clod should be less than 6
inches prior to compaction.
Processed limestone or other rock-like materials used as fill should be compacted to at least 95
percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density. The compacted moisture content of limestone
or other rock-like materials used as fill is not considered crucial to proper performance.
However, if the material's moisture content during placement is within 3 percentage points of
optimum, the compactive effort required to achieve the minimum compaction criteria may be
minimized. In general, processed limestone used as fill should have a maximum particle size of
6 inches. However, any processed limestone used as fill within 3 ft of the final pavement
subgrade elevation should have a maximum particle size of 3 inches. A gradation of at least 40
percent passing a standard No. 4 sieve is recommended.
Where mass fills are deeper than 10 ft, the fill/backfill below 10 ft should be compacted to at
least 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-698) and within 2
percentage points of the material's optimum moisture content. The portion of the fill/backfill
shallower than 10 ft should be compacted as outlined herein.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
9
Compaction should be accomplished by placing fill in about 8-inch thick loose lifts and
compacting each lift to at least the specified minimum dry density. Field density and moisture
content tests should be performed on each lift.
In general site grading areas where final fill slopes will be four horizontal to one vertical (4:1) or
steeper and greater than 5 ft in height, field density and moisture content tests should be
performed on each lift.
Utilities
Where utility lines are deeper than 10 ft, the fill/backfill below 10 ft should be compacted to at
least 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and within –2 to +2
percentage points of the material's optimum moisture content. The portion of the fill/backfill
shallower than 10 ft should be compacted as previously outlined. Density tests should be
performed on each lift (maximum 12-inch thick) and should be performed as the trench is being
backfilled.
Even if fill is properly compacted, fills in excess of about 10 ft are still subject to settlements over
time of up to about 1 to 2 percent of the total fill thickness. This should be considered when
designing pavement over utility lines and/or other areas with deep fill.
If utility trenches or other excavations extend to or beyond a depth of 5 ft below construction
grade, the contractor or others shall be required to develop an excavation safety plan to protect
personnel entering the excavation or excavation vicinity. The collection of specific geotechnical
data and the development of such a plan, which could include designs for sloping and benching
or various types of temporary shoring, is beyond the scope of this study. Any such designs and
safety plans shall be developed in accordance with current OSHA guidelines and other
applicable industry standards.
Groundwater
Free groundwater was not encountered in the borings. However, from our experience, shallow
groundwater could be encountered during general excavation at this site. The risk of
encountering this seepage is increased during or after periods of precipitation. Standard sump pit
and pumping procedures should be adequate to control seepage on a local basis for relatively
shallow excavations. Supplemental dewatering methods, such as well points, may be required
where groundwater is encountered in granular soils.
In any areas where cuts are made, attention should be given to possible seasonal water seepage
that could occur through natural cracks and fissures in the newly exposed stratigraphy. The risk
of seepage is increased where limestone is exposed in excavations and slopes or is near final
grade. In these areas subsurface drains may be required to intercept seasonal groundwater
seepage. The need for these or other dewatering devices should be carefully addressed during
construction. Our office could be contacted to visually observe final grades to evaluate the need
for such drains.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
10
LIMITATIONS
Professional services provided in this geotechnical exploration were performed, findings
obtained, and recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices. The scope of services provided herein does not include an
environmental assessment of the site or investigation for the presence or absence of hazardous
materials in the soil, surface water or groundwater. ALPHA, upon written request, can be
retained to provide same.
ALPHA is not responsible for conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based
on this data. Information contained in this report is intended for the exclusive use of the Client
(and their designated design representatives), and is related solely to design of the specific
structures outlined on the cover page of this report. No party other than the Client (and their
designated design representatives) shall use or rely upon this report in any manner whatsoever
unless such party shall have obtained ALPHA’s written acceptance of such intended use. Any
such third party using this report after obtaining ALPHA’s written acceptance shall be bound by
the limitations and limitations of liability contained herein, including ALPHA’s liability being
limited to the fee paid to it for this report. Recommendations presented in this report should not
be used for design of any other structures except those specifically described in this report. In all
areas of this report in which ALPHA may provide additional services if requested to do so in
writing, it is presumed that such requests have not been made if not evidenced by a written
document accepted by ALPHA. Further, subsurface conditions can change with passage of time.
Recommendations contained herein are not considered applicable for an extended period of time
after the completion date of this report. It is recommended our office be contacted for a review
of the contents of this report for construction commencing more than one (1) year after
completion of this report. Non-compliance with any of these requirements by the Client or
anyone else shall release ALPHA from any liability resulting from the use of, or reliance upon,
this report.
Recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of information
provided by the Client about characteristics of the project. If the Client notes any deviation from
the facts about project characteristics, our office should be contacted immediately since this may
materially alter the recommendations. Further, ALPHA is not responsible for damages resulting
from workmanship of designers or contractors and it is recommended the Owner retain qualified
personnel, such as a Geotechnical Engineering firm, to verify construction is performed in
accordance with plans and specifications.
ALHA Report No. W220545-A
11
CLOSURE
All recommendations in the referenced preliminary geotechnical report remain unchanged unless
specifically modified herein. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Please contact us
with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
ALPHA TESTING, LLC
April 4, 2022
Santosh Mahat, EIT Brian J. Hoyt, P.E.
Geotechnical Project Manager Regional Manager
SM/BJH/eg
Copies: (1-PDF) Client
Attachments: Boring Location Plan – Figure 1
Moisture - Density Relationship – Figure 2
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) – Figures 3A and 3B
Mechanical Lime Series – Figure 4
WinPAS Analysis Results
Log of Borings (Preliminary Borings 1 through 18)
Key to Soil Symbols and Classifications
BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 1
B-16
B-15B-14
B-12B-11
B-10B-9B-8
B-7B-6
B-4
B-17 B-18
B-5
B-13
B-1 B-2
B-3
N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
FRASER RANCH
OFF OLD GRANBURY ROAD AND
ROCKY CREEK PARK ROAD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W220545-A
03/23/22
CLASSIFICATION:
SAMPLE LOCATION:
TEST METHOD:ASTM D698-B
TESTED FOR: SOIL ID NUMBER:
87.4 PCF
25.9 %
LIQUID LIMIT: 68
PROJECT: PLASTIC LIMIT: 24
PLASTICITY INDEX:
83%
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian J. Hoyt, P.E
ALPHA TESTING, LLC
Page 1 of 1FIGURE 2A
OUR REPORT NO.:
Our test results and reports are for the exclusive use of the Client (and their designated recipients on file in our office) and shall not be reproduced and/or distributed except with express approval of Alpha. The use of our
name and test results must receive our written approval. Test results and reports apply only to the samples tested and/or observed, and are not indicative of the qualities of apparently identical or similar specimens.
44
Academy Development
Houston, Texas
Rocky Creek Crossing
Fort Worth, Texas
W220545-A
Dark Brown CLAY
5058 Brush Creek Road
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
Geotechnical I Construction Materials I Environmental
www.alphatesting.com
TBPE Firm No. 813 PB 2
MAXIMUM DRY UNIT WEIGHT:
% FINER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE:
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT:
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:
CH
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
8% 13% 18% 23% 28% 33% 38% 43%DRY UNIT WEIGHT (lbs/cu.ft.)MOISTURE CONTENT
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
03/23/22
CLASSIFICATION:
SAMPLE LOCATION:
TEST METHOD:ASTM D698-B
TESTED FOR: SOIL ID NUMBER:
87.0 PCF
26.8 %
LIQUID LIMIT: 73
PROJECT: PLASTIC LIMIT: 25
PLASTICITY INDEX:
87%
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian J. Hoyt, P.E
ALPHA TESTING, LLC
Page 1 of 1FIGURE 2B
5058 Brush Creek Road
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
Geotechnical I Construction Materials I Environmental
www.alphatesting.com
TBPE Firm No. 813 PB 15
MAXIMUM DRY UNIT WEIGHT:
% FINER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE:
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT:
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION:
CH
OUR REPORT NO.:
Our test results and reports are for the exclusive use of the Client (and their designated recipients on file in our office) and shall not be reproduced and/or distributed except with express approval of Alpha. The use of our
name and test results must receive our written approval. Test results and reports apply only to the samples tested and/or observed, and are not indicative of the qualities of apparently identical or similar specimens.
48
Academy Development
Houston, Texas
Rocky Creek Crossing
Fort Worth, Texas
W220545-A
Dark Brown Clay
69
74
79
84
89
94
99
104
9% 14% 19% 24% 29% 34% 39% 44%DRY UNIT WEIGHT (lbs/cu.ft.)MOISTURE CONTENT
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RESULTS
(ASTM D1883)
Project No:W220545-A Date:03/23/22
CBR @ 0.20 Inches = 2.60%
FIGURE 3A
Material Description: Dark Brown Clay
Sample Location: PB 2
CBR @ 0.10 Inches = 2.80%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Stress, psiPenetration, in
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RESULTS
(ASTM D1883)
Project No:W220545-A Date:03/23/22
CBR @ 0.20 Inches = 1.40%
FIGURE 3B
Material Description: Dark Brown Clay
Sample Location: PB 15
CBR @ 0.10 Inches = 1.60%
0
10
20
30
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Axis TitleAxis Title
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF MECHANICAL LIME SERIES RESULTS
Project No:W220545-A Date:03/23/22
6
% Lime 0% 4% 6% 8% 10%
FIGURE 4
PI 43 18 14 9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15%PIPercent Dry Weight of Lime
WinPAS
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Rigid Design Inputs
Agency:
Company:
Contractor:
Project Description:
Location:
Residential Pavement Analysis
Fort Worth, TX
Rigid Pavement Design/Evaluation
PCC Thickness
Design ESALs
Reliability
Overall Deviation
Modulus of Rupture
Modulus of Elasticity
5.91
930,000
85.00
0.39
620
4,000,000
inches
psi
psi
percent
Load Transfer, J
Mod. Subgrade Reaction, k
Drainage Coefficient, Cd
Initial Serviceability
Terminal Serviceability
3.00
280
1.00
4.50
2.00
psi/in
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k-value) Determination
Resilient Modulus of the Subgrade
Resilient Modulus of the Subbase
Subbase Thickness
Depth to Rigid Foundation
Loss of Support Value (0,1,2,3)
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
psi
psi
inches
feet
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 280.00 psi/in
Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:12:04PM
Engineer:
City of Fort Worth
Alpha Testing, LLC
WinPAS
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Rigid Design Inputs
Agency:
Company:
Contractor:
Project Description:
Location:
Collector Pavement Analysis
Fort Worth, TX
Rigid Pavement Design/Evaluation
PCC Thickness
Design ESALs
Reliability
Overall Deviation
Modulus of Rupture
Modulus of Elasticity
7.52
3,000,000
85.00
0.39
620
4,000,000
inches
psi
psi
percent
Load Transfer, J
Mod. Subgrade Reaction, k
Drainage Coefficient, Cd
Initial Serviceability
Terminal Serviceability
3.00
280
1.00
4.50
2.25
psi/in
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k-value) Determination
Resilient Modulus of the Subgrade
Resilient Modulus of the Subbase
Subbase Thickness
Depth to Rigid Foundation
Loss of Support Value (0,1,2,3)
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
psi
psi
inches
feet
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 280.00 psi/in
Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:11:04PM
Engineer:
City of Fort Worth
Alpha Testing, LLC
WinPAS
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Rigid Design Inputs
Agency:
Company:
Contractor:
Project Description:
Location:
Arterial Pavement Analysis
Fort Worth, TX
Rigid Pavement Design/Evaluation
PCC Thickness
Design ESALs
Reliability
Overall Deviation
Modulus of Rupture
Modulus of Elasticity
9.87
13,000,000
85.00
0.39
620
4,000,000
inches
psi
psi
percent
Load Transfer, J
Mod. Subgrade Reaction, k
Drainage Coefficient, Cd
Initial Serviceability
Terminal Serviceability
3.00
280
1.00
4.50
2.50
psi/in
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k-value) Determination
Resilient Modulus of the Subgrade
Resilient Modulus of the Subbase
Subbase Thickness
Depth to Rigid Foundation
Loss of Support Value (0,1,2,3)
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
psi
psi
inches
feet
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 280.00 psi/in
Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:09:59PM
Engineer:
City of Fort Worth
Alpha Testing, LLC
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
1
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY with limestone
fragments
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+21 66 23 43
100/1.5"
100/3.25"
100/1.0"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
2
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and limestone
fragments
6.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY with calcareous
deposits and limestone fragments
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 17
4.5+13 56 18 38
4.5+15 63 21 42 1.2
4.5+22
4.0 232.5 11 64 23 41 2.3
3.5 25
86/10.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
3
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Brown and Gray CLAY with calcareous deposits
8.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY with limestone
fragments
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+18
4.5+16 66 21 45 5.3
4.5+8 39 20 19
4.5+22
4.5+24 66 23 43 0.0
100/1.875"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
4
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
-with limestone fragments 2 ft to 4 ft
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+18 63 22 41
4.5+12
4.5+16 33 17 16 0.0
100/1.5"
100/1.0"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/28/2020 7/28/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
5
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and limestone
fragments
6.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15 46 19 27
4.5+15
4.5+16 43 18 25 1.7
4.5+20
4.5+24 64 23 41 2.3
100/2.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
6
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.25 29
4.5+22 65 23 42
4.5+11 41 17 24 2.8
100/0.25"
100/1.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
7
W201823
Crowley, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
8.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
12.0
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
18.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 22
4.5+20 61 22 39
4.5+20 64 23 41 0.8
4.5+20
4.5+18 47 20 27 0.0
4.5+15 53 17 36 0.0
4.5+19
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
8
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY
4.0
-with limestone fragments 2 ft to 4 ft
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments 5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.75 31
4.5+19 62 20 42 2.8
3.0 14 43 14 29 0.0
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
9
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and limestone
fragments
7.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 25
1.75 36
4.5+16 54 17 37 0.7
4.5+14 42 18 24 0.0
100/1.5"
100/2.0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
10
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
4.0
Brown and Gray SHALY CLAY
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
4.5+12 43 16 27 0.4
3.75 24
4.5+20 62 20 42 5.5
4.5+22
100/4.0"
100/2.0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
11
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
4.5+20 70 23 47
4.5+12 28 13 15 0.0
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
12
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown and Brown CLAY with limestone
fragments
6.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
12.0
Brown SHALY CLAY
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+23
4.5+218.3 103 74 24 50 2.7
4.5+13
4.5+9 36 16 20 0.0
4.5+17 40 18 22 0.0
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/31/2020 7/31/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
13
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18 57 21 36
100/1.0"
100/1.0"
100/2.75"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
14
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+15 61 21 40
4.5+8
4.5+16 64 21 43 3.9
4.5 16
100/1.0"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
15
W201823
Crowley, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits and
limestone fragments
6.0
Brown SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+26
4.5+13
4.5+14 40 18 22 0.0
3.5 22
3.5 22 63 21 42 2.7
4.5+22 65 23 42 0.5
4.5+22
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
16
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+22 75 26 49
100/3.0"
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
100/1.0"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
17
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23 72 24 48
100/0.5"
100/2.0"
100/1.5"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC
Fraser Ranch
7/30/2020 7/30/2020
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
18
W201823
Crowley, Texas
170 / 24
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
6.0
Brown SHALY CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+16
4.5+174.2 111 59 19 40 3.7
4.5+17
4.5+23 63 22 41 2.3
100/2.5"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
TEXAS CONE PENETRATION
FILL
LIMESTONE
(MH), Elastic SILT
SANDSTONE
(GP), Poorly Graded GRAVEL
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
VERY HIGH
4 TO 15
16 TO 25
26 TO 35
OVER 35
SAMPLING SYMBOLS
(OL), ORGANIC SILT
(OH), ORGANIC CLAY
8.0" OR LARGER
3.0" TO 8.0"
0.75" TO 3.0"
5.0 mm TO 3.0"
2.0 mm TO 5.0 mm
0.4 mm TO 5.0 mm
0.07 mm TO 0.4 mm
0.002 mm TO 0.07 mm
LESS THAN 0.002 mm
SOIL & ROCK SYMBOLS
KEY TO SOIL SYMBOLS
AND CLASSIFICATIONS
(CH), High Plasticity CLAY VERY LOOSE
LOOSE
MEDIUM
DENSE
VERY DENSE
RELATIVE DENSITY OF COHESIONLESS SOILS (blows/ft)
0 TO 4
5 TO 10
11 TO 30
31 TO 50
OVER 50
SHELBY TUBE (3" OD except where
noted otherwise)
SPLIT SPOON (2" OD except where
noted otherwise)
AUGER SAMPLE
ROCK CORE (2" ID except where
noted otherwise)
PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION (DIAMETER)
(CL), Low Plasticity CLAY
(SP), Poorly Graded SAND
(GW), Well Graded GRAVEL
(GC), CLAYEY GRAVEL
(GM), SILTY GRAVEL
BOULDERS
COBBLES
COARSE GRAVEL
FINE GRAVEL
COURSE SAND
MEDIUM SAND
FINE SAND
SILT
CLAY
TRACE
LITTLE
SOME
AND
1 TO 10
11 TO 20
21 TO 35
36 TO 50
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS (%)
VERY SOFT
SOFT
FIRM
STIFF
VERY STIFF
HARD
LESS THAN 0.25
0.25 TO 0.50
0.50 TO 1.00
1.00 TO 2.00
2.00 TO 4.00
OVER 4.00
SHEAR STRENGTH OF COHESIVE SOILS (tsf)
RELATIVE DEGREE OF PLASTICITY (PI)SHALE / MARL
(SC), CLAYEY SAND
(SW), Well Graded SAND
(SM), SILTY SAND
(ML), SILT
CITY OF FORT WORTH ROCKY CREEK CROSSING, PHASE 2A
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 105576
Revised July 1, 2011
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Approval Spec No.Classification Manufacturer Mix ID Mix Description Design Rquirements National Spec
Concrete
Class A (Sidewalk, ADA Ramps, Driveways, Curb/Gutter, Median Pavement)
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design American Concrete Company 30CAF029 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D1000001043S 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Curbs 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D10000001055 3000 psi Concrete for Inlets, Junction Boxes, Manholes, Channel Liners, Sidewalks, Driveways, Curb & Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/24/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design Big Town Concrete 302050-1 3000 psi Concrete for Curbs and Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Burnco Texas 30U101AG 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Flatwork 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/1/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design Burnco Texas 30U500BG 3000psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWCC502001 3000 psi for Sidewalks, Driveways, Ramps, Curb & Gutter, Flatwork 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWCC502021 3500 psi concrete for Sidewalks, Driveways, Ramps, Curb & Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 3759 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 4502 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Chisholm Trail Redi Mix C13020AE 3000 psi Concrete for Driveways, Curb & Gutter 3-5" Slump; 4.5-7.5% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 30HA20II 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking, Sidewalks, Flatwork, Pads 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 253-W 3000 psi Concrete Mix Sidewalks, ADA Ramps, Driveways, Curb & Gutter, Safety End Treatments, Non-TxDOT Retaining Walls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 250 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Driveways, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 350 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Driveways, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/29/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design Estrada Ready Mix R3050AEWR 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Ramps, Inlets, and Manholes 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design GCH Concrete Services GCH4000 4000 psi Concrete for for Sidewalks, Ramps, Headwalls, Inlets, and Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.1261 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.5177 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.5409 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Inlets 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-147QW5D5 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-70J23504 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/7/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Liquid Stone C301D 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Approaches, and Driveways.3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136214 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136014 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/1/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136N14 5.00 sacks / 3,000 psi concrete for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/1/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136R20 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/1/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136N20 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/2/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141K24 4,000 psi Concrete for Junction Boxes, Sidewalks and Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136R14 5.00 sacks / 3,500 psi Concrete for Sidewalks and Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/7/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136K14 3,000 psi concrete for sidewalks and ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2131314 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2132214 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta D9490SC 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps 3-5" Slump; 4.5-7.5% Air
10/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS A-YY 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps, and Curb & Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
10/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS A-NY 5.00 Sacks / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks & Ramps, and Curb & Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
7/10/2023 03 30 00 Mix Desing Osburn 30A50MR 5 SK / 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/18/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM5020A 3000 psi Concrete for Curb, Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalk, Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/24/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM5525A 3600 psi Concrete for Valley Gutters, Sidewalks, Approaches, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10L11504 6.00 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Curb & Gutter, Sewer Manhole, Inlets, & Junction Boxes 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10J11524 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix V0J11524 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 30050 3,000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks, Ramps, Inlets, Junction Boxes, Thrust Blocks, Curb and Gutter, Driveways, Barrier Ramp 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5025A 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete CP5020A 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb and Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
10/10/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete TCFW5020A 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5525A2 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Drive Approaches, ADA Ramp, Curb and Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Titan Ready Mix 3020AE 3000 psi Concrete for Sidewalks 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0250.230 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Flatwork, Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0250.2301 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb & Gutter, Driveways, Sidewalks, ADA Ramps 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Class CIP (Inlets, Manholes, Junction Boxes, Encasement, Blocking, Collars, Lightpole Foundations)
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design American Concrete Company 40CNF065 4000 psi Concrete for Manholes & Utility Structures 3-5" Slump; 0-3% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D10000001061 3600 psi Concrete for Inlets, Boxes, Encasement, Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D10000001055 3000 psi Concrete for Inlets, Junction Boxes, Manholes, Channel Liners, Sidewalks, Driveways, Curb & Gutter 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D1000001615 3600 psi Concrete for Inlets, Boxes, Encasement, Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 4502 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Burnco Texas 40U500BG 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures, Driveways, Screen Walls, Collars 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 255-2 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Inlets, Thrust Blocking, Concrete Encasement 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 355 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Inlets, Thrust Blocking, Concrete Encasement 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 255 3500 psi Concrete Mix for Flatwork, Inlets, Thrust Blocking Concrete Encasement 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 270 5000 psi Concrete Mix for Cast-in-Place Box Culverts 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 370 5000 psi Concrete Mix for Cast-in-Place Box Culverts 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 353 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, ADA Ramps, Driveways, Curb & Gutter, Safety End Treatments, Non-TxDOT Retaining Walls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 257 3600 psi Concrete mix for Valley Gutters, Lightpole Foundations 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 357 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Valley Gutters, Lightpole Foundations 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.1701 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures, Sanitary Sewer Manholes, Junction Box 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.1551 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.5409 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Sidewalks, Inlets 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/27/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Liquid Stone C361DNFA 3,600 psi Concrete for Retaining wall, driveway, junction box apron, approach 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141230 4,000 psi Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls, Valve Pads 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141R24 5.53 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete for Junction Box, Box Culvert, Sidewalks and Ramps.3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/20/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146R33 6.01 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete Mix for CIP Sewer Manholes 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/20/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K33 6.01 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete Mix for CIP Sewer Manholes.3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2142233 3,600 psi Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 4.5-7.5% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2136224 3,600 psi Concrete for Curb Inlets 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141233 3,600 psi Concrete for Storm Structures, Inlets, Blocking & Encasement 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146038 4,500 psi Concrete for Inlets, Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146R35 6.11 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete for Inlets, Manholes, and Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/12/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS P1-YY 6.00 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete for Collars, Manholes, Box Culverts 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C-YY 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb Inlets 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C-NY 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Curb Inlets 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/18/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM5320A 3000 psi Concrete for Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/18/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM6020ASS 4000 psi Concrete for Strom Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 1RJ11524 3500 psi Concrete Mix for Thrust Blocks, Valve Pads 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 15611524 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Cast-in-Place Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
12/5/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10K115C4 3500 psi Concrete for Thrust Blocks, Valve Pads 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 09/23/2024
Approval Spec No.Classification Manufacturer Mix ID Mix Description Design Rquirements National Spec
CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 09/23/2024
Concrete (Continued)
12/5/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 156115C4 4000 psi Concrete for CIP Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/29/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10L21524 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Manholes 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/2/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 145P25P4 4500 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/16/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 35050 3500 psi Concrete for Thrust Blocks and Collars 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5320A 3000 psi Concrete Mix for Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
10/10/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete TCFW6025A2 4000 psi Concrete for Manholes 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Class C (Headwalls, Wingwalls, Culverts, Drilled Shafts)
Drilled Shafts
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Burnco Texas 36U500BG 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations (Drilled Shafts)5.5-7.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/21/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360-DS 3600 psi Concrete for Drilled Shaft/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundation (Drilled Shafts)5.5-7.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
12/5/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.1822 3600 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shafts)/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5.5-7.5" Slump; 0-3% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.1859 4000 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shafts)/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5.5-7.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/7/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 10LQS50N 3,600 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shafts)/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5.5-7.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/7/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Liquid Stone C361DHR 3,600 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shaft)/Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5.5-7.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/27/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta U2146N41 6.44sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shafts) / Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5-7" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/27/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta U2146K45 6.65 sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shafts) / Lighting and Trafic Signal Foundations 5-7" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/4/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta U2146R41 6.44 sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete for (Drilled Piers)/Light Pole bases.5-7" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/22/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix 135K2524 3500 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shaft) Lightpole Foundations 5.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/22/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix 135K0524 3500 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shaft) Lightpole Foundations 5.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
5/15/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 80L115D5 3600 psi Concrete for (Drilled Shafts) /Lighting and Traffic Signal Foundations 5.5-7.5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Other Applications
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D10000001083S 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads, Inlets, Structures, Headwalls, Thrust Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D10000001083 4000 psi Concrete for Valve Pads, Inlets, Structures, Headwalls, Thrust Blocking 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Argos D10000001681 4000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Retaining Walls, Box Culverts, Valley Gutters 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWCC602001 4000 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures, Manholes, Headwalls, Retaining Walls, Valley Gutters, Drive Approaches 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 4518 4000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Wingwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 5642 4000 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design City Concrete Company 40LA2011 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260-2 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Box Culverts, Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360-1 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Box Culverts, Headwalls, Wingwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260-1 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/29/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design Estrada Ready Mix R3655AEWR 5.50 Sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Wingwalls, and Culverts 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design GCH Concrete Services GCH4000 4000 psi Concrete for for Sidewalks, Ramps, Headwalls, Inlets, and Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.1851 4500 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures, Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/1/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta 310LBP 3,600 psi Concrete for Retaining Walls 3-5" Slump; 4-7% Air
8/30/2023 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141R30 5.85 SK / 4,000 psi Concrete for Box Culverts & Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146035 4,000 psi Concrete for Manholes, Inlets & Headwalls, Valve Pads 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
12/5/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10L115C4 3600 psi Concrete for Manhole, Inlet, Junction Box, Headwall 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 40050 4,000 psi Concrete for Headwalls, Retaining Wall, Collars 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 35022 3,600 psi Concrete for Junction Box, Retaining Walls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/1/2024 03 30 00 Mix Design SRM Concrete 45050 4500 psi Concrete for Storm Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 03 30 00 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW6020A2 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Class P (Machine Placed Paving)
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Argos D10000001617 3600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/24/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design Big Town Concrete 360060-1 3600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
6/24/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design Big Town Concrete 362060-1 3600 psi Concrete for Machince Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWCC552091 3600 psi for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWCC602091 4000 psi for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 5167 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design City Concrete Company 36LA2011 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 33 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 257-M 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/14/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 357-M 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260-M 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360-M 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
2/6/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design Estrada Ready Mix TD3655AEWR 5.50 Sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-C56PS5D5 4000 psi Concrete Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta Q2141R27 5.69 sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta Q2141K30 4,000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C SF-YY 5.50 Sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX C SF-NY 5.50 Sacks / 3,600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/16/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 40025 4000 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW5520AMP 3600 psi Concrete for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0255.2301 3600 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3.5-6.5% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0260.2302 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Machine Placed Paving 1-3" Slump; 3.5-6.5% Air
Class H (Hand Placed Paving)
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design American Concrete Company 45CAF076 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Argos D10000001273 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Argos D10000001737 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Argos D10000002107 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Argos D10000001791 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Argos D10000001103 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
5/2/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Big D Concrete CM14520AE 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Big Town Concrete 452065-1 4500 psi hand placed paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Big Town Concrete 450065-1 4500 psi hand placed paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Burnco Texas 45U500BG 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWCC602021 4500 psi concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 4609 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Manholes 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 6103 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Manholes 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design City Concrete Company 45NA20II 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 265 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 365 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/29/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design Estrada Ready Mix R4560AEWR/6.00 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 4-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design GCH Concrete Services GCH4500 4500 psi Concrete Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.1851 4500 psi Concrete for Storm Drain Structures, Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-161PS5EM 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3.5-6.5% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-161UV5DM 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Ingram Concrete & Aggregates 2MWR-10MQS50N 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146N35 6.11 sacks / 4,500 psi concrete for Hand Place Paving, Inlets, Manholes, Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
8/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146R36 6.17 / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Approval Spec No.Classification Manufacturer Mix ID Mix Description Design Rquirements National Spec
CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 09/23/2024
Concrete(Continued)
11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146N36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/2/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
5/22/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K37 6.22 sack / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
12/22/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146R44 6.60 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
12/22/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K44 6.60 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/15/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146P36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
11/15/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146K36 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2147241 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 4.5-7.5% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146236 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146036 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving, Inlets 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146242 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146042 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS P2-YY 6.50 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
10/4/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix CLS P2-NY 6.50 Sacks / 4,500 psi Concrte for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
7/10/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Osburn 45A60MR 6 SK / 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/24/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Rapid Redi Mix RRM6320AHP 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10M11524 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10M115D4 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10M11504 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix 145CD5P4 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving, Storm Drain Structures 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/13/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 45023 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 45000 4,500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW6020AHP 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW60AHP 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete TCFW6020AHP 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Titan Ready Mix TRC4520 4500 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0260.2301 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 0265.2301 4500 psi Concrete Mix for Valley Gutters, Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3.5-6.5% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design True Grit Redi Mix 270.230 5000 psi Concrete for Hand Placed Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Class HES (High Early Strength Paving)
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Big D Concrete 14500AE 4500 psi Concrete for High Early Strength Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Burnco Texas 55U120AG 4000 psi Concrete Mix for High Early Strength Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Charley's Concrete 6589 4500 psi Concrete Mix for High Early Strength Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 370-1NC 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 375-NC 5000 psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 370-NC 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/18/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 380-NC 4500 psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/29/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design Estrada Ready Mix 4575AESC 7.50 Sacks / 4,500 psi (3,000 psi @ 3-day) Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Holcim - SOR, Inc.2125 5000 psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/24/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Liquid Stone C451DHR-A 4500psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/7/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2161K70 6,000 psi (3,000 psi @ 24 hrs.) for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix 10N11507 4500 psi (2600 psi @ 24 hrs.) Concrete Mix for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 4.5-6.5% Air
2/10/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 50310 5,000 psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete 40326 4,500 (3,000 @ 3-days) psi Concrete for HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW6520AMR 4500 (3000 psi @ 3-days) psi HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FW7520AMR 4500 (3000 psi @ 3-days) psi Concrete HES Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Class S (Bridge Slabs, Top Slabs of Direct Traffic Culverts, Approach Slabs)
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 260 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Bridge Slabs, Box Culverts, Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 360 4000 psi Concrete Mix for Bridge Slabs, Box Culverts, Headwalls 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix 365-STX 4000 psi Concrete for Bridge slabs, top slabs of direct traffic culverts, approach slabs-TXDOT Class S-No Fly Ash 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
1/29/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design Estrada Ready Mix R4060AEWR 6.00 Sacks / 4,000 psi Concrete for Bridge Slabs, Top Slabs, and Approach Slabs 4-6" Slump; 3-6% Air
5/3/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta M7842344 4,000 psi Concrete for Bridge Deck 3-5" Slump; 4.5-7.5% Air
4/1/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146P33 6.01 sacks / 4,000 psi concrete for Bridge Deck 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/15/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX S-NY 5.50 Sacks / 4000psi Concrete Mix for Class S Slab Paving - No Fly Ash 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/15/2024 32 13 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix TX S-YY 4.50 Sacks / 4000psi Concrete Mix for Class S Slab Paving 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
9/9/2022 32 13 13 Mix Design Redi-Mix 156115D4 4000 psi Bridge Slabs 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
5/5/2023 32 13 13 Mix Design SRM Concrete D100008553CB 4,000 psi Concrete for Bdridge Approach Slab, Deck Slab 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Concrete Base Trench Repair
4/1/2023 03 34 16 Mix Design Burnco Texas 10YH50BF 1000 psi Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair Flowable; 8.5-11.5% Air
9/9/2022 03 34 16 Mix Design Burnco Texas 08Y450BA 800 psi Concrete Mix for Base for Trench Repair 5-7" Slump; 3-6% Air
Controlled Low Strength Material
9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Burnco Texas 01Y690BF 100 psi Concrete Mix for Flowable Fill Flowable; 8.5-11.5% Air
9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWCC359101 50-150 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 3-5" Slump; 8-12% Air
9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Carder Concrete FWFF237501 50-150 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM Flowable; 8.5-11.5% Air
9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design City Concrete Company 11-350-FF 50-150 psi Concrete for Flowable Fill-CLSM Flowable; 8-12% Air
9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Cow Town Redi Mix Mix# 9 70 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM 7-9" Slump; 8-11% Air
9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Martin Marietta FLOW25A 50 psi Concrete for Flowable Fill/CLSM 8-12" Slump; 5-15% Air
10/4/2023 03 34 13 Mix Design NBR Ready Mix FTW FLOW FILL 150 psi concrete for Flowable 7-10" Slump; 8-12% Air
9/9/2022 03 34 13 Mix Design Tarrant Concrete FWFF150CLSM 50-150 psi Flowable Fill - CLSM Flowable; 8-12% Air
Concrete Rip Rap
4/1/2023 31 37 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2141030 4,000 psi Concrete for Riprap 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
4/1/2023 31 37 00 Mix Design Martin Marietta R2146033 4,000 psi Concrete for Riprap 3-5" Slump; 3-6% Air
Asphalt Paving
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Austin Asphalt FT5B117965 FT5B117965 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Austin Asphalt FT1B139965 FT1B139965 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Austin Asphalt FT1B117.2 FT1B117.2 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
5/1/2024 32 12 16 Mix Design Reynolds Asphalt 340-DG-B P 340-DG-B PG64-22 Type B Base Course
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Reynolds Asphalt 1112B 1112B PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Reynolds Asphalt 1612B 1612B PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
12/5/2022 33 12 16 Mix Design Sunmount Paving 3076BV6422 3076BV6422 PG62-22 Type B Fine Base
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design Sunmount Paving 341-BRAP6422ERG 341-BRAP6422ERG PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design TXBIT 37-211305-20 37-211305-20 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design TXBIT 44-211305-17 44-211305-17 PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design TXBIT 211305 (1757)211305 (1757) PG64-22 Type B Fine Base
Approval Spec No.Classification Manufacturer Mix ID Mix Description Design Rquirements National Spec
CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 09/23/2024
Asphalt(Continued)
9/9/2022 32 12 16 Mix Design TXBIT 64-224125-18 PG 64-224125-18 PG70-22 Type D Fine Surface
4/1/2024 32 12 16 Mix Design TXBIT 344 MAC-SP-D 70-22XR 344 MAC-SP-D 70-22XR SAC A-R Type D Fine Surface
Detectable Warning Surface
9/9/2022 32 13 20 DWS - Pavers Pine Hall Brick (Winston Salem, NC)Tactile Pavers
9/9/2022 32 13 20 DWS - Pavers Western Brick Co. (Houston, TX)Detectable Warning Pavers
9/9/2022 32 13 20 DWS - Composite Armor Tile
9/9/2022 32 13 20 DWS - Composite ADA Solutions (Wilmington, MA)Heritage Brick CIP Composite Paver
4/7/2023 32 13 20 DWS - Pavers ADA Solutions (Wilmington, MA)Detectable Warning Pavers
Silicone Joint Sealant
9/9/2022 32 13 73 Joint Sealant Dow 890SL 890SL - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893
9/9/2022 32 13 73 Joint Sealant Tremco 900SL 900SL - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893
9/9/2022 32 13 73 Joint Sealant Pecora 300SL 300SL - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893
9/9/2022 32 13 73 Joint Sealant Crafco RoadSaver Silicone RoadSaver Silicone - Cold Applied, Single Component, Silicone Joint Sealant ASTM D5893
Utility Trench Embedment Sand
9/9/2022 33 05 10 Embedment Sand Silver Creek Materials Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33
9/9/2022 33 05 10 Embedment Sand Crouch Materials Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33
9/9/2022 33 05 10 Embedment Sand F and L Dirt Movers Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33
9/9/2022 33 05 10 Embedment Sand F and L Dirt Movers Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33
9/9/2022 33 05 10 Embedment Sand Tin Top Martin Marietta Utility Embedment Sand ASTM C33
Storm Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers AccuCast (Govind Steel Company, LTD)MHRC #220605 MHRC #220605 (Size - **24" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Cover Neenah Foundry NF-1274-T91 NF-1274-T91 (Size - 32" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry NF-1743-LM (Hinged)NF-1743-LM (Hinged) (Size - 32" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frame Neenah Foundry NF-1930-30 NF-1930-30 (Size - 32.25" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry R-1743-HV R-1743-HV (Size - 32" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
4/3/2019 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++2279ST 2279ST (Size - 24" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
4/3/2019 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++2280ST 2280ST (Size - 32" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
10/8/2020 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers EJ ( Formally East Jordan Iron Works)EJ1033 Z2/A EJ1033 Z2/A (Size - 32.25" Dia.)ASTM A536 AASHTO M306
3/8/2024 33 05 13 Curb Inlet Covers SIP Industries ++2296T 2296T (Size - ***24" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
6/18/2024 33 05 13 Curb Inlet Covers SIP Industries ++2279STN 2279STN (Size - 24" Dia.)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306
Storm Sewer - Inlet & Structures 33-05-13
10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x3-405-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 3')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x3-406-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 3')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x4.5-407-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 4.5')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x4.5-420-PRECAST** (Size - 10' X 4.5')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-4X4-409-PRECAST-TOP (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-4X4-409-PRECAST-BASE (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-5X5-410-PRECAST-TOP (Size - 5' X 5')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-5X5-410-PRECAST-BASE (Size - 5' X 5')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-TOP (Size - 6' X 6')ASTM C913
10/8/2020 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-BASE (Size - 6' X 6')ASTM C913
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-10X3-405-PRECAST INLET** (Size - 10' X 3')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-15X3-405-PRECAST INLET** (Size - 15' X 3')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-20X3-405-PRECAST INLET** (Size - 20' X 7')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-409-PRECAST TOP (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-409-PRECAST BASE (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-412-PRECAST 4-FT RISER (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-410-PRECAST TOP (Size - 5' X 5')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-410-PRECAST BASE (Size - 5' X 5')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-412-PRECAST 5-FT RISER (Size - 5' X 5')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-411-PRECAST TOP (Size - 6' X 6')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-411-PRECAST BASE (Size - 6' X 6')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-412-PRECAST 6-FT RISER (Size - 6' X 6')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-411-PRECAST TOP (Size - 7' X 7')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-411-PRECAST BASE (Size - 7' X 7')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-412-PRECAST 4-FT RISER (Size - 7' X 7')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-411-PRECAST TOP (Size - 8' X 8')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-411-PRECAST BASE (Size - 8' X 8')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-412-PRECAST 5-FT RISER (Size - 8' X 8')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-408-PRECAST INLET (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-408-PRECAST INLET (Size - 5' X 5')ASTM 615
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-408-PRECAST INLET (Size - 6' X 6')ASTM 615
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 4' x 4' Stacked Manhole (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM C478
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x 8' Storm Junction Box (Size - 5' X 8')ASTM C478
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 4' x 4' Storm Junction Box (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM C478
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x 5' Storm Junction Box (Size - 5' X 5')ASTM C478
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 6' x 6' Storm Junction Box (Size - 6' X 6')ASTM C478
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 8' x 8' Storm Junction Box Base (Size - 8' X 8')ASTM C478
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Oldcastle Precast 5' x 8' Storm Junction Box Base (Size - 5' X 8')ASTM C478
8/28/2023 33 49 10 Manhole Rinker Materials Reinforced 48" Diameter Spread Footing Manhole (Size - 4' X 4')ASTM C433
8/28/2023 33 39 20 Curb Inlet 10 'x 3' Riser Thompson Pipe Group Inlet Riser (Size - 3 FT)ASTM C913-16
8/28/2023 33 39 20 Curb Inlet 15 'x 3' Riser Thompson Pipe Group Inlet Riser (Size - 3 FT)ASTM C913-16
8/28/2023 33 39 20 Curb Inlet 20' x 3' Riser Thompson Pipe Group Inlet Riser (Size - 3 FT)ASTM C913-16
1/12/2024 33 49 20 Drop Inlet AmeriTex Pipe &Products Drop Inlet (4' X 4')ASTM C913
1/12/2024 33 49 20 Drop Inlet AmeriTex Pipe &Products Drop Inlet (5' X 5')ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products Precast 4'x4' Storm Junction Box ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products Precast 5'x5' Storm Junction Box ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products 5' Precast Tansition MH (4' MH on the top of 5' JB)ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products Precast 6'x6' Storm Junction Box ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products 6' Precast Tansition MH (4' MH on the top of 6' JB)ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products Precast 8'x8' Storm Junction Box ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products 8' Precast Tansition MH (4' MH on the top of 8' JB)ASTM C913
1/19/2024 33 49 20 Manhole AmeriTex Pipe &Products Type C Storm Drain Manhole on Box (4' MH on the top of RCB)ASTM C913
7/16/2024 33 49 20 Curb Inlets AmeriTex Pipe &Products 10x3 Precast** (Size 10' x 3')ASTM C913
7/16/2024 33 49 20 Curb Inlets AmeriTex Pipe &Products 15x3 Precast** (Size 15' x 3')ASTM C913
**Note: All new development and new installation manhole lids shall meet the minimum 30-inch opening requirement as specified in City Specification 33 05 13. Any smaller opening sizes will only be allowed for existing manholes that require replacement frames and covers.
**Note: Pre-cast inlets are appoved for the stage I portion of the structure (basin) only. Stage II portion of the structure are required to be cast in-place. No exceptions to this requirement shall be allowed.
Approval Spec No.Classification Manufacturer Mix ID Mix Description Design Rquirements National Spec
CITY OF FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCTS LIST AS OF 09/23/2024
Storm Sewer - Pipes & Boxes 33-05-13
4/9/2021 33 41 13 Storm Drain Pipes Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (ADS)ADS HP Storm Polypropylene (PP) Pipe (Size - 12" - 60")ASTM F2881 & AASHTO M330
8/28/2023 33 41 10 Storm Drain Pipes Rinker Materials Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe (Size - 21" or larger)ASTM C76, C655
8/28/2023 33 41 10 Culvert Box Rinker Materials Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (Sze - Various)ASTM C789, C850
10/12/2023 33 41 10 Storm Drain Pipes AmeriTex Pipe &Products Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe* (Size - 15" or larger)ASTM C76, C506
10/12/2023 34 41 10 Culvert Box AmeriTex Pipe &Products Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (size - Various))ASTM C1433,C1577
10/18/2023 35 41 10 Storm Drain Pipes The Turner Co.Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe* (Size - 15" or larger)ASTM C76, C506
10/18/2023 33 41 10 Culvert Box The Turner Co.Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (size - Various)ASTM C1433,C1577
4/12/2024 33 41 10 Storm Drain Pipes Thompson Pipe Group Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe* (Size Various)ASTM C76, C506
6/25/2024 33 41 10 Culvert Box Oldcastle Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert ASTM C1433,C1577
6/25/2024 33 41 10 Storm Drain Pipes Oldcastle Reinforced Concrete Pipe Tongue and Groove Joint Pipe* (Size Various)ASTM C76, C506
Approval Spec No. Classsification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Components 33-39-10 (Rev 2/3/16)
07/23/97 33 05 13 Urethane Hydrophilic Waterstop Asahi Kogyo K.K. Adeka Ultra-Seal P-201 ASTM D2240/D412/D792
04/26/00 33 05 13 Offset Joint for 4' Diam. MH Hanson Concrete Products Drawing No. 35-0048-001
04/26/00 33 05 13 Profile Gasket for 4' Diam. MH. Press-Seal Gasket Corp. 250-4G Gasket ASTM C-443/C-361 SS MH
1/26/99 33 05 13 HDPE Manhole Adjustment Rings Ladtech, Inc HDPE Adjustment Ring Traffic and Non-traffic area
5/13/05 33 05 13 Manhole External Wrap Canusa - CPS WrapidSeal Manhole Encapsulation System
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Fiberglass 33-39-13 (1/8/13)
1/26/99 33 39 13 Fiberglass Manhole Fluid Containment, Inc. Flowtite ASTM 3753 Non-traffic area
08/30/06 33 39 13 Fiberglass Manhole L.F. Manufacturing Non-traffic area
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Rectangular 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)
* 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Western Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry 1001 24"x40" WD
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)
* 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Western Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry 30024 24" Dia.
* 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers McKinley Iron Works Inc. A 24 AM 24" Dia.
08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry R-1272 ASTM A48 & AASHTO M306 24" Dia.
08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry NF 1274 ASTM A48 & AASHTO M306 30" Dia.
33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Sigma Corporation MH-144N
33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Sigma Corporation MH-143N
33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Pont-A-Mousson GTS-STD 24" dia.
33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Casting 24" dia.
10/31/06 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers (Hinged) Powerseal Hinged Ductile Iron Manhole ASTM A536 24" Dia.
7/25/03 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Saint-Gobain Pipelines (Pamrex/rexus) RE32-R8FS 30" Dia.
01/31/06 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover East Jordan Iron Works V1432-2 and V1483 Designs AASHTO M306-04 30" Dia.
11/02/10 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Sigma Corporation MH1651FWN & MH16502 30" Dia
07/19/11 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Star Pipe Products MH32FTWSS-DC 30" Dia
08/10/11 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Accucast 220700 Heavy Duty with Gasket Ring 30" Dia
10/14/13 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover (Hinged & Lockable) East Jordan Iron Works
30" ERGO XL Assembly
with Cam Lock/MPIC/T-Gasket ASSHTO M105 & ASTM A536 30" Dia
06/01/17 34 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover (Lockable) CI SIP Industries 2280 (32") ASTM A 48 30" Dia.
12/05/23 34 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover (Hinged & Lockable) CI SIP Industries 4267WT - Hinged (32") ASTM A 48 30" Dia.
09/16/19 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Composite Access Products, L.P.
CAP-ONE-30-FTW, Composite, w/ Lock
w/o Hing 30" Dia.
10/07/21 34 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Trumbull Manufacturing 32"(30") Frame and Cover 30" Dia.
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Water Tight & Pressure Tight 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)
* 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Pont-A-Mousson Pamtight 24" Dia.
* 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Casting 24" Dia.
* 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Western Iron Works,Bass & Hays Foundry 300-24P 24" Dia.
* 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers McKinley Iron Works Inc. WPA24AM 24" Dia.
03/08/00 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Accucast RC-2100 ASTM A 48 24" Dia.
04/20/01 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers (SIP)Serampore Industries Private Ltd. 300-24-23.75 Ring and Cover ASTM A 48 24" Dia.
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Precast Concrete (Rev 1/8/13)
* 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete Hydro Conduit Corp SPL Item #49 ASTM C 478 48"
* 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete Wall Concrete Pipe Co. Inc. ASTM C-443 48"
09/23/96 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete Concrete Product Inc. 48" I.D. Manhole w/ 32" Cone ASTM C 478 48" w/32" cone
12/05/23 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete The Turner Company 72" I.D. Manhole w/ 32" Cone ASTM C 478 72"
05/08/18 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete The Turner Company 48", 60" I.D. Manhole w/ 32" Cone ASTM C 478 48", 60"
10/27/06 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast Concrete Oldcastle Precast Inc. 48" I.D. Manhole w/ 24" Cone ASTM C 478 48" Diam w 24" Ring
06/09/10 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer)Concrete US Composite Pipe Reinforced Polymer Concrete ASTM C-76 48" to 72"
09/06/19 33 39 20 Manhole, Precast Concrete Forterra Pipe and Precast 60" & 72" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone ASTM C-76 60" & 72"
10/07/21 32 39 20 Manhole, Precast Concrete Forterra Pipe and Precast 48" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone ASTM C-77 48"
10/07/21 33 39 20 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer) Concrete Armorock 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone 48" & 60"
10/07/21 33 39 20 Manhole, Precast (Hybrid) Polymer & PVC Predl Systems 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone 48" & 60" Non Traffic Areas
03/07/23 33 39 20 Manhole, Precast Concrete AmeriTex Pipe and Products, LLC 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone
ASTM C-478; ASTM C-923;
ASTM C-443
03/07/23 33 39 20 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer) Concrete P3 Polymers, RockHardscp 48" & 60" I.D. Manhole w/32" Cone
04/28/07 Manhole, Precast (Reinforced Polymer) Concrete Amitech USA Meyer Polycrete Pipe
Sewer -(WAC) Wastewater Access Chamber 33 39 40
12/29/23 33 39 20 Wastewater Access Chamber Quickstream Solutions, Inc. Type 8 Maintenace Shaft (Poopit)
For use when Std. MH cannot be
installed due to depth
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/Cementitious
* E1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems Quadex
04/23/01 E1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems Standard Cement Materials, Inc. Reliner MSP
E1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems AP/M Permaform
4/20/01 E1-14 Manhole Rehab System Strong Company Strong Seal MS2A Rehab System
5/12/03 E1-14 Manhole Rehab System (Liner) Triplex Lining System MH repair product to stop infiltration ASTM D5813
08/30/06 General Concrete Repair FlexKrete Technologies Vinyl Polyester Repair Product Misc. Use
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023
* From Original Standard Products List 1
Approval Spec No. Classsification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023
Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/NonCementitious
05/20/96 E1-14 Manhole Rehab Systems Sprayroq, Spray Wall Polyurethane Coating ASTM D639/D790
12/14/01 Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior) ERTECH Series 20230 and 2100 (Asphatic Emulsion)
For Exterior Coating of Concrete
Structures Only
01/31/06 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Chesterton Arc 791, S1HB, S1, S2 Acid Resistance Test Sewer Applications
8/28/2006 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Warren Environmental S-301 and M-301 Sewer Applications
03/19/18
33 05 16, 33 39 10,
33 39 20 Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior) Sherwin Williams
RR&C Dampproofing Non-Fibered Spray
Grade (Asphatic Emulsion)
For Exterior Coating of Concrete
Structures Only
Water & Sewer - Manhole Inserts - Field Operations Use Only (Rev 2/3/16)
* 33 05 13 Manhole Insert Knutson Enterprises Made to Order - Plastic ASTM D 1248 For 24" dia.
* 33 05 13 Manhole Insert South Western Packaging Made to Order - Plastic ASTM D 1248 For 24" dia.
* 33 05 13 Manhole Insert Noflow-Inflow Made to Order - Plastic ASTM D 1248 For 24" dia.
09/23/96 33 05 13 Manhole Insert Southwestern Packing & Seals, Inc. LifeSaver - Stainless Steel For 24" dia.
09/23/96 33 05 13 Manhole Insert Southwestern Packing & Seals, Inc. TetherLok - Stainless Steel For 24" dia
Water & Sewer - Pipe Casing Spacers 33-05-24 (07/01/13)
11/04/02 Steel Band Casing Spacers Advanced Products and Systems, Inc. Carbon Steel Spacers, Model SI
02/02/93 Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Advanced Products and Systems, Inc. Stainless Steel Spacer, Model SSI
04/22/87 Casing Spacers Cascade Waterworks Manufacturing Casing Spacers
09/14/10 Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Pipeline Seal and Insulator Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Up to 48"
09/14/10 Coated Steel Casin Spacers Pipeline Seal and Insulator Coated Steel Casin Spacers Up to 48"
05/10/11 Stainless Steel Casing Spacer Powerseal 4810 Powerchock Up to 48"
03/19/18 Casing Spacers BWM SS-12 Casing Spacer(Stainless Steel)
03/19/18 Casing Spacers BWM
FB-12 Casing Spacer (Coated Carbon Steel)
for Non_pressure Pipe and Grouted Casing
03/29/22 33 05 13 Casing Spacers CCI Pipeline Systems CSC12, CSS12
Water & Sewer - Pipes/Ductile Iron 33-11-10(1/8/13)
* 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe Griffin Pipe Products, Co. Super Bell-Tite Ductile Iron Pressure Pipe, AWWA C150, C151 3" thru 24"
08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe American Ductile Iron Pipe Co. American Fastite Pipe (Bell Spigot) AWWA C150, C151 4" thru 30"
08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe American Ductile Iron Pipe Co. American Flex Ring (Restrained Joint) AWWA C150, C151 4" thru 30"
* 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co. AWWA C150, C151
* 33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe McWane Cast Iron Pipe Co. AWWA C150, C151
Water & Sewer - Utility Line Marker (08/24/2018)
Sewer - Coatings/Epoxy 33-39-60 (01/08/13)
02/25/02 Epoxy Lining System Sauereisen, Inc SewerGard 210RS LA County #210-1.33
12/14/01 Epoxy Lining System Ertech Technical Coatings Ertech 2030 and 2100 Series
04/14/05 Interior Ductile Iron Pipe Coating Induron Protecto 401 ASTM B-117 Ductile Iron Pipe Only
01/31/06 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Chesterton Arc 791, S1HB, S1, S2 Acid Resistance Test Sewer Applications
8/28/2006 Coatings for Corrosion Protection Warren Environmental S-301 and M-301 Sewer Applications
Sewer - Coatings/Polyurethane
Sewer - Combination Air Valves
05/25/18 33-31-70 Air Release Valve A.R.I. USA, Inc. D025LTP02(Composite Body) 2"
Sewer - Pipes/Concrete
* E1-04 Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Wall Concrete Pipe Co. Inc. ASTM C 76
* E1-04 Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Hydro Conduit Corporation Class III T&G, SPL Item #77 ASTM C 76
* E1-04 Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Hanson Concrete Products SPL Item #95-Manhole, #98- Pipe ASTM C 76
* E1-04 Conc. Pipe, Reinforced Concrete Pipe & Products Co. Inc. ASTM C 76
Sewer - Pipe Enlargment System (Method)33-31-23 (01/18/13)
PIM System PIM Corporation Polyethylene PIM Corp., Piscata Way, N.J. Approved Previously
McConnell Systems McLat Construction Polyethylene Houston, Texas Approved Previously
TRS Systems Trenchless Replacement System Polyethylene Calgary, Canada Approved Previously
* From Original Standard Products List 2
Approval Spec No. Classsification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023
Sewer - Pipe/Fiberglass Reinforced/ 33-31-13(1/8/13)
7/21/97 33 31 13 Cent. Cast Fiberglass (FRP) Hobas Pipe USA, Inc. Hobas Pipe (Non-Pressure) ASTM D3262/D3754
03/22/10 33 31 13 Fiberglass Pipe (FRP) Ameron Bondstrand RPMP Pipe ASTM D3262/D3754
04/09/21 33 31 13 Glass-Fiber Reinforced Polymer Pipe (FRP) Thompson Pipe Group Thompson Pipe (Flowtite) ASTM D3262/D3754
03/07/23 33 31 13 Fiberglass Pipe (FRP) Future Pipe Industries Fiberstrong FRP
Sewer - Pipe/Polymer Pipe
4/14/05 Polymer Modified Concrete Pipe Amitech USA Meyer Polycrete Pipe ASTM C33, A276, F477 8" to 102", Class V
06/09/10 E1-9 Reinforced Polymer Concrete Pipe US Composite Pipe Reinforced Polymer Concrete Pipe ASTM C-76
Sewer - Pipes/HDPE 33-31-23(1/8/13)
* High-density polyethylene pipe Phillips Driscopipe, Inc. Opticore Ductile Polyethylene Pipe ASTM D 1248 8"
* High-density polyethylene pipe Plexco Inc. ASTM D 1248 8"
* High-density polyethylene pipe Polly Pipe, Inc. ASTM D 1248 8"
High-density polyethylene pipe CSR Hydro Conduit/Pipeline Systems McConnell Pipe Enlargement ASTM D 1248
Sewer - Pipes/PVC (Pressure Sewer) 33-11-12 (4/1/13)
12/02/11 33-11-12 DR-14 PVC Pressure Pipe Pipelife Jetstream PVC Pressure Pipe AWWA C900 4" thru 12"
10/22/14 33-11-12 DR-14 PVC Pressure Pipe Royal Building Products Royal Seal PVC Pressure Pipe AWWA C900 4" thru 12"
Sewer - Pipes/PVC* 33-31-20 (7/1/13)
* 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pipe J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc. (JM Eagle) SDR-26 (PS115) ASTM D 3034 4" - 15"
12/23/97* 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pipe Diamond Plastics Corporation SDR-26 (PS115)
ASTM D 3034 4" thru 15"
* 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pipe Lamson Vylon Pipe SDR-26 (PS115)
ASTM D 3034 4" thru 15"
12/05/23 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pipe Vinyltech PVC Pipe SDR-26 (PS115) ASTM D3034 4" thru 15"
12/05/23 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pipe Vinyltech PVC Pipe Gravity Sewer PS 115 ASTM F 679 18"
* 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Pipe J-M Manufacturing Co, Inc. (JM Eagle) PS 115 ASTM F 679 18" - 28"
05/06/05 33-31-20 PVC Solid Wall Pipe Diamond Plastics Corporation PS 115 ASTM F-679 18" to 48"
04/27/06 33-31-20 PVC Sewer Fittings Harco SDR-26 (PS 115) Gasket Fittings ASTM D-3034, D-1784, etc 4" - 15"
*33-31-20 PVC Sewer Fittings Plastic Trends, Inc.(Westlake)Gasketed PVC Sewer Main Fittings ASTM D 3034
3/19/2018 33 31 20 PVC Sewer Pipe Pipelife Jet Stream SDR 26 (PS 115) ASTM F679 18"- 24"
3/19/2018 33 31 20 PVC Sewer Pipe Pipelife Jet Stream SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4"- 15"
3/29/2019 33 31 20
Gasketed Fittings (PVC)GPK Products, Inc. SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4"- 15"
10/21/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4" - 15"
10/22/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer Pipe Sanderson Pipe Corp. SDR 26 ASTM D3034 4"- 15"
10/21/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) SDR 26 PS 115 ASTM F-679 18"- 36"
Sewer - Pipes/Rehab/CIPP 33-31-12 (01/18/13)
* Cured in Place Pipe Insituform Texark, Inc ASTM F 1216
05/03/99 Cured in Place Pipe National Envirotech Group National Liner, (SPL) Item #27 ASTM F-1216/D-5813
05/29/96 Cured in Place Pipe Reynolds Inc/Inliner Technolgy (Inliner USA) Inliner Technology ASTM F 1216
Sewer - Pipes/Rehab/Fold & Form
* Fold and Form Pipe Cullum Pipe Systems, Inc.
11/03/98 Fold and Form Pipe Insituform Technologies, Inc. Insituform "NuPIpe" ASTM F-1504
Fold and Form Pipe American Pipe & Plastics, Inc.Demo. Purpose Only
12/04/00 Fold and Form Pipe Ultraliner Ultraliner PVC Alloy Pipeliner ASTM F-1504, 1871, 1867
06/09/03 Fold and Form Pipe Miller Pipeline Corp. EX Method ASTM F-1504, F-1947 Up to 18" diameter
Sewer - Pipes/Open Profile Large Diameter
09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, Ribbed Lamson Vylon Pipe Carlon Vylon H.C. Closed Profile Pipe, ASTM F 679 18" to 48"
09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, Ribbed Extrusion Technologies, Inc. Ultra-Rib Open Profile Sewer Pipe ASTM F 679 18" to 48"
E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, Ribbed Uponor ETI Company
11/10/10 (E100-2) Polypropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Double Wall Advanced Drainage Systems (ADS) SaniTite HP Double Wall (Corrugated) ASTM F 2736 24"-30"
11/10/10 (E100-2) Polypropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Triple Wall Advanced Drainage Systems (ADS) SaniTite HP Triple Wall Pipe ASTM F 2764 30" to 60"
ASTM D3262, ASTM D3681, ASTM D4161, AWWA M45
* From Original Standard Products List 3
Approval Spec No. Classsification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023
Water - Appurtenances 33-12-10 (07/01/13)
01/18/18 33-12-10 Double Strap Saddle Romac 202NS Nylon Coated AWWA C800 1"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe
08/28/02 Double Strap Saddle Smith Blair #317 Nylon Coated Double Strap Saddle
07/23/12 33-12-10 Double Strap Service Saddle Mueller Company DR2S Double (SS) Strap DI Saddle AWWA C800 1"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe
03/07/23 33-12-10 Double Strap Service Saddle Powerseal 3450AS, Incl. Corp. Stop, Dbl Strap, Stainless NSF ANSI 372 1"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe
10/27/87 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves McDonald 6100M,6100MT & 610MT 3/4" and 1"
10/27/87 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves McDonald 4603B, 4604B, 6100M, 6100TM and 6101M 1½" and 2"
5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves Ford Meter Box Co., Inc.
FB600-7NL, FB1600-7-NL, FV23-777-W-NL,
L22-77NL AWWA C800 2"
5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves Ford Meter Box Co., Inc.
FB600-6-NL, FB1600-6-NL, FV23-666-W-
NL, L22-66NL AWWA C800 1-1/2"
5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves Ford Meter Box Co., Inc.
FB600-4-NL, FB1600-4-NL, B11-444-WR-
NL, B22444-WR-NL, L28-44NL AWWA C800 1"
5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves Mueller Co., Ltd.
B-25000N, B-24277N-3, B-20200N-3, H-
15000N, , H-1552N, H142276N
AWWA C800, ANSF 61,
ANSI/NSF 372 2"
5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves Mueller Co., Ltd.
B-25000N, B-20200N-3, B-24277N-3,H-
15000N, H-14276N, H-15525N
AWWA C800, ANSF 61,
ANSI/NSF 372 1-1/2"
5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter Valves Mueller Co., Ltd.
B-25000N, B-20200N-3,H-15000N, H-
15530N
AWWA C800, ANSF 61,
ANSI/NSF 372 1"
01/26/00 Coated Tapping Saddle with Double SS Straps JCM Industries, Inc. #406 Double Band SS Saddle 1"-2" Taps on up to 12"
0/5/21/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel) JCM Industries, Inc. 412 Tapping Sleeve ESS AWWA C-223 Up to 30" w/12" Out
03/29/22 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated or Stainless Steel) JCM Industries, Inc. 415 Tapping Sleeve AWWA C-223 Concrete Pipe Only
05/10/11 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel) Powerseal 3490AS (Flange) & 3490MJ 4"-8" and 16"
02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel) Romac FTS 420 AWWA C-223 U p to 42" w/24" Out
02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel) Romac SST Stainless Steel AWWA C-223 Up to 24" w/12" Out
02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel) Romac SST III Stainless Steel AWWA C-223 Up to 30" w/12" Out
05/10/11 Joint Repair Clamp Powerseal 3232 Bell Joint Repair Clamp 4" to 30"
Plastic Meter Box w/Composite Lid DFW Plastics Inc. DFW37C-12-1EPAF FTW
Plastic Meter Box w/Composite Lid DFW Plastics Inc. DFW39C-12-1EPAF FTW
08/30/06 Plastic Meter Box w/Composite Lid DFW Plastics Inc. DFW65C-14-1EPAF FTW Class "A"
Concrete Meter Box Bass & Hays CMB37-B12 1118 LID-9
Concrete Meter Box Bass & Hays CMB-18-Dual 1416 LID-9
Concrete Meter Box Bass & Hays CMB65-B65 1527 LID-9
Water - Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 33-11-05 (01/08/13)
Water - Combination Air Release 33-31-70 (01/08/13)
* E1-11 Combination Air Release Valve GA Industries, Inc. Empire Air and Vacuum Valve, Model 935 ASTM A 126 Class B, ASTM A 1" & 2"
* E1-11 Combination Air Release Valve Multiplex Manufacturing Co.
Crispin Air and Vacuum Valves, Model No. 1/2", 1" & 2"
* E1-11 Combination Air Release Valve Valve and Primer Corp. APCO #143C, #145C and #147C 1", 2" & 3"
Water - Dry Barrel Fire Hydrants 33-12-40 (01/15/14)
10/01/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American-Darling Valve Drawing Nos. 90-18608, 94-18560 AWWA C-502
03/31/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American Darling Valve Shop Drawing No. 94-18791 AWWA C-502
09/30/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Clow Corporation Shop Drawing No. D-19895 AWWA C-502
01/12/93 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American AVK Company Model 2700 AWWA C-502
08/24/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Clow Corporation Drawings D20435, D20436, B20506 AWWA C-502
E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant ITT Kennedy Valve Shop Drawing No. D-80783FW AWWA C-502
09/24/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant M&H Valve Company Shop Drawing No. 13476 AWWA C-502
10/14/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Mueller Company
Shop Drawings No. 6461
A-423 Centurion AWWA C-502
01/15/88 E1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant Mueller Company
Shop Drawing FH-12
A-423 Super Centurion 200 AWWA C-502
10/09/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant U.S. Pipe & Foundry Shop Drawing No. 960250 AWWA C-502
09/16/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant American Flow Control (AFC) Waterous Pacer WB67 AWWA C-502
08/12/16 33-12-40 Dry Barrel Fire Hydrant EJ (East Jordan Iron Works) WaterMaster 5CD250
Water - Meters
02/05/93 E101-5 Detector Check Meter Ames Company Model 1000 Detector Check Valve AWWA C550 4" - 10"
08/05/04 Magnetic Drive Vertical Turbine Hersey Magnetic Drive Vertical AWWA C701, Class 1 3/4" - 6"
* From Original Standard Products List 4
Approval Spec No. Classsification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023
Water - Pipes/PVC (Pressure Water) 33-31-70 (01/08/13)
12/05/23 33-11-12 PVC Pressure Pipe Vinyltech PVC Pipe DR14
AWWA C900, AWWA C605,
ASTM D1784 4"-16"
12/05/23 33-11-12 PVC Pressure Pipe Vinyltech PVC Pipe DR18
AWWA C900, AWWA C605,
ASTM D1784 16"-18"
3/19/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Pipelife Jet Stream DR14 AWWA C900 4"-12"
3/19/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Pipelife Jet Stream DR18 AWWA C900 16"-24"
5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Diamond Plastics Corporation DR 14 AWWA C900 4"-12"
5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Diamond Plastics Corporation DR 18 AWWA C900 16"-24"
12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc d/b/a JM Eagle DR 14
AWWA C900-16
UL 1285
ANSI/NSF 61
FM 1612
4"-28"
12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc d/b/a JM Eagle DR 18
AWWA C900-16
UL 1285
16"-24"
9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Underground Solutions Inc. DR14 Fusible PVC AWWA C900 4" - 8"
9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) DR18 AWWA C900 16" - 24"
9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe NAPCO(Westlake) DR14 AWWA C900 4"- 12"
9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure Pipe Sanderson Pipe Corp. DR14 AWWA C900 4"- 12"
Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Ductile Iron Fittings 33-11-11 (01/08/13)
07/23/92 E1-07 Ductile Iron Fittings Star Pipe Products, Inc. Mechanical Joint Fittings AWWA C153 & C110
* E1-07 Ductile Iron Fittings Griffin Pipe Products, Co. Mechanical Joint Fittings AWWA C 110
* E1-07 Ductile Iron Fittings McWane/Tyler Pipe/ Union Utilities Division
Mechanical Joint Fittings, SSB Class 350 AWWA C 153, C 110, C 111
08/11/98 E1-07 Ductile Iron Fittings Sigma, Co.
Mechanical Joint Fittings, SSB Class 351 AWWA C 153, C 110, C 112
02/26/14 E1-07 MJ Fittings Accucast
Class 350 C-153 MJ Fittings AWWA C153 4"-12"
05/14/98 E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint Restraints Ford Meter Box Co./Uni-Flange
Uni-Flange Series 1400 AWWA C111/C153 4" to 36"
05/14/98 E1-24 PVC Joint Restraints Ford Meter Box Co./Uni-Flange
Uni-Flange Series 1500 Circle-Lock AWWA C111/C153 4" to 24"
11/09/04 E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint Restraints One Bolt, Inc.
One Bolt Restrained Joint Fitting AWWA C111/C116/C153 4" to 12"
02/29/12 33-11-11 Ductile Iron Pipe Mechanical Joint Restraint EBAA Iron, Inc.
Megalug Series 1100 (for DI Pipe)AWWA C111/C116/C153 4" to 42"
02/29/12 33-11-11 PVC Pipe Mechanical Joint Restraint EBAA Iron, Inc.
Megalug Series 2000 (for PVC Pipe)AWWA C111/C116/C153 4" to 24"
08/05/04 E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC) Sigma, Co.
Sigma One-Lok SLC4 - SLC10 AWWA C111/C153 4" to 10"
03/06/19 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC) Sigma, Co.
Sigma One-Lok SLCS4 - SLCS12 AWWA C111/C153 4" to 12"
08/05/04 E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC) Sigma, Co.
Sigma One-Lok SLCE AWWA C111/C153 12" to 24"
08/10/98 E1-07 MJ Fittings(DIP) Sigma, Co.
Sigma One-Lok SLDE AWWA C153 4" - 24"
10/12/10 E1-24 Interior Restrained Joint System S & B Techncial Products
Bulldog System ( Diamond Lok 21 & JM ASTM F-1624 4" to 12"
08/16/06 E1-07 Mechanical Joint Fittings SIP Industries(Serampore)
Mechanical Joint Fittings AWWA C153 4" to 24"
11/07/16 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands Star Pipe Products, Inc.
PVC Stargrip Series 4000 ASTM A536 AWWA C111
11/07/16 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands Star Pipe Products, Inc.
DIP Stargrip Series 3000 ASTM A536 AWWA C111
03/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands SIP Industries(Serampore)
EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Black For DIP
ASTM A536 AWWA C111 3"-48"
03/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands SIP Industries(Serampore)
EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900
DR14 PVC Pipe ASTM A536 AWWA C111 4"-12"
03/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands SIP Industries(Serampore)
EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900
DR18 PVC Pipe ASTM A536 AWWA C111 16"-24"
Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Resilient Seated Gate Valve* 33-12-20 (05/13/15)
Resilient Wedged Gate Valve w/no Gears American Flow Control Series 2500 Drawing # 94-20247 16"
12/13/02 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2530 and Series 2536 AWWA C515 30" and 36"
08/31/99 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2520 & 2524 (SD 94-20255) AWWA C515 20" and 24"
05/18/99 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2516 (SD 94-20247) AWWA C515 16"
10/24/00 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control Series 2500 (Ductile Iron) AWWA C515 4" to 12"
08/05/04 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American Flow Control 42" and 48" AFC 2500 AWWA C515 42" and 48"
05/23/91 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American AVK Company American AVK Resilient Seaded GV AWWA C509 4" to 12"
01/24/02 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve American AVK Company 20" and smaller
* E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve Kennedy 4" - 12"
* E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve M&H 4" - 12"
* E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve Mueller Co.4" - 12"
11/08/99 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Series A2361 (SD 6647) AWWA C515 16"
01/23/03 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Series A2360 for 18"-24" (SD 6709) AWWA C515 24" and smaller
05/13/05 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Mueller 30" & 36", C-515 AWWA C515 30" and 36"
01/31/06 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co. Mueller 42" & 48", C-515 AWWA C515 42" and 48"
01/28/88 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. AWWA C509 4" - 12"
10/04/94 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. 16" RS GV (SD D-20995) AWWA C515 16"
11/08/99 E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. Clow RW Valve (SD D-21652) AWWA C515 24" and smaller
11/29/04 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. Clow 30" & 36" C-515 AWWA C515 30" and 36" (Note 3)
11/30/12 Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co. Clow Valve Model 2638 AWWA C515 24" to 48" (Note 3)
05/08/91 E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve Stockham Valves & Fittings AWWA C 509, ANSI 420 - stem, 4" - 12"
* E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate Valve U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.Metroseal 250, requirements SPL #74 3" to 16"
10/26/16 33-12-20 Resilient Seated Gate Valve EJ (East Jordan Iron Works)EJ FlowMaster Gate Valve & Boxes
08/24/18 Matco Gate Valve Matco-Norca 225 MR AWWA/ANSI C115/An21.15 4" to 16"
* From Original Standard Products List 5
Approval Spec No. Classsification Manufacturer Model No. National Spec Size
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST Updated: 12/29/2023
Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve 33-12-21 (07/10/14)
* E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve Henry Pratt Co. AWWA C-504 24"
* E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve Mueller Co. AWWA C-504 24"and smaller
1/11/99 E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve Dezurik Valves Co. AWWA C-504 24" and larger
06/12/03 E1-30 Valmatic American Butterfly Valve Valmatic Valve and Manufacturing Corp. Valmatic American Butterfly Valve. AWWA C-504 Up to 84" diameter
04/06/07 E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve M&H Valve M&H Style 4500 & 1450 AWWA C-504 24" to 48"
03/19/18 33 12 21 Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve G. A. Industries (Golden Anderson) AWWA C504 Butterfly Valve AWWA C-504 30"-54"
Water - Polyethylene Encasement 33-11-10 (01/08/13)
05/12/05 E1-13 Polyethylene Encasment Flexsol Packaging Fulton Enterprises AWWA C105 8 mil LLD
05/12/05 E1-13 Polyethylene Encasment Mountain States Plastics (MSP) and AEP Ind. Standard Hardware AWWA C105 8 mil LLD
05/12/05 E1-13 Polyethylene Encasment AEP Industries Bullstrong by Cowtown Bolt & Gasket AWWA C105 8 mil LLD
09/06/19 33-11-11 Polyethylene Encasment Northtown Products Inc. PE Encasement for DIP AWWA C105 8 mil LLD
Water - Sampling Station
03/07/23 33 12 50 Water Sampling Station Eclipse Number 88 , 12-inch Depth of Bury As shown in spec. 33 12 50
Water - Automatic Flusher
10/21/20 Automated Flushing System Mueller Hydroguard
HG6-A-IN-2-BRN-LPRR(Portable)
HG2-A-IN--2-PVC-018-LPLG(Permanent)
04/09/21 Automated Flushing System Kupferle Foundry Company Eclipse #9800wc
04/09/21 Automated Flushing System Kupferle Foundry Company
Eclipse #9700 (Portable)
Yellow Highlight indicates recent changes
The Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Products List has been developed to minimize the submittal review of products which meet the Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Specifications during utility construction projects. When Technical
Specifications for specific products, are included as part of the Construction Contract Documents, the requirements of the Technical Specification will override the Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Specifications and the Fort Worth Water Department’s
Standard Products List and approval of the specific products will be based on the requirements of the Technical Specification whether or not the specific product meets the Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Specifications or is on the Fort Worth Water
* From Original Standard Products List 6