HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5923 ORDINANCE N0.
�; 4i VJ ti iE.y
AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVIDING
FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF N. W. SIXTEENTH STREET
AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS,
AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CON-
TRACT TO TEXAS BTTIJT.TTHTC COMPANY AND FOR THE
MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION;
MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBTEDNESS THEREBY
INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST ABUTTING
PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVE-
MENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH
ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE
ESTIMATES; DIRECTING THE CITY SLCRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF
THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET
IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SES-
SION OF THE FORTIETH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106; COM-
MONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES AS AMENDED
BY ACTS 1967, 60TH LEGISLATURE, PAGE 365, CHAPTER 176, SECTION 1, EMER-
GENCY EFFECTIVE MAY 12, 1967; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS
AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE
BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPRO-
PRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has prepared Plans
and Specifications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets,
avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been ex-
amined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all mat-
ters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE:
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT:
I.
The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and
adopted.
II.
There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter
described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of
Fort Worth, Texas, to-wit:
Unit l: N. W. 16th Street From Kearney Avenue to True Aveaue
Unit 2: N. W. 2',',th Street From Ephriham Street (Hwy. 183) to
150' West of Grayson
Unit 3: Dooling Street From Highcrest Avenue to Bruce Avenue
Unit 4: Dooling Street From Bruce Street to 185 feet north
Unit 5: Crabtree Street From south line of Highcrest Avenue to
185 feet north of Bruce Avenue
Unit 6: Retta Street From Noble Avenue to Damon Street
Unit 7: Damon Street From Chandler Avenue to Retta Street
Unit 8: Noble Street From Retta Street to Chandler Avenue
Unit 9: Chandler Street From Noble Avenue to Belknap Street
Unit 10: Gilmore Street From Beach Street to Wayne Street
Unit 11: Menzer Street From Schilling Drive to 135 feet east
III,
Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public
places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, shall be improved by raising,
grading, and filling same and by constructing thereon the following, to-wit:
Unit 1: N. W. Sixteenth Street From Kearney Avenue to the south line
of Lot 18, Block 13, North Beverly Hills
Estates, to be improved with 6-inch thick
hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on
a 4-inch thick foundation course of pit
run gravel so that the finished roadway
will be 30-feet wide.
Unit 2: N. W. Twentieth Street From Ephriham Avenue (Highway :183) to
150' southwest of Grayson Avenue, to be
improved with 6-inch thick hot-mix asphaltic
concrete pavement on a 4-inch thick foun-
dation course of pit run gravel so that
the finished roadway will be 30-feet wide.
Unit 3: Dooling Street From Highcrest Avenue to Bruce Avenue to
be improved with 6-inch thick hot-mix
asphaltic concrete pavement on a 6-inch
thick lime stabilized subgrade, so that
the finished roadway will be 30-feet
wide.
Unit 4: Dooling Street From Bruce Avenue to the north line of
Lot 15, Block 1, Highcrest Addition to
be improved with 6-inch thick reinforced
concrete pavement on a 6-inch thick lime
stabilized subgrade, so that the finished
roadway will be 40-feet wide.
Unit 5: Crabtree Street From the south line of Highcrest Avenue
to the north line of Lot 16, Block 2
Highcrest Addition, to be improved with
6-inch thick reinforced concrete pavement
on a 6-inch thick lime stabilized sub-
grade so that the finished roadway will
be 40-feet wide.
Unit 6: Retta Street From Noble Avenue to Damon Street to be
improved with 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic
concrete pavement on a 6-inch thick lime
stabilized subgrade so that the finished
roadway will be 36-feet wide.
Unit 7: Damon Street From Chandler Avenue to Retta Street
to be improved with 6-inch thick hot-
mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a
6-inch thick lime stabilized subgrade
so that the finished roadway will be
36-feet wide.
Unit 8: Noble Avenue From Retta Street to Chandler Avenue to
be improved with 6-inch thick hot-mix
asphaltic concrete pavement on a 6-inch
thick lime stabilized subgrade so that
the finished roadway will be 36-feet
wide. .
Unit 9: Chandler Avenue From Noble Street to Belknap Street to
be improved with 6-inch thick hot-mix
asphaltic concrete pavement on a 6-inch
thick lime stabilized subgrade so that
the finished roadway will be 40-feet
wide.
Unit 10: Gilmore Street From Beach Street to Wayne Street to be
improved with 6-inch thick hot-mix
asphaltic concrete pavement on a 4-inch
thick foundation course of pit run gra-
vel so that the finished roadway will be
30-feet wide.
Unit 11: Menzer Street From Schilling Drive to east line of
Lot 8, Block 5, Hollowbrook Addition to
be improved with 6-inch thick hot-mix
asphaltic concrete pavement on a 4-inch
thick foundation course of pit run
gravel so that the finished roadway will
be 30-feet wide.
The above, together with concrete curbs, gutters, driveways and incidentals
to such improvements, on proper grade and line where same are not already
so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary
incidentals and appurtenances; all of said improvements to be constructed
as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor.
IV.
The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as
follows, to-wit:
A. The property abutting on that portion of the street, avenue or public
place and the real and true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and
gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine-tenths (9/10ths) of the
estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements.
B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said
improvements after deducting the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting
properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A.
The amounts payable I:v the abutting properties and the real and true owners
thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners there-
of and shall constitute � rir,t and prior lien upon such properties and a personal
liability of the real ano true owners thereof and shall be payable to-wit:
When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular
unit, the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted
units shall be and become payable in five (5) equal installments, due respectively
on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years
from the date of such completion and acceptance and the assessments against the pro-
perty abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such
installments after the dale of completion and acceptance of such respective unit.
The entire amount assesser' against the particular pr.rcels -f property shall bear
interest from the date of s.ch completion and acceptance of the improvements on the
un,t upon which the partic.. I property abuts at the rate of six (6%) percent per
annum, payable annually excepL as to interest on the f rst installment, which shat ,
be due and payable on the 'l .t.= ;aid installment matures provided that any owner
shal 1. have the right t:, p;, . ., and all of su, I. inst.e", -rent_ at any time before r;.tt
ity by paying principal With interest accrued :o the date of payment and further
provided if default be maue in the payment of any installment promptly as the same
matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns, the entire
amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immedi-
ately due and payable; but it is specifically provided that no assessments shall in
any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special
benefits to property in the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in
the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing pro-
vided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case
until after notice of hearing as provided by law. Said assessments against the
respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by
certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed in the name of the City
of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director
of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaining the right to authorized payment
of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such completed and accepted unit
in not more than forty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than
$9.00 each, the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than
30 days after the completion and acceptance by the City of the particular unit,
PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby empowered to authorize payments
of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in
which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial
hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result and PROVIDED FURTHER, that
such method of payment shall be authorized only in instances where the owner or owners
of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and
delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful, valid and binding note and mechanic's
and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien
upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said
owner or owners according to the terms thereof of the sums assessed against such
property.
V.
The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the
owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which
shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the City
Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon,
and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments,
or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which
certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and
time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property,
and the name of the owners, as far as known, and shall contain such other recitals
as may be pertinent thereto, and shall further recite substantially that all pro-
ceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had
in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment
lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability
of the owners thereof, have been regularly had, done and performed, and such re-
citals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof
shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substantially
that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same
matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire
amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together
with reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which,
as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior
lien against the property, superior to all other liens and claims except State,
County, School District, and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming
any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall
invalidate any assessment or any certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the
omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt
by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not in-
validate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain
recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall
suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto.
VI.
Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the re-
vised Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, and the bid of TEXAS BITULITHIC COMPANY
having been found to be the lowest
and best bid for the making and construction of said improvements, the contract
therefore is hereby awarded to TEXAS BITULITHIC COMPANY
, at and for the prices stated in the Proposal
of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department,
which said report and recommendation is on file with the City, the City Manager,
and the City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the
name of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the
City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things, the prices for the
work.
VII.
To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort
Worth, Texas, by said contract, there is hereby appropriated out of available funds
and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pay said indebtedness so
incurred.
VIII.
The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice
given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in
accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of
the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of
Texas, now known as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended,
which law has been adopted as an amendment to and made a part of the Charter of
the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and under which law these proceedings are taken
and had.
IX.
Each unit above described shall be and constitute a separate aid in -pender,
unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be macre I .
the improvements r. each uni_' according to the cost of the improvements if'. tl.nc
unit and according ._o '.-'nP bp->fi s a-ising rr—, the improveme:is in that on t.
X.
In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be
sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by
any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it shall not be
necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the
property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall
be valid.
XI,
The Director of Public Works of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is
hereby ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of
such improvements in each unit, in accordance with the terms of the powers and
provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth, Texas.
XII.
The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County
Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the
Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature of the State
of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature,
said Act having been passed in the year 1930, and now known as Article 1220a of
Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes.
XIII.
The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance
by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing
the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City.
XIV.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and
after the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
City of Fort WortA, Texas
"E Mayor and Council Communication
MORPH{8
GRAHAM DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: PAGE
NUMBER Award of Contract - Assessment 3
3/18/68 C-1191 Paving - 11 Locations on the North Side i °r
Council action on the project described below is requested.
Pirgject Description
Nature of Work: Assessment Paving at 11 Locations on the North Side
as follows:
ROADWAY
UNIT STREET LIMITS WIDTH R.O.W.
1 N.W. Sixteenth Street Kearney Street to True St. 30 60
2 N.W. Twentieth Street Ephriham Ave. to 150'
west of Grayson Avenue 30 60
3 Dooling Street Highcrest Avenue to 30 50
Bruce Street
4 Dooling Street Bruce Street to 185' 40 50
north to existing pavement
5 Crabtree Street 180' south of Highcrest to 40 50
185' north of Bruce Street
6 Retta Street Noble Avenue to Damon Street 36 60
7 Damon Street Chandler Street to 36 60
Retta Street
8 Noble Avenue Retta Street to 36 60
Chandler Street
9 Chandler Street Noble Avenue to Belknap St. 40 60
10 Gilmore Street Beach Street to Wayne St. 40 60
11 Menzer Street Schilling Drive to 135' east 30 50
Units 1 and 2 were initiated by the City to complete the paving of streets in
the Astro Area which did not qualify for a federal grant. The residents in the
Astro Area were advised at the time the Astro NIP was initiated that these
streets would be Included in a future assessment paving program to` provide for
continuous paving in the neighborhood. Units 3, 4 and 5 were initiated by the
City to provide for continuous pavement and better traffic circulation, in the
area South of the Diamond Heights Industrial Addition, (Community Facilities
Contract No. 5669) and to provide for a storm drain system to serve the area.
Petitions were submitter} for the paving of Units 6 through I1.
Unit 112 Menzer Street
Unit 11, Menzer Street was included in an earlier project, for which the
benefit hearing was held on September 11, 1967, (M&C G-1135) . It was deleted
from the project by the Council because, of the two ownersn- V
e
requesEed the paving and the other opposed it. The Counci �thatthe pavement should have been provided by the origina .'-rETARY TEX.
DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: PAGE
NUMBER Award of Contract - Assessment 2 3
3/18/68 C-1191 Paving - 11 Locations on the North Side of
Additional information has been received by the staff which was not known at
that time. The Federal Housing Administration had required that the street be
paved as a condition of the loan on the house owned by Otho L. Logan (Tr. 3-D)
1525 Shilling. The contractor constructing the house contacted the Assessment
Paving Section of the Public Works Department in the spring of 1967 and was
advised that the street would be paved. He then placed money in escrow with
FHA to insure the paving. There was a change in the assessment paving staff
shortly thereafter and the information was not available to present to the
City Council prior to the benefit hearing on September 11, 1967.
It is the opinion of the staff that due to representations made by the former
Assessment Paving Supervisor to the contractor and the FHA, that the City
Council should reconsider its September 11, 1967, decision in regard to the
assessment paving of Menzer Street.
Change Order
A Change Order is proposed to delete a portion of Unit No. 5, Crabtree Street,
extending 180 feet south of Highcrest Avenue due to opposition by abutting
property owners. This section may be improved when the unplatted property
south of Highcrest Avenue is developed. Elimination of this section reduces
the contract price by $6,048.56 based on the low bid.
Submission of Bids
The following bids have been received:
Working Days Allotted: 130
BIDDER AMOUNT BID
Texas Bitulithic Company $127,581.15
Glade, Inc. $134,911.49
General Construction Company $139,202.35
Austin Road Company and Worth
Construction Company $140,097.15
The normal procedure for assessment paving is to hold the Benefit Hearing
before issuing a work order. It is proposed, however, that the work order be
issued upon award of contract for Units 6, 7, 8 and 9, in order to expedite
completion of these units to coincide with the opening of the new Riverside
State Bank presently nearing completion.
Project Cost and Financing
Based on the low bid, approximately $59,706.26 will be assessed against
abutting property owners. The cost to the City-at-large will be approximately
$73,979.59, including engineering, storm drainage and miscellaneous expenses.
A Bond Fund Transfer from Unspecified Funds is proposed to provide for the
City's portion of the cost of the project. —----
OFfICIrt RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. Vi'ffltl, TEX
P DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: PAGE
NUMBER Award of LontraLt - Aasessment
3/18/68 C-11.91 Paving - 1.1 Locations on the L4orth Si +e -.:3... of 3 -
Recommendations
It is recommended:
1) That Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $6,041.5, ae anproved,
reducing the total contract price to
2) That the following Bond Fund Transfers be approved:
AMOUNT FROM TO REASON
$59,706.26 Revolving Fund 11 Locations North Side Property owners'
042-09724-901 Q42-10424-171 portion of
construction cost.
$71,000.00 104-24000-901 1.04-24!11Jn-117 City's portion of
Unspecified 11 Locations North Side construction, engin-
Projects eering and miscella-
neous costs.
3) That an ordinance be adopted:
a) Declaring the necessity for and ordering th•a improvements;
b) Malting provisions for levying of assessments;
c) Directing the Public Works Department to prepare estimates of cost
and amounts to be assessed,
d) Awarding a contract to Texas Bitulithic Company in the amount of
$121,532.59, which includes Change Order No. 1 for $6,-044.56 con-
tract decrease.
e) *laking appropriations to cover the indebtedness thereby incurred for
improvements of the project named above.
4) That an ordinance be adopted:
a) Approving the estimates of cost and amountL_ prol)osed to be assessEu;
and,
b) Setti.nq; Aril 22, 1968, as the date of t -,e Relie`it Hearing.
The following summaries are attached:
"A" - Summary of the project and Resume of t:ie ie'g.�bor food -`eating
"B" - D�_stribution of Cost and results o: Post Cart Survey.
OFFICIAL RLCORD
HDM:f k
CITY SECRETARY
Attach.
FT. WORTH, TEX.
SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSIT COUNCIL' PROCESSED BY
ff APPROVED �{ (3'�THER (DESCRISE) 1-117
1� "! .^ : ./l , nnt.a1j (l7•r3- T�In rG�•�J T�ar+l ari ng
Necessity of _ SRCRITTARY
Paving and Ord. No.Sy,)�Setting Date of Benefit DATE
CITY MANAGER Hearing
CITY OF FORT WORTH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
11 LOCATIONS - NORTH SIDE
PROJECT NO. 104-24000-177
A Neighborhood Hearing was conducted by the Engineering Division of the
Public Works Department at the Riverside Elementary School, 420 North
Riverside Drive, at 7:30 P.M. on February 26, 1968. The procedures con-
cerning owner participation in the cost of construction, including methods
and policies of determining assessments, construction standards and methods
of payment were explained to the seventy persons in attendance.
The question and answer period was then opened and the property owners were
requested to give their names, addresses and property descriptions as their
streets were called, if they had any questions.
Mr. Richard Johnson, an Attorney, stated that he was representing the owners
of properties abutting on both Dooling Street - Units 3 & 4 - and Crabtree
Street - Unit 5. He said the owners were opposed to the paving on these
streets for the following reasons: 1) . The proposed assessment costs were
too high; 2) . They were still paying for recent assessments on Highcrest and
Bruce Streets and did not feel the proposed improvements would enhance their
properties by the amounts being assessed.
No objections were voiced on the proposed improvements on any of the other
eight units in this project.
A staff member thanked all those present for attending this meeting and ex-
plained that they would be notified of the date and time of the Benefit Hear-
ing to be held before the City Council, at which time those wishing to do so
could present their objections or suggestions on the proposed improvements.
OFFICfU, REVORT
GI i i LIS 11 i A IR
tL: 4V1",1J1RTfl, Tai.
�NMCBKNT "B" IACATIONS N. SIDE
Page 1 of 12
Project 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE__..._.......... ......_ .. .........., .............__ . . . _ .._ _... .$1.21,532.59
ENGINEERING ......... ........... ....... .......... ... .............. ..._.........,............................ . 12,153.26 p
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST ......... ...................._................................... ...............,....._.. .........$ 133!685.85 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................ . 51272.39 52.9
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. ...... ................... 4,703.31 47.1
TOTAL FOOTAGE. ._ .... .
- 9,975.70 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT....... .. ... .... ...._................ ,.$24,783.22 18.6
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT... . . _........ 34,923.04 26.1
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED... .., . .................. ... ...._......... _.... .... - $5977.26 44.7
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT......... . __................._ _._ ............ .. _ _ .. 59,7o6.26 44.7
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................ _ ..,..... _ __._ .. $ 73,979.59 55.3
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 51523.10* 21972-57
PER CENT 100.0 53.8
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 66 24
PER CENT 100.0 36.4
Cumulative Results
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 52 2L4 of the Post Card
PER CENT 100.0 46.2 Survey are available
upon request.
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 32 23
PER CENT 100.0 71.9
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 20 1
PER CENT 100.0 5.0
IL
These two columns repre- r _ f T'r. �
sent petitioned streets t,�i I t uirlLT,911
only. 77 Tr' T �t
1. ; Ui;if1, 1fl.
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 2 of 12 Unit No. 1: N. W. Sixteenth Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................... ........................................ ..... ........i 9-079.75
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 907.97
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST......................................................................................... ......................i 9,987.72.72 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... 1,069.8 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0-
TOTAL FOOTAGE. ...... ................ ...,............ 1,069.8 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT..... ............. ... ..................... .$ 5,368.65 53.2
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT................................................. -�-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.._.... ............. ..................................._....._......... ., .. i 5,368.65 53.8
........... ..................
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.......... ..................... ..............._....._........................ .. ... ... ............ ............ .. . 52368.65 53.8
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE...... ............ ........... ........................ .......... . .......... .S 4,619.07 46.2
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 706.8* H -0- 50.0 656.8
PER CENT 100.0 y -0- 7.1 92.9
►h-'C
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 12 M -0- 1 11
PER CENT 100.0 -0- 8.3 91.7
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 7 C -0- 1 6
PER CENT 100.0 ,b -0- 14.3 85.7
O
,,
(M
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 -0- 1 1
PER CENT 100.0 H -0- 50.0 50.0
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 5 -0- -0- 5
PER CENT 100.0 -0- -0- 100.0
* 363 feet City owned -
property not included. "� 5}' �
�iT r-rrm
�,.: i 1, [
FT. V1 S I T J, TEX. �
,11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
PROJECT NO. 104-24000-177
PROPOSED
PAVING ',•,� ,;c�s:�''�`•C: '` ( /
16
12. s
PRESENTLY PAVED
2`
IN
,S
1 61
-
__ �� 8 1'S�
10
o s LYDON
-
R O f2 q
11 14
VIP
q IS 10 15
O�♦ �e��,a,1� 'C 3, \ — 9--- -- 16 9 16
64 17 17
lo
IB Z 16
S YI S 20 5 20
1D 4 21 4 X21
z2 — - —i 22
---20
21 t 24 1 24
�RO COSED ai CLO S,N6 --
O s ~��, KEARNEY
Oq 1 15 12 q 12i 13
• 14 11 14 '\11 — 14 11- --- —14
Q15 q IS 0 to IS I 10 1S
16 00,\ 16 9 _16 -9- --
fl 9 �i7 8 11 8 n
18 7 10 7 19
19 6 r 19
20 S zo S Hz 20 S u�l i0
JJ S
zl 4 21 21 4 21
_ —_-- 11)
\@ 22 e S zz 3 22 3
23 2 z3 z 73 2 Z5
Z Z
3 rn t 24
�9 LONG
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 3 of 12 Unit No. 2: N. W. Twentieth Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE _ $11,278.25
ENGINEERING .......... ....... ........... .. ._.... ............,,.. .... .,,. ..... ... ... .... ... . 1,127.82
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST_.. ................................................................ $ 12,406.07 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE... ................ ... .. . 1071 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. ..... ....... . .... -0-
TOTAL FOOTAGE _ 1071
100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT. _ .. ..._ $ 3,249.68 26.2
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT... ..
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED. _....,...__... ... .... .. .. : 3,249.68 26.2
1�6=7CJiROCbCARA[l7x6t _ ._ .
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT... ._ _ 3.249.68 26.2
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.. .. .... ......... _ . i 9,156.39 73.8
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1071.0 200.0 488.0 383.0
PER CENT 100.0 N 18.7 45.6 35.7
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 22 3 6 13
PER CENT 100.0 N 13.6 27.3 59. 1
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 15 r,�..� 3 6 6
PER CENT 100.0 C 20.0 40.0 40.0
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 5 'Jrod 2 2 1
PER CENT 100.0 40.0 40.0 20.0
n
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 H 1 4 5
PER CENT 100.0 10.0 40.0 50.0
t .e
LIT
95
FT. '`� r,Y�, TGA
�;•'wtd i tt, J
_ r
(41.D4?
a
2
F�
to
4 — 14 a
t `~ IS
12
a
li ie 4
\ 10 19 J • I
\1 10
15 22
011,
It
f3 9 ..
FwL
g 'os ,9 j JPO' 4 �'•�� `6� �\`\( ,� % `� �,� \ // j �� �
9 /19
7
IS
2
S�
/Al
.92 AC. TR 1
2.11.AC. 15
to /
Y VI�L�G 4 6 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
e PROJECT NO. 104-24000-177
4-3 A G ci \�
N.
F PROPOSED PAVINGcc
y4. W I
u
= PRESENTLY PAVE
LES U
'Lu ►
Ls { VELRETPAY
---- ---- - ---— - } - — ET. VOTH, TEX.
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 4 of 12 Unit No. 3: Dooling Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACT4 PRICE.........................................................................................................S-5
5 016.60
ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 566
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................i 5,518.26� 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... -0- -0-
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE............................ 736 100.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE....... ..................... . .... ..... 736 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT,....... .. _... .... .........................S -0- -0-
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT... ..... ................................ _..... 21,221.44 40.3
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.... .... ........ .... ................. -..- . ....>f 2,221.44 40.3
XN MMMXXMKM....................................................
........._..............,. ...._....
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................ .......-.............................,.... _ .. ..... ...,.,...... _. . 2,221.44 40.3
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE...................... ...................,._... .......................5 3,296.82 59.7
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 736.0 -0- 184.0 552.0
PER CENT 100.0 y�y -0- 25.0 75.0
►C
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 M -0- 1 3
PER CENT 100.0 H -0- 25.0 75.0
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 �� -0- 1 3
PER CENT 100.0 d -0- 25.0 75.0
b
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 O -0- 1 3
PER CENT 100.0 -0- 25.0 75.0
H
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE -0- -0- -0- -O-
PER CENT -0- -0- -0- -0-
CF ll121'il R' 0
r
IUARY
f T. 6"i utt i R, TEX.
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 5 of 12 Unit No.4: Dooling Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE.................................................................................................. .........5 5.961.00
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 596.10
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST..................................................................................................... ..........i 6.557.10 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... _0_
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE—,.................... ..... 370 100.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE........ .................................
370 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.,............ ...................................._ —0—
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT................................................... 1,128.00 17.2
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED......... ... ............................................................... .... ....f 1,128.00 17.2
Clil ............................................................ .......... ...... .. ._..... .
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................. ......................... ... 1,128.00 17.2
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................. ............. .......................... .........................5 5,429.10 82.8
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 370.0 A —0- 370.0 —O—
PER CENT 100.0 -0- 100.0 -0-
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 —0— 2 —0—
PER CENT 100.0 y -0- 100.0 -0-
NO,, OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 —0— 2 -0—
PER CENT 100.0 ty -0- 100.0 -0-
"d
7d
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 G�.� —0— 2 —O—
PER CENT 100.0 -0- 100.0 -0-
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE -0— —0— —0— —O—
PER CENT —0— —0— —0— —0—
U 1 E 11;1 I'.L G Si
3�s. silJli1H, TEX.
ATTACHKE T "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 6 of 12 Unit No. 5; Crabtree Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
1, CENT
CONTRACTPRICE.. .. ..... .......... ...... .... ...... ......................................... . --_ ...-:38.159.74
ENGINEERING ........... ................... ............................................................................. ,R.815.97
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST..................................................................................... ............._........i 41.975.71 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... -O-
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.. ........... .. ............ 1.205.8 100.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE._ ... 11205.8 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.. ... . ..... ... ... ............... ..i -O-
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT... ... ........_ 15.392.60 36.7
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.,__... . _ _ $ 15,392.60
36.7
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT......... ... 5,392.60 36.7
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE...... ........... 26,583.11 63.3
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTALPETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1205.8 -0- 10210. .8 185.0
PER CENT 1010,.0 N -0- 84.7 15.3
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 14 -0- 13 1
PER CENT 100.0 H -O- 72•9 7.1
H
H
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 3 H -0- 2 1
PER CENT 100.0 C -0- 66.7 33.3
ro
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1 G -0- 1 -O-
PER CENT 100.0 � -0- 100.0 -0-
n
H
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 -0- 1 1
PER CENT 100.0 -0- 50.0 50.0
C9
ET. `"IORTH, TEX.
11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
PROJECT NO. 104-24000-177
g
PROPOSED PAVING
6 37G
PRESENTLY PAVED \�
GFI " � Lu
4
CITY 'uFUrg '`r'
FT.
34
�3 32 ,1 1 3014
/v
7 r
F'. I U
9 I I 12 II
�f I4
U U � 15
7 S IU
89 10 II 12 ..13 14': :1 Ti ?i` 1 2 4 ':•. F, I 7 � r, 9 ) 11 12 ( t3 14 IS 6c t 2
�� I:..
f
8 9 II 10 �. ! 1 112 1114 15 I— 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I i l I 12 I 13 14 15
G - fir -- " ——
J
23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 32 31 30 29 28 ?- 7 26 25 24 5 2?_ 21 20 T9 18 j 17 t ` u.Q�_
10
. 12
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15,1 1 2 3 '} ` 6 7 g ', ic) II I?_ 13 14 15 ;16 ; " ,—'— . 13
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 7 of 12 Unit No. 6: Retta Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................. ................................................. .........i 9.464.90
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 946.49
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST........................................................................ ................ ......... ..........i 10,411.39 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... 154.5 14.1
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. ........................... 939.4 85.9
TOTAL FOOTAGE.- .................... .... ..1,093.9 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.........._. ... ......................... _= 943.95 9.1
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.... ...._..............................._...... 6%058.43 58.2
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED......... ......... .... ...............................,... ...... ..... _$ 7,002.38 67.3
OIF�SX�47L1C>f11>iLiiEa....................... .............. ................. .......... ..
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................ ......................_..._......,..... _, 7,002.38 67.3
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE...... ................_ . .._. ........_ __. ... .i 30409.01 32.7
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,093.9 564.9 414.9 -0- 679.0
PER CENT 100.0 51.6 37.9 62.1
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 9 1 1 -O- 8
PER CENT 100.0 11.1 11.1 88.9
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 7 1 1 -0- 6
PER CENT 100.0 14.3 14.3 85.7
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 1 1 -0- 2
PER CENT 100.0 33.3 33.3 66.7
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 -0- -0- -0- 4
PER CENT 100.0 100.0
lif an a rP., uPt
.1401.1 ' ,
CITY V-VR�o
FT. VXRTH, TEX.
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 8 of 12 Unit No. 7: Damon Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE............................... i 4,904.35
ENGINEERING ...................................................,..,....................... 4� 90.44
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST........................................... .......s 5.3� 94.79 100.0
................. ................
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE... ................... ... . -0-
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. ..................... .... 392.31 100.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE. ...... 392.31 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT _ S -O-
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.... ... ..... 2,945.05 54.6
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.,..._.. _.._. ............... ........ ... ... S 2,945.05 54.6
u=]GRl0C0CssRw=.. ..............._. ... ....... ._ ., ., . . ... ._
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................ ... . ........ ..................... . .. ..... .. .__. _ _.. 2,945.05 54.6
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE...... ................ _ ._....._ i 21449.74 45.4
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 392.31 351.65 351.65 -0- 40.66
PER CENT 100.0 89.6 89.6 10.4
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 2 2 -0- 2
PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 3 2 2 e0- 1
PER CENT 100.0 66.7 66.7 33.3
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1 1 1 -0- -O-
PER CENT 100.0 100.0 100.0
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 1 1 -0- 1
PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
r
L RELM
SEICRETRRY
I' ORTR, TEX.
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 9 of 12 Unit No. 8: Noble Avenue
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE......................................................................... . _.......: 6,911.00
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 691.10
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST......................................................................................... ......................: 7,602.10 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... 366,0 55.9
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 288.6 44.1
TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ... ............... ....... ..... 654.6 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......... .. .... ... ....................... ..5 1,676.02 22.0
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.... ..... ............................... ....... 12464.51 19.3
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED......... .... .........,.................................................._..... .. 5 3,140.53 41.3
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT...........---............... ................................................... ........ ......................... .,. 3,140o53 41.3
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE............................... .. ............. .......................... ....................... .5 4,461.57 58.7
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 654.6 288.6 68.6 -0- 586.0
PER CENT 100.0 44.1 10.5 89.5
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 6 1 1 -0- 5
PER CENT 100.0 16.7 16.7 83.3
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 1 1 -0- 3
PER CENT 100.0 25.0 25.0 75.0
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 1 1 -0- 2
PER CENT 100.0 33.3 33.3 66.7
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 -0- -0- -0- 1
PER CENT 100.0 100.0
6ul"
Ir
w.1
GRI
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 10 of 12 Unit No. 9: Chandler Avenue
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE................ ............................................................s 15,833.75
ENGINEERING ........................................ ....... 1,583.3
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST....................................... ........................................5 172417.13 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE 55090 41.6
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE 77�_ 58.4
TOTAL FOOTAGE... .......................... .....1,321.2 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT..--,.. .. ...................................S 2,660.46 15.3
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.......... 5.71 32.8
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED................................. ...........-....... S 89373.47 48.1
..1.11
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT...........................-.......................... ..................,.,.. 8073.47 48.1
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................... ....... ........... .......................... .........................5 9,043.66 51.9
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAYING PAYING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,321.2 568.5 671.2 300.0 350.0
PER CENT 100.0 43.0 50.8 22.7 26.5
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 15 1 1 4 10
PER CENT 100.0 6.7 6.7 26.6 66.7
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 11 1 1 4 6
PER CENT 100.0 9.1 9.1 36.4 54.5
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 5 1 1 2 2
PER CENT 100.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 40.0
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 6 -0- 1 2 3
PER CENT 100.0 16.7 33.3 50.0
OFFICi�i�. RFCO�v '
CITY uFCRELT;`:.R
FT. V ORTN, TEX.
PROJECT NO. 104-24000-177re
rtu/ADDAI +� r
PROPOSED PAVING
PRESENTLY PAVED
rte,,... \ =S gnY:_•...,::,�:rF�-:::.;.:::;::
a KLA
t%j
rx
s
SO ,s —_1, a i. :.,a a f. Ir^• .ems�._: ._ _-1iGIs1
12 x { f2 I, 1 I I�^Z2
13 R 2 !3 + 2i`• I 2 2 21 UQ
LE AVE
14 3 14 3 3 3 20 3 ^I 21 _ �2 r� 33
IS c ? 4 Is = 4 4 4 19 = s 4 I 20 � —
f--- 'II � 34
4 165 1 5 16 �� 5 19 70 —1 ` 35
17 6 i 6 6 6 17
6 18 69 C>' O 36
18 W — 7 UJ 7 7 7 T 16 17 68 < 37
7 _— —
19 ¢ ,s 19 ¢ 8 8 �8 ` IS �8 I6 69 38
20 9 20 9 9 9 14 i _ —— —u
9 R F IS 66 },39
145
21� 21 1
0 SO 10 13 — 1. 14 65
� PLACE
Q. 1 12
13 2 13 2 to
,' K14
U)i0
Va:tRy
15 4 Is FT. WORTH r
N0 -
12�
S
,:.,a 49
TATE YHY. .. -- � 5� �49=
��,
O5 0
10 i 11 53 1 52+
S ST. °
eo —"--1'0^"s",— ani 7 _—•_�_•
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 11 of 12 Unit No. 10: Gilmore Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE................................................................................................ .........i 13,135.00
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1,313 50
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................11].4.448.50 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,791.09 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -n-
TOTAL FOOTAGE.. ..... .. ................ ............ 1$791.09 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT............... ..... ........................... ..11 10,006.46 69.3
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT............................................. ...... -0-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED......... ... ........ ............................... ...._....__........ ... . .11 10,006.46 69.3
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT....................................................... ...................._.. 10,006.46 69.3
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................... . ........ .. ........................ .............. .........i 49442.04 30.7
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1791.09 1063.92 664.71 -0- 1126.38
PER CENT 100.0 59.4 37.1 62.9
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 30 18 11 -0- 19
PER CENT 100.0 60.0 36.7 63.3
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 25 18 11 -0- 14v-
PER CENT 100.0 72.0 44.0 56.0
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 18 18 11 -0- 7
PER CENT 100.0 100.0 61.1 38.9
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 7 -0- -0- -0- 7
PER CENT 100.0 100.0
DFt :EiTil
RD
CI i�r RY
FT. VIX X.
11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
PROJECT NO. 104-24000-177 ,.
9
to it rt
]PROPOSED PAVING
PRESENTLY PAVED LANA
e
i a � Titai5L,
.i— f--'FJ 1're M lw a—r—so T � -•�
41
rilA :,
• ----
TFt11[3 if •j � a 3 2 U) 2 :jfi.•, 9 n
j y'+ 1 ��• j-' 1 1
Tn.MIL
,
3 SJ 7R12G — i - - ✓i co , Z <[i W
♦ 0
n Tk R�A
VA A, °i.s .. t .s t 1 3 q J
l'R l2 F n trn� Q( --
t3
T�
16 Is• w I'Sm u to 9 t ' i j�. a s�. c' ? 4 A Gds•1a
•� � 16.8'1 GS,Q
O V r l-R 2•9 j-L �
PIt
6 c
,er =�":: - •_yq a�;'k;;.r-.�:tyt1,-�.\;5: ::Irw>:' �' ���
TR.
aM'::_^•� �A��l5.51���G 4 i`" '15�� �-�c �,��j y',-. �r•"� S l ll
ist is o
JO �, M
b S 4
p D• Z
• Q
.3
2 s o s s a 13 Iz ;k n 10 9
a
CF1IL�:,L, R� RD s
,.� CITY SCRIJR'1
V
ATTACHMENT "B" 11 LOCATIONS N. SIDE
Page 12 of 12 Unit No. 11 : Menzer Street
Project No. 104-24000-177
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE... ........................................._................,.. ..................._......._ .......i 1,788.25
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 178.83
ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 11 967.08 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................. . 270 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE........................... -0-
TOTAL FOOTAGE. . .... 270 100.0 '
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT............ ..... .... .........................i 878.00 44.6
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.... ............................................. -0-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.... .... .... .................. .......... ............... ...... ...... ... . .i 878.00 44.6
Qvlv3Cx
I7w-9Aw9 6C................................................ ........ .......... ..
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT.........................,...... ...................... ......................... ...... ... .................. ....,. ... 878.00 44.6
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.........................__.................. . .......................... ............... ....... .i 1,089.08 55.4
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION
TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED
NO. OF FRONT FEET 270 135 135 135 -O-
PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 1 1 1 -0-
PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
INO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 1 1 1 -O-
PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 1 1 1 -O-
PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE -0- -0- -0- -0- -O-
PER CENT
IUARY
F r. vi OR111, TEX.
LL LUU&ILUNN N. SIDE
PROJECT NO. 104-24000-177
1I
PROPOSED PAVING
1
PRESENTLY PAVED \ � ^
ti
co x
r. �0 t
a,: ensu ew7 s+I no�7so .-
�.l
LYNNHAVENe
RD. I
!
ao ao eo eo n n ea w tp O t
m v
ao no
MONTCLAIR, ST. �� 1
1
00
I a0 p BJ 7, �, JSu 8o W
Tom+ ,c ,. , , •rrJ
ANN /'�J�r� 1 tt�
_ . _ - N - W tr
W I a0 DO !b 7l ,l PJ so eo (D to i �•'...
uo _ uo uo no
+e +c s s
N63 HOLT ST. t
_ :.,..�.
novo j no iwoc� roc loci .t,
�LANDHOLT ST. eo SUrc B
1.9 116 . ¢o
IM
1,3a -4 r._ig - N W
j i° J E
N W I ►—n I m - N
,
C'`' HOLLOWBIZo OIC ADD. ftPl,
a
Rim-
W
N I 1
\\ v• AZZ.
10 >.,
uNir �►
o
N I °vl rn
xl
o {,y
S4 m CITY 'WECPCTARY 1
Q'uEEti ' FT. WORTH, TEX. y