HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968/01/03-Agenda-Pre-Council MINUTES
PRE-COUNCIL CONFERENCE
January 3, 1961
Present Late Absent
1. Sarsgard 6. Stovall McKinley
2. Dunham 7. Hoover (1)
3. Wilson 8. Guinn (1)
4. Kersnick
5. Kemble
I t e m Follow-up
1 Di:;cussion with Mr. Bob Crook, District Engineer, DEF - Make sure Graham
Texas Highw;iy Department includes information on
the four corners free
After being presented to the City Council, Mr. Bob Crook, right hand turn in
District Engineer, Texas Highway Department introduced to Council addition to right-ui-wi,
Members the Assistant District Engineer, Mr. J. R. Stone. Mr, and construction costs
Crook advised the City Council that the traffic configuration at previously requested
the interchange of Odom Road and Interstate 35W had been under
study by the Texas Highway Department long before the most recent
round of discussions was initiated regarding adequacy of the
structure to gerve adjacent development. It was the consensus of
highway engineers and traffic planners that the diamond type
int exchange would be sufficient to accomodate all present and
future traffic anticipated at this intersection.
The Highway District Engineer reported that public law
required him to plan highway projects on a twenty year basis, and
that anticipated traffic demands beyond twenty years were excluded
from current. planning and construction scheduling. Ile stated that
there might be a need someday for a clover leaf at the intersection,
and he stated that if such conditions warranted in the future, the
State in cooperation with the Federal Government would assume the
responsibility for such construction,
tie added that it was his recommendation at this time, if the
roadway were being built from the beginning, that a diamond inter-
change rather than a cloverleaf be constructed at this location.
He added that there was no money now available, and he doubted that
there would be approval of any proposal for such expenditure either
in Austin or in the Bureau of Roads in Washington. There are many
other areas, he noted, where there are no roads and a high demand
for new constuction that have a much higher priority than the
clover leaf interchange st Odom Road,
Councilman Kemble inquired whether the Highway Department
had taken into consideration the industrial development now
under way and projected fot this area, including American Manufac-
turing of Texas and the Homart Investment Corporation connectedfvr/nqttr
with Sears-Roebuck and Company. Mr„ Crook replied that successive flfT4 .� D
computer runs had been made for this area inserting data supplied , '`''►� RL�p,7�
by the regional transportation study and the City of Fort Worth eli? 7
anticipating full development of the area and its traffic generation, 1 RY
needs. Mr. Crook added that the shopping center planned by Homart II ��t,� ��j U
IInvestment Corporation would also be served by Loop 820 and Beach / n l
Street.
.. ...
2
Councilman Kemble inquired whether Riverside Drive would be
extended and developed as an interchange at Loop 820. Mr. Crook
indicated that they were studying opening Riverside Drive at 820
but no definite plans or scheduling had been established to date.
He indicated that such work would be scheduled when traffic demands
develop,
Councilman Sarsgard inquired whether additional right-of-way
would be needed for diamond intersection, and whether additional
right-of-way would be needed for a free right turn movement.
Mr. Crook replied that he could not recommend expenditures for
additional right-of-way at this time; however, he indicated that
his staff in cooperation with the City was studying right-of-way
and other needs for possible future construction of free right
turn movements when traffic volume indicated the need for such
channelization,
Councilman Stovall inquired about comparative traffic volumes
at various intersections and inquired what criteria are normally
established for cloverleaf installation, Highway Engineer said
that 30,000 vehicles are anticipated for Odom Road East of 35,
whereas there are now 25,000 at Berry and 35W, and 30,000 on 28th
Street at 35W. He mentioned that Loops were installed on the
north side of 28th Street on 35W to avoid taking costly right-of-
way from the Gorbett Brothers Tank Mfg. Planta He mentioned that
the cloverleaf loops north of 28th Street are not working well
because of the need for changing lanes for position to go on and
off of the cloverleaf system..
Councilman Wilson inquired whether the Highway Department
would recommend a U turn at Odom and whether the bridge would be
modified. The Highway Engineer replied that such installations
and modifications would be made at such time as traffic warranted.
Councilman Hoover inquired about access by service stations
to the service roads and turning radiuses when a free right hand
turn is installed. Highway Engineer replied that there would be
no access provided at the free right turn, but that access would
be permitted both from the service road and the Odom Road for
service station installations.
Public Works Director Graham reported to the City Council
that preliminary studies indicated that about 25 acres instead
of 60 acres would be needed for the cloverleaf installation and
that work was continuing on the information which had been
requested by the City Council for a report to the Council on
January 8, 1468.
OT��ul•-L lf+.irf! Q
C'TY SFCRI TARY
FT. ORTH, TFt,
look
3
Mr. Crook emphasized his opinion that a properly designed
diamond intersection with free right hand turn movements would handle
traffic more efficiently and satisfactorily than a tight radius
cloverleaf installation. He also replied to a question of Council-
man Stovall that the free right hand turn movement would reduce the
waiting time from two lights to one light under heavy traffic
conditions on the diamond type interchange.
Councilman Hoover asked why the loadings had been changed
two times since September, 1967, and Assistant Engineer Stone
replied that new information had been furnished by the Planning
Department and by developers in the area regarding the proposed
development trends. He stated that he felt that the volumes
of traffic projected were reasonable.
Both Councilman Guinn and Dunham emphasized the fact that
the industrial area held great potential for the City, that
previous projections of traffic areas had been inadequate, and
it was a critical decision for the City Council to make regarding
adequate provision for future traffic loads and traffic circulation
in this area.
At the conclusion of discussion, there was general consensus
among council members that the staff should refine iae. information
regarding the needs for additional right-of-way for free right hand
turn in addition to otsher information previously requested by the
City Council.
2. Benefit Hearing-Assessment Paving of Odom Road and Old HAN
Denton Road (M&C G-1177)
Councilman Hoover inquired why the City's share bf the cost
of this paving was somewhat lower than the normal amount shared by
the City and adjacent property owners. City Manager explained that
a boulevard system was being constructed on Old Denton Road wherein
the City pays the cost of the center medians, curbs and gutters and
the center widening, whereas adjacent property owners pay only the
border curb and 20' of paving, On Odom Road, he remarked that only
half of the boulevards section was being constructed at this time
thereby requiring that the City sustain the cost of the south
curbing and all width in excess of 20 feet. Odom Road is being
constructed 36 feet wide.
The limits of the project were outlined by the City Manager
and there was discussion regarding the advisability of delaying
assessment of properties until right-of-way had been acquired.
It was agreed by the Council that the value of adjacent land had
no bearing of the amount of the enhancement resulting from the OFF14"'m .�
paving to the adjacent property owners, and that the Council ll++ `»i✓ ,, �
would proceed with the benefit hearing and levying of assessments
during the regular Council meeting.
The hearing was closed and assessments levied during the
regular meetinst.
Aft
4
There was insufficient time during the Pre-Council
session to discuss the following items: NAN
a) Pedestrian crossing Pennsylvankg_ Avenu% ,
b) Transmittal of 1968 Capital Improvement
Program - Park & Recreation and Office Building
Sections
.WMW it fir.V1
1
AL-
1MMW* mow
rwMlt �ri�► � +
• rte +"*
meow
ARM
4WFAW 49- 411ft- VIA**
�rs� "Ir■rrr
CITYiie
T. W