HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964/02/10-Agenda-Pre-Council Avhk
& GEDDA
Pre-Council Conference
8:30 A.M. , Menday, February 10, 1964
1) Special Council Meeting to Act on sand side - February 18, 1964
2) Discussion of Community Renewal Progrm Report no. 2
3) Parking Charge - Municipal Buildings fleet (MbC G-611)
4) Other MiC`s of February 10, 1964
S) Other Itma
FFT
FICIAL REC0� 0
TY SECRETARY
WORTH, TES(.
,�► ...*
PRE-COUNCIL CONFERENCE
FEBRUARY 10, 1964
Present: Late : Absent;
I . Friedman None None
2. Harding
3. ctovall
4. Shannon
S. Hamm
6. Barr
7 . Jones
8. Hoover
I t e m Follow-up
1 . Special, Council Meeting; to Act on Bond Bids - CKD - Note in Wednesday's busl-
Feb. 18, 1964 ness regarding special meetin. .
The City Manager reported that it would be advan- EHD - Pre-Council Conference
tageous to the City if a special Council meeting could agenda, Feb. 17, 1964.
be held on Tuesday, Feb. 18, 1964, at 4 PM, to award
bids onthe bonds which are to be sold earlier on that
date .
Consensus of Council was to hold a special Council
meeting on that date, and except for Councilman Shannon,
all indicated that they could attend the spacial meeting.
It was requested that the Manager remind the Council of
this special meeting,.
2. Discussion of CRP Report No. 2 CKD - Follow up (GAIT asked to pre-
pare M&C initiating procedure on
Council discussed at length the CRP program and condemnation of commercial batild-
Report No. 2, and consensus of Council was not to con- Ings , including discussion of Ir-,al
sider the CRP RFport No . 2 further until additional position)
study and reports had been prepared by the staff.
Council also discussed powers of the City con-
cerning a Minimum Housing Code for business, commercial
and industrial properties, and requested the City At-
torney to study this matter.
3. Parking Charge - Municipal Buildings west NAN
(M&C G-611)
Consensus of Council was to table this M&C pro-
viding for the establishment of parking charges at the
parkin; lots at Municipal Buildin:•s West, and this ac-
tion was taken at regular Council meeting.
4. West Berry Street Extension Adjacent to CKD - follow up
TCU Campus
The City Manager informed the Council that con-
ferences had been held with representatives of TCU
regarding the proposed W. Berry Street extension project ,
and that stxne modification had been made in the prelim-
inary plans previously transmitted to the City Council
for their information. It was further reported that the }t p_ {fin
staff was ready to contact other affected people in this OFFICIAL f1rGJii�
area concerning the proposed plan, if the Council was in
agreement with the general plan as outlined in the I.R. CITY SECRE 'A
FT. WORM, T.Y. �
Mk
I t e m Follow-Up
No objection to the proposal calling for a new divided road-
way adjacent to the existing streets was voiced by any
Council Members.
Councilman Jones inquired as to the Fire Station site
which had been indicated adjacent to buildings on the campus,
and was informed by the City Manager that this Station would
probahly be moved to another location off of TCU property.
Councilman Hamm referred to the median strip in the pro-
posed plan and inquired if the Park Dept had been consulted
concerning; the maintenance work which would be required on
this area. The City Manager reported that the maintenance
responsibility of the area could be determined by Council
assignment , but that the Park Dept would be consulted con-
cerning the proRosed plan.
S. Annual Report of Water Dept (M&C P-343) FI[D
Councilman Hanan referred to this M&C and requested
information concerning the need for such an annual re-
port, and whether or not it could be transmitted as an
additional summary to the regular monthly newsletter.
Council deferred action on this purchase at regular
Council meeting„ and requested additional information
from the staff concerning the report.
6. Proposed Developer Contract in Ridgmar Addi- NAN
tion (M&C C-241)
Councilman Shannon inquired if the proposed
street improvements to be constructed under this de-
veloper's contract would be constructed according to
the specifications which the Council had previously
deleted from use in further City projects, and was
informed that only specifications as approved by the
City Council could be used by the developer.
Hft�ICfAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TM