HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5811 ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR PART OF THE COST
OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF—._---,Skyline Drive
AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS: FIXING CHARGES AND LIENS AGAINST ABUTTING
PROPERTY THEREON, AND AGAINST THE OWNERS THEREOF: PROVIDING FOR THE
COLLECTION.OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFI-
CATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF: RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE RIGHT
TO ALLOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE RESPECTIVE ASSESSMENT TO
THE EXTENT OF ANY CREDIT GRANTED: DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO EN-
GROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FORT WORTH, AND BY FILING THE ORDINANCE
IN THE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF SAID CITY: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WiIER,EAS, the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has heretofore ordered that each of the hereinafter described
z)crtions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be improved by raising, grading,
or filling same and by constructing thereon to-wit
1. SKYLINE DRIVE From a line 132.7 feet south of South Brook
Drive .to the south line of Jacksboro Highway,
known and designated as Unit 19 Project No*
lo4-22000-103, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic
concrete surface on a 40 foot roadway.
The above,together with combined concrete curbs and gutter on proper grade and line where same are.not already
so constructed, together with storm drains and other necessary incidentals and appurtenances; all of said improve-
ments are to be. so constructed as and where shown on the plans and'in strict accordance with the Plans and
Specifications therefor: and contract has been made and entered into with R. W. GIBBINS, INC
for the making and construction of such improvements on the above said portion of streets, avenues and public
places.
WHEREAS, estimates of the cost of the improvements of each.such.portion of streets, avenues and public
places were prepared and filed and approved and adopted by the City Council of the City, and a time and place
was fixed for a hearing and the proper notice of the time, place and purpose.of said.hearing was given and said
hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor, to-wit, on the 24-day of Ju17 ,
19 67 in the Council Chamber in the City Hall'in the City of Fort Worth, Texas,`and at
such hearing the following protests and objections were made, to-wit:
_protested that
- protested that
protested that
-protested that
_ _-protested that
---.'protested that
— — ------ --- ------ -----.- .--protested that
-- ---------"----- ---------- -_------protested that
-protested that
—_--protested that
— --._ _protested that
_protested that
j and said hearing was continued to the present time in order to more fully accomplish the purposes thereof, and
all desiring to be heard were given full and fair opportunity to be heard, and the City Council of the City having, .
fully Considered all proper .matter, is of the opinion that the said hearing should be closed and assessments
should be made and levied as herein ordered:
NOW THEREFORE:
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH,
TEXAS, 'THAT:
Said hearing be, and the same is hereby, closed and the said protest and objections, and any and all other
Protests and objections, whether herein enumerated or or not, be and the same are hereby, overruled.
II.
The City Council, from the evidence, finds that the assessments herein levied should be made and levied
against the respective parcels of property abutting upon the said portions of streets; avenues and public places
and against the owners of such property, and that such assessments and charges are right and proper and are
substantially in proportion to the benefits to the respective parcels of property by means of the improvements
in the unit for which such assessments are levied, and establish substantial justice and equality and uniformity
between the respective owners of the respective properties, and between all parties concerned, considering the
benefits received and burdens imposed, and further finds that in each case the abutting property assessed is.
specially benefited in enhanced value to the said property by means of the said improvements in the unit upon
which the particular property abuts And for which assessment is levied and charge made, in a sum in excess of
the said assessment and charge made against the same by this ordinance, and further finds that the apportion-
ment of the cost of the improvements is in accordance with the law in force in this City, and the proceedings of
the City heretofore had with reference to said improvements, and is in all respects valid and regular.
III.
There shall be, and is hereby, levied and assessed against the parcels of property herein below mentioned,
and against the real and true owners thereof (whether such owners be correctly- named herein or not) the sums of
money itemized below opposite the description of the respective parcels of property and the several amounts
assessed against the same, and the owners thereof, as far as such owners are known, being as follows:
IV.
Where more than one person, firm or corporation owns an interest in any property above described, each' .',.
said person, firm or corporation shall be personally liable only for its, her or his pro rata of the total assessment
against such property in proportion as its, his or her respective interest bears to the total ownership of such
property, and its, his or respective interest in such property may be released from the assessment lien upon pay-
ment of such proportionate sum.
V.
The several sums above mentioned and assessed against the said parcels of property, and the owners
thereof, and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent (6yr) per annum, together with reasonable attorney's
fees and costs of collection, if incurred, are hereby declared to be and are made a lien upon the respective parcels
of property.against which the same are assessed, and a personal liability and charge, against the real and true
owners of such property, whether such owners be correctly named herein or not, and the said liens shall be and
constitute the first enforceable lien and claim against the property on which such assessments are levied, and
shall be a first and paramount lien thereon, superior to all other liens and claims, except State, County,.School
District and City ad valorem taxes.
The sums so assessed against the abutting property and the owners thereof shall be and become due and
payable as follows, to-wit: in five (5) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, one (1),
two..(2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of completion and acceptance of the improvements in the.
respective unit, and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become .
due and payable in such installments after the date of the completion and acceptance of such respective_units, and
shall bear interest from said date at the rate of six per cent (6�r) per annum, payable annually with each install-
ment, except as to the first installment, which shall be due and payable at the maturity thereof, so that upon the
completion and acceptance of the improvements in a particular unit, assessments against the property abutting
upon such completed and accepted unit shall be .and become due and payable in such installments, and with
interest from the date of such completion and acceptance. Provided, however, that any owner shall have the
right to pay the entire assessment, or any installment thereof, before maturity by payment of principal and
accrued interest, and provided further that if default shall be made in the payment of principal or interest
promptly as the same matures, then the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall,
at the option of said City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, be and become immediately due and payable, and shall be
collectable, together with reasonable attorney's fees and cost of collection, if incurred, PROVIDED, however,
that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works the City of Fort Worth retains the right to
authorize payment of the sums assesed against abutting property upon such completed and accepted unit in not
more than forty-eight (48) equal regular monthly installments of not less than $9.00 each, the first of such
installments to become due and payable not more than thirty (30) days after the completion and acceptance by
the City of the particular unit. PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby empowered to authorize ,
payments of said sums of lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director
of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will
otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payments shall be authorized only in instances
where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and
delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful, valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract
upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in
trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms thereof of the sums assessed against
such property.
Vh
If default shall be made in the payment of any assessment, collection thereof shall be enforced either by
the sale of the property by the Assessor and Collector of Taxes of said City as near as possible in the same man-
ner provided for the sale of property for the non-payment of ad valorem taxes, or at the option of. the City of
Fort Worth, or its assigns, payment of said sums shall be enforced by suit in any court of competent jurisdic-
tion, or as provided in any mechanic's or materialman's contract as aforesaid, and said City shall exercise all of
its lawful powers to aid in the enforcement and collection of said assessments.
VII.
The total amount assessed against the respective parcels of abutting property, and the owners thereof, is
in accordance with the proceedings of the City relating to said improvements and assessments thereof, and is
less than the proportion of the cost allowed and permitted by the law in force in the City.
VIII.
Although the aforementioned charges have been fixed, levied, and assessed in the respective amounts
hereinabove stated, the City Council does hereby reserve unto itself the right to reduce the aforementioned
assessments by allowing credits to certain property owners where deemed appropriate. Notwithstanding the City
Council has herein reserved the right to issue credits, it shall not be required to issue credits, and will not do so,
if same would result in any equity and/or unjust discrimination.
The principal amount of each of the several assessment certificates to be issued the City of Fort Worth,
Texas, as hereinafter provided, shall be fixed and determined by deducting from the amount of any assessment
hereinabove levied such amount or amounts, if any-, as may hereafter be allowed by the,City Council as a credit
against the respective assessments.
I%.
For the purpose of evidencing the several,sums assessed against the respective parcels of abutting prop-
erty and the owners thereof, and the time and terms of payment, and to aid in the enforcement and collection
thereof, assignable certificates in the principal amount of the respective assessments less the amount of any re-,
spective credit allowed thereon, shall be issued by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, upon completion and accept-
ance by the City of the improvements in each unit of improvement as the wort: in such unit is completed and
accepted, which certificates shall be executed by the mayor in the name of the City and attested by the City
Secretary, with the corporate seal of the City impressed thereon, and shall be payable to the City of Fort Worth,
or its assigns, and shall declare the said amounts, time and terms of payment, rate of interest, and the date of
the completion and acceptance of the improvements abutting upon such property for which the certificate is
issued, and shall contain the name of the owner or owners, if known, description of the property by lot and block
number, or front feet thereon, or such other desciption as may otherwise identify the same; and if the said
property shall be owned by an estate, then the description of same as so owned shall be sufficient and no error or
mistake in describing any property, or in giving the name of the owner, shall invalidate or in anywise impair
such certificate, to the assessments levied.
The certificates shall provide substantially that if same shall not be paid promptly upon maturity, then
they shall be collectable, with reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, and shall provide
substantially that the amounts evidenced thereby shall be paid to the Assessor and Collector of Taxes of the
City of Fort Worth, Texas, who shall issue his receipt therefor, which shall be evidence of such payment on any
demand for the same, and the Assessor and Collector of Taxes shall deposit the sums so received by him forth-
with with the City Treasurer to be kept and Held by him in a separate fund, and when any payment shall be
made in the City the Assessor and Collector of Taxes upon such certificate shall, upon presentation to him of
the certificate by the holder thereof endorse said payment thereof. If such certificate be assigned then the holder
thereof shall be entitled to receive from the City Treasurer the amount paid upon the presentation to him of
such certificate so endorsed and credited; and such endorsement and credit shall be the Treasurer's Warrant for
making such payment. Such payments by the Treasurer shall be receipted for the holder of such certificate in
writing and by surrender thereof when the principal, together with accrued interest and all costs of collection
and reasonable attorney's fees, if incurred, have been paid in full.
Said certificates shall further recite substantially that the proceedings with reference to making the
improvements have been regularly had in compliance with the law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the
assessment lien against the property described in such certificate and the personal liability of the owners thereof
have been performed, and such recitals shall be prima facie evidence of all the matters recited in such certificates,
and no further proof thereof shall be required in any court.
Said certificates may have coupons attached thereto in evidence of each or any of the several installments
thereof, or may have coupons for each of the first four installments, leaving the main,certificate to serve for the
fifth installment, which coupons may be payable to the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns may be signed with the
facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Secretary.
Said certificates shall further recite that the City of Fort Worth, Texas shall exercise all of its lawful
powers, when requested so to do, to aid in the enforcement and collection thereof, and may contain recitals sub-
stantially in accordance with the above and other additional recitals pertinent or appropriate thereof, and it
shall not be necessary that the recitals be in the exact form above set forth, but the substance thereof shall be
sufficient. The fact that such improvements may be omitted on any portion of any of said units adjacent to any
premises exempt from the lien of such assessments shall not in anywise invalidate, affect or impair the lien of
such assessments upon other premises.
X.
Full power to make and levy reassessments and to correct mistakes, errors, invalidities or irregularities,
either in the assessments or in the certificates issued in evidence thereof,is,in accordance with the law in force
in this City,vested in the City.
XI.
All assessments levied are a personal liability and charge against the real and true owners of the premises
described, notwithstanding such owners may not be named, or may be incorrectly named.
XII.
The assessments so levied are for the improvements in the particular unit upon which the property
described abuts, and the assessments for the improvements in any unit are in nowise affected by the improve-
ments or assessments in any other unit, and in making assessments and in holding said hearing, the amounts
assessed for improvements in any one unit have been in nowise connected with the improvements or the assess-
ments therefor in any other unit.
XIII.
The assessments levied are made and levied under and by virtue of the terms, powers and provisions of an
Act passed at the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, known as Chapter 106
of the Acts of said Session and now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, which Act has been
adopted as an amendment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth, Texas.
XIV.
The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same
in the Minute Book of the City Council of Fort Worth,Texas, and by filing the complete Ordinance in the appro-
priate Ordinance Records of said City.
XV.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and
it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED this(? / day of
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
ENGINEER'S - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PAVING OF SKYLINE DRIVE
FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE
TO JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
UNIT No. 1 OF 1 AP 67-192 - PROJECT No. 104-22000-103 ROADWAY WIDTH 40'
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT: 6" H.M.A.C. with 7" Curb & 2' Gutter
RATE FRONT GROSS AMOUNT CREDITS NET AMOUNT SUB TOTAL APPAREAT
PER FEET ASSESSED ASSESSED TOTAL COST
FRONT
FOOT
j
CONTRACT $88,929.85
10 PER CENT ENGINEERING $ 8,892.99
TOTAL CONTRACT $ 97,822.84
CURB AND GUTTER
RESIDENTIAL 2.13 7,830.36 $16,678.68 $ 1,571.09 $ 15,107.59
COMMERCIAL -0- - $, -0- $ -0- $ -0-
TOTAL FOR CURB AND GUTTER $16,678.68 $ 1,571.09 $ 15,107.59
PAVEMENT:
RESIDENTIAL 5.49 7,830.36 $42,988.68 $ 18,061.58 $ 24,927.10
COMMERCIAL -0- -0- $ -0- $ =0- $ -0-
TOTAL FOR PAVEMENT $42,988.68 $ 183,061.58 $ 24,927.10
TOTAL ASSESSED $ 7.62 7,830.36 $59,667.36 19,632.6.7 $ 40 034.69
CITY'S PCRTION $ 57,788.15
AUNIT
GE P
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL. NO. 1 OF 1
PAGE No. 2 CF 10
CONTRACTORs R. W. Gibbins, Inc. CONTRACT DATE& June 26, 1967 UNIT DESCRIPTION& Skyline Drive
From South Brook Drive To: Jacksboro Highway
ITY
CERTIFICATE PROPERTY LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMENTS CURBS PROPERTY ADJUSTAT.NT AMOUNT
N®: 0MER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. & GLTT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT
FRONT FOOT EPLL.INEAR BEFORE
i 5.49 FOOT CREDITS
2.13 $ 7.62
James W. C,osper Tract 3-B Geo. 106.1 582,49 225.99 808.48 106.1' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 235.54
1601 Skyline Drive Boicourt 30.0' c&g @ 2.13 = 63.90
Survey 299.44 509.04
Roy S. Watson Tr. 3-B-2 " 287.8 1580.02 613.01 2,193.03 287.8' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 638.92 1,554.11
1605 Skyline Drive
Morris V. Liepman Tr. 3-B-1 "' 99.11 544.11 211.10 755.21 99.11' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 220.02 535.19
1701 Skyline Drive
R. K. Miller Lot A Sara Hitri 100 549.00 213.00 762,00 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00 540.00
1717 Skyline Drive
R. K. Miller Lot B Sarah Hitr 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Res. Cr. @2,22 = 222.00 540.00
1717 Skyline Drive
Bobbye Joe Mosley Tr. 3-D-3 G. W. 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00 540.00
1725 Skyline Drive Boicourt
Survey
J. D. Kutch 1 1 " 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Res. Cr. @ 2.22 = 222;,00 540.00
1807 Skyline Drive
UNIT loo. 1 OF 1
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARy ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE No. 3 OF 10
C.ONTRACTO.t R. W. GIBBINS, INC. CONTRACT DATEt June 26, 1967 UNIT DESCRIPTION& SKYLINE DRIVE
FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
CERTIFICATE PROPERT11 LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMENTS CURB" PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
Not OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. B GUT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT
FRONT FOOT PFALINEAR BEFORE
$ 5.49 FOOT CREDITS
$ 2.13 $ 7.62
Fred Patillo 4 1 G. W. 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Res. Cr. @ 2.22 = 222.00 540.00
1813 Skyline Dr. Boicourt
Survey
A, L Sims 5 & 6 1 " 200 1,09$.00 426.00 1,524.00 200' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 444.00 1,080.00
1817 Skyline Drive
Anna Malone 10 1 '° 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00 540.00
1901 Skyline Drive
Jack Walensky 11 1 " 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' C & G @2.13 = 213.00
1903 Skyline Drive 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00 327.00
435.00
Erma Grace McLarty Tr. 3-D-7 1i 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00 540.00
1905 Skyline Drive
Ronda Gordon Tr. 3-D-5 G. W. 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Exist. C & G @2.13 = 213.00 327.00
1909 Skyline Drive Boicourt 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00
Survey 435.00
F,
UNIT NO. 1 OF 1
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE No. 4 CP 10
CONTRACTORS R. W. GIBBINS, INC. CONTRACT DATE& June 26, 1967 UNIT DESCRIPTION& SKYLINE DRIVE
FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
a
CERTIFICATE PROPERTY LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMENTS CURB- PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
No.. OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND ONNER•S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. B GUT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT
FRONT FOOT PEILLINEAR BEFORE
: 5.49 FOOT CREDITS
S 2.13 $ 7.62
Ronda Gordon Tr. 3-D-6 " 87.6 480.92 186.59 667.51 87.6' Exist. C &.G @2.13 = 186.5
1909 Skyline Drive 87.6' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 194.4
381.OE 286.45
City of Sansom Park Tr. 3-D-8 " 79 433.71 168.27 601.98 No Cr. - 601.98
John M Murphy 1 2 '° 111.5 612.14 237.50 849.64 111.5' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 247.53 602.11
2001 Skyline Drive
Bernard V. Bartow 2 2 if 156. 1 856.99 332.49 1,189.48 156.1' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 346.54 842.94
2009 Skyline Drive
J. B. McVean 3 2 " 116 636.84 247.08 883.92 116' 'Res. Cr. @2.22 = 257.52 626.40
2017 Skyline Drive
Troy D. Stiles Tr. 2-G " 121.67 667.97 259.16 927.13 121.67' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 270.11 657.02
2025 Skyline Drive
W. B. Boling Tr. 2-C " 106.67 585.62 227.21 812.83 106.67' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 236.81 576.02
2101 Skyline Drive
UUIT loo. 1 OF 1.
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE No. 5 OF 10
CONTRACTot: R. W. GIBBINS, INC. CONTRACT DATE% June 26, 1967 UNIT DESCRIPTION% SKYLINE DRIVE
` FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE
TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
CERTIFICATE PROPERTY LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMENTS CURB; PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
No.. OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. & GUT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT-
FRONT FOOT PE1LLINEAR BEFORE
E 5.49
FOOT CREDITS
= 2.13 $ 7.62
Lucy Ann Nichols Tr. 2-E G`. W 106.67 585.62 227.21 812.83 106.67' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 236.81 576.02
2105 Skyline Drive Boicourt
Survey
Darel Hampton Tr. 2-B " 106.67 585.62 227.21 812.83 106.67 Res. Cr. @2.22 = 236.81 576.02
2109 Skyline Drive
Roscoe Minton B Minton 106.67 585.62 227,21 812.83 106.67 Res. Cr. @2,22 = 236.81 576.02
2113 Skyline Drive
C. M Ball Tr. 2-A " 106.67 585.62 227.21 812.83 106.67 Res. Cr. @2.22 = 236.81 576.02
2121 Skyline Drive
Dora T. Rollins A & B Blue Ridge 213.33 1,171.18 454.39 1,625.57 213.33 Res. Cr. @2,22 = 473.59 1,151.98
2125 Skyline Drive
W. Lester McNatt & Part of A. 905 4,968.45 1927.65 6,896.10 -0- 6,896.10
Walter H. Patton Van Nords-
Villa Capri Apts. trand
2213 Capri Drive Survey
UNIT No. 1 Og 1
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE No.6 CF 10
CON'TRACTORa R. W. GIBBINS, c, INC.
CONTRACT DATE& June 26, 1967 UNIT DESCRIPTION& SKYLINE DRIVE
- FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
D
CERTIFICATE PROPERTY LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMEM CURS: PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
No.. OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. $ GUT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT'
FRONT FOOT EP-LINEAR BEFORE
$ FOOT CREDITS
5.49
a 2.13 $ 7.62
Tremarco Corp. c/o Portion of A. 160 878.40 340.80 1,219.20 160' Exist. C & G @2.13= 340.80 878.40
Gulf Oil Company Van Nordstrand
P. 0. Drawer 2100 Survey
Houston, Texas
Claude E. Armour A Arthur 170 933.30 362.10 1,295.40 170' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 377.40 918.00
2240 Skyline Drive Albrights
Subdivisio
Gordon Travis B " 135 741.15 287.55 1,028.70 135' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 299.70 729.00
2232 Skyline Drive
Don Kennard C & Pt of °' 174.8 959.65 372.33 1,331.98 174.8' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 388.06 943.92
2224 Skyline Drive Lots AA &
Bertha Nolley AA-2 " 120 658.80 255.60 914.40 120' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 266.40 648.00
2208 Skyline Drive
J. T. Boothman AA-1 " 165.2 906.95 351.87, 1,258.82 65.2' Side Lot Cr. @7.62= 496.82
2200 Skyline Drive 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00 540.00
718.82
OF
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL UNIT NO. 1 1 PAGE NO. 7 OF 10
CONTRACTIORz R. W. GIBBINS, INC. CONTRACT DATE& June 26, 1967 UNIT DESCRIPTION& SKYLINE DRIVE
FROM: SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
CERTIFICATE PROPERTY LOT BLOCK. ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMENTS CURB,, PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
No.. OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CE. b GUT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT
FRONT FOOT PEILLINEAR BEFORE
S FOOT CREDITS
5.49
$ $2.13 7.62
Howard Lawler C Arthur 272.5 1,496.03 580.43 2,076.45 100' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 = 762.00 931.50
5125 Circle Ridge Dr. Albrights 172.5' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 382.95
West Subdivisio - 1,144.95
Mrs. Dorothy M. D " 125 686.25 266.25 952.50 125' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 277.50 675.00
Mitcham
2124 Skyline Drive
William H. Fifer, Sr. D, Tr. 14 Beverly 125 686.25 266.25 952.50 125' Res. Cr, @2.22 = 277.50 675.00
2122 Skyline Drive Hills Est-
ates
B. Pinto A, Tr. 14 " 275 1,509.75 585.75 25,095.50 100' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 = 762.00
5140 Crown Drive 175' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 388.50
1,150.50 945.00
Harry Walensky 22-B " 254.9 1,399.40 542.94 1;942.34 100' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 = 762.00 836.46
5141 Crown Road 154.9' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 343.88
1,105.88
George K. Dills 22-A " 100 549.00 213.00 762.00 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 222.00 540.00
4924 Montrose Dr.
i
1 1
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IT PAGE No. 10
r
i
i
CON'TRACTORs R. W. GIBBINS, INC. CONTRACT DATE& June 26, 1967 UNIT DESCRIPTION& SKYLINE DRIVE
f FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
DESCRIPTION-CF-MP1WrT-
I
l �g
CERTIFICATE PROPERTY LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMENTS CURBS PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
No®, OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. $ GVT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT
FRONT FOOT PERLINEAR BEFORE
i FOOT CREDITS
5.49
$ $
2.13 7.62
James D. Reid A-3 23 Beverly 117 642.33 249.21 891.54 117' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 259.74 631.80
2016 Skyline Drive Hills
Estates
Milburn W. Holmes A-2 23 " 117 642.33 249.21 891.54 117' Res 2 22 = 2
. Cr. @ 59. 74 631.80
I 2000 Skyline Dr.
j Guy B. Boatman A-1 23 " 121 664.29 257.73 922.02 21' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 = 160.0
5140 Circle Ridge Dr. 100' Exist C&G @2.13 = 213.00 327.00
100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.0
595.0
1 .
Maurice I. Harriman 43 " 175 960.75 372.75 1,333.50 75' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 = 571.50
5141 Circle Ridge Dr. 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00 540.00
793.50
Johnnie Victor 3 2 Skyline 80 439.20 170.40 609.60 80' Exist. C&G @2.13 = 170.40
j Langley Terrace 80' Res. Cr. @2.22 177.60
IJ 1908 Skyline Drive 348.00 261.60
I
I „
1
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL UNIT loo. CF PAGE NO. 9 CF 10
CONTRACTORs R. W. GIBBINS., INC. CONTRACT DATE& June 26, 1967 UNIT 'DESCRIPTION& SKYLINE DRIVE
r FROM: SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
No..
CERTIFICATE PROPER LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT' IMPROVEMENTS CURBS PROPERTY ADJUSTATM AMOUNT
N®°• OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. B GUT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT
FRONT FOOT PFJLLINEAR BEFORE
5.49 FOOT CREDITS
2.13 7.62
R. W. Athens 2 2 Skyline 80 439.20 170.40 609.60 80' Exist.C&G @2.13 = 170.40
1904 Skyline Terrace 80' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 177.60
348.00 261.60
I,
Noel E. Lewis 1 2 " 79.7 437.55 169.76 607.31 79.7' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 176.93 430.38
1900 Skyline Drive
Charles A. Savage 1 1 " 137 752.13 291.81 1,043.94 37' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 = 281.94 540.00
1816 Skyline Drive 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00
503.94
A. Leo Burns 3A 1 " 90 494.10 191.70 685.80 90' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 199.80 486.00
1812 Skyline Drive
Flake Roberson 16-B 1 " 107 587.43 227.91 815.34 107' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 237.80 577.80
1808 Skyline Drive
Raymond B. Lanyon 16A 1 " 140 768.60 298.20 1,066.80 140' Res. Cr. 02.22 = 310.80 756.00
1800 Skyline Drive
Ben F. Hickey 15 1 '° 150 823.50 319.50 131143.00 150' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 333.00 810.00
1712 Skyline Drive
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL UNIT Teo. 1 OF 1 PAGE No. 10 CF 10
CONTRACTORa R. W. GIBBINS, INC, CONTRACT DATE: June 26, 1967 19NIT DESCRIPTIONt SKYLINE DRIVE
FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO: JACKSBORO HIGHWAY
4
DESCRIPTION CF PROPERTY- —W99M%9&1Tr-M M, PER FOOT
CERTIFICATE PROPERTY LOT BLOCK ADDITION APPARENT IMPROVEMENTS CURBS PROPERTY ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
N®.. OWNER FRONT EXCLUSIVE: OF AND OWNER'S CREDITS OF
FEET CB. b GUT.PER GUTTER COST ASSESSMENT
FRONT FOOT PEJLLINEAR BEFORE
FOOT CREDITS
� S
- Charles D. Fulton 14 1 Skyline 145 796.05 308.85 1,104.90 145' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 321.90 783.00
1708 Skyline Drive Terrace
A. C. McMillan 13 1 " 165 905.85 351.45 1,257.30 65' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 = 495.30
Rt. 10, Box 615 100' Res. Cr. @2.22 = 222.00
717.30 540.00
Carl L. Lampley 1 7 132.7 728.52 282.65 1,011.17 32.7' Side Lot Cr. @7.62 =249.17
5145 South Brook Dr. 100' Res. Cr.@2.22 = 222.00
471.17 540.00
7,830.36 42,988.68 16,678.68 59,667.35 19,632.67 4010034.68
City ®f Fort Worth,th, Eexas McMAHAN
Mayor"
a ®U and Council Communication LINE MORPHIS
HAM
DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Benefit Hearing - Skyline PAGE
NUMBER Drive Improvements (CLP A-13) 1 of 1 HA DY
7/24/67 G-1115
R£�
On June 26, 1967, the contract was awarded for the improvement of Skyline Drive,
Project No. 104-22000-103, and July 24,. 1967 was set: as the date of the benefit
hearing (M&C C-991). The project includes the following:
Street Limits Roadway Width R.O.W.
Skyline Drive South Brook Dr. to Jacksboro Hwy. 40 feet 60 feet
Two parcels of property abutting Skyline Drive are within the corporate limits
of the City of Sansom Park.. The project and assessments have been explained to
the City Council of Sans,om Park, which has consented-by motion to the proposed
improvements. In accordance with State law and contingent on the results of the
benefit hearing, the City of Fort Worth will forward an ordinance to the City of
Sansom Park requesting the ratification and approval of assessments ,to be levied
against the affected properties.
It is the opinion of the Public Works Department that each parcel of property is
benefitted in an amount equal to or in excess of the amount recommended for as-
sessment.
Reconmendation
it is recommended that an ordinance be adopted closing the hearing_ and levying
the assessments as recommended.
HDM:lp
The following summaries are attached:
"A" - Resume of the Neighborhood Hearing.
"B" Distribution of costs and assessments, results. of Post Card
Survey,. and Engineer's Preliminary Assessment Roll.
K9
CITY q u'li. Y
� c 4
SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSITIO BY COUNCIL: SED BY
APPROVED OTHER (DE ROBE)
CITY SECR
� DATE
CITY MANAGER 2 19s
Fol
a
O �
o �I
o �
y ; �8
3nd80 NI hS
o
c
7- �N
00 0 z Yood
O&IJ .
l000e
SKYLINE DRIVE
FROM SOUTH BROOK DRIVE TO JACKSBORO Fes,
PROJECT NO. 104-22000-103
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE.............................................................................................................5 88n929.85
ENGINEERING ............................................................................... R 8 99
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST..................................................:.............................................................5 97J22,84 1®0.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 7,830.36 100.
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. m0° -0-'
TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ '7,830.36 100.
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 59,p667.36 61.0
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... ®®m ®®°
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................5 59,667.36 61.
LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 19,632.67 2 0.1
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 409034.69 40.9
NET AMOUNT PAID BY-CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................E 57,788.15 59.1
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 7,830.36 1,269.8 3,415.85 3;141+.71
PER CENT 100.0 16.2 43.6 4 0.2
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 53 11 1.8 24
PER CENT 100.0 2 0.7 34.0 45.3
HO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 51 11 17 23
PER CENT 100.0 21.6 33.3 45.1-
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 49 E4 11 16 22
PER CENT 88.0 22.4 32.7 44.9
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 m®m 1 1
PER CENT 12=0 °®m 5 0.0 50.0
ai4.�19
pill
My
C 11 Jtrx
CITY OF..FORT WORTH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGDMERING DIVISION
PAV'?, G OF SKYLINE DRIVE
PROJECT NO, 104-22000-103
A Nc ighborhood Hearing was conducted by the Engineering Division at the W. J.
Turner. Elementary School on May 22, 1967, for the assessment paving of Skyline
Drive, Project No. 104-22000-103. The procedure concerning owner participation
in the cost of the paving, including method and policies of determining assess-
ments, street construction standards, and method of payment were explained to the
twenty-seven persons in attendance.
Mr. Savage, 1816 Skyline Drive, wanted to know if the project was sure to go
through. It was explained that the project would be' presente,d to the Council
and if approved, the work would be done.
Mr. Leipman, 1701 Skyline Drive, was concerned about the street becoming a
raceway.: $e said that the residents were not able to get any traffic control,
and that the paving improvement would only make the problem worse.
Mr. Cosper, . 1601 Skyline, stated that when the bond issue was voted in 1965 he
understood that the only additional cost to property owners would be for curb
and gutter, and that the bonds would be for all other costs.
It was_ explained that the bond fund was to pay the City's portion under standard
assessment policies, and that credits had been granted for the value of the
existing paving.
Mr. Fulton, 1708 .Skyline, asked about the depth of the excavation. , It was ex-
plained that it would be approximately one foot, Mr. Fulton also said that
the street had not been properly maintained.
Mr. Burns, 1812 Skyline Drive, said his lot was low and he wanted-to be sure
the drainage would be adequate.
Mr. Holmes, 2000 Skyline Drive, asked about the per cent of cost to be paid
by the property owners. After a response that it was about 40 per cent, he
stated that in his opinion it was rather high.
Mr. Travis, 2232 Skyline Drive, agreed with Mr. Holmes. He also said he
thought that the paving would create an even greater drainage problem. He
stated that the channel sixty feet below Skyline Drive would not handle the
present. run-off. He said that his retaining wall had been washed away and
that water came up into his yard and also the yard next door to his.
The staff promised to check into these problems and see what could be done about
them.
Ud F0l.J21 Bl isR�
UFTY llrf' OIc RE�
'n ¢;ja'�.7�4 L�.h 9'a
71 5;
�a,qc� MY F d.
Attachment "A"
Page Two
i
An investigation by the Public Works Departmen't reveals the following :
Concrete structures have been constructed within the drainage easement immediately
east of Skyline Drive. The first structure is a water retaining basin consisting
of concrete walls dammed at the lower end td retairi water. A'suction pump with
suction line has been installed in conjunction with this structure for the purpose
of watering lawns.
The second structure consists of a retractable steel dam which can be lowered to
retain water or raised, during heavy rains. However, the concrete structure which
encompasses the steel dam may restrict the flow of water during heavy rains thus
contributing to a flooding condition of yards upstream.
According to the records in the Building Division Office, permits were not re-
quested or obtained for the construction of these structures. A study is cur-
rently being made of the entire drainage system downstream to determine if yard
flooding is caused by the existing structures or by other obstructions downstream.
This drainage condition will have no direct effect on the planned improvements on
Skyline Drive, but rather the improvements should relieve the condition somewhat
by collecting water on Skyline Drive ,and carrying -it to a point further "downstream"
before it flows into this drainage system.
EIETIV