HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 2518 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 2518
""" August 22, 1975
o�Foar To the Mayor and Members of the City Council
u �0
s
"rExP� Subject: INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED 1975-76 BUDGET
At the Council Budget Study Session on August 15, 1975, several re-
quests were made for additional information. This report attempts to
answer four of the questions asked. Additional information will be
supplied later concerning the other questions.
1. What would it cost to provide 100 per cent of the health and
life insurance for City employees?
The City currently pays 75 per cent of the cost of health and
life insurance for employees. If an employee desires to also
cover his dependents in the group plan, he is expected to pay
all of that expense himself in addition to the 25 per cent of
his own. Based on this policy, approximately 87 per cent of
the City's employees participate in the group health and life
insurance program. It is anticipated that if the City increased
the City's participation to 100 per cent, that all of the City
employees would take advantage of this fringe benefit.
Increasing the City's participation to 100 per cent and assuming
all City employees would participate, it is estimated that the
additional cost to the City for tax supported funds would be
$311,789 and an increase in the water and sewer fund of $69,833.
2. Does state law limit the occupancy tax to 3 per cent?
The City Attorney has advised that Article 23-02 of the Revised
Civil Statutes of Texas limits the occupancy tax that may be
charged by. a city on hotel and motel rooms to a maximum of 3 per
cent.
3. What would be the possibility of establishing a two-level fee
structure for use of City Park and Recreation facilities and
Library facilities, distinguishing between residents and non-
residents?
The Library has a policy of charging non-county residents a
separate additional fee for use of the Library. A $2 charge per
year is made to non-Tarrant County residents. Residents within
Tarrant County are provided free Library service based on the
County's contribution to support of the Library.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS -
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 2518 - Page 2
oisoRp To the Mayor and Members of the City Council August 22, 1975
0
;rExPy Subject: INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED 1975-76 BUDGET
The Park and Recreation Board has considered on several different
occasions further implementation of a two-level fee structure.
Currently non-residents are charged an increased fee for use of
golf courses, when they buy annual memberships. The membership
fee structure is currently charged as indicated below.
Type. of Membership Residents Non-Residents
Junior Membership
(week-days only) $ 60 $ 90
Senior Membership
(62 and over,
week-days only) 60 90
Single Membership
(week-days only) 100 162
Single Membership
(play every day) 150 250
Man and Wife
Membership
(play every day) 200 325
Each additional child
added to Man and Wife
Membership 40 62.50
The Greens fee for players is the same regardless of residency.
The memberships for the McCleland Tennis Center are only
available to residents. Users pay the same fee regardless of
residence.
Fees are charged only to those individuals who enroll in specific
recreation center programs. There is no fee for individuals who
frequent the centers and take part in unorganized activities. The
present policy is to charge non-residents an added fee of $1 per
course per month more than residents (fees range from $4 to $8) .
The projected enrollment for 1974-75 is 22,700 people. The Park
and Recreation Department staff estimates that non-residents make
up less than 5 per cent_.of that total.
The current policy for swimming pool's has no differentiation
between residents and non-residents.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 2518 - Page 3
+•"•'�•.
o�soar To the Mayor&W Members of the City Council August 22, 1975
raX Sub*t: INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED 1975-76 BUDGET
fell
The athletic activity generates its revenue from league entry fees
and facility use charges: No money is collected from participants,
only the sponsors of teams. Presently four different sponsor-
player relations exist:
1. The sponsor is from Fort Worth and the players are
not.
2. The players are from Fort Worth and the sponsor is not.
3. Neither the players nor the sponsor are from Fort Worth.
4. Both the sponsor and the players are r.,rt Worth
residents.
It is estimated that about 15 per cent of the participants in
organized athletic programs are non-residents. There is some
concern that if the City of Arlington deletes from their. budget
for next year the City's athletic program this percentage would
increase considerably.
The City of Fort Worth presently belongs to Texas Amateur Athletic
Federation. There is a possibility of violating TAAF rules if
a two-level structure is instituted since there is a stipulation
which allows a person to participate in athletic events where he
works or lives.
The Park and Recreation Board has considered several times the
possibility of instituting additional non-resident fee activities.
The primary problem, however, has been one of identification of
residents and non-residents and administering this program. Due
to these problems further use of a differntial fee structure has
not been proposed by the Park and Recreation Board.
4. How much would the proposed budget increase if those employees in
the Human I-asources Department being paid by both the General Fund
and grant tunds were paid entirely by the general fund?
With the development of the Housing and Community Development
grant several existing activities within the City were expanded
:trough the use of grant money. With these expansions, speci-
.i.c- ,Iv in housing inspection and community affairs, existing
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 2518 - Page 4
a
•""•• August 22, ]_975
To tI1 Msiror snd Moanbas of tM Citi►CouncilSub*t: INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED 1975-76 BUDGET
employees were assigned additional supervisory responsibility and
part of their salary is being funded through the grant. These
positions include the following:
.50 Assistant City Manager $ 14,062
. 75 Housing and Community
Development Director $ 15,593
.50 Assistant Director of Housing $ 8,326
. 75 Housing Coordinator $ 9,540
.50 Community Affairs Coordinator $ 8,175
.50 Administrative Assistant II $ 5,324
Total $ 61,020
These positions are budgeted in the General Fund, however, the
portion of their salaries paid through grant funds is subtracted
from the budget through use of salary savings.
Should the City Council desire any additional information on these items,
please do not hesitate to ask.
Respectfully ubmitted,
R. N. Line
City Manager
RNL:xff
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS