Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5830 ORDINANCE NO.-- C,��- AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVID- ING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF WATSON STRMLT AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CONTRACT TO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR THE MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBT- EDNESS THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESS- MENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CER- TIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE ESTIMATES;DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSE- QUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE FORTIETH LEG- ISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106, COMMONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDI- NANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth,Texas, has prepared Plans and Speci- fications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been examined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all matters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I. The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and adopted. II. There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter described portions of streets, av- enues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, to-wit: 1. WATSON STREET From the north line of Meadowbrook Drive to 2621 North of Meadowbrook Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 1, Project No. 104-24000-163. 2. BENMAR STREET From the east line of Edgewood Terrace to the west line of Lynahaven Road, known and designated as Unit No. 2, Project No. 104-24000-163- 3* BENMAR STREET From the east line of Lynnhaven Road to the west line of Montclair Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 3, Project No. 104,24000-163. 4. MENZER STREET From the east line of Shilling Drive to 1351 East of Shilling Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 4, Project No. 104-24000-163. 5. QUEEN STREET From the north line of Briarwood Lane to 1451 North of Briarwood Lane, known and designated as Unit No. 5, Project No. 104-24000-163. 6. PYRON AVENUE From the east line of Jenson Road to the west line of Wilson Road, known and designated as Unit No. 6, Project No. lo4-24000-163. 7. STARK STREET From the south line of Hightower Street to the south line of Meadowbrook Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 7, Project No. 104-24000-163. 8. MEADERS STREET Fran 10501 South of Meadowbrook Drive to the south line of Meadowbrook Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 8, Project No. 104-24000-163. iII Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas,shall be improved by raising,grading,and filling same and by constructing thereon the following,to-wit: 1. WATSON STREET From the north line of Meadowbrook Drive to 2621 North of Meadowbrook Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 1, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 30 foot roadway. 2. BENMAR STREET From the east line of Edgewood Terrace to the west line of Lynnhaven Road, known and designated as Unit No. 2, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 30 foot roadway. 3. BENMAR STREET From the east line of Lynnhaven Road to the west line of Montclair Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 3, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 30 foot roadway. 4. MENZER STREET From the east line of Shilling Drive to 135' East of Shilling Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 4, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 30 foot roadway. 5. QUEEN STREET From the north line of Briarwood Lane to 1451 North of Briarwood Lane, known and designated as Unit No. 5, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 40 foot roadway. 6. PyRON AVENUE From the east line of Jenson Road to the west line of Wilson Road, known and designated as Unit No. 6, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 30 foot roadway. 7. STARK STREET From the south line of Hightower Street to the south line of Meadowbrook Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 7, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot- Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 30 foot roadway. 8. MEADERS STREET From 10501 South of Meadowbrook Drive to the south line of Meadowbrook Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 8, Project No. 104-24000-163, a 6 inch Hot--Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement on a 30 foot roadway. The above,together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line Where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurten- ances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor. IV. The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as follows, to-wit: A. The property abutting on that portion of the street, avenue or public place and the real and,true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine- tenths (9/10ths) of the estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements. B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said improvements after deduct- ing the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A. The amounts payable by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners thereof and shall constitute a first and prior lien upon such properties and a personal liability of the real and true owners thereof, and shall be payable, to-wit: When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular unit,the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become payable in five (5) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of such completion and acceptance,and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such installments after the date of completion and acceptance of such respective unit.The entire amount assessed against the particular parcels of property shall bear interest from the date of such completion and acceptance of the improvements on the unit upon which-the particular property abuts at the rate of six (6%) per cent per annum,payable annually except as to interest on the first installment,which shall be due and payable on the date said installment matures, provided that any owner shall have the right to pay any and all of such installment at any time before maturity by paying princi- pal with interest accrued to the date of payment, and further provided if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly asthe same matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns,the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immediately due and payable; but it is specifically provided that no assessment shall in any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special benefits to property in the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing provided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case until after notice of hearing as pro- vided by law. Said assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed,in the name of the City of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaiiring the right to authorize payment of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such com- pleted and accepted unit in not more than forty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than$9.00 each,the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than 30 days after the completion and acceptance by the City of the particular unit, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby em- powered to authorize payments of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payment shall be authorized only in instances where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful,valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms there- of of the sums assessed against such property. V. The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the City Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon. and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments, or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, and the name of the owners, as far as known, and shall contain such other recitals as may be pertin- ent thereto,and shall further recite substantially that all proceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability of the owners there- of, have been regularly had, done and performed, and such recitals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substan- tially that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together wtih reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which, as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior lien against the property, superior to all other liens and claims except State,County,School District,and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall invalidate any assessment or any certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not invalidate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto. VL Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and the bid of GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO. , having been found to be the lowest and best bid for the malting and construction of said improvements,the contract therefore is hereby awarded to GIIQERAL CONSTRUCTION CO. , at and for the prices stated in the Proposal of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department, which said report and recom- mendation is on file with the City, the City Manager, and City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the name of the City of Fort Worth,Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things,the prices for the work. VII. To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by said contract, there is hereby appropriated out of available funds and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pay said indebtedness so incurred. VIII. The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, which law has been adopted as an amend- ment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas,and under which law these proceedings are taken and had. ix. Each unit above described shall be and constitute a separate and independent unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be made for the improvements in each unit according to the cost of the improvements in that unit and according to the benefits arising from the improvements in that unit. � i y r X. In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it shall not be necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall be valid. XI. The Director of Public Works of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is hereby, ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of such improvements in each unit,in accordance with the terms of the powers and provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth, Texas. XII. The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County Clerk of Tarrant County,Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature of the State of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature,said Act having been passed in the year 1930, and now shown as Article 1220a of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. XIII. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. XIV. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full f i-ce and effect fro n and after the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 1 DAY OF- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney k City of Fort Worth, Texas M E Mayor and Council Communication wp` GRAOW DATE REFERENCE susiscT: Assessment Paving on the East PAGE NUMBER Side Project No. 4-163 2 8/14/67 C-1035 Council action on the project described below is requested: Proiect Description Nature of work: Assessment paving at 8 Locations on the East Side as follows: Roadway Unit Street Limits W dth R.O.W. 1 Watson Street Meadowbrook Dr. to 262 feet 30 feet 50 feet north 2 Benmar Street Edgewood Terrace to Lynhaven. 30 feet 50 feet Road 3 Benmar Street Lynhaven Road to Montclair Dr. 30 feet 50 feet 4 Menzer Street Shilling Drive to 135 feet 30 feet 50 feet East 5 Queen Street Briarwood Lane to 145 feet 40 feet 60 feet North 6 Pyron Avenue Jenson Rd. to Wilson Rd. 30 feet 50 feet 7 Stark Street Hightower St. to Meadowbrook 30 feet 50 feet Dr. 8 Meaders Street 1050 feet south of Meadow- 30 feet 50 feet brook Dr. to Meadowbrook Dr. Petitions were submitted for the paving of Units 2 through 6. Unit 1, (Watson Street) was included in connection with issuance of a building permit for con- struction of a new residence approximately 200 feet north of Meadowbrook Drive. The builder has requested paving to this point in order to provide a paved ac- cess to Meadowbrook Drive. Watson Street will end temporarily north of the proposed paving because the remaining tract is undeveloped and will be subject to installation of street and utilities when developed in the future. Unit 4 (Menrer Street) and Unit 5 (Queen Street) also temporarily dead end at tracts where streets will be built when the area is platted and developed. Unit 7 (Stark Street) and Unit 8 (Meaders Street) were included in the project at the request of residents in the area to eliminate the duet being transmitted into surrounding homes, businesses and schools, and upon the recommendation by the Traffic Engineer to provide for better traffic circulation in the neighborhood. Both units- close paving skips immediately south of Meadowbrook Drive. Submission of Bids The following bids have been received: till DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving on the East PAGE NUMBER Side Project No. 4-163 22 8/14/67 C-1035 °� Bidder Amount Bid Working Days General Construction Company $38,992.10 55 S.R.O. Asphalt, Inc. 41,304.40 55 Worth Construction Company 42,681.50 55 Texas Bitulithic Company 44,323.90 55 Proiect Cost & Financing Based on the low bid, approximately $25,673.64 will be assessed against abutting property owners. The cost to the City-at-large will be approxi- mately $17,217.67, including engineering, storm drainage & miscellaneous expenses. Recommendations It is recommended: 1) That the following Bond Fund Transfers be approved: Amount From To For $25,673.64 Revolving Fund 8 Locations East Side Property owners ' portion of construction cost 17,217.67 104-24000-901 104-24000-163 City's portion of con- Unspecified 8 Locations East Side struction, engineeri Projects and misce s 2) That an ordinance be adopted: �F�,C1 ` �� a) Declaring. the necessity for and ordering the improvemen s--%J S���ET b) Making provisions for levying of assessments; c) Directing the Public Works Department to prepare estimat 'PI xbe� amounts to be assessed; .- d) Awarding the contract to General Construction Co. on its low bid of $38,992.10; and, e) Making appropriations to cover the indebtedness thereby incurred for improvements of the project named above. 3) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Approving the estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; and b) Setting September 11, 1967, as the date of the Benefit Hearing. HDM:lp The following summaries are attached: "A" - Resume of the project and Summary of the Neighborhood Hearing "B" - Distribution of Cost and results of Post Card Survey. SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSITI BY COUNCIL: !/� VCJY J1 APPROVED OTHER (DESCRIBE) /� � TY SECRETARY 14 CITY MANAGER CITY OF FORT WORTH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Assessment Paving at 8 Locations, East Side, Project No. 104-24000-163 A Neighborhood Hearing was conducted by the Engineering Division, of the Public Works Department at Meadowbrook Elementary School Auditorium on July 31, 1967, for the Assessment Paving at 8 Locations on the East Side, Project No. 104-24000-163. The procedures concerning owner participation in the cost of paving, including methods and policies of determining assess- ments, street construction standards, and methods of payment were explained to the 11 persons in attendance. No objections to the paving were stated at the hearing on any unit of the project. 141 TEL yr p� 1 Bi g4't'f 1 c,4 Gem �W'�t q0 ff I White P OL Lady 'l Victory 1 Lake �,,. o,, , .A ` DALLAS- '1184 ALLAS- -� E_ 4 FT. WORTH 11 Plaza / -_ ov' • r !kEDERVILLE +� E ,t ORAee�TO. RD IAVI%IV 0 MENIFR z Q 1� CMA"LOTrs ". P N j RENMA �^ RW00D C ILI" ` i .I ,tuERip LO �( DR O .TWWC oR o 0 lE J U. f41oe a RD. uTwpO 1 W O cin. a X__ Yy� O JACuwL,.► .a. IlN116 IE "tLo • { 9C or o o OAK ND _IZ n LAKE v Kf BLE RICE U. I r� M•OC>fOWE;rOOlC ` P wf fRANW000 TER. e ar o PARK ��J ° PANrT a►�y` Golf Co�rse I ��� oa J 011A v000 � TO WBAP • .NETT W Q j Z _ (Public)\ �aAo« orP pNTERREY RD 2 O 4� cS L� SIDEE O W Z woA O E o<x A _ inn Z O0 1 4' xroSEMITE OR ANDY R Z W ~ Z (`� MITE m Do,, O 4ILA44N r0 NO MIANDY ' 3 W 1 i f��� FIS(Irn = AM Lj * OR F l _m_ c� DR t 0 rEDIOq� cR� ~ ` 145 > eI.WU Z ; RLIRTMA LA. / ROA +u c, Ir; IfES J S El O+ c C T. 2 JA 2 T It a r J a'' �' •� c, LAeul d S LX t LA I / OW BROOK WW DR ` � � Z � ORRI 10 O re�om -- MORRIS Iel AVE. ,t� 01[MI[llA E 02MAAd 1 I V O' Na O<. r� AV m KEN- O « ORMA Z < Bopp iNE T WOOU w CT =O W PURINGTON AVE rw E Z DR H Z E. LANCAST Ri gp AVE. 3 sRSEawAr VANNA(TAC Cr '< W o = ' VIRGINIA LA_ 180 O Ty cc p U BEATY > $ K < PANOLAAVE. ; x W ., W o p DALLAS AVE. CRAIG Z o t� r o ` ` ` < °; Z NSONt r U or z BLVD. o N. HAMPSHIRE BLVD. 0 W W N S HAMPSHIRE BLVDfco or O Z W W Cr s 7 = C Y r Z LA! K T w c Z_ fRR V ` D wI H a WINDOWWRE E. ROSEDALE t HART N W W ET MOOT- t WE. G � AVE. G � o W AVE. < G � MEppE� � N � AVE H o �< AVE W H ►urine.cin ,i wE H -_ OF�IvI��I E:ECs;�D LOCA T/O/V "AP ASSESS"AmN ;r PA1//NG Fj, -�%utkti, TEX. (5 Im OCA TIONS EAST SIDE ,opo,zE cT NO. 10-4-2-4'000- 16- 9 ,4,o67i�8 C-2343 D/?A WN 1,Cw 5-2-67 7 ROAD So& �—'MO N I C LA 111 O fV DRIVE X 1p > e JUNIUS ST < Qp (9 Of F-7- quEf ST MRECORD ST. SECRETARY TEX. FT. TEX. 3b cl PROJECT NO. 104-24000-163 LEGEND PRESENTLY PAVED ......... .w .. ... .... ... ..... ....... DIRT OR GRAVEL PROPOSED PAVING, UNIT 1 WATSON STREET PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY PETITION OR POLL CARD \�\\ OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED TO PAVING CA powe( OWNERSHIP OPPOSED TO PAVING OULAND PAPM, ... EDER,VILLE QQ » If 19 35 eo , co ►r O 0o an „ e CARL ST. =I 7s If so 80 00 77 k► f:liFy{l I , d7 A I4 fr r.(jA f" a I N 0) w ♦ w i °•Vv I„ .180 n n t ..}; :'�' 'i.`;'24:•. :a:•t :4"iifSr'?Ei>i�'i'.;?i:.;:. I ea IL w .......... >:,1 m 1 a N N s w {' f P 1► i to Oo OFFICIAL R"MIO J OS VI � fp el " N CITY eo so ,N P_ v �u — N W ion ------- } N I w + l I 0� PROJECT NO. 104-21000-1.63 L-0, eo eo eo eo eo :so eo eo LEGEND PRESENTLY PAVED P „A'N X� Et YI -•� �i N ;�tr 0p CA '•' i N i W~'� •1"` VI - f r N�� , lN, PROPOSED mf 2 UNITS (r - 2 & 3v BMAR STREET IU IIO "o 110 Ib Ci" I IOf lom :� as HOLT ST. 1.6PROPERTY REPRESENTED $Y ALO IK I ¢ IK ❑f :`� 11( 1K! N I W + IUta °1 r r o \ PETITION OR POLL CARD itl IK 114 IIf IK IK IK IK . CA co �// PAVING OWNER HIP NOT OPPOSED TO HOLLOWnROOK'• s �// ° SHILLING ST. W ST. - O � e :�i, � r ' �- Q r .. H©J,.j . � �.:. .y d 'iii ''ir'i: i• ........ ..��i.....:..J;.-�:�a:::;ii�.Jii;ifiiiiii::::.:.i:E:;ii;iii:;iiFia N Fr':: .:::..:: :::::::.:... .• ' .:..:.::.::,...:•:...:::.isk .,•i+::..:..::•::..,YGR ..•.::: e.: 7T.::E:i'6ieii:: .:.Ufa:a......,.....:::::e..........i::.:nr• tr •���'��W.. F O J i. 0 - - ib N A .may qp y � Lca:: n ;•; u 8 rn o - i k OFFICI'I RECORD ST. RY FT. ``! TEX. , PROJECT NO. 104-24000-163 ' P LEGEND s•:. ,.;.- - - - - -----�--- :�� :•:;;� PRESENTLY PAVED �N ST. >t :.... �- PROPOSED PAVING, UNIT 4, MENZER STREET AND UNIT 5, QUEEN STREET z t_) > PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY * lkPETITION OR POLL CARD OWNERSHIP OPPOSED TO PAVING m J RVAU �~ TIERNEY ROAD m 1p. fT1 13 c.� i Zcca . ;� z 46 Z W �.� s ` •9i ou JEN SON )'+• ¢t 2� <' Cz :Sa ..... ;::i fi':::.<z...;:a;,,:.,t'. fi .yv;`.: x vc?'r'.:< ..;#`.fi f•f.Y ko gh ..AS.•Y::f �� s m a MERL '%joRo 7� I PROJECT NO. 104-24000-163 6 a LEGEND r �� "i PRESENTLY PAVED PROPOSED PAVING, UNIT 6 C7 :: PYRON AVENUE G Ln PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY PETITION OR POLL CARD OWNERSHIP OPPOSED TO PAVING • �k I: N SO OFFA 0Pgogsm/ 144 Moso�+� ; : OAF VFW, too PIE, ,���c��I 1. 1,fr ,:i ter• _ :: • �ti': Attachment "8" 8 Locations East Side Page 1 of 9 Project No. 104-24000-163 PER GENT CONTRACTPRIOR................................................................................M..........................5 38,992. 10 [NGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 3,899.21 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 42,891.31 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE. 6,345.8 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE - 0 .0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 6,345.8 100.0 RESIDENTIALASS[eeMENT.....................................................440,172.81 93.7 COMMERCIALASSESSMENT............................................I....... -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASS[SARD..........................................................................................$409172.81 93.7 LESSCREDITS GRANT[D............................................................- 14.4_ 9_ 33.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT...............................................................................................................................25,673.64 59.9 NETAMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................s17,217.67 40.1 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED No. OF FRONT FEET *2,569.6 *1,676 PER CENT 100.0 65.2 PARCELS of PROPERTY 16 11 Cumulative Results of the PER CENT 100.0 68.8 Post Card Survey are Avail- able upon request No, OF PROPERTY OWNERS 16 11 PER CENT 100.0 68.8 OWN[RY LIVING ON STREET 15 10 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 RFI�II�I. RLC0R� OWNERNT MNG ELSEWN[RE loo.o bolo CITY SECRETARY PER V1. Y�El�tr�2, TEX. * These two columns represent petitioned streets only. .At taohmer t, "B" Unit page 2 of 9 Watson Street From Meadowbrook Drive to 262 North PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 3,413,60 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 341.36 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 3,754.96 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE 516,6 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. —0— TOTAL FOOTAGE...................................._.... 516.6 10®.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 3,239.08 86.3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT..........................................I......... -0- —Q GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 3,239A8 86.3 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 13139.57 30.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 2,099.51 55.9 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE................................................. ....................................................il,655.45 44. 1 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 516.6 73 189.6 254 PER CENT 100.0 14.2 36.7 49. 1 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 1 2 1 PER CENT 100.0 a 25,0 50.0 25.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 u 1 2 1 PER CENT 100.0 G 25.0 50.0 25.0 H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1 1 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 -0- -0- OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 0 2 1 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 66. 7 33.3 4EFiCIAI RL�,�iOr CITY c�r,�?�s�►� P d b- Attachment "B" Unit 2 Page 3 of 9 Benmar Street From Edgewood Terrace to Lynnhaven Road. PIR LINT CONTRACTPRICE...............................................................................:..::::.:::::..:::::::..:..1 2%733. 10 9NOIN99RINO ,,,;;;,;;;;;,,,,,;,;;,,;,,,,,,;;,,,;,;,,,,,,,,,,;,,;,,;,,,,,;,;,,,;,,;,,,,,,,,;,;,;,,,,,,,,,,,,I.....,,,,,,,: 273.31 ESTIMATEDCONITRUCTION CO/T,,;;,,,,;,,,,,,,;,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..I.,...................................................._s3,006.41 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAOI, 516 100.0 COMMERCIAL ROOTAGE -0- -0- TOTAL ROOTAGE...,::: .: 516 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMINT:.::..::::::...:::.:::.:::::::...::.:..::..::.::..::::1 3,328,20* 110. 7 COMMERCIAL ASSISSMINT..................... -0® .0- ORO$$ AMOUNT AEEIEEID..... 1 3,328.20 * 110. 70 LEGS CREDITS GRANTED.:..:..:.:.::..::::..:...:...:.::.:..:.:::...:::...:::.:.:.:::::. 1%586.20� � 52.80 TOTALNIT ASSISSMINT..........::...........::..:.:::::..:..........:..:.:..:::.:..::...:.::..::::::.:::::.::.:::::::..:..:......................... 1.742.00 57.9 NIT AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LAROI.:::.......:.:..........:: .:.:,,:,,:,::,::,,:::,,..:::s1,264.41 42. 1 SIGNID RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL POR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO, OF FRONT PITT 516 516 516 .0- .0- PIR CENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 4 4 -0FOFFICIII�Ojf �- PIR CENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 � ;,U i NO, OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 4 4 -0URETAPIR CENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 TE OWNER& LIVING ON STREET 3 3 3 =0� PER CENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 1 1 -0- .0- PER CENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 Not applicable for percentage comparison in that bide were received ex- cluding construction of curbs and gutters where some presently exist, but the gross amount assessed includes curb and gutter which reflects a gross assessment greater than the contract price. After credits are awarded, the net assdssment, compared with the contract 'price, reflects a true percentage comparison. Attachment "P" Unit 3 Page 4 of 9 Sermar Street From Lynnhaven Road to Montclair Drive PER CENT CONTRACT PRICE....................................................................................................I.......= 22065.00 ENGINEERING ..............................................................................................I............... 206.50 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s2,271.50 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 520 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0z -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE.. .. 520 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 2,267„20 99.8 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT...................................I....I........... m0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 2.267, 20 99.8 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 943.20 4105 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 12324.00 58.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. .....................................................5 947.50 4L7 7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 520 390 390 -0- 130 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 75 ,0 0 25 .0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 3 3 -0- 1 PER CENT 100,0 75.0 75 .01 --0- 25 .0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 3 3 0 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 75 .0 -0- 2.5 �G OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 3 3 -0- 1 PER CENT 100,0 75.0 75 .0 -0- 25 .0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE -� 0 0 0 0 PER CENT -0" -0- rt1` �y``i ulr'�i� 111"0 CITY pryl-r'n Atta-'mert I'El' Unit 4 Ya&E 5 cf 9 Menzer Street From Shilling Drive to 135' East PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE...........................................................................................................$—1,834. 70 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 183.47 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$2,0M17 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 270 IMO COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0-' TOTAL FOOTAGE 270 IWO RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT..................... ................... ......$ 1,692,90 83,9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT............................................ -... -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED....................... ................................................ 1,692.90 83.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED........................ .........I...... 818.90 40 6 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT...................................................... .................... .. ...... ...................I...... 874.00 43 3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................... ..... .. .......... ................................. .$1 s 144. 17 56.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 270 135 135 135 0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 51-l'0 50.0 0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 1 1 1 0 PER CENT IMO 510,0 50.0 50.0 0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 1 1 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 1 1 1 0 � 0 PER CENT 1001 0 50,�0 1`0 0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0 -0- -0- -Q- OFFICIAL pre 1"3 FL WORTH, Attachment "B" Unit 5 Page 6 of 9 Queen Street From Briarwood Lane to 145° North PER CENT CONTRACT PRICE........................... .......................,.......................................$ 2,711.00 ENGINEERING ........................................................................................I....................1 271. 10 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i2,982.10 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................283.6 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0 -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ...................................283.6 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 2,300.00 77. 1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... m0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 2,300.00 77.1 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 977.00 32.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 1,323.00 44.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. .....................................................f 1,659. 10 55.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 283.6 145 145 138.6 0 PER CENT 100.0 51.1 51. 1 48.9 0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 1 1 1O PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50 �FFIU��OI����,� CITY q"PlIETrI NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 1 1 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50 OFT. ��� ;�, TE OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 1 1 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- e Attachment "B", Unit 6 Page 7 of 9 Pyron Avenue From Jenson Road to Wilson Road PLR CENT CONTRACTPRICE................................................................................ .......................-11 5,476.40 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 547.64 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST............................................................................«..................................=6,024.04 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 980 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE.....-.................................... 980 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.....................................................$6,321.00 104.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... . -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 6,321.00 * 104.91 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 3.642.85 * 60.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 2)678.15 44.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......:............................................................................................., .Tr 3,345.89 55.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 980 490 490 490 0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 a PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 2 2 2 CITY PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50• CT 1 0`' NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 2 2 2 FT' PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 2 2 2 0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Not applicable for percentage comparison in that bids were received ex- cluding construction of curb and gutter where same presently exists, but the gross amount assessed includes curb and gutter which reflects a gross assessment greater than the contract price. After credits are awarded, the net assessment, compared with the contract price, reflects a true per centage comparison. Attachment "B" Unit 7 Page 8 of 9 Stark Street From Hightower Street to Meadowbrook Drive PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE....................................................I......................... v ........................s9,269.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 926.90 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................E 10,195.90 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1226.1 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. —0— -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1226.1 10M RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 7,908.35 77.6 COMMERCIALASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- —0— GROSS AMOUNT ASSESBED..........................................................................................f 7,908.35 77.6 LESS CREDITS SHAHTED.,_............................................................................................. 1,680.68 16.5 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................... 62227.67 61.1 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................f 3,968.23 38.9 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBIECTION TOTAL PETITION PAYING PAYING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1226.1 746.6 61 418.5 PER CENT 100.0 60.9 5.0 3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 10 5 1 GFFIIAL f PER CENT 100.0 50.0 10.0 ,��UE' R 1 � L NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 5 2 1 2 o.. PER CENT 100.0 I"1 40.0 20.0 Q,0. a.+ OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 V 2 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 33.3 -D- OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 -0- -0- 100.0 Atta,�f,Pent "B" Unit 8 Page 9 of 9 Meaders Street From 1050° South of Meadowbrook Drive to Meadowbrook Drive PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 11,489.30 ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 1,148.9 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COW..............................................................................................................612,638.23 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 2033.5 100,0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 2033.5 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 13,116.08* 103.8 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 13,116.08* 103.81 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 3,710.77* 29.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................... 93405.31 74.4 w NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................$3,232.92 r OF full RLLORD AY SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SU EY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST N Okk4kc"ON M1 TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING OUI TTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 2033.5 871.0 1043.9 118.6 PER CENT 100.0 42.8 51.4 .5.8 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 14 4 8 2 PER CENT 100.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 .o NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 8 1 5 2 PER CENT 100.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 rl OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 H 0 3 1 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 75.0 25.0 n4 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 U 1 2 1 PER CENT 100.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 * Not applicable for percentage comparison in that bids were received ex- cluding construction of pavement where same presently exists, but, then gross amount assessed includes pavement which reflects a gross assessment greater than the contract price. After credits are awarded, the net assessment, compared with the contract price, reflects a true percentage comparison.