HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 30109 CITY SECRETARY
CONTRACT NO. {
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth (the "CITY"), and Carter & Burgess, Inc.,
(the "ENGINEER"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Engineering Services for Alliance
Airport Runway Extension Prosect, Phase 4 - Design of FM 156, Railroad and Eagle Parkway.
Article I
Scope of Services and Schedule
A. The Scope of Services and Schedule are set forth in Attachment A.
Article II
Compensation
A. The ENGINEER's compensation is set forth in Attachment B.
Article III
Terms of Payment
Payments to the ENGINEER will be made as follows:
A. Invoice and Payment
(1) The ENGINEER shall provide the CITY sufficient documentation to
reasonably substantiate the invoices.
(2) Monthly invoices will be issued by the ENGINEER for all work performed
under this AGREEMENT. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days of
receipt.
(3) Upon completion of services enumerated in Article I, the final payment of
any balance will be due within 30 days of receipt of the final invoice.
(4) In the event of a disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested
will be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. The
CITY will exercise reasonableness in contesting any bill or portion thereof.
No interest will accrue on any contested portion of the billing until mutually
resolved.
(5) If the CITY fails to make payment in full to the ENGINEER for billings
contested in good faith within 60 days of the amount due, the ENGINEER
may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to CITY, suspend services
under this AGREEMENT until paid in full, including interest. In the event of
suspension of services, the ENGINEER shall have no liability to CITY for
delays or damages caused the CITY because of such suspension of
services.
Article IV
Obligations of the ENGINEER
Amendments to Article IV, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. General
The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering representative
under this Agreement, providing professional engineering consultation and advice
and furnishing customary services incidental thereto.
B. Standard of Care
The standard of care applicable to the ENGINEER's services will be the degree of
skill and diligence normally employed in the State of Texas by professional
engineers or consultants performing the same or similar services at the time such
services are performed. All design plans shall be prepared by, or under the direct
supervision of, a Texas licensed professional engineer who is regular full-time
employee of the consultant company.
C. Subsurface Investigations
(1) The ENGINEER shall advise the CITY with regard to the necessity for
subcontract work such as special surveys, tests, test borings, or other
subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering work to
be performed hereunder. The ENGINEER shall also advise the CITY
concerning the results of same. Such surveys, tests, and investigations
shall be furnished by the CITY, unless otherwise specified in Attachment A.
(2) In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations, the
actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points
and sample intervals and at locations other than where observations,
exploration, and investigations have been made. Because of the inherent
uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or unanticipated
underground conditions may occur that could affect the total PROJECT cost
and/or execution. These conditions and cost/execution effects are not the
responsibility of the ENGINEER.
D. Preparation of Engineering Drawings
The ENGINEER will provide to the CITY the original drawings of all plans in ink on
reproducible plastic film sheets, or as otherwise approved by CITY, which shall
become the property of the CITY. CITY may use such drawings in any manner it
desires; provided, however, that the ENGINEER shall not be liable for the use of
such drawings for any project other than the PROJECT described herein.
E. Engineering Personnel at Construction Site
(1) The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site,
whether as on-site representatives or otherwise, do not make the
ENGINEER or its personnel in any way responsible for those duties that
belong to the CITY and/or the CITY's construction contractors or other
-2-
entities, and do not relieve the construction contractors or any other entity of
their obligations, duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all
construction methods, means, techniques, sequences, and procedures
necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the construction
work in accordance with the Contract Documents and any health or safety
precautions required by such construction work. The ENGINEER and its
personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction
contractor or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or
any health or safety precautions.
(2) Except to the extent of specific site visits expressly detailed and set forth in
Attachment A, the ENGINEER or its personnel shall have no obligation or
responsibility to visit the construction site to become familiar with the
progress or quality of the completed work on the PROJECT or to determine,
in general, if the work on the PROJECT is being performed in a manner
indicating that the PROJECT, when completed, will be in accordance with
the Contract Documents, nor shall anything in the Contract Documents or
the agreement between CITY and ENGINEER be construed as requiring
ENGINEER to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to
discover latent defects in the work or otherwise check the quality or quantity
of the work on the PROJECT. If, for any reason, the ENGINEER should
make an on-site observation(s), on the basis of such on-site observations, if
any, the ENGINEER shall endeavor to keep the CITY informed of any
deviation from the Contract Documents coming to the actual notice of
ENGINEER regarding the PROJECT.
(3) When professional certification or performance or characteristics of
materials, systems or equipment is reasonably required to perform the
services set forth in the Scope of Services, the ENGINEER shall be entitled
to rely upon such certification to establish materials, systems or equipment
and performance criteria to be required in the Contract Documents.
F. Opinions of Probable Cost, Financial Considerations, and Schedules
(1) The ENGINEER shall provide opinions of probable costs based on the
current available information at the time of preparation, in accordance with
Attachment A.
(2) In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility
projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER has no
control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent
conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or
maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions;
time or qualify or performance by third parties; quality, type management, or
direction of operating personnel; and other economic and operational
factors that may materially affect the ultimate PROJECT cost or schedule.
Therefore, the ENGINEER makes no warranty that the CITY's actual
PROJECT costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or schedules will
not vary from the ENGINEER's opinions, analyses, projections, or
estimates.
J
G. Construction Progress Payments
Recommendations by the ENGINEER to the CITY for periodic construction
progress payments to the construction contractor will be based on the
ENGINEER's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling and
observation that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such
recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations have
been made by the ENGINEER to ascertain that the construction contractor has
completed the work in exact accordance with the Contract Documents; that the final
work will be acceptable in all respects; that the ENGINEER has made an
examination to ascertain how or for what purpose the construction contractor has
used the moneys paid; that title to any of the work, materials, or equipment has
passed to the CITY free and clear of liens, claims, security interests, or
encumbrances; or that there are not other matters at issue between the CITY and
the construction contractor that affect the amount that should be paid.
H. Record Drawings
Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of information
compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent the exact location,
type of various components, or exact manner in which the PROJECT was finally
constructed. The ENGINEER is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the
information from others that is incorporated into the record drawings.
1. Minority and Woman Business Enterprise (M/WBE) Participation
In accord with the City of Fort Worth Ordinance No. 11923, as amended by
Ordinance 13471, the CITY has goals for the participation of minority business
enterprises and woman business enterprises in CITY contracts. ENGINEER
acknowledges the M/WBE goal established for this contract and its commitment to
meet that goal. Any misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent
misrepresentation) and/or the commission of fraud by the ENGINEER may result in
the termination of this agreement and debarment from participating in CITY
contracts for a period of time of not less than three (3) years.
J. Right to Audit
(1) ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall, until the expiration of three (3) years
after final payment under this contract, have access to and the right to
examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers
and records of the ENGINEER involving transactions relating to this
contract. ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall have access during normal
working hours to all necessary ENGINEER facilities and shall be provided
adequate and appropriate workspace in order to conduct audits in
compliance with the provisions of this section. The CITY shall give
ENGINEER reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
(2) ENGINEER further agrees to include in all its subconsultant agreements
hereunder a provision to the effect that the subconsultant agrees that the
CITY shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under
the subcontract, have access to and the right .to examine and photocopy
any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and_ records of such
subconsultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and. further, that
-4-
the CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary
subconsultant facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate
work space, in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of
this article together with subsection (3) hereof. CITY shall give
subconsultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
(3) ENGINEER and subconsultant agree to photocopy such documents as may
be requested by the CITY. The CITY agrees to reimburse ENGINEER for
the cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in
effect as of the time copying is performed.
K. ENGINEER'S Insurance
(1) Insurance coverage and limits:
ENGINEER shall provide to the CITY certificate(s) of insurance documenting
policies of the following coverage at minimum limits which are to be in effect prior to
commencement of work on the PROJECT:
Commercial General Liability
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability
$1,000,000 each accident (or reasonably equivalent limits of coverage if written on
a split limits basis). Coverage shall be on any vehicle used in the course of the
PROJECT.
Worker's Compensation
Coverage A: statutory limits
Coverage B: $100,000 each accident
$500,000 disease — policy limit
$100,000 disease—each employee
Professional Liability
$1,000,000 each claim
$2,000,000 aggregate
• The retroactive date shall be coincident with or prior to the date of the
contractual agreement and the certificate of insurance shall state that the
coverage is claims-made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage
shall be maintained for the duration of the contractual agreement and five
(5) years following completion of the service provided under the contractual
agreement. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall
evidence such insurance coverage.
(2) Certificates of insurance evidencing that the ENGINEER has obtained all
required insurance shall be delivered to the CITY prior to ENGINEER
proceeding with the PROJECT.
(a) Applicable policies shall be enforced to name the CITY an Additional
insured thereon, as its interests may appear. The term CITY shall
include its employees, officers, officials, agents, and volunteers as
respects the contracted services.
-5-
(b) Certificate(s) of insurance shall document that insurance coverages
specified according to Section K.(1) and K.(2) of this AGREEMENT
are provided under applicable policies documented thereon.
(c) Any failure on part of the CITY to request required insurance
documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance
requirements.
(d) A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation, non-renewal or
material change in coverage shall be provided to the CITY. A ten
(10) days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of
premium. Such terms shall be endorsed onto ENGINEER's
Insurance policies. Notice shall be sent to the respective
Department Director (by name), City of Fort Worth, 1000
Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
(e) The insurers for all policies must be licensed/approved to do
business in the State of Texas. Except for workers' compensation,
all insurers must have a minimum rating of A: VII in the current A.M.
Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial
strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management.
(f) Deductible limits, or self insured retentions, affecting insurance
required herein may be acceptable to the CITY at its sole discretion;
and, in lieu of traditional insurance, any alternative coverage
maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups must be
also approved. Dedicated financial resources or letters of credit may
also be acceptable to the CITY.
(g) Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of
subrogation in favor of the CITY as respects the PROJECT.
(h) The CITY shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring
expense, to review the ENGINEER's insurance policies including
endorsements thereto and, at the CITY's discretion, the ENGINEER
may be required to provide proof of insurance premium payments.
(i) The Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall have no
exclusions by endorsements unless such are approved by the CITY.
Q) The Professional Liability insurance policy, if written on a claims
made basis shall be maintained by the ENGINEER for a minimum
two (2) year period subsequent to the term of the respective
PROJECT contract with the CITY unless such coverage is provided
the ENGINEER on an occurrence basis.
(k) The CITY shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any
insurance premiums required by this agreement. It is understood
that insurance cost is an allowable component of ENGINEER's
overhead.
-6-
(1) All insurance required in Section K, except for the Professional
Liability insurance policy, shall be written on an occurrence basis in
order to be approved by the CITY.
(m) Subconsultants to the ENGINEER shall be required by the
ENGINEER to maintain the same or reasonably equivalent
insurance coverage as required for the ENGINEER. When
insurance coverage is maintained by subconsultants, ENGINEER
shall provide CITY with documentation thereof on a certificate of
insurance. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
herein, in the event a subconsultant's insurance coverage is
canceled or terminated, such cancellation or termination shall not
constitute a breach by ENGINEER of the Agreement.
L. Independent Consultant
The ENGINEER agrees to perform all services as an independent consultant and
not as a subcontractor, agent, or employee of the CITY.
M. Disclosure
The ENGINEER acknowledges to the CITY that it has made full disclosure in
writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest, including
personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in property abutting the proposed
PROJECT and business relationships with abutting property owners. The
ENGINEER further acknowledges that it will make disclosure in writing of any
conflicts of interest which develop subsequent to the signing of this contract and
prior to final payment under the contract.
N. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances
(1) If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or
suspected, the ENGINEER will stop its own work in the affected portions of
the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation.
(2) If asbestos or other hazardous substances are suspected, the ENGINEER
will, if requested, assist the CITY in obtaining the services of a qualified
subcontractor to manage the remediation activities of the PROJECT.
O. Permitting Authorities— Design Changes
If permitting authorities require design changes so as to comply with published
design criteria and/or current engineering practice standards which the ENGINEER
should have been aware of at the time this Agreement was executed, the
ENGINEER shall revise plans and specifications, as required, at its own cost and
expense. However, if design changes are required due to the changes in the
permitting authorities' published design criteria and/or practice standards criteria
which are published after the date of this Agreement which the ENGINEER could
not have been reasonable aware of, the ENGINEER shall notify the CITY of such
changes and an adjustment in compensation will be made through an amendment
to this AGREEMENT.
-7-
Article V
Obligations of the City
Amendments to Article V, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. City-Furnished Data
The CITY will make available to the ENGINEER all technical data in the CITY's
possession relating to the ENGINEER's services on the PROJECT. The
ENGINEER may rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the
information provided by the CITY.
B. Access to Facilities and Property
The CITY will make its facilities accessible to the ENGINEER as required for the
ENGINEER's performance of its services and will provide labor and safety
equipment as required by the ENGINEER for such access. The CITY will perform,
at no cost to the ENGINEER, such tests of equipment, machinery, pipelines, and
other components of the CITY's facilities as may be required in connection with the
ENGINEER's services. The CITY will be responsible for all acts of the CITY's
personnel.
C. Advertisements, Permits, and Access
Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, the CITY will obtain, arrange,
and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses required by local,
state, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights-of-way, and access
necessary for the ENGINEER's services or PROJECT construction.
D. Timely Review
The CITY will examine the ENGINEER's studies, reports, sketches, drawings,
specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of an attorney,
insurance counselor, accountant, auditor, bond and financial advisors, and other
consultants as the CITY deems appropriate; and render in writing decisions
required by the CITY in a timely manner in accordance with the project schedule in
Attachment D.
E. Prompt Notice
The CITY will give prompt notice to the ENGINEER whenever CITY observes or
becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of the
ENGINEER's services or of any defect in the work of the ENGINEER or
construction contractors.
F. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances and Indemnification
(1) To the maximum extent permitted by law, the CITY will indemnify and
release ENGINEER and its officers, employees, and subcontractors from all
claims, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, attorney's
fees and litigation expenses arising out of or relating to the presence,
discharge, release, or escape of hazardous substances, contaminants, or
-8-
asbestos on or from the PROJECT. Nothing contained herein shall be
construed to require the CITY to levy, assess or collect any tax to fund this
indemnification.
(2) The indemnification and release required above shall not apply in the event
the discharge, release or escape of hazardous substances, contaminants,
or asbestos is a result of ENGINEER's negligence or if such hazardous
substance, contaminant or asbestos is brought onto the PROJECT by
ENGINEER.
G. Contractor Indemnification and Claims
The CITY agrees to include in all construction contracts the provisions of Article
IV.E. regarding the ENGINEER's Personnel at Construction Site, and provisions
providing contractor indemnification of the CITY and the ENGINEER for
contractor's negligence.
H. Contractor Claims and Third-Party Beneficiaries
(1) The CITY agrees to include the following clause in all contracts with
construction contractors and equipment or materials suppliers:
"Contractors, subcontractors and equipment and materials suppliers on the
PROJECT, or their sureties, shall maintain no direct action against the
ENGINEER, its officers, employees, and subcontractors, for any claim
arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from the engineering services
performed. Only the CITY will be the beneficiary of any undertaking by the
ENGINEER."
(2) This AGREEMENT gives no right or benefits to anyone other than the CITY
and the ENGINEER and there are no third-party beneficiaries.
(3) The CITY will include in each agreement it enters into with any other entity
or person regarding the PROJECT a provision that such entity or person
shall have no third-party beneficiary rights under this AGREEMENT.
(4) Nothing contained in this section V.H. shall be construed as a waiver of any
right the CITY has to bring a claim against ENGINEER.
I. CITY's Insurance
(1) The CITY may maintain property insurance on certain pre-existing
structures associated with the PROJECT.
(2) The CITY will ensure that Builders Risk/Installation insurance is maintained
at the replacement cost value of the PROJECT. The CITY may provide
ENGINEER a copy of the policy or documentation of such on a certificate of
insurance.
(3) The CITY will specify that the Builders Risk/installation insurance shall be
comprehensive in coverage appropriate to the PROJECT risks.
-9-
J. Litigation Assistance
The Scope of Services does not include costs of the ENGINEER for required or
requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in
litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. In the event CITY requests such
services of the ENGINEER, this AGREEMENT shall be amended or a separate
agreement will be negotiated between the parties.
K. Changes
The CITY may make or approve changes within the general Scope of Services in
this AGREEMENT. If such changes affect the ENGINEER's cost of or time
required for performance of the services, an equitable adjustment will be made
through an amendment to this AGREEMENT with appropriate CITY approval.
Article VI
General Legal Provisions
Amendments to Article VI, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. Authorization to Proceed
ENGINEER shall be authorized to proceed with this AGREEMENT upon receipt of
a written Notice to Proceed from the CITY.
B. Reuse of Project Documents
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products of the
ENGINEER, whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments of service
for this PROJECT, whether the PROJECT is completed or not. Reuse, change, or
alteration by the CITY or by others acting through or on behalf of the CITY of any
such instruments of service without the written permission of the ENGINEER will be
at the CITY's sole risk. The final designs, drawings, specifications and documents
shall be owned by the CITY.
C. Force Majeure
The ENGINEER is not responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by
acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the control of the
ENGINEER.
D. Termination
(1) This AGREEMENT may be terminated only by the City for convenience on
30 days' written notice. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either the
CITY or the ENGINEER for cause if either party fails substantially to
perform through no fault of the other and does not commence correction of
such nonperformance within five (5) days of written notice and diligently
complete the correction thereafter.
(2) If this AGREEMENT is terminated for the convenience of the CITY, the
ENGINEER will be paid for termination expenses as follows: - _
(a) Cost of reproduction of partial or complete studies, plans,
specifications or other forms of ENGINEER's work product;
(b) Out-of-pocket expenses for purchasing storage containers,
microfilm, electronic data files, and other data storage supplies or
services;
(c) The time requirements for the ENGINEER's personnel to document
the work underway at the time the CITY's termination for
convenience so that the work effort is suitable for long time storage.
(3) Prior to proceeding with termination services, the ENGINEER will submit to
the CITY an itemized statement of all termination expenses. The CITY's
approval will be obtained in writing prior to proceeding with termination
services.
E. Suspension, Delay, or Interruption to Work
The CITY may suspend, delay, or interrupt the services of the ENGINEER for the
convenience of the CITY. In the event of such suspension, delay, or interruption,
an equitable adjustment in the PROJECT's schedule, commitment and cost of the
ENGINEER's personnel and subcontractors, and ENGINEER's compensation will
be made.
F. Indemnification
(1) The ENGINEER agrees to indemnify and defend the CITY from any loss,
cost, or expense claimed by third parties for property damage and bodily
injury, including death, caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct
of the ENGINEER, its employees, officers, and subcontractors in connection
with the PROJECT.
(2) If the negligence or willful misconduct of both the ENGINEER and the CITY
(or a person identified above for whom each is liable) is a cause of such
damage or injury, the loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the
ENGINEER and the CITY in proportion to their relative degrees of
negligence or willful misconduct as determined pursuant to T.C.P. & R.
Code, section 33.011(4) (Vernon Supplement 1996).
G. Assignment
Neither party will assign all or any part of this AGREEMENT without the prior
written consent of the other party.
H. Interpretation
Limitations on liability and indemnities in this AGREEMENT are business
understandings between the parties and shall apply to all the different theories of
recovery, including breach of contract or warranty, tort including negligence, strict
or statutory liability, or any other cause of action, except for willful misconduct or
gross negligence for limitations of liability and sole negligence for indemnification.
_11-
Parties means the CITY and the ENGINEER, and their officers, employees, agents,
and subcontractors.
I. Jurisdiction
The law of the State of Texas shall govern the validity of this AGREEMENT, its
interpretation and performance, and any other claims related to it. The venue for
any litigation related to this AGREEMENT shall be Tarrant County, Texas.
J. Alternate Dispute Resolution
(1) All claims, disputes, and other matters in question between the CITY and
ENGINEER arising out of, or in connection with this AGREEMENT or the
PROJECT, or any breach of any obligation or duty of CITY or ENGINEER
hereunder, will be submitted to mediation. If mediation is unsuccessful, the
claim, dispute or other matter in questions shall be submitted to arbitration if
both parties acting reasonably agree that the amount of the dispute is likely
to be less than $50,000, exclusive of attorney's fees, costs and expenses.
Arbitration shall be in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration
Rules of the American Arbitration Association or other applicable rules of
the Association then in effect. Any award rendered by the arbitrators less
than $50,000, exclusive of attorney's fees, costs and expenses, will be final,
judgement may be entered thereon in any court having jurisdiction, and will
not be subject to appeal or modification except to the extent permitted by
Sections 10 and 11 of the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. Sections 10 and
11)
(2) Any award greater than $50,000, exclusive of attorney's fees, costs and
expenses, may be litigated by either party on a de novo basis. The award
shall become final ninety (90) days from the date same is issued. If
litigation is filed by either party within said ninety (90) day period, the award
shall become null and void and shall not be used by either party for any
purpose in the litigation.
K. Severability and Survival
If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any reason to
be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or
unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this AGREEMENT shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been
contained herein. Articles V.F., VI.B, VI.D, VI.H, and VI.J shall survive termination
of this AGREEMENT for any cause.
L. Observe and Comply
ENGINEER shall at all time observe and comply with all federal and State laws and
regulations and with all CITY ordinances and regulations which in any way affect
this AGREEMENT and the work hereunder, and shall observe and comply with all
orders, laws, ordinances and regulations which may exist or may be enacted later
by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for such enactment. No plea of
misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be considered. ENGINEER agrees to
defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY and all of its officers, agents and
-12-
employees from and against all claims or liability arising out of the violation of any
such order, law, ordinance, or regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees.
Article VII
Attachments, Schedules, and Signatures
This AGREEMENT, including its attachments and schedules, constitutes the entire AGREEMENT,
supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, and may only be changed by a written
amendment executed by both parties. The following attachments and schedules are hereby made
a part of this AGREEMENT.
Attachment A—Scope of Services and Schedule
Attachment B —Compensation
Attachment C —Amendments to Standard Agreement for Engineering Services
gc-61
Executed this day of Gq'�fL , 20_.
ATTEST: CIT FOR ORTH
Sylyfa Glover Marc A. Ott
Acting City Secretary Assistant City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVAL RECOMMENDED
AND LEGALITY
�7 L2
6arq�Steit ewer i'Vl ?ZI-1u MC6 A. Douglas Rademaker, P.E., Director
Assistant City Attorney Department of Engineering
ATTEST: CARTER & BljRfESS SNC.
�i
r d Evans,
Senior Vice-President and Principal
Contract Authf orization
C5 -Date
S •1ft il���.4�J �i�.•r
-13-
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 5/11/2004
DATE: Tuesday, May 11, 2004
LOG NAME: 55ALLIANCE IV REFERENCE NO.: **C-20071
SUBJECT:
Award of Contract to Carter & Burgess Inc., for Phase IV of the Program Management Services for
the Runway Extension Project at Fort Worth Alliance Airport
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
Authorize an award of contract to Carter & Burgess, Inc., in the amount of $2,859,099.19, for Phase IV of
the Program Management Services for the Runway Extension Project at Fort Worth Alliance Airport.
DISCUSSION:
On March 27, 2001 (M&C C-18528), the City Council approved a contract with Carter & Burgess, Inc., for
Program Management Services for the Runway Extension Project at Fort Worth Alliance Airport. These
services are to be performed in multiple phases, as funds are made available.
On July 29, 2003 (M&C G-14039), the City Council authorized the submission of a grant application, in the
amount of $20,000,000.00 to the Federal Aviation Administration for Phase IV of the Runway Extension
Project. On September 10, 2003, a grant in the amount of$7,039,276.00 was executed.
Carter & Burgess, Inc., submitted a fee proposal for Phase IV which includes the design of FM 156, design
of BNSF railroad relocation, design of Eagle Parkway, FM 156 Environmental Updates, Land Acquisition
Title Policies and Program Management Services. A contract in the amount of $2,859,099.19 for Phase IV
services has been negotiated.
M/WBE - Carter & Burgess, Inc., is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance by committing to 38.4%
M/WBE participation. The City's goal on this project is 30%.
FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION:
The Finance Director certifies that funds are available in the current capital budget, as appropriated, of the
Airport Grants Fund.
TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers
GR14 539120 055218871010 $2.859.099.19
Submitted for City Manager's Office by: Marc Ott (8476)
Originating Department Head: Mike Feeley (5403)
Additional Information Contact: Mike Feeley (5403)
Logname: 55ALLIANCE IV Page 1 of 1
ACORD,�, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE3/3O/04Y)
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
Wm. Rigg Co. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
777 Main Street, Suite C-50 HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Fort Worth, TX 76102-5333
817-820-8100 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURED INSURER A; American Zurich Ins Co
Carter & Burgess, Inc.
P O Box 901058 INSURER B: Sentry Ins a Mutual Co
Fort Worth, TX 76101-0258 INSURER C: Great American Ins. Co
INSURER D: American Guarantee&Liab
INSURER E:
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR POLICY EFFECTIVEPOLICY EXPIRATION
T TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER y y LIMITS
A GENERAL LIABILITY CP03981552-01 3/31/04 3131105 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Blanket Addl.lnsd FIRE DAMAGE[Any one fire) $ 50000
CLAIMS MADE a OCCUR &Blkt.Waiver of MED EXP(Any one person) 9 5000
Subrogation as PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1000000
Required by GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2000000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: Written Contract. PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG s 2000000
POLICY E PRO• LOC
A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY TAP3981553-0.1 3/31/04 3/31/05 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT of 1000000
X ANY AUTO Blanket Addl.lnsd (Ea accident)
ALL OWNED AUTOS &Blanket Waiver BODILY INJURY $
SCHEDULED AUTOS of Subrogation as mer person)
X HIRED AUTOS Required by BODILY INJURY
X
(Per accident) $
NON-OWNED AUTOS written contract
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
(Per accident)
GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT
ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $
AUTO ONLY: AGG $
EXCESS LIABILITY UMB9310317-01 3/31/04 3/31/05 EACH OCCURRENCE s 3000000
OCCUR ❑CLAIMS MADE COMPANY D AGGREGATE 3 3000000
TUE3577730-04= Each Occur. s 22000000
DEDUCTIBLE COMPANY C Aggregate
s 22000000
X RETENTION s 10000 EXCESS LIABILITY $
B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 90-05811 3/31104 3/31/05 X 7NCY IMIT_ x D R
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY
incl Blkt Waiver E.L.EACH ACCIDENT 8 1000000
of Subrogation E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE s 1000000
per Contract E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1000000
A OTHER CP03981552-01 3/31/04 3/31/05
PROPERTY,SPECIAL BLDG, BPP&VALUABLE PAPERS
80% C ) INS. RC $41,974,150;$25,000 PROP.DED.
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS
RE PROJECT NO.010819 -ALLIANCE AIRPORT RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
PHASE IV.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER ADDITIONAL INSURED: INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
CITY OF FORT WORTH DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN
RICK TRICE/DEPT OF ENGINEERING NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT.BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL
811 LAMAR #310 IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR
FORT WORTH TX 76102 REPRESENTAT
AUTHORIZE PRE
4CORD 25-S (7/97) 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988
ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 1
DATE 5/21/04
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
Wm, Rigg Co. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
777 Main Street, Suite C-50 HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
Ft. Worth, TX 76102-5333 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
817-820-8100 Fax-817-870-0310 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURED INSURER A: Lexington Ins Co
Carter & Burgess, Inc.
P. O. BOX 901058 INSURER B: Lloyds Of London Fort Worth, TX 76101-0258 INSURER C: CNA
INSURER D: Quanta Insurance Co.
INSURER E:
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATIODD Y,N LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY "CONTRACTORS EACH OCCURRENCE $
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLLUTION LIAR. FIRE DAMAGE(An one fire) $
CLAIMS MADE FlOCCUR INCLUDED IN MED EXP(Any one person) $
PROFESSIONAL PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $
POLICIES AS GENERAL AGGREGATE $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: SHOWN BELOW PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $
POLICY PROT LOC
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
Eaaaccident)ent
ALL OWNED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY $
SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person)
HIRED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY $
NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
(Per accident)
GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $
ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $
AUTO ONLY: AGG $
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $
OCCUR FICLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $
DEDUCTIBLE $
RETENTION $ $
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC STAT U- OTH-
ER
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y
E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $
E.L. DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $
E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $
OTHER 5/24/04 5/24/05
A-PROF LIABILITY 1323451 $10,000,000
B-XS PROF LIAB I P49604 10MIL XS 10MIL
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS
RE: PROJECT NO.010819. ALLIANCE AIRPORT RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
PHASE I. COVERAGE IS UNDERWRITTEN ON A CLAIM-MADE BASIS, AND THE
RETROACTIVE DATE IS COINCIDENT WITH OR PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE
CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT.
C-EXCESS PROF LIAB- POLICY#114096010- $5MIL XS$20MIL
D-EXCESS PROF LIAB -POLICY#AEP1000193-04 -$5MIL XS$25MIL
CERTIFICATE HOLDER I I ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION
CITY OF FORT WORTH SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN
RICK TRICE/DEPT OF ENGINEERING NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL
811 LAMAR #310 IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER ITS AGENTS OR
FORT WORTH, TX 76102 REPRESENTAT
AUTHORIZE RE
ACORD 25-S(7/97) 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988
Attachment A
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE
Alliance Airport Runway Extension Project, Phase 4
Design of FM 156, Railroad and Eagle Parkway
The Alliance Airport Runway Extension Project — Phase 4 Services will provide for the
continuation of program management services for the overall project, design of the new
alignment foe FM 156, Eagle Parkway and the BNSF rail. It will also provide for the re-
formatting of the FM 156 EA, to make it conform to FHWA standards. Also covered are the Title
Policy costs associated with land acquisition necessary to re-route the roads and rail line.
Each major task is listed below. A detailed scope of work for each task has been provided
along with an overall schedule.
1. Program Management
2. FM 156 Design
3. Reformat EA for FM 156
4. Railroad Design —Alternative 6
5. Eagle Parkway Design
6, Title Policies for Land Acquisition
r,,
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Program Management
CARTER & BURGESS
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
SCOPE OF WORK
The Program Management activities will consist of planning & scheduling, budgeting, cost
control, cost estimating, FAA grant assistance, financial strategy development, contract
administration and management, document control, coordination and communications to
support the Carter& Burgess team in the successful execution of the Alliance Airport Runway
Extension Project. This information will be presented both in written and graphic form.
C&B will develop and implement cost containment and budget control systems, based on the
overall project budget. A realistic budget will be developed using a comprehensive budgeting
procedure and validation/confirmation report. The procedure will:
❑ Categorize project cost elements in accordance with contract packaging plan
❑ Establish guidelines for budgeting all project hard and soft cost categories
❑ Provide guidelines for establishing and authorizing use of project contingency and
reserves.
❑ Establish procedures for authorizing budget and scope changes and transfers
❑ Prepare Project status reports
The budget/confirmation report will allow the C&B team to continuously monitor and forecast
budgets, and track the status of contingency.
Once the baseline budget has been established at a detailed level, comprehensive cash flow
projections will be prepared by linking the budget elements to the activities in the Master
Schedule. Microsoft Project provides excellent cash flow capability, detailed color graphic and
tabular reports. The system's modeling feature allows for convenient"what if' analyses by
allowing alteration of design and construction schedules or changing cost escalation and
contingency factors.
PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
The key for the successful and timely completion of the Runway Extension Project is detailed
and comprehensive schedule management at both the program and project levels. The
program level schedule identifies the interfaces between various project elements and manages
the schedule by measuring float at these interface points. Project schedules will include
milestones specified in the contract documents or final completion dates. Project schedules are
managed to these milestone dates should they be specified.
Planning and scheduling is the heart of project control services. It is the roadmap for project
execution. Staff will take a very proactive approach in identifying the most cost/time effective
approach to accomplishing tasks and progressing the project. The staff will provide information
to drive the project and ensure tasks are completed on time or mitigation plans are implemented
to bring work items back on track.
The hierarchy of schedules to be used on the Airport Extension Project includes:
❑ Level 1 — Summary Schedule
❑ Level 2 - Master Schedule
Carter Surgess '
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Program Management
o Level 3 - Project Master Schedule
o Level 4 - Detail Contract Schedules
The Program Management Team will be responsible for developing and maintaining all
schedules. Specific tasks to be accomplished include, but are not limited to the following:
❑ Develop a preliminary work schedule within14 days of Notice to Proceed .
❑ Develop a preliminary submittal schedule for all deliverables and design review data, as
required.
❑ Develop an integrated program master schedule highlighting specific contractual
milestone dates, and other important milestone dates to ensure everyone on the team is
.on the same page". Included in these milestones will be when critical deliverables or
events must occur.
❑ Meet with team members and develop a list of activities, resource requirements to
accomplish these activities, and realistic durations.
❑ Logically connect these activities to develop a pure logic diagram depicting the workflow,
predecessor and successor activities and develop the optimum time for design and
construction of the work.
❑ Impose contractual dates and revise plan as necessary—to include logic, additional
resources, and/or revise durations to ensure date completion.
❑ Develop and implement detail schedules for all scopes of work.
❑ Hold weekly meeting with team members to discuss progress, lack of progress and
steps needed to bring the project back on track.
❑ Provide schedule reports to the management team.
o Provide schedule analysis and mitigation plans
❑ Project Controls will be a single source for data collection and accessible by all project
team members.
❑ Produce graphical (bar charts, pie charts, line graphs, 3d bars, etc.) representations of
all data and distribute to team members.
❑ Prepare, collect and manage Action Lists (action item, party responsible for completion
and date for completion) on a weekly basis.
The goal is to measure productivity of each project against a baseline.
To ensure scheduling information is collected in a timely and uniform manner, schedules will be
updated at various time frames; however, critical work items will be updated on a weekly basis.
The updates will serve as both a means of monitoring progress as well as a mechanism for
warning of potential problems.
COST MANAGEMENT
Cost management will be integral to the planning and scheduling function. C&B will prepare
timely reports, which will be the basis for projecting final costs at the completion of the project.
Specific tasks to be accomplished include, but are not limited to:
❑ Development of a cost control system.
❑ Development of, and communication of, budgets for scopes of work to all project
participants.
❑ Allocations of proper contingencies.
❑ Provide assistance for FAA grant applications and processes.
❑ Develop Financial Strategies.
Carter::Burgess 2
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Program Management
❑ Reporting on budgets, commitments, and actual, pending and anticipated costs.
❑ Prepare weekly status reports.
❑ Change order documentation and reporting.
❑ Each change order will be documented, including the party originating the change and
the reason for the change.
CONTRACT/SUBCONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
C&B will provide contract administration for all contractors, subcontractors, vendors and
suppliers that have direct subcontract agreements with C&B. The contract administrators will
develop contract documents, incorporating those provisions necessary to assure that the
quality, cost and time of performance of subcontracted work will meet the requirements of the
overall program including:
❑ Develop standard contract documents for the procurement of labor, materials,
equipment, professional services and supplies.
❑ Ensure contract requirements are being accomplished.
❑ Document all issues of non-conformance.
❑ Work hand-in-hand with other team members to ensure compliance.
❑ Procure labor, materials, equipment, professional services and supplies in support of the
program.
❑ Enforce City of Forth Worth's DBE goals and requirements.
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Information is a key component of project controls. Multiple projects generate and require use of
information and documentation, which must be effectively and accurately handled, distributed,
controlled, received, and stored. C&B will maintain a document control filing system to incude
the following:
❑ Correspondence control - incoming and outgoing correspondence
❑ Contracts and other conformed documents
❑ Meeting Minutes
❑ Facsimile and e-mail distribution
❑ Transmittals
❑ Drawing and Specifications
❑ Status reports
❑ Field inspection reports
❑ Non-conformance logs
❑ Shop drawing logs
❑ Request for information logs
❑ Change control logs
❑ Safety reports
❑ Progress photographs
❑ As-built drawings, warranties and guaranties
C&B will provide records management in a consistent manner, including required lists, indexes,
logs, distribution matrices, status reports, look-ahead reports, exception lists, transmittal letters,
routing,follow-up and coordination.
Carter Surgess 3
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Program Management
COST ESTIMATING
Cost estimating shall be performed throughout the Project to constantly reinforce within budget
execution. Specific tasks to be accomplished are as follows:
❑ Provide order of magnitude estimates based on concepts.
❑ Provide preliminary construction cost estimates for all phases of the work.
❑ Provide preliminary quantity take-offs and cost of the work.
❑ Develop a database of unit costs for the work.
COORDINATION AND COMMUNICATION
The fundamentals for good project management are good coordination and thorough
communication. Regularly scheduled meetings will be held, as well as for specific subjects.
Agendas for regularly scheduled meetings shall be published in advance of the meetings. The
agenda shall efficiently plan the use of management time. This allows individuals to selectively
attend meetings based on the content of the agenda. Meetings shall be limited to one hour
when appropriate. A comprehensive and concise record of issues, resolutions and/or actions
required shall be prepared (meeting minutes) and issued to all attendees and affected parties
within one week after the meeting.
DESIGN REVIEWS
C&B will perform design reviews of the construction documents for FM 156, Railroad and Eagle
Parkway. Written comments will be prepared for each review and the comments provided to the
designer for incorporation into the documents. Incorporation of the review comments will be
verified with the designer.
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT SERVICES
C&B will provide assistance to the Alliance Airport Staff in the preparation of FAA Grant
Applications, NPIAS updates and graphic and technical support for the Runway Extension
Project and perform other miscellaneous duties as assigned.
Carter.-:Burgess 4
N
Q O
�W
04
- ---------
LO
------------- .............................................. -.......... ........ ...LL
..........
�p
........... ........... .............. _-___------_._____
E
L --
•� � N_
O _.....--_..... .......... .......... _________ -_____.- __.____.____•__
In.
C
--------' -------" ..-----'.. ____....._ ----------------
a� 3 -------- -------- ----'----'
u.t CL CL
a� -------- ------- --------- ---------
ca �
w ------
.a ............ ......................... ......... ........ .........
04
° --------- ------'-
LO
o -
Q �o
ca H
to
r
'N oo m
Er
CD ¢ Lo m n C:
0 E � o o L
Z
N d LL Ofcu
W
y
N ch v ca n ap rn o N r�
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
LOPEZGARCIA GROUP
FM 156 DESIGN
SCOPE OF WORK
The work to be performed by LOPEZGARCIA GROUP (hereinafter referred to as "the
Engineer') under this contract consists of providing Engineering services required for the
preparation of complete Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for the relocation of FM
156 from south of Alliance Airport at the intersection of Main Street and existing FM 156, to
north of Alliance Airport approximately % mile south of the proposed SH 114 crossing in
accordance with the previously approved schematic. Station limits are from approximately STA
36+00 to STA 276+22.75. PS&E will be prepared for construction of two lanes of the ultimate
four-lane section.
Carter& Burgess, the General Engineering Consultant (hereinafter referred to as the "GEC") will
provide the overall project supervision and management. The GEC will be the single point of
contact between the City of Fort Worth, Alliance Airport, TxDOT Fort Worth District and the
Engineer.
The Engineer shall prepare plans, details and compute quantities to include roadway design,
grading, paving, drainage, bridge layouts, plans and details, signing, pavement markings, traffic
control plans, storm water pollution prevention plans, demolition plans, specifications and cost
estimates.
Cross-sections of the complete four-lane section will be prepared for determination of right of
way requirements. In addition, cross-sections will be prepared for earthwork computations for
the two-lane section to be constructed in this contract. Cross culverts will be designed and
plans prepared based on the ultimate four-lane section for the following culverts:
Location
STA 94+05 3 - 8'x4' RCBC
STA 109+50 4— 5'x3' RCBC
STA 154+77 4—8'x4' RCBC
STA 190+00 2—8'x4' RCBC
The storm sewer trunk line will be designed for the ultimate section however plans will be
prepared for only that portion of the drainage system necessary for draining the two-lane section
to be constructed in this contract. Lateral stub-outs will be constructed for the ultimate section.
Three bridges are included in this design contract; however, bridge layouts for both bridges over
the BNSF Railroad will be prepared. The Engineer shall furnish bridge layouts, the structural
details, and bridge quantities for the following bridges:
Location
FM 156 NB over Henrietta Creek and the BN & SF RR (approximate STA 52+00 to 68+00)
FM 156 SB over Henrietta Creek and the BN & SF RR (approximate STA 52+00 to 68+00)
(bridge layout only)
FM 156 NB over Elizabeth Creek (approximate STA 213+00 to STA 222+00)
FM 156 NB over unnamed creek (approximate STA 251+00 to STA 254+00)
The Engineer shall prepare a comparative cost analysis of bridge length versus embankment, to
determine optimum bridge lengths. The Engineer shall submit this analysis for approval, prior to
preparing the bridge layouts. A scour analysis will be performed at each bridge crossing.
Carter:.-Burgess 1
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
The Engineer shall identify, prepare exhibits and complete all necessary forms for Design
Exceptions and/or Waivers within its limits prior to the 30% Submittal. These exceptions shall
be provided to the GEC and TxDOT for coordination and processing of approvals. If
subsequent changes require additional exceptions, the Engineer shall notify the GEC as soon
as possible after identification.
The Engineer shall prepare any exhibits necessary for Utility approvals and other
governmental/regulatory agencies. The Engineer shall compile, maintain, and update a Utility
Conflict List. The Engineer shall provide the most current copy of the list to the GEC at each
Progress Report, and shall be responsible for coordination with utility companies to resolve
conflicts. The Utility List shall identify the owner of the facility, the contact person (with address
and telephone phone number), location of conflict (station and offset), type of facility, expected
clearance data and type of adjustment necessary.
The Engineer shall use CADD to fully develop all drawings. The CADD drawings developed
shall be compatible with TxDOT standards. The computer graphics files furnished must comply
with the TxDOT Document and Information Exchange. The Engineer shall provide earthwork
cross-section data files in GEOPAK format. TxDOT cross-section criteria files shall be used to
generate design cross-sections. New criteria should only be developed in the absence of
applicable existing TxDOT criteria files.
The Engineer shall collect, review and evaluate the available existing data pertaining to the
project and prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates in accordance with the requirements
and policies of TxDOT.
The Engineer shall provide supplemental field surveying services necessary to verify the Digital
Terrain Model (DTM), establish the project baseline on the ground, locate and tie existing
utilities to the project baseline, supplement topography at stream and culvert crossings and
update topography. Coordinate geometry shall be based on and tied into State plane surface
coordinate system.
The Engineer shall make every effort to prevent detours and utility relocations from extending
beyond the proposed right of way. If it is necessary to obtain additional permanent or temporary
easements and/or Right of Entry, the Engineer shall notify the GEC in writing of the need and
justification of such action. The Engineer shall identify and coordinate with all utility companies
for relocations required.
The PS&E shall be complete and suitable for the bidding and awarding of a construction
contract, and in accordance with the latest TxDOT policies and procedures and the Fort Worth
District's PS&E Checklist.
The PS&E shall be developed in English units. The final plan sheets shall be 4 mil-double
matte standard mylars, size 11" x 17", signed, sealed and dated by a Professional Engineer
registered in the State of Texas. The plans shall be noted as copyrighted with the TxDOT's logo.
The Engineer shall make intermediate submittals, as defined by the milestones in the attached
project schedule, and in accordance with the latest TxDOT policies and procedures. The
submittals shall consist of five (5) 11"x17" paper sets.
PS&E for the above work shall be prepared in accordance with the applicable requirements of
the TxDOT's Specifications, Standards and Manuals (latest revision). Whenever possible, the
Carter Surgess 2
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
TxDOT's standard drawings, standard specifications, or previously approved special provisions
and/or special specifications shall be used. If a special provision or a special specification must
be developed for this project, it shall be in the TxDOT's format and, to the extent possible,
incorporate references to approved TxDOT test procedures. Any specifications developed by
the Engineer shall be submitted to the TxDOT for approval prior to inclusion in the PS&E. The
Engineer shall sign, seal, and date all project specific modifications to standard drawings.
The Engineer shall be required to meet with the GEC representatives on a regularly scheduled
basis (not to exceed every four weeks) to report on progress. After each meeting with the GEC,
the Engineer shall submit a memorandum summarizing the events, including an ACTION ITEM
LIST, within five (5)working days of the meeting.
The Engineer shall prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SW3P), including details
and pay quantities. TxDOT will provide the Notice of Intent.
The Engineer shall prepare a construction duration estimate using TxDOT's duration estimating
procedure and production rates applicable to the Fort Worth District. The Engineer shall provide
assistance to GEC personnel in interpreting the schedule.
The Engineer shall prepare and execute contracts with sub consultants, monitor sub consultant
activities (staff and schedule), and review and recommend approval of sub consultant invoices.
The Engineer shall prepare progress reports, every four weeks, describing activities during the
reporting period; activities planned for the following period; problems encountered and actions
to remedy them; list of meetings attended; overall status, including a tabulation of percentage
complete by task.
The Engineer shall prepare meeting minutes, solicit and incorporate participants' comments,
and distribute the minutes for all meetings attended by the Engineer during the design phase,
unless otherwise directed.
PS&E Development
1. Roadway Design
1.1. Finalize Schematic
1.1.1. The Engineer, in cooperation with the GEC and TxDOT Fort Worth District, shall
plan, attend and document a Design Concept Conference (DCC). Personnel
from the TxDOT's Fort Worth District will participate. The conference will provide
for a brainstorming session in which decision makers, stakeholders and technical
personnel may discuss and agree on:
• Roadway and drainage design parameters
• Engineering and environmental constraints
• Project development schedule
• Other issues as identified by the GEC, the City of Fort Worth, and/or TxDOT
1.1.2. Beginning with the design schematic, the Engineer shall refine the plan and
profile to secure adequate ties to intersecting roadways and driveways. Identify
intersecting roadway and driveway construction limits. The Engineer shall
address State comments and update the construction cost estimate.
Carter:--Burgess 3
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
1.1.3. Design cross sections will be developed by the Engineer at 100' station intervals
using Geopak design software. The design cross sections shall include the
following elements: each pavement layer and required undercut, right of way
limits, side slopes, pavement cross slopes, curbs and sidewalk retaining walls.
1.2. Finalize Earthwork Cross Sections
1.2.1. The Engineer shall update the earthwork cross sections to reflect the final design
elements. Cross sections will be developed for the ultimate section for
determining right of way requirements. In addition, cross-sections for the initial
construction of the two lanes of the ultimate four-lane section will be developed.
1.3. Roadway Design (General)
1.3.1. The Engineer shall provide roadway plan and profile drawings using CADD
standards as required by the State for the construction of two lanes of the
ultimate four-lane section. The drawings shall consist of a planimetric file of
existing features and files of the proposed improvements. The roadway base
map shall contain line work that depicts existing surface features obtained from
the schematic drawing. Existing major subsurface and surface utilities shall be
shown. Existing and proposed right-of-way lines shall be shown. Plan and Profile
to be shown on one sheet for mainlines and one sheet for frontage roads.
1.3.2. The plan view shall contain the following design elements:
• Calculated roadway centerline for FM 156 and cross roads. Horizontal control
points shall be shown. The alignments shall be calculated using GEOPAK.
• Pavement edges for all improvements (FM 156, cross streets and driveways).
• Lane and pavement width dimensions.
• Proposed structure locations, lengths and widths.
• Direction of traffic flow on all roadways. Lane lines and /or arrows indicating the
number of lanes shall also be shown.
• Drawing scale shall be 1"=100'
• Control of access line, ROW lines and easements.
• Begin/end superelevation transitions and cross slope changes.
• Limits of riprap, block sod, and seeding.
• Existing utilities and structures.
• Benchmark information.
• Radii callouts, curb location, guard fence, crash safety items and ADA
compliance items.
1.3.3. The profile view shall contain the following design elements:
• Calculated profile grade for FM 156. Vertical curve data, including "K" values
shall be shown.
• Existing and proposed profiles along the proposed centerline of the FM 156 and
the outside gutter of the northbound roadway.
• Calculated vertical clearances at grade separations and overpasses, taking into
account the appropriate super-elevation rate, superstructure depth and required
clearance.
• Drawing vertical scale to be 1"=10'.
Carter:Burgess 4
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
1.4. Roadway Summaries
1.4.1. The Engineer shall prepare Roadway Summary CADD sheets.
1.5. Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets
1.5.1. The Engineer shall prepare Horizontal Alignment Data CADD sheets.
1.6. Paving Layout
1.6.1. The Engineer shall prepare overall paving layout CADD sheets depicting
pavement type and location of use.
1.7. Demolition Plans (1"=100')
1.7.1. The Engineer shall prepare CADD sheets depicting roadway removal items
1.8. Roadway Plan/Profile
1.8.1. Using the approved schematic as the base drawing, the Engineer shall prepare
plan & profile sheets at 1"=100' scale. (11"x17" plan sheets)
1.9. Driveway Profiles
1.9.1. The Engineer shall analyze all driveways within the project and develop driveway
profiles as needed to ensure that driveways function as intended
1.10. Intersecting Roadway Plan/Profiles
1.10.1.The Engineer shall develop profiles for each intersecting roadway. Delineate the
limits of construction necessary to secure a suitable profile. For intersecting
roadway reconstruction exceeding 100', prepare a 1" = 40' plan-profile sheet
(11"x17" sheet) with the plan and the profile and construction limits. Calculate
and summarize intersecting roadway quantities.
1.11. Intersecting Roadway Grading
1.11.1.The Engineer shall provide an intersection layout detailing the grading, the
pavement design and drainage design at the intersection of each cross street.
The layout shall include the curb returns, geometrics, transition length, stationing,
pavement and drainage details.
1.12. Cut/Fill Quantities
1.12.1.The Engineer shall develop an earthwork analysis to determine cut and fill
quantities and provide final design cross sections at 100 feet intervals for the
construction of two lanes of the ultimate four-lane section of FM 156. Cross
sections shall be delivered in standard GEOPAK format on 11"x17" sheets and
electronic files. The Engineer shall provide all criteria and input files used to
generate the design cross sections. Cross sections and quantities shall consider
existing pavement removals. Two sets of drawings shall be submitted by the
Engineer at the 30%, 60% and 90% submittals, respectively.
1.13. Roadway Miscellaneous Quantities/Details
1.13.1.The Engineer shall identify and calculate miscellaneous roadway items.
Carter Surgess 5
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
1.13.2.The Engineer shall prepare any necessary roadway details to clarify construction
details.
1.14. Summary of Roadway Quantities
1.14.1.The Engineer shall compute and tabulate all roadway quantities using TxDOT bid
items for three submittals.
1.15. Standards
1.15.1.The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable Statewide and District
standards. The Engineer shall modify standards as needed, fill in the title block
with the project number, CSJ and page number etc. and plot sheets and
incorporate into the plans.
1.16. Right-of-Way Determination.
1.16.1. Based on the design cross sections, right of way taking lines will be developed by
the Engineer.
1.17. Typical Sections.
1.17.1.The Engineer shall develop typical sections for all proposed and existing
roadways and structures. Typical sections shall include width of travel lanes,
shoulders, median widths, border widths, curb offsets, and ROW. The typical
section shall also include PGL, centerline, pavement design, longitudinal joints,
side slopes, sodding/seeding limits, concrete traffic barriers, station limits,
common proposed/existing structures including riprap, limits of embankment
excavation, etc.
2. Hydrology& Hydraulics
2.1. Drainage Area Mapping
2.1.1. The Engineer shall delineate drainage area boundaries based on USGS
topographic maps.
2.2. Calculate Discharges
2.2.1. The Engineer shall determine conveyance paths, channel slopes, time of
concentration, runoff coefficients/SCS curve numbers as required to calculate
design-year flows. All design and calculation criteria utilized shall be the current
TxDOT criteria.
2.2.2. All drainage designs are to comply with TxDOT criteria.
2.3. Hydrology Related Tasks (Ultimate Discharges)
2.3.1. The Engineer shall research data and obtain existing hydrologic models by
coordination with the City(s) and FEMA.
2.3.2. The Engineer shall convert data, if required, from NUDALLAS to HEC-1 or HEC-
HMS.
2.3.3. The Engineer shall obtain USGS Maps and/or other suitable contour maps.
2.3.4. The Engineer shall delineate drainage area.
Carter Surgess 6
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
2.3.5. The Engineer shall verify future zoning or land use with the City(s).
2.3.6. The Engineer shall develop HEC-1 (or HEC-HMS) model to determine ultimate
discharges.
2.4. Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) for Henrietta Creek
2.4.1. The Engineer shall research data and obtain existing or currently effective
hydraulic (HEC-2) models.
2.4.2. The Engineer shall model conversion, if required, from HEC-2 to HEC-RAS.
2.4.3. The Engineer shall field locate channel cross-sections for hydraulic modeling.
2.4.4. The Engineer shall process surveyed data for hydraulic model.
2.4.5. The Engineer shall develop hydraulic models for proposed conditions.
2.4.6. The Engineer shall prepare CLOMR report and related exhibits.
2.5. Develop HEC-RAS Model of Channels
2.5.1. The Engineer shall develop dynamic models of downstream conveyance
elements (channels, culverts, slab bridges, encroachments, etc.) using HEC-
RAS.
2.6. Identify Drainage Easement Requirements
2.6.1. The Engineer shall identify drainage easements needed to construct drainage
facilities at discharge points along the project corridor.
2.7. Sub Area Mapping/Inlet Sizing (Winstorm)
2.7.1. The Engineer shall subdivide the overall drainage areas into sub-areas and
calculate the discharge at each inlet. The Engineer shall analyze inlet capacities
and adjust inlet locations and sub-areas as needed to obtain desirable ponded
widths. This will include the overall drainage area map.
2.8. Scour Analysis
2.8.1. The Engineer will perform a scour analysis at the following bridge locations:
• FM 156 over Henrietta Creek
• FM 156 over Elizabeth Creek
• FM 156 over unnamed creek (approximate STA 252+00)
2.9. Storm Sewer Sizing (Winstorm or Geopak)
2.9.1. The Engineer shall size a network of storm sewers, based on the ultimate four-
lane section, to collect inlet flows and route the discharge to the outfall locations.
Prepare hydraulic data sheets for inclusion in the plans. This will also include the
Hydraulic Data Sheet that will become part of the plans.
2.10. Culvert Sizing (THYSYS Culvert)
2.10.1.The Engineer shall size each cross culvert to pass the design-year storm without
exceeding allowable headwater requirements established by the State and meet
any applicable FEMA criteria. The Engineer shall prepare hydraulic data Iheets
for inclusion in the plans.
Carter::Burgess
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
2.11. Storm Sewer Plan Profile (Trunk line)
2.11.1.The Engineer shall prepare storm sewer plan profile sheets depicting storm
sewer, inlets and manholes necessary to drain the two-lane facility to be
constructed in this contract and convey the runoff to the designated discharge
points. The storm sewer plan profiles will be consistent with the TxDOT
Hydraulic Manual. Inlets, manholes and junctions will be in accordance with Fort
Worth District standard details. Laterals will be sized and designed for the
ultimate four-lane section, however only stub-outs for the future four-lane section
will be included in the construction plans as required. Stub-outs will be designed
to clear the two-lane section for future extension and will be plugged.
2.12. Lateral Sheets
2.12.1.The Engineer shall prepare lateral sheets drawn at 1"=10' and 1"=40' for the
portion of the laterals to be constructed. However, the engineer can change the
scale if this is necessary to fit the lateral profiles into the sheets. These laterals
shall be prepared in accordance to the Hydraulic Manual.
2.13. Culvert Layouts
2.13.1. The Engineer shall prepare culvert layouts sheets for each cross drainage
structure in accordance with State standard details, the TxDOT Hydraulic
Manual. Culvert layouts will be designed and constructed for the ultimate four-
lane section at the following approximate locations (sizes to be verified by the
Engineer):
• STA 94+05 3 - 8'x4' RCBC
• STA 109+50 4— 5'x3' RCBC
• STA 154+77 4 — 8'x4' RCBC
• STA 190+00 2— 8'x4' RCBC
2.14. Special Inlet Details
2.14.1.The Engineer shall prepare custom details to clarify construction details of non-
standard inlets.
2.15. Outfall Structure Details
2.15.1.The Engineer shall provide plan sheets and details to construct storm sewer
outfalls in the existing channels.
2.16. Channel and Easement Grading
2.16.1.The Engineer shall determine outfall-grading requirements and provide plans,
details and quantities to shape the outfall channel and stabilize the channel with
slope protection or vegetation.
2.17. Miscellaneous Drainage Details
2.17.1.The Engineer shall prepare any and all necessary plan details necessary to
clarify the construction requirements of the drainage facilities.
2.18. Summary of Drainage Quantities
Carter----Burgess 8
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
2.18.1. The Engineer shall compute quantities, summarize in the plans and prepare a bid
item list and estimated prices for all drainage facilities.
2.19. Drainage Removal Summary
2.19.1. The Engineer shall prepare drainage removal summaries for existing drainage
structures to be removed or replaced.
2.20. SW3P Plans (Double Stack)
2.20.1.The Engineer shall develop the SW3P on separate sheets from the TCP, to
minimize potential impact to receiving waterways. It shall include text describing
the plan, quantities, typical sections, phase and locations of erosion control
devices and any required permanent erosion control measures such as: sediment
control fences, rock filter dams, soil retention blankets, riprap slope protection
and other devices as required. Erosion control plans shall be coordinated with
the Traffic Control Plan and Sequence of Work.
2.21. Assemble Applicable Standards
2.21.1. The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable Statewide and District
standards and modify standards as needed. The Engineer shall fill in the title
block with project number, CSJ and page number etc., plot sheets and
incorporate into the plans.
2.22. Structural Design and Detailing of Drainage Features
2.22.1.The Engineer shall perform layout, structural design and detailing for the
following:
• Culverts.
• New or modified storm sewers; inlets; manholes; trunk lines.
• Outfall channels within existing ROW.
• Bridge deck drainage systems, including internal drainage piping within the bents
where required on structures.
3. Signing & Pavement Markings & Signalization
3.1. Signing & Pavement Marking Layouts
3.1.1. The Engineer shall prepare signing and pavement marking layout sheets at 1" _
100' scale, double stacked, in accordance with TxDOT design standards and the
Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD).
3.2. Pavement Marking Details
3.2.1. The Engineer shall detail permanent and temporary pavement markings and
channelization devices on plan sheets. The Engineer shall coordinate with the
GEC/TxDOT for overall temporary, interim, and final pavement marking
strategies. Pavement markings shall be selected from the latest State standards.
3.2.2. The Engineer shall provide the following information on sign/pavement marking
layouts:
o Proposed markings (illustrated and quantified) which include pavement
markings, object markings and delineation. j1U
Carter Surgess i 9
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
o Proposed signs (illustrated and numbered).
o Existing signs to remain, to be removed, or to be relocated.
o Quantities of existing pavement markings to be removed.
o Proposed delineators and object markers.
o The number of lanes in each section of proposed roadway and the location of
changes in numbers of lanes.
o ROW lines.
o Direction of traffic flow on all roadways.
o Roadway layout.
o Center line with station numbering.
o Culverts and other structures that present a hazard to traffic.
o Location of utilities.
3.3. Summary of Pavement Markings
3.3.1. The Engineer shall compute quantities, summarize in the plans and prepare a bid
item list and estimates prices for all striping.
3.4. Small Sign Summary
3.4.1. The Engineer shall determine the mounting requirements for each sign or sign
cluster based on TxDOT standards. List all the signs on the TxDOT standard
summary sheets together with totals for each mount type.
3.5. Assemble Applicable Standards
3.5.1. The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable Statewide and District
standards and modify standards as needed. The Engineer shall fill in the title
block with project number, CSJ and page number etc., plot sheets and
incorporate into the plans.
4. Traffic Control Plans
4.1. Traffic Control/Sequence of Work Layouts
4.1.1. The Engineer shall prepare layouts at 1" = 100' scale showing the travel lanes
and construction area for each phase of construction. Included in the layouts will
be temporary signing and striping, channelization devices, barricades and a
narrative of the sequence of work. The sheets will include detour diagrams,
where applicable. The sheets will include horizontal alignment data for any
temporary alignments created for the various traffic control phases. The scope
does not include the preparation of profiles for these alignments.
4.2. Traffic Control Typical Sections
4.2.1. In conjunction with the Traffic Control Layouts, the Engineer shall develop typical
cross sections showing lane widths, edge conditions, channelization and
proposed construction area.
4.3. Intersection Staging
4.3.1. The Engineer shall develop typical intersection staging plans for similar
intersections. The Engineer shall develop custom intersection staging layouts for
special conditions.
CarternBurgess 10
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
4.4. Miscellaneous TCP Details
4.4.1. The Engineer shall prepare any and all necessary plan details necessary to
clarify the construction requirements of the traffic control and erosion plans.
4.4.2. The Engineer shall provide a written narrative of the construction sequencing and
work activities per phase and determine the existing and proposed traffic control
devices (regulatory signs, warning signs, guide signs, route markers, construction
pavement markings, barricades, flag personnel, etc.) to be used to handle traffic
including at grade intersections during each construction sequence. The
Engineer shall show temporary roadways and detours required to maintain traffic
throughout the construction phasing.
4.4.3. Where detours are required, the Engineer shall develop typical cross sections,
calculate quantities, and show horizontal and vertical alignment information. The
Engineer shall provide a detailed layout and arrangement of construction signs,
construction pavement marking and traffic control devices.
4.5. Assemble Applicable Standards
4.5.1. The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable Statewide and District
standards and modify standards as needed. The Engineer shall fill in the title
block with project number, CSJ and page number etc., plot sheets and
incorporate into the plans.
5. Bridge Design
5.1. Bridge Layouts
5.1.1. The Engineer shall prepare bridge layout plans and elevations, in accordance
with the latest editions of the State's Bridge Design Manual, Bridge Division
Operation and Planning Manual, and Bridge Detailer's Manual. The Engineer
shall prepare bridge layouts for:
• FM 156 NB over Henrietta Creek and the BN & SF RR (approximate STA 52+00
to 68+00)
• FM 156 SB over Henrietta Creek and the BN & SF RR (approximate STA 52+00
to 68+00) (bridge layout only)
• FM 156 NB over Elizabeth Creek (approximate STA 213+00 to STA 222+00)
• FM 156 NB over unnamed creek (approximate STA 251+00 to STA 254+00)
5.2. Detailed Bridge Plans
5.2.1. The Engineer shall prepare detailed bridge plans of the three bridges listed
below. All bridge structures shall be designed for HS 20 loading.
• FM 156 NB over Henrietta Creek and the BN & SF RR (approximate STA 52+00
to 68+00)
• FM 156 NB over Elizabeth Creek (approximate STA 213+00 to STA 222+00)
• FM 156 NB over unnamed creek (approximate STA 251+00 to STA 254+00)
5.2.2. The Engineer shall prepare any and all necessary plan details necessary to
clarify the construction requirements of the bridges.
5.3. Assemble Applicable Standards
Carter=Burgess 11
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
5.3.1. The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable Statewide and District
standards and modify standards as needed. The Engineer shall fill in the title
block with project number, CSJ and page number etc., plot sheets and
incorporate into the plans.
6. PS&E Documents (TxDOT Format)
6.1. Construction Cost Estimate, Basis of Estimate
6.1.1. The Engineer shall compute and tabulate all quantities using State bid items and
descriptive codes. The Engineer shall prepare an engineer's estimate to
accompany the 60%, 90% and final PS&E submittals.
6.2. Construction Duration Estimate
6.2.1. The Engineer shall prepare a construction duration estimate using TxDOT's
duration estimating procedure and production rates applicable to the Fort Worth
District. The Engineer shall provide assistance to GEC personnel in interpreting
the schedule.
6.3. General Notes & Specifications
6.3.1. The Engineer shall prepare general notes and specification data, based on
applicable bid items and Fort Worth District "master' notes. The Engineer shall
identify any Special Specifications and/or Special Provisions applicable to the
project and prepare any custom specifications needed for the project and submit
with appropriate justification.
7. Project Management
7.1. Project Administration
7.1.1. The Engineer shall prepare project correspondence and progress reports,
coordinate with sub-consultants, and maintain routine project record keeping.
7.2. Periodic Progress Meetings
7.2.1. The Engineer shall attend periodic progress meetings as required to monitor the
development of the project.
8. Utility Plans
8.1. Research Existing Utilities
8.1.1. Each utility company determined to have facilities within the project area will be
contacted by the Engineer to provide utility information in the form of as-built
drawings or on-site identification of their facilities. This effort will serve the
purpose of beginning a dialog with the utilities to keep them informed of the
project progress and how it will affect their facility.
8.2. Utility Coordination Meetings
8.2.1. The Engineer shall attend utility coordination meetings and provide technical
support to facilitate the development of relocation plans.
8.3. Utility Layout Sheets in CADD
Cartern-Burgess 12
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
8.3.1. The Engineer shall prepare drawings early in the design phase to be used as
exhibits in utility agreements. The exhibits shall be prepared using English units.
Existing Utilities shall be shown, including those that will conflict with
construction. When such conflicts are determined, a plan and profile of the
existing utility along with the roadway conflict will be developed.
8.4. Utility Relocation Design
8.4.1. The Engineer shall design proposed utility relocations based on the proposed
alignment of FM 156. The design will include a layout and cost estimate for the
proposed relocation of water& sewer public utilities.
9. Illumination
9.1. Illumination Plans
9.1.1. There are no illumination plans included in this scope of services.
10.Traffic Signals
10.1. Traffic Signal Plans
10.1.1. The Engineer will prepare Traffic Warrant Studies for the intersections of
Proposed FM 156 and Intermodal Parkway and Proposed FM 156 and the
connection to the existing FM 156 north of Alliance Airport.
10.1.2.The Engineer will prepare traffic signal plans and details for the intersections of
Proposed FM 156 and Intermodal Parkway and Proposed FM 156 and the
connection to the existing FM 156 north of Alliance Airport.
11. Geotechnical Investigations
11.1. Geotechnical Borings
11.1.1.The Engineer shall coordinate with the GEC and the State to determine the
location of soil borings to be drilled. (Terra-Mar's Scope of Services is included
as an attachment) A pavement design report including pavement bores and
pavement design shall be provided by Terra-Mar. This report and pavement
design shall be incorporated into the typical sections.
12. Right of Way Data
12.1. Right of Way Requirements
12.1.1. The Engineer shall develop cross sections for the ultimate section and determine
right of way requirements. The Engineer shall review and evaluate the proposed
right of way map to verify that all construction staging and alignment
considerations have been taken into account. The Engineer shall make every
effort to prevent detours and utility relocations from extending beyond the
proposed right of way lines. If it is necessary to obtain additional construction
easements and/or right-of-entry, the Engineer shall notify the GEC in writing of
the need and justification for such action. The Engineer shall identify and
coordinate with all utility companies for relocations required within these
construction easements and/or right-of entries (short of litigation).
13. Field Surveying and Photogrammetry
Carter Surgess 13
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
13.1. Field Surveying
13.1.1.The Engineer shall verify the benchmark coordinates and establish the horizontal
and vertical control for the project.
13.1.2. The Engineer shall:
• Stake Project Baseline: The project baseline must be coincidental with, or
parallel to, the stationed "Design Center Line." Base line control points shall be
established using 15M (ASTM) (5/8 inch) iron rods, 36 inches long, at P.C.' s,
P.I.'s and P.T.'s of horizontal curves and at 1000 feet maximum intervals on
tangents. Baseline control points shall be offset with set iron rods on both sides
near the existing ROW lines at a measured distance.
• Vertical Control: Locate previously set benchmarks established by State (State
Datum); establish benchmark circuit (run levels) throughout the Project; establish
additional benchmarks at intervals not to exceed 1,000 feet for the limits of the
Project; tie benchmarks (station/offset) to Project baseline. Benchmarks shall be
20M (ASTM) (3/4-inch) diameter, 48 inches long, located near the existing ROW
line at a measured distance. All benchmark circuits shall be tied to the State's
elevation datum. Perform the benchmark circuits in accordance with good
surveying practices. The Surveyor shall verify the closure and submit
adjustments to GEC for approval prior to beginning the field surveys.
• Profile and cross section intersecting streets and driveways (to 50 feet outside
ROW for driveways, 200 feet for intersecting streets and 500 feet for intersecting
streets greater than two lanes wide)for tie into project.
• Cross section drainage channels for a distance of 500 feet each way outside the
ROW lines. Cross sections shall not exceed 250 feet intervals and shall be taken
at right angles to the channels.
• Secure right-of-entry (short of litigation), as needed for the project.
• Tie to existing underground and overhead utilities (location, elevation and
direction).
• Determine type of existing material, pavements, etc.
• Obtain profiles of existing drainage facilities.
• Obtain top of manhole and flowline elevations, type and size, etc. of manholes,
inlets, and valves of utilities.
• Provide temporary signs, traffic control, flags, safety equipment, etc. and obtain
necessary permits.
• Perform datum ties as required (COE, etc.). If required, establish an elevation
base on the State's datum to other public entities published benchmarks.
• The Surveyor shall control traffic in and near surveying operations adequately to
comply with the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices. In the event field personnel must divert traffic or close traveled lanes, a
Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by the Engineer's surveyor and approved
by the State prior to commencement of field work. A copy of the approved plans
shall be in the possession of field personnel on the job site at all times and shall
be made available to State personnel upon request.
• All standards, procedures and equipment used by the Surveyor shall be such
that the results of survey will be in accordance with Board R,W7e as
Carter-.:Burgess 14
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway FM 156 Design
promulgated by the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveyors. At a minimum,
the following standards of accuracy shall be met:
HORIZONTAL GROUND CONTROL
o The coordinate location of the traverse points shall be based on traverses
conducted by the Surveyor meeting standards of accuracy as set forth below.
o Reference may be made to standards of accuracy for Second Order, Class II,
horizontal control traverses as described in the Federal Geodetic Control
Committee publication entitled Standards and Specifications for Geodetic
control Networks, reprinted February 1991.
o Azimuth closure shall not exceed 4.5 seconds times the square root of the
number of traverse segments.
o Position closure after azimuth adjustment shall not exceed 1 in 20,000.
o In cases where a traverse approaches but does not entirely meet these
standards of accuracy and the Surveyor has assured itself that gross errors,
mistakes and blunders have been eliminated, the Surveyor shall submit the
traverse data to the GEC for further review by the State. The State will make
a determination as to the acceptability of the traverse as an exception to the
standard and will notify the Surveyor accordingly.
VERTICAL GROUND CONTROL
o Elevations established on the benchmarks shall be conducted by the
Surveyor meeting standards of accuracy as set forth below. Reference may
be made to standards of accuracy for third order vertical control traverses as
described in the Federal Geodetic Control Committee publication entitled
Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks, reprinted
February 1991.
o Vertical closure shall not exceed 0.05 feet times the square root of the
distance in miles.
o In case where a traverse approaches but does not entirely meet these
standards of accuracy and the Surveyor has assured itself that gross errors,
mistakes and blunders have been eliminated, the Surveyor shall submit the
traverse data to the GEC for further review by the State. The State will make
a determination as to the acceptability of the traverse as an exception to the
standard and will notify the Surveyor accordingly.
Carter Surgess 15
r sp!8 joloeiuo:D jol Apead pue ajaldwoo uo!;euipjoo:D
VN3J pue sl!q!gx3 2:N `sdeW Mdl:i `3VSd %001. `
r U -
r
,= e
w
c
o '
rL
0
r
t
C
O
r O
C YI
00 o a
i
c K zO ~
`a
00
C �
O
at
H
O C
L �
C
O d 67 .�
u � L a
mom
c V
C O O C
O
O H C
V Lu
a
0 w
N L y t0 $
r
Z
OAw
N
M O )� N
W C W Y+ C
LL O ++ y
(10
aYi L
N O 0 -0 T
~ ' w V N
� YL a
Ix O C
V L
N m
O Co u
C
� C
� w 7
X E O
~ O
U-
Ln V N v
Z rn v L O
oE 0L
fJ) O II NE
ami L
t N
-� d m Q c c 0 .0
CL
p d y 3. CD
3. w W. L m N
mLL O O LL 2 TIn
Q m
® aci 3 ai m Q Q > 4 Ya C m v Mc M w > C7
a m •- — .n �- U c .-
� � vm ❑ �cm 3: .2 >
t) w m v L c v o ,c ua v v �o
o Q v ❑ .� O a>i x W ,n �a m to > °' Q v �° o a � E o d y w
� w m v v) � 3 v �- o u� m ' � ..
Yjr U Z m c m n� m y v v O m °� o o a� o o c n r
C m 7 C m U J@ U ❑ ❑ Q' Cl) ,N U U m H
O 3 cn 3 v v a� m m c o 1
m '� m Op .0 v v O SOO .c E > c 'c � ccn E aoi 0 E •!: Vr�k�
m o n o v x co O O x `�° J J -�° o c - c m x O x o
Oyu a W CD) mHRQ mmX � t- ❑ UU ❑ cn0inU) F- MOwu� H OwH c0
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4- Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Reformat FM 156 EA
LOPEZGARCIA GROUP
REFORMAT FM 156 EA
SCOPE OF WORK
Services to be Provided by LopezGarcia Group
FM 156 Re-evaluation-New EA Outline
The Engineer will prepare an environmental re-evaluation using TxDOT's new environmental
assessment (EA) outline for the relocation of FM 156 from'/ miles south of the original town
site of Haslet north to a point 1,800 feet south of SH 114 in Tarrant and Denton Counties,
Texas. The latest re-evaluation, approved by the TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division (ENV)
in the summer of 2002, will be updated and reformatted for submittal and approval by the
Federal highway Administration (FHWA).
The tasks included in this work authorization for the preparation of the environmental document
are:
A) Project Management
B) Re-evaluation using new EA outline
C) Draft 1-Submittal to TxDOT and FHWA
D) Final Submittal
The scope of services for each of these tasks is described below.
A. Project Management
1. Schedule, progress reports, and invoices
The Engineer will prepare simple graphic milestone schedule indicating completion dates of
major work items, deliverables and reviews.
The Engineer will submit invoices by the 25�h of each month and by percent complete (30%,
70%, 90%, and 100%). Invoices will include progress reports with written description of all
activities ongoing or completed during the reporting period, activities planned for the following
month, problems encountered and action required to remedy them.
2. Attend Project Meetings
It is anticipated that the Engineer will attend eight(8) project coordination meetings to ensure
that the project is progressing on schedule, issues are addressed in a timely manner and
deliverables meet the satisfaction of Carter& Burgess and TxDOT. It is anticipated that these
meetings will be held at the Carter& Burgess office in Fort Worth.
3. Quality Assurance/Quality Control
The Engineer will provide continuous monitoring throughout the life of the project. Specific QC
reviews of work task deliverables have been incorporated into subsequent tasks.
B. Re-evaluation using new EA outline
The Engineer will provide environmental services to review the latest re-evaluation and re-
generate an environmental document using the new TxDOT's EA outline to assess potential
environmental impacts resulting from the proposed highway relocation project for FHWA
approval. The new document includes the following chapters/sections:
Carter=-Burgess '
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4- Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Reformat FM 156 EA
Chapter 1: Purpose and Need for the Project
A. Proposed Project
B. Need for the Project
C. Objectives of the Project
D. Focus of the Environmental Analysis
D.1 Planning and Scoping Process
D.2 Related Studies and Relevant Documents
D.3 Issues Studied in Detail
DA Issues Eliminated from Further Study
E. Applicable Regulatory Requirements and Required Coordination
Chapter 2: Description of the Alternatives
A. Process Used to Develop the Project Alternatives
B. Requirements for and Benefits of Alternatives
B.1 Principal Design Requirements
B.2 Desired Design Benefits
B.3 Environmental Protection and Enhancement Requirements
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study
C.1 Build-Alternative 1
C.2 Build-Alternative 2
D. Detailed Description of Reasonable Alternatives
D.1 Description of No-Build Alternative
D.2 Description of Build -Alternative 3
Chapter 3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
A. Jurisdictional Waters of the United States
A.1 Existing Environment
A.2 Environmental Consequences of Implementing the No-Build Alternative
A.3 Environmental Consequences of Implementing Build-Alternative 3
Chapter 4: Recommendation of the Preferred Alternative
A. Support Rationale
B. Mitigation and Monitoring Commitments
C. Recommendations for Alternative Selection and for a FONSI
List of Appendices
List of Tables
C. Draft 1-Submittal to TxDOT and FHWA
a. The Engineer will submit two (2) copies of the preliminary draft EA to Carter & Burgess
for review.
b. Upon receipt of comments, the Engineer will submit two copies (2) of Draft 1 to TxDOT-
Fort Worth District.
c. The Engineer will revise preliminary Draft 1 to respond to TxDOT-Fort Worth's
comments and submit twelve (12) copies to TxDOT for forwarding to FHWA.
d. The Engineer will revise Draft 1 to respond to FHWA's comments and submit ten (10)
copies to TxDOT for forwarding to FHWA.
1
i
Carter::Burgess 2
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4- Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Reformat FM 156 EA
D. Final-Submittal to TxDOT and FHWA
a. The Engineer will submit ten (10) copies of the Final to TxDOT for forwarding to FHWA,
filing and circulation.
b. The engineer will submit two (2) electronic (CD version) copies of the final document to
TxDOT in electronic format.
The following assumptions were made in preparation of this scope of work:
• No major changes to the proposed design (horizontal and vertical) have taken place
since approval of the last re-evaluation. if so, impacts of these changes to
environmental resources may need to be re-evaluated. Any work done (field work or
research) under this task item conducted by LOPEZGARCIA GROUP will be reimbursed
at a time and materials basis.
• No additional public involvement is required. However, if the FHWA requests an
additional public meetings or a public hearing, the work done under this task item
conducted by LOPEZGARCIA GROUP will be reimbursed at a time and materials basis.
Carter burgess 3
ER�:fi
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Railroad Design
TRANSYSTEMS
SCOPE OF WORK
RAIL DESIGN
Alignment: Exhibit No. 6
BNSF Preferred Alignment (Exhibit No. 6) - Scope of Services:
• A complete topographic survey will be required within the design limits of the Preferred
Alignment. Both the Intermodal Facility and the Marshalling Yard are active facilities and
will require close coordination with facility personnel for safety and operational limitations
during the duration of the survey effort. Current BNSF track safety regulations require a
dedicated lookout on each survey crew. Accurate definition of track alignment and
switch placement will be identified during the field survey. Existing surface utilities,
drainage structures and topography shall be tied down.
• The scope of services shall include horizontal and vertical track alignment of Exhibit 6
and associated switch configuration. Current alignments detailed in this exhibit show
preliminary switch placement and additional trackage for this project. BNSF standards
shall be used to complete the final design and will require BNSF approval. Portions of
the existing trackage will be realigned to meet the overall track plans.
• A set of grading plan and profiles shall be completed to accommodate the new track
section through out the project limits. This grading plan shall incorporate ditch grading,
placement of switch pad and signal berms as required.
• A drainage plan shall detail all existing structures that influence the site drainage. A new
bridge at Henrietta Creek will require a drainage study to properly analyze the capacity
and hydraulic characteristics. In addition studies will be required at Elizabeth, Harriet
and Fossil Creeks. These all are FEMA studied waterway's and will require a revision to
the FIRM. This proposal includes the filing of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) and the final Letter of Map Revisions (LOMR).
• Underground utilities will be investigated throughout the project limits. BNSF utilities
shall be relocated or encased per the railroad engineering standards as related to
existing utility polices. All authorized licensed utilities which have agreements to be
located within the project limits will be identified. These utilities will be contacted and
advised of BNSF utility policy. TranSystems will coordinate with the utilities for the
design of their relocations..
• A geotechnical investigation and report shall be conducted for embankment and
stabilization recommendations. Subsurface bore shall be included for abutment and
foundation design at both Henrietta Creek North and South bridges, Harriet, Elizabeth
and Fossil Creek bridges in addition.
• Two new bridges will be placed over Henrietta Creek one South of the existing yard and
the other North of the yard. Other new structures will be required over Harriet, Fossil and
Elizabeth Creeks. The design of bridge plans and details shall be included in the project
scope.
• TranSystems shall coordinate with the BNSF signal Department for the placement of
switch/signal pads and intermediate signal berms to meet the overall signal plan for the
project. j
Carter.-:Burgess _ 3 '
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Railroad Design
• A final chosen track alignment exhibit shall be prepared for distribution to the BNSF
Engineering departments. Meetings with the BNSF Engineering, Signal and Public
Projects Departments will be scheduled for review of the exhibit and approval process.
• All review comments from the BNSF and contributing parties upon the authority's
concurrence shall be incorporated into the final design package. Bid Documents and
Specifications will completed and distributed for bid. A revised Cost of Probable
Construction Costs shall be completed for the Owner.
• TranSystems will provide to the highway designer BNSF clearance and pertinent
information to assist in their overpass design work.
• Reimbursable for travel, printing and supplies have been included in this proposal.
Qualifications:
• TranSystems has not included any tasks associated with Construction Permits in the
proposal.
• TranSystems has not included any tasks associated with Environmental Permits or
Environmental Site Assessments in the proposal.
• TranSystems assumes that the grade separation at John Day Road will be reviewed by
and constructed per the City of Fort Worth specifications.
• Construction Management has not been included in this proposal.
• The highway overpass design done by others is to meet BNSF criteria and is not the
responsibility of TranSystems.
Carter:-.Burgess 2
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Railroad Design
Connector Track
Connector Track - Scope of Services:
• A complete topographic survey will be required within the design limits of the Connector
Track corridor. This is new alignment and will require additional topographic detail of all
drainage features within the corridor. The Intermodal Facility to the west and the BNSF
main line and Auto Facility to the east are active operations and will require close
coordination with facility personnel for safety and operational limitations during the
duration of the survey effort. Current BNSF track safety regulations require a dedicated
lookout on each survey crew. Accurate definition of track alignment and switch
placement will be identified during the field survey. Existing surface utilities, drainage
structures and topography shall be tied down. This phase of the project will be
coordinated with the closing of a portion of existing FM 156 and the construction for the
realignment of FM 156. Track configuration at the Auto Facility will also be coordinated
at the intersection of new FM 156.
• The scope of services shall include horizontal and vertical track alignment of Connector
Track and associated switch configurations. Current alignments detailed in this exhibit
show preliminary switch placement and additional trackage for this project. BNSF
standards shall be used to complete the final design and will require railroad engineering
department's approval. Portions of the existing trackage may be realigned to meet the
overall track plans.
• Additional right of way parcels will be required along the Connector Track corridor to
accommodate the grade separation. This work will be done by TranSystems and will
include a boundary survey of the site, working sketches of deed information, boundary
mapping and legal description for approximately 9 acres.
• A set of grading plan and profiles shall be completed to accommodate the new
Connector Track section through out the corridor limits. This grading plan shall
incorporate ditch grading, placement of switch pad and signal berms as needed.
• A drainage plan shall detail all existing structures that influence the site drainage. A new
bridge at Henrietta Creek will require a drainage study to properly analyze the capacity
and hydraulic characteristics. This appears to be a FEMA studied waterway and will
require a revision to the FIRM. This proposal includes the filing of a Conditional Letter of
Map Revision (CLOMR) and the final Letter of Map Revisions (LOMR).
• Underground utilities will be investigated throughout the project limits. BNSF utilities
shall be relocated or encased per the railroad engineering standards as related to
existing utility polices. All authorized licensed utilities which have agreements to be
located within the project limits will be identified. These utilities will be contacted and
advised of BNSF utility policy. TranSystems will coordinate with the utilities for the
design of their relocations.
• A geotechnical investigation and report shall be conducted for embankment and
stabilization recommendations. Subsurface bore shall be included for abutment and
foundation design.
• A new grade separation will be required at the intersection of John Day Road. The
design of bridge plans, details and revised pavement at the grade separation shall be
included in the project scope. Additional right of way parcels will be required along John
Cartero-Burgess 3
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Railroad Design
Day Road to accommodate the grade separation. Preparation of documents and
associated work for the acquiring of this land and will be done by TranSystems.
• A crash wall design is required by BNSF Engineering standards when clearance from
centerline of track to the closest pier or pile is less than 25 feet. The design
requirements will be completed for the new alignment of FM 156. This work will be
coordinated with the highway design engineering firm.
• TranSystems shall coordinate with the BNSF signal Department for the placement of
switch/signal pads and intermediate signal berms to meet the overall signal plan for the
project.
• Track alignment exhibits shall be prepared and presented for BNSF approval. Meetings
with the BNSF Engineering, Signal and Public Projects Departments will be scheduled
for the review and approval process. TranSystems will attend two (2) public meetings.
• All review comments from the BNSF and contributing parties upon the authority's
concurrence shall be incorporated into the final design package. Bid Documents and
Specifications will completed and distributed for bid. A revised Cost of Probable
Construction Costs shall be completed for the Owner.
• Reimbursable for travel, printing and supplies have been included in this proposal.
Qualifications:
• TranSystems has not included any tasks associated with Construction Permits in the
proposal.
• TranSystems has not included any tasks associated with Environmental Permits or
Environmental Site Assessments in the proposal.
• TranSystems assumes that the grade separation at John Day Road will be reviewed by
and constructed per the City of Fort Worth specifications.
• Construction Management has not been included in this proposal.
• The highway overpass design done by others is to meet BNSF criteria and is not the
responsibility of TranSystems.
Carter::Burgess 4
00
to
cv)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
to
CV)
..........................................................................
CV)
O ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
04
cv)
O .......... ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------
cv)
-------------------- ...........................................
00
04
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
to
04
U)
----------------------------------------------------------------
04
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
04
04
--------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ---
04
.................................................
00
O —m
------------------------------------------------i� ------------------
to
------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
------------------------- ------------------ ------------- ------------------
zm— -----------------------------------------M- --------------------------------
- -----------------------------------------
--------------------------------
Cl)
X LLJ
.... --------------------------------
-------------------------- ----------
m
W (L
to
------------------- --------------------------------------------------
—04 ------------ -------------------------------------------------------
m ----------------------------------------------------
..........................................................
co m
C.)
co N et
CL
----------------------— ----=-------------- ------ ---
Q H
Q�
W
---------------------------
ui
cc
C
E IL 0
m
Z LL
m z
(no
C
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
EAGLE PARKWAY DESIGN
SCOPE OF WORK
The work to be performed by CARTER::BURGESS, INC. (hereinafter referred to as "the
Engineer") under this contract consists of providing Engineering services required for the
preparation of complete Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E)for the relocation of Eagle
Parkway from the existing FM 156 intersection to approximately 1,100 feet east. Station limits
are from approximately STA 81+97.04 to STA 93+05.73. PS&E will be prepared for
construction of six lane divided roadway.
Carter& Burgess, the General Engineering Consultant (hereinafter referred to as the "GEC') will
provide the overall project supervision and management. The GEC will be the single point of
contact between the City of Fort Worth, Alliance Airport, TxDOT Fort Worth District and the
Engineer.
The Engineer shall prepare plans, details and compute quantities to include roadway design,
grading, paving, drainage, plans and details, signing, pavement markings, traffic control plans,
storm water pollution prevention plans, demolition plans, specifications and cost estimates.
Cross-sections will be prepared for earthwork computations. The storm sewer system will tie
into the existing system and will be designed per the City of Fort Worth Storm Drainage Criteria
and Design Manual.
The Engineer shall identify, prepare exhibits and complete all necessary forms for Design
Exceptions and/or Waivers within its limits prior to the 30% Submittal. These exceptions shall
be provided to the GEC and City of Fort Worth for coordination and processing of approvals. If
subsequent changes require additional exceptions, the Engineer shall notify the GEC as soon
as possible after identification.
The Engineer shall prepare any exhibits necessary for Utility approvals and other
governmental/regulatory agencies. The Engineer shall compile, maintain, and update a Utility
Conflict List. The Engineer shall provide the most current copy of the list to the GEC at each
Progress Report, and shall be responsible for coordination with utility companies to resolve
conflicts. The Utility List shall identify the owner of the facility, the contact person (with address
and telephone phone number), location of conflict (station and offset), type of facility, expected
clearance data and type of adjustment necessary.
The Engineer shall use CADD to fully develop all drawings. The CADD drawings developed
shall be compatible with City of Fort Worth and/or TxDOT standards. The Engineer shall provide
earthwork cross-section data files in GEOPAK format.
The Engineer shall collect, review and evaluate the available existing data pertaining to the
project and prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates in accordance with the requirements
and policies of the City of Fort Worth.
The Engineer shall provide supplemental field surveying services necessary to verify the Digital
Terrain Model (DTM), establish the project baseline on the ground, locate and tie existing
utilities to the project baseline, supplement topography at stream and-culverf-aa"s and
update topography. Coordinate geometry shall be based on and tied into State-plane Surface
coordinate system.
Carter-.:Burgess '
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
The Engineer shall make every effort to prevent detours and utility relocations from extending
beyond the proposed right of way. If it is necessary to obtain additional permanent or temporary
easements and/or Right of Entry, the Engineer shall notify the GEC in writing of the need and
justification of such action. The Engineer shall identify and coordinate with all utility companies
for relocations required.
The PS&E shall be complete and suitable for the bidding and awarding of a construction
contract, and in accordance with the latest City of Fort Worth policies and procedures.
The PS&E shall be developed in English units. The final plan sheets shall be 4 mil-double
matte standard mylars, size 11" x 17", signed, sealed and dated by a Professional Engineer
registered in the State of Texas. The plans shall be noted as copyrighted with the City of Fort
Worth's logo.
The Engineer shall make intermediate submittals, to include 35% Conceptual Plans, 75%
Preliminary Plans, and 100% Final Plans. The submittals shall consist of five (5) 11"x17" paper
sets.
PS&E for the above work shall be prepared in accordance with the applicable requirements of
the City of Fort Worth's Specifications, Standards and Manuals (latest revision). Whenever
possible, City and/or TxDOT's standard drawings, standard specifications, or previously
approved special provisions and/or special specifications shall be used. If a special provision or
a special specification must be developed for this project, it shall be in the City's format. Any
specifications developed by the Engineer shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to
inclusion in the PS&E. The Engineer shall sign, seal, and date all project specific modifications
to standard drawings.
The Engineer shall be required to meet with the GEC representatives on a regularly scheduled
basis (not to exceed every four weeks) to report on progress. After each meeting with the GEC,
the Engineer shall submit a memorandum summarizing the events, including an ACTION ITEM
LIST, within five (5) working days of the meeting.
The Engineer shall prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SW3P), including details
and pay quantities. The City of Fort Worth will provide the Notice of Intent.
The Engineer shall prepare a construction duration estimate. The Engineer shall provide
assistance to GEC personnel in interpreting the schedule.
The Engineer shall prepare and execute contracts with sub consultants, monitor sub consultant
activities (staff and schedule), and review and recommend approval of sub consultant invoices.
The Engineer shall prepare progress reports, every four weeks, describing activities during the
reporting period; activities planned for the following period; problems encountered and actions
to remedy them; list of meetings attended; overall status, including a tabulation of percentage
complete by task.
The Engineer shall prepare meeting minutes, solicit and incorporate participants' comments,
and distribute the minutes for all meetings attended by the Engineer during the design phase,
unless otherwise directed.
PSBE Development
1. Roadway Design
1.1. Finalize Schematic
Carter::Burgess 2
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of-FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
1.1.1. The Engineer, in cooperation with the GEC and the City of Fort Worth, shall plan,
attend and document a Design Concept Conference (DCC). The conference will
provide for a brainstorming session in which decision makers, stakeholders and
technical personnel may discuss and agree on:
• Roadway and drainage design parameters
• Engineering and environmental constraints
• Project development schedule
• Other issues as identified by the GEC and the City of Fort Worth.
1.1.2. Beginning with the design schematic, the Engineer shall refine the plan and
profile to secure adequate ties to intersecting roadways and driveways. Identify
intersecting roadway and driveway construction limits. The Engineer shall
address State comments and update the construction cost estimate.
1.1.3. Design cross sections will be developed by the Engineer at 50' station intervals
using Geopak design software. The design cross sections shall include the
following elements: each pavement layer and required undercut, right of way
limits, side slopes, pavement cross slopes, curbs and sidewalk retaining walls.
1.2. Finalize Earthwork Cross Sections
1.2.1. The Engineer shall update the earthwork cross sections to reflect the final design
elements. Cross sections will be developed for the ultimate section for
determining right of way requirements.
1.3. Roadway Design (General)
1.3.1. The Engineer shall provide roadway plan and profile drawings using CADD
standards as required by the City for the construction of two lanes of the ultimate
four-lane section. The drawings shall consist of a planimetric file of existing
features and files of the proposed improvements. The roadway base map shall
contain line work that depicts existing surface features obtained from the
schematic drawing. Existing major subsurface and surface utilities shall be
shown. Existing and proposed right-of-way lines shall be shown.
1.3.2. The plan view shall contain the following design elements:
• Calculated roadway centerline for Eagle Parkway and cross roads. Horizontal
control points shall be shown. The alignments shall be calculated using
GEOPAK.
• Pavement edges for all improvements (Eagle Parkway, cross streets and
driveways).
• Lane and pavement width dimensions.
• Proposed structure locations, lengths and widths.
• Direction of traffic flow on all roadways. Lane lines and /or arrows indicating the
number of lanes shall also be shown.
• Drawing scale shall be 1"=40'for 11"x17" sheets.
• Control of access line, ROW lines and easements.
• Begin/end superelevation transitions and cross slope changes.
• Limits of riprap, block sod, and seeding.
• Existing utilities and structures.
CarternBurgess 3
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
• Benchmark information.
• Radii callouts, curb location, guard fence, crash safety items and ADA
compliance items.
1.3.3. The profile view shall contain the following design elements:
• Calculated profile grade for Eagle Parkway. Vertical curve data, including "K"
values shall be shown.
• Existing and proposed profiles along the proposed centerline of the Eagle
Parkway and the outside gutter of the northbound roadway.
• Calculated vertical clearances at grade separations and overpasses, taking into
account the appropriate super-elevation rate, superstructure depth and required
clearance.
• Drawing vertical scale to be 1"=10'.
1.4. Roadway Summaries
1.4.1. The Engineer shall prepare Roadway Summary CADD sheets.
1.5. Horizontal Alignment Data Sheets
1.5.1. The Engineer shall prepare Horizontal Alignment Data CAD sheets.
1.6. Paving Layout
1.6.1. The Engineer shall prepare overall paving layout CADD sheets depicting
pavement type and location of use.
1.7. Demolition Plans (1"=100')
1.7.1. The Engineer shall prepare CADD sheets depicting roadway removal items.
1.7.2. Limits of demolition for the existing railroad crossing are defined as the existing
south ROW line to the proposed north ROW line, approximately 370'. This scope
assumes the railroad in this vicinity will be abandoned, and a proposed railroad
crossing is not included.
1.8. Roadway Plan/Profile
1.8.1. Using the approved schematic as the base drawing, the Engineer shall prepare
plan & profile sheets at 1"=40' scale. (11"x17" plan sheets)
1.9. Driveway Profiles
1.9.1. The Engineer shall analyze all driveways within the project and develop driveway
profiles as needed to ensure that driveways function as intended
1.10. Intersecting Roadway Plan/Profiles
1.10.1. The Engineer shall develop profiles for each intersecting roadway. Delineate the
limits of construction necessary to secure a suitable profile. For intersecting
roadway reconstruction exceeding 100', prepare a 1" = 40' plan-profile sheet
(11"x17" sheet) with the plan and the profile and construction limits. Calculate
and summarize intersecting roadway quantities.
1.11. Intersecting Roadway Grading
Carter Surgess 4
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
1.11.1.The Engineer shall provide an intersection layout detailing the grading, the
pavement design and drainage design at the intersection of each cross street.
The layout shall include the curb returns, geometrics, transition length, stationing,
pavement and drainage details.
1.12. Cut/Fill Quantities
1.12.1.The Engineer shall develop an earthwork analysis to determine cut and fill
quantities and provide final design cross sections at 50 feet intervals for Eagle
Parkway. Cross sections shall be delivered in standard GEOPAK format on
11"x17" sheets and electronic files. The Engineer shall provide all criteria and
input files used to generate the design cross sections. Cross sections and
quantities shall consider existing pavement removals. Two sets of drawings shall
be submitted by the Engineer at the 30%, 60% and 90% submittals, respectively.
1.13. Roadway Miscellaneous Quantities/Details
1.13.1.The Engineer shall identify and calculate miscellaneous roadway items.
1.13.2. The Engineer shall prepare any necessary roadway details to clarify construction
details.
1.14. Summary of Roadway Quantities
1.14.1.The Engineer shall compute and tabulate all roadway quantities using the City of
Fort Worth bid items.
1.15. Standards
1.15.1.The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable standards. The Engineer
shall modify standards as needed, fill in the title block with the project number,
page number etc. and plot sheets and incorporate into the plans.
1.16. Right-of-Way Determination.
1.16.1.A 150' ROW width will be used and the Engineer will develop right of way taking
lines.
1.17. Typical Sections.
1.17.1.The Engineer shall develop typical sections for all proposed and existing
roadways and structures. Typical sections shall include width of travel lanes,
shoulders, median widths, border widths, curb offsets, and ROW. The typical
section shall also include PGL, centerline, pavement design, longitudinal joints,
side slopes, sodding/seeding limits, concrete traffic barriers, station limits,
common proposed/existing structures including riprap, limits of embankment
excavation, etc.
2. Hydrology & Hydraulics
2.1. Drainage Area Mapping
2.1.1. The Engineer shall delineate drainage area boundaries based on USGS
topographic maps.
2.2. Calculate Discharges
Carter Surgess 5
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
2.2.1. The Engineer shall determine conveyance paths, channel slopes, time of
concentration, runoff coefficients/SCS curve numbers as required to calculate
design-year flows.
2.2.2. All drainage designs are to comply with the City of Fort Worth criteria.
2.3. Hydrology Related Tasks (Ultimate Discharges)
2.3.1. The Engineer shall research data and obtain existing hydrologic models by
coordination with the City(s) and FEMA.
2.3.2. The Engineer shall convert data, if required, from NUDALLAS to HEC-1 or HEC-
HMS.
2.3.3. The Engineer shall obtain USGS Maps and/or other suitable contour maps.
2.3.4. The Engineer shall delineate drainage area.
2.3.5. The Engineer shall verify future zoning or land use with the City(s).
2.4. Identify Drainage Easement Requirements
2.4.1. The Engineer shall identify drainage easements needed to construct drainage
facilities at discharge points along the project corridor.
2.5. Sub Area Mapping/Inlet Sizing (Winstorm or Geopak Drainage)
2.5.1. The Engineer shall subdivide the overall drainage areas into sub-areas and
calculate the discharge at each inlet. The Engineer shall analyze inlet capacities
and adjust inlet locations and sub-areas as needed to obtain desirable ponded
widths. This will include the overall drainage area map.
2.6. Storm Sewer Sizing (Winstorm or Geopak)
2.6.1. The Engineer shall size a network of storm sewers, based on the ultimate four-
lane section, to collect inlet flows and route the discharge to the outfall locations.
Prepare hydraulic data sheets for inclusion in the plans. This will also include the
Hydraulic Data Sheet that will become part of the plans.
2.7. Culvert Sizing (THYSYS Culvert)
2.7.1. The Engineer shall size each cross culvert to pass the design-year storm without
exceeding allowable headwater requirements established by the State and meet
any applicable FEMA criteria. The Engineer shall prepare hydraulic data sheets
for inclusion in the plans.
2.8. Storm Sewer Plan Profile (Trunk line)
2.8.1. The Engineer shall prepare storm sewer plan profile sheets depicting storm
sewer, inlets and manholes necessary to drain the project and convey the runoff
to the designated discharge points. The storm sewer plan profiles will be
consistent with the City of Fort Worth Hydraulic Manual. Inlets, manholes and
junctions will be in accordance with standard details.
2.9. Lateral Sheets
2.9.1. The Engineer shall prepare lateral sheets drawn at 1"=10' and 1"=40' for the
portion of the laterals to be constructed. However, the engineer can change the
Carter:.-Burgess 6
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
scale if this is necessary to fit the lateral profiles into the sheets. These laterals
shall be prepared in accordance to the Hydraulic Manual.
2.10. Culvert Layouts
2.10.1. The Engineer shall prepare culvert layouts sheets for each cross drainage
structure in accordance with the City of Fort Worth standard details.
2.11. Special Inlet Details
2.11.1.The Engineer shall prepare custom details to clarify construction details of non-
standard inlets.
2.12. Outfall Structure Details
2.12.1. The Engineer shall provide plan sheets and details to construct storm sewer
outfalls in the existing channels.
2.13. Channel and Easement Grading
2.13.1.The Engineer shall determine outfall-grading requirements and provide plans,
details and quantities to shape the outfall channel and stabilize the channel with
slope protection or vegetation.
2.14. Miscellaneous Drainage Details
2.14.1.The Engineer shall prepare any and all necessary plan details necessary to
clarify the construction requirements of the drainage facilities.
2.15. Summary of Drainage Quantities
2.15.1. The Engineer shall compute quantities, summarize in the plans and prepare a bid
item list and estimated prices for all drainage facilities.
2.16. Drainage Removal Summary
2.16.1. The Engineer shall prepare drainage removal summaries for existing drainage
structures to be removed or replaced.
2.17. SW3P Plans (Double Stack)
2.17.1.The Engineer shall develop the SW3P on separate sheets from the TCP, to
minimize potential impact to receiving waterways. It shall include text describing
the plan, quantities, typical sections, phase and locations of erosion control
devices and any required permanent erosion control measures such as: sediment
control fences, rock filter dams, soil retention blankets, riprap slope protection
and other devices as required. Erosion control plans shall be coordinated with
the Traffic Control Plan and Sequence of Work.
2.18. Assemble Applicable Standards
2.18.1.The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable standards and modify
standards as needed. The Engineer shall fill in the title block with project
number, page number etc., plot sheets and incorporate into the plans.
2.19. Structural Design and Detailing of Drainage Features
Carter::Burgess
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
2.19.1. The Engineer shall perform layout, structural design and detailing for the
following:
• Culverts.
• New or modified storm sewers; inlets; manholes; trunk lines.
3. Signing & Pavement Markings & Signalization
3.1. Signing & Pavement Marking Layouts
3.1.1. The Engineer shall prepare signing and pavement marking layout sheets at 1" _
100' scale, double stacked, in accordance with the Texas Manual of Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD).
3.2. Pavement Marking Details
3.2.1. The Engineer shall detail permanent and temporary pavement markings and
channelization devices on plan sheets. The Engineer shall coordinate with the
GEC/City for overall temporary, interim, and final pavement marking strategies.
Pavement markings shall be selected from the latest State standards.
3.2.2. The Engineer shall provide the following information on sign/pavement marking
layouts:
o Proposed markings (illustrated and quantified) which include pavement
markings, object markings and delineation.
o Proposed signs (illustrated and numbered).
o Existing signs to remain, to be removed, or to be relocated.
o Quantities of existing pavement markings to be removed.
o Proposed delineators and object markers.
o The number of lanes in each section of proposed roadway and the location of
changes in numbers of lanes.
o ROW lines.
o Direction of traffic flow on all roadways.
o Roadway layout.
o Center line with station numbering.
o Culverts and other structures that present a hazard to traffic.
o Location of utilities.
3.3. Summary of Pavement Markings
3.3.1. The Engineer shall compute quantities, summarize in the plans and prepare a bid
item list and estimates prices for all striping.
3.4. Small Sign Summary
3.4.1. The Engineer shall determine the mounting requirements for each sign or sign
cluster based on City and/or TxDOT standards. List all the signs on the standard
summary sheets together with totals for each mount type.
3.5. Assemble Applicable Standards
'77 ,
Carter Surgess - 8
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
3.5.1. The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable City and State standards
and modify standards as needed. The Engineer shall fill in the title block with
project number, page number etc., plot sheets and incorporate into the plans.
4. Traffic Control Plans
4.1. Traffic Control/Sequence of Work Layouts
4.1.1. The Engineer shall prepare layouts at 1" = 100' scale showing the travel lanes
and construction area for each phase of construction. Included in the layouts will
be temporary signing and striping, channelization devices, barricades and a
narrative of the sequence of work. The sheets will include detour diagrams,
where applicable. The sheets will include horizontal alignment data for any
temporary alignments created for the various traffic control phases. The scope
does not include the preparation of profiles for these alignments.
4.2. Traffic Control Typical Sections
4.2.1. In conjunction with the Traffic Control Layouts, the Engineer shall develop typical
cross sections showing lane widths, edge conditions, channelization and
proposed construction area.
4.3. Intersection Staging
4.3.1. The Engineer shall develop typical intersection staging plans for similar
intersections. The Engineer shall develop custom intersection staging layouts for
special conditions.
4.4. Miscellaneous TCP Details
4.4.1. The Engineer shall prepare any and all necessary plan details necessary to
clarify the construction requirements of the traffic control and erosion plans.
4.4.2. The Engineer shall provide a written narrative of the construction sequencing and
work activities per phase and determine the existing and proposed traffic control
devices (regulatory signs, warning signs, guide signs, route markers, construction
pavement markings, barricades, flag personnel, etc.) to be used to handle traffic
including at grade intersections during each construction sequence. The
Engineer shall show temporary roadways and detours required to maintain traffic
throughout the construction phasing.
4.4.3. Where detours are required, the Engineer shall develop typical cross sections,
calculate quantities, and show horizontal and vertical alignment information. The
Engineer shall provide a detailed layout and arrangement of construction signs,
construction pavement marking and traffic control devices.
4.5. Assemble Applicable Standards
4.5.1. The Engineer shall identify and acquire all applicable Statewide and District
standards and modify standards as needed. The Engineer shall fill in the title
block with project number, page number etc., plot sheets and incorporate into the
plans.
5. Bridge Design
5.1. Bridge Plans
Carter Surgess 9
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
5.1.1. There are no bridge plans included in this scope of services.
6. PSBE Documents (City of Fort Worth Format)
6.1. Construction Cost Estimate, Basis of Estimate
6.1.1. The Engineer shall compute and tabulate all quantities using City bid items and
descriptive codes. The Engineer shall prepare an engineer's estimate to
accompany the 60%, 90% and final PSBE submittals.
6.2. Construction Duration Estimate
6.2.1. The Engineer shall prepare a construction duration estimate. The Engineer shall
provide assistance to GEC personnel in interpreting the schedule.
6.3. General Notes & Specifications
6.3.1. The Engineer shall prepare general notes and specification data. The Engineer
shall identify any Special Specifications and/or Special Provisions applicable to
the project and prepare any custom specifications needed for the project and
submit with appropriate justification.
7. Project Management
7.1. Project Administration
7.1.1. The Engineer shall prepare project correspondence and progress reports,
coordinate with sub-consultants, and maintain routine project record keeping.
7.2. Periodic Progress Meetings
7.2.1. The Engineer shall attend periodic progress meetings as required to monitor the
development of the project.
8. Utility Plans
8.1. Research Existing Utilities
8.1.1. Each utility company determined to have facilities within the project area will be
contacted by the Engineer to provide utility information in the form of as-built
drawings or on-site identification of their facilities. This effort will serve the
purpose of beginning a dialog with the utilities to keep them informed of the
project progress and how it will affect their facility.
8.2. Utility Coordination Meetings
8.2.1. The Engineer shall attend utility coordination meetings and provide technical
support to facilitate the development of relocation plans.
8.3. Utility Layout Sheets in CADD
8.3.1. The Engineer shall prepare drawings early in the design phase to be used as
exhibits in utility agreements. The exhibits shall be prepared using English units.
Existing Utilities shall be shown, including those that will conflict with
construction. When such conflicts are determined, a plan and profile of the
existing utility along with the roadway conflict will be de eloped.
8.4. Utility Relocation Design
Carter-.:Burgess 10
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
8.4.1. The Engineer shall design proposed utility relocations based on the proposed
alignment of Eagle Parkway. The design will include a layout and cost estimate
for the proposed relocation of water & sewer public utilities.
9. Illumination
9.1. Illumination Plans
9.1.1. There are no illumination plans included in this scope of services.
10.Traffic Signals
10.1. Traffic Signal Plans
10.1.1.There are no Traffic Signal plans included in this scope of services.
11. Geotechnical Investigations
11.1. Geotechnical Borings
11.1.1.There are no geotechnical borings included in this scope of services. The
proposed pavement will match the existing Eagle Parkway section.
12. Right of Way Data
12.1. Right of Way Requirements
12.1.1.The Engineer shall develop cross sections for the proposed section and
determine right of way requirements. The Engineer shall review and evaluate the
proposed right of way map to verify that all construction staging and alignment
considerations have been taken into account. The Engineer shall make every
effort to prevent detours and utility relocations from extending beyond the
proposed right of way lines. If it is necessary to obtain additional construction
easements and/or right-of-entry, the Engineer shall notify the GEC in writing of
the need and justification for such action. The Engineer shall identify and
coordinate with all utility companies for relocations required within these
construction easements and/or right-of entries (short of litigation).
13. Field Surveying and Photogrammetry
13.1. Field Surveying
13.1.1.The Engineer shall verify the benchmark coordinates and establish the horizontal
and vertical control for the project.
13.1.2.The Engineer shall:
• Stake Project Baseline: The project baseline must be coincidental with, or
parallel to, the stationed "Design Center Line." Base line control points shall be
established using 15M (ASTM) (5/8 inch) iron rods, 36 inches long, at P.C.' s,
P.I.'s and P.T.'s of horizontal curves and at 1000 feet maximum intervals on
tangents. Baseline control points shall be offset with set iron rods on both sides
near the existing ROW lines at a measured distance.
• Vertical Control: Locate previously set benchmarks established by State (State
Datum); establish benchmark circuit (run levels) throughout the Project; establish
additional benchmarks at intervals not to exceed 1,000 feet for the limits of the
Project; tie benchmarks (station/offset) to Project baseline. Benchmarks shall be
Carter:-.Burgess 11
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
20M (ASTM) (3/4-inch) diameter, 48 inches long, located near the existing ROW
line at a measured distance. All benchmark circuits shall be tied to the State's
elevation datum. Perform the benchmark circuits in accordance with good
surveying practices. The Surveyor shall verify the closure and submit
adjustments to GEC for approval prior to beginning the field surveys.
• Profile and cross section intersecting streets and driveways (to 50 feet outside
ROW for driveways, 200 feet for intersecting streets and 500 feet for intersecting
streets greater than two lanes wide)for tie into project.
• Cross section drainage channels for a distance of 500 feet each way outside the
ROW lines. Cross sections shall not exceed 250 feet intervals and shall be taken
at right angles to the channels.
• Secure right-of-entry (short of litigation), as needed for the project.
• Tie to existing underground and overhead utilities (location, elevation and
direction).
• Determine type of existing material, pavements, etc.
• Obtain profiles of existing drainage facilities.
• Obtain top of manhole and flowline elevations, type and size, etc. of manholes,
inlets, and valves of utilities.
• Provide temporary signs, traffic control, flags, safety equipment, etc. and obtain
necessary permits.
• Perform datum ties as required (COE, etc.). If required, establish an elevation
base on the State's datum to other public entities published benchmarks.
• The Surveyor shall control traffic in and near surveying operations adequately to
comply with the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices. In the event field personnel must divert traffic or close traveled lanes, a
Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by the Engineer's surveyor and approved
by the State prior to commencement of field work. A copy of the approved plans
shall be in the possession of field personnel on the job site at all times and shall
be made available to State personnel upon request.
• All standards, procedures and equipment used by the Surveyor shall be such
that the results of survey will be in accordance with Board Rule 663.15, as
promulgated by the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveyors. At a minimum,
the following standards of accuracy shall be met:
HORIZONTAL GROUND CONTROL
o The coordinate location of the traverse points shall be based on traverses
conducted by the Surveyor meeting standards of accuracy as set forth below.
o Reference may be made to standards of accuracy for Second Order, Class II,
horizontal control traverses as described in the Federal Geodetic Control
Committee publication entitled Standards and Specifications for Geodetic
control Networks, reprinted February 1991.
o Azimuth closure shall not exceed 4.5 seconds times the square root of the
number of traverse segments.
o Position closure after azimuth adjustment shall not exceed 1 in 20,000.
o In cases where a traverse approaches but does not entirely meet these
standards of accuracy and the Surveyor has assured itself that gross errors,
mistakes and blunders have been eliminated, the Surveyor shall submit the
CarternBurgess 12
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Eagle Parkway Design
traverse data to the GEC for further review by the State. The State will make
a determination as to the acceptability of the traverse as an exception to the
standard and will notify the Surveyor accordingly.
VERTICAL GROUND CONTROL
o Elevations established on the benchmarks shall be conducted by the
Surveyor meeting standards of accuracy as set forth below. Reference may
be made to standards of accuracy for third order vertical control traverses as
described in the Federal Geodetic Control Committee publication entitled
Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks, reprinted
February 1991.
o Vertical closure shall not exceed 0.05 feet times the square root of the
distance in miles.
o In case where a traverse approaches but does not entirely meet these
standards of accuracy and the Surveyor has assured itself that gross errors,
mistakes and blunders have been eliminated, the Surveyor shall submit the
traverse data to the GEC for further review by the City. The City will make a
determination as to the acceptability of the traverse as an exception to the
standard and will notify the Surveyor accordingly.
CarternBurgess 13
0
04
----------------- ------------------------------------------
04
04
U) is
(1) --------------------- ----------------- ----------------------------------------- --
Cj
----------------- -------- ---------------- ------------------------------
00
----------------- ------------------------------- --------------------------- -
!Ww --------------
---------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ---- ----------------
---------------------- --------------------------------------------- -- ---------- -------
0 — ---------------------------------------------------------------------
LM
CL
— ---------------------------------------------------------------------
0 00
-------------------------------------------- - ------------------ -------
co
-------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
CD
w
CL
----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
. .............. .............................................................................
uiT a a U)
U)
ca m m m m m
0 M
N N00
LO r- N r.-
0 w
a o cu
�,
rn
caz LO LO
'Ae
Lf
(Y)
wim
LO (c r 00 N
-
1%7—' Iu
co
OHM,
?
ALLIANCE RUNWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, PHASE 4 - Design of FM 156,
Railroad and Eagle Parkway Title Policy Expense for ROW Acquisition
SCOPE OF WORK
TITLE POLICY EXPENSE
It has been deemed necessary to acquire approximately 126 acres of land to allow for the
relocation of FM 156, Eagle Parkway and the BNSF rail line.
As shown in the table in the 'Compensation' portion of this contract, James Daniels &
Associates has estimated the cost of this land to be approximately $5 million, and the
associated Title Policy expense to`be approximately $41,000.
Title Policy costs are a necessary administrative expense of land acquisition, and were not
represented in the budget item for Land Acquisition.
Carter::Burgess '
Attachment B
COMPENSATION
Alliance Airport Runway Extension Project, Phase 4
Design of FM 156, Railroad and Eagle Parkway
Carter and Burgess, Inc. will be the prime "Engineer'/Program Manager. Subcontracts will be
executed with the firms listed below. The total amount for the contract is $2,858,584.66.
The Engineer shall be compensated a total lump sum fee for the project. Payment of the lump
sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment A for all
labor, materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to complete the services.
The Engineer shall submit monthly invoices to the City for all work performed under this
agreement set forth in Article III, Terms of Payment. The monthly invoices will contain a
description of the tasks performed for that particular month, percent complete for each task,
amount budgeted for each task, portion of budget amount expended, previous billing totals, and
totals for invoice.
The following is a list of all of the firms and their fees in the contract:
Carter and Burgess, Inc. $851,718.57
LopezGarcia Group $994,527.59
TranSystems $815,610.01
ANA Consultants $ 64,272.49
James Daniels &Associates $ 41,000.00
Terra Mar $ 91,456.00
TOTAL $2,858,584.66
The Engineering Design fees for this project will be distributed as follows:
Contract DBE Contract
Consultant Amount Amount Total
1. Program Management C&B $256,381.38 $256,381.38
2. FM 156 Design LopezGarcia $977,410.74 $1,373,128.66
C&B $285,259.43
Terra-Mar $46,186.00
ANA $64,272.49
3. Reformat FM 156 EA LopezGarcia $17,116.85 $17,116.85
4 Railroad Design— TranSystems $815,610.01 $1,087,707.77
Alternative 6
C&B $226,827.76
Terra-Mar $45,270.00
5. Eagle Parkway Design C&B $83,250.00 $83,250.00
6 Title Policies for Land James Daniels $41,000.00 $41,000.00
Acquisition &Associates
Total Fee $1,758,784.58 $1,099,800.08 $2,858,584.66
'DBE Participation—38.47%
Carter&Burgess Fee Proposal
Alliance Airport Runway Extension Project
Fort Worth,Texas 9-Dec-03
Program Management Services Approximately 54 weeks
Phase IV-Road&Rail Design
Labor Hour Estimate Project Program Senior Project CADD Contract Admin
Principal Manager , Engineer Controls Mgr. Tech Admin Assistant
Conduct Weekly Progress Meetings 162 1621 54
Prepare&Distribute Meeting Minutes 54 54
Develop&Maintain Project Schedules 40 40
Maintain Document Control System 40 40
Administer Contracts&Sub-Contracts 40 40
Provide FAA Grant Assistance 401 80 40 40
Technical&Graphic Support 80 160
Right of Way Coordination 80 80
Prepare Project Status Reports 40 40
Review FM 156 Design 24 80
Review Rail Design 24 80
Review Eagle Parkway Design 16 40
Coordinate with BNSF&TxDOT 40 40
Coordinate with FAA, Alliance,Ft.Worth 16 401 40
Total Hours 16 6001 440 80 280 336 94
Fee Proposal Hourly Hours Labor
Rate Cost
Project Principal $ 65.00 16 $ 1,040.00
Program Manager $ 60.00 600 $ 36,000.00
Senior Engineer $ 50.00 440 $ 22,000.00
Project Controls Manager $ 37.00 80 $ 2,960.00
CADD Technician $ 25.00 280 $ 7,000.00
Contract Administrator $ 27.00 336 $ 9,072.00
Administrative Assistant $ 18.00 94 $ 1,692.00
Salary Cost $ 79,764.00
Overhead Rate @ 176.72% $140,958.94
Sub-Total $220,722.94
Profit @ 15% $ 33,108.44
C&B Labor Cost $253,831.38
Expenses
Mileage $ 750.00
Courier/Express Mail $ 300.00
Printing&Plotting $ 500.00
Reproduction $ 1,000.00
Total Expenses $ 2,550.00
Total Cost $256,381.38
eyl LItU•r
Cartern-Burgess
Engineering Cost Estimate
Project No.:
Structure: FM 156 Bridges
By:GMC
Description:
Two Locations
TxDOT Type IV precast concrete beams
(2)12'Traffic Lanes
(1)10.00'Outside Shoulder plus Type T201 Rail
(1)12.00'Inside Shoulder plus Type T201 Rail
52.00'Overall Width-0 degree skew-horizontally curved
To be constructed using 1993 TxDOT Standard Specifications
Unnamed Creek Bridge (52'x300'):
Item Description PM PE EIT Tech Total Manhours
Unnamed Crk Bridge Layout (1 sht) 8 16 16 24 64
Preliminary Structure Design 2 4 8 6 20
Boring Log/Layout 2 4 8 16 30
Beam Design&Bm Seat Els(1 sht) 8 8 24 4 44
Bridge Geometry 8 8 24 4 44
Abutment Plans(4 shts) 8 24 32 56 120
Bent Plans(2 shts) 4 12 24 40 80
Slab Plans(2 shts) 4 12 24 40 80
Beam Plans(2 shts) 4 12 24 40 80
Estimated Quantities(1 sht) 4 16 16 4 40
Plan Coordination 8 16 8 8 40
QA/QC 16 16 32
Proposals,Scheduling,Specs 8 8 16
Totals: 84 156 208 242 690
2004 Raw Rate $48.00 $37.50 $27.00 $25.40
C&B Multiplier:3.1823 $152.75 $119.34 $85.92 $80.83
$12,831.03 $18,616.46 $17,871.80 $19,560.96 $68,880.25
12% 23% 30% 35%
Elizabeth Creek Bridge(52'x900):
Item Description PM PE EIT Tech Total Manhours
Elizabeth Crk Bridge Layout (3 shts) 12 24 48 80 164
Preliminary Structure Design 4 8 12 12 36
Boring Log/Layout 4 8 12 12 36
Beam Design&Bm Seat Els(1 sht) 8 24 40 8 80
Bridge Geometry 8 24 40 8 80
Abutment Plans(4 shts) 8 24 32 56 120
Bent Plans(8 shts) 24 40 80 160 304
Slab Pians(5 shts) 16 36 48 80 180
Beam Plans(5 shts) 16 36 48 80 180
Estimated Quantities(1 sht) 8 16 16 8 48
Plan Coordination 16 24 16 16 72
QA/QC 16 16 32
Proposals,Scheduling,Specs 8 8 16
Totals: 148 288 392 520 1348
2004 Raw Rate $48.00 $37.50 $27.00 $25.40
C&B Multiplier:3.1823 $152.75 $119.34 $85.92 $80.83
$22,607.06 $34,368.84 $33,681.46 $42,031.82 $132,689.18
11% 21% 29% 39%
JEngineering Cost Estimate: $201,569.43
Required Data
Final roadway cross section Bridge Layouts&Design
Final vertical and horizontal geometric alignments Unnamed Crk: $ 68,880.25
Final hydraulic requirements and location of structure over creeks Elizabeth Crk: $ 132,689.18
Final geotechnical information with TxDOT criteria for bridge structures
Total: $ 201,569.43
No architectural\aesthetic treatments have been considered
No special traffic or pedestrian railing has been considered
No retaining walls have been considered-sloped header banks
FM156.Cost.x1s:Engr Cost(3) 10282003
artermmms Burgess
ESTIMATE FOR SURVEY SERVICES
ESTIMATE REQUESTED BY: Don M. Treude/ Lopez-Garcia JOB NUMBER:
JOB NAME: FM 156 Re-Location DATE: 10-27-2003
SCOPE OF WORK TOTAL
Perform field and office work necessary to prepare acquisition surveys maps and legal
descriptions for approximately 11 parcels and 14 drainage easements to be acquired for
the FM 156 Relocation. The approximate length is +/- 5 miles and the property area of
the tracts to be affected totals more than 2500 acres
FIELD
1. Establish horizontal /vertical control necessary to locate boundary corners and 9,870.00
features.
2. Perform field surveys to locate boundary monumentation and other features signifigant 10,000.00
to the resolution of the boundary takings (NOTE: If aerial photography is available it will
be used for background features, any dimensioning from said aerial will be field verified
prior to publication)
3. Perform additional topographic surveys at water crossings, existing road crossings 8,560.00
and the tie in locations at the ends of the project
4. Set monumentation at PC's, PT's and every 1000 feet along the centerline 5,000.00
OFFICE
1. Preliminary calculations to prepare a working sketch of the properties to be surveyed. 3,800.00
The working sketch to be based on supplied record documentation of all the properties
involved in the acquisition
2. Reduce and verify fieldwork performed to be used in determination and analysis of 11,400.00
boundary construction
MAPPING
1. Preparation of ROW Strip Map 4,750.00
2. Prepare individual Parcel Exhibits and legal descriptions 11,400.00
3. Prepare drainage easements and legal descriptions 19,000.00
Assumption:
1. We will be supplied with TxDoT specified border sheets, cell libraries and valid
current examples of all mapping products from the district overseeing the project.
2. Approximate time of completion is 90 working days.
3. We will be supplied with design files and coordinates of the centerline and rights-
of-way.
4. Work to begin within 10 days after notice to proceed.
ESTIMATE BY: Todd Bridges @ 735-6098 83,690.00
MASTERS\SURVEY\ESTIMATE.SS